Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 05-18-15BESTPITCH 40234 - 051815 ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MAY 18, 2015 2:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA 1. Call to Order- -Roll Call. Council Member Rosen arrived late (3:28 p.m.) The Invocation was delivered by Council Member Sherman P. Lea. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States ofAmericawas led by Mayor David A. Bowers. Welcome. Mayor Bowers. NOTICE: Today's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel on Saturday, May 23 at 4:00 p.m., and Sunday, May 24 at 4:00 p.m.; and video streamed by internet through Rev.Net Technologies, Inc., at http: / /www.wrev.net Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. ANNOUNCEMENTS: THE PUBLIC IS ADVISED THAT MEMBERS OF COUNCIL RECEIVE THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND RELATED COMMUNICATIONS, REPORTS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, ETC., ON THE THURSDAY PRIORTO THE COUNCIL MEETING TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT TIME FOR REVIEW OF INFORMATION. THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PROVIDES THE MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ON THE INTERNET FOR VIEWING AND RESEARCH PURPOSES. TO ACCESS AGENDA MATERIAL, GO TO THE CITY'S HOMEPAGE AT WWW.ROANOKEVA.GOV, CLICK ON THE GOVERNMENT ICON. NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE IS AVAILABLE FOR DISABLED PERSONS ADDRESSING CITY COUNCIL. EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO PROVIDE ADAPTATIONS OR ACCOMMODATIONS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL NEEDS OF QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES, PROVIDED THAT REASONABLE ADVANCE NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PRIOR TO THE TUESDAY COUNCIL MEETING, OR REGISTER WITH THE STAFF ASSISTANT AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. ONCE THE COUNCIL MEETING HAS CONVENED, THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER REGISTRATION OF SPEAKERS, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC HEARING MATTERS. ON THE SAME AGENDA ITEM, ONE TO FOUR SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOTTED FIVE MINUTES EACH; HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE MORE THAN FOUR SPEAKERS, EACH SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOTTED THREE MINUTES. ANY PERSON WHO IS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON A CITY COUNCIL APPOINTED AUTHORITY, BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE MAY CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT 853 -2541, OR ACCESS THE CITY'S HOMEPAGE TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IS SEEKING APPLICATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING CURRENT OR UPCOMING EXPIRATIONS OF TERMS OF OFFICE: BUILDING AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS - THREE VACANCIES (BUILDER, ENGINEER, AND CITIZEN AT LARGE) FOUR YEAR TERMS OF OFFICE ENDING JUNE 30, 2019 ROANOKE ARTS COMMISSION — ONE VACANCY THREE -YEAR TERM OF OFFICE ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 ROANOKE VALLEY - ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION ONEVACANCY CITY REPRESENTATIVE THREE -YEAR TERM OF OFFICE ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAYS COMMISSION — ONE VACANCY CITY REPRESENTATIVE THREE YEAR TERM OF OFFICE ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD — VACANCIES 4 -ONE, 4 -TWO, 5- THREE, AS WELL AS TWO STUDENT MEMBERS COMMENCING JULY 1, 2015 2. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Recognition of visitors from North Africa. The Mayor recognized Limame Barbouchi from Morocco, Yomna Karoui from Tunisia and Amy Hatheway, Co -Vice President for Planning and Resource Development, TAP. Presentation by Delegate Sam Rasoul of a Resolution from the General Assembly in recognition of the 1WAnniversary of the Municipal Building. 3. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: CITY COUNCIL SETS THIS TIME AS A PRIORITY FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. ALL MATTERS WILL BE REFERRED TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR RESPONSE, RECOMMENDATION OR REPORT TO COUNCIL, AS HE MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. James Lynch, George Riles, Margie Lucas, Robert Gravely and Martin Jeffrey appeared before the Council. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (APPROVED 6 -0) ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEMS. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. The Mayor called attention to C -7, an additional request for Closed Meeting to discuss the disposition of City -owned property, a request for Closed Meeting to discuss appointments of School Trustees; and one requestfor public hearing from the Director of Finance. C -1 A communication from Mayor David A. Bowers requesting that the Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss appointments of three School Trustees to serve on the Roanoke City School Board, for three -year terms, each, commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C -2 A communication from the Director of Finance requesting that Council schedule a public hearing for Monday, June 15, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, on the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, not to exceed $27 million, for qualifying Capital Improvement Projects. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C -3 Minutes of the Audit Committee held on Wednesday, April 15, 2015. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. C -4 A communication from the City Attorney reporting on a personal propertytax exemption for disabled veterans. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. C -5 A communication from the City Manager with regard to the regulation of roosters within the City. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. C -6 Report of qualifications of Edward Garner as a Citizen City representative of the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors for a term ending December 31, 2016; and Gordie L. Zeigler as a member of the Parks and recreation Advisory Board for a three -year term of office ending March 31, 2017. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. C -7 A communication from the City Manager requesting that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the disposition of City -owned property located at 120 Church Avenue, S. E., where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. REGULAR AGENDA 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE. 6. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: a. Request of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to present its Proposed 2015 -2016 Annual Budget. Daniel D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, Spokesperson. (Sponsored by the City Manager) Adopted Resolution No. 40234-051815 (6-0). Presentation by Melanie Almeder, Associate Professor of Creative Writing and Literature, Roanoke College, regarding the Art by Bus Writing Program. (Sponsored by the City Manager) No action taken. 7. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND COMMENTS OF CITY MANAGER: CITY MANAGER: BRIEFINGS: 2015 Community Carbon Emissions - 30 minutes and Energy Summary ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR ACTION: 1. Acceptance and appropriation of funds from the Virginia Department of Social Services for the Southwest Virginia Regional Employment Coalition to maintain existing services for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) population. Adopted Resolution No. 40235 - 051815 and Budget Ordinance No. 40236 - 051815 (6 -0). 2. Appropriation of funds in the connection with the Federal Asset Forfeiture Sharing Program and the Department of Treasury Federal Asset Sharing Program, in order to replace equipment in the Police Department. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 40237 - 051815 (6 -0). 3. Appropriation of funds in connection with the State Asset Forfeiture Sharing Program in order to acquire new and replacement equipment in the Police Department. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 40238 - 051815 (6 -0). 4. Appropriation of Fleet Management Retained Earnings in connection with the completion of alternative fuel initiatives at the Public Works Service Center. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 40239 - 051815 (6 -0). 5. Amendment of the City Code in connection with retirement benefits for Roanoke City employees, effective July 1, 2015. Adopted Ordinance No. 40240- 051815 (6 -0). 6. Execution of Amendment No. 2 to the contract between the City of Roanoke and ThyssenKrupp for elevator /escalator maintenance and repair. Adopted Resolution No. 40241 - 051815 (6 -0). COMMENTS OF CITY MANAGER. The City Manager offered the following comments: Carillon Clinic Children's Hospital Playground • Grand opening was held on Friday, May 15, in Elmwood Park to officially welcome citizens to the playground, which has a Peter Pan narrative. • First themed playground constructed in a Roanoke city park. • Features include: • Captain Hook's ship with a rope bridge spanning to the Peter Pan and the Lost Boys' treehouse. • Historically designed treasure maps that highlight several of Roanoke's local amenities. • A sponge -like, rubberized surface that addsfall resistance and mimics the colors of the sea, beach and forest. • An expansive and custom crocodile head that breaks through the blue, ocean -like surface. • Special thanks to Roanoke Parks and Recreation staff forall the great work done for the playground. • Kudos to the Library staff for planning Peter Pan - related activities in conjunction with the grand opening —face painting, balloon animals, children's theater, and more. Leadership College Reception & Graduation • On May 18, a catered reception will be held in the Municipal Building Lobby from 6:15 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. Council is invited to attend and greet the graduates. • Awarding of certificates will be done during 7:00 p.m. Council meeting. Festivals and Activities Continue • Local Colors event was held on Saturday, May 16. • Several Neighborhood Month events occurred over the weekend. Coming soon: Festival in the Park • May 22 — 24, Friday through Sunday, in Elmwood Park. • Information on specific events and performances available at www.roanokefestival.com. Police to Conduct Community Walk • DMI Community Walk in the Melrose area. • Wednesday, May 27, at 6:00 p.m. • Walk will begin at Fire Station #2 (1920 Orange Avenue, N. W.). • The two respective neighborhood groups — Melrose /Loudon and Melrose /Rugby —will participate. • The focus of this walk will be to identify problems in the specifcareas such as trash, abandoned properties, graffiti removal, and any other issues that need to be addressed to enhance the quality of life forthe community. City departments have been invited to participate in the walk as well. Food Co -Op Recognized • The National Co -op Grocers recently recognized Roanoke Natural Foods Co -op's, downtown co -op grocery store as one of the fastest growing in the nation. • News of this success comes as the downtown co -op celebrates its second anniversary on the Historic City Market in Downtown Roanoke. In the first quarter of 2015, sales growth averaged 35 percent for the downtown co -op, which operates out of the first floor of Center in the Square. b. CITY ATTORNEY: 1. Correction of scrivener's error in Resolution No. 40228- 051115. Adopted Resolution No. 40242 - 051815 (6 -0). 8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: NONE. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. 10. INTRODUCTION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: NONE. 11. MOTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: a. Inquiries and /or comments by the Mayor and Members of City Council. Council Member Ferris invited everyone to attend the Annual Lebanese Festival to be held on May 29 -31, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at St. Elias Church. b. Vacancies on certain authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council. 12. RECESS - 3:14 P.M. THE COUNCIL MEETING WAS DECLARED IN RECESS FOR A CLOSED MEETING IN COUNCIL'S CONFERENCE ROOM, ROOM 451, FOURTH FLOOR, NOEL C. TAYLOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING. At this point, Council Member Rosen entered during the Closed Meeting. (3:28 p.m.) 8 At 4: 24 p.m., the meeting reconvened in the Council Chamber Appointed Richard "Dick Willis, Jr., Laura Day Rottenbom and Mark K. Cathay as Trustees of the Roanoke City School Board for three -year terms of office, each commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. The City Attorney was instructed to prepare a resolution appointing the abovementioned Trustees for adoption at the 7:00 p.m. session. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED MEETING. (7 -0) AT 4:28 P.M., THE COUNCIL MEETING WAS DECLARED IN RECESS TO BE RECONVENED AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 450, NOEL C.TAYLOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING. ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MAY 18, 2015 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA Call to Order - -Roll Call. All present. The Invocation was delivered by Mayor David A. Bowers. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Bowers. Welcome. Mayor Bowers. NOTICE: Tonight's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Saturday, May 23 at 4:00 p.m., and Sunday, May 24 at 4:00 p.m., and video streamed by Internet through Rev.Net Technologies, Inc., at http: / /www.wrev.net. Council Meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. A resolution appointing three School Board Trustees on the Roanoke City School Board for three -year terms of office, each, commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Adopted Resolution 40243. 051815(7 -0). 10 A. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Recognition of the Patrick Henry High School Forensic Team. The Mayor recognized the Forensic Team. Recognition of Leadership College Graduates. The Mayor presented certificates to the graduates. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Request of Shakers Restaurant Corporation to rezone property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W., from CG, Commercial General, to CLS, Commercial Large Site, subjectto certain proffered conditions. Tim Scoggin, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 40244-051815 (7-0). 2. Request of the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S. E., bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502; a 2.0379 acre portion of property from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District; a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S. E., from ROS, Recreation Open Space, to IN, Institutional District; and a 0.4453 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S. E., from ROS, Recreation Open Space, to 1 -2, Heavy Industrial District. Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Attorney, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 40245- 051815 (6 -0, Vice -Mayor Trinkle abstained from the vote). 3. Request of the City of Roanoke to vacate and release the public's right to use said portion of real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S. E., designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502, known as Crystal Spring Park, owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority. Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager. Adopted Ordinance No. 40246 - 051815 (6 -0, Vice -Mayor Trinkle abstained from the vote). 4. Receive citizen comments with regard to Botetourt County becoming a member locality with the Western Virginia Water Authority. Michael T. McEvoy, Executive Director, Western Virginia Water Authority, Spokesperson. Adopted No. Resolution 40247 - 051815(7 -0). 11 At this point, Council Member Rosen left the meeting. (8:38 p.m.) 5. Request of Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP), for designation of its real property located at 1215 3rd Street, S. W., known as Official Tax Map No. 1023008, as exempt from taxation. Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager. Adopted Ordinance No. 40248-051815 (6-0). D. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: CITY COUNCIL SETS THIS TIME AS A PRIORITY FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. ALL MATTERS WILL BE REFERRED TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR RESPONSE, RECOMMENDATION OR REPORT TO COUNCIL, AS HE MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. Jeff Artis, Carrie Poff, Jim Thompson and David Hess appeared before the Council. E. ADJOURNED - 9:19 P.M. 12 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOL SEJOINT RESOLVnON NO, 915 Commending the Noll C. Taylor Municipal Blinding Agreed to by the Ilona, of Delegates, February 25, 2015 Agre«I to by tlm Son" Ic, Fcbmmy 26, 2017, WHEREAS, for 100 years, till Noel C. Taylor Muniapal Building has housed several City of Roanoke departments and employees as they wek to serve and support the ntentbrrs of the coinmminty; and WHEREAS, after the chizrn,. of Rwmoke voted to establish a ntantcipal ouldn" and min hilt" m better wive the residents of till 11 community, ynomndion began in 1915, ,,d the building was dedicated to 1916; and WHEREAS, in liparanng Greek and Roman ambit Yoral styles, the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building was designed by the Fvn of 1'ryo K Chester man and inryired by the White City buildings of the Chiatgo World's Fair and till City Beaunful Movement; it was constnmted by Ring Lumber Company of Charlotte.willc; and WHEREAS, the Noel C. Taylor Mwncipal Building wan enhanced with an annex in the 1970, and in 2000, it was renamed for Noel C. Taylor, a longtime Snaillike mayor and respedod leader in the civil rights movement; and WHEREAS, in 2015, the City Cf Roanoke plans to .... ovate and reopen file Campbell Averne entrance to the Noel C'Ltyka Municipal Building to coah91 ute to the revimliration of dery ttewn Rommke; now, theienh , be it RESOLVED by the Houw of Delegates, the Senate mac ur ring,'Fhat the General Assembly )let cry conm,end the Noel C. Taylor Mwncipal Building on the «casino of its 100th...nrversary; and, be it RESOLVED HJMILR,'I'hat the Clerk of till House of Delegates prepare a copy of this resolution for presentation In Christopher F- Mor511, city manager of Roanoke, as an expression of the Gcncral Assembly's admiration for the Noel C. Taylor Mmrieipol Bntlding's unique place in local history. Hfa-c folica s: Raroul, Austin, Carr, Davis, Yntohl, l6tbceb, Hop:, Rory, Lmdes, Mornasey, Rust, Spruill, Villanueva, and Ware Senate Fattens: Barker, Eblan , Edwards, and Saslaw Clerk of the Horse of Delegates CITY OFROANOKE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Z� 215 CHURCH AVENUE, S_W., SUITE 452 ROANOKE, VIRGTNIA24011 -1594 TLLO'HONE. 1540) x55 1444 PA%. (i40)R53 -1145 DAN ID A. BOWERS Mayor May 18, 2015 The Honorable Vice -Mayor David B. Trinkle and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Vice -Mayor Trinkle and Members of Council: This is to request that the Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss appointmentsof three School Trustees to serve on the Roanoke City School Board, for three -year terms, each, commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Sincerely, dQ David IM^� Mayor DAB:ctw Q) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Public Hearing for Authorization of the Issuance of Debt for FY 2016 Capital Improvement Projects Background: On May 11, 2015, City Council approved the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Update for FY 2016 -2020. The CIP includes bond issuance in FY 2016 in the amount of $26.1 million for the following projects: • School Facility Maintenance and Improvements - S 8,500,000 • Bridge Renovation - 5,650,000 • Library Master Plan - 3,577,000 • Parks and Recreation Master Plan - 1,000,000 • Civic Center Improvements - 1,500,000 • Stormwater Management - 1,920,000 • Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Program - 1,000,000 • Street Scapes - 500,000 • Rail Passenger Infrastructure - 2,500,000 Total: $26,147,000 Considerations: Council authorization of a public hearing on the issuance of debt is required to ensure that the public hearing notices are published in accordance with code requirements. The public hearing is to be scheduled for June 15, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Recommended Action: Authorize a public hearing to be scheduled at City Council's meeting on June 15, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, on the issuance of general obligation bonds not to exceed $27 million for qualifying Capital Improvement Projects. This authorization includes authorization to provide proper notification and publication of such public hearing in accordance with code requirements on or about June 1 st and June 8 =� Barba a A. Dameron Director of Finance Distribution: Council Appointed Officers 1. Call to Order Mr. Ferris called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m. and welcomed everyone 2. Recommended Contract for the Annual Financial Audit Mr. Harmon briefed the Committee on the requirements for the annual financial audit and the reasons for using separate selection committees for the City and City Pension, Schools, and Greater Roanoke Transit Company [GRTC]. He noted that the City, Schools, and GRTC each have their own finance departments, financial systems, procurement policies, and governing boards. Having separate committees helped ensure the unique needs and requirements of each entity were appropriately addressed. The selection committees for the City and GRTC selected Cherry Bekaert, while the selection committee for the Schools selected Brown Edwards & Company. Mr. Harmon introduced the partner from Cherry Bekaert who will be serving as the lead partner on the City's audit, Rob Churchman. Cherry Bekaert has seven (7) offices in Virginia, is headquartered in Richmond, and also has offices in North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The firm audits Roanoke County and several of Virginia's largest cities. Clients spoke very highly of the firm and Mr. Churchman. The contract will be awarded for one (1) year and will automatically renew for up to four (4) additional years. The contract for the audit of the June 30, 2015 financial reports includes sufficient funds to audit up to 12 federal grants compared to five (5) that were audited in 2014. This projected increase in the number of grant programs is partially due to the City being designated as "high risk' based on findings in last year's audit. The other contributing factor is changing how the City reports grants from the Federal Transportation Administration [FTA]. Historically the City has reported FTA grants awarded to GRTC in the City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards. However, GRTC applies for the grants and receives the funds directly from the FTA. The administrators and staff at GRTC manage the funds and are MINUTES Audit Committee of Roanoke City Council Location: Council Conference Room Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, Room 451 South Date: April 15, 2015 Time: 4:31 p.m. to 5:39 p.m. Attendees: Ray Ferris, Audit Committee Chair Anita Price, Audit Committee Member Drew Harmon, Municipal Auditor Dawn Hope Mullins, Assistant Municipal Auditor Dan Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara Dameron, Director of Finance Sherman Stovall, Assistant City Manager — Operations Rob Churchman, Partner — Cherry Bekaert 1. Call to Order Mr. Ferris called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m. and welcomed everyone 2. Recommended Contract for the Annual Financial Audit Mr. Harmon briefed the Committee on the requirements for the annual financial audit and the reasons for using separate selection committees for the City and City Pension, Schools, and Greater Roanoke Transit Company [GRTC]. He noted that the City, Schools, and GRTC each have their own finance departments, financial systems, procurement policies, and governing boards. Having separate committees helped ensure the unique needs and requirements of each entity were appropriately addressed. The selection committees for the City and GRTC selected Cherry Bekaert, while the selection committee for the Schools selected Brown Edwards & Company. Mr. Harmon introduced the partner from Cherry Bekaert who will be serving as the lead partner on the City's audit, Rob Churchman. Cherry Bekaert has seven (7) offices in Virginia, is headquartered in Richmond, and also has offices in North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The firm audits Roanoke County and several of Virginia's largest cities. Clients spoke very highly of the firm and Mr. Churchman. The contract will be awarded for one (1) year and will automatically renew for up to four (4) additional years. The contract for the audit of the June 30, 2015 financial reports includes sufficient funds to audit up to 12 federal grants compared to five (5) that were audited in 2014. This projected increase in the number of grant programs is partially due to the City being designated as "high risk' based on findings in last year's audit. The other contributing factor is changing how the City reports grants from the Federal Transportation Administration [FTA]. Historically the City has reported FTA grants awarded to GRTC in the City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards. However, GRTC applies for the grants and receives the funds directly from the FTA. The administrators and staff at GRTC manage the funds and are April 15, 2015 Page 2 of 4 responsible for ensuring compliance with the FTA's requirements. It was agreed that having GRTC report the expenditures of FTA funds would be more appropriate in terms of accountability and governance. As a result, multiple smaller grants at the City may have to be audited to provide the dollar coverage equivalent to one FTA grant. The new contract will be effective May 1, 2015. Cherry Bekaert will begin planning in May and will meet with the City Audit Committee on June 3 to review the general audit plan. The briefing was received and filed without objection. 3. Police Cash Mr Harmon commented that that CALEA standards require the Police Department to be audited annually for accreditation. The Police Department manages four funds, two cash funds and two checking accounts. Cash funds are used for petty cash purchases and flash- and -buy operations. The Emergency Fund checking account is typically maintained at $2,000 and is used for unanticipated expenses. The Federal Drug Funds checking account is funded with asset forfeiture monies held by the city. The balance is maintained at approximately $10,000. These monies support vice operations and expenses are tracked in Quickbooks. The department has a good system of documentation. As usual, cash transactions were in good order and there were no audit findings. The report was received and filed without objection. 4. Auditing Update Mr. Harmon commented that there was no committee meeting last quarter due to turnover and other issues in terms of available staff. He presented a slide show and provided an overview of Municipal Auditing activity. Mr. Harmon gave the background of new staff members starting on April 28, 2015. Mr. Ferris asked if the department will be fully- staffed with the addition of these individuals. Mr. Harmon affirmed that it will. Mr. Harmon discussed the work done by the department which did not culminate in audit reports. Consultations have not traditionally been brought to the committee. Fiscal Year 2015 projects included work related to the Community Development Block Grant [CDBGJ and Workforce Investment Act programs. Staff began an audit of Parks and Recreation revenues, which was slowed due to staffing issues and the complexity of the audit. Final recommendations were provided to the director; management and staff have done a good job addressing recommended changes. Staff reviewed engineering data related to bridge inspections. Engineering appeared to be doing a good job managing the work; actual bridge inspection data was not audited. An audit related to employee health insurance was opened. Shortly thereafter, Human Resource hired an independent consulting firm to review the status of dependents included on the City's coverage. Mr. Stovall reported that all but approximately 55 employee responses have been received and the exercise has been very beneficial. One Senior Auditor's time was dedicated to Roanoke City Public School audits. The Municipal Auditor worked with Human Resources personnel on an ethics policy. Other staff members participated on the Information Technology Committee and in other meetings. Management assistance was provided in relation to security cameras and the on- street parking transition. Additional projects included work with Finance on the collection approach to delinquent April 15, 2015 Page 3 of 4 emergency medical services fees and coordination of the external audit firm selections for the City, Roanoke City Public Schools, and Greater Roanoke Transit Company. Mr. Harmon discussed active assignments including a review of the tax/treasury functions. This project is nearing completion and a final report will be brought to the Committee. The outcome of this project may potentially result in changes to the City Code; it may be necessary for the Committee to make a related recommendation to City Council. Work is underway on an upgrade of the Advantage Financial System, which will include the implementation of accounts receivable functionality. Municipal Auditing serves as a resource for the implementation team. Ms. Dameron noted that moving forward will take significant time and effort, especially in the accounts receivable area. However, she believes it will result in major improvements, particularly in the areas of reporting and functionality. Mr. Harmon commented that the implementation of this functionality is part of the plan to discontinue mainframe computer usage. In addition, Municipal Auditing staff is working on annual audit procedures at the Clerk of Circuit Court. A follow -up CDBG assignment is open, and the Municipal Auditor is exploring an issue related to code enforcement. Mr. Harmon stated that the Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Hotline has had little activity this year. Only three concerns have been reported. Related investigations took approximately 80 hours, in total. Municipal Auditing staff continues to present hotline information at new employee orientations and maintain a link on the City's website. Future outreach under consideration includes refreshing posters, advertising in the newspaper, and adding hotline information to purchase orders and contracts. Mr. Harmon noted that the standards from the Institute of Internal Auditors [IIA] require that he brief the Audit Committee on the Auditing department's budget. Fiscal Year 2015, discretionary expenditures included dues and membership fees for the IIA, ISACA, and the Virginia Board of Accountancy. Future one -time funding needs include the procurement of a consultant to perform a city -wide information technology risk assessment. Mr. Harmon reported that he will bring the Fiscal Year 2016 annual audit plan to the Committee in June for approval. This plan will be the result of a city -wide risk assessment. Going forward, audits will be smaller in scope, focus on identified risks, and include more collaboration with department managers. Auditing processes have been redesigned to conform to IIA standards and follow a risk -based approach. This approach along with the new audit plan should expand and improve audit coverage. Additional goals for the year include adopting an Audit Committee charter and updating the departmental strategic plan. Mr. Ferris thanked Mr. Harmon for the detailed report and noted that it is good to be moving in the direction of the standards. The update was received and filed without objection. 5. Other Business Mr. Harmon reviewed the Audit Committee meeting schedule for the remained for the calendar year. Meeting dates are set for: June 3, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. September 2, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. April 15, 2015 December 2, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. December 21, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. There was no additional new business. 6. Adjournment Mr. Ferris adjourned the meeting at 5:39 p.m. Page 4 of 4 Daniel J. Callaghan City Attorney CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 464 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 215 CHURCH AVENUE, SW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011-1595 Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor and Member of City Council TELEPHONE 540 - 853.2431 FAX 540.853 -1221 EMAIL cityam(& ... anokevaecv May 18, 2015 Re: Classification of motor vehicle owned and used by disabled veterans Dear Mayor Bowers and Members of Council: Timothy R. Spencer Steven J. Talevi David L. Collins Heather P. Ferguson Laura M. Carlini Assistant City Attorneys Council received my report dated April 6, 2015, regarding the request of a disabled veteran and Roanoke resident that Council consider implementing a separate personal property classification for motor vehicles owned and used by disable veterans who reside in the City. The authority for Council to provide this separate classification is established in State Code. Specifically, Section 58.1 -3506 (A) (19) provides: 19. One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veterans Services. In order to qualify, the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue or other assessing officer from the Department of Veterans Services that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the Department of Veterans Services as to meet the requirements of this section, and that his disability is service- connected. For purposes of this section, a person is blind if he meets the provisions of § 46.2 -100: Council Member Bestptich requested that my office provide Council with a report regarding the implementation of this authorization by other localities within the Commonwealth of Virginia. Our research indicates that 26 localities provide some type of exemption. These localities are Cities: Alexandria, I- Iampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Suffolk, Virginia Beach Counties: Cumberland, Dinwiddie, Fairfax, Greensville, Hanover, Isle of Wight, James City, Louisa, Mathews, Powhatan, Prince George, Roanoke, Southampton, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Sussex, Tazewell, Wise Towns: Haysi, Vinton The type of classification adopted by these localities varies. Some localities allow a veteran to exempt the value of one vehicle. Many localities set a percentage or amount annually as a part of their budget process. For example, Roanoke County allows for a personal property tax rate for one motor vehicle owned and used by a disabled veteran at 50% of the current rate assessed for other motor vehicles. A summary of exemptions prepared by the Cooper Center is attached to this report. in addition, a summary of specific code provisions adopted by localities prepared by my colleague, Laura Carini, is also attached. As noted in my prior report, the impact of creating this separate classification could amount to more than $100,000. The actual impact will be dependent on (i) the amount of the tax relief granted to disabled veterans; (ii) the number of veterans who apply for this relief; and (iii) the value of the motor vehicles for which this classification will apply. We recommend that any adjustment be made as of January 1, 2016. Please let me know if you have any further questions. ��?OAJIA- City Siiinccerely, Attorney DJS /lsc Enclosures: Chart 9.2, Table of Exemptions, prepared by Cooper Center Code provisions of localities, prepared by Laura M. Carini, Assistant City Attorney Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Sherman Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operation Sherman Holland, Commissioner of the Revenue Evelyn Powers, Treasurer Barbara Dameron, Director of Finance Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, Clerk Troy A. Harmon, Municipal Auditor Laura M. Carini, Assistant Attorney Table 9.2 Tanaible Personal Property Tax Relief for Elderly and Disabled, 2014 N/A Not applicable. e The tax rate for Manassas City may be confirmed by viewing hdp //www. manassescity.org /IndeX_aspx?NID =282 Tangible Personal Property Tax 103 Income Net Worth Locality Type of Relief or Exemption Limit ($) Limit ($) Cities (Note: All cities responded to the survey. Those that answered not applicable" for all items in this table are excluded.) Alexandria Elderly: Tax rate of $0.01 /$100 20,000 75,000 Disabled. Tax rate of $3.55/$100 on vehicles for handicapped Bristol Elderly Reduction of taxes based on formula 18,000 3(1 Disabled: Reduction of taxes based on formula Buena Vista Elderly. Mobile homes taxed as real property 25,000 65,000 Disabled: Mobile homes taxed as real property Danville Elderly Percentage deduction based on income 20,000 50,000 Disabled: N/A Falls Church Elderly: $25 credit on license fee for 1 vehicle NIA N/A Disabled : $25 credit on license fee for 1 vehicle Hampton Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Tax rate of $1.00/$100 on handicapped- equipped vehicles Harrisonburg Elderly: 100% relief on 1 vehicle 30,000 75,000 Disabled : 100% relief on 1 vehicle Manassas Elderly. Tax rate of $000001 /$100aon certain vehicles 77431 340,000 Disabled: Tax rate of $0.00001 /$100aon certain vehicles Newport News Elderly: Mobile homes taxed as real property 50,000 200,000 Disabled: Tax rate of $1.001$100 for vehicles for handicapped and mobile homes Norfolk Elderly. N/A 67,000 350,000 Disabled : Tax rate of $3.00/$100 for vehicles Norton Elderly : Maximum exemption of $100 on mobile homes 15,000 25,000 Disabled: Maximum exemption of $100 on mobile homes Suffolk Elderly. Mobile homes same relief as real property 57,150 256,135 Disabled Mobile homes same relief as real property Virginia Beach Elderly. Tax rate of$3.00 /$100 fort vehicle 29,500 70,000 Disabled : Tax rate of $1001100 for 1 vehicle', Disabled veterans get tax rate of $1.501$100 Williamsburg Elderly: N/A N/A NIA Disabled : Vehicles for handicapped are exempt Counties (Note: All counties responded to the survey. Those that answered not applicable' for all items in this table are excluded -) Amelia Elderly : Exemption for single -wide mobile home 30,000 100,000 Disabled: Exemption for single -wide mobile home Amherst Elderly: Mobile homes same relief as real property 50,000 150,000 Disabled: Mobile homes same relief as real property Appomattox Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real property 20,000 100,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real property Bedford Elderly. N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Vehicles modified for handicapped are excluded Bland Elderly Exemption for mobile home 25,000 75,000 Disabled. Exemption for mobile home Caroline Elderly Mobile homes get same relief as real property 35,000 85,000 Disabled : Mobile homes get same relief as real property Chesterfield Elderly Exemption for mobile home 52,000 350,000 Disabled: Exemption for mobile home Craig Elderly Mobile homes get same relief as real property 30,000 90,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real property Dickenson Elderly. $150 credit based on income 35,000 75,000 Disabled : $150 credit based on income Dinwiddie Elderly Up to $3D0 based on income and net worth 30,000 75,000 Disabled: Up to $300 based an income and net worth Fairfax Elderly Total exemption 22,000 75,000 Disabled: Total exemption N/A Not applicable. e The tax rate for Manassas City may be confirmed by viewing hdp //www. manassescity.org /IndeX_aspx?NID =282 Tangible Personal Property Tax 103 Table 9.2 Tangible Personal Property Tax Relief for Elderly and Disabled, 2014 (continued) N/A Not applicable. ° Rate confirmed by Prince William County 104 Tax Rates 2014 Income Net Worth Locality Type of Relief or Exemption Limit ($) ❑mit ($) Counties (continued) Franklin Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real property 25,000 80,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real property Frederick Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real property 50,000 150,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real property Greensville Elderly: N/A 30,000 75,000 Disabled: Exempt up to $500 depending on formula Isle of Wight Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Vehicles modified for handicapped are excluded James City Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Vehicles modified for handicapped are excluded: Disabled veterans receive exemption King George Elderly: Mobile home exempt 25.000 60,000 Disabled: Mobile home exempt Loudoun Elderly: Tax rate of $2.10/$100(50% rate reduction) 52,000 195,000 Disabled. Tax rate of $2.103100 (50% rate reduction) Mathews Elderly: N/A N/A MA Disabled: 100% reliefon 1 vehicle for disabled veterans Middlesex Elderly: Mobile homes, 1 vehicle 27,000 100,000 Disabled: Mobile homes: 1 vehicle Montgomery Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 51,000 150,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate New Kent Elderly: Mobile homes 50,000 75,000 Disabled: Applicable vehicles and mobile homes are exempt Northumberland Elderly. Exemption up to $400 based on income 20,000 100.000 Disabled: Exemption up to $400 based on income Nottoway Elderly N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Vehicles modified for handicapped are excluded Orange Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 40,000 120,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Page Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 21,500 90,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Pittsylvania Elderly Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 18,000 60,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Powhatan Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Veterans 100% disabled in service get $1.80/$100 Prince George Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 45,000 120,000 Disabled_ Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Prince William Elderly Rate of $0.00001/$100 on vehicles° 81,490 340,000 Disabled: Rate of $0.0001/$100 on vehicles for handicapped" Roanoke Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled_ Subjectto rate of$1.75 /$100 Rockingham Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 35,000 75,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Scott Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 25.000 85,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Shenandoah Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 30,000 100,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Southampton Elderly N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Vehicles for handicapped are exempt Spotsylvania Elderly N/A N/A N/A Disabled Disabled veterans exempt Stafford Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled: Rate of $0.10/$100 cn vehicles for handicapped: Disabled veterans receive exemption for 1 vehicle So" Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 30,000 100,000 Disabled. Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Sussex Elderly: N/A N/A N/A Disabled Veterans vehicles are exempt Tazewell Elderly Relief on mobile home taxes up to $300 25,000 75,000 Disabled: 1 vehicle exempt for veteran disabled in service N/A Not applicable. ° Rate confirmed by Prince William County 104 Tax Rates 2014 Table 9.2 Tangible Personal Property Tax Relief for Elderly and Disabled, 2014 (continued) Tangible Personal Property Tax 105 Income Net Worth Locality Type of Relief or Exemption Limit ($) Limit ($) Counties (continued) Warren Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 30,000 100,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Washington Elderly: Property subject to income /worth limits 24,273 100,000 Disabled: 100% disabled subject to income /worth limits Wise Elderly: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate 42,000 85,000 Disabled: Mobile homes get same relief as real estate, 1 vehicle for disabled veterans York Elderly. Mobile homes exempt based on formula 50,000 200,000 Disabled: Mobile homes exempt based on formula Towns (Note'. Towns that answered not applicable for all items in this table are excluded. For a list of town respondents and non- respontlents, see Appendix B.) Chdstiansburg Elderly: Mobile homes gel same relief as real estate 51,000 150,000 Disabled'. Mobile homes get same relief as real estate Clintwood Elderly: Mobile home relief 35,000 75,000 Disabled: Mobile home relief Haysi Elderly. N/A 25,000 75,000 Disabled: Disabled veterans (service connected) exempt Leesburg Elderly No taxes owed on one motor vehicle 52,000 195,000 Disabled. No taxes owed on one motor vehicle Smithfield Elderly. N/A N/A N/A Disabled Exemption oftax N/A Not applicable. Tangible Personal Property Tax 105 be qualified under this section. In order to qualify the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue from the department of veterans services that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the department of veterans services as to meet the requirements of this section, and that his disability is service- connected. For purposes of this section, a person is blind if he conforms to the definition contained in Va. Code 46.2 -739. Town of Haysi Cooper center report says they do, but cannot find code section in Municode. Isle of Wieht Count 4 Sec. 15 -4.2 Motor vehicles equipped for transportation of physically handicapped and certain motor vehicles owned by volunteer rescue squad members or volunteer firemen exempt from taxation. The following tangible personal property is exempt from the tangible personal property tax levies of the board of supervisors: (a)Motor vehicles specially equipped to provide transportation for physically handicapped individuals who reside in the county. (1)One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veterans' Affairs. In order to qualify, the veteran shall provide a written statement to the Commissioner of Revenue or other assessing officer from the Department of Veterans' Affairs that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the Department of Veterans' Affairs as to meet the requirement of this section, and that his disability is service - connected. For purposes of this section, a person is blind if he meets the provisions of section 46.2 -739 of the Code of Virginia. James City Countv Sec. 20 -13.6. Exemption from personal property taxation for disabled veterans. (a) Motor vehicles owned and regularly used by any disabled veteran shall be exempt from personal property taxation. However, a qualifying disabled veteran may have no more than one motor vehicle exempted from taxation. (b) For the purposes of this section, a "disabled veteran" shall mean any veteran of the United States Armed Forces who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, arms or hands, or who is blind, or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veterans= Affairs. In order to qualify under this section, the disabled veteran must provide a written statement to the commissioner of the revenue from the Department of Veterans' Affairs as to meet the requirements of this section and that his /her disability is service connected. For the purposes of this section, a person is blind who meets the provisions of section 46.2 -739 of the Code of Virginia. Louisa County § Sec. 70 -239 Exemption for motor vehicle owned by disabled veteran. One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veteran's affairs shall constitute a classification separate from other classifications of personal property, and shall be exempt from taxation as tangible personal property. Mathews County § 145 -16. Filing of return required; exemptions A. Every taxpayer shall file an annual return with the Commissioner of Revenue of Mathews County by the due date. This return shall reflect all property and ownership as outlined within the definition of tax date and as required within the Code of Virginia, as amended. Every taxpayer shall pay all annual taxes or levies by the due date. B. One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veterans' Affairs shall be exempt from the annual tax or levy hereinabove created in Subsection A. In order to qualify the veteran shall provide a written statement to the Commissioner of Revenue from the Department of Veterans' Affairs that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the Department of Veterans' Affairs as to meet the requirements of this § 145 -1613, and that his /her disability is service - connected. For purposes of this subsection, a veteran is blind if he /she meets the provisions of § 46.2 -739 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Newport News Citv § Sec. 40 -220.9 Tax on motor vehicles owned and regularly used by disabled veterans; levied; amount. (a)For the calendar year beginning January 1, 1994, and ending December 31, 1994, and for the calendar beginning January 1, 1995, and for each and every calendar year thereafter, unless changed, there shall be, and hereby is, levied a tax on not more than one (1) motor vehicle owned and regularly used by any disabled veteran, at the rate of one dollar ($1.00) on everyone hundred dollars ($100.00) of the assessed value thereof. (b)When used in this section, the phrase "disabled veteran" shall mean any veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one (1) or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind, or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veterans' affairs. In order to qualify under this section, the disabled veteran must provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue from the department of veterans' affairs that the disabled veteran has been so designated or classified by the department of veterans' affairs as to meet the requirements of the section, and that his disability is service connected. For the purpose of this section, a person is blind if he meets the provisions of 46.2- 739 of the Code of Virginia. (c)A qualifying disabled veteran may have no more than one (1) motor vehicle assessed pursuant to this section. All other motor vehicles owned by said disabled veteran shall be assessed pursuant to section 40 -220.1 Norfolk City § Sec. 24 -3 Tax levied on tangible personal property, machinery and tools; proration, refund For each and every calendar year, beginning January 1 and ending December 31 of each such year, unless otherwise changed by the council, there are hereby imposed and levied the following taxes on tangible personal property, except household goods and personal effects as classified by Code of Virginia 1950, section 58.1 -3504, and including motor vehicles and delivery equipment, and on machinery and tools used in manufacturing, mining, processing and reprocessing, radio or television broadcasting or dairy business, within the city or having a situs within the city: (1)On all tangible personal property of every kind and description, as classified by Code of Virginia, 58.1- 3500, 58.1 -3503, 58.1 -3506, 58.1 -3507 and 58.1 -3521, not exempt from taxation, except household goods and personal effects as classified by Code of Virginia, 58.1 -3504, there shall be a tax of four dollars thirty -three cents ($4.33) for every one hundred dollars ($100.00) of the assessed value thereof provided, however, that a single motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a disabled veteran who meets all the requirements of clause 17 in subsection (A) of Code of Virginia, 58.1 -3506, shall be subject to a tax rate of three dollars ($3.00) for every one hundred dollars ($100.00) of the assessed value thereof. Powhatan Countv Cooper center report says they do, but cannot find code section in Municode. Prince George Countv § Sec. 74 -434 Qualification for special tax rate of motor vehicle owned or leased by disabled veteran (a)Pursuant to Code of Virginia, 58.1- 3506(A)(19), one motor vehicle owned by a disabled veteran, or leased by such veteran, if obligated by terms of such lease to pay tangible personal property tax, which is regularly used by such veteran, is hereby defined as a separate item of taxation and shall constitute a classification separate from other classifications of tangible personal property. (b)By January 31 of each year, each disabled veteran shall provide the commissioner of the revenue with a certification of total disability in accordance with Code of Virginia, 58.1 -3506, and a personal certification that he regularly used the qualifying motor vehicle during the previous calendar year. The certification must include the vehicle identification of the motor vehicle for which the separate tangible personal property classification is sought. Roanoke Count § Sec. 21 -21 Same, Other classifications of tangible personal property (a)The items of property set forth below are each declared to be a separate class of property and shall constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications of tangible personal property provided in this article: (I)One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veteran's Affairs. In order to qualify the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue or other assessing officer from the Department of Veteran's Affairs that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the Department of Veteran's Affairs as to meet the requirements of this section, and that this disability is service- connected. For purposes of this section a person is blind if he meets the provisions of section 46.2 -739 of the Code of Virginia. (6)The board of supervisors may levy a tax on the property enumerated in subsection (a) at different rates from the tax levied on other tangible personal property. The rates of tax and the rates of assessment shall not exceed that applicable to the general class of tangible personal property. (c)For the tax year commencing January 1, 1993, and for all tax years thereafter, unless otherwise changed, the rate of taxation on the property enumerated in subsection (a) shall be at a percentage of the rate of tax applicable to the general class of tangible personal property to be established annually. Southampton Count § Sec. 15 -79.1 Motor vehicles equipped for transportation for physically handicapped individuals and certain vehicles of disabled veterans exempt from taxation. The following tangible personal property is exempt from the tangible personal property levies of the board of supervisors. (a)Motor vehicles specially equipped to provide transportation for physically handicapped individuals. (b)One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind, or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veterans' affairs. In order to qualify the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of the revenue or other assessing officer from the department of veterans' affairs that the veteran has been so designated or classified by the department of veterans' affairs as to meet the requirements of this section, and that his disability is service - connected. For purposes of this section, a person is blind if he meets the provisions of Section 46.2 -739, Code of Virginia. Spotsvlvania Countv § Sec. 21 -27.4 Same, Motor vehicle owned by disabled veteran. One motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veteran's affairs shall constitute a classification separate from other classifications of personal property, and shall be exempt from taxation as tangible personal property. Stafford Countv Cooper center report says they do, but cannot find code section in Municode. Suffolk Citv § Sec. 82 -202 Exemption from personal property taxation for eligible disabled veterans (a)For the calendar year beginning January 1, 2014, and ending December 31, 2014, and for each and every calendar year thereafter, unless changed, there shall be, and hereby is, levied a tax on not more than one motor vehicle owned and regularly used by an eligible disabled veteran, at 50 percent of the tax rate established by city council on motor vehicles. (b)This rate shall not be applied retroactively to previous years' tax filings (c)When used in this section, the phrase "disabled veteran" shall mean any veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an armor a hand, or who is blind, or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veterans affairs, or who has been so designated or classified by the department of veterans affairs as meeting the requirements of Code of Virginia, 58.1- 3506(19), and that his /her disability is service connected. For the purpose of this section, a person is blind if he /she meets the provisions of Code of Virginia, 46.2 -100. (d)An eligible disabled veteran may have no more than one motor vehicle taxed or levied pursuant to this section. All other motor vehicles owned or regularly used by said eligible disabled veteran shall be taxed or levied pursuant to the tax rate established by city council on motor vehicles. (e)An application must be submitted to the commissioner of revenue by the eligible disabled veteran upon purchase, sale, replacement, or trade of the designated vehicle. Tax rate reductions will not continue with the vehicle upon transfer or sale nor will the reduced tax rate automatically or retroactively transfer to a new vehicle. Sussex Countv Cooper center report says they do, but cannot find code section in Municode. Tazewell Count § Sec. 18 -51 Personal property tax exemption for veterans (a)One (1) motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one (1) or both legs, or an arm or a hand, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the department of veteran's services shall be taxed at a reduced rate of zero (0) percent of the vehicle's value. (b)ln order to qualify for the reduced tax rate, the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue from the department of veteran's services that the veteran's disabilities are service related and permanent. Vinton § Sec. 86 -56 Proration of taxes; credits; refunds; tax classification. (e)The items of property set forth below are each declared to be a separate class of property and shall constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications of tangible property provided in this chapter: (1)A separate tangible personal property tax classification is hereby established for one motor vehicle owned and regularly used by a veteran who has either lost, or lost the use of, one or both legs, or an arm, or who is blind or who is permanently and totally disabled as certified by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In order to qualify forthe classification, the veteran shall provide a written statement to the commissioner of revenue or other assessing officer from the Department of Veterans Affairs that the veteran has been so designated or classified as to meet the requirements of this subsection; and that this disability is service- connected. For purposes of this subsection, a person is blind if he meets the provisions of the Code of Virginia, 46.2 -739, as amended. (2)The town council may levy a tax on the property enumerated in subsection (1) at different rates from the tax levied on other tangible personal property. The rates of tax and the rates of assessment shall not exceed that applicable to the general class of tangible personal property. (3)For the tax year commencing January 1, 1994, and for all tax years thereafter, unless otherwise changed, the rate of taxation on the property enumerated in subsection (1) shall be at a percentage of the rate of tax applicable to the general class of tangible personal property to be established annually. Virginia Beach § Sec. 35 -13 Applications for personal property tax relief by elderly or disabled persons. Any deadline for submission of an affidavit or written statement for relief from personal property taxes by qualifying persons totally and permanently disabled or not less than 65 years old shall be the same as provided in section 35 -66. Wise County § Sec. 19 -12.1 Exemption for disabled veterans. The Wise County Board of Supervisors hereby ordain that one (1) automobile of a qualified veteran is declared to be a separate class of property and shall constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications as set forth in Section 56.1- 3506A(17). Further, it is ordained that Wise County shall levy a tax on the subject property not to exceed that applicable to the general class of tangible personal property. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Regulation of Roosters within the City BACKGROUND Two citizens, Jim Thompson and David Hess, who live in the Mountain View Neighborhood, addressed Roanoke City Council on March 16, 2015, regarding a rooster being kept in the neighborhood. The citizens expressed concern over noise levels they say are created by the rooster, and requested that Roanoke City Council adopt an ordinance banning roosters from being kept in the City. Current City Code allows citizens to keep certain animals, including fowl such as roosters, at their properties. CONSIDERATIONS The right of residents to own, keep and maintain animals within their homes and properties is not unlimited. City Code attempts to balance this right with the obligation of all residents to avoid creating unnecessary nuisances. Specifically, City Code prohibits keeping animals that are deemed to be "public nuisance animals" as defined in Section 6 -11, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended ( "City Code "). This section provides: (a) A public nuisance animal shall mean and include any animal or animals that (1) Is observed to run at large, as defined by section 6 -22 of the City Code, two (2) or more times in any six -month period; (2) Excessively makes disturbing noises including, but not limited to, continued or repeated howling, barking, whining, or other utterances causing unreasonable annoyance, disturbance or discomfort to neighbors or others in close proximity to the premises where the animal is kept or harbored; (3) Creates unsanitary conditions or offensive and objectionable odors in enclosures or surroundings where the animal is kept and thereby creates unreasonable annoyance or discomfort to neighbors or others in close proximity to the premises where the animal is kept; (4) Is offensive or dangerous to the public health, safety or welfare by virtue of the number or types of animals maintained; or (5) An animal which is not being kept in conformity with city zoning ordinances. (b) No person shall keep, harbor, act as the custodian of or permit to remain in or about any premises occupied by him any public nuisance animal, and violation of this section shall constitute a Class 3 misdemeanor. In addition, any violation of this section is hereby declared a public nuisance, and any person suffering injury or damage therefrom may seek correction, removal or abatement of such public nuisance through appropriate suit in equity. Any public nuisance animal, as defined by subsection (a) of this section, may be impounded. Under Section 6-11, City Code provides residents who believe that an animal has become a public nuisance with remedies to ask a court to take appropriate measures, including removal and impoundment of the animal, if the resident can establish the nuisance. Localities throughout Virginia have adopted varying laws on the keeping of roosters, as the following representative sampling of localities demonstrate: Localities that allow roosters Residents in the City of Lynchburg can keep up to four roosters. Section 7 -6 of the Code of the City of Lynchburg (1981), as amended, defines circumstances when keeping a rooster violates its city code, and provides: (a) It shall be unlawful and shall be a nuisance for an owner or custodian of any animal, livestock, poultry or fowl to harbor or keep any animal, livestock, poultry or fowl within the city which frequently or for a continued duration makes excessive, continuous or untimely sounds which are audible on the property of a complainant in the city. (b) For the purposes of this section, "excessive, continuous or untimely sounds" shall mean any animal, livestock, poultry or fowl sounds (with the exception of dogs and cats which are covered by sections 7 -33 and 7 -35 of the city code) which: (1) Can be heard inside the confines of a dwelling unit, house or apartment of another person between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; or (2) Can be heard inside the confides of a dwelling unit, house or apartment of another person at least once a minute for ten (10) consecutive minutes between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.; or (3) Can be heard at fifty (50) feet or more feet from the animal, livestock, poultry or fowl between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; or (4) Can be heard at fifty (50) feet or from the animal, livestock, poultry or fowl at least once a minute for ten (10) consecutive minutes between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (c) Any person who is subjected to excessive, continuous or untimely sounds from any animal, livestock, poultry or fowl may appear before a magistrate and request that a summons to be issued summoning the person owning or having custody of any animal, livestock, poultry or fowl suspected of making excessive, continuous or untimely sounds before the general district court of the city to show cause why such animal, livestock, poultry or fowl should not be ordered to be removed beyond the city limits. Upon proof that such animal, livestock, poultry or fowl is making excessive, continuous or untimely sounds, such animal, livestock, poultry or fowl shall, upon order of the general district court, be removed beyond the city limits, as directed by the general district court. The City of Richmond allows fowl, including roosters to be kept within the city. The placement of fowl is regulated under Section 10 -88 of the Code of the City of Richmond, which provides, in part, as follows: (b) The keeping, placement or maintenance of fowl shall be unlawful unless any person keeping, placing or maintaining fowl on any parcel of real property in the city has complied with the applicable requirements of Chapter 114 of this Code and other applicable provisions of this Code and state law. (c) All fowl shall be kept in securely and suitably fenced areas, pens or structures designed for the purpose of the keeping of fowl. (d) Except as provided in subsections (e) and (f) of this section, no fenced area, pen or structure for fowl shall be permitted closer than 500 feet to any house or other building used for residential purposes by anyone other than the person having a permit in accordance with section 10 -95 of this Code and maintaining such fowl for such person's immediate family. (e) Fenced areas, pens or structures for the keeping, placement or maintenance of fowl for noncommercial purposes shall be located not less than 200 feet from all property lines. However, this subsection shall not apply to the keeping, placement or maintenance of not more than four female chickens. (f) Fenced areas, pens or structures for the keeping, placement or maintenance of not more than four female chickens shall not be located closer than 15 feet to any dwelling on an adjacent lot, provided that no such fenced area or pen shall be located within any front yard or street side yard required by applicable provisions of Chapter 114 of this Code, as the terms "front yard" and "street side yard" are defined in section 114 -1 220 of this Code, and no structure accessory to any such fenced area or pen shall be located within any yard required by Chapter 114 of this Code. (g) Every person maintaining any area, pen or structure for keeping fowl shall comply with the requirements set forth in Article II, Division 4 of this Chapter and shall keep such area, pen or structure clean, sanitary and free from refuse. All feed or other material intended for consumption by birds shall be kept in containers impenetrable by rats or other rodents, and such containers shall be equipped with tightly fitting caps or lids. The presence of rats in an area, pen or structure used for the keeping of fowl shall be prima facie evidence that such area, pen or structure is maintained in violation of this section. Section 5 -7 -2 of the Code of the City of Alexandria (1963), as amended allows roosters to be kept in the city with restrictions on the proximity of the animals to residences and dwellings. This section provides: It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or allow to be kept within the city, within 200 feet of any residence or dwelling not occupied by such person, any fowl. The word "fowl," as used in this section, shall include, but is not limited to, chickens, hens, roosters, ducks, geese, pigeons or any domesticated barnyard bird. The City of Charlottesville also allows roosters to be kept in the city. The roosters can be subject to the Code of the City of Charlottesville (1990), as amended, Chapter 16, Noise Control. Localities that ban roosters. Roosters are prohibited from being kept in the Cities of Salem, Norfolk, Harrisonburg, and Hampton, and the Town of Vinton. The following are the code sections that prohibit the keeping of roosters in these localities: • Section 106- 318.1, Code of the City of Salem • Section 10-97, Code of the Town of Vinton • Section 6.1 -7, Code of the City of Norfolk (1979), as amended. • Section 15-2-24, Code of the City of Harrisonburg • Section 5 -24.1, Code of the City of Hampton As noted, localities within the Commonwealth of Virginia have approached the issue of roosters in a variety of proposals. Lynchburg allows roosters and establishes specific factors and burden of proof for the consideration by a court in determining whether a rooster's activities constitute a nuisance. Alternatively, Roanoke has left the determination whether the particular conduct of the rooster warrants a determination that the animal is a "public nuisance animal" for which sanctions and penalties may be imposed. Roanoke affords its residents opportunities to seekjudicial redress of their grievances if neighbors are unable to resolve these matters. City Council has several options in response to the issues presented by Messrs. Thompson and Hess. Council may determine that current City Code adequately addresses the issue of nuisance animals and provides residents with a private right of action against the neighbor alleged to be creating a nuisance. The aggrieved resident may also seek criminal action by petitioning the court magistrate. In the matter involving the rooster in the Mountain View Neighborhood, Roanoke Police were called on July 31, 2014, to investigate the rooster following a complaint made by Mr. Thompson. The police determined that the dispute between neighbors was a civil disagreement. This determination does not preclude Mr. Thompson, or other neighbors, from exercising their private rights under current City Code. City Council may also adopt amendments to Chapter 6 of City Code to that prohibit keeping roosters within the City. While this option would result in the removal of all existing roosters from the city, it would require police enforcement of such a ban. In discussions with Chief Perkins, additional staffing, training, and equipment will be necessary for enforcement of this particular ban on this particular type of animal. City Council could also ban roosters in residential districts by amending the current zoning ordinance. This action would not impact the roosters currently living within the City. This alternative will require additional code enforcement regulatory activities to implement these amendments. The City Manager, in consultation with the Police Chief and the City Attorney, recommends that City Council take no action to amend City Code. Current City Code attempts to strike a balance among the interests of all residents in their enjoyment of their lives and properties within the City. City Code also recognizes that, when disputes arise between neighbors and those disputes cannot be resolved through discussion, compromise, and cooperation, residents should have a remedy to resolve the issue. City Code affords such remedies. In the event that Council would like to consider code amendments, Council should request input from residents, especially residents that have roosters. While roosters are present in several neighborhoods within the City, the Police have received three complaints since 2014, all related to the rooster in the Mountain View Neighborhood, and two of the complaints were from Mr. Thompson. 