Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 11-07-88REGULAR WEEKLY SESSION ...... ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL November 7, 1988 2:00 p.m. AGENDA FOR THE COUNCIL ~uS S eh (29347] Call to Order -- Roll Call. ~rs. Bowles was absent. The invocation will be delivered by Father Nicholas G. Bacalis, Priest, Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church· P~esent. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America will be led by Mayor Noel C. Taylor. CONSENT AGENDA {Approved 6-0) ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION IN THE FORM LISTED BELOW. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DIS- CUSSION OF THESE ITEMS. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. C-1 Minutes of the regular meetings of Council held on Monday, July 11, 1988, and Monday, July 25, 1988. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Di!spense with the reading thereof and approve as recorded. C-2 A communication from Mayor Noel C. Taylor requesting an Executive Session to discuss personnel matters relating to vacancies on various authorities, boards, commissions and com- mittees appointed by Council, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended· RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concur in request for Council to convene in Executive Session to discuss personnel matters relating to vacancies on various authorities, boards, commissions and com- mittees appointed by Council, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 A report of the City Manager, Director of Finance and Director of Utilities and Operations requesting an Executive Session to discuss a matter pertaining to other legal matters within the jurisdiction of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (?), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concur in request for Council to convene in Executive Session to discuss a matter per- taining to other legal matters within the jurisdiction of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (7), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. A report of the City Manager with regard to concerns expressed by lessees of the Municipal Parking Garage on Church Avenue, S. W., relating to parking fees, security, and the overall condition of the parking garage. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. A list of items pending from July 10, 1978, through October 24, 1988. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. Qualification of Mr. Wallace Youth Services Citizen Board for May 31, 1990. 1. Allen as a member of the a term of three years ending RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. Qualification of Mr. Timothy L. Jamieson as a member of the Architectural Review Board for a term of four years ending October 1, 1992. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. Qualification of Mr. Lynn D. Avis as a member of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Building Code for a term of five years ending September 30, 1993. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. Qualification of Messrs. Harold S. Zimmerman and Lewis W. Peery as members of the City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Commission for terms of four years each, ending October 31, 1992. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. Qualification of Mr. Sam H. McGhee, III, as a Director of the Industrial Development Authority for a term of four years ending October 20, 1992. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. (2) ~' REGULAR AGENDA 3. Hearing of Citizens Upon Public Matters: None. 4. Petitions and Communications: a. A corr~unication from Council Member James O. Trout requesting Council's consideration of an appropriation of funds to Total Action Against Poverty's Transitional~i~e Center· Referred to the Cit!~ ~anager, Cit~ Attorney Director of Finance for preparation of the appropriate document. b. A communication from Mr. Robert E. Glenn, Attorney, repre- senting the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke, requesting Council's concurrence in an Inducement Resolution adopted by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia, allowing Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley to participate in a $61,000,000.00 Variable Rate Hospital Revenue bond is~u~ Adopted Resolution No. 29347 (5-0, ~{r. Garland a~sta~nea from c. A co~nunication from the Roanoke City School Board requesting appropriation of $51,600.00 for the Family Life Education Program, to provide for the development and implementation of family life curriculum; and $6,250.00 for the 1989 Western Virginia Regional Sci'ence Fair, which is being hosted by Roanoke City. Adopted Ordinance No. 29348. Reports of Officers: a. City Manager: Briefings: None· Items Recommended for Action: 1. A report recommending award of a contract for employee health care insurance to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, for a one year period from January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989; and award of a contract for employee dental insurance to Delta Dental Plan of Virginia, for a two year period from Januar~~ 1989 to ~e~31, 1990. Adopted Ordinance No. 293~, 29350, . (6-0) 2. A report recommending authorizatio~ to execute a close- out agreement with the Gainsboro Project Area Committee and the Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation as subgrantees of the CitN ~n~r the Corr~nunit¥ Develoo- ment Block Grant· Adoptea Urd~nance No. 2935~. (6-O~ A report recommending authorization to appropriate $19,200.00 from the Internal Service Fund previous years' retained earnings to Utility Line Services capi- tal accounts, to provide for operational and main- tenance capital needs. Adopte~ Ordinance No. 29353. ~ 4.b. votin~ inasmuch as he is an emplo~ee o~ Communit~ ~ospital. (3) 4. A report recommending appropriation of $50,109.00, representing a grant award received by the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium from- the State Department of Education, to administer an Adult Literacy Project within certain jurisdictions of the Fifth Planning District. Adopted Ordinance No. 29354. (6-01 5. A report with regard to structured settlement of a Worker's Compensation claim, including job related disability retirement benefits. Adopted Ordinance No. 29355, 29356, and 29357. (6-0) 6. A report with regard to a Master Plan for Downtown North. Adopted Resolution No. 29358. (6-0) The Director of Finance was requested to prepare the appropriate budget 7. A report concurring in a report of the Bid Committee recommending acceptance of the bid submitted by International Salt Company, in the total amount of $41,270.00, to supply 1,000 tons of deicing salt, to provide for a successful snow and ice removal program. Adopted Ordinance No. 29359. {6-0) Director of Finance: i. A financial report for the month of September, 1988. Received and filed. 2. A report recommending the close-out of Youth Services Grant 87-I-8, and certain appropriation and revenue adjustments therefor. Adopted Ordinance No. 29360. {6-0) c. City Attorney: 6. Reports 1. A report transmitting a measure expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species, and requesting the federal government to share in any additional costs for community projects addres- sing needs along and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation. Adopted Resolution No. 29361. (6-0) 2. A report with regard to the City's purchase of proper- ties located at 118, 120, 122 and 124 Campbell Avenue, S.W. Deferred until the regular meeting o~ Council on Mondaq~ November 14, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. ^Ir. Bowers abstalne~ of Committees: I from voting. a. A report of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of the proposal of the Citizens' Advisory Committee on City-Wide Parks Study to name the sports complex area near Victory Stadium "Roanoke River Sports Complex." Mr. Michael M. Waldvogel, Chairman. De~erred until the regular meeting of Council on ~onday, November 14, 198~, at 7. Unfinished Business: None. 7:30 p.m. 8. Introduction and Consideration of Ordinances and Resolutions: None. 5.a.6. ordinance. (4) ~' 9. Motions and Miscellaneous Business: Inquiries and/or corr~ents by the Mayor and Members of City Council. i. A communication from Council Member David A. Bowers transmitting the 1987-88 Annual Report of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority. Received and ~iled. Vacancies on various authorities, boards, co~nissions and committees appointed by Council. i0. Other Hearings of Citizens: Reappointed the following persons: Mr. Virgil L. Ro~ers Mr. Jan P. Wilkins Mr. John A. Sabean Mr. Robert W. Glenn, Jr. Roanoke Neighborhood Partnership Steering Committee Roanoke Neighborhood Partnership Steering Committee Roanoke Neighborhood Partnership Steering Committee Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority Adopted Resolution No. 29362 16-0) authorizing the Roanoke Valle~ Regional Solid (~aste ~lanagement Board to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke rati~ing certain actions taken to date and authorizing the expenditure of ~unds. (5) ~' MINUTES CONSIDERED AT THIS COUNCIL MEETING MAY BE REVIEWED ON LINE IN THE "OFFICIAL MINUTES" FOLDER, OR AT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE C~ce of the Mo/or November 7, 1988 The Honorable Vice-Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mrs. Bowles and Gentlemen: I wish to request an Executive Session to discuss personnel matters relating to vacancies on various authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Sincerely, NCT:se Room 452 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 981-2444 Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: Please reserve space on Council's agenda for an Executive Session pertaining to other legal matters within the jurisdiction of the public body in accordance with Section 2.1-344(a)(7) of the Code of Virginia. Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert /C~ty Manage~~ Landfill Board Repres~a~tative Landfill Board Representative WRH:JMS:KBK:afm cc: City Attorney Director of Finance Office of the City November 9, 1988 File #255 Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Oear Mr. Herbert: Your report with regard to concerns expressed by lessees of the Municipal Parking Garage on Church Avenue, S. W., relating to parking fees, security, and the overali condition of the parking garage, was before the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regu- Iar meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. On motion, duly seconded and adopted, the report was received and filed. Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra pc: Mr. Richard Dennis, 2414 Bermuda Road, N. ~V., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Ms. Deborah Charles, Route 1, ~ox 183, Hardy, Virginia 24101 Ms. Linda Milton, 2924 Dell Avenue, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 ' ~r. Char~es ~unn, Resident Manager, Southeast Region, APCOA, Inc., 229 Peachtree Street, Suite 2410, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Room 456 Municipal Builcling 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke ~rg~nia 2401 t (703) 981-2541 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Roanok~ ~7 Vi~ia~ November 7, 1988' Dear Members of Council: Subject: Municipal Parking Garage - Church Avenue, S. W. - Council Information I. BackKround: City Council received a petition from individuals using the Municipal Parking Garage on September 12, 1988 in regard to: 1. Elevator malfunctions 2. Cleanliness 3. Security 4. Parking fees Petition was referred to the City Manager to evaluate and report back to Council. APCOA, Inc. manaKes and operates the parking garage for the City. Mr. Munn, Regional Manager, Southeast Region, APCOA, Inc. has met with Mr. Kiser in regard to this matter. II. Current Situation: A. Cleaning pro,ram, which is the responsibility of APCOA, has been revised and approved by the City after recommendations from City custodial services personnel. The Daily Maintenance Report will be followed by the Municipal Parking Garage. B. Communications and information have been sent to individuals who appeared before Council in regard to the parking garage. C. Work order has been submitted to Building Maintenance for improvements to parking facilities. APCOA~ Inc. has hired professional cleaners to help clean the Municipal Parking Garage. III. Issues more specific to the complaint can be categorized as follows: A. Action taken or considered B. Action to be taken C. Response to citizens Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 IV. Response: The following response has been made: A. Action taken or considered: Air conditioner installed in elevator mechanical room on east end of parking facility to prevent malfunctions of elevator controls due to sticking contacts during times of extremely high temperatures. Burned out light tubes on parking ramps, elevator lobbies, and stairwells have been replaced to improve lighting. 3. New floor tile has been placed in all three elevators. 4. Trash cans have been placed in all elevator lobbies. 5o Security guards have been directed to make themselves more available at peak traffic hours. Work orders submitted to paint all bollards, machines, lobby doors, etc. Power sweeper replacement for cleaning parking ramps is on bid. Cards being placed on vehicles parking in handicapped spaces without handicapped tags or stickers asking operator not to park in these spaces. Air circulation improvement during hot summer weather was attempted by propping open elevator and stairwell lobby doors. This effort has been discontinued due to conflict with the Fire Code. 10. New portable vacuum cleaner has been purchased by APCOA to help with clean up of corners and cigarette butts. B. Action to be taken: Place "No Smoking" signs in elevator lobbies and stairwells. o Professional cleaners will clean floors and walls in elevator lobbies, stairs and walls in stairwells, etc. within the next four weeks. Decision to paint or not paint walls in elevator lobbies and the walls and stairs in the stairwell will be made after professional cleaners have completed their work within this facility. 4. Follow cleaning schedulm. Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 3 C. Response to Citizens - Two communications. First communication, copy attached, dated September 21, 1988 states that the City was gathering information requested and asked individuals to call Mr. Kiser to give him their telephone number so as to coordinate a meeting. Second communication, copy attached, dated October 13, 1988, transmitted obtained information requested and again offered to coordinate a meeting. Only one of the individuals receiving these con~nunications has called Mr. Kiser. A number of meeting times suggested did not agree with this individual's schedule. The citizen was asked to pick a meeting date, but as of this date no communication has been received. It was decided, as noted above, however, that information would be sent to the three individuals for their review and questioning as desired. This is for Council's information. Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager WRH:JBW:afm Attachments CC: City Attorney Director of Finance Mr. Charles Munn, APCOA Mr. Kit B. Kiser, Director, Utilities & Operations Ms. Linda Milton Mr. Richard Dennis Ms. Deborah Charles Post in Elevator Lobbies Sept~nber 21, 1988 Mr. Richard Dennis 2414 Bermuda Road, N. W. Roanoke, VA 24017 Dear Mr. Dennis: Reference your appearance at City Council on September 12, 1988 in support of the petition of complaints regarding the Church Avenue Parking Garage. This is to let you know that I am gathering information you requested and intend to meet with you. I have met again with APCOA representatives and City staff and am preparing the following: 1. List of maintenance/special operational activities to take place and when (if not already accomplished). 2. Financial report. While the Parking Garage has an operating budget it does not have a separate all encompassing financial statement. I have asked that other City departments give me actual expenses for FY 87-88 and for our Finance Director to combine all this infozlaation with the debt payment to produce a financial statement. 3. Routine cleaning schedule. I hope to meet with you and the other two parking patrons who came to City Council within 2 - 3 weeks, once the above information is complete and at a time convenient to you and Mr. Charles Munn of APCOA. Please call me at 981-2602 to give me your work telephone number so I can call you to coordinate a meeting. Respectfully, KBK:afm cc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Mr. Charles Munn, APCOA Ms. Linda Milton Ms. Deborah Charles bcc: Jack Woodson Jim Grisso Kit B. Kiser, Director Utilities & Operations Room ,~54 Mun,c,pa~ Bu,lOing 215 Church A',,~nue S W ~noke Virginta 24011 C703) 981-2002 DireO'or of Utilities & Operarion~ October 13, 1988 Mr. Richard Dennis 2414 Bermuda Road, N. W. Roanoke, VA 24017 Ms. Deborah Charles Rt. 1, Box 183 Hardy, VA 24101 Ms. Linda Milton 2924 Dell Avenue, N. E. Roanoke, VA 24012 Ladies & Gentleman: I would like to follow up my previous letter to each of you and my telephone call of October 12, 1988 to Mr. Dennis.' Attached for your information are the following= 1. Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the year ending June 30, 1988. Listing of Recom~endations/Considerations of improvements under consideration. 3. Cleaning schedule for the garage. I repeat my earlier offer for a meetin8 with you. Please call me if you have questions or comments regarding the enclosed information or · if you desire to meet to discuss any of these issues. Respectfully, Kit B. Kiser, Director Utilities & Operations KBK:afm Attachments cc: Mr Charles Munn, APCOA, Inc. - bcc: Bob Layman Jack Woodson 354 Mun,o001Du,ldin9 215 Churd~ Av~[.,~, 5 '~ ~N~e' Virginia 24011 (703) 981-2b02 ,i ~Tr OF RQANO?E i~IUNZCI~AL PAI~KING GARAGE ST~TEPlENT OF REVENUES AND E, ~N.~E~ YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, ,3per'ating Revenues Monthly Parking Rental Spaces Short Ferm Parking Piiscellaneous Total Operating Revenues $~, 71., 3peratJng Expenses Contractual Se r'v Lces Central Services Cost alloca:{on Other Charges Building Maintenance ~nternal Services Total Operating Expenses Net Operating Income 30,473 20,i55 820 158,759 2o6,37 5 <,ebt Service Bond Princtpal Bond Interest Total Debt Servxce Cash Flo~ (Loss) ~ 7 _ , 000 141 , 41o, ($15o,096) COnCLUSIOnS Replace Tile in Elevators - Work order has been submitted to replace floor tile in three existing elevators. Work will be scheduled on weekends with one elevator being taken out of service at a time. 2. Replace Fan wit-hAir Conditioner for Elevator Control Tow~. - Air conditioner installed 1st Street, S.W. tower where two elevators exist. 2nd Street, S.W. may not need air conditioners due to there being only one elevator. Will continue to evaluate. 3. Repair or Rep]m~ ~w~,~r - City Garage notified of overheating problem and will repair. Seek to budget $20,000 for replacement of existing 10 year old sweeper in FY 89-90 Budget. 4. Increase~ - Existing warm glow lights will be replaced with cool glow lights, which give off a brighter light, as the existing lights burn out. Work order has been submitted to replace burned out lights throughout parking garage. The lighting level on the parking decks will be increased to provide additional lighting which should prove satisfactory with citizens using this parking facility. Lighting adequate in lobbies and stairwells. 5. Provide Addition~l --q~it¥ - Watcfw~nts clocks have been installed within the parking garage. Security guard time at the Municipal Parking Garage will be increased, especially during peak traffic hours. e Reseal and Re-stripe pa~k4,~ S~lln - Funds budgeted for this year will need to be used for structural analysis. If r~maining funds exist, the top deck and entranceways will be resealed. Pr°videHeavyDutvBoltedDo#nTrash ~,_. and AshT~,,.~ - City has had bad experience with this suggestion in the past. Attachments to wall have been pulled out, chains broken, or chains pulled thru trash cans. Trash can supports with removable trash cans can be bolted to the floor but would be expensive to replace if vandalized. Existing trash cans will be used and replaced if removed. "No Smoking Area" signs will be placed in all elevator lobbies. Paintin~ of Elevator Lobbtes~ Stat~e~ St~iml!~ etc - A work order has been submitted to paint all doors between elevator lobbies and parking ramps, bollards on parking deck, and machines on parking decks. APCOA, Inc., within the next five weeks, will have a cleaning company clean this parking facility. The City will determine, after the cleaning is completed, if the elevator lobbies and walls in the stairwells need paintin~. Should these areas need Page 2 10. painting a work order will be submitted to paint same. The stairs will also be painted after this cleaning project is completed. Lea~e Lobby Doors Open for Air Cir~!!ati,~ - The Fire Marshall will not give the City a waiver to leave either of the doors within the elevator lobbies open, due to this practice not conforming to the State Fire Code. Walls and Col~. Cou/d be Color C_~_ed or an Area for ~--.-,l[.~ Art - Not reco~eiided due to continuous mintenance. 11. 12. 13. 14. LockDownGara~e - Ruling to leave parking facility open due to complaints received from monthly parkers, banks and lawyers offices, which park in the garage at night. Non-Chloride De-t~,~ Should be Ii_~i - This type of salt has always been used in this garage. CleaninK of Lobbtes~ Stairt~l!~ Rte - These areas will be cleaned by a professional cleaning company within the next five weeks, l cleaning schedule suggested by Mr. Nelson Jackson, Manager of Building Maintenance/Custodial Services, will be followed in the future. This schedule is attached. Accu~u/ation of Tirml~t - Parking decks are generally clean and few complaints received on their appearance, however, spiral ramps need to be cleaned more frequently. Mr. Laym~n, Manager of Parking Garage, has been notified. APCOA, INC DAILY MAINTENANCE REPORT LOCATION REVISED 10/6/88 DATE/DAY NAME TIME IN TIME OUT DAILY QUICK CLEAN These items must be Check off as completed in space provided. completed Empty trash all floors, replace liners. everyday. 2. Check all elevators for proper operation. Report malfunctions to your supervisor immediately. 3. Remove all litter from elevator lobbies, stairwells, entrance/exit area. Spot clean as needed. 4. Walk garage ramps. Remove all litter and debris. Spot sweep as needed. 5. Place violator notices on cars parked incorrectly. 6. Spot clean vagrant or vandal damage. Report this to your supervisor. 7. Note lights out by floor location DAILY MAINTENANCE - These items noted or more often if needed. provided. must be completed each day as Check off as completed in space Mon. Sweep and mop east street lobby and elevator Sweep and mop west street lobby and elevator Wipe down elevator doors and frames each floor Dust ledges and remove cobwebs each floor Wipe down elevator ceiling panels and elevator walls Tues. Sweep and mop east lobbies and elevators Wipe down all handrails Sweep and mop east stairwell Daily Maintenance continues: Wed. Sweep and mop west lobbies and elevators Wipe down all equipment and signage Sweep and mop west street lobby and elevators Thur. Sweep and mop east lobbies and elevators Dust ledges and remove cobwebs each floor Sweep and mop west street lobby and elevators Fri. Sweep and mop west lobbies and elevators Blow out corners for power sweeper Sat. Power sweep Garage Clean restroom OTHER PROJECTS - These items must be completed today, as assigned by your supervisor. (Examples: Machine scrub and recoat lobby floors, spray cleaning, wash windows, wash out trash cans, repaint curbs and bollards, replace missing or broken light bulbs, fire extinguishers, or drain plates, etc.) Upon completion of days work sign in the with your supervisor. Completed By (Employee) space below and leave Reviewed By (Supervisor) Mary F. Parker City Clerk November 4, 1988 Ms. Deborah Charles Rt. 1, Box 183 Hardy, Virginia 24101 Ms. Linda Milton 2924 Dell AVenue, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Richard Dennis 2414 Bermuda Road, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Ladies and Mr. Dennis: This is to advise you that the enclosed report is included on the agenda of the Council of the City of Roanoke for its meeting on Monday, November 7, 1988, said Council meeting to begin at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber on the fourth floor of the Municipal Building. Sincerely, MFP:js Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk Enc. Pending Items from July 10, 1978, through October 24, 1988. Referral Date Referred To Item 7/10/78 City Manager Recommendation No. 11 con- tained in the Mayor's 1978 State of the City Message. (Development of Mill Moun- tain - hotel.) 8/12/85 2/23/87 City Manager Regional Cable Television Committee Mayor's 1985 State of the City recommendation No. I - establishment of a working relationship with the volunteer rescue squads and the Roanoke Historical Society for the purpose of establishing a museum and national headquarters for volunteer rescue squads in the City. Request of Cox Cable Roanoke for a renewal of their fran- chise agreement in order to simplify and clarify langu- age, make certain additions and deletions, and extend the term. 6/20/88 Regional Cable Television Committee Communication advising of Cox Cable Roanoke's intent to seek renewal of the Cable Television Franchise in the City of Roanoke. 7/11/88 City Manager Remarks of Mr. Lawrence M. Taylor regarding parking regulations in the City and more specifically in the downtown area. 8/8/88 City Manager 1989-90 Budget Study Mayor's 1988 State of the City recommendation No. i - pursue a diversified economic development strategy invol- ving downtown, industrial areas, tourism and conven- tions and review the current City organizational structure manpower, and money available to market the City. Pending Items _Referral Date 8/8/88 9/12/88 9/26/88 9/26/88 from July 10, 1978, Referred To City Manager Special Events Corr~nittee City Manager City Attorney City Manager City Manager City Attorney City Manager City Attorney through October 24, 1988. Item Mayor's 1988 State of the City recommendation No. 3 designation of the City of Roanoke as the premiere "Festival City" of Virginia, including development of a yearly calendar of public events and festival activi- ties. Mayor's 1988 State of the City recommendation No. 4 - appointment of a Drug Abuse Task Force. Mayor's 1988 State of the City recommendation No. 5 - encourage federal officials to ensure health care costs for AIDS patients and to pre- vent all forms of discrimina- tion against those who are stricken with this disease. Comments of Mr. Michael Smith, regarding t,~e need for a storm drainage system on EdgeIawn Avenue, N. W., to eliminate excessive water run-off. Communication from Council Member David A. Bowers with regard to the City hiring a lobbyist in the Washington, D.C., area to assist the City in discovering new funding sources which might be available. Comments of Mr. William Jones, 2904 Bradley Street, N. E., regarding gasoline fumes emanating from a house next door to his residence, indecent exposure, and drink- ing in public. -2- Pending Items Referral Date 10/10/88 10/17/88 10/24/88 from July 10, 1978, Referred To City Manager City Manager Robert A. Garland William F. Clark Kit B. Kiser Robert A. Garland William F. Clark Kit B. Kiser City Manager City Manager through October 24, 1988. Item Comments of Mr. Lo M. Cruise, 2813 Kennedy Avenue, N. E., with regard to undesirable conditions that exist in the vicinity of his residence as a result of dogs owned by his next door neighbor. Communication from Council Member David A. Bowers requesting additional infor- mation prior to April I, 1989, regarding progress of the City administration in designating additional buildings in the downtown area as historic sites. Bids for construction of a salt storage building at the Public Works Service Center. Bids for replacement of the Read Road, N. E. bridge over N & W Railway. Comments of Mrs. Gladys O'NeaI Brown, Community Awareness Organization, regarding excessive water run-off in the 2100 block of Staunton Avenue, N. W. Final report of the Office on Youth's Adolescent Pregnancy Task Force. -3- Office of ~ne City Clerk November 9, 1988 File #15-304 The Reverend UIas N. Broady, Youth Services Citizen Board 2204 Lynnhope Drive, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Chairman Dear Reverend Broady: This is to advise you that Mr. Wallace I. Allen has a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a years, ending May 1, 1990. qualified as term of three Sincere Iy, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Cler~ MFP: ra pc: i{s. Marion V. Crenshaw, Youth Planner Room456 MunicipalBuilding 215 C'nurch Avenue SW Roanoke ~rg~nia24~11 (703) 98t-254t 0-2 Oath or Affirmation of Office State o] Virginia, Ci~$1 o] Roanoke, to.