HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 03-11-97 JtMtg JOINT MEETING
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL
THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
5204 BERNARD DRIVE
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Tuesday, March 11, 1997 - 12:00 Noon
AGENDA
A. WELCOME:
Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
B. INVOCATION AND LUNCH
C. ROLL CALL
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke City Council
D. OPENING REMARKS
Chairman Johnson
Mayor Bowers
REQUESTS TO ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
Fe
DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS
1. Request for a team of volunteers to offer assistance to flood vicfim~ in
the Midwest. (Requested by Roanoke County)
o
Habitat for Humanity (Requested by Roanoke City. CONTINUED
FROM NOVEMBER 4, 1996)
Low Band Tourist Radio System. (Requested by Roanoke County and
Roanoke City)
4. Segregation in the Roanoke Valley. (Requested by Roanoke City)
Discussion of tipping fees at the landfill. (Requested by Roanoke
County)
o
Discussion of Specialized Transit Arranged Rides (STAR) bus service.
(Requested by Roanoke City)
o
Changes in the General Assembly to the Personal Property Tax and
Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax.
(Requested by Roanoke City)
G. ADJOURNMENT
FEB
· Blue Ricl ie I-Iou in [ Development: ¢orpo 'ation
AFFORDABLE HOUSING . . . ~E FOUNDA~ON Of OPPO~N~
AlViN NasH, PRESIDENT
P.O. bOX 20708
rOANOKe, va 240 I 8
PHONE: (540) 774-7408
FAX: (540) 774-805 I
February18,1997
Elmer Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive SW
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Elmer:
TAP has been operating its Housing Programs out of the Pinkard Court School Building
roi: the past two and a half years. Roanoke County donated the building to us so that we could
develop affordable housing. One of the decisions we made after listening to the residents was
that additional people in the neighborhood would not be appropriate at this time. Since Roanoke
County and the residents of Pinkard Court had legitimate concerns, we felt it was our
responsibility to try and balance out these issues. Therefore, we decided to operate our Housing
Programs out of the facility and to do everything we could to make sure housing services were
provided to Roanoke County residents.
Please fred enclosed a report titled "The Pinkard Court Report." This report is a detailed
description of the affordable housing programs that we have been operating out of the facility.
Our objective is to operate cost effective programs and coordinate those programs as to
maximize resources, staff coordination, and have a positive impact on the Roanoke County
community. In addition to TAP's Housing Programs, we have also created The Blue Ridge
Housing Development Corporation, which is a community development corporation (CDC)
whose sole function is the development of and education about homeownership.
Most of our programs are continuous and ongoing, although we continue to seek
resources and find ways to deliver quality services to those who need it. We believe Roanoke
C,p~.~.~,~_h.~ significantly contributed to the develor~ment of affordable
wath a quality ~ml[{ty ~om whicl{ to oper[i{~
There is a need for the development of new affordable homeownership programs in
Roanoke County and to upgrade existing housing stock in some of the older, low to moderate
income communities. We intend to work with the appropriate departments to assess the
possibilities and develop a working strategy. We know your office and the Board of Supervisors
is extremely concerned about the problem of affordable housing at all income levels and it is
because of that concern we can develop a creative plan. I especially don't want to walt until
there is negative criticism toward the County about doing its fair share regarding affordable
housing in the Roanoke Valley. I thir~_. Roanoke ~u~,,~.g ~o~g.}ts, ~[~..s~,ar~,.t.o.~ard_~qg~d~d~le
housin however ~ need ~
you Ior your support and cooperation over the Past few year~ ~m~t w;'i ;0Xh krd to some
positive results in 1997.
Finally, I hope you will fred "The Pinkard Court Report" helpful and informative. I
would be willing to discuss the report with you in the near future. Please feel free to contact me
at (540) 774-7408.
Deputy Director of TAP
President, Blue Ridge Housing Development Corp.
The Pinkard Court Report
TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation
Roanoke County Affordable Housing Programs
Roanoke County Section 8
Emergency Home Repair
HUD Housing Counseling
Weatherization Assistance
Indoor Plumbing/Rehab
Crisis Intervention Program
Share/HiP - Homeless Intervention Program
Welcome Home - BRHDC's Homebuyer Education Club
P.O, Box
42~0 PINKA'RD STREET
ROANOKE, VA 240 I 8
PHONE: (540) 774-7405
FAX: (540) 774-805 I
Roanoke CoUnty Section 8
This program provides familteslindividuais with safe, sanitary and decent affordable
housing through supplemental rental funds. Routine inspections are done to ensure that all
the units meet HUD's Housing Quality Standards.
