Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 09-20-10 ) TRINKLE 38947-092010 ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 20,2010 2:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA 1. Call to Order--RolI Call. All Present. The Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Kenneth P. Lane, Pastor, Trinity Lutheran Church. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor David A. Bowers. Welcome. Mayor Bowers. NOTICE: Today's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channe/3 on Thursday, September 23 at 7:00 p.m., and Saturday, September 25 at 4:00 p.m. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. ANNOUNCEMENTS: THE PUBLIC IS ADVISED THAT MEMBERS OF COUNCIL RECEIVE THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND RELATED COMMUNICATIONS, REPORTS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, ETC., ON THE THURSDAY PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL MEETING TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TIME FOR REVIEW OF INFORMATION. 1 THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PROVIDES THE MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ON THE INTERNET FOR VIEWING AND RESEARCH PURPOSES. TO ACCESS AGENDA MATERIAL, GO TO THE CITY'S HOMEPAGE AT WWW.ROANOKEVA.GOV.CLlCK ON THE GOVERNMENT ICON. NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE IS AVAILABLE FOR DISABLED PERSONS ADDRESSING CITY COUNCIL. EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE ADAPTATIONS OR ACCOMMODATIONS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL NEEDS OF QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES, PROVIDED THAT REASONABLE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PRIOR TO THE MONDAY COUNCIL MEETING, OR REGISTER WITH THE STAFF ASSISTANT AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. ONCE THE COUNCIL MEETING HAS CONVENED, THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER REGISTRATION OF SPEAKERS, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC HEARING MATTERS. ON THE SAME AGENDA ITEM, ONE TO FOUR SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOTTED FIVE MINUTES EACH; HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE MORE THAN FOUR SPEAKERS, EACH SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOTTED THREE MINUTES. ANY PERSON WHO IS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON A CITY COUNCIL APPOINTED AUTHORITY, BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE MAY CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT 853-2541, OR ACCESS THE CITY'S HOMEPAGE TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IS SEEKING APPLICATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING CURRENT OR UPCOMING VACANCIES: ROANOKE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVOCATES - ONE VACANCY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - ONE VACANCY FAIR HOUSING BOARD - ONE VACANCY LOCAL BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS - ONE VACANCY THE CITY OF ROANOKE IS CURRENTLY ACCEPTING NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2010 CITIZEN OF THE YEAR. CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OR ACCESS THE CITY'S HOMEPAGE TO OBTAIN A NOMINATION FORM. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF NOMINATIONS IS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2010. Council sent get well wishes to Andrea Johnson, Administrative Assistant, City Clerk's Office. 2 2. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: A Proclamation declaring September 27,2010 as Family Day - A Day to Eat Dinner With Your Children. Presentation of the Excellence Achievement Award for Financial Reporting to the Director of Finance and Staff. Presented plaque to the Director of Finance and staff. 3. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: CITY COUNCIL SETS THIS TIME AS A PRIORITY FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. MATTERS REQUIRING REFERRAL TO THE CITY MANAGER WILL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY FOR RESPONSE, RECOMMENDATION OR REPORT TO COUNCIL. Robert Gravely 4. CONSENT AGENDA (APPROVED 7-0) ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEMS. IF DISCUSSIONIS DESIRED, THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED "FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. C-1 Minutes of the regular meetings of Council held on Monday, July 19, 2010 and Monday, August 2,2010. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Dispensed with the reading of the minutes and approved as recorded. C-2 Minutes of the Audit Committee meeting held on Wednesday, September 1, 2010. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. \ 3 C-3 Reports of qualification of the following individuals: Jeff S. Philips as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term ending May 31,2012; Richard F. Walters as a member of the Roanoke Civic Center Commission for a term of three years ending September 30, 2013; Marion Vaughn-Howard as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term ending May 31,2012; and Rena E. Cromer and Anthony S. Tate as members of the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates for terms ending June 30, 2013. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. REGULAR AGENDA 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE. 6. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: a. Request of Total Action Against Poverty to share information regarding Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers (SERC). Rick Sheets, Director, Energy Conservation and Rehabilitation, Spokesperson. (Sponsored by Council Members Lea and Rosen) Comments received and filed. 7. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND COMMENTS OF CITY MANAGER: a. CITY MANAGER: BRIEFINGS: · Countryside Property Reuse 30 minutes At 4:00 p.m., the Council meeting was declared in recess. At 4:15 p.m., the Council Meeting reconvened in the Council Chamber, with Mayor Bowers presiding and all Members of the Council in attendance. 4 At this point, the Mayor advised that the Council would conduct public interviews with Timothy Witten and Russ Barksdale for consideration to fill the vacancy on the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority created by the expiration of the term of office of Cheryl Miller on August 31, 2010, adding that the position is a four-year term of office ending August 31, 2014, and will be televised live. Inasmuch as Mr. Witten has an illness in his family, the Council agreed to grant him a public interview during the 7:00 p.m. session of the Council. ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR ACTION: 1. Execution of Amendment No.2 to the FY 2009 CDBG/HOME-funded Agreement with Habitat for Humanity in the Roanoke Valley, Inc., for housing activities in the City's Hurt Park Neighborhood. Adopted Resolution No. 38947-092010 (7-0). COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER. The City Manager provided an update regarding the Parks and Recreation Greenway Courtesy check point in Smith Park; and announced that the Prescription Take Back Drug Enforcement would be held on September 25 from 10:00 - 2:00 p.m., at the Civic Center, and Halloween would be observed on Sunday, October 31, 2010, as well as activities sponsored by Downtown Roanoke, Inc., on Saturday, October 23,2010. b. CITY CLERK: 1. A communication advising of the expiration of the two-year terms of office of the City Attorney, City Clerk, Director of Finance and Municipal Auditor on September 30,2010. Council / reappointed William Hackworth, City Attorney; Stephanie Moon, City Clerk; Ann Shawver, Director of Finance; and Drew Harmon, Municipal Auditor, for terms of two-years, each, commencing October 1, 2010 and ending September 30, 2012. 8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: a. A report of the Roanoke City School Board requesting appropriation offunds for various educational programs; and a report of the Director of Finance recommending that Council concur in the request. Kathryn K. Fox, Lead Accountant, Spokesperson. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 38948-092010 (7-0). 5 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. 10. INTRODUCTION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: a. A resolution reappointing A. Damon Williams as a Director of the Economic Development Authority for the City of Roanoke for a term of four years commencing October 21,2014. Adopted Resolution No. 38949-092010 (7-0). b. A resolution designating a Voting Delegate and Alternate Voting Delegate for the Annual Business Meeting of the National League of Cities on Saturday, December 4,2010, in Denver, Colorado. Withdrawn. 11. MOTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: a. Inquiries and/or comments by the Mayor and Members of City Council. A communication from Ralph Fuller Community Band was referred to the City Manager for review and consideration. b. Vacancies on certain authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council. None. At 4:50 p.m., the Mayor declared the Council meeting in recess until 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber. 6 ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 20,2010 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA Call to Order--RolI Call. All Present. The Invocation was delivered by Mayor David A. Bowers. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Boy Scout Troop No. 17, St. John's Episcopal Church. Welcome. Mayor Bowers. The Council sent get well wishes to Andrea Johnson, Administrative Assistant, City Clerk's Office. NOTICE: Tonight's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursday, September 23 at 7:00 p.m., and Saturday, September 25 at 4:00 p.m. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. A. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Recognition of U. S. Kids Care participants. Presented certificates to the participants. Recognition for Outstanding Preservation/Renovation Projects by the Architectural Review Board. Erica Taylor, Agent. Certificates were presented by the ARB. 7 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Request of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to amend Proffered Condition No. 14 and repeal Proffered Condition No. 17 in connection with the property / located at 4176 Franklin Road, S. W. Mary Trott, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 38950-092010 (7-0). 2. Request of Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.1. to rezone property located at 3454 Cove Road, N. W., from R-7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain proffered conditions. David E. Greer, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 38951-092010 (7-0). 3. Request of Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S. E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District. Scott Horchler, Spokesp~rson. Adopted Ordinance No. 38952-092010 (7-0). 4. Request of the City of Roanoke Planning Commission to amend the City Code in order to permit residential uses to be located on the first floor of a mixed-use building in the MXPUD District. Christopher L. Chittum, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 38953-092010 (7-0). C. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. A communication from the City Manager recommending termination of the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project. Adopted Resolution No. 38954-092010 (7-0). 2. A communication from the City Manager recommending termination of the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project. Adopted Resolution No. 38955-092010 (7-0). 3. A ,communication from the City Manager recommending approval of Amendment NO.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Gainsboro Community Development Program Area. Adopted Resolution No. 38956-092010 (7-0). 8 D. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: . CITY COUNCIL SETS THIS TIME AS A PRIORITY FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. MATTERS REQUIRING REFERRAL TO THE CITY MANAGER WILL BE REFERRED IMMEDIATELY FOR RESPONSE, RECOMMENDATION OR REPORT TO COUNCIL. Chris Craft - repairs needed at Elmwood Parking Garage. At this point, the Council conducted a public interview with Timothy Witten for consideration to fill the vacancy created by the expiration of the four-year term of office of Cheryl Miller as .a Commissioner of the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority on August 31, 2010. E. ADJOURNED - 8:08 p.m. 9 Office of the Mayor CITY. OF the use of illegal and prescription drugs and the abuse of alcohol and nicotine constitute the greatest threats to the well-being of America's children; WHEREAS, 15 years of surveys conducted by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University have consistently found that the more often children and teenagers eat dinner with their families the less likely they are to smoke, drink and use illegal drugs; WHEREAS, frequent family dining is associated with lower rates of teen smoking, drinking, illegal drug use and prescription . drug abuse; WHEREAS, the correlation between frequent family dinners and reduced risk for teen substance abuse is well documented; WHEREAS, parents who are engaged in their children's lives - through such activities as frequent family dinners - are less likely to have children who abuse substances; and WHEREAS, family dinners have long constituted a substantial pillar of family life in America. NOW, THEREFORE, I, David A. Bowers, Mayor of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, urge all citizens to recognize and participate in its observance and, do hereby proclaim the fourth Monday of evel}'September, throughout this great All-America City, as FAMIL Y DA Y - A DA Y TO EA T DINNER WITH YOUR CHILDREN. Given under our hands and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twentieth day of September in the year two thousand and ten. ATTEST: ~';:;;~ City Clerk MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL Location: Council Conference Room Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, Room 451 South Date: September 1, 2010 Time: 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Attendees: Sherman Lea, Audit Committee Chair Court Rosen, Audit Committee Member David Trinkle, Audit Committee Member Mayor David Bowers, Ex-Officio Member of the Audit Committee Drew Harmon, Municipal Auditor Ann Shawver, Director of Finance Chris Morrill, City Manager Jim Grigsby, Assistant City Manager - Operations Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager - Community Development Dawn Hope Mullins, Assistant Municipal Auditor Pam Mosdell, Information Systems Auditor Debbie Noble, Senior Auditor Ann Clark, Senior Auditor Sheriff Octavia Johnson Phil Schirmer, City Engineer Luke Pugh, Civil Engineer II Stephanie Moon, City Clerk Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Andrea Trent, Assistant Director of Finance 1. Call to Order Mr. Lea called the meeting to order at 4:04pm. 2. Selection of Committee Chair Mr. Rosen nominated Mr. Lea; Mayor Bowers seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered and Mr. Lea was unanimously elected chair. 3. Audit Committee Annual Report Mr. Lea briefly reviewed the report and commented that the year went well for the committee. He asked for additional comments and questions. There were none and the Committee voted to forward the report to the Clerk's office for placement on the Audit Committee Minutes September 1, 2010 September City Council consent agenda. 4. Code Enforcement Follow-up Audit This audit served as a follow up to findings identified in the March 2009 Code Enforcement report. Community concerns with enforcement of weed, trash, and property maintenance ordinances, as well as the timelines involved with remedying issues, prompted Municipal Auditing to schedule a separate, early follow up audit. The outcome of the report was favorable. Mr. Harmon highlighted some of the notable findings: . A complete and comprehensive set of policies and procedures have been developed and provide a good foundation for future improvements in enforcing weed, trash, and property maintenance codes. . Two Senior Inspector positions were created that help ensure consistency in how Inspectors enforce the code. . A measure of housing conditions was identified in Real Estate Valuation. Real Estate Appraisers visit each house in the City over a four (4) year cycle to evaluate condition. This information provides an excellent gauge of the health of the City's housing stock. The data indicated that 95% of the city's residential properties were in average or better condition. The Code Enforcement Division plans to review the houses evaluated by Appraisers to be in poor condition and to cite those properties as appropriate. . Code Enforcement and Technology staff have invested significant time in improving Property Maintenance screens in the Accela system which will help facilitate work. These improvements are expected to be completed by December 31,2010. The Mayor asked about the inconsistency of control dates [go-live dates for improvements to various Accela modules] in the report. Mr. Harmon responded that it was normal for changes to be implemented over the course of time. He noted that the Auditing department will follow up on audit findings annually until they are resolved. Mr. Rosen and Mr. Lea both commented that the progress in Code Enforcement over the last year and a half has been impressive. Dr. Trinkle commented on the positive impact realized when the Neighborhood Coordinator began sending the court docket to neighborhood representatives. This has encouraged people to attend court hearings and helped demonstrate to the Judges the neighborhoods' support for enforcing the code. Mr. Morrill commented on other related efforts: Page 2 of 5 Audit Committee Minutes September 1, 2010 . The Police Department has organized anumber of neighborhood walks that bring together residents and representatives from various city departments. Crime and its contributing factors, such as property maintenance issues, are identified during the walks and collectively addressed. . The Old Southwest Neighborhood Association has created a rental property sub- committee. The City is working on a pilot 'project with this group to assemble data and attempt to determine the root causes of neighborhood problems, as well as identify means to address them. . City representatives have met with the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates group and discussed ways of improving communication. Additionally, City staff are developing a business case for implementing a 311 system which would better support two-way communication with citizens. Such a system would require one to two years to fully implement, as well as a significant monetary investment. The only 311 system in the Commonwealth is thought to be in Hampton. The committee further discussed general aspects of how a 311 system works and the benefits of partnering with other localities. A regional system would be ideal. The Code Enforcement Follow-up report was received and filed. 5. Roanoke River Flood Reduction Audit The Roanoke River Flood Reduction project was initiated in 1988 and a Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the Army Corps of Engineers [Corps] in 1990. At the request of the City's Engineering Division, Municipal Auditing staff worked with Corps personnel to validate the Corps' August 2009 request for $1.2 million in additional project funds. Based on available information the request was deternlined to be adequately supported by the Corp's accounting records. The audit report offers recommendations for potential project accounting and communication improvements. The scope and scale of the project, the span of time involved, and the complexities of cooperation agreement contributed to the reportable issues. Mr. Harmon noted that both the Corps and the City Engineering Division personnel were very cooperative and supportive of the audit. Mayor Bowers asked how the City managed the unexpected request for an additional $1.2 million in local matching funds. Mr. Schirmer responded that project funding is derived from a designated portion of the City's utility tax and that the Corp's request was primarily a cash flow issue. The City was able to identify the cash funds necessary to make the required payment. Ms. Shawver also noted that City Council approved additional bond funding for the flood reduction project in November. Page 3 of 5 Audit Committee Minutes September 1, 2010 Mr. Schirmer further explained that the flood reduction portion of the project is nearing completion, with the final contract for benchcuts and recreational trail having already been awarded. The Engineering Division does not anticipate additional large payments will be required. Dr. Trinkle commented that the report was a good summary and asked if any federal stimulus funds for the project were lost. Mr. Schirmer replied that no stimulus funds were lost. The Committee discussed greenways in relation to the flood reduction project. Mr. Schirmer reported that the project will conclude with the benchcuts and recreational trails that stretch to Bridge Street, which are already under contract. Recreational trails along the river required to reach Salem will not be funded as part of the flood reduction project. The City will pursue other funding sources to complete this portion of the greenway which is estimated at approximately two miles. . The Mayor asked about the original project cost estimate and how it compared to final costs. Mr. Schirmer stated that original costs were estimated at $31 million with final project costs totaling approximately $74 million. The Committee discussed the success of the project in reducing flood damage and improving the recreation around the river. The Committee received and filed the Roanoke River Flood Reduction report. 6. Sheriff's Canteen and Auxiliary Funds Audit The Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts [APA] requires that Inmate Canteen funds be audited annually by an external audit firm. Staff of the Municipal Auditing Department perform the audit according to the specifications provided by the APA and the results are reviewed by the City's independent audit firm, KPMG. No findings were noted in the Fiscal Year 2010 audit. A separate, independent audit of the Sheriff's internal controls is also required by the APA. The City has contracted with Brown, Edwards and Company to perform this work. The report related to Sheriff's internal controls will be presented at the December Audit Committee meeting. The Committee had no questions; the Sheriff's Canteen and Auxiliary Funds report was received and filed. 7. City Council Expenditures - FY 2010 Page 4 of 5 Audit Committee Minutes September 1, 2010 Per the Travel and Expense Policy for City Council, Municipal Auditing is required to review council expenditures annually. During Fiscal Year 2010, all Council Members sustained a spending level well within budget and there were no findings cited in the report. Mr. Lea thanked Ms. Moon and her staff for their work in helping to ensure Members of Council complied with tne travel policies and procedures. Dr. Trinkle asked about a disbursement to the Roanoke Tribune noted in the results section of the audit report. Mr. Harmon stated that the payment was for an advertisement congratulating the Tribune on its 715t anniversary. This disbursement was noteworthy as it was classified as a gratuity and is paid annually. It was noted in the report to ensure Members of Council were aware of the expenditure. Committee members commented that the expenditure had been approved by Council. Committee members discussed the City's Discretionary Expenditures Policy. It was noted that government officials play an important ceremonial role in the community. A desire that the policy be clear and consistent was expressed. Based on the discussion, the Committee asked City staff to research model policies and to make recommendations for improving the City's policy. 8. Call for Other Business Requiring the Committee's Attention . Ms. Shawver shared with the Committee that the Internal Revenue Service [IRS] has notified the Department of Finance of its intent to audit the City. Roanoke County and the City of Salem have already been visited. The audit will likely involve reviewing the City's files for required forms such as W-4s. IRS staff may also look at issues such as the City's treatment of employees as contractors. The engagement will cover Calendar Year 2008 and will take place in late Octobe~. . Mr. Harmon proposed continuing to hold Audit Committee meetings on Wednesdays from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. and the following dates were confirmed by the Committee: March 2,2011 June 1, 2011 September 7,2011 December 7,2011 9. Adjournment Mr. Lea adjourned the meeting at 5:01 pm. Page 5 of 5 , CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk September 22,2010 Michael Clark, Secretary Youth Services Citizen Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Clark: JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Jeff S. Philips has qualified as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term of office ending May ~31, 2012. ecelj T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virg'inia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Jeff S. Philips, do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term of office ending May 31, 2012, according to the best of my ability (So help me God). /;;f '" Subscribed a~d sworn to before me this 3/ ~ ~ 201 O. BRENDA S. HAMILTON, CLERK OF T E CIRCUIT COURT ~'c; ~ BY STEPHANIE M. MOON,CMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov September 22, 2010 Robyn Schon, Assistant General Manager Roanoke Civic Center Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Schon: JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Richard F. Walters has qualified as a member of the Roanoke Civic Center Commission for a three-year term of office ending September 30, 2013. Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Richard F. Walters do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Roanoke Civic Center Commission for a term of three years ending September 30, 2013, according to the best of my ability (So help me God). iJu) T I1Jdiw Subscribed and sworn to before me this /.$ day OfU~ 2010. BRENDA S. HAMILTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BY~ ~q7d- , CLERK . ,.. . .~ ~ 0.. :.1.. '"'. -., l 1,,' f-,~ :.J: ,J L:\CLERK\DAT A\CKSM I \Oaths\Civic Center Commission\Richard F. Walters oath. doc STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov September 22, 2010 Michael Clark, Secretary Youth Services Citizen Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Clark: JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Marion A. Vaughn-Howard has qualified as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term of office ending May 31,2012. Cecelia T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Marion A. Vaughn-Howard, do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term ending May 31, 2012, according to the best of . my ability (So help me God). Subscribed and sworn to before m~ thi.v~ay ~ 2010 BRENDA S. HAMILTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ------- , LERK B J CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk September 22, 2010 Robert A. Clement, Jr. Neighborhood Services Coordinator Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Clement: This is to advise you that Rena E. Cromer has qualified as a member of the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates for a term of office ending June 30, 2013. eaT. Webb Assistant Deputy City C.lerk \ K:\Oaths-Qualification\Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates\Rena E. Cromer Qualification.doc Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Rena E. Cromer do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates for a term ending June 30, I 2013, according to the best of my ability (So help me God). ~ ~ frr1PJ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11- day of~1bJJV2010. BRENDA S. HAMILTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT s@e ~Ul ~jCLERK . j' L:\CLERK\DAT A \CKSM 1 \Oaths\Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates\Rena E. Cromer oath. doc " STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov September 22,2010 Robert A. Clement, Jr. Neighborhood Services Coordinator Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Clement: JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Anthony S. Tate has qualified as a member of the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates for a term of office ending June 30, 2013. Cece . Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk K:\Oaths-Qualification\Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates\Anthony S. Tate Qualification.doc Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Anthony S. Tate do solemnly affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constjtutioll of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates for a term ending June 30, 2013, according to the best of my ability (So help me God). --1~ 5. fa . . ':iJ Subscribed and sworn to before me this j!j day of J;!2010. BRENDA S. HAMILTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BY ~./Y~'CLERK L:\CLERK\DAT A\CKSM I \Oaths\Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates\Anthony S. Tate oath. doc CITY OF ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL 215 Church Avenue, S.w. Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540)853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 Council Members William D. Bestpitch Raphael E. "Ray" Ferris Sherman p, Lea Anita J. Price Court G. Rosen David B. Trinkle DAVID A. BOWERS Mayor September 20, 2010 The Honorable Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of Council: We jointly sponsor a request of Rick Sheets, Director, Energy Conservation and Housing Rehabilitation, TAP, to share information regarding Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers (SERC), at the regular meeting of City Council to be held on Monday, September 20, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. Sincerely, ~ rfi~ Sherman P. Lea Council Member ~ Court G. Rosen Council Member SPUCGR:ctw . .. tD. a. ~t~Re Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers (SERe) Brief description of the proiect to be undertaken Total Action Against Poverty, Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the Association of Energy Conservation Professionals (AECP), and Virginia Tech propose a cooperative, block-focused pilot program to expand weatherization services to income-eligible households using materials, benefits, and renewable energy technologies not currently covered by the program. Participating entities are especially interested in utilizing cool roof technologies, high performance hot water systems, geothermal heating/cooling systems, and solar photovoltaic technology. Roanoke County staff and City of Roanoke staff will be responsible for identifying city blocks or portions of county neighborhoods that have a high proportion of income-eligible residents. (Residents who are "income- eligible" will meet the definition of such set down by DHCD, the weatherization regulatory body in Virginia.) Once appropriate blocks or swaths of neighborhoods have been identified and the residents have confirmed their interest to participate, that infonnation will be forwarded to TAP's weatherization department for inspection. TAP, the local W AP provider for both the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County, will schedule an inspection of the properties identified by City or County staff. The inspector will proceed as usual, identifying all of the energy-saving measures that the house needs. After the inspection is complete, TAP's ECHR director, the crew foreman, and crew leaders will review the inspection fonns to determine which non-traditional energy efficiency measures and technologies would best suit each home. (For example, if the inspection found a malfunctioning or old hot water heater, then installation of a new, high-performance system, would be an appropriate option.) The crew foreman would then take care of contacting an appropriate contractor to handle installation of the agreed-upon technologies, while TAP's weatherization crew would handle work done under the scope of standard WX program measures. The purpose of this partnership is not only to utilize methods and technologies not usually available to weatherization recipients and to increase the number of eligible people receiving weatherization services, but to develop reliable ways to measure total carbon reduction as a result of weatherization services. Weatherization providers often face difficulties doing this due to the variety of houses and services provided. TAP has approached an engineer at Virginia Tech about the feasibility of developing methods to measure total carbon reduction per household that would take into account the variables of house size and services provided. As part of this project, the Virginia Tech engineer would utilize final inspection measures provided by AECP as the certified third-party inspector for weatherization services, and develop standards for measuring total carbon reduction that could be utilized by TAP and other state W AP agencies in the future. In addition, he would calculate the total carbon reduction for the pilot program. . .. ReQuested fundine: levels for the described proiect TAP proposes program funding of $1 million dollars for this project. That would help cover the cost of staff time and-resources devoted to the project by Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and TAP. Total administrative costs will not exceed the 10% cap on the use of funds; indeed, we expect the total administrative budget to be well under $100,000. A portion of the funding will go to AECP for their work on the final inspections (service fees are still being negotiated), and a portion will go to Virginia Tech for the engineer's time for data analysis and development of reliable carbon reduction measures (fee for services are still being negotiated). The remainder of the funds will go toward paying for the materials, benefits, renewable energy technologies, and contractor fees that will be utilized in the program. , . ~eK ~ Countryside Property Development City Council Briefing September 20, 2010 Contents 1. Timeline/Background 2. City Plans and Citizen Involvement 3. Planning Approach 1 . -lA-il'" (~ f'\ .~t 1-~ I re I l~")/ . ;....... -- , I t__, . ' Background . Vision 2001-2020 recommended housing cluster development . Purchased in 2005 for purposes of mixed-use development . Two attempts to identify a developer . Pursued con,tinuation of golf course - $1.5 million in capital improvements needed - Extension of the operating agreement for 5 years - Interim management agreement ($75,000 per year) Public Golf Course Performance · Nationally, 1990s & 2000s were a period of overbuilding of courses. · Growing imbalance between supply of courses and demand by golfers beginning in mid-1990s - Number of courses up 24% - Decrease of 8,000 rounds per course National Golf Foundation, Golf Industry Report, Fall 2009 2 , . Public Golf Course Performance · Many courses trapped in a downward spiral - 60% report lowered maintenance standards - Almost 90% deferring capital expenditures · 100-200 courses will close every year for the next 10 years. National Golf Foundation, Golf Industry Report, Fall 2009 Public Golf Course Performance 2008 Construction Cost Estimates Low High New Course $7.4 million $8.5 million Greens Renovation $1.05 million $1.3 million ", :" ,:,.-.,.'. -, :,,'-- .....>' ,', ,"'" ":'/',", Irrigation Renovation , ,:.~.t./, '- '., "- .,.;'. . $1.6million . $?~milliori; Source: From CB Richard Ellis, Inc., Golf Market Analysis (2008) Table information from Golf Course Builders Association of America 3 . ' Municipal Golf Course Performance · 16 Virginia local governments surveyed · None posted net income for more than two years · 9-hole courses do not fare better than 18-hole courses · AveraQe subsidy is $302K ....;.x",,,,,.,::::-::.:...;.::,,::::,,,,::::"',::,,::,.::::::.,,,,.;,-".""::::"::",.::::::::::::.:::"::::",:::::::::-::,;::::::::::",<:.:,,,,,,,:::::::x::",. "::::':::::::::;:::', ;";:..:::;::::;:..". ......,..,:: ::::-'-:-'--'-'---:::1:::"":<:'":-:;:"::;>:-;-:-::-;-:::::::::.,x-..::::-::::->:::::::::<:::::::",,,::::: ::::::x:;:,::::.::::-..".... I Municipal Golf Course Performance in Virginia $100,000 $50.000 lil $n >. <ll (IJ ~ I E ::l I '" (S50.000) 0 81 0 .E .... t>> ;; ($100,000) c: 0 :;:; E ($160,068.) '" ... ($150.000) (IJ ;; ~ Q. 0 '0 "S (IJ ($200.000) .. '" ($237.330) z t>> '" (520S.,7361 .....