HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 07-31-95 SpMtg32590
SPECIAL SESSION
ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL
CII~( COUNCIL CHAMBER
July 31, 1995
3:00 p.m.
AGENDA FOR THE COUNCIL
2.
3.
4.
5.
Call To Order -- Roll Call. Council Members Parrott and White were absent.
Invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
Statement of Purpose. Mayor Bowers.
A report of the City Manager with regard to the sale of the Roanoke
City Nursing Home.
Adopted Ordinance No. 32590 on first reading. (5-0)
Adjournment.
DAVID A. BOWERS
Mayor
CITY OF ROANOKE
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
215 Church Avenue, S.W,, Room 452
Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1594
Telephone: (703) 981-2444
July 27, 1995
The Honorable Vice-Mayor and Members
of the Roanoke City Council
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Members of Council:
Pursuant to Section 10, Meetines of Council, of the Roanoke City Charter, I am
calling a special meeting of the Roanoke City Council on Monday, July 31, 1995, at
3:00 p.m., in the Roanoke City Council Chamber, for the purpose of discussing and
taking possible action on a report and recommendation of the City Manager in
connection with the sale of the Roanoke City Nursing Home.
Sincerely,
Mayor
DAB:gd
pc.'
W. Robert Herbert, City Manager
James D. Ritchie, Sr., Assistant City Manager
Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney
James D. Grisso, Director of Finance
Mary F. Parker, City Clerk
Robert H. Bird, Municipal Auditor
Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation
Honorable Mayor, members of City Council, I bring you
greetings from the Human Resource Advisory Board.
The inevitable transfer of our beloved City Nursing Home
to the private sector of nursing home management has
brought groat concern to all of us. We have been so proud
of the compassionate, professional, home-like cato of the
staff. But the time has come for change.
Our advisory board has been aware from the very~eginning
of the processes of decision necessary to bring us~his
moment. We have been fully informed by Director Glenn
Radcliff. We have devoted entire meetings to discussion,
questions, alternative avenues of approach. Nothing has
been decided which has not had our input. And we concur
with these recommendations today without one voice of
descent.
The over riding concern in these decisions before you today,
were the residents, their families and the staff. Never once I
detected even a trace of anything else. I commend the
administrative staff of our city for their compassionate
concern through all of this so far. And I know that this
attitude will continue. Our advisory board will continue to
monoter and be a viable part of these proceedings.
With regret and grief, the time has come for us to turn the
corner. We have no other realistic choice. Many, many hours
of time and energy, and specific concern for the future of
the residents and the staff has and will continue to assure
us that the turning of the corner will be okay. ~
July 31, 1995
Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of Council:
Subject: Roanoke City Nursing Home
I. Background on the subject in chronological order is:
The rocess to date for reviewing future service delivery options for the Roanoke
City Nursing Home has consisted of the following steps:
March 13, 1995 - City Council approved the appropriation of $70,000 for
legal assistance to fully explore the option of allowing a private
developer/operator to construct and operate a new facility. Crews &
Hancock, P.L.C., of Richmond was selected as the City's legal advisor
because of their prior experience in this area.
March 23, 1995 - The nursing home study team members met with the
legal firm to discuss strategy and conditions under which such a service
delivery change might take place.
April 5 and June 6, 1995 - Two briefings were conducted for the Human
Development Advisory Board that were very similar in nature to those
provided earlier to City Council.
Auril 11, 1995 - A Nursing Home Personnel Committee consisting of
administrative staff (Jim Ritchie, Glenn Radcliffe and Ken Cronin) and
nursing home employees (R.F. Hyatt, Martha Hartley, Kathy Crawford,
Shelby Barbour, Kathleen Manning, Dorothy Shelbume, Maxine
Matthews, Lisa Frye, Frances Roope and Helen Meador) was formed to
address the following issues:
Hear concerns ofemDloye~ and develop appropriate responses or
proposals for consideration during negotiations.