Eligibility: Meet low income guidelines, which is 60% below median area income.
Fees: None.
Service Area: Roanoke County, Salem and Vinton.
Supported bF. Federal and State funds.
Under TAP~BRHDC's management the number of vouchers have increased from 45 to 68.
1996
1995
Housi ~ ent
$2,760
Tenants Pavme~tt~
$1,560 $2,660 $1,478
Salem
$2,888 $1,741 $3,453 $2,126
Vlnton
Total
$4,594 $1,347 $3,896
$10,24~ $10.009
$1,629
Emergency Home Reuair/Re~sh
Provide emergency home repairs and improvements. Provide minor and major repairs to rural
and city homes, and provide handicap ramps and other needed alterations.
EligibilltF. Low income families/individuals, elderly and handicap. Must own home needing
None.
e Area- Fifth Planning District, Rockbrldge, Buena Vista and Lexington.
Supported by: Federal, State and local funds.
The goal of the Emergency Home Repair Program is to improve the living conditions of low income persons by
removing imminent health and safety hazards and/or barriers to habitability in their homes. The progrsm~
obJect~ves are to repair and/or make physical improvements to housing units occupied by low income persons to
remove health and safety hazards. To make necessary adaptations and/or improvements to housing units
occupied by Iow income persons with disabilities.
The emergency repairs performed In 1995 and 1996 include roof repair/replacement, repair/replacement of
heating' systems, plumbing repairs, structural repairs where hazards exist, (i.e., roofs, ceilings, wall.~_ floors,
stairs, eic.). '
1996-97
$4,090
2-YearTotal= $12,241
$970
27 Clients have been served thus far in 1996-97
25 Clients were served in 1995-96
1995- 96
$6,476 $100
Fees: None.
This program provides conn,~eling for pre-rentals, rental delinquencies, pre-purchases and
homeowners. The program provides mortgage assistance counseling with FHA & HUD insured
mortgagors. The program also provides rental assistance to subsidized renters and regular
renters through local resources in alliance with TAP.
Eligibility: Low to mo~derate income and previously self-sufficient.
Service Area: Fifth Planning District.
Supported by: State funding, private, and nonprofit funds.
1994-95 1995-96
Roanoke County $488 $312
Salem $770 $258
Vinton $480 n/a '
Total $1,738 $570
2 - Year Total = $2,308
Clients Served 23 10
'HECM ~ome Heuitv Conversion Mortgage)
This program provides counseling to seniors 62 years or older on Reverse Mortgage Loans (a
loan on the equity built up in the home). Loan usage can be for home repairs, or to pay off
medical bills. The loan is due when 1) tn the event of death, 2) move from the home, or 3) sell
the home.
HECM
Eligibility: 62 years or older. Must own or ~!,~ost own your home (owe less than $10,000) and
you must reside in the home.
Fees: None.
Service Area: Fifth Planning District.
Roanoke County
5 Clients served tn 1995-96
Total = $500
Share-HIP ./Homeless Intervention Pro,ram)
Provide rental, mortgage and security deposit assistance to families/individuals in Jeopardy of
/losing their homes due to eviction or foreclosure, orin need of moving into housing.
aid is provided in the form of loans and~or grants. Financial
EligibllltT:. Low income, cause of the crisis and previously self-sufficient.
-m~- Fees: None.
Service Area: Fifth Planning District, Rockbridge, Buena Vista and Lexington.
Supported by: Federal and State funds.
1996-97 1995-96
Rents $5,905. $25,410
Mortgages $2,124. $800
SecurityDeposits $573* $700
2- Year Total -- $35,512
13 Clients have been served thus farin 1996-97
32 Clients were served in 1995-96
*This amount reflects services through December 1996.
What is the value of this program to Roanoke County and its residents? We have prevented foreclosures.
We have given people time to recuperate from unexpected crisis/emergencies thus keeping
'f~mlll es intact.
~ We have prevented homelessness.