-+- ... <ll ($250.000) ~ (S274,1~ ~ ($300,000) .... I (5302,510) ($350,000) =,~~~"^W~~=~~'=~M~=.=m~ Ii FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 4 Municipal Golf Course Performance 1990s · New courses built in Roanoke MSA increased the supply of public courses by 50% (4 courses to 6) · Population increase for Roanoke MSA was 5.1 % Municipal Golf Course Considerations · Fundamentally different from other parks and recreation facilities - access provided to citizens - limiteq target market (average golfer income is in the $60-65K range) · Expect an operating subsidy each year · Expect to fund capital improvements and ongoing repairs/maintenance/periodic replacements . . 5 Current Situation · Financial situation resulted in the need to defer capital improvements · No finalization of management contract given delay in improvements · Golf course closed · City staff directed to work with community on a process to develop alternative development strategies for the property. The Opportunity · Scarce land resource for new development · Create new residential development · Create jobs through economicdevelopment · Enhance recreational amenities needed in the area · Add value to the area 6 City Plans to be Considered · Vision 2001-2020 · Peters Creek North · Parks and Recreation Master Plan · Greenway plans · Housing plan Community Involvement · 5 community meetings · 6 focus groups. · Open-house follow up · Excellent attendance · E-mail correspondence · Slideshare a useful involvement tool 7 Community Involvement · Neighborhood · Recreation · Economic Development · Realtors · Homebuilders · Planning Commission Common Ground · All want something that adds value to the properties surrounding the former golf course · The City and the citizens are all concerned about property values · Urgency to find a path forward; uncertainty is harmful · Area near 1-581 an important gateway · Land between Ranch Road, Mattaponi Drive, and Countryside Road most critical area in terms of adjacency. · Cove Road needs attention 8 Planning Approach · The property should be considered as a community,:wide opportunity · Responsive to recommendations and needs identified in existing plans · Ensure development enhances community · Development that is financially sustainable · Creates a sense of place and is uniquely Roanoke · Respects a visible gateway to Roanoke Challenges · RPZ restrictions · Topography · Street access · Airport Noise · Fragmentation of property · Variety of surrounding uses to be considered 9 Planning Opportunities . Largest land area currently available in Roanoke . Greenway route . No environmental cleanup issues . Can be approached in different pieces with unique character . Proximity to retail, airport, 1-81 . Visibility . Strong neighborhood association . Good to excellent adjacent development . Address identified needs of the area . Potential for expansion of Trane . Proximity to WFHS Planning Areas 10 Portland Laurel Ridge -137 acres are City-owned Schematic - 8 areas - Relative size shown -72 acres RRAC Ranch~~ Mattaponl U MattaponiQ CountrySideu Laurel Ridge Mattaponi Countryside 11 Positive Features Existing street frontages Strong adjacent residential Good topography Ranchl Mattajloni 16 acres Challenges Narrow shape A portion is noise impacted Comments Most critical areas in terms of resident interest. Existing residential uses make the area a candidate for some form of residential. Residential lots could be divided along existing street frontages. Resulting lots would need to be relatively shallow. If divided for residential, likely to be remaining area for open space (possibly deeded or leased to adjoining owners). Some adjoining owners have expressed interest in acquisition. Mattaponil Countryside 17 acres Single-family residential Ranchl Mattaponi 16 acres ,/ or open space Mattaponil Countryside 17 acres ,/ or some of both 12 Laurel Ridge RanCh/D Mattaponi Frontage A Mattaponi/D countrySide. Positive Features Terrain Access Existing street frontages Challenges Noise impact - extended centerline of runway 6 - located within the 65 DBL contour. Comments Most of the land is not suitable for residential development due to airport noise impact. 13 open space or agriculture reserved for future neighborhood commercial and civic space (square) ./ Portland RanCh/D Mattaponi MattaponiD Countryside Frontage A 14 Positive Features Western portion has exceptional views Good existing access streets Western portion is relatively flat Challenges Flood plain Pond/wetland Access to eastern portion Comments Single-family residential would be appropriate in terms of use, but raying out traditional lots would be a challenge. 4-unit condos, townhouses, or patio homes with 4 units or fewer per building would be good options because a driveway, rather than a new street, could be used for access. Such units could use the land efficiently and leave opportunities for meaningful open space. Airport has expressed interest in acquiring 'navigation easements" to limit height of structures and trees due to flight patterns. Single-family residential r/ 15 Portland RanCh/D Mattaponi MattaponiD Countryside. laurel Ridge Features Visibility from 1-581 Adjacent high quality office/industrial uses Potential greenway linkage Challenges Flood plain and steep topography limit usable acreage. Existing structures could be a liability if not reused. Narrow shape Comments Potential to complement other properties. Consider adjacent higher-intensity, higher density uses. Appearance is important along this gateway. 16 Portland RanCh/D Mattaponi '. Mattaponi/[J Countryside Commercial office! flex space .I or townhouses .I Frontage A 17 Positive Features Large contiguous parcel of land Visibility from 1-581 Potential greenway linkage Challenges Flood plain Steep slope Limitations on use Approach lighting towers Cannot create water features or uses attractive to birds. No occupied structures Under control of Airport Commission; use subject to TSA mandates. Comments Potential uses severely limited (no structures and no public assembly) Passive uses commercial agriculture/ community garden .t or greenway/walking trails .t or passive open space .t or solar power array .t 18 Portland Laurel Ridge Ranchl Mattaponi Mattaponi Countryside Frontage B Positive Features Large contiguous parcel. Good terrain. Existing buildings could be an asset. Central area is the most usable portion of the property. Open to a wide variety of potential land uses. Potential greenway linkage Challenges Existing buildings could be a liability, depending on land use. Disconnected street access 19 Light, small-scale commercial Mixed density residential .I Recreation/Sports complex .I Recommended Path Forward Create a master plan with a focus on each unique area Continue process that keeps the community engaged in planning The Planning Commission should have a prominent role Involve other professionals (planners, lawyers, engineers, real estate, marketing, etc.). Approximately 6 months to develop a master plan Different parts of the property may develop at different times, depending on market, opportunities, and participation by developers 20 . ..,' Conclusion · The land is an opportunity to meet long-standing community needs and goals · Questions and discussion 21 J. .t3ri elinj Countryside Detailed Chronology Supplement for City Council Briefing September 20, 2010 1925-1999 · 1925-1962: - Ole Monterey (1925) - Blue Hills (1957) - Botetourt(1962) · 1965: Map of Arrow Wood Country Club. - 46-acre clear zone owned by City of Roanoke leased to the club. - U.S. Golf begins subdividing lots off of the property, · 1991-1999: - Hanging Rock (1991) - Ashley Plantation (1999) - Numerous courses open near SML. 1 .-\ . r\ 'i','..r'~ \~~ ~ .:-\)0':'. ; I \l \,...- . \.....1(' ! \..... 2001 · Vision 2001-2020 recommends housing clusters. · Fairways Group offers property for sale for +/- $6 million. · Appraisal - $4.1-$4.5 million as a golf course - $5.2 million if not limited to a golf course 2002 · Lawrence Group provides a general assessment of the property · Peters Creek North Plan recommends mixed density housing for the property. 2 2003 · Lawrence Group provides conceptual-level plans to assess development potential. · Revenue projections estimate recapture of land investment in about 10 years or less. · Meadowbrook ceases operation of the swimming pool facility. 2005 · Pending sale announced (May). Public. meeting held at Fleming. · Roanoke Regional Airport Commission indicates need for expansion of RPZ · Toll Brothers responds to RFQ and invited to submit a proposal. 3 . , '. " .... 2005 · Property conveyed to City · City and Meadowbrook Golf operation agreement · Land leased for $35,000 per year · Property rezoned to ROS (Recreation and Open Space) - Main portion was zoned RM-2 (Potential for over 1,900 units) - laurel Ridge area was zoned RS-1 (Single-family Residential) 2006 · Toll Brothers notified City that it does not intend to pursue development of the property · Community meeting to gain guidance on content of 2nd RFP · Proposal submitted by Countryside, LLC · City Council authorizes Countryside, LLC to refine its proposal and resubmit by March 1, 2007 4 'J . . ,'. . 2007 · Community meeting to review Countryside LLC proposal · City requested refinements to proposal · City rejects revised Countryside LLC plan · Renewed operating agreement with Meadowbrook Golf · Land lease decreases to $17,500/year 2008 · Conveyed 1.1 acres of the property to Newbern Properties · Land exchange with Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for expansion of the Runway Protection Zone - The airport gains +/- 17 acres - City gains +/- 15 acres · City and Airport Commission execute a 1 O-year lease for the RPZ 5 . ~ .' ',... 2009 · City Council considers $1.5 million in capital improvements and extension of the operating agreement for 5 years. · Interim management agreement with Meadowbrook Golf · City pays Meadowbrook Golf $75,000 until a 5-year agreement is effective and capital projects are initiated 2010 · January: Fiscal constraints require deferral of capital improvements to fiscal year 2012 · February: No agreement on terms of 5-year management agreement given delay in improvements · Golf course closed - Interim management agreement terminated - Lease with the Airport Commission is terminated · City staff directed to work with community on a process to develop alternative development strategies for the property 6 /6Z Lj~~ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38947-092010. A RESOLUTION authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute, upon certain terms and conditions, Amendment No.2 to the FY 2009 Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") and HOME Investment Partnerships Program ("HOME") Agreement with Habitat for Humanity in the , Roanoke Valley, Inc. ("Habitat"), for housing activities in the City's Hurt Park neighborhood. WHEREAS, by Resolutions Nos. 38197-081808 and 38638-091102, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("Council"), approved, respectively, the execution of a Subgrant Agreement with Habitat and Amendment No.1 for housing activities in the City's Hurt Park neighborhood; WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 38808-051010, Council approved the City's 2010-2015 Consolidated Plan for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including additional CDBG and HOME funding for Habitat's activities; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 38845-062110 and by Budget Ordinance No. 38846-062110, Council accepted and appropriated the 2010-2011 CDBG and HOME funds. THEREFORE, BE IT RE~OLVED by Council that the City Manager, and the City Clerk, are hereby authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the City, Amendment No.2 to the FY 2009 CDBG and HOME Subgrant Agreement with Habitat, approved as to form by the City l... Attorney, within the limits of funds and for the purposes as are more particularly set forth in the City Manager's report dated September 20,2010, to this Council. {fD~ A. hpu'1 CityC1erk. R-CDBG-Habitat for Humanity-Amend2.doc CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Meeting: Subject: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Amendment No.2 to the FY 2009 CDBG/HOME-funded Agreement with Habitat for Humanity in the Roanoke Valley, Inc. (Habitat) Background: The City began targeted neighborhood revitalization activities in Hurt Park in FY 2008. In FY 2009, the City undertook single-family housing development in the neighborhood through a collaborative planning effort with the community's public and nonprofit housing agencies. Habitat is one of the housing agencies engaged in this effort and has an agreement with the City to build or rehabilitate 11 single-family homes to be sold to income-eligible buyers, for which the agreement provides $1,000,037 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds. Habitat has committed over $450,000 in cash and/or in-kind contributions toward the development of these homes. The City's HUD plan for FY 2011 provides an additional $286,373 in CDBG and HOME funds to Habitat for 3 more single-family homes to be built or rehabilitated for sale, toward which Habitat has committed $119,000 in additional cash and/or in-kind contributions. Considerations: The $286,373 in additional CDBG and HOME funds for Habitat's activities were authorized by City Council through Resolution No. 38808-051010, which approved the City's 2010-2015 Consolidated Plan. The action sought by this report will provide these funds by amending Habitat's FY 2009 agreement. The agreement currently calls for completing all homes by December 31, 2011. An extension to June 30,2012, is included as part of this Amendment No.2 in order to allow time for the additional housing development. . Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No.2 to the FY 2009 CDBG/ HOME Agreement with H bitat, similar in form and content to the draft attached to this letter, and a p ve a to form by the City Attorney. CHRISTOPHER P. MORRILL City Manager Attachment Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Frank Baratta, Budget Team Leader Karen Mason, Executive Director, Habitat AMENDMENT No.2 This Amendment No.2 is made and entered into as of September 20,2010, by and between the City of Roanoke (AGrantee@) and Habitat forHumanity in the Roanoke Valley, Inc. ("Subgrantee"). WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 38197-081808 and Resolution No. 38638-091102, respectively, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, ("Council") approved the execution of a Sub grant Agreement ("Agreement") and Amendment No.1 to the Agreement between the Grantee and the Subgrantee; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 38451-051109, Council approved the 2010-2015 Consolidated Plan for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), including the 2010-2011 Action Plan, which incorporates additional funding for the Subgrantee's Hurt Park housing activities to be assisted with Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") and HOME Investment Partnerships Program ("HOME") funds; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. _-092010, Council approved the execution of Amendment No.2 to the Agreement between the Grantee and the Subgrantee; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: 1. Section 1., "SCOPE OF SERVICES," subsection c., "Performance Expectations," subpart (2), "Specific Quantifiable Objectives," shall be revised to increase the number of home buyer units developed and to delete the performance objective related to owner-occupied ho~es, and shall now read: * * * * * (2) Specific Quantifiable Objectives: · By June 30, 2012, the Subgrantee shall complete the development of at least fourteen (14) sing1e- family homes and their sale to eligible homebuyers. * * * * * 2. Section 1., "SCOPE OF SERVICES," subsection f, "Period ofthis Agreement," shall be revised to extend the end date of the Agreement and shall now read: * * * * * f Period of this Agreement - This Agreement shall be effective as ofJuly 1, 2008, and, unless amended, shall end June 30,2012. * * * * * 3. Section 1., "SCOPE OF SERVICES," subsection h., "Subgrantee Investment," shall be revised to increase the amount of such investment and shall now read: Page 1 of4 * * * * * h. Subgrantee Investment - In consideration ofthe in-kind or cash resources that the Subgrantee, as part ! of the Partnership proposals to the Grantee, indicated would be made available to the project, it is understood that the value ofthis investment in the project by the Subgrantee from such other resources shall be $569,663.00. * * * * * 4. Section 9., "ANNUAL AUDIT," shall be revised to clarify audit requirements applicable to the Subgrantee to conform with federal OMB Circular A-133, and shall now read: * * * * * 9. ANNUAL AUDIT Pursuant to City Council policy adopted under Resolution No. 37281-010306, nonprofit entities existing for at least two years and with an annual budget exceeding $50,000 are required to perform an annual independent audit. As such, the Subgrantee is subject to this audit requirement. In addition, as . an entity expending more than $500,000 in federal funding in a fiscal year, the Subgrantee is required to undergo an annual independent audit conforming to the requirements offedera1 OMB Circular A-133. To the extent permitted by the budget ofthis Agreement, the increase in the Subgrantee's audit costs attributable to this requirement are allowable costs under this Agreement. The independent audit required for federal purposes satisfies both the Council and federal. requirements. A copy of the required audit is due to the Grantee within 30 days of receipt from the auditor, or 9 months after the end ofthe fiscal year audited, whichever occurs earlier.. * * * * * 5. Section 11., "OTHER PROGRAM/PROJECT REQUIREMENTS," subsection a., "Maximum per-unit subsidy amount and subsidy layering," shall be revised to conform with increased subsidy amounts issued by HUD, and shall now read: * * * * * a. Maximum per-unit subsidy amount and subsidy layering - The total amount of HOME funds invested shall under no circumstances exceed $139,543 for a one-bedroom unit, $169,684 for a two-bedroom unit, $219,516 for a three-bedroom unit, and $240,962 for a unit with four or more bedrooms. However, as set forth in section 1.h., it is expected that the Subgrantee shall contribute the indicated minimum investment to the development of the properties provided for under this Agreement, which shall reduce the amount of HOME assistance per unit. Further, in accordance with 24 CFR 92.250, HOME funds invested in combination with other governmental assistance shall not exceed the amount necessary to provide affordable housing. * * * * * 6. The CDBG and HOME funding made available by the Grantee under this Agreement shall be increased by $286,373.00 to a total of$1,286,41O, in accordance with the revised Attachment A, "2008/2009 Habitat Hurt Park Agreement Financial Accounts," included with this Amendment No.2 Page 2 of4 The Agreement, dated July 1,2008, and Amendment No.1, dated November 2,2009, shall remain unchanged in all other terms and provisions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No.2 as of the day and year hereinabove written: ATTEST: FOR THE GRANTEE: By By. Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager ATTEST: FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: By By Steve Kessing, Secretary ofthe Board Karen L. Mason, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO CDBG/HOME ELIGIBILITY APPROVED AS TO FORM Dept. of Planning, Building and Development Assistant City Attorney APPROPRIATION AND FUNDS REQUIRED APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION FOR THIS CONTRACT CERTIFIED Assistant City Attorney Director of Finance Date Account # (See Attachment A) Page 3 of4 Attachment A 2008-2009 Habitat Hurt Park Agreement Financial Accounts Funds Account No. Description Project Funds Delivery Total Funds Activity: Development of Homebuyer Housing CDBG 35-G07-0nO-5549 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $25,000 $25,000 CDBG 35-G07-0nO-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $5,000 $5,000 CDBG 35-G09-0nO-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $50,000 $50,000 CDBG 35-G 10-1020-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $63,500 $63,500 CDBG 35-GI I-I I 19-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $25,000 $25,000 CDBG Subtotal $143,500 $25,000 $168,500 HOME 35-090-5313-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $93,459 $93,459 HOME 35-090-5364-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $78,440 $78,440 HOME 35-090-5368-5527 Habitat Hurt Park Housing (Rehab Reserve) $50,000 $50,000 HOME 35-090-5368-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $207,651 $207,651 HOME 35-090-5370-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $426,987 $426,987 HOME 35-090-5370-5532 Habitat Hurt Park Housing $261.373 $261.373 HOME Subtotal $1,117,910 $1,117,910 Total CDBG and HOME Funds $1,261,410 $25,000 $1,286,410 Page 4 of4 STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk Stephanie M. Moon City Clerk Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Moon: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: cIerk@roanokeva.gov September 21 , 2010 JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke which was held on Monday, September 20, 2010, you were reappointed as City Clerk of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years commencing October 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2012. Attached you will find a Certificate of your reappointment and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which must be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke or her designee. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to the undersigned by September 30, 2010. Jonathan E. Craft . Deputy City Clerk L:\CLERK\DA T A\CKSM1 \Oaths\Council Appointed Officers\Reappointments.doc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: ) CITY OF ROANOKE I, Jonathan E. Craft, Deputy City Clerk, and as such Deputy City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the twentieth day of September 2010, STEPHANIE M. MOON was reappointed as City Clerk of the City of Roanoke, for a . term of two years commencing October 1, 2010, and ending September 30,2012. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty-first day of September 2010. ._~/#- Deputy City c7l-- L:ICLERK\DA T AICKSM1 IOathslCouncil Appointed OfficerslReappointments.doc CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 21 , 2010 Ann H. Shawver Director of Finance Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Shawver: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke which was held on Monday, September 20, 2010, you were reappointed as Director of Finance of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years commencing October 1, 2010, and ending September 30,2012. Attached you will find a Certificate of your reappointment and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which must be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke or her designee. Please return one copy of the Oath of OffiC?e to the undersigned by September 30, 2010. !lJJ~ --1lA-Stephanie M. Moon, CMC r--zy City Clerk L:\CLERK\DA T A\CKSM1 \Oaths\CounciJ Appointed Officers\Reappointments.doc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) . ) To-wit: ) CITY OF ROANOKE I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the twentieth day of September 2010, ANN H. SHAWVER was reappointed as Director' of Finance of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years . commencing October 1,2010, and ending September 30,2012. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty-first day of September 2010. 4. '1 L:ICLERK\DA T AICKSM1 IOathslCouncil Appointed OfficerslReappointments.doc CITY OF ROANOKE. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIEM. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 21, 2010 Troy A. Harmon Municipal Auditor Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Harmon: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke which was held on Monday, September 20, 2010, you were reappointed as Municipal Auditor of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years commencing October 1,2010, and ending September 30,2012. Attached you will find a Certificate of your reappointment and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which must be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of. the City of Roanoke or her designee. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to the undersigned by September 30, 2010. ~ L:ICLERK\DA T AICKSM1 IOathslCouncil Appointed OfficerslReappointments.doc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE ) ) To-wit: ) I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the twentieth day of September 2010, TROY A. HARMON was reappointed as Municipal Auditor of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years commencing October 1,' 2010, and ending September 30,2012. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty-first day of September 2010. L:\CLERK\DA T A\CKSM1\Oaths\Council Appointed Officers\Reappointments.doc CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 21, 2010 William M. Hackworth City Attorney Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Hackworth: At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke which was held on Monday, September 20,2010, you were reappointed as City Attorney of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years commencing October 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2012. Attached you will find a Certificate of your reappointment and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which must be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke or her designee. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to the undersigned by September 30, . 2010. rt- -" L:ICLERK\DA T AICKS M1 IOathslCouncil Appointed OfficerslReappointments.doc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: ) . CITY OF ROANOKE I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the twentieth day of September 2010, WILLIAM M. HACKWORTH was reappointed as City Attorney of the City of Roanoke, for a term of two years "commencing October 1,2010, and ending September 30,2012. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty-first day of September 2010. A~ ~"'tt City Clerk L:\CLERK\DAT A\CKSM1\Oaths\Council Appointed Officers\Reappointments.doc CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 20, 2010 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of Council: Your attention is called to Section 9, Elections by Council, when held, terms, etc., of the Roanoke City Charter which provides, in part, that during the month of September 1974 and during the month of September of the second year thereafter, the Council shall elect a City Clerk, a Director of Finance, a Municipal Auditor and a City Attorney, each of whom shall serve for a term of two years from the first day of October next following the date of their election and until their successor shall have been elected and qualified. Pursuant to the abovereferenced City Charter provision, the two-year terms of the following Council Appointed officers will expire on September 30, 2010: Stephanie M. Moon, CMC, City Clerk Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Troy A. Harmon, Municipal Auditor William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Sincerely, ~rn."YY\D~ Stephanie M. Moon, CMC "- City Clerk SMM:ctw CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIEM. MOON, CMC City Clerk September 22,2010 CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk Roanoke City School Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Poulton: I am enclosing copy of Budget Ordinance No. 38948-092010 appropriating funding from the Federal and Commonwealth governments, private grants, and local match for various educational programs, and amending and r~ordaining certain sections of the 2010-2011 School Grant Fund Appropriations. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. elia T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure pc: Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Sherman M. Stovall, Director, Management and Budget Dr. Rita D. Bishop, Superintendent, Roanoke City Public Schools ~ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38948-092010. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the Federal and Commonwealth governments, private grants, and local match for various educational programs, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2010-2011 School Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2010-2011 School Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations Teachers Program Coordinator/Site Manager Instructional Assistants Retiree Health Social Security . VRS Medical/Dental Group Life Contracted Services . Travel - Mileage Travel - Fares Travel - Meals & Lodging Pupil Transportation Supplies Teachers Program Coordinator/Site Manager Instructional Assistants Retiree Health Social Security VRS Medical/Dental Group Life Contracted Services Travel - Mileage . Travel - Fares Travel - Meals & Lodging Pupil Transportation Supplies Teachers Program Coordinator/Site Manager Instructional Assistants Retiree Health . Social Security VRS Medical/Dental Group Life Contracted Service~ Travel - Mileage Travel- Fares Travel- Meals & Lodging Pupil Transportation Supplies Substitute Teachers Social Security 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-41121-3-05 302-1.10-1102-0280-139E-61100-41124-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-41141-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-42200-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-42201-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-42202-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-42204-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-42205-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-43313-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-45551-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-45552-3-05 302-110-11 02-0280-139E-611 00-45553-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-63200-43343-3-05 302-110-1102-0280-139E-61100-46614-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-41121-3-05 302-110-11 02-0340-149E-611 00-41124-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-41141-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-42200-3-05 302-110-11 02-0340-149E-611 00-42201-3-05 302-110-11 02-0340-149E-611 00-42202-3-05 302-110-11 02-0340-149E-611 00-42204-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-42205-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149F61100-43313-3-05 . 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-45551-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-45552-3-05 302-110-11 02-0340-149E-611 00-45553-3-05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-63200-43343-3_05 302-110-1102-0340-149E-61100-46614-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-61100-41121-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-61100-41124-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-61100-41141-3_05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-42200-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-61100-42201-3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-42202-3-05 302-11 O~ 11 02-0060-150E-611 00-42204-3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-42205~3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-43313-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-61100-45551-3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-45552-3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-45553-3-05 302-110-1102-0060-150E-63200-45583-3-05 302-110-11 02-0060-150E-611 00-46614-3-05 302-110-0000-0110-151 E-61100-41 021-2-01 302-110-0000-0110-151 E-611 00-42201-2-01 $ 20,400 24,240 36,000 113 6,339 1 ,450 2,225 87 38,328 492 750 2,236 21,500 21,500 30,600 20,500 33,000 . 72 6,604 1,065 1,625 48 34,278 246 750 1,474 21,500 21,500 30,600 20,500 33,000 72 6,604 1,065 1,625 48 34,278 246 750 1,474 21 ,500 21,500 1,000 77 Contracted Services Training/Conference Travel Professional Development Materials & Supplies Teacher Salary - Jackson Social Security - Jackson Teacher Salary - Breckinridge Social Security - Breckinridge Teacher Salary - Addison Social Security - Addison Teacher Salary - Wilson Social Security - Wilson Educational Materials Food Services Personnel Social Security Food Food Service Supplies Equipment Retirement Health VRS GLI Materials & Other Supplies Staff Development Contracted Services Advertising/Outreach Travel/Mileage Teacher Salary Social Security Mileage Instructional Supplies Non-capital Technical Hardware Revenues Federal Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts State Grant Receipts Private Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts Local Match . Federal Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts Federal Grant Receipts 302-110-0000-0110-151 E-61100-43313-2-01 302-110-0000-0110-151 E-61100-45554-2-01 302-110-0000-0110-151 E-61100-46617-2-01 302-11 0-1305-0230-359E-611 00-41121-3-01 302-11 0-1305-0230-359E-611 00-42201-3-01 302-110-1305-0210-359E-61100-41121_3_01 302-110-1305-0210-359E-61100-42201_3_01 302-110-1305-0280-359E-61100-41121_3_01 302-11 0-1305-0280-359E-611 00-42201-3-01 302-110-1305-0150-359E-61100-41121_3_01 302-110-1305-0150-359E-61100-42201_3_01 302-180-1307-1170-764E-61100-46614_3_01 302-320-0000-1 000-168E-651 00-41182-2-00 302-320-0000-1 000-168E-651 00-42201-2-00 302-320-0000-1 000-168E-651 00-46602-2-00 302-320-0000-1 000-168E-651 00-46603-2-00 302-320-0000-1 000-168E-651 00-48821-2-00 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-611 00-42200-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-611 00-42202-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-61100-42205-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-61100-46614-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-61100-45586-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-61100-43313-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-611 00-43361-9-07 302-160-0000-1304-101 E-611 00-45551-9-07 302-110-0000-1070-1340-61100-41121_3_09 302-11 0-0000-1 070-1340-611 00-42201-3-09 302-110-0000-1070-1340-61100-45551_3_09 302-110-0000-1070-1340-61100-46614_3_09 302-110-1315-1000-1650-68100-46650_3_01 302-000-0000-0000-139E-00000-38287 -0-00 302 -000-0000-0000-149E-00000-38287 -0-00 302-000-0000-0000-150E-00000-38287 -0-00 302-000-0000-0000-151 E-00000-3801 0-0-00 302 -000-0000-0000-359E-00000-3237 5-0-00 302 -000-0000-0000-764E-00000-33808-0_00 302-000-0000-0000-168E-00000-38555_0_00 302-000-LMA T-0000-1 01 E-00000-72000-0-00 302-000-0000-0000-101 E-00000-38002-0-00 302-000-0000-0000-1340-00000-3801 0-0-00 302-000-0000-0000-1650-00000-38371_0_00 6,000 3,000 3,581 4,645 355 9,289 711 4,645 355 4,645 355 1 ,462 1,000 77 16,000 2,681 998 970 2,030 452 755 4,703 (2,645) 1,812 1,000 (2,214) (552) 4,934 2,832 15,000 175,660 173,262 173,262 13,658 25,000 1 ,462 20,756 1,381 7,696 5,000 15,000 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. fr---/ BI~ ~ September 20, 2010 ROANOKE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Strong Students. Strong Schools. Strong City. School Board The Honorable David Bowers, Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, VA 24011 David B. Carson Chairman Dear Members of Council: Jason E. Bingham Vice Chairman As a result of official School Board action on September 14, 2010, the Board respectfully requests City Council approve the following new and revised appropriations, which impact the Schools' 2010-11 budget: New Appropriations Total New Award Mae G. Huff Annette Lewis Suzanne P. Moore Todd A. Putney Lori E. Vaught Title IV-B Addison Community Learning Center 2010-11 Title IV-B Lincoln Terrace Community Learning Center 2010-11 Title IV-B Morningside Community Learning Center 2010-11 Title I Distinguished School - Highland Park 2010-11 Virginia Middle School Teacher Corps 2010-11 ACS-Hach High School Chemistry Grant 2010-11 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program - Hurt Park 2010-11 $175,660 $173,262 $173,262 $ 13,658 $ 25,000 $ 1,462 $ 20,756 Dr. Rita D. Bishop Superintendent Cindy H. Poulton Clerk of the Board Revised Appropriations Additional Award Adult Basic Education 2010-11 Title I, Part D Detention Center Reading Program 2009-10 Striving Readers 2009-10 $ 9,077 $ 5,000 $15,000 The School Board thanks you for your approval of the appropriation requests. Sincerely, ~~~ Cindy H.