Develoo a process for working with nursing home employees
regarding the following:
Employees who wish to remain employed with the City (how the
job application and referral process will function);
Retirement benefits and options;
Page 2
Sick and vacation leave transfer; and
Comparable health insurance coverage
April, 1995 - A "notice of intent" was advertised in the Roanoke Times
on April 8th, 16th and 23rd. This notice requested that parties interested in
acquiring certain assets of the nursing home under conditions to be
specified submit preliminary inquiries by April 28th. In addition, Crews &
Hancock contacted twenty other potential sendce providers from a list
provided by the study team and from their own internal files.
April 28, 1995 - Nine of twenty providers expressed an interest in
considering the acquisition based on the criteria originally discussed with
City Council:
Transfer of residents - Provide the option for all nursing home
residents at the opening date of the new facility to transfer to the
new facility.
Hirino of employees - Hire all nursing home employees who wish to
transfer at the same salary for a minimum of one year.
Continuation of employment - Do not terminate those employees
that are hired by the buyer except for "good cause shown" during
the first year.
Comparable employee fringe benefits - Provide a comparable health
insurance, vacation and sick leave benefit package for a minimum
of one year.
Employee sick and vacation leave balances - Assume a level of sick
and vacation leave balance accruals.
Employee retirement - Provide a defined contribution program to
which employees can contribute.
Medicaid occupancy - Maintain a Medicaid occupancy percentage
consistent with the annual Virginia Statewide Medicare and
Medicaid occupancy percentage averages for licensed Virginia
nursing facilities.
Aoril 28 - May 5, 1995 - Confidentiality agreements were signed by
interested providers and relevant confidential nursing home information
was distributed to each.
Page 3
Il.
III.
IV.
May 22, 1995 - Service providers still interested in acquiring the city's
nursing home business were advised that proposals would be due by May
31, 1995.
June 21, 1995 - Crews & Hancock reviewed the top-ranked proposal with
members of the study team and the proposer.
Current situation is:
An agreement has been negotiated with the top-ranked proposer, Smith/Packett
Meal-Com. Inc., (with headquarters in Roanoke). The agreement is contingent
upon issuance ora Virginia Medical Care Facility Certificate of Public Need by the
State Health Commissioner authorizing the construction of a new facility. Under
this agreement, the following assets of the Roanoke City Nursing Home would be
acquired by Smith?Packett Med-Com, Inc.:
Certain capital equipment not disposed of in the ordinary course of
business prior to closing;
2. Goodwill related to the operation of the Nursing Home;
The unconditional right to relocate the City's fifty-eight nursing home beds;
and
Medical records~ patient lists, files, reports and correspondence
relative to nursing home residents.
Smith/Packett Med-Com. Inc. has executed the agreement and is ready to proceed
in good faith with the acquisition process.
Issues in order of importance are:
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Conformance of the agreement with stated criteria
Fair treatment of affected employees
Timing
Budgetary_ imoact
Location of the new facility
Communications
Alternatives in order of feasibility are:
City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an aoreement with
S mith-Packett Med-Com, Inc. for the acquisition of certain specific assets of the
Roanoke City Nursing Home as previously stated and further detailed in the
agreement document.
Page 4
Conformance of the agreement with stated criteria - All criteria identified
by the study team as having to be met under such an acquisition have been
met with this agreement.
1. Transfer of residents Yes
2. Hiring of employees Yes~
3. Continuation of employment Yes
4. Comparable employee fringe benefits Yes2
5. Employee sick and vacation leave balances Yes - up to $100,000 aggregate
total3
6. Employee retirement Yes
7. Medicaid occupancy Yes - for 5 years
Employee salaries will be equal to those being paid as of the closing date.
Employee fringe benefits will be comparable to those being awarded as of the closing
date.
Employees will have the option of(l) being paid for vacation or paid leave balances by
the City as of the end of the transition period, (2) having the buyer assume vacation,
paid and sick leave balances (up to an aggregate cap for all employees of $100,000 in
value), or any combination of(l) and (2).
2. Fair treatment of affected employees
In addition to the criteria regarding employees that have been
previously defined and addressed in the agreement, it is
recommended that aH regular employees on payroll as of July 31,
1995, who remain employed by the Nursing Home until the new
facility opens receive a continuity bonus. This bonus will be
calculated based on each employee's final rate of pay just prior to
the new facility opening. The bonus would be equivalent to one
week's pay for each year of service or fraction thereof, with a
minimum of four weeks' pay and maximum of twenty-six weeks'
pay or 50% of annual salary, and would serve as an incentive for
current employees to continue to provide quality service to
residents at the nursing home through the transition period.