0--- k--/- --- -- Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Chris Perkins, Chief of Police Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building and Development Aisha Johnson, Special Assistant to City Manager S'I'CPIIANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540)853 -2541 Fax: (540)853 -1145 E -mnil: derk(nkmnakc...... May 19, 2015 Debbie Bonniwell, Executive Director Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare 301 Elm Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Ms. Bonniwell: JONAI IIAN E. CRAliT CMC Depaty City Clerk CE]CE[AA'1'. WEBB, CMC Assistant City Clerk This is to advise that Edward Garner has qualified as an At -Large City representative of the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors to replace The Reverend Erin Hensley, who was unable to fill the unexpired term of Max E. Davis ending December 31, 2016. Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: I, Edward Garner, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as an At -Large City representative of the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors to replace The Reverend Erin Hensley, who was unable to fill the unexpired term of Max E. Davis ending December 31, 2016, according to the best of my ability. So help me God. /EDWARD GARNER The foregoing oath of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Edward Garner this �20 day of 2015. Bren . Hamilton, Cle r of the Circuit Court B , Eck CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Awi ne, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 'I elepLeuc (S41)8S3 -2541 Fur: (541)X53 -1145 F S'I'EPIIANIE M. MOON UF.YNOLDS,MMC .'aniL elu V1, nunmkern.gnv City Clerk May 19, 2015 Nicole Ashby, Secretary Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Ashby: JONA I'BAN E. CNAF f, CM(' Deputy City Clerk CECELIA I. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Gordie L. Zeigler has qualified as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a three -year term of office ending March 31, 2017. Sincerely, ecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: Ze yle � I, Gordie L. Zje§fer, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a three -year term of office ending March 31, 2017, according to the best of my ability. So help me God. \ L / �� j ✓ \ Gordie L. Ziegler � (P The foregoing o th of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Gordie L. erthi / % ay of rt 2044' z ter ��IS Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court e CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 201 S Subject: Request for Closed Meeting This is to request that City Council convene a closed meeting to discuss the disposition of City -owned property located at 120 Church Avenue, S.E., bearing Official Tax Map No. 4011413 where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to §2.2 -3711 .A.3, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. L&_ ---- k ---------------- Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers ,NIT: P I I AN I IC 11. M OO.N It ICYN(11.115_ AI M( Ot, ( Im'k CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE Of TIFF, CI'T'Y CLERK 215 Church A,miic, S. W., Suit, 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 'I'cicPMm: (541)X53 -5541 1:" (541) 1851 -1145 L: ,null: <Icrltn ,'ounnkc�uguv May 19, 2015 Daniel D. Miles, P. E. Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority 1020 Hollins Road, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Mr. Miles: .IONA I'll AN 1:. ('1IA1'1, ('Al(' Dep,1 S 0th ('lurk (l;(E1AA'1'.A419316, kl( AC%i%tanl 1)eP10 ('in ('leek I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40234 - 051815 approving the annual budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for Fiscal Year 2015 -2016, in the amount of $8,525,174. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. Sin rely, Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: Debbie Jacks, Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, R O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Susan Johnson, Clerk, Town of Vinton, 311 S. Pollard Street, Vinton, Virginia 24179 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Amelia C. Merchant, Director, Management and Budget IN'I'I Ili COUNCII, OI; It Ilk CITY OI' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of Nay, 2015. No. 40234 - 051815. A RESOLUTION approving the annual budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for Fiscal Year 2015 -2016, upon certain lens and conditions. BP; I RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the annual budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for Fiscal Ycar 2015 -2016, in the amount of $8,525,174 is hereby approved, all as more particularly set forth in a letter, and attachments thereto, to the City Manager dated March 27, 2015, hem Peggy Bishop, Board Secretary of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, copies of which have been provided to Council. Resouroe Awhonly 8,14111 2015 2❑16 o,c TEST: iT 6to City Clerk. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Annual Budget - Roanoke Valley Resource Authority I would like to sponsor a request from Daniel D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, to present its Fiscal Year 2015 -2016 proposed annual budget. - - Ro-W�erk.-M-omr-il-1 ------ ris City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers P4& ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY March 27, 2015 Christopher J. Morrill, City Manager City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Morrill: Enclosed is Roanoke Valley Resource Authority's 2015 -16 Reserves & Budget which was approved by its Board on Wednesday, March 25 ". I understand this has been placed on Council's Agenda for Monday, April 6, 2015, beginning at 2:00 p.m. Cordially, Peggy L. Bishop RVRA Board Secretary Enclosure c: Daniel J. Callaghan, Esq. (w /enc.) Stephanie M. Moon, MMC, City Clerk (w /enc.) 1020 Hollins Road, NF. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 -8011 (540) 857 -5050 Fax (540) 857 -5056 Web Site: www.rvra.net 1ROANOKE VALLEY 1R,LSO'UIIKCIL AUTHORITY 2015 -16 RESEIRVES BUDGET TRANSFER STATIM" Roanoke Valley Resoume Authority RESERVE FUNDS 2015 -2016 HORIZONTAL GRINDER Roanoke Valley Resource Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS RESERVE FUNDS 1. RVRA Financial & Reserve Policy II. Annual Review III. Consulting Engineer's Review IV. Summary of Reserve Funds A. Ending 2014/2015 B. Ten -year Projections V. Reserve Funds and Expenditure Plans A. Landfill Closure Fund B. Equipment Reserve Fund C. Groundwater Protection Frond D. Bost Communitylmprovement Fund E. Property Value Protection Fund F. Further Site Development Fund G. Capital Improvement Plan H. Roanoke (Rutrough Rd) Regional Landfill 1. Contingency Fund PAGE# 1 -3 4 5 -8 9 10 11 -34 11 -12 13 -16 17-18 19 -20 21 -22 23 -26 27 -29 30 -31 33 -34 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority pp ES lr"{5, V F POLICY ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AWHO[ ITY FINANCIAL AND RESERVES POLICY Background The Authority recognizes one of the keys to sound financial management is the development of a systematic way to fund planned capital projects and on -going maintenance programs. The Authority believes it is equally important to establish the planned expenditures of associated funding for its capital projects and maintenance programs on a pay -as- you -go basis whenever possible. The National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines representing standards of excellence in governmental budgeting that include the preparation of policies and plans for capital asset acquisition, maintenance, and replacement (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2). This policy addresses this standard. IL Purpose This policy will provide for the establishment and the planned funding level of maintenance and improvement reserve accounts for planned expenditures over a short-term planning period of five (5) years and a long -term planning period of ten (10 +) years or more. Each individual account provides for a separate funding purpose to be designated as either "restricted" or "unrestricted" accounts. Restricted accounts must be used solely for their intended purpose as required by regulatory statute, contractual obligation, or operating permit conditions. Unrestricted funds are intended for planned capital and maintenance purposes, but may be periodically used by the Authority temporarily, for not more than six (6) months, to provide emergency funding for the Authority's operations, if needed. Reserve Accounts may be utilized to fund the same or separate projects as deemed necessary for supporting the mission of providing quality programs and facilities necessary to serve the Authority's Member Communities of Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton and their residents and businesses of the Roanoke Valley, 111. Policy Guidelines for Reserve Fund Accounts A. The Authority will maintain reserve accounts and an initial beginning balance of funds will be deposited into accounts as identified for the current fiscal year. B. Annual funding transfers will occur in twelve (12) equal monthly transfers from revenues received by the Authority and as budgeted for the current fiscal year. C. Ongoing expenditures from the funds will occur as budgeted for the current fiscal year as costs are accrued. 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS — Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PJ FS If' RD 5 / E POLICY D. Planned deposits to the funds are calculated sufficient to maintain the desired fund balances with a positive fund balance, at a minimum, for any given fiscal year during the long -term planning period. E. Planned expenditures of the funds are calculated sufficient to provide cash funding for all planned capital projects and maintenance projects for any given fiscal year during the long -term planning period. F. Any end of year operating surplus and /or interest earnings may be allocated to one or more account, as determined by the Authority's Board of Directors. G. An internal review of the account allocations and funding levels by a professional engineer familiar with best management practices of solid waste operations and facilities will occur annually to ensure the priorities are consistent with the goals of the Authority and to ensure the funding levels are adequate. H. An external, third party review of the account allocations and funding levels by a professional engineer, familiar with best management practices of solid waste operations and facilities, will occur every five (5) yi�ars to ensure the funding levels are adequate. IV. Account Definitions The Landfill Closure Fund (Unrestricted) provides a reserve for the costs of capping completed areas of the landfill and at the end of the landfill's useful life, to completely close any remaining area, install all monitoring and collection systems and perform all post - closure care activities per regulatory requirements. The Equipment Replacement Fund (Unrestricted) provides funds for the future purchases, regularly scheduled replacement of major operating equipment, and any uninsured risk, in an orderly fashion as to minimize annual operating costs, maximizc any trade -in or surplus value, and to provide for the best overall purchasing value. The Ground Water Protection Fund (Restricted) provides funds to address any environmental effects the operation of the landfill may have on the surrounding area. The fund also serves to assist in complying with post closure and corrective action requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. The Host Community Fund (Restricted) provides funds for the construction and maintenance of public improvements to Authority property within the Host Community, as requested by the Host Community, and as approved in a formal public improvement plan. The Property Protection Fund (Restricted) provides funds for the one -time payments under the Property Protection Policy to property owners within the Host Community for any actual, realized decline in property values as a result of their relatively close proximity to the Smith Gap Regional Landfill. 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RESERVE POLICY The Site Development Fund (Unrestricted) provides funds for the construction of subsequent phases of the Smith Cap landfill, as necessary, to provide ongoing landfill disposal capacity. The Capital Improvement Fund (Unrestricted) was established to be used for various capital maintenance items and new capital projects anticipated for the ten -year planning period. Projects may be amended as solid waste operations and the industry in general continues to evolve. The Rutroul Road Landfill (RRLF) Post Closure Fund (Restricted) provides funding for the Authority's contractual obligation to provide for the ongoing post closure care of the closed Rutrough Road Landfill. The Contingency Fund (Unrestricted) provides funding to stabilize year -to -year rate adjustments and to provide a source of funding for any unforeseen increases in expenses or decreases in revenue that would otherwise cause a negativebalance for the Authority's operating funds. V. Reporting The Treasurer will track reserve account deposits and expenditures on a monthly basis. A monthly report will be sent to the Chief Executive Officer, the Authority's Secretary, which will be included on the Board of Directors' agenda for review at all regularly scheduled meetings. The Treasurer will also ensure that all expenditures have been through the appropriate approval process. The Chief Executive Officer will provide an annual report to the Board of Directors as to the adequacy of the funding levels of each respective reserve account. 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS - Roanoke Valley Resource Authority AN NUAL RE y rEW AND RIFSERVE FUNDS ANNUAL REVIEW RVRA RESERVE FUNDS PLAN & 1[ FPORT FY 2015 - 2016 The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority reviewed its replacement reserve requirements as outlined per the Authority's `Financial and Reserves Policy" and has determined the adequacy of the funding plan as submitted herein. The Authority, in its review, has defined adequacy to mean that sufficient funding, if funded as scheduled, exists in amounts equivalent to or exceeding the anticipated expenditures during a short-term period of the next five subsequent fiscal years, with the understanding that certain amounts are to be borrowed, if needed, as indicated in the expenditure plan. According to staff's current review, funds are adequate for the immediate tive year planning period. The Authority has established the funding and expenditure plan, as outlined in the "Summary of Reserve Funds: 10 -Yr. Planning Period" (p.10.). All funds required for expenditures are currently available or will be available from future annual deposits or future borrowing with the exceptions of: the Capital Improvement, Equipment and the Site Development Reserve Funds. At some point within the next five years, the Authority will need to increase the annual deposits to the reserve accounts to cover any shortfalls. The plan is consistent with the needs and obligations of the Authority and has been approved by the Authority's Board of Directors. MM 611.1 4 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CON5U L FF-IG ENGINIEFR.S REVIEW CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW The retirement of all outstanding bond debt in FY 2011 subsequently relieved the Authority of its former financial requirements as previously imposed by the Master Indenture of Trust, including the establishment and funding of certain reserve funds as recorded and reported in the annual report. While no longer obligated to the terms of the Master Indenture of Trust, several previously established reserve funds remain as ongoing obligations to the Authority due to start- up and operating restrictions imposed under the Authority's separate "Landfill, Rail, & Transfer Station Permit Conditions & Operating Policies," including, The Groundwater Protection Fund (formerly known as "The Environmental Fund "); The Host Community Fund; and The Property Protection Fund. Additionally, the Authority is contractually obligated to maintain the post - closure care of the closed Roanoke Landfill (a.k.a. the Rutrough Road Landfill) with funds initially established and designated expressly for this purpose in The Rutrough Road LandRll Post - Closure Fund. Therefore, these four reserve funds are designated as "Restricted" reserve accounts which must be maintained and adequately funded for their express, respective purposes. As part of its post -bond debt, fiscal responsibility, the Authority recognizes one of the keys to sound financial management is the development of a systematic way to fund planned capital projects and on -going maintenance programs beyond its operating permit and contractual requirements. The Authority believes it is equally important to establish the planned expenditures of associated funding for its capital projects and maintenance programs on a pay -as- you -go basis whenever possible. The National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines representing standards of excellence in governmental budgeting that include the preparation of policies and plans for capital asset acquisition, maintenance, and replacement (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2). Therefore, the Authority established additional reserve 2015 -2016 _ RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONSULT ➢NG IFlNGINE'ERS R iEVIFW funds for these purposes which are designated as "Unrestricted" reserve accounts since there are no external conditions, other than sound financial management as outlined and approved in the RVRA RESERVES PLAN ( "Plan "), requiring their existence and funding levels. Unrestricted Funds include: The Closure Fund; The Equipment Fund; The Site Development Fund; The Capital Improvement Fund; and The Contingency Fund. The Closure, Equipment, and Site Development Funds were previously required under the former Master Indenture of Trust and funding levels were maintained and managed accordingly. The Capital Improvement and Contingency Funds, while not previously required per any outsiric obligation, were established and recognized as being necessary for sound financial management of the Authority's operations and its facilities. The Authority recognizes that periodically, it may need to add, delete, or amend its unrestricted funds as deemed to be in the best interest of the Authority and its members. All funds required for expenditures are currently available or will be available from future annual deposits or future borrowing. The Plan is consistent with the needs and obligations of the Authority and has been approved by the Authority's Board of Directors. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority must review, prior to the preparation of its annual budget, the adequacy of the respective amounts of the reserve fund accounts under the current operating conditions, and in comparison with industry standards. In conducting such review, the Authority agrees to consult with and obtain the recommendations of a professional engineer familiar with solid waste services, equipment, and facilities as utilized by the Authority. In accordance with the "Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Financial Policy" (Reserves Policy, Sec.IILH.) adopted by the Board on February 27, 2012, a professional consulting engineer, external to the Authority, is to review the Plan every five years That external review was last conducted in FY 2012 in review of the FY 2013 Plan. 'the next external review is scheduled for 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Vale, Reseume Authority CCENS'C1C1[' NG IENC][P,!'EERS REVIEW FY 2017 for the FY 2018 Plan. If at any time, the Authority, in its sole judgment, determines the amount of any reserve fund is inadequate, the Board will utilize best fiscal practices to attempt to remedy any shortage(s). The Authority annually makes deposits to its reserve funds for funding future planned expenditures. These reserves allow the Authority to establish and project an orderly adjustment of its tipping fee revenues as necessary to prepare for future capital expenditures to coincide with its annual operating costs. Initial projections made in 1992 during the start-up, 20 -year revenue bond issuance established a basis of anticipated costs and revenues for operating the new solid waste disposal system through the bond term. Almost two decades of actual operating experience of the Authority's systems has allowed the Authority to delay anticipated increases in tipping fees and offer rates less than projected. However, a prolonged downtumed economy has significantly affected the Authority's revenues primarily due to an overall reduction of waste flow and a significant reduction in investment earnings. The Authority has been able to maintain rates below those originally projected due to improved operational efficiencies resulting in reduced operating costs and expanded life expectancies of landfill cells which allowed for a restructuring of deposits to some of the reserve funds, most notably The Closure and Site Development Funds, while maintaining adequate funding levels for the short- term planning periods. Each reserve fund has been reviewed for its adequacy to meet the planned expenditures over a short-term period of five years and for an extended, long -term, planning period of ten years. Only one reserve fund (Capital Improvement) shows a slight negative balance during the short -term plamring period, the cumulative unrestricted fund balance remains sufficient to cover anticipated expenditures by transferring funds between Reserve Funds as needed and if needed. Therefore, all 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CO N VS131'3 I N G ENGINEERS REVIEW reserve funds have been determined to be adequate for the short-term planning period. The long- term planning period is less than adequate, most notably for the Equipment and Capital Improvement Funds, primarily due to staff a scheduling for the replacement of two gondolas per year starting in 2017 -2018. Staff is exploring other options than using the gondolas that may require issuing new debt. The Equipment Fund, Site Development Fund and Capital Fund are marginally funded over the ten -year planning period and will need to be addressed within the next five years. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel D. Miles, P.E. Chief Executive Officer 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY SUMMARY OF RESERVE FUNDS Expenditures for FY 2015 BALANCE AT PLANNED /ACTUAL DEPOSITS BEGINNING EXPENDITURES BALANCE 07/01/14 2014/2015 1 -Jul -2015 (anticipated) CLOSURE FUND' $ 6,042,337 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 6,292,337 EQUIPMENT' $ 1,295,265 $ 1,507,142 $ 1,100,000 $ 888,123 ENVIRONMENTAL FUND $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 HOST COMMUNITY' $ 160,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 170,000 PROPERTY VALUE PROTECTION $ 443,193 $ 43,150 $ - $ 400,043 SITE DEVELOPMENT $ 2,150,118 $ - $ 500,000 $ 2,650,118 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 993,165 $ 1,090,223 $ 190,000 $ 92,942 TO ALS $ 11,584,078 $ 2,690,515 $ 2,100,000 $ 10,993,563 RUTROUGH ROAD LANDFILL $ 2,173,066 $ 390,500 $ 5,000 $ 1,787,566 CONTINGENCY $ 1,755,199 $ 456,323 $ - $ 1,298,876 NOTES: 1 Again, as noted the last couple of years, we have submitted closure plans toDEQ a couple of times to close several acres of the landfill; however, we still do not have approval. We anticipate that VIDEO will approve this FY and work will begin next FY. We may advertise this FY; therefore, a nominal amount of Funds are 2. While we have known cost (Wheel Loaders (3 ea), Hydro Seeder & Excavator), we still need to purchase a street sweeper and mowing tractor. 3. The Host Community cap was raised from $150,000 to $250,000 last year. 4. Work was completed on the Tipper, Smith Gap Floor, HVAC Transfer Station (TS) and we have an estimate to repair and paint the roof at the TS. The Residential Service Area should be bid and awarded later this FY with completion scheduled for early or late Fall. Estimated four months of construction. 2015 -2016 9 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY Summary of Reserve Funds: Ten Year Planning Period Fiscal Year 2014 -15 2015 -16 2016 -17 2017 -18 2018 -19 2019 -20 2020 -21 2021 -22 2022 -23 2023 -24 2024 -25 Deposits Censure 300 200 200 300 300 300 300 300 300 30D 300 Equipment 1100 1000 1000 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 Groundwater Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Host Community 10 10 in 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Property Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Development 500 500 5011 500 1 500 1 500 1 500 500 500 500 500 Capital) improvement 190 390 390 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 total 2100 2100 1 2100 2100 1 2100 1 MID 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 Expenditures Closure 50 2,200 477 0 0 0 100 3,500 1,192 0 0 Equipment 1,507 1,062 1,458 969 1,578 854 1,244 1,075 751 2,16] 1,274 Groundwater Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Host Community 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 10 10 Property Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Development 0 50 3,450 200 0 0 0 0 30D 2,900 2,000 Capital Improvement 1090 430 50 530 260 410 260 260 620 260 260 total 2647 3742 5435 1699 1838 1264 1604 4835 2863 5337 3544 Balances 5 year 10 year Closure 6,292 4,292 4,015 4,315 4,615 4,915 5,115 1915 1,023 1,323 1,623 Equipment 888 826 368 499 21 267 123 148 497 -570 -744 Groundwater Protection 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Host Community 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 250 250 Property Protection 400 400 400 400 400 400 403 400 400 400 400 Site Development 2,650 3,100 150 450 950 1,450 1,950 2,450 2,650 250 1 -1,250 Capital Improvement 93 53 393 53 -17 -237 -307 -377 -807 -877 -947 total 10,993 9,351 6,016 6,417 6679 ],515 8,011 5,276 4,513 1,2]6 -168 Summary of Other Reserve Funds: Ten Year Planning Period Fiscal Year 2014 -15 2015 -16 2016 -17 2017 -18 2018 -19 2019 -20 2020 -21 2021 -22 2D22 -23 2023 -24F2024 25 Deposits Rutrough Read 6 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Contingency 1755 1 0 1 0 0 1 D 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Rutrough Road 390 1 1,688 156 161 161 163 165 167 168 Contingency 456 582 717 0 0 0 0 0 Balances 5 year r Rutrough Roatl 1,]88 106 -49 -210 -371 -534 -699 -866 -1,034 0 Contingency 1,299 ]1] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [72174 Totals 5 year ar All Funds 14,080 10,174 5,96] 6,20] 6,308 6,981 ],312 4,410 3,479 8 ds 5 year ar All Funds 11,222 8,988 4,926 5,31] 5,569 6,395 6,881 4,136 3.363 8 2015 -2016 10 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CLOSURE ]FUN D Landfill Closure Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998 -99 2,375,000 250,000 0 2,625.000 1999 -20 2,625,000 250,000 0 2,875,000 2000 -01 2,882,755 250,000 0 3,132,755 2001 -02 3,132,755 250.000 0 3,382,755 2002 -03 3,382,755 250,000 0 3,632,755 2003 -04 3,632,755 250,000 0 3,882,755 2004 -05 3.882 755 250,000 0 4,132,755 2005 -06 4,132,755 250,000 0 4,382,755 2006 -07 4,382,755 250,000 0 4,632,755 2007 -08 4,632,755 1,050,000 10,291 5,672,464 Phase I Design 2008 -09 5.672,464 600,000 29.817 6,242,647 Phase I Design & LFGCCS 2009 -10 6,242,647 600,000 72,704 6,769,943 Phase I Design 8 LFGCCS 2010 -11 6,769,943 400,000 1589,591 5,580.352 Complete LFGCCS 2011 -12 5,580,352 100,000 193,600 5,486,752 Miss LFGCCS & LFGTE 2012 -13 5,486,752 300,000 22,500 5,764,252 Closure & Misc LFGCCS 2013 -14 5,764,252 300,000 21,915 6,042,337 Misc, LFGCCS 2014 -15 6,042,337 300,000 50,000 6,292,337 Engineering & Ad. Closure 2015 -16 6,292,337 200,000 2,200,000 4,292,337 Phase I Construction (7.0 Ac) 2016 -17 4,292,337 200,000 477,297 4,015,040 Phase I Construction (7.0 Ac) 2017 -18 4,015,040 300,000 0 4,315,040 2018 -19 4,315,040 300,000 0 4,615,040 2019 -20 4,615,040 300,000 0 4,915,040 2020 -21 4,915,040 300,000 100,000 5,115,040 Phase 11 Design 2021 -22 5,115,040 300,000 3,500,000 1,915 040 Phase 11 Construction (10 Ac) 1022 -23 1,915,040 300,000 1,191,760 1,023280 Phase l l Construction (1 D AC) 1023 -24 1,023,280 300,000 0 1,323,280 1024 -25 1,323,280 300,000 0 1.623,280 1025 -26 1,623,280 300,000 1 0 1,923,280 1026 -27 Note: Additional funding from Surplus ($550,000) was added from FY06 /07 budget in FY 07/08 2015 -2016 RESERVE FUNDS 12 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority EQUIII"iY E y(II FUL`!T) Equipment Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE Detailed Schedule 1998 -99 2,704,000 375,000 260,000 3,127,939 See Attached 1999 -20 3,127,939 375,000 288,289 3,214,650 See Attached 2000 -01 3,214,650 375,000 555,535 3,034,115 See Attached 2001 -02 3,034,115 375,000 987,595 2,421,520 See Attached 2002 -03 2,421,520 375,000 680,090 2,116,422 See Attached 2003 -04 2,116,422 400,000 459,327 2,057,095 See Attached 2004 -05 2,057,095 400,000 561,464 1,895,631 See Attached 2005 -06 1,895,631 400,000 323,589 1,972,042 See Attached 2006 -07 1,972,042 400,000 492,652 1,879,390 See Attached 2007 -08 1,879,390 674,231 1,280,731 1272,890 See Attached 8 note below 2008 -09 1,272,890 400,000 1,103,483 569,407 See Attached 2009 -10 569,407 600,000 351,088 818,319 See Attached 2010 -11 818.319 600,000 625,485 792,034 See Attached 2011 -12 792,834 600,000 937,839 454,995 See Attached 2012 -13 454,995 1250,000 651,27] See Attached 2013 -14 1,053,718 1,100,000 858,452 See Attached 2014 -15 1,295,266 1,100,000 1,507,142 See Attached 2015 16 888,124 1,000,000 1,062,187 V1,053718 See Attachetl 2016 -17 825,937 1,000,000 1,458,048 See Attached 2017 18 367,889 1,100,000 969,132 See Attached 2018 -19 498,757 1,100,000 1,578,361 20,396 See Attached 2019 -20 20,396 1,100,000 853.885 266.511 See Attached 2020 -21 266,511 1,100,000 1,243,621 122,890 See Attached 2021 -22 122,890 1,100,000 1,075296 147,594 See Attached 2022 -23 147,594 1,100,000 751,428 496,166 See Attached 2023 -24 496,166 1,100,000 2,166,529 - 570,363 See Attached 2024 -25 - 570,363 1,100,000 1273,686 - 744,049 See Attached 2025 -2fi - 744,049 2026 -27 Note: Additional Funds (Insurance) from FY 2009/2010 Revenues ($97,605) was deposited Additional Funds (Surplus) from FY 2012/2013 Revenues ($200,000) was deposited 2n15 -2n16 .n RESERVE FUNDS I II I I I I I I ° m I I W ! l m III L- m I I I I II I I 'I I 0 o I e I IIII I I I m m I I N n I Y i r l I IIII I �I I N. N U' U' N N N N N N N N N N U' fU/1 VUi y N U' U' NI N JI _ I, m ° -o � of N Nm o II II N ° ti U CI °= A rc p' o ti E o o x Y x�° Y m C� E U 3 n H a! m Q o n a'. of o o rn Y E' ill o x m m LLJ 10 Z 1 1 0 O LL N I� it uY I SIN N b ° N' u li i � III i 'i C r n I M G v I7 o- e ry ro � M a 0 0 w N m A ! I �wY x_ I- m a N y II ml o ^o 0 ry o N Q � V _ J I oI r O v n U O CD lo N Roanoke Valley Resource Authority GIP.OU VID PALER IRESE VIE FUND D Groundwater Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998 -99 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 1999 -20 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2000 -01 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2001 -02 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2002 -03 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2003 -04 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2004 -05 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2005 -06 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2006 -07 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2007-08 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2008 -09 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2009 -10 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2010 -11 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2011 -12 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2012 -13 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2013 -14 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2014 -15 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2015 -16 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2016 -17 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2017 -18 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2010 -19 500,000 0 0 508000 No Planned Uses 2019 -20 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2020 -21 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2021 -22 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2022 -23 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2023 -24 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2024 -25 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2025 -26 500,000 2026 -27 2014 -2f115 18 c�xyamaaau.� -y Roanoke Valley Resource Authority T40ST C'OlYIlIY11. 1J V'IT1 lI OS "I C®M1MdUNITY (FUND The Host Community Fund is established to fund the construction acrd /or maintenance of public improvements to Authority property for the benefit of the Host Community which is defined as the area within a 5,000 ft. radius of the Smith Gap Regional landfill property lines. Funded improvements will be established with input from the Host Community and set out in a public improvement plan. Originally Annual deposits were made in the ani of $10,000 on a monthly basis with the balance not to exceed $150,000. However, the Host Community with assistance from the Authority's staff, increased the limit from $150,000 to $250,000 in FY 2014. The Host Community is exploring its options for the use of the Host Community Fund, including the possibility of constructing a Community Building to hold their annual meetings. Existing and proposed funds are adequate for the immediate five -year planning period as shown. 2015 -2016 19 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority �I OS a CO1 V MJ y ITY Host Community Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1992 -93 0 0 0 0 1993 -94 0 8.000 0 8,000 1994 -95 8,000 10,000 0 18,000 1995 -96 18,000 10,000 0 28.000 1996 -97 28,000 10,000 29,385 8,615 Computers($25,385).F &R($4.000) 1997 -98 8,615 10,000 615 18,000 Playground Equipment 1998 -99 18,000 10,000 0 2F_000 1999 -20 28,000 10,000 0 38,000 2000 -01 38,000 10,000 0 48,000 2001 -02 48,000 10,000 0 58,000 2002 -03 58,000 10,000 0 68,000 2003 -04 68,000 10,000 0 78,000 2004 -05 78.000 10,000 0 88,000 2005 -06 88,000 10,000 0 98,000 2006 -07 98,000 10,000 0 108,000 2007 -08 108,000 10,000 0 118,000 2008 -09 118,000 10,000 0 128,000 2009 -10 120,000 10,000 0 139,000 2010 -11 138,000 10,000 0 148,000 No Planned Uses 2011 -12 148,000 10,000 3,681 154,319 Intranet/property 2012 -13 154,319 0 4,319 150,000 IntraneHoapped 2013 -14 150,000 10,000 0 160,000 No Planned Uses 2014 -15 160,000 10,000 0 170,000 No Known Uses 2015 -16 170,000 10,000 0 180,000 No Known Uses 2016 -17 180.000 10,000 0 190,000 No Known Uses 2017 -18 190,000 10,000 0 200,000 No Known Uses 2018 -19 200,000 10,000 0 210,000 No Known Uses 2019 -20 210,000 10,000 0 220,000 No Known Uses 2020 -21 220,000 10,000 0 230,000 No Known Uses 2021 -22 230,000 10,000 0 240,000 No Known Uses 2022 -23 240,000 10,000 0 250,000 No Known Uses 2023 -24 250,000 10.000 10,000 250,000 Miso, Expenses 2024 -25 250,000 10,000 10,000 250,000 Viso Expenses 2025 -26 2015 -2016 go RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PROPERTY ER II IPRO EC Il 1'ON PROPERTY JPR®TEC'1! ®N FUND The Property Protection Fund provides funds for payments under the Property Value Protection Policy to property owners within 5,000 feet of the landfill for any actual decline in property values that may be directly attributed to their proximity to the Smith Gap Regional Landfill, as determined and outlined under the Policy. The Board of Directors authorized the use of $43,150 to settle a piece of property meeting the property protection guidelines in FY 2014. The Property Protection Fund balance of $400,043 is deemed to be sufficient for its intended purpose. Deposits to this fund may also be made from the proceeds of any property purchased and then resold under the terms of the Policy. Existing funds are adequate for the immediate five -year planning period as shown. "t"I -111 21 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PROPERTY Property Protection Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998 -99 504,061 0 1962 , 502,099 Crawford, Johnson 1999 -20 502,099 0 150 501 949 Appraisal - Brunk 2000 -01 501,949 0 0 501,949 None 2001 -02 501,949 0 125,317 376,632 Crawford, Johnson 2002 -03 376,532 0 697 375,935 Miscellaneous 2003 -04 375,935 92,258 25,000 443,193 Sale of Crawford, Markle 2004 -05 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2005 -06 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2006 -07 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2007 -08 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 200E 09 443,193 0 0 443,193 1 None 200510 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2010 -11 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2011 -12 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2012 -13 443,193 0 0 443,193 None Projected 2013 -14 443,193 0 0 443,193 None Projected 2014 -15 443,193 0 43,150 400,043 Sale of 8385 Bradshaw Rd 2015 -16 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2016 -17 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2017 -18 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2018 -19 400,043 0 0 400;043 None Projected 2019 -20 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2020 -21 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2021 -22 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2022 -23 400,043 1 0 1 0 400,043 None Projected 2023 -24 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2024 -25 400,043 0 0 400,043 None Projected 2025 -26 400,043 261.52016 22 RESERVEFUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE N)INELOFMIENT SITE DEVELOPMENT FUND The Site Development Fund provides funds for the construction of subsequent phases of the Smith Gap Regional Landfill cells. For the current planning period, deposits will be made monthly providing a total annual deposit $500,000. Existing funds are adequate for the immediate five -year planning period as shown. Staff has delayed the construction of Phase VI for another year due to operational improvements and some reductions in the quantity of solid waste being accepted and disposed of The Fund is inadequate for the ten -year planning period and additional deposits to the reserve account or borrowing may be required in the future. The Site Development Fund also serves to assist in complying with post - closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 2015 -2016 23 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE DEVELOPl EN11 Site Development Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998 -99 3,019,000 500,000 314,000 3.205,000 See Attached 1999 -20 3,205,000 500,000 914,591 2,790,409 See Attached 2000 -01 2,790,409 500,000 660,033 2,630,376 See Attached 2001 -02 2,630,376 500,000 104,491 3,025,885 See Attached 2002 -03 3,025,885 500,000 105,973 3,419,912 See Attached 2003 -04 3,419,912 50000 167,375 3,752,537 See Attached 2004 -05 3,752,537 500,000 47,057 4,205,480 See Attached 2005 -06 4,205,480 500000 41,582 4,663,898 See Attached 2006 -07 4,663,898 500,000 904,313 4,259,585 See Attached 2007 -08 4.259,585 1,500.000 4414,187 1,345,398 See Attached &note below 2008 -09 1,345,398 500,000 1,096,295 749,103 See Attached 2009 -10 749,103 300,000 98,985 950,118 See Attached 2010 -11 950,118 100,000 0 1050,118 See Attached 2011 -12 1,050,118 100,000 0 1,150,118 See Attached 2012 -13 1,150,118 500,000 0 1,650,118 See Attached 2013 -14 1,650,118 500,000 0 2,150118 See Attached 2014 -15 2,150,118 500,000 0 2,650,118 See Attached 2015 -16 2,650,118 500,000 50000 3,100,118 See Attached 2016 -17 3,100,118 500,000 3,450,000 150,118 See Attached 2017-18 150,118 500,000 200,000 450,118 See Attached 2018 -19 450,118 500.000 0 950,118 See Attached 2019 -20 950,118 500,000 0 1,450,118 See Attached 2020 -21 1,450,118 500,000 0 1,950,118 See Attached 2021 -22 1,950,118 500,000 0 2,450,118 See Attached 2022 -23 2,450,118 500,000 300,000 2,650,118 See Attached 2023 -24 2,650,118 500,000 21900,000 250,118 See Att ached 2024 -25 250,118 500,000 2,000,000 - 1249,882 See Attached 2025 -2026 Notes: 1. An additional deposit of $1,000,000 was added in FY 2007/2008 to this account from FY 06107 surplus funds. 2015 -2016 24 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority S'V E DEV ILLOPMEN1 COS LS SW 19 t GAP LANDFILL FISCAL YEAR ACTIVITY EXPENSES 2014 -15 no activity engineering phase 6liner (7.64ac) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2015 -16 construction phase 6liner (7.64ac) $ - contruction management $ - engineering phase 6liner (7.64ac) $ 250,000 2016 -17 construction phase 6liner (7.64ac) $ 2,700,000 $ 3,450,000 contruction management $ 500,000 2017 -18 construction phase 6liner (7.64ac) $ 100,060 $ 200,000 contruction management $ 100,000 2018 -19 no activity $ - $ - 2019 -20 no activity $ - $ - 2020 -21 no activity $ - $ - 2021 -22 no activity $ - $ - engineering phase 7liner (10.07 ac) $ 300,000 $ 300,000 2022 -23 construction phase 7 liner (10.07 ac) $ - contruction management $ - YDikII9i[H 25 Reserve Funds Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE 'D'EV ELOPMEN V COSTS CON ptrUUFF) FISCAL YEAR ACTIVITY EXPENSES engineering phase 7liner (10.07 ac) $ - 2023 -24 construction phase 7liner (10.07ac) $ 2,450,000 $ 2,900,000 contruction management $ 450,000 construction phase 7 liner (10.07ac) $ 1,550,000 $ 2,000,000 2024 -25 contruction management $ 450,000 2025 -26 no activity $ - 2026 -27 no activity $ - 2015 -2025 TOTAL $ 8,900,000 estimated casts 2015 -2025 $ 8,900,000 available funds 7/1/2015 $ 2,650,118 additional funds required $ 6,249,882 deposit years 10 annual deposits required $ 624,988 deposit amount (no borrowing required) $ 400,000 $ (2,249,882) $ 500,000 $ (1,249,882) $ 600,000 $ (249,882) NOTES Projections based on actual and estimated costs. 26 Reserve Funds Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CAPITAL ll1Yll.l RO Y JL,IY E V' II_ ]FUN ID CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND In FY 2008 - 2009, The Capital Improvement Fund was established by the Authority, outside the Master Indenture of Trust, to be used for various capital maintenance items and new projects anticipated for the short and long -term ten -year plamring periods. Examples of the projects include: Concrete floor overlay, re- surfacing all asphalt internal roads and parking lots, replacing the beating and cooling systems, renovation and maintenance of all existing building structures, construction of a residential service area, scale maintenance and possibly a new and additional automated, in -bound scale. Projects may be added or amended as the solid waste operations and industry continues to evolve and funds are available. Previously, the Board authorized an independent Facility Wide Assessment (Report) of the facilities owned and operated by the Resource Authority. The Report identified and prioritized several deficiencies that needed to be addressed and the Board authorized staff to proceed with those highpriority projects as soon as possible. The new HVAC system and roofing repairs at the Tinker Creek Transfer Station were identified in the Report mid funds will or have been allocated from this account for those improvements. Also, as noted in the Report and the Equipment Fund, the Gondolas and /or the shipping container conversion need to be addressed and staff has shown funds for the replacement of the gondolas to start in FY 2018. The Board also authorized staff to proceed with the engineering design sufficient to solicit construction bids for the residential service area in several phases and we are currently completing the first phase now. Staff anticipates that this project will be completed in early FY 2015. Funds are to be expended from this account. Additional funding to complete the project may be required or subsequent phases may have to be revised, delayed or eliminated in order to accommodate any funding shortages. This year, staff increased the Capital Improvement Plan funding from $190,000 to $390,000, primarily due to the newly scheduled replacement of the gondolas and to address the needs outlined in the Report and for the Residential Service Area. The additional $200,000 came from other reserves (Closure & Equipment) that were deemed adequate for the five-year planning. This increase funding has only been shown for two years. Even with the increase in Funding, the Capital Improvement Fund is marginally adequate for the immediate five -year planning period as shown and inadequate in the long range plan due to the replacement of the Gondola's. The Capital Improvement Fund also serves to assist in complying with post - closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 2015 -2ar 27 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CAPITAL t 8L Capital Improvement Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 2008 -09 260,000 200,000 0 460,000 No Planned Uses 2000 -10 460,000 201 21,356 638,644 SG Dust& Od Control 2010 -11 638,644 200,000 319,917 518,727 Tipper 8 TS Floor 2011 -12 518,727 200,000 220,271 498,456 Tipper B Hollins Road 2012 -13 498,456 100,000 108,900 489,556 Tipper & Roofing 2013 -14 489,556 613,407 109,798 993,165 RSA Engring B Dirt, HVAC 2014 -15 993,165 190,000 1,090,223 92,942 RSA, HVAC. SG floor, TS Roofing 2015 -16 92,942 390,000 430,000 52,942 RSA, Carpet B Tile 2016 -17 52,942 390,000 50,000 392,942 Steel Plates 2017 -18 392,942 190,000 530,000 52,942 Gondolas, TS Asphalt. B GG Roof 201819 52,942 190,000 260,000 - 17,058 Replacing 2 Gondolas 2019 -20 - 17,058 190,000 410,000 - 237,058 Gondolas & Scales 2020 -21 - 237058 190,000 260,000 - 307,058 Replacing 2 Gondolas 2021 -22 - 307,058 190,000 260,000 - 377,058 Replacing 2 Gondolas 2022 -23 - 377,058 190,000 620.000 - 807,056 Replacing 2 Gondolas & Floor 2023 -24 - 807,058 190,000 260,000 - 877,058 Replacing 2 Gondolas 2024 -25 - 677,058 190,000 260,000 - 947,058 Replacing 2 Gondolas 2025 -26 - 947,058 2026 -27 2027 -28 2028 -29 Notes: Funds ($423,407) from VDOT's purchase of the ROW were deposited in FY 2014 2015-2016 28 RESERVE FUNDS / 2 \ _ e , } / \ / Roanoke Valley Resource Authority R 6_J ROILJ G1­1 ROAD RI S ETR` E FUND RUTR ®UGH ROAD LANDFILL P®S'I'- CLOSURE FUND The Rutrough Road Landfill Post - Closure Fund (RRLF PC Fund) was established with an initial contribution of $5,500,000 per the terms of the `Implementation Agreement For (i) Distribution and Indemnification Agreement dated October 23, 1991 and (ii) Assignment Agreement dated October 23, 1991." The sole purpose of the RRLF PC Fund is to provide the funding necessary for the Authority to manage the post - closure care of the closed Rutrough Road Landfill until (i) such time as the funds in the account are depleted; or, (ii) the Authority determines the account is no longer needed for its intended purpose, in which case, any funds remaining in the account sliall be available for use by the Authority for any authorized purpose. The Rutrough Road Landfill Post - Closure Fund (RRLF PC Fund) is inadequate for the five year planning period. Staff is in the process of developing an alternate method of disposing of the site's leachate which is the single most significant post - closure care cost. Even with the new method of leachate disposal, staff projects the RRLF PC Fund will be depleted in the next three to five years and the Authority will have to assume and fund any remaining post closure -care legal requirements and associated costs. 2015 -2016 30 RESERVE FUNDS wwwwwwwwwwwwpwwuiww ����rvrvrvnnrvrvnnrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvn ry F O a N �Um LL����owemme�opwpmaammrvry o �.o F�mrvdrvderv� .-rvrv� ¢oe �wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww o�rvwwwwwwwpwwwwwpwwww pwwpwwppwwwpwwwpwww U wuLLO ww pwwwpw p wwwwwwww rc�az m w e�pP �m °' __mrvrv��mrvmrvm of w i$'"� wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww awpi a�i w� r if _er «m .. �<<<ry �mrvmrvm o0 LL p° °a ao u wwwwwwwwppwwwwwwwp 0 �£ mmem�.,�mm hwa a u �pmm.ommm - -N 3 0 s wwwwwwwpwwwwwpppwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwp wwwwwwwwwwwwpwwuiww ����rvrvrvnnrvrvnnrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvn ry F O a N w� nu" 1.0 m a O A m =N m P3 _ o " z z � � � m t 2 .2 F � o na mt E v 3 zw �. m _ o C N N N o � m u � W w OXUmi - moo 0 wwwNUi diwwui u w d+ z E o v E E 2 a Es W vL rc rc (1L Nr 8 x w o 0 a N P? wFo0 O o u w Q V N O m C aZ 7 W J F U W ml K G �m F afo ry rcwp$° EK TES m _ won ¢xpo N J W O = GOO > 2 U ~ dcQ"'`o 1 p W W Y N K W w isoo N ao y ----- -- `x N ---- rc a C N E O W u Z S C_ ry Try - _N mmvm�n tae o N mmLL n - 2 mva v w �2 w w w w rn (n rv2 0 f X y en N en ui w w ✓f ✓f � � r» C'-0 Gl Gil Gil �I FA BB BB ® ® ° O c —O O N 1- E E a e» � O QZo = OaN � rcfw�n �n wenwwwwN�nw �U f N 0 W ui vi w w w w w w� w en ui O qW LL u L m 1.0 m a O A m =N m P3 _ o " m � t 2 .2 m m > na mt E v 3 m C E E o � m u v = E m E � v - moo 0 u v o 0 E o v E E 2 m`o N'N Es vL _ (1L Nr 8 ol—'c N P? n o LL O° Q m C a EK TES m _ = ow'mv dcQ"'`o n @ A N E v U `x � E C N E O W C_ ry Try - _N mmvm�n o m mmLL - mva v 0 C'-0 Gl Gil Gil �I FA BB BB ® ® ° O ,,, —O O N 1- E E a e» Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CO VTINGL !'Cll RFSILRVE FUND CON IINGENCY 1, UND The purpose of the Contingency Fund is to provide (i) rate stabilization on an annual basis; and (ii) emergency funding for unforeseen increases in expenses or decreases in revenues. All reasonable efforts will be made to maintain a minimum balance in the Contingency Fund equal to 8 -10% of the Authority's total annual operating budget for the current fiscal year. Funds are adequate for the immediate planning period. The Contingency Fund also serves to assist in complying with post - closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 201 &201 f 33 `tESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Ql N ^r _NF(� EN Y RESFRV FUND Date Amounts June 30 1994 Surplus from operations $ 296,864 $ 296,864 June 30 1995 Surplus from operations $ 836,358 $ 1,133,222 June 30 1996 Surplus from operations $ 989,940 $ 2,123,162 June 30 1997 Surplus from operations $ 335,254 $ 2,458,416 July 1 1997 Transfer to Future Site Development $ (920,000) $ 1,538,416 July 1 1997 Transfer Prom Recycling Reserve $ 243,053 $ 1,781,469 June 30 1998 Surplus from operations $ 1,017,184 $ 2,798,653 June 30 1999 Surplus from opeations $ 1,216,266 $ 4,014,919 June 30 2000 Surplus from operations $ 1,808,425 $ 5,823,344 June 30 2001 Surplus from operations $ 1,363,227 $ 7,186,571 June 30 2002 Deficit from operations $ (494,012) $ 6,692,509 June 30 2003 Deficit from operations $ (451,845) $ 6,240,714 June 30 2004 Surplus from operations $ 224,069 $ 6,464,783 June 30 2005 Surplus from operations $ 18,773 $ 6,483556 June 30 2006 Surplus from operations $ 276,040 $ 6,759,596 July 2006 Transfer for 06 -07 Operating Budget $ (783555) $ 5,976,041 July 1 2007 Transfer for 07 -08 Operating Budget $ (926,499) $ 5,049542 June 30 2008 Surplus from operations $ 873,246 $ 5,922,788 1 -Jul 2008 Transfer for 08-09 Operating Budget $ (1,289,635) $ 4,633,153 June 30 2009 Surplus from operations $ 70,441 S 4,703,594 1 -Jul 2009 Transfer for 09 -10 Operating Budget $ (2,053,044) $ 2,650,550 June 30 2010 Surplus from operations FY 2010 $ 637,465 $ 3,288,015 June 30 2011 Transfer for paying off Bond Debt $ (3,171,248) $ 116,767 1 -Jul 2011 Surplus from operations FY 2011 $ 244,082 $ 360,849 Mar 2012 'Transfer Funds from Post Develop. $ 244,000 $ 604,849 June 30 2012 Surplus from operations FY 2012 $ 1,140,111 $ 1,744,960 Sept1 2012 Transfer for Operating Budget 12-13 $ (490,991) $ 1,253,969 Jan 23 2013 Transfer for Residential Service Area $ (62,130) $ 1,191,839 June 30 2013 Surplus From Operations $ 425,662 $ 1,617,501 July 1 2013 'Transfer for Operating Budget 13-14 $ (405,405) $ 1,212,096 July 1 2014 Surplus from Operating $ 543,103 $ 1,755,199 'Total $ 1,755,199 Beginning Budget: 2014-15 $ 456,323 Contingency Funds Available $ 1,298,876 PROPOSED USES Through June 30, 2025 Reserved for Equipment $ _ Through June 30, 2025 Reserved for Site Development $ - Through June 30, 2025 Reserved for Capital $ - Total $ - AVAILABLE for future FEE REDUCTION $ 1,298,876 Proposed Budget 2015 -2016 $ 434,974 Contingency balance $ 863,902 201,42016 34 JROANO E VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 111, II I:� Lip IN 1 1 f RANSF ER STATION Roanoke Valley Resource Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS Budget Summary 1 1&2 Capital Reserves Tipping Pees Breakdown Rutrough Road Landfill Appendix 24 -25 26 -27 28 29 -30 2015-2016 BUDGES OARY 20152016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY Total $ 8,525,174 EXPENSES REVENUE 2015 -2016 Disposal Fees $ 7,981,200 Interest Income $ 35,000 Transfer from Contingency Reserve Fund $ 434,974 Sale of Recyclable Material $ 38,000 Miscellaneous - MulchSales $ 36,000 'Transfer - Rutrough Road $ - 1 Total $ 8,525,174 EXPENSES Personnel Administrative $ 665,851 Transfer Station $ 712,528 Smith Gap $ 804,848 Totals $ 2,183,227 Operating Administrative $ 399,945 'Transfer Station $ 2,478,681 Smith Gap $ 1,338,321 Totals $ 4,216,947 Capital Administrative $ - 'f muster Station $ 15,000 Smith Gap $ 10,000 'Totals $ 25,000 Reserves Administrative $ - '1'ransferStation $ 559,700 Smith Gap $ 1,540,300 'Totals $ 2,100,000 Debt Service $ - Totals Administrative $ 1,065,795 Transfer Station $ 3,765,909 Smith Gap $ 3,693,470 Total $ 8,525,174 2015 -2016 RUDG17F 1 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority REVENUE SUMMARY 2010 -2011 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Disposal Pees $ 7,786,670 $ 7,594,400 $ 7,326,600 $ 7,729,480 $ 7,932,050 $ 7,981,200 Interest Income $ 200,000 $ 45,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 32,000 $ 35,000 Transfer from Contingency $ 1,629,080 $ 1,596,087 $ 490,991 $ 405,405 $ 456,323 $ 434,974 Reserve Fund Sale of Recyclable $ 44,640 $ 50,600 $ 55,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 38,000 Material Miscellaneous - Mulchsalec $ 38,000 $ 59,800 $ 39,450 $ 39,450 $ 46,830 $ 36,000 Transfer - Rutrough Road $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 'TOTAL $ 9,823,390 $ 9,470,887 $ 7,940,041 $ 8,237,335 $ 8,502,203 $ 8,525,174 EXPENSES Personnel $ 1,818,943 $ 1,863,655 $ 1,972540 $ 2,004,856 $ 2,126,647 $ 2,183,227 Operating $ 3,907,661 $ 3,828,652 $ 3,995,501 $ 4,118,479 $ 4,260,556 $ 4,216,947 Capital $ 15,000 $ - $ 12,000 $ 14,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 'Transfer to Reserves $ 1,310,000 S 1,010,000 $ 1,960,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 Debt Service $ 2,771,786 $ 2,768,580 $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 9,823,390 $ 9,470,887 $ 7,940,041 $ 8,237,335 $ 8502,203 $ 8525,174 DISPOSAL EIEES Municipal $ per ton Private $ per ton % INCREASIE in expenses 45 45 45 47 48 49 55 55 55 57 58 59 -5.6% -3.6% -16.2% 3.7% 2 3.2% 0.3% 2015 -2016 RUDGFT quEs 2015 -2016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority REVENUES CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 493 Total '1'ipping Pees $7,932,050 $ 7,981,200 Based on tonnage receipts of: 153,120 Municipal 83,720 tons $ 4,044,500 Commercial 39,000 tons $ 2,290,100 Private 21,500 tons $ 1,230,100 Residential 8,900 tons $ 416,500 Total $ 7,981,200 401 Interest Income $ 32,000 $ 35,000 Operating & Other Reserve $ 35,000 956 Transfer from Contingency $ 456,323 $ 434,974 Funds available from Contingency Reserve Reserve Fund 460 Sale of Recyclable $ 35,000 $ 38,000 Sale of Recyclable Scrap Material Metal & Miscellaneous 515 Miscellaneous $ 46,830 S 36,000 Mulch Sales Revenue 976 Transfer from $ - $ - Transfer to operating budget Rutrough Road Fund for administrative Services TOTALREVENUE $8,502,203 $ 8,525,174 2015-20165UDGFT FICATION 49 $1,915,900 35 $ 70,000 120 $ 5,400 5 $ 2,500 $ 1,993,800 49 $1,764,000 35 $ 105,000 120 $ 8,400 5 $ 4,000 J $ 1,881,400 49 $ 161,700 35 $ 7,000 120 $ 600 5 $ $ 169,300 59 $ 2,265,600 35 $ 21,000 120 $ - 5 $ 3,500 $ 2,290,100 2015- 2016BUD= WMIEFRuarmmsix FICATION 59 $1,144,600 35 $ 70,000 120 $ 12,000 5 $ 3,500 $ 1,230,100 )sal Allocation 53s% $ 222,828 412% $ 171,598 53% $ 22,075 C� $49 $ 343,000 $35 $ 66,500 © $5 $ 7,000 $ 416,500 20152016BODGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority EXPENSE PERSONNEL 2015 -2016 BUDGE'] ON 11,1 :)N olidays aintenance arthme nployees $ 1,029,933 nployees nployees $ 95,312 nployees $ 39,109 nployees $ 207,141 5.0% th th th th th Annual$ $ 135,022 $ 28,070 $ 20,068 $ 58,126 $ 13,956 4 per month rployees $1,332,386 1ployees $ 39,109 ays 50% $2,654 aye 100W, 1ployecs tployces $1,332,386 2015-20163WC67 aoanake Vaney aesnume Avithorlty PhRS®NNEL ADMIN CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 1010 Salaries $ 437,489 $ 456,656 Salaries for 5 employees 1015 Overtime $ - $ - Extra work required on Saturdays & Holidays 1020 Part - time $ - $ - Operat ions, Buildings, and Grounds Maintenance 1116 Supplements $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Outstanding performance recognition 2100 F.LC.A. $ 33,468 $ 34,934 7.65 % of salaries, overtime, part time 2200 Retirement -VRS $ 48,824 $ 45,635 11.12 % of salaries 4 employees $ 410,385 2202 Deferred Comp. Match $ 3,250 $ 3,250 $25 per pay period 5 employees 2203 Retirement - VRS Plan 2 $ - $ - 12.04 % of salaries 0 employees $ - 2204 Retirement - City $ - $ - 22.24 % of salaries 1 employees $ - 2205 Retirement- VRSHybrid $ - $ 5,571 12.04 % of salaries 1 employees $ 46,270 2300 Hospitalization $ 63,516 $ 70,210 9 participating employees 6.0% Annual$ single 2 $536 per month $ 13,502 Retiree 4 $557 per month $ 28,070 em &ap 1 $796 per month $ 10,034 family 1 $923 per month $ 11,625 Em & Ch 1 $582 per month $ 6,978 2310 Dental $ 2,039 $ 2,039 5 participating employees ® $34 per month 2400 Life Insurance - VRS $ 5,775 $ 5,434 1 .19 A of salaries 5 employees $ 456,656 2401 Life Insurance - City $ - $ - 1.39 % of salaries 0 employees $ - 2500 Long Term Disability Ins. $ 847 $ 884 0.39% salaries RVRA pays 50% $884 2510 Short Term Disability Ins. $ 219 $ 259 RVRA pays 100% 2700 Workers'Comp. Ins. $ 867 $ 867 Workers'Comp. Insurance 5 employees 2750 Retirement Health Insurance Credit $ 1,094 $ 1,324 0.29 % of salaries 5 employees $ 456,656 2800 Termination Pay $ - $ 10,000 Annual and sick leave payments 2810 Cash-in FIX $ 16,827 $ 17,564 Flexible Leave pay out 2830 Employee Benefits $ 8,759 $ 9,224 Retiree Health Insurance TOTAL PERSONNEL $ 624,974 $ 665,851 2015- 2016BUDGET •,'""' NN EL TS )N llidays ainterance art time mloyces $ 261,930 aployees yloyees S 29,307 ,ployees S 39,109 yloyees $ 97,403 .0% Annual$ [h $ 54,009 th $ - th $ 10,034 th $ 23,251 th $ - 1 per month iployces $ 388,640 iployees $ 39,109 ,ys50% $828 rys100% ,ployees iployees $ 388,640 2015-2016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PERSONNEL SG CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 1010 Salaries 5 423,289 $ 487,090 Salaries for 13 employees 1015 Overtime $ 30,000 $ 22,000 Extra work required on Saturdays & Holidays 1020 Part - time $ 17,000 $ 17,000 Operations, Buildings, and Grounds Maintenance 1116 Supplements $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Outstanding performance recognition 2100 F.LCA. $ 35,977 $ 40,246 7.65 % of salaries, overtime, part time 2200 Retirement - VRS $ 38,628 $ 39,767 11.12 % ofsalaries 9 employees $ 357,617 2202 Deferred Comp. Match $ 8,150 j $ 8,450 $25 per pay period 13 employees 2203 Retirement - VRS - Plan 2 $ - $ 7,947 12.04 % of salaries 2 employees $ 66,005 2204 Retirement -City $ 17,153 $ - 2223 % of salaries 0 employees $ - 2205 Retirement - VRS- Hybrid $ - $ 7,642 1204 % of salaries 2 unployees $ 63,468 2300 Hospitalization $ 95,227 $ 97,739 13 participating employees 5.0% single 10 $536 per month Retiree 0 $557 per month em &sp 0 $796 per month family 2 $923 per month Eno & Ch 1 $582 per month Annual$ $ 67,511 $ - $ - S 23,251 $ 6,978 2310 Dental $ 4,487 $ 5,302 13 participating employees ® $34 per month 2400 Life Insurance - VRS $ 4,569 $ 5,796 1.19 % w salaries 13 employees $ 487,090 2401 Life Insurance - City $ 1,073 $ - 1.39 % of salaries 0 employees S - 2500 Long 'Term Disability Ins. $ 819 $ 943 039% salaries RVRA pays 50% $943 2510 Short Term Disability Ins. $ 212 $ 672.41 RVRA pays 100°k 2700 Workers Comp. Ins. $ 13,500 $ 29,633 Workers' Comp. Insurance 13 employees 2750 Retirement Health Insurance Credit $ 865 $ 1,413 0.29 % of salaries 13 employees $ 487,090 2800 Termination Pay $ - S - Annual and sick leave payments 2810 Cash -in FLF $ 4,578 $ 5,225 Flexible Leave pay out 2830 Employee Benefits $ 19,269 $ 23,983 Retiree Health Insurance TOTAL PERSONNEL $ 718,796 $ 804,848 2015 -2016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PI.RSONNEL. TOTALS CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL two Salaries $ 1,371,495 $ 456,656 $ 427,749 $ 487,090 1015 Overtime $ 52,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ 22,000 1020 Part - time $ 34,000 $ - $ 17,000 $ 17,000 1116 Supplements $ 10,000 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 2100 F.LCA. $ 111,498 $ 34,934 $ 36,318 $ 40,246 2200 Retirement - VRS $ 114,529 $ 45,635 $ 29,127 $ 39,767 2202 Deferred Comp. Match $ 18,850 $ 3,250 $ 7,150 $ 8,450 2203 Retirement- VRS Plan 2 $ 11,476 $ - $ 3,529 $ 7,947 2204 Retirement - City $ 8,694 $ - $ 8,694 $ - 2205 Retirement - VRS Hybrid $ 24,940 $ 5,571 $ 11,727 $ 7,642 2300 Hospitalization $ 255,242 $ 70,210 $ 87,293 $ 97,739 2310 Dental S 11,829 $ 2,039 $ 4,487 $ 5,302 2400 Life Insurance - VRS $ 15,855 $ 5,434 $ 4,625 $ 5,796 2401 Life Insurance - City $ 044 $ - $ 544 $ - 2500 Long Term Disability Ins. $ 2,654 $ 884 $ 828 $ 943 2510 Short Tenn Disability Ins. $ 1,500 $ 259 $ 569 $ 672 2700 Workera Comp. Ins. $ 44,000 $ 867 $ 13,500 $ 29,633 2730 Retirement Health Insurance Credit $ 3,864 $ 1,324 $ 1,127 $ 1,413 2800 Termination Pay $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - 2810 Cash in FLP $ 26,758 $ 17,564 $ 3,968 $ 5,225 2830 Employee Benefits $ 53,500 $ 9,224 $ 20,293 $ 23,983 TOTAL PERSONNEL $ 2,183,227 $ 665,851 $ 712,528 $ 804,848 2015 -2016 BUDGET 10 «a„ k vanes aesour e A.01 ow 1 U PERSONNEL POSITION N GRADE CURRENT PAY RANGE CEO 1 U Unclassified Operations Manager 1 37 $ 75,897 to $ 120,676 Environmental & Safety Manager 1 33 $ 62,441 to $ 99,281 Business Manager 1 30 $ 53,939 to $ 85,763 Operations Supervisor 2 27 $ 46,594 to $ 74,084 Administrative Coodinator 1 25 $ 42,263 to $ 67,198 Senior Equipment Operator 2 23 $ 38,333 to $ 60,949 Business Supervisor 1 22 $ 36,508 to $ 58,048 Building Maintenance Mechanic 1 21 $ 34,769 to $ 55,283 Motor Equipment Mechanic 1 21 $ 34,769 to $ 55,283 Motor Equipment Operator 11 15 19 $ 31,537 to $ 50,144 Motor Equipment Operator 1 1 17 $ 28,605 to $ 45,482 Scale Operator 1 16 $ 27,243 to $ 43,316 Laborer /Operator 0 13 $ 23,533 to $ 37,417 1'0 '1'AL SALARIES Adjustments: Market Performance TOTAL ADJUSTED SALARIES 29 2.0% 2.0% mid -point $ 1,477,659 Reclass(s) Total 11 $ 1,315,629 6/30/2015 $ 26,313 $ 29,553 $ 55,866 $ 1,371,495 2015 -2016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley ResonmeAuffionty PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE BY LOCATION POSITION # GRADE ADMIN. TRANSFER LANDFILL CEO 1 U 1 0 0 Operations Manager 1 37 1 0 0 Environmental & Safety Manager 1 34 1 0 0 Business Manager 1 30 1 0 0 Operations Supervisor 2 27 0 1 1 Administrative Coordinator 1 25 1 0 0 Senior Equipment Operator 2 23 0 1 1 Business Supervisor 1 22 0 1 0 Building Maintenance Mechanic 1 21 0 1 0 Motor Equipment Mechanic 1 21 0 0 1 Motor Equipment Operator II 15 19 0 6 10 Motor Equipment Operator I 1 17 0 0 0 Scale Operator 1 16 0 1 0 Laborer /Operator 0 13 0 0 0 TOTAL EMPLOYEES 29 11 13 2015 - 2016 BUDGET 12 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority EXPENSES OPERATING 2015 -2018 BUDGET 13 MON i employees; >m testing rogram: yees $ 472 ng mpling $ 14,904 r $ 38,000 $ 24,000 $ 21,000 $ 5,200 $ 15,300 TS $ 24,500 $ 51,000 $ 3,060 Is Q e $ 20,000 $ 6,720 $ 40,000 eS $ 24,000 $ 600 $ 600 m 51000 $ 13,500 $ 48,500 $ 9,000 $ 3,500 $ 4,000 $ 2,000 143,200 I 3.0% decrease $ 1,578,600 $ 345,780 $ 1,924,380 2015-2016euDcur Roanoke Valley R,.- OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL 3004 Medical $ 1,000 Physical exams for new employees; $ 1,000 S - $ - E.xams drug and alcohol random testing 3007 Contract $ 264,156 Employee Assistance Program: Services $16.28 9 x 29 employees $ 472 $ 472 $ - $ - Groundwater Monitoring *Drinking Water Sampling 249$621 $ 14,904 $ - $ - $ 14,904 *Monitoring Wells 6 wells; 2 events /year $19,000 /event= $ 38,000 $ - $ - $ 38,000 Stormwater Discharge *Permit Sampling $ 24,000 $ - $ 2,500 $ 21,500 4 samples *Lab Cost 4 samples $ 21,000 $ - $ 750 $ 20,250 Gas Monitoring Quarterly 9 $1,300 $ 5,200 $ - $ - $ 5,200 Montldy 9 $1,275 $ 15,300 $ 15,300 title V, e -GGRT, CC & TS $ 24,500 $ 24,500 Clean Valley Council 12 months S 51,000 $ 51,000 $ - $ - Landscaping $255 /month $ 3,060 $ - $ 3,060 $ - Tire Disposal - 250 Tons Cal $70.00 + Fuel Surcharge S 20,000 S - $ 20,000 $ - Copier Rental S560 /month $ 6,720 $ 6,720 $ - $ - HHW Disposal $ 40,000 $ 40,000 3011 Janitorial $ 24,000 Services for all Facilities Service $2000 /month $ 24,000 $ - $ 16,800 $ 7,200 3012 Exterminating $ 1,200 T.S. -$50 /month $ 600 $ - $ 600 $ - Services S.G. -$50 /month $ 600 $ - $ - $ 600 File & Record Retention $ 5,000 $ 5,000 3013 Professional $ 85,500 Auditing Services $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ - $ - Services Legal Services $ 48,500 $ 48,500 $ - $ - Engineering Services $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Software support $ 3,500 $ - $ 3,500 $ - Outside Legal $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ - $ - Leachate sampling $ 2,000 $ 2,000 3029 Municipal $1,924,380 N S tons shipped 143,200 Waste 62 tons /car = 2,310 $ - 1,800 cars: $877 /car $ 1578,600 510 cars:$678 /car $ 345,780 $ - Total $ 1,924,380 $ - $1,924,380 $ 20162016 BLDGE'r 14 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority OPERATING ING CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 3030 Waste Water Freight $ 227,825 $ 203,700 Leachate Cars 300 Cars Q $679 $ 203,700 3035 Stone Car Freight Charge $ 14,000 $ 13,560 Stone Cars 20 Cars Q $678 $ 13,560 3101 'temporary Help $ - $ - Buildings and grounds maintenance 3202 Repairs /Office Equipment $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Maintenance and repairs to office equipment 3204 Repairs to Vehicles $ 7,200 $ 7,200 Maintenance and repairs to all road vehicles 3206 Repairs to Data $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Maintenance and repairs to processing all data processing equipment 3208 Repairs to Buildings $ 110,000 $ 110,000 Maintenance and repairs to all buildings and Grounds and property; pump stations, septic tanks. 