%ulton, Clerk pc: William M. Hackworth Chris Morrill Ann Shawver' David B. Carson Rita D. Bishop Curt Baker . Margaret Lindsey Yen Ha (with details) p: 540-853-2381 f: 540-853-2951 P.O. Box 13145 Roanoke, VA 24031 www.rcps.info CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Meeting: Su bject: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 20, 2010 School Board Appropriation Requests Background: As the resu It of official School Board action at its September 14th meeting, the Board respectfully requested that City Council appropriate funding as outlined in this report. The Title IV-B Addison Community Learning Center (CLC) grant of $175,660 su pports the CLC's efforts to address the critical attendance, academic, and parental involvement needs of the school in a safe, supervised, and nurturing environment. The Addison CLC is designed to provide significant expanded learning opportunities after school and during the summer that contribute to reducing violence and drug use while assisting students to meet or exceed local and state standards in core academic subjects. The program will be fully reimbursed by federal funds and will end September 30, 2012. The Title IV-B Lincoln Terrace Commun'ity Learning Center grant of $173,262 su pports the CLC's efforts to address the critical attendance, academic, and parental involvement needs of the school in a safe, supervised, and nurturing environment. The Lincoln Terrace CLC is designed to provide significant expanded learning opportunities after school and during the summer that contribute to reducing violence and drug use while assisting students to meet or exceed local and state standards in core academic subjects. The program will be fully reimbursed by federal funds and will end September 30,2012. This is a new program. The Title IV-B Morningside Community Learning Center grant of $173,262 su pports the CLC's efforts to address the critical attendance, academic, and parental involvement needs of the school in a safe, supervised, and nurturing environment. The Morningside CLC is designed to provide significant expanded learning opportunities after school and during the summer that contribute to reducing violence and drug use while assisting students to meet or exceed local and state standards in core academic subjects. The program will be fully reimbursed by federal funds .and will end September 30, 2012. This is a new program. The Title I Distinguished School- Highland Park grant of $13,658 funding allows states to financialJy reward Title I schools that significantly close the achievement gap or exceed adequate yearly progress for two or more consecutive years. Mayor and Members of City Council September 20,2010 Highland Park Elementary has earned the distinction of Title I Distinguished School for the 2009-10 school year and as such, this award is being made to provide funds for professional development purposes during the 2010-11 school year.. The program will be fully reimbursed by federal funds and will end September 30,2011. This is a new program. The Virginia Middle School Teacher Corps program grant of $25,000 is designed to help schools designated as "at risk in mathematics" to fill teaching vacancies with qualified, experienced math teachers and improve student achievement in mathematics. This grant supports a salary differential for qualifying math teachers at Jackson, Breckinridge, Addison, and Wilson Middle Schools. This program will be fully reimbursed by state funds and ends June 30, 2011. The American Chemical Society (ACS) grant of $1,462 awards the ACS-Hach High School Chemistry Grant to selected high school chemistry teachers with innovative ideas for transforming the teaching and learning of chemistry. This grant has been received by the Roanoke Valley Governor's School to fund the implementation of Teacher Steve Smith's project, "The Heat Is On." This program will be fully funded by grant receipts and will end June 30,2011. This is a new program. Hurt Park Elementary School has been accepted as a participant in the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program grant of $20,756 provides funding to assist the school in providing a fresh fruit or vegetable snack during the school day at times other than meal periods at least three times per week. The program is intended to create healthier school environments by providing healthier food choices, expand the variety offresh fruits and vegetables students experience, increase students' consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables, and make a difference in students' diets to impact their present and future health. This program will be fully reimbursed by federal funds and will end June 30,2011. This is a new program. The Adult Basic Education program grant of $9,077 provides funds for the education of adults who have not completed high school. The program will be reimbursed by federal funds in the amount of $167,451. Matching funds will be provided in the amount of $29,573. The increase noted above aligns the budget with the final award amount determined by the Virginia Department of Education. The program will end January 5,2012. 2 Mayor and Members of City Council September 20,2010 The Title I - Part D Detention Center Reading program grant of $5,000 provides federal funds to employ a part time reading teacher at the Roanoke Juvenile Detention Center. The above increase represents the final allocation awarded. The program is one hundred percent reimbursed by federal funds and will end September 30, 2011 . The Striving Readers program grant of $1 5,000 provides fu nds to su pport the provision of supplemental reading instruction at Roanoke's five middle schools, in support of students who are reading below grade level. Through the grant, intervention specialists will use a supplemental instruction program to work with groups of"seventh and eighth grade students during the school day. This award is the first year of a multi-year grant, and will cover the start-up costs associated with preparing for and beginning the program at the start of the 2010-11 school year. The increase noted above represents supplemental funding awarded by the Virginia Department of Education. This program will be fully reimbursed by Federal funds and will end September 30,2010. This is a new program. Recommended Action: We recommend that you concur with this report of the School Board and adopt the attached budget ordinance to appropriate funding as outlined. ~~V~ ANN H. AWVER -- Director of Finance Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Rita D. Bishop, Superintendent, RCPS Curtis Baker, Deputy Superintendent for Operations, RCPS 3 CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-niail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFf Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 21, 2010 Allen D. Williams 2618 Charing Cross Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Williams: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 38949-0920'10 reappointing you as a Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Roanoke for a term commencing October 21, 2010, and ending October 20, 2014. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting which was held on Monday, September 20, 2010. Enclosed you will find a Certificate of your reappointment and an Oath or Affirmation of Office which may be administered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, located on the third floor of the Roanoke City Courts Facility, 315 Church Avenue, S. W. Please return one copy of the Oath of Office to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were reappointed. Pursuant to Section 2.2-3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your reappointment and each appointee is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." L:\CLERK\DA T A\CKSM I \Oaths\Economic Development AuthorityWlen D. Wiliams oath. doc Allen D. Williams September 21 , 2010 Page 2 L On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to continue your service to the City of Roanoke as a Director of the Economic Development Authority. -:bA- tephanie M. Moon, CMC () City Clerk Enclosures pc: Harwell M. Darby, Jr., Assistant Secretary, Economic Development Authority of the City of Roanoke, Glenn, Feldmann, Darby and Goodlatte, P. O. Box 2887, Roanoke, Virginia 24001 L:\CLERK\DA T A \CKSM I \Oaths\Economic Development AuthorityWlen D. Wiliams oath. doc \J~~ Ii IN THE COUNClL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38949-092010. A RESOLUTION appointing a Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Roanoke. WHEREAS, the Council is advised that there is a vacancy in the position of Director of the Economic Development Authority ofthe City of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, 915.2-4904, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, provides that appointments made by the governing body of such Directors shall be made for terms of four (4) years. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that A. Damon Williams is hereby reappointed as a Director on the Board of Directors of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, for a term commencing October 21,2010, and expiring October 20,2014. A. K:\Measures\eda appointment Damon Williams 201O.doc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To-wit: ) CITY OF ROANOKE I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the twentieth day of September 201 0, ALLEN D. WILLIAMS was reappointed as a Director of the Economic Development Authority, for a term commencing October21 , 2010, and ending October 20,2014. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty-first day of September 2010. L:ICLERKIDA T A ICKSM I IOathslEconomic Development AuthorityWlen D. Wiliams oath. doc u.s. Kids Care is an organization that strives to build young leaders through community service. U.S. Kids Care is a 501 (C)3 organization designed to empower children in Roanoke to take on leadership roles in helping others. It is U.S. Kids Care's goal to help foster the young community leader so that members can continue to make a difference in their community, on' their college campuses, and in their work places as they grow in,o young adults. U.S. Kids Care is open to all children, ages 8 - 18 years of age. .It currently has over 125 members and is still growing. U.S. Kids Care is divided into four portfolios of leaderst)ip: Community Service, Individual Development, Fund Raising, and Publicity. U.S. Kids Care members run the organization and all projects are created by either Officers, chairmen, or members who have an idea. U.S. Kids Care has helped thousands of people in the Roanoke Valley and beyond since its creation here in Roanoke 6 years ago in response to the 2004 Tsunami. ~ A Manna Ministries Help Night for the working poor ~ A Greenvale School Summer Camp for the Preschoolers (3 days in all) ~ Our annual Mission School Supply Drive ~ A Car Wash for the Presbyterian Community Center 3 CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 22,2010 Mary M. Trott, Agent Home Depot 4176 Franklin Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Ms. Trott: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 38950-092010 amending as requested; such property located at 4176 Franklin Road, S. W., Official Tax No. 5470104, to be zoned as CG, Commercial-General District, with proffers as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application NO.1 dated July 12, 2010. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010; and is in full force and effect upon its passage. Enclosure Mary M. Trott September 22, 2010 Page 2 pc: Southern Hills Roanoke, LLC, 1100 Kenilworth Avenue, Charlo~e, North Carolina 28204 The Weston Roanoke, LLC, 9643 McCormick Place, Windmere, Florida 34786 Virginia L. Cobbs, 4208 Southern Hills Drive, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 John W. and Mary Ann Spring, 4207 Griffin Road, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 James A. Allman, 1630 Jumping Run Drive, Goodview, Virginia 24095 Just Duus II, LLC, 2634 Dovetail Circle, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Lowes Home Centers, Inc., P. O. Box 1000, Mooresville, North Carolina 27115 Phyllis Hill, 4305 Van Winkle Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Philip Schirmer, City Engineer Martha P. Franklin, Secretary, City Planning Commission 15\ ~ \~~O IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38950-092010. AN ORDINANCE to amend 936.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, by amending and repealing certain conditions presently binding upon certain property conditionally zoned CG, Commercial-General District; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. WHEREAS, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., has made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to amend Proffered Condition No. 14 and repeal Proffered Condition No. 17 presently binding upon a tract of land located at 4176 Franklin Road, S.W., being designated as Official Tax No. 5470104, which property is zoned CG, Commercial-General District, with proffers, such proffers being accepted by the adoption of Ordinance No. 37159-081505, adopted August 15,2005; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving property notice to all concerned as required by 936.2-540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at, its' meeting on September 20, 2010, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 936.2- 540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed amendment; and O-Home Depot-amend and repeal proffers.doc 1 WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the reconunendation made to this Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the amendment of the proffers applicable to the subject property, and is of the opinion that the conditions . now binding upon a tract ofland located at 4176 Franklin Road, S.W., being designated as Official Tax No. 5470104, should be amended as requested, and that such property be zoned CG, Conunercial-General District, with proffers as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application No.1 dated July 12, 2010. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Proffered Condition No. 14 is amended, and Proffered Condition No~ 17 is repealed, as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application No.1 dated July 12, 2010, so that the subject property is zoned CG, Conunercial-General . District, with such proffers. / 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. O-Home Depot-amend and repeal proffers. doc 2 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT . 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 166 Roan?ke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 E-mail: planning@roanokeva.gov Architectural Review Board Board of Zoning Appeals Planning Commission September 20, 2010 Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor Honorable David B. Trinkle, Vice Mayor Honorable William D. Bestpitch, Council Member Honorable Raphael E. Ferris; Council Member Honorable Sherman P. Lea, Council Member Honorable Anita J. Price, Council Member Honorable Court G. Rosen, Council Member Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of City Council: Subject Request' from Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to amend Proffered Condition No. 14 and repeal Proffered Condition No. 17, as set forth in the Third Amended Petition to Amend Proffered Conditions and Proffers of Conditions filed on July 29, 2005, and accepted by City Council by the adoption of Ordinance No., 37159-081505, as they pertain to the parcel of land at 4176 Franklin Road, S.W., bearing Official Tax No. 5470104. . Planning Commission Public Hearing and Recommendation: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, August 19, 2010. A summary of discussion may be found at the end of this report. By a vote of 7- 0, the Commission recommended approval of the request to amend and repeal proffers. ' Respectfully submitted, ~~ Angela Penn, Chair City Planning Commission cc: William M. Hackworth, City Attorney R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Applicant . Members of City Council ' Page 2 September 20, 2010 Application Information Req uest: Amendment of Proffered Conditions (Ordinance No. 37159-081505) Owner: Royal Skies Investors Limited Partnership Applicant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Authorized Agent: Mary M. Trott City Staff Person: Maribeth B. Mills, City Planner Site Address/Location: 4176 Franklin Road SW Official Tax Nos.: 5470104 Site Area: 10.58 Acres Existing Zoning: CG, Commercial-General District with Conditions Proposed Zoning: CG, Commercial-General District with Conditions Existing Land Use: Building Supplies and Materials, Retail Proposed Land Use: Building Supplies and Materials, Retail NeiQhborhood Plan: Southern Hills Neighborhood Plan Specified Future Land Use: Commercial Filing Date: Original Application: June 30, 2010; Amended Application NO.1: July 12, 2010 Background In August 2005, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 37159-081505 amending the subject property's proffered conditions to permit the construction of Home Depot. That ordinance also permitted the creation of two outparcels that have since been developed as eating establishments (Starbucks and Chick-fiI-A). The subject of this amendment is the Home Depot parcel only (Official Tax No. 5470104). Seventeen proffers currently apply to the site, including the prohibition of any outdoor display except as delineated on the Concept Site Plan for the seasonal sale of spring/summer live plants, Christmas trees, and other related greenery. The proffers also prohibit outdoor storage except in locations screened from view by ornamental fencing. These proffers were drafted in response to concern expressed by the Planning Commission given the site's visibility from adjoining single-family residences. \ The applicant requests an amendment to proffer no. 14 to enable outdoor display of items such as sheds, mowers,. grills, and special order fence panel in designated areas along the front apron of the store. The seasonal display area located in the parking area would remain. The applicant also requests to remove proffer no. 17 which addresses outdoor storage. Under the City's current Zoning Ordinance, outdoor storage is not permitted in the CG District, even when screened from view. Outdoor storage currently located on the site would be allowed to remain as a legal nonconforming use, but could not be expanded beyond those areas currently being used for that purpose. An Outdoor Display Members of City Council Page 3 September 20, 2010 ~ Plan has been proffered showing the location of the proposed outdoor display area as well as the existing outdoor storage and seasonal display area. Conditions Proffered by the Applicant The applicant requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 37159-081505 be AMENDED as they pertain to property located at 4176 Franklin Road SWand identified as Official Tax No. 5470104: 14. The seasonal sales area designated on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) will be used solely for the seasonal sale of plants, shrubs, trees and assorted potted nursery products together with associated bag products such as mulch, top soil and potting soil. The seasonal sales area '....ill be in use, intermittently,f-or approximately six months per year f-or the sale of plants and plant related items appropriate to the time of the year, such as spring and summer live plants and Christmas trees and related greenery. No buildings sheds trailers lavm mO'....ers gas grills tractors or similar items ",".:ill be displayed stored or sold in the seasonal sales area. The location of outdoor display will be in substantial conformity with the Outdoor Display Plan prepared by the Home Depot, dated July 17, 2010, a copy of which is attached to this application as Plan Sheet No. C-1. . 17. There will be no outdoor storage of goods materials or merchandise other than as proffered for the seasonal sales area designated on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) and the areas surrounded by ornamental fence shown on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) and the Rendering of the Home Depot building (Exhibit C). All other proffered conditions would remain the same. Considerations Surroundinq Zoninq and Land Use: Zoning District Land Use North CG, Commercial-General District with Eating establishments conditions. (Starbucks and Chick-fil-A). South CLS, Commercial Large-Site with Commercial shopping center conditions. (including Wal-Mart). ..- East R-7, Residential Single-Family District and Single-family dwellings. RA, Residential Agricultural District with conditions. West C2C, General Commercial District with Retail sales. special use. Members of City Council Page 4 September 20, 2010 Compliance with the Zoninq Ordinance: The City's Zoning Ordinance defines 'outdoor display' as the placement of goods or merchandise for sale or for advertisement outside of the building or structure' in which the merchandise is normally sold, and 'outdoor storage' as the keeping or storing, other than in a wholly enclosed building, of any goods, items, materials, or merchandise. Outdoor display is permitted as an accessory use in . the CG District. The proposed outdoor display shown on the Outdoor Display Plan complies with the supplemental regulations listed in Section 36.2-422 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. The display area will be located on the same lot as the principal use. 2. The principal use occupies more than the minimum 5,000 square feet of gross floor area. 3. The square footage of proposed display area is less than 15% of the area of the principal building. 4. The height of stacked merchandise will be limited to six feet. 5. Merchandise will be placed on a concrete surface. 6. Merchandise placement will not interfere with ingress or egress of pedestrians or vehicles or access to any utility. The existing outdoor storage area shown on the Outdoor Display Plan was established under the 1987 Zoning Ordinance. The 2005 ordinance does not permit outdoor storage as an accessory use in the CG District. Removing proffered condition no. 17 will not have an adverse impact because the existing outdoor storage areas cannot be expanded beyond what already exists. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neiqhborhood Plan: Both Vision 2001-2020 and the Southern Hills Neighborhood Plan recognize the potential conflicts created by commercial development in close proximity to residential uses. With a residential neighborhood separated from the development by only a 50 foot right-of-way, proffered conditions were carefully drafted in 2005 to ensure that potential conflicts were minimized. However, with the Home Depot now established for three years in the Southern Hills Neighborhood, it is apparent that outdoor display along front apron of the store will not have a detrimental effect on surrounding residences.. The following policy of Vision 2001-2020 is relevant in the consideration of this application: · ED P6. Commercial development. Roanoke will encourage commercial . development in appropriate areas of Roanoke to serve the needs of citizens and visitors. Members of City Council Page 5 September 20,2010 The following recommendations of the Southern Hills Neighborhood Plan are relevant in the consideration of this application: . Economic Development o Evaluate future commercial development to ensure a good relationship to surrounding uses in terms of access, scale, and orientation. City Department Comments: None. Plannina Commission Public Hearina: The following comments and questions were posed by the Planning Commission at their February 18, 2010 public hearing. 1. Mr. Williams and Mr. Chrisman noted that during the 2005 rezoning, there was a great deal of discussion regarding the visibility of outdoor display and storage from surrounding residences. 2. Ms. Katz noted that the original proffered condition was attached to the property before construction as a precaution but now that it had been built, it was apparent that it was a non-issue. She also noted that the store was only visible from a few residences on Griffin Road and Southern Hills Drive . who did not comment on the request. 3. Mr. Williams stated that he had recommended denial of the request to establish Home Depot at this location in 2005, but did not feel that outdoor display of merchandise would detract from the Southern Hills neighborhood any further. 4. Mr. Chrisman asked staff if there were any parts of the request that were more objectionable than ot,hers that led to the negative recommendation. Staff responded that the negative recommendation was in response to the policies of Vision 2001-2020 and the Southern Hills Neighborhood Plan, but also because the reason for attaching the subject proffers to the property in 2005 were still pertinent, mainly the visibility of the site to surrounding residences. Mr. Chrisman asked if the recommendation would be positive if more vegetative buffering were proffered. Staff responded that additional buffering had not been explored as the available areas for planting were limited. 5. Mr. Van Hyning asked the applicant if she agreed with staff's statement that the reasons for adopting the proffers to protect thesurrounding neighborhood had not changed. The applicant responded that she had never agreed with the proffer since visibility of the property was so limited. She also stated that the type of merchandise displayed were all items you could find in the back yard of any home. Members of City Council Page 6 September 20,2010 6. Mr. Futrell gave his support for the application, stating that the lack of outdoor display gave the store the appearance of being closed. The only public comment at the Planning Commission's public hearing was from Jim Haynes (526 Marshall Avenue, S.W.). Mr. Haynes supported the request, stating that Home Depot had been an asset to the City and had partnered with Old Southwest Inc., on numerous projects that had greatly improved the neig hborhood. oepartm~ritof Planning ;~Bllildlng and; DeVelOpment Room 166. NoeIC. TaylOf Munlcipal BUIlding 215 Church Avenue. S.W. Roanoke. Virgllli~24011 Phone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853.1230 [;j'r~':A.~1 AIJZ:;'L i~~~~I\~~-\JI~~.~' I.C@'K~~o:@nt'kl $Ubmltt~l N\lmber:I~Ill~nd~d APpllc:atlQn N;'-;-'-'. I . o Rezoning, NOt otherWise lisle(! o ReZOning, CoridlliOnal o Rezoning 10. PlannedUnil DeVelopment p.EstabllshmEmlOrCom f!!:1ensive Sl~ Overlay District [gI Amendrnont of Proffered CondItions o Amendmont af Planned UnirDevelopmentPlan o Amendment af Comprehensive SIgn Overlay DIstrict Address: Official Tax No(s).: 15410104 Exl9th~g Ba~eZ?nlng: . . ICG Commercial-General (Ifmulhple zones, please manually enterati districts.) , 0ralnance N6(s). for Exlsttil9 Conditions (If applicable): 1371 s,.s:qs ~~~~_____._ RequesledZonlng; leG. eomr!,lI~r(J~I-(;~~leral I Proposed Land Use: /Buildlng Supplies and Materials. Retail ','.," "::_:-',:>~;'-:"",'> -' ..... . '-'.;';-"-,-' -.., 1181 With Condilions o Without Conditions --I Phone Number: I ~;";"""'''''''''---''P:-'''7'-''-''''''''''~''',_,,;<,~; '. . ,', + 1 (?O7) 276-3:tOQ I I E-Mail: IJOhn@W1ru/.l.lproperties.com Nam$.:: Address: 4176 Franktin.Road R okc, VA 2401!f fIl~.~~. . HomcJ'cpOt U.S.A.. In'~ Address: 12455 PClces FerryRoa,d,Atla(l~r GA 30339 .. , .,,-'~-'.', ~. ',-.' Jennifer,M..Ev:ans . Attorney Phone NurIlber: I + 1 (770) 384-5024 1 E-Mail: ~t!l\nlre(_M_EVa'\S@hOmedepot.,ooi -~. 1 P~one Nl!fuber: I + 1 (540)772-3~~! I E.Mail: ~""':"'TrOUl/flhOlnedepot_(Om I 2455 Paces Ferry Road, N.W. . Atlanta, GA 30339-4024 (770) 433-8211 Direct Dial: 770/433-821/ ext. /8420 Fax: 770/384-3042 e-mail: Mariej_Vielot@homidepot.com July 20, 2010 Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, VA 24011 RE: Narrative to the Amendment of Proffered Conditions Application (the "Application") by HD Development U.S.A., Inc. ("Home Depot") regarding Store 4628 located at 4176 Franklin . Road Roanoke, VA 24014, as more particularly described on the enclosed legal description (the "Store") . Dear Department of Planning, Building and Development, Please accept this narrative in support of the referenced Application. Home Depot respectfully requests approval of the Application to amend proffered conditions #14 and #17 to allow the Store to display certain merchandise outside along the front apron of the Store. The enclosed Site Plan depicts the area proposed for the outdoor display of merchandise. Home Depot requests approval for limited display of select merchandise in order to better serve the customers who depend upon the variety of products available at this Store. In particular, the Store requests that it be allowed to, upon issuance of the Amendment of Proffered Conditions, establish a seasonal sales/display area in order to display live goods (e.g., plants and flowers) and other garden materials (e.g., mulch and soil), sheds, mowers, grills and special order fence panel displays in a designated area along the front apron of the Store. If you have any questions regarding the Application, please do not hesitate to contact Marie Vielot, Paralegal, at (770) 433-8211, ext. 18420. ii c ely,. . '~~t Par . egal - re. Support Legal Group AMENDMENT OF PROFFERED CONDITION The Applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 37159-081505 be AMENDED as they pertain to property located at 4176 Franklin Road and identified as Official Tax No. 5470104: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Concept Plan The Home Depot Franklin Road and Valley Avenue City of Roanoke Virginia prepared by Mattern & Craig dated July 8, 2005, a copy of which is attached to this Petition as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the Virginia Department of Transportation or the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plan review. 2. The 105,000+/- s.f. commercial building shall be architecturally finished in substantial conformity with the July 25,2005, rendering of The Home Depot, City of Roanoke, Franklin Road & Valley A venue by Architectural Group International, a copy of which is attached to this Petition as Exhibit C. 3. Any outdoor light fixture shall be a full cuto[ffixture or a decorative fixture with full cutoff optics. A "full cutoff fixture" shall mean an outdoor light fixture shielded in such a manner that all light emitted by the fixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the fixture, is projected below the horizontal plane. A "decorative fixture with full cutoff optics" shall mean an outdoor light fixture with manufacturer-provided or manufacture-installed full cut-off optics. 4. The spillover of lighting from any parking area on the subject property onto public rights-of-way or abutting property in residentially zoned districts shall not exceed one-half (0.5) foot candle at the property line. 5. Any outdoor lighting in parking areas shall not exceed forty (40) feet in height. The maximum height shall apply to the height of the poles or other standards to which the fixtures ~ attached or the top most point of the fixture itself, whichever is higher. i I I 6. Outdoor lighting information for the subject property shall be submitted during comprehensive development plan review. Such information shall include the following: a) Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures including the manufacturer's specifications of the area to be lighted with such fixtures; b) Plans indicating the location on the property and the type, of illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors and other devices; c) Description of the illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors and other devices; d) Photometric data, such as that furnished by manufacturers, showing the angle of cut off of light emissions; and e) Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator to determine compliance with the lighting proffers. 7. All dumpsters, loading docks, heating/air conditioning handling units and ground mounted electrical transformer boxes shall be screened from view from public rights of way adjacent to the subject property by landscaping, masonry or metal screen walls. 8. There shall be no building wall signs facing the residentially zoned property along the easterly side of Griffin Road. 9. Signage provided by the petitioner and approved by the City of Roanoke and identifying the Southern Hills Neighborhood shall be placed on the side of Griffin Road near its intersection with Roy Drive. 10. Landscaping shall be as shown on the Concept Landscape Plan, The Home Depot, , Franklin Road and Valley Avenue, City of Roanoke ,Virginia dated July 8, 2005, prepared by Mattern & Craig a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D subject to any changes required by the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plan review. 11. The following C-2 uses as designated in the Code ofthe City of Roanoke shall be permitted on the subject properties: 36.1-206 (1) Dwellings located above ground floor nonresidential uses. 36.1-206 (3) Trade business and art schools of a nonindustrial nature. 36.1-206 (4) Trade and vocational schools of an industrial nature. 36.1-206 (6) Day care centers with unlimited capacity subject to the requirements of section 36.1-510 et seq. 36.1-206 (7) Churches, synagogues and other places of worship including accessory co1umbariums. 36.1-206 (8) Libraries, museums, art galleries and art studios and other similar uses including associated educational and instructional activities. 36.1-206 (16) Post offices. 36.1-206 (17) Indoor recreational uses including bowling alleys, indoor tennis courts, squash courts, fitness centers and other similar uses. 36.1-206 (18) Theaters with unlimited seating capacity. 36.1-206 (20) Outdoor recreational facilities including swimming clubs, tennis courts, athletic facilities and other similar uses. 36.1-206 (23) General and prof~ssional offices including [mancial institutions. 36.1-206 (24) Medical clinics. 36.1-206 (25) Medical offices. 36.1-206 (26) General service establishments, except for repair or maintenance of motor vehicles or trailers, provided that, all repair or maintenance activities shall occur in a wholly enclosed building. 36.1-206 (27) Funeral homes. 36.1-206 (28) Restaurants;; 36.1-206.(29) Hotels, motels, and inns. 36.1-206 (30) Bed and breakfast establishments subject to the requirements of section 36.1-520 et seq. 36.1-206 (31) General retail establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale or rental of merchandise, goods,'or products except automobiles, trucks, or construction equipment; and including the incidental repair and assembly of merchandise, goods or products to be sold on the premises. 36.1-206 (32) Open air markets selling farm produce, crafts, plants, secondhand merchandise and other miscellaneous items. 36.1-206 (33) Food stores with unlimited gross floor area. 36.1-206 (34) Neighborhood and highway convenience stores, provided that no motor vehicle service station canopy over a gas pump island shall be allowed, unless: a) Such canopy shall have a maximum clear unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches. and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches; b) There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy; c) Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site; d) The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than.two (2) feet; and e) Signs attached to or on such c~opy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. , 36.1-206 (37) New motor vehicle sales and service establishments provided the lot area for this use is no less than forty thousand (40,000) square feet. 36.1-206 (38) Auto accessory sales with related installation. 36.1-206 (43) Storage and warehouse activities which are accessory to a retail use where all storage activities are wholly enclosed in a building which is located on the same Iotas the retail use and where the gross floor area of buildings used for storage activities does not exceed fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of the retail use. 36.1-206 (47) Plant nurseries and greenhouses including those with retail sales. (, 36.1-206 (48) Commercial printing establishments which print newspapers publications and other materials. 36.1-206 (49) Personal service establishments. 36.1-206 (50) Business service establishments. 12. The following C2 uses as designated in the Code of the City of Roanoke shall be permitted on the subject properties by Special Exception granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals: ' 36.1-207 (2) Fast food restaurants. 36.1-207 (7) Establishments primarily engaged'in the wholesale distribution of goods where all related activities are wholly enclosed in a building provided that: a) The total gross floor area of buildings on a lot shall not exceed twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. b) The use is located on a major arterial road or highway. 