In addition, it is recommended that employees on payroll as of
July 31st, 1995, who remain employed by the Nursing Home
until the new facility opens and leave the employment of the city
(resignation, retirement or transfer to the employment of the buyer)
will receive seoaration pay equivalent to four weeks of pay.
Page 5
Separation pay will also be calculated based on each employee's
final rate of pay just prior to the new facility opening.
Employees who either accept another City position or leave the
employment of the City through resignation or retirement prior to
the opening date of the new facility will not be eligible for either a.
or b. above.
Timing - Smith/Packett Med-Com, Inc. has negotiated in good faith and is
ready to begin the acquisition and construction process estimated to take
twenty-four months.
Budgetary impact - Total compensation paid to the City by Smith/Packett
Med-Com, Inc. will be $455,000 ($420,000 for assets acquisition and
$35,000 for consultation services during the transition period), plus up to
$100,000 in assumed employee vacation and sick leave balances. Total
estimated expenditures by the City during the transition period are
affordable within the total compensation figure, and are itemized as
follows:
Continuity Bonus for Employees $ 270,000
Separation Pay for Employees 82,000
Legal Expenses 70,000
Payment of Accrued Vacation Leave 33,000
The long-term budgetary impact after the transition is complete is the
elimination of the General Fund operating supplement to the nursing home
($504,210 for Fiscal Year 1995-96) and the generation of new tax revenue
from the new nursing home business.
Location of the new facility - The new facility will be constructed on a
mutually agreeable site. Smith/Packett Me&Cora, Inc., has indicated a
desire to construct the facility within the City of Roanoke and has identified
four possible sites for consideration.
Communications - Nursing home employees have been briefed on the
details of the agreement and employee compensation plan. The Human
Development Advisory Board and other key community stakeholders have
also been briefed. Finally, a press conference was held to alert the
media of this pending action. All of these activities took place during the
week ending Friday, July 28th.
City Council not authorize the City Manager to enter into an a~reement with
Smith-Packett Med-Cora, Inc. for the acquisition of certain specific assets of the
Roanoke City Nursing Home as previously stated and further detailed in the
Page 6
agreement document and continue to operate the facility directly or under a
management agreement.
Recommendation is as follows:
City Council approve (1) the recommendation to authorize the City Manager to enter into
an agreement with Smith-Packett Med-Com, Inc. for the acquisition of certain specific
assets of the Roanoke City Nursing Home as previously stated and further detailed in the
agreement document and (2) the recommended emnloyee compensation package detailed
under sections IV.A. 1, and IV.A.2. of this report.
Respectfully submitted,
,¥
CC~
Wilbum C. Dibling, City Attorney
James D. Grisso, Director of Finance
Mary F. Parker, City Clerk
James D. Ritchie, Assistant City Manager
Glenn D. Radcliffe, Director, Human Development
Barry L. Key, Manager, Management and Budget
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROANOKE,
VIRGINIA
AN ORDINANCE authorizing a certain Agreement to be entered
into between the City and Smith/Packett Med-Com, Inc., by which the
City agrees to sell certain tangible and intangible assets of the
Roanoke City Nursing Home; authorizing the City Manager to execute
an Agreement relating to the terms and conditions of such sale, a
bill of sale and such other documents on behalf of the City as may
be necessary to close this transaction; authorizing the City
Manager to agree to one or more sites for construction of a new
nursing home facility; authorizing the City Attorney to issue a
certificate and opinion in connection with the closing of this
transaction; authorizing officials of the City to consult and
assist the buyer in connection of the closure of the existing
Nursing Home and issuance of a certificate of public need for and
construction of a new facility; and authorizing continuity bonus
and separation pay programs for certain employees of the Nursing
Home on July 31, 1995.
BE
follows:
1.
IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as
For and on behalf of the City, the City Manager is
authorized to execute and the City Clerk is authorized to attest an
Agreement between the City and Smith/Packett Med-Com, Inc., a
Virginia corporation (Smith/Packett), by which the City agrees to
sell certain tangible and intangible assets, including Nursing Home
equipment, good will, the unconditional right to relocate the
City's fifty-eight Nursing Home beds and medical records, patient
lists, files, reports and correspondence relative to residents, of
the Roanoke City Nursing Home located at 4365 Coyner Springs Road
in Botetourt County (Nursing Home) to Smith/Packett in
consideration of $420,000 and Smith/Packett's agreement to build a
new nursing home facility at a site acceptable to the City and to
relocate to the new facility all residents of the current Nursing
Home who desire to be in the new facility, such agreement being
conditioned upon issuance of a certificate of public need to
Smith/Packett by the appropriate agencies of the Commonwealth and
being subject to such other terms and conditions as are more
particularly described in the report of the City Manager, dated
July 31, 1995 (Agreement).
2. The City Manager is authorized to execute a bill of sale
and assignment in connection with the tangible and intangible
assets described in Paragraph 1 of this ordinance and to execute
such other documents on behalf of the City as may be necessary to
close this transaction. The Agreement and all documents in
connection with this transaction shall be in such form as is
approved by the City Attorney.
3. Pursuant to Section
Manager is authorized to agree,
5.10 of the Agreement, the City
for and on behalf of the City, to
one or more sites proposed by Smlth/Packett for construction of a
new nursing home facility.
4. The City Attorney is authorized to issue the certificate
required of the seller pursuant to Section 8.02 of the Agreement
confirming and certifying that all representations and warranties
of the seller contained in the Agreement are true and correct and
to issue his opinion as required by Section 8.03 of the Agreement
in connection with closing of this transaction.
5. Officials of the City are authorized to consult with and
assist Smith/Packett as required by Section 6.02 of the Agreement.
6. The City Manager is authorized to establish and implement
the continuity bonus and separation pay programs for certain
employees of the Nursing Home on July 31, 1995, more particularly
described in the City Manager's report to this Council, dated July
31, 1995.
7. As required by Section 6.05 of the Agreement, it is
agreed that, after the date that residents of the current Nursing
Home are relocated to the new facility to be constructed by
Smith/Packett, the City will not use the site of the existing
Nursing Home as a nursing home or health care facility.
ATTEST:
City Clerk.
DAVID A. BOWERS
Mayor
CITY OF ROANOKE
CITY COUNCIL
215 Church Avenue, S.W, Room 456
Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536
Telephone: (703) 981-254l
July 27, 1995
Council Members:
Elizabeth T. Bowles
John S. Edwards
Delvis O. "Mac" McCadden
John H. Parrott
William White, Sr.
Linda F. Wyatt
The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Roanoke City Council
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Members of Council:
Please be advised that I will not be present for the special meeting of City Council
scheduled for Monday, July 31, 1995, inasmuch as I will be out of the City on
vacation.
You have my best wishes for a successful meeting.
Sincerely,/ //~
John H. Parrott
Council Member
JHP:gd
pc:
W. Robert Herbert, City Manager
Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney
James D. Grisso, Director of Finance
Willard N. Claytor, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Robert H. Bird, Municipal Auditor
~,Mary F. Parker, City Clerk
DAVID A. BOWERS
Mayor
CITY OF ROANOKE
CITY COUNCIL
215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456
Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536
Telephone: (703) 981-2541
July 27, 1995
Council Members:
Elizabeth T. Bowles
John S. Edwards
Delvis O. "Mac" McCadden
John H. Parrott
William White, Sr.
Linda F. Wyatt
The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Roanoke City Council
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Members of Council:
Please be advised that I will not be present for the special meeting of City Council
scheduled for Monday, July 31, 1995, due to a previous business commitment.
You have my best wishes for a successful meeting.
Sincerely, _
William whIte,~r. /
Council Member
WW:gd
pc:
W. Robert Herbert, City Manager
Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney
James D. Grisso, Director of Finance
Willard N. Claytor, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Robert H. Bird, Municipal Auditor
~Mary F. Parker, City Clerk