3209 Repairs to Other $ 190,000 $ 190,000 Construction Equipment Equipment Oft Road Vehicles $ 155,000 Tipper $ 15,000 Railcars $ 5,000 Miscellaneous Equipment $ 15,000 Tub Grinder, Seeder, etc. 3530 Printed Forms S 2,600 $ 3,000 Letterhead, envelopes, cards, scale tickets repair orders, purchasing farms includes General Counsel 3610 Advertising $ 4,500 $ 4,500 Personnel, RAP, bids, public hearings, etc. 3620 Public Information $ 850 $ 850 Handouts $ 150 User Brochures $ 400 III IW Brochures $ 200 Miscellaneous $ 100 2015-2016BUDGE'I 15 Roanoke Valley Resource OPERATING 2015-2016 BUDGET 16 CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL 3030 Waste Water Freighi $ 203,700 Payments to NS to haul leachate from $ - $ - $ 203,700 Smith Gap 3035 Stone Car Freight $ 13,560 Payments to NS to haul stone to Smith $ - $ - S 13,560 Charge Gap 3101 Temporary Help $ - Buildings and grounds maintenance S - $ - $ - 3202 Repairs /Office $ 1,000 Maintenance and repairs to $ 1,000 $ - $ - Equipment office equipment 3204 Repairs to Vehicles $ 7,200 Maintenance and repairs to all road $ 4,500 $ 1,350 $ 1,350 vehicles 3206 Repairs to Data $ 6,000 Maintenance and repairs to $ 6,000 $ - $ - Processing all data processing equipment 3208 Repairs to Buildings $ 110,000 Maintenance and repairs to all building $ 10,000 S 55,000 and Grounds and property; pumnp stations, septic tanks. F445,000 3209 Repairs to Other $ 190,000 Construction Equipment Equipment Off Road Vehicles $ 155,000 $ - $ 85,000 Tipper $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Railcars $ 5,000 5 5,000 $ - Miscellaneous Equipment $ 15,000 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 Tub Grinder, Seeder, etc 3530 Printed Forms $ 3,000 Letterhead, envelopes, cards, scale 3,000 $ - $ - tickets repair orders, purchasing forms includes General Counsel 3610 Advertising $ 4,500 Personnel, RAP, bids, public hearings, $ 4,500 $ - $ - ete. 3620 Public Information $ 850 Handouts $ 850 $ - $ - User Brochures HHW Brochures Miscellaneous 2015-2016 BUDGET 16 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -I6 JUSTIFICATION 3625 Promotional Articles $ 400 $ 400 Recycling handouts, pens, pencils, miscellaneous items 3630 Special Events $ 3,500 $ 3,500 Annual Employee Functions & Customer Appreciation Da 4600 Central Services $ 63,000 $ 60,000 Administrative services, Roanoke County /Roanoke City for data processing, .accounting, web updates, miscellaneous 5110 Utilities - Electricity $ 69,000 $ 69,000 Transfer Station .",2,250 /month $ 27,000 Smith Gan Landfill $3,500 /month $ 42,000 5121 Utilities - Heat - Fuel $ 29,000 $ 34,000 Transfer Station Natural Gas $ 6,000 Smith Gap Landfill Propane Gas $ 28,000 5141 Water Service - Transfer $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Water & Sewer Service for Transfer Station Station 5142 Sewer Service - Transfer $ 22,750 $ 21,000 Sewer Service_ leachatge Smith Gap Station 300 Leachate can $3.50 /1000gal- WVWAFee $ 21,000 5210 Postage $ 4,500 $ 4,500 Postage for all mailings and correspondence, postage meter rent includes General Counsel 5230 'telephone $ 6,000 $ 6,000 'Telephone service to both facilties, long distance calls, & credit card processing 5233 Internet Lines $ 8,000 $ 7,500 Fees for internet service at Smith Gap Landfill and Transfer Station 5235 Cell Phones $ 4,500 $ 5,000 Service for cell phones 2015-2016BUDGFT 17 R ... kevzuey Resource Awh.de, OPERATING 2015- 2016RUDGRT 18 CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION ADMEN TRANSFER LANDFILL 3625 Promotional Articles $ 400 Recycling handouts, pens, $ 400 $ - $ - pencils, miscellaneous items 3630 Special Events $ 3,500 Annual P,mployee Functions & $ 3,500 $ - $ - Customer Appreciation Day 4600 Central Services $ 60,000 Achimustrative services, $ 60,000 $ - $ - Roanoke County/ Roanoke City for data processing, accounting, web update, misc. 5110 Utilities - Electricity $ 69,000 Transfer Station $ - $ 27,000 $ 42,000 $2,250 /month Smith Gap Landfill $3,500 /month 5121 Utilities - Heat - Fuel $ 34,000 Transfer Station $ - $ 6,000 $ 28,000 Natural Gas Smith Gap Landfill propane Gas 5141 Water Service - $ 10,000 Water & Sewer Scrvice for Transfe $ - $ 10,000 $ - Transfer Station Station 5142 Sewer Service- $ 21,000 Sewer Service $ - $ - $ 21,000 Transfer Station Leachate - Smith Gap 5210 Postage $ 4,500 Postage for all mailings and $ 4,500 $ - $ - correspondence, postage meter rent, includes General Counsel 5230 Telephone $ 6,000 'Telephone service to both facilites $ 6,000 $ - $ - & long distance calls & Credit Card 5233 Internet Lines $ 7,500 Fees for Late net service Q S. Gap $ 1,980 $ - $ 5,520 5235 Coll Phones $ 5,000 Service for cell phones $ 5,000 $ - $ - 2015- 2016RUDGRT 18 19 1TION ngs, contents, vehicles 1. or VACO pools les & property s Hquipment ent as for RVRA rrd Members e lodging, SWANA, s, including meals is; SWANA, VML, gs, dinners, and ✓ith RVRA azardous materials, anus to: $ 300,000 $ 100,000 ue S 2,000 2015-2016 BUDGE IEINu 20 RANSFFR LANDFILL 5 $ 6 $ - 6 - $ 6 $ $ 2,640 $ 2,640 6 - $ 6 500 $ 500 6 250 $ 250 i 1,500 $ 500 100,000 $ 302,000 20152016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource AulhuTey OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 5801 Dues $ 2,100 $ 2,100 Professional & Association dues: SWANA, SWVSWMA, & iAAP Returned check fees and misc. fees 5815 Warrants and Fees $ 34,200 $ 51,200 DEQ & City annual fees $37,000 Credit Card fees $4,200; CAR CC FEE $10,000 5823 Employee Recognition $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Awards and Certificates 5850 Miscellaneous Operating $ - $ - No programs planned 6010 Office Supplies $ 3,900 $ 3,900 Office paper, pens, pencils, folders, etc. 6011 Photocopies $ 400 $ 400 Miscellaneous Photocopies 6013 Small Equipment & $ 30,500 $ 36,200 Items of office and shop equipment Supplies and supplies, tools, computers 6040 Medical Supplies $ 500 $ 500 Supplies for first aid kits & medicine cabinet 6050 Janitorial Supplies $ 3,400 $ 3,400 Supplies for general cleaning & sanitation 6071 Radio Parts $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Communications Equipment & Fees 6080 Gas, Oil, Grease $ 420,000 $ 400,000 Fuel for all equipment and vehicles, includes oil, lubricants 6091 Tires, 'Iubes, Parts $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Replacement and maintenance parts and supplies for all equipment and vehicles 6130 Uniform and Wearing $ 21,400 $ 21,400 Safety Shoes & Jeans $ 7,100 Apparel Rain gear, shirts, hats, misc. $ 5,500 Purchase of uniforms $ 8,800 20152016 BUD= 21 Roavoke Valley Resovme Authodfy OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN fRANSFEF LANDFILL 5801 Dues $ 2,100 Professional & Association dues: $ 2,100 $ - $ - SWANA,SWVSWMA, & IAAP Returned check fees and muse. fees 5815 Warrants and Fees $ 51,200 DEQ annual fee- -$30,000 $ 1,200 $ 9,500 5 40,500 Collectioi, Pees $1,200 5823 Employee Recognition $ 6,000 Awards and Certificates $ 6,000 $ - $ - 5850 Miscellaneous Operati $ - No programs planned $ - $ - $ - 6010 Office Supplies $ 3,900 Office paper, pens, pencils, folders, etc. $ 3,900 $ - $ - 6011 Photocopies $ 400 Miscellaneous Photocopies $ 400 $ - $ - 6013 Small Equipment & $ 36,200 Items of office and shop equipment $ 8,500 $ 12,100 $ 15,600 Supplies and supplies, tools, computers 6040 Medical Supplies $ 500 Supplies for first aid kits & medicine $ - $ 250 $ 250 cabinets 6050 Janitorial Supplies $ 3,400 Supplies for general cleaning & $ 3,400 $ - $ - sanitation 6071 Radio Parts S 4,000 Communications Equipment & Fees $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 6080 Gas, Oil, Grease $ 400,000 Fuel for all equipment and vehicles, $ 16,000 $ 144,000 $ 240,000 includes oil, lubricants 6091 Tires, To bes, Parts $ 50,000 Replacement and maintenance parts an $ 8,000 $ 15,000 $ 27,000 supplies for all equipment and vehicles 6130 Uniform and Wearing $ 21,400 Safety Shoes & Jeans $ 125 $ 2,750 $ 4,225 Apparel Rain gear, shirts, hats, MISS. $ 3,500 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Purchase of uniforms $ - $ 3,350 $ 5,450 20152016 BUDGEI 22 Roanoke Valley Resuoree Authority OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 6202 Subscriptions $ 200 $ 260 Professional magazines and manuals 6203 Books $ 200 $ 200 Miscellaneous books and manuals 6211 Code Books $ - $ - Miscellaneous legal code books 6501 Other Operating Supplies $ 40,000 $ 50,000 Disinfectants, deodorizers, salt for roads, gravel and stone for roads, seed, mulch fertilizers and lime for seeding slopes, fill areas and other areas, miscellaneous office supplies 6503 Fire Equipment and Supplies $ 1,200 S 1,200 Fire hoses & extinguishers replacements & and for annual inspections for both facilities 6510 Safety Equipment $ 2,000 $ 2,400 Dust mask, safety glasses, etc. 9670 Unappropriated Balance $ 52,599 $ 52,061 For unexpected expenditures 1.25% TOTAL OPERATING $ 4,260,556 $ 4,216,947 201 520 16 6UDGET 23 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN TRANBFF. LANDFILL 6202 Subscriptions $ 260 Professional magazines and manuals $ 260 $ - $ - 6203 Books $ 200 Miscellaneous books and manuals $ 200 $ - $ - 6211 Code Books $ - Miscellaneous legal code books $ - $ - $ - 6501 Other Operating Supplies $ 50,000 Disinfectants, deodorizers, salt for roads, gravel & stone for roads, seed, mulch fertilizers & lime for seeding slopes, fill areas and other areas, miscellaneous office supplies $ - $ 5,500 $ 44,500 6503 Fire Equipment and Supplies $ 1,200 Fire hoses & extinguishers replacements & and for annual inspections for both facilities $ - $ 600 $ 600 6510 Safety Equipment $ 2,400 Dust mask, safety glasses, etc. $ - $ 1,200 $ 1,200 SUB -TOTAL $ 54,060 $ 460 $ 7,300 $ 46,300 TOTALS PAGES 1324 $ 395,007 $2,448,080 $1,321,799 9670 Unappropriated Balance $ 52,061 For unexpected expenditure! L25% $ 4,938 $ 30,601 $ 16,522 TOTAL OPERATINC $4,216,947 $399,945 $2,478,681 $1,338,321 2015- 2016BUDGET 24 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority C' m IDT'T A 7 25 ATION trial mower at SG 2015-2016BUDGET 2015- 2016BUDGET ]CC ILI\ Y L3 26 JUSTIFICATION s required by State ad Federal Regulations t dose Smith Gap andfill lose 7 Acres or replacement of luipment per luipment replacement hedule. roundwater refection fund per cal permit. s per local permit. dranet /property s per local permit. urrent fund is ]equate based on iticipated sales. rz future construction the landfill igincering for Phase I )r maintenance and tprovements to the cilitics. iA, Bathrooms, upet r unexpected expenses d for tipping fee tbilization 2015 -2016 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RESERVES CODE. DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION DEPOSIT ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL FY15 -16 924500 Landfill Closure As required by State $ 200,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 190,000 and Federal regulations to close Smith Gap Regional Landfill 925010 Equipment For replacement of $1,000,000 $ - $ 354,700 $ 645,300 Reserve Fund equipment per equipment replacement schedule. 925020 Groundwater Groundwater $ - $ - $ - $ Protection Fund protection fund per local permit. 925030 Landfill Host As per local permit. $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 Community intranet /property Improvement Fund 925040 Property Value As per local permit. $ - $ - $ - $ - Protection Current fund is adequate based on anticipated sales. 925050 Future Site For future construction $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 Development of the landfill No planned expenditur 925065 Capital For maintenance and $ 390,000 $ - $ 195,000 $ 195,000 Improvement improvements to the Fund facilities. 00840- Contingency For unexpected expense $ - $ - $ - $ - 0929 Reserve and for tipping fee Fund stabilization TOTAL RESERVE $2,100,000 $ - $ 559,700 $ 1,540,300 FUNDS 2015 -2016 RUDM 27 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Roanoke Valley Resourre Authority TIPPING FEE BREAKDOWN ALL OPERATIONS CATEGORY ADMIN LANDFILL TRANSFER TOTAL PERCENT PERSONNEL $ 665,851 $ 804,848 5 712,528 $ 2,183,227 26'7 OPERATIONS $ 399,945 $ 1,363,321 $ 2,478,681 $ 4,241,947 50% DEPOSITS AND RESERVES $ - $ 1,540,300 $ 559,700 $ 2,100,000 25% TOTAL $ 1,065,795 $ 3,708,470 $ 3,750,909 $ 8,525,174 100% PERCEN'T'AGE 13% 44% 44% 100% TRAM SPQR T A I ]ON CATEGORY LANDFILL TRANSFER 'LO'LAL PERCENT MUNICIPAL FREIGIIT $ - $ 1,924,380 $ 1,924,380 23% LEACHATE TANKERS $ 203,700 $ - $ 203,700 2% STONE $ 13,560 $ - $ 13,560 0% TOTAL $ 217,260 $ 1,924,380 $ 2,141,640 25% 3% 23% 25% Required Tipping Fee '. Deposits from Contingency funds allow Municipal $ 52 per ton fora lower tipping fee charge. Commercial $ 62 per ton 2015- 2016BUDGET 28 Roanoke Valley Resouree Authority RUTROUGH ROAD LANDFILL 2013 -20 UDGCT � T lI'lr'Tr � 11 T � l� n U ALILL 29 ATION ily 1, 2015 Activities ome from 20152016B0DGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RU,IROUGH ROAD CODE DESCRIPTION FY14 -15 FY15 -16 JUSTIFICATION 3007 Contract Services $ 87,000 $ 87,000 Groundwater Monitoring Lab Analysis - 2 Events $ 42,000 Gas Monitoring Quarterly $1500 /Event S 6,000 Gas Extraction System $ 18,000 monitoring Cap Maintenance $ 10,000 miscellaneous seeding, grading, E & S control care Air Emissions $ 11,000 Corrective Action $ - Plan 3013 Professional Services $1,564,000 $1,332,385 Engineering Services Groundwater Sampling 2 Events Q $22,000 $ 44,000 Groundwater Assessment $ - Program Miscellaneous $ 10,000 I Jft Station -Engr. & Constr. $ 1,268,385 Le al Services $ 10,000 3208 Repair and Maintenance $ 130,000 $ 210,000 Disposal of Leachate $ 200,000 Road Maintenance Stone $ 10,000 5110 Utilities - Electricity $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Electric Service for Blower /Flare Station 5230 Telephone $ - $ - Included in internal services 5815 Warrants & Fees $ 1,400 $ 1,400 DEQ Annual Fee 5850 Miscellaneous $ 2,000 $ 2,000 advertisement and bottled gas. 6302 Property insurance $ - $ - Coverage for Flare Station and Associated Equipment 8101 Machinery & Equipment $ - $ - 9808 'Transfer to RVRA $ - $ - Operations TOTAL $1,787,400 $1,635,785 201 52016 BUDGET 30 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority APPENDIX 2015-2616 BUDGET CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 201 S Subject: Presentation on the "Art by Bus" Program I would like to sponsor a presentation by Dr. Melanie Almeder, Associate Professor of Creative Writing and Literature at Roanoke College, related to her recently completed collaboration with the Roanoke Arts Commission, Greater Roanoke Valley Transit Company (Valley Metro) and RIDE Solutions, the region's commuter services program, in the "Art by Bus" program. Dr. Almeder's role in the program was to produce literary works about her experiences, people she met, and neighborhoods through which she travelled while riding on the Valley Metro system. C ristopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers City of Roanoke 2013 Community Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions And Energy Summary Roanoke City Council Meeting May 18, 2015 Sean McGinnis Director - VT Green Engineering Program Roanoke Citizens for Clean & Green Committee W�-, ROANOKE ®i VirginiaTech Invent (he Future CITIZENS FOR Roanoke GHG Emissions — Scale of Reduction MoW ROANOKE • Greenhouse gas emissions are measured using carbon dioxide as the reference, though these emissions include other gases • 10% Carbon Dioxide Reduction = 230,000 tons • City of Roanoke — 45,000 households • 1 ton per household savings — "Save a Ton" Regional Campaign 26 feet 1 ton COZ E 3 � 26 feet S t :6 feet 1" I I 1,500 cul 1,500 cubes = 7.5 miles VirginiaTech Invent the Future u 2.& rt VP'P _.. - _...(ion 1. -tons of n, COZ 't ,r I 1,500 cul 1,500 cubes = 7.5 miles VirginiaTech Invent the Future City of Roanoke Electricity Usage Sector 2005 (kWh) 2013 (kWh) Residential Commercial Industrial Other 502,467,666 616,360,103 487,843,077 145,349,802 481,753,007 611,367,951 423,842,823 121,429,959 Totals 1,752,020,648 1,638,393,740 Year -to -Year Change -0.5% Year -to -2005 Change -6.5% Electricity Usage - City of Roanoke 2,00,000,000 5,8470,000,000 •7005 El"idly 3 1,600,000,000 •2008 EIKVJdty 1,400,000,000 *2009 Ele city d 1,100,000,000 12010 Electricity ixo,000 000 •2011 ElectI 800000000 n 201 Electricity d 600,000,000 W .. *201 El"Idt 400,000,000 100,000,000 e Residential Cornnnercial Industrial Other Totals ROANOKE 2013 Roanoke Electrical Usage (kWh) ®VirginiaTech Invent the Future ITIZENS FOR City of Roanoke Natural Gas Usage Sector 2005 (therms)2013 therms Residential Commercial Industrial 19,967,493 13,087,409 15,435,141 19,233,865 12,233,266 15,715,510 Totals 48,490,043 47,182,641 Year -to -Year Change 13.3% Year -to -2005 Change -2.7% 60,000,000 50,000,000 E fi aD,00D,oOo C u m j 30,000,000 l7 z 20,000,000 2 i[QRbAI4] IN Natural Gas Usage - City of Roanoke • 20DS Natval Gas 0 2" Natval Gas • 2009 Natval We 0 2010 Natval Gas ■ 2011 Natural Gas • 2012 Natural Gas +, 2013 Natural Gas Data Residential Commercial Industrial Totals - -WI ROANOKE 2013 Roanoke Natural Gas Usage (therms) Industrial Residential 33.3% 1 40.8% ®ViTiniaTech Invent the Future City of Roanoke VDOT Transportation Analysis ROANOKE Year VMT Change from Baseline (2005) 2005 736,548,004 na 2008 744,814,259 +1.1% 2009 792,675,391 +7.6% 2010 816,696,781 +10.9% 2011 776, 822,009 +5.5% 2012 751,636,835 +2.0% 2013 1 741,178,855 0.6% Roanoke City Road Miles By Category Interstate 1.2% Primary 10.9% • While most of the road miles in the City of Roanoke are secondary, the relative percentage of miles traveled on the primary and interstate roads is much higher due to traffic volume. Roanoke City Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) By Road Type (2013) W Vir&iaTech Invent the Future TIZENS FOR City of Roanoke Community GHG Emissions Roanoke City CACP Carbon Emissions By Sector (2013) Transportatio Indus 20.2 Waste 2.1% Appm —RO ANOKE Roanoke City CACP Carbon Emissions By Source (2013) nipspl All Others W VirginiaTech Invent the Future City of Roanoke Community GHG Emissions ROANOKE Sector 2005 2013 % Change 2013(%) Residential 536,056 486,781 _9.2% 23.6% Commercial 711,951 640,698 -10.0% 31.1% Industrial 497,160 421,053 -15.3% 20.4% Transportation 489,149 470,357 _3.8% 22,8% Waste 42,027 44,291 5.4% 2.1% Totals 2,276,3431 2,063,180 -9.4% 100% CO, Emissions - City of Roanoke 2.500.000 M2005 2,000,000 rl 0 N 1s00,000 t M1 I pi: 0 'N ■2013 N_ E 1,000,000 - W O U 500.000 Sam Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Waste Totals • 2014 analysis is completed except for VDOT Transportation analysis. This data is published in June. • Best estimate is 12% reduction which MEETS Goal. • Municipal data still to be compiled but 2012 analysis showed 15% decrease and more than $575,000 savings Qj VirginiaTech Invent the Future Conclusions IMIPP� ROANOKE • 2013 analysis indicates a decrease in Community greenhouse gas emissions of 9.4 %. The City is currently on track to meet its City Council Resolution targets at the end of 2014. • Municipal emissions are even lower and based on 2012 data will meet the higher goal for City Government. • These GHG reductions also correspond to significant economic savings from decreased fuel usage and reduced environmental and health effects related to air and water quality. • Sustainability requires continued leadership and initiatives in order to improve the environmental, health, and economics of the City for the future. As such, it is recommended that City Council should pass another resolution with a new target for the next 5 years. I@VirginiaTech Invent the Future oxIN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40235- 051815. A RESOLUTION authorizing the acceptance of an Employment Advancement for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Participants grant from the Virginia Department of Social Services (V DSS); authorizing the City of Roanoke to scrve as the primary fiscal agent for the distribution of such funds to the provider agencies for services provided to the local departments of social services (DSS) in Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Franklin County, Botetourt County, and Craig County; and authorizing execution of any and all necessary documents to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: The Employment Advancement for TANF Participants grant from the V DSS, in the amount of 5312,887, for the period commencing July 1, 2015, though June 30, 2016, for the purpose of maintaining acrd improving existing services to eligible TANF recipients by the provider agencies which comprise the Southwest Virginia Regional Employment Coalition, for services provided to the local departments of social services in Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Franklin County, Botetourt County, and Craig County, by Total Action Against Poverty, Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare, and Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, as further set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated May 18, 2015, is hereby ACCEPTED. 2. The City of Roanoke is authorized to be the primary fiscal agent for this grant, and shall be responsible for distributing the grant proceeds to the provider agencies for services provided to the local DSS agencies. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any and all requisite documents pertaining to the City's acceptance of these funds, and to furnish such additional in Formation as may be required in connection with the City's acceptance ofthe grant funds. All such documents shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney. "fTEST: r\ City Clerk. R -fanf Gmnt SW VA Reg amp Caa ➢ion 5.18-15 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of Nay, 2015. No. 40236- 051815. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the Federal Government through the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services for the Southwest Virginia Regional Employment Coalition Grant, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2015 -2016 Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2015 -2016 Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations Fees for Professional Services 35- 630 - 8867 -2010 $312,887 Revenues SWVA Regional Employment Coalition FY16 35- 630 - 8867 -8867 312,887 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. A TEST: [IKi K�City Clerk. Q� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Southwest Virginia Regional Employment Coalition Background: The City of Roanoke Department of Social Services (DSS), in collaboration with the local departments of social services in Roanoke County, Franklin County, Craig County, and Botetourt County, along with Total Action for Progress, Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare, and Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, have been awarded funding for the Employment Advancement for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Participants grant from the Virginia Department of Social Services (VDSS) in the amount of $312,887. The agencies named have formed the Southwest Virginia Regional Employment Coalition. The grant is to assist citizens of our localities who are receiving TANF benefits to obtain employment or, where appropriate, an alternative disability income. The funds are available for use from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. The City of Roanoke is to be the primary fiscal agent for this grant, and is to be responsible for distributing the grant proceeds to the provider agencies for services provided to the local departments of social services. Considerations The above grant funding is required to maintain existing services to the TANF population such as job development /placement, mental health screening and referral and medical case management, which will enable them to obtain employment. When appropriate, Supplemental Social Security Income advocacy is provided in an effort to obtain an alternative monthly disability income for this population. Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution accepting the grant, authorizing the City of Roanoke to be the fiscal agent for the grant, and authorizing the City Manager to execute all appropriate documents related to acceptance of the funding. All documents shall be in such form as approved by the City Attorney. Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to establish a revenue estimate in the amount of $312,887 and appropriate the same amount into accounts to be established in the Grant Fund by the Director of Finance. —� --- - �C___--- - - - - -- Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Jane R. Conlin, Director of Human /Social Services �i IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40237- 051815. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the Department of Justice Federal Asset Sharing Program and the Department of Treasury Federal Asset Sharing Program for enhancing law enforcement operations, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2014 -2015 Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2014 -2015 Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations DoJ Expendable Equipment DoT Expendable Equipment Revenues DoJ Federal Asset Forfeiture DoJ Federal Asset Forfeiture DoT Federal Asset Forfeiture DoT Federal Asset Forfeiture 35- 640 - 3304 -2035 $ (85,616) 35- 640- 3304 -2035 147,453 35- 640 - 3304 -3305 (86,184) Interest 35 -640- 3304 -3306 568 35- 640- 3307 -3307 147,287 Interest 35- 640- 3307 -3308 166 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST City Clerk. C CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Appropriation of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds Background: In 1986, the United States Congress authorized the transfer of certain federally forfeited property to state and local law enforcement agencies that participated in the investigation and seizure of the property. Application for an equitable share of property seized by local law enforcement must be made to the U.S. Department of Justice and certified by the U. S. Attorney. This property, including funds shared with state and local agencies may only be used for the purposes stated in the application, i.e. narcotics investigations related to law enforcement. Participation in federally forfeited property sharing enhances the effectiveness of narcotics investigations by providing necessary investigation equipment and offsets the cost that would otherwise be borne by the City's taxpayers. Considerations: The Police Department receives funds periodically from the Federal Asset Forfeiture Sharing Program. Federal law mandates that these seized funds be placed in an interest bearing account until forfeited and that any interest earned be used in accordance with program guidelines. These funds are provided by either the United States Department of the Treasury (DOT) or the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). Program guidelines require that these funds be segregated by the providing department. To adjust balances for individual federal asset forfeiture accounts it is necessary to reduce the DOJ account by $86,184 while appropriating interest of $568 that has been earned on the DOJ account and is available for appropriation. Revenue in the amount of $147,287 and interest in the amount of $166 (a total of $147,453) has been collected in the DOT account and is available for appropriation to the corresponding DOT grant fund account. The $147,453 will be appropriated into the expendable equipment budget which will allow the Police Department to acquire new and replacement equipment for officers (ballistic vests, computer software, etc.) as well as equipment for vehicles (cameras, partitions, and window barriers, etc.) Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to appropriate interest earnings of $568 in the DOJ grant fund account and reduce the revenue estimate in the DOJ Grant Fund by the amount of $85,616 and increase the revenue estimate in the DOT grant fund account in the amount of $147,453 and appropriate funding in the same amounts in the corresponding expendable equipment accounts. - ----- - - - - -- Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Christopher C. Perkins, Chief of Police Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Management and Budget IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May. 2015. Mo. 40238- 051815. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the State Asset Sharing Program for enhancing law enforcement operations, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2014 -2015 Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2014 -2015 Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations Expendable Equipment Revenues State Asset Forfeiture - Interest State Asset Forfeiture 35- 640- 3302 -2035 $ 72,756 35- 640 - 3302 -3299 268 35- 640- 3302 -3300 72,488 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Appropriation of State Asset Forfeiture Funds Background: In 1991, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation allowing local law enforcement to seize property that is connected with illegal narcotics distribution. The Code of Virginia also makes it possible for police departments to receive proceeds from these forfeited properties. Application for an equitable share of the property seized by local law enforcement must be made to the Department of Criminal justice Services, Forfeited Asset Sharing Program and be certified by the Chief of Police. Property which includes funds shared with state and local agencies may only be used for law enforcement purposes. Program requirements mandate that these funds be placed in an interest bearing account and any interest earned be used in accordance with program guidelines. Considerations: The Police Department receives funds periodically from the State Asset Forfeiture Sharing Program. The Code of Virginia mandates that these seized funds be placed in an interest bearing account until forfeited and that the interest earned be used in accordance with program guidelines. Revenue in the amount of $72,487.97 and interest in the amount of $267.56 have been collected and are available for appropriation to the corresponding grant fund account. The $72,756 will be appropriated to the expendable equipment budget which will allow the Police Department to acquire new and replacement equipment for officers (ballistic vests, computer software, etc.) as well as equipment for vehicles (cameras, partitions, and window barriers, etc.) Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to increase the revenue estimate in the Grant Fund in the amount of $72,756 and appropriate funding in the same amount into the corresponding expendable equipment account (35- 640 -3302- 2035). - ---- - -- - - -- Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Christopher C. Perkins, Chief of Police Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Management and Budget IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40239 - 051815. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the Fleet Management Fund Retained Earnings to Capital Improvements for the installation of propane autogas fuel infrastructure, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2014 -2015 Fleet Management Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2014 -2015 Fleet Management Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations Appropriated from General Revenue Appropriated from General Revenue Fund Balance Retained Earnings - Available 17- 440 - 9591 -9003 $ 34,000 17- 440- 9592 -9003 35,000 17 -3348 (69,000) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTES . ,r(,City Clerk. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Appropriation of Fleet Management Fund Retained Earnings for Capital Improvements Background: The Fleet Management Division has identified two alternative fuel initiatives to reduce reliance on traditional vehicle fuels, reduce costs and provide for more sustainable fleet operations. The first initiative is the installation of propane autogas fuel infrastructure at the Public Works Service Center, which will initially focus on high -use law enforcement vehicles. The cost of the fuel pump and storage tanks are included in the fuel purchase contract, but Fleet Management is obligated to provide electrical service, equipment protection measures and vehicle conversion services. The total amount required for these items is $34,000. The second initiative is the completion of the design of a compressed natural gas fuel station at the Public Works Service Center. Fleet Management anticipates using a phased approach in the installation of this system, and these engineering services will provide plans to be used in the future procurement of construction, equipment and facility alterations. The cost of this phase of the project is $35,000. Considerations: The capital improvement and alternative fuel initiatives described above will improve Fleet Management financial performance and sustainability efforts. Funding is available from Fleet Retained Earnings. Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to appropriate funding of $69,000 from Fleet Management Retained Earnings to an account as established by the Dire for of Finance. o A her P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers S I'EPIIANI E M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 ChnreO Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Rti Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (5411) 853 -2541 Fax: (540)8.53 -1145 M1: ,mJi: eimir(n9'mmokcvp. goy May 19, 2015 Municipal Code Corporation P. O. Box 2235 Tallahassee, Florida 32316 Ladies and Gentlemen: JONAI'IIAN 1?. CRAFT, CMC Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WF.BC C'MC Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 40240 - 051815 amending and reordaining Section 22.3 -27, Contribution and member's contribution account, Article IV, Contributions, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -42, ESRS definitions, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -43, Normal service retirement, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -44, Early service retirement allowance, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -45, Vested allowance, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -76, Member Elections, Article XIII, Member Elections and Hybrid Program, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, effective July 1, 2015. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015, and is in full force and effect on July 1, 2015. rel 7 Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure pc: The Honorable Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk, Circuit Court Rick Kahl, Clerk, General District Court David C. Wells, Clerk, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Stephen D. Poff, Chief Magistrate, Twenty -third Judicial District Municipal Code Corporation May 19, 2015 Page 2 PC: Joey Klein, Law Librarian Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Andrea Trent, Assistant Director of Finance IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015 - No. 40240 - 051815. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Section 22.3 -27, Contributions and member's contribution account Article IV, Contributions of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -42, ESRS definitions, Division I, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -43, Normal service retirement Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -44, Early service retirement allowance, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Detennination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -45, Vested allowance, Division 1, ESRS, Article VII, Determination of Benefits, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; Section 22.3 -76, Member Elections Article XIII, Member Elections and Hybrid Program, of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; providing for effective dates; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, is amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Sec. 22.3 -27. Contributions and member's contribution account. (a) Beginning July I, 2015, Beach per °ser, - ,�member, a °r T- -.--n �m � including a police officer or firefighter but excluding a hybrid member, shall contribute five percent (5 %) of his earnable compensation each pay period. Except as described in the preceding sentience, no contributions were deducted after May 31, 1973 from the compensation of members. The participating employers shall deduct the contribution payable by the member and every employee accepting or continuing employment shall be deemed to consent and agree to any deductions from his eamable compensation required by this section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the member contributions, although designated as employee contributions hereunder, will be paid by the participating employers and shall be treated as employer contributions pursuant to Section 414(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall not be included as gross income of the employcc until such time as they are distributed or made available to the employee. The city shall "pick -up" the employee contributions by reducing the amount payable to each employee by the amount of his required employee contribution on a salary reduction basis. Any other participating employer shall "pick -up" the employee contributions either in lieu of future salary increases or by reducing the amount payable to each employee by the amount of his required employee contribution on a salary reduction basis, as indicated by such participating employer in the authorization passed by its governing body. 2. Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, is amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Sec. 22.3 -42. ESRS definitions. a�• Normal retirement age means: (a) For firefighters and deputized police officers the earlier of (i) attainment of age sixty -five (65) and five (5) years of creditable service, or (if) the attainment of age forty -five (45) and any combination of age and years of creditable service that equals not less than the sum of seventy (70) or, in the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 in who elects to be treated tike a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, and who is a firefighter or deputized police officer, the earlier of (i) attainment of age sixty-five (65) and five (5) years of creditable service, or (if) the attainment of age fifty (50) and any combination of age and years of creditable service that equals not less than the sum of seventy -five (75). Only service as a firefighter or deputized police officer shall be credited to determine eligibility; provided, however, should any firefighter or deputized police officer become disabled for his regular duties as a firefighter or deputized police officer as a result of an accident occurring in the line of duty or as a result of an occupational disease and such firefighter or deputized police officer is transferred to another position in the city service, then such member shall continue to accrue creditable service as a firefighter m deputized police officer and shall remain subject to the normal retirement age established by this subsection as if he had remained a firefighter or deputized police officer. Any member employed on December 1, 1997, as o firefighter who was employed by the city in an emergency medical services capacity prior to October 30, 1995, shall receive credit under this subpart for service from the later of (i) July 1, 1989, or (ii) the date on which the employee became a member working in an emergency medical services capacity. (b) For all other members not described in (1) above the earlier of (i) the attainment of age sixty -five (65) and five (5) years of creditable .service, or (ii) the attainment of age fifty (50) acid any combination of age aid years of creditable service that equals not less than the sum of eighty (80) or, in the case oI, a person who becomes a mcmbcr after June 30, 2014, or who elects to be treated like a person who bccmncs it mcmbcr after June 30, 2014, not described in (1) above, the earlier of (i) attainment of age sixty -five (65) and five (5) years of creditable service, or (ii) the attainment of age fifty -five (55) and any combination of age and years of creditable service that equals not less than the sum of eighty -five (85). Y #� Sec. 22.3 -43. Nomml service retirement. wxa (b) vinioam of nml refirenienl benefit on or after normal reliremenf age. (1) In the case of a member other than a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a mcmbcr after June 30, 2014, the retirement allowance shall be two and one -tenth percent (2.1 %) of the member's average final compensation for each year of creditable service subject to a maximum of sixty -three (63) percent of average final compensation. (2) In the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 (other than a hybrid member), the retirement allowance shall be two percent (2.0 %) of the member's average final compensation for each year of creditable service subject to a maximum of sixty -three (63) percent of average final compensation. xx« Sec. 22.3 -44. Early service retirement allowance. (a) Eligibility. A member shall be eligible to receive an early retirement benefit commencing on the first day of the month next following or coincident with the date of termination of employment if he meets the following criteria: (1) In the case of a member other than a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, a member who has had five (5) or more years of creditable service and has attained the age of fifty -five (55) shall be eligible to receive an early retirement benefit commencing on the first day of the month next following or coincident with the date of termination of employment. (2) In the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, (other than a firefighter or a deputized police officer), a member who has had fifteen (15) or more years of creditable service and has attained the age of fifty - five (55) shall be eligible to receive an early retirement benefit commencing on the first day of the month next following or coincident with the date of termination of employment. (3) In the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treaded lilac a person who becomes a member alto June 30, 2014, and who is a firclightcr or deputized police officer, a member who has had fifteen (15) or more years of creditable service and has attained the age of fitly (50) shall be eligible to receive an early retirement benefit commencing on the first day of the month next following or coincident with the date of termination of employment. (b) Amount of catty retirement benefit. (1) 111 the case of a member other than a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, the retirement allowance shall be two and one -tenth percent (2.1 %) of the member's average final compensation for each year of creditable service subject to a maximum of sixty -three (63) percent of average final compensation. (2) In the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, (other than a hybrid member), the retirement allowance shall be two percent (2.0 %) of the member's average final compensation for each year of creditable service subject to a maximum of sixty -three (63) percent of average final compensation. (c) This retirement allowance may be deferred and become payable without further adjustment: (1) In the case of a member other than a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, until the date when such member first actually attains the earlier of (1) age sixty -five (65), or, (2) age fifty -five (55) and thirty (30) years of creditable service. (2) In the case of a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, (including hybrid members), until the date when such member first actually attains normal retirement age. =k ** Sec. 22.3 -45. Vested allowance. (c) Payment of the vested allowance. The vested allowance may commence to be paid at any time after the member has reached, in the case of a member other than a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or who elects to be treated like a person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, the age required for early retirement subject to any applicable reductions for early 4 payment as set out in section 22.3 -44(d) or in the case of a person who becomes it member after .Iunc 30, 2014 or who elects to be Reined Bite it prison who becomes it member aficr .little 30, 2014, (including hybrid members), age sixty (60) subject to any applicable reductions for early payment as set out in section 22.3- 44(d). Sec. 22.3 -76. Member Elections. (a) A person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014, may make an irrevocable election to participate in the hybrid program maintained pursuant to section 22.3 -77. Such election shall be exercised no later than 60 days from the time of the employee's entry upon the performance of his duties. If an election is not made within such 60 days, such employee shall be deemed to have elected to participate only in the otherwise applicable defined benefit retirement plan established by this chapter and administered by the board and will not be considered a hybrid member. (b) An ERS member or an ESRS member who is employed as of May 18, 2015, may, during the 30 day period of May 18, 2015 through and including June 17, 2015, elect to be treated like it person who becomes a member after June 30, 2014 or may elect to be a hybrid member. Such election shall be irrevocable and shall not affect the retirement allowance based on creditable servicer prior to July I, 2015. Pursuant to Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. 4. Section I of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2015. The remaining sections of this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ZATTE City Clerk. aCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Retirement Benefits for Roanoke Employees Background: On May 11, 2015, City Council adopted the FYIS -16 annual budget. The budget included the initialization of member contributions for those employees hired prior to July 1, 2014, effectively establishing member contributions for all active employees who currently participate in the City's Pension Plan. Certain sections of Chapter 22.3, Pensions and Retirement, require modifications to reflect this action. Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying ordinance amending and reordaining §22.3 -27, Contributions and member's contribution account, §22.3 -42, ESRS definitions, §22.3 -43, Normal service retirement, §22.3 -44, Early service retirement allowance, §22.3 -45, Vested allowance, and §22.3 -76, Member elections. Q 1 arbara A. Dameron Director of Finance Distribution: Council Appointed Officers IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40241- 051815. A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager's issuance and execution of an additional Amendment to the City's Contract with ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation ( "ThyssenKrupp ") for additional professional services for repairs to the Elmwood Park Parking Garage elevator; and authorizing the City Manager to take certain other actions in connection with such Amendment. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: L The City Manager is authorized to issue and execute an additional Amendment as may be necessary to the City's Contract with ThyssenKrupp, in an amount not to exceed an additional $61,633 for additional professional services to replace obsolete parts in the Elmwood Park Parking Garage elevator in order to modernize this unit, all as more fully set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated May 18, 2015. 1 The form of such Amendment shall be approved by the City Attorney. 3. Such Amendment shall provide authorization for additions to the work, with an increase in the amount of the Contract, and provide that the total amount of such Amendment will not exceed an additional $61,633, all as set forth in the above mentioned City Council Agenda Report. 4. The City Manager is authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to provide for the implementation, administration, and QCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Amendment No. 2 to Contract for the Comprehensive Full Elevator /Escalator Maintenance & Repair Program Background: A Contract dated March 25, 2013, was issued to ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation (ThyssenKrupp) for the Comprehensive Full Elevator /Escalator Maintenance & Repair Program in the amount of $111,996. The Program covers all City owned elevators and escalators located in City buildings, the Berglund Center, and City owned parking garages. This Contract has been amended twice for a total Contract amount of $119,597.04. The contract scope of work includes replacement of obsolete parts at the City's option in the elevators covered by this contract. A third Amendment is now needed to replace parts in the Elmwood Park Parking Garage elevator in order to modernize this unit. ThyssenKrupp has agreed to replace obsolete parts on the elevator for the cost of $61,633. Considerations: City Council approval is needed to amend the current Contract. Funding in the amount of $61,633 for this Amendment is available in account 07 -540- 8278 -9003, (Elmwood Park Garage Elevator Modernization). Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to issue and execute Amendment No. 3, approved as to form by the City Attorney, to the City's Contract with ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation, in the amount of $61,633 for additional services as set forth above. Authorize the City Manager to take such action and execute such documents, approved as to form by the City Attorney, as may be necessary to provide for the implementation, administration, and enforcement of such Amendment to the above mentioned Contract. - - -- - -------- ----------- ristopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Sherman M. Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operations Kenneth Cronin, Director of General Services /Sustainability Debbie Moses, Parking Administrator S'I'k:PIIANIE M. MOON RFVNOLDS, MMC City Clerk Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Morrill: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Chinch Avenne, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Felapkm,e: (5411)x51 -2541 Fax: (540)851 -1145 E -n.,H: clerk( ?roan. E,...... May 19, 2015 JONA'I'BAN 6. C'HAF'F, CM(' Deputy ('ity ('lerk CE.('EIAA 1. WEED, CMC Asu,Wll Deputy City Clerk I am attaching copy of Resolution No. 40242 - 051815 correcting a clerical error in Resolution No. 40228- 051115 that indicated the Five Year Capital Improvement Program update was for Fiscal Years 2015 -2019, rather than Fiscal Years 2016 -2020, as correctly set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated May 11, 2015; and reaffirming the endorsement of the update to the Capital Improvement Program in the recommended amount totaling $156,130,568.00. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. Sincerely, Cecelia . Web , MC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Attachment pc: Donald G. Gurney, Bond Counsel, Hawkins Delafield and Wood, LLP Kevin Rotty, Managing Director, Public Financial Management, Inc. Dr. Rita D. Bishop, Superintendent, Roanoke City Public Schools Robyn Schon, Global Spectrum General Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Amelia C. Merchant, Director, Management and Budget IN Tf It' COl1NCL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of Nay, 2015. No. 40242- 051815. A RESOLUTION endorsing the update to the Capital Improvement Program submitted by the City Manager by City Council Agenda Report dated May 11, 2015. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 11, 20t5, the City Manager has presented an update to the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2016 -2020 in the recommended amount totaling $156,130,568.00; WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program and the funding recommendation for projects is affordable and consistent with previous discussions by City Council and actions taken by City Council; WHEREAS, City Council adopted Resolution No. 40228 - 051115, dated May 11, 2015, endorsing the recommended update to the Capital Improvement Program and Resolution No. 40228- 051115 contained a clerical error that indicated the Five Year Capital Improvement Program update was for Fiscal Years 2015 -2019, rather than Fiscal Years 2016 -2020, as correctly set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated May 11, 2015; WHEREAS, City Council desires to correct the error and reaffirm its endorsement of the update to the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2016 -2020, retroactive to May 11, 2015; and WHEREAS, this Council is desirous of endorsing the recommended update to the Capital Improvement Program, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: I. This Council endorses and concurs in the recommendations of the City Manager for a certain update to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for the City of Roanoke for 2016 -2020 Capital Onpmvunmil Pmgr'am Fiscal Years 2016 -2020, and the related funding recommendations, as set out in the letter of the City Manager dated May 11, 2015, 2. This Council corrects the clerical error contained in Resolution No. 40228- 051115 by correcting the date of update to Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2016 -2020. 'I'his Council ieaflh'm.s Resolution No. 40228-051115, as corrected herein and its endorsement and concurrence in the recommendations of the City Manager for a certain update to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program for the City of Roanoke for the Fiscal Years 2016 -2020, and the related funding reconmendations, as set forth in the letter of the City Manager dated May 11, 2015, 3. This Resolution shall take effect retroactively to May 11, 2015. WL v AV�490City Clerk. 2016 -2020 Capital Impmveniem Program Daniel J. Callaghan City Attorney The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 464 MUNICIPAL BI jll.DING 215 CIIURCI I AVENUII, SW ROANOKF VIRGINIA 24011.1595 TF9-EPHONE 540. 853.2431 PAX 540 -853 -1221 EMAIL: cityattyProanokcca.goc May I8, 2015 Re: Correction of Resolution No. 40228- 051115 Dear Mayor Rowyers and Members of Council: Background Timothy R. Spencer Steven J. Talevi David L. Collins Heather P. Ferguson Laura M. Carini Assistant City Attorneys Resolution No.40228- 051115, adopted on May 11, 2015, endorses the update to the Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2016 -2020, as presented by the City Manager in his report dated May 1 I, 2015. The resolution contained a clerical error by identifying the five fiscal years as 2015 -2019. The attached resolution corrects this mistake. Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution that corrects the references to the fiscal years, effective retroactively to May 11, 2015, and reaffirms the actions taken by Council on May I L 2015. Sincerely, Daniel City Attorney DJCAsc Attachment c: Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Sherman Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operation COMMITTEE VACANCIES /REAPPOINTMENTS May 18, 2015 Public VACANCIES /REAPPOINTMENTS: Three four -year terms of office on the Building and Fire Code Board of Appeals ending June 30, 2019 (expertise as a building and an engineer are required for two positions) One three -year term of office on the Roanoke Neighborhood Advocates ending June 30, 2018 One three- yearterm of office on the Roanoke Valley Greenways Commission ending June 30, 2018 One three -year term of office on the Western Virginia Water Authority ending June 30, 2018 One three -year term of office on the Roanoke Arts Commission ending June 30, 2018 One three -year term of office on the Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Commission ending June 30, 2018 Ms. Laura D. Rottenborn One 26" Street, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Ms.Rottenborn: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Ck.Ccit Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 '1'r1r,lupe: (540)X53-2541 Fax: (540)X53 -1145 k: mail rlerkOroanokeva.gov May 19, 2015 JONA'I'LAN E. CRAFr, CM(' Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing a copy of Resolution No. 40243 - 051815 appointing you as a Trustee on the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Please find enclosed a Certificate of your appointment. Your Oath of Office has been forwarded to Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, for appropriate handling prior to commencement of your term of office. Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing a copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to serve the City of Roanoke as a Trustee of the Roanoke City School Board. Sincerely, Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, P. O. Box 13145, Roanoke, Virginia 24031, w /attachments Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the eighteenth day of May, 2015, LAURA D. ROTTENBORN, was appointed as a Trustee of the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this nineteenth day of May, 2015. Assistant Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telepkm,e: (540)853 -2541 Fax: (5411)853 -1145 8'fEP11ANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC N: mail elerkkil ... nokeva.gav City Clerk May 19, 2015 Mr. Mark K. Cathey 2430 Cornwallis Avenue, S. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Mr. Cathey: IONA I IAN E. CRAIA, CMC Oepnty City Clerk CECELIA'1'. WERII, CMC Assistant Deputy Cily Clerk I am enclosing a copy of Resolution No. 40243 - 051815 appointing you as a Trustee on the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Please find enclosed a Certificate of your appointment. Your Oath of Office has been forwarded to Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, for appropriate handling prior to commencement of your term of office. Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing a copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and appreciation for your willingnes s Roanoke City School Board. Enclosure Members of City Council, I would like to express to serve the City of Roanoke as a Trustee of the Sincerely, ecWiaT eb b, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk PC: Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, P. O. Box 13145, Roanoke, Virginia 24031, w /attachments Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the eighteenth day of May, 2015, MARK K. CATHEY, was appointed as a Trustee of the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this nineteenth day of May, 2015. Assistant Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avrnue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 240141536 '1'delih'nc: (540)x53 -2541 Enx: (540)X53 -1145 S I'IiP11ANI E M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC P -nu iL dcrk(ahonnukcvo . gav Cily Clerk May 19, 2015 Mr. Richard Willis, Jr. 501 Woods Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Mr. Willis: JONA'r1IAN E. CRAVI', CMC Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. W BBB, CMC Assistant Depa(y City Clerk I am enclosing a copy of Resolution No. 40243 - 051815 appointing you as a Trustee on the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Please find enclosed a Certificate of your appointment. Your Oath of Office has been forwarded to Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, for appropriate handling prior to commencement of your term of office. Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing a copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to serve the City of Roanoke as a Trustee of the Roanoke City School Board. Sincerely, ecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk, Roanoke City School Board, P. O. Box 13145, Roanoke, Virginia 24031, w /attachments Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Stephanie M. Moon, City Clerk, and as such City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council which was held on the eighteenth day of May, 2015, RICHARD M. WILLIS, JR., was reappointed as a Trustee of the Roanoke City School Board for a three -year term of office commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2018. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this nineteenth day of May, 2015. Assistant Deputy City Clerk it �) IN THE COUNCIL OF TI II; CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of Nay, 2015. No. 40243 - 051815. A RESOLUTION appointing Mark K. Cathey, Laura Day Rottenborn, and Richard M. "Dick" Willis, Jr., as School Board Trustees of the Roanoke City School Board for terms commeneing,Iuly I, 2015, and ending June 30, 2018. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 -24, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, a public hearing was held on April 20, 2015, relating to the appointment of School Board Trustees; and WHEREAS, this Council is desirous of appointing Mark K. Cathey, Laura Day Rottenborn, and Richard M. "Dick" Willis, Jr., to fill the vacancies on the Roanoke City School Board. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: Mark K. Cathey, Laura Day Rottenborn, and Richard M. "Dick" Willis, Jr., are hereby appointed as School Board Trustees of the Roanoke City School Board for terms commencing July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2018, 2. The City Clerk is directed to transmit an attested copy of this resolution to the Clerk of Roanoke City School Board, and to Mark K. Cathey, Laura Day Rottenborn, and Richard M. "Dick" Willis, Jr. AT ity Clerk. T —T.. c CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 I 'elepkone (540)853 -2541 F"x: (540)853-1145 SI'EPIIANIEM. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC E- rreul: ulerk(,e,,'onneke...... City Clerk May 19, 2015 Tim Scoggin, Agent Madison Realty Service 152 South Main Street Marshall, North Carolina 28753 Dear Mr. Scoggin: JONATHAN E. CRAP '1', CMC Deputy City Clerk CECELIA'1.. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 40244 - 051815 rezoning certain property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W., from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated April 16, 2015. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. Sincerel, a!2 '_�'-". Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure Tim Scoggin May 19, 2015 Page 2 PC: Philip C. Schirmer, City Engineer Susan S. Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Ian Shaw, Agent, City Planning Commission IN "FHE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40244- 051815. AN ORDINANCE to rezone certain property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W., from CG, Commercial- General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; mid dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Shaker's Restaurant Corporation has made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ( "City Council "), to have the property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W, bearing Official Tax Map No. 2380110, rezoned from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, subject to certain conditions; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on May 18, 2015, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of the subject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that 1. Section 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Map No. 2380110 located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W., be, and is hereby rezoned from CG, Commercial- General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. I dated April 16, 2015, 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. T: City Clerk. 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Application by Shaker's Restaurant Corporation to rezone property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N.W., bearing Official Tax Number 2380110, from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, with conditions. Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Monday, May 11, 2015. By a vote of 7 - 0 the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request, finding that the Amended Application No.1 is consistent with the overall goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Williamson Road Area Plan, and Zoning Ordinance as the subject property will be redeveloped for an active use in a manner compatible with the surrounding area. Application Information Request: Rezoning Owner: John Buckles Shaker's Restaurant Corporation Applicant: N/A Authorized Agent: Tim Scoggin, Madison Realty Service City Staff Person: Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Site Address Location: 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N.W. Official Tax Nos. 2380110 Site Area, Approximately 2.0 acres Existing Zoning, CG, Commercial - General District Proposed Zoning: CLS, Commercial-Large Site District, with conditions Existing Land Use: Eating and drinking establishment, not abutting a residential district Proposed Land Use: Eating and drinking establishment, not abutting a residential district Retail sales establishment Neighborhood Plan: Williamson Road Area Plan Specified Future Land Use: Large Scale Commercial Filing Date: Original Application: March 31, 2015 Amended Application No.l : Aril 20, 2015 Background Shaker's Restaurant has occupied the parcel located at the northwest corner of Valley View Boulevard, NW, and Valley View Boulevard West, NW, since 1988. They now wish to have an additional retail sales establishment on the same parcel, but the CG zoning district dimensional regulations would restrict the new building to a portion of the parcel currently occupied by the main vehicular accessway to the ingress and egress point furthest from the intersection for the parcel. The owner does not wish to give up the vehicular accessway for safety reasons. In March 201 S, the owner filed a petition to rezone the parcel from CG to CLS, with conditions. The conditions included: complying with CG dimensional standards with the exception of minimum and maximum front yard, the orientation of the primary entrance, a sidewalk along Valley View Boulevard West, a landscaping strip with six large deciduous trees between the parking area and the street, and 50 percent of the interior parking lot trees as large deciduous. Amended Application No.] revised the proffered conditions to include impervious surface area maximum of 80 percent. Conditions Proffered by the Applicant The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as they pertain to Official Tax No. 2380110. 1) Any new building will comply with the dimensional regulations and development standards for the CG, Commercial - General District, with the exception of minimum and maximum front yard and the impervious surface area maximum of the Zoning Ordinance. The maximum front yard for any new buildings will be 80 feet from Valley View Boulevard West, NW and 90 feet from Valley View Boulevard, NW. The impervious surface area maximum for the parcel will be 80 percent of the lot area. 2) The primary entrance to the new building shall be visible from and oriented towards the closest street (Valley View Boulevard West, NW or Valley View Boulevard, NW). 3) A 5 feet wide sidewalk shall be provided along Valley View Boulevard West, NW. 4) A landscaping strip along new parking areas shall conform to the requirements of Section 36.2 -647 and 649 of the Zoning Ordinance with a minimum of six large deciduous trees per Table 642 -1 of Zoning Ordinance placed adjacent to the right -of -way between the parking area and the street. 5) A minimum of 50% of the interior parking lot trees shall be large deciduous trees per Table 642 -1 of Zoning Ordinance. Spacing will be per Table 649 of Zoning Ordinance. Considerations Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance: The purpose of the CLS District is to accommodate multiple buildings and uses that are large in scale and generally characterized by multiple tenants or uses on a single zoning lot which share common parking, curb cuts, driveways, and access to and from streets. These uses and areas are heavily dependent on the motor vehicle and tend to result in large parking areas and outdoor display of merchandise. CLS District uses include large motor vehicle sales and service establishments and community and regional shopping centers. The district standards provide for landscaped buffers to minimize the impact of CLS uses on surrounding areas. Pedestrian accommodations and additional site development features that are required or regulated by the zoning ordinance are not all shown on the concept plan. These details will be finalized during the development review process. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neighborhood Plan Both Vision 2001 -2020 and the Williamson Road Area Plan encourage the infill development of underused commercial property. The existing building on the subject property currently has 135 parking spaces serving 7,793 square feet of eating and drinking establishment. The City's Zoning Ordinance only requires 59 spaces for that square footage of restaurant and a sizeable portion of the parking lot is unused. furthermore, a retail sales establishment is an appropriate use considering the site's location on the ring road surrounding Valley View Mall. Zoning District Land Use North ROS, Recreation and Airport landing clear zone Coen S ace District South CLS, Commercial -Large Retail sales establishment Site District East CG, Commercial - General Vacant - buffer strip between commercial District development and neighborhood West CG, Commercial - General Retail sales establishment, not otherwise District listed; Eating and drinking establishment, not abutting a residential district Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance: The purpose of the CLS District is to accommodate multiple buildings and uses that are large in scale and generally characterized by multiple tenants or uses on a single zoning lot which share common parking, curb cuts, driveways, and access to and from streets. These uses and areas are heavily dependent on the motor vehicle and tend to result in large parking areas and outdoor display of merchandise. CLS District uses include large motor vehicle sales and service establishments and community and regional shopping centers. The district standards provide for landscaped buffers to minimize the impact of CLS uses on surrounding areas. Pedestrian accommodations and additional site development features that are required or regulated by the zoning ordinance are not all shown on the concept plan. These details will be finalized during the development review process. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neighborhood Plan Both Vision 2001 -2020 and the Williamson Road Area Plan encourage the infill development of underused commercial property. The existing building on the subject property currently has 135 parking spaces serving 7,793 square feet of eating and drinking establishment. The City's Zoning Ordinance only requires 59 spaces for that square footage of restaurant and a sizeable portion of the parking lot is unused. furthermore, a retail sales establishment is an appropriate use considering the site's location on the ring road surrounding Valley View Mall. Relevant Vision 2001 -2020 policies: • ED P6. Commercial development. Roanoke will encourage commercial development in appropriate areas of Roanoke to serve the needs of citizens and visitors. Relevant Williamson Road Area Plan policies: Development Patterns Large -scale Commercial: encompasses Valley View Mall, Towne Square Shopping Center, and limited portions of Williamson Road. Commercial development within this pattern has a regional and super - regional market and includes shopping malls, big box retailers, and large -scale auto sales and service. Retail areas should be well- connected to one another to create a cohesive center. Access to surrounding neighborhoods must be balanced with the need to avoid spillover impacts. Regional commercial areas should primarily be designated with large scale commercial zoning, but may contain limited areas with general commercial districts. • Community Design Policies o Building location: Zoning regulations will encourage a pedestrian environment and desirable streetscape by allowing future buildings to be located close to the street, with the intent to set in motion a long -range transformation of commercial forms. Storefronts should be limited in width (25' -40') or broken into smaller units by changes in architectural features. • Transportation: Street design will be carefully considered to ensure that design principles of Roanoke Vision 2001 -2020 are incorporated. Functionally, streets must be capable of accommodating pedestrians and bicycles. Trees should be used to create a canopy over streets, so large species of trees should be used whenever possible. Streets that carry higher traffic volumes will be priorities for improvements to pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. Rezoning to CLS with a conditioned maximum front yard allows for development that matches the setback of existing buildings while preventing a new building from sitting at the rear of the lot, counter to the goals of Vision and the Williamson Road Area Plan. The conditions will also require sidewalk and large deciduous trees along the Valley View Boulevard street frontage. The rezoning will allow for an expansion of retail sales use within the identified large scale commercial area at Valley View in a manner that matches existing development patterns while continuing to introduce pedestrian accommodations and maintaining streetscapes. Public Comments: None. Planning Commission Work Session: The following items were discussed in the Planning Commission Work Session for compliance with City policy and ordinances and sent to the applicant as recommended changes to address. The first proffered condition should be revised as follows "Any new building will comply with the dimensional regulations and development standards for the CG, Commercial - General District, with the exception of the minimum and maximum front yard and the impervious surface area maximum of the Zoning Ordinance." An additional proffered condition should be added as follows: "The impervious surface area maximum for the parcel will be 80 percent of lot area." The applicant subsequently submitted Amended Application No.] that addressed all of the comments. Planning Commission Public Hearing None. i Chad A. Van Hyning, Chair u City Planning Commission cc: Chris Morrill, City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Ian D. Shaw, Planning Commission Agent Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney John Buckles, Shakers Restaurant Corporation Tim Scoggin, Madison Realty Service Zoning Amendment Applicat'�Q� Fir"l:. �i \IF D Department Plannrg Bm ding and Deve:opment .i Op H`CKE Room '66 Noe C. Tay or 4i cpa Building APR $ 0 2015 215 Church Avenue S.W _ Roanoke, irgina 24_V CITY OF ROANOKE Nere tD Pdrd. Phone 540 853 -1730 Fa 54 853 -1230 PUNNING BUILDING A `- _.-. DEVELOPMENT _A Date. „pr tb 20 Submilla iJa—ha': A b7QI7 �{Qd,_ �i9pl ��"A No. I Request ;select ai: rFat apply!: - — Reza g o• Ct e s_ a ed Amend e F fie ed Cond o s ✓f ezonng Cono'tona — 4menrlme Panned e aDDmen Pa Razor ngtoPan ad - D- exrne — Amendmen o Co prehe s S 5 era Ds r Es.abishmen o Compre ensve Sgn Over aq Ds-c PfQLeT�! LlRtormatte n: I ' -_ — Fury Address: 1909 a - B Roanoke 14 :2 D -C Tax Es g Base Zr, -__ -. c U pezo P, . asp e e a dst cs o Drdgo w o Exs is d o s a;[, ane repI r Condrtnns iLaa. eC Wait, Ml1 La7 l� %IrA I� ninc ��s ''raPerty_ @wn3ElnSortnatyMl; ame IL s Corporato 1 dd ss Ce nchbu g 2 T a Appirai Inlormstlon jiltdtlten djMili pAii : ame -o e ess. c S e Autbedred Agent Iniormaf_Aqp_(M "Aj csbt*j: a IT S on° S > ee - - -ars a C 8753 -- - 4 Dress = Zoning;Amendment> . Department of Planning, Building and Development ' `E'CE! `7 6U Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue SW. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 Date: IAprl116,2015 S Rezoning Not Otherwise Listed RkMirng Conditional ROANOKE APR 2 p 2015 Click Here b Print CITY Ur nUnNOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 Submittal Number: nMP I(C(,'�'(0!1 rv0• ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District MilE'. —_ Address, 1909 Valley View Blvd., Roanoke, VA 24102 Official Tax No(s). 1#2380110 Amendment of Proffered Cordd:ons ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Pan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Existing Base Zoa:ng — _ —. —_ —_ -- W th Conddlcoe pfmullpezones p.easemanuallyentera"disoicts.) CG a24ithout Conditions Ordinance No,$). for Existing Conditions (If applicable): n L� / (''� Arthout Conditions Land Ke4ru &tkos Reques.ed Zanng. a5 (fablt$l,mLpvrf Name Shakes Restaurant Corporation Phone Number. +' (434) 66O40n Address. 106 Goldenrod Place, Lynchburg, VA 24502 E -Mai'. ohn8,yshakers.eom Property Owner's Signature. _._ Name: Phone Number Address, E -Ma': App 'cants S!gnat ne: _. Name, .m Scoggin Phone Number +t te65)n9 -3330 Address 152 S. Main St-eet. Marshall, NC 28753 E• Mai. - tscoggin @madnanrea.ryserviceca5 _ �1Aw Autlwn2ed Agents Signature: - - - - -- Zoning Amendment ROANOKE F- Completed applicalon form and checklist. f- Written narrative expiaming the mason for the request r Metes and bounds descSption, If applicable r Fning fee. f- Concept plan meeting the Application Requiremens of item '2;c)' :n Zoning Annal t Procedures. F- Written proffers. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Con:apt plan meeting the Appication Requirements of lem 2(c)' m Zoning Amandmel Pmcedxes. P,eaae :abe. as 'developmenl pan' d proRered. i- Deveopment pan meet'ng Ice requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance f Comprehensive sigiage plan meeting the requirements o` Section 36.2- 336fd)(2` of the City's Zoning Ordinance. G r Amended development or concept p'.an meeting the Application Requirements of tern 2(c) ' in Zoning Amendment Procedures 6 appEcab e. C Written proffers to be amended. Sae the Cdys Guide to Proffered Conditions Copy of previous'y adom'ed Ordinance. Amended development plan meaing the requirements of Section 362.326 of the Ciys Zoning Ord nance. i- COPY of Prev ous:y adopted Ordinance. NEW ft"Iwmbft�� i wow, Amended cemprehensive, signage plan mel the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d) of the Cdys Zon:rg Ordinance. f- Copy of P'eviously adopted Ordinance. F- A Traffic mpact Study in compaace, with Appel B-2(e) of the City's Zoning Ordnance. 00,00011 f-Cowashee. _. .. F Traffc'mpact ma ys s. ' : Concept p,an. Proffered conditions, if applicabe. - Requxed fee. 'A- e'echonic copy of tris app!caaon and checklim can be found at w .narekeva.govlpbd by seecling'P arming Comm ss!on' under Boards and Comm scions A complete packet must be submitted each time an app icaf :on s amended, un sea otherwMe specified by staff ET �7 T T � BANK OL THE JMAES BUILDING 11 J1 U j\�I� J '' 828 Main Scmec, 19th Floor Lynchburg. Virginia 24504 WILLIAMS Tdcphane (434) 846 Faai�nile: (434) 946 900 www.cwlaw.Co. April 17, 2015 To expedite your receipt of the enclosed material, it has been sent without a cover letter TO: Via Federal Express Katharine Gray, Architect Roanoke Department of Planning, Building & Development Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Rm 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 RECEIVED FROM: S. Henry ( "Hank ") Creasy IV APR E 0 2015 RE: Shakers Restaurant Corporation CITYOFROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING A DEVELOPMENT Enclosed please find the following 1. Zoning Amendment Application; 2. Shakers Restaurant Corporation Letter and Proffers; 3. Corporate Resolution of the Sole Director and Sole Stockholder of Shakers Restaurant Corporation; 4. Site Plans; 5. Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement (excerpt as to parking notice); 6. Joint Driveway Easement; and 7. Relocation of Access Easement. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed, please contact me Shakers Restaurant Corporation 106 Goldenrod Place Lynchburg, VA 24502 April 17, 2015 Planning Commission 910 Ian Shaw, Agent of the Planning Commission Planning, Building and Development Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 170 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 RECEIVED APR 20 20f5 OITYOFROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING g DEVELOPMENT Re: REVISED Application for change in zoning of Shakers Restaurant Parcel at 1909 Valley View Blvd, Dear Planning Commission: Shakers Restaurant Corporation, 1909 Valley View Blvd., sits on a 2 acre parcel that it has operated a restaurant on for many years. We have been approached and would like to build a 4500 square feet mattress store at the far end of our parking lot facing Valley View Blvd. West. The current zoning on the property is CG. In order to make this new building fit with the existing restaurant and other building on the street we would like to change the zoning of the parcel to CLS with certain proffered conditions. Either zoning classification would allow this new use but the CG setback requirements would severely impair the development of the new building. All the existing buildings on Valley View Blvd. West currently sit off the street enough to allow parking in front of the buildings. Under CG the new building would have to be pulled up to the street with parking in the rear. The main concern of this design is the safety of consumer car traffic. A lot of the customers of Shakers restaurant currently use the far entrance and exit on Valley View Blvd. West so as to avoid making a left turn out closer to Valley View Blvd traffic that is turning on to Valley View Blvd. West. If there is not a drive lane in front of the new building to be developed then customers would use the entrance closer to the restaurant that is closer to the Valley View Blvd intersection which would create more traffic and safety issues than exist today. Also if the new building was built close to the street then the shared entrance and exit drive with the adjacent Casual male building would create safety issues for their customers as it would be harder to see around the new building when making a turn out of their lot. We feel that CLS with conditions would be the best solution for our lot and ask the planning commission to grant this request. We have revised our proffers based on city review and comments. Thank you. Si John Buckles Shakers Restaurant Corporation Proffered Conditions to be Adapted The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as they pertain to Official Tax No. 2380110. 1. Any new building will comply with the dimensional regulations and development standards for the CG, Commercial. General District, with the exception of the minimum and maximum front yard and the impervious surface area maximum of the Zoning Ordinance. The maximum front yard for any new buildings will be 80 feet from Valley View Boulevard West, NW and 90 feet from Valley View Boulevard, NW. The impervious surface area maximum for the parcel will be 80 percent of the lot area. 2. The primary entrance to the new building shall be visible from and oriented towards the closest street (Valley View Boulevard West, NW or Valley View Boulevard, NW(, 3. A 5 feet wide sidewalk shall be provided along Valley View Boulevard West, NW. 4. A landscaping strip along new parking areas shall conform to the requirements of Section 36.2- 647 and 649 of the Zoning Ordinance with a minimum of six large deciduous trees per Table 642 -1 of the Zoning Ordinance placed adjacent to the right of way between the parking area and the street. 5. A minimum of 50% of the interior packing lot trees shall be large deciduous trees per Table 642- 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Spacing will be per Table 649 of Zoning Ordinance. RECEIVED APR 8 1205 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING a DEVELOPMENT SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION JOINT ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SOLE DIRECTOR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SOLE STOCKHOLDER M LIEU OF MEETINGS Pursuant to Sections 13.1 -685 and Section 13.1 -657 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, the undersigned, being the sole Director and sole stockholder of SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation (the "Corporation'), does hereby approve and adopt the following action by written consent in lieu of meetings of the Board of Directors and the sole stockholder of the Corporation and waives all requirements of notice. statutory or otherwise: RESOLVED, that the President of the Corporation, John T. Buckles, is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for and seek the rezoning of real property of the Corporation (the "Property ") shown and described on a plan titled "Concept Plan for Mattress Firm, Roanoke Virginia" made by Doyle Allen, P.E., of Hurt & Proffitt, Inc., dated 3/30/2015 ( "Plan'), from CG to CGL subject to certain proffered conditions submitted with the application by letter dated of even date with this resolution, to allow the redevelopment of a portion of the Property as a retail mattress store, as shown on the Plan, and continued use of the existing building as a Shakers Restaurant location. Effective Date: April 17, 2015 Witness the following signature as of the Effective 1[ . 4'11-7 11r Date of Execution Jc uckles, Jr., Stockholder and Director Attest: The undersigned hereby confirms, as counsel to the Corporation, the authority of John T. Buckles, Jr., as the President of the Corporation, pursuant to this resolution. S. Henry Cr6asy IV,fiq Edmunds& Williams, .C. 828 Main Street, 191° FL Lynchburg, VA 24504 t This Construction. operation and Reciprocal Zane- meet Agreement .,ie;�inattez referred to u the •REA-) is "do as of the S day of December, 1982, by and among NOafO LBOCIA22S. aa North Carolina limited Part- _ 1 StrNtts pChar ott�e. North Carolina .28202 whoseMmer authorized to �asra N J. sign of e North Carolina (- NSrseh•); VALM VINN AMMIA22S, UM., a North Carolina limited Partnership with SG principal office at 122 Nut stonewall Street, Charlotte, North Carolina, whose 4010 gtperal - partuar Ss marmeik and whose Ltd. 3 A Georgia general pert b*rW ip,wwhose mole general Partner is Nora- Valley Vi&V_W4lnp W-V .- u NOtherlands Antilles corporation ( oPar•); SEARS, ROSSUCN AND Co., a New York corporation with SG Eastern Territory offices at 555 East Lancaster Avenue, St. Devies, Pennsylvania 190/7 (- Searse); TaATJUMR lROlt@R, INCORPORATED, a Virginia carpe- Nation with Its princivul office at GIs Nast Broad street, Richmond, Virginia 22219 (•Thalhlrrs•)! ALSTOREi REALST CORPORATION. a Delaware mzearatiom •w.. . a.a.wase Voryerauam vier es Office at 917 Rut Brand strut, Richmond, BC Virginia 21217 ('A stern• ), it ha abGLOGod tha term 'N A Re as Sued berain shall maas and nfOr G whichever Of AlstoreS or ABC #toms shall be entitled G and In Possession of the N A R Parcel, Provided. however, that is the avant neither A1Rter0e nor ARC !Yews, shall he entitled G and In Possession Of the N A R Sexual, N A R ahsll memo and refer G AlsGne; and ROAMM LSOOAM RRALTL ASSOCZATSS, a Virginia general Partmrah* with SG principal office in Lyncoberg, Virgiale (easaociates'), and LEOOLM OP VIROINIA, INC.. a Virginia Oorperation with its Principal office o +erg. Virginia PL of amdaretaod the Gem V') It bein a u t' "In aa rem both Associates C. of V. all Mpimfyr referred G jointly es the •parties.' IL2 -.' TALB I. Developer owns in fee simple certain land containing approximately 21.21s aarca situated In the City -N- jy,M1DAMERICA f f -� egg rae1822 of Roanoke and State of Virginia, more Particularly described in exhibit A, Part 1 (hereinafter called 'Developer Parcel') and located as shown on the Plot Plan hereto annexed as eehihit a (Mot Plan'). 2. Sears owns in fee simple Certain land con- taining approximately 12.000 acres situated in the City of Roamhe and State of Virginia, more particularly described in exhibit A, Part 2 (bereicefter Called -Sean Parcel') and located as shown on exhibit S. S. Thalhimers owns in fee simple certain land Containing approximately 5.104 acrat situated in the City of Roanoke and State of Virginia, more particularly described in exhibit A. Part 3 (hereinafter Called •Sbalhimers Parcel•) and located as shown on exhibit a. 4. R) 4 R owns in fee simple Certain land Contain- ing approximately 7.135 acres situated in the City of Roanoke and State of Virginia, more particularly described in Rx- hibit A, Part 4 (hereinafter Called 'R 6 R Pascal-) and located as ehewn on exhibit e. S. Idwett owns in fee simple Certain land con- taining approximately 6.573 acres situated in the City of Roanoke and State of Virginia. more particularly described in exhibit A, Part U(bersinatter called •legpett Parcel•) end located as Shown on eshihit a. G. Developer owns in fee simple those edfitional Parcels of land abown as 'Drainage Lake- DSveloper Reserve Parcel 1.' 'Futmre "MR gas inland- Developer Reserved Pawl S,' 'ACwae Parcel A,' -Access Parcel a, • - Acomes Parcel C,' 'Rererved for Future Parking - Developer Reserved Parcel 2.' and "Reserved for Peters Parking- Develepr Reserved Parcel 4• aw exhibit a, CmtalnLq in tie aggregate approximately 15.904 &area, situated in the City of Roanate and State of Virginia. noon Particularly described in —bibit A, Part 5, which Parcels of land sball be referred to as the 'Developer Reserved Pareal(s),- s • sass e(1823 7. Baruch owns in fee Simple certain lanCmntain- ing approximately 60.607 acres Situated in the City of Roanoha and State of Virginia, more particularly described in exhibit A. Part 7 (hereinafter called •!singe Parcalsa), and shown located om exhibit B. 7. The Developer Parcel, Sears Pascal, Tbalhlfers Parcel, m a it parcel. Leggett Parcel and Developer Reserved Pervel(a), as individually dawribed by mates and bawds in exhibit A, Paste 1, 2, 3, 4, 4.1 and 5, respectively, and located as shown m exhibit a arc Collectively called the "shopping Center site, a which tea is defined in section 1.35 hereof. a. The parties desire to make an integrated ese of their Parcels. and to develop ash improve them Parcels to mate a two -lsval unclosed mall -type regional shopping Center. 9. The Parties desire to provide for the con Uno- tion, maintenance and operation of the Commmn Area and the buildings and other improvements to be situated on and off the Shopping pater Site, as shown on the Plot Plan, and in that regard to Create Certain rights, privileges, obligations duties and easammnts and to impose certain restrictions and movements upm their respective Parcels and the Shopping Center site. Bow. 211CSQOPB, for good and Valuable considers - ties, including the mateal prsisea, CsvesaatS and agree - mats herein Contained, the Parties agree as follows As used in thin IRA, the following tarag have the following meanings, -3- J�RICA 6 t Section 1.1 Access loadfa) -. 14W naim -Access Road(s)- means those rcede Drrovidin9 iugresv to and agrees from the ling bead en the ShoPpin9 Center site to the existing and Proposed streets and which are located as shown and designated on O*hihit C as Across Parcels A, B, C and D and cress hatched on the Plot Plan. Notion 1.3 ASC baildine -ASC Building` mein the building designated as Such es as v17Av en Sshibit -0- which such major, nspaetivaly, may caeas to be comattuatad on its Parcel, whether or net such bail" is attached to its Main Saildin9, suitable for the storage, mWor sale of merchandise or service, including, but not limited to, was as a store specializing in the male and installation of tiro, batteries, automobile accesasriee and lubricants and repair of motor vehicles other than body work, for purposes of this Agreement, the ASC building shall he doomed to he a building separate and apart from said major's Main building. even if physically attached thereto. Rouen 1.3 Car "see -Car Space- means a Paved and striped area for the parking Of motor vehicles, an shown OR the Plot Plan. Sach Car Space shall have the minimum dimensions set forth in section 1S.1. - Section 1.e, Center 0contar` means the shopping Center site defined in Section 1.35, together with all buildings and other Improve- wants constructed at any time thereon. which Center aba11 be knwm as galley View es provided in section 9.3. section 1.S Coon Arse 'Common Arms- rams all areas within the boundaries of the Shopping Center Me and Improvements therein and thersen that under this PL are to be made awailable for the am- eaelwive was, Convenience and benefit of W Parties LANDAMERICA -4- 11/03/91 • ! :_ 1466 FAKIM hereto am their •Pamfittems• Y hereinafter defined, if authorised pursuant to section 10.13 hereof, which shall be demand to include but without limitation the followings (a) the Parking Ana (including without limitation Anneal Roads and Ring Road); (b) the Enclosed Mall including all amenities in the inclosed Mall after its completion except for the areas thence, occupied by ki mks; (c) sidewalks and walkways, including PRdmmter Sidewalks located exterior to the perimeter of all buildingsi (d) landscaped and planted anew including such areas lying between the Perimeter Side- walks and the buildings an each Party's Parcel; (a) all curbs and lighting standards, traffic and directional signs and traffic striping and markings located within the Canter; (f) retaining walls and grads sparatiws (other than retaining walls whim are an intpsal part of a building); (g) common Utility Fwilitims; (h) fin corridors leading Iron the melomd Mll or beWmen the Mll Store Buildings and the Main Building of a Major; and (1) for so long as ear are covered by any Sasanee,t rights an aK forth is Sections 10.11 and 10.12, the Drainage Lake Area rKerx" to in said Sec- tion 10.11 and the Buffer Eonan referred to in said section 10.12, npeatiwly. Sotwitbetaodiog the foregoing, than shall net be included in Cameon Aran guy Baseline pump island facilities am adiaeant apron or Truck hcilities. section 1.6 Ceron vt111tw reciutime mcamean Utility racilities• mans all atop drainage facilities. Sanitary newer systems, natural gas systmes (if MY), water ayatams, fin protection installations (including such boaster PUMPS or POSOXMin and fire Amps as may be reasired by a=& Party-s fin issuranme rating Organisation at the time of W approval of the Final 1prnPemmt place), and uasesgmsmW eleatrieal Power, wale SP (if available), MA telephone antra situated on the shopping Canter site, mss_ lM AMERICA s f each respectively at elevations and specific points oZ entry stipulated by each Party as to its respective buildings. Included within the Common Utility raailities ars the drainage lakes located within the Developer Reserved Parcel(s). section 1.7 Condemnation sCoodemostico' seems (a) the temporary or perma- nent taking of all or any part of the shopping Center site or the possession thereof under the power of emiment domain; or (b) the voluntary sale or Conveyance of all or any part of the shopping Center site to cry body or entity having the power of eminent domain provided that such portion of the shopping Center site is than under the actual or imminent threat of esdsent domain. peetion 1,6 Dsvelooar Improvements The 'Developer Improvements• wane these improve- ments defined in Notion 6.1. Section 1.9 Deleted Section 1.10 inclosed Mall "Enclosed Mall• weans the two -level enclosed, lighted, sprinklersd, heated, ventilated and air - conditioned mull to be located on the Developer Parcel as shown on the Plot Plan, and thereon designated ORMlosed Malls. Nation 1.11 rloor Aron Manz Area- Yemen the aggregate, from time to time, Of the actual number of agmare fast Of enclosed floor space in nay building located on the shopping Center site, eaclesively appropriated for use by an Ooeupaat, whether or sot actually occupied. rloor Area *Ball include, but without limitation; (a) Easement space and subterranean arses; (b) EalooMy and auxamLme opens except as provided in le) of tbig section 1.11; W spa" euupled by "Sum, stairs, aasalstors, dumbwaiters, conveyor\ or other interior equipment �1 0 lass ,Nip within the building involved (except on excluded below); and (d) Floor space occupied by the Mocks located within the meloeed Hall, Including in the pee of Meeks having open counters for the purpose of serving customers, an area four (a) fast in depth Outside such open counters. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition. Floor Area Wall net inelnda space fur; (a) Za second or mere levels of ring multi -deck stock area being used exclusively by an occupant for stocking and storage of MrtLaudise to be sold by arch occupant in the promises occupied by it within the Canter) (f) Are ", including pentboug", used primarily to boxes sacb nical. electrical, taluphome. air - conditioning and similar equipment, including any computer equipment met used for sole or lease to third persons and Used solely for the Occupant, and any garbage (et other vets) collecting area or waste baling or compacting areal (9) The Center's management and security offices, the marthant's Association or Fremational road office and the area, it ace, eat maid. by Developer as a co un- ity auditoria, bet to exceed 6,000 square fact of floor mpace in the aggregate, (b) Caaem Area malatsnanee office and equipment storage areas Mesa exclusively for the storage of sais- tananp and prOmet coal equipment, supplies and nate- rials fur Common Area saintmmance and Canter proautioea which are includable in Developer's improvements) IS) no inclosed Nell, except for areas tbarsof occupied by kiosks; f 0 (j) outdoor Sailing Ara" as defined 1.11 so 1049 as such Outdoor Sailing Are" are not en- clo"d so as to be reaapably cvpable of being boated, ventilated or air - conditioned by mechanical aeons; (k) %ruck Facilities: (1) Fire and service corridors required by build- ing codas and not Contained within any are" exelnsively appropriated for the use of any single Occupant; (a) Public restroame. Floor AYea shall be measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walla (including basement wails), except that where party and interior common walls we in- solved, the Floor Ares Wall be measured from the center thereof instead of from the exterior faces thereof. Prince Parcels Those parcels located adjacent to fvr 8boppin9` center site ornsd -by_ _designated on 16a Plan and described on blhibit A, Part 7. _ s *p • or Partip' LxorowWaste •ISprovrmn•, " •Parties' Improwwwour+• means the buildings, structures and improvements which " to Dawlepar are defined in section 6.1 hereof and as to each Major are defined in Section 7.1 bsrpf, and any additions thereto, or replacements thereof, or either of same, made in accordance with this M. An used in this RM •Iapzovemsmte` or •P'nj"' Isprowpente• shall mean the Developer Improvements, or one or more Majors Improvements, Or any combination of all of such Improvements an the content my require. Section 1.11 Institution 'Institution- seep a bank. savings and lop asp - clarion, trust CeaOs47, insurance Campa4, public pension fend or retirement food, .private pension or retirement fund having a bank or treat company as truce, or, private pension ar "tireaa.•.t fund which is a limited partner of Developer 11/01/81 1 AwMAMFERICA t w 1OS t+UM er Owns a controlling interest in a limited partoffof Developer. Motsithstesdinj the foregoing, a private pension or retirement fund vbinh is a limited partner of Developer or owns a control- ling interest in a limited partner of Developer shall not be meted u an •Institution• for purposes of Sections 17.3 and 10.7 hereof. Section 1.14 Interest •interest• race the interest computed at the prim rate the- being somouneed or published by the Chase Manhattan Bank, an the rata charged to its Best valued high Credit awn- goWrsantel Customer at the time the QXpseditosc on which the interest is being Computed vas Made pins an mount equal to IX above sects prime rate. In w evwt Shall Interest exceed the applicable ---I m rate permitted to be Charged by the lass of Virginia. yoetiw 1.15 Sae •Igase• moment wy lease, dead or other instrument or arrangement in writing (other than this AEA) thereby an occupant acquires rights to nse ewer ocow noor Area. SWUM 1.104 [goat% Improvements Roggatt Improvements• mans the impra is defined in section 7.2(d). seance 1.14 win Building(s) -wain Building(s). mews, with respect to each Major, the two or more story building permitted er required by this Rio to be constructed by or for each Beier within each Bajer'• Permissible Building Ares. but such term does met include a Major'.■ ABC Building, if any, whether or not attached to the Main Building. section 1.17 Baiors "Raja", or •Major• meson Seers. '1hathimers, N A a and BAY awes or ground losses of a portion of the shopping Cant" site on much a single specialty er department store building. used primarily by a Single occupant and oentaiaiog -� ,1-MAAMERICA 6 50.000 sgnere feet or sore of Moor Kea is loch! sod their respective nsecesmors sad rsigm, m say ome or any combination tbersof as the cactsst my require. section 1.18 wit store Buildinels) 9411 store Building(*)- ram the buildings which Developer is obligated or !emitted to construct Pursuant to this "A and which are within Developer-• PemiSMMO build- ing Area mud which abut or *pan em the melued 1411. section 1. it NAB IsernvmmIM 91 A I Improvements• means these isprowernb defined in Section 7.2(e). section 1.121 nuvaom me tern *mortgage" as used in this IIA shell be deemed to ran and include a deed of treat u well as a mortgage, If and wben 80216ablo, and the to= "mortgages" u need in this IIA shell be dammed to ran and include the beneficiary under a dead of trust an well an • mortgage, if and wham applicable. Section 1.20 occupant "Oxupant" er *001M Auto- ran each Najor, Devel- aper and aqy other P=xon entitled by leans, dud or other Kitten cewoy&=* to use and Occupy Plom Area within the auto, or ere Or more Of them, and their respective licensee, concessionaires mas embtemRDta u the context my require. $Action 1.21 ftodpa Date "Opening Date• seems the data defined in Section 8.1, which date in subject to change as provided in sst- tion 8.1. 8001192 1.22 outdoor sellime Area "Outdoor $A11109 Area" SURDS that part of the Cates where outdoor aellltg, including the display and storage of artehaedir incidental . tbereto, may be conducted from time to time. aed which W bun identified an the Plot Plan ntt&ebed u Ishlbit b RD en Outdoor selling Area. -10- LANDAMERICA 12/02/8] 6 V E2etlon 1.27 Parcel = "Parcel" or -parcels. Yen the Dawloper Pawl, the Developer Reserved Parcel(s), seen Parcel, Th"hinsrs Parcel, a A R Parcel, Fringe Parcels) or my conbination or Portions thereof, So the contest say require. Any portion(,) of the Developer Parcel which is intended to be conveyed or land leased to a Raj" and is shown on ssbibit a as a Future Store Parcel, FUTURE or PRHRY ,hail be a separate Parcel for purposes of this RRA upon Conveyance or land lease to a Rajer, if such conveyance is subject to tares and Provisions of this MA applicable to a Rajor. Section 1.24 Parklm Ares -Parking Area" Susan all areas in the Center which are set apart or used free tine to Lire for autowbiie and otbr vehicular traffic and for the parking of rotor vehicles, including without limitation mwlti -level Parking decks, and all traffic lanes, aisles and readvoys (including the Ring Road and Access Roads) and curbs adjacent thereto, vehicle parking stalls, -Pedestrian walkways (other then Perimeter Sidewalks an defined in section 1.26), grade separations including retaining walls (other than retaining wells which are an integral part of a Party's building), and landscaping within or adjacent to suck area (but Secluding landscaped areas between Periaster Sidewalks and the buildings served by such Perimeter Sidwalks), lighting standards and traffic and diraational signals. Parking Area does net include any Outdoor selling Areas. Truck racilition, or gasoline pang, island facilities and adjacent apron. SoCUM 1.25 j!artv A "Part• neane each separate entity, now or here- after 41Mteriag fate and aseeasin7 this an, whether or net suab astit to M isdividual, or individnele (oat le, natural Person, or Persons), a partnership (general or limited), a -11- LANAWUCA Joint venture or corporation, or, amiect to with the provisione of Article 20 of this M, any successor to coy such entity permitted under the Provisions of this RSA, and being referred to collectively herein AS •Parties.• In the event, under any circumAtabces, a Parcel my be Owned by more than one entity in undivided Ownership interests, such entities nevertheless shall com tituts only a single Party. of all such entities constituting Only a single Party, those entities owning at lent seventy percent (70x) of the an- divided ownership interest in the Vernal of such Party, shalls (2) Designate and of their number to act as agent, autboriaed to act for, and to bind and obligate, all of such entities constituting only a single Party, u the act and obligation of such Partyt and (2) Ratify the other Parties haieunder, in Kiting, of such designation as set cut in the provisions of Article 26. In the absence of sudh written designation, the note of the Party moss, Parcel car to be bold Sn wdividal ownership interests (whether or not such Party retains any interest in the Parcel In question) shall be binding upon all entities having as interest in and Parcel In question, until such time as writes notice Of each designation is served upon each of the other Parties as aforesaid. notwithstanding the foregoing, the term -Party' or *parties- shall net include Dersm unless esrsch is specifi- cally rafsresood in tin provision. "GUOn 1.26 Perimeter Sidewalks - Perimetsr Sidewalks- sews tbase paved sidewalk areas (Other than within the Rwelsssd Nall) between the back of the out line and either a building wall or landscaping adjacent to a building wail u the Oostart nay appropriately LA.N )ANERICA dz- 12/42/82 s require; provided, hewwer, sidewalks and curbs WSjoi�q or on retaining walls or berms within grade changes *ball not ba considered Perimeter sidewalks except to the extent they are adjacent to building walls or landseapinq adjacent to building walla. Section 1.27 Permissible Building Area - Permissible Building Area" means the arsa(s) located within the Shopping Center Site and within the Building Limit Line shown on Exhibit -B- within which a building, together with Psrimeter•sidwalks, has been, will be, or may be constructed as hereinafter more fully provided. Section 1.28 Permissible Deck Area -Permissible Deck Areas @hail mean the area(s) designated on page 1 of the Plot Plan attached as Bxbihit B within which a Party may construct multi -leval parking facilities. Section 1.29 Pexmlttees - yersittmes- rams all Occupants mad their respec- tive officers, directors, employmes, agents, partners, con- tractors, customers, visitors, invites, licensees and con- cessionaires. section I an N-enn -Persons or - Persons- means individuals, partner- ships, associations, corporations and any other form of business organisation, or one or mare of then, as the con- text may require. Section 1.91 Project Architect .Project Architect- means Perabes, Walters S Asso- ciates or such other architect lioemeed to practice in the State of Virginia as may from time to time be designated by Developer and approved by the IMjors. section 1.32 Reserved Parcels 2boa Parcels excluding Developer Parcel located within the Shopping Center Site owned by Developer, so desig- -13- i* t�4iSIA noted on the Plot Plan attached as Exhibit 8, end mute speci- fically described in Exhibit A, Part S. section 1.33 Ring Road -Ring Road- shall mean the area designated as such on page 1 of Exhibit C. Section 1.34 Sears Imeroyenants *Sears Improvements` means the improvements defined in Section 7.2(b). Section 1.35 5 p Center Site .Shopping Cuter Site- means the Developer Parcel, Developer' Raerved'rarceis, sear rare".,2haimimers Parcel, M 4 R Parcel and Leggett Parcel AS collectively described on Exhibit A, Part 6, and show on Exhibit R. Section 1.36 Sueolameetal Agreament(s) .Supplemental Agreement(s)" Seems the separate agreement or agreements which haw been entered into contem- poraneously herewith between Developer and each Major. Each such a9mmmeut is herein referred to as a -Supplemental Agreement•. Section 1.37 Termination Date •TeRinstion Date" means the date on which the term of this REA shall terminate, as provided in Section 26.1. Section 1.39 Thalhimers Improvements •Tha2himers ISpzwamenu• Seams the improvements defined in Section 7.2(e). Section 2.39 Truck Facilities -Truck Facilities• mew those area designated as such m the Plot Plan attached as exhibit B which are to be used exclusively for shipping and receiving and truck accom- modAtim in monection therewith, including, (a) truck docks, open or enclosed, and ramps and approaches thereto, (b) area Constructed for truck leading, unloading, Parking or term- areunds, and -14- WAMEF1CA (c) areas exterior to building va11e:.uod f- or compacting, baling or handling trash. Section 1.40 Tove aereement 'those agreements described in Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Section 1.41 love Mork That portion of the roadway and other work to be performed by governmental bodies and Developer as set fortt. in the Town Agreement. _ _ .... LANDAMERICA -15- 12/02/61 S - ARTICLE 3 . ids Max ErEIEITS Attached hereto and torming a part of this REA are the following exhibits, which, for the purpose of idantifi- nation, have been signed or initialled by the Parties or their respective attorneys; Exhibit A, part 1 - Legal Description of the Developer Parcel Exhibit A, Part 3 - Legal Description of the Sears Exhibit A, Part 9 - Legal Description of the Thslhisers Exhibit A, Part 4 - Legal Description of the M A E Paccal Exhibit A, Part 4.1 -Legal Descripti= of the Leggett Exhibit A, Part S - Legal Description of Developer Reserved Pargl(s) <Draisage Lake Areas I, Butter zone. Access Parcels, Future Saar, Gas Island and for Future ParkiagjsServed Exhibit A, Part 6 - Legal Description of the Shopping Center Site Exhibit A, Part 7 - Legal Description of Fringe Parcel, Exhibit a - Plot Plan , Exhibit C - Survey Exhibit D - Minimus Technical Specifications Exhibit E - Town Agreement Exhibit P - Rules and Regulations and Maintenance Standards Exhibit C - Sign Criteria Exhibit H - Allied Will cause Letter Exhibit I - Carter, Hawley, Hale Will Cause Letter -16 AMERICA 13/03 /R� 0 _ ARTICLE 15 :... i0s X19= auction 15.1 Reonired Pam Ratio Except as otherwise provided is Article 18 or Article 27, each Party Wall maintain on its Parcel, other than as to Developer on Developer's Reserved Parcel(s), at least lies (5) astombile Car Spaces for every 1,000 square fat of Floor Area on its Parcel or such higher number of Car Spaces as my be required by the appliemble Soning coda. Par purposes of this section 15.1 only, Fluor Area includes any Outdoor Selling Area. Ruch Car space -ball have a aloimum width of 9 -1/2 fast an center measured at right angles to the side line of the parking space, *:Copt oat all Car spaces located totally inside the Parking Transitional Lim aboma on sheet 1 of exhibit e9e shall haw a -4 -1, width of 9 feet. each parking lam or Parking bey shall conform to the typical parking layout specified on Caibit •se or to a car pace width, bay pace end drive lam layout which in each instance either equals or "*,Me the typical parking layout specified on inhibit Va." Notion 15.2 Charms In Parklumi Employee varkAng A"" no charge of any typo shall be made to or collected free nay occupants or Petmitteas for the right to park vebicles in the Parking Ana, except such Common Area maintenance, costs as may he provided for in any supplemental Agroesants or in any Leeas with any occupant. She Parties may from ties to time, by separate agreement, desigaste certain auctions within the Parking Area for a Ivories antmbilo parking ace by the Occupants aed their employs". agents, contractors, licensees. and eameasicsairn. sack Party shall sso 14 best efforts to -100- 12/02/83 �CA 0 2 taus, its employees and the employees of its teaan}i �~ sabt,ma .is, contractors, licens"a and Concessionaires to use only the designated parking sections. 3e such designs- tint Shall he binding Upon any Party who has Out Comested, in writing, thereto. So such cesignated area shall be provided within 300 fact of any entrance of any Main Building or within 300 feet of say entrance to the ffilosed Mall without the mment of the Party an whoa, Parcel such parking is intended to be Provided and the Consent of any Party rhos* entrance would he within 300 feet to such designated area. Absent such a separate consent. each Party agrees that the Occupants of its Pascal and its employees, agents, Contractors, licemess and concessionaires shall part only on its Pascal. Se e ShM�15.3 gn gj Fortino Area Built as otherwise mopressly provided in Articles 5. 13, le and 15 baraof, an Party shall Use or permit the me of the Parking Area on its Parcel far any purpose other than Pedestrian movement and the parking sad passage of motor vehicles. no Party shall grant any pasklag rights to anyone other than Permittees witbmt the con Out of the other Parties hereto, such oomeat not to be ummmombly withheld. fti }fir auction 15 A Chanme jg Parking Amm, Ash Party shall haw the right, fro' time to time, to make reasonable changes and modifications in and to the Packing Area located on each Party's respective Parcel provides, however, that me such changes and modifications, may he weft which (1) shall adversely affect the orderly flow of ptdeetrim a" vehicular traffic in the center or render any Parcel w the buildings thereon less aametible to such traffic, (ii) reduce the umber of Car Spaces on the Parcel in question below the amber required to be maintained in order to meet them requirements of Petition 15.1 hereof (iii) would be iarossistent with the requirements of Bahibit -D- er would result in the Parking Area lighting being inconsistent P' I -102- 11/01/81 0 2 ices P4104 With the reguirsaents of Section 11.1 hereof, oz (its) eeuld ruult in malti -level parking other than as provided in ' section 15.5, and further provided that an Party shall, at any ties, have any right to relocate or materially modify the Ring Peed or Access Roads leading to mad from the public roadways except ex otherwise provided in Section 10.1. LANDAMERICA ! V section 1515 Multi -Level Parkins. In the event that any Party requires or desires additional Parking for any reason whatsoever, including, without limitation, u a result of a Permitted expansion of its /ailding in accordance with the terms of this hG or eondm tien, that Party or those Parties, as the cue sey he, shall he entitled to Provide the hedessary additional Parking by constructing (es and whore shown on Yshibit vsa attached harete, but not otherwise), at its or their expense, on its or their own Parcel er respective Parcels, or the Parcel or Parcels of other Parties subject to the written wMant of such other Party or Parties which consent nay be withheld in such Other Party's or Partin" sole discretion, ons or more of the sections of the parking deck and appurtenant imProvem uto (including, without limitation, access rasps and connecting bridges, 411 of which shall be domed to be included in the ten •parking deft" u hereinafter used) within the permissible Parking heck area shown hatched no Page s of tshib ;t 4e attached hereto, as shown thereon and Out otherwise, subject to the following terms, conditions MW limitetionsl (a) eke plans am specification for construction Of the Parking deck, or section thereof, shall he subject to the written approval of W Parties, which approval shall not b4 unre4sonably withheld. Provided, however, mtwithsianding anything to the Contrary contained herein- if only Cow (1), Party desires to eroat a parking . deck, it skull Crest • section thereof only m it, see Parcel es shown m bhibit W attached hereto and an Party Chen Curt any parties Or segtlm of the parking dank m the Parcel of any Other Party unless the Developer am the holders of the fee side end leasehold titles te arse Perssl shell avert assts ion vPitiM, Mick Cmsent may he uereasmably withbsld. (b) The Party or Parties Constructing the parking -103- iiAWAMERICA a :... saes FMRsM deck or "Cum or contributing to the coat thereof (•peck owner(W) suet perform soft construction, or cause the same to be performed, in a mapper that ne liens, including mechanic's or materialmenes liens, are placed on the land on which the parking deck is con - stsueted. the Deck Owner(s), at its sole expense, as Part of construetlou shall relocate any utilities as required by comettnction of the Parking deck or section in such a mammer as not to mrsawcum ly interfere with the watinued operation of the oacter and shall repair my damage sensed by such relocation. (c) Prior to coat Of Construction, the Deck wmer(s) amet agree in writing in form and contact .reasonably acceptable to the Parties holding the fee simple and leasehold titles to the land upon or over which the parking deck or section is to be located, to maintain, rasters, repair, Insure and pay all real PrcWq takes and assessments aspen the Parking dock or section. (d) Demstrmdtion of such sectios or sectioma of the Parking deck shall be performed in a good and worasan- ILb member and Shall be snpeditioosiy completed with a minimum of intorrapt.iun to existing parking facilities WW aeosme in compliance with all laws, ordinances, orders, rulma, rpalatisms and reguirements applicable thereto and with the rsgmirsmante of this MPA. All such abstraction work shall comply with the rsgmire- amte of 012 iasarance policies affecting the Parcels OR Which comstrucUou occa a and with the orders, MISS and regulatiema of the Mational Pita Protection Amecoia- tim or rep other bedp emardiaing similar functions. 'ka back dmaer(s) shall pr,xptly Pry all costs and expanses of each construction, Shall discharge all lime 911W against the Parcel or Parcels m which the Parking depk Or section is located arising not of such -104- i2kAA)DAMERICA V .... i tkFi.M construction, and shall procure and pay for all persits and licenses required in eonmetim with such construc- tion. If Several Parties require or desire the construc- tion of such parking deck or sections thereof on their respective Parcels or the Parcel or Parcels of other Parties, such Deck Owners) shall cooperate in the selection and joint esploynent of one contractor to perfors all such work and such Dock Owner(e) shall contribute to the mot of such parking deck as they may agree, except that each Party shall bear the Coot of guy connecting bridge which directly connects its Building to the parking deck. coostruc -ion or said Parking deck also shall be subject to all other con- struction provisions Contained in Article 5 of this AG to the extent that the saes era applicable to such construction. (e) the Deck Owners) shall provide all interested Parties with a detailed statuent of total construction cost within thirty (30) days after the parking deck or section is placed in use. (f) If and when said deck on section or Suctions thereof is constructed, the sale shall be and hecone Part of the Coason Areas in the Center and part of the Isprowaents upon the Parcel upon or over which such deck or section thereof is erected, and the sane shall be subject to all of the obligations respecting Cosom Area and to the reciprocal easesust rights of all Parties as provided under Article 10 of this RNA, which easesent rights shall be sutesatically superior to any USE, against all or part of the shopping Center Site frm and after the recording of this krA$ provided, however, =lose otherwise agreed in writing by the Deck Owners, the parking spaces on the deck or section thereof comtrnoted by then shall not be utilized by any other Party for purposes of satisfying its parking -105- 12/02/83 w v ratio reguicmments. such easement rights Sh:114ftwim surface and subsurface *Yemenis for the support of the packing deck and air space easements for the use of the air space shove the horizontal and inclined planes of the under side of said parking d*ek. Open rsgasst of any !arty the hack Owner(s) shall obtain Subordination Agr*uenL fra any holder of a lien on the property on which the dank or section or sections is located, comfirming that such lime are aubordinate to the reciprocal easement rights created by this Article 15 and Article 10 beroof. (g) All parking docks shall contain directional and other signing reasonably ragmestad by other parties. -106- 11/UA3 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Del. Wcods,ROgers',lmr B K 1 7 6 2 P 6 00385 CITY OF ROANOKE JOINT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT THIS JOINT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT is made and entered into as of this %Sday of February, 1996, by and between HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership ( "Hersch"), and SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation ( "Shakers "). RECITALS A. Hersch is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land located on Valley View Boulevard West, N.W., in the City of Roanoke, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -2A" on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 1038 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Hersch Parcel "). B. Shakers is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land located adjacent to and contiguous with the northeastern boundary of the Hersch Parcel, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -1" on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 717 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Shakers Parcel "). C. The Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel share a curb cut onto Valley View Boulevard West, and Shakers has constructed a paved driveway providing vehicular access from Valley View Boulevard west to the Shakers Parcel, which driveway is located partially on the Shakers Parcel, and partially on the Hersch Parcel. The driveway is located within a thirty foot (30') wide strip of land along the common boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Easement Area ,,). D. Hersch and Shakers have agreed to convey to one another a reciprocal non- exclusive easement over the Easement Area, for the purpose of using, maintaining and replacing the common curb cut and driveway and related improvements, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Joint Driveway Easement (this "Agreement "). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for the purposes aforesaid, the parties hereto agree for themselves, their successors and assigns as follows: 1. Grant of Drivewa Easement over Hersch Parcel. Hersch hereby grants to Shakers, its successors and assigns, a permanent non - exclusive driveway easement over the portion of the Easement Area located on the Hersch Parcel, for the purpose of vehicular access, ingress and egress between Valley View Boulevard West and the Shakers Parcel, and for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and reconstruct -ng the paved areas, curbs and gutters and related c�_00.059ro.D] c BN1762PG 00386 roadway improvements located within the Easement Area, subject to the other terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. Grant of Roadway Easement over Shakers Parcel. Shakers hereby grants to the Hersch, its successors and assigns, a permanent non - exclusive driveway easement over the portion of the Easement Area located on the Shakers Parcel, for the purpose of vehicular access, ingress and egress between Valley View Boulevard West and the Hersch Parcel, and for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and reconstructing the paved areas, curbs and gutters and related roadway improvements located within the Easement Area, subject to the other terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3. No Obstructions. Each party agrees that it will not erect any permanent improvements over, across or within the Easement Area, or any other surface obstructions within the Easement Area, that obstructs or interferes with paved access between Valley View Boulevard West and each Parcel. The foregoing provisions shall not prohibit the reasonable designation and relocation of traffic lanes, nor shall it be deemed to require Shakers to remove any existing improvements on the Shakers Parcel. In addition, each party may block traffic on its Parcel as may be reasonably required for the purpose of repairing or replacing the paved areas on its Parcel. If possible, however, such action shall be taken on a day or at a time when the buildings on the other Parcel are not open for business, and in any event only after prior written notice to the owner of the other Parcel and to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission c/o Executive Director, 5302 Aviation Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24022. 4. Roadway Maintenance. The owner of the Shakers Parcel shall be responsible, at its sole expense, for the routine maintenance of the roadways and related improvements located within the Easement Area, including all paved surfaces, pavement markings, directional signs, curbs and gutters, and storm drainage inlets. This maintenance obligation shall include, without limitation, the following obligations imposed upon Shakers under paragraph 2 of the Deed conveying the Shakers Parcel to Shakers, recorded in Deed Book 1579 at Page 1074 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia: a. To keep and maintain all sidewalks, roadways, and paved parking surfaces in good, safe, clean and sightly condition at all times. b. To remove promptly, to the extent reasonably practicable, snow, ice, surface water and debris. C. To keep all directional signs, pavement signs, and parking lot striping distinct and legible. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the owner of the Hersch Parcel shall be responsible, at its expense, for all necessary repairs to the paved surfaces located within the caawsaM70.01M4 -2- BK1762PG 00387 Easement Area. This maintenance obligation shall include, without limitation, the obligation to repair potholes or pavement cracks, and to resurface or repave the paved areas within the Easement Area when reasonably necessary. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph 4, each party shall be solely responsible, at its expense, for any maintenance primarily necessitated by the negligence or wrongful intentional acts of such party, its agents, contractors or employees. If the owner of either Parcel fails to perform its maintenance obligation with respect to the roadway improvements within the Easement Area, except when the necessary maintenance is the result of the negligence or wrongful intentional acts of the owner of the other Parcel, or its agents, contractors or employees, and if such failure or default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after the defaulting owner has received written notice specifying the nature of the default or failure from the owner of the other Parcel, then the owner of the other Parcel shall have the right to perform any necessary maintenance or repairs, or to cause them to be performed, at the expense of the defaulting owner. Provided that such maintenance work is bid on by at least two (2) responsible contractors and the lowest bidding contractor performs the maintenance work, the cost of the maintenance work will be deemed authorized and incurred by the defaulting owner. The defaulting owner shall reimburse the owner of the other Parcel within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice for the completed maintenance work, accompanied by a copy of the bids for such work from at least two (2) contractors. If the defaulting owner fails to pay such costs within the thirty (30) day period, the owner of the other Parcel shall be entitled to file a mechanics lien against the Parcel of the defaulting owner in the amount of such invoice, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum or at the highest rate of interest permitted by law, whichever is less; and the owner of the other Parcel may recover that amount plus interest in an action at law, all in accordance with Chapter 43 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. In addition, the owner of the other Parcel shall have any and all other remedies available to it at law or in equity for such a default in the maintenance obligation. 5. No Cross - Parking Easements. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to grant to the owner of either Parcel any righ =s to use the parking areas located on the other Parcel for the parking of motor vehicles. 6. No Rights in Public or Third Parties. This Agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to grant any rights or privileges to the public in general, or to any third parties except as provided in paragraph 3 above and paragraph 7 below; provided, however, that Hersch and Shakers recognize and agree that this joint Driveway Easement is subject to the terms and conditions of caua9. M70.omu -3- BK1762PG 00389 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /S day of Febraury, 1996, by Henry J. Faison, as General Partner of HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership. Notary Public My commission expires: M9 CorvnL- Im E^,.Irca C;^ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINI/A COUNTY (OR CITY) OF (-- r��,�I��.��r� 1 �_ I• �loa Kcwi,YI(J Ckwjisen a Notary Public in and for the to a4d County (or City) aforesaid, do certify that _S,_t,@ it KVu4tf 1 1 whose name, as President of SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, is signed to the writing above, bearing date on the ITf day of February, 1996, has acknowledged the same before me in my County (or City) aforesaid. Given under my hand and official seal this day of Febraury, 1996. My term of office expires on �l �O®miitinn Fzpires 9ctoh =r 71,799$ Notary Public [NOTARIAL SEAL] C- nmsiAWO.01 c -5- ?OA:gx -: ARPORT kVEV VKWTY MAP NOT TO SCALE am Iyyb 2 General Milis Restaurants, Inc. Parcel 7C -3B EXHIBIT A 8K1762PG 003'. Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Deed Book 1564 Page 662 Airport Clear Zone undeveloped iL o a �G m ^� fie an i a $ S e. SB'96'03- E 10.02' Shakers Restaurant DB 1579 pg 1o74 BN1762PG 00391 039 S. TAX S `� In the Clerks Olece of I GirnliS it for the Cjty,ol 038 S. ADD TAX. S Roanoke, the Cerubcale or S �``i this instrument was or senled wdh 214 C. TAX acknowledgment [her e10 an xed and admitted to 220 C ADD , TAX S_ record at4 /4 ocLk. � m I hereby pertly 301 FEE _ that the I Imposed under Sec. 58.1-801 and Sec. 212 TRANSFER 5 58.1 -802 a e been paid to this oll¢e 800 ADD TAX S 1 TOTAL Tea e. dhur B. C sh, III Clerk By . Depuly Cierk MAILED OR DELIVERED TO r BI(1762P6 00388 the Relocation of Access Easement dated December 18, 1995, recorded immediately prior to this document. 7. Covenants Running With Land. The obligations, easements and conditions contained in this Agreement are covenants running with the land; and they are made by the parties for the benefit of themselves, each future owner of fee simple title to all or part of the Hersch Parcel or the Shakers Parcel, and the grantees, successors, assigns, lessees, agents, employees and invitees of each of the foregoing. B. Miscellaneous. This Agreement has been entered into, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters set forth herein, and supersedes any prior written or oral understandings between the parties with respect to those matters. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement under seal as of the day and year first above written. HERSCH: HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited artnershi p By: (SEAL) Henry J. Faison, General Partner SHAKERS: SHAKERS REST CORPORATION i By: Pr sident [CORPORATE SEAL) C-3=03.0 VUWI w - 4 _ 42'i ,N U.1. 1 :xcs ,'rooc rs 'i'uhiir BK1762P6 00370 RELOCATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT THIS RELOCATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT (" Relocation Agreement ") is made as of the i4!4 day of December, 1995 by and between H RSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership whose address is 1900 Interstate Tower, 121 West Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina ( "Hersch "), SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION- a Virginia corporation whose address is 2095 Langhorne Road, Suite C, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 ( "Shakers ") and THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION, a body corporate organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Grantee "), acting Pursuant to Resolution No. 0q.03909 6 GRANTEE IS EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 58 811.A.3. AND 58.1- 811.C.3 OF THE CODE OF VIR-_NIA 195C1 AS AMENDED FROM PAYMENT OF RECORD amrON TP.XES W I T N E S S E T H WEEREAS, Hersch is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Hersch Parcel_") located on Valley View Boulevard west, N.W., in the City of Roanoke, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -2A" on that man recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 1035 in the C °fice of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Shakers is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Shakers Parcel') located adjacent to and contiguous with the northeastern boundary of the Hersch Parcel, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -1" on that map recorded -in Map Book 1 at Page 717 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia; and C -322M B K 1 7 6 2 P G 00371 WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of a parcel of land located adjacent to and contiguous with the northwestern boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, identified as Airport Clear Zone, acquired by deed recorded in Deed Hook 1564 at Page 662 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Adjacent Land ,,); and WHEREAS, an access easement has previously been granted across a portion of the Hersch Parcel, which access easement is shown on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 450 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Original Access Easement "); and WHEREAS, Hersch intends to develop the Hersch Parcel, and Hersch, Shakers and Grantee have agreed to relocate the Original Access Easement along the common boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, as more particularly Provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Grant of Relocated Access Easement and Construction of Connecting Road Hersch and Shakers (collectively, "Grantors ") hereby grant, give, convey and transfer to Grantee, with General Warranty and English covenants of title, a non - exclusive perpetual easement across and over the Easement Area (as hereinafter defined) for the purposes of ingress, egress, and regress between the right - of -way of valley view Boulevard west, N.W. and the Adjacent Land, for use by Grantee, its employees, v'sitors, agents, contractors, 6322034 B K 1 7 6 2 P 6 00372 invitees and representatives, including, without limitation, Federal Aviation Administration employees and contractors. The Easement Area shall consist of a thirty (30) foot wide strip of land running from the northern boundary of the right -of -way of Valley View Boulevard West, N.W. to the southern boundary of the Adjacent Land, which strip is located partially on the northeastern portion of the Hersch Parcel and partially on the southwestern portion of the Shakers Parcel, and is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Hersch, pursuant to a right of entry to be granted by Grantee, covenants and agrees to grade and gravel in a mutually acceptable location a roadway connecting the Easement Area to the existing road on the Adjacent Land. Grantee shall have no rights in or to any property owned by Grantors other than the easement granted herein. Except as set forth herein, each Grantor reserves the right to fully utilize, without restriction, the Easement Area for the benefit of itself, its employees, visitors, agents, customers and invitees, and to grant additional easements to third parties through the Easement Area, subject to and so long as; (i) any such use or the use of such easements does not in any way interfere with Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement rights hereby granted; and, (i') neither Grantor shall allow parking, standing, loading or unloading or any other such use in the Easement Area, or make or allow any changes in the Easement Area that would deprive or interfere in any way with Grantee's use of the Easement Area. Hersch and Shakers further covenant and agree to post and maintain permanent signage for the Easement Area adequate under the laws of the Commonwealth G33+ 2034 -3- 6K1762P0 00373 of Virginia to authorize the lawful removal, towing, or immobilization of vehicles parked in or occupying the Easement Area. Hersch and Shakers further authorize and assign to Grantee as the owner of the easement conveyed herein the non- exclusive right to have such vehicles removed, towed, or immobilized. 2. Maintenance of Easement Area Shakers shall clear (including removal of snow and ice) and maintain the paving and other improvements located within the Easement Area at its sole cost and expense, and Hersch shall repair and replace such improvements as necessary at its sole cost and expense. Each Grantor shall indemnify, defend, and hold Grantee harmless from any claim or cause of action arising out of the negligent performance or failure to perform such obligations. If either Hersch or Shakers (the "Defaulting Owner,) fails to maintain or cause to be maintained the roadway improvements within the Easement Area as provided above, and such failure or default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after it has received written notice specifying the nature of the default or failure from the owner of Grantee, then Grantee shall have the right to perform any necessary maintenance or repairs, or to cause them to be performed, at the expense of the Defaulting Owner. Provided that such maintenance work is bid on by at least two (2) responsible contractors and the lowest bidding contractor performs the maintenance work, the cost of the maintenance work will be deemed authorized and incurred by the Defaulting Owner. The Defaulting Owner shall reimburse the Grantee within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice for the completed maintenance work, accompanied by a copy of the bids for such work from at least two c.n:zoN a _ B K 1 7 6 2 P G 00374 (2) contractors. If the Defaulting Owner fails to pay such costs within the thirty (30) day period, Grantee shall be entitled to file a mechanics lien against the Parcel of the Defaulting Owner in the amount of such invoice, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12t) per annum or at the highest rate of interest permitted by law, whichever is less; and the Grantee owner may recover that amount plus interest in an action at law, all in accordance with Chapter 43 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. In addition, the Grantee shall have any and all other remedies available to it at law or in equity for such a default in the maintenance obligation. 3. Continuous Access by Grantee Across Parcel to Adjacent Land. Notwithstanding any provision of the Joint Driveway Easement dated February 15, 1996 and recorded immediately following this document, Hersch covenants and agrees that Hersch shall maintain for Grantee's use and benefit at all times, including without limitation, during any periods of construction, continuous, usable access across the Hersch Parcel between the right -of -way of Valley View Boulevard West, N.W. to the existing road on the Adjacent Land at least comparable to the access in existence as of the date of this Relocation of Access Easement. Hersch and Shakers expressly covenant to and agree with Grantee that at no time shall Grantee be totally blocked from utilizing the Easement Area without prior notice to and approval by Grantee or alternative access. 4. Quitclaim of Original Access Easement, Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, Grantee hereby quitclaims to Hersch, and its successors and assigns, the access easement over -5- B K 1 7 6 2 P G 00375 the Hersch Parcel created by the map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 450 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia. S. Recording Costs Hersch shall be responsible for any costs applicable to the proper recording of this Relocation Agreement. 