We have provided budget counseling thus enabling the client to do a better job with managing
their money.
Indoor Plumbin~! R~l~b Prom'~m
Install indoor plumbing in housing units without plumbing or in units where the existing water
~j~ delivery or waste water disposal systems are failing. Provide repair to substandard housing
and make accessibility improvements.
~~ Eligibility: Households must lack functionln~ indoor plumbing. Gross combined household
~ ,,~/J/ income must be below 80% of the median income adjusted for family size for each locality.
~ Fees: Loan Program.
Service Area: Rockbrldge County, Buena Vista, Botetourt, Roanoke County, Salem and Lexington.
Supported by: Federal and State funds.
1995-1996 1994-1995
$79,600 $37,615
2- Year Total -- $117,215
Clients served in 1994-95 ~ 3, this represents installation of indoor plumbing in one home.
Clients served in 1995-96 -- 6, this represents installation of indoor plumbing in two homes.
This program provides an energ~y conservation pro,ram to stop air infiltration and cut the costs of high
fuel bills. Provides an inspection of the heating system, insulation of sidewalls and attics, duct
wrapping and other technology to improve thermal efficiency and help reduce utillty costs. Services
being provided are:
~f Vent and insulate attics and sidewalls
~f Weather strip doors
~ Replace broken glass
)f Inspect heating and cooling equipment
)f Insulate floors and water heaters, and keel seal trailer roofs
Eligibility: Elderly, handicapped, low income homeowners, and Iow income renters.
Fees: None.
Service Area: Fifth Planning District, Buena Vista, Lexington and Rockbridge.
Supported by: Federal and State funds, private and nonprofit funds.
1995-96
Total Homes 40
Total Clients 108
Averse cost Per house -- $1,964
Total Costs ~ $78,574
'Crisis Intervention Pro~.m
The Crisis Intervention Program Is a program that provides assistance to eligible households
with unsafe or inoperable heating systems. This effort is an interdepa~-~nental effort between
the local Department of Social Services, the Department of Housing and Commllntl~
Development and the Weatherization Assistance Program. By the coordination of these
factions the Crisis Intervention clients will be assured of good quality work from trained
inspectors and contractors who are dedicated to their professions and who take a true interest
in assuring that Crisis clients receive the best job possible.
The Department of Social Services provides crisis assistance funds for emergency
heating equipment, repairs and purchases to be handled by the Department of Housing's Weatherization
Assistance Program. If needed the Weatherisation Program can supplement funds to assist in serving eligible
households. The program begins on November 1st of each year and continues through March 31st.
In 1995-96 ninety three households were served in the program. This represents total revenues of
approximately $II1,430, expenses of $100,205 and total administration of $11,225. This program helps to solve the
problems that low income f~mt]tes and individuals face when there is only a limited or fixed income in the
household, and the heating system suddenly stops in the middle of winter and they are faced with the decision of
whether to get the heating system repaired or replaced or eat and pay the rent.
The Crisis Intervention Program solves that problem for them. Being that this program is available to
them, they can continue to pay their bills, buy food, clothing, and for the elderly, buy much needed medical
supplies.
Crisis Intervention St~tt~cs. 1995- 1996
Number of homes that received services in Roanoke County ~ 17
Number of furnace repairs -- 5
Number of furnace replacements -- 12
Total cost of repairs -- $1,500
Total cost of replacements -- $19,200
Total monies spent = $20.700
Summary of Services and Dollar Amount.~ Snsnt for Roanoke County. Salem and Vintnn'
Gran~l Total Spent -- $287,301
Total Number of Clients Served --- 269
Average Cost Per Client = $1,068
TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation Staff
Alvin Nash
Barbara Rlggs
James Robinson
Paulette Dixon
Sharon 1~fltenack
Andrea Hager
Sandra Ferguson
Angle Smith
James Lesnlak
Donald Reynolds
Eric 0tey
David Penn
Robert Boyd
Deputy Director of TAP
TAP Housing Component Director
President, Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation
Assistant Director, TAP Rousing
Director of Operations, Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation
Weatherization Manager, TAP Housing
Coor/inator of Client Services, TAP Rousing
Admint,~trative Assistant, TAP Housing
Welcome Home, BRHDC's Homebuyer Education Program
Housing Counselor for Share~HIP and HUD Counseling Programs, TAP Housing
Roanoke County Section 8 Supervlsor/Rehab Specialist, TAP Housing
Planner/Program Developer, TAP Housing
Weatherization Crew Chief
Asst. Crew Chief
Weatherzation Technician
Weatherlzation Technician
IY~H~--~t~---L~r 1~:~1 CI I¥ CL~RK'$ OFFICE 540 8~1145 P.02
J
TOTAL P.02
DAVID A. BOWERS
Mayor
CITY OF ROANOKE
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 452
Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1594
Telephone: (540) 981-2444
Fax: (540) 853-1145
March 7, 1997
The Honorable Members of
the Roanoke City Council
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Members of Council:
The Quarterly Luncheon Meeting of the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors will be held on Tuesday, March 11, 1997, at 12:00 noon at the
Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W.