~it: , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that lr will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Virginia, and that ! will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me aa._ according to the best of my ability. So help me God. -~, Deputy Clerk Or, ce of ~ O~y August 21, 1987 File #15-304 Mr. ~Vallace I. Allen 3821 Harvest Lane, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Mr. Allen: This is to remind you that you have not qualified as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board to which you were reelected on May 18, 1987, for a term of three years ending May 31, 1990. Enclosed you will find an Oath of Office which may be adminis- tered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, So W. It will be appreciated if you will qualify for this position by Friday, August 28, 1987, and return the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Municipal Building. Sincere ly, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:se Enco CC': Ms. Carol B. Marchal, Chairman, Youth Services Citizen Board, 2320 Mount Vernon Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24015 ' Mrs. Marion V. Crenshaw, Youth Planner Room456 MuniclpalBuildlng 215~urchAve~ue, S.W. Roonoke, Vlrginla24011 (703)981-2541 Office of ~ne City Clenk May 20, 1987 File #15-304 Mr. Wallace I. Allen 3821 liarvest Lane, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Mr. Allen: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, May 18, 1987, you were reelected as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term of three years ending May 31, 1990. Enclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Municipal Building prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reelected. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. cc: Ms. Carol B. Marchal, Chairman, Youth Services Citizen Board, 2320 Mount Vernon Road, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Ms. Marion V. Crenshaw, Youth Planner Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Church A~'~ue, $.W. Roanoke, Virginia 2401 '1 (703) 98~-2541 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: CITY OF ROAN~I~ ) I, Mary F. Parker, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council held on the 18th day of May, 1987, WALLACE I. ALLEN was reelected as a Member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term of three years, ending May 31, 1990. Given under rrry hand and the seal of the City of Roanoke this 20th day of May, 1987. City Clerk CY~ce of the Ci~,, Cler~ November 9, 1988 File #15-249 Mr. W. L. Whitwell, Chairman Architectural Review Board 1255 Keffield Street, N. W. ~oanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Whitwell: Jamieson has qualified Review Board for a term of four This is to advise you that Mr. Timothy L. as a member of the Architectural years, ending October 1, 1992. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, City Clerk MFP:ra pc: Ms. Evelyn S. ~unter, Secretary, Architectural Review Board Room 456 Municil:x~l Buildincj 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke 'vfrg~nJa 24011 (703) 98t-254t 0-2 afh orAffirmafion of Office 8tare o] Virginia, ~itst o] Roanoke, t~ .un't: --, do solemnly Sw~r (or ~) ~at I w~l sup~rt the Constitution of the United States, ~d the Constitution of ~e State of Virginia, and that I w~l faithfully and impa~ially discharge and ~rform all the duties incumbent U~n me a~ f~c~ober l~ lC,~', '' '~' " ...... ~ ~ '~- according to the best of my ability. So help me God. -- ~, Deputy Office o~ the City C~erk October 12, 1988 File #15-249 Mr. Timothy L. Jamieson 6857 Sugar Rum Ridge, S. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 We Dear Mr. Jamieson: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, October 10, 1988, you were reelected as a member of the Architectural Review Board for a term of four years, ending October 1, 1992. Enclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Municipal Building prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reelected. Sincerely, Mary F. .Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. pc: Mr. W. L. Whitwell, Chairman, Architectural Review Board, 1255 Keffield Street, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ~s. Evelyn S. Gunter, Secretary, Architectural Review Board Room 456 :v,,~nlc~pal [~:,iO~,~g 215 Ch. ch Avena~e SW Rox~?/oke ~irg~nia 24011 (703) 98'~-2541 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Mary F. Parker, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council held on the 10th day of October, 1988, TIMOTHY L. JAMIESON was reelected as a member of the Architectural Review Board for a term of four years, ending October I, 1992. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this 12th day of October, 1988. City Clerk Of~ce of the Ci~, Clerk November 9, 1988 File #15-64 Mr. Paul V. Childress, Jr., Chairman Board of Adjustments & Appeals Building Code 2792 Beverly Boulevard, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Dear ~r. Childress: This is to advise you that Mr. Lynn D. Avis has qualified as a member of the Board of Adjustments &Appeais, Building Code, for a term of five years, ending September 30, 1993. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra pc: Mr. Ronald H. Administrator Miller, Building Commissioner/Zoning I'~om456 MunicipalBuildJng 215 C'hurch Avenue SW Roanoke ~rg~nia24011 (703) 981-2541 0-2 Oath or Affirmation of Office 8~ ot Vi~#inia, Citer of Roanoke, ~o I, Lvnn O. f~vi~ . do solemnly swear (or affirm) ~at w~l sup~rt the Constitution of the United S~tea, and the Conatitution of the State of Virginia, and that will faithfnlly and impa~ially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me Member o~ t~e ~o~rd ~'~ ~dlusr~ ~d .~-,,~-!g ~:i~ ': ~ F~ve years, endinq Seoter~er ~C%" 1~. ~. according to the best of my ability. So help me God. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ~puty Clerk Or, ce of ~e C:'/C~ed~ September 28, 1988 File #15-64 ~4r. Lynn D. Avis 3902 Bosworth Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Mr. Avis: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, September 26, 1988, you were reelected as a member of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Building Code for a term of five years, ending September 30, 1993. Enclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Municipal Building prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reelected. Sincerely, SHE:ra Eno. pc: Sandra H. Eakin Deputy City Clerk Mr. Paul V. Childress, chairman, Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Building Code, 2792 Beverly Boulevard, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Mr. Ronald H. Miller, Building Corr~issioner/Zoning Administrator 456 Munici~al Building 215 C~urch Avenue S W Roanoke 'v'~rg~nia 2401 t (703) 981-254t COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wi t: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Sandra H. Eakin, Deputy City Clerk, and as such Deputy City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby Certify that at a regular meeting of Council held on the 26th day of September, 1988, LYNN D. AVIS was reelected as a member of Appeals, Building Code, for a September 30, 1993. Given under my hand and 28th day of September, 1988. the Board of Adjustments and term of five years, ending the Seal of the City of Roanoke this Deputy City Clerk Office of the City Cler~ November 9, 1988 File #15-20 Mr. Robert K. Dengston, Chairman City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Commission Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Bengston: This is to advise you that Messrs. Harold S. Zimmerman and Lewis W. Peery have qualified as ~embers of the City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Commission for terms of four years each, e~ding October 31, 1992. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk ~FP:ra Room 456 Municipal Building 215 C'~urch A,.~nue SW Rc~noke V~rg~nia 24~t 1 (703) 981-2,.~.1 Oath or Affirmation of Office State o] Vir~inla, Cit~t o] Roanoke, ~ .vdt: , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I w~l sup~ the Constitution of the Unit~ S~tes, and the Constitution of ~e State of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impa~ially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent u~n me a~ according to the best of my ability. So help me God. ~ ribed and sworn to before me, this~_~O -- ~/~'~"~ '% '~'~"N'°~'~,"~tY Clerk Office o~ rne City Cle~ October 19, 1988 File #15-20 ~r. Harold S. Zimmerman 4526 ~den Drive, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Oear ~]~r. Zimmerman: 4t a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, October 17, 1988, you were reelected as a member of ttle City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Commission for a term of four years, ending October 31, 1992. ~nclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of ~oanoke, located on t,be third floor of the ~oanoke City Courts ~acilit¥, 315 ~hurch Avenue, S. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to ~oo~ 456 in the Municipal ~uilding prior to were reelected, serving in the capacity to which you MFP: ra Sincere ly, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk pc: ?4r. Robert K. Bengtson, Chairman, Transportation Safety Commission City of aoanoke 2401 ~ (703) 981-2541 COMMO~VEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE ) ) To-wit: ) I, ~gary F. Parker, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of the Council held on the ' 17th day of October, 1988, HAROLD S. ZIMMER~t4N was reappointed as a member of the City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Corr~ission, for a term of four years, ending October 31, 1992. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this 19th day of October, 1988. City Clerk 0-2 Oath or Affirmation of Office oI l~irginia, ~it~l o] Roanoke, to.~e: . do solemnly awear (or ~) that sup~ the Constitution of the United States, ~d the Constitution of the State of Virginia, ~nd that faithfully and impa~ially discharge and ~rform all the duties incumbent upon me ~ ~OOY'S~ ~r~s~'~ qc~ob~ ~o~":~. ' CY~¢e of n~e Cir~ Cle~ October 19. 1988 File #15-20 Mr. Lewis Wo Peery 508 Rutherford Avenae, N. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear ~r. Peery: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, October 17, 1988, you were reelected as a member of the City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Co~r~nission for a term of four years, ending October 31, 1992. Enclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the ~1unicipal Building prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reelected. Sincerely, ~..~ Mary F. Parker, City Clerk MFP:ra Enco pc: l~r. Robert K. Bengtson, Chairman, Transportation Safety Commission City of Roanoke Ro,a ;, ~56 ,,_,,~.Jl E, ,'~.~g 2~5 (1 J~chA,,'enue bW Rc,~not~e v~rg~n,a 24011 (703) 981-2541 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE To-wit: l, Mary F. Parker, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 17th day of October, 1988, LEWIS W. PCERY was reappointed as a member of the City of Roanoke Transportation Safety Commission, for a term of four years, ending October 31, 1992. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this 19th day of October, 1988. City Clerk CY~¢e of~e CiW Clen~ November 9, 1988 Fi le #15-207 Mr. Jack C. Smith, Chairman Industrial Development Authority c/o Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce 14 West Kirk Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Smith: This is to advise you that Mr. Sam H. McGhee, III, has qualified as a Director of the Industrial Development Authority for a term of four years, ending October 20, 1992. ~f~"'~/~Sincerely' Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: r a P,~3om 456 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke Virginia 2401 t (703) 981-2541 0-2 Oath or Affirmation of Office 8tato o] Virginia, ~.ity o] Roanoke. to .u.,it: I, ;i':,? ~;. '~c~"TAc~t XZZ . do solemnly swear (or affirm) that will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Btate of Virginia, and th&t will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties ineumhent upon me aa according to the best of my ability. So help me God. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ~J ?'~'~' __day CY~ce of n~e City Cler~ October 19, 1958 File #15-207 ~r. Sam H. McGhee, III 411Cassell Lane, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Mr. McGhee: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, October 17, 1985, you were reelected as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a term of four years, ending October 20, 1992. Enclosed you will find a certificate of your reelection and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please retur~ one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Municipal Building prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reelected. Sincerely, ~ary F. Parker, C~C City Clerk MFP: ra Enc. pc: Mr. Jack C. Smith, Chairman, [ndustrial Bevelopment Authority, ~4 ~irk Avenue, S. ~., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Roa" ;56 ~,*; ;:;,~1 2, ;i,Ji '~g 2! ~ (! ~Ch Aven~e SW ~qc,~ o~e ~rg,ma 24011 (703) 98~-2541 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Mary F. Parker, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council held on the 17th day of October, 1988, SAM H. MCG~EE was reelected as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a term of four years, ending October 20, 1992. Given under my hand and the Sea~l of the City of Roanoke this 19th day of October, 1988. City Clerk November 3, 1988 Office of the Council The Honorable Mayor and Members of ROanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear M~s. BOwles and Gentlemen: The opening of the Shaffer's Crossing Transitional Living Center for the home- less is an important milestone in our cornrunity's corrrnitment to ser~e the needs of horr~less citizens searching for away to get back on their feet. The TLC is at present the only facility of its kind in the state providing up to 100 residents 18 months to get back on their feet. It is the only facility whose operation is guided by an appointed local steering corrmittee insuring full coordination of local services. As you are aware from recent publicity, TAP has received an $849,247 corrmitment fromHUD over five years for one half of the operation's cost. After a $120,000 state appropriation match fell through, TAP has raised all but $30,000 of the match, including a corrrnitment of $10,000 n~ade by the Honorable ~ayor at the ribbon cutting ceremony, and a $10,000 appropriation by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. Of the required $168,273 of local match, $138,273 has been raised, as follows: TAP's corrmitment to Project ............. $17,835 Private Contributions .................... 43,938 Dominion Bank ............................ 20,000 Local Governments ........................ 21,500 State Contributions ...................... 25,000 United Way ............................... 10,000 It is extremely important to the City that the $849,000 of Federal funds not be jeopardized by a failure to raise the remaining $30,000. After investigating the matter, I am apprised by the TAP Planning Department that another $10,000 of contributions is anticipated, leaving a balance of $20,000 to be raised by the middle of November, when letters of con~nitment have to be in to the HUD offices. It is my fervent hope that Roanoke City Council at its next meeting will corrrnit the funds necessa~, to ensure the security of the federal five year grant and the full operation of the Transitional Living Center as we head into the winter months When our citizens are most vulnerable. Room 456 Munl¢ipol Bulldln9 ~,__~ncereIy yours, Council Member 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roonoke, Virginia 2401 'l (703) 981-2541 C~ce of the Ci~ Clerk November 9, 1988 File #207-53-221 Mr. Robert E. Glenn Attorney P. O. Boz 2887 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 Dear Mr. Glenn: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29347, in which the City Council of the City of Roanoke indicates its concurrence to the participation by Community Hospital of Roanoke Valiey in a bond financing issued through the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia, on May 23, 1985, which Resolution No. 29347 was adopted by the Council of the City of ~oanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, ?l~.~..-~. Mary Fo Parker, CMC City Clerk .~,~FP: ra Enc. ~r. Jack C. Smith, Chairman, Industrial Development Authority, c/o Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce, 14 West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ~r. Karl A. Vandegriff, Vice President, Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley, P. 0. 6ox 12946, Roanoke, Virginia 24029 Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Room 456 Municipal Building 2'15 Church Avenue S',V f~)anoke V~rg~nia 240~ ~ (700) IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of ~ovembeD 1988 No. 29347 VIRGINIA A Resolution in which the City Council of the City of Roanoke indicates its concurrence to the participation by Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley in a bond financing issued through the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia, on May 23, 1985. WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia (the "Lynchburg Authority"), on May 23, 1985, adopted an inducement resolution (the "Resolu- tion''), a copy of which has been submitted to Council, for the benefit of VHA Mid-Atlantic States, Inc., a nonprofit association ("VHA") wherein the Lynchburg Authority has agreed to assist VHA in financing the acquisition of certain real and personal property, including the purchase of certain equipment and the acquisition and construction of certain improvements for lease or sale to various nonprofit hospitals throughout Virginia and for the financing of indebtedness previously incurred by nonprofit hospitals to acquire such real or personal property (collectively, the "Facilities"), through the issuance of its medical facilities revenue bonds; and Act, WHEREAS, the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, states that an industrial development authority may not finance facilities in another jurisdiction that has an industrial development authority "unless the governing body of such county, city or town in which the facilities are located or are proposed to be located, concurs with the inducement resolution adopted by the authority, and shows such concurrence in a duly adopted resolution"; and WHEREAS, the Authority has issued its $61,000,000.00 Variable Rate Hospital Revenue Bonds (VHA Mid-Atlantic States, Inc., Capital Asset Financing Program), 1985 Series A through Series G (the Bonds); and WHEREAS, the City Council of Roanoke, Virginia, has been asked by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke and by Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley to express its concurrence with proceeds of the Bonds being taken down by Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley to finance facilities located in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, THAT (a) The City Council concurs with the Resolu- tion adopted by the Lynchburg Authority for the benefit of VHA to the extent required by the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950 to allow the Authority to finance with the proceeds of the 2 Bonds a portion of the Facilities described in the Resolution for the benefit of Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley that is to be located in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. (b) This Resolution shall take effect immediately. ATTEST: City Clerk GLENN, FLrPPIN, FELDMANN ~ DARB¥ November 1, 1988 HAND DELIVERED Mary F. Parker, Clerk Roanoke City Council Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re: Concurrence Resolution for VHA Mid-Atlantic Program Loan to Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley Dear Ms. Parker: Delivered with this letter are materials from the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and from Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley asking the City Council to adopt at its November 7, 1988, meeting a resolution concurring in an inducement resolution adopted in 1985 by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia, the effect of which will be to allow Community Hospital to participate in a pool financing which was closed in 1985 through the City of Lynchburg Industrial Development Authority. We would appreciate your placing the concurrence resolution on the City Council agenda for the November 7, 1988, and would be pleased to answer any inquiries that you or any of those receiving copies of this letter might have. Very truly Robert E. Glenn HMDJR:bgm:0042076 Enclosures OLENN, l~LIPPINl i~ELDMANN ~ DARBY cc: Mr. Jack C. Smith w/encs. Wilbur C. Dibling, Jr., Esq. w/encs. Mr. W. Robert Herbert w/encs. Mr. Brian Wishneff w/encs. Theodore J. Craddock, Esq. Mr. Karl A. Vandegriff Alton L. Knighton, Jr., Esq. Willie Dennis, Esq. Jack C. Smith Chairman 14 West Kirk Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 2401 October 31, 1988 Telephone (703) 344-5188 Members of the Roanoke City Council c/o Mary F. Parker, Clerk Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re: Concurrence Resolution for VHA Mid-Atlantic Program Loan to Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley Gentlemen and Mrs. Bowles: The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke have been asked by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg and Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley to concur in the Inducement Resolution adopted by the City of Lynchburg Industrial Development Authority relating to a $61,000,000.00 Variable Rate Hospital Revenue bond issue which was closed in 1985 (copy enclosed). As indicated by the enclosed letter from Community Hospital, the Hospital wants to participate in the issue by drawing down some of the proceeds in a transaction which is scheduled to close November 28, 1988. On behalf of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, I would like to take this opportunity to inform the council of our concurrence and agreement with the proposal and recommend that City Council adopt a compliance resolution substantially in the form of the Resolution of Governmental Unit enclosed. bgm Enclosures ery truly you~ 0ac~ C. SmJ~t~,~'Chairman cc: Mr. Jack C. Smith w/enc. Wilbur C. Dibling, Jr., Esq. w/enc. Mr. W. Robert Herbert w/enc. Mr. Brian Wishneff w/enc. Willie Dennis, Esq. w/eric. Theodore J. Craddock, Esq. w/enc. Alton L. Knighton, Jr., Esq. w/enc. Mr. Karl A. Vandegriff w/enc. PRESIDENT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ROANOKE VALLEY October 26, 1988 Mr. Jack C. Smith, Chairman Industrial Development Authority City of Roanoke Roanoke, Virginia Cc~anunity Hospital of Roanoke Valley would like to borrow funds frc~the VHAMid-Atlantic States, Inc. Capital Asset Financing Program. This program will allow the hospital to be reimbursed for assets purchased with operating funds during the last fiscal period and to purchase budgeted items in the 1989 fiscal period. The transaction will allow the hospital to maintain working capital levels. We are requesting that the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Roanoke request that the Roanoke City Council pass a "Concurrence Resolution" authorizing the described transaction. The bends were issued through the IDA of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia and it is my understanding that a resolution from the Roanoke City Council is required. Thank you for your assistance. Please call me at extension 985-8088 if you have any questions relating to the borrowing. Sincerely, A. Vandegriff ~/ ~ Vice President lrw cc: William R. Reid Partner-VHA Mid-Atlan c V ~l~A ldo,pi,I, of America System. Aflf[iata of the Voluntary R O. BOX 12946 · ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24029 . (703) 985-8000 EXHIBIT B RESOLL~iON OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY. OF LYNC!~BURG, VIRGINIA WF~REAS, there have been described to the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg, Virginia (the Aur_hority), the plans of the V'rlA Mid-Atlantic States, Inc., a nonprofit organization (the Association), to provide for (a) the acquisition of certain real and personal property, including ~he purchase of certain equipment and the acquisition and construction of certain improvements for lease or sale to various nonprofit hospitals (the "Participating Hospitals") ~hroughout Virginia and (b) the refinancing of indebted/less Previously incurred by such nonprofit hospitals to acquire such ~eal or personal property; and' ~.~EA$, tb~ Association in its appearance before the Authority and in its ~Dp. lica=i~n =o =he Authority has described' =he benefits that such an undertaking will provide to the residents of Virginia and has requested the Authority to agree to issue its medical facilities revenue bonds under the Virginia Indus- trial Development and Revenue Bond Act (the Act) in such amounts as may be necessary to constructing such property and °U$1y acquired and constructed finance costs of acquiring and refinancing such property previ~ (collectively, the Facilities); SE IT RESOLVED BY TF~ INDUSTRIAL bEVE. LOPMENT AUTHORITY 0F TF~ CITY OF L,~'NCHBURG, VIRGINIA: !. It is hereby found and determined that the acquisition and construction of the Facilities will result in better hospitals for ~-he in.habitants of the City of LyncP~urg and other areas of Virginia, will lower the cost of nonprofit hospitals in providing medical care to t_he in-habitants of Commonwealth, will be in the public interest, will be of bene- fit to the inhabitants of Virginia and will be consistent with the purposes of the Act. 2. To induce the Association to undertake or assist-in the acq~uisition and construction of ",.he Facilities and ~hereby induce nonprofit hospitals in Virginia to do the same, ~he Au- thority hereby agrees to undertake t.he issuance of its medical facilities revenue bonds therefor, in an amount not to .exceed $60,000,000 without further approval of ~he Au%hority, upon terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon between the Au- thority and the Association. The facilities shall be leased or sold by the Authority to the Association or to the Participating Hospitals pursuant to lease or installment sale agreements that will provide payments to the Authority suffi- Cient to pay the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the bonds. to terms to be bonds shall be holders thereof, The bonds shall be issued in form and pursuant set by the Authority, and the payraent of the secured by an assignment, for the benefit of the of the Authorlty's rights =o payments under -2- =he lease or installment sale agreement and may be additionally secured by liens on or security interests in ~he Facilities. 