6. Governing Law. This Relocation Agreement has been entered into under, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 7. Successors and Assigns. The rights, obligations, and covenants contained in this Relocation Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective lessees, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year first above written. HERSCH: HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited artnership Byv (SEAL) Henry J. Faison, General Partner SHAKERS: SHAKERS RESTA CORPORATION By: President [CORPORATE SEAL: [signatures continue; C 32203 -6- BK1762PG 00376 GRANTEE: THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Attest: By' (SEAL) ZACqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Cathy endletononnn Commission Secretary C 322M4 -7- Bf11762PG 00377 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this T day of Act 1995, by Henry J. Faison, as General Partner of Hers-Eh Associates Limited Partnership, a North Carolina limited Partnership. Notary lIc My commission expires: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY (OR CITY) OF i I, flo Q �oSW1nd G1f Si2A1SPa I and for the State and Count a Notary Public in ._4ack le,$ y (or City) aforesaid, do certify that whose name, as P�esiuent of Shakers Restaurant Corporation, is signed to the writing above, bearing date on the 40443 ember 19r, has acknowledged the same b o1 e me rein my County (or City) aforesaid. Given under my hand and official seal this Febr allI , 19jL. ��5+ day of My term of Office expires on 6y COMMission Expires Ddaber 21, 1999 Notary Pubic - -- (NOTARIAL SEAL) c mo3 -9- BK1762P6 00378 STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o3�'�°1 day of /�j n- _, 199?, by Jacqueline Shuck, as Exe,I,E ve Director of The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. /%J%_ .L 49 Notary Public My commission expires: 17ALL,_/ Approved as to forum: 11 By: /1 a'g L /� Mark A Ian Williams, General Counsel Roanoke Regional Airport Commission c- 3'_1034 R�az B K 1 7 6 2 P G 0037y Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 3 Deed Book 1564 Page 662 Airport Clear Zone Val" MAP undeveloped NOT TO SCALE is y S° �m T 56'46'OJ' C 1a.Op' Shakers Restaurant Corp DB 1579 pg 1074 General Mills N Restaurants, Inc. Parcel 7C -3B z o C VI 0 �a ya y 8• is y S° �m T 56'46'OJ' C 1a.Op' Shakers Restaurant Corp DB 1579 pg 1074 BK7762PG 00380 In ine Clerk's Olhce oI the CI Nit CN4 I the CI}y,_�j 039 5 TAR S Roanoke. Va., on vat, the Cediheate of S_— Iles test[-- was pte8entetl. 034 C ADD TAX c Cv._ r cedily 214 C TAX �� necold acknowledgme 12 Iheretp annexe 5and� ea to o /� oclock.� 220C ADD. TAX 9 real t at �- a thal the tax imposed wE p,I� s oll ce BOt and Sec 301 FEE 5B 1-130 ve been p 212 TRANSFER 5— an, III , Clerk dhw R. C 8 CO. ADD TAX 8 i U Teste'. Deputy Clerk TOTAL B By MAILED OR DELIVERED TO'. m� c W it ."..o.,� PRELIMINARY 76 Mfg ti y S ilk= o �� a , y,. •O wm y y rva�m njn � � I' � � � 9 Q4 c W it ."..o.,� PRELIMINARY 76 Mfg ti y S ilk= o �� ZONING DISTRICT MAP z20 �- ..�2 1909 Valley View Blvd NW; 2� °cos ° °OS Official Tax Parcel: 2380110 2� °�' °� Pc+o 2j °s 0 J o Area to be Rezoned `ov'� `BOO _ Conditional Zoning °� {➢ 6J 2`��c °' 06' Zoning - RA (Residential - Agriculture) R -12 (Res. Single - Family) R -7 (Res. Single - Family) o 'S'G 0Ob 2 °o'er R -5 (Res. Single-Family) r 'O 2�0, R -3 (Res. Single - Family) !y �� °s p �P RM -1 (Res. Mined Density) 06; S `tee .y► RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) �s JPGl RMF (Res. Multi - Family) CN (Commercial- Neigh) - CG (Commercial - General) - CLS (Commercial -Large Site) O� _ I -1 (Light Industrial) } 1-2 (Heavy - D (Down own)ustriaq - MX (Mixed Use) coq - IN (Institutional) - ROS (Rec & Open Space) O� 6VJO AD (Airport Dev) MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Devi -_ I PUD (institutional Planned Unit Dev) .lpvV�y ry�8O10d _ IPUD (Industrial Planned Unit Dev) i OF (Urban Flex) , N 0 100 200 Feet w�E �� s daary e�sa�«aa aaa.a ROANOKE Pmpnli6.Ho11C.TT11��oorr ttiMB E160umMa�ii,4M1 Np�MOti Pliaee ft 4M Fm: Pgft7 -= 0' 6.Mw4 M1 bw CcnGmm ❑Pmi�,l7ei156nW ❑NedrmMAdPrwG.(fi0.kUMOpon'tPlet Oe�oYrba+nN�N+►n.w�w pMrnd�.ddca�d�.cgntnwya+da A 0ftC mm � m uaMed�rawksi ca rjfflfjwtc am. C1a % .R*Cwdbu Paw [] w6m£aam Ludaw -lom. iu �iw�eieL 'F NM �i &At= F- Filing fee. (For a remnFig oot athawlsajii the Todowhg I ma_sl aboiba su3mltkd � r- Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of Henri in Zoning Amendment Procedures. For a cun�dooal razbMq'gj 3reT� iwing muefaleo besubmlbil, F- Milan proffers. See the City§ Guide to Proffered Conditions. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)'m Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as r ' devebpment plan' ff proffered. For aptsiiir"VA di"Jo*etdy tho'fal(oadng mustalsobe subnulkdi (- Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 362 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordnance. Fat a CiMilmiT1e11aVe sign —aii ay 111109A IN Nbwhg muted be stbmided.. r- Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Sectw 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the Cos 2onng Ordinance. For an ametikaent oTpioffbreA'aondTdoris, the i &mmust aleolte "milted: Amended development or concept plan meetng the Application Requrements of eem 2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures, r Iapplicable. F- Wdden proffers to be amended. See the Citys Guide to Proffered Conditions. r Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For aplennedunTtdawlopmentamandrpen o,theidbwlrigmtstaeo- a bmTneda r Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2.326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. F- Copy ofpreviously adopted Ordinance. For a eaitt jrelienell sTgp ovrKky imendwill Via ToWng.muetalso 6eaubmiged r- Amended comprehensive sgnage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2,336(d) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. F- Copy of premously adopted Ordinance. Fora propoeeTlbat reipires affsgTcbnppot stilly bs submlttsd to drs City, $410 owtig must isobe'sul,mllred: ` r- A Traffic Impact Stud to cote Gana with .. . pa y' p Appendix B -2(e) of the Ciy's Zoning Ordinance. ;Fora proposaltietTegaires a tiAC11tpaotipeljnk be submTbed IDVDOT,Ihe.falbwTng must ako be aub`mlHed? r Cover sheet. F- Traffic Impact analysis. F- Concept plan. F- Profferedcondttci applicable. i- Required fee. 'An eleclrwic copy of this application and chaddist on be found at m .roanokeva.govlpbd by selecting 'Planning Commicoon'under 'Boards and Commissions'. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application Is amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. Shakers Restaurant Corporation 106 Goldenrod Place Lynchburg, VA 24502 March 30, 2015 Planning Commission c/o Ian Shaw, Agent of the Planning Commission Planning, Building and Development Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 170 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re. Application for change in zoning of Shakers Restaurant Parcel at 1909 Valley View Blvd Dear Planning Commission Shakers Restaurant Corporation, 1909 Valley View Blvd., sits on a 2 acre parcel that it has operated a restaurant on for many years. We have been approached and would like to build a 4,500 square feet mattress store at the far end of our parking lot, facing Valley View Blvd. West. The current zoning on the property is CG. In order to make this new building fit with the existing restaurant and other buildings on the stree,t we would like to change the zoning of the parcel to CIS with certain proffered conditions. Either zoning classification would allow this new use, and would permit continued restaurant use for Shakers Restaurant, but the CG setback requirements would severely impair the development of the new mattress building. All of the existing buildings on Valley View Blvd. West currently sit off the street enough to allow parking in front of the buildings. Under CG the new building would have to be pulled up to the street with parking in the rear. The main concern of this design is the safety of consumer car traffic. A lot of the customers of Shakers Restaurant currently use the far entrance and exit on Valley View Blvd. West so as to avoid making a left turn out closer to Valley View Blvd traffic that is turning onto Valley View Blvd. West. If there is not a drive lane in front of the new building to be developed, then customers would use the entrance closer to the restaurant that is closer to the Valley View Blvd intersection. We believe that would create more traffic and safety issues than exist today. Also if the new building was built close to the street then the shared entrance and exit drive with the adjacent Casual Male building would create safety issues for their customers as it would be harder to see around the new building when making a turn out of their lot. We feel that CLS with conditions would be the best solution to accommodate the existing restaurant use and the proposed new retail mattress store use for our lot. Accordingly, we ask the planning commission to grant this request. Thank you. n ly 5i(.(m�- Fkc�lCiz) John Buckles Shakers Restaurant Corporation Proffered conditions to be Adopted The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as they pertain to Official Tax No. 2380110. 1. Any new building will comply with eh dimensional regulations and development standards for the CG, Commercial General, Zoning District, with the exception of the minimum and maximum front yard, of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The maximum front yard for any new buildings will be 80 feet from Valley View Boulevard West, NW and 90 feet from Valley View Boulevard, NW. 3. The primary entrance to the new building shall be visible from and oriented towards the street Walley View Boulevard West, NW or Valley View Boulevard, NW). 4. A 5 feet wide sidewalk shall be provided along Valley View Boulevard West, NW. 5. A landscaping strip along new parking areas shall conform to the requirements of Section 36.2- 647 and 649 of the Zoning Ordinance with a minimum of six large deciduous trees per Table 642 -1 of the Zoning Ordinance placed adjacent to the right of way between the parking area and the street. 6. A minimum of 50% of the interior parking lot trees for new parking areas shall be large deciduous trees per Table 642 -1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Spacing will be per Table 649 of Zoning Ordinance, SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION JOINT ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SOLE DIRECTOR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SOLE STOCKHOLDER IN LIEU OF MEETINGS Pursuant to Sections 13.1 -685 and Section 13.1 -657 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, the undersigned, being the sole Director and sole stockholder of SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation (the "Corporation "), does hereby approve and adopt the following action by written consent in lieu of meetings of the Board of Directors and the sole stockholder of the Corporation and waives all requirements of notice, statutory or otherwise: RESOLVED, that the President of the Corporation, John T. Buckles, is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for and seek the rezoning of real property of the Corporation (the "Property") shown and described on a plan titled "Concept Plan for Mattress Firm, Roanoke Virginia" made by Doyle Allen, P.E., of Hurt & Proffitt, Inc., dated 3/30.2015 ( "Plan "), from CG to CGL subject to certain proffered conditions submitted with the application by letter dated of even date with this resolution, to allow the redevelopment of a portion of the Property as a retail mattress store, as shown on the Plan, and continued use of the existing building as a Shakers Restaurant location. Effective Date: March 30, 2015 Witness the following signature as of the Effective Dote: Date of Execution Johnkles, Jr., Stockholder and Director Attest: The undersigned hereby confirms, as counsel to the Corporation, the authority of John T. Buckles, Jr., as the President of the Corporation, pursuant to this resolution. S. IF enry Creasy IV, Esq. Edmunds & Williams, P.C. 828 Main Street, W FL Lynchburg, VA 24504 i CL. 0 U Lai zz `o 0�. 9598 cown" now, O ZRAM= No ...nw.w.�. OOOWf 1000MM v"m vnx - mum, vr3cnlX 1 IM I �i � l( LANDAMERICA mmMMIMOB. OFIRMOm 14.% rvAj815 AND P19CIPROG4 EASM=T AOl11111311lf VALLAr VIEW - AOAY0101. VIAOIM TAUX OP 001021INf$ socftUn peaa AATICLB 1 - IMMITICES . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.38 1.39 1.4 1.41 0 Access Stnad(s)• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . ABC Building• • . ... . .. . .. . . . . 4 Oar /paea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 CanrAr. 4 COamom Ares Count DYility Pesilitlee .... . . . . . 4 5 OmOamati60. DaV0lagr Iaprayssants: Dalepad 6 6 SWIG"d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 near ar a . . . . • . ..... • • Pringatercala. . . . 9 L.Or Parries'. Impnmmonu . . . $ flaw . .. ...... 9 majors Nae 8ni. . . . . . . . . . . 9 Wl atOre SULUU9(8).. . . . . . . . . . 10 MARl ta. . . iS ssrtW 9a. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Ooa1VesY. ... . 30 O�a01np Data• . . . . . . . . Outdone palling Ana. 30 . . . . . . . . Pascal. ............. ... Parking At". 10 11 .. Piwtee pidawlb IS 12 Permissible Building Area . . . . . . . . . 13 Pamissibin Dark Area . . .. . . . . . . . 13 po=ittaes. . . . . . . . . . . . Parson. ......... . Pn�aet Acghitaot . . .. 13 13 . . . . . . . . War'9ad Pascale. . . . . . . 13 13 Sting Send . . . . . . 14 $0000 1RL W Smta .. . . . . . . . . . shopping Mter site. . . . . . . . . . . 14 14 �• nY(e........ ,a,',=eian Dada. .. 14 111 � rs�t 14 1S Tom WrAssmt. 35 AATICM 2 - ®ISITS. . . . . . . . . . . . 16 sshibit A. Part 1 - Na0logas pascal B Ihit A. Part 2 - SM AOhibit A. Past 3 - Thalhla0a tahibit A. Part 4 - N A a labibit A, part 4.1 - Leggett sshibit A, Past S - Dwelnpar Reserved Percale C4otlr Site A. �uklblit Past priW- Ia MLUM XMIMrl =�Taciam I A i. 12/02^3 i section 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 S.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 ].9 3.10 3.11 x.12 3.13 4.1 4.2 4.{ 4.3 4.6 4.7 $.1 5.3 5.3 S.4 5.3 S.6' S.7 S.B S' 6.3 6.S •.1 7.1 R aWeasnndaictturios es L oof MPajaoird. • • . . • . • • ' ' . s . . . . . im te ite 31 u Dpravenent Mork . . . . . . . . . . . . . al AETICfE a - impio ni is. . . . . . Ppt DRAGPOmrfs. . . . . . . . . . as Developer Improvements Preliminary I vs"ip Dr^lqw a � as Improvements Final esign ZAppsevel as ro of Of .� Design Plane. . . . . 35 Caster to be Architecturally Eernoolome . . 36 Motifi9atime . . .. .. ... .. . . . . Regesst for a Sepia . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 ARTICLE S - GOMM Cwi6aucrlom REDPI'MINORTS. . . . . . . . . 37 •Dmetrmcuone Defined. . . . . . . . . 37 PerfensmpS Of Cmmettvmti9n . . . . . . . . 37 Safety BeaaMems . . . . 38 CmestrWtiam Storage and Timm Scbednle. . . S8 Construction. whedule . Ceyliemca with Bert Limitations. . . . . 40 LM Compliance . with Construction. 40 AN-wilt survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 ARTICLE 6 - COMBTRGCI'IOM OP DEvzumgR SgAC9YRB21'i. . . . . . . . . . 42 DevmlapaPr8 COUStsWIMPUam 0=ttyy . . . . . seen e4es +Be�imyepaBavele8er . . . 44 Tim I 4{ ARTICLE 7 - M63ORS' IMPAMMU BS. . . . . . 1 A „ ^ ^- Majors. Constructim Duty • • . . . . . . i5' - "'�vDGx1G 11. 12/02/33 140 ? %t1W zvhihit C - snuccvwsyy axhibit D - Technical specifications Rmhihit E - TOM Agreement ' whibit P - Rules and 2491dation. Exhibit o - sign Criteria Exhibit E - Allied Will Came Letter Exhibit I - Carter. Bawler. Sale will Cause letter ARTICLE 2 - PLAEB - SPiCIPICATIOSS - CDRBTMOTIOM OM -BITE AND OFF-SITE SMP1DVYmlT WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Deeoriptien of On -Bite and Off -Site Improvement Mork. . . . . . . 17 General Responsibility of Dewlaper . . . . 21 CaoesltenL and Sstabliebment Plees. of Ilstiae Re9oeetinE Awroval. . . . . . . 24 . . 26 eapproved Deemed Approved . . . . . . 27 Sa "l9pdr'l sespmdbility_ ._. . . . . 27 . . 29 aWeasnndaictturios es L oof MPajaoird. • • . . • . • • ' ' . s . . . . . im te ite 31 u Dpravenent Mork . . . . . . . . . . . . . al AETICfE a - impio ni is. . . . . . Ppt DRAGPOmrfs. . . . . . . . . . as Developer Improvements Preliminary I vs"ip Dr^lqw a � as Improvements Final esign ZAppsevel as ro of Of .� Design Plane. . . . . 35 Caster to be Architecturally Eernoolome . . 36 Motifi9atime . . .. .. ... .. . . . . Regesst for a Sepia . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 ARTICLE S - GOMM Cwi6aucrlom REDPI'MINORTS. . . . . . . . . 37 •Dmetrmcuone Defined. . . . . . . . . 37 PerfensmpS Of Cmmettvmti9n . . . . . . . . 37 Safety BeaaMems . . . . 38 CmestrWtiam Storage and Timm Scbednle. . . S8 Construction. whedule . Ceyliemca with Bert Limitations. . . . . 40 LM Compliance . with Construction. 40 AN-wilt survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 ARTICLE 6 - COMBTRGCI'IOM OP DEvzumgR SgAC9YRB21'i. . . . . . . . . . 42 DevmlapaPr8 COUStsWIMPUam 0=ttyy . . . . . seen e4es +Be�imyepaBavele8er . . . 44 Tim I 4{ ARTICLE 7 - M63ORS' IMPAMMU BS. . . . . . 1 A „ ^ ^- Majors. Constructim Duty • • . . . . . . i5' - "'�vDGx1G 11. 12/02/33 • • 9.etiao Page 7.2 Naj0ra' Iepra9esant.. . . . . . . . . . . . 46 ARSTCfi 0 - 500"200 CO M OPENING DAIS. . 49 e.l 9.2 •. . E■rlior OP�ag . .. so .......... ARTICLE 9 - OPERATING CMXRA 9 . . . . . 52 9.1 Developor'■ Oon.ral Operating . 9.2 C.meOmets . . . . . Ten of Dwelapar'■ Opesating 52 Coraoants .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 9.3 Name of Centar. . . 54 9.4 major'■ Oanaral Operating Covenants . . . 54 AMCLL 10 - lNeRaflS. . . . . . . . 57 +QA1 Vi-finitiol■ 416 Documentation . .....__ __-.57,_� `10.2 l Zo to for We of En01ae6 Ea11 and Ot6ar Coua0n An4 (Other mac COaaoa Ctlllty Facilities, Aoneaa Roads and -- - RSnQ der Be �owi■ fence end Iti�q 10.4 Road s4aoaonte for Common utility 60 Fesilitia■. . . . . . . . . . . 66 10.5 construction sa■oments . . . . 65 10.6 Ocommomiro sooting.. . . . • . . es 10.7 s■1f4Nelp iM.Nanfi . . . . . . 69 10.9 EaOesants for saintolaceo of 10.9 comma Ares . . . . . . . . . . Accent [auaaonts. . . . . . . . 69 69 10.10 �. 011 Druinage�(aEj. . . 71 10.12 buttes ■■ae . 73 10.13 No Do"Cation of Eaemeonta� and semefit 10.14 Rig Grant Easements to Dtility 74 10.15 light to Dedicate Ring Road or. 75 10.16 • Read . Smnfa4fion et Esaemeata. 75 76 10.17 ogont Construction and 77 ARTICLE 11 - WAVOIDAm1A MAU . . . . . 79 ARTICLE 12 - RO ®In or 9ADI U 9RIOR 7o OPOmpG DA7s . . . . . . . . e0 12.1 Davolopet'■ Defeat . . . . . . . so 12.2 Itaais Me by 96121" Maier: . . Bi 12.3 h Unit on� or■ Right to rarterance tes. . e3 32.4 Anal . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 12.5 Purchase Pries. . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 12.6 12.7 C10eiag . gales'■ Peru" Rauain et 603o to REA . 93 65 12.6 lR6bilitr of a Party to Cesar 12.9 Acdesledg■entof Deeaieyer's �iienea ss 12.10 by Yles's. . . . . 2blo Article Not W.&G,g on A W ibrtCa9es an 12.11 of D■ealapsr'■ Parcel ia t.. aer6i" survive - sommo cwmaai" es IRM A ...-.._CA ���KI iii. 22/02/63 40 0 zwAuwM -..- 1496 RGEIM am estCiea Pace AATICLB 13 - MAIBTm M=, IMPAIR AM ' RecmArIOM or BUILDIMw Am nwROWSHISM8 01RRAL 99 13.1 maintenance 01 Buildings• . . . Be 13.2 cook" Or Destiuetim Of DOveloPer 13.3 Damage W DSStCSCtiOG to Main Building 09 of a 13.4 Duty to L1�p6Opleft'@budding . . . . free Improvements 91 92 13.5 Olaariap Debit Beesd 13.6 Dmage to er DeOtssetim of Carom Area 93 ARTICLL 14 - CPOATIOM N&IWMUM= AND BQAIR - NBIOY ARM . . . . 94 14.1 Operation and Maintenance Of Ceman Area i0ther then Macicaed Mall) . . . . . . 94 14.2 Operation anMaintenan0e Of 14.7 mminetion of Parking Area. . . . . . . as 97 14.4 Failure of Performance. . . . . . . . . . 99 A3219M 15 - PADMIMO RMQMIR12mIT6 . . . . 100 15.1 enquired Parking Ratio. . . 100 15.2 Cbargaa for Patki"I employes Parking 15.3 AVIAS . . . . . . . . . . gee Of Parking Ma . . . . . . . . 100 101 16.4 fie& m Parting Ma . . . . . . . . . 101 13.5' 1011ti -Level Pasting . . . . . . . . . . . 103 ASTICLi 16 - aamRL COMMA11'B - CmRQ APPMABAMCP. . . 107 16.1 3a19bt Limitation . . . . . . . . . 107 16.2 aemoval of Maildal!ppaa.� .� . . . . . . . 107 16.3 Limitation on DatslmesLl ChAVocteaintlaa . . . . . . . . . . . . ice 16.4 !bubo Location . . . . 109 16.5 Man- Interfmanee with Permittes CirNlAtien . .. . .. . . ... . ... 109 16.1 PPerm ssible Building Ma Ideas . . . . . 110 16.9 Vocation of Article 16 Covenants. . . . . 110 ACICLB 17 - 13M W M. . . . . . . . . . 111 17.1 Mty to Carry.Firs InaasanCe and vaivec 17.2 General g�agaireanb for . Fire Policies. . 111 17.3 on of Pei ey Pseneade. . . . 113 17.4 Duty to CAM Liability IatBta us . . . . 214 17.6 cmeral magairommav far Liability 17.6 POIIAIan. . . . . . . . . . Indemnification by Parties. . . . . . 114 116 17.7 Contractual Liability Insuranp . . 116 17.8 Joint Common Area Liability Inmormara . . 116 17.9 self Immucance ana Blanket Policies . . . 117 17.10 Certificate of Insurance. . . . . . . . . Ira 17.11 Valcatim Or Improvements . . . . . . . . 118 ARTIQa 16 - MUM9MT DOMMUM . . . . . . . 120 18.1 -Condemnation Date- Defined . . . . . . . 1 T �2�0�TA'�' 1..d91�UcA iv. 12/02/83 ME 4 t a- Im m"m section Pass 16.2 Condensation of a Building. . . . • . . • 220 18.1 CeWnsnation of Parting Area. . . . . . . 122 16.4 waives of Award . . . . . . . . . . 126 16.5 Bff9et of Zsclosion . . . 126 18.6 Instrument IVidnsaing B6CUYim Or Termination . . . . . Restoration . 127 16.7 Aware and Bee for . . . . 227 16.8 notion Of Proposed Condensation . . . . . 127 ARTICIM 19 - M.M. IMTA22 TAXES. . . . . . 229 19.1 Payment Of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 19.2 Contesting Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 19.1 Pailare to Pay Tares. . . . . . . . . . . 129 ARPICIA 20 - 2RAIMPXE 02 COPUTANCE . . . 130 20.1 Party Hot Released. . . . 130 Pam 331 20.3 Deqpsesrer Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 20.4 lights of w7orm . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 AITICLZ 21 - 7201011cm PIAm . . . . . . Liz 21.1 .Pooetion of Promotional Pond . . . . . . 137 ARTICLE 22 - IMUCIOUNf6. . . . . . . . . 129 AIT2CM 23 - LWnWOOM COMMANXE. . . . 141 ARTICLE 24 - MTICIIS. . . . . . . . . . . 141 24.1 Nation . . matt" wrt9an . . . . . . Most of Notice . . 1" 145 24.1 Perm and . . . . . . . AITICli 25 - ATMMZCMS Alm ADDITIONS To LQBOVINCO Y. . . . 146 25.1 A1MCntim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 2S.2 Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 23.! Compliance with ML . . . . . . . . . 147 25.4 Limitation Cm Additions . . . . . . . . . 147 ARPICLI 26 - Mt6CULA "-^^8. . . . . . . . 148 26.1 Teas of this RNA. . . . . . . Ise 26.2 Amendments end Modifiatio . . . . . . . 148 24.3 Exhibits. . . . . 148 26.4 References to Articles. Sections MA suhsmntim . . . . . . . 149 26.5 Table of Oomteat0 and Captions. . . . . . 149 26.6 Location Adverbs. . . . . 149 26.7 IG for ZmClmaive Benefit of Peru". . . 149 26.8 Naives Of DefMat . . . . 149 26.9 No Pastaerahip. Joint Venture or Prinulpa -.AAggnnLi Relationship. . . . . . 150 26.10 to Opp*' Certificates . . . . . . . . . . ISO 26.11 suce m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 26.12 Oovmraibg taws . . . . . . . . . . . . . ISO 26.13 son"" Cneulatt. . . . . . . . ISO 26.14 Reaeoaatki ss of Comment . . . . . . . . 231 I ANDA MERICA V. 12/02/81 R LANDANMRICA H. 12/02/03 U96 naiM a. 66. P.Oa 151 26.16 D.� Il 66 11 Y t P.i.1t ToMiDatim of PLO. .... ..... . . . 152 26.17 Rlgat to aoloin . . . . . . . . . . 152 26.16 Certification, at 72oer Arca . iS2 26.19 Ceitectica Of Yarcal p..orlDticaa 26.20 peateaeica. 153 156 16.21 Cecatn,rperb.•. - Pleaecial Rsapcecibillty Of D.-pi-per After 26.22 Openl06 Date . 141r6 Pert? SoaaflelerP • • ' • • ' ' 164 ' 26.23 26.24 Will 0.996 Letters. . . . . . . 156 ARt1Qi 27 - ACM FRIMOi PARCELS. . . . 155 27.1 anob !lpbags Parcels Reparats From DNaPastrlOtl�On,ma on rr10gs Percale. . . . lss 27.2 27.3 P&Ming Rpeiresmt6 fat Friar Parcels . . . . 6aseas sts for Friar Parcels t0 . . 155 27.4 Van Access Maas and the Ring Road . 156 27.5 Rasn,mte t Percale to - a � l Ot Pac111tias . . . . . 157 27.6 Edght-aUd Sign teti. ® Parcels. . . . . . . . 159 27.7 Wfsrc.n,aat of Restriction by Ms10r6l -7i r PartP . . . 189 27.6 Pa.Klciaries Of Metrletleas .. .. • by Reference. . 160 . . 160 27.16 Ieaerpetetion . . . • SI0Ma17RMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 R LANDANMRICA H. 12/02/03 4 t CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND ,,,1186 nYlB'l1 JUIPOWAL xmmexr AMOPCM This Construction, operation and Reciprocal Gas - Out Ag[eernt Iftei raKsrred to the -RU-) is Nods as of the day of December, 1961, by and NOW iomm A6 IATES, a North Carolina limited part- y td -p�til office - at-1f2 -Nut f NEMlMR-, d=lotte, North Carolina 7+262 Whose s Samurai partner authorised to sign this eement is Beery J. a Charlotte, North Carolina ('Eer:eh•)rasidamt of VAUST VIEW ASSOCIATES, M., a North Carolina limited partnership with its principal office at / 122 Get Stoewall Street, Charloottee,, North Carolina, VOaau tad partur i Nsre -Vol ei r vier mmm e , igy�tadi:r�pa1a-paaer-otrpgai_r yANCaTt�aitti.turp, .hose sari I�Nithsri�lintil • ssrperattae •)i � SUM, ROMCN AND CO., a Now York corporation with its Seaters Territory Officem at 151 Seat Lancaster avenue, 9t. Reside. Pennsylvania 19007 (•6esss')l TINLRNDI NR)tIDle INCORPORAT®. A Virginia aacpo- ration with its pr office at 616 Nast armed Street, Richmond, Virginia 21219 (•lhelblmsrs•)i ' a'ASC Stem■•), it being rmdes E 6e Used beraim Shall name Autem s oar ABC Roma. ■ball in Panamanian of the N A R h seem and refer to AlStem■I and WAMCKI LESOM SEALTY ASSOCIATES. a Virginia Sacral partnership with Ste principal office in Ignenbarg. INC., Virginia corporation Its principal office in Lynchburg, Virginia (•L of V.I. it being understand the tom -Leggett- u used husin shell Mam bOte YaociaW and L of V. all berslaafter rsfurred to jointly Be the •Partiam.• RECITALS 1. Developer arse in fu simple certain lard containing approximately 11.219 +eras situated in the City -I- ILOWAAMRICA 4 ! -,,, fR98 rs1f922 of Roanaka aed Slats of Virginia, sore Particaarly described in uahibit A. Part 1 (hereinafter called 'DavelaPar Parcel -) and located as Shorn as the Plot Plan bsrete Succeed as _ inhibit ■ (-Plot Plan•). 1. Roan cams in fee simple certain land con- taining appror(aataly lt.doo acres situated in the City Of Roamke and state of Virginia. Rare PSrtlwlarly dssrrihed in Eebibit A. Part f thereinafter called •warn Parcels) and located as sham on Exhibit 8. 1. Sbalbirrs own in tae SiMie certain land Containing npproxlSStely 8.101 Surat situated in the City of leasoka and state of Virginia. San psrticalarly described in Rnbibit A. Part 1 (bssdcafter called 4hanimars Pared•) and located of ohm am Rshibit ■. a. R 6 R Cass in fee Simple Certain land eontaia- ing approximately 7.135 Suns situated in the City of Roamoke and State of Virginia. San Particularly described in Ex- hibit A. Part 6 (hereinafter called ON 6 R Pascal•) and located as show on Smbibie B- 5. faggstt Casa in fee simple certain land con- raising apprardSately 6.973 Saran Situated in the City of Roanchs and Stara of Virginia. Scre Particularly described in Exb46lt A, Part 1.((bereieaft4r called •Leggett Parcel') aed located as sham on Suhihit R. 6. Developer owes in fee elSpla those adfitiocal parcels of land show as -Drains" Lake - Developer Reserved parcel 1.• •ygtora seen am ached- Developer Reserved Parcel 3,• •Amused Parcel A,• -Access Parcel ■.• -Access Pascal C.• •Rssdrved Car yura u parking- Daoslapw Ragerrad Paml i.• and -Reserved far rotes+ Pukint- Develops Rsasrwd Parcel a- " Exhibit ■, containing in the aggregate approximately fS.984 acres. Situated in the City of Reamaks and State of Virginia. Sore particularly described in tebibit A. Part 5. which parcels of lead sedl be referred to u the -Developer Reserved Partrl(s).• 0 f JAN nKIM 7. Borsch own in foe dingle certain lamY"cent@in- ing apysoaimsblr w.go7 acres situated in the city of Aoenob MA state cf Virginia, esre Partiwlarlr ascribed in gahibit A, Put 7 lbu"naftar w1Ld Orrin" Parcels'). and Show locates on >o<hibit D. 7, Sb Develepar Parcel. gears Parcel, 2halbisre Parcel, a A e Parcel., LeggsM Pared and Devologw Seservod Parwl(e), as individually daeribd by nods and hounds in tabihit A. Part@ 1, 2, 3, ♦. 4•1 end 6, respectively. and located u abwn on Wd"it A are wli.eetvely called the •Shopping Center Site, a which term is defined in section 1.35 bereef. 9. 2b parties anise to lab es integrated ono of their Parcels. and. to daroelop and imPrew then PaxDa1S to create ■ tso level eselesed MRU- a regional Shagging center. 9. 2b Partin desire CO previd for the wntr tin, naiatemanw and uparatioo of the Common Area and the buildings and COW LprovoaantM to be situated on and off the sbepping Center Site. an sbwo on the Plot Plan, and in that regard to ereetm ,certain rights, privileges, obligations duties and easosnts and to impose certain restriction and covenant span their respsotiw Parcels and the SbMing Center site. Vmv MRRKM, for good and valuable eonsidara- tion, including the aataml praxises. covesmnte and sgeed- seats boreia nontaiaad, the Parties agree es folloesi An need in this M. the following terms how the following meanings, -3- ]��WCA • t -_ auction la 1.1 As load(.) ,. 14§6 MOM •AECess load(@)• means those roads Providing ingreaP to and egress from the King load on toe ShoPPimg Center Site to the *listing and proposed sCSeeto and which are located as shown and designated on tsbiblt C an Access Parcels A, S, C and D and oreas batched on the Plot Plan. UOLOD 1.1 NC Soildloa •ASC maildiag• men• the building designated as saeb or as 12SA• on M ditbit OW which aCh Msior, respectively, may oaten to be Comwtreated on its Peroel, whether or net ffWa building is attached to its Main Building, suitable for the storage and/or sale of merchandise hr service, including, but not limited to, Use u A store specialising in the was and installation of title, bstteria, automobile accessories and lubricants and repair of motor vehicles Haar than body work. Pas purposes of this Agreement, the ABC Building sha11 be deemed to be a building wavelets and evert free Slid Seier'■ Main Building. even if pbfsloally atesmed thereto. $action 1.1 Car emaCe -car speua• means a Plead mod striped area for the parking of meter Vehicles, a shown on the Plot Plan. Sec' Car Spey shall Save the moil dimensions met' forth in Notion 15.1. Section 1.4 Center oCentar• arms the Shopping Center Site defined in emotion 1.13, together with all buildings and other Improve- ,mete Constructed at any time thereon. which Center shall be mown u Valley View a provided in section 9.1. Sertios I.S [gran Area •Caren Areas mean• all area within the boundaries of the Shopping Center Site and Improvements therein ad thereon that under this SSA are to he safe available for the ,oa a laiwa was, convesienee and benefit of the Parties LANDAMERICA -4- 12/02/3 • ! :. 1496 )N(iM bersto sed tLa1r •persittees• se hereinafter defined, if euthorited Pursuant to Section 10.19 hereofl which shell be dsaed to (nclade but without limitation the following. (a) the Parking Area (including without limitation ACCaMe 3020 and king Road)/ (b) the malosed Sall including all mmitles in the mclosad Nall after its COmplation etoapt far the areas thereon occupied by kio2ksJ (c) sidewalks and walkways. including Perimeter Sidewalks located emrior to the Perimeter of all buildlnuai (d) lauscaped and Planted areas including such areas lying bstnem the rMriWetat Side - salks and the buildings CO, each Party's Pmrcelt (a) all curba and lighting standards, traffic and directlobal signs and traffic striping and Working* located within the CanterN (f) retelaing wells and grad* 2eParatiobs (other than rataining wells which an an integral past of a building)! (9) Cokman utility racilitimN (b) fire cerridorm leading from the Enclosed ]all or bMtaemm the Sell Store mildings and the Main Building of a Najorr and (i) for m long as smm arm covered by any ga$"mt rights as set forth in Sections 10.11 and 10.12. the Sraim" Lis Area reforrwd to to said See - ties 10.11 and the Buffet Souse rafarrad to in said Section 10.12, respectively. . Notwithstanding the foregoing, than dull met be Included in COMMOM Area wi gasoline PUMP island facilities and adjacent apron or Truck ranllitias. section 1.6 CaaWOb gtilitw retilltiu •Common utility racilitteee mans all storm drainage facilities. sasitur saws Uranus. natural gas systems Of soy), weer systems. fire protection installations (including Much beeeter PUMPS or mservoire and fin PUMPS m Say be required by "Oh ram's fire iasoramoe rating organisation at the ties of the approval of the riaal D19=11meat Plans), A" underground Mleatsrdal Peer, seblo T (if walSYls), and isiepbema systems situated em the Shopping Center Site. -5. 4/14 f3AMMCA e f each respectively at elevations and specific points of entry stipulated by each Party u to its respective buildings. Included within the Cie Utility Parilitiea are the drainage Islas located within the Developer pureed Parma (a). section 1.7 Condesuatiun acondeanstien- mass (a) the temporary or pens' mot taking of all or any part of the Shopping Center Site or the Possession thereof under the power of mast dosaint or (b) the velantery sale or conveyance of all or any put of the Shopping center Site to any body or entity having the power of esteem do•ein provided that such portion of the shopping Center Site is then under the actual or inainent threat of eminent dome. Parties 1.9 Deve29per IunrorssestS rha aDSveloper IeprevssenLa Yana those Lpro"e outs defined in section 6.1. SOCUOU 1.9 belated deation 1.10 Cocl9sed hull •Inclosed NOW "am the two -level enclosed, lighted, sprinUend, heated. ventilated and air - conditioned sell to be located on the Developer Parcel u showo on the Plot Plan, and thereon designated "Noclosed Nall -. Seteien 1.11 Fluor Area -Floor Ana- vans the aggregate, funs tine to ties, of the actual hnsber of square feet of enclosed floor Span In any building located an the shopping Center Site, exclusively appropriated for use by an Occupant. whether or sot actually occupied. Floor Ana Shall include. but without 11-itetioos (a) )eeesent span and Subterranean areas: (b) Balcony and r aaine spate except an provided Is (e) of this Saution l.11x (a) soon essup(ed by olssns, Stain, eaaalawls, dusbwaitan, moveyors or other interior eyuipsent -a- TAmA%MF.RT('.A f 140 MUW within the building involved (— t as azoludid below); and (d) nonr space aeagied by the kiosks located within the aaalased Mall, including in the CLN Of kiaska basing Open Counters for the Forgone of serving costommrm, m erwa four (e) fast in depth Outside snch GPM countess. bteith'tonding the foregoing provisions of this definition, near Ares dull but include space, for. (') the atesed or toss levels of am multi -deck stock essa being used eaclesively by an Occupant for stocking and atorape of mmemadise to be sold by such OaMW=t in the praises occupied by it within the Center; (f) imsas, including penthouses. used prlmmrily to house meeasniaal, eleetrieal, tslephoae, sir - conditioning sod similar equipment, including any oORnter squipect set used for sale or lease to third venom and used solely for the oecopent, and wS Qasbage (or ether rests) collecting are or weste baling Or Compacting Gnat (g) dhe center's emngement ad security offices, the Marcbnt's Association at promotional food office add the and, if my, sK said+ by Developer as a cosmee- ity esditsrimm, not to exceed 6,000 Moen fast of floor space in the aggregate; (b) Commas Area maintenance office cud aguiPOwt steep, areas need esclesivair for the atOrage of esia- taaence end promotional equipment, agiplits end mats- rials for Comme, Area malatenaaCe and Center pCmmOtic" Wish arm includable in DevelOper'• Ieprwwmments; (i) The mclesed cell, ssnpt for ones thereof occupied by Meshes As 0 0 (i) outdoor Selling MOMS as defined i_ —___ 1.22 so long as such outdoor Selling areas ass act an- eloaad so as to be reasonably evpable of being heated, ventilated or ___..traasd by mechanical ne4007 (k) Track Yacilitiut (1) Piro sd ■ervics corridors required by build- ing codes and not contained within any areas emlmiwly appropriated for the a■e of nay single OOCUpeoti (m) Public testtcema. Floor Am shall he measured from the eateriar faces of the a:tatior walls (including basement wane), ascept that wham Party and interior er•on vans ere in- velved, the ylonr Ma shall be measured from the canter thereof int ad of iron the exterior faces thereof. saction 1.21A Prince Parcels yhnea �scni■ looabsd adianent eb dater ei onu de■igotte6 Plot Plan and dent on eal+ib r Part 7. s ..... e.rt�e ■' Iaescvemeat! elsprovanetsa, or Rarti■s' '"raveoonts' neon the buildings, structures and ieprova U which as to Developer are defined in Section 6.1 bersof and " to each MdOr era defined in Section 7.2 brreof, and any addition thereto, or replacements thereof, or either of eeme, made in accordance with this 856. As =d In this akA, vlaprovamemtas or 'Parties' ]npzeuranente• ■ball nas the Developer Dupravanent■, or one or mass major's Isprcvsnents, er a■Y combination of all of such Isprwumts as the contest may "gaits. Section 1.11 Institation •I"titwtion• Bases a bank, savigp ad loan asso- eiation, trust compsgi', inuraan company, public Peneion fund or retirement food, private pshsion or retirasent fund having a bank or trust aeapauY as tswstme, u, private psneion or rgtirs- m fund which is a limited partner of DMIOPOr .g- 12/02/63 rrtF.RICA S R tog "a= ar neap a controlling interest in a limited Partezra Davelepar. xotelWtaodia� the foregoing. a private Peeeion or retirement fwd which is • limited partner of Developer or owes a control- ling interest in a limited partner of Davelopm shall not be treated am an •UWtitatiwe for purposes of Sections 17.1 and 15.7 barsof. section 1.11 interest •Interest" meeme the interest cagwtad at the prime rate than being announced or published by the Chats Nanbettao gent, me the rate charged to its meet valued high credit rem- gooatsentai container at tin time the expenditure ap which the interest is being computed was made plus an semen peal to 1% Wove much prime rate. In m event shall Interest aond the applicable maximum rate permitted to be charged by the /ems of Virginia. Section 1.15 Lasse sfeaee" rams any lease, deed ar other instrument or arrangement in writing (other then this in) whereby an occupant acquits/ rights to we and/or occupy Floor Area. sectim S.ISA eI,eett imusovemente *Leggett 1>oravememtms =w the improvements "fined in redcap 7.20). tentim 1.15 Main hildlmais) 4W. ft Wilding(s)" cone, with respect to each major, the two m mere story building permitted or rewired by tote MR to be eemet mi" by ee for ash major within aW maim'■ permissible moilding Ara. but such term daps met include a major's Asa Rending, if any, whether or not attached to the Maio suildiog. iaetim 1.17 majors "Majors" or "Major- rams Sears, 3balhlmers. N A R and soy oweer or grand lama of a portion of the shopping Cont., site an which a alple specialty ar department store building. weed primarily by a single Occupant and captaining j,A@ DAMERICA _s. 13/01/01 0 Q .- 1ANS TM A'S 50.000 square feet or aoss of floor Area L 1.0067 and their respective soeceesora and assigns, or any one or asy ceebinotron thereof as the contest W reguiss. section I.1S Mall store suildita(a) -Mall stop building(.)• wages the buildings which Developer is obligated or permitted to construct pursuant to this in and which are within Developer's Pamissible build- ing Area and which shut or, open on the inclosed Mall. Foutien 1.11 M g 1 lsnroywmats -M A n lsprovemmu- arias those imptovinente defined in Section 7.7(a). Section 1.HA Mortgage ySe tars - mortgage- as used in this SMA shall be douse to man and include ■ deed of trust as wall as ■ eertgage, if and whoa applicable, and the tarn awartgag"' as need in this Uh shall be deesd to man and include the bseeficIW under a deed of trust as well an a Mortgage, if and what applicable. seatfen 1.30 comment .Ocoupant- or '0oeap=too mean each Major, Devel- oper and any other Pursue entitled by 144018, dead or other written eoneeyamee to use and oocupy Floor Aran within the Cantu, ar eee or sore of thee, and their nepsctive license", congsssiossiree and Statements as the contut way rsgairs. Section 1.11 coming Date 'Opining Date- warns the data defined in Sectiom 4.1, which date In subject to change as provided in sec - " a.1. Section 1.11 outdoor selling Area 'Outdoor Selling Aree- waams that part of the Center where outdoor selling, including the display and Storage of iaruWdiN incidental tbenb, say te Conducted from tiwa to tile. and which has been identified an the Plot Plan attached an eshfbit m as an outdoor Selling Arm. L ANDAMERICA -10- 11/01/43 6 1 section 1.23 Parcel SOB grill •Parcel` or 7areales ran the DevaloPer Parcel, the Developer Reees•ad Parcel(.), Reare Parcel, TDalhieare Parcel, 11 A R Parcel. Prin" Pareel(s) or any combination or portions thereof, as the. content say require. AV portien(■ ) of the Developer Parcel which is intended to be conveyed or laud leased to • Major all In shown on ahibit b an a Puture Store Parcel, rU=n or Psasm enall be a separate Parcel for purposes of this 8611 upon nonvsyaone or land lease to a Rajw, if such nonw7asce is subject to tens and provisions of this in applicable to a Rajor. Notion 1.25 pushing Area opukinw Arena means all asela in the center which are net apart or used fro, time to time for aotamobile and other wmhichLm traffic and for the parking of motor vehicles, including without limitation multi -level parking decks, and all traffic lanesv aimlas and roadways (including the Ring Road mad Access aged.) and curbs adjacent theretot vehicle parking stalls, • psdestxim walkways (other than Perimeter Sidwalks as &fined in Secticm 1.26), grade separations including ve -F imiAld walls (other than staining wells which are as integral past of a Patty-* building), and lendsuaPSRg within on adjacent to such areas (bat excluding landmAybd area between Perimeter Sidewalks and the buildings served by sash Perimeter sidewalks), lighting standards and traffic and directional signals. !asking Area dean not include any Outdoor Selling Areas, Trunk rocilities, or gasoline PUMP island facilities and adjacent spree. section 1.25 party A •pity' means each somata entity, now or bere- after entering Sate and eaacuting this IPA, whether or act such entity is an "Aividsa3, er iadivtdasls (that is, natural person, or persons), a partnership (gmearal or limited), a T .AhmAmEmCA � w ' �� n�1,532 joint venture or Corporation, e. sobje.t to Comia . wit4 the Provisions of Article 20 of this M, soy successor to eny such entity punitted Dade the Provisions Of this gBA# and being referred to collectively berein AS •Partin.° In the event, order any circumstances, a Parcel say be owned by sore than use entity in undivided Ovnere6IP intereste, such entities nevertheless shell Constitute only ■ single Party. Of all each entities onnEtltating only a single Putt'. those entities arcing at least seventy percent (70%) of the =- divided ownership interest In ths Parcel Of Each Party. shells (1) Designate Oast of steels =mbar to net es agent. authorized to act for, end to bind and obligate. all of such entities eoostitatiw Only a single Party. es the net and obligation of such Partyl and (2) Notify the other Parties heremdar, in writing. Of such designation an set amt In the pruvisiona of Article 24. In the aboa Of each mitten designation, the note of the Pasty ebom Perml ace to be bald in =divided OwestehiP interests (whether or not such Party retains mw interest in the Parcel in Quastim) sha11 be binding UPOO all entities baving an Internet in said Paroal in guestim, until such tim es written notice of .aonh designation is served VPM each of the other Parties es aforesaid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ths tars -Party' or •Parties• shall Dot include Beech unless Borsch is speaifi- Cally referenced In the pruvialon. pection 1.26 Perimeter sidewalks Raribetar sidwalkev sexes these paved sidewalk areas (Otaet then within the mClasad Nall) betwea ths back of the curb line and either a building wail or landscaping adjacent to a building wall u the contest my appropriately LANDANIERICA i required provided, bovsver, sidewalks and Curbs lRjoiiing or on retaining wells or berms within grade charges shall not be considered Perimeter sidwdke except to the extent they are adjacent to building walls or landscaping adjacent eo building walls. Section 1.37 Pars<Lsibla Building Area •Permisaiblb Building Area• means the areas) located within the shopping Center Site and within the Building Limit Line shown on Exhibit "B" within which a building, together with Perismtor•aidewalks, has been, will be, or WAY be comstsuo"d as bereimefter more fully provided. Section 1,14 Permissible Deck area "Permissible Deck Area" shall Bran the srse(a1 designated on page 7 of the Plot Plan attached an Exhibit e within which a Party way construct melti -level parking facilities. section 1.19 Pareitt"m "penittess" means all Occupants and their respec- tive officers, directors, amploYmes, agents, Partnan, cem- tracts", customers, visitors, invitees, licensees and con- cessionaires. Se a •a w.. •Parson• or •Parsons• means individuals, partmer- ships, associative, corporations and any other fore of business organisation, or one or more of than, u the Gen - test say require. Section 1.11 Project Architect -Project Arehitsot" Ness yerehee, Walters 4 Seen - ciates or such ether uchiteet licensed to practice in the State of Virginia u may from time to time be designated by Developer and approved by the Majors. Section , 1.17 Reserved Parcels ibose pascals excluding Developer Parcel located within the Shopping Canter Site owned by Developer, so desi9- l 00 "4lyae hated on the Plot Plan attached an Exhibit n, and iere speci- fically described in Exhibit A, Part S. section 1.11 Elan Road using Read- shall man the area designated as such on page 1 of Exhibit C. Section 1.16 Scare lmrOVemnts •sun Isprwemente- man, the iWovemenw defined in section 7.2(b). section 331 shopping Center Site - shoPpin9 CoAter Site• Maw the Developer Parcel, Dvwlopar "msazved' rarceae, sears rarcel7Tbainlaers Parcel. M A R Parcel and Leggett Parcel m Collectively described On Exhibit A, Part 6, and shove On Exhibit s. section 1.16 Saeeleaantal harm asap t(s) - suppleaeatal Agreesent(s)- aroma the asparate agrumnt or agreements which Mw been entered into Contea- perswoasly herewith betty on Developer and each Mayor. Each such agreeseat is heroin referred to as a •Supplanantel AgmasenV section 1.17 Termination Data - Teaination Date- mans the date on which the term of this REA shall terninnte, as provided in "Section 26.1. section 1.28 7halbimers 1®rovwenw - Phalhinors lepro mamma- maw the Smpr'awas ats defined in section 7.2(C). section 1.29 Tuck Facilities -7rnk FwLiLties- maw those areas designated as such on the Plot Plan attached as Exhibit E which aze to be wed exclwiwly for shipping ans receiving and truck accoa- mdation in connection therwith, including, (a) truck docks, open or enclosed, and reaps sad approaches thsrmtat (b) areas constructed for truck loading. unloading, parking or turn- arounds; and T AwnA%AFRYr..A t r (c) as exterior to building valli•,uaedd for compacting. baling or handling traab. Section 1. 40 Tevn Agreement mow agreements described in affiibit E attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Section 1.41 Town abik , That portion of the roadway and other work to be performed by governmental bodies and Developer am net forth in the Town Agreement.. LANDAWRICA -15- 12 /02 /W r = AIISICLE 15 ..-:Lm M3922 Section 15.1 Demises Psalm Ratio geept Of othereise provided in Article 15 or Article 27, each party SM11 aeintain on its parcel, other than as to Developer on Developer's 09served Psrwl(m), at least fiw (5) automobile Car Spaces for every 1,000 'guars feet of Floor Area ou its parcel or such higher number of Car Spaces m my be ruguired by the applicable Zoning code. For purposes of this 2sWon 15.1 only, Floor Area includes any outdoor $ailing Ares. anh C=s apace shell bass a ■imimem width If 6-1/2 feet on center summered at right =9109 to the side line of the parking Maw, except that all Car Spaces located totally inside the Parking Trwltional Line sawn on mast 1 of Exhibit W shall base a minlmm width of g feet. Each parking law or parking bay shall wefon to the typical parking layout specified an Exhibit 7e her to a ear $paw sidth, bay space and drive law layout which in each instance either *Vale or $snoods the typicel parking layout specified an Eahlbit Ws.- section 15.2 chazom fir Parki l Soployes Parking Ana No charge of any two shell be ma& to or collected two any occupants or rermittemm for the right to put vehicles In the larking Ares, amapt such Coasen Ares saintennca wets as my be provided for in amy Supplemental Agreements or in say Less with any occupant. The Parties may free time to tier. by separate "r t, demtgaete curtain sections within the parking Area for non- emelwiw automobile parking use by the oocvponto and their etplayeee, agents. contractors. licensees, and eeswesiamins. tack Party *hall use tb beet efforts to L ANDAMERICA -200- 12/01/93 8 1 cause its employees; and the esPlcyses of its tanan0 W suhtena^.te, contractors, Jins, me and concessionaires to nee only the designated Perking section. se such desigoe- tion shall be binding upon any Party who has nut consented, in writing, tbmvto. No such designated area shell be, Provided within 300 fast of any entrance of any Irvin Building or within 500 fast of any entrance to the rmcloaed Mall without the consent of the Party on whose Parcel such Parking is intended to be provided and the congest of ap Party whose entrance would be within goo fast to such designated area. Absent such ■ separate cement, each Party agrees that the occupants of its Parcel and its maployass, agents, centragtera, licemese and cemceeeiehaisas aball Park only en its Paro". Searing, , eati ss.3 2M 3 parking aL cwpt u otherwise arpressly provided in Articles S, 11, 14 and 15 bumf, on Party shall We or Permit the we of the Parking At" m its Parcel for any purpose, other than pedestrian movement and the Perking end Passage of moms vshtelas. go Party shell grant aq Parking rightm to anyom other than yaaittusa witbmt the cooeent of the other Parties mrsto, such consent Out to be ,mrsaombly withheld. Se i ,1Tp�i�n 15.e chasm I& parking Area Each Party sbali have the right, Gram' ti" to ties, to make reuomble Changes and modifimtims in and m the Parking area located an each Party's ragactive yaxeel prawidd, however, that m such Changes and modifimtiom say be as" which fit shall adversely affect the orderly new of pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the Center or render any Parcel or the buildings thereon loam accessible te such traffic, iii) reduce the amber of Car spaces en the Parcel in question below the saber requi red to be maintained in order to seat the requirements of asetion 15.1 hereof Iris) would be inconsistent with the requirusnu of Brhibit "Do or would result in the Parking Arse lighting being inconsistent LANDAMERICA -101- 12/01/01 a 2 U06 AWA with the requirements of section 14.3 bersof, or (iv) would result in wcltt -level parking other than am Provided in section I5.5, and further provided that b party mhall, at I: any sib, have acy right to "locate or materially modify the King Road or Aroesa Roads leading to and frcmi the public roadways except as otherwise provided in seatien 10.3. LANDAATmCA 12462 Jel. Woods, HOgers/Pahm:r BH1762P6 00385 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JOINT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT CITY OF ROANOKE THIS JOINT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT is made and entered into as of this d� day of February, 1996, by and between HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership ( "Hersch "), and SHARERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation ( "Shakers" RECITALS A. Hersch is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land located on Valley View Boulevard West, N.W., in the City of Roanoke, which is shown as "Parcel 7C-2A" on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 1038 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Hersch Parcel "). B. Shakers is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land located adjacent to and contiguous with the northeastern boundary of the Hersch Parcel, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -1" on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 717 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Shakers Parcel "). C. The Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel share a curb cut onto Valley View Boulevard West, and Shakers has constructed a paved driveway providing vehicular access from Valley View Boulevard West to the Shakers Parcel, which driveway is located partially on the Shakers Parcel, and partially on the Hersch Parcel. The driveway is located within a thirty foot (30') wide strip of land along the common boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Easement Area "). D. Hersch and Shakers have agreed to convey to one another a reciprocal non - exclusive easement over the Easement Area, for the purpose of using, maintaining and replacing the common curb cut and driveway and related improvements, on the terms and conditions se_ forth in this Joint Driveway Easement (this "Agreement "). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for the purposes aforesaid, the parties hereto agree for themselves, their successors and assigns as follows: 1. Grant of Driveway Easement over Hersch Parcel. Hersch hereby grants to Shakers, its successors and assigns, a permanent non - exclusive driveway easement over the portion o` the Easement Area located on the Hersch Parcel, for the purpose of vehicular access, ingress and egress between Valley View Boulevard West and the Shakers Parcel, and for the purpose of maintaining, repairin7. and reconstructing the paved areas, curbs and gutters and related Ca=' s .9W".01 W BK1762PG 00386 roadway improvements located within the Easement Area, subject to the other terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. Grant of Roadway Easement over Shakers Parcel. Shakers hereby grants to the Hersch, its successors and assigns, a permanent non - exclusive driveway easement over the portion of the Easement Area located on the Shakers Parcel, for the purpose of vehicular access, ingress and egress between Valley view Boulevard West and the Hersch Parcel, and for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and reconstructing the paved areas, curbs and gutters and related roadway improvements located within the Easement Area, subject to the other terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3. No Obstructions. Each party agrees that it will not erect any permanent improvements over, across or within the Easement Area, or any other surface obstructions within the Easement Area, that obstructs or interferes with paved access between Valley View Boulevard West and each Parcel. The foregoing provisions shall not prohibit the reasonable designation and relocation of traffic lanes, nor shall it be deemed to require Shakers to remove any existing improvements on the Shakers Parcel. In addition, each party may block traffic on its Parcel as may be reasonably required for the purpose of repairing or replacing the paved areas on its Parcel. If possible, however, such action shall be taken on a day or at a time when the buildings on the other Parcel are not open for business, and in any event only after prior written notice to the owner of the other Parcel and to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission c/o Executive Director, 5302 Aviation Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24022. 4. Roadway Maintenance. The owner of the Shakers Parcel shall be responsible, at its sole expense, for the routine maintenance of the roadways and related improvements located within the Easement Area, including all paved surfaces, pavement markings, directional signs, curbs and gutters, and storm drainage inlets. This maintenance obligation shall include, without limitation, the following obligations imposed upon Shakers under paragraph 2 of the Deed conveying the Shakers Parcel to Shakers, recorded in Deed Book 1579 at Page 1074 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia: a. To keep and maintain all sidewalks, roadways, and paved parking surfaces in good, safe, clean and sightly condition at all times. b. To remove promptly, to the extent reasonably practicable, snow, ice, surface water and debris. C. To keep all directional signs, pavement signs, and parking lot striping distinct and legible. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the owner of the Hersch Parcel shall be responsible, at its expense, for all necessary repairs to the paved surfaces located within the c�=+m AMV.nmw -2- BK1762P6 00387 Easement Area. This maintenance obligation shall include, without limitation, the obligation to repair potholes or pavement cracks, and to resurface or repave the paved areas within the Easement Area when reasonably necessary. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph 4, each party shall be solely responsible, at its expense, for any maintenance primarily necessitated by the negligence or wrongful intentional acts of such party, its agents, contractors or employees. If the owner of either Parcel fails to perform its maintenance obligation with respect to the roadway improvements within the Easement Area, except when the necessary maintenance is the result of the negligence or wrongful intentional acts of the owner of the other Parcel, or its agents, contractors or employees, and if such failure or default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after the defaulting owner has received written notice specifying the nature of the default or failure from the owner of the other Parcel, then the owner of the other Parcel shall have the right to perform any necessary maintenance or repairs, or to cause them to be performed, at the expense of the defaulting owner. Provided that such maintenance work is bid on by at least two (2) responsible contractors and the lowest bidding contractor performs the maintenance work, the cost of the maintenance work will be deemed authorized and incurred by the defaulting owner. The defaulting owner shall reimburse the owner of the other Parcel within thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice for the completed maintenance work, accompanied by a copy of the bids for such work from at least two (2) contractors. If the defaulting owner fails to pay such costs within the thirty (30) day period, the owner of the other Parcel shall be entitled to file a mechanics lien against the Parcel of the defaulting owner in the amount of such invoice, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum or at the highest rate of interest permitted by law, whichever is less; and the owner of the other Parcel may recover that amount plus interest in an action at law, all in accordance with Chapter 43 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. In addition, the owner of the other Parcel shall have any and all other remedies available to it at law or in equity for such a default in the maintenance obligation. S. No Cross - Parking Easements. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to grant to the owner of either Parcel any rights to use the parking areas located on the other Parcel for the parking of motor vehicles. 6. No Rights in Public or Third Parties. This Agreements not intended and shall not be construed to grant any rights or privileges to the public in general, or to any third parties except as provided in paragraph 3 above and paragraph 7 below; provided, however, that Hersch and Shakers recognize and agree that this Joint Driveway Easement is subject to the terms and conditions of ca_osi.asxm.miw+ - 3 - BK1762PG 00389 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /5 day of Febraury, 1996, by Henry J. Faison, as General Partner HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership. My commission expires: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Notary Public dN Con nlstm C;.[r- ": 15, 1946 COUNTY (OR CITY) CI,rT�LY) '�O1F�c�� �,.I �•rICMEu � i, i IoYA I\ll� imd C. riowsefi a Notary Public in and for the S�[$te aryd County (or City) aforesaid, do certify that JUhf1 [SUi/,QCS whose name, as President of SHAKERS RESTAURANT CORPORATION, is signed to the writing above, bearing date on the /57�'- day of February, 1996, has acknowledged the same before me in my County (or City) aforesaid. ��� n Given under my hand and official seal this � �I- day of Febraury, 1996. My term of office expires on NYCEIrlsfinnExpiresIon* St, 199F Ckw Notary F`ublic [NOTARIAL SEAL] cszm'.Wo ma - 5 - WOAIYX-- APDCQT, VICNTY MAP NOT TO SCALE General Mills Restaurants, Inc. Parcel 7C -30 EXHIBIT A BK1762PG Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Deed Book 1564 Page 662 Airport Clear Zone undeveloped N 58%16'03" E 194 OD' 13,5.96' in swat r Se a s°^' 1 >d L p moo a ��s Q 3 $ 1 C V 00390 r SB <6 03' E fo.C1' ul m Shakers Restaurant 1 DB 1579 pg 1074 BN1762P6 00391 5 l`7 In the Clerk's 011ice of I1- ¢m dloi Iheg C- of Ole5.TA% Roanoke. Va., on . .Lle 0;1 S. ADD TAB. S this instm. was PI minted. with the Ced.LCala of 2110 TAX 5_L15- acknowledgment Iherelo an red end admilte= to � 20 C ADD. TAX S_. _ _ — record ati /4 o'clock, m I he ebe teddy 5 � that the I mowed under Sea 581-801 and See. 301 FEE -- 58.4802 a ebeenpadlolNsolhce 212TRANSFER 5 E CO. ADD TAX S dhur 8 _h. III , Clerk TOTAL S� TeSte Deputy Me k By MAILED OR DELIVERED TD: BK1762PG 00388 the Relocation of Access Easement dated December 18, 1995, recorded immediately prior to this document. 7. Covenants Runninv with Land. The obligations, easements and conditions contained in this Agreement are covenants running with the land; and they are made by the parties for the benefit of themselves, each future owner of fee simple title to all or part of the Hersch Parcel or the Shakers Parcel, and the grantees, successors, assigns, lessees, agents, employees and invitees of each of the foregoing. B. Miscellaneous. This Agreement has been entered into, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters set forth herein, and supersedes any prior written or oral understandings between the parties with respect to those matters. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement under seal as of the day and year first above written. RERSCH: HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited artnership Hy: (SEAL) Henry J. Faison, General Partner SRABERS: SHAKERS REST CORPORATION Sy: Pr sident [CORPORATE SEA:,] V. =�WIUIIW - q - 12ti! , 7c1. t-.'oocs,Faocrs/PULwr BK1762PG 00370 RELOCATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT THIS RELOCATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT (" Relocation Agreement--) is made as of the Jj�� day of December, 1995 by and between HERSCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership whose address is 1900 Interstate Tower, 121 West Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina ( "Hersch "), SHAKERS RESTADRANT CORPORATION. a Virginia corporation whose address is 2095 Langhorne Road, Suite C, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 ( "Shakers ") and THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMI SION, a body corporate organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia ( "Grantee "), acting pursuant to Resolution No. 04•03QO% 6 GG=2E IS EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 58.:- 811.R.3. AND 56.1-811.C.3 OF Tv" CODE OF VIRCINIA (12501. A AYMED FROM PAYMENT OF RECORDATION, TPX" W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, Hersch is the owner of a parcel of land (the '2ersch Parcel ") located on Val lev View Boulevard West, N.W., =n the C_ty of Roanoke, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -2A" on that man recosced in Map Book 1 at Page 1038 _n the Office of. the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Shakers is the owner of a parcel of land (the "Shakers Parcel ") located adjacent to and conticuous with the northeastern boundary of the Hersch Parcel, which is shown as "Parcel 7C -1" on that man recorded ^n Map Book 1 at Page 717 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for tl -e City or: Roano:_e, Virginia; and ca._o„ BK1762P6 00371 WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of a parcel of land located adjacent to and contiguous with the northwestern boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, identified as Airport Clear Zone, acquired by deed recorded in Deed Book 1564 at Page 662 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Adjacent Land -); and WHEREAS, an access easement has previously been granted across a portion of the Hersch Parcel, which access easement is shown on that map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 450 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Original Access Easement -'); and WHEREAS, Hersch intends to develop the Hersch Parcel, and Hersch, Shakers and Grantee have agreed to relocate the Original Access Easement along the common boundary of the Hersch Parcel and the Shakers Parcel, as more particularly nrov:ded herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Grant of Reloc t -d A ^cuss Easement And Cons--uc`icn of Conngctina Road. Hersch and Shakers (collectively, "Grantors ") hereby grant, give, convey and transfer to Grantee, with General Warranty and English covenants of title, a non - exclusive perpetual easement across and over the Easement Area (as hereinafter defined) for the purposes of ingress, egress, and regress between the right - of -way of Valley View Boulevard West, N.W. and the Adjacent Land, for use by Grantee, its employees, visitors, agents, contractors, ca22034 - 2 - BKI?62PG 00372 invitees and representatives, including, without limitation, Federal Aviation Administration employees and contractors. The Easement Area shall consist of a thirty (30) foot wide strip of land running from the northern boundary of the right -of -way of Valley View Boulevard West, N.W. to the southern boundary of the Adjacent Land, which strip is located partially on the northeastern portion of the Hersch Parcel and partially on the southwestern portion of the Shakers Parcel, and is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Hersch, pursuant to a right of entry to be granted by Grantee, covenants and agrees to grade and gravel in a mutually acceptable location a roadway connecting the Easement Area to the existing road on the Adjacent Land. Grantee shall have no rights in or to any property owned by Grantors other than the easement granted herein. Except as set forth herein, each Grantor reserves the right to fully utilize, without restriction, the Easement Area for the benefit of itself, its employees, visitors, agents, customers and invitees, and to grant additional easements to third parties through the Easement Area, subject to and so long as; (i) any such use or the use of such easements does not in any way interfere with Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement rights hereby gr anted; and, (ii) neither Grantor shall allow parking, standing, loading or unloading or any other such use in the Easement Area, or make or allow a.y changes in the Easement Area that would deprive or interfere in any way with Grantee's use of the Easement Area. Hersch and Shakers `urther covenant and agree to post and maintain permanent sicnage `or the Easement Area adequate under the laws of the Commonwealth 8K1762PG 00373 of Virginia to authorize the lawful removal, towing, or immobilization of vehicles parked in or occupying the Easement Area. Hersch and Shakers further authorize and assign to Grantee as the owner of the easement conveyed herein the non - exclusive right to have such vehicles removed, towed, or immobilized. 2. Maintenance of Easement Area. Shakers shall clear (including removal of snow and ice) and maintain the paving and other improvements located within the Easement Area at its sole cost and expense, and Hersch shall repair and replace such improvements as necessary at its sole cost and expense. Each Grantor shall indemnify, defend, and hold Grantee harmless from any claim or cause of action arising out of the negligent performance or failure to perform such obligations. If either Hersch or Shakers (the "Defaulting Owner ") fails to maintain or cause to be maintained the roadway improvements within the Easement Area as provided above, and such failure or default continues for a period of thirty (30) days after it has received written notice specifying the nature of the default or failure from the owner of Grantee, then Grantee shall have the right to perform any necessary maintenance or repairs, or to cause them to be performed, at the expense of the Defaulting Owner. Provided that such maintenance work is bid on by at least two (2) responsible contractors and the lowest bidding contractor performs the maintenance work, the cost of the maintenance work will be deemed authorized and incurred by the Defaulting Owner. The Defaulting Owner shall reimburse the Grantee within thirty (30r days after receipt of an invoice for the completed maintenance work, accompanied by a copy of the bids for such work from at least two as¢m+ -4- BK1762PG 00374 (2) contractors. If the Defaulting Owner fails to pay such costs within the thirty (30) day period, Grantee shall be entitled to file a mechanics lien against the Parcel of the Defaulting Owner in the amount of such invoice, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12}) per annum or at the highest rate of interest permitted by law, whichever is less; and the Grantee owner may recover that amount plus interest in an action at law, all in accordance with Chapter 43 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. In addition, the Grantee shall have any and all other remedies available to it at law or in equity for such a default in the maintenance obligation. 3. CCgnt'n➢ous Access by Grartee Across Par gel to Adjacent Land. Notwithstanding any provision of the Joint Driveway Easement dated February 15, 1996 and recorded immediately following this document, Hersch covenants and agrees that Hersch shall maintain for Grantee's use and benefit at all times, including without limitation, during any periods of construction, continuous, usable access across the Hersch Parcel between the right -of -way of Valley View Boulevard West, N.W. to the existing road on the Adjacent Land at least comparable to the access in existence as of the date of this Relocation of Access Easement. Hersch and Shakers expressly covenant to and agree with Grantee that at no time shall Grantee be totally blocked from utilizing the Easement Area without prior notice to and approval by Grantee or alternative access. 