I am forwarding copy of the agenda for your information.
Best personal regards.
Sincerely,
David A Bowers
Mayor
DAB:MFP:sm
Enc.
pc:
W. Robert Herbert, City Manager
Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney
James D. Grisso, Director of Finance
Robert H. Bird, Municipal Auditor
Mary F. Parker, City Clerk
Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation
James D. Ritchie, Sr., Assistant City Manager
William F. Clark, Director, Public Works
Kit B. Kiser, Director, Utilities and Operations
Glenn D. Radcliffe, Director, Human Development
George C. Snead, Jr., Director, Public Safety
H:~COUNCIL,OT~JARTERL.COU
252
ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
March 11, 1997
12:00 noon
A joint meeting of the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors was called to order on Tuesday, March 11, 1997, at 12:00 noon, at the
Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernar~ Drive, S. W., Roanoke,
Virginia, with Mayor David A. Bowers and Chairman Bob L. Johnson presiding.
ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Nelson Harris, John H.
Parrott, Carroll E. Swain, Linda F. Wyatt and Mayor David A. Bowers -5.
ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: James O. Trout and William
White, Sr. ............................................................... 2.
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PRESENT: Fenton F.
Harrison, Jr., Harry C. Nickens, Lee B. Eddy, H. Odell Minnix and Chairman
Bob L. Johnson ................................................ 5.
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ABSENT: None..
ROANOKE CITY STAFF PRESENT: W. Robert Herbert, City Manager; James D.
Ritchie, Sr., Assistant City Manager; Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney; James D.
Grisso, Director of Finance; Mary F. Parker, City Clerk; Kit B. Kiser, Director, Utilities
and Operations; Glenn D. Radcliffe, Director, Human Development; and George C.
Snead, Jr., Director, Public Safety.
ROANOKE COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County
Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers,
Assistant County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Diane D.
Hyatt, Director of Finance; Ann Marie Green, Public Information Officer; Mary H.
Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors; and William J. Rand, III, Director, General
Services.
Following lunch, the business session convened at 12:25 p.m.
Chairman Johnson called attention to numerous efforts of the two governing
bodies regarding joint cooperation, viz: a joint Request for Proposals for health cars,
joint ventures in the 800MHZ Trunking Radio System, Sewage Treatment Plant
upgrade, extraterritorial arrest powers to the City and County Police Departments,
overlay districts for backing up fire and rescue efforts, $12 million at Smith Gap with
253
the refuse transfer station in Roanoke City, and the Roanoke Regional Airport. He
stated that the two governing bodies should commend themselves and apprise the
citizens of the Roanoke Valley that there are no confrontational issues between the
City and the County that, through a series of negotiations and cooperative ventures,
cannot be overcome. He suggested that the Public Information Officers from both
localities coordinate a documentary program to be televised on RVTV Channel 3
featuring cooperative efforts of Roanoke City and Roanoke County.
FLOOD REDUCTION/CONTROL: Chairman Johnson called attention to
devastating flooding conditions in West Virginia and parts of Kentucky and
Arkansas, etc., and advised that he would request the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting later in the day to ask staff to coordinate efforts to render assistance to
those in need in the flood areas. He suggested that Roanoke City also join with the
County in providing assistance.
Without objection by Council, Mayor Bowers requested that the matter be
referred to the City Manager for appropriate response.