36.1-207 (8) Manufacturing assembly mixing processing or other processes which are accessory to a retail use, where all such activities are wholly enclosed in the same building as the retail use and where no more than five (5) people are involved in such processes on the premises. 13. As any development on Tracts B and C, as identified on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B), will be visible from public roads from multiple directions the architectural treatment and palette of exterior materials utilized for any structure built on either of these tracks shall be applied to all facades of such structure in a consistent and uniform manner. 14. The seasonal sales area aesignatea on the Caneept Site Pllm (Exhibit B) will be 1:lsea solely for the seasoaal sale of plants, slu1ibs, trees aRa assorteg potted n1:lfsery proa1:lets tegether ..vith assoeiated bag f)fag1:lets s1:lch as m1:lleh, tap soil and petting soil. The seasonal sales area v.ill be ill1:lSe, intermittently, fer approximately six months per year for the sale of plants and plant related items apf)raf)riate ta the time of the year, sueR as spring aRe swnmer live plants and Christmas trees aad felated greeaery. No b1:lilaings sheas tmilers lavlfl mewers gas grills traetors or similar items will be displayed stared or said in the seasonal sales aFea. The location of outdoor display will be in substantial conformity with the Outdoor Display Plan prepared by the Home Depot, dated July 17,2010, a copy of which is attached to this application as Plan Sheet No. C-l. 15. If requested by the City as part of the Comprehensive Development Plan review a natural non-handicapped accessible pedestrian access will be located between the Home Depot parking lot and Griffin Road near its intersection with Southern Hills Drive. 16. The finished grade of Griffin Road ben;een its intersection with Southern Lane and its intersection with Southern Hills Drive as shown on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) will not exceed twelve and one-half (12 ~) percent. 17. Ther-e will be R:e elitaoor storage of 800gS materials or mereaandise ather tRaR as prafferea for the seasonal sales area aesigaatee all the Concept Site Plan. (Exhibit B) and the areas sW'fOundee by ornamental fence saa'.VB Oll the Ceneept SitePlaa (Exhibit B) and the Rendering of the Home Depet b1:lileiRg (Exhibit C). .... vl>< ;:~o-' .:z..,.~< ~ciJ,oeJ .... ," c;::1::l rslll VI <o:olCllOll VI. ~ f- I ..... 10 o::)~<:r:l":v' 3"'" a::: cp&J 000 u:r~2jceJ~;: ....O....Vlwb/::& .~ 0: Cl-::&Vlo: .......~ .~o~< 0::&<< Uu v Oo..f-~I<2j oeJ:J:",~z 100 IZ...."'i=!....Cl.....Et o~j!:;1j<~':'~Cl r!.o .. gG-~ vz ~- "9 "'< wl!:L:l- .;j,~ o~~ffi 0..< l5 Cl ;iu Clr.lz :J .... Z C:1I= ~~ ~~~~ ....< ZNQ..LLJ ~~ VA '3)K)Ny0l:f iI. III B! CJ\f0l:f Nf'DINW:j 9at Iii I I ~~;= ~ IIIIII! II ;' a I I ::; I'III!J ,till . I I 9 I .' III a. a !I'l i" I ~!lIliill~ :iJI i., . ~ . .I!jl,,~ u~ o ~5 il...... I ~ II n\i ,0 rl ., '~ 'f 05 LUo:: lIlo.. lr< Of- I . o::z "1:.\11 :';~; 0..0 < ... LUo:: .... VI :' ~ I "I 0::U- 0: < '" <LU >- ..... I' III :I: en lIlf- < N III :! ..l ~" 51 ~ . ,I oo[ o::z i5 I ~I I <0 ...J 0: AI I I 0 0< 8 I ~ ~lIlW ,:! I <<0:: ::) ZLU12 0 I ~~lIl l5 LU)-LU .... 'I o <:I: Cl I L LU...Jf- ;: :I:!!!u- Z f-OO ~ I 0: ... D.. < ,i .I Adjoining Property Owners List of 4176 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Tax Number 5470116 Property Address 4210 FRANKLIN RD SW Legal Description TRACT A1 (15.323AC) PT AIRHEART TR Owner Name GAll LEO APOLLO I SUB LTC Owner 2 Name ' N/A Owner Address 4210 FRANKLIN RD SW ROANOKE VA 24014 Neighborhood Number 900 Property Use 40O-CommerciaVlndustrial Tax Number 5460716 Property Address 4109 SOUTHERN HILLS DR SW Legal Description TRACT C PINE GROVE Owner Name SOUTHERN HILLS ROANOKE LLC Owner 2 Name N/A Owner Address 1100 KENILWORTH AVE CHARLOTTE NC 28204 Neighborhood Number 900 Property Use 400-CommerclaVlndustrtal Tax Number 5480704 Property Address 4110 SOUTHERN HILLS DR SW Legal Description TRACT B PINE GROVE Owner Name WESTON ROANOKE LLC (THE) Owner 2 Name N/A Owner Address 9643 MCCORMACK PLACE WINDERMERE FL 34786 Neighborhood Number 900 Property Use 40O-CommerciaVlndustrial Tax Number 5480301 Property Address 4208 SOUTHERN HILLS DR SW Legal Description LOT 1 SEC 3 SO HILLS Owner Name COBBS VIRGINIA L Owner 2 Name NlA Owner Address 4208 SOUTHERN HILLS DR SW ROANOKE VA 24014 Neighborhood Number 310 Property Use 200-SingleFamily l Adjoining Property Owners List of 4176 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24014 (cont..) Tax Number 5480341 Property Address 4207 GRIFFIN RD SW . Legal Description LOT 41 BLK 3 SEC 1 SOUTHERN HILLS Owner Name SPRING JOHN W & MARY ANN Owner 2 Name N/A Owner Address 4207 GRIFFIN RD SW ROANOKE VA 24014 Neighborhood Number 310 Property Use 200-SingleFamily Tax Number 5480401 Property Address 4210 GRIFFIN RD SW Legal Description NEW LOT A BLK 4 SEC 1 SOUTHERN HILLS Owner Name ALLMAN JAMES A Owner 2 Name N/A Owner Address 1630 JUMPING RUN DR GOODVIEW VA 24095 Neighborhood Number 310 Property Use 20o-SingleFamily JUST. DUUS II LLC Address: 4347 FRANKLIN RD, Roanoke VA Owner Address: 2634 DOVETAIL CIRCLE ROANOKE, VA24018 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC Address: 4224 VALLEY AVE Roanoke, V A Owner Address: P. O. BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE. NC 27115 City of Roanoke - GIS ROANOKE VA Page 1 of2 Print Report I Full Detail Report I Close Window Property Information Card for: ROYAL SKIES INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNE 500 L ST 100 STE ANCHORAGE AK 99501 PARCEL INFORMATION Tax Number 5470104 Property Address 4176 FRANKLIN RD SW Legal Description TRACT A OGDEN Deed Reference 070013904 Deed Reference 2 050014212 Prevo Sale Date 0813112005 Prevo Sale Price 825000 Sale Date 08/1312007 Safe Pri98 $12,070,000.00 Owner ROYAL SKIES INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNE 500"L ST 100 STE ANCHORAGE AK 99501 Address I Property Acres OVerlay Zoning Property Frontage Property Avg. Depth Property Area Basement Area, Land Assessment Improvements Total 10,5840 N/A 510 Feet 660.00 Feet 461,039 N/A $2,365,100.00 $5,049,800,00 $7,414,900.00 DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this page is NOT to be construed or used as a "legal description." http://gis.roanokeva.gov/rotDetai1.cfin?maono=54 70104%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%... 6/30/2010 -.,'... -,..- .... '- .--~ , _"""'_''',.' . '-. e e EXHIBIT "8" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HOME DEPOT PROPERTY BEGINNING at the southeast intersection of U.S. Route 220 and Oriffm Road, S.W.; Thence with the southerly rigbt-of.way of Griffm Road, S.W. N 25642'04" E, 43.50 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same with a curve to the left whose radius is 233.00 feet an arc distance of 158.90 feet (chord == N 46047'59" E, 155.84 feet) to a point; Thence continuing with same N 27015'45" E, 147.00 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same N 15"21'17" W, 26.58 feet to a point; Thence continuing with Same N 27015'45" E, 51.50 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same with a curve to the right whose radius is 165.00 feet an arc distance of 19.4.09 feet (chord = S 60"57'42"W, 183.09 feet) to a point; Thence continuing with same S 85"20'20" E, 49.99 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same with a curve to the right whose radius is 165.00 feet an arc distance of 101.54 feet (chord = S 67"42'31" E, 99.95 feet) to a point; Thence continuing with same S 40"52']6" E, 130.62 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same S 40"11 '58" E, 452.67 feet to a point, said point being the northeast comer of the property of New Plan Realty Trust (lnst. #980004504, Pg. 84); Thence with the northerly property line of said New Plan Realty Trust, S 59"29'43" W, 693.10 feet to a point; Thence with the northerly rigbt-of,way of Southern Lane, S.W. . S 60"17'00" W, 14.44 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same S 60"08'54" W, 157.48 feet to a point on the easterly right-of.way of U.S. Route 220; Thence with the easterly right-of-way of U.S. Route 220, N 17008'06" W, 403.47 feet to a point; Thence continuing with same N 17005'30" W, 106.15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 10.539 Acres and being as shown on subdivision plat for Faison-Southern Lane, LLC by Mattern & Craig dated Development Agreement Roanoke VA 728024.7 1630.231??oo ,. B-1 .- ....... ,;- ~tS' IN THE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINlA, The 15th day of August, 2005. No. 37159-081505. AN ORDINANCE to amend M36.1-3 and 36.1-4, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as . amended, and Sheet Nos. 547 and 548, Sectiona11976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, by amending certain conditions presently binding upon certain property previously conditionally zoned C-2, General Commercial District, by Ordinance No. 33759-040698, and placing such proffers on certain other property zoned C-2, General Commercial District; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. WHEREAS, Faison-Southern Lane, LLC and Save-X 2, LLC have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke to amend certain conditions presently binding upon Official Tax Nos. 5470115, 5470113,5470114,5470112, 5470111, 5470108,54 70109,5470110,5480701 and 5480704, which property was previously rezoned by the adoption of Ordinance No. 33759-040698, adopted Apri16, 1998; , WHEREAS, Faison-Southern Lane, LLC and Save-X 2, LLC seek to have the subject property zoned C-2, General Commercial District, with proffers amended from those accepted by City Council in Ordinance No. 33759-040698, adopted Apri16, 1998; WHEREAS, Faison-Southern Lane, LLC and Save-X 2, u.c seek to have the proffered conditions which they seek to have applied to the above-referenced parcels of property apply to Official Tax Nos. 5470104, 5470103; 5470102, 5480717 and 5480718, which are zoned C-2, General Commercial District, WHEREAS, tQ.e City Planning Co~ssion, which after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by ~36.1-693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on August 15, 2005, after due and timely notice thereof as required by S36.1-693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to the Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, is of the opinion that the conditions now binding upon Official Tax Nos. 5470115, 5470113, 5470114,5470112,5470111,5470108,5470109, 5470110, 5480701 and 5480704, which property was previously rezoned C-2, General Commercial District, with proffers, by the adoption of Ordinance No.33759-040698, adopted April 6, 1998, should be amended, and Official Tax Nos. 5470104, 5470103, 5470102, 5480717 and 5480718, zoned C-2, General Commercial District, should be rezoned to C-2, General Commercial District, with proffers, as set forth in the Third Amended Petition to Amend Proffers filed in the City Clerk's Office on July 29, 2005. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Sections 36.1-3 and 36.1-4, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, mid Sheet Nos. 547 and 548 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Nos. 5470115, 5470113, 5470114, 5470112, 5470111, 5470108, 5470109, 5470110,5480701,5480704,5470104,5470103,5470102, 5480718 and 5480717 be rezoned C-2, General commercial District, with proffers as set forth in the Third Amended Petition to Amend Proffers filed in the City Clerk's Office on July 29,2005, and as set forth in th~report of the Planning Commission dated August 15,2005, so that the subject property is zoned C.;.2, General Commercial District, with such proffers. 2. Pursuantto the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is her<t~Y dispensed with. ATTEST: /? A~ j(~kt City Clerk. - Jt:\oJU)INANCIlS\O-ANENI>>'RO"w (I'AISON.sourHERN LAI'lII) 0I15O'.1lOC ""," '. . ' .~ , ~ THIRD AMENDED PETITION TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS AND PROFFER QF CONDITIONS IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA INRE: Amendment and Substitution of Proffered Conditions on eleven (11) and Proffer of Conditions on four (4) tracts ofland lying and being in the City of Roanoke, Virginia and briefly described as: Tax Map No. 5470115, 1.48 acres, Pine Grove, 4156 Southern Lane, S. W.; Tax Map No. 5470113, 0.5 acres, Part Lot 4, Maggie Redd Property, 4148 Southern Hill Lane, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470114,0.84 acres, Pine Grove, Griffin Road, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470112, 1.34 acres, Pine Grove, 4325 Southern Hills Lane, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470111, 1.19 acres, Pine Grove, 4134 Southern Lane, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470108, 0.51 acres, Pine Grove, Southern Lane, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470109,0.71 acres, Pine Grove, 4146 Southern Hills Drive, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5470110, 0.()6 acres, Pine Grove, Griffin Road, S.W.; Tax Map No. 5480701,0.18 acres, Part Parcel No.3, Pine Grove, 4118 Southern Hills Lane, ~.W. and Tax Map No. 5480704, 5.3 acres, Pine Grove, 4116 Southern Hills Drive, S.W., Tax Map No. 5480718, .357 acres, Pine Grove, Franklin Road, S.W., Tax Map No. 5480717, .143 acres, Pine Grove, Franklin Road, S. W., Tax Map No. 5470103, .245 acres, Ogden, 4166 Franklin Road, S.W., Tax Map No. 5470104, .98 acres, Ogden, 4176 Franklin Rd., S.W., Tax Map No. 5470102, .4 acres, Ogden, Franklin Rd., S.W. TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE: By Ordinance ~o. 33759-040698 at the request of Southern Lane Group, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, City Council rezoned the property identified as Tax Map Nos. 547011S,S470113~5470114,5470112,S470111,5470108,S470109,5470110,5480701 and 5480704 from RS.-3 to C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions. This property, together with Tax Map Nos. 5470103,5470102,5480717 and 5480718~ which are also zoned C-2, General Commercial District, were to be combined as the site for a retail out parcel development as shown on map of the referenced property attached hereto as Exhibit A. {110932227-1.093230-00041.o1} Petitioner, Faison-Southern Lane, LLC, owns the abQve referenced property and is the , . contract purchaser of the property identified as Tax No. 5470104 which.is zoned C-2, General Commercial District. Faison-Southern Lane, LLC requests that the proffered conditions which, apply to the above-referenced parcels of property be amended and that the conditions proffered in this Petition apply to all of the property owned by or under contract to Petitioner Faison- Southern Lane, LLC. Save-X 2 LLC, the Virginia limited liability company that owns Tax Map No. 5470104, joms with Petitioner Faison-Southern Lane, LLC in this request. Petitioner, Faison-Southern Lane, LLC believes that the repeal of proffers in Ordinance No. 33759-040698 in favor ofthe conditions proffered in this Petition will further the intent and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinance and its comprehensive plan in that it would allow for a better use of the property of Petitioner. Petitioner hereby requests that the following proffers enacted by Ordinance No. 33759- 040698 be repealed: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Development Plan prepared by Lumsden Associates, dated June 17, 1997, and revised August 7, 1997, a copy of which is attached to the Petition for Rezoning as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plan review. 2. The exterior treatment of all buildings on the property shall be architecturally finished and shall be consistent in the use of architectural details and materials on all sides of the building. 3. All lighting on the property shall consist of fixtures designed with shields that direct illwnination away from the adjoining residential neighborhood along the easterly side of Griffin Road. 4. All dumpsters, loading docks and heating/air conditioning handling units shall be screened from view by landscaping, masonry or metal screen walls. (tI0932227 -1 , 093230-00041.(1) 2 5. There shall be no building wall signs facing the residentially zoned neighborhoods along the easterly side of Griffin Road. 6. Outdoor advertising, as defmed in the Roanoke City Code, shall not be permitted. 7. The combined surface area of all signs on the commercial lots, including signs erected in a required yard, shall not exceed 2.5 square feet for each foot of lot frontage for the first one hundred feet oflot frontage, and an additional 1.0 square feet for each foot of lot frontage remaining. All freestanding sign structures shall be limited to one per lot with a signage area no greater than 100 square feet. 8. Tract E shall not be used as a restaurant. Any restaurants located on Tracts, D, G & F shall not be Fast Food restaurants. Any restaurants constructed on Tracts D, G & F shall contain odor abatement equipment to abate the disbursement of cooking odors to the outdoors. 9. Any structure constructed op Tract E, including a . motel or hotel, will be no more than three (3) stories high or a maximum of 45 feet measured from ground level. 10. A sidewalk shall be included along the northern side of the relocated Southern Hills Drive, and continue along the eastern side of Southern Lane, such, sidewalk shall run the length of the relocated Southern Hills Drive on the site and that portion of Southern Lane shown on the Development Plan. 11. The following C.2 uses as designated in the Code of the City of Roanoke shall not be permitted on Tracts D, E, For G: 36.1-206( 11) Police stations. 36.1-206(14) Military reserve and National Guard centers. 36.1-206(15) Training facilities .related to police, rue, rescue and ambulance uses. ,. 36.1-206( 19) Coliseums, stadiums, exhibition halls, and similar facilities. 36.1-206(21) Parks and playgrounds. I 36.1-206(22) Drive-in movie theaters. 36.1-206(34) Neighborhood and hi.ghway convenience stores. (tI0932227.1, 09323().()0()4 Hl1 ) . 3 _..~---'=----- .-.-.... " 36.1-206(35) Outdoor advertising subject to the requirements of section 36.1-440 et seq. 36.1-206(36) Gas stations. 36.1-206(39) Automobile 'cleaning facilities. 36.1-206(40) Automobile repair establishments except painting and body shops. 36.1-206(42) Public parking structures. 36.1-206(44) Bus terminals for the loading and unloading of passengers. 36.1-206(45) Veterinary clinics with no outside corrals or pens. 36.1-206(46) Kennels with no outside pens or "runs." . 36.1-206(47) Plant nurseries and greenhouses including those with retail sales. (Ord. No. 28611, ~ 2,4-27-87; Ord. No. 29932,2- 20-90; Ord. No. 30648A, 8-26-9 1). 36.1-207( 1) Group care facilities subject to the requirements of section 36.1-560 et seq. 36.1-207(4) Establishments primarily engaged in the sale or rental of automobiles, trucks and construction equipment including the incidental repair and maintenance of vehicles where the lot area is less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. 36.1-207(5) Automobile painting and body shops provided that there shall be no outdoor storage of damaged automobiles, equipment, auto parts or other materials. 36.1-207(9) , Utility substations, transmission lines and towers, booster stations, relay stations and transfonners, ai1d similar uses provided that light, fumes, noise, unsightliness, or other associated activities or emissions are adequately screened from the surrounding neighborhood. 36.1-207(1 0) Medicalla~ratories. Additionally, open air markets selling second hand merchandise and other miscellaneous items shall not be permitted on Tracts D, E, F or G. 12. Signage approved by the petitioner and the City of Roanoke, and identifYing the Southern Hills Neighborhood shall (Mlll32227-1.093230-00041.Q1) 4 ..----~._--' - .~."'_. '. '-:-;'"~.','~' be placed on both sides of Southern Hills Drive at its intersection with Griffin Road. 13. Petitioner's landscape buffering/screening along Griffin Road shall be designed so that a row of evergreen trees shall face the residential neighborhood located on the easterly side of Griffin Road, followed by a secOnd and interior row of deciduous trees, subject to any changes required by the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plail review. Petitioner hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be substituted and adopted for those existing proffers delineated above and apply to all of the referenced property owned by or under contract by the Petitioner: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Concept Site Plan, The Home Depot, Franklin Road and Valley Avenue, City of Roanoke, Virginia prepared by Mattern & Craig, dated July 8, 2005, a copy of which is attached to this Petition as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the Virginia Department of Transportation or the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plan review. 2. The 105,000:i; s.f. commercial building shall be architecturally finished in substantial conformity with the July 25, 2005, r~dering of The Home Depot, City of Roanoke, Franklin Road & Valley Avenue, by Architectural Group International, a copy of which is attached to this Petition as Exhibit C. 3. Any outdoor light fixture shall be a full cutoff fixture or a decorative fixture with full cutoff optics. A "full cutoff fixture" shall mean an outdoor li~t fixture shielded in such a manner that all light emitted by the fixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the fixture, is projected below the horizontal plane. A "decorative fixture with full cutoff optics" shall mean an outdoor light fixture with manufacturer-provided or manufacture-installed full cut- off optics. {1I0932227-1.093230-00041..o1) 5 ~.-:-:-----'---:. . ,.... ./' -'-----:--- .. .....,._.,. ,,-'o..~_"_____ 4. The spillover oflighting from any parking area on the subject property onto public rights-of-way or abutting property in residentially zoned districts shall not exceed one-half (0.5) foot candle at the property line. 5. Any outdoor lighting in parking areas shall not exceed forty (40) feet in height. The maximum height shall apply to the height of the poles or other standards to which the , fixtures are attached or the top most point of the fixture itself, whichever is higher. 6. Outdoor lighting infonnation for the subject property shall be submitted during comprehensive development plan review. Such infonnation shall include the following: (a) Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures including the manufacturer's specifications of the area to be lighted with such fixtures; (b) Plans indicating the location on the property, and the type, of illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports~ reflectors and other devices; (c) Description of the illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors and other devices; (d) Photometric data, such as that furnished by manufacturers, showing the angle of cut off of light emissions; and (e) Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator to determine compliance with the lighting proffers. 7. All.dumpsters, loading docks, heating/air conditioning handling units and ground mounted electrical transformer boxes shall be screened from view from public rights of way adjacent to the subject property by landscaping, masonry or metal screen walls. 8. There shall be no building wall signs facing the residentially zoned property along the easterly side of Griffin Road. {#0932227-1. 0932~1.(1) 6 ~.~._-.;,.....;....-,~.--.....:..,....!",,'" 9. Signage provided by the petitioner and approved by the City of Roanoke, and . identifying the Southern Hills Neighborhood shall be placed on the side of Griffin Road near its intersection with Roy Drive. 10. Landscaping shall be as shown on the Concept Landscape Plan, The Home Depot, ,Franklin Road and Valley Avenue, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated July 8, 2005, prepared by Mattern & Craig, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D, subject to any changes required by the City as part of Comprehensive Development Plan review. 11. The fol,lowing C-2 uses as designated in the Code of the City of Roanoke shall be pennitted on the subject properties: 36.1~206(1) Dwellings located above ground floor nonresidential uses. 36.1-206 (3) Trade, business and art schools of a nonindustrial nature. 36.1-206 (4) Trade and vocational schools of an industrial nature. 36.1-206 (6) Day care centers with unlimited capacity subject to the requirements of section 36.1-510 et seq. . 36.1-206 (7) Churches, synagogues and other places of worship including accessory columbariums. 36.1-206 (8) Libraries, museums, art galleries and art studios and other similar uses including associated educational and instructional activities. 36.1-206 (16) Post offices. 36.1-206 (17) Indoor recreational uses including bowling ~lleys, indoor tennis courts, squash courts, fitness centers and other similar uses. 36.1-206 (18) Theaters with unlimited seating capacity. 36.1-206 (20) Outdoor recreational facilities including swimming clubs, tennis courts, athletic facilities and other similar uses. 36.1-206 (23) General and professional offices including financial institutions. (tI0932227-1.093230-00041.o1) 7 36.1-206 (24) Medical clinics. 36.1-206 (25) Medical offices. 36.1-206 (26) General service establishments, except for repair or maintenance of motor vehicles or trailers, provided that. all repair or maintenance activities shall occur in a wholly enclosed building. 36.1-206 (27) Funeral homes. 36.1-206 (28) Restaurants. 36.1-206 (29) Hotels, motels, and inns. 36.1-206 (30) Bed and breakfast establishments subject to the requirements of section 36.1-520 et seq. . 36.1-206 (31) General retail establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale or rental of merchandise, goods, or products except . automobiles, trucks, or construction equipment; and including the incidental repair and assembly of merchandise, goods or products to be sold on the premises. 36.1-206 (32) Open air markets selling farm produce, crafts, plants, secondhand merchandise and other miscellaneous items. 36.1-206 (33) Food stores with unlimited gross floor area. 36.1-206 (34) Neighborhood and highw~y convenience stores, provided that no motor vehicle service station canopy over a gas pump island shall be allowed, unless: (a) Sucb canopy shall have a maximum clear, unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches; (b)" There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy; '. (c) Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside ofthe canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site. (d) The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet; and {#0932227-1,093230-00041.(1) 8 .... ~"'-""",:",;,,,,--""."'''~~ ( e) Signs attached to or on such canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not' extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. 36.1-206 (37) New motor vehicle sales and service establishments, provided the lot area for this use is no less than forty thousand (40,000) square feet. 36.1-206 (3'8) Auto accessory sales with related installation. 36.1-206 (43) Storage and warehouse activities which are accessory to a retail use where all storage activities are wholly enclosed in a building which is located on the same lot as the retail use and where the gross floor area of buildings used for storage activities does not exceed fifty (50) percent, of the gross floor area of the retail use. 36.1-206 (47) Plant nurseries and greenhouses including those with retail saleS. . 36.1-206 (48) Commercial printing establislunents Which print newspapers, publications, and other materials. 36.1-206 (49) Personal service establislunents. 36.1-206 (50) Business service establislunents. 12. The following C-2 uses as designated in the Code of the City of Roanoke shall be permitted on the subject properties by Special Exception granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals: 36.1-207 (2) Fast food restaurants. 36.1-207 (7) ~tablishments primarily engaged in the wholesale distribution of goods where all related activities are wholly enclosed in a building provided that: (a) The total gross floor area of buildings on a lot shall not exceed twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. (b) highway. The use is located on a major arterial road or 36.1-207 (8) Manufacturing, assembly, mixing, processing or other processes which are accessory to a retail use, where all such activities are wholly enclosed in the same building as the retail use (#O932227 -1, 09323().000.41-O') e ....~---- ~.. .. .. --.,., . ~''''-~''-:-'' and where no more than five (5) people are involved in such processes on the premises. 13. As any development on Tracts Band C, as identified on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B), will be vi~ible from public roads from multiple directions, the architectural treatment and palette of exterior materials utilized for any structure built on either of these tracks shall be applied to all facades of such structure in a consistent and uniform marmer. 14. The seasonal sales area designated on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) will be used solely for the seasonal sale of plants, shrubs, trees and assorted potted nW'Sery products together with associated bag p~ucts such as mulch, top soil and potting soil. The seasonal sales area will be in use, intermittently, for approximately six months per year for the sale of plants and plant related items appropriate to the time of the year, such as spring and summer live plants and Christmas trees and related greenery. No buildings, sheds, trailers, lawn mowers, gas grills, tractors or similar items will be displayed, stored or sold in the seasonal sales area. 15. If requested by the City as part of the Comprehensive Development Plan review, a natural non-handicapped accessible pedestrian access will be located between the Home Depot parking lot and Griffin Road near its intersection with Southern Hills Drive. 16. The finished grade of Griffin Road between its interseCtion with Southern Lane and its intersection with Southern Hills Drive as shown on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) will not exceed twelve and one-half (12 Yz) percent. : 17. There will be no outdoor storage of goods, materials or merchandise other than as proffered for the seasonal sales area designated on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) and the areas surrounded by ornamental fence shown on the Concept Site Plan (Exhibit B) ,and the Rendering of the Home Depot building (Exhibit C). {#O932227-1. 0932~041-O1} 10 ...~-,~... ..--~,'" .... .....~__._.h._--.. Attached as Exhibit E are the names, addresses and tax numbers of the owner or owners of all lots or property immediately 8djac~t to and immediately across a street or road from the subject property. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner requests that the'above-described amended proffers be approved as herein set out in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Roanoke. Respectfully submitted, this#th day of July, 2005. Respectfully submitted, FAISON-SOUTHERN LANE, LLC By: (("6> -- /> KentR~ SA VB-X 2, LLC By: SA VE-X USA, INC. By. KL{&/ Pre& /;;?" .J2 James F. Douthat, Esq. Woods Rogers PLC 10 S. Jefferson Street, Suite 1400 P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 540-983-7662 Counsel for Faison-Southern Lane, LLC And Save-X 2 LLC {#0932227.1, 093230-00041~1} 11 -..... --- . _'. a . r. ; .. ( .,;' p~' Ii, ,. I' '. ,',.. i ,I i . .. . . . I' , fI"I~' .. , .'Jlt c . . 'id I ~ . ~:l, B ~ g...... I d I , i! I ~ .. i j ~I ,~ i ~ ~ i.. '0 .... .., l :, d p'1~~ II . I .11111 ~ Ilhll I'r" 5 .t'l ~"1 7f 111 , . .'-.--. ~ .. ~~..__. .'" h~'i. I -t~ c: 1:1( 'II' )\ ~\/I \ ( -::{ '.-.~ :";'1, -'- - -' - ...~ --- ~ - ------, \,..- .- i~ I . . - .. ~... -:'Wi g . EXHIBIT B .-j,;--"-' ..... ~4',~_ - . .----.-:.:-""-, E'T1 n " !<;o - ::a ~)> ~ ~ ~~ 0 q r-'T1~ - ~ Z ;0 .. ;00 0)> )>2 00 J20~ .< )> r- r- m -< ?J: m 2 C m ~ ~~J~ 1"- ;l~ I~ ! ai ... :~Il a :e~ · u I .i!~ ii! c '" . ~a!' ....;! = 6! ~ ~.., 0 c; E~g I ; !!! C m m r- ~ .~ o Z I ~ n Z C\ :xJ m !!! o m ~ > r- c: V\ m " ~ " o VI m O. '" > ::0 o m Z n ~ :xJ ~ ~ \\:' r-t~ ~ i !.' ......... ~-~.'~~. I t", l.' I.." b"':'::,- '. ,/ :. t, ~. I...:~!.,I\' .: ~ · ..,' "" I .1_ -c:. '7":")~' . > -.t- ~ : ~~ ," ",,'i .t,:. . ....t.>;i.:.":-4~ f~ Af..l.,.:~~:.j S . '"$,,~~~,-'f' I I ~ n Z " :xJ ~ r- " Z m o ~ r- r- ~ ~ rn ! i I I ~ ! ~ f!! ~ .~ ~ ., 5i ... ~ ~ I ~ fi! I 111 c: ~ ~ . ~ ~ i a ~ EXHIBIT I L .(J II' I I I '11 ::J. I II .. Blun...... . . Iii II,IS ! )IJI"~""'.)I~:-"1o'.)I.... I , . I ~: II' I 'i,! i' Ii ...., ::}h I ! i Ii' - - - \ . t~ ,I . . I !. . _\. ,-.l ..'" J'.{ I ~ I I'i ----- /1.-- ->I' ~l I; I . . I' I' I . ,. L ~ I 11. \.:0,. I . 0 , .' I . "- ""f' 1 "1 1\ :; (0 , . , 'fi'\ I : I' I! t I .' .! 1; d t I . I ! Il I~ lq 91 1 q ill' I! If! 1',11: I( I l' · I II I . .',,~:, :\. ... 'I~ , ws:.' , , '~~.... . 0 'I I II, ~ DI~ -- .- _-1 \ ------- \--~-- t..r __ \ .,;:tr-- __ -- .J-\..-- ~... _--~- ~.:A __ --..- -- \ ',. \ .~ L~,~ \ . ~.::J- -- - - --- -- I t \ '~ ~ I, ,\ \ ~ I I .' .,-' '\ ~O' ~~ ~~ .\ !I 15, I ..../\ . L_' j (' /Y' \ _~~.:.-:~;:_.. ~ _~-=:.:..:.~. - - - - - \J v \. \./fP't.J---:;" .. \, \ .. \ \~~~'y-_:'\-.-rr-''''\ , - - . ..,....;~".,y.,. \. \. ) \ \ Y ".,..-.....1.../ ,/1"'" ~\ -:;., \ ~\ \ ~) r ~~., \ ~ III . .;....::;..;;..........--......,.. , , _" _f...f_~_~_'.. ~ ~..* ~.~ '!' ADJACENT PROPERTY CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TAX NO. OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 5470116 New Plan Realty Trost P.O. Box 4900. Scottsdale. AZ 85261 5470201 WR Grant 1613 Dunbar St.. NW. Roanoke. VA 24012 5480401 J lU'Iles A. Allman 1630 Jumping Run Dr., Goodview, VA 24095 5480301 Virginia L. Cobbs 4208 Southem Hills Dr., SW, Roanoke, VA 24014 5480341 ' John W. & Mary Ann Spring 1757 Tapa Canyon Suite 300, Simi Valley, CA 93063 5480121 Rama May Ford 4215 Rov Drive. SW. Roanoke, VA 24014 5480703 HeDlY H. & Madeline D. Muse 4049 Griffin Rd.. SW. Roanoke. VA 24014 5480716 City of Roanoke, Virginia 1317 Loudon Ave., NW, Roanoke, VA 24014 5480706 A Gary & Jeanne Yamine 6760 ChristoDher Dr., Roanoke, VA 24018 5480705 Charles B. & Catherine C. Lon2 4527 Burma Rd.. Radfotd. VA 24141 5470104 SA VB-X 2 LLC 416 S.lefferson St., Ste. 205, Roanoke, VA 24011 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA " PARCEL ID# OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 087.08-05-01.00- Lowes Home Centers Inc. 4224 Valley Avenue, Roanoke, VA 24014 ??oo , 087.08-05-02.00- lust Duus IT LLC 4347 Franklin Road, Roanoke, VA 24014 OOOQ 077.20-01-40.00- First National Exchange 4143 Franklin Road, Roanoke, VA 24014 0000 Bank '. 087.08-01-02.00- Old Heritage Cotp. 4252 Summit Street, Roanoke, VA 24014 ??oo . EXHIBIT IA {IJ0922078-1.10821t~1} The Roanoke Times c-NOnCrOFPUBU-1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\ C I The CO~~~lf~~e City of I Roanoke will hold a public he.aring on Monday, I September 20, 2010, at I 7:00 p,m., or as'soon thereafter as ttie matter I may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth I floor, in the Noel C, Taylor Municipal Building, 215 I Church Avenue, .S,W" IRoa,noke, Virginia, to I 'consider the following: I ' Request from Home Depot 'U.S,A" Inc., to amend I ,Proffered Condition No. 14 and repeal Proffered I ICOnditiOn No. 17, as set forth in the Third Amended I Petition to Amend Proffered i Conditions and Proffers of I Icondit!OnS filed on July 29, 2005, and accepted by City I Counci! by the adoption of Ordinance No, I 37159-081505, as they I pertain to the parcel of land at 4176 Franklin Road I S.W" bearing Official Ta~ No, 5470,104, such I amendment of proffers to allow for the outdoor I storage and display of goods and merchandise as I set forth in the Applica/;on for. an Amendment of I Proffered Conditions dated' July 12, 2010. The I proposed general usage of / t~e property is commercial, with a floor area ratio up to, I 5,0. The comprehensive I plan designates the I property for commercial uses, with no density / specified. , A copy of the application I : IS ayallable for review in the I Office of the City Clerk; Room 456, Noel C. Taylor I Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S,W., I Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in Interest and I citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on I 'the matter, If you' are a ,person with a disability who I ineeds accommodations for I jthis hearing, please contact ,the City Clerk's Office at I 1853-2541, before noon' on . the Thursday before the I Idate of the hearing listed ,above. I GIVEN under my hand this ,31st day of August,.2010, I Stephanie M, Moon, CMC I City Clerk. I ,(12323283) I I I MARY M. TROTT, AGENT 4176 FRANKLIN ROAD, W ROANOKE VA 24014 REFERENCE: 80175568 12323283 NPH-Home Depot State of Virginia City of Roanoke The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Times-World Corporation, which corporation is publisher of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice was published in said newspapers on the following dates: City/County of Roanoke, Commonwealth/State of Virginia. S~orn and subscribed before me this __~ay of SE T 2010. Witness my hand and official seal. PUBLISHED ON: 09/03 09/10 TOTAL COST: FILED ON: 486.72 09/10/10 Notary Public \\,111111111 ,,\ '^YIIA III " ~ IJ' IV/.A " ......:-l.. . . .. . '. ., A . I, ... '" .' " '. 