4. Quitclaim of Original Access Easement. Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, Grantee hereby quitclaims to Hersch, and its successors and assigns, the access easement over -5- aK1762PG 00375 the Hersch Parcel created by the map recorded in Map Book 1 at Page 450 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia. 5. Recording Costs Hersch shall be responsible for any costs applicable to the proper recording of this Relocation Agreement. 6. Gov rn+na Taw. This Relocation Agreement has been entered into under, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 7. Successors and Assigns. The rights, obligations, and covenants contained in this Relocation Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective lessees, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOP, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year first above written. EERSCH: HERSCH ASSOCIATES L_M.ITn"7. PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limitedjl/ artnership By' '1 (SEAL) Henry S. raison, General Partner SHAKERS: SHAKERS RESTA CORPORATION By: President [CORPORATE SEAL) [signatures continue] c- ::2034 -6- B91762PG 00376 GRANTEE: THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT CONMIISSION Attest: By: (SEAL) I A / cgueline L. Shuck C l/ //� / = EXecutcve Director Cathy endleton lll` Comission Secretary toliola BK1762PG 00377 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,? day of &1 — 199E by Henry J. Faison, as General Partner of Hersch Associates Limited Partnership, a North Carolina limited partnership. Notary blic My commission expires: 1'� C r,; �� `C' ": li, 1936 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY (OR CITY) OF Lu Onb.trz- I. h��I Q �O-�Zojind C�riCiP.f15PA I a Notary Public in and for thg State and County (or City) aforesaid, do certify that _M1111 RUL4Ck2$ whose name, as Presiaent of Shakers Restaurant Corporation, is signed to the writing above, bearing date on the ,�� day of Det 2 her 19a, has acknowledged the same before me cn my County (ot City) aforesaid. Given under may hand and official seal this o21'+ day o` � 6 'aLu 1 , My term of office expires on 6p 90MUn 101M 0dabIr 31, 1999 Notary Public (NOTARIAL SEAL) C.;.z¢.. _d_ BK1762PG 00378 STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '?C) M day of Vlach 1 199,, by Jacqueline Shuck, as Execu eive Director of The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. %�av«o 4 LAM Alm Notary Public My commission expires: '510 [995' Approved as to �� f�of�rmp:�� B / E17: �G.a Mark lan Williams, General Counsel Roanoke Regional Airport Commission or_CI C Re: Pa Ioe View Boulevard West, NW > ✓lx Plat relereoce — M8 1 o e 1078 DLlot o New Access oeement to nonore egional Airport Commission Property over the properties of Hersch Associates Limited Partnership & Shakers Restaurant Corp. Roanoke, &ginio AssocF PA r j ti5 ^x mtle' 1 I PoL: Mnr 2 1313 O de (o mtt tl Ass b,ec N £ae Wflx�m s4n1 %Po bu lou umz xwn cea o lnia rdryw (mp zes -IaA Orowtng t7e wr.IRDR >.D,G Drax;rg ne. Job na0022 BK1762PS 0037s 6 V VEW VALL +� v� Ramoke Repbnd Akpa C. Ib 08 Ceetl Do 1561 Poge 661 A#PP Clem Zme untlewloyetl yqo T TO NJT TO 504E C Re: Pa Ioe View Boulevard West, NW > ✓lx Plat relereoce — M8 1 o e 1078 DLlot o New Access oeement to nonore egional Airport Commission Property over the properties of Hersch Associates Limited Partnership & Shakers Restaurant Corp. Roanoke, &ginio AssocF PA r j ti5 ^x mtle' 1 I PoL: Mnr 2 1313 O de (o mtt tl Ass b,ec N £ae Wflx�m s4n1 %Po bu lou umz xwn cea o lnia rdryw (mp zes -IaA Orowtng t7e wr.IRDR >.D,G Drax;rg ne. Job na0022 BK1762PG 00380 ft C' In the CY'ka 01bce d the ra 19 039 S. TAX S Ruamke. Va.. m S�� Ih 'nslMne111h , tl'esellm, vnlh the Ced'dvaY d 03BS. ADD TAX In,, ilYread a,h-xed and admllled to 214 C TAX S.�� Q. � l u'a k. j0- .m I hereby caddy 'amid at Sec 5B.1 al and Sec 220 C. ADO. TA% S—M��— IV the lax hvsm undo 301 FEE S ve been DmdblNS alike. 58.1• 212TFIANSFER 5��— CIeM B CO. hot) TAX S dhmEC SS /9y Da„lY Cle'k � L Test TOTAL 5 by / MAILED OR DELM RED TO ..o..w_,,.,..�,T.- ..�... a. l F�YONVOH INISHIA W111b4 N �EHAONd N3N0D �o 'sgg o 34, zw, g?kH N pcgF [a@ 8 g f —r tj L �i _$ ! 1 D 6 qq a I vy Y 'Will .jq c A _ 9 s l ZONING DISTRICT MAP 1909 Valley View Blvd NW; Official Tax Parcel: 2380110 ®Area to be Rezoned 2,00 08 p�A 2 000 `'2> _ _ l) (r c11 F 06, _ i Conditional Zoning J _ 0 �0 Zoning s 0 o > RA (Residential- Agriculture) 6 O R -12 (Res. Single - Family) �� � >O O> S`, 6 R -7 (Res. Single - Family) O re p� 2> O 3 R -5 (Res. Single- Family) Z R -3 (Res. Single - Family) 2? >Oms v yp0 RM -1 (Res. Mixed Density) 00 6 G RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) RMF (Res. Multi - Family) •">',� 09 J0 CN (Commercial - Neigh) CG (Commercial - General ,x�0 "0 d� 000j CLS (Commercial -Large Site) 9 1 -1 (Light Industrial) I -2 (Heavy Industrial) 00 D (Downtown) d0 X01 MX (Mixed Use) 09 IN (Institutional) ^ �� p ROS (Rec &Open Space) AD (Airport Dev) MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev) fix` r Y% �(} bEA� y INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Dev) ' ,�, ,T ! ''��- �t JP • IPUD (Industrial Planned Unit Dev) -�` OF (Urban Flex) t ' � t 0 100 200 Feet �� \ ,.�, ' . �• '71 . Gale Category DeauoLon Ad Sre Total Coal 051112015 Mundpal Nolces PUBLIC NEARING NOT" T1a OlyafRoanoke Pbnmg O I t 140 L 1.3a6bo Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorked representative of the Roanoke These, a dally newspaper published In Roanoke, In the State of Virginia, do ceNy that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Twas published in said newspapers on the fallowing dates: 0926, 06'052015 The First Insertion being given... 09282875 Newspaper reference: 0000160404 Iling Re resentat( Ewers to and subscribed before me ink Tuesday. May 5, 2015 The Roanoke Times A «Door Number - y�WEAU. Notary Rearwke, Virginia 60N939 Stale of Vlrginla Affidavit of Publication CiylCounyaf Roanoke I My Commission expires ssyy C, RECEIVED Gem CITY OF ROANOKE- PW 7 May 05, 2016 Alin Tae M. Cam MAY - 2n 215 CHURCH AVE ROOM IB6 CITY OF ROANOKE ROANOM, VA 240111 PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT Gale Category DeauoLon Ad Sre Total Coal 051112015 Mundpal Nolces PUBLIC NEARING NOT" T1a OlyafRoanoke Pbnmg O I t 140 L 1.3a6bo Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorked representative of the Roanoke These, a dally newspaper published In Roanoke, In the State of Virginia, do ceNy that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Twas published in said newspapers on the fallowing dates: 0926, 06'052015 The First Insertion being given... 09282875 Newspaper reference: 0000160404 Iling Re resentat( Ewers to and subscribed before me ink Tuesday. May 5, 2015 THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU 5TA E1/r irri - y�WEAU. Notary tic ZPOa 140 Stale of Vlrginla gga4+ _ CiylCounyaf Roanoke I My Commission expires ssyy C, 'VOTARY Q� THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE a CRr al aamlke aarobY Caa . " Ito al to aub, cm tl keeein wlp oo bald in ae l C. CPnleance Moan, Rrop 120. Ctoo C. RaaaC S.W. RnroW. l PUaa aoor that Ma Is a eWw ree b bmlbn for (be 201S mnabslm Wtlkhea b' ey. to a tmmdPla x! . lMefil a w 'n llle aaesre. e. 11 am Deseb Av oilim, hap 566, N, CUIha�� pverou S.W. PoaaYe, MY w Wh a alMMary reWhR0 MY sWMal amoprcnmlbn b atleM w W kioata at ale Na,lm fhmM maal Phtorl , aeMb0 and Oo, myea IN, toW IY saal IMM five daYS par M He faleduled IMIIbY Che CRY al Mxole plerWre la oall000 cill haltl polo hrinx an May q I015. a IN P ax mon x ae NWHW, mry be Repel h ..der Ihse appkadpn aM reaueM: aaPnmaalions and WPa IMbb o"'a . ent0lmmde:plblk MtMNWbrol an0 mmmNW Ixiaks: InnWrtatiorc tl0ry; rerltuRaaF,aMMAyary. Thc mottilt No Ales WmllbMln be 4i waaak ot,to a [MamrnW, in POW Wbelglaal and dkaaway MN, IxtlatloM aM ml0eaeJly aYWHx' Uanf aotV Th,,..nhmaanl; and amxmryy me wx t, or pan desl0nahs me prop0ty tor pork Rlsa0oeMMa0eaxWlpW 1 sasMale crystal $Pop oftk MMh to MWe ae WORC's sIPM IOUs Cryaal SOdw Pak Pn a palm PI r!y Vi YW� by a! Wow. MIM. NIWPMr, aeh real W" S.F., cad at MM jet" as T Mapm,4 lMaJ x al nn M. Cart, Seenl, My PWMig Cpnnlymb. CRY CooWl Mil halo Walk hMNMa m to aatxaW aallmtbx aM mn1Mf nn Mey VI, MM, el I:in aa.. a M o x matters, ins, h r�tby t RPmm swEa,°xoolmcana. sw,s yooft.E15Caach Mena. S.W.,aanoh.Wralala sloom A M. Moon "IN, "c CRYC GibMU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Roanoke Planning Commission public hearing advertised herein will be held in the EOC Conference Room, Room 159, Nocl C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Please note that this is a change in location for the May 2015 Planning Commission public hearing only. All applications are available for review in the Planning, Building and Development office, Room 166, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the hearings should contact Planning, Building and Development at (540) 853 -1730 at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold public bearings on May 11, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, to consider these applications and request: Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carition Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development plan. The proposed uses of that portion of the property are hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off-site. The application is also to rezone a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility distribution. The application is also to rezone a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to I -2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility treatment. The land use categories permitted in the INPUT) include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory; with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of lot area. The land use categories permitted in the IN District include accommodations acrd group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The land use categories permitted in the I -2 District include commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Park: Resource Management Plan 3. Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Application by Shaker's Restaurant Corporation to rezone property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N.W., bearing Official Tax Number 2380110, from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, with conditions. The proposed use is a retail sales establishment. The land use categories permitted in the CLS District include accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Large Scale Commercial, but does not specify density. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid applications and matters on May 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, April 28, 2015, and Tuesday, May 5, 2015. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Coordinator Planning, Building & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1330 tina.carr @roanokeva.gov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 'telephone: (5411)X51 -2541 fax: (5411)859 -1145 N'11TIIANIE M. MOON REVNOIDS, MM( Cn,al: clerk(nYOnnoke...pav City ('loth May 19, 2015 Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Esquire Glenn, Feldmann, Darby and Goodlatte 37 Campbell Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Ms. Goodlatte: JON KI11AN E. ('RAFT, ('M(' Ocpnty City Clerk C EC E.IA A'1'. WEBB,CMC Ase'istanl Deputy City Clu'k I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 40245 - 051815 rezoning a 2.0379 acre portion of property from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District; a 0.2518 acre portion of property from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to IN, Institutional District; and a 0.4453 acre portion of property from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to 1 -2, Heavy Industrial District, located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S. E., as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 3 dated April 3, 2015. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. Sincerely, ecelia T. Webb, ­C MC Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: Gary Robertson, Executive Director, Water Operations, Western Virginia Water Authority, 601 South Jefferson Street, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Maryellen Goodlatte, Esquire May 19, 2015 Page 2 pc: Curtis Mills, Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC, 213 Jefferson Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Tax Department, P. O. Box 12385, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 First Presbyterian Church, 2101 Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 City of Roanoke Mill Mountain, P. O. Box 1451, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Fairfax Condominiums, 4519 Brambleton Avenue, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Bandy, LLC, P. O. Box 4143, Roanoke Virginia 24015 Patricia B. Morgan, Trustee, 5 Stonegate Drive, Bellaire, Florida 33756 Stephen and Florence Workman, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Suite 103, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 James Justice, III, P. O. Box 2178, Beaver, West Virginia 25813 Richard Sherry and Judy Carpenter 1371 Sunset Road, Watertown, New York 13601 William and Lee Saunders, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 108, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Margaret Morris, P. O. Box 3890, Norfolk, Virginia 23514 G & P Jefferson, LLC, 1994 Merriman Way, Moneta, Virginia 24121 Patrick Malone, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 201, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Doris Pollard, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 202, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Westwin of Roanoke, LLC, 1125 Berkshire Road, N. E., Atlanta, Georgia 30306 Fred Baker Trustee, 443 Johnson Avenue, Unit 501, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 Richard Grayson, 6313 Lake Charlene Drive, Pensacola, Florida 32506 Darrell and Nancy Long, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 209, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Barbara Bailey, 2512 Jefferson Street, S. E., 24014 Edward and Elizabeth Kappus, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 212, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Bruce and Joan Brenner, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 213, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Thomas and Eugenia 2830 Longview Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Ellen Marie Arledge, 2923 Rosalind Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The A P Kirby Trust, 9030 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 460, Richmond, Virginia 23235 William Poe, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 304, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Ronald Tessendorf, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 306, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Mary Ellen Goodlatte May 19, 2015 Page 3 PC: Thomas McDonald and Melina Perdue, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 307, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Carol Bewley Dalhouse Revocable Trust, 3514 River Birch Lane, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Edward Goyette, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 309, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 David and Cynthia Caudill, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 312, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Garnett Smith, 1994 Merriman Way, Moneta Virginia 24121 Garland Bowman, ll, 2201 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Chan and Kae Bolling, 2341 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Leman Dudley, 1710 Dawn Lane, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Suzanne Gandy, 2310 Yellow Mountian Road, S .E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Mark and Rebecca Kilgus, 2303 Mack Chick Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Michelle Frey, 2301 Mack Chick Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 George Baron, Jr., 2301 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Howard Jones, Jr., Revocable Trust, 2225 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Robert and Carol Cole, 2231 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 JPR Properties, 4818 Grandin Road, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Susan S. Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation Philip C. Schirmer, City Engineer Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner [an Shaw, Agent, City Planning Commission Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission IN THE COUNCIL OP THF, CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40245 - 051815. AN ORDINANCE to amend § 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, to rezone certain property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.F.; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC, and the Western Virginia Water Authority have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ( "City Council'), to have a 2.0379 acre portion of the property bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, S.S., rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development Plan, such Planned Unit Development Plan allowing only certain uses in the INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, and regulating, among other things, parking, access, building design, dumpster location, signage, utilities and stormwater improvements in accordance with the Plan; to have a 0.2518 acre portion of the property bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to IN, hnstitutional District; and to have a 0.4453 acre portion of the property bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to I -2, Heavy Industrial District; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WI IFREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on May 18, 2015, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §362 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of the subject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to have a 2.0379 acre portion of the property bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., be and is hereby rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development Plan; that a 0.2518 acre portion of the property bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., be mud is hereby rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to IN, Institutional District; and that a 0.4453 acre portion of the property 2 bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, located on 2012 Jefferson Street, SR, be and is hereby rezoned from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to 1 -2, I leavy Industrial District, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 3 dated April 3, 2015. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. A A r T: / I A-, //il'% ity Clerk. STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1, David B. Trinkle, state that I have a personal interest in agenda ite B 1 for the Regular Session of City Council set for Monday, May 18, 2015, at :00 p.m. regarding the request to rezone portions of property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, situated at 2012 Franklin Road, S.E., bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, because my employer, Carilion Clinic, is affiliated with Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, the entity that has an agreement to acquire a portion of this property. My only interest with Carilion Clinics is an employment interest. Therefore, pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3112, I must refrain from participation in this matter. I ask that the City Clerk accept this statement and ask that it be made a part of the minutes of this meeting. Witness the following signature made this 18`' day of May, 2015. (Seal) .1 Member CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone: a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development plan; a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District; and a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to 1 -2, Heavy Industrial District. Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Monday, May 11, 2015, By a vote of 5 - 0 (2 of the 7 members recused themselves) the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request, finding that the Amended Application No.3 for rezoning from ROS (Recreation and Open Space District) to INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Development District), IN (Institutional District), and 1 -2 (Heavy Industrial District) is consistent with the overall goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Traffic Impact Analysis, revision dated 27 March 2015, shows there is adequate capacity for the development on Jefferson Street and the PUD plan provides for flexibility to refine the traffic patterns, pedestrian access, and signal timing at the direction of the City's Traffic Engineer during the development review process. Application Information Request: Rezoning Owner: Western Virginia Water Authority Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority and Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC Authorized Agent: Maryellen Goodlatte, Attorney City Staff Person: Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Site 2012 Jefferson Street SE Address /Location: Official Tax Nos.: Three portions of 4060502 Site Area: Approximately 2.04 acres to INPUD, 0.25 acre to IN, and 0.45 acre to 1 -2 Existing Zoning, ROS Recreation and Open Space District Proposed Zoning: INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Development District), IN (Institutional District), and I -2 (Heavy Industrial District) Existing Land Use: Park and Vacant Proposed Land Use: For the INPUD portion: hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off - site For the IN portion: utility distribution For the 1 -2 onion: utility treatment Neighborhood Plan: Mill Mountain Park Management Plan Specified Future Park Land Use: Filing Date: Original Application: Feb 20, 2015 Amended Application No.l : Mar 19, 2015 Amended Application No. 2: Mar 27, 2015 Amended Application No.3: Apr 03 2015 Background Carilion Hospital has long been located at the base of Mill Mountain along Jefferson Street. The hospital has expanded many times on the existing parcel over the past 100 years, but some of their older buildings no longer meet life safety codes and are unable to be renovated or repurposed due to structural and technical reasons. The hospital's recent growth in services and current building locations leads to the need to expand on a site located to the south of the current location. In February 2015, the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties filed an application to rezone two portions of the Western Virginia Water Authority property at 2012 Jefferson Street SE from ROS to INPUD and IN. The proposed development will allow for the expansion of the hospital with a new proposed medical building with parking below. It also rezones the existing water distribution portion of the parcel to IN so that it does not become non - conforming. In March 2015, the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, filed Amended Application No. 1 to rezone three portions of the property from ROS to INPUD, IN, and 1 -2. The application revisions included rezoning an additional portion of property adjacent to the water treatment facility along Jefferson St. SE from ROS to 1 -2, restricting emergency vehicular access to Weller Lane, including a pedestrian safety island between vehicular entrance and exit drives at the building, restricting placement of the dumpster enclosure, further defining signage, and minor text notations in the development plan. Amended Application No.2 provided minor revisions to building use, roadway improvements, and text notations in the development plan. Amended Application No.3 added a development standard that the traffic impact analysis will be updated during the development plan review at the direction of the City's Traffic Engineer. Conditions Proffered by the Applicant As an INPUD, the development plan attached to this amendment is binding for future development on the INPUD portion of the property. Development standards are listed directly on the development plan. Considerations Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance: The purposes of the INPUD District are to encourage harmonious development of institutional uses and mixed -use campus developments, to provide flexibility for creative development, to minimize potential negative impacts of institutional uses on neighboring uses, and to recognize the special complexity and interrelationships of land uses and activities in these institutional complexes. Zoning District Land Use North INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District Hospital !, South 1 -2, Heavy Industrial District Utility treatment East INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District Hospital, and Park West INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District Medical clinic Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance: The purposes of the INPUD District are to encourage harmonious development of institutional uses and mixed -use campus developments, to provide flexibility for creative development, to minimize potential negative impacts of institutional uses on neighboring uses, and to recognize the special complexity and interrelationships of land uses and activities in these institutional complexes. In a Planned Unit Development District, many of the dimensional regulations are defined by the PUD development plan. The proposed development plan displays the required information through graphics and text. Those site development features that are required or regulated by the zoning ordinance that are not shown on the development plan will be finalized during the development review process. A traffic impact analysis for the rezoning has been performed based on the development proposed in the INPUD plan. The applicant added a development standard noting that the traffic impact analysis will be updated, as necessary, during development plan review to determine the appropriate configuration of traffic patterns, pedestrian access, and signal timing, at the direction of the City's traffic engineer. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Neighborhood Plan: Vision 2001 -2020 recognizes that Carilion Health System is the major medical center of southwestern Virginia and provides significant medical services and employment for the region. The hospital has been located on its present site for over the past 100 years, undergoing major renovations and restructuring during that time. The hospital's approximately eighteen acre parcel is largely built -out in the lower flatter area of the parcel and treed in the area that rises with an approximately 50% slope up the base of Mill Mountain. The proposed addition to the hospital property is one of the few adjacent areas that would allow contiguous expansion of the hospital without climbing up the slopes of Mill Mountain. Relevant Vision 2001 -2020 policies • EC P3. Viewsheds. Roanoke will protect steep slopes, ridgetops, and viewsheds within the City as important environmental and scenic resources and will cooperate regionally to protect such resources located outside of the City. • EDP6. Commercial Development. Roanoke will encourage commercial development in appropriate areas (i.e., key intersections and centers) of Roanoke to serve the needs of citizens and visitors. IN P2. Transportation system. Roanoke will provide a transportation system that is an integrated, multi -modal network of automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Interconnected street systems should be encouraged in new development and be maintained in existing development. New roadways through existing urban areas should be designed to minimize impact on the City's urban fabric and complement Roanoke's neighborhoods. • City Design Streets • Street design principles address the design of new and existing streets and are intended to provide guidance for improvements. These principles are based on discussions of the case studies and research of street design practices. They address eight general elements of the streetscape: automobile accommodations, bicycle accommodations, pedestrian accommodations, transit accommodations, trees, signs, lighting, and buildings. Design principles: • Automobile Pavement should be kept to the minimum width necessary. • Pedestrians • Sidewalks should be provided on both sides of urban residential, urban collector, downtown, and arterial streets. Existing brick sidewalks should be preserved and maintained. Sidewalks should be separated from vehicle travel lanes by street trees and on- street parking. • Wide streets with multiple lanes such as major arterials should have center medians that create a pedestrian refuge. • Buildings • Building location and design should be considered as important elements of the streetscape and should be used to define the street corridor as a public place, especially at major intersections. • Building height and location should create a feeling of enclosure along a street. Residential and commercial buildings should be located very close to streets with low vehicle speeds. Large public and institutional buildings should generally have deeper setbacks. • Building setbacks should be consistent along the street. • Building fronts and entrances should face a street. The Mill Mountain Park Management Plan is technically the neighborhood plan for the three portions of the parcel to be rezoned. However, the plan speaks mainly to the management of the various portions of the entirety of Mill Mountain. Little mention of this remote area with existing tennis courts in the western edge of the park is made and the focus of management comments is regarding protecting intermittent streams, care with large tree removal, and trail management. However, both the South Roanoke Neighborhood Plan and the Riverland /Walnut Hill Neighborhood Plan recognize that the hospital that lies adjacent to each neighborhood is a significant factor in the physical development at the edge of each neighborhood. The land surrounding the proposed parcels for rezoning is shown as institutional uses in each of the neighborhood future land use plans. Specific items to address are the minimal impact commercial uses are to have on the surrounding neighborhood residential areas. Relevant South Roanoke Neighborhood Plan Policies: Community Design Policies • Established neighborhoods should retain their overall character and development patterns, while incorporating new development that is compatible with the neighborhood, the design guidelines of Vision 2001- 2020, and efficiently uses limited land resources. • Commercial and multifamily zoning districts with building height limits greater than that of single - family zoning districts should be confined to the village center and surrounding properties along McClanahan Street, Broadway Avenue, 22nd Street, Jefferson Street, Longview Avenue, and Stephenson Avenue. • Future commercial development should adhere to the design principles of Vision 2001 -2020 for village centers: • Concentrations of higher- density, mixed use development and live/ work space. • Increased lot coverage, co- located signs, efficient lighting, on- street parking, pedestrian accommodations and orientation of buildings close to the street that emphasizes pedestrian activity. Relevant Riverland /Walnut Hills Neighborhood Plan Policies: Community Design Policies • Building location: To encourage a pedestrian environment and desirable streetscape, any new buildings in the village center should be placed close to the street, immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. Parking should be placed to the side or rear of the building. Incompatible land uses: Commercial and utility uses should have as minimal impact as possible on adjoining residential areas in terms of visibility, noise, and air quality. Land uses should be compatible with the surrounding natural environment, specifically Roanoke River and Mill Mountain. The proposed development plan for the hospital and contiguous rezonings for the Water Authority achieve many of the policies noted above from the plans. The hospital that has existed in the area for over a century is able to expand in a manner that has the least impact on the viewshed of Mill Mountain and to the surrounding neighborhoods while the Water Authority is able to maintain their existing operations. The traffic impact analysis performed to date shows that there is adequate capacity for the development on Jefferson Street and the INPUD plan allows flexibility to refine the traffic patterns, pedestrian access, and signal timing at the direction of the City's traffic engineer during the development review process. This flexibility is important as actual construction of the hospital facility is four to five years in the future and the ability to adapt exact traffic patterns to any changes in the surrounding neighborhood is important. The proposed rezoning provides for the continued ability for the hospital to grow and the Water Authority to continue operation in a manner appropriate to the surrounding neighborhoods while minimizing the impact of the growth on the City's urban fabric. Public Comments None. Planning Commission Work Session: The following items were discussed in the Planning Commission Work Session for compliance with City policy and ordinances and sent to the applicant as recommended changes to address. Note overall height of building on PUD plan Increase transparency requirement on the Jefferson Street fa4ade to 50% for the first floor and 25% for the 211 to 5" floor Add language to address architectural variation in the vertical fa4ade of the first five floors Language regarding the intent of the trees and shrubs along the facades visible from the public streets such as "a row of large deciduous trees and a row of shrubs will be provided per Section 36.2 -649 of the Zoning Ordinance" with a hatched area around the building on three sides (Jefferson Street facade and the two facades visible from Jefferson Street) would meet the desire to soften the edges of the building while providing the owner with more flexibility in the final design than the current development plan in the application provides Add language regarding helipad if intending to incorporate one into the new building An approved Traffic Impact Analysis with recommendations from the Transportation Department will be needed for both the Planning Commission and staff to fully evaluate this proposal. Items that may be required include, but are not limited to, a south bound left turn lane, a median with a safety pedestrian island in Jefferson, a safety island within the vehicular entrance into the garage from Jefferson, limitations on emergency vehicle ingress /egress points, and dedication of right -of -way to accommodate the improvements noted above. These items may affect the proposed development plan. Comments on the current Traffic Impact Analysis have been sent to the applicant's traffic engineer and we are awaiting a revised Traffic Impact Analysis to evaluate before comments can be made. The applicant subsequently submitted Amended Applications No.2 and 3 with an Amended Traffic Impact Analysis, revision dated 27 March 2015, that addressed all of the first five comments. The final concern regarding traffic is addressed with a development standard in the PUD plan that allows the applicant to address the remaining issues at the direction of the City's traffic engineer during the development review process. As previously noted, this approach confirms that Jefferson Street has adequate capacity to support the proposed development while allowing the City the ability to fine tune the analysis based on any changes in the surrounding neighborhood when the project is developed four to five years in the future. Planning Commission Public Hearing: Barbara Duerk asked the Planning Commission to consider the larger public transit system, the additional traffic this would generate for the neighborhood, the potential impact on the water source for the Water Authority, and the tennis courts in their recommendation to City Council. �t (,l7aGL� H - Gt7N- H�7t -L /LG Chad A. Van Hyning, Chair City Planning Commission cc: Chris Morrill, City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Ian D. Shaw, Planning Commission Agent Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Gary Robertson, Western Virginia Water Authority Curtis Mills, Carilion Clinic Properties Maryellen Goodlatte, Attorney Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 188, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Vuginia 24011 Phone: (540) 8531730 Fax: (540) 8531230 Date:April 3, 2015 2 Rezoning, Not Omenise Listed APR S 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING a DEVELOPMENT Subormal Number. Amended Application No.3 ROANOKE ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Rezoning Cordeional ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan 0 Rezoning to Planned Un8 Developmerd ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Dveday District fteRKWOURMIA"; Address 12 Jefferson Street S.E., Roanoke, VA 24011 Official Tax Nola). Parcof4060502 Existing Base Zoning: ❑ )Mth Conditions (If multiple zones, please manuaky enter as d'Islricls) ROS, Aecreat'on and Open Space Without Cond bore Ordinance No(s) for Existing Condmons of applicable) Requested Zoning: See attached sheet ❑ Nth Conditions proposed Seeattachedsheet 0 Wnhout Conditions Land Use: �aatraaMlv.�tkiarr wTw..i..�Tme Name: Western Virginia Water Authority, Attn: Mr. Gary Robertson Plane Number +1 (540) 853 -5749 Address: 801 S. Jefferson Street, S.W., Suqe 200, Roanoke, Virgins 24 E -Mail. ary.robertson@westemvewate M -J._a' X Property efs Signature: a$oe�UU1T4..aa4 irean esiVaarr� Name: Carilion Cl nic Properties, LLC, Attn: Mr. Curtis Mills Plane Number. +1(540)981 -7204 Add,ass. 135outh Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 240:1 E.Mail cemillspcadlionc'inicorg Applicant's Signs ,e Name IMaryellen F. Goodlatte Esq. Phone Number. +1 ;540) 224 -0018 Address: Glenn, Feldmann, ea l P.O. Box 2887, Roanoke, V24001- E -Mal mgoodlane4eglenn � F x2 Authorized feklmann com C&AFkvab Pmt fb G ConVeled application form and cheddist. r Written narrative explaining the reason for the request. (r Metes and bounds description, if applicable. Fig Filing fee. Fae ttoltttlra rlgmtat wfanitbd3 rx Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c) in Zoning Amendment Procecures. r— Written proffers. See the City's Guide to Proffered Cond tans Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as r 'development plan' if proffered. Faa 0 n muel71sobeeultte� ._:__�, __._..__ r Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2-326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. a rtNbt be w'"3mlged I— Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Omma^ce. affnikidili"of - eo ";lie mitq trlso sli6mllted3 Amended development or concept plan meeting the Appl7cation Requirements of item'2(c)'"n Zon'ng Amendment Procedures, r if applicable. r— Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. F Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. t>r wl Mariwr mans IheblowTegmusttilsobesubmibed:i F- Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the C'ys Zo,i ,,g Ordinance. r Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. (FOf a !a —w @i atnan _wraMM N fd g rou st ilio be submilted7 r— Amended comprehensive sgnage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2-336(4) of the Chys Zoning Ot'nance. F Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. (Fa a propose �AA �es a irate �rMpeet Hj -6e a Err ttelito Ire CNy, IFa o�Naedirwdt el�o be r A Traffic Impact --- __ ng _..... __ pact Study in compliance with Appendix &2(e) of the Cis Zoning Ordinance. 'f-oia WcPosaT —Ihet 8 -a hellle fmp9Cl Malys 68 eU r0 V�OT. �"le fOYeWifly Irwef �e0 be atidilNled "'. r Cover Sheet. r Traffic impact analys s. r- Concept plan. r— Proffered condii applicable. F- Required fee. 'An electronic copy of this application and cheddist can be found at www.roanokeva.gov:'pbd by seleding'Plann'ng Commission' under 'Boards and Commissions'. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application 'a amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. ATTACHMENT TO ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC Requested Zonine: INPUD (2.0379 ac.) IN (0.2518 ac.) I -2 (0.4453 ac.) Proposed Land Use: hospital and related uses (2.0379 ac.) pump house (W V WA) (0.2518 ac.) water filtration facility (W V WA) (0.4453 ac.) RECEIVED APR S 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT /} ,. a / Lu - ! �)) \ !, 4 /} ,. a / Lu NARRATIVE As part of a larger transaction, the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Water Authority ") and Carilion Clinic ( "Carilion ") have agreed to subdivide the 27+ acres which constitute tax parcel 4060502 in order to create three parcels — two of which would be retained by the Water Authority (the "Pump Station Parcel" containing 0.2518 acre and the "Residue Parcel" containing 24.9954 acres) and one of which would be conveyed to Carilion (the "Carilion Parcel" containing 2.0379 acres). The Carilion Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Pump Station Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Residue Parcel is currently zoned ROS and I -2. While the majority of the Residue Parcel is zoned ROS, its I -2 zoned portion encompasses the area new the intersection of Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street within which the Water Authoritv's filtration plant is located. This application seeks to (1) rezone the Pump Station Parcel from ROS to IN; (2) rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to BNPUD; and (3) rezone a 0.4453 acre portion of the Residue Parcel from ROS to I -2. Metes and bounds descriptions for all three parcels are provided. Crystal Spring, along with other historic and operational buildings of the Water Authority, is located on the Residue Parcel. Water from the spring has been pumped to an underground water storage cistern located on the Carilion Parcel. Because of significant leakage problems, the old cistern on the Carilion Parcel is in the process of being replaced by a new one under construction on the Residue Parcel. The pump house building located on the Pump Station Parcel will continue to house the pumping machinery needed to transfer the water from Crystal Spring through the Water Authority's systems. No changes to the exterior of the building on the Pump Station Parcel are needed or anticipated. Because the reduced size of the Pump Station Parcel is no longer conducive to an ROS zoning designation, and because the Pump Station Parcel cannot be classified as a "utility lot', a rezoning of that small parcel to IN is sought. Other than the zoning designation, no changes in the current use or design of that 0.2518 acre parcel arc anticipated. In addition to the underground water storage cistern, the Carilion Parcel also includes tennis courts. As part of the larger transaction, those courts would be removed and would be replaced with new courts on City -owned land on Reserve Avenue. The Carilion Parcel adjoins Carillon's Roanoke Memorial Hospital, located on 18+ acres (mx parcel no. 4060301) (the "Hospital "). The Hospital consists of six towers/buildings as f ohms: - North Tower - Built 1925, 5 stories - East Tower — Built 1956, 7 stories - Old Nursing School Building — Built 1959, 3 stories - West Pavilion - Built 1971,15 stories - Mountain Tower —Built 2003, 5 stories - South Tower— Built 1993, 10 stories originally with 5 stories added in 2007 The oldest structures are located on the north end of the Hospital parcel. The Mountain and South Towers, the newest structures are located on the south end of the Hospital parcel and house the Emergency Department (including the Trauma Center), Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, high tech specialty services, and imaging Past and future medical developments coupled with aging structures and facilities that no longer meet life safety codes, will require Carilion to remove the older structures as structural and technical issues will not allow them to be renovated or repurposed. In addition, expanding medical education activities — including new educational programs being created by Carilion's affiliation with Virginia Tech and the Jefferson College of Health Sciences as well as significantly increased utilization of clinical services (particularly Emergency Department and Trauma Services) require more parking capacity. This is especially true in the campus zone on the south side of the Hospital, close to one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the state, where few parking spaces are available forcing patients and families to walk farther than reasonable to and from their cars to reach needed clinical services. Although the Hospital parcel consists of I8+ acres, its sleep topography and challenging shape makes even more intensive utilization of that parcel for hospital use realistically impossible and certainly undesirable because of their massive disruptions to major clinical and ancillary support operations. The Carilion Parcel, then, represents the optimal location to support the hospital's construction of more modern facilities, allowing orderly and cost - effective replacement of clinical patient care and ancillary support functions from existing obsolete structures before the old, antiquated structures can be demolished. While the planning for such a renor ation will take many years, the timing associated with the larger transaction among the Water Authority, the City, and Carilion, requires that the Carilion Parcel be rezoned at this time in order to lay the foundation for that future planning and eventually optimal reconfiguration and modernization of the Hospital ensuring effective use of that community resource for future generations of Roanoke and the region's residents. Consequently, Carilion seeks to rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD. As delineated on the fNPUD Development Plan, the uses would be those typical of hospital uses. In order to provide adequate current and future off- street parking, the hospital building constructed on the Carilion Parcel would include structured parking. During the planning phase provisions would be made to connect the building proposed for the Carilion Parcel to the existing Hospital. The exterior finish materials and architectural design of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be similar to those used on the current Hospital buildings. The maximum height of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be 200 feet, so as to be compatible with those on the Hospital parcel. In order to mesh with both the buildings on the Hospital parcel (where the towers are located towards the rear of the parcel) and neighboring buildings on Jefferson Street (where the Fairfax. at the comer of Jefferson Street and Yellow Mountain Drive, for example, is five stories high), the INPUD Plan requires that the upper floors of the building (i.e. the floors above the fifth floor) be set back at least twenty feet from the front fagade of the building along Jefferson Street. This will allow the higher section of the building to be located towards the rear of the parcel similar to the configuration of the Hospital parcel. The Building Design conditions detailed on the Development Plan are consistent with the key elements of the City's Public and Institutional design standards. The building's exterior finish materials (masonry, brick, and granite) will not only be in keeping with the character of the Carilion campus, but will also harmonize with nearby development. Adequate parking to serve the needs of patients, visitors, staff and students'residents is needed and will be provided on the lower five floors of the building. The current South Tower houses one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the Commonwealth, but has very few readily accessible parking spaces. About half of those spaces are on land adjacent to the tennis courts and leased from the Water Authority. Those spaces will be lost when development begins on the Carilion Parcel. Cari lion plans to move the Emergency Department into the new building where it will be updated and redesigned to more efficiently handle the growing number of emergency and trauma patients with all required parking for those patients accessible in the same building. Outpatient services are expected to relocate to the new building which will allow the parking for those patients to be easily accessible. The structured parking provided in the building will also absorb those spaces lost when the older garage on I3elleview Avenue is either replaced, repurposed, or renovated. Finally, in order to avoid a small ROS -zoned strip between the Carilion Parcel and the 1 -2 zoned portion of the Residue Parcel, we also seek to rezone the 0.4453 acre parcel from ROS to 1 -2. Except to remove that portion of the tennis courts now located on the 0.4453 acre parcel, no change in its current use or development is anticipated. It will continue to be owned and operated by the Water Authority. RECEIVED APR 3 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING; DEVELOPMENT INPUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS Applicant Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, hereby requests that the development standards set forth on the INPUD Development Plan dated April 3, 2015 be imposed on the 2.0379 acre parcel: USES THE PROPERTY SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING LAND USES: LABORATORY, DENTAL, MEDICAL, OR OPTICAL LABORATORY, TESTING AND RESEARCH MEDICAL CLINIC HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER HOSPITAL PARKING, OFF -SITE THE HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER USE SHALL BE ANCILLARY TO THE HOSPITAL USE, SHALL BE LIMITED TO HOSPITAL STAFF ONLY, AND SHALL NOT EXCFFD 1,000 SQ FT IN SIZE. PARKING STRUCTURED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE LOWER FLOORS (AS HEREINAFTER DEFINED) OF THE BUILDING. APPROXIMATELY 800 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. PARKING EGRESS, CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL SPACES WILL BE DETERMINED AS NECESSARY DURING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. VEHICULAR ENTRANCES TWO ENTRANCES WILL SERVE THE SITE. ONE PRIMARY ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON STREET SERVING THE LOWER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION WILL BE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE SERVING THE HIGHER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE THE ENTRANCE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE. BUILDING DESIGN THE BUILDING SHALL FRONT JEFFERSON STREET PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY AND SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. TO FACILITATE IMPROVEMENTS TO JEFFERSON STREET WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ROANOKE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, THE BUILDING MAY BE SET BACK FURTHER FROM JEFFERSON STREET THAN SHOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 200 FEET. THE FIVE (5) LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING (THE "LOWER FLOORS ") WILL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 S.F. EACH, PRINCIPALLY AS PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT HUNDRED (600) PARKING SPACES. FLOORS OF THE BUILDING ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS (THE "UPPER FLOORS ") SHALL HOUSE THE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND SHALL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 50,000 S.F. EACH. THE UPPER FLOORS SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM JEFFERSON STREET SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO A LOBBY WHERE ELEVATORS TO THE UPPER FLOORS WILL BE LOCATED. A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISLAND SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EXIT DRIVES FROM JEFFERSON STREET. THE BUILDING SI4ALL BE DESIGNED IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CARILION CAMPUS AND THE VERNACULAR DESIGN OF THE SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CORRIDOR, AS FOLLOWS: LOWER FLOORS. THE LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CLAD IN MASONRY, A COMBINATION OF BRICK AND GRANITE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE INTERRUPTED WITH WINDOW WALL ELEMENTS FOR FENESTRATION. THE FRONT FACADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET WILL HAVE A MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY OR GLAZING OF AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT (50 °0) FOR THE GROUND FLOOR AND AT LEAST TWENTY FIVE PERCENT (250-0) FOR FLOORS TWO THROUGH FIVE. WINDOWS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS BEGINNING AT A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE ON JEFFERSON STREET. THE VERTICAL FACADES OF THE LOWER FLOORS SHALL INCORPORATE INTERVALS OF ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION AT LEAST EVERY SIXTY (60) FEET OVER THE LENGTH OF THE APPLICABLE FACADE, UTILIZING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: VARYING THE ARRANGEMENT, PROPORTIONING, OR DESIGN OF GARAGE FLOOR OPENINGS; INCORPORATING CHANGES IN ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING TEXTURE AND COLOR; OR PROJECTING OR RECESSING PORTIONS OR ELEMENTS OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE FACADE. UPPER FLOORS. AS THE BUILDING RISES ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS AND STEPS BACK FROM JEFFERSON STREET, THE CLADDING WOl "LD TRANSITION TO A CURTAINWALL SYSTEM THAT WOULD UTILIZE BOTH GLASS AND METAL PANEL AS INFILL ELEMENTS. THOSE MATERIALS WOULD VISUALLY TIE THE NEW TOWER BACK TO THE EXISTING ROANOKE MEMORIAL, AS WELL AS CONNECT IT TO THE ARCHITECTI RE OF RIVERSIDE CENTER. TO FACILITATE IHE MOVEMENT OF STAFF, SUPPLIES AND PATIENTS, SKYWAYS AND POTENTIALLY OTHER CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDINGS ON TAX PARCEL. 4060301 MAY BE PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (IF ANY) SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO JEFFERSON STREET THAN 60 FEET AND HAVE EXTERIOR BUILDING FINISHES SIMILAR TO THOSE ON THE LOWER FLOORS. PROJECT SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE "CG" ZONING DISTRICT. GROUND SIGNS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE EXEMPT DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AS DEFINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. Lou19YYlm ALL UTILITIES ON SITE AND ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THAT SERVE THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AFFECTED BY BUILDING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED AND /OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED, PER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARILION CLINIC AND WVWA. SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO BE ABANDONED AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED BY WVWA DUE TO WVWA WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES. ALL STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED SHALL MEET ALL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ALL SANITARY, ELECTRIC, GAS IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPING IN ORDER TO SOFTEN THE EDGES OF THE BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREETS, A ROW OF LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES AND A ROW OF SHRUBS WILL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 36.2 -649 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE AREA DF.NOTID BY HATCHING ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BARRIER LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE CURB AND THE PEDESTRIAN WAY IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING TO FUNNEL PEDESTRIANS FROM THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE IN THE BUILDING TO THE JEFFERSON STREET S.E. MID -BLOCK CROSSING. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DATED MARCH 13, 2015 (REVISED MARCH 27, 2015) WILL BE UPDATED, AS NECESSARY, DURING DEVFLOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE CONFIGURATION OF TRAFFIC PATFERNS. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. AND SIGNAL TIMING, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER, RECEIVED APR 9 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT [g I E '�g ad• ®�� t ;I it 4 tla fr3gag gg$ s pa a $ 9 Oil' Nj io € s3a$aFSi aa9r$ r �I is se [r✓§ stG4 e¢ $ 4d1 r�pc fraiafr 5 ai § g fr i # Mi �� . s e WNW. 9 e a �g r§ e � a� �sfY pp ash 3y fr a3frg 3 pg B a a g7 i gad fr p'P sz fi a € ` s g a! $4 e 6k 9 - z xaq@ 24- g�oe13 sr a� §a 5I@�¢gk q pY §�5�e NO �' g4g re" S igga s s 4 5 iu�ae�� d �a t¢1 �e ➢rqgg� qg 9 8� € E 3 i e E. sH . �`� 4 HH i1 €a" �� "1,4r�a Sr E A €g& 1 M a ,!?B[1 s 3% a g fr es gg egSYS ' e e d e�i . ?. s. � Vii€ .�� a n 4E E ,�oe_� Iri j✓, ' W � s a7 .CQ uI � U4 �W u LL W— it F Fpm 3i� C € €� e3 a 6UyPp;zng s� lizolE m VOZ UlObeean• -Iptl — RO1M MTyGWw�los )� OK 1 (R/lY Wes) aE 0 , ...:....... ASPHALT P•RR r 1M XRX 1 i . � mR. Xx'RMx ...:.:....... 5 / 0 I �yy G�Q�j77'y -. eLf -M WT ASIMAL PARRIRR m F a To J. •\ W I o \fin Y 5 ri g \� • • • • '' RETAMMG WNL 50' 0 50• TRACT B -1 -C ® 24.9954 AC. SCALE: 1• — s0' (1,064800 SF.) CONCEPT PLAN SNOW NG A PORTION OF NOM TRACT "B -1 -C" (24.9954 ACRES) REZMO 1- � Y � MNG REZONED FROM ROS TO / -Z REMED MM ROS TO 1-2 ON THE PROPERTY OF (IAJM SF. — OWAT.T AO.) THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY SITUATED AT 2012 &TFERSON ST., SE CITY OF ROANOSR, VIRGINIA DATE FYM 1&4016 - LUAIM AS90CIAln P.C, 9CALFi CORK X0+ 1• MAM TMMMA 14-100 A0M00� **= Ip010100l 1 80000 RAR010) _... 00W�RbNf0111 FAIIL WYM0bRm1 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 2.0379 AC. TO BE REZONED TO INPUD The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B-1-13' being subdivided out of Tract'B -1', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property oflhe Weston Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at corner '17', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located N 20" 11'22" I:, 272.17 feet from the Northeasterly corner of Ycllow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E. f'or the following four courses. N 200 11'22" E, a distance of 135.07 feet to a point designated Corner'2', Thence N 250 54'00" E. a distance of 50.25 feel to a point designated Comer'3', Thence N 200 11'22" E, a distance of 70.08 feet to a point designated Comer '4', Thence N 21019'07" E, a distance of 21.15 feel to Comer'B', the southwesterly corner of proposed Tmct'13-1 -A', Thence leaving said JeB"erson street, S.E. and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the southerly and easterly lines ofsaid Tract'B -I -A' for the following two courses, S 710 26'24" E, a distance of 111.46 feet to a point designated Comer'A', Thence N 15 47'55" E, a distance of 32.50 feet, to a point designated Corner 10, located on the southerly property line of Roanoke hospital South Wing, Tract "A -l" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804 Thence with the southerly property lines of said Tract "A -1" for the following three courses. S5551'00 E, a distance of 196.55 feet to a point designated Comer' 11'. Thence S 220 15' 50" E, a distance of 81.83 feet to a point designated Corner'12', Thence S 120 1644" W. a distance of 115.01 feet to a point designated Comer'13'. located on Northerly property line of the Western Virginia Water Authority Tract "B -1 ", Thence leaving said Tract "A -1" and with four new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority for the following four courses: N 44° 54'44" W, a distance of 21.60 feet to a point designated Corner'C', Thence N 76° 57' 18" W, a distance of 54.60 feet to a point designated Corner'D', Thence S 130 02'42" W, a distance of 54.14 feet to a point designated Corner'C', Thence N 760 57' 18" W, a distance ol'311.53 feet to a point designated Comer'F', the Point of Beginning and containing 88,773 square feet, 2.0379 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. I, Paues 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -I -13" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "13.1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated a12012 Jefferson street, S.C., City of Roanokc. Virginia ". METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.2518 AC. TO BE REZONED TO IN Tile following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -1 -A' being subdivided out of Tract 'B-l', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at center 'B', a point located on the wstcrly side of Jefferson strut, S.I.., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 548.72 feet northerly from the Northeasterly corner of Yellow Mountain Road, S.E. and Jefferson Street, SG., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.B., N 210 19'07" E, a distance of 90.38 feet to a point designated Comer'5', said point being located at the southeasterly comer of the intersection of Jefferson Street, S.E. and Weller Lane and being the southwesterly property comer of the property of Roanoke I lospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book I, Page 2804. Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Weller Lame and said'rract "A -1" for the following five courses: Run a distance of 23.49 feel along the are of curve to the right, said curve having a Delta Angle of 530 50'41 ", a radius distance of 25.00 reel, a tangent distance of 12.70 feet, a chord bearing. of N 68" 49' 16" L, and a chord distance of 22.64 feet to a point designated Corner'6', Thence S 660 19'36" E, a distance of 25.37 feet to a point designated Comer'T, Thence S 740 10'48" E, a distance of 42.26 feet to a point designated Corner'R', Thence S 660 19'36" E, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point designated Corner'9', Thence S 150 47'55" W, a distance of 70.58 feet to a point designated Corner' 10', Thence leaving said Weller Lane and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the proposed easterly and southerly lines of said Tract 'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 15'47'55" W. a distance of 32.50 feet to a point designated Corner'A'. Thence N 71° 26' 24" W. a distance of 111.46 feet, to a point designated Cumer'B', the Point of Beginning and containing 10,967 square feet. 0,2518 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. I, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -I -A" (0,2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.4453 AC. TO BE REZONED TO 1 -2 The following is a description of the proposed area to be rezoned from ROS to 1 -2 on a portion of the land designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson Street, S.B., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 211.70 feet northerly from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.L., said point also being the approximate zoning line between the current 1 -2 zomrg on the south and ROS zoning on the north. Thence with said easterly side of Jelferson Street, S.E., N 20" 1 P 22" E, a distance of 60.47 feel to a point designated Comer F, said point being the southwesterly property comer of the property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Tract 'B -1 -B" being mom particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC., dated February 18, 2015. entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The We-stem Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Tract " B -1 -B ", S 760 57' 18" L, a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Corner'E', on said plat. Thence leaving said Tract " B -1 -1311, S 010 50'38" E, a distance of 62.08 feet to a point, on the approximate original 1 -2/ROS zoning line. Thence with said approximate original zoning line (1- 2ROS), N 760 57' 18" W, a distance of 335.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 19,395 square feel. 0.4453 acres, and said proposed rezoning to be continuous with the existing 1 -2 zoned area, wm vmm'.mwa nmx wx'nwnw VINIONIA'�IONYOtl .wu win:3xowe .vmwv.aa�.wne nn Sd N3'NOABANN 3 y331tlMSSV K3aS W'l m E gg1 L Z^ ketl� , U ppm ym 5 �� a °- = U a Aeeiptl1 1 a�mi11is1IQ i °i5� i 4e 94 m :jjj �� a Y• ° b b i °ir �Im� �,�dmEE mE �Ei@ E b m�'c gmpy�b `d is EEE tl I �•Q,p B� y m pe o m9i ESE E a.E ®lib b € €•x! € °e 'CIE: E 1`Eiili��Elr��� "�g�$��� '�flmbg.@ 140 (Efl film1 y m b m mmEmii`�Q�Qbb B���ElE mEEl� tm�i�6RE� • I C E m I - �� �_,�, @.�,��mE.�.6EE, .I�e.m•t� wwxe�..n'wim..�mre vw. wuromrn SU3NNY'IESNOA3A'WIS- Stl39NIJN3 � e Jill i pill $ a� �eajv¢{ 41P be /iii y 6Fe3bl8Eg�yl cbiel k]�b ill ai yye 8 a 0 n m "yp� a w '•V a� ik:A�6a��kP3Sea pp Sit¢b kbG b y i �y � `1 2 � ye ♦ "' '�A''N lApb�! �kl�k _ �.. _._ 4 C I A t kiilpppl, , € r` lit 11 i_g� �m8 \ill b6 bht�b �• �. iy v R I � .-�•?e � Fit iii ��MgMp @�e � . FI Y I� .u»uooam.pm -3rma awe wwmxw tlWl'JaIA'3a0NY0a '^° e Od 3Id-Sa0ASSY SaGswaB »+`.mmY«o�. ,u NM1YNN31B'me.s» Jd 53,LtlIJO5SV N845Wf1'I uw Q / � 6 m � o�g 9eg hey jig q�. bpi � Q — �ME EEE a o y S6� • 22 1 r Ab'a* F ,ate... j !2wT s 11.8 N84 TRACT B-1 —A -- 111 il8 0.2518 r a ,.e• ............. PC Nor m ) �- z za a 64 TRACT B -1 -C 24.9854 AC. n.m. �r ru,.woww �s.� xsov a � oamwu Mff a -, MWI Ac o eov�rvmox ,on r,a arr or xoenron, rtxccvu ai n°m THE WESTERN V1RG^AU�NATER AUTRORTIY TRACT "B -1 -A" (0.2510 ACRES) TRACT "8-1 -B" (2.0979 ACRES) my aw TRACT "B-1 -C" (24.9954 ACRES) 9= O! xOL o= VW4L4L E rm.mrmiu rawmr `� 1 l 1 cR1P10C 9C.U.E I � .I I � I y� � 1 3 INSTRUMENT # ✓•v¢JB77gT, eE TRACT E -1 -A y 0n1Bu o _ TRACT R-1 C' 24.8854 W. fumem ul ii. miiimr°`vaioa•e se°m�i '�` p � ux�n b` Teri aimwo"csm°rs'o°c ®m�roue oArcaw, rAen A -, rarsea) eceml wucmeQUUUO a..rwm.. wrs _ _ RH.4Vd0IR.4(ON IYIA•THF �OF� II• YpGPM THE WESTERN WRGI,NIAWATER AUTIIORTTY xm T 1 TRACT "B -1 -A" (0.2510 ACRES) rm.gmm°FEw'i•v.uaw 6 n TRACT "B- 1- H(Z.0378 ACRES) TRACT -B-1-C (2+24.4.9954 ACRES) 9cm of xaxoa, v�av�E — e iucroi eFOUr. ZONING DISTRICT MAI Portions 01 2012 Jefferson Street SE; Official Tax Parcel: 4060502 C3Area to be Rezoned I_ _ I Conditional Zoning Zoning RA (Residential- Agriculture) R -12 (Res. Single - Family) R -7 (Res. Single - Family) R -5 (Res. Single - Family) R -3 (Res. Single - Family) RM -1 (Res. Mixed Density) RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) RMF (Res. Multi - Family) CN (Commercial- Neigh) CG (Commercial - General) CLS (Commercial -Large Site) 1 -1 (Light Industrial) 1-2 (Heavy Industrial) ".., D (Downtown) MX (Mixed Use) IN (Institutional) ROS (Rae & Open Space) T'. AD (Airport Day) MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Devi INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Day) IPUD (Industrial Planned Unit Devi OF (Urban Flex) N 0 100 200 Feet 1 V' c — s 4050501 1. � ROS {J f a (c)0RD.30431 INPUD(c) aY %_ INPUD + 7 -, INPUD' ROS I.2 4050501 1. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS For Carilion Clinic Medical Building On Jefferson Street City of Roanoke, VA For Carilion Clinic 231 Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24011 March 13, 2015 Revised: March 27, 2015 Commission No. 3507 drH�ICHA 5. G . Lie. No. 15232 �L 03n7/15 ��Mat-F, - & Craig 701 FIRST STREET, S.W. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 (540) 345 -9342 FAX: (540) 345 -7691 CARILION CLINIC MEDICAL BUILDING TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document presents the results of the traffic impact analysis performed for a proposed 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in the upper ten levels. The proposed development is located between Flannagan Drive and McClanahan Street east of Jefferson Street in the City of Roanoke, VA. The medical facility will be a part of the Roanoke Memorial Hospital complex. The development is proposed by Carilion Clinic The primary access to the proposed development is via Jefferson Street; a secondary access will be from Flannagan Drive. Jefferson Street is an urban collector street serving as a main connection for daily commuters from the Crystal Spring neighborhood to downtown Roanoke. Jefferson Street is currently operating adequately for the existing traffic volumes during the AM and PM peak hours; current ADT is approximately 7,000 vehicles per day. Trip generation for the proposed development was performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition. The land use of the proposed development is represented by land use code 610 — Hospital in the Trio Generation Manual. Per the Manual, the proposed development generates 499 trips in the AM peak hour and 491 in the PM peak hour. The proposed development includes parking consisting of 800 spaces. The parking will serve medical facility employees, patients, and the general public. Although the parking structure itself does not generate trips, it will result in parking turnover as patients and the general public utilizes the space and visit other facilities within the Roanoke Memorial complex. This turnover traffic is estimated to be 75 trips into and 75 trips out of the parking structure per hour. These additional trips are considered in this study. It is anticipated that a portion of the existing traffic utilizing the existing parking garages on Reserve Avenue and Belleview Avenue will utilize the proposed parking structure in future years. This redistributed volume is rerouted to the proposed parking structure from the Reserve intersection. New trips to the area generated by the proposed development and reallocated trips from the existing Roanoke Memorial complex are described in detail in Section 5.0 of the traffic impact analysis. The study analyzes 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, and 2020 Build -out traffic operations with the new development. Analysis is provided for the three existing signalized intersections on Jefferson Street at Reserve Avenue, McClanahan Street, and Flannagan Drive and for both a single lane and multilane access at the proposed development site. The study analyzes level of service and delays, vehicle queue lengths, potential improvements to the Jefferson street typical section, and pedestrian accommodations. Overall, level of service and delays are acceptable for all study scenarios within the public right -of -way at the signalized intersections studied and at the proposed entrance on Jefferson Street. After analysis of the study network as described above, the following recommendations are offered: I. Provide separate left and right turn lanes for vehicles exiting the proposed development to Jefferson Street. 