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: The County Administrator reviewed a report in
regard to Pinkard Court in Roanoke County, which facility was donated by the
County to Total Action Against Poverty .(TAP). He stated that Roanoke County has
a good record insofar as working with Total Action Against Poverty, that TAP
compiled a report of its activities over the past two years, and the information is
shared with Roanoke City to demonstrate that numerous successful programs have
operated out of the Pinkard Court Office.
Mr. Eddy clarified that Pinkard Court is a school building which was
constructed in the 1960's, and the County gave the building to TAP for its housing
program. He stated that the issue of affordable housing will be addressed in
the County's Comprehensive Plan, and Roanoke County would welcome any
suggestions from its neighbors as to a regional approach to the issue.
Chairman Johnson advised that the water and sewer tap fees are
approximately $5,000.00 in Roanoke County, and in view of the high cost, unless
incentives are offered to encourage citizens to construct houses within a certain
price range, many $75,000.00 - $80,000.00 homes will be constructed.
Mr. Eddy called attention to an offer by a Roanoke Valley resident to donate
land to Habitat for Humanity in the Starkey Road area; whereupon, the County
Administrator advised that Billy H. Branch offered five - six acres of land in the
Starkey Road area, however, a problem with regard to access to the property has not
been resolved.
254
Chairman Johnson advised that Roanoke County will continue to work on the
issue.
LOW BAND TOURIST RADIO-STATE HIGHWAYS: Mayor Bowers advised that
a Iow band tourist radio system involves the posting of signs along the interstate
highway or along the Blue Ridge Parkway inviting travelers to dial a specific number
on their AM band radio for tourist information. He stated that millions of visitors
travel 1-81 and approximately two million visitors travel the Blue Ridge Parkway
annually. He added that the matter was discussed last week at a meeting of
Roanoke City Council with Congressman Robert W. Goodlatte who was requested
to contact the Blue Ridge Parkway Service, Asheville, North Carolina, with regard
to working with the City to provide better signags on the Blue Ridge Parkway leading
into the City of Roanoke and to assist in the development ora Iow band tourist radio
system. He explained that the initial cost would be approximately $17,000.00 for the
City of Roanoke.
Mr. Eddy advised that Augusta County is used as a model, with four
transmitters having been installed at a total cost of $45,000.00 initially, and an
annual maintenance cost of approximately $8,000.00. He stated that the County of
Augusta, Cities of Waynesboro and Staunton, and the Virginia Department of
Transportation each shared equally in the cost which amounts to an initial
investment of approximately $1t,000.00 each, plus annual maintenance cost of -
$2,000.00. He added that the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau has
agreed to coordinate the necessary updates to the information.
Mayor Bowers advised that the Virginia Department of Transportation has
indicated that installation along the Roanoke Valley's section of 1-81 would be
approximately $15,000.00 - $30,000.00.
Mr. Minnix advised that the Roanoke Valley should promote activities that will
make the area a destination point for travelers before they leave home instead of as
they listen to the radio while traveling. He stated that he would like to review
statistics on Iow band radio systems used by other localities to determine if it is a
worthwhile venture. He explained that a traveler en route to another location would
most likely not be inclined to stop in the Roanoke Valley, no matter how good the
radio announcement might be, because the traveler has a destination point in mind
and a pre-set limited amount of time for arrival.
Mr. Eddy advised that the Fifth Planning Dis~ct Commission, in conjunction
with Virginia Tech students, engaged in a survey at the rest stops along 1-81 two
years ago, and of the persons surveyed, 75 per cent said they were traveling for
pleasure rather than business and of those numbers, 70 - 75 per cent said they
would likely tune in to a radio station if they saw the sign on the highway.
255
Chairman Johnson advised that the matter will be discussed during the
County's 1997-98 budget study process.
Vice-Mayor Wyatt advised that a Iow band radio system would cost in the
range of $50,000.00, and if confronted with the choice of $50,000.00 for a Iow band
radio system or $50,000.00 for the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau, her
vote would go to the Convention & Visitors Bureau.