'V" .::: ~v.., ~r>.\,-'\ ". , .::: '<'>" .. ~O d ,0 " '. -t' ':. , -,. 0'"''' 9'b'V' .... :: CC: ? 109Fj .., .. 4. = - CO . .Il-. C:'~\'" _- : : s::,(;.' 'I'f. &oI\,S-'" : z = - . \'\ ,,\J~x-;, . <5 - -=:. i' ". ~'( \..i,~,?,.1 ~ ..' 'C : -:. '. \' .'~'::: " C'/) .... . . . . .' ,,<<. ...... , vl/f, ..... ,~'V... "'" 'II10NWEp..\.\"\~\.." 11""fll\lll\ --------------------------------------------------+------------------------ Billing Services Representative 02: 1m!d 17 1- d3S 0 1. ~iM3TI ;\.11:] 0t~o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 20, 2010, at 7 :00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth floor, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to amend Proffered Condition No. 14 and repeal Proffered Condition No. 17, as set forth in the Third Amended Petition to Amend Proffered Conditions and Proffers of Conditions filed on July 29, 2005, and accepted by City Council by the adoption of Ordinance No. 37159-081505, as they pertain to the parcel of land at 4176 Franklin Road, S.W., bearing Official Tax No. 5470104, such amendment of proffers to allow for the outdoor storage and display of goods and merchandise, as set forth in the Application for an Amendment of Proffered Conditions dated July 12, 2010. The proposed general usage ofthe property is commercial with a floor area ratio up to 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for commercial uses, with no density specified. A copy ofthe application is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this 31st day of August ,2010. .Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk. I-Iome Depot-amend profelTed conditions,doc Notice to Publisher: Publish in the Roanoke Times on Friday, September 3, and Friday, September 10,2010. Send affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon, CMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853-2541 NPH-Home Depot.doc Send Bill to: Mary M. Trott, Agent 4176 Franklin Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 (540) 772-3087 Mary trott@homedepot.com AMENDMENT OF PROFFERS Home Depot USA, 4176 Franklin Road, SW. Tax No. 5470104 )AFFI DAVIT ) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) TO-WIT: ) CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Martha Pace Franklin, first being duly sworn, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first-class mail on the 2nd day of August, 2010, notices of a public hearing to be held on the 19th day of August, 2010, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: Tax No. Owner Mailinq Address 5470116 Galileo Apollo I 4210 Franklin Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 5480718 Southern Hills Roanoke LLC 1100 Kenilworth Avenue Charlotte,NC 28204 5480704 Weston Roanoke LLC 9643 McCormack Place Windermere, FL 34786 5480301 Virginia L. Cobbs 4208 Southern Hills Drive Roanoke, VA 24014 5480341 John and Mary Spring 4207 Griffin Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 5480401 James A. Allman 1630 Jumping Hun Drive Goodview, VA 24095 County Just Duus II LLC 2634 Dovetail Circle (4347 Franklin Road, SW) Roanoke, VA 24018 County Lowes Home Centers Inc. POBox 1000 (4224 Valley Avenue) Mooresville, NC 27115 Also Notified: Phyllis Hill, Southern Hills NH Council, 4305 Van Winkle Road 24014 .r"" " , ..., CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk . JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk September 1 , 2010 CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Mary M. Trott, Agent 4176 Franklin Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Ms. Trott: Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to amend and repeal certain conditions as set forth in the Application for an Amendment of Proffered Conditions dated July 12, 2010. For your information, I am enclosing copy of a notice of public hearing. Please review the document and if you have questions, you may contact Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney, at 540-853-2431. It will be necessary for you, or your representative, to be present at the September 20th public hearing. Failure to appear could result in a deferral of the matter until a later date. Sincerely, ~Ih, h-Joo-.0 Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk SMM:ctw Enclosure ~ "', / CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk September 1 , 2010 Galileo Apollo I Sub LTC Southern Hills Roanoke, LLC The Weston Roanoke, LLC Virginia L. Cobbs John W. and Mary Ann Spring James A. Allman . Just Duus II, LLC Lowes Home Centers, Inc. Phyllis Hill, Southern Hills Neighborhood Council Ladies and Gentlemen: JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to amend' and repeal certain conditions as set forth in the Application for an Amendment of Proffered Conditions dated July 12,2010. This letter is provided for your information as an interested property owner and/or adjoining property owner. If you have questionswith regard to the matter, please call the Department of Planning, Building and Development at 540-853-1730. If you would like to' receive a copy of the report of the City ~Ianning Commission, please call the City Clerk's Office at 540-853-2541.' ~in~erel~ J ~~J-V 'rn_ 0'0\00Y0 Stephanie M. Moon, CMC l City Clerk SMM:ctw . ~. ~ .to .. .. THE ROANOKE VALLEY COMMUNITY BAND Ralph L. Fuller: Marketing Director 3117Fleetwood Ave.S.W. Roanoke, Va. 24015 September 12, 2010' Honorable David Bowers Mayor City of Roanoke 215 Church Ave. S. W. Roanoke, Va. 24011 RECEIVED / . SEP~ 1 5 2010 MAYOR'S OFFICE Dear Mayor Bowers:: In 2007, The Roanoke Valley Community Band represented Roanoke at the Four Hundred Anniversy of America iil Jamestown Va. and 'the City of Roanoke was kind enough to donate ohe thousand dollars to help with expenses. We were the band to play at prime time on the main stage. We are asking the City of Roanoke to help in our 2011. spring concert. We plan to present Evita and Phantom of the Opera at the Jefferson Center ' We are requesting that you ask city councel for one thousand two hundred dollars [$1,200.00] for our 2011 spring concert at the Jefferson Center We have been advised that you are the one who can take this to city councel S~inCereIY:' ~"':' ""'''''' .. , , . . . . . -, . ," . '. ' .' -' .. . . ". '. " .,' Ralph L. Fuller c.~~ \ ~. ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 364 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 540.853.2333 www.roanokeva.gov October 20,2010 Mr. Ralph l. Fuller, Marketing Director The Roanoke Valley Community Band 3117 Fleetwood Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia 24015 ( Dear Mr. Fuller: This correspondence is to address your request for funding for the Roanoke Valley Community Band's 2011 Spring Concert. First, let me say that I appreciate the concerted efforts of the RVCS staff to promote arts and culture and provide entertainment in our community. Roanoke is a hub for the arts and cultural community and has a surprisingly strong cultural presence that rivals those of larger urban centers. The City yiews arts and culture as an essential component to the community and recognizes its potential to enhance the quality of life for our citizens. This is demonstrated in the city's commitment to provide approximately $259,000 in funding to the Roanoke Arts Commission for the promotion of arts and humanities. In regards to your request, I spoke with Dylan Locke, Artistic Director of the Jefferson Center, to inquire about the rental rate of the Shaftman Performance Hall. Mr. Locke is willing to provide a reasonable reduction in the rental rate to the city. As a result, I have agreed to fund the $600.00 rental cost for the RVCS's use of the facility for the 2011 Spring Concert and will provide the payment directly to the Jefferson Center. In the future, I ask that you participate in the Roanoke Arts Commission application process for all arts and cultural funding requests. The Roanoke Arts Commission (RAC) is tasked with advising and assisting City Council on matters relating to the advancement of the arts and humanities within the city. The Agency Funding Advisory Committee of the RAC makes annual recommendations to City Council for expenditure of funds to arts and cultural non.profit organization. Its application is made available annually through the Office of Economic Development during mid-January. This process ensures that all arts and cultural resources are fairly considered and that there is no precedence established th~t would encourage other arts and cultural organizations to seek funding for artistic performances outside the purview of the RAC. Again, I thank you and the staff of the Roanoke Valley Community Sand for your efforts in promoting and enhancing arts and culture in our community. I am hopeful that this letter has addressed your concerns. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Susan Jennings, Public Art Coordinator, at (540) 853-2715. ChristopHer P. Morrill City Manager cc: Mr. Myron White, Director Mayor David A. Bowers Sherman Stovall, Director of OMB CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M, MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 22, 2010 David Greer, Agent 4720 Sanders Drive, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Greer: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 38951-092010 rezoning property located at 3454 Cove Road, N. W., Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, fromR7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application No.2 dated August 19, 2010. . The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010; and is in full force and effect upon its passage. J ecelia T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure David Greer September 22, 2010 Page 2 . pc: Doris V. McKinney, 4735 Barclay Square, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 B.M. and Frances Hale, 3451 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Daniel A. Grey, 3511 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Henry T. Phan, et als, 3448 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 . Harvey and Dianne Cardwell, 3466 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Marie N. Lapierre, 3518 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 J. Donald Pugh, P. O. Box 6172, Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Ernest and Rebecca Johnson, 3524 Cove Road, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Philip Schirmer, City Engineer Martha P. Franklin, Secretary, City Planning Commission .fv ~~.. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38951-092010. AN ORDINANCE to amend S 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia; dated December 5, 2005, as amended, to rezone certain property within the City, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Inglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.l., has made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to have the property located at 3454 Cove Road, N.W., Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, rezoned from R-7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain conditions; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to, all concerned as required by S36.2-540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on September 20,2010, after due and timely notice thereof as required by S36.2- 540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, -. after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's 0- IngJesia De Dios-rezone with proffers. doc 1 Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of the subject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described - - property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, located at 3454 Cove Road, N.W., be, and is hereby rezoned from R-7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioner, as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application No.2 dated August 19,2010. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading ofthis ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. City Clerk. O-lngJesia De Dios-rezone with proffers.doc 2 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 166 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 E-mail: planning@roanokeva.gov Architectural Review Board Board of Zoning Appeals Planning Commission September 20,2010 Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor Honorable David B. Trinkle, Vice Mayor Honorable William D. Bestpitch, Council Member Honorable Raphael E. Ferris, Council Member Honorable Sherman P. Lea, Council Member Honorable Anita J. Price, Council Member Honorable Court G. Rosen, Council Member Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of City Council: Subject: Request from Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.1. to rezone property located at 3454 Cove Road, N.W., Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, from R-7, Residential Single Family, to IN, Institutional District, for a place of worship, subject to conditions proffered by the applicant. Planning Commission Public Hearing and Action: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on Thursday, August 19, 2010. Discussion at the public hearing is included at the end of this report. By a vote of 7-0, the Commission recommended approval, finding the application to rezone the subject property to be consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Vision 2001-2020, and the Peters Creek North Neighborhood Plan. The request provides for the continued mix of churches, schools, and commercial centers within the City's neighborhoods that allow residents to obtain a variety of services in close proximity to their homes. Rl:A: Angela Penn, Chair City Planning Commission cc: William M. Hackworth, City Attorney R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Applicant Members of City Council Page 2 September 20, 2010 Application Information Request: Rezoning, Conditional Owner: Luz Rodriguez Applicant: Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal M.1. Authorized Agent: David E. Greer (DEG Design & Services) City Staff Person: Maribeth B. Mills Site Address/Location: 3454 Cove Road NW Official Tax Nos.: 6440211 and 6440210 Site Area: 3.2198 acres Existing Zoning: R-7, Residential Single-Family District Proposed Zoning: IN, Institutional with Conditions Existing Land Use: Single-family dwelling and vacant Proposed Land Use: Place of Worship Neighborhood Plan: Peters Creek North Neighborhood Plan Specified Future Land Use: Multifamily Residential I Filing Date: Original Application: January 7,2010; Amended Application No.1: July 6, 2010; Amended Application NO.2: August 19, 2010 Background The proposed development is a 4,500 square-foot sanctuary building and 7,380 square-foot future addition with an exterior treatment of brick and stucco. The building would be oriented to Cove Road with a concrete sidewalk connecting the main entrance to a five foot wide public sidewalk constructed along the frontage by the applicant. A 40-space parking lot would be located towards the rear of the. building and accessed by a 24-foot way driveway from Cove Road. The existing single-family dwelling and two associated accessory structures would be demolished. Conditions Proffered by the Applicant The applicant requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as it pertains to Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the development plan entitled 'Development Plan for Rezoning Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal M.I.' prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 8/17/2010, subject to any changes that may be required by the City during Comprehensive Development Plan Review. Members of City Council Page 3 September 20,2010 2. The church will be developed in substantial conformity with the exterior elevations entitled 'Brick and Stucco Church Building Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal M.I.' prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 2/2/10. 3. Light levels, generated by the site, shall not exceed 0.5-foot candle measured at property lines. Considerations Surroundinq Zoninq and Land Use: Zoning District Land Use North R-7, Residential Single- Single-family dwellings. Familv District South R-7, Residential Single- Single-family dwellings. Family District East R-7, Residential Single- Single-family dwellings. Family District West R-7, Residential Single- Vacant and single-family dwelling. Family District Compliance with the Zoninq Ordinance: The IN District's purpose is to accommodate and integrate institutional uses within a neighborhood setting through thoughtful site design. The regulations of this District require the following: 1. The construction of a sidewalk connecting the public sidewalk to a building entrance. 2. The installation of a type C buffer yard between any new construction and abutting residential districts. 3. The prohibition of parking between Cove Road and the principal building. 4. A limitation on lighting to 18 feet in height with a 10 foot setback. The applicant has 'also proffered a maximum 0.5 foot-candle at all property lines. 5. A limitation on signage to six feet height and 32 square feet in sign area for one freestanding sign and 32 square feet in sign area for one building mounted signs. 6. A minimum of 36 spaces and a maximum of 54 spaces to accommodate a total of 144 sanctuary seats. A total of 40 spaces, including four handicap spaces, are proposed. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neiqhborhood Plan: The compatibility of new construction, lack of pedestrian accommodations, traffic congestion, and flooding are a few of the issues identified by the Peters Creek Members of City Council Page 4 September 20,2010 North Neighborhood Plan for this area of the City. The proposed rezoning addresses these issues as they relate to the subject properties. 1. The proposed building placement along the public street with minimal parking located in a subordinate location is consistent with the Design Principles of Vision 2001-2020: Furthermore, the one-story, brick and stucco veneer design of the church building is consistent with other institutional buildings along Cove Road. 2. A five foot wide public sidewalk separated from Cove Road by a six foot planting strip is proposed for length of the property. 3. A traffic analysis completed by the applicant determined that the site's primary use during off-peak hours on Sunday morning would only require the construction of a taper into the site from the west. 4. Stormwater will be mitigated through the use of porous asphalt and a rainwater harvesting system for the building's roof runoff. The applicant proposes a zero increase in discharge and volume from the site. The following policies of Vision 2001-2020 are relevant to the application: . NH P2. Neighborhoods as villages. Neighborhoods will function as villages, offering opportunities to live, work, shop, play, and interact in a neighborhood setting. . IN P4. Parking. Roanoke will encourage on-street parking wherever possible and discourage excessive surface parking lots. Off-street parking will be encouraged to the side or rear of buildings. . EC P4. Environmental Quality. Roanoke will protect the environment and ensure quality air and water for citizens of the region. (Note EC A 13. Limit the amount of impervious surfaces to reduce runoff) The following policies of the Old Southwest Neighborhood Plan are relevant in the consideration of this application: . Economic Development Policies o Encourage good relationships between commercial and residential development through thoughtful site and building design, landscaping, and transitional uses." . Infrastructure Policies o Improve stormwater drainage. o Improve sidewalk/curb system. · Require developers to install sidewalks and curbs at rezoning, special exception, or subdivision stage in a manner consistent with current City policy. · Provide planting strips at least six feet wide when new sidewalks and curbs are installed. Design Principles: Application's Conformity: Site development should be maximized The principal building is set close to through reduced parking spaces, the street with the minimum amount of increased lot coverage, and parcels required parking located to the rear. Members of City Council Page 5 September 20, 2010 developed along street frontages. Parking should be located to the rear or side of the rinci al buildin . Building location and design should be considered as important elements of the streetscape and should be used to define the street corridor as a public lace. Building fronts and entrances should face the street. Outside Aqencv Comments: The rear of the property has not been used because it is rone to floodin . Parking is located to the rear of the rinci al buildin . The principal building is set close to the street and. is compatible with the setback of other buildings along Cove Road. The principal building is oriented to the street with a front entrance, portico, and sidewalk connecting the entrance to the public sidewalk. The City's Traffic Engineer, Hong Liu, stated that a 24 foot turning radii would be necessary based on a traffic analysis conducted by the applicant. Planninq Commission Public Hearinq: The following comments and questions were posed by the Planning Commission at their August 19, 2010 public hearing. 1. Mr. Williams questioned the need for a 25 foot turning radii proposed for the driveway off Cove Road, stating that it made the crossing distance for pedestrians on the sidewalk much longer than necessary. He also wanted to ensure that the sidewalk maintained a 2% cross slope at the driveway intersection. Staff responded that the development plan did need to be amended to ensure that the driveway width was no greater than 24 feet at the property line but that it would be most appropriate to allow the design professional to determine the appropriate turning radii to meet. performance standards. Staff also stated that the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a 2% cross slope. 2. Mr. Williams expressed concern for the recommendation of a taper into the site as proposed by the traffic analysis provided by the applicant which allowed increased speed for turning vehicles and cut into the 6 foot planting strip. Mr. Chrisman asked if the recommendation for a taper was in order to meet VDOT standards. Mr. Hong Liu, City Traffic Engineer, stated that the recommendation was a VDOT standard based on the volume of traffic generated by the site. Mr. Williams stated that he did not feel that VDOT highway standards were appropriate for City streets. Staff stated that the taper was not included on the development plan and therefore would not be required. 3. Ms. Katz asked if traffic analysis took into consideration that the peak time for a church was Sunday morning. The City's traffic engineer said that it did take that into consideration. Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 Date: IAU9 19,2010 Submittal Number: lAm ended Application No.2 D Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed lEI Rezoning, Conditional , D Rezoning to Planned Unit Development D Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District D Amendment of Proffered Conditions D Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan D Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 13454 Cove Road NW Official Tax No(s).: 16440211 and 6440210 Existin.g Base Zoning: .. IR-7 Residential Single-Family (If multiple zones, please manually enter all dlstncts.) , , . Ordinance No(s). for Existing Conditions (If applicable): INA Requested Zoning:I~N, Institutional I Proposed Land Use: Iplace of Worship I D With Conditions lEI Without Conditions Name: ILUZROdrlgyez Address: 114 Christian Avenue NE, Roanoke, VA 24015 LLI'2 &, tKaAr:~\.l€ 2- ,P~perty ()wner'sS.i9.natu~:. . . U .. ',-", ,~~~t; I Phone Number: E-Mail: I + 1 (540) 520-5098 I I , Phone Number: I +1 (540) 366-5760 I E-Mail: Ipastoralaurap@netzero.com I Name: lDavi~ Greer I Phone Number: I + 1 (540) 366-5575 I E-Mail: IOEGOESIGNS@VERIZON.NET I Address: Authorized Agenfs Signatu David E. Greer 4720 Sanders Dr. NE Roanoke, Virginia 24019-5838 540-366-5575 Fax 540-366-4664 February 8,2010 To: City of Roanoke Rezoning ~ , IGLESIA DE OIOS PENTECOSTAL M.I. Church of Roanoke, Va. Request a rezoning property on Cove Road NNI/ Roanoke Va. for the intent of building of a wood frame construction building with brick and front corners with the upper front and sides & rear with stucco as shown on elevation drawings A 101. Building size as noted on the drawings A 101 provided with Phase One shown and Phase Two shown (Phase Two at a later date.) A development plan 0101 showing ;~11Rl!,jl~ing, pourous parking lot. Parking lot to have pourous asphalt paving wI stone ,:~r~~g'arge bed. :(t,r',,t:t';. :$r~>~~jk, trees, bushes, plants with sewer line as shown on drawing 0101. ~ ~ ~ / :'.:' .., , .;",t ,,~ " . . "~~Q,, sewer line & pump system to be in place for sewer. , . iYCfrawin s) 'ij... 'y,;f,~,~,-.- "'Y"'" 'f' 9 ~ 5~~:~_:,:,~~~~1~:. ',,' <~; . , T~'ffic Anaylsis shows traffic 391 + Approaching from Peters Creek Road. Tf~~c,Anaylsis shows traffic 490 + Approaching from Hershberger Road. Dat~a: /11/212009 (See Engineering Report for Whole Anaylsis) l~'_< ~""Y' ~ -d, At this time the properties are two separate lots with an eXisting structure on Lot (tax map #644-0210). This structure is to be disposed of and if any other structures on lot. A professional Architect, Engineers and/or other personnel will be involved in the design phases of the said structure for IGLESIA DE DlOS PENTECOSTAL M.I. This will insure that this structure will be presentable to the neighborhood and surroundings and to meet all State, Federal & Local Building Codes. If you have any questions please call or e-mail meatdeadesiansaI>.verizon.net Thank you. Sincerely, David E. Greer ....................... i Preliminary Design Narrative Iglesia De Dios Penticostal M.I. Church 6 July 2010 The proposed worship space structure is to be a one-story preengineered steel frame building containing approximately 7,500 square feet. The Occupancy Classification will be A-3, Assembly (2006 IBC). The Type of Construction will be Type IIIB, Unprotected Combustible/Noncombustible (2006 IBC). The floor will be concrete slab-on-grade. The exterior walls will have a masonry (brick or decorative CMU) or E.I.F.S. finish. The interior partitions will be wood studs with gypsum board sheathing. The roofwill be standing seam metal. The facility will be fully handicap accessible. The building will contain a worship space, toilet room facilities, a residential-grade kitchen and related support areas (electric room ,mechanical space, corridors, storage closets, etc.). Proffered Conditions The applicant hereby agrees .to proffer the following conditions as they apply to Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the development plan entitled 'Development Plan for Rezoning Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal M.I.' prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 8/17/2010, subject to any changes that may be required by the City during Comprehensive Development Plan Review. 2. The church will be developed in substantial conformity with the exterior elevations entitled 'Brick and Stucco Church Building Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal M.I.' prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 2/2/1 O. 3. Light levels, generated by the site, shall not exceed 0.5-foot candle measured at property lines. DEG Designs & Services David Greer , -; ~ 111L -.::: ,< c PETERS CREEK ~QAD a (,of (,of ! o co..... -0 at.... -0 '.' , 0" , (J) - _ c: z: UJ G) N II UI CHURCH SITE a << o rx I.&J .' > .,' 0 u It) . N C) 1~ ~ ,'Q. % -c co- > co en Q , "It.... oC( . HERSHBERGER ROAD TRAFFIC ANAYLSIS SKETCH FOR IGLESIA DE DIOS CHURCH LOCATED ALONG COVE ROAD IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 2009 i . TRAFFIC ANA YLSIS FOR IGLESIA DE DIOS.CHURCH LOCA TED ALONG COVE ROAD IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Proposed Church Data: To be built in the year 2010 Approximate 200 seating capacity Will use a ratio of 4 people to 1 car = SOcars per Sunday Will use a SO/50 split for traffic flow Existing Traffic Data: Data from 2007 VDOT Traffic Report for the City of Roanoke AADT = 8,400 K-Factor = 0.096 Direction Factor = 0.556 Speed Limit = 35mph No Bid Traffic Data: WiD use a 3% Growtb Factor Year 2007 = 8,400 Year 2008 = 8,652 Year 2009 = 8912 Year 2010 = 9179 Pear Hour Traffic Flow along Cove Road from the direction of Hershberger Road: "Advancing" 9,179 " 0.556 " 0.096 = 490 Tbe churches traffic will be mostly on Sundays at off-peak bours. A very conservative 5% reduction in the peak hour of traffic will be used. 490 *0. 95 = 466 Will add 25 cars from site = 491 "Opposing" 9,179 * 0.444 * 0.096 = 391 391 * 0.95 = 371 Will add 25 cars from site = 396 Based on Fil!ure C-l-l.2. No Left Turn is warranted Based on Chart from Section C-36. onlv a taDer is reauired for entrance C:~ . C", '- 2007 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates where available Special Locality Report 128 City of Roanoke Information in this report is included in Report 80 (Roanoke County) Prepared By Virginia Department of Transportation Trame Engineering Division In Cooperation Wi1h U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Higbway Administration ,,'. ,.-:z~ _"m ., " ...~. .; Route ('ii,. nrRnAnnL:. 8 Salem Tnpk e Salem Tnpk e Garden City Blvd e Garden City Blvd 8 Shenandoah Ave ~ Shenandoah Ave :.:J 8 Shenandoah Ave 8 Shenandoah Ave e Odgen Rd e Grandin Rd e Grandin Rd 8 Grandin Rd e Franklin Rd 8 Franklin Ave e Tazev.ell Ave e Tazev.ell Ave e Green Ridge Rd ,:,;-'? e Cove Rd Q Mud Lick Rd \..J e EdgelMXld Ave 8; Memorlal Ave 5/14/2008 Virllinia Department of T ransportalion Traffic Enllineerinll OMs Ion 2007 Annual Averaae Oaitv Traffic Volume Estimates Bv Section of Route City of Roanoke .-------- Truck--------- K Oir Length AAOT QA 4Tlre Bus 2Axle 3+Axle 1Trail 2Trail ac Factor aK Factor AAWOT aw 1.35 ....1 1600 G .::::1 8100 G "I "'_I 4800 G 1.20 0.42 1.36 .::::1 6900 G T'I "-1 12000 G 2.13 o.n .::::1 9400 G 0,86 .:':1 9400 G 0,29 .:':1 4600 G T'I '-1 9200 G T'I Jr~1 7100 G "I '''1 6600 G 0.55 1.11 0,72 0,97 .:':1 2900 G T'I '''1 12000 G .:1 6100 G ..:1 6700 0 0.60 0;.14 0..54 rr:.1 0.34 4800 0 T'I "-I 5100 G 1;,23 1,,49 ..':'1 9400 G "I 1'043 "'rIll 3100 G .:1 8200 G .:1 6100 G T'I 0.76 0;71 98% WCL ROIIlloke 1% 1% 0% 0% 96% 36Ih 51 0% 1% 1% 1% 24th 51 98% y.llow MID Rd (lOA. 1 % 0% 0% RayRd 0% 1% 0% 0% SR I 16 RivorlandRd WCL Raoooko 1% 1% 1% 2% 98% 95% 95% :!4th 51 1% 1% 1% 2% 95% 15th St 1% 1% 1% 2% 95% SlhSt 1% 1% 1% 2% Willillll1llanRd SCL Rosooko 0% 1% 0'l6 0% WCL ROlIllolc. SCL Roan<>I<e 0% 1% 0% 0% U5 II 5R419 0% 1% (lOA. 0% 99% 99% 99% Mudlick Rd 98% Danl MiD Rd US 220B\15 0% 1% 0% 0% US 22! Ebn Avo US22! )otfononSI 0% 1% 0'l6 0% Williomson Rood WilIillll1lon Rd 0% 1% 0% 0% !1rh SI 0% 1% 0% 0% 13Th St NCL ROIII1Clko NCL Sa10m 0% 1% 0% 0% 98% 98% 98% 99% 99% SR 111 PotorJ Crcc.I: Roed 0% 1% 0% 0% HeIohberRer Rd 0naxIiil Rd 0% 1% 0% 0% US 11 BruIldon Avo Branden Avo 0% 1 % 0% 0% Memor\&l Avo Edilewood Avo 0% 1% 0% 0% Onmdiil Rd 99% 99% 99% 16 0% I F 0.087 I C 0.085 I 1 F 0.104 I C 0.096 I 1 C 0.097 1 F 0.099 I C 0.102 I F 0.094 1 I C 0.097 I I C 0.1 I I F 0.098 I NA I I C 0.098 I F 0.138 I C 0.14 I F 0.144 I 1 F 0.103 I C 0.096 I I F 0,126 I C 0.099 I F 0.100 I F 0.502 8200 Year G 2007 0% 2007 0% F 0.514 F 0,585 8800 5200 G G 2007 G 2007 0% 0% F 0,578 F 0.51 6300 13000 G 2007 2007 0% F 0.5~4 1 ??oo G 0% G 2007 F 0.536 10000 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.605 F 0,564 F F 0,504 5000 9900 7600 6100 G 2007 G 2007 G 2007 G 2007 G 2007 0% F 0.622 3100 13000 G 2007 0% G 2007 F 0.n3 6500 0% G 2007 F 0.805 6100 0% G 2007 0% F 0,913 F 0.519 5200 5500 G 2007 G 2007 0% 0% 0% 0% F O.~ ~.~ F 0.645 F 0,541 F 0.547 9100 3300 6700 5500 G 2007 G 2007 G 2007 C-36 ~:1 \ a: :::l o J: a: w a. en w -l ~ J: UJ > en z a: :::l ~ ~ J: " a: > J: a. .., .......... ::=::;::::::::.:-. ..... ..... ... ....... .... ...... ... :~:~:~: ~:~: ~:~: ~:~:~:~:~: ::;::" 1 00 ii!IJIJI::i'illl'I:IIJ:ilill:1!11[:ii.:!:::i::~:~::t:::\:::" 80 ;:::;:::::;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. ~....................................................................................................... .... .....0 ..... ...... .... .................. ... .................................................................................... ......... .0.... ... ...... ............. '.0 ...... -0. ............ ................. ........ .... ..... .... .......... ........ ........ .0. ........ . '.'~".'..'.."..".'.'..".".."..'..'.."..'..'.."."..'..".."..".".."."..'."."..".".".. eo........................ 0..0 '0. ... ......... ...................... .... .... '.'. .~:.:.: .:.:.:.:.:.: .:.:.:.: .:.:..:.: .:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:. :.: .:.:.:.: ..:. :.:.. :.:.:~.... ....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:;..... .,.....:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:":.:':.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:":-. ''',:,: . TAPER REQUIRED. ':::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::-. ".0.:::::::: ::::::::::::: :::::::::: :~::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::.. : ..;::::::::,:: ~::: : I!::::.::: ..1111::111111111 i III! illl! Iii 11111 III II! Ill; II II 111II I Iii Ii I"!.:.::.:::: i!: :~!. ::1':: .::::~: , '..~: :: :~::: ::=:: ::::::::::::::: ::::~:::::::::: :~:: 20 RADIUS REQUIRED 700 PHV APPROACH TOTAL. VEHICLES PER HOUR LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adiustment for Riaht Turns For posted speeds at or under 70 km/h (45 mph), PHV right turns> 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns - PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = AOT x K x 0 K = the percent of MDT occurring in the peak hour o = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11 % for K x 0 will suffice. FIGURE C-1-8 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) (~'r "',.~~ C', C-9 WAR R ANT FOR LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO-LANE HI GHW A YS ~\ ::z: Q. > Or.d_. Unalvn.llc.d Jnt.r..ctlon. L - . ~ft ?urna in Y , & - Storav. Lenvth R~~ired V - ~O .ph (OperaUnv/o..&vn Speed) to - 6. w ~ ::> ....l o > C> Z VI o Q. Q. o o > S=100r VA 600 800 1000 CING VOLUME (VPH) E C-1-1.2 !"^ ----------------------------------------------~---+-i I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication The Roanoke Times DAVID GREER, AGENT 4720 SANDERS DRIVE, ROANOKE VA 24019 E REFERENCE: 80175569 12323300 NPH-Iglesia De Dios State of Virginia City of Roanoke I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Times-World Corporation, which corporation is publisher of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice was published in said newspapers on the following dates: City/County of Roanoke, Commonwealth/State of Virsl?ia. Sworn and subscribed before me this __J~ay of SEPT 10. Witness my hand and official seal. PUBLISHED ON: 09/03 . ",""fllll ..."" p.. LA YIl1.I"" ...... ^'l ...... '~A.', ... ~v.' :'l '. "'v ' ~ ..::;- . ....,'Oit p.~ .... -:;. ... ~ . ~ ~C . g ~.... \,U6 909SO ". ~ ~ -' :lf10 ~,: - = : ~'C.G. ~'I\'2}o\G'~::::: - ~. .IN cOlJ\\" . <: - :~.... N\'~\?\ t:<5~ , ;-. 10' . ~... , <-;-,'. .' .~... " VA... -. .- ~........ , 'I7AI ......... <0~ ... "~~;/ONWEA\..\~ \\"", lilt,,,,,,,," 09/10 TOTAL COST: FILED ON: 505.44 09/10/10 ---.:"'"-=-.=......= - - - - - - --_:- ---- .----- I j'MUniCiPal Building, 215 NonCE Of PUBLIC i Church Ave~u~, ,S.W., : Roanoke, VirginIa, to I HEARING I' consider the following:, I Th Request from IgleSIa De :Roa~ Coun~1I of the City of, Dlos Pentecostal M.1. to 'h e a o,ke Will hold a pUblic I rezone property located at 's ring o'n Monday,. 3454 Cove Road, N.W" /8~ember 20, 2010, at' Official Tax Nos. 6440211 lIi p.m., or as Soon: and 6440210, from R.7, 1m ere'bfter as the matter" IResidential Single Family CO.~.~CileC~eard' in the/:' District, to IN, Institutional 'fl ' . amber, fourth .' 