2. Provide a full access entrance from Jefferson Street. Provide secondary access to the Jefferson Street/Flannagan Drive intersection traffic signal. 3. Eliminate on -street parking on northbound Jefferson Street. 4. Provide a mid -block crosswalk with pedestrian raised refuge island at the Jefferson Street site entrance. 5. Provide a separate left turn lane from southbound Jefferson Street into the site entrance. 6. Remark southbound Jefferson Street at Flannagan/Weller intersection: one right turn lane, one through lane, and one left turn lane. Z Remark northbound Jefferson Street at Flannagan/Weller intersection: one left turn lane (40' storage and 50' taper) and one through/right lane. 8. Modify Jefferson Street typical section adjacent to Carilion property such that Jefferson Street is four lanes wide (two southbound through, one southbound left/one northbound left, and one northbound through /right). 9. Coordinate study network signalized intersection upon implementation of the proposed development. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... ..................................................................................... .......................... _......................1 2.0 Proposed Development . ..................... ............................. .. .................................................................... 1 3.0 2015 Existing Condit ions .............................................. ....... .. ........................................ ...................... I 4.0 Background Traffic Volumes ........ .. ..................................................... .......... ........... .......................... 3 5.0 Projected Development Volumes ..................... ........................ .. ...... .. ........................................ ....... ... 6 5.1 Trip Generation ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 5.2 Trip Distribut ions ......................................................................._....................... ..............._............._6 6.0 2020 Build -Out Volumes...._ ............................................................................... ............................... 16 7.0 Turn Lane Warrant Anal ysis ..................................................... 16 7.1 Right Turn Treatment ............................................................. ................................................. ........ . 16 7.2 Left Turn Treatment ..... ............................... _...... _............................................. ............................... 16 8.0 Level of Service Analysis ................................................................................... ............................... 18 8.1 Specific Intersection Analysis ......................_........_..................................... ....._........._............... 25 8. 1.1 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson St. & McClananhan /St. /Yellow Mountain Rd ............. 25 8.1.2 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson St. & Weller Ave./Flannagan Dr . ............. .................. 25 8.1.3 Unsignalized Intersection of Evans Mill Road & Weller Ave . ......................... .................. 25 8.1.4 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson St. & Reserve Ave .................... ..__.................._._...... 25 S.1.5 Unsignalized Intersection of Jefferson St. & Site Entrance ......... .. ... . ............ .......... ............ 25 9.0 SimTraffic Queue Length Analyses ......... .. ...... ................................................................................ 26 10.0 Pedestrian Accommodat ions ............................................................................. ......................_........ 31 11.0 Conclusions and Recommendations.... ........................... .................................................................. 32 List of Figures Figure l.1 — Site Specific Location Map ...................................................................... ............................... 2 Figure 3.1 — 2015 Existing AM/PM Peak Hour... ..................................... ................................................. 4 Figure 4.1 — 2020 Background AM /PM Peak Hour ...................... ........................... .................................. 5 Figure 5.1 - Site Trip Distribution (Land Use 610) AM Peak Hour ............................ ............................... 8 Figure 5.2 - Site Trip Distribution (Land Use 610) PM Peak Hour ............................ ............................... 9 Figure 5.3 -AM Peak Hour (Land Use 610) Trip Distribut ion ....................................................... 10 Figure 5.4- PM Peak Hour (Land Use 610) Trip Distribut ion...__ ................_.._... .........................___... I I Figure 5.5 - Parking Garage Turnover AM Peak Hour .............................................. ............................... 12 Figure 5.6 - Parking Garage Turnover PM Peak Hour ............................................... ............................... 13 Figure 5.7 - Re- Distributed S.B.L Reserve Trips AM Peak Hour ... .. .......... ........ .. ................... ................ 14 Figure 5.8 - Re- Distributed S.B.L Reserve Trips PM Peak Hour ............................. ............................... 15 Figure 6.1 - 2020 Buildout AM /PM Peak Hour ......................................................... ............................... 17 List of Tables Table 3.1 - Directional Distribution on Jefferson Street ....... ...................................... ............................... 3 Table 5.1 - Trips Generated (Land Use 610 - Hospital) ............................................. ............................... 6 Table 5.2- Site Trip Directional Distribution Entering From Jefferson Street ......................... ............1111. 6 Table 8.1 - Level of Service and Delay ........................................................ ._ ......... .. .......... ................... 18 Table 8.2 - Level of Service per Movement by Approach ...... .................................. ............................... 20 Table 9.1 - Critical Movement Queue Length... ....... - ...... - ....... ............................................................... 27 Table 9.2 - Build -Out Scenarios Queue Length Comparison ..................................... ............................... 31 Appendices Appendix A - Proposed Development Layout Appendix B - Turning Movement Counts Appendix C - Synchro Reports Appendix D - SimTraffic Reports Appendix E - Conceptual Jefferson Street Layout Appendix F -Left and Right Turn Lane Warrants (VDOT Road Design Manual) M &C Comm. # 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Caribou Clinic 1.0 Introduction Mattem & Craig, Inc. was commissioned by Carilion Clinic to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis for a proposed medical facility in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. The medical facility is scheduled to be constructed and fully occupied by 2020. Figure 1.1 depicts the location of the proposed development and the surrounding area. This report includes discussion of existing and projected traffic volumes in the study area, trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed medical building, level of service analyses, queuing analyses, turn lane warrant analysis, and identification of warranted geometric improvements. This study will analyze two weekday peak hour periods: AM and PM 2.0 Proposed Development The proposed development is a 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in upper ten levels located on a portion of Parcel 4060502. The parking is proposed to include 800 spaces and the medical facility is proposed to encompass 500,000 square feet of medical use space. The parking will be for employees and for the general public; public parking will be free. The primary, full- movement access location is from Jefferson Street between McClanahan Street and Weller Avenue / Flannagan Drive; a secondary access location is from Flannagan Drive. The proposed development layout is provided in Appendix A 3.0 2015 Existing Conditions Three -hour AM (6:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM (3:00 — 6:00 PM) classification turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, February 3, 2015 by The Traffic Group, a sub-consultant to Mattem & Craig. Turning movement classification counts included pedestrians and bicycles. The counts were performed at the signalized intersections of Jefferson Street and McClanahan Street/Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive; and at the unsignalized intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue. The traffic volumes include the existing percentage of heavy vehicles trucks, buses and ambulances, within the study network. Recorded vehicular traffic volumes, percent heavy vehicles, and conflicting pedestrians are included in the Synchro models. The existing traffic counts are included in Appendix B. The AM and PM peak hours of Jefferson Street, as indicated by the turning movement counts, are 7 :30 — 8:30 AM and 4:45 — 5:45 PM, respectively. SITE LOCATION Goo'* earth M &C Comm. # 3507 Carbon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.LA. For Carilion Clinic Turning movement counts were collected on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at the signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and Reserve Avenue for the Roanoke River District traffic study, performed by Balzer and Associates, Inc. It was mutually agreed between Mattem & Craig and the City of Roanoke that a 1.0% annual growth rate be applied to the existing traffic counts to current year 2015. The 2015 traffic volumes at the Reserve Avenue intersection were then balanced with the recorded traffic counts at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive. The existing traffic counts are included in Appendix B. Existing AM and PM peak hour volumes on the street network are presented in Figure 3.1. These volumes were used to quantify the existing traffic within the network and to determine the directional distribution of existing peak hour traffic. The directional distributions for the AM and PM peak hours along Jefferson Street are delineated in Table 3.1. Table 3.1— Directional Distribution on Jefferson Street Peak Hour Northbound Percentage Southbound Percentage AM 70% 30% PM 40% 60% 4.0 Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic is that which would be anticipated to be utilizing the existing street network when the proposed development is expected to be completed, but without the traffic volume from the new development. The proposed medical facility is projected to be complete and fully operational by 2020. It was mutually agreed upon in the February 18, 2015 Pre- Scoping meeting with City of Roanoke that an annual growth rate of 1.0% be utilized between 2015 and 2020. The existing, balanced 2015 traffic counts were convened to 2020 background traffic volumes by utilizing the annual growth rate of 1.0% from year 2015. 2020 background traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. A w N 8 IP p 2016 i /0/5 20/25 -60/50 f WELL£F AVE. ra5�j'� 45 � FLANNAGAN DR. 0/45 pP � p < 1 S WILL �pl 30/55 � "\' o N EN �90/r0 m h I 1 � �/m /50 �5/5 MC LANAHAN ST. S.W. /90//90 YELLOW VGUNTNN RD. 20/150 —� �o Nm rvMm � e N h /Z0 /OS -30135 x b �D/5 5i9rarh� rmeiseGlon RESEFVE AVE w Umsigwrize0 /nlerseclIon X/Y AN /PM WeekOay Peak 2!0//95 Rwr ho /Rc 30/25 zo /2s� N JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. 2015 EXISTING LL AM /PM PEAK HOUR 4 w rouu.xo. asm xrs rreua[ �.r A 4 A h wo< �e i �2r/32 3tio�lyh n _ a L -63/53 6315 �2l/26 � WELLER AVE. P —] f F FLANNAGAN GR. � 4214)- D 49 hh�ti \ �rll m" C 8 i -1416 /5 5/5 �5 Ma LANAHAN ST.S.W. 189/189 YELLOW MOUNTAIN R0. 2r /ISBN 32/2l� Nm N ^m �r26/l84 _ CN� 32/37 0 L�^N �0/5 � sNrauzeo ImeFSenlon X• /Y qUm/siPgM u lrww kGI,, Peck AVE. 22/94 LL W HWl TIOTTIC 32/26 z1 /z6� JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE. VIRGINIA. 2020 BACKGROUND AM /PM PEAK HOUR w COMM. NO. JSW NT$ FIGURE 4.1 A M&C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carillon Clinic 5.0 Projected Development Volumes Trip generation was performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trio Generation Manual, 9ih Edition. Site trip generation was determined as agreed upon in the City of Roanoke Pre- Scoping meeting on February 18, 2015. The land use of the proposed development is described in Section 2.0 and is represented by land use code 610 — Hospital in the Manual. Based on size of the facility and the peak hour, the Manual provides an estimate of the new trips generated by the proposed development. Trip generation and projected distributions are discussed in section 5.1 and 5.2. 5.1 Trip Generation Table 5.1 provides the number of trips generated by the proposed land use. Table 5.1 — Trips Generated (Land Use 610 — Hospital) 5.2 Trip Distributions Site trip assignment and distribution on the existing street network me anticipated to be unique to the proposed development and therefore will differ from the existing traffic distributions, due to local travel patterns in the area. Table 5.2 indicates the site trip distribution for site generated trips entering from Jefferson Street based on local travel patterns. Site generated trips exiting the development are anticipated to be distributed as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Table 5.2 — Site Trip Directional Distribution Entering From Jefferson Street Peak Hour Northbound Percents e Southbound Percents e AM Weekday Peak PM Weekday Peak 50% PM 30% Hour of Adjacent Hour of Adjacent Street Street ITE Land Land Use Use Code Size Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Hospital 610 500,000 SF 314 (63%) 185 (37 %o) 187 (38 %) 304 (62 %) TOTAL 499 491 5.2 Trip Distributions Site trip assignment and distribution on the existing street network me anticipated to be unique to the proposed development and therefore will differ from the existing traffic distributions, due to local travel patterns in the area. Table 5.2 indicates the site trip distribution for site generated trips entering from Jefferson Street based on local travel patterns. Site generated trips exiting the development are anticipated to be distributed as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Table 5.2 — Site Trip Directional Distribution Entering From Jefferson Street Peak Hour Northbound Percents e Southbound Percents e AM 50% 50% PM 30% 70% M &C Comm. q 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carillon Clinic During the February 18, 2015 Pre- Scoping meeting it was agreed that 80% of site generated trips will use the Jefferson Street entrance and 20% the Flannagan Drive entrance. The Flannagan Drive entrance will primarily serve medical facility employees and potentially emergency services; the Jefferson Street entrance will be the primary access for patients and the general public. Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2 provide the anticipated site trip distributions by percentage for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Site trip distributions are provided in Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Additionally, during the February 18, 2015 Pre-Scoping meeting parking turnover at the proposed five levels of parking within the proposed development was discussed. As mentioned previously, the parking area will serve medical facility employees, emergency services, patients, and the general public. Some of the parking spaces will turnover more frequently than others due to the nature of the visits generated by the medical facility. At the PreScoping meeting, it was mutually agreed that 300 of the 800 available parking spaces can be expected to turnover three times per 12 -hour period (6AM — 6PM). This logic results in 900 vehicle turnovers at the parking structure over the 12 -hour period and 75 turnovers per hour evenly distributed. The entering and exiting of these movements are all assumed to occur at the Jefferson Street entrance. The 75 entering and 75 exiting trips are distributed to and from the site based on the same logic described for the site generated trips. Parking turnover trip distributions are provided in Figure 5.5 and Figure 5.6 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. It is anticipated that a portion of the existing traffic utilizing the existing parking garages on Reserve Avenue and Belleview Avenue will utilize the proposed parking structure in future years. For this study, it is assumed that 60% of the Jefferson Street southbound left traffic volume at the Reserve Avenue intersection will be re- routed to the proposed parking structure via southbound Jefferson Street. This volume reallocation and projected distribution is presented in Figure 5.7 and Figure 5.8 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. It is anticipated that pedestrians accessing their vehicles parked in the lower levels of the medical facility will be going to and leaving from other facilities within the Roanoke Memorial campus. This project proposes a mid -block crosswalk with a pedestrian raised refuge island located just south of the proposed site entrance on Jefferson Street. Therefore, for the 2020 Build -Out conditions, pedestrians are conservatively estimated to cross Jefferson Street at a rate of 50 pedestrians per hour in both the AM and PM peak hours. Further, 20 pedestrians per hour are estimated to cross the proposed site entrance in both the AM and PM peak hours. A o w w �42 6' j% —a% —j% �l% � FLANNAGAN OR. RD' JS5 E =N �2IL y 1 9% PROP. 1 � '.....SITE..... oN M L Mc LANAHAN ST.S.W. YELLM MOUNTNN RD. n 0 yN o� � 519�1/zed lnlerssNdi RESERVE AVE. 5] w W� � Un519NV1 /zeO /nlNSecllon JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. o SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION w LAND USE 610 AM PEAK HOUR w caMM.NO. JiW N!5 F�LVRE 5.� A 8 A o a w 6I" 3 -3% �3% � FLANNAGAN OR. WELLER AVE EN N/5 L20L 1 30% - PROP. SME }�r J WCLANAHAN ST.S.W, 3% YELLOW MOUNTNN RD. N I 0 ono s"W' a �MerseclIon RESERVE AVE. 47, w w � Umsl9/K/IIZSN lnlersealIon JEFFERSON lCAR100Nl N TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION W LAND USE 610 PM PEAK HOUR W J'Nt! N/5 F�LURf 5.2 A 9 A a N W �zo 8 N �p0��5 �5 s F�NAGAN OR. WELLER AVE. 25 (� 52,--) rLL EJ WS 0 L105 1 45 PROP..... SME oN Mc LANAHAN 5F.5.W. 50 YELLOW MWNTNN R0. 8 1 o � srgnouzm rmerstaron RESERVE AVE. 25 w wUnsrgmrize0 � rnrersecr/on JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. o AM PEAK HOUR w LAND USE 610 u TRIP DISTRIBUTION W NJS F�[URE 5.3 A 10 A o w 4 w 2LEROR. L/5 e_ . 39 _� � � � 39� S�IV'MD Nr°,� hN ra] PROP. SrrE }�r pM J 1 4 �la Mc LANAHAN ST.S.W. IS YELLLW 1011TNN R0, O RESERVE AV£. 19 w LmeM ■ 519/bllzeJ lnlerseUlM � � unsl91Mlhee lnlersB[ flan JEFFERSON ICARILION7 TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. o PM PEAK HOUR w LAND USE 610 TRIP DISTRIBUTION w jO 7 NO. NTS I-- 5.9 A 11 A III I o T1n" w w 5 E O i F aGaN OR. A/y w£uEa AVE. 05 �53 PROP. }�zz I � .....SITE__... o� _JILL Mc LAN " 4.5A �s YELLOW MWNTNN RD. o Slgnollz� InlerseclIon RESER✓E AVE. 5 w� Unslgrwllzee lnlersedlan JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. PARKING GARAGE TURNOVER 4 AM PEAK HOUR w w roW "° ",s .,�NaE s.s A A I` W w T s �o —5 -0 ° MNA M DR. wE<LER AVE. �30 _. 1 PROP. }�r45 SffE oN L �T McCLANANAN STS.A H YELLM MOUNTAIN RD. i o RESEME AVE. H w S /grin @e0 IolersNlm w� Unslgwlhea Imersedlon JEFFERSON ICARILIONI TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. PARKING GARAGE TURNOVER w PM PEAK HOUR w CO�M.NO. NT5 FILUFf 5.6 A 13 A I' a T I w 1 FLANNAGAN OR. WELLER AVE. +10 RD M EN �5 m LPROP..... SITE Mc LANAHAN ST. 50.. YELLOW MOUNTAIN R0. + + I L o oM RES E AVE. ¢ SlgrwllzM lnlersecflon � � Unslgwllze0 InlerseNlon JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE.VIRGINIA. o RE- DISTRIBUTED w S.B.L.RESERVE TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR w COMN. NO. 350] Nis F/ RE 5.7 A 14 A w I w 1 FLANNAGAN OR. +5 WELLER AVE. MILL RO N ss L PROP. STE MC LANA AN 5T.S.W. Yf(LIX4 MININT" R0. o� + I Y o Lece b R£5ER✓E AVE. w Sl,,//,M IN...ttllon w� Ilnsl9nollzeN InlerSeGlon JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE,VIRGINIA. o RE- DISTRIBUTED w S.B.L.RESERVE TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR w MM.xo. Nrs Frcoae s.e A 15 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic 6.0 2020 Build -Out Volumes The 2020 Build -Out volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are determined by summing the 2020 Background projected traffic volumes (Figure 4.1), site generated trips (Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4), the parking turnover trips (Figure 5.5 and Figure 5.6), and the projected existing parking structure trip reallocation (Figure 5.7 and Figure 5.8). The resulting 2020 Build -Out volumes are presented in Figure 6.1 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 7.0 Turn Lane Warrant Analysis On high volume roads, vehicles slowing or stopping to turn create a hazard for other vehicles. This hazard increases as the number of turning vehicles increases. The VDOT Road Design Manual provides guidelines for turn lanes on two-lane roads. These guidelines are based on the design speed, turning volume, approach volume, and opposing volume. 7.1 Right Turn Treatment Figure 3 -26 of Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual (See Appendix F) was used to determine the required right turn treatments at the northbound approach to the proposed site entrance on Jefferson Street. The projected site traffic warrants a full width right turn lane and taper in the AM peak hour and warrants a taper in the PM peak hour. Although a right turn lane is warranted, the City of Roanoke desires to encourage pedestrian accommodations and promote pedestrian safety by means of traffic calming through this section of Jefferson Street. Therefore, the right turn lane, warranted by projected vehicular traffic volume, will not be included in the analysis or recommendations in this study. 7.2 Left Turn Treatment Table 3 -1 (page F -53) of Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual (See Appendix F) was used to determine if a left turn lane is warranted at the southbound approach to the proposed site entrance on Jefferson Street The projected site traffic warrants a left turn lane in the AM and PM peak hour. The proposed development will require a separate left turn lane at the site entrance. Further, the development requires reallocation of lane usage on Jefferson Street to provide an exclusive northbound left turn lane and an exclusive southbound left turn lane at the signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive. The southbound left turn lane replaces A I p 4 r 7 Iw �p 1 e l4 1141 06 41135 J L - -261 /4l -96172 �ffi � FLANNAGAH OR. 75144 WE( R AVE. 15E��� 32/41 ap. p9 �9 82/i I F °n MILL 9£ 65 //R ff M n ti e$ n m N 6711 6]/192 PROP. ME �gN N m h 115132 Id J � /5 �515 Mc LAVA M ST.S.W 254/212 Y£LLM MOUNTNN RD. 3211 32/221 Nh 32137 /5 0/3 Leaeno �D 51grp1lze0 Inlersedlon R£SEI E AVE. W 2211194 UmsigmNZea /n /ersecNOn X/Y AM /PM WeekOq PeoK w H., T, /ffk 32/26 51/53 JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. ° 2020 BUILDOUT w AM /PM PEAK HOUR w CO(�NAI. NO. NTS FI6Ofl£ 6.l A 17 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic an existing shared through/left lane. All lane allocation revisions can be made by changing the pavement markings, with the exception of a short section of street at the new entrance. See Appendix E for a preliminary layout of Jefferson Street. 8.0 Level of Service Analysis Synchro traffic software was used to analyze the operational conditions for the study area for all study scenarios. Synchro reports operational Level of Service (LOS) at an intersection with a letter designation and with an average delay time in seconds for vehicles stopped at the intersection. Level of service is a quantitative measure of driver perception of delay (waiting time) experienced at an intersection, and LOS is based on the delay thresholds specified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). LOS conditions range from "A" (little delay) to "F" (very long delay). Table 8.1 reflects the delay ranges in seconds drivers may experience for a corresponding level of service for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. The criteria used to measure LOS for signalized intersections are different from the criteria used for unsignalized intersections. LOS for signalized intersections is based on control delay per vehicle. Control delay, as defined by HCM, includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay and final acceleration delay. According to this definition the minimum design acceptable delay is "D" for design purposes, particularly in a more developed area. For signalized intersections, LOS F indicates that more than one signal change cycle may be required for a driver to pass through the intersection. For unsignalized intersections, levels of service are based on critical gap, the minimum time interval in the major street traffic stream that allows entry for one minor street vehicle from an intersection, particularly critical being the left turn vehicles. Level of service "E" is generally considered to be the minimum design standard. At an unsignalized intersection, LOS F occurs when there are not enough minimum gaps to allow the movements on the minor street to enter the major street in a "reasonable" amount of time. Table 8.1— Level of Service and Delay Unsi nalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 0 -10 A 0 -10 B 10 -15 B 10.20 C 15 -25 C 20 -35 D 25 -35 D 35 -55 E 35 -50 E 55 -80 F >50 F >80 18 M &C Comm. N 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carillon Clinic Synchro traffic software was used to analyze all signalized and unsignalized intersections in this report. SimTraffic simulation software was used in conjunction with Synchro to further analyze vehicle queuing results. The procedures used by Synchro and SimTrafFie are in accordance with the methodologies stated in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for intersection analysis. SimTraffic analysis results are summarized in Section 9.0. Analysis results for signalized intersections provide level of service calculations for all approaches as well as an overall intersection level of service. Please note that analysis results for unsignalized intersections do not provide level of service results for all approaches or an overall intersection level of service, but rather a level of service for movements and /or approaches that have a conflicting movement. In this study, level of service is the basis for the evaluation of existing and background traffic conditions and the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed site on the existing roadway network. Two alternates for design of the parking garage exit were analyzed for this study; a one lane exit and a two lane exit with separate left and right turn lanes. Additionally, a scenario with warranted modifications to Jefferson Street and a two lane exit with separate left and right mm lanes were analyzed. The buildout scenarios were analyzed as a coordinated system between the three existing signalized intersections. LOS and delay are summarized for the 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, 2020 Build -out (Single Lane Site Exit), 2020 Build -out (Two Lane Site Exit), and 2020 Build-out (Two Lane Site Exit and Modified Jefferson Street) study network scenarios per intersection (see Table 8.2). See Appendix C for detailed Synchro HCM LOS Reports 19 Table 8.2 Input by TC9 /PY9 Checked by PYB/TCD 20 Level of Selvlce per Movement by Approach (Delay In secweb) ovonll LOB Easroouna WeMbouna Northbound soaOboune Intersected scenario LT TH RT LT TX RT LT TN RT LT TH 0.T AM B B A B B B 2015 Exrd119 AM B (15.9) (10 1) (9 ]) (13 0) (11.2) (11.9) B (16.0) A(8.0) B(136) B(11.6) B A B B B 020 Background AM (15.8) (19 -9) (d d) (13]) (11 B) (12.5) (126) B(1-5 3) A(9 8) B(13 7) B(12.2) C C B B ig P02n BUIIJOU1 S"'. B (27•T) H3]) (13.6) (29.2) Lp AM (183) C(2ZT) 8(13.6) C(20.2) A(9.4) f 3 C B B C 20208 IIdaul(gaud¢ B (2] T) (13-/f (13.fi) (211.2) b Ln1 AM (16.3) C(2]]) B(136) C(202) A(8.4) N C B B C 2020 BUIMaN(oauele B Ln IM.rdi (2].]) (13 7) (136) (20.2J (9 2) (9 ]) q Jar -511 AM (18.3) 0(22)) 8(136) C(20.2) A(94) U A PM i B A A B B B �_ m5Fya11ne PM (13 5) (9.0) (8 T) (124) (12.4) (129) (12 6) 8(185) A(B.0) 8(124) 3(12.6) N C O B B 020 Bxkgmnd aM . (141) 9) (88) 1B 33) . (130) 1B (123) B(14,1) A(9.1) 3(133) B(133) a N C B B B A A M C 202oe iMem(sm91e B (31.6) (15 6) (153) (18 8) (B T) (84) d, PM (t] 3) C(316) 8(15.5) 306.81 A(A5) N N C B 6 B A A om (Double uLn)PM B (31.6) 05.6) (153) (186) (3Tf (86) (1I 3) C(31.6) B(155) B(166) A(6.5) B B B A A 2.2. emmoml.d 3 Ln eMedigetl (31 B) (15.6) (159) (1fi.8) ,glen -911PM (123) C (316) B(t55) B(i66) A(85) Input by TC9 /PY9 Checked by PYB/TCD 20 Table 6.2 (cone Input by TLD /PYB Checked by PYB/TCO Level of Service per Movement by Approach (Delay In mc eh) Ovwzll let ersed io Sc Scenano Los Eastbound wetlbound xonheound Somnnoune LT TH I RT LT 1 TH RT LT I TH I RT LT--F-TH--T RT AM B B B B A A A 2015Eelenng AM (16 �) (15 9) (14.9) (149) (8.8) (6 3) (5 9) (5 4f (91) B(16.1) B(14.91 A(8.8) A(59) B B B B A 2030Beck. -u AM 5) (17 7) (15 T) (16 8) (15 5) (9.2) ( B(17.0) B(156) A19.2) A(6 -0) C C A A p` 2020 outdoor oun01e A 7) 7) 1) Lot AM (9.3) (328) (28 (2].]) (25.2) (2 (8 0(29,5) 0(26.4) A(2.7) A(77) th C C C C A A A i @d aullaounl A (32.8) 1287) (27 T) (25.27 (2.T) (B -1) p -8) (6.1) ki (Douce Lnl AM (9 3) C(295) C(26A) A(27) A(77) y a C C C C A A A A A 2020 Bunn -t D-bu, Lp (32.8) (28 T) (27 7) (25.2) (0.4) (23) (0e) 10.8) (0.1) N Jelrenon RAM O (B 0) C(295) C(264) A(21) A(0.8) }� b PM an B B B B A A A A A 2015 a.pbrp PM ( 14 6 ) ( 13 - 5 ) 126 ( - ) (122) (T.3) (6.4) (6.fi) (5]) (� B (13.8) B (124) A If 3) A (6.3) W B B B B A A A C BVno.ound PM 1162) (199) (181) (12.6) (T.5) (6.5) (6.8J (68) (B0) B(14.3) B(12.8) A(].5) A(6.5) c rn C C C C A B B B N 2020 B,Ild,,t (sngle B (1 2) (18.1) Ln)PM (15 5) C (29.4) C (27.2) A (1 2) B (1 7.9) C C A B B B tube build... B (34 9 (28 0 30 2 ( - ) (24.0) (1 2) (18.1) (Double Lnl AM (165) C (28,4) C(27.2) A(L2) B(1 ].9) D C A 8 C B x0zg Bur on, 1pooeie (362) 1282) (30.5) (242) (SA) (L1) (14.8) (22.2) (ID.9) detl vona1PM (169) C(2].4) A(1 6) C(20b) Input by TLD /PYB Checked by PYB/TCO Table 8.3 (cons) Input by TCB /PYB Checked by PYB/TCB Level of Service per Movement by Approach (Delay In seclveh) Intersection Scenano Overall LOS Cardboard Weatbouna Nanbbountl Southbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN Ri AM B x0,5 Enbnn9 AM - (13.6) 1 1 (91) B(125) B A 2020 Background AM - - (14.0) (92) - B (12.6) A A 2020 BubaoeN51,91, (177) (94) (B 2) - Ln) AM - a' (177) �i tn1AM C (15.0) b C A A 9 O BU Ia oudrad dIe - JeNenon .1 AM C(150) PM A t. W IDmtitvSen9vM - (154) (B.0) - (x.9) a - 8(139) - - a q C A Ol act Berko .... d PM - (t61) (9 -0) (7B) 8(14,5) � C A A o2o avdd..r(5Inna _ (20.fiJ (9 2) Lo PM - C(16.9) - C A A oxo BUOaou d...dle - (20.6) (9 2) - (6.2) Ln) PM C(16 9) q zd B&Imem (po.ele - - LraMOamM - - (20 6) (s .z) (B Z) JeNerson 50 PM G (t6 9) Input by TCB /PYB Checked by PYB/TCB Table 9.2 (cant.) Input by: TCD /PYB Checked by PYB/TCD 23 Level of Service per Movement by Approach (Delay In sectveb) Overall LDS Eastbound westbound N..hbountl Southbound Intersection Scenario LT I TX I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TN I RT AM E C A B B 2015 Even, AN (676) 1240) - (283) (BJ) (21.2) (162) (t74) (263) E(59.2) C(293) B(19.8) B(162) E C A B B 2020 Background AN C (8001 (241) - (29.7) (B.8) (21 �) (14.6) (17 5) - 30 7) E(69.1) C (49.7) B(2(L2) B(16.4) E C A B B B 2020 Bwmout(ample C (80.0) (25 2) - (29 7) (9 1) (14.3) (15.4) (1 B.9J - ln)AM (273) E(651) 0(297) B(13.8) B(19.3) N E CC A B B B - a 2ozo Bull tlum(Dlue" C (86.6) (25 2) - (29 ]) (0.1) (14.3) (154) - Z L. (273 E(651) G(29 7) 0(13.8) 0(19.3) � m 4d E A B B B xazo "u" C Lna xa. Jeeere n1 (86.0) (25 2) - (29.7) (B.1J (M4J (15.4) 119.97 - y AM 273) E(65.1) C(297) 0(13.9) B(19.3) 0 PM F C C C A B B B - 1 2015 Existing PM (95.4) (240) (24 -3) (34.57 Ie. ]) (142) (14. ]J (18 p) - (32 5) F (809) C (34.3) B (140) B (17.7) H i m F C C D A B B B - D 2020 BvekgwntlPM (126 0) (24.0) (24.3) (950) IB.B) (14.4) (14 8) (18.6) go (3].7) F(104.6) D(35.6) B(14.2) B(17.9) F C C D A A S 2020 Bwtlougsingle D (126 0) (25.1) (25.4) (35.6) (76) (3-3) (13.8) (20.3) Ln)PM (32.3) F(96 8) D(35.6) A(3 4) B(19 9) F C D A A B C 20xo Sudden (Double C ((46.0) (251) Ln)PM (323) F(96.8) D(35.6) A(3.4) B(189) F D A A B C 2oxg Bulltloui(DOU We C L. Aenggea (126 0) (25.1) (25.4) (3 8) p.8) (69) (13.8) (203) - JeNdmn at) PN (32.3) F (96 -6) D(3S6J A(3.4) 0(19.9) Input by: TCD /PYB Checked by PYB/TCD 23 Table 6.E (tort.) input by TCDPYB cnelkea by ve69co 24 Level of Service per Movemart by Appeacn (Delay In amhen) Imeraetlmn Scenario ove.all Ds eanboe.e w.ewo.m Monnaeeea aomnboene LT TH RT LT TX RT LT TX RT LT TN RT AM B 2020 8.11d.1t - (1023) (11 2) L(alm .)AM F(1b2 3) F C 6 o(o N eeeb (1024) (1012) ]) (1 - ea)AM E (43 6) - W 20208 yy n - (895) (18_7) - (11 1) E(398) y .mnm a,)eM b PM N F A R (289 .1) C LnI PM (279 1) F B aulmoN locum. J209 5) (127) - 190i M F (130b) F B A . (1866) (126) (90) F(10s.0) input by TCDPYB cnelkea by ve69co 24 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carilion Clinic 8.1 Specific Intersection Analysis The following subsections discuss the data presented in Table 8.2. 8.1.1 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & McClanahan Street/Yellow Mountain Road The signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and McClanahan Drive/Yellow Mountain Road experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. 8.1.2 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive The signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. 8.1.3 Unsignalized Intersection of Evans Mill Road & Weller Avenue The unsignalized intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. 8.1.4 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street and Reserve Avenue The signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and Reserve Avenue experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods with the exception of the eastbound left turn lane which experiences LOS E and LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, for all study scenarios. 8.1.5 Unsignalized Intersection of Jefferson Street and Site Entrance The entrance to the proposed development along Jefferson Street experiences undesirable operations (LOS F) at the exit from the parking structure in the single exit lane scenario in the AM and PM peak hours. The LOS for the left and right turn movements entering the site from Jefferson Street is acceptable. In the two lane exit scenario the entrance experiences LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours for the exiting left turn movement; the LOS is acceptable in the AM and PM peak hours for the exiting right turn movement. The LOS for movements entering the site from Jefferson Street is acceptable. In the two lane exit with Modified Jefferson Street scenario the exiting left turn movement experiences LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours. The total delay reported for the exiting left turn movement is much less than the current Jefferson Street lane configuration scenario. The LOS is acceptable for the AM and PM peak hours for the exiting right turn movement. The LOS for movements entering the site from Jefferson Street is acceptable. 25 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carillon Clinic 9.0 SimTraffic Queue Length Analyses Queue lengths associated with the 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, 2020 Build -out (Single lane site exit), 2020 Build -out (Two lane site exit), and 2020 Build -out (Two Lane site exit and Modified Jefferson Street) conditions were analyzed within the study area. The maximum queue length was determined as detailed in Section 7.6 of the V DOT Traffic Operalions Analysis Tool Guidebook, Version 1.1. See Appendix D for detailed SimTraffic Queue Reports for all intersections and movements. Table 9.1 provides a summary of the maximum queue length in relation to the storage length available at critical locations. 26 Table 9.1— Critical Movement Queue Length 27 orage Queue Length Peak Length Available Scenario Hour Intersection Movement (K) (it) Jefferson Of SO LT 86 615 McClanahan /Yallow Mtn. SO R 66 615 AM Jefferson St 8 Weller /Fianna an NO LIFE 200 615 Jefferson St B Reserve NO 1]] 100 Ave Sa L 126 220 2015 Exidt. Jefferson 5t8 SO LT 166 615 MCCIdndM1an /Yellow Mfn. SB R 108 615 PM Jefferson StB Weller /Fianna an NR LTR 153 615 Jefferson StB Rese NO 28 100 58 L 81 220 Ave_ Jefferson St & SO LT 91 615 McClanahan/ Yellow Mtn. SEE ]] 615 AM Jefferson St 8 Weller / Fianna an NR LTR 230 615 Jefferson St& Reserve NO L 178 100 SO L 129 220 Ave. 2020 Backgrcuntl Jefferson St& SO LT 182 615 McClanahan/Yellow SB R 126 615 Mtn. PM Jefferson St Wellerflannablan NB LTR 132 615 Jefferson St& Reserve NO L 33 100 SO L 85 220 Ave. 27 Table 9.1 — Critical Movement Queue Length 28 max forage Queue Length Peak Length Available Soenano Hour imlareran Movement (ft) (ft) Jefferson Sf & SB LT 126 324 McClonathanNellow Mtn SET 68 324 Jefferson St& Weller /Flanna an NB LTR 310 293 WE LR 295 270 AM Jefferson St& Site Entr NB TR 293 324 SB LT 276 293 Jefferson St & Reserve NB L 70 100 SB L 93 220 2020 BuiMaw Ave' Jefferson St SB LT 232 324 (Single Exlt Ln) McClanabarPAelow Mtn. SB R 102 324 Jefferson St NB LTR 242 293 Wellerfflanna an WE LR 354 270 PM Jefferson St& Site Ent, NB TR 60 324 SB LT 179 293 Jefferson St & Reserve NBL 33 100 SB L 48 220 Ave Jefferson St& SB LT 130 324 MrCiAhtihi rov Mtn. SBR 67 324 Jefferson St& Weller /Flanna an NB LTR 292 281 WE L 190 270 AM WE R 213 270 Jefferson St & Site i NS TR 282 324 SB LT 269 281 Jefferson St &Reserve NB 132 100 SB L 72 220 2020 Builtlout Ave ' Jefferson St & S8 LT 198 324 Double Exit Ln) MCClanaflanNuflOw Mtn SET 106 324 Jefferson St& Weller /Flanna an NB LTR 271 281 W B L 310 270 WET 238 270 PM Jefferson St& Site En1r. NB TR 75 324 SB LT 194 281 Jefferson St & Reserve NB L 36 100 S5 L 46 220 Ave_ 28 Table 9.1 — Critical Movement Queue Length 29 x Storage Queue Length Peak Length Available Scenario Hour Intersection Movement (R.) (XJ Jefferson Of & SO LT 134 324 McClanahanlYellow SO R 84 324 Mtn. Jefferson Of is NBL 89 40 WellerlFlannegan NO TO 265 280 WBL 161 270 AM WOE 123 270 Jefferson St& Site Entr. NR TR 133 324 SO L 188 170 Jefferson St& Reserve NO L 62 100 2020 Buildout (Double Exit Ln 8 Ave. SO L 72 220 Modified Jefferson SQ Jefferson Sf& McClonahannYellovv SO LT 229 324 SBR 88 324 Mtn Jefferson Of & NO L 89 40 WellerlFlannagan NO TO 172 280 WE L 221 270 PM WBR 134 270 Jefferson Of A Site Entr. NO TR 77 324 S9L 1 104 170 Jefferson St Reserve NO L 32 100 Ave S8 L 46 220 29 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carlson Clinic The reported maximum queue lengths at the westbound left turn lane at the intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue exceed the available storage beginning in the 2015 Existing AM peak hour conditions. Weller Avenue between Evans Mill Road and Jefferson Street is only 60 feet from edge of pavement to edge of pavement. See Appendix D for Sin-Traffic Queue Reports. The northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Reserve Avenue exceeds the available storage beginning in the 2015 Existing AM peak hour conditions. In the buildout scenarios without modifications to Jefferson Street, the maximum reported queue length at the northbound approach to the intersection of Jefferson Street and Weller/Flannagan spills back into the proposed site entrance location during the AM peak hour. With modifications to Jefferson Street and a two lane exit from the site, the northbound approach reported queue length is reduced such that it does not spill back to the proposed site entrance in either peak hour. All other public streets in the study network do not exceed their available storage lengths. The proposed site entrance exiting trips will experience excessive queue lengths based on the projected traffic volumes in the AM and PM peak hours. The queues will stack back into the proposed parking garage. The two lane exit scenario produced considerably shorter queue lengths than the single lane exit scenario. Further, the two lane exit with modifications to Jefferson Street scenario produced shorter queue lengths than the current Jefferson Street lane configuration scenarios. Table 9.2 compares the three scenarios. M &C Comm. N 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic Table 9.2 — Build -Out Scenarios Queue Length Comparison Peak Lane Reported Max. Scenario Hour Configuration Queue Length (FL) Jefferson St & Site Entr. WB LR 295 (Single lane site exit) Jefferson St & Site Entr. WB L 190 (Two lane site exit) WB R 213 AM Jefferson St & Site Erin. WB L 151 (Two lane site exit & WB R 123 Modified Jefferson Sy Jefferson St & Site Emr, WB LR 354 (Single lane site exit) Jefferson St & Site Entr. WB L 310 PM (Two lane site exit) WB R 238 Jefferson St& Site Entr. WB L 221 (Two lane site exit & WB R 134 Modified Jefferson Se) 10.0 Pedestrian Accommodations The proposed parking structure is anticipated to generate pedestrians that will visit other facilities within the Roanoke Memorial complex. Some of these facilities are on the opposite side of Jefferson Street from the proposed development. To facilitate the safety and accessibility for pedestrians of the west side of Jefferson Street from the proposed development, a raised refuge island is recommended. The raised refuge island should be located south of the proposed site entrance. Projected pedestrian volumes at this mid -block crosswalk location are discussed in Section 5.0. See Appendix E for a conceptual layout of Jefferson Street and raised refuge island. 31 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carilion Clinic 11.0 Conclusions and Recommendations This study analyzes existing traffic operations of the study street network and impacts to these operations that might be expected upon completion of the proposed 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in the upper ten levels. The study evaluates the impacts to vehicle level of service and delays, vehicle queue lengths at the study intersections, pedestrian accommodations, potential improvements to the Jefferson Street typical section, and site entrance lane configuration. The medical facility is scheduled to be constructed and fully occupied by 2020. The study evaluates the proposed site entrance from Jefferson Street with three options. Option #1 provides a single exiting lane for left and right turn movements; option #2 provides two exit lanes, one each for left and right turn movements; option #3 replicates the two exit lane access to the site configuration and implements warranted improvements to Jefferson Street (Refer to Appendix E for a conceptual layout of option #3J The operational and queueing analyses indicate that option #3 will operate with less delay and less queue length than both option #1 and option #2. It is recommended that option #3 (two exit lanes and modification to Jefferson Street) be implemented. The recommended modifications to Jefferson Street include a southbound left turn lane at the proposed site entrance, a northbound left turn lane at the northbound approach to the signalized intersection of Jefferson Street & Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive, and creating an exclusive left turn lane in place of the existing through/left lane at the southbound approach to the Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive intersection. Refer to Appendix E for a conceptual layout of the recommended modifications to Jefferson Street. It is recommended that a full -access entrance be allowed for the site onto Jefferson Street The recommended southbound left turn lane on Jefferson Street to the site should be minimum 170' to accommodate the turning volume. Two southbound through lanes should be provided between the site entrance and Flannagan/Weller intersection. The AM peak hour SimTraffic analysis indicates the queue length in the 170' left turn lane will be exceeded. The two adjacent through lanes will provide additional storage while maintaining adequate southbound through capacity during infrequent times in which the available left turn lane storage may be full. Furthermore, the two southbound through lanes allow more roadway capacity and thus more gaps to improve the egress from the site entrance. The recommended northbound left turn lane at the Weller Avenue /Flannagan Drive intersection should be minimum 40 feet. The provision of a northbound left turn lane, although short in length, will significantly reduce the frequency of lane blockage due to small left turn movement demand to Weller Avenue. These modifications to Jefferson Street will require some curb and gutter relocation to achieve required lane widths. KN M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic To accommodate the proposed lane configuration on Jefferson Street described above, it is recommended that the southbound approach to the Flannagan/Weller intersection should be remarked to provide separate left, through, and right lanes. Existing on- street parking on the east side of Jefferson Street should be eliminated to provide adequate sight distance for drivers exiting the parking structure. Replacement free public parking will be available in the new parking structure. Pedestrians are projected to leave from and go to the proposed medical facility and parking structure as they access other medical facilities within the Roanoke Memorial complex. This study estimates 50 pedestrians per hour crossing Jefferson Street. It is recommended that a mid - block crosswalk be constructed parallel to the south edge of the new site entrance (refer to exhibit in Appendix E). Additionally, the construction of a pedestrian raised refuge island in Jefferson Street is recommended. The anticipated increase in pedestrians due to the proposed development does not cause adverse effects to vehicular operations within the study network. An in -road sign for motorist to yield to pedestrians within crosswalk (Sign RI-6, Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD) may be placed at the crosswalk location. Depending on actual pedestrian volumes upon implementation of the proposed facility, additional steps may be taken to protect pedestrians, including possibly implementing pedestrian actuated flashing beacons in advance of the crosswalk. Should undesirable LOS at the exit from the parking structure be realized during actual operations, it is anticipated that drivers would use the secondary entrance to Flannagan Drive and the Jefferson Street traffic signal. This signal has adequate capacity to handle such additional traffic. Carilion prefers to provide a full- access entrance on Jefferson Street and allow drivers to make left turns out of the parking structure during all hours of the day, realizing that inconvenience due to delays at the exit during peak hours may be a consequence. Queueing of this exiting traffic will be on Carilion property and not on public right of way. Per City of Roanoke recommendation, the three signalized intersections are analyzed as a coordinated system with 80 second cycle lengths. The LOS results of the coordinated system are such that this study recommends the three signalized intersections be coordinated upon implementation of the proposed development. This analysis indicates that the existing study network provides adequate vehicular traffic capacity to accept the proposed development, so long as the afore mentioned measures are implemented for the site entrance from Jefferson Street, modifications to the Jefferson Street typical section, and for pedestrian accommodations at a mid -block crosswalk. APPENDIX A Proposed Development Layout i' `.. it , V _- I1 w II > wo= Lb A �I m F I ti CA I E CO R� 5 r x a 1 c z 2 x � i' `.. it , V _- I1 6LL P U d W � CV d o O � 1 '` O -w a w II > wo= Lb m �I m F I ti CA I E CO 6LL P U d W � CV d o O � 1 '` O -w a w > wo= m� m �I m F 6LL P U d W � CV d o O � 1 '` O -w a APPENDIX B Turning Movement Counts DNJ / I N Office Complex 0 t (1147,d Netlp h M °Cz d�''s 5• ((, 01206. SPEED LIMIT 00", O', driln9 O• 0 First Presb elan Chu ch � o vE IT % ..F eii °� 25 °C H 4Q'/ Building 41, 25 FEmwoaHBr. JW/JH I..NO: 2015 -0106 S. Jefferson Street Danvmer: Fe DON N.F mo Mre Nr @S at McClanahan Street DATE'. Febmag10.2015 LOCMION RWWkeCounty.VA sO.E: N/A SHEET NO 7 OF 9 CARS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY n..mv 7inf%iCp SIn R.11. , S TRAFFIC FROM WERST TRU 1 11 1 16 IS 3.15 6 5 <5 USA! MODURAIR, RUSH 0 0 All R.S,y!C.R1 16 9 Sa 2 19 THAPP 0 FROM HOSSITH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH 3] TRAFFIC FROM EAST Al 17 1� 411 1 564 174q TIME 66 3 85 I]2 141 1 1 TOP 4D 0 J1 FIGHT TURS LEFT .- 10FIL HUST TRA. IF- — UTDO l SUST SH. LEFT AM 1 27 11 1 16 111 Z9 L - 9 0 is 45 00 2D 24 10 0 1 is 3 R, a.3 263 155 0 366 ] 193 '. 0 0 ]33 50 171 D 2 ]IB S52 0 DID DIII :a : 19 51 0 0 IF I 10 2. 0 .2 SRI 1S 50 0 0 6 IB BI 182 0 21T 71 1 9 3 7; 18 137 176 0 331 927 n..mv 7inf%iCp SIn R.11. , S TRAFFIC FROM WERST TRU 1 11 1 16 IS 3.15 6 5 <5 0 0 11 16 9 Sa 2 19 4 3] 3 62 ISfi Al 17 1� 411 1 564 174q 66 3 85 I]2 141 1 1 TOP 4D 0 J1 1 27 11 1 16 111 PM 3.15 6 5 <5 0 0 11 16 9 Sa 2 19 4 3] 3 62 ISfi 51 0 9 9 66 3 85 I]2 0 J1 1 27 11 1 16 111 Z9 L - 9 0 is 45 00 2D 24 10 0 1 is 3 R, a.3 263 155 0 366 ] 193 '. 0 0 ]33 50 171 D 2 ]IB S52 0 DID DIII :a : 19 51 0 0 IF I 10 2. 0 .2 SRI 1S 50 0 0 6 IB BI 182 0 21T 71 1 9 3 7; 18 137 176 0 331 927 59 132 60 0 359 I 60 « 0 "1 I< A 1 0 40 173 0 140 DA4 ,EAI HOUR (HEAVY TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY 1 0 c_Um ,vCU pr mm,..aon.11 s11.n.,... sv..t ... r.ao.ry m. zots 0 Oil ..1mxml...n.a,..1 9 0 w..u.,..00vca1d C .�: RO.00x.. vHm•1. 0 FOUORHI y: RN SUMS ..U.M 0 1 R rxa.FC FROM 30uiX a.�om„ I 0 0 Eosi�.n � OTH 10- FIGHT 0 ,o .r ao w a 0 p p o p o p a o 0 I 0 o p o a o o z sap -ras o a 3H,Tm.!. o 1 d e 1 0 1 d p 0 d n p H, TWIII 1 01 . 11 2 o o 0 1 o e 1s s 1 1 o z 0 p o o p o 0 R r0s B:IS -900 3 z< 0 0 0 3HrT.pl.. < 1 0 22 D 5 2 0 < 0 0 4 2 1 16 0 19 52 1 Mr iaa. s 0 0 p -T ➢O t 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 9 0 p a t] R 0 d p R 00 1 0 1 1 p ]15 a10 ] 0 0 t . 0 a 13 F10, ] 2 3 0 9 -B9s 7 2 p e B;aO 0 -900 9 2 0 0 11 0 d 1 0 4 0 t p 0 1 1 0 ] 0 to 1 0 0 1 0 1 3i] 38 d:30 -d!a5 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 sap -ras 3H,Tm.!. ze s 1 d e 1 0 1 d p 0 d n p H, TWIII n r0s z< s 0 0 t] R 0 d p R 00 1 0 1 1 p 1 0 0 t . 0 a 13 F10, BICYCLES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY coumW hr =vcV z00.z is C /1� 0 0 mu.nnioI'd oa[:R[hnO m, zom 0 *•a�^v J:1s -JOO 77lllnfJu MICI, hll&l.e �.n.IIseKt eoRIRATR 0 0 w[.m.,S[omic °a C ;lwtp 0 W[ello¢ R 390.3:<s nbrN by: SN 0 0 I D I I I I TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH 0 TRAFFIC F ... FAIL TRAFFIC FROM TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 s00 -E'JS 0 0 0 AM 0 0 aas -a. 0 0 6:00.6 �5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6:5.630 0 0 0 C 0 0 630.6tls 0 0 0 0 0 6:a5 -]00 C 0 0 0 0 � C0 v 0 C s -�s -u0 0 o C C 0 0 0 1 o 0 0 1 0 1 o a 0 o a o 0 o C o s:as -6:00 0 C 0 o C C o z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 N.mI Is C o C C C o C 6 C C o 0 0 0 0 0 o C C o 0 0 0 0 o C 0 a o 6- �s -ras o C C C C -smo 0 a o o o a 0 I D 0 0 0 0 C o a 0 o 0 C 7 :1s o C o C 0 0 2 a o 500.600 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 ]e5 -C N C 0 C C C o 0 0 0 0 CC C 0 C o 0 0 o C 6 C C o 0 RN z00.z is C 0 0 0 0 0 J:1s -JOO 0 0 C 0 0 390.3:<s 0 0 I D I I I 0 0 0 3.Ji -OAO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s00 -E'JS 0 0 0 0 0 aas -a. 0 0 1 0 0 C 0 0 0 C s -�s -u0 0 o a o spa -sas 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 o C o s:as -6:00 0 C o C C o z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 N.mI Is 0 0 m11 -4.l 0 C 0 C o C -smo 0 a o o a o C o C C C 0 C 0 0 o a o 500.600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 C o 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE OBSERVATIONS - SUMMARY �) Inumoi ' S. JaNenm 54ee1 Oahe: Febnery 00.3015 Tutley ( / /j ✓� o ea ITS NeClemnen Stmt wennec su,'T.'e n: POamFe, SwR"la EEterttl by: ON Slm RANON.S 1, %IOwQ NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG _ 5 Je B�rynk TOTALS 0 A 11 1 IT (TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY TAG., , Stn Rating 61 wip TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FOCKFIGMayff I INS AM 5 10 is 21 0 18 211 111 161 111 0 Ill 7 211 141 1 111 C1 232 Ill 911 1411 T: :�G 'T PEAK HOUR TAG., , Stn Rating 61 wip 5 10 is 21 0 18 211 111 161 111 0 Ill 7 211 141 1 111 C1 232 Ill 911 1411 T: :�G 'T PEAK HOUR ON FIEm WORK en JW/ ✓H IOBKO.: 2015 -0106 S. Jefferson Street FR.W V: PRO OOF..E 511,, ��s,,,we,K,,,� 3r 77 onre. February 10, 2015 Locnnoe Roanoke, VA MIT 25 VIOL scnce N/A SHEET NO 2 or 3 I� I� 11 I I I 10A, 1;o5, 11' 11' 0.5' r 1 Gate o Carillon t0 X 11 F Existing 9' Roanoke Memorial Traffic Signal 10,5, Hospital 12' 1 �►10' Weller / Flan n age n e Drive > 13' W Clinic I T 14' 9.5' I N Line Removed for 1 Lane 25 f) O N N N FIEm WORK en JW/ ✓H IOBKO.: 2015 -0106 S. Jefferson Street FR.W V: PRO OOF..E 511,, ��s,,,we,K,,,� 3r at onre. February 10, 2015 Locnnoe Roanoke, VA Weller Avenue/ Flannagan Drive VIOL scnce N/A SHEET NO 2 or 3 CARS TURNING MGVEMENTCGURT-SUMMARV m. bay:v.0 mu,.I nc s. J..'A..SPAS, III m.:C10 Tue.a.r e: R,nmweonve- MIA... A. W.9MC 5u ^.y1CaI F ... OUR, veymN E"i en ON A., III L]uup TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST T TOTAL - AM _ um _ _. .' _- E 11 6:15 3 2 7 D 12 14 1 D 11 D 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 0 3 39 8 20 0 10 81 0 -6d5 9 35 39 2 13 9 18 38 d 0 1 4 4 11 109 W -]:�5 15 tl6 15 2] 13 0 26 10 0 00 745 8 m 23 37 1 0 69 1 p6 9 6:00 B. 0 60 0 106 ) 5 6 0 815 -800 ZB 31 ] 95 5 0 29 208 090.845 19 N 3 ] 0 BS 0 2 0 6 6 ] 103 2 91 I 19 17 X.TOI.h 0 255 134 0 56] 154 ]65 14 0 333 52 15 36 0 123 55 04 ]1 0 2 1HTO ] 3 el6 .0 -]90 30 ]2 05 0 <2 35a 6:15 -]:15 ]B I36 0 5] ddt -]90 40 66 q9 0 9� J9 0 71 514 6d5 -]NS 9 236 1] 0 45 I9 ]'90 -6'90 31] 29 17 21 0 8 711 ]]5 -6'IS ]6 235 5C 1. IB 0 <6 25 ]30 -030 01 B q 32 32 0 11 111 Ba0 .5 6E 6 JE] 0 0 35 a 30 00 0 86 0 0 00 116 49 0 244 33 43 7 0 363 25 3 13 a 2a d] 0 6< ] 56 3 0 19 21 PIN 134 666 123 1 Ell 1 N:T 4 1 211 34 232 7 1 271 11 11 11 1 E2 l 45 4 45 14 ill 43 1 271 6 11 4A 14 1 147 711 IT I PC 4 45 545 I 'TO 11. I PEAK HOUR I [HEAVY TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY Inbrnt ion ol: S.JeXenan Slrnl Uab:PobueryO].3 %6 TuaN.y 3 „f��� 1 .m: Rlannasan oN.e walls n.nn. w..m..an�ymo1O (mlp IquU.. XOanoke. Virpinla ErRerc] Ly: SN SIT RelinS < T All .—:: 0 0 �reN p N 9. _. N f0 r[n _ w'^o .ro Fa A. 695 -]. p 2 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 ]p9p 2 p1 0 p 3 0 ]:3p -]95 S p 0 3 0 745 0 0 1 1 1 1 U 0 0 0 1 0 0 ] 0 2 13 0 p Ifi 2 2 2 p 1 ] 5 10 0 2 1 S T_ 690 -7 2 0 ] 1 1 1 T 0 1 ] 0 6 19 1 2 0 9 2 2 D 0 5 p B 2] ]00.800 0 10 3E 8:15 B 9 0 26 T90 -8;70 3 5 0 1 ] J 5 0 11 27 5 2 0 .IF 110 a 6 a 0 10 0 6 2 0 a I p I 1 s a 0 10 ]3 � 0 ]�sa6o a n a iap -oas a o 0 0 0 aas -asp o p 1 0 0 ] 0 2 p ] 0 p;a5 3 0 0 1 71 500 -405 0 0 0 i.rTOlels 6 21 9 0 36 0 II 0 0 26 5 0 6 0 1 ] V 0 97 110 0!a5 -<a5 S 2 0 3 9 400 -SW 1 p 5 5 515 3 0 0 25 E:6 -S:aS 0 0 3 0 5;00 -6 ] 0 0 B 1 < 0 0 1 1 p 0 1 U E 0 REM HOUR BICYCLES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY � cYxFw u'. RFe 3 -IS 0 0 frj n\,p Inlen[nlonol:...... 0 Ye .Fe 0 p 0 015 0 TueeEay G Penuep. 111. NIe, <ven WeaNer :SU y [oIJ ("July n FX ,ME. 1.1.1- P all nle 330 a -OS re0 6H SIR FROG - M x iRPFFp FROM 50uix - iP1FF - IIE WESY rex �F- 0 ev. Flmnepm EET ,DRA ,FF ev. µ TIME I I 0 0 a:15 -a a0 0 0 0 nu 0 0 ro0 1 0 me _ 0 [ x�Pm _- _ 411 ans AM 0 OF 6:0O 6 :IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 630 0 0 0 �s o 0 1 0 1 F D 0 0 F 0 0 0 OF 1 6. 0 0 0 1 0 I IS 1 0 0 0 0 r:15 -v no 0 0 0 0 0 ra0 -xs I T. xr ul[ o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z e :15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 ]x, TO 1M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tmeie o 0 0 0 III a :�s -s :IS o aa0 IS e" 711 0 1 o a o 0 fins v. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eoo -EOO 0 aoo -e ao 0 0 0 o 1 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rns -E :IS ERR HOUR a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e0o s0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM 3 -IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 a -OS 0 0 0 ,FF I I 0 0 a:15 -a a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 o a 411 ans o 0 OF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �s o 0 1 0 1 F D 0 0 F 0 0 0 I IS 0 S I T. xr ul[ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 0 0 34 R o 0 0 0 III a :�s -s :IS o aa0 IS Eoo -EOO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERR HOUR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE OBSERVATIONS - E Ime.ve nre�a�sy�.o� Birynea MI nnegan MXraWeller RV en ue R 0 NORTH LAO 0 1n fi45 -090 5 AM Y6:1a 600 7 30 745 1 fins -fi 0 firs o A 10 141 141 1 TOTALS T.OD T A. ]JO 1 1 -e:00 811 0 940 4'46 400 4 15 811 841 4f J0 -0:a5 841 901 5:00 T D 5 15 P. 0 0 sJO -ss 11 1 11 0 s:45 -fiW o 190 ] ° 145 41. 0 0 400.415 4.90 —E1a6 0 W -S:os a TOTALS 0 v e � ony :FAbH,J. 2015 TueaMy 6N [oIY SY, N.H.FV Glwp � _ neex:nms — Birynea MI 0 0 ° fi45 -090 5 0 7 30 745 1 A 10 141 141 1 TOTALS - - - - - -- A. 0 940 4'46 400 4 15 4f J0 -0:a5 5:00 D 5 15 1 11 111 0 0 sJO -ss s:45 -fiW o J LEG o,.Ma:xena WNR I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o s ° J LEG o,.Ma:xena WNR I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 �OTALS TUNNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY x 6sr sr�� c re xv= .S �q\ I'lan"Ithl, Of -11. rII o :f MU.ry oJ.fo T SMV llipJlr a: ..9 w 11n nm.ua w n a .vlcme ( }IYl(1 11ox. a rea W:s s a ar9 x m om THAI lUM I In - 2 IT 7,- S. n o nOrn T G u 5 3 T3 ToZ L x xr ] 0 6 fi 1 4 4 701 11 t0 0 39 0 4 B 0 IS 20 Ia 91 6 S 0 24 11. 741 811 '1 0 2 0 6 11 7 0 26 239 25 J2 1] 96 5 0 3< 19 Jfi 6 0 in U l 11 0 22 0 267 141 0 592 156 ]]3 17 0 Ul I 1] JB 0 :9 84 p 2J5 6100 T]b0 99 121 73 106 0U 10 a H4 142 220 19 29 690 -090 r0 N 0 77 Ill 6tl5 -Tq6 �7 81 4 1]9 56 295 19 Ip 0 BB 108 46 319 6 0 49 9] ]3G 700 800 1 120 0 24 9 19 0 47 28 31 11 0 an 810 43 0 0 48 30 36 662 40 0 JS 31 042 0a0 9 ➢0 64 121 52 0 25] 33 349 9 0 391 25 3 14 0 42 26 2] 41 0 9 0 66 11 11 1 0 / 5 13 16 0 63 4 11 1 1 56 15 1 9 1 1 16 0 ]6S 5 0 1 :1 0 0] ]p a:�5 IS a5 19 4:45 69 19 Ip Z6 6] 11 p 9 _ q p 0 65 t5 Ifi 0 9 1 2 I Ii 3 S I 590 545 1 2 0 65 0 3 3X TS alf 140 63] 132 0 9 692 20 0 606 1 32 64 0 2ID 115 133 V4 0 422 2394 T. 06 25 45 t98 63 1 152 40 10 x56 �.�5.50i5 J2 �09 _ 5 Ba0 4#5 -5#5 54 4 6 248 N 6 5� 0 149 B46 00 286 40 0 311 223 1 0 b6 21 1 24 0 53 50 34 40 0 124 0 FS 00OR Can . O SPEEe LIMB 25 x cc a 0 0 x N C x RD tit W .5'10. 10' 9.5 x x ♦ Weller Lane /Ave /Avenue N Y a Q j 1' F 0 11 1 d 0n Flashing 12' x Yellow d Signal 13' V) x 1l1 t *_ f Clinic 10' 10' 10' 11' 0 K N m x W LI.0 LIMB 25 FIELDMWBv JW/JH .we Nn.: 201501016 Evans Mill Road oravm PRD DGNw E: [...,.mmrsmW.w at w E F.b .a f0, 2015 Loc IM Roa noke, ✓A Weller Avenue WA S.M.0 1 aE 3 CARS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY c uu nNJ ICU mctlonol: Enw Mill 34 0 ... :fabwry03. 3015 12 TueaEay ��i111 /( 49 .- ant Wella Awnw L 0 wetlnen sunnwcom 330 3 45 61 16 0 17 nn:Rwnotle V1,9 111a 0 0.5 4 FORMSE 9yaN 0 0 Nnma:a 695 4_ 2] 0 rx TRAFFlU FROM rx - 45 6 nar TRAFFIC 0 waar 1i e . E.a.e..li.a.T w.x.,..I.- . 0 13 � E.m _ _ 0 104 - RMU LEFT AM 0 ill 10 0 19 0 2 11 2 0 0 11 5 0 0 <0 6:16 -140 0 0 So o I0 0 0 6:30 -Q<5 0 0 a�s -s:ao 0 a 0 0 0 6tl5 -]00 29 0 64 o I96 s:30 -ss 0 0 0 t ➢0 -]15 D 4R 13 0 0 50 5 0 0 ]:15 -]30 0 117 11 57 1 63 19 1032 226 0 1259 20< ]30 -]JS 0 0 lOC IF 0 t66 0 68 0 0 0 0 19 1 xr To ta:: 0 191 p 19 B 26 0 35g0. 4:00 315 70 1]6 15 n5 0 3 05 0 0 42e 63 0 1 5 0 ]6 0!50 -916 52 EO 54 20 0 112 9:0.5 -9!00 B 0 0 3 xrtauln 121 1W 0 734 1W 55] 0 0 66< 0 u6 0 200 0 0 0 0 1606 1 W Taiah 6] 50 0 0 ITS 19 120 11 23 0 0 0 0 5 -i15 0 120 111 1 59 17 B6 24 0 22 1 6 0 0 0 - 711 1 199 11 70] 500 6 00 0 349 ]9 0 RB 39 150 35 1 IB9 10 0 41 0 11 0 0 0 264 11 1 119 15 222 0 10 8:15 0 951 31 1 187 205 0 0 0 0 ]W 02 17 1 111 21 0 0 74 8:45 0 249 52 145 0 ]fi 0 0 0 0 591 9Y0 B YO A .� 0 21] i6 0 2 55 51 116 0 0 16] 21T 0 71 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 515 34 0 015 12 49 L 0 330 3 45 61 16 0 17 0 0 0.5 4 0 0 0 164 695 4_ 2] 0 100 45 6 0 0 0 13 _ _ 0 104 5] 0 0 ill 10 0 0 0 0 11 So o I0 a�s -s:ao a 1p 0 0 o I96 s:30 -ss 541.6 1032 226 0 1259 9 299 0 0 16, IF 0 t66 0 1111 0 0 0 0 1 xr To ta:: 35g0. 4:00 315 70 n5 0 05 0 0 42e 63 0 1 62 0 ]6 O1 54 400 -5. 0 0 0 6] 50 0 0 ITS .1 5 -SAS 0 964 B6 0 51 70] 500 6 00 0 349 ]9 0 RB 39 150 1 1 IB9 10 0 41 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 66] HEAVY TRUM TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY cpunw ey, vcu ,.{ /)�q Imen.cnonnc Er.nv MITI PO.a F.e.yIE.d xots Tuse.v e: w.11., eenw w..m. a.nnmcae (rOgl/1 q VbBl nle En.,ld, 5 ur Pallnp:♦ pLLO: �p p.rrl T6t9 nn. e..n. uul P..e ^. .um Paw w.II.,.�. Ea uo w OmT p6 N PM p o p 6:0 :IS -:30 0 0 0 0 630.695 0 1 0 I I 0 I I 0 1 0 1 1 0 6:05 -]00 0 5 0 0 0 0 E I 6 0 -]a5 0 0 0 0 x 7W74 1 0 41 0 6 0 0 0 0.045 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 nm, u ] 6 w tx o 6 0 12 10 6 11 1 o 0 6 6 a3 60oT ]� 0 6 0 0 0 6:t5 -]. 0 t0 630 -]q0 B 4 0 0 0 645 -74 9 ] 0 3 0 0 701 1 I 0 0 0 0 T15 -e.a5 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 45 645 0 4 000 p 01 1 6 9 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 BICYCLES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMi �1 c000me sv: vcu 7Jq .nlelee0lpn on E.a n Roae ono: ne H 0 a rueemy %ilgrl( Ild 1.rmeooe ....... le 0 Lo[aam:n ., MlMIa EnbreExey: a su. nM', - TRAMFC FROM puswr. - rnou e.sr - wsar r oow w E.a..0 �w � 0 '® 0 0 WF- LLm � um pox r x0� o —S LEFT IFIEL 411 411 1 0 0 III soo axis 0 o 0 0 9:as 0 0 0 o 0 a s -630 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 0 a 630.695 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:OS -]00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 ]00 -L�5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tls -]130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 I H, TOM 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o a o 0 0 0 e50 E9s o 0 4 1 e:<s -E:00 I 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o 130 -< 0 0 0 0 0 o a o fi0-700 5215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 F 1 0 0 0 E o s:W -a:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e00 soo 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 '® 0 0 a 0 a 411 411 1 0 0 0 0 9:as 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 a o 0 0 0 o -s�s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a I H, TOM 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 130 -< 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 s:W -a:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FERN HOUR: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE OBSERVATIONS - SUMMARY aawav l� 7 /rr S., EM, E CrLYr� Am o 645 700 b 0 0 0 0 BAS -4.00 0 _ 0 iOm4 0 0 0 0 A. 600 -.3.35 ] 30 711 E 10 1 11 1 TIT B30 315 441 1 30 „ o 4 11 5 15 A. 600 -.3.35 ] 30 711 E 10 1 11 1 TIT B30 315 441 1 30 „ o TOTALS TUNNMG MOVEMENT COUNT-SUMMANV ce vcU 1j./ In lene[11on oP E na Mill ROetl ery03"2016 Tueatley % 0" ar Rrenue 'Mea nn. BU Y'Doltl Gd]2 /f2n L[w11o:P En.. On SX Star H.S.:< ka " Mx iPPFFK FROM Sauix x TRAFFIC FROM wESi TO TIPIF TO, q "A', as Pom nw OU lxn, un um mT en xxwT mnu PM 11. t0 0 10 29 fi 0 0 0 3 BNS 0 09 3 82 10 0 0 141 T FIT 0 -]:105 0 47 13 0 60 7 0 D 59 I B 0 0 105 209 96 R t0 56 ] <E B 00 02 5 3] 0 0 23 0 0 0 BOi5 B:30 16 0 1 41 t0 0 2 0 1 0 1 111 A3 I I 1 11 12 2 0 0 145 ' On 0 0 0 TO 3R Toua 0 640 1% 0 ] 9 55] 0 0 171 63 0 156 0 211 D 0 0 0 0 1649 6:00T 205 0 271 47 0 318 020 53 220 0 60 0 8015 0 065 5] 205 0 76 0 0 40 1It 0 ]] 0 103 0 680 711 . 11 0 DID ]96 B 4D 0 250 0 0 102 0 0 69] O'A.H 223 39 0 2 116 0 0 171 9 0 l6 0 9 0 0 0 0 502 PERM MOUP ]:16 -B:16 T DID ol 1 .1 23 0 M 390 "3. 0 465 4 0 22 0 26 0 0 3:15 -9'90 t05 IS 0 0 0 0 S90 3A6 0 101 46 0 1 71 a:A6 -4:00 0 t06 46 5 0 0 0 0 6B A 05 0 101 0 120 TO 32 0 1 0 1 1 tot 1 411 0:45 "500 0 26 0 5:00 515 0 99 A3 0 0 t9 0 39 3MRO1x15 0 1046 233 0 11 t00 40n 0 0 562 3B 0 156 0 11 96 0 0 0 0 1 6 ]2 R ]] 0 04 55 Be 3:a5 "A:45 0 0 0 0 -6'90 0 56 0 69 aa0 99 0 0 0 < US 0 364 B] 0 0 ? III ] 0 0 0 T6 3a9 01 0 4 150 0 193 t0 0 2 0 6 0 625 P. HOUR a(� OM \ aeaw: «eaa _.__ ; 2 tit a(� APPENDIX C Synchro Reports Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St Mountain Rd 3126/2015 //Yellow * Lane Configurations 4. IT fir 4+ d iT Volume (vph) 180 20 30 5 140 80 25 185 5 15 60 95 Ideal Flow(vphpp 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (it) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade 1%) 2% -6% A% 4% Lane U61. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.91 Fit 0.982 0.850 0.997 0.850 Flt Protected 0.962 0.998 0.994 0.990 Said. Flow(proi) 0 1573 0 0 1609 1397 0 1720 0 0 1542 1278 Ftt Permitted 0.672 0.989 0.963 0.923 Said. Flow (pen) 0 1092 0 0 1594 1356 0 1654 0 0 1433 1163 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 87 2 103 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 744 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 16.9 Conti. Peds. (#Ihr) 6 13 13 6 45 16 16 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 6% 0% 2% 0% 6% 2% 0% 8% 3% 4% Parking ( #mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 196 22 33 5 152 87 27 201 5 16 65 103 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow Ivor) 0 251 0 0 157 87 0 233 0 0 81 103 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Lek Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Oftset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdfh(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 122 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thm Left Thin Right Left Thou Left Thm Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector l Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Defector 1 Queue (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Pen Perm NA Perm NA Perm Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SUYellow Mountain Rd 312612015 --* -V *- 41,, t `► l Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Swuh Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 310 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split 1%) 53.8% 53.8% 53.8% 53.8% 53.8% 46.3% 46.3% 46.3% 46.3% 46.3% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Lost Time (a) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (Whir) 19 19 19 19 19 61 61 61 61 61 Act Eli Green (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 19.4 19.4 19.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.27 0.16 0.37 0.15 0.20 Control Delay 21.9 13.5 3.9 14.2 12.4 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.9 13.5 3.9 14.2 12.4 4.5 LOS C B A B B A Approach Delay 210 10.1 14.2 8.0 Approach LOS C B B A y Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length. 50.9 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.0 Intersection LO& B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3'. Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd te2 --e4 �- 1 � as Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 1 !~ t 1 T P 1* 1 r Lane Configurations 251 +fix 244 233 184 4 r a'+ 13.0 11.6 Approach LOS 4 F Volume (veh/h) 180 20 30 5 140 80 25 185 5 15 60 95 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0lob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.98 0.99 12.4 0.98 0.95 HCM 2010 LOS 0.94 0.96 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehfh/In 1693 1707 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1771 1744 1676 1612 1611 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 196 22 33 5 152 87 27 201 5 16 65 103 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, vei 397 45 48 78 697 600 109 507 12 146 474 459 Anive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.36 0.36 0,36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, vehlh 666 110 118 12 1711 1473 83 1419 33 173 1325 1283 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 251 0 0 157 0 87 233 0 0 81 0 103 Grp Sal Flow(s),vehi 894 0 0 1723 0 1473 1535 0 0 1498 0 1283 0 Serve(g_s), s 10.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), a 13.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 2.9 Prop In Lane 078 0.13 0.03 1.00 0.12 0.02 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 490 0 0 774 0 600 627 0 0 620 0 459 VIC Ratio(X) 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 808 0 0 1319 0 1070 999 0 0 978 0 781 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 13.6 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 9.5 12.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 11.4 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 Initial Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BwkOfO(50 %),veh4n 3.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.8 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.1 LnGrp Deli 15.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 9.7 13.