3. It having been represented to the Authority t-hat it is necessary to proceed immediately with ~he Facilities, the Authority hereby agrees that the Association and the Participating Hospitals may proceed with plans for the Facili- ties, enter into contracts for acquisition and construction and take such other steps as it may deem appropriate in con~ection '~-herewith, provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to au- thorize ~he Association or any Participating Hospital to obli- gate the Authority without its consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in connec- tion with the Facilities. The Authority'agrees that the Asso- ciation and the Participating Hospitals may be reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds for all costs so incurred by it. The Authority also agrees, if requested, to issue its notes to ob- tain interim financing for the Facilities on terms to bm mutu- ally agreed upon, such notes to be secured as required by the lender and the Authority. 4. The Authority may accept from or on behalf of the Association and the Participating Hospktals conveyance of such land in the Commonwealth on which the Facilities are to be lo- ca~ed. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and -3- directed to accept and have recorded a proper deed or deeds in connection with such conveyances. If for any reason the bonds are not issued, i= is understood t_hat the AuThority shall con- vey such property to.the Association, The Participating Hospi- tals or to such other person as the Association and the ?articipating Hospitals may request, without cost other than '~he expense of preparation and recordation of such deed or deeds.of conveyance, which shall be paid by ~_he Association.. 5. The Authority hereby agrees to The request of The Association =hat Messrs. Hun=on & Williams, Richmond, Virginia, be appointed as bond counsel and hereby appoints such firm to supervise the proceedings and approve t_he issuance of =he ~onds. 6. At The ~equest of the Association the AuThority hereby appoints Kidder, Peabody & Co., New York, New York, as underwriters for the purchase and sale of the bonds pursuant to terms to be mutually agreed upon. 7. If required by Messrs. Hunton & Williams as bond COunsel, the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of or counsel for '~he Authority is hereby authorized =o see to the institution of a PrOCeeding on the Authority's behalf in the Circuit Court of the City of Lynchburg to provide for the judicial validation of the bonds pursuant to Article 6, Chapter 5, Title 15.1 of =he -4- Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and, in connection there- with, to take whatever further action, including the taking of an appeal, as is deemed necessary or desirable in order to pro- vide for validation of the Bonds. 8. Ail costs and expenses in connection wi~h the fi- nancing and the acquisition and construction of ~he Facklities, including ~he fees and expenses of bond counsel and counsel to %he Authority shall be paid from the proceeds of the bonds. If 'for any reason such bonds are not issued, it is understood t_hat all such expenses shall be paid by =he Association and that Authority shall have no responsibility therefor. 9. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward the issuance of the bonds within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Reve- nue Service pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. 10. The Participating Hospitals shall consist of: Mary Washington Hospital . Community Hospital of the Roanoke Valley Lynchburg General--Marshall Lodge Hospitals Alexandria Hospital Alliance Health System (Norfolk General Hospital) Martha Jefferson Hospital (Charlottesville) Mary Washington Hospital'(Fredericksburg) Radford Community Hospital Sou~b-hampton Memorial Hospital (Franklin) and any other non-profit hospital in Virginia that agrees to -5- abide by the terms of t.he planned financing, and the inducement given by this resolution shall also run to each Participa=lng Hospital, ~he Association, Voluntary Hospitals of America and any other nonprofit entity related to the Association and any other nonprofit corporation or other entity created wi~h the assistance of the Association for the purpose of financing the costs of expansion of, improvements to and equipment for non- prokit hospitals in Virginia. 11. Unless this resolution is extended by the Authori- ty, the bonds authorized hereunder shall be issued within one year from the date hereof. 12. This reso!u=ion shall take effect immediate/y..upon its adoption. INDUgT.~!AL D_rVELOPHE.%-r AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LYNCP~URG, VIRGINLA APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY F!NABCING Section 1 Informalion Concernin~ Agplican~ Legal Name(s) of A~pllcan:(s): Ymiling A~dress: VHA Mid-At!antic States~ Inc. 909 Duke ~tr~e* Alexandria, VA 223~{ Applicant's TA~ I.D. No.: 54-1300828 2. Name _9~ 9PP!$cam~'s represen~a:Ive ~o be con,ac:ed for ad~i:ioual information: .Mailing A~ress If Differen~ Name from Applica~='s Taleph~ne No. (-L0-~_~ 3. Type o~ business prese~=ly con,ut:ed by applicau:, i~ any: A h,~=~.~ ~artnership with selected VHA HosDi=al$ in the MiS-At~.~ ~,~.~= Preseu= loca=ion of applicau='s principal place of business, if any: L In ~a= year vas business s~ar~ed? .... ~q~ 6. If a co~ora:ion, give s:a:e of incorpora=ion: Virginia ~' If a subsidia~ of ano=her co.oration, give n~e, s~a~a of incorpora=ion and mailing ad~ress of paran~ co~ora~ion: A**~,~ o~ V~.~=~i~ ~itals of ~erica (~A) , Dallas. T~w~S If appllcan= is a partnership, give (a) name of s=a=e under v~ose lsvs i~ is organized: Virginia ;.and (b) Ci=¥ or Coun=y in ~ich i=s principal office is located: Alexandria If a Partnership, s~a~e ~he~her Eeneral or limi:ed: If a partnership, give u~es and residence addresses of all present partners and indicate ~he:her general or l~ni:ed: 15 Partne:s See Attached Schedule A. If applicant is a Joint venture or other business enTiTy (oTher Tham a corpor- ation or partnership), dgscribe and give names and residence addresses of all principals: N/A If applicant proposes to undertake the facility sought To be financed :brough s subsidia:T corporation, a new corporation, or o:her entity To be *~-& by applicanT, give details: N/A If applicant intends To lease the fa¢lliT7 To some other corporation or entl:y or if some other enTiTy is To oThervise occupy and use the facility, so state a~d give The ful! proper name of such enTiTy and its principal place of_bus!ness. N/A SecTion 2 InformaTion Concernin~ Psci!i:¥ SoushT To Be Finanoe~ T~pe of facility: (a) industrial ; (b) facility for co=mercial enter- prise_ ; (c) parking facility ; (d) pollution control faciliT7 ---.~_.; (e) multi-staTe, regional or national headquarters or opera:ions _ ; (f) facility for The residence and care of The aged ; (g) facility for private accrediTe~ and non-profiT instiTuTions of collegiate education . ; (h) other ~ , if so, describe ~ee attached In~iCaTe ~heT5er facility sought To be financed is a (a) new facility N/A ; (b) existing facility ; or (c) addition to or ~dification of ~s:ing facility - TYPe of business or activity :o be conducted and pu~ose of facility sought to be fi~nced. ~lain proposed use of facility by applicant and/or °:hers and, if a ~nufac:uring plan:, :he type of products :o be manufac:ure~. ~ached Schedule B. Specific site location, including street nu=ber, if available and apDroxi_ ~a~e acreage or size of site: N/A General description of proposed facility (describe type of construction, square footage, amount for each operation such as manufacturing, storage, office, etc.): N/A Name and address of archi:et:, if re:ained: N/A Telephone No., (. ) ¢ive name of presen: o~ers(s) of si:e: N/A If an e-~is:ing facility_ (a) what is its present use? ~ployees presently ~mployed on year round basis annual salary per such employee. $ ; (b) number of regular ; and (c) average ~ applican: is no: the present o~er of :he site, state ~hat, if any~hing, has been done concerning :he location and acquisition of a s±:e by or Dn behalf N/A Ste:e the present zonlu$ classification of the si:e under the Zoning Ordinance of :he City of Lynchbur$: N/A zoning change re~uire~? YES NO If yes, state the zoning ~las$1fication required: N/~--- 'F~a~e~ number of regular employees to be e=ployed on year round basis acquisition or co=p!etion of facility: N/A ^verage a~nua~ sa~arT per such e~p~oyee: $ ~/~ If application is approved by the Authority, ~hen'~uld applicant anticipate issuance of bonds and ~rk on the facility started? Section 3 Coat of Fao!ll:7 and F!nanc!n~ Estimated total cost of proposed faci!itT: $.. 60 million Maximum amount of financing sought through the Authority: $ 60 million Items of cost to be paid from Authority financing (i.e., land, building, equipment, legal, etc.): .Proceeds will be u~ed to ~a ]~n= t~ ~hospitals to finance or refinance r . COnnection with the · · ~ rovision of heal· If financing ia approved, does applicant expect the Authority bonds to be sold by (a) private placement .. ; or (b) public offering X ~ by private placement, has applicant received a commitment or other assurance from a bank or others ~rith respect to the sale of the bonds? ~ by public offering, name and address of under~riter(s) desired..-'-~ Name ~id~pder, Peabody & co. InCOrporated 10 Hanover Square New York, New York 10005 Telephone No. (212) 510-3000 Name and address of bond counsel desired: Name Williams 707 ~?~+ ~ ~'-=at Richmond, VA 23212 Telephone No. ( ~) v - ~n ,Section 4 Tax In£o~mation State the current assessed value for real estate tax purposes of the land co~prislng the site end e~sting £mprovements thereon. Land $ N/A Z~pr~e~ents $ TOTAL $ Current yearly real property tax on the proposed site: $ N/A Est/mated taxable value of the £acility's real property (bulldlng~ and improvements) to be constructed: $ N/A . Estimated real property tax per year ~r!th respect to the facility ~nen com- pleted ~bp~idings and improvements) using present City of LFnchburg tax rates: $_ ~/A 5. Estimated personal property tax per year ~-lth r~spect to the facility W~en completed, using present City of Lynnhburg tax rates: ~. N/A 6. ~=~a:e8 ~r~au=s' capital tax per year ~:h respec: ~o ~he facility c~ple~e~, using presen~ t~ rates: $ N/h L ~t~te~ business license tax per 2ear ~th respect to the fac!lit2 c~plete~ an~ in use, using present ~ty of L~chbur~ license t~ rates: - , ~' ~=~a=e8 dollar value per year of goo~s an~ se~ices =ha= ~1! be purchased loc~!7 by applicant or other users of ~he fac!!i=y: $ N/A ~ection 5 ~xPlain how the requested financing by the Authority ~rill enable or induce aPPlicant to locate in or remain in the City of Lynchburg and the Commonvealth of Virgin/s? The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to make loans ~ care providers in the Commonwealth. The_~_~.ose of th__e ~am is to provide such providers with a source of ca i~_~l which is both low cost and accessible. By pooling the ~ needs of ~__ several Commonwealth hospitals health care will be enhanced lng the cost of borrowing and thus making it easier for such hospitals to function in a compeitive environment. :: Ls understood and agreed by :he ApplLcant, as evLdence~ by :he e.xecu:Lon an~ ~g hereof, :ha: Applicant (a) ~ill, upou :he filiug of :his applica:i~u, pay :o Sth0ri:y non-refundable fees an~ a~vauces in the :oral ~oumt of $650.00, ~ich includes S250.00 applies:ion fee, (ii) $150.00 advance again: coats of a~ver:is~e~: of ~blic henri., copyin8 amd o~er iociden:al cos:s, and (iii) a $250.00 ad~ance against m Au:hori:y's ~u~sel fees an~, l~ a~dl:ion, (b) ~11 pay. ~e~ bille~, all other a~d ~pe~ses of :he Authority, i~clu~ing :he reasonable fees of its counsel, :~: :o :his applica~ion and any Authority or L~bur~ City ~uncil ~e:ings held ~pllcan: also umderstands aug a&rees :ha: in :he even: :he ~:hority approves ~lication and adopts an induc~ent resolution and/or em:ers into an indua~en: contract respa: thereto and thereafter author~es the issuance of its ~nds or no:es ~o !~ce a .facUlty on behalf of the Applicant, all costs of :he ~:hori~ lu ~any ~ch issue, lnaludinE :he reasonable fees of i:s cou~el and bond cou~el, ~11 ~pa~ either fr~ the process of :he ls~e or directly by the ~plicant or, if su~ or notes are no: isled for any reason, then ~:ec:ly by the ~plican:. · e Applicant understands that :he approval or disapproval of :his applica:ion is ~l~ the discretion of the Au:hori~ and :ha: if appr~ed by :he Authority :he :eques:ed ~m~ ~11 also h~e ~o ~ appr~e~ by :he City ~uncil of :he Ci~ of L~chburg and ~0~: ~loca:ion (~nd lssuinE au:hority) ~de :o the ~:hori:y for :he issuance of ~uds or notes under :he s:a:e ltei: for :he la.muse of su~ ~nds or notes as ~ed in Section 103 of :he Inte~al Revenue ~e of 195~. as ~ende~, and ~ulatioM issued :hereunder, and as prodded by any applicable s:a:e legislation, ~cutive order, ad~nistra:lve rules or re&ula:io~; that the ~:horicy and/6r City ~1 ~y require addi:ional financial an~ other i~o~ation fr~ :he Applicant; that ~:hor!:y rese~es :he righ: :o approve or disapprove bond cou~el ~:h respect to issue; :hat if this application is approved and Au:horl:y ~nds or notes are ~:e~fter issued all financing doc~en:s shall be In fo~ and ~bs:ance s~isfac:o~ ~e~:ho:i:y, irs cou~el and bond counsel for the is&me and shall includg ":~i~fac:o~ :o :he Au:hority and its cou~el ~th res~c: :o inde~lf~n8 the Authority ~.Pa7~n: by Applican: :o the Au:horl:y of an annul payment ~o be applied to '~e:L:y's general opera:in& a~d aunt e~ense ~!le such ~nds or notes are outs:and- ~t :ha: if :he Au:hori:y adop:s an lnduc~en: resolu:ion and/or enters into an ~=~en: con:rat: ~:h respec: to the issuance of bonds or notes on behalf of ~eteaf:er before :he issuance of its bon~ or no,es de:e~ines (I) :ha: any ~:erial '°~:lon fu~ished :he Au:hori~ or the Cl:y ~uncil by or on behalf of the Applican ]~al~e or =sleadi~E, or (2) If al:er :he adop:io~ of su~ resolution :he proposed ~ng ls no: :hereaf:er aDDrowed by :he City ~uncil of :he Ci: of L chbur or a '~r .... Y ~ g allo=a:Lou of bond is~ng au:ho:ltv is no: made o= (3) ~f a roved b the -~ and :he Ci: Council and a r ' ' ~ -. Y p ope: allocation of bond :ssu~ng authority is ~ ?l:can: has no=, ~:hin :he c~endar year or other period of :~e ~:h reset: :e~ bo~d lssul:~ authori~ is ~de applicable, made all necessa~ arrangements . ~ 0f l: ~h respec: :o the is~ance an~ sale of :he bonds or no:es and :he ~a~g of :he facility :o be fi~nced therebw, or if for cnw other reason :he ~nds ~ u:, rese~es and sh~l have the right in its cole discretion ~o revoke or .~ ~u~ lnduc~en: resolution and/or induc~en: :on:rac: ~ich :he Au:horSt has ~:Y S intention so :o do, addressed and ~iled zo :he ~olicant a: i:s address ~ :his APplies:ion, --' s~ec:f~llY sub--:ced :h:s ~ day of~ , , 19 r~ . Mic~-AliAntic States. inc. BOARD OF DIP~CTORS (3/85) willia/n R. Reid, Adaninistrator ¢0~unity Hospital of Roanoke Valley I01 Elm Avenue, $.E. P.0. Box 12946 R0anoke, VA 24029 {703) 985-8000 Leonard E. Cantre!l, Jr., Exec. Director Harford Memorial Hospital 501 South Union Avenue Havre De Grace, ~D 21078 /301) 939-2400 Arthur A. Maher, President/CEO St. Joseph's Hospital 19th St. & Murdoch Avenue P.O. Box 327 ~arkersbu~g, WV 26101 {304) 424-4111 Ra~ond E. Hogan, Executive Vice President Lync,h.%urg General-Marshall Lodge Hospitals Tare Springs Road Lynchburg, VA 24506 (B04) 528-2108 W. Grant Heggie, Jr. ~.~A Mid-At!antic States, Inc. 909 Duke Street AleXandria, VA 22314 (705) 549-3031 ~',, ~dWard Sweet, Jr., President ~?e::andria ~ospit~! ~0 Seminary Road A~exandria, VA 22304 (~0~) 379-3167 ~,~ R. M~=che!l, Pres~den= R~ r Executive [~%;?tk, VA 23501 ~; 466-~6!5 SCHEDULE A Chail-man Vice Chai?man Secretary President D~fiA :%iD_ATLANTIC STATES OF DiR~-XZTORS james C. Crews, President charleston Area Medical Center p. O. Box 1547 ~rooks & Washington Streets charleston, ~W 25326 1304) 348-7627 Normal E. Carpenter, Administrator Martha. Jefferson Hospital 459 LocuSt Avenue charlottesville, VA 22901 (804) 293-0111 William F. JacobS, Jr., President Mary Washington Hospital 2300 Fall Hill Avenue Fredericksburg, VA 22401 1703) 899-1403 Nick Rajacich, Executive Vice President Memorial Hospital at Easton Maryland South Washington Street Saston, MD 21601 {301) 822-1000 XT-5501 Kenneth R. Fultz, A~ministrator Montgomery General Hospital Washington & Sixth Avenue Montgomery, WV 25136 {304) 442-4511 or. 949-5291 William L. Sheppard, A~ministrator Princeton Community Hospital 12th Street Princeton, WV 24740 1304) 425-3471 LeSter L. Lamb, President ~adford Community Hospital ~i~hth & Randolph Streets Sox 3527 Radford, VA 24141 (703) 731-2000 Gerald W. DeEaven, Adminstrator aamp,on Memorial Hospital 100 Fairview Drive, Drawer 817 Pranklin, VA 23851 (804) 562-6633 PAGE TWO V~TL~NT!C STATES ~ O~ DIRECTORS PAGE T~RE~ Marc Gelinam VRA Reaional Vice Presiden.t. ~$% MAin Street, =.ui%e A i{ooreStOWn, NJ 08057 (609) 866-1177 Joseph B. Ahlmchier, Premiden~ Milford Memorial Hospital clark Avenue, Box 199 Milford, Delaware 19963 {302) 422-3311 sCHEDULE B NO facility ~er se will be financed with bond proceeds directly; rath~r~--the proceeds of the bonds will be deposited in=o a loan pool and will be used to make loans to VHA - member hospitals to finance equipment and capital needs in connection with the delivery of health care services. C~ce of ,he Cra/Cle~ November 9, 1988 File #60-467 Mr. Joel ,~. Schlanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. SchIanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29348, amending and reor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 General and Grant Funds Appropriations, ~roviding for appropriation of $51,600.00 for the Family Life Education Program, to provide for the development and implementation of £ami ly life curriculum; and appropriation of $6,250.00 for the 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair to be hosted by Roanoke City, which Ordinance ,',lo. 29348 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincereiy, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra pc: lir. tV. Robert Herbert, City Manager Mr. ,lames M. Turner, Chairman, Roanoke City School Doard, P. O. Box 1020, Salem, Virginia 24153 Dr. Frank P. Tota, Superintendent of Schools, P. O. Box 13145, Roanoke, Virginia 24031 Mr. Richard L. Kelley, Executive for Business Affairs and Clerk of the Board, P. O. Box 13105, Roanoke, Virginia 24031 Room456 MunicipalBuildin9 215 C~urch Avenue SW Roanoke Vkg,nia24011 (703)981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29348. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain certain sections of the 1988-89 General and Grant Funds Appropriations, and providing for an emergency. WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the City of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 General and Grant Funds Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: General Fund Appropriations Education Other Uses of Funds (1) ............................. Instruction (2) ..................................... $57,445,683 504,499 42,343,188 Grant Fund Appropriations Education Family Life Education 88-89 (3-9) ................... 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair (10-il). Revenue Education Family Life Education 88-89 (12) .................... 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair (13-14). 1) Transfers to Grant Fund 2) Matching Funds 3) Indirect Costs (001-060-6005-6999-0911) $ 1,600 (001-060-6001-6311-0588) ( 1,600) (001-060-6944-6306-0201) 1,000 $17,607,710 51,600 6,250 $17,607,710 51,600 6,250 4) Consultants 5) Printing 6) Stipends 7) Travel 8) Inservice 9) Educational Materials 10) Travel Expenses 11) Instructional Materials 12) State Grant Receipts 13) Local Match 14) Contributions (035-060-6944-6306-0313) $ 2,500 (035-060-6944-6306-0351) 3,500 (035-060-6944-6306-0381) 12,000 (035-060-6944-6306-0554) 7,600 (035-060-6944-6306-0587) 10,000 (035-060-6944-6306-0614) 15,000 (035-060-6945-6311-0554) 3,700 (035-060-6945-6311-0614) 2,550 (035-060-6944-1100) (035-060-6936-1101) (035-060-6936-1103) 51,600 1,600 4,650 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, an emergency existing, this Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. November 7, 19~ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Joel M. Schlanger School Board Request to Appropriate Grant Funds I have reviewed the attached request to appropriate grant funds for the School Board. The Family Life Education grant is 100% state funded. The Western Regional Science Fair is funded with contributions from other school districts and a $1,600.00 local match. Funding for the local match is available in the Instruction category of the General Fund Education budget in account number 001-060-6001-6311-0588 (Matching Funds). I recommend that you concur with this request of the School Board. JMS/kp Attachment ec~tor of FinancO  /~1 James NL Turner, Jr., Chairman Sallye T. Coleman, Vice Chairman Donald Bartal f/.- Roanoke Ct¥ Schoo Board {Warflyn C. Curtis Edwin R. Feinour Velma B. Seif UJitlla~ Ujhite, Sr. Frank P. Tota, Superintendent Richard L Kelley, Clerk of the Board P.O Box 13105, Roanoke, Virginia 24031 · 703-981-2381 October 26, 1988 The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Members of Council: As the result of official School Board action at its meeting of October 25, 1988, the School Board respectfully requests City Council to appropriate funds to the following school accounts: Grant No. 6944- $51,600 for the Family Life Education program to provide for the development and implementation of family life curriculum. The program is one hundred percent funded by state monies. Grant No. 6945- $6,250 for the 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair which is being hosted by Roanoke City. School Districts will contribute toward the cost of the fair, with a local match cost to Roanoke City Schools in the amount of $1,600. Richard L. Kelley Clerk of the Board and" Executive for Business Affairs rg CC: Mr. James M. Turner, Jr. Dr. Frank P. Tota Mr. William L. Murray, Jr. Mr. Kenneth F. Mundy, Jr. Mr'. W. Robert Herbert r. Wilburn C. Dibling r,~ Joel M. Schlanger (with accounting details) Excellence in' Education ROJ~IOI~ CITY SCRO01~ BOARD Roanoke, Virginia APPROPRIATION P~UEST Family Life Education 1988-89 6944 035-060-6944-6306-0201 035-060-6944-6306-0313 035-060-69¢4-6306-0351 035-060-6944-6306-0381 035-060-6944-6306-0554 035-060-6944-6306-0587 035-060-6944-6306-0614 Appropriation Unit Z95 Indirect Costs Consultant Printing Stipends Travel Inservice Educational Materials 1,000.00 2,500.00 3,500.00 12,000.00 7,600.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 $ 51,600.00 035-060-6944-1100 State Grant Receipts 51,600.00 The Family Life Education program will provide for the development and implementation of the family life curriculum. The program is one hundred percent funded by state monies. The program will end June 30, 1989. October 25, 1988 RO~NO~ CITY SCROOL BOaen Roanoke, Virginia APPROPRIATION REOUEgT 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair 6945 035-060-6945-6311-0554 035-060:6945-6311-0614 Travel Expenses Instructional Materials Total Appropriation Unit 296 $ 3,700,00 2,550.00 $ 6r250.00 035-060-6936-1101 035-060-6936-1103 Local Match $ 1,600.00 Contributions 4,650.00 $ 6,250.00 The 1989 Western Virginia Regional Science Fair is being hosted by Roanoke City. School Districts will contribute toward the cost of the fair, with a local match cost to Roanoke City Schools in the amount of 81,600 to be taken from account 001-060-6001-6311-0588. The grant period will end June 30, 1989. October 25, 1988 C~ce of flhe Cih/Clerk November 9, 1988 File #184-58 Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear lit. tterbert: [ am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29351, authorizing execution of a contract and related documents with Delta Dentai Plan of Virginia, to provide group dental insurance for employees of the City and members of their families, for a term of two years beginning January 1, 1989, and ending December 31, 1990, which Ordinance No. 29351 was adopted by the Council of the City of ~oanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra Eno. pc: Mr. Tom Booker, Delta Dental, 3807 arandon Avenue, S. Suite 360, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 }~r. Joel bi. SchIanger, Director of Finance Mr. George C. Snead, Jr., Director of Administration and Public Safety Mr. Kenneth S. Cronin, Manager, Personnel Management lis. Jayne ~. Smith, Benefits Coordinator Room 456 Municipal Building 215 C~u~'ch Avenue SW Roanoke V~rg~nio 240'11 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29351. VIRGINIA, AN ORDINANCE authorizing the execution of a contract and related documents with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia to provide group dental insurance for employees of the City and members of their families; and providing for an emergency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City ~anager is hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the City, to execute a contract with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia, for group dental insurance for a term of two years beginning January 1, 1989, and ending December 31, 1990, and any other necessary and appropriate documents setting forth the obligations of each party thereto, and setting forth such terms as shall be consistent with the terms negotiated by and between the City and Delta Dental Plan of Virginia and described in a report to Council by the City ~anager dated November 7, 1988, and the attachments thereto. Said contract shall be delivered, if possible, to the City not later than December 15, 1988, fully executed by Delta Dental Plan of Virginia and ready for execution by the City. Such contract and any other necessary and appropriate documents shall be in form approved by the City Attorney. 2. In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordi- nance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. Attest: City Clerk. Office of the C~,¥ Cle~ November 9, 1988 File #501-184-58 Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear ~r. Herbert: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29350, authorizing execution of a contract and related documents with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, to provide group hospitalization and health insurance for employees of the City and members of their fami- lies, for a term of one year beginning January 1, 1989, and ending December 31, 1989, which Ordinance No. 29350 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a ,egular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, .Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra pc: Mr. Tom Alcoke, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, P. O. Box 13047, Roanoke, Virginia 24045 Mr. Joel M. Schlanger, Director of Finance ~r. George Co Snead, .ir., Director of Administration and Public Safety Mr. Kenneth S. Cronin, Manager, Personnel Management Ms. Jayne M. Smith, Benefits Coordinator Room456 Municil:x~iBuilOing 215 C~urch Avenue SW Rc.x~no~e V~rg~nia24011 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29350. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the execution of a contract and related documents with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia to provide group hospitalization and health insur- ance for employees of the City and members of their fami- lies; and providing for an emergency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the City, to execute a contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, for group hospitalization and health insurance for a term of one year beginning January 1, 1989, and ending December 31, 1989, and any other necessary and appropriate documents setting forth the obligations of each party thereto, and setting forth such terms as shall be consistent with the terms negotiated by and between the City and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia and described in a report to Council by the City Manager dated November 7, 1988, and the attachments thereto. Said contract shall be delivered, if possible, to the City not later than December 15, 1988, fully executed by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia and ready for execution by the City. Such contract and any other necessary and appropriate documents shall be in form approved by the City Attorney. 