'District, for a place of I oor, ',n the Noel C. Taylor :worship, subject to the . . - :conditions that the property r 'will be developed in .substantial conformity to a 'Idevelopment plan prepared by DEG Design & Services, 'dated 8/17/10, subject to "any changes made during ,comprehensive Idevelopment plan review; [that the church will be :developed in substantial Iconformity with the exterior ',elevations on a plan. ,prepared by DEG Design & I 'Services, dated 2/2/10; 'and that light levels shall not exceed 0.5 foot candle Imeasured at the property :lines, The proposed general ,usage of the property is a place of worship with no density specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for multifamily residential with no density specified. A copy of the application is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C, Taylor Municipal 8uilding, 215 Church Avenue, S,W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a Iperson with a disability who Ineeds accommodations for 'this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853.2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this 31st day of August, 2010. Stephanie M, Moon, CMC City Clerk. (12323300) } Billing Services Representative .,.-. ';' T 'J'.n,rl \ In 02:l0iM vl Cb:J~~1 i.1 !lO.:lI~ i. " .-/i1 (?(~ ~u NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 20, 2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth floor, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.l. to rezone property located at 3454 Cove Road, N.W., Official Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, from R,7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, for a place of worship, subject to the conditions that the property will be developed in substantial conformity to a development plan prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 8/17/10, subject to any changes made during comprehensive , development plan review; that the church will be developed in substantial conformity with the exterior elevations on a plan prepared by DEG Design & Services, dated 212/10; and that light levels shall not exceed 0.5 foot candle measured at the property lines. The proposed general usage ofthe property is a place of worship with no density specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for multifamily residential with no density specified. 'I A copy ofthe application is available for review in the Office ofthe City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this 3..1s.t day of Al1g'ISt ,2010. Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk. Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal MI-rezone with proffers.doc Notice to Publisher: Publish in the Roanoke Times on Friday, September 3, and Friday, September 10,2010. Send affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon, CMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853-2541 Send Bill to: David Greer, Agent 4720 Sanders Drive, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (540) 366-5760 degdesigns@verizon.net NPH-Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal MI-rezone with proffers,doc ) REZONING REQUEST Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.I., 3454 Cove Road, N.W. )AFFIDAVIT Tax Nos. 6440211 and 6440210, from R-7 to IN, w/conditions) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) TO.:WIT: ) CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Martha Pace Franklin, first being duly sworn, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first-class mail on the 15th day of March, 2010, notices of a public hearing to be held on the 15th day of April, 2010, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: Tax No. 6440112 6440113 6440122 6440209 6440212 6440214 6440213 6440215 6440218 Owner Mailinq Address Doris V. McKinney 4735 Barclay Square, SW Roanoke,VA 24018 B M and Frances Hale 3451 Cove Road, NW . Roanoke, VA 24017 Daniel A. Grey 3511 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24017 Henry 1. Phan, et als 3448 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24017 Harvey and Dianne Cardwell 3466 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24017 Marie N. Lapierre 3518 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24017 J. Donald Pugh POBox 6172 Roanoke, VA 24017 Also notified: Ernest and Rebecca Johnson, 3524 Cove Road, 24017 ~~~~iJ7~ Martha Pace Franklin SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, \/irnini:::l thic:: 1 ~th n:::l\/ nf M:::Irf'h ?n1() / CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk JONATHAN E. CRAFf Deputy City Clerk September 1 , 2010 CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk David Greer, Agent 4720 Sanders Drive, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Greer: Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m;, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.1. to rezone property located at 3454 Cove Road, N. W., from R-7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain proffered conditions. For your information, I am enclosing copy of a notice of public hearing. Please review the document and if you have questions, you may contact Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney, at 540-853-2431. It will be necessary for you, or your representative, to be present at the September 20th public hearing. Failure to appear could result in a deferral of the matter until a later date. Sincerely, ~ /'Y1. ~OiW Stephanie M. Moon, CMC . City Clerk SMM:ctw Enclosure CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1I45 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk September 1, 2010 CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Doris V. McKinney Daniel A. Grey Harvey and Dianne Cardwell J. Donald Pugh B. M. and Frances Hale Henry 1. Phan, et als Marie N. Lapierre, Ernest and Rebecca Johnson Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215' Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal M.1. to rezone property located at 3454 Cove Road, N. W., from R-7, Residential Single Family District, to IN, Institutional District, subject to certain proffered conditions. This letter is provided for your information as an interested property owner and/or adjoining property owner. If you have questions with regard to the matter, please call the Department of Planning, Building and Development at 540-853-1730. If you would like to receive a copy of the report of the City Planning Commission, please call the City Clerk's Office at 540-853-2541. . .. rn. ~OOYv Stephanie M. Moon, CMC . City Clerk SMM:ctw .I \. CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Septemoer 22, 2010 Scott and Ascension Horchler 2911 Winterfield Road Midlothian, Virginia 23113 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Horchler: r am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 38952-092010 rezoning property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S. E., Official Tax No. 4130501, from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Planned Unit Development District, as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application NO.1 dated July 23, 2010. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010; and is in full force and effect upon its passage. . ecelia T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure Scott Horchler September 22, 2010 Page 2 pc: Arling T. Clark, 1312 Morningside Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Timothy Underwood, P. O. Box 339, Ferrum, Virginia 24088 LRC Virginia, LLC, 1005 Pen mar Avenue, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Robert and Anne Jenkins, .1332 Morningside Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Hilton Holdren, 1542 Langhorne Avenue, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Laura Padgett, 1040 Morgan Avenue, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Philip Schirmer, City Engineer Martha P. Franklin, Secretary, City Planning Commission 10 \ '\v c;/ ~ '\\. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38952-092010. AN ORDINANCE to amend 9 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, to rezone certain property within the City, and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Scott and Ascension Horchler,have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to have the property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax No. 4130501, rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by 936.2-540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on September 20,2010, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 936.2- 540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's O-Horchler-rezone without proffers. doc Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of thesubject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described ) property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Map No. 4130501, located at 1321 Momingside Street, S.E., be and is hereby rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, as set forth in the Zoning Amended Application No.1 dated July 23,2010. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. O-Horchler-rezone without proffers. doc 2 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 166 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 E-mail: planning@roanokeva.gov Architectural Review Board Board of Zoning Appeals Planning Commission September 20, 2010 Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor Honorable David B. Trinkle, Vice Mayor Honorable William D. Bestpitch, Council Member Honorable Raphael E. Ferris, Council Member Honorable Sherman P. Lea, Council Member Honorable Anita J. Price, Council Member Honorable Court G. Rosen, Council Member Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of City Council: Subject: Request from Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S.E., Tax No. 4130501, from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District. Planning Commission Public Hearing and Action: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, August 19, 2010, on the request. There was no one present in favor of or against the proposed rezoning. By a vote of 7-0, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request, finding the application to rezone the subject property to be consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Vision 2001-2020, and the Morningside/Kenwood/ Riverdale Neighborhood Plan. Allowing for a mixed-use building containing a residential unit and meeting hall is appropriate considering the property's size, will ensure its renovation and upkeep, and will not alter the current character of the site. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Angela Penn, Chair City Planning Commission cc: William M. Hackworth, City Attorney R. Brian Townsend, Assistant, City Manager Applicant Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Page 2 Application Information Re uest: Owner: A plicant: City Staff Person: Site Address/Location: Official Tax Nos.: Site Area: Existin Zonin : Proposed Zonin Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Nei hborhood Plan: S ecified Future Land Use: Filing Date: Background Rezonin to Planned Unit Develo ment Cit of Roanoke Scott & Ascension Horchler Maribeth B. Mills 1321 Mornin side Street SE 4130501 3 acres ROS, Recreation and 0 en S ace MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Develo ment Community Center and Offices Mixed Use Building to include Residence and Meeting Hall Mornin side/Kenwood/Riverdale Neighborhood Plan Public and 0 en S ace Original Application: July 7,2010; Amended Application NO.1: July 23,2010 The subject property (commonly known as Buena Vista) contains an 1849 Greek Revival structure listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places. Since the City acquired the property in 1934, Buena Vista has been used as a community center and the local field office for the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. On June 21,2010, City Council authorized the sale of Buena Vista, along with three acres of Jackson Park, in order to transfer it to an entity who can feasibly undertake necessary rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance. The sales agreement contains conditions related to retention of the building and the timing and manner of rehabilitation activities. Also, closing is contingent upon successful rezoning of the property to permit a mixed-use building to include a residential unit and meeting hall. The applicant would like to use the entire. building residentially, with portions used intermittently as a meeting hall for weddings and other similar functions. Buena Vista, along with the log accessory building and driveway from Pen mar Street, would be retained. Changes to the site would include: · An improved entrance and driveway (max. 20 feet in width) off Morningside Street. · A freestanding sign (maximum 15 square feet and 6 feet in height) on Morningside Street. · A one and one-half story, three-car garage with bays oriented to the interior of the site. Members of City Council September 20,2010 Page 3 . A deck or verandah off the rear of the main house. . A 40' x 60' pool area to include a pool, pool decking, enclosure, and pool house. Conditions Proffered by the Applicant As a MXPUD, the development plan attached to this application is binding for future development. Development standards are listed directly on the development plan. Considerations Surroundinq Zoninq and Land Use: Zoning District Land Use North RM-1, Residential Mixed Density District Single-family residences. South ROS, Recreation and Open Space Jackson Park. East HOS, Recreation and Open Space Jackson Park. West ROS, Recreation and Open Space Jackson Park. Compliance with the Zoninq Ordinance: The MXPUD district is intended for mixed commercial and residential sites that have a number of constraints to conventional development. While this site is not the typical application of the MXPUD district, it fulfills a number of its objectives including permitting a compatible mix of commercial and residential uses and encouraging the preservation of historic structures. The City's supplemental regulations for mixed-use buildings do not permit residential uses on the first floor. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance has been initiated by motion of the Planning Commission to allow any residential use permitted within the MXPUD district to be permitted on the first floor ofa mixed- use building. The text amendment will be considered by a separate vote. The development plan provided by the applicant establishes the following standards for the site: . As a meeting hall, the structure's maximum occupancy is 150 people requiring a total of 30 parking spaces. The applicant would provide 24 parking spaces within the existing parking areas and driveways, taking advantage of the reduction for proximity to public transportation. There is no on-street parking along the subject property's frontage on Morningside Street. · The existing driveway off Morningside Street would be re-graded and expanded to a maximum width of 20 feet to allow for two-way ingress and Members of City Council September 20,2010 Page 4 egress. An access easement has been provided through Jackson Park from the entrance off Penmar Avenue. . A freestanding sign with a maximum sign area of 15 square feet and 6 feet in height would be installed at the entrance on Morningside Street. The dimensions of the sign are consistent with sign requirements in residential zoning districts. . No additional buffering or lighting is proposed. Elements not addressed by the development plan must be in compliance with the City's applicable codes or may require an amendment of the PUD. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neiqhborhood Plan: Vision 2001-2020 and the Momingside/Kenwood/Riverdale Neighborhood Plan emphasize the importance of preserving the City's historic structures and area history. Buena Vista is an important element in telling the story of Roanoke's history and is a prime example of Greek Revival architecture. City Council has attached a number of conditions on the sale of the property including a requirement that all renovations must be in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation. This type of investment in the Morningside neighborhood will serve as a strong marketing tool in attracting other families to the neighborhood. Despite being identified for recreation and open space on the future land use map, its use as a dwelling and meeting hall is appropriate due to the size of the structure and site. The proposed meeting hall component is, in part, consistent with the recent former use of the building. The building was frequently rented for receptions and other gatherings as part of the recreation center function. The rezoning also does not preclude the structure from being used solely as a single- family residence which is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. No other public amenity (tennis courts, basketball court, baseball field, playground, and picnic shelter) in Jackson Park would be affected by the sale of Buena Vista. The following policies of Vision 2001-2020 are relevant to the application: . NH PS, Housing choice. The City will have a balanced, sustainable range of housing choices in all price ranges and design options that encourage social and economic diversity throughout the City. · EC P6. Cultural and historic resources. Roanoke will identify, preserve, and protect its historic districts, landmark features, historic structures, and archaeological sites. The following policies of the Momingside/Kenwood/Riverdale Neighborhood Plan are relevant to the application: Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Page 5 . Residential Development Policies a. Market the neighborhoods: Advertise and promote the strengths of the neighborhood, with an emphasis on promoting the positive attributes of the housing stock. b. Zoning patterns: Zoning patterns will support housing revitalization and desired future residential land use patterns and encourage the preservation of single-family housing. City Department Comments: None. Planninq Commission Public Hearinq: At the public hearing, Mr. Chrisman asked for clarification on what uses would be permitted on the property. Staff responded that the property could only be used as a single-family dwelling or a single-family dwelling with the meeting hall component. Department of Planning, Building and Developmenl Room 166, Noel C, Taylor Municipal Building . 215 Church Avenue, S.w. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 Submittal Number: I Amended Application No.1 Date: Jul 23, 2010 rt::l' OJUJ[] t-l;H(f1lfllr;r~tl.:):1 ~~:H o Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed o Rezoning, Conditional [g] Rezoning to Planned Unit Development 0, ~st~blishmenl;()f Comprehensive Sign Overlay District o Amel1dlllenl,of Proffered Conditions o Amendme'nt of Planned Unit Development Plan o Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District irl:;r:I. )1\~'111 tf.l~ r~ ;'1 rfj t; f. If:;; Address: 1321 Morningside Street SE, Roanoke, vA Official Tax No(s),; r 13,0501, I Existing Base Zoning: IROS, Recreation and Open Space (If multiple zones, please manually enter all districts,) . . . .,..... . Ordinance No(s), for Existing Conditions (If applicable): I N/A Requested Zoning: !MXPUD, Mixed Use PlahnecfiJh~ Proposed land Use: Mixed-use'Blding to include dwelling:S 10 With Conditions [g] Without Conditions meetingihat ' ;'r{.! ;';:c} g ~'!(O 1'.',. n ,'j II t {.J! i'l!' U (";,'1' Name: . fcity of Roanoke, VA . " Address: 1215 Church Street, R~~noke, Va 24011 IRI:10ne~Number: IE.Mail: L J I Property Owner's Signature; :~-:l.m'i,lllll ti~ t.};",! Fl ft.) I} rt;f{;''f; [( : ( 1 i\:~(t;('J I d (.)','[i (rfll Name:' '1;~coit8iA~,t~ns'on :rt9(~hl~r,' Addres's: ;~ j1~:J;:Winteif!~lp'R().~'qi'M(cl)()t.l')r~nl;~~ij~t3 1'P,hOneNl.llTiber: J. +l(B94)2~5;n~2; 'I ;E;Mail:J}~~~Il;l'o~'#,~r~1~y,efi~0r):ne!' :1 I f?h9f1e Numb~r: ./ 1 E-Mail: I r 1 Name: Address: Authorized:Agenl!s Signatllre: Zoning Admendment Application' 1321 Morningside Street SE - Tax Number 4130501 ' Amended 7/2312010 Narrative On June 21,2010 the Roanoke City Council approved the sale of the property located at 1321 Morningside Street SE, named Buena Vista, to Scott and Ascension Horchler. As part of the sales agreement the Horchlers have requested that the property be rezoned from Recreation and Open Space (ROS) to MXPUD as a single-family dwelling or a mixed use building to include a dwelling and meeting hall. Potential future plans would include renting the Meeting Hall space for Wedding receptions and for other similar functions that would be conducive to the historic nature of the property. { 2. } Zoning Admendment Application, 1321 Morningside Street SE - Tax Number 4130501 ,Amended 7/23/2010 Development Plan 1321 Morningside Street SE Rezoning Request Applicant Name: Scott & Ascension Horchler Plat of Development: See Plat page. Lot Size: 3 Acres Location: 1321 Morningside Street SE -The existing driveway off of Morningside Street will be used as the principle entrance to the property along with the granted ingress/ egress easement on the driveway from Pen mar Avenue SE. Location / Adjacent Owners: See Adjacent Owners page and Map page. Zoning / Land Use of Adjacent Parcels: ROS immediately surrounding property and RM-1 across Morningside Street SE. Property is located within Jackson Park. Property Lines/Easements: See GIS & Plat pages. Buildings: Currently there are two existing buildings, the main house and a shed. The main house is approximately 14,000 square feet on three levels - an 1849 original house of two floors and basement, an 1890 addition (two floors and a basement), and an 1960's single story addition (over a crawl space). The shed was originally a meat house constructed in the 19th century of logs. It currently has a dirt/gravel floor. Proposed Future Development: Request is for MXPUD to convert from ROS to a mixed use building to include a dwelling and meeting hall or single-family dwelling. Future development plans include constructing an historically correct 3-car 1 Y2 story garage, developing an in-ground pool compound to potentially including a pool, pool enclosure, pool decking, and pool house. Plans also include building a deck/verandah off of the single level ballroom. Driveways/Parking: See Plat for existing drives and parking. Plan to widen the existing Morningside Street drive to 20' and re-grading. A new drive will branch off the Morningside driveway (branch currently exists) to go to the proposed garage. A parking terrace will be place directly in front of the garage. Entrance to garage will not be visible from Morningside Street. No additional parking is planned at this time. 24 spaces are required under the parking reduction for proximity to public transit. This parking for the mixed use building's maximum capacity of 150 and can be accommodated within the existing parking and driveway(s) where noted on the development plan. ( 3 ) Zoning Admendment Application, 1321 Morningside Street SE - Tax Number 4130501 ' Amended 7/23/2010 Development Plan for Tax ID 4130501 Morningside Street SE Entrance Sign-IS Sq Ft no higher than 6', )' ---- \ ~~. \, Expand drive to 20'and regrade, (749.76 TOTAL) -~---- 373.37 <6> w .. .. ~.. I:-T g ~ . 1"")0 oL.() 01"") I"") Z New Drive - 20' with parking terrace ',' ".D-EXisting Shed Oe ' '<:~ .. o o o L.() I"") 9 Parking Spaces Existing Main House '@ 44. :W / i( . N59025'16"W - 373.37' G) Dwelling, Single Family and Mixed use building to include dwelling and meeting hall f 4 ) Zoning Admendment Application, 1321 Morningside Street Sf - Tax Number 4130501 - Amended 7/23/2010 Adjoining Property Owners Tax 10 Street Address Owner Name Owner Address 4130131 4130132 4130133 4130135 4130136 4130137 4130138 4130139 4130504 1312 Morningside Street SE Vacant Land 1320 Morningside Street SE Vacant Land 1328 Morningside Street SE 1332 Morningside Street SE Vacant Land 1336 Morningside Street SE 1030 Penmar Avenue SE Clark, Arling T. Clark, ArUng T. Underwood, Timothy LRC Virginia LLC LRC Virginia LLC Robert ft Anne Jenkins Robert ft Anne Jenkins Holdren, Hilton K. City of Roanoke { 5 } Same Same PO Box 339, Ferrum VA 24088 1005 Penmar Ave SE, Roanoke, VA 24013 1005 Penmar Ave SE, Roanoke, VA 24013 Same Same 1542 Langhorne Ave SE, Roanoke, VA 24013 215 Church Ave SW, Roanoke, VA 24011 Zoning Admendment Application' 1321 Morningside Street SE - Tax Number 4130501 ' Amended 7/23/2010 Location Map ( 6 ) Zoning Admendment Application - 1321 Morningside Street SE. Tax Number 4130501 ,Amended 7/23/2010 Plat of Tax Number 4130501 KMllIIJII JiLL ... ~ 1NEIl _1tlID1. 1G 'M'f; ",...1.. TllL ~ C1ItJ'1 IItIll WI.... lit" 'u. SIIPlL ~ ~~u $rCNII ~1'\A1 ~_l\..:iWlMJlD. ~ A.CI Of'1UWb-.....t~~AllO ~ttl"&Mt ~JUII rJ _tilll '"L &J01JlIIDiIIMl~ or Ill.. r"tf.l..~ ~ttP.Jg.~~~~~"m.(~ ~. 11 ltt( an Of: IIWDCL 'MClII~ rHIlT_YlDl2IWltCiP1nlrf,""llaT"l!jI!lOl-=tD"'~ i :: ~ : ~~NQ~~' ='f~:J W"-1tS nmo.'lOt " "'" 111 ~~ filil"Whtf "',... WIfaf ~A~~":~"n~= ~1II~ :::--m:1fT ..~~r.. wrrH M ~.-. caDI 1\h1-Ult a '0 QI4. H ~ .'N 'HI. O'n g~ AICIIIlOCi. LIItD .....IDN AI MIDGm 'rQ MIL ~~s!'n~~~ '?o~~~TUIlI:NO ~~IUI'HUI I'. WO~ (an loWW;U() .." QT"1'OI~ pp.&f:1 ,... 1lQIPs: ~nlW) TP 41J1tl1'.O!J 1il'1I1~ 0. """11M '" " ~ 14llI1Hrl PlMJC IN HflJ I rat tHE AIOlIlDNO Nfl) I'TIft DC) iCJIOII' cumrr 1I"Kl' I nM#W, ~ NUIIJ . I:l~m TD JCBZ:DIC ...-nt.lr; 1.1fIl1J)~.1o .DI;)~l""",,,IIJ~LNl 1~~~._NtJ';o1An."""~TIl\.~ I en ~"'UN L.Jl1"ll~_:P.O.- A.l)1N/' P\N.C "'101. JUWIIU(' IN ~[ aJ:JII;''I QII'G CI" M gm,ry c.a.111 (IF M "CIrCA. TN!! "\,A'lM\t II'fIaDIrm ON YNS f1AV" , 2L-MO ..,~ 1ft:. (lLr.11l~1\.5 DI lA..DlCAIUIf ....u AO.JIQIIlUlQllUaI$ ~IO U~-'OGD rS oMUJU "' AUWD A' _D'~--M. ""IT ..... fll ,.... l:U.M." ~a. 0- ... CJfQ.II c.v.Dil1 g M em' f6 ~r. \1111:1NA. ma P!.AT' ... ~~~~.:un-:AlJa. ,l(Mttm 1'0 ~ At_CfClODl" ,Ill. "."., "'MIlA. L HIMI fQII ""'" .ill1 1===--~ -.-- ....-.-- __ .-v.... ....... - -.. ~ .... - I ~.......4 .~I.CIOM -, 9.l!llo\ltSON IDJI( ""tl'CI~t W"'WINC.'iCr Sf, !PO F (J>' .,.., ---l]~"''ll''.l =':,-...L UJT .,." 1- .I.OID M:lU 0- II i ..~ ~IIlllNf A'-'... s.t. (~-"tyI) _T' ....- ...ini:lu.l-' ,.......... .IU?fIlLI t.t'?~ ,.........,.; ~Wi~ ~__ t~'" , MTI'. I HDIPr aRIlrY T1fI$. f'W' or ~~ 10 DC CtHW:'t YO '"I .., gr lIP VlUW......... aa.r ( 7 ) ..... "'"'" 'Nn~ I>>tN"HIIC 1IiCH.t J;.;...p...f (_""'1 ) I Na. tDC!' ft.. ........ -11lI''''''''''n,_ -~~T'l'u.. ""'.... ,. ., liteM . m:r.-a .aN ~D ~ w ~( "Ill ~.~ ~.~ 3 naI Jl.A'" ~A!ICN tOFS Mm' COH!I'ftI'IJ1F .. c:cN.f't\fIHCf" " l,/Ht. 1M ,or. Mlkf'l.. at ntrC 011 IJflO IHOWII ~ mu :.s~~:,.~~~~ ....16T..1If'aItOf'tl... fW omc:r r;,TItr cum: or THt 0tcuR' ~ or l"tC om LK\S~.......__ .eftQ UlHaN1 QMUiO A10lG T16 QlSnNC ~t J1IIIN flDIM.I M. &1.. ~~l.at"'~lIltIICIlClll.UllVlYlMlI PLAT OF SURVEr SllOW'INC THI\' RKSUHDIYISION OJ' J'HA' . R(){;Jo:RS RJo:.W:RVArION" PROPER".)' OWNF.TJ RY TilE CITY OF ROANOKE AND CREATINe HEREON LOT "A" (3,0000 ACRES) AND LOT "n" (9,9425 ACRJ:S) LOCA7'A'}) ON P!;'NMAR, A V&" I{!;'. ANI! IN 'l'HA' r.Trr OJ' ROANOKE. VlRGINTA co. 31>> ~ Cl4 Zoning Admendment Application - 1321 Morningside Street Sf - Tax Number 4130501 ' Amended 7/23/2010 . ~ ~~ ~. Q:l~~~ ~~. :<!; '"'1:. C s .....~~).."I::. .,::5 lit: 0 t,... ~ ::~:n:.~ ~~~:~2~~~~ CI)~~~C ~t3~ c~;:c:~~..,;c"l:: . )......~lIt:~O~>4 .~ ~~~cec:~___~~ ~....-).. ~CI)tI]CI:l~ :::i~~t,...~::t:~l:al .~ CI)~CI)~o ~ct:~c:s :::i ~)..~~ll~ec: f:iCl)~~E--.~'"'I:"l:",,=~ f$ t) C (J E:: 0 I.l) ~.o ~~Ofl: oC\l ~~~~~~g~ ~ Q,;;t: ~ ~ . o)~t) ~ .t::. --~ Q,; w ~d~iSt~ Br~~ it i~i~ ~ iJ.~ b~~~5i:~ liW~ ~ i S~ ~i~ l ,A2 ~I~' ~s~ ~~ ~ I!! J!;'1:'~I::; :1;1!!~1 ~I!; J;~I;~II~i~jl~II,1 IS'!'II!fiil' Ii il~il! ~i~!~ i~~~~ 9 I~~I ~~!I!I~I!';~!I:II!:~I~"!II:l .. I i R r:; I (M!lj .C'i) .3"5 "lS 3NWH!lN'o" ~ 3~ i ..e5 ~ ~i ~ j <<f j:~!~ I ~sa~llIf5 Ill. a i >lnG< ..tt'.M..ot$ ~ . <! ~]-~ ~ ~. x ~ '" i -5 ~ / i r--l" ~ J 0 I~oa .1 ~ ii!~---:J ~ ~...~! , "~i"~ ~ ~ ~~ /0.. w/~ s~ ..-~. .. " ~ ~ I I i I I I I J Ii w '" :;;~ ~.. I~ o :J IJ III '. .. ~..... ... ell< ! ~~ ~~ III ~ ij ,J ~~ ~j ~~ ja ~~ I~ _9 ~ lel~ ... ~.. j II a~1 i~ '" ~I :!! z t'.1Q,l jJ = " I 'n ..~" 0ItD_ f I I I I ~.........- ;1>,"1' .;;.... 04 ~~ ' ~ :a i.~ .~t l~ d Ei \~u! z ~qi ~~ ~..."7 ~.....;:...# .i6"M i !I! l:. .: II,. ~ ! l f ~ J ~ e ~~ ig II !H U J ~ if ~ 'I~ r If" i" ~ .i i ; J JlJ! l M J ~ a~ JI ~i~ ~~I~~ b ~I ! i,i" ; idl JJ.= ~r . b ~: ~1 I ~. ILl I :1 ~ I 'J~ ~ f S E (~O ~ 8: 8 !g~ & Ii N i l>' ! ~ ~ E II ~ n ~ ~I 11< I ~ ~ lh ~ , ~ .. 1 ~ I Ii ~dll i !!,I!P !!~Ii! !:!!: I i ret~j~A led., i!c-'1!1 I, .~!!~~fl !dl!~ 1',;1: ~J i!!lj~li ~~1~9A 1~I;il r i!li'~!:H;;~ni~l!i i: ! ~I~iii:~~ Ijl:!i !dii, ; I ! ;l jbl!!eSi I..~a~b A~jW' it 0 . b ~ag i! ee~!~ i. 8 ! ;;I.:I~!! j~~!!; :ii!h !i I ~ i! .1" ioi, ~ ..t n ii g ~f;d J ~~~~Ii ~ l"i!1 W J !;i~ i ~i l'lh 'i "'II at f q & Bfa --lf~ ~ J. III 1ll.J The Roanoke Times - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.- - - - ;T1CE OF PUBLIC I HEARING . The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public; hearing on Monday,' Se~ember20, 2010, a~ 7:00 p,m" or as soon. thereafter as the matter may be heard, In the , Council Chamber, fourth, floor, In the Noel C, Taylor! Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.. Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S,E" bearing Official Tax No, I 4130501, from ROS, , Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, for the purposes of establishing a mixed.use building i containing a dwelling unit I and a meeting hall. The I proposed general usage of the property is mixed : residential/commercial with a density of up to one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of land area. , The comprehensive plan I designates the property for public and open space use, with no density specified. A copy of the application I is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C, Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S,W" Roanoke, Virginia, ' All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact 'the City Clerk's Office, at '853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the ,date of the hearing listed :above, GIVEN under my hand this 31st day of August, 2010. Stephanie M, Moon, CMC City Clerk, The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of publication HORCHLER, SCOTT AND ASCENSION 2911 WINTERFIELD ROAD MIDLOTHIAN VA 23113 REFERENCE: 80175025 12323363 NPH-Horchler Rezone State of Virginia City of Roanoke I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Times-World Corporation, which corporation is publisher of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice was published in said newspapers on the following dates: City/County of Roanoke, Commonwealth/State of VirgiEia. Sworn and subscribed before me this __1~~ay of SEPT 2010. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public PUBLISHED ON: 09/03 \\\\1111", \ \ I, ",\ \J'-YMAI\t I", ",I ~ ......... " ...... ~ ..'..,.-..l. ". ~ "'... ... " . ",,"'-'Or. . ... ... .;;:!. "l"'. ,v !;). ... ~ '" :'~o. ,<ov d?J~ ". -:S :. = o:t': <(v :1ClQ) S(j~ . z - ; ~ ~ ~00~<0~~~~ ~ .3 ~ ~ .- . ~~o ~ . ;:- ~ ~. . ~ - .- "" . l, ~ ~ T ... ..- <S'" .:- , -. ....\.,' '... tlo. ........ "\"-' ... ""'" ~MONWt.\\\\\" ""'""1\\\ 09/10 TOTAL COST: FILED ON: 430.56 09/10/10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,(12323363) --------------------------------------------------+------------------------ illing Services Representative - d-:J~ r.'1 "o-.r:ll" 111'"1 ~"G:l0~M n I :b ~I ."la.:l ,J;. ,"0 ~~ ~\\V NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 20, 20 I 0, at 7 :00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth floor, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.,"Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Momingside Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax No. 4130501, from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, for the purposes of establishing a mixed-use building containing a dwelling unit and a meeting hall. The proposed general usage of the property is mixed residential/commercial with a density of up to one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of land area. The comprehensive plan designates the property for public and open space use, with no density specified. A copy of the application is available for review in the Office ofthe City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date ofthe hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this .3ls.tday of August ,2010. Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk. Horchler-rezolle.doc '-- Notice to Publisher: Publish in the Roanoke Times on Friday, September 3, and Friday, September 10,2010. Send affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon, CMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853-2541 NPH-Horchler-Rezone.doc Send Bill to: Scott and Ascension Horchler 2911 Winterfield Road Midlothian, Virginia 23113 (804) 245-9282 Richmonders4@verizon.net REZONING REQUEST Scott and Ascension Horchler, 1321 Morningside Street, S.E.. Tax No. 4130504 from ROS to MXPUD, conditional )AFFIDAVIT ) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO-WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Martha Pace Franklin, first being duly sworn, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first-class mail on the 2nd day of August, 2010, notices of a public hearing to be held on the 19th day of August, 2010, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: Tax No. 4130131 4130132 4130133 4130135 4130136 4130137 4130138 4130139 4130503 4130501 Owner Mailina Address Arling Clark 1312 Morningside Street, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Timothy Underwood 1320 Morningside Street, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 LRC Virginia, LLC 1005 Pen mar Street, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Robert and Anne Jenkins 1332 Morningside Street, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Hilton K. Holdren 1336 Morningside Street, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 City of Roanoke Parks and Rec Also Notified: Laura Padgett, SEAF, 1040 Morgan Avenue, SE 24013 Martha Pace Franklin SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this 2nd day of August, 2010. CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk September 1,2010 CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Scott and Ascension Horchler 2911 Winterfield Road Midlothian, Virginia 23113 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Horchler: Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450,. Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S. E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, for the purposes of establishing a mixed-use building containing a dwelling unit and a meeting hall. For your information, I am enclosing copy of a notice of public hearing. Please review the document and if you have questions, you may contact Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney, at 540-853-2431. It will be necessary for you, or your representative, to be present at the September 20th public hearing. Failure to appear could result in a deferral of the matter until a later date. Sincerely, #fL m hJ.OJMJ Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk SMM:ctw Enclosure CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk September 1 , 2010 CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk Arling T. Clark LRC Virginia, LLC Hilton K. Holdren , Timothy Underwood Robert and Anne Jenkins Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to provisions of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, I have advertised a public hearing for Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p,m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., on the request of Scott and Ascension Horchler to rezone property located at 1321 Morningside Street, S. E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to MXPUD, Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, for the purposes of establishing a mixed-use building containing a dwelling unit and a meeting hall. This letter is provided for your information as an interested property owner and/or adjoining property owner. If you have questions with regard to the matter, please call the Department of Planning, Building and Development at 540-853-1730. If you would like to receive a copy of the report of the City Planning Commission, please call the City Clerk's Office at 540-853-2541. . h-). ?JDh0 Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk SMM:ctw CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-II45 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov JONATHAN E. CRAFT Deputy City Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON, CMC City Clerk CECELlA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk September 22,2010 Municipal Code Corporation P. O. Box 2235 Tallahassee, Florida 32316 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 38953-092010 amending and reordaining Section 36.2-416, Mixed use buildinas and live-work units, of Chapter 36.2, Zonina, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as al1)ended. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010; and is in full force and effect upon its passage. ecelia T. Webb Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure Municipal Code Corporation September 22, 2010 Page 2 pc: The Honorable Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk, Circuit Court Ronald S. Albright, Clerk, General District Court David C. Wells, Clerk, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Chief Magistrate, Office of the Magistrate Lara A. Wilson, Law Librarian Scott and Ascension Horchler, 2911 Winterfield Road, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager William M. Hackworth, City Attorney Ann H. Shawver, Director of Finance Christopher L. Chittum, Planning Administrator Martha P. Franklin, Secretary, City Planning Commission I I ~~ '\ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38953-092010. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Section 36.2-416, Mixed use buildings and live-work units, of Chapter 36.2, Zoning, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. Chapter 36.2, Zoning, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, is hereby amended and reordained, to read and provide as follows: Sec. 36.2-416. Mixed use buildings and live-work units. * * * (b) Mixed-use buildings and live-work units. Mixed-use buildings and live- work units, as permitted by this chapter, shall comply with the following standards: Development Standards Mixed,Use Building Live-Work Units Location criteria Where peimitted by the Use Matrix of the Where permitted by the Use Matrix applicable zoning district of the applicable zoning district ......................-....... .................................................--....-.. ..-................. .......,..................... Types ofland Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the Residential dwelling units; Uses uses allowed applicable zoning district pennitted in the applicable zoning district . Pennitted density No density restrictions apply. The building is See subsection (c), below: The or intensity subject to the dimensional requirements of the building is subject to the dimensional Dimensional Matrix for the applicable zoning requirements of the Dimensional district. Matrix for the applicable zoning district. . , DIstrIbutIOn of uses by floor: . Uses permitted on fIrst floor Nonresidential uses permitted in the applicable zoning district~, except that any residential use , permitted within the MXPUD district is permitted on the first floor of a mixed,use building within the MXPUD district. Nonresidential uses permitted in the applicable zoning district (Residential uses may be located to the rear of the principal building.) .. .. - ,,- ... ,_~,,"..._..~. - . -.. "'''.--.. .-.---_.._.'__, .".". ~~ .... h.._..._.__ '._ '.._, O-Amending Section 36.2-416 (b),doc . Uses permitted on second floor Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district . Uses permitted above second floor Residential dwelling units; Professional or general offices Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district * * * 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. A. ~ O-Amending Section 36.2-416 (b). doc , 2 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 166 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 E-mail: planning@roanokeva.gov Architectural Review Board Board of Zoning Appeals Planning Commission September 20,2010 Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor Honorable David B. Trinkle, Vice Mayor Honorable William D. Bestpitch, Council Member Honorable Raphael E. Ferris, Council Member Honorable Sherman P. Lea, Council Member Honorable Anita J. Price, Council Member Honorable Court G. Rosen, Council Member Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of City Council: Subject: Request from the City of Roanoke Planning Commission to amend subsection (b) of Section 416, Mixed use buildings and live-work units, of Chapter 36.2, Zoning, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to permit residential uses to be located on the first floor of a mixed use building in the MXPUD district Planning Commission Public Hearing and Action: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Thursday, August 19, 2010, on the request to amend the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission approved the amendment by a vote of 7-0. Background: As part of City Council's agreement to convey the subject property (commonly known as "Buena Vista") to Scott and Ascension Horchler, the property must be rezoned to permit a mixed use building to include a residential unit and meeting hall. The purchaser intends to use the entire building as a dwelling, with portions used intermittently as a meeting hall. The City's supplemental regulations for mixed use buildings, however, do not permit residential uses on a building's first floor. As currently adopted, the only uses permitted on a first floor are "nonresidential uses permitted in the applicable zoning district. " Amendments to the text of the zoning ordinance must be initiated by motion of the Planning Commission or by resolution of City Council. Therefore, staff asked the Planning Commission to initiate an amendment of Section 36.2-416(b) of the Zoning Ordinance to allow any residential use permitted within the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MXPUD) district to be permitted on the first floor of any mixed-use building. The Commission approved such a motion at its regular meeting on July 15, 2010. Considerations: The proposed change is accomplished by amending the table in Section 36.2-540(b) to modify "Uses permitted on first floor" [Addition noted in italics]: Sec. 36.2-416. Mixed use buildings and live-work units * * * (b) Mixed-use buildings and live-work units. Mixed-use buildings and live-work units, as permitted by this chapter, shall comply with the following standards: Development Standards Location criteria Mixed-Use Building Where permitted by the Use Matrix of the applicable zoning district Types of land uses allowed Permitted density or intensity Distribution of uses by floor: · Uses permitted on first floor · Uses permitted on second floor · Uses permitted above second floor Live-Work Units Where permitted by the Use Matrix of the applicable zoning district Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district No density restrictions apply. The building is subject to the dimensional requirements of the Dimensional Matrix for the applicable zoning district. Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district See subsection (c), below. The building is subject to the dimensional requirements of the Dimensional Matrix for the applicable zoning district. Nonresidential uses permitted in the applicable zoning district.. 1 except that any residential use permitted within the MXPUD district is permitted on the first floor of a mixed-use building within the MXPUD district. Nonresidential uses permitted in the applicable zoning district (Residential uses may be located to th,e rear of the principal building.) Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district Residential dwelling units; Professional or general offices 2 Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district Residential dwelling units; Uses permitted in the applicable zoning district This amendment would apply to only the MXPUD District and would therefore be permitted only as part of a MXPUD development plan. The proposed amendments will increase options for how space can be used within mixed-use buildings. Additional oversight of this increased flexibility is provided through the public hearing process required to establish the MXPUD district. Recommendation: By a vote of 7-0, the Commission recommended approval of the request finding that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance consistent with, and will further the intent of, Vision 2001-2020. Permitting residential uses on the first floor of mixed-use buildings will allow more flexibility in determining the most appropriate and feasible combination of uses. o Respectfully submitted, A,~~ Angela Penn, Chair City Planning Commission cc: William M. Hackworth, City Attorney R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development 3 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication The Roanoke Times --------------------------------------------------+------------------------ CITY OF ROANOKE, PDV PLANNING, BLDG., DEV 215 CHURCH RM 166 ROANOKE VA 24011 -.-'-,y--.-- City/County of Roanoke, Commonwealth/State of Vir~.nia. Sworn and subscribed before me this __l~~day of SEPT 2010. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public NonCE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 20, 2010, at 7:00 p.m" or as soon thereafter as the matte, may be heard, in the' Council Chamber, fourth' floor, in the Noel C. Taylo~ Municipal'Building, 215 Church Av;e.'nue, S.W,,' I Roa,noke)jirginia, to' , consider the .IQjlowing: I . Requ~st'ft~m the City of Roanoke Planning I Commission to amend subsection (b) of Section 136.2-416, Mixed use , buildings and live-work i units, of Chapter 36,2, Zoning, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979),.as amended, to permit residential uses to be located on the first floor of a mixed-use building in the MXPUD District. A copy of the amendment , is available for review In the : Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor I Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S,W., Roanoke, Virginia, All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter, If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations'for this hearing, please contact I the City Clerk's Office, at . 853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. ' GIVEN under my hand this : 31st day of August, 2010, . Stephanie M, Moon, CMC City Clerk, REFERENCE: 80076514 12323412 NPH-Code Amendment-P State of Virginia City of Roanoke I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Times-World Corporation, which corporation is publisher of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice was published in said newspapers on the following dates: PUBLISHED ON: 09/03 09/10 ",,"11",,/ \' LA I, ,\\ po. YIl1. '" ,,^~ ...... '4A,'" ,'.;;;.v.... ?-'l '..:V ...... ~ ~ ,"~01:~\..\G ". i'-:;' = a:::' ~\J~ 909':JJ \ = _ CD . Jl.l0 "1\\' 4: - = : ~G. 'If ~'iJ'iJ\\; : - = ~i':..~~G~~~ "V~E -:... . 9::: -:. ~ ". ..' ~ ," ......"O~ ........... ~~ ,," "', '4tONWE~\..\'(\ \\' ," t\" ""11111\' (12323412) TOTAL COST: FILED ON: 368.16 09/10/10 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ Authorized ~ ~ Signature:__i~zAf_~ Billing Services Representative r ~ '~l\1-. )\"d31:1 t,ll:! r.-;. T l/'~\d \71- d3:j t ~:}G\ \.'i.: "- [,.,~ \ \~ I~~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, S~ptember 20, 2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth floor, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from the City of Roanoke Planning Commission to amend subsection (b) of Section 36.2-416, Mixed use buildings and live-work units, of Chapter 36.2, Zoning, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to permit residential uses to be located on the first floor of a mixed-use building in the MXPUD District. A copy ofthe amendment is available for review in the Office ofthe City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853-2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this ..3..ilt day of August ,2010. Stephanie M. Moon, CMC City Clerk. Code amendment-36.2-416 (b),doc Notice to Publisher: Publish in the Roanoke Times on Friday, September 3, and Friday, September 10,2010. Send affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon, CMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853-2541 NPH-Code amendment-36,2-416 (b).doc Send Bill to: Martha P. Franklin Department of Planning, Building, and Development 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 166 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853-1730 CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853-1145 E-mail: c1erk@roanokeva.gov STEPHANIE M, MOON, CMC City Clerk September 22, 2010 Glenda Edwards, Executive Director Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority 2624 SalemTurnpike, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Ms. Edwards: JONATHAN E, CRAFT Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing certified copies of Resolution No. 38954-092010 approving the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) Resolution No. 3597, which will terminate and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project; Resolution No. 38955-092010 approving the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) Resolution No. 3598, which will terminate and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project; and Resolution No. 38956-092010 approving Amendment No.5, dated June 2010, to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area; providing for an effective date of such Amendment No.5; and providing for the City Clerk to take certain actions. The abovereferenced measureS were adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, September 20, 2010. ~ Enclosure p-S IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38954-092010. A RESOLUTION approving the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) Resolution No. 3597, which will terminate and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project; and providing for the City Clerk to take certain actions. WHEREAS, the RRHA Board of Commissioners previously approved the original Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project dated April 1975 (Hurt Park Plan); WHEREAS, after appropriate public notice, on June 28, 2010, the RRHA Board of Commissioners made a determination that the continued existence of the Hurt Park Plan is no longer necessary and that property owners within the boundaries of the Hurt Park Plan will not be adversely affected by the termination of such Hurt Park Plan, and adopted Resolution No. 3597 to terminate and vacate the Hurt Park Plan; and WHEREAS, the RRHA Board of Commissioners recommends in its Resolution No. 3597 that the City approve such RRRA Resolution, which will terminate and vacate the Hurt Park Plan. R-Hurt Park Plan termination.DOC 1 A. R-Hurt Park Plan termination.doc A. Qp;~ City ClerIc 2 )J:r. . IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38955-092010. A RESOLUTION approving the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) ResolutiOlyNo. 3598, which will termina!e and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project; and providing for the City Clerk to take certain actions. WHEREAS, the RRHA Board of Commissioners previously approved the original Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Proj ect dated January 1975, as amended by Amendments 1,2, and 3, dated October 9,1984, July 1985, and September,1994, respectively (Deanwood Plan); WHEREAS, after appropriate public notice, on June 28, 2010, the RRHA Board of Commissioners made a determination that the continued existence of the Deanwood Plan is no longer necessar~ and that property owners within the boundaries of the Deanwood Plan will not be adversely affected by the termination of such Deanwood Plan, and adopted Resolution No. 3598 to terminate and vacate the Deanwood Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the RRHA Board of Commissioners recommends in its Resolution No. 3598 that the City approve such RRHA Resolution, which will terminate and vacate the Deanwood Plan. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. That City Council hereby approves RRHA Resolution No. 3598 dated June' 28, 2010, which RRHA Resolution terminates and vacates the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project, as set forth iJ;l such Resolution. R-Deanwood Plan termination.doc 1 2. That RRHA Resolution No. 3598, as attached to the City Manager's Report dated September 20, 2010, to this Council, having been approved and adopted by the RRHA Board of Commissioners at its meeting on June 28, 2010, and hereby being approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke, shall and does become effective on date this Resolution is adopted by City Council, and that the Deanwood Plan, as amended, shall be, and hereby is tenninated and vacated effective as of such date. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the RRHA Resolution No. 3598 with the minutes of this meeting in the City Clerk's Office, attach a copy to this Resolution, and to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the Executive Director of the RRHA. ~ City Clerk. ,A. R-Deanwood Plan termination.doc 2 JJ: I. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of September, 2010. No. 38956-090210. A RESOLUTION approving Amendment No.5, dated June 2010, to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area; providing for an effective date of such Amendment No.5; and providing for the City Clerk to take certain actions. WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) previously approved the original Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Neighborhood Development Program, which was dated November 22, 1971, and was subsequently approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke by Resolution No. 20032, adopted January 10, 1972;. WHEREAS, the above Redevelopment Plan was subsequently amended by the following: Amendment No. 1 - Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Urban Renewal Area Neighborhood Development Program, dated June 1975, approved by City Council by Resolution No.22658, adopted on January 19, 1976; Amendment No. 2 - Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area, dated April 1983, approved by City Council by Resolution No. 26684, adopted on September 12, 1983; Amendment No.3 - Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area, dated December 1986, approved by City Council by Resolution No. 28463, adopted on December 8, 1986; and Amendment No.4 _ Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area, dated January 1993, approved by City Council by Resolution No. 31425-042693, adopted on April 26, 1993; WHEREAS, the RRHA on June 10, 2010, held a public meeting with residents of the Gainsboro Community to discuss the proposed Amendment No.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area and it did not appear to the RRHA that such R-Amendment No, 5-Gainsboro Redev Plan.doc I Amendment No. 5 would have a material adverse impact on any owner, lessee, or transferee of '. property located within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area; WHEREAS, on June 28,2010, the Board of Commissioners of the RRHA duly approved Amendment No.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area in order to reflect changes in State law, including (but not limited to) restrictions on the use of eminent domain, which became applicable to the Redevelopment Plan effective July 1, 2010; WHEREAS, the City has given written notice to owners of property in'the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area of the City's intent to consider the Amendment No.5 approved by the RRHA on June 28, 2010, and that such Amendment No.5 will be presented to and considered for approval by City Council at Council's regular meeting on September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be considered by Council. Such notice further advised that any person wishing to be heard on the matter could be heard before City Council on September 20,2010, at such Council meeting; WHEREAS, based on the recommendations of City staff, it appears that it is necessary to amend the Redevelopment Plan to reflect the changes in State law as mentioned above; and WHEREAS, it appears that the continued operation of the Redevelopment Plan, as , amended, by Amendment No.5, as indicated in the RRHA's Resolution No. 3599 dated~June 28, 2010, will.in fact benefit the property owners in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roan,?ke as follows: 1. That Amendment No. 5 to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area, which was approved by the Board of Commissioners of the RRHA on June 28, 2010, is hereby approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke. 2. That such Amendment No. 5, dated June 2010, to the Redevelopment Plan for, Gainsboro Community Development Program Area, as attached to the City Manager's report R-Amendment No. S-Gainsboro Redev Plan.doc 2 dated September 20, 2010, to this Council, having been approved and adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the RRHA at its meeting on June 28,2010, and hereby being approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke, shall and does become effective on the date this Resolution is adopted by City Council. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of Amendment No.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area with the minutes of this meeting in the City Clerk's Office, attach a copy to this Resolution, and to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the Executive Director of the RRHA. ATM~ . A'. arul'l ~:- CIIrk ,- R-Amendment No. S-Gainsboro Redev Plan.doc 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Meeting: Subject: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Termination of the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project Background: A Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project (Plan), dated April, 1975, was approved in 1975 by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) and the City Council. This Plan guided the acquisition, disposition', and redevelopment of properties in an area of the Hurt Park neighborhood generally bounded by Salem Avenue, S.W. on the south, 15th Street, S.W. on the east, Hurt Park Elementary School on the north, and the former Hurt Park Public Housing Complex on the west. (Attachment 1) The goals and objectives of the Plan and related redevelopment activities over the subsequent years were substantially accomplished, resulting in the creation of public open space used in conjunction with the Hurt Park Elementary School complex. No further activity related to the Plan has been undertaken by the RRHA in recent years. Considerations: Since May, 2007, the RRHA and the City of Roanoke have been engaged in carrying out other community development activities in the Hurt Park neighborhood under the terms of the "Hurt Park Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Plan" (NRSA Plan). This NRSA Plan implementation has involved the demolition of the adjacent public housing complex, the construction of new housing in its place, and the construction and rehabilitation of additional housing immediately adjacent in the Hurt Park neighborhood. With the NRSA Plan implementation underway, the . RRHA Board of Commissioners has determined that continued existence of the Redevelopment Plan is no longer necessary and that property owners within the boundaries of the Plan will not be adversely affected by the termination of the Plan. After appropriate public notice, on June '28,2010, the RRHA Board of Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 3597 to terminate and vaca~e the Plan. (Attachment 1) On August, 2, 2010 legal counsel of the RRHA briefed the City Council on the proposed termination of the Plan. City Council action is necessary to terminate and vacate the Plan. Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving RRHA Resolution No. 3597, which will terminate and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project. ----..;- RISTOPHER P. MORRILL City Manager Attachment Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Glenda Edwards, Executive Director, RRHA 2 Attachment 1 CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO: 3597 Meeting Date: June 28,2010 Agenda Item Number: 4 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE HURT PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, by Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (URRHAn) dated October 20, 1975, RRHA approved the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project ?ated April 1975 (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Roanoke City Council did approve and adopt the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, since May 2007, RRHA and the City of Roanoke have been engaged in a carrying out activities in the Hurt Park area under the terms of the "HURT PARK NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY AREA (NRSA) PLAN" (the "NRSA Plan"); and WHEREAS, the project area designated in the Redevelopment Plan is included within the 157 acres, more or less, that is covered by the NRSA Plan; and WHEREAS, RRHA has determined that the Objectives of the Redevelopment Plan largely duplicate the goals and objectives of the current NRSA Plan, and thus the Redevelopment Plan is duplicative and no\onger serves any useful purpose; and WHEREAS, there appears to be no further need for further acquisition or disposition of real property under the terms of the Redevelopment Plan (as distinct from the NRSA Plan) by RRHA; and WHEREAS, RRHA has determined that continued existence of the Redevelopment Plan is no longer necessary and that the property owners within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Plan will not be adversely effected by the termination of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, RRHA has given an appropriate public notice of its intent to consider this resolution terminating the Redevelopment Plan, in order to advise 'all past and present owners, lessees or succes.sors in interest of property located within the project area, or on the boundaries of the project area, as well as all persons who might be considering the purchase or lease of such properties, of RRHA's intent to terminate the Redevelopment Plan; Resolution #3597 - June 28,2010 - Agenda Item #4 1 of 2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project dated April 1975 be and the same is hereby terminated and vacated and said termjnation and vacation is hereby recommended to Roanoke City Council for its consideration and approval; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED thatthis Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and the Redevelopment Plan for the Hurt Park Community Development Project dated April 1975 shall be terminated effective immediately upon action by the City Council of the City of Roanoke. Recommended by: ~LP~ V of Real Estate Development ~. ~VUA-' Executive irector Date b -..2'2.-/6 Approved by: Date ~/~!JO COMMISSIONERS ACTION: ~pproved o Disapproved Remarks: Resolution #3597 - June 28,2010 - Agenda Item # 4 2of2 m' x ~ d C1l en )!>-z :c 1:: ;:+ "t1 Dl .., ;r:; OJ o 1:: ::I g- o< :J: c ::1- ""0 SU ~ ~ () o 3 3 c :s ~ C CD < CD 0' 1J 3 CD :s r+ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Meeting: Subject: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Termination of the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project Backg rou nd: A Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project (Plan), dated January 1975, was approved in 1975 by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) and the City Council. This Plan guided the acquisition, disposition, and redevelopment of properties in an area of the City generally bounded by Orange Avenue, N.E. on the south, Williamson Road, N.E. on the west, Compton Street, N.E. on the north, and Norfolk Southern Railway tracks on the east. (Attachment 1) The Plan was amended by the RRHA Board of Commissioners and the City Council in three instances by Plan amendments dated October 9, 1984, July 1985, and September 1994, respectively. The goals and objectives of the Plan and related redevelopment activities over the subsequent years were substantially accomplished, resulting in the development of new office and warehousing facilities and improved streets and public rights-of-way to facilitate that development. No further activity related to the Plan has been undertaken by the RRHA in recent years. Considerations: Given the determination by the RRHA Board of Commissioners that continued existence of the Plan is no longer necessary and that property owners within the boundaries of the Plan will not be adversely affected by the termination of the Plan, and after appropriate public notice, on June 28, 2010, the RRHA Board of Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 3598 to terminate and vacate the Plan, as amended. (Attachment 1) On August, 2, 2010, legal counsel of the RRHA briefed the City Council on the proposed termination of the Plan. City Council action is necessary to terminate and vacate the Plan, as amended. Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving RRHA Resolution No. 3598, which will terminate and vacate the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project. -~~--------- CHRISTOPHER P. MORRILL City Manager Attachment Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Glenda Edwards, Executive Director, RRHA 2 Attachment 1 CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO: 3598 Meeting Date: June 28, 2010 Agenda Item Number: 5 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DEANWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners.ofthe Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing,~uthority ("RRHA") duly approved the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood CommunitY Development Project dated January 1975, as amended by Amendment No. :1 dated October 9, 1984, Amendment NO.2 dated July 1985, and Amendment NO.3 dated September 1994 (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Roanoke City Council did approve and adopt the' Redevelopment Plan and all of the amendments to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, RRHA has determined that the Objectives of the Redevelopment Plan have been substantially accomplished, and that there is no need for further acquisition or disposition of real property within the project area by RRHA; and WHEREAS, RRHA has determined that continued existence of the Redevelopment Plan is no longer necessary and that the property owners within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Plan will not be adversely effected by the termination of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, RRHA has given an appropriate public notice of its intent to consider this resolution terminating the Redevelopment Plan, in order to advise all past and present owners, lessees or successors in interest of property located within the project area, or on the boundaries of the project area, as well as all persons who might be considering the purchase or lease of such properties, of RRHA's intent to terminate the Redevelopment Plan; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project dated January 1975, as amended by' Amendment No.1 dated October 9,1984, Amendment No.2 dated July 1985, and Amendment No.3 dated September 1994, be and the same is hereby terminated and vacated and said termination and vacation is hereby recommended to Roanoke City Council for its consideration and approval; and . FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project January 1975, as amended by Amendment No.1 Resolution #3598 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 5 1 of 2 dated October 9,1984, Amendment No.2 dated July 1985, and Amendment NO.3 dated September 1994 shall be terminated effective immediately upon action by the City Council of the City of Roanoke. Recommended by: Date th .-22-/{) Approved by: V of Real Estate Development ,~ ~dA~ Executive Director Date 'IAI :1.).)/0 COMMISSIONERS ACTION: iii" Approved o Disapproved Remarks: Resolution #3598 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 5 2of2 o CI) A) ~ r;j~ ~ X.Q. 0 ~ a 8- 2 g' 0 u; 3 0 g. 03 -< 0 3 S'c g 2. ;:,~ :"'0 lOCI) ~~ 0' "C 3 CI) ~ - >z CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Meeting: Subject: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 20, 2010 Amendment No.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Gainsboro. Community Development Program Area Background: A Redevelopment Plan for the Gainsboro Community Development Program Area (Plan), dated November 22, 1971, was approved in 1971 by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) and the City Council. This Plan guided the acquisition, disposition, and redevelopment of properties in an area of the Gainsboro neighborhood generally bounded by Shenandoah Avenue, N.W. on the south, Williamson Road, N.E. and Interstate 581 on the east, Orange Avenue, N.E. on the north, and 5th Street, N.W. on the west. (Attachment 1) The Plan was amended by the RRHA Board of Commissioners and the City Council in four instances by Plan amendments dated June 1975, April 1983, December 1986, and January 1993, respectively. Considerations: The goals and objectives of the plan have been pu rsued by the RRHA and the City over the years subsequent to the Plan's adoption, subject to funding availability. RRHA wishes the Plan to remain in effect in order to continue the pursuit of the goals and objectives, but changes in State law which became effective July 1, 2010, pertaining to the implementation of such Redevelopment Plans require the Plan's further amendment. These state law changes include, but are not limited to, restrictions on the use of eminent domain in the implementation of such Redevelopment Plans. Under proposed Amendment No.5, RRHA would not actively seek to acquire any additional properties within the Gainsboro Community Development Program Area (Area), but would only consider acquisition of any property so designated through voluntary transactions with landowners or acquisitions at the request of landowners, subject to availability of funding from the City of Roanoke. Any acquisition of property by eminent domain within the Area would be conducted only as permitted under current State Code, and would be conditioned on further action of the RRHA Board of Commissioners approving the use of eminent domain and setting out other findings required by law. Amendment No. 5 describes in more detail the current conditions in the Area, updates the Plan reflecting those cu rrent conditions, and amends the language of the Plan to reflect changes in State law noted above. (Attachment 1) It is desirable and appropriate that certain aspects of the Plan remain operative in order to control, direct, and assist the ongoing and future development of remaining parcels still in need of redevelopment and rehabilitation. Therefore, as indicated in Amendment No.5, other provisions of the original Plan, as amended, remain in effect. The RRHA gave written notice of its intent to consider adoption of Amendment No. 5 to all property owners of record within the Area, and held a public meeting on Amendment No.5 on June 10, 2010. Upon feedback from that public meeting, the Board of Commissioners of the RRHA determined that the approval of Amendment No.5 to the Plan would not have an adverse impact on any owner, lessee, or. transferee of property located within the Area. Furthermore, the Board of Commissioners determined that the continued operation of the Plan, as previously amended and in accordance with the provisions of Amendment No.5, would benefit property owners within the Area. On June 28, 2010, the RRHA Board of Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 3599 to approve Amendment No.5 to the Plan, as amended. (Attachment 1) City Council action is necessary to approve Amendment No.5 to the Plan. On August, 2, 2010, legal counsel of the RRHA briefed the City Council on the proposed amendment. By letter dated August 19, 2010, the City Manager's office provided written notice to all property owners of record within the Area regarding City Council's intent to consider adoption of Amendment No.5 at its September 20, 2010, 7:00 p.m. meeting.. Recommended Action: Adopt, a Resolution approving Amendment No.5 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Gains oro Community Development Program Area. . RISTOPHER P. MORRILL City Manager Attachment Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Glenda Edwards, Executive Director, RRHA 2 Attachment 1 CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO: 3599 Meeting Date: June 28,2010 Agenda Item Number:, 6 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.5 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE GAINSBORO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AREA WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority ("RRHA") duly approved the Redevelopment Plan for the Gainsboro pommunity Development Program Area, as amended by Amendment NO.1 (approved by Roanoke City council on January 19, 1976); Amendment No.2 (approved by Roanoke City Council on September 12, 1983); Amendment NO.3 (approved by Roanoke City Council on December 8, 1983) and Amendment NO.4 (approved by Roanoke City Council on April 26, 1993), all collectively hereinafter referred to. as the "Redevelopment Plan"; and WHEREAS, RRHA has pursued the Goals and Objectives of the Redevelopment . Plan as funding for activities has been made available to it by the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, RRHA wishes to continue the Redevelopment Plan in effect in order to permit it to pursue the Goals and Objective of the Redevelopment Plan in the future as funding is made available to RRHA by the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate that the Redevelopment Plan remain in place, and that redevelopment activities continue in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area as funding is made available to RRHA by the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Redevelopment Plan in order to reflect changes in State law, including (but not limited to) restrictions on the use of eminent domain which will become applicable to the Redevelopment Plan effective July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area" describes in more detail the current conditions in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, and would amend the Redevelopment Plan in order to reflect the referenced changes in State law; and WHEREAS, RRHA has given written notice of its intent to consider the proposed Amendment No.