SEGREGATION/INTEGRATION-HOUSiNG/AUTHORITY-SCHOOLS: The City
Manager referred to a newspaper article in ~.~/9_B~1~]~ dated January 30,
1997, entitled, "Roanoke - Most Segregated City Study Says". He stated that the
article was part of a study performed by staff at the University of Michigan,
Population Study Center, which referred to the 1990 census. He advised that he
requested the City's Economic Development staffto review the study which revealed
that levels of new construction have a direct bearing on the change in residential
segregation, and since the 1980's, the City of Roanoke has had few new residential
units constructed within its corporate limits due to lack of available land and the fact
that citizens choose to purchase new housing more frequently than existing homes,
thus, the trend is to move into new housing which is more abundant in the outlying
areas. He advised that the analysis also revealed that many of the integrated cities
were the result of annexation that had taken place in the surrounding suburbs
during the past decade. He added that other questions which entered into the study
pertained to economics, race and education. He stated that the City has reviewed
the University of Michigan study, and based on the above factors, there are no quick
fixes, it is a regional question, and it is not surprising that some of the statistics
might be skewed looking at independent cities versus counties, as well as other
factors such as the inability to annex and the lack of one common school system.
REFUSE COLLECTION-ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY:
Chairman Johnson expressed concern with regard to tipping fees at the regional
landfill which will have an impact on local budgets. The County Administrator
advised that the impact on the County's budget will be $185,000.00, Roanoke County
has discussed the matter with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to determine
what can be dons to cause more major refuse companies to use the regional landfill,
and it has been determined that it would be advantageous to engage a consultant
to study the matter.
Mr. Minnix suggested that long range efforts should include consolidation of
operations/offices of Roanoke City and Roanoke County refuse collection.
256
BUSES: The City Manager advised that Roanoke City previously notified
Roanoke County that the Specialized Transit Arranged Rides (STAR) bus service
would be terminated on June 30, 1997. He explained that earlier in the year,
Roanoke City requested Roanoke County's financial participation in the program
which would cost approximately $35,000.00 per year, however, Roanoke County
declined and elected to proceed with its CORTRAN service. He stated that Greater
Roanoke Transit Company personnel provided Roanoke County with a list of County
residents who used the STAR service on a regular basis, and it is the City's
understanding that the County is working to insure a smooth transition.
LICENSES-TAXES-LEGISLATION: Mr. Grisso called attention to changes in
Stats law regarding the Business, Professional and Occupational License Tax which
will take effect in fiscal year 1999. He noted that during its Financial Planning
Session on March 8, 1997, City staff advised Council that the estimated cost to the
City of $125,000.00 in annual revenues have eliminated the $50.00 fee on those
businesses that pay a tax rata of $100,000.00 in gross receipts. He stated that the
Business, Professional and Occupational License tax is not a fair tax, the City has
requested an altarnative, and lobbying efforts for local flexibility at the General
Assembly level will continue. He further stated that discussions have taken place
with regard to making the personal property tax a Stats tax, with the Stats assuming
certain responsibilities that are now inherent upon local government, and the
Lieutenant Governor is chairing a study committee charged with the responsibility
of reviewing the matter during the year.
Mr. Minnix called attention to the possibility that the Business, Professional
and Occupational License tax may be phased out, and Roanoke City and Roanoke
County should prepare an alternata plan because when the tax no longer exists, the
citizens of the Roanoke Valley will have to assume the burden.
RECYCLING: Mr. Eddy advised that in the future, it would be advantageous
to have a universal systam of recycling, and inquired about Roanoke City's future
plans.
The City Manager advised that Roanoke City has approximately 3,500 - 5,000
households that are not currently on line for recycling; that studies show, over the
long term and depending on the buy-back rata which fluctuatas from year to year,
that the program has been cost effective by diverting material from the landfill and
coming close to covering the City's operating costs. With Council's approval, he
statad that it would be his goal to add the balance of citizens to the City's recycling
program by the end of this calendar year.
257
INSURANCE: Ms. Hyatt advised that the Employee Health Care Subcommittee
met on February 20, 1997, to review a proposed schedule of activities, each locality
was given a Request for Proposals for review, and it is proposed to advertise the
Request for Proposals by April or May, with the review process to be completed by
the end of August, followed by negotiations with potential bidders, and a
recommendation to City Council and to the Board of Supervisors by late August, for
a January 1, 1998 implementation date.
There being no further business, the Mayor declare~'the Roanoke City Council
meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m., and the Chairman declared the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors meeting in recess until 3:00 p.m.
APPROVED
ATTEST:
Mary F. Parker
City Clerk
David A. Bowers
Mayor