2. In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. Attest: City Clerk. O'~ce of me C!ty Gerk November 9, 1988 File #60-501-184-58 Mr. Joel M. Schlanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear ,~,fr. SchIanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29349, amending and reor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, providing for the transfer of $26,950.00 from the General Fund Contingency to Residual Fringe Benefits, in connec- tion with award of a contract for employees health care insurance to ~iue Cross and Blue Shieid of Virginia, for a one year period from January l, 1989, to December 31, 1989, which Ordinance No. 29349 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on ~ionday, November 7, 1988. Sincere fy,f Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk ~iFP:ra Enc. pc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Mr. George C. Snead, Jr., Director of Administration Public Safety Mr. Kenneth S. Cronin, Manager, Personnel Management Ms. Jayne M. Smith, Benefits Coordinator and Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue SW Poanohe '~rg~nia 24011 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29349. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, emergency. VIRGINIA, certain sections of the and providing for an WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the City of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: Appropriations Nondepartmental Contingency - General Fund (1) ...................... Residual Fringe Benefits (2) ........................ 1) Contingency (001-002-9410-2199) $(26,950) 2) Hosp. Insurance (001-004-9110-1125) 26,950 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, an emergency Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage. $11,199,575 539,365 1,093,950 existing, this ATTEST: City Clerk November 7, 1988 Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mayor and Members of Council: Subject: Executive Summary -- Report on Selection of a Health Care Provider and New Benefits The attached staff report recommends a new one-year employee health insurance contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia. In addition, it recommends a two-year contract with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia for Basic and Preventive Dental coverage. After analyzing bids from a number of insurance carriers, I believe we have a good contract to present to our employees. This program provides new benefits that will encourage employees to take a preven- tative approach to both health and dental care. Employees are being notified, individually, by letter of the proposed contract. Upon recommendation of the Roanoke City Council, we have made additional steps to bring employees into the insurance selection process. A Health Benefits Awareness Committee, representing employees from all areas and all ranks within the city, was appointed in August. They communicated employee insurance needs and continue to serve as employee advocates for this new propo- sal and cost efficient use of the city's health care plan. Several changes and new features have been included in the recommended plan which, if accepted, will represent a 15 percent increase in the cost of health insurance for individuals, and a 16 percent increase for family coverage. This is an excellent improvement from last year's 38 percent increase, and in addi- tion is below the expected 1989 regional trend of 19 to 24 percent. I am recommending that the city continue to pay 90 percent of the cost of individual employee health insurance. The new health care premiums are as follows: Monthly 90% Monthly Employee Cost Increase Rate City Share Per Paycheck Per Paycheck Employee $99.00 $89.00 $5.00 $.77 Employee/Child $149.14 $89.00 $30.07 $4.24 Family $249.88 $89.00 $80.44 $10.82 In addition, I am recommending that the city pay 90 percent of the cost of individual employee dental insurance. Dental insurance has long been requested by our employees and I believe will be seen as a strong benefit. Employees will have the option of purchasing only health insurance, only dental insurance or both. The Delta Dental Plan would cover 100 percent of the cost for diagnostic and preventive care including routine examinations and cleaning twice in a twelve month period. It would also cover 80 percent of the cost for basic care after the deductible is met, excluding crowns, bridges, full and partial den- tures and orthodontics. An advantage to the plan is that coverage for employee and one dependent can mean employee and spouse, not just employee and child. A key factor in obtaining dental insurance is that 75 percent of eligible employees must participate in the program. The new dental care premiums are as follows: Monthly 90% Monthly Employee Cost Rate City Share Per Paycheck Employee $8.14 $7.00 $.57 Employee/1 Dependent $12.94 $7.00 $2.97 Family $24.90 $7.00 $8.95 One change in the health insurance coverage will include a reduction in the percentage paid by Blue Cross once the deductible is met, from 85 percent to 80 percent. However the maximum out-of-pocket expense to the employee will remain the same. Another change is a reduction of the out-patient surgery benefit from 100 percent with no deductible to 90 percent with deductible. These changes coincide with the majority of health care plans in our area. Other cost con- tainment measures include a separate $30 deductible on all emergency room visits unless the patient is admitted to the hospital. This is designed to discourage the use of emergency rooms for everyday problems, and encourage the use of pri- vate physicians. The city's annualized cost of both health and dental insurance for the fiscal year 1989-90 is $1,679,022 which represents a $176,950 increase over fiscal year 1988-89. Funding is available in the Hospitalization Insurance Residual Fringe Benefit Account and in the General Fund Contingency Account to provide for the city's portion of the expense. Blue Cross and Blue Shield has reported that in the first seven months of 1988, claims paid out to city employees were $1,362,018 compared to $1,494,863 in premiums. This is in sharp contrast to the past several years where Blue Cross paid out hundreds of thousands more in claims than was taken in through premiums. I believe this played a strong role in our being able to present such a strong insurance package for 1989, and in addition highlights the fact that our employees are doing a better Job of using their health insurance in a cost effective way. Given the regional and national increases expected this year in health insurance, I believe we have structured a new coverage plan with the most desirable benefits available to every city employee at a reasonable rate. Respectfully submitted, City Manager WRH/MMB Attachment Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council ~anoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: SUBJECT: Selection of a Health Insurance Provider following the expiration of the current contract on December 31, 1988. I. BACKGROUND: The present Comprehensive Health Insurance contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia expires December 31, 1988. Be City currently contributes 90% towards single employee rate. Specifications were developed to obtain competitive proposals for the City's Group Health insurance. De Request for Proposals were completed which included one and two year contracts for the existing Health Insurance Plan and three(3) optional plans including dental coverage. All plans emphasized cost containment and/or enhancement of benefits. Thirty-eight (38) a~ents/brokers were mailed Requests for Proposals on August 24, 1988. A listing of those agents/brokers is attached. (Attachment A) Advertisement of the Request for Proposals was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on August 28, 1988. Six (6) responses were received and publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. on Friday, September 23, in Council's Conference Room. Attachment B) 1988 II. CURRENT SITUATION: Medical Costs have escalated in recent years causing a direct increase in health insurance premiums. Health insurance providers are projecting a 19-24% regional cost trend increase in 1989 assuming a break even situation between premiums and claims experience. Be Claims Experience for the City of Roanoke in the first seven months of 1988 was marginally below the level of premiums for the same time period, which is an indicator that employees have made a conscious effort to use health care benefits wisely and that cost containment features in our current plan are starting to have a positive impact. Claims paid out in the first seven months of this calendar year were $1,362,018 compared to $1,494,863 in premiums. ~3onorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 II. CURRENT SITUATION: (Continued) Health Benefits Awareness Committee was appointed by the City Manager on August 9, 1988. The objectives of the committee were to communicate employee needs and to serve as an employee advocate for health maintenance and cost efficient use of the City's health care plan. Suggestions were made by the Health Benefits Awareness Committee based on educational information provided to the Committee by the City's Health Benefits Consultant and Personnel Management staff. Specific suggestions, which incorporated cost containment measures and enhancement of health maintenance benefits, are as follows: 1. Reduce the co-insurance amount from 85% to 80%. 2. Reduce the out-patient surgery benefit from 100% with no deductible to 90% with deductible. Initiate a separate $30.00 deductible on all emergency room visits unless the patient is admitted to the hospital. Cover accidents at 100% of the first $300.00 with the remainder paid at 80% after the deductible is satisfied. Calculate Family calendar year deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums on an aggregate basis versus a per person method. 6. Cover well baby care at 80% for children under the age of six subject to limitations. Add Dental Insurance which emphasizes a health maintenance approach by covering preventive visits at 100% twice a year and Basic restorative coverage at 80% up to a $1,000 per person maximum per calendar year. Bid Committee was appointed by the City Manager to evaluate the current situation, review proposals and make recommendations. The committee consisted of the following: Director of Finance Director of Administration & Public Safety Manager of Personnel Management Benefits Coordinator '~Dnorable Mayor and City Council Page 3 II. CURRENT SITUATION: (Continued) F. Initial evaluations were made by the Bid Committee and the Department of General Services on the six (6) proposals. Three (3) proposals met specifications on one year contracts, two (2) proposals offered administrative services only which would require the City to assume all financial risk through a self insured program and one (1) proposal offered dental coverage only. G. City Attorney has advised that, in accordance with the City of Roanoke procurement code, negotiations are permissible under Section 23.1-6 for the procurement of Health Insurance Services. Informational meetings were called with four (4) health care companies meeting bid specifications to provide enough comparable data to rank the companies. Suggestions of the Health Benefits Awareness Committee and the City's Benefits Consultant were endorsed by the Bid Committee inasmuch as this approach provides for high quality health care coverage at a reasonable cost. Negotiations were conducted with the first ranked vendor, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia for health insurance and with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia, the first ranked vendor for dental insurance, following the guidelines of the City's procurement code. III. ISSUES: A. Coverage B. Compliance with Specifications C. Qualifications of the Selected Health Care Company D. Cost E. Funding IV. ALTERNATIVES: Council Approve the award of a contract for Health Care Insurance to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia for the period of one (1) year beginning January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1989 and approve the award of a contract for Dental Insurance to Delta Dental Plan of Virginia for the period of two (2) years beginning January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1990. The City contribution would continue to be 90% of the "employee only" cost including dental coverage. Employees may select single, subscriber plus dependent, family or no dental insurance at all based on their individual needs. ~.onorable Mayor and City Council Page 4 IV. ALTERNATIVES: (Continued) Coverage has been restructured to provide for a broader range of health maintenance benefits or "wellness" benefits such as well baby care and basic dental coverage while at the same time encouraging cost awareness. (Attachment C) 2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia and Delta Dental Plan of Virginia complied with specifications of initial bid and responded to the negotiation process. 3. Qualifications of the selected health care companies a. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia (1) Local marketing representatives to service the account by providing up-to-date information on benefits, trouble shooting problem areas and establishing a contact between physicians and employees. (2) Established working relationship with the city and a clear understanding of the group's needs. (3) Participating Network of doctors, hospitals and other providers of health care services that file and accept Blue Cross and Blue Shield's determination of "using a participating doctor are not required to pay any amount over the "usual, customary, and reasonable" fee. (4) Special Customer Service to specifically handle City claim problems to speed up slow response time and reduce the number of computer errors. (5) "Lifestyle" news letter a new educational Publication will be made available to employees ten (10) times during the year to promote a wellness attitude. This benefit will be provided at no cost to the City by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia at a savings of $6,000 annually. (6) COBRA Administration which allows employees who leave the City and their dependents to continue their coverage for eighteen or thirty-six months under the City's plan would be provided for 2% of each continuing participant's monthly premium. 'qonorable Mayor and City Council Page 5 IV. ALTERNATIVES: (Continued) e Delta Dental Plan of Virginia (1) Local marketing representatives to service the account. (2) Participating Network of dentist with 75% participation in the Roanoke Valley. (3) Choice of type of coverage is optional and separate from health insurance. Cost a. Monthly rates would remain constant for the period of the contracts. The full rates are as follows: (1) Health Insurance Rates Employee - $99.00 Employee/Child - $149.14 Family - $249.88 (2) Dental Insurance Rates Employee - $8.14 Employee/Dependent - $12.94 Family - $24.90 Employee Cost after City contribution would be as follows: ADDITIONAL HEALTH PROPOSED PROPOSED BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY BI-WEEKLY COST Employee $ 10.00 $ 5.00 $ .77 Employee/Child 60.14 30.07 4.24 Family 160.88 80.44 10.82 DENTAL* PROPOSED PROPOSED MONTHLY BI-WEEKLY Employee $1.14 $ .57 Employee/Dep. 5.94 2.97 Family 17.90 8.95 * Employees may choose any option based on their specific needs. However, in order for Delta Dental Plan of Virginia to underwrite this benefit, 75% o~ eligible employees must participate in the program, '~3onorable Mayor and City Council Page 6 IV. ALTERNATIVES: (Continued) Present City contribution is $78.00 per participating employee per month. The new contributions based on "employee only" costs would be as follows: Health Insurance $89.00 Dental Insurance 7.00 Total 90% contribution 96.00 $96.00 represents an $18.00 increase per employee per month. Maximum Potential Cost - The annual premiums for one year would be $3,005,261 for both health and dental insurance based on the current enrollment data. Budget Impact - Annualized cost of the program for the fiscal year 1989-90 is $1,679,022 which represents a $176,950 increase over the fiscal year 1988-89 budgeted amount of $1,502,072. The health contract must be renegotiated after the first six months of fiscal year 1989-90. Be Fundin9 is available in the Hospitalization Insurance Residual Fringe Benefit Account (H.I.R.F.B.) and in the General Fund Contingency Account to provide for the City's portion of the expense of this alternative. Council Approve the award of a contract for Health Care Insurance to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia for the period of one (1) year beginning January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1989 for coverage very similar to the present plan. The City contribution would continue to be 90% of the "employee only" cost. Coverage remains very similar to the present plan with a few cost containment changes, such as a $30.00 separate deductible on emergency room visit. (See Attachment D) Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia complied with specifications of initial bid and did respond to negotiation process. (Same as Alternative A) 3. Qualifications of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia would remain the same as in Alternative A. '~3onorable Mayor and City Council Page 7 IV. ALTERNATIVES: (Continued) 4. Cost Se Monthly rates would remain constant for the period of the contract. The full rates are as follows: (1) Health Insurance Rates Employee $102.54 Employee/Child - 154.46 Family - $258.79 (2) Dental Insurance Rates Not offered as an option under this plan. b. Employee cost after follows: PROPOSED HEALTH MONTHLY Employee $10.54 Employee/Child 62.46 Family 166.78 City contribution would be as PROPOSED BI-WEEKLY ADDITIONAL BI- WEEKLY COST $ 5.27 $1.04 31.23 5.40 83.39 13.77 Present City Contribution is $78.00 per participating employee per month. The new contribution based on "employee only" cost, would be $92.00, a $14.00 increase per employee per month. Maximum Potential Cost - The annual premiums for one year would be $2,851,272 for health insurance based on current enrollment data. ee Budget Impact - Annualized cost of the program for the fiscal year 1989-90 is $1,634,754 which represents a $132,682 increase over the fiscal year 1988-89 budgeted amount of $1,502,072. The health contract must be renegotiated after the first six months of fiscal year 1989-90. Funding is available in the Hospital Insurance Residual Fringe Benefit (H.I.R.F.B.) Account to provide for the City's portion of the expense of this alternative. (Same as Alternative A) H6~orable Mayor and City Council Page 8 V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Council Approve the award of the contract for Health Care Insurance to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia for the period of one (1) year beginning January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1989 for the coverage and rates described under Alternative A of this report, and under the terms and conditions contained in the City's present contract with such firm, except as otherwise noted in said report, and authorize the City Manager to execute the same in form as approved by the City Attorney and with the understanding that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia prov~e the the City Manager with said contract, ready for execution no later than December 15, 1988. Council Approve the award of the contract for Dental Insurance to Delta Dental Plan of Virginia for the period of two (2) years beginning January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1990 for coverage and rates described under Alternative A of this report and authorize the City Manager to execute the same with the understanding that Delta Dental Plan of Virginia provide the City Manager with said contract ready for execution no later than December 15, 1988. Council Approve Alternative A and increase the City participation from $78.00 per employee per month to $96.00 per employee per month beginning in December of 1988. Funding of $150,000 was anticipated during the Fiscal Year 1989 Budget Study and provided in the H.I.R.F.B. account. The additional funding of $26,950 should be transferred from the General Fund Contingency Account #001-002-9410-2199 to the Fringe Benefits Non-Departmental Account 9001-004-9110-1125. WRH:elo cc: George C. Snead Joel M. Schlanger Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr. Kenneth S. Cronin Jayne M. Smith Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager ATTAC~TT A INSURANCE BID LIST 1988 Bid Ogening - September 23, Bid Number 88-8-60 1988 Blue Cross and Blue shield of Va. P.O. Box 13047 Roanoke, Virginia 24045 Attn: Tom Alcoke Marketing - 7th Floor Davis & Stephenson, Inc. P.O. Box 1300 Roanoke, Virginia 24006 Charles Lunsford Sons & Assoc. P.O. Box 2571 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. P.O. Box 12748 Roanoke, Virginia 24028 Chaney Thomas Stephenson & Hill P.O. Box 1600 Roanoke, Virginia 24005 Insurance Assoc., Inc. P.O. Box 4800 Roanoke, virginia 24015 Hartford Insurance Group 3140 Chaparral Drive SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Home Insurance Co.. 4224 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Life Insurance Co. of Va. 5115 Bernard Drive SW Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Metropolitan Life Insurance 3807 Brandon Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Travelers Insurance Co. 5204 Bernard Drive SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States c/o Thomas E. Link P.O. Box 13526 Roanoke, Virginia 24035 Bankers Life & Casualty Co. 6136 Peters Creek Road N-W Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Mr. Alex Martin Finance Service Insurance Agency 4415 Electric Road SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Thomas G. Karrasch, CLU Prudential Insurance Co. 1802 Electric Road SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Shenandoah Life Insurance 2301 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Aetna Life & Casualty 4235 Electric Road SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Flora & Martin c/o Joel Nichols P.O. Box 3130 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Allstate Insurance 1819 Electric Road SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Lincoln National Life 617 S. Jefferson St. SW Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Teachers Protective Mutual Life Insurance 5204 Bernard Drive SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 McDonough Caperton Employee Benefits P.O. Box 1051 Roanoke, Virginia 24005 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 New York Life 111 Franklin Plaza Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Nationwide Insurance Co. 7307 williamson Road NW Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Liberty Mutual Insurance 3223 Brandon Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Kansas City Life 1344 Clarke Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Paul J. Houseman 1901 Memorial Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Mutual of Omaha 1314 Peters Creek Road NW Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Lawrence C. Musgrove Assoc. P.O. Box 13487 Roanoke, Virginia 24034 Delta Dental 3807 Brandon Ave. SW suite 360 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Attn: Nancy Smith or Carol Stuart Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp. Innsbrook Corporate Center P.O. Box 31353 Richmond, Virginia 23294 Attn: Robert L. Fahlman Roanoke, District Vice President of Sales Mr. Bill Kite D & S Life Insurance P.O. Box 629 Roanoke, Virginia 24004 Mr. Richard V. Quinn, Jr. The Principal Financial Group 6307 Executive Blvd. Rockville, Maryland 20852 Charles Lascola Benefit Consultant Service P.O. Box 6096 Newport News, Virginia 23606 Duke & Associates 7 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Horace Mann Co. 4502 Starkey Road SW suite 203-A Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Robert Bye & Company, Inc. 2447 colonial Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ATTACHMENT B RESPONDING COMPANIES American General (Presented by: H. L. Duke & Company, Inc.) Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia Commonwealth Health Alliance, Inc. (Presented for National Administrative Services, Inc. by: D & S Life Agency, Inc.) Delta Dental Plan of Virginia - Dental Only McDonough Caperton Benefit Services, Inc. (Presented by: D & S Life Agency, Inc.) The Travelers (Presented by: Insurance Associates, Inc.) ATTACHMENT C ALTERNATIVE A BENEFIT DESIGN $1,000,000 $100.00 $200.00 80% $750.00 $1500.00 (Aggregate) (includes deductible) Aggregate (includes deductible) 30 days per calendar year 50% $1,000 Maximum 90% (with deductible) 100% of the first $300.00 $30.00 deductible per visit 80% (with deductible) 80% (with deductible) 100% $25.00 deductible Lifetime Maximum Individual Calendar Year Deductible Family Calendar Year Deductible Payment Level Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum Family Out-of-Pocket Maximum Inpatient Nervous & Mental Outpatient Nervous & Mental Outpatient Surgery Outpatient Accidental Injuries All Emergency Room visits excluding when patient is admitted Prescription Drugs (including Birth Control and Nicorette) Well Baby Care DENTAL COVERAGE Preventive Coverage (i.e., check-ups, cleaning & X-rays) Individual Calendar Year Deductible for Basic Coverage $75.00 80% deductible Family Calendar Year Deductible for Basic Coverage Payment Level for Basic Services (i.e., fillings, extractions, peridontal, etc.) ATTAC~ENT D ALTERNATIVE B BENEFIT DESIGN $1,000,000 $100.00 $200.00 85% $750.00 (Aggregate) includes deductible $1500.00 (Aggregate) includes deductible 30 days per calendar year Lifetime Maximum Individual Calendar Year Deductible Family Calendar Year Deductible Payment Level Individual Out-of-Pocket Maximum Family Out-of-Pocket Maximum Inpatient Nervous & Mental 50% - $1,000 Maximum 100% (no deductible) 100% of the first $300 $30.00 deductible per visit 85% (with deductible) Outpatient Nervous & Mental Outpatient Surgery Outpatient Accidental Injuries Ail Emergency Room visits excluding when patient is admitted Prescription Drugs (including Birth Control and Nicorette) Well Baby Care 85% (with deductible) Office of ~e Ci~,' Clerk November 9, 1988 File #175 ~tr. W. Robert tferbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear ~.Ir. Herbert: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29352, authorizing appropriate City officials to execute, on behalf of the City, a close-out agreement with the Gainsboro Project Area Committee and the Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation as subgrantees of the City under the Community Development Block Grant, which Ordinance ~o. 29352 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. ~incerely, ~~ lqary F. Parker, C~,fC City Clerk MFP:ra pc: Mr. Michael Dowe, President, Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation, 2912 ~mbassy Drive N. iq. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ' , '~fr. Percy T. Keeling, Chairman, Gainsboro Project Area Committee, 1519 Syracuse Avenue, ~. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 ~r. George HelIer, Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Organization, 304 Fairfax Avenue, ~. ~. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 tlr. Earl B. Reynolds, .Ir., Assistant City Manager Ms. Marie T. Pontius, Grants Monitoring Administrator Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenu~ SW Roanoke Wrg~nia 24011 (703) 98t-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29352. VIRGINIA, AN ORDINANCE authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute on behalf of the City a close-out agreement with the Gainsboro Project Area Committee and the Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation as subgrantees of the City under the Community Development Block Grant, and providing for an emergency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City Manager or the Assistant City Manager and the City Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, in form approved by the City Attorney, the appropriate close-out agreement with the Gainsboro Project Area Committee and the Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation, as subgrantees Under the Community Development Block Grant, as well as any Other necessary written documentation, providing for property disposi- tion and management of certain properties, as more particularly set forth in the report to this Council dated November 7, 1988. 2. In order to provide for the Usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Dear Members of Council: Subject: Disposition of property owned by Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) I. Background: Gainsboro Project Area Committee (PAC) and Gainsboro Neighborhood Development CorDoration (GNDC) have been subgrantees of the City s~nce July 19~1 under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) owns property (7 structures and 8 lots) purchased with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. (see Attachment A for list). Federal regulations (24 CFR 570.503(b)(8)) require that upon expiration of the funding agreement between Grantee (City) and Subgrantee (Gainsboro), CDBG assets shall revert to the Grantee (City). Any real property that was acquired or improved by a subgrantee with CDBG funds in excess of $25,000 must either be: Used t_~o meet one of the national objectives of HUD until five years after expiration of the respective funding agreement, or Disposed of in a manner that results in the city's being reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value of the property less any portion of the value attributable to non-CDBG funds. (Reimbursement is not required after the five year period of time). II. Current Situation: ae Contractual agreement between City and Gainsboro (GNDC) will expire December 31, 1988. ~NDC ~ishes to retain ownership of property and to retain incom~-from property to support neighborhood center. C. Use of property (occupancy by low and moderate income Mayor and Members of Council Page 2 III. De families) would remain the same. This would satisfy HUD requirement of meeting one of national objectives. (Benefit to low and moderate income people). GNDC .has developed a property di_~p_osition and management Rlan (see Attachment B) which addresses sale of some property, continued rent of some property, and costs for management, maintenance, and operation of community center. ~ssues: A. Legal issues Be Compliance ~ith federal reg_91ations Cost to City Community development ob~ CDBG Program income IV. Alternatives: Authorize City Manager to execute a close-out agreement with Gainsboro PAC and ~-~DC as specified in Attachment C. Agreement prescribes what is to be done with four properties whose CDBG investment exceeds $25,000. Remaining property would remain in ownership of GNDC free and clea~ following expiration of contract. 1. Legal issues would be addressed through mutually acceptable agreement among City, Gainsboro PAC and GNDC. Se Compliance with federal r_~_gulations would be met by provisions that ~roperty continue to benefit low and moderate income persons for five years after fiscal year of last CDBG investment. See Attachment D, letter from HUD officials in Richmond. Cost to City would be lost CDBG revenue from program income generated by properties. (ApProximately $100,000 CDBG share of resale value) Community development objectives would be addres ~Y allowin~ GNDC to ~a~ntain housin f ~_~sed moderate · g or low income families, and giving GNDC a source of revenue to contribute to their self-sufficiency. CDBG program income would not be generated since HUD defines program income as "gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG funds." Mayor and Members of Council Page 3 After December 31, 1988 neither PAC nor GNDC will be subrecipients of the City. Do not authorize City Manaqer to execute close-out agreement as proposed. -- 1. Legal issues would remain a question, since some agreement will be needed to close out City's grant relationship with PAC and GNDC. 2. Compliance with federal re_~_qlations would have to be met some other way. See Alternative C. 3. Cost to City would be in staff time for continued monitoring of houses and program income. 4. Community development ~ would be addr - ' · ~sed ~hrough the housing provided to low and modera income families. Clear title to four subject properties would be in question. GNDC would not be self-sufficient and independent. 5. CDBG proqram income will have to be returned to City as long as PAC and/or GNDC remains a subrecipient of the City. Direct GNDC to sell subject property (four structures) at fair-'mark~ value'and return proceeds (est $100 000) to city. · , ~egal issues would be handled by GNDC's attorney. Costs would be deducted from sale proceeds. ~ with federal re_~g_ulations would be assured since thls is one option given in 24 CFR 570.503(b)(8). ~ost to City would be nothing. Community development objectives of providing housing wo~ld still be addressed, but this would remove a source of revenue to GNDC for their continued operation. CDBG ~ income from the proceeds of the sale would be returned To the city's CDBG accounts as required by federal regulations. V. Recommendation: Adopt Alternative A which would authorize City Manager to execu'te a close-out agreement w~th ~a~nsboro p - · ~ approved by City Attorney = ~ ~ ~ .... A? and GNDC in form ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ a~acnment C. Mayor and Members of Council Page 4 WRH/MTP Attachments: A. B. C. D. Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager List of property owned by GNDC GNDC property disposition plan Proposed close-out agreement among City, Gainsboro PAC and GNDC. Letter from HUD saying procedure is in compliance with regulations. CC. Assistant City Manager City Attorney Director of Finance Grants Monitoring Administrator Executive Director, Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation President, Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation Chairman, Gainsboro Project Area Committee Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation Property ATTACHMENT A A. Houses: 7 properties Grant Purchase Rehab Address Date Tax Number Price 1. 127 Patton Ave 1987 2010913 $ 4,328 $ -0- $ 4,328 2. 422 Rutherford 1984 2021703 $15,360 $11,750 $27,110- 3. 420 Rutherford 1984 2021704 $ 7,444 $26,961 $34,405* 4. 410 Rutherford 1983 2021707 $ 6,622 $ 8,998 $25,620* 5. 318 Rutherford 1987 2021714 $ 6,009 $ -0- $ 6,009 6. 319 Harrison 1987 2021756 $ 5,500 $ -0- $ 5,500 7. 304 Fairfax 1987 2010715 $ 6,850 $25,000 $31,850- Lots: 8 properties Grant Address m~A _ . Purchase ~=== Tax Number Price Improve Total 1. Rutherford 1982 2021691 $ 1,500 -0- $ 1,500 2. Rutherford 1982 3.. Rutherford 1982 4. Rutherford '1983 5. Rutherford 1982 6. Rutherford 1982 7. Harrison 1984 8. Rutherford 1982 2021692 $ 1,500 -0- $ 1,500 2021708 $ 998 -0- $ 998 2021709 $ 9,988 -0- $ 9,988 2021715 $ 1,100 -0- $ 1,100 2021718 $ 1,224 -0- $ 1,22A 2021746 $ 6,850 -0- $ 6,850 2022145 $ 1,500 -0- $ 1,500 Properties' covered by CDBG real property regulations 570. 503 (b) (8) ATTACHMENT page 1 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ~ DISPOSITION PLAN GAINSBORO NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 Submitted By: George H.R. Heller, GNDC Administrator O ens -ommJttee. Inc. ATTACHMENT B page 2 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE/%NTENT The Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) was founded upon the concept and principle that the Gainsboro Project Area Committee (PAC) and its corporation would be able to become self-sufficient. It has been the overall intent of the GNDC and PAC to work towards that end. The PAC and GNDC over the past seven (7) or more years has proven that it can operate in a busi- ness-like manner and that it can develop, initial and carry out projects. The current period is a transitional period for the organization(s) and it is intperative that the GNDC and PAC be offered the opportunity to adjust and stablize, as an organization and corporation, without Federal funding as its primary support base. In order that the GNDC and PAC may make such an adjustment, it stands to reason, that a realistic plan to aid and abet that transition be set forth, in a cooperative manner with its former Grantor, the City of Roanoke. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have agreed to the "principle" of Property Transferal and as such has provide an avenuewhereas GNDC and PAC can move to greater self dependence. In this light, the "Property Management Plan ann Property Disposition Plan being submitted should take into account a major consideration and that is-in order for PAC and GNDC to remain viable, it must maintain "Control" over its "rental" properties, which at the present are its primary source of income. Therefore, the intent and purpose of the Property Management Plan and Disposition Plan should be viewed as such. GNDC and PAC intend to "sell" such properties to maintain a Staff and the Community Center that a coordinated and cohesive "Plan" of revitalization may continue in the Gainsboro Project Area. These plans are therefore submitted to show our overall intent with regards to certain properties owned by the GNDC and our sense of responsibility toward them. It should in no way be construed that GNDC or PAC should give up every thing that it has worked hard to accomplish over the past seven years. 604 GAINSBORO ROAD, N.W. ROANOKE, VIROINIA 24016 (703) 345-3367, 3368 ATTACHMENT B page 3 GAINSBORO NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROPERTY M-~NAGEMENT PLAN September 26, 1988 The Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) will continue to manage the properties it currently owns. The GNDC will retain the services of Ms. Margaret Turpin to oversee the general management of these properties. The job responsibility will be as follows: 1. Collection of all rents (currently due the first of the month), and to record such collections in an appropriate manner. 2. Inspections [periodically) of all rental properties. S. Payment of such bills as required with regards to the maintenance and upkeep of the rental properties and operational cost o£ the Gainsboro Community Center. (In accordance with the projected budget, see attachment #1) 4. Payment o£ other "bills" due the GNDC such as liability Insurance and other such designated expenditures $. Depositing of rental Income to the GNDC's bank of records 6. Alerting the GNDC Board of any problems that arise needing their imput and decision making. The services of the Property Management Services will be compensated at Two thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($2,400.00) @ 200.00 per 12 ~0s. Note: It is anticipated by GNDC that by September, 1989, other funds will have been secured for Management Cost and to supplemant any additional operational expenses. ATTACHMENT B page 4 PROPERTY DISPOSITION PLAN I. RENTAL UNITS 1. The GNDC will sell at its discretion (upon "resale" of the properties by the City of Roanoke to the GNDC) certain "Rental Properties" located in the 400 Block of Rutherford ye. N.W. known as 410, 420, respectively. 2. The GNDC will solicit a reputable Real Estate Firm or Agent to ~arket such Properties, actively, for a period of not less than six (6} months or more than twelve (12) months.The properties will be sold in the overall interst of the neighborhood to continue revitalization efforts. 3. The GNDC will be responsible for the "general" maintenance of its rental units and will set aside funds for such upkeep in its budget (see attachment #1). 4. The GNDC will retain ownership of two (2] vacant units located at 319 Harrison Ave. N.W. and 318 Rutherford Ave. N.W. These units are to be rehabilitated as low income rental and will not be marketed for sale, the rental income will be used to cover the Permanent Mortgage Loan to VHDA. 5. The GNDC will retain ownership of 304 Fairfax (Gainsboro Community Center) and the Apartment, the income from the apartment will be used to pay the rehabilitation loan to Impact Housing, Inc. 6. The GNDC will retain rental property locatd at 422 Rutheford Ave. N.W.-generated income will be used to cover operational and Property ~anagement Cost. II. VACANT DWELLINGS ~ VACANT LOTS 1. The GNDC will hold the option to "sell" such vacant lots at its discretion, or to use such lots in a constructive way to benefit the overall neighborhood revitalization plan. If sold certain Deed restrictions will require that construction begin within an alloted time, and that any/all plans for such, be approved by the GNDC and appropriate parties. 2. The GNDC will set aside funds in an amount that will be deter- mined by the proceeds from the sale of marketed property(s), for the continued operational cost of the Gainsboro Community Center, and the upkeep and general maintenance of rental properties and vacant lots. ATTACHMENT B page 5 SHORT TERM/LONG TERM DISPOSITION PLAN Short Term: 1-6 Month~ 410 & 420 Rutherford Ave. N.W.-The GNDC has already marketed 410 Rutherford Ave. N.W. for Sale (currently a Section 8 Rental Unit). The GNDC will uon the sale of 410 Rutherford, concurrently market 420 Rutherford Ave. N.W. (It should be noted that no sale will occur until the retransfer of-all,~p_Ep_~erties to the GNDC has occurred. 127 Patton Ave. N.W.-The vacant dwelling will be sold within one (1) to three months after "resale" of property to the GNDC. A prospective buyer has already indicated interest in the property. Long Term: 422 Rutherford Ave. N.W.-Will be retained by the GNDC as a rental unit and S04 Fairfax Ave. N.W., the Gainsboro Conununity Center. S19 Harrison/S18 Rutherford.-The two dwellings (currently vacant) should be completely renovated on or before December $1, 1988. It is the intention of GNDC to retain control of these two (2) units. The rental income will be used to repay the VHDA Permanent Mortgage Loan. tong Term: Vacant Lots The main impetus of the lon~ range plan will be to sell the vacant lots along Rutherford Ave. (southside) or to build new housing on such properties if funds are available. One lot, formly known as 405 Harrison will be retained, it is non buildable at the current time. If a definite plan is at some point conceived or implemented in the Harrison Ave. area, it could be sold or donated. ATTACHMENT #1 ANTICIPATED REVENUE GNDC'~ BUDGET BASED ON TEN MONTH FOR TWELVE MONTHS November 1, 1988-October $, 1989 ATTACHMENT page 6 I NC OME RENTAL INCOM~ 420 Rutherford @ 225.00 per mo. 422 Rutherford @ 240.00 per mo. 304B Eairfax @ 285.00 per mo. Total projected Income: $750.00 " ,, $2,250.00 per 10 mos. 2,400.00 " ', ,, 2~850.00 " " ,, $7,500.00 " " ,, SALE OF RENTAL PROPERTY (410 Rutherford Ave. Income to GNDC [after fees, etc.) Total Anticipated Revenue (GNDC Income based on rental income @ Rutherford ave.). 10 months plus $17,500.00 $25,000.00 sale of 410 EXPENDITURES FIXED COST: Permanent Mortgage Loan to Impact Housing Inc. for re- habilitation of the Gainsboro community Center/Apt. $280.00 per month @ 12 mos. $,560.00 OPERATIONAL COST (Community Center) Telephone @ 165.00 per 12 mos. Electric @ 85.00 per 12 mos. Gas @ 75.00 per 6 mos. Water @ S0.00 per quarter RENTAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Liability ~ Fire Insurance General Maintenance @ 15% of Rental Income PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $200.00 per mo. X 12 Total Anticipated Expenses Balance After Anticipated Expenses NOTES OF INCOME, EXPENDITURES, ETC. 1. 1,980.00 1,020.00 450.00 120.00 '~$,570.00 1,550.00 1~125.00 $2,675.00 $2,400.00 $12,005.00 $12,995.00 The Budget is based on Rental Income and the Sale of 410 Rutherford Ave. N.W. The GNDC will use the remaining funds to continue the Planning of activities in the Gainsboro Project Area. It should be noted that GNDC plans to pursue actively, the soli- citation of other funds to assist in the maintenance of the Community Center.(2) planning and developemnt of revitalization activities in the Gainsboro Project Area, (3) development of housing for low income persons. Attachment #1 continued Notes ATTACHMENT B p~ge 7 $. The PAC/GNDC will continue 'to maintain one paid staff person to be primarily responsible for Property Management, and to provide other services to PAC/GNDC as needed. 4. The PAC/GNDC will maintain the Community Center to continue to provide needed services to Gainsboro residents. 5. The Budget doesnot reflect any income that will be received by PAC/GNDC once the rehabilitation of $19 Harrison and 318 Rutherford is completed, the income generated will be used to pay the Permanent Mortgage to VHDA. ATTACHMENT 8 page 8 GAINSBORO NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROPERTY Attachment #2 A. Houses: 7 Properties, total assessed value $96,800 Address Tax Number Disposition 1. 127 Patton Ave. 2010913 W/S Immediately 2. 422 Rutherford 2021703 W/K 3. 420 Rutherford 2021704 W/S 6 months 4. 410 Rutherford 2021707 W/S Immediately 5. 318 Rutherford 2021714 W/K 6. 319 Harrison 2021756 W/K 7. 304 Fairfax 2020175 W/K B. Buildings Lots: Assessed value S,100.00 1. Rutherford 2021708 W/S 6 months 2. Rutherford 2021709 W/S " 3. Rutherford 2021715 W/S " 4. Rutherford 2021718 W/S " 5. Harrison 2021746 W/K non buildable 6. Rutherford (park) 2022145 W/K 7. Rutherford Ct. Lots 12&13, Sec. 9 Committed to Habitat for Hummanities of Roanoke Valley W/S-Will Sell W/K Will Keep ATTACHMENT C Page I CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made this of 1988, by and among the CITY OF ROANOKE (City), ~insboro Project Area Committee (PAC) and Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) (Subgrantees). The parties hereto agree as follows: WHEREAS, the contract for services among the City and the Subgrantees will expire at the end of the 1988 calendar year. THEREFORE it is agreed that the current contract between the City of Roanoke and the Subgrantees is terminated and closed out effective December 31, 1988. In addition, City and Subgrantees shall comply with all applicable regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development including, without limitations, the following provisions: A. ~eal ProDerty The properties listed below shall be rented to low and moderate income persons (defined as 80 percent of median family income) through affordable rents on the following schedule: Property 422 Rutherford Ave 420 Rutherford Ave 410 Rutherford Ave 304 Fairfax Ave Tax ~arcel ~umber 2021703 2021704 2021707 2010715 Expiration of ~ ~ear period July 1, 1990 July 1, 1990 July 1, 1989 July 1, 1993 Further, the property at 304 Fairfax Ave shall continue to be available as a community center for the benefit of the entire neighborhood, at least through July 1, 1993. If the Subgrantees choose to sell or lease any of these above mentioned properties prior to the expiration of the five year period, 1. the deed of transfer or lease agreement shall include the restrictions that the property be rented at affordable rents to persons in the 80 percent of median income category or below, or the property shall be sold to a low or moderate income family as defined by 80 percent of median family income and also ATTACHMENT C Page 2 continue this status for the applicable five year period. The following properties, owned by GNDC, and constituting a total CDBG investment of less than $25,000 per property, will not be restricted in any way as to their use or disposition except as hereinafter provided: Property ~ax 127 Patton Ave. 318 Rutherford 319 Harrison Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Harrison Lot Rutherford Lot Parcel Number 2010913 2021714 2021756 2021691 2021692 2021708 2021709 2021715 2021718 2021746 2022145 B. R~eversion o_~f~unds: Ail CDBG funds or program income on hand as of December 31, 1988 will be returned to the City by January 10, 1989. All rents or other accounts receivable due to PAC or GNDC as of December 31, 1988, but not yet received, will be returned to the City within 10 days of their receipt. Income received after closeout shall not be governed by the provisions of HUD regulations, except that, if a clos~out ~%ther of the Subgrantees has ano~= t t~e time of · ~ner ongoing CDBG grant received directly from the City, funds received after closeout shall be treated as program income of the ongoing grant program. If neither of the Subgrantees have another ongoing grant received directly from the City at the time of closeout, income received after closeout from the disposition of real property or from loans outstanding at the time of closeout shall not be ~overned by the provisions of HUD regulations except that such Income shall be used for activities that meet one of the national objectives in 570.901 and the eligibility requirements described in section 105 of the Act. C. Equipment Possession of one Ducan pottery kiln, owned by the Grantee, will revert to the Grantee as of December 31, 1988 for use in the Northwest Community Services program. All other equipment shall be used by the Subgrantees in the program or project for which it was acquired as long as needed, whether or not the project or program continues to be supported by Federal funds. When no longer needed for the original program or project, the equipment ATTACHMENT C Page 3 may be used in other Gainsboro neighborhood improvement activities, or returned to the City for use in other CDBG projects. Equipment not needed by the Subgrantees for CDBG activities shall be transferred to the City for the CDBG program or shall be retained after compensating the City. D. Access to Records: Ail records pertaining to Gainsboro CDBG projects shall be retained for a period of three (3) years after the effective date of this Agreement. Appropriate City and/or HUD personnel shall have free access to those records during the three-year time period. Findings of noncompliance may be taken into account by HUD and/or the City, as unsatisfactory performance of the Subgrantees in the consideration of any future grant award. E. gOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as the day and year hereinabove written: ATTEST: CITY OF ROANOKE By ... By. Mary F. Parker, City Clerk W. Robert Herbert, City Manager By Witness By. President, Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation By Witness By - Chairman, Gainsboro Project Area Committee Mrs. Marie Pontius Grants Monitoring Administration 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 2zt01 I ATTACHHENT D U.S. Department of Houelng~nd Urban DevMopment Richmond Office, Region 701 East Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219-2591 Dear Mrs. Pontius: We have reviewed your letter of October 10, 1988, concerning provisions of a closeout agreement with subrecipient, Gainsboro PAC and Cainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation, and hove concluded the following: l. HUD has no requirements for a closeout agreement between CDBG grantees and their subrecipients. Therefore, no formal closeout agreement is technically required. 2. Beginning October 6, 1988, new Regulatory provisions mandate written agreements between grantees and subrecipients, and contain certain provisions for reversion of assets as well as real property use/disposition. The City's contract with PAC/GNDC precedes the new Regulatory provisions. Further, we understand that no additional CDBG funding is proposed for this specifi.c activity (acquisition/rehabilitation) by this subrecipient. Hence, a new suogranfee agreement drawn up in accordance with 2/~ CFR 570.503 or -570.505 would not be necessary, although this would leave the matter of real property disposition and program income unresolved or unclear at best. We concur with your interpretation of the Regulations as cited in your letter. Please note, however, that since the City has opted to use HUD regulations in its proposed closeout agreement, HUD would like to see the City monitor for compliance with those regulations for the stated time period. We commend the City's initiative in developing such agreements to clarify the expectations and responsibilities of all parties involved. If I or my staff can be of further assistance to you, please call upon us. Very sincerely yours, 'ng & Development Division Off~ce of Grants Compiianm Ms. Alwyn Jennings Community Planning & Development U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development 701 East Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219-2591 Dear Alwyn: October 10, 1988 Subject: Provisions of close-out agreement with subrecipient, Gainsboro PAC and Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation. Following extensive telephone conversations with you, and studying the new "common rule" regulations and "Subpart j,, regulations, I plan to recommend to the City Manager the following proposal dealing with Gainsboro. I know he will expect me to have confirmed this proposal with you and received assurance that it is in compliance with federal regulations. I would appreciate your response at earliest opportunity. BACK~I~OUND: I. Real Property ~ A. Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation (GNDC) has been a subgrantee of the City of Roanoke since July 1981. During that time they have acquired and rehabilitated properties with CDBG funds. Some building lots have been given away in an approved lotsteading program, but at present the organization owns seven (7) structures and eight (8) vacant lots. (Please see Attachment A for a list of these properties) B. As shown in the attachment to this letter, four of these properties involved CDBG investments totalling in excess of $25,000, and so are s~bject to the real property regulations. (24 CFR 570.505 or 570.503(b)(8)). These regulations provide that such property must be used to meet one of the national objectives in 570.901 until five years after the closeout of the grant from which the assistance to the property was provided. (24 CFR 570.505) In this case it would mean that the properties must continue to be occupied by low and moderate income persons for five years after the closeout of the grant for latest expenditure on the property. These regulations only address use or in the case of 570.505(b), procedures to follow if use is to be changed. The regulations do not impose any other restrictions on the property, nor do they stipulate that ownership must remain the same for the five years. So long as the use is to benefit low and Room 362 Mumc,Dal Du~ldJng 2J5 Church Avenue, S W r~anoke, Virginia 24011 ~703) 981~2141 moderate income persons, the regulations are satisfied. II. Program Income: A. "The agreement (with the subrecipient) shall specify that upon its expiration the subrecipient shall transfer to the recipient any CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG funds. (570.503(b)(8) Reversion of assets) This means that GNDC will return any funds on hand to the City at the end of the existing contract. Any rent due as of that date must also be returned to city when it is received. However, after the termination of this contract, (12/31/88) GNDC will no longer be a subrecipient. Under 570.500(a) Definitions, '"Program income" means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG funds.' If GNDC sells or rents property after the termination of its contract, when it is no longer a subrecipient, then the funds received are not program income by definition, and therefore do not have to be returned to the city. Nor would these funds have federal restrictions placed on them. At the termination of its current contract with Gainsboro PAC and GNDC, on December 31, 1988, a formal close-out agreement will be executed. This agreement will include the following provisions: A. The properties listed below will be rented to low and moderate income persons (defined as 80 percent of median family income) through affordable rents on the following schedule: Expiration of Property Tax Parcel Number ~ year Period 422 Rutherford Ave. 2021703 July 1, 1990 420 Rutherford Ave. 2021704 July 1, 1990 410 Rutherford Ave. 304 Fairfax Ave. 2021707 2010715 July 1, 1989 July 1, 1993 Be If GNDC chooses to sell or lease any of these above mentioned properties prior to the expiration of the five year period, 1. the deed of transfer or lease agreement must include the restrictions that the property be rented at affordable rents to persons in the 80 percent of median income category or below, or 2. the property must be sold to a low or moderate income 'family as defined by 80% of median family income. 