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan fOf Gainsboro Community Development Program Area" to all fecord owners of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area; a~ . Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 1 of 2 WHEREAS,-RRHA on June 10, 2010, held a public meeting with residents of the Gainsboro community to discuss the proposed Amendment NO.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area"; and WHEREAS, it does not appear that approval of the proposed Amendment NO.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area" will have a material adverse impact on any owner, lessee or transferee of property located within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area; and , WHEREAS, the continued operation of the Redevelopment Plan, as amended in accordance with the proposed Amendment No.5 to the "Redevelopment plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area" will in fact benefit the property owners in the G'ainsboro Redevelopment Area; . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, that 1. Amendment No.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community Development Program Area" is hereby approved; and 2. Amendment No.5 to the "Redevelopment Plan for Gainsboro Community , Development Program Area" shall become effective as of the date of the resolution of the City Council of the City of Roanoke approving and adopting such amendment. Recommended by: ~ ~ A ~_:eaJ Eslale Developmen1 Approved by: ~ ~ Exec~tive irector Date b -2'2- /6 Date ~ /~c;l /1 () COMMISSIONERS ACTION: M" Approved o Disapproved Remarks: Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 20f2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GAINSBORO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AREA AMENDMENT NO.5 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA June 2010 City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority Resolution #3599 - June 28.2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 1 of 11 The Redevelopment Plan for the Gainsboro Community Development Program Area (commonly referred to as the "Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan") was approved by Roanoke City Council on January 10,1972, which plan generally provided for the renewal of the Gainsboro area as a residential neighborhood. Amendment No. 1 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan was approved by Roanoke City council on January 19, 1976. The general purpose of said amendment was to lower site preparation costs by the adjustment of new street rights-of-way and by making adjustments in residential land use and residential densities to more adequately reflect economic conditions that existed at the time of the amendment. Amendment NO.2 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan was approved by Roanoke City Council on September 12, 1983. The general purpose of said amendment was to allow the rehabilitation/conservation of residential structures. . Amendment NO.3 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan was approved by Roanoke City Council on December 8, 1983. The general purpose of said amendment was to eliminate certain provisions from the plan in order to allow for the development of motels in Light Industrial Land Use Areas. Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan was approved by Roanoke City Council on April 26, 1993. The purpose of said amendment was to bring the Plan Exhibits into conformity with what existed at the time; to provide for the revitalization of the Hotel Roanoke/Henry Street commercial area in general and the development of a modem hotel-conference center complex In conjunction with the renovation of the Hotel Roanoke; to make changes in land uses so as to bring them into conformity with the City of Roanoke's Zoning Districts; and to address the preservation and rev~alization of historic, residential neighborhoods. This Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan is for the purpose of conforming the provisions of the plan dealing with the acquisition of real property to reflect changes in applicable State law, so as to remove the use of eminent domain as a tool for acquisition of property except in certain, narrowly-defined circumstances and to condition any future use of eminent domain on further findings and actions by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority. This Amendment also seeks to amend certain provisions of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan in order to reflect developments that have occurred since the plan was last amended. This Amendment No.5 amends and supplements the provisions of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan as in effect after approval of Amendment No.4. Except to the extent repealed, revised, or amended in this AmendmeJit No.5, all provisions of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan as in effect after approval of Amendment NO.4 shall remain in full force and effect. Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 . Attachment 2 of 11 A. 'DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AREA. The Boundary Description of the Gainsboro Community Development Area (the "Gainsboro Redevelopment Area") shall continue to be as set forth in Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan. B. DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, The Development Goals and Objective of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan are as set forth in Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, except fhat all provisions addressing acquisition of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area by the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority ("RRHA"), including but not limited to Sections B.1,a, B.1.d, B.2.b.1, B.2.d.1 and B.3.f.11, shall be subject to the provisions of Section Dof this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan. C. GENERAL LAND USE PLAN. The Land Use Plan as set forth in Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan shall remain in effect, except that any acquisition of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area by RRHA shall be subject to the provisions of Section D of this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan. Section C.3 of Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan provides that the regulations and land use provisions set out in that Amendment NO.4 "shall be in full force and effect until September 1, 2001." Nothing in this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan shall be construed to alter, amend or modify in any way any contractual obligations set forth in any agreement for the purchase or lease of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area acquired from RRHA prior to the effective date of this Amendment No.5, nor shall it be construed to alter, amend or modify any obligations set forth in any deed or other disposition document(s) for property sold or leased by RRHA under the provisions of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan or any amendments thereto. . D. PROJECT PROPOSAL. The provisions of Section D of Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan are deleted in their entirety, and replaced with the following provisions: To the extent property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area has not previously been redeveloped and/or rehabilitated in a manner consistent with the terms of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA may use any of the following techniques to achieve and/or assist in such redevelopment and/or rehabilitation. RRHA's ability to use any of the techniques described in this Section D. is dependent on the availability offunding from the City of Roanoke to permit RRHA to pursue activities under the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, as RRHA has no funds of its own which can be used to pursue such activities. ~esolutjon #3599 -:- June 28.2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 3 of 11 ~, 1. Land -Acquisition. a. From and after the date of the approval of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA will focus on redevelopment through private, voluntary transactions with owners of properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Afea, either through voluntary acquisition of properties if requested Of agfeed to by the property owner(s) or through partnerships to support owner . redevelopment of the properties. RRHA has no present plans to acquire any additional properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area unless requested to do so by the owner(s) of the property or unless the acquisition is by agreement of the property owner(s). RRHA does not intend at this time to use the power of eminent domain to acquire additional properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. However, eminent domain will be considered in very narrow circumstances as permitted under Virginia Code ~ 1-219.1, but only based on additional future action by the Board of Commissioners of RRHA. b. From and after the date of approval o(this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA will no longer actively seek to acquire properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. However, RRHA reserves the right to initiate a request for voluntary acquisition if RRHA's Board of Commissioners approves and authorizes such a request. c. RRHA will consider acquisition of real property located within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, whether or not such property was previously designated as property "To be Acquired," if requested by the property owner(s) or with the agreement of the property owner(s). RRHA will consider acquisition of properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area only on the b.ases set forth below. (i) Acquisition of Real Property by Use of Eminent Domain (1) From and after the date of approval of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA will not acquire property in the Gainsboro . Redevelopment Area through the use of eminent domain except in the following limited circumstances: (a) RRHA may utilize eminent domain to acquire property within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area if the property is abandoned. Before eminent domain may be utilized in any such case, RRHA's Board of Commissioners must pass a resolution (a) determining that the Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010..., Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 4 of 11 property is abandoned; (b) identifying the source of the funds to be used for acquisition of the property; and (c) authorizing the use of eminent domain. '(b) RRHA may utilize eminent domain to acquire property within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area if the acquisition is needed to clear title where one of the owners agrees to such acquisition. Before eminent domain may be utilized in any such case, RRHA's Board of Commissioners must pass a resolution (a) identifying the source of the funds to be used for acquisition of the property; and (b) authorizing the use of eminent domain. (c) RRHA may utilize eminent domain to acquire property within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area if the acquisition is by agreement of all the owners. Before eminent domain may be utilized in any such case, RRHA's Board of Commissioners must pass a resolution (a) identifying the source of the funds to be used for acquisition of the property; and (b) authorizing the use of eminent domain. (d) RRHA may utilize eminent domain to acquire property within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area if the property is itself a blighted property. However, any such acquisition shall be conducted under, and in accordance with, the provisions of Virginia Code ~ 36-49.1:1. (2) Voluntary Acquisition of Real Property. (a) RRHA currently does not intend to acquire additional prope"rties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, but if approached by the owner or owners of properties in the Redevelopment Area RRHA will consider purchases of property within the Gainsboro , Redevelopment Area through a voluntary transaction with the owner(s). RRHA shall not, however, be obligated to purchase a property solely because the owner or owners may have requested that RRHA acquire the property. Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 5 of 11 (b) RRHA also reserves the right to initiate a request for such voluntary acquisition if its Board of Commissioner's approves and authorizes such a request. 2. Rehabilitation and Conservation. RRHA may seek to provide assistance in residential property rehabilitation. The residential property rehabilitation standards made a part of Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan shall remain in effect, except that in the event of any conflict between any provisions of the residential property rehabilitation standards and any provisions ofthe BuildingHegulations of the City of Roanoke ("Building Regulations"), or the Zoning Regulations of the City of Roanoke ("Zoning Regulations"), the Building Regulations and/or Zoning Regulations shall control. To facilitate rehabilitation activities within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, RRHA, its agents, or other subcontractors may provide financial and technical assistance to qualified owners of properties needing rehabilitation, but shall not be obligated to do so. 3. Owner Rehabilitation/Redevelopment. RRHA will seek to encourage owner rehabilitation/redevelopment of properties within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. RRHA will consider a plan of development by an existing property owner for said owner's property/properties if the proposed development plan complies with the provisions and intent of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, as amended, and may enter into a contractual agreement with the owner for rehabilitation/redevelopment of the property. RRHA may consider providing assistance to owners, in the form of loans or grants of funds, to facilitate the construction, reconstruction or rehabilitation of properties, but RRHA shall not be obligated to provide any such assistance. 4. Disposition of Property. From and after the date of approval of this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, any property within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area acquired by RRHA will be disposed of by sale or lease for redevelopment or rehabilitation by private enterprise or by public enterprise, or else will be used for public rights-of-way or development or enlargement of public areas, except that RRHA may, at is discretion, utilize acquired property for rehabilitation purposes and delay disposition of such property until such time as rehabilitation has been completed. 5. Proposals for Low and Moderate Cost Housing. Resolution #3599 - June 28. 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 6 of 11 In administering assistance in rehabilitation and/or redevelopment of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, in considering proposed development plans for properties located in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, and in making decisions about the disposition and use of any property acquired under the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, as amended, RRHA shall endeavor to provide for the development of housing within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area at a sales price or rental rate not exceeding that which can be afforded by low and moderate income individuals and families. 6. Developer Obligations. Any developer acquiring property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area from RRHA shall be subject to the following conditions which shall be implemented by appropriate covenants running with the land or other provisions in disposition documents. a. The developer shall begin and complete the development of the land within the time specified in the disposition documents. b. The developer shall retain th.e interest acquired until the completion of construction and development of the land so acquired, pursuant to this Plan. and shall not sell, lease or transfer the interest acquired or any part thereof prior to such completion of construction and development, except that RRHA may give written consent to such a sale, lease or transfer with appropriate conditions to ensure that the purchaser, lessee or transferee'will comply with the terms of this Plan. c. The developer shall comply with such other conditions as are necessary in the judgment of RRHA to ensure that the purposes of Title 36 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, are carried out. d. Nothing in this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan shall be construed to alter, amend or modify in any way any contractual obligations set forth in any agreement for purchase of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area acquired from RRHA prior to the effective date of this Amendment No.5, nor shall it be construed to alter, amend or modify any obligations set forth in any deed or other disposition document(s) for property sold by RRHA under the provisions of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan or any amendments thereto.. 7. Underground Utilities. Within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, overhead utility lines will be placed underground as required by the City of Roanoke, insofar as practicable. Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6. Attachment 7 of 11 E. OTHER PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL LAW. In connection with this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA has not conducted or commissioned any formal study of the conditions in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area to determine whether it continues to meet the definition of a "blighted area" under the definition contained in Virginia Code S 36-3, or to determine which individual properties might qualify as "blighted property" under the definition contained in Virginia Code ~ 36-3. Rather, the purpose of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan is to ' provide RRHA with the means to continue to address the conditions set out in Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan in a manner consistent with current State law. 1. This Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan provides an outline for the continued development/redevelopment of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. 2. Based on available information and observations, many of the conditions identified in Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan (including the conditions identified in Sections E.1 of Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan) still exist in parts of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area and have not been addressed, or have not been addressed fully, by activities under the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan or by private action in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. Parts of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area continue to be appropriate for rehabilitation and redevelopment treatment through the removal, prevention and reduction of blight, blighting influences and other causes of blight. 3. Despite the r&-opening of the Hotel Roanoke and the addition of its Conference Center, other conditions identified in Amendment No.4 to the , Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan have not been addressed, or have not been addressed fully, through redevelopment and/or rehabilitation. 4, As set forth in Section D., above, RRHA has no present plans to acquire any additional properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area unless requested to do so by the owner(s) of the property or unless the acquisition is by agreement of the property owner(s). From and after the, date of approval of this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, RRHA will not acquire property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area through the use of eminent domain except in the narrowly-defined, limited circumstances set forth in Section D.1.d.(1), above, of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan and only after further action of RRHA's Board of Commissioners. Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 -Attachment 8 of 11 5. The plan for the proposed rehabilitation/redevelopment of properties in the Gainshoro Redevelopment Area continues to be in general conformity with the City of Roanoke's Comprehensive Plan, and has a definite relationship with local objectives as to appropriate land uses and transportation, public utilities, recreation, and community facilities and other improvements. Based on available information and observations, the provisions of Section E.9 of Amendment No.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan continue to be applicable to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. 6. From and after the date of approval of this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, if RRHA acquIres any additional property/properties within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area such property/properties shall be made available to private enterprise or non- government persons or entities for the purposes of redevelopment in accordance with the terms of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, or to public enterprise for use as public rights-of- way or for development ancVor enlargement of public areas pursuant to the provisions of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan. ' 7. Because RRHA has no present plans to acquire any additional properties in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area unless requested to do so by the owner(s) of the property or unless the acquisition is by agreement of the property owner(s), it is not possible for this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan to indicate the real property to be made available to private enterprise/non-government persons or entities for the purposes of redevelopment, or the land which will be made available to public enterprise for redevelopment. If any real property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area is to acquired by RRHA, additional action will be required by the Board of Commissioners of RRHA, at which time the - Board of Commissioners will identify the intended use and/or disposition of the real property, 8. From and after the date of approval of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, if RRHA acquires any additional property/properties within the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area, then in evaluating proposals for redevelopment of such property RRHA shall given preference to redevelopment proposals which provide for development and/or rehabilitation of a number of decent, safe and sanitary dwellings at least equal, or substantially equal in number to the number of substandard dwellings to be cleared as a part of the redevelopment of the property, at rents within the financial reach of the income groups displaced from such substandard dwellings. To assist in achieving this goal, RRHA will encourage redevelopers to utilize townhouse style designs and to consider construction of buildings designed to include multiple rental units, where appropriate. RRHA will also encourage redevelopers to replace substandard dwelling units with new units that would be affordable by Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - AUachment 9 of 11 individuals with income levels not exceeding 80% of the Area Median Income. 9. In determining whether a dwelling unit is considered to be decent, safe and sanitary, RRHA will utilize the criteria set out in Section E.11.c. of Amendment NO.4 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan. 10. RRHA will offer relocation assistance and services as required under Virginia's Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1972, as amended (hereafter referred to as "the Act"), and the related sections of the Virginia Administrative Code, (hereafter referred to as "the Code") to individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations that are to be displaced as a result of approved redevelopment activities. The Act and the Code are the basis for this relocation plan and where any provision of this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan is in conflict with the Act or the Code, the Act or the Code shall govern. 11. From and after the date of approval of this Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan, if RRHA acquires any additional property/properties within the Galnsboro Redevelopment Area, then at the time property is made available for rehabilitation, development or redevelopment by public or private enterprise RRHA shall stipulate in disposition documents that the purchaser(s) or lessee(s) shall (i) use the land for the purpose designated in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan;, (ii) begin the building of their improvements within a period of time which RRHA fixes as reasonable; and (iii) comply with such other conditions as are necessary to carry out the purposes of the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan and the purposes of Title 36 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. 12. RRHA believes that this Amendment No.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan does not materially adversely affect the owner, lessee or successor in Interest of any property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area affected by the amendment. However, RRHA has provided notice of this proposed Amendment NO.5 to the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan to all record owners of property in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area. F, PROCEDURES FOR CHANGES IN APPROVED PLAN. The Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan may be modified from time to time upon compliance with the requirements of law and outstanding covenant rights, provided that prior to the passage of any resolution amending the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan the owner of any land in the Gainsboro Redevelopment Area previously disposed of by RRHA for use in accordance with the Gainsboro Redevelopment Plan and/or any Amendments thereto shall be sent at least thirty (30) days prior to the consideration of any such resolution by the Roanoke City Council, written notice of the time and place of such Council meeting, and where Resolution #3599 - June 28,2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 10 of 11 a copy of the proposed amendment and a precise description of the proposed changes may be inspected. . Resolution #3599 - June 28, 2010 - Agenda Item # 6 - Attachment 11 of 11 :'~.t , ROANOKE PLANNING. . ;;~". Gainsboro Community Development Program . January 1993 N . ~~~ A D Tax Parcels The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication The Roanoke Times --------------------------------------------------+------------------------ \\111111/1" "", ~ LA y~ "'" ,,^,\ ...... ~1r'''' ..... ~v .... ,,~'l .... -:. : ~ ."\,\o\r C, ". it ~ ~ ll::' \,0'00 909?JO \ :. _ CO. :jj:1a 'I~' <- = : ~~G. ~~SS\\J : ~ = ~ ~ ". ~ C;~~\~t: .: CE : ~ -. . .._~:: -; a e. .- ~........ "'''''''O~ ............ \::)Y... ....." TOTAL COST: 647.68 ",,'410NWEp.,\..\'0,," ," \' 7/ F I LED ON: 09/05/10 II" III \ \ , --------------------------------------------------+----------------------- STEPHANIE M. MOON CITY OF ROANOKE CLERK'S OFFICE 215 CHURCH AVE SW RM 456 NOEL C. TAYLOR MUNICIPAL BLDG. ROANOKE VA 24011 REFERENCE: 32143302 12323492 NOM-Deanwood Termina State of Virginia City of Roanoke I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Times-World Corporation, which corporation is publisher of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice was published in said newspapers on the following dates: City/County of Roanoke, Commonwealth/State of Virginia. Sworn and subscribed before me this _~~_day of SEPT 2010. Witness my hand and offlcial seal. ~u Notary Public PUBLISHED ON: 09/05 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT , Notice is hereby given that ! the Council of the City of , Roanoke (City Council) at its ! regular meeting on Monday, i September 20, 2010, at ~ 7:00 p.m., or as soon , thereafter as the matter: may be conslaered by Council, will consider the I adoption of Resolutions terminating the . Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project (Deanwood Plan), and the' Hurt Park Community Development Project (Hurt Park Plan). The location of such Council meeting will be in the Council Chambers Room 450, in the Noel C: , Taylor Municipal Building, I 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011. i On June 2B, 2010, the I Board of Commissioners of I the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) I adopted Resolution No. 359B which provided for the termination of the Deanwood Plan dated January 1975, as amended I by Amendment No.1 dated ~ October 9, 19B4, Amendment No.2 dated July 19B5, and Amendment No.3 dated September I 1994, which RRHA, Resor'ution is to become: effective immediately upon action by City Council approving such 'RRHA Resolution. -un-JUne 28,-2010, the Board of Commissioners of Ithe RRHA'adopted I Resolution No. 3597 which , provided for the termination , of the Hurt Park Plan dated , April 1975, which RRHA I Resolution is to become i effective immediately upon , action by City Council i approving such RRHA I Resolution. ' Copies of RRHA Resolutions Nos. 3597 and 'I 3598 dated June 28, 2010, and the proposed City I Council Resolutions : approving the two RRHA I Resolutions, as well as , copies of the Deanwood :Plan, including I Amendments No.1, No.2, and No.3, and the Hurt I Park Plan are available for I inspection and 'review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011'. RRHA Resolutions Nos. , 3597 and 3598 and the I proposed City Council ' I Resolutions may also be I viewed by accessing a link : under the' READ ABOUT 'column on the City of , Roanoke Website Home IPa.ge at , www.roanokeva.gov. RRHA , Resolutions Nos. 3597 and! , 3598 and the proposed City, , Council Resolutions referred I to above contain a precise , description of the actions to I be taken regarding the ter,mlnation of the' Deanwood Plan and the' Hurt Park Plan. If City Council approves: the proposed Resolutions, ' they will become effective as of the date each I Resolution is adopted'by : Ci!y CounciL . Authorized v:- .Jl1/l1rh// r ~ ~ utA /I . Signature'_~~~_~~t~ Billing Services Representative '<..:."""'---_..JJ _,.:;;,.;......-.;.....-...........,__~.-.~_. "__._ . An~wishing to be : heard on this matter should I sign up at the City Clerk's Office'before the 7:00 p.m. i meeting on September 20, i 2010, by contacting the City I Clerk's Office at (540) 853-2541 or by signing up : before the meeting at the I table in front of Room 450. , Furthermore, ,if you are a i person with a disability and ! who n~ e ,e d s I accommodations for the City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk's I Office at (540) 853-2541 before Noon on. the' Thursday before the date of the Council meeting listed above. ': If you are unable to attend the City Council meeting, I you may submit written ,I comments to the CiJy by , directing such comments to , the attention of .the City: , Clerk at the City Clerk's. address referred to above. i If you have any questions; , , please contact the City," Clerk at (540),853-2541. i ' GIVEN under my hand this , 31st day of August, 2010. I Stephanie M.Moon, City ! ' Clerk'i (12323492) -,.;.;........ " . ': '11 ~' :., . 7.- j "j 2h) HIt! E2 d3~3 01. )J?l31:1 A1D '1 p1. NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS TERMINATING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE DEANWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE HURT PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Roanoke (City Council) at its regular meeting on Monday, September 20,2010, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be considered by Council, will consider the adoption of Resolutions tenninating the Redevelopment Plan for the Deanwood Community Development Project (Deanwood Plan), and the Hurt Park Community Development Project (Hurt Park Plan). The location of such Council meeting will be in the Council Chambers, Room 450, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S,W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011. On June 28, 2010, the Board of Commissioners of the City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) adopted Resolution No. 3598 which provided for the tennination of the Deanwood Plan dated January 1975, as amended by Amendment No.1 dated October 9, 1984, Amendment No.2 dated July 1985, and Amendment No.3 dated September 1994, which RRHA Resolution is to become effective immediately upon action by City Council approving such RRHA Resolution. On June 28, 2010, the Board of Commissioners of the RRHA adopted Resolution No. 3597 which provided for the termination of the Hurt Park Plan dated April 1975, which RRHA Resolution is to become effective immediately upon action by City Council approving such RRHA Resolution. Copies of RRHA Resolutions Nos. 3597 and 3598 dated June 28, 2010, and the proposed City Council Resolutions approving the two RRHA Resolutions, as well as copies of the Deanwood Plan, including Amendments No.1, No.2, and No.3, and the Hurt Park Plan are available for inspection and review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011. RRHA Resolutions Nos. 3597 and 3598 and the proposed City Council Resolutions may also be viewed by accessing a link under the READ ABOUT column on the City of Roanoke Website Home Page at www.roanokeva.gov. RRHA Resolutions Nos. 3597 and 3598 and the proposed City Council Resolutions referred to above contain a precise description of the actions to be taken regarding the termination of the Deanwood Plan and the Hurt Park Plan. If City Council approves the proposed Resolutions, they will become effective as of the date each Resolution is adopted by City Council. Any person wishing to be heard on this matter should sign up at the City Clerk's Office before the 7:00 p.m. meeting on September 20, 2010, by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853-2541 or by signing up before the meeting at the table in front of Room 450. Furthermore, if you are a person with a disability and who needs accommodations for the City Council meeting, 1 please contact the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853-2541 before Noon on the Thursday before the date of the Council meeting listed above. If you are unable to attend the City Council meeting, you may submit written comments to the City by directing such comments to the attention of the City Clerk at the City Clerk's address referred to above. If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk at (540) 853-2541. GIVEN under my hand this 311st day of August ,2010. Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk. Note to Publisher: Please publish once in the Roanoke Times, legal notices, on Sunday, September 5,2010. Please send bill and affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon City Clerk's Office 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 (540) 853-2541 2