2 C. The following properties, owned by GNDC, will not be restricted in any way as to their use or disposition: De Property Tax Parcel Number 127 Patton Ave. 318 Rutherford 319 Harrison Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Rutherford Lot Harrison Lot Rutherford Lot 2010913 2021714 2021756 2021691 2021692 2021708 2021709 2021715 2021718 2021746 2022145 Ail program income or CDBG funds on hand as of December 31, 1988 will be returned to the City by January 10, 1989. Ail rents or other accounts receivable due to GNDC as of December 31, 1988, but not yet received, will be returned to the City within 10 days of their receipt. Proceeds from transactions undertaken after December 31, 1988 will not be considered program income and therefore do not have to be returned to the City. Alwyn, after studying these new regulations, and deciding on recommending this close-out agreement between the City and Gainsboro, I believe we do not need to transfer the properties back and forth between the City and Gainsboro. I also believe we do not need to have a CDBG program amendment for disposition of property, which was one solution you suggested. Please examine my logic. Discuss it with others at HUD if need be, and let me know if this approach will work. Sincerely, Marie T. Pontius Grants Monitoring Administrator attachment cc. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Wilburn C. Dibling, City Attorney George H. Robinson Heller, Director, Gainsboro PAC/GNDC ATTACHMENT A Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Corporation Property Houses: 7 properties Grant Purchase Rehab Address Date Tax Number Price Costs 1. 127 Patton Ave 1987 2010913 $ 4,328 $ -0- 2. 422 Rutherford 1984 2021703 $15,360 $11,750 3. 420 Rutherford 1984 2021704 $ 7,444 $26,961 4. 410 Rutherford 1983 2021707 $ 6,622 $ 8,998 5. 318 Rutherford 1987 2021714 $ 6,009 $ -0- 6. 319 Harrison 1987 2021756 $ 5,500 $ -0- 7. 304 Fairfax 1987 2010715 $ 6,850 $25,000 Be Buildin~ Lots: Address 8 properties Grant .Purchase Date Tax Number Price Improve Total $ 4,328 $27 110' $34 405* $25 620* $ 6 O09 $ 5 500 $31850* 1. Rutherford 1982 2021691 $ 1,500 -0- 2. Rutherford 1982 2021692 $ 1,500 -0- 3. · Rutherford 1982 2021708 $ 998 -0- 4. Rutherford 1983 2021709 $ 9,988 -0- 5. Rutherford 1982 2021715 $ 1,100 -0- 6. Rutherford 1982 2021718 $ 1,224 -0- 7. Harrison 1984 2021746 $ 6,850 -0- 8. Rutherford 1982 2022145 $ 1,500 -0- Total 1,500 1,500 998 9,988 1,100 1,22~ 6,850 1,500 * Properties covered by CDBG real property, regulations 570.503(b)(8) C~¢e of ~e Ci~ November 9, 1988 File #60-268 Mr. Joel ~. Schlanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Schlanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance ~o. 29353, amending and reor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 Internal Service Fund Appropriations, providing for the transfer of $19~200.00 from Retained Earnings Unrestricted to Utility Line Services, to provide funds for operational and maintenance capital needs, which Ordinance No. 29353 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP : ra pc: Mr. W. Robert tterbert, City Manager Mr. Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Mr. Jesse H. Perdue, Jr., Manager, Utility Line Services ~r. George C. Snead, Jr., Director of Administration and Public Safety Mr. D. Darwin Roupe, Manager, General Services Room456 Municil:~lBuilOing 215 C~urch Avenue SW Roanoke ~rg~nia24~11 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29353. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain certain sections of the 1988-89 Internal Service Fund Appropriations, and providing for an emergency. WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the City of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 Internal Service Fund Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: Appropriations Utility Line Services $ 2,495,709 Other Charges (1) - 267,885 Capital Outlay (22~i[[[[[[i[i[[[[[[[[[.[[[[[~[[[[[[i 228,610 Retained Earnings Retained Earnings - Unrestricted (4) $ 1,619,427 1) Expendable Equipment 2) Other Equipment 3) Land Purchase 4) Retained Earnings Unrestricted 006-056-2625-2035) $ 3,500 006-056-2625-9015) 14,700 006-056-2625-9050) 1,000 006-3336) (19,200) BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, an emergency existing, this Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: Subject: Authorization to Appropriate Funds from Internal Service Fund Previous Years' Retained Earnings to Utility Line Services' Accounts I. Background: Funding is available in the amount of $19,200 in the Internal Service Fund retained earnings for operational and maintenance capital needs. Equipment Replacement/Purchase needs exist to efficiently and effectively support and continue 24-hour sewer and water service to the public. Co Equipment Replacement/Purchase needs identified for FY 88-89 are as follows: 1. Land Purchase Development (Soil Disposal Site) $ 1,000 2. Flashing Arrow Sign 5,200 3. Expendable Tools (<$500 each) 5,000 4. Pavement Breakers (3) 4,500 5. Communication Equipment (Beepers) (2) 2,000 6. Hydraulic Root Cutter 1~500 $19~200 II. Issues in order of consideration are: A. Need B. Funding C. Competitive Biddinz III. Alternatives: Council authorize the appropriation of $19,200 from Internal Service Fund previous years' retained earnings to Utility Line Services accounts as follows: Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 Account Number Account Title Amount of Transfer 006-056-2625-9015 006-056-2625-9050 006-056-2625-2035 Other Equipment Land Purchases Expendable Equipment (< $500 each) $14,700 1,000 3,500 Need to replace/purchase equipment as requested will be met. Funding in Internal Service Fund previous years' retained earnings has been identified. 3. Competitive bidding will be utilized. Bo City Council not authorize the appropriation of $19~200 from the Internal Service Fund previous years' retained earnings to Utility Line Services capital accounts. Need to replace/purchase equipment as requested will not be met. 2. Funding will not be utilized. 3. Competitive bidding is a moot issue. IV. Recon~endation: Council authorize appropriation of $19~200 to Utility Line Services' accounts in accordance with Alternative "A". Respectfu~ submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager WRH:JHP:afm CC: City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ULS Manager Office of the City Clerk November 9, 1988 File #60-236-246 Mr. Joel M. Schlanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear ~r. Schlanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29354, amending and reor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 Consortium Fund Appropriations, providing for the appropriation of $50,109.00 representing a grant award received by the Fifth District ~mployment and Training Consortium from the State Department of Education, i~ connection with administering an Adult Literacy Project within certain jurisdictions of the Fifth Planning District, which Ordinance ~Jo. 29354 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincere Iy, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. pc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager ~r. ,lames D. Ritchie, Director of Human Resources ~is. Carolyn H. Barrett, Administrator, Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium, 425 West Campbell Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Room456 6/~Jnicipol~3uilciing 215C~urchA',,~,nue SW Roanoke Vlrg~nia24011 (703) 98t-254t IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. AN ORDINANCE 1988-89 Consortium emergency. No. 29354. to amend and reordain certain sections of the Fund Appropriations, and providing for an WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the City of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 Consortium Fund Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: ApDropriations Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium- FY89 Adult Literacy Grant (1) ........................... Revenue $ 1,145,000 50,109 Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium- FY89 Adult Literacy Grant (2) ........................... 1) Funding Authority (034-054-8971-9990) $ 50 109 2) Adult Literacy ' Grant Revenue (034-034-1234-8975) 50,109 $ 1,145,000 50,109 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, an emergency Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage. existing, this ATTEST: City Clerk. Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Members of Council: Subject: Additional Fiscal Year 1989 Funding for the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium I. Background: A. Funds are allocated annually for each locality in Virginia to ~ister Adult Literacy Programs through a bid process with the State. These funds are available to public schools and agencies. B. Bidders interested must submit letters of intent and complete appli- ~ for each jurisdiction they intend to serve to the Department of Education, Adult Education Division. C. Total ~A.c~ion Asainst Poverty (TAP) submitted applica.tions to provide Adult Literacy training to all eight jurisdictions wzthin the Fifth Planning District. The Depar~nent of Education approved funding for TAP to serve koanoke and Alleghany counties, as well as the cities of Salem, Covington and Clifton Forge. The three school divisions in Roanoke City, Craig and Botetourt counties elected to serve their own designated service area. II. Current Situation: ~ndin~ for t~.s pro,~ect is contingent upon the Consorti~n agreeing to receive, ac~znzster and contract the funds to TAP. ..The Private Industry Cot~cil and Policy Board of the Consorti~n have apv~oved ot this arrangement, which is no different than any other contractual agreement the agency enters into, with the exception of the different funding source. The Consortium has received notification of the grant award frem the S~ta.te. Departnmnt of Education, in the armmant of ~50~109.00 to oa~th_Zs~t_.er=~an~Adul.t Li~t.er.ac.y Project, within certain jurisdictions c~= r.c.ccn r£ar~lD~ OlSErlct. The City of Roanoke is the grant recipient for Consortium funding. City Council must appropriate the funding for all grants the Consor- tium receives. III. Issues: A. Progrem Operation Members of City Council Page 2 November 7, 1988 CC: IV. C. .Timin~ Alternatives: ~0 of Consortil~n fund~-~ --~ ....... ~%~an~_e_snanll.s~ a revenue ~ lrector 1. Progran Operation - Planned progr~ns will serve those persons eligible and the contract will be awarded to the service pro- vider. 2. ~ - $50,109.00 is available from grantor agency at no cost to the City. 3. T' ' ~ent~e - Iamediate action will allow for program to be imple- and finalized by required date. r~vn~a~es~O_~iate $50 109.00 of Consortium fund' and establish 1. Pro, ram Operation - ~Pl,anned pro.grams will not be impl~nented, and contract will non oe awarae~ to approved agency. 2. ~ondin~ - Not a factor. 3. ~ Any delay will cause the late start up of program and cause an underexpenditure of available funds. Reco~ndation: Approve Alternative A: A. ro riate $50,109.00 of Consortium fun ' and establish a revenue ~stmma lrector Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager City Attorney Director of Finance Director of HtmmnResources November 9, 1988 File #63-24A-25-184-429 Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear ?Ir. Herbert: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29357, amending and reor- daining §22.1-52, Lump sums, and §22.1-71, Lump sums, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to provide that lump sum payments may be made to disability retirees under certain circumstances, which Ordinance No. 29357 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, ~ Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk ~FP:ra ~O. pC: The Honorable Kenneth E. Trabue, Chief Judge, Circuit Court, 305 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 The ffonorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable Roy B. Willett, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable G. 0. Clemens, Judge, Circuit Court, P. O. Box 1016, Salem, Virginia 24153 The lIonorable Philip Trompeter, Chief Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court The Honorable Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Room456 MunicipalBuilOing 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke ~rg~nia24011 (703) 98t-2541 Mr. W. Robert Herbert November 9, 1988 Page 2 pc: The Honorable Edward S. Kidd, Jr., Chief Judge, General District Court The Honorable Julian H. Raney, Jr. Judge, General District Court ' The Honorable Diane ~. Strickland, Judge, General District Court The Honorable Patsy Testerman, Clerk, Circuit Court Ms. Patsy ~ussey, Clerk, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Mr. Ronald Albright, Clerk, General District Court The Honorable Donald S. CaldweIl, Commonwealth,s Attorney Mr. Raymond F. Leven, Pubiic Defender, Suite 4B, Southwest Virginia Building, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Mr. Bobby D. Casey, Office of the Magistrate, p. 0. Box 13867, Roanoke, Virginia 24037 Mr. F. Wiley Hubbell, Chairman, Board of Trustees, City of Roanoke Pension Plan, 3712 Peakwood Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 ' Mr. John W. Thompson, Buck Consultants, Xerox Centre, 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60603 Mr. Joel M. SchIanger, Director of Finance Mr. George C. Snead, Jr., Director of Administration and Public Safety Mr. Kenneth S. Cronin, Manager, Personnel Management Ms. Clayne M. Calhoun, Law Librarian Mr. Robert L. Laslie, Vice President Supplements, Municipal Code Corporation, p. 0. Box 2235, Tallahassee, Florida 32304 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of Noven~er, 1988. No. 29357. VIRGINIA, AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining ~22.1-52, Lump sums, and §22.1-71, Lump sums, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to provide that lump sum payments may be made to disability retirees under certain circumstances; and providing for an emergency. BE 1. Code of and IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: Section 22.1-52, Lump sums and §22.1-71, Lump sums, of the the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, are hereby amended reordained to read and provide as follows: $22.1-52. Lump sums. (a) Monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less shall be paid in the form of lump sums. Except as provided in subsection (c), monthly benefits of more than fifty dollars ($50.00) shall not be paid in the form of a lump sum. Nothwithstanding the above, monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less whose lump sum value is above thirty-five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) shall require member consent before a lump sum is paid. Any beneficiary shall be required to receive a lump sum distribution of thirty-five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) or less. (b) All lump sums shall be based on the pen- sion benefit guaranty corporation (PBGC) annuity rates effective on the first day of the calendar year in which payment is made. If the PBGC uses sex distinct factors, the PBGC male rates set back one Fear will be used for males and females. (c) With the written concurrence of the em- ployee, monthly benefits payable to an employee who is retired on a disability retirement allowance may be paid in the form of a lump sum, by purchase of one or more annuities or a combination of lump sum and annuity payments. $22.1-71. Lump sums. (a) Monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less shall be paid in the form of lump sums. Ex- cept as provided in subsection (c), monthly benefits of more than fifty dollars ($50.00) sba11 not be paid in the form of a lump sum. Notwithstanding the above, monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less whose lump sum value is above thirty-five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) shall require member consent before a lump sum is paid. All benefi- ciaries as of June 30, 1984 receiving monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less shall have an option of receiving alum sum distribution. Any beneficiary of an allowance beginning on or after July 1, 1984 shall be required to receive a lump sum distribution of thirty-five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) or less. (b) All lump sums shall be based on the pen- sion benefit guaranty corporation (PBGC) annuity rates effective on the first day of the calendar year in which payment is made. If the PBGC uses sex distinct factors, the PBGC male rates set back one year will be used for males and females. (c) With the written concurrence of the em- ployee, monthly benefits payable to an employee who is retired on a disability retirement allowance may be paid in the form of a lump sum, by purchase of one or more annuities or a combination of lump sum and annuity payments. 2. In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordi- nance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. Office of ~ne Cirv C~e~: ~ovember 9, 1988 File #63-25-184 Mr. W. Robert lierbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear ,~lr. Iterbert: I am attaching copy of Ordinance ~o. 29356, authorizing appropriate City officials to execute an agreement providing for the settlement of a Workers' Compensation and disability retire- ment claim and authorizing the purchase of annuities to provide a portion of the funding of such agreement, subject to approval of the Virginia Industrial Co~nission, which Ordinance No. 29356 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, ~.~_~ Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra pc: Ur. Robert A. Hodges, 2158 I~esvan Drive, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Chris Caveness, Financial Services l~anager, lfcOonough Caperton Insurance Group/Davis & Stephenson, P. O. aox 1300, Roanoke, Virginia 24006 Ms. Elizabeth J. Stewart, Deputy Cotr~t~issianer, Virginia Industrial Commission, P. O. Box 1794, Richmond, Virginia 23214 l{r. Joel ~. SchIanger, Director of Finance Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke V]rq~nia 24011 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29356. VIRGINIA, AN ORDINANCE authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute au agreement providing for the settlement of a Workers' Compensation and disability retirement claim and authorizing the purchase of annu- ities to provide a portion of the funding of such agreement, subject to the approval of the Virginia Industrial Commission; and providing for an emergency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City Manager or Assistant City Manager and City Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, an agreement with Robert A. Hodges (hereinafter Claimant) to provide for a full and final settlement of all claims against the City for Workers' Compensa- tion benefits, disability retirement benefits and any other benefits of whatever kind or nature. Such agreement shall provide for the payment of $10,000 to the Claimant, for the purchase of annuities to provide a total of $1,500.00 per month to the Claimant for life, and for payment or reimbursement of costs associated with major surgery caused by his disabling condition. Such agreement shall contain other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the City Manager, and such agreement to be approved by the City Attorney. 2. The City accepts the proposal of McDonough Caperton Insurance Group/Davis ~ Stephenson and the City's Manager of General Services is authorized to issue the requisite purchase order to procure from such firm one annuity for the sum of $117,968.00, such annuity to provide payments of $1,200.00 per month for life to Claimant, and a second annuity for the sum of $29,492.00, such annuity to provide payments of $300.00 per month for life to Claimant. Such annuities shall comply with the request for proposals issued by the City, and such annuities shall fund a portion of the settlement agreement authorized herein. 3. The settlement agreement and annuity purchases authorized herein are expressly contingent on approval by the Virginia Industrial Commission of a Joint Petition for Compromise Settlement of any and all claims of Claimant against the City under the Workers' Compensa- tion Act, disability retirement plan of the City and otherwise. cipal shall In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the muni- government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance be in full force and effect upon its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. Office of the Cir:/Clerk November 9, 1988 File #60-63-58-184 Mr. Joel M. Schlanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ur. Schlanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29355, amending and ,eor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, providing for the transfer of $78,730.00 from the General Fund Balance designated for insurance claims to Workers' Compensation Wages, in connection with the structured settlement of a Worker's Compensation claim, including job related disabi- lity retirement benefits, which Ordinance No. 29355 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. SincereIy,~ ~ __~. /~~ Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk ~FP: ra Enco pc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager ~4r. George C. Snead, Jr., Director of Administration Public Safety Mr. Kenneth S. Cronin, Manage~, Personnel Management and Room 456 Municipol Building 215 C~urch Avenue SW Roanoke V~rg~nta 240tt (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29355. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, VIRGINIA, certain sections of the and providing for an emergency. WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the City of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the C6uncil of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 General Fund Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: ApproDriations Nondepartmental Residual Fringe Benefits Fund Balance Designated for Insurance Claims (2) ................. 1) Workers Compensa- tion Wages 2) Designated for Ins. Claims (001-004-9110-1135) $ 78,730 (001-3325) $(78,730) $11,199,575 1,145,730 $ 771,770 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, an emergency existing, this Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk Roanoke, Virginia ~Nov'~mber 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: SUBJECT: Structured Settlement of a Workers' Compensation Claim Including Job Related Disability Retirement Benefits. I. BACKGROUND: Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, Sec. 65.1-47.1, provides for the presumption as to death or disability from hypertension or heart disease for police officers, fire fighters, and deputy sheriffs. Sec. 65.1-54 allows entitlement of 66-2/3% benefits of average weekly wages during periods of full incapacitation. Claimant, born in 1944, sustained a heart attack in October, 1987 while in his capacity as a Senior Police Officer. Full job related disability was granted by Roanoke City Employees' Supplemental Retirement System in December, 1987. Ce Potential liabilities of this claim, to be paid from Workers' Compensation Act and City's Pension Plan, are estimated to be the following cumulative amounts: 1. $184,341 under remaining workers' compensation benefits (until May, 1997). 2. $332,588 by age 60. 3. $530,250 by age 70. De Annuities to provide guaranteed monthly payments to workers' compensation claimants are available through insurance companies. Claimant will agree to waive all claims under the Workers' Compensation Act and City Pension Plan in lieu of guaranteed annuity payments. Ee Workers' Compensation claims, for FY 88-89 are budgeted $300,000 for compensation and $300,000 for medical payments. Fo Current unfunded liabilities for cases which are subject to provisions of 65.1-47 of the Workers' Compensation Act is estimated at 2.6 million dollars (effects upon the retirement system are not included). II. CURRENT SITUATION: A. Bid proposals for annuities were developed and sent to twenty-three (23) insurance firms. ~unorable Mayor and City Council November 7, 1988 Page 2 II. CURRENT SITUATION (CONTINUED): Request for proposals requires pricing for two annuities, one for $1,200.00 compensation and one for $300.00 medical expense, each to be paid to the claimant on a monthly basis for life. Request for proposals were to be submitted by 2:00 p.m., October 31, 1988 in the Office of General Services. Costs incurred by the City from any single claim may exceed $500,000 in total from compensation, medical expenses under workers' compensation, and benefits entitlement from the City of Roanoke Pension Plan. Roanoke City Code, Sec. 22.1-52. Lump Sums and Sec. 22.1-71. Lump Sums., currently limits lump sum payments for retirement benefits to those who are entitled to monthly benefits of fifty dollars ($50.00) or less. III. ISSUES: A. Cost of claim. B. Compliance with specifications. C. Funding. IV. ALTERNATIVES: A. Council, Authorize an a~reement with claimant, subject to final approval by the Virginia Industrial Commission. The agreement will provide for two (2) annuities as set forth in next section, payment of $10,000 lump sum, and continued obligation of the City to pay for major surgery required by disability. Claimant will agree to waive all claim under Workers' Compensation Act and City Retirement System. Agreement to be approved by the City Attorney. Approve the purchase of annuities from McDonough Caperton Insurance Group/Davis & Stephenson in the amount of $147,460.00 to provide guaranteed monthly payments of $1,200.00 and $300.00 for ten years, and thereafter, for as long as the claimant shall live. ~unorable Mayor and City Council November 7, 1988 Page 3 IV. ALTERNATIVES (CONTINUED): 3. Amend City Code Sec. 22.1-52 and 22.1-71. Cost of claim would be fixed at $157,460.00, resulting in a better overall control of this liability. Compliance with specifications annuity carriers must meet financial ratings of no less than an A+ rating as listed by the A.M. Best Company, an industry recognized rating service. Funding of the annuities and lump sum amounts would be provided in equal shares by the City Pension Plan of $78,730 and through the Self Insured Liability Retention Fund of $78,730 maintained by the City. Reject all proposals. Claimant would continue to receive benefits as entitled under the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act and when applicable, the City Pension Plan. Cost of claim the City would incur an estimated annual cost of $21,476.00 excluding any major surgery expense which may be required. The City would lose the potential savings of $150,000 should the claimant reach age 60 and $350,000 by age 70. 2. Compliance with specifications would not be a factor in this alternative. Funding would continue to be paid from the expense fund for workers' compensation claims without a fixed cost of the claim. V. RECOMMENDATION: Council take the following actions: Authorize agreement and annuity purchase as set forth in IV A and amend City Code section 22.1-52 and 22.1-71 to provide for this type of lump sum payment under disability retirement system. R~norable Mayor and City Council November 7, 1988 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): Appropriate $78,730 from the General Fund Balance designated for insurance claims to account number 001-004-9110-1135, Workers' Compensation Wages. Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager WRH:ewb cc: Wil C. Dibling, City Attorney Joel M. Schlanger, Director of Finance C~ce of ~e C~W Cle~ November 9, 1988 Fiie #68-277-247 Mr. Wo Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Herbert: I am attaching tion of funds, Inc., to fund the City, which Ordinance of the City of Roanoke November 7, 1988. copy of Ordinance No. 29358, in the amount of $40,000.00, authorizing a dona- to Downtown Roanoke, a portion of a study of the Downtown North area of No. 29358 was adopted by the Council at a regular meeting held on ~4onday, Sincerely, Nary F. Parker, C~,fC City Clerk MFP: ra pc: Mr. Robert W. Hooper, Executive Director, Downtown Roanoke, Inc., 410 First Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Mr. Joel M. SchIanger, Director of Finance Mr. Brian J. Wishneff, Chief of Economic Development Room 456 MuniciDal Building 215 C'~urch Avenue SW Roanoke Virginia 240t 1 (703) 981-254.1 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29358. A RESOLUTION authorizing a donation of funds Inc. to fund a portion of a study of City. VIRGINIA, to Downtown Roanoke, the Downtown North area of the WHEREAS, Downtown North, an area bounded generally by Wells Avenue on the northerly side, by Interstate 581 on the easterly side, by Campbell Avenue on the southerly side and by First Street, N. W. and Second Street, S. W. on the westerly side, is an area which is a vital part of the downtown section of the City; WHEREAS, a number of important public and private facilities or structures, including a Trade and Convention Center, will or may be located in Downtown North area; WHEREAS, it is important for the future growth of the City that this area be studied to determine the best location of facilities and best use of the area; WHEREAS, Downtown Roanoke, Inc., a non-profit organization, has agreed to conduct a study of the Downtown North area; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the City donates the sum of $40,000.00 to Downtown Roanoke, Inc. to be used for part of the funding of the study to be conducted of Downtown North. ATTEST: City Clerk. November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: Subject: Master Plan for Downtown North I. Background: Trade and Convention Center Task Force has been studying, among other things, location for the Trade and Convention Center, questions related to financing and operation of the center. Bo Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dominion Bankshares among others have been studying their future office needs. Henry Street plans as well as Music Center plans have been studied independently. Do First Street Bridge/Gainsboro Road/Wells Avenun road planning project has been going on independently. II. Current Situation ao Need for communication and coordination through a joint effort to prepare a master plan for the entire 17 acre area in the northern part of downtown has become important in order to produce a plan that is in the best interest of the community as a whole. Bo City of Roanoke has been requested to support this maste~~ development plan in cooperation with the Norfolk Southern Corporation and Dominion Bankshares Corporation. The City has been asked to contribute $40,000 towards this plan, or one-third of its cost. Funding is available in the Civic Center fund account, Trade and Convention Center Study. RTKL, an urban design firm out of Baltimore, Maryland has been selected by Downtown Roanoke, Inc., who will be the contracting agent for this Master Plan. Members of Council November 7, 1988 Page 2 III. Recommendation ao City Council approve a contribution to Downtown Roanoke, Inc. of $40,000 to contribute towards the Master Plan for the northern part of downtown. Bo Funding is available in the Civic Center Fund in the Trade and Convention Center Study account, previously appropriated for this purpose. WRH/BJW:kds cc: Respectfully submitted: W. Robert Herbert City Manager City Attorney Director of Finance Director of Administration and Public Safety Chief of Economic Development Robert W. Hooper, Executive Director, Downtown Roanoke, Inc. November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: Subject: Master Plan for Downtown North Please reserve space on Monday's agenda for a report on the above- referenced matter. WRH/kds Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager CITY OF ROANOKE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 4, 1988 Mary F. Parker, City Clerk William X Parsons, Assistant City Attorney Disclosure under Virginia Code $2.1-639.14.G. In accordance with $2.1-639.14.G. of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, attached please find disclosure statements to be filed on behalf of Mayor Taylor, Vice-Mayor Fitzpatrick and Councilmember Trout. These statements are submitted in regard to the proposed donation of funds to Downtown Roanoke. Inc., which is scheduled for Council action on Monday, November 7, 1988. As provided in the above-referenced State Code section, these declarations are to be retained and made available for public inspection for a period of five years from the date of filing. Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions about this matter. WXP:ps Attachment cc: Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney Pursuant to §$2.1-639.11A and 2.1-639.14 G of the Code of Virginia, I hereby disclose that I have a personal interest in the transaction whereby the City will donate funds to Down- town Roanoke, Inc. because I am a member of the Board of Directors .z A/./~. which is in the area to be studied by Downtown Roanoke, Inc.; that I am a member of a group, the members of which are affected by the transaction; and that I am able to participate in the transaction fairly, objec- tively and in the public interest. Pursuant to §§2.1-639.11A and 2.1-639.14 G of the Code of Virginia, I hereby disclose that I have a personal interest in the transaction whereby the City will donate funds to Down- town Roanoke, Inc. because I am employed by ~ ~a*~$~.~f~r~ which is in the area to be studied by Downtown Roanoke, Inc.; that I am a member of a group, the members of which are affected by the transaction; and that I am able to participate in the transaction fairly, objectively and in the public interest. Pursuant to §§2.1-639.11 A and 2.1-639.14 G of the Code of Virginia, I hereby disclose that I have a personal interest in the transaction whereby the City will donate funds to Down- town Roanoke, Inc. because I am receiving retirement benefits from ~/~f~/~ SO~rm ~/-.~.~ which is in the area to be studied by Downtown Roanoke, Inc.; that I am a member of a group, the members of which are affected by the transaction; and that I am able to participate in the transaction fairly, objec- tively and in the public interest. O~ce ~ ~h~ CiW Cle~ November 9, 1988 File #472 International Salt Company Abington Executive Park Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania 18411 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 29359, accepting your bid to furnish 1,000 tons, more or less, of deicing salt to the City of ~oanoke at a unit price of ~41.27 per ton, which Ordinance No. 29359 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke regular meeting held on ~4onday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk at a ~4FP: ra pc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager ~r. William F. Clark, Director of Public Works Air. WiiIiam L. Stuart, Manager, Street Maintenance Mr. D. Darwin Roupe, Manager, General Services Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue SW P,c~noke V~rg~nia 24011 (703) 981-2541 or, ce of ~e City Cler~ November 9, 1988 File #472-410 Cargill, Inc. Bulk Deicing Sales 191 Portland Point Road Drawer "B" Lansing, New York 14882 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 29359, accepting the bid of International Salt Company to furnish 1,000 tons, more or less, of deicing salt to the City of Roanoke at a unit price of $41.27 per ton, which Ordinance No. 29359 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. On behalf of the Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for submitting your bid on deicing salt. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra Enc. Room 456 Municipal BuilOing 215 Church A',,~nue SW Roanoke V~rD~nia 24011 (703) 981-2,~1.1 Office of rh~ City Cl~rk November 9, 1988 File #472-410 Morton Salt Division Ice Control Department 110 North Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 29359, accepting the bid of International Salt Company to furnish 1,000 tons, more or less, of deicing salt to the City of Roanoke at a unit price of $41.27 per ton, which Ordinance Mo. 29359 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. On behalf of the Members of City Council, I would [ike to express appreciation for submitting your bid on deicing salt. Sincereiy, ~'~ Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. Room 456 Municipal Building 215 Ohurch Avenue SW Roanoke V~rg~nia 24011 (703) 981-2541 Office of the Ci~, Cle~ November 9, 1988 File #472-410 Domtar Industries, Inc. Sifto Salt Division 4825 North Scott Street Schiller Park, illinois 60176-1354 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 29359, accepting the bid of International Salt Company to furnish 1,000 tons, more or less, of deicing salt to the City of Roanoke at a unit price of $41.27 per ton, which Ordinance No.. 29359 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. On behalf of the Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for submitting your bid on deicing salt. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk .~FP: r a Enc. Room456 MunicipalBuildincj 215 Church Avenue SW I~x:~noke ~r§~nia24011 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of Noveraber, 1988. No. 29359. VIRGINIA, AN ORDINANCE accepting a bid for furnishing deicing salt to the City; rejecting other bids; and providing for an emergency. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The bid of International Salt Company to furnish 1,000 tons, more or less, of deicing salt to the City at a unit price of $41.27 per ton, is hereby ACCEPTED. 2. The City's Manager of General Services is hereby authorized and directed to issue the requisite purchase orders for the above-mentioned deicing salt in such amounts as may be needed by the City, said purchase orders to be made and filled in accordance with the City's specifications, the bidder's proposal made therefor and in accordance with this ordinance. 3. Any and all other bids made to the City for the supply of deicing salt are hereby REJECTED, and the City Clerk is directed to so notify each said bidder and to express to each the City's appreciation for its bid. 4. In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ATTEST: City Clerk. Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: SUBJECT: BIDS ON DEICING SALT BID NUMBER 88-10-37 I concur in the bid committee's recommendation for the purchase of deicing salt. Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert City Manager WRH/DDR/klm cc: City Attorney Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 II. Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: SUBJECT: BIDS ON DEICING SALT BID NUMBER 88-10-37 I. BACKGROUND A. Deicing Salt is necessary to provide for a successful snow and ice removal program. B. October 12, 1988, Request for Quotations were sent to Nine (9) firms on the City's current bid list for deicing salt. Ce E. Four (4) responses were received. of bids received £s attached. Current Situation October 26, 1988, bids were received, after due and proper advertisement. All bids so received were publicly opened and read at 2:00 p.m., in the Office of the Manager of General Services. Bid specifications require price to remain firm until March 31, 1989. A tabulation Ail bids received were evaluated in a consistent manner by representatives of the following departments. Public Works Street Maintenance General Services The lowest bid meeting specification is submitted by International Salt Company for the amount of $41.27 per ton delivered. Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 III.Issues A. Need IV. B. Compliance with Specifications C. Fund Availability Alternatives Council award the bid for Deicing Salt to International Salt Company to subply the City 1000 tons, more or less, for the amount of $41 27 per ton delivered. ' Need - deicing salt is necessary for a successful snow and ice removal program. Compliance with Specifications - all bids received met required specifications. Fund Availability - funds are designated in FY '88 -'89, Snow Removal account number 001-052-4140-2045, to provide for the purchase of deicing salt for the total amount of $41,270.00. B. Reject all bids. Need - deicing salt would not be available for removal of snow and ice from City Streets. Compliance with specifications - would not be an issue with this alternative. Fund Availability - budgeted funds designated for snow and ice removal would not be extended. Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 3 V. Recommendation Council concur with Alternative "A", award the bid, to furnish and deliver 1000 tons, more or of deicing salt, to International Salt Company, the total amount of $41,270.00 and reject all other bids. less, for Chairman: Respectfully submitted, 'William F. Clark i~lliam L. Stuart D. Darwin Roupe GCS/DDR/klm cc: City Attorney Director of Finance _ ~EI~ARTM£NT OF FINANCE November 7, 1988 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Joel M. Schlanger Monthly Financial Report Attached is a copy of the financial report for the month of September, 1988. JMS/kp CON'1' I'~GEI~Y='¥ A8 OF $~'Z'gl,~]~ 30,, 1988 General Contingency: Balance July 1, 1988 Economic Development Economic Development Economic Development Social Services Health Department Health Department Contributions Social Services Jail Advertising Advertising Trinkle Property Option Local Match Equipment Equipment Christmas Decorations Local Match Local Match $ 412,097 1,700) 4,667) 3,000) 16,344) 4,495) 1,847) 25,000) 6,402) 1,200) $ 347,442 Maintenance of Fixed Assets Contingency: Balance July 1, 1988 200,000 Equipment Replacement Contingency: Balance July 1, 1988 600,000 Total Contingency Balance $1,147,442 CITY OF ROANOI~, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND STATI~II~ OF ~ General Property Taxes . Other Local Taxes Permits, Fees and Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Revenue Fr~m Use of Mc~ey ~ducation Gove~ .,~nt fharges for Current Services Non-Revenue Receipts Intmrnal Services Total July 1~.30 July 1-S~t.]0 19~-87 1987-88 $ 6,106,271 $ 6,497,043 6.40% 4,090,255 5,040,123 23.22% 112,881 138,886 23.04% 127,282 155,376 22.07% $ 40,962,775 15.86% 32,867,964 15.33% 428,500 32.41% 497,000 31.26% 243,165 153,535 5,847,554 5,538,735 2,514,631 2,426,021 36.86%) 5.28%) 3.52%) 1,200,500 12.79% 30,498,833 18.16% 21,825,435 11.12% 177,437 58,959 415,414 536,984 4,044) ( 3,905) 311,765 233,190 66.77%) 27,000 218.37% 29.26% 1,781,788 30.14% - 603,856 25.20%) 1,494,300 15.61% $ 19,942,611 $ 20,774,947 4.17% $132,187,951 15.72% CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUI~D STAT~4I~T OF EXPENDITURES AND ENCII~LqANCES General ~ Judicial 2k~ninistraticn Public Safety Public Works Health and Welfare Cultural C~munity Dev~lqunent ~ucation Eebt Service Non-Depart~_ntal Total 19~6-87 19~7-88 c~ ~ ~] ~ce 2~cms ~] {~m~d $ 1,823,934 $ 2,122,194 16.35% $ 5,643,439 $ 7,765,633 27.33% 626,556 711,007 13.48% 2,116,060 2,827,067 25.15% 5,550,151 6,167,170 11.12% 17,450,777 23,617,947 26.11% 5,237,228 6,234,197 19.04% 11,496,776 17,730,973 35.16% 2,408,056 3,070,700 27.52% 8,178,054 11,248,754 27.30% 926,470 983,308 6.13% 2,184,111 3,167,419 31.04% 354,293 424,568 19.84% 641,818 1,066,386 39.81% 9,757,815 9,964,672 2.12% 47,034,290 56,998,962 17.48% 3,807,305 3,764,943 (1.11%) 4,747,471 8,512,414 44.23% 328,948 416,660 26.66% 2,303,623 2,720,283 15.32% $ 30,820,756 $ 33,859,419 9.86% $101,796,419 $135,655,838 24.96% CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND STATemENT OF EXP~DITuKES, ENCU~ANCES AND UNENCUmbERED APPROPRIATIO~S SG~ARY AS OF SEI-r]m~ER 30, ~988 Mass Transit Facilities Str~s and Brid~es Sanitation Pro~=cts Traffic ~. and Comunicatic~ ture Pro~cts Reserve $13,016,881 $ 101,396 $13,118,277 3,883,717 5,610,040 9,493,757 2,114,161 - 2,114,161 1,510,708 - 1,510,708 9,005,294 1,187,342 10,192,636 10,731,321 10,731,321 1,387,872 1,387,872 1,133,046 200,000 1,333,046 2,969,073 5,204,264 8,173,337 to D~te ~l~ce ~ ~l~-x~ $12,268,789 $ 849,488 $ 458,529 $ 390,959 3,527,372 5,966,385 217,360 5,749,025 1,953,740 160,421 133,178 27,243 1,510,707 1 - 1 8,159,228 2,033,408 809,381 1,224,027 8,872,088 1,859,233 1,225,973 633,260 753,729 634,143 84,112 550,031 930,980 402,066 132,045 270,021 - 8,173,337 8,173,337 ~ Cap±tal Pro~cts Fund $45,752,073 $12,303,042 $58,055,115 $37,976,633 $20,078,482 $ 3,060,578 $17,017,904 CITY OF ROANOKE N~'l'~ FUND FOR 'l'~L~ 3 HObrr~ B~IDED S~]~t 30, 1988 O~erating Revenue= Commercial Sales Domestic Sales Industrial Sales Town of Vinton Roanoke County Customer Services Total Operating Revenue Less: Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Personal Services General Expenses Pumping Stations and Tanks Purification Total Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Operating Income Before Depreciation Less: Depreciation Operating Income Add: Non-Operating Income Interest on Investments Rents Miscellaneous Bad Debt Collections Total Non-Operating Income Income Before Non-Operating Expenses Less: Non-Operating Expenses Interest Expense Total Non-Operating Expenses 1988 $ 281,877 395,028 29,242 16,667 315,754 134,835 1,173,403 206,941 280,359 115,344 48,209 650,853 522,550 167,668 354,882 42,112 1,238 355 1,400 45,105 399,987 4,567 4,567 1987 266,899 398,515 27,434 11,835 263,968 88,833 1,057,484 193,792 219,699 109,284 43,033 565,808 49],676 153,491 338,185 31,307 1,588 287 1,855 35,037 373,222 6,917 6,917 Net Income $ 395,420 $ 366,305 Capital Outlay Not Included in Operating Expenses: Pro~ect Water - New Service, Hyd., Lines Water - Unidentified Plant Replacement Water - Fire Hydrants Water Maintenance - Painting FY 86 Project Design Total Project Expenditures Less Prior Year Expenditures Total Current Year Expenditures Year to Date Expenditures $ 146,537 51,924 8,412 214 12,103 219,190 12,103 $ 207,087 NOTE: Some of these projects are continued from FY87 and FY88 with inception to date totals. CITY OF ROANOKE S~AGE TREATMENT FUND C~MPA~ATIVE INCOME STAT~f~T FOR 'ru~ 3 MONTHS E~DED SEPT]~BER 38,1988 Operating Revenue= Sewage Charges - City Sewage Charges - County Sewage Charges - Vinton Sewage Charges - Salem Sewage Charges - Botetourt County Customer Services Interfund Services Total Operating Revenue Less: Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Personal Services Administrative and Operating Expenses Total Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation Less= Depreciation Operating (Loss) Income Add: Non-Operating Income Interest on Investments Miscellaneous Bad Debt Collections Total Non-Operating Income Income (Loss) Before Non-Operating Expenses Less: Non-Operating Expenses Interest Expense Total Non-Operating Expenses 1988 $1,070,661 136,41]. 52,176 176,235 10,915 26,513 3,607 1,476,518 320,627 1,182,499 1,503,126 26,608) 226,921 253,529) 55,664 5,325 1,341 62,330 191,199) 25,673 25,673 1987 $1,064,235 173,681 61,228 320,666 13,889 37,212 1,984 1,672,895 296,462 1,013,071 1,309,533 363,362 223,660 139,702 72,963 3,988 ],897 78,848 218,550 30,309 30,309 Net Income (Loss) $( 216,872) $ 188,241 Capital Outlay Not Included in Operating Expenses: Project S.T.P. Flood Relief Williamson Road West Sewer Project FY86 Projects Design Mud Lick Sewer - Land Purchase S.T.P. Land Acquisition Williamson Road East Sewer Ph I, Cont II Blue Hills Drive Ext. @ RCIT Fine Mesh Screens Williamson Road Storm Drain Ph 2, Cont IIA Norwood Sanitary Sewer Replacement Williamson Road Storm Drain Ph 2, Cont IIB Chip Drive, NE @ RCIT Total Project Expenditures Less Prior Year Expenditures Total Current Year Expenditures Year to Date Expenditures $ 609,930 45,900 22,074 795,147 15,801 379,298 23,643 42,540 274,337 163,964 134,219 4,875 2,511,728 ],912,797 $ 598,931 NO~: Some of these projects are continued from FY87 and FY88 with inception to date totals. ROANOKE R~GIOHAL AIRPORT C~ISSION C~PARAT1-FE INCfkME STATEMenT FOR Tlil~ 3 ~ONT]]S ~D~D S~;T~]~ 30, 1988 Operating Revenue: Landing Fees Building and Equipment Rentals Terminal Building Rentals Other Property Rentals Advertising Commissions Fuel and Oil Sales Commissions Miscellaneous Fees Total Operating Revenue Less: Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Personal Services Operating Expenses Total Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Operating Income Before Depreciation Less: Depreciation Operating Income Add: Non-Operating Income Interest on Investments Total Non-Operating Income Income Before Non-Operating Expenses Less: Non-Operating Expenses -Interest Expense Total Non-Operating Expenses Net Income 1988 $ 105,624 39,062 53,741 6,943 6,427 393,976 12,263 23,541 641,577 135,335 316,303 451,638 189,939 132,~68 57,171 18,525 18,525 75,696 26,541 26,541 $ 49,155 1987 $ 104,773 42,270 53,192 7,437 6,123 386,248 9,958 10,291 620,292 111,844 317,696 429,540 190,752 145,059 45,693 41,578 41,578 87,271 27,544 27,544 $ 59,727 ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT C0~9~I SSION CONTINUED Capital Outlay Not Included in Operating Expenses: Pro~ect Other Equipment Paint Hangars Unidentified Construction Repaint R/W & T/W Markings Roof Repairs - Replacement AIP #01 Terminal Bldg. Additions/Alterations Noise Protection and Soundproofing Total Project Expenditures Less Prior Year Expenditures Total Current Year Expenditures Year to Date Expenditures $ 10,547 38,307 2,000 630 100 269,712 9,503,179 50,262 9,864,190 6,968,085 $2,896,105 NOTE: Some of these projects are continued from FY87 and FY88 with inception to date totals. CITY OF ROANOKE CMC C~wr~K FUND COMPARATIVE ~ STAT]~T FOR 'r~ 3 MONTHS ENDED SEI~T~4BBR 30, 1988 Operating Revenue: Rentals Parking Fee Event Expenses Advertising Admissions Tax Commissions Total Operating Revenue Less: Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Administrative: Personal Services Utilities and Communications Administrative Expenses Promotional Expenses: Personal Services Services and Charges Total Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Operating (Loss) Before Depreciation Less: Depreciation Operating (Loss) Add: Non-Operating Income Interest on Investments Miscellaneous -Total Non-Operating Income 1988 $ 74,032 5,320 20,119 640 15,223 24,077 139,411 137,560 129,917 129,404 14,174 1,178 412,233 ( 272,822) 80,733 353,555) 12,672 1,151 13,823 1987 $ 65,771 10,014 31,393 785 27,346 21,188 156,497 123,238 72,141 148,755 16,325 4,282 364,741 ( 208,244) 72,309 280,553) 14,069 1,762 15,831 Net (Loss) $( 339,73~2) $( 264,722) CONlI~mu~ Capital Outlay Not Included in Operating Expenses: Project Other Equipment Steps on Terrace and Handicap Ramp Total Project Expenditures Less Prior Year Expenditures Total Current Year Expenditures Year to Date Expenditures $ 26,569 23,916 50,485 15,726 $ 34,759 NOTE: Some of these projects are continued from FY87 and FY88 with inception to date totals. CITY OF ROANOKE II~rm~AL SERVICE FUl~D C(~A~A?IV~ II~(~E S?A?]~]~ FOR 'l'~u~ 3 MOI~IqIS ENDED SEI~I'~ER 30, 1988 Operating Revenue: 1988 Charges for Services $1,595,580 Total Operating Revenue 1,595,580 Less: Operating Exp. Before Depreciation Personal Services 964,862 Operating Expenses 487,398 Total Operating Expenses Before Depreciation 1,452,260 Operating Income (Loss) Before Depreciation 143,320 Less: Depreciation 154,507 Operating Income (Loss) ( 11,187) Add: Non-Operating Income Interest on Investments 15,i25 Total Non-Operating Income 15,125 $ 3,938 Net Income (Loss) 1987 $1,464,689 1,464,689 909,018 514,185 1,423,203 41,486 111,027 69,541) 17,688 17,688 $( 51,853) Capital Outlay Not Included in Operating Expenses: Pro~ect CIS - Other Equipment Motor Vehicular Maintenance - Furniture and Equipment Utility Line Service - Furniture & Equipment Utility Line Service - Land Purchase ~ear to Date Expenditures $ 60,102 942 546 155 Total $ 61,745 CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CITY TREASUREA'S OFFICE GENERAL STATENENT OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MONTH ENBEB SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE: ~ENEDAL STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE CITY TAEASUBER OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA FOR THE FUNDS DF SAID CITf THE MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 FUND BALANCE AT RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTB BALANCE AT BALANCE AT AUG 31, 1988 SEPT 90, lg88 SEPT 30, 19BT GENERAL ~8,395,781 57 51t~9~8~991 38 $1t,113,550.57 K9,i81,288 33 $6,636,~89 97 CAPITAL ~lB,687,726 27 5879,709 90 $678,809 88 $18,294,126.85 $80,908,255 ~8 DEBT SERUICE $416,849.10 $559,940 06 $583,387 5A $~82,8§1.62 59,818 38 WATER $B,280,236 93 $404,750 49 $3O5,386.36 $8,372,101.06 $I,999,~66 46 SEWAGE TREA~MEHT $8,305,345 g4 5546,548.48 5652,783 83 s2,599,154 89 $4~344,869 B1 AIRPORT $1,386,60849 $1,277,54983 $1,464,899 62 $1,199,559.07 $5:096,765 55 CIVIC CENTER $642,757.~9 ~54,094 94 S158,553 BB $538,299 B1 $655,099.31 INTERNAL SERVICE 5990,317 77 $671,084 49 $568,I68.99 $I,099~673 27 5~,011~978 PAYROLL (13,806,009 63) $7,763,893 o3 s8,740,891.45 l$4,I8],507 40) ($1,303,911 7&) PbBLZC ASSISTANCE ($303,4~B 1O) $3!3,047 08 $982 707 ]6 ($316,088 18) $13,~48 82 ~IFTH DIST CONSDDT!UM ($157,401 75) $24A,70~,~1 $24T,BA8 47 $160,545.~1) 556,120 39 GRANT PROGRAM5 (5388,695 ~5/ $418,076 94 5488,830 78 ($447,889 19) ','OT4L 53:,495,8~4.~3 $84,q9!,885 83 K85,BSI,B[7.5A $90,726 163.02 $38,868,540 Ol i HEREBY CEDTZFY THAT tHE FOREGOING ZS A TRUE iTATEM£HT OF MY ACCOOHTF, DiLITY TO THE CiTy OF RDANOEE, dI~GZHIA, FOR THE FUNg5 OF THE VHRIOU5 AC[OUNT5 THEREOF FOB THE ~ONT3 ENDIMG ~EF'TE~BER 30, 19~8 1HAF 5AID FOREGOING; CERTIFICATES CASH OF DEPOSITS UNITED STATES SECUPETI85 TOTALS CASH IH H~ND [ASH IN DDHIJION BANK INVESTMENTS ACQUIKEU FROM CCHPETITIVE F, ROPOSAL~: D~MINION BANK CGLONIAL AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 5BURAN DANK CREDTAR BA~K SIGNET DANK. VENTRAL FIDELITY $1,343,048 $393,114 OB $13,J00,000.00 ~IB,000,DOO QO 5~,O00,JO0.O0 $6,000 000 O0 ~4,000,OOO.O0 $6,~00,000 O0 $6,000,000 OD TCTAL5 $1,736,163.08 s83,000,000.00 $6 D,tO,O00.O0 S30,73&,163 OB DATE DCTDBER ~D~ I988 ROANOKE CITY T~EASURER CITY OF ROANOKE PENSION PLAN STATEt4]~T OF RE~'E~U~ AND EXP]~ISES FO~ Tu~ 3 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMB~ 30, 1988 City's Contributions Investment Income Gain on Sale of Investments Income from Bond Discount Amortization Total Revenue 1988 $ 804,424 392,341 123,453 58,367 $ 1,378,585 1987 $ 930,688 337,490 843,571 62,008 $ 2,173,757 EXPENSES Pension Payments Commissions Active Service Death Benefit Expense from Bond Premium Amortization Insurance Expense Administrative Expense Total Expenses $ 1,177,354 69,323 9,4]2 1,256;089 $ 1,011,964 181 67,245 1,413 765 1,081,568 Net Income Year to Date $ 122,496 $ 1,092,189 ClT~ OF ROANOKE PE~SIO~ pLAN BALANCE S--K~P AS OF SEFT~BER 30, 1988 ASSES Cash Investments: (market value - 1988 $90,721,764 and 1987 $88,824,008) Prepaid Expenses Total Assets 1988 1987 $ 369 $ 197 86,748,089 $86,748,458 80,601,910 3,767 $80,605,874 L?ABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Fund Balance, July 1 Net Income Year to Date Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $86,625,962 122,496 86,748,458 $86,748,458 $79,513,685 1,092,189 80,605,874 $80,605,874 Office oft'he Ci,'¥C~er~ November 9, 1988 File #60-236-304 Mr. Joel Ri. SchIanger Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Schlanger: I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 29360, amending and reor- daining certain sections of the 1988-89 Grant Fund Appropriations, providing for the close-out of Youth Services Grant 87-I-8, and also providing certain appropriation aad reve- nue adjustments therefor, which Ordinance No. 29360 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Eric. pc: Mr. ~s. Ms. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Mario~ V. Crenshaw, Youth Planner Marie T. Pontius, G.ants Monitoring Administrator Room 456 Municipal Builcling 215 Church Avenu~ SW Roanoke 'virginia 2401 t (703) 981-254t IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29360. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain certain sections of the 1988-89 Grant Fund Appropriations, and providing for an emergency. WHEREAS, for the usual daily operation of the Municipal Government of the city of Roanoke, an emergency is declared to exist. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that certain sections of the 1988-89 Grant Fund Appropriations, be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained, to read as follows, in part: Appropriations Health and Welfare Youth Services Grant 87-I-8 (1-9) ................... $ 301,821 46,140 Revenue Health and Welfare Youth Services Grant 87-I-8 (10-11) ................. 1) Reg. Employee Wages 2) ICMA 3) FICA 4) Hosp. Insurance 5) Life Insurance 6) Termination Leave Wages 7) Management Services 8) Telephone 9)' Admin. Supplies (035-052-8824-1002) $ (035-052-8824-1115) (035-052-8824-1120) (035-052-8824-1125) (035-052-8824-1130) (035-052-8824-1150 (035-052-8824-7015 (035-052-8824-2020 (035-052-8824-2030 10) State Grant Revenue (R035-035-1234-7007 il) Local Match (R035-035-1234-7008 445) 35 23 44) 14 252 101 225) 87) 116) 260) $ 301,821 46,140 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that, Ordinance shall be in effect from its an emergency existing, passage. ATTEST: this City Clerk. CITY OF RO*NOKE, VA, November 7, 1988 FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Joel M. Schlanger Close-out of Youth Services Grant 87-I-8 The Youth Services Grant 87-I-8 ended on June 30, 1988. Funding and expenditures for this grant were as follows: Funding Expenditures Unexpended State Local $36,516.00 $10,000.00 36,400~00 9~740.00 $ 116.00 $ 260.00 Total $46,516.00 46,140.00 $ 376.00 The total appropriation for this grant was $46,516.00. Actual funding received was $46,516.00 and total expenditures were $46,140.00. Of funds received, $116.00 in State funds remain unspent and will be returned to the State. The unspent amount of local funds of $260.00 will be returned to the General Fund. The planning and program programs. The Office Board have developed programs and agencies. agencies benefits the and programs. Youth Services Grant provides the coordinated implementation of local youth-serving on Youth and the Youth Services Citizens relationships with other youth-serving Coordination and cooperation between these youth of Roanoke with improved activities Honorable Mayor and Members Page 2 November 7, 1988 of City Council Recon~endations: A. Grant may now be closed. B. Unexpended State funds of $116.00 be returned to the State. C. Unexpended local funds of $260.00 be returned to the General Fund. D. The following appropriation and revenue adjustments be enacted: 6 7 8 9 (10 (11 Regular Employee Wages I.C.M.A. F.I.C.A. Hospitalization Ins. Life Insurance Termination Leave Wages Management Services Telephone Administrative Supplies State Grant Revenue Local Match (035-052-8824-1002 035-052-8824-1115 035-052-8824-1120 035-052-8824-1125 035-052-8824-1130 035-052-8824-1150 035-052-8824-7015 035-052-8824-2020 035-052-8824-2030 035-052-8824-7007 035-052-8824-7008 $(445 35 23 44 14 252 101 (225 ( 87 (116 (260 ~ce ' JMS:dp Off~ce of ~e Ci~, Cier~ November 9, 1988 File #54-237 Mr. G. Andrew Moser U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1825 Virginia Street AnnapoIis, Maryiand 21401 Dear Mr. Moser: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29361, expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and reouesting the Federal Government to share in any additional costs for con.unity projects addressing needs a[ong and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation, which Resolution No. 29361 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. ~ ~ ~SincereZy' , p~.. Mary F. Parker, C~C City Clerk MFP:ra Eric. Room 456 Municipal Building 215 C~urch Avenue SW Roanoke V~rg~nia 2401t (703) 98~-254t C~ce of the Ci~,/Cler~ November 9, 1988 File #54-237 The Honorable James R. Olin Member, United States Congress Room 706, First Federal Building 406 First Street, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Congressman Olin: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29361, expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and requesting the Federal Government to share in any additional costs for community projects addressing needs along and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation, which Resolution No. 29361 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincere ly, /) Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Eric. Room 456 Municipal Building 215 C~urch Avenue SW r'~anoke ~irg~nia 2401'~ (703) 981-254t C~ce of ~he Cil,/ November 9, 1988 File #54-237 The Honorable Paul S. Trible ~4ember, United States Senate P. O. Box 869 Roanoke, Virginia 24005 Dear Senator Trible: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29361, expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and requesting the Federal Government to share in any additional costs for community projects addressing needs a~ong and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation, which Resolution No. 29361 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. ~'~'"~--'~'Sincerely' fl~L,~,- ~fary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP: ra ~nc. Room 456 Municipal Building 215 C~urch Avenu~ SW Rc~noke ~rg~nia 24Ot I (703) 981-2.~.1 Office of the City Cle~ November 9, 1988 File #54 The Honorable John Wo Warner Member, United States Senate Room 405, Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D. C. 20510 9ear Senator Warner: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29361, expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and requesting the Federal Government to share in any additional costs for community projects addressing needs along and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation, which Resolution No. 29361 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on ~onday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk ,~4 FP : r a Enc. I~:)om456 Municit:x]lBuilding 215 C~urch Avenue SW Roanc~e V~r§~nia24011 (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOEE, VIRGINIA, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29361. A RESOLUTION expressing support for designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and requesting the federal govern- ment to share in any additional costs for community projects addressing needs along and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek that may result from such designation. WHEREAS, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed to list the Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) as an endangered species; and WHEREAS, comments on the proposed listing by interested parties have been requested by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and WHEREAS, this Council understands that the decision whether to designate the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species will be made on the basis of environmental and biological factors; and WHEREAS, this Council is vitally concerned with protection of the environment and is also aware of the potential for additional costs for community projects addressing needs along and crossing the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek as a result of such designation. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that this Council supports the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service propo- sal to classify the Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) as an endangered species and hereby respectfully requests that the United States government through the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service or other suitable agency be responsible for and pay its,fair share of any addi- tional costs for future community projects that may result from such an endangered species designation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Council is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Senators John Warner and PauI S. Trible, Jr., and Representative Jim Olin. ATTEST: City Clerk. CITY OF ROANOKE ( OFFICE OF THE CITY ATFORNEY 464 MUNICIPAL BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011-1595 703-9m -2431 November 7, 1988 WILLIAM X PARSONS WILLIAM M. HACKWORTH MARK A. WILLIAMS KATHERINE HOWE JONES ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Re: Designation of Roanoke Logperch as endangered species Dear Mrs. Bowles and Gentlemen: At the October 24, 1988, meeting of Council, this office was requested to revise the resolution concerning designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species. In accordance with Council's request, attached for your consideration is a measure expressing support for the designation of the Roanoke Logperch as an endangered species and requesting that the federal government be responsible for and pay its fair share of any additional com- munity project costs which may result from such designation. I will be happy to respond to any comments or questions you may have with regard to this matter. With kindest personal regards, I am Sincerely yours, Wilburn C. g, Jr. City Attorney WCDJ/MAW:sm Attachment cc: W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Mary F. Parker, City Clerk C~ce o~ ~he G~y Ge~ November 9, 1988 File #144 Mr. John H. Parrott, Chairman Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board P. O. Box 12312 Roanoke, Virginia 24024 Dear Mr. Parrott: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29362, authorizing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke, ratifying certain actions taken to date, and authorizing the expenditure of funds, which Resolution No. 29362 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. Room456 MuniciDalOuilding 215C~urchA',.,~.nue SW Roanoke ',/~rq~n~a24011 (703)98t-2541 Or, ce of ~he City Cie~ November 9, 1988 File #144 Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Herbert: I am attaching copy of Resolution No. 29362, authorizing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste ~fanagement Doard to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke, ratifying certain actions taken to date, and authorizing the expenditure of funds, which Resolution No. 29362 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, Sincerely, November 7, 1988. Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk A~FP:ra Enc. pc: Mr. Joel M. SchIanger, Director of Finance Mr. Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Room 456 Municipal BuJldin(j 215 Church Avenue SW F~:~no~e, ¥~rg~nia 24011 (703) 981-2541 Office of~neCi~Cierk November 9, 1988 File #144 The Honorable Charles R. Mayor, Town of Vinton 311 South Pollard Street Vinton, Virginia 24179 Hill Dear Mayor Hill: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29362, authorizing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke, ratifying certain actions taken to date, and authorizing the expenditure of funds, which Resolution No. 29362 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, ~ary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Erie. pc: Mr. George W. Nester, Town South Pollard Street, Vinton, Manager, Town of Vinton, 311 Virginia 24179 Room 456 Municipal Building 2t5 C~urch Avenue, S.W. Roanc~e. V~rg~nia 24~11 (703) 981-254.1 Office of~e CiWClerk Noven~er 9, 1988 File #144 The Honorable Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Garrett: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29362, authorizing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke, ratifying certain actions taken to date, and authorizing the expenditure of funds, which Resolution No. 29362 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, November 7, 1988. Sincerely, fl~l~ Mary F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP:ra Enc. pc: Mr. Elmer C. Hodge, Roanoke County Administrator, 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 P. O. r~ox 456 Municipal Builcling 21§ C~urch Avenue SW Roanoke V~rg~nia 2401t (703) 981-2541 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, The 7th day of November, 1988. No. 29362. VIRGINIA, A RESOLUTION authorizing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board to assign a contract to the County of Roanoke, ratifying certain actions taken to date, and authorizing the expenditure of funds. WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke entered into an agreement dated July 29, 1975, providing for the operation of a regional sanitary landfill and establishing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board (the "Board"); and WHEREAS, said Board has entered into a certain contract with Olver Inc. to assist in the siting of a new regional solid waste disposal facility; and WHEREAS, said Board has raised certain questions concerning its authority to undertake certain activities relating to the siting of such new facility; and WHEREAS, the participating local governmental jurisdictions which are the parties to this agreement desire to address certain issues regarding the siting of a new regional solid waste dispo- sal facility. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. That the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board is hereby authorized to assign that certain contract be- tween it and Olver Inc. for professional engineering activities concerning the siting of a new regional solid waste disposal facility or facilities in Roanoke County to the County of Roanoke at the request of Roanoke County, except for those por- tions of the contract related to the waste to energy study and the recycling study. 2. That the expenditures by said Board for this contract and for those actions undertaken by it in connection with the siting of said facility to date are hereby authorized, ratified, confirmed and approved. The Board is further authorized and empowered to take such actions as may be required in administra- tion of the waste to energy and recycling elements of the Olver Inc. contract and to make future expenditures with regard to these contract elements. 3. That the Board is authorized to reimburse Roanoke County for its payment to Olver Inc. of fees, expenses, and charges arising under the assigned contract. Roanoke County is authorized to receive as a credit toward its obligation to pay the Board the charge based on the per ton rate for refuse garbage or other material delivered by its vehicles to the regional land- fill pursuant to Section 10 of the Agreement, for any financial obligation it incurs under the assigned Olver Inc. contract. 4. That the City Manager and City Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, such documents, in form approved by the City Attorney, and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this resolution and the City Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this resolution to the appropriate officials of the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton. 5. That this resolution shall take effect only upon the adoption of a resolution of the same substance and effect by each of the parties to the Roanoke Valley Regional Landfill Agreement dated July 29, 1975. ATTEST: City Clerk. Roanoke, Virginia November 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: Subject: Authorization of Study Costs and Assignment of Consultant Contract - New Solid Waste Disposal Methods and Locations I. BackKround: Current landfill site operated by the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board (Board) has in the range of 3 - 4 years of useful life r-m-ining without amendments to the permit issued by the Comonwealth of Virginia. Board co.~issioned a study for a Solid Waste Management Plan for the Roanoke Valley in 1987. That study was completed in April, 1988 with copies made available to members of Council. Solid waste facility sitin~ requir~m.nt~, as stipulated by State regulations, require both a Part "~" and a Part "B" application. Part "A" may be considered preliminary but does require fairly extensive terrain, access and geological information. Part "B", to be prepared once the State approves a Part "A" application, involves more detailed site information, design plans and specifications, operations plan, etc. Implementation and additional study contract (contract) was executed between the Board and Olver, Incorporated (Olver) on 3une 14, 1988. This contract identified a work scope that would lead to the sitin$ of a new regional landfill, transfer stations as needed, and additional studies for waste-to-energy facilities and recycling. The specific work scope can be s,,-..-rized as follows: Walk over, field test and re-evaluate five (5) potential landfill sites. 2. Prepare Part A applications for three (3) sites. 3. Obtain State approval of Part A applications. Provide technical assistance for Part A and Part B applications. Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 5. Provide detailed cost estimates for three (3) sites. Prepare Part B applications on up to two (2) sites (includes plans and bid documents, construction inspection and project start-up services). 7. Prepare Part A and B applications for transfer stations. 8. Prepare and implement a Public Relations Plan. Prepare detailed waste-to-energy evaluation, to include as specifically authorized end user negotiations and bid package. 10. Assist in Authority formation if that course is elected. 11. Develop and assist with policy issues. 12. Recycling study and implementation recommendation. Fees have been authorized and work initiated on work scope items 1, 4, g, 9, and 12. Fees have been authorized but no work initiated on work scope items 2, 3, 5, and 9. Hourly fee schedule has been negotiated but no work authorized or initiated on work scope it-m, 6, 7, 10, and 11. Total authorized contract amount to date Expenditures through October 2, 1988 $245,017.00 105~329.62 Authorized fees yet unearned $139,686.38 Ge Scope of work yet to be accomplished but for which fees have not been authorized (discounting waste-to-energy plan and specification preparations and discounting engine,tinE services during construction) would cost approximately $200,000.00 He Clarification of Board authority to engage in solid waste disposal siting activities was requested of City Council by the Board per the attached letter dated September 20, 1988. Roanoke County has advised the Board that the County desires to take over the process of siting a new regional landfill. Note the attached copy of a letter dated September 29, 1988 from Mr. Garrett to Mr. Parrott. II. Current situation: Landfill Board needs Council's clarification as to authority for the following: Ratification of Board's efforts to date, including the procurement, execution and implementation of the Olver contracts and payments thereunder. Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 3 Assignment of the remaining portions of the Olver contract, less the waste-to-energy study to Roanoke County. Reimbursement of Roanoke County for payment of services rendered by Olver under the assigned contract for establishing a regional landfill and other waste management facilities for the Roanoke Valley. Chief Administrators and leKal officials of Roanoke City, Roanoke County, City of Salem and Town of ¥inton have met with the Chairman of the Landfill Board. Roanoke County has stated its intent to take over the landfill siting process since the ultimate decision rests with the County in that the County must take formal action to permit the ultimate site. County officials have assured City officials that the new landfill would be regional and that the Landfill Board can stipulate certain requirements as a condition of assignment of the Olver contract, namely: 1. Landfill Board and Chief administrative official of each participatin~ political subdivision will get copies of all information prepared by Olver, Incorporated. Landfill Board and participatin~ political subdivisions must approve all substantive emendmmnts to the Olver Contract. AssiKnment a~reement will impose a financial cap for payments to Olver by the County under the assigned contract. Landfill Board will reimburse the County for payment of fees to Olver for services rendered under the assigned contract. New State regulations were passed by the Commonwealth on October 18, 1988. These regulations dictate that all existing landfills be in full compliance with the new regulations or closed by July 1; 1992. III. Issues: A. Expenditure authorization B. AssiKnment of contract C. Ultimate permittin~ responsibility D. Orderly process E. Timing 'Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 4 IV. Alternatives: Council take the followin~ action by adoption of resolution prepared by the City Attorney: Ratify previous actions of the Landfill Board including entry into Olver contract and expenditures thereunder. Authorize the assignment of the contract with Olver, Incorporated from the Landfill Board to Roanoke County and the Landfill Board to reimburse the County for the costs incurred. 1. Expenditure authorization will be clarified. 2. Assignment of contract will be concurred with by Council. Ultimate permittinK responsibility by Roanoke County is recognized. 4. Orderly process will be re-established. Timin~ to continue the process is best met. A new landfill site needs to be identified and be in operation by July 1, 1992. Council refrain from concurrin~ that the Landfill Board cz- assign to and reimburse Roanoke County for cost for future consulting services to establish regional solid waste management facilities in Roanoke County. 1. Expenditure authority will not be authorized. Assi~nment of contract, with reimbursement provision, will not be granted. Ultimate permittin~ responsibility for Roanoke County is not recognized as an overriding concern. Orderly process will not be re-established since apparently there would be two organizations trying to site a regional landfill in Roanoke County. Timin~ will be further delayed by confusion and misunderstanding by citizens. Reco~nendation: Council approve the expenditures and contract assi~nment in accordance with Alternative "A". Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 5 WRH:JMS:KBK:afm Attachments Respectfully submitted, W. Robert Herbert Landfill Board Representative Landfill Board Representative September 20, 1988 Mayor Noel C. Taylor City of P~anoke Room 456, Municipal ~uilding 215 Church Avenue, S. ~. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mayor Taylor: POST OFFICE BOX 12312 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24024 703 931-9331 As you are aware, the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Mamagement BOard was established under an agreement dated July 29, 1975 to administer and operate a regional sanitary landfill for the City of P~anoke, County of Roanoke and Town of Vinton. The Landfill BOard embarked on a study to evaluate future solid waste disposal methods and potential landfill sites with the understanding, that the BOard was expected to make reccmnendations to the local governments. The BOard, at .its september 14, 1988 .~eting, expressed concern that these efforts imay be in conflict with its legal powers set forth in the agreement and the intent of the goveming bodies in establishing the Landfill BOard. The BOard is requesting clarification from the three governing bodies as to its duties and powers regarding the evaluatibn of solid waste disposal methods and potential land£ill sites and if the BOard is following the intent of the local governing bodies in this regard. ';ge are still continuing our efforts at evaluating disposal metlx~is and potential landfill sites. Please advise the LandfilI BOard on this matter. cc:. ~tmbers, P~anoke Valley Regional Solid P/aste ~huagoment Board Job~i ~. Parrott, Chaiman 'a~ste Valley Regional selid Atanagement BOard Mr. Jack Parrott, Chairman Roanoke Regional Solid Waste Management Board P. O. Box 12311 Roanoke, Virginia 24024 Dear Mr. ParrotC: On September 27, 1988, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors took action on concerns expressed in your letter of September 20, 1988. The Landfill Board had requested clarification of the duties and powers of the Landfill Board regarding evaluation of solid waste disposal methods and potentiaI landfill sites. Based on questions raised by Mr. Schlan er di · Herbert and the f ~, ~_~ _ g. , scusslons with Mr. .agreement will onlV dli J'kJn . menaments to the existing believes it is tim~ ~,~_~=l~g pro~es~, Roanoke County . ~ ~u move ~orwara with the regional landfill s~te process. Because of the im ortance to the entire valle~ Ro.__= ..... ~J. of this project lead -*~- ~- ~- z! ~,u&~ ~ouncy wlll proceed o ~ · .v~ in the slti~, n~-- ~ _. . t .... · the reglonal landfilI' - r .... ~.~ anu ~eslgn of the new The Board of Supervisors has directed the County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge to proceed with the necessary action to gain entry to the proposed sites for the required testing and evaluation. He has also been authorized to continue the Permitting and design process with Olver, Inc. to construct a new regional landfill. P.O. BOX 29800 . ROANOKE:. VIRGINIA 2401e.oT9e ,, (703) 772.2004 Mr. Parrot~ Page 2 September 29, 1988 The Board of Supervisors appreciates the progress the Landfill Board has made on this critical issue and requests your continued support as Roanoke County moves forward to provide regional facilities for the Roanoke Valley. LG/bjh CC: Sincerely, Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Roanoke The Honorable Charles Hill, Mayor, Town of Vtnton Regional Landfill Board Members Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager George Nester, Vinton Town Manager Office of the Council November 3, 1988 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mrs. Bowles and Gentlemen: I am pleased to present to you as your Council liaison, the 1987- 1988 Annual Report of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority. The report this year has been dedicated to Hallie B. Albergotti who has served with distinction as a Commis- sioner for fourteen years and as Vice-Chairman of the Aut~hority since 1985. This year the Authority reports that it is managing 1,511 housing units for the poor in our City. The Federal government authorized a $3.9 million modernization program for Jamestown Place and a $2.9 million modernization for Morningside Manor this Additionally, they report 1,233 participants in the Section 8 Program, including 729 existing units and 321 moderate rehabili- tated units. There are also 71 certificates/vouchers issued under the Self-Sufficiency Project which Mayor Taylor has been so interested in. [n the area of economic development, the Authority is pleased to report the establishment of AbaI Material, Foot Levelers, and AZIMUTH electronic designs as new businesses in the Deanwood Development District. The demolition of structures in Shaffer's Crossing for future economic development is also progressing. Finally, I wish to note that the Authority has returned to the City as payment in lieu of taxes, the sum of $120,353.00, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1988. I am sure the Council joins with me in acknowledging the dedi- cated work of Mrs. Albergotti and the other fine members of the Board of Commissioners, as well as, the management and staff of this Authority which continues to be one of our nation's finest public housing efforts. Best personal regards. Sincerely, Council Member DAB: ra Room 456 Municipal Building 2t5 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, Vlnginlo 2401 t (703) 981-254t