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0,0 11.9 LnGrp LOS B B A B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 251 244 233 184 Approach Delay, slveh 15.0 9.9 13.0 11.6 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 24.2 26.7 24.2 261 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6,0 6.0 6.0 6,0 Max Green Selling (Gmax), a 31.0 37.0 31.0 37.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_cd1), s 7.6 15.1 4,9 5.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 3.8 4.8 19 5.5 HCM 2010 CM Delay 12.4 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report ihllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St(Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.fl) Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (prh) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh. Perm. L, Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Corner Quality of Service Ped, Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Cade Pedestrian Delay (s/p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 29.6 32.0 28.2 38.3 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 1.98 2.04 1.88 2.16 A B A B Synchro 8 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 3/28/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection, Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Lane Configurabons tT r Volume (vi 30 40 30 20 10 20 W 395 40 85 120 60 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane UBI. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit 0.935 0,850 0.988 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.968 0.999 0.980 Satd. Flow(prot) 1472 1539 0 0 1557 1475 0 1746 0 0 3163 1433 Flt Permitted 0.736 0.753 0.993 0.713 Satd. Flow (pen) 1141 1539 0 0 1199 1475 0 1736 0 0 2300 1433 Right Tom on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sam. Flow (RTOR) 33 41 9 65 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance ft) 138 151 744 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 16.9 34.8 Conft. Peds.(#mr) 17 17 3 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 14% 9% 10% 0% 13% 0% 20% 1% 0% 2% 4% 4% Parking ( #thr) 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 33 43 33 22 11 22 11 429 43 92 130 65 Shared Lane Traffic (A) Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 76 0 0 33 22 0 483 0 0 222 65 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 11 11 Link Ofset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(fl) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thor Left Thru Right Leading Detector (11) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posidon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Pasiflon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Baseline Synchro 8 Report thpmsa Page Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Penn NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 120 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Total Split 1%) 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% Maximum Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls (#Ihr) 17 17 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 30.5 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.63 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.21 0.12 0.06 0.44 0.15 0.07 Control Delay 17.2 11.9 17.1 3.6 9.6 7.1 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.2 11.9 17.1 3.6 9.6 7.1 2.8 LOS B B B A A A A Approach Delay 13.5 11.7 9.6 6.2 Approach LOS B B A A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 48.6 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio, 0.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.1 Intersection LOS'. A Intersection Capacity U8lization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Split s and Phases'. 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flanna an or ♦ I ez Ana �- ms oa Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Volume(vehm) 30 40 30 20 10 20 10 395 40 85 120 60 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (Ob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(AybT) 096 098 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehth/In 1560 1625 1778 1736 1664 1736 1761 1807 1761 1753 1699 1685 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 43 33 22 11 22 11 429 43 92 130 65 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, vehRi 338 174 134 271 106 292 86 766 75 568 780 760 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 Sat Flow, veh/h 1107 844 648 680 515 1415 11 1442 142 773 1469 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehfn 33 0 76 33 0 22 483 0 0 92 130 65 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1107 0 1492 1195 0 1415 1595 0 0 773 1469 1430 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.0 0.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.1 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 0.67 1.00 0.02 0.09 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 308 378 0 292 928 0 0 568 780 760 VIC Ratio(X) 0.10 0.00 0.25 0.09 0.00 0.08 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.17 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 763 0 880 871 0 835 1504 0 0 873 1316 1281 HCM Platoon Rego 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 16.5 0.0 15.2 14.7 0,0 14.6 7.2 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.5 5.3 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.2 Initial Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Me BackOfO(50 %),veh /In 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.2 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d)s/veh 16.7 0.0 15.9 14.9 0.0 14.8 8,8 0.0 0.0 6.3 5.9 5.4 LnGrp LOS B B 8 8 A A A A Vol, veh /h 109 55 483 287 Delay, s/veh 16.1 14.9 8.8 5.9 LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 30.3 15.5 30.3 15.5 Change Period (Y.Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 27.0 41.0 27.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g c+ 11), s 11.3 5.2 5.4 4.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 131 1.3 14.2 1.3 HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 9.1 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ihl /msa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 58.2 45.3 47.5 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size 8 (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Lek -Right Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right- Left Flow Rate(plh) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh, Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh, Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Pad. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.18 2.02 2.16 2.32 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 8126/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3126/2015 t T P �► 1 Lane Configurations 'j B T'H -TT Volume(vph) 60 20 170 60 40 305 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane U 1. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Fit 0.850 0.961 Flt Protected 0.950 0.994 Satd. Flow (prot) 1604 1537 2840 0 0 2961 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.994 Sald. Flow (perm) 1604 1537 2840 0 0 2961 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (N) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 4% 0% 10% 8% 1% Adj. Flow(vph) 65 22 185 65 43 332 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 22 250 0 0 375 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Widtli 14 0 0 Link Offse!(tt) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Leff Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1,01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free tue*:za. , n +a,:, Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 312612915 Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 - - 486 896 1270 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.134 0.024 Vol, veh/h 60 20 170 60 40 305 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - a Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 65 22 185 65 43 332 Conflicting Flow All 470 125 0 0 250 0 Stage 1 217 - - - - - Stage 2 253 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 507 896 - - 1270 - Stage1 781 - - - - - Stage 2 748 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 486 896 - - 1270 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 486 - - - - - Stage 1 781 - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - a3aE: rz351s ,. we. �.,�_�;^ - v"»�`xiav �:1 •;.a�4ta °wc}s HCM Control Delay, s 12.5 0 1 HCM LOS B Capacity(veh/n) - - 486 896 1270 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.134 0.024 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.6 91 7.9 0.1 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0,5 0,1 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 4- 4N 1 `► 1 ✓ Lane Configurations 7j j. 1S T. aj j. }} Volume (vph) 210 30 20 0 30 120 50 345 5 155 245 165 Ideal Flow(vpli 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (tl) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade 1%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (f) 25 100 150 180 Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.940 0.880 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0,950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1577 1717 0 1660 1461 0 1563 1642 0 1525 3049 1552 Flt Permitted 0054 0.551 0.450 Sand. Flow (pen) 1086 1717 0 1660 1461 0 906 1642 0 722 3049 1552 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 22 130 1 179 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Adj. Flow (vi 228 33 22 0 33 130 54 375 5 168 266 179 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 228 55 0 0 163 0 54 380 0 168 266 179 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Wictli 12 12 11 11 Link Offset(tt) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 ifi ifi Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1 01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Third Left Thru Left Thro Left Third Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Positon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CFEx CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tom Type Perm NA Penn NA pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Perm Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing AM 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 -. 4% 1 `► 1 ✓ Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Swsh Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 38.0 16.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split ( %) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 47.5% 20.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Greens) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 32.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Last Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max None Max None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dent Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 44.0 32.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.55 0.40 0.50 0.38 0.38 vfc Rate 0.84 0.12 0.35 0.09 0.58 0.36 0.23 0.26 Control Delay 57.1 16.8 9.8 7.2 23.0 10.2 17.8 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.1 16.8 9.8 7.2 23.0 10.2 17.8 3.9 LOS E B A A C B B A Approach Delay 49.3 9.8 21.1 11.7 Approach LOS D A C B Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length. 80 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Semi Act- Uncoord Maximum We Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave \$ 01 IO2 ~94 F• 15 ®6 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 14 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing AM 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 1 !~ t 1 1 P '► l d Volume (vehlh) 210 30 20 0 30 120 50 345 5 155 245 165 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial O Ci veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehRiM 1660 1727 1778 1660 1660 1710 1702 1702 1753 1660 1660 1727 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 228 33 22 0 33 130 54 375 5 168 266 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Vein, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap, veh/h 259 242 161 90 74 290 655 670 9 490 1183 550 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.40 0.40 0.13 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1085 968 645 1197 295 1161 1621 1675 22 1581 3154 1468 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 228 0 55 0 0 163 54 0 380 168 266 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vei 1085 0 1613 1197 0 1455 1621 0 1698 1581 1577 1468 O Serve(g_s), s 12.4 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 7.6 1.3 0.0 13.8 4,8 4.6 0.0 Cycle O Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 7.6 1.3 0.0 13.8 4.8 4.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.40 1,00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 259 0 403 90 0 364 655 0 679 490 1183 550 VIC Ratio(X) 0,88 0.00 0.14 000 0.00 0.45 0.08 0.00 0.56 0.34 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 259 0 403 90 0 364 655 0 679 490 1183 550 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 35.4 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 25.3 9.5 0.0 18.6 12.3 17.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 32.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.2 0.0 2.7 1.9 0.3 0.0 Initial O De1ay(d3ts /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 %its BackOfO(50 %),vehlln 7.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.6 0.0 6.9 2.3 2.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 67.6 0.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 97 0.0 21.2 14.2 17.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C C A C B B Approach Vol, vehlb 283 163 434 434 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.2 29.3 19.8 16.2 Approach LOS E C B B ® -: - y'^k'✓Z gi. ' ^aVi''9 ,_ `bu, 3::c; Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G-Y +Rc), is 16.0 38.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y-Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gri s 10.0 32.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max O Clear Time (g ctll),s 6.8 15.8 22.0 3.3 66 9.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 9.5 1.7 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 28.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 15 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing AM 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Crosswalk Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right-Tum Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Comer Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Red. Left -Right Flow Rate (plh) Red. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veld. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped (sri Right Corner Duality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (slp) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 39.1 36.5 46.3 45.1 12.0 110 12.0 12.0 3 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.12 2.07 2.31 2.46 B B B B Synchro 8 Report Page 16 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection, Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 17 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 -� 1 `► 1 Lane Configurations 4- Volume (vph) 180 150 20 5 60 10 60 70 5 70 135 175 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 ifi 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.94 Frt 0.992 0.850 0.995 0.850 Flt Protected 0.975 0.996 0.978 0.983 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1642 0 0 1637 1397 0 1678 0 0 1582 1291 Flt Permitted 0.801 0.971 0.778 0.841 Saud. Flow (pen) 0 1340 0 0 1596 1350 0 1318 0 0 1342 1214 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Salo. Flow (RTOR) 41 3 190 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 744 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 16.9 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 9 7 7 9 25 19 19 25 Confl. Bikes (Whir) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 3% Parking (#Art) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow (vph) 196 163 22 5 65 11 65 76 5 76 147 190 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 381 0 0 70 11 0 146 0 0 223 190 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Widih(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Oftseu(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 ifi 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thu Left Thor Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posidon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(fl) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detectors Type CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI *Ex CI *Ex Cli CI.Ex CI-Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector l Queue (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posifion(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Cl-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 * I Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Penn Turn Type Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (a) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (a) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split 1%) 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time(a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Leadltag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Times) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls(Whr) 16 16 16 16 16 44 44 44 44 44 Act Effct Green (s) 22.8 22.8 22.8 18.3 18.3 18.3 Actuated gi Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.10 0.02 0.33 0.49 0.35 Control Delay 20.1 10.6 0.1 17.4 20.2 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.1 10.6 0.1 17.4 20.2 5.1 LOS C B A 8 C A Approach Delay 20.1 9.2 17.4 13.3 Approach LOS C A B B Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 54.1 Natural Cycle', 65 Control Type Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Raba: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.1 Intersection LOS'. B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Tits and Phases: 3'. Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Kul te2 �e4 F ¢6 ee Baseline Synchro 8 Report BUI/msa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Lane Configurations 4- B it «H Q C Volume ( veh/h) 180 150 20 5 60 10 60 70 5 70 135 175 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial O(Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(ApbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h1n 1693 1734 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1762 1744 1676 1665 1627 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 196 163 22 5 65 11 65 76 5 76 147 190 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, veh/h 350 254 30 96 685 596 234 226 12 236 392 463 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 589 632 75 38 1702 1480 363 649 36 390 1128 1333 Grp Volunni veh/h 381 0 0 70 0 11 146 0 0 223 0 190 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hfln 1295 0 0 1740 0 1480 1048 0 0 1518 0 1333 0 S8Ne(g_s), s 9.8 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 02 1.4 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 11.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 6.3 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 5.2 Prop In Lane 0.51 0.06 0.07 1.00 0.45 0.03 0.34 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 635 0 0 780 0 596 473 0 0 628 0 463 V/C Ratiox) 0,60 0.00 0,00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1129 0 0 1440 0 1173 793 0 0 1028 0 834 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 11.9 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 8.6 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 11.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.0 Initial Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BwkOfO(50 %),vehdn 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 2.0 LnGry Delay(d)slveh 13.5 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 8.7 12.4 0.0 0.0 124 0.0 12.9 LnGry LOS B A A 8 B B Approach Vol, veh/h 381 81 146 413 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.5 9.0 12.4 12.6 Approach LOS B A B B c Ada', 4 .. ,my S - yy- Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 22.7 25.3 22.7 25.3 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), a 30.0 38.0 30.0 38.0 Max O Clear Time(g_c+ll), s 8.3 13.7 7.2 3.2 Green Ext Time (p-c), a 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.4 y HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 12.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ihl /rasa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SI/Vellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 29.6 32.0 28.2 38.3 Crosswalk Length (it) Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size 8(it) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.H) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped, Right -Left Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Fell. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percenfile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulaton Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedesman Delay (slip) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.06 2.05 1.88 2.17 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI /msa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaagan Dr 3126/2015 w * A I Lane Configurations yi A ti' iT TT Volume (vi 45 45 55 25 5 30 5 230 25 35 295 55 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.917 0.850 0.987 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.960 0.999 0.995 Satd. Flow(prot) 1554 1614 0 0 1558 1341 0 1715 0 0 3255 1461 Fill Permitted 0.736 0.685 0.992 0.900 Said. Flow( perm) 1204 1614 0 0 1109 1341 0 1703 0 0 2944 1441 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sato. Flow(RTOR) 60 41 9 60 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 744 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 16.9 34.8 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 4 4 2 1 1 2 Confl. Bikes (#Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 Heavy Vehicles 1 %) 8% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% 0% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 49 49 60 27 5 33 5 250 27 38 321 60 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 109 0 0 32 33 0 282 0 0 359 60 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 11 11 Link OBsehlit) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thor Left Thru Right Left Thm Left Thru Right Leading Detector (11) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Cli Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector l Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Detector 2 Positlon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report tNlmsa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI-Ex Cli Cli Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Penn Penn NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Swuh Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22,0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (a) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Total Split 1%) 47,5% 47.5% 47.5% 47.5% 47.5% 52.5% 52.5% 52.5% 52.5% 52.5% Maximum Green (a) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Yellow Time (a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Tme(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Plash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #Ihr) 4 4 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 21.4 21.4 21.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.53 0.53 0.53 we Ratio 0.15 0.23 0.11 0.09 0.31 0.23 0.08 Control Delay 13,0 7.9 12.6 4.8 9.8 8.6 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.0 7.9 12.6 4.8 9.8 8.6 3.6 LOS B A B A A A A Approach Delay 9.5 8.7 9.8 7.9 Approach LOS A A A A Cycle Length'. 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 40.3 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.31 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 49,7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 slits and Phases. 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /hlanna an Or t02 �0M1 r m6 ma thl/msa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr 3/2612015 --* � -V 4, - 4- .0" 1 `► 1 Volume (vehi 45 45 55 25 5 30 5 230 25 35 295 55 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0(Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1647 1731 1778 1736 1679 1578 1761 1778 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, veh)h 49 49 60 27 5 33 5 250 27 38 321 60 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 362 147 180 331 45 277 102 659 70 202 1358 683 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.47 047 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, vehi 1197 707 865 730 216 1328 7 1407 150 182 2901 1459 Grp Volumejvj, vehlh 49 0 109 32 0 33 282 0 0 190 169 60 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1197 0 1572 946 0 1328 1564 0 0 1594 1489 1459 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 2.2 2.5 0.0 0.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 0.84 1.00 0.02 0.10 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 362 0 328 376 0 277 831 0 0 863 697 683 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.33 0.09 0.00 0.12 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.24 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh(n 1144 0 1356 1166 0 1145 1607 0 0 1621 1444 1415 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d) slveh 14.3 0.0 12.5 12.4 0.0 11,9 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 5.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.2 Initial Q Delay(0),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back0fQ(50 %),vehlln 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.2 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d)s /veh 14.6 0.0 13.5 12.6 0.0 12.2 7.3 0.0 0.0 6.4 6.6 5.7 LnGrp LOS 8 B 8 B A A A A Approach Vol, vehi 158 65 282 419 Approach Delay, srveh 13.8 12.4 7.3 6.3 Approach LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 23.4 13.7 23.4 13.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6,0 6.0 6.0 60 Max Green Setting (Gri s 36.0 32.0 36.0 32.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c +11), s 6.3 5.9 4.5 4.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.0 1.9 11.3 1.9 HCM 2010 Chi Delay 8.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 31262015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 58.2 45.3 47.5 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81,00 8100 81.00 Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p(h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm, L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh, Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circula8on Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.19 2.00 2.17 2.32 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS 8 B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report dilmnsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/26/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchm 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 t ? P �► 1 Lane Configurations 'f f TP HT Volume (vi 50 15 145 55 90 365 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Fd 0.850 0.959 Ftt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow(proh 1699 1599 2838 0 0 2990 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Sate. Flow (perm) 1699 1599 2838 0 0 2990 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Cana. Peds.( #Ihr) 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 2% 0% 0% 9% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 54 16 158 60 98 397 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 16 218 0 0 495 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 14 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wldth(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type'. CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 312612015 Capacity (vehrh) - - 402 926 1348 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.135 0.018 lint Delay, s /veh 2.3 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.4 9 7.9 0.2 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.2 - Vol, veh/h 50 15 145 55 90 365 Conflicting Peds, Kuhr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Contra] Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, p 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 54 16 158 60 98 397 Conflicting Flow All 582 111 0 0 217 0 Stage 1 188 - - - - - Stage 2 394 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pat Cap-1 Maneuver 444 927 - - 1350 - Stage1 825 - - - - - Stage 2 650 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap-iManeuver 402 926 - - 1348 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 402 - - - - - Stage 1 825 - - - - - Stage 2 589 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 0 1.7 HCM LOS B Capacity (vehrh) - - 402 926 1348 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.135 0.018 0.073 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.4 9 7.9 0.2 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Lane Configurations I I. ff if Volume(vph) 185 25 25 5 35 175 10 260 5 80 360 270 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade 1%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Uhl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 0,95 1.00 Fit 0.925 0.875 0.997 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 1593 1706 0 1593 1467 0 1578 1656 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0.533 0.722 0.428 0.583 Said. Flow(perm) 894 1706 0 1210 1467 0 711 1656 0 945 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 190 2 293 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 163 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 201 27 27 5 38 190 11 283 5 87 391 293 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 54 0 5 228 0 11 288 0 87 391 293 Enter Blacked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Wdth(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link Oftsei(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thin Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 PosiBonfft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cli Cli Cli Cl +i C4Ex Cli CI.Ex CI -Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posi8on(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Szefft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cli Cli Cli Cli Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pri NA pri NA Pen Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report ihllmsa Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2015 Existing PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 -A 4 1 `► 1 -' Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30,0 40 30,0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 360 36.0 Total Split (%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time(a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (a) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max None Max None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 v1c Ratio 0.90 0.12 0.02 0.45 0.02 0.37 0.20 0.34 0.38 Control Delay 71.9 14.9 23.0 9.4 6.6 15.0 9.4 18.9 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.9 14.9 23.0 9.4 6.6 15.0 9.4 18.9 3.9 LOS E B C A A B A B A Approach Delay 59.9 9.6 14.6 12.1 Approach LOS E A B B Area Type'. CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type. Semi Act- Uncoord Maximum vlc Rai 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.1 Intersecton LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 12'. Jefferson St & Reserve Ave ♦ \*01 I92 ~84 4 F \ 05 ab e8 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 14 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 201 � i 4~ 0 t4., 11 I 288 87 391 U Grp Set Flow(s),vehmM 1033 0 1602 1210 0 1462 1637 0 1713 1597 1593 1482 Lane Configurations aj f+ 2.1 ) H 11.1 at t. 8.5 2.7 7.0 0.0 Volume(vehlh) 185 25 25 5 35 175 10 260 5 80 360 270 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A -pbT) 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Set Flow, vehlhlln 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehfn 201 27 27 5 38 190 11 283 5 87 391 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Van, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh(n 205 200 200 361 61 304 598 800 14 531 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.38 0.00 s.r Fi- vanlh 1033 801 801 1210 244 1218 1637 1683 30 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 201 0 54 5 0 228 11 0 288 87 391 U Grp Set Flow(s),vehmM 1033 0 1602 1210 0 1462 1637 0 1713 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g_a), s 8.9 0.0 2.1 0.3 0.0 11.1 01 0.0 8.5 2.7 7.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 2.1 2.4 0.0 11.1 0.2 0.0 8.5 2.7 7.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 205 0 401 361 0 365 598 0 814 531 1194 556 VIC Rabo(x) 0.98 0,00 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.62 0,02 0.00 0,35 0,16 0.33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 205 0 401 361 0 365 598 0 814 531 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.4 0.0 23.3 24,2 0.0 26.7 8.7 0.0 13.3 140 17.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 57.9 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 7.8 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.0 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),vehlln 7.7 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 5.2 0.1 0.0 4.2 1.2 3.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 95.4 0.0 24.0 24.3 0.0 34.5 8.7 0.0 14.2 14.7 18.4 00 LnGrp LOS F C C C A B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 255 233 299 478 Approach Delay, s/veh 80.3 34.3 14.0 17.7 Approach LOS F C B B Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y+RC), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 60 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gni s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g ct11),s 43 10.5 22.0 2.2 9.0 13.1 Green EM Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 9.4 1.6 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 32.5 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI/msa Page 15 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 32612015 Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.R) Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flaw Rate (plh) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thl/msa 39.1 36.5 46.3 45.1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 3 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 9.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.14 2.06 2.31 2.49 B B 8 B Synchro 8 Report Page 16 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 17 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 -% t `► 1 4- 4 iy «A «? Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 189 21 32 5 147 84 26 194 5 16 63 100 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane Ulil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ford Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.91 Fit 0.982 0.850 0.997 0.850 Flt Protected 0.962 0.998 0.994 0.990 Sand. Flow (mot) 0 1573 0 0 1609 1397 0 1720 0 0 1542 1278 Flt Permitted 0.668 0.989 0.962 0.919 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1086 0 0 1594 1356 0 1652 0 0 1427 1163 Right Tum on Red No Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 91 2 109 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 744 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 16.9 Conti. Peds. (#Ihr) 6 13 13 6 45 16 16 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 6% 0% 2% 0% 6% 2% 0% 8% 3% 4% Parking (plhr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 205 23 35 5 160 91 28 211 5 17 68 109 Shared Lane Traffic (% Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 263 0 0 165 91 0 244 0 0 85 109 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Wictl ) 0 0 0 0 Link Oftset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widdi 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tum Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thor Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (fib 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posidon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector l Queues) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posi4on(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tum Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Baseline Synchro 8 Report ihllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Ai 4,, 1 /W `► 1 Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Svnlch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (a) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 55.0% 55D% 66.0% 55.0% 55.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (a) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time Is) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/ Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (9/hr) 19 19 19 19 19 61 61 61 61 61 Act Effct Green (s) 19.6 19.6 19.6 19.4 19.4 19.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.27 0.16 0.39 0.16 0.22 Control Delay 22.3 13.3 3.8 15.1 13.1 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.3 13.3 3.8 151 13,1 4.6 LOS C B A B B A Approach Delay 22.3 9.9 15.1 8.3 Approach LOS C A B A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 51.8 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 3plits and Phases: 3'. Jefferson/Jefferson St & McClanahan StfYellow Mountain Rd t02 �0a F e6 pe Baseline Synchro 8 Report tul/msa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 � 7 4- ~ t 4\ I /W 14. 4/ Lane Configurations +1+ Q r «j+ 4 it Volume(vehi 189 21 32 5 147 84 26 194 5 16 63 100 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qi veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehRiOn 1693 1707 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1771 1744 1676 1611 1611 Adj Flow Rate, vehRi 205 23 35 5 160 91 28 211 5 17 68 109 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, vehRi 399 45 49 76 718 618 106 498 11 145 463 450 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, vehlh 659 107 118 11 1712 1474 84 1418 31 176 1317 1282 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 263 0 0 165 0 91 244 0 0 85 0 109 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmlln 884 0 0 1723 0 1474 1533 0 0 1493 0 1282 Q Seri a),s 11,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 2.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 0.78 0.13 0.03 1.00 0.11 0.02 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehi 493 0 0 793 0 618 615 0 0 607 0 450 VIC Ratio(X) 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.21 000 0.15 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), vehm 798 0 0 1318 0 1071 944 0 0 923 0 735 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay( d), slveh 138 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 9.4 13.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 12.0 Incr Delay (Q), shah 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BackOfQ(50 %),vehdn 3.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.8 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),siveh 15.3 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 9.6 13.7 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 12.5 L G p LOS B A A B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 263 256 244 194 Approach Delay, stveh 15.3 9.8 13.7 12.2 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 24.4 27.9 24.4 27.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 38.0 30.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 8.2 162 5.2 5.2 Green Ext Time(p_c), s 3.9 5.1 4.1 5.8 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thVmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 29.6 32.0 28.2 383 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Paid. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Paid. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perth. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Paid. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Cade - - - - Pedestrian Delay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.99 2.04 1.89 2.17 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS A B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312612015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Lane Configurations Vi A in Volume (vph) 32 42 32 21 11 21 11 415 42 89 126 63 Ideal Flow(vphpp 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util, Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit 0.935 0.850 0.988 0.850 Fill Protected 0.950 0.968 0.999 0.980 Sand. Flow (prat) 1472 1540 0 0 1555 1475 0 1746 0 0 3163 1433 Flt Permitted 0.734 0.753 0.992 0.702 Satd. Flow (perm) 1138 1540 0 0 1198 1475 0 1734 0 0 2264 1433 Right Tom on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sato. Flow(RTOR) 35 41 9 fib Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 744 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 16.9 34.8 Confl. Peds.(#Ihr) 17 17 3 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 9% 10% 0% 13% 0% 20% 1% 0% 2% 4% 4% Parking (#/hr) 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 35 46 35 23 12 23 12 451 46 97 137 68 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 35 81 0 0 35 23 0 509 0 0 234 68 Enter Blocked lntersecban No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 11 11 Link Oftset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thou Left Thm Right Left Thor Left Thou Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector i Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI *Ex CI,Ex CItEx CI«Ex Cli CI-Ex Ch,Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(fi) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI.Ex CI.Ex CI-Ex CI«Ex Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 1 *­~ t 1 1 I �► : r Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Penn Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32,0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Total Split 1%) 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.09A 40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18,0 18.0 21.0 21.0 210 Pedestrian Calls (#ihr) 17 17 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 31.0 31.0 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.63 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.22 0.13 0.06 0.46 0.16 0.07 Control Delay 18.2 12.6 18.0 4.0 9.7 7.1 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.2 12.6 18.0 4.0 9.7 7.1 2.7 LOS B B B A A A A Approach Delay 14.3 12.4 9.7 6.1 Approach LOS B e A A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 49.1 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type'. Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases. 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Fianna an Dr 192 ~04 F Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 � 7 i t 1 1 P\0-: r Lane Configurations I A 4 r N TT r Volume(vehm) 32 42 32 21 11 21 11 415 42 89 126 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0(ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1560 1625 1778 1736 1662 1736 1761 1807 1761 1753 1699 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 46 35 23 12 23 12 451 46 97 137 68 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0192 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, vehm 330 177 135 262 108 296 83 780 78 547 796 775 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, vehm 1106 848 645 660 516 1415 12 1438 144 734 1469 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehm 35 0 81 35 0 23 509 0 0 97 137 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1106 0 1492 1176 0 1415 1594 0 0 734 1469 1430 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 2.2 0,0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 1.1 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.6 10.3 0.0 0.0 4.2 2.3 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 0.66 1.00 0,02 0.09 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 330 0 312 370 0 296 940 0 0 547 796 775 VIC Ratio( %) 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.09 0.00 0.08 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.17 009 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 694 0 804 793 0 763 1459 0 0 815 1278 1245 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fifter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.5 0,0 16,0 15.4 0.0 15.3 7.4 0.0 0.0 6.0 5.6 5.3 ]nor Delay (0), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 Initial De1ay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackO(0(50 %),vei 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 17.7 0.0 16.7 15.6 0.0 15.5 9.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 5.9 5.5 LnGrp LOS B B B B A A A A Approach Vol, vehm 116 58 509 302 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.0 15.6 9.2 6.0 Approach LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 32.2 16.1 32.2 16.1 Change Period (Y+Rc) , s 60 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 26.0 42.0 26.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g _c +11), s 12.3 5.5 6.2 4.2 Green Ext Time (p_cJ, s 13.9 1.3 15.2 1.4 app. �3;eR� , >;�r_ .; �.si'•.:`;�a HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 9.5 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ihllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 58.2 45.3 47.5 58A Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 U 0.0 U Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right- Left Flow Rate(plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (mh) 0 0 0 0 85th peroeni a speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.19 2.03 2,17 2.33 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thl /rasa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 aj Lane Configura0ons Volume(vph) 63 21 179 63 42 320 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Fit 0.850 0.961 Flt Protected 0.950 0.994 Bald. Flow(prot) 1604 1537 2841 0 0 2960 Fit permitted 0.950 0.994 Said, Flow (perm) 1604 1537 2841 0 0 2960 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 8% 4% 0% 10% 8% 1% Adj. Flow(vph) 68 23 195 68 46 348 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Gmup Flow(vph) fib 23 263 0 0 394 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Widtri 14 0 0 Link OBsel(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widdi 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3126/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report dlVmsa Page 12 Int Delay, slveh 2.1 Vol, vehlh 63 21 179 63 42 320 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 68 23 195 68 46 348 Conflicting Flow All 494 132 0 0 263 0 Stages 229 - - - - - Stage 2 265 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - - - - - FollDw -up Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 490 887 - - 1256 - Stage 1 770 - - - - - Stage 2 738 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 468 887 - - 1256 May Cap-2 Maneuver 468 - - - - - Stage 1 770 - - - - - Stage 2 705 - - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 0 1 HCM LOS B Capacity (vehlh) - - 468 887 1256 - HCM Lane VIC Raffia - - 0.146 0.026 0.036 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14 9.2 8 0.1 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report dlVmsa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background AM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 4- 4% t `► 1 -' Lane Configurations yj j. yS j. Vi A Volume(vph) 221 32 21 0 32 126 53 362 5 163 257 173 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade 1%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Util, Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.941 0.881 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1593 1735 0 1676 1477 0 1578 1558 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0,638 0.544 0.429 Satd. Flow (pen) 1070 1735 0 1676 1477 0 904 1658 0 695 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sand. Flow (RTOR) 23 137 1 188 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11,5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 240 35 23 0 35 137 58 393 5 177 279 188 Shared Lane Traffic I %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 58 0 0 172 0 58 398 0 177 279 188 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link OBset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(fl) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thm Left Thru Left Thu Left Thor Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector f12) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI-Ex CI.Ex CI-Ex CI4Ex CI�Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) Oft 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector i Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI,Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm +pt NA pm *Pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thpmsa Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 12'. Jefferson St & Reserve Ave \*ml I t02 "�m4 ms F me ma 2020 Background AM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 4 t �► 1 �' Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (a) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 38.0 16.0 36.0 36,0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 47.5% 20.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 32.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max None Max None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 44.0 32.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.55 0.40 0.50 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0,90 0.13 0.36 0.10 0.60 0.39 0.24 0.27 Control Delay 66.5 16.8 9.7 7.2 23.6 10.5 17.9 3.9 Oueue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Total Delay 66.5 16.8 9.7 7.2 23.6 10.5 17.9 3.9 LOS E B A A C B B A Approach Delay 56.8 9.7 21.5 11.8 Approach LOS E A C B _E a;s1 --,e 11 °a.; `;'dar Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length', 80 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio'. 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Ufflizarion 79.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 3 fits and Phases: 12'. Jefferson St & Reserve Ave \*ml I t02 "�m4 ms F me ma Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 14 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 ,-*� 7 4- ~ t 4\ 1/� s I -*I Lane Configurations I A I 'A I 1' 71 TT C Volume(veh/h) 221 32 21 0 32 126 53 362 5 163 257 173 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Inifial Q lob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehfhlln 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 240 35 23 0 35 137 58 393 5 177 279 0 Act No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 254 246 162 90 75 293 654 677 9 483 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.40 0.40 0.13 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, vehlb 1087 983 646 1206 299 1171 1637 1693 22 1597 3185 1482 Grp VolumeM, vehlh 240 0 58 0 0 172 58 0 398 177 279 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhM 1087 0 1629 1206 0 1470 1637 0 1715 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.4 0.0 14.5 5.0 4.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.4 0.0 14.5 5.0 4.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0,40 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 254 0 407 90 0 367 654 0 686 483 1194 556 VIC Ratio(X) 0.95 0.00 0.14 0,00 0.00 0,47 0.09 0.00 0.58 0.37 0.23 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 254 0 407 90 0 367 654 0 686 483 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.9 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.0 18.8 12.5 17.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 44.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.3 0.0 2.9 2.1 0.4 0.0 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),vehlln 8.4 0.0 11 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.7 0.0 7.4 2.4 2.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 80.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 0.0 29.7 9.8 0.0 21.7 14.6 17.5 0.0 L GpLOS E C C A C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 298 172 456 456 Approach Delay, s/veh 69.1 29.7 20.2 16.4 Approach LOS E C C B Assigned Pre 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y +Rc),s 16.0 38.0 26.0 1&0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 32.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c +Ii), s 7.0 16.5 22.0 3.4 6.8 10.0 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.8 ACM 2010 Ctd Delay 30.7 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Repel thllmsa Page 15 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background AM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 Baseline Synchm 8 Report thl/msa Page 16 36.5 46.3 45.1 Crosswalk Length (ft) 39.1 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A pi 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right- Left Flow Rate(p /h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Comer Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestnan Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.13 2.07 2.32 2.48 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchm 8 Report thl/msa Page 16 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be perfoned on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 17 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 i - A\ t `► 1 Lane Configurabons xT+ a" If + T Volume(vph) 189 158 21 5 63 11 63 74 5 74 142 184 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade 1%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane U81. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Red Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.94 Fd 0.992 0.850 0.996 0.850 Flt Protected 0.975 0.997 0.978 0.983 Said. Flow (prot) 0 1642 0 0 1639 1397 0 1680 0 0 1582 1291 Flt Permitted 0.800 0.972 0.772 0.836 Sets. Flow (pen) 0 1338 0 0 1597 1350 0 1310 0 0 1335 1214 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 41 2 200 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 744 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 16.9 Com. Peds.(#4v) 9 7 7 9 25 19 19 25 Confl. Bikes ( #Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 3% Parking (Or) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 205 172 23 5 68 12 68 80 5 80 154 200 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 400 0 0 73 12 0 153 0 0 234 200 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Widih(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Otfset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widlh(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thor Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Sizefft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector i Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0,0 Detector 1 Delay (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Sizefft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St(Yellow Mountain Rd 312612015 4, ~ � ,\ } A I I / Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Penn NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Splits) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 35.0 35,0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split 1%) 56.3% 56.3% 56.3% 56.3% 56.3% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% 43.8% Maximum Green (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39,0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /tag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time (a) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (tghr) 16 16 16 16 16 44 44 44 44 44 Act Effct Green (s) 23.8 23.8 23.8 18.7 18.7 18.7 Actuated g/C Raba 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.34 0.34 0.34 We Ratio 0.70 0.11 0.02 0.35 0.52 0.37 Control Delay 21.0 10.6 0.2 18.2 21.4 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.0 10.6 0.2 18.2 21.4 5.1 LOS C B A B C A Approach Delay 21.0 9.2 18.2 13.9 Approach LOS C A B B Area Type. CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.5 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type'. Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 16,8 Intersection LOS. B Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Slits and Phases'. 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Nd 102 -l".4 r ac me Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /rasa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StfYellovv Mountain Rd 3126/2015 �# l ! t 1 1 /' �► 1 1 Lane Configurations Ffs 4 F 4. Q F Volume(vehm) 189 158 21 5 63 11 63 74 5 74 142 184 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0(0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A -pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1693 1734 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1761 1744 1676 1665 1627 Adj Flow Rate, veh /h 205 172 23 5 68 12 fib 80 5 80 154 200 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, vehlh 351 259 31 92 702 610 226 220 12 236 393 466 Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0,41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, vehlh 590 628 74 37 1703 1481 352 629 33 400 1124 1334 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 400 0 0 73 0 12 153 0 0 234 0 200 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /hM 1292 0 0 1740 0 1481 1013 0 0 1524 0 1334 0 Serve(g s), s 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), a 13.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 7.4 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 5.8 Prop In Lane 0.51 0.06 0,07 1.00 0.44 0.03 0.34 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 640 0 0 793 0 610 458 0 0 629 0 466 V/C Rado(X) 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1099 0 0 1406 0 1146 716 0 0 954 0 768 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 88 12.6 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 12.5 Incr Delay (d2), stveh 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.1 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back=(50 %),vehM 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.2 LnGrp Delay(d alveh 141 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 8.8 13.3 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 13.6 LnGrp LOS B A A 8 B B Approach Vol, vehm 400 85 153 434 Approach Delay, s /veh 14.1 9.1 13.3 13.3 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phis Duration (G +Y +RC), s 23.6 26.6 23.6 26.8 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 39.0 29.0 39.0 Max O Clear Time (g c +l l ), s 9.4 15.1 7.8 3.3 Green Ext Time (p _c), s 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.8 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 Crosswalk Length (ft) 29.6 32.0 28.2 38.3 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Sin A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81,00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flaw in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Cade - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.08 2.06 1.88 2.18 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/26/2015 * 1 41� Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 47 47 58 26 5 32 5 242 26 37 315 58 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane UtiI. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 095 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit 0.917 0.850 0.987 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.959 0.999 0.995 Said. Flow (mot) 1554 1613 0 0 1556 1341 0 1716 0 0 3255 1461 Flt Permitted 0.736 0.681 0.992 0.898 Sect. Flow (perm) 1204 1613 0 0 1102 1341 0 1703 0 0 2938 1441 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 63 41 9 63 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 744 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 16.9 34.8 Com. Peds.(#lhr) 4 4 2 1 1 2 Conft. Bikes (Whr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 Heavy Vehicles V%) 8% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% 0% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% Parking (#Ihr) 0 0 Adj. Flow (vph) 51 51 63 28 5 35 5 263 28 40 342 63 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 51 114 0 0 33 35 0 296 0 0 382 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 11 11 Link OBset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widih(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thor Left Thum Right Left Thum Left Thum Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posibon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posidon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thimisa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 t 4N ♦ I /� 1 Detector 2 Type COEx CI-Ex Cli CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 220 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Total Split 1%) 47.5% 47.5% 47.5% 47.5% 47.5% 52.5% 52.5% 525% 52.5% 52.5% Maximum Green (a) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 70 7.0 Flash Dort Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #mr) 4 4 3 3 3 Act Ell Green (s) 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 21.4 21.4 21.4 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.53 0.53 0.53 vlc Ratio 0.16 0.24 0.11 0.09 0.33 0.25 0.08 Control Delay 13.1 8.0 12.7 5.0 9.9 8.7 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.1 8.0 12.7 5.0 9.9 8.7 3.6 LOS 8 A 8 A A A A Approach Delay 9.5 8.7 9.9 8.0 Approach LOS A A A A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 40.3 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.33 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Fianna an or imz �m4 �- P6 ae thllmsa Page HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 i � 7 i~ t 4N I /� �► 1 r Lane Configurations Ti 14 +T r Q+ TT f Volume(vehm) 47 47 58 26 5 32 5 242 26 37 315 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 lob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehi 1647 1731 1778 1736 1679 1578 1761 1778 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 51 51 63 28 5 35 5 263 28 40 342 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 356 151 187 328 43 286 97 670 70 199 1374 693 Arrive On Green 022 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0,47 Sat Flow, veh /h 1195 703 869 728 202 1329 6 1410 148 184 2893 1459 Grp Volume(v), vehm 51 0 114 33 0 35 296 0 0 202 180 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1195 0 1572 930 0 1329 1564 0 0 1589 1489 1459 0 Serve(g s), s 1.5 0.0 2.4 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.9 Cycle O Clear(g c), s 4.3 0.0 2.4 2.8 0.0 0.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.8 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 0,85 1.00 0.02 0.09 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 356 0 338 372 0 286 837 0 0 866 707 693 V/C Rabo(X) 0.14 0.00 0.34 0.09 0.00 0.12 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.25 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 1087 0 1298 1106 0 1098 1540 0 0 1551 1384 1356 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(Q 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sNeh 14.9 0.0 12.9 12.9 0.0 12.3 6.6 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.1 5.6 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.2 Initial De1ay(d3),s1veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Nile BackOfO(50 %),veh4n 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 0,3 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 15.2 0.0 119 13.1 0.0 126 7.5 0.0 0,0 6.5 6.8 5.8 LnGrp LOS B B B B A A A A Approach Vol, vehlh 165 68 296 445 Approach Delay, sNeh 14.3 12.8 7.5 6.5 Approach LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 24.4 14.3 24.4 14.3 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), a 36.0 32.0 36.0 32.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_a11), s 6.7 6.3 4,8 4.8 Green Exl Time (pc), s 11.7 2.0 12.0 2.0 HCM 2010 Chi Delay 8.6 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/26/2015 Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (a) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area ( sq.ft) Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (ph) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p /h) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk Iv/h) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Comer Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Corner Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thl /rasa 58.2 45.3 47.5 58.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 4 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.19 2.01 2.18 2.33 B B B B Synchro 8 Report Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 53 16 152 58 95 383 Ideal Flow(vphpf 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Ubl. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Red Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.959 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow(prot) 1699 1599 2838 0 0 2990 Ftt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 1699 1599 2838 0 0 2990 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Cam. Pads. (#fhr) 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles f%) 2% 0% 0% 9% 2% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 58 17 165 63 103 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 17 228 0 0 519 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median With(ft) 14 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widih(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Taming Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Utilization 35.4% ICU Level of Service A 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/262015 Capacity(vehlh) - - 382 920 133b - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.151 0.019 Int Delay, slveh 2.5 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 9 7.9 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C Vol, vehRi 53 16 152 58 95 383 Conflicting Peds, 9/hr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 58 17 165 63 103 416 Conflicting Flow All 612 116 0 0 228 0 Stage 1 197 - - - - - Stage 2 415 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow -up Hi 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 425 921 - - 1337 - Stage1 817 - - - - - Stage 2 635 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap 1 Maneuver 382 920 - - 1335 - Mary Cap-2 Maneuver 382 - - - - - Stage 1 817 - - - - - Stage 2 571 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 0 1.8 HCM LOS B Capacity(vehlh) - - 382 920 133b - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.151 0.019 0.077 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 9 7.9 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Diver) - - 0.5 0.1 0.3 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Lane Configurations T. T+ ?4 Volume(vph) 194 26 26 5 37 184 11 273 5 84 378 284 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 it 11 11 11 it 15 Grade 1%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane UtiI. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fri: 0.925 0.875 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Saud. Flow(prot) 1593 1706 0 1593 1467 0 1578 1658 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0.511 0.720 0.414 0.576 Said. Flow (pen) 857 1706 0 1207 1467 0 688 1658 0 933 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 28 200 1 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 211 28 28 5 40 200 12 297 5 91 411 309 Shared Lane Traffic I %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 56 0 5 240 0 12 302 0 91 411 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widih(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Trim Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l PosiBonfR) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector l Type CI-Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI.Ex CI.Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posidon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CHEx CI +Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA pm +pt NA pm +pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 13 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Background i 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 7 ~ 4% ♦ I � 1 i Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Svntch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split ( %) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Times) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time Is) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max None Max None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (a) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11,0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (Mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 We Rai 0.99 0.13 0.02 0.47 0.02 0.38 0.21 0.36 0.40 Control Delay 92.0 14.9 23.0 9.4 6.6 15.3 9.6 19.2 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 92D 14.9 23.0 9.4 6.6 15.3 9.6 19.2 3.9 LOS F B C A A B A B A Approach Delay 75.9 9.7 14.9 12.3 Approach LOS E A B B Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Semi Act- Uncoord Maximum v/c Rado'. 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay. 22.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 12. Jefferson St & Reserve Ave * \,el 107 E I ~ ®a F ms 11 ¢s 1 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Lane Configurations aj 1. `j H 9 H 15 TT C Volume(veh1h) 194 26 26 5 37 184 11 273 5 84 378 284 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Ob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh4n 1676 1744 1776 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 211 28 28 5 40 200 12 297 5 91 411 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 195 200 200 359 61 304 588 800 13 520 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, vehlh 1022 801 801 1208 244 1218 1637 1685 28 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 211 0 56 5 0 240 12 0 302 91 411 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh4n 1022 0 1602 1208 0 1462 1637 0 1713 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g s), s 8.2 0,0 2.2 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.3 0.0 9.0 2.8 7.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 2.2 2.4 0.0 11.8 0.3 0.0 9.0 2.8 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.50 1.00 0,83 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 195 0 401 359 0 365 588 0 814 520 1194 556 VIC Ratio(X) 1.08 0.00 0.14 0,01 0.00 066 0,02 0.00 0.37 0.17 0.34 0.00 Avail Cap(c_s), vehlh 195 0 401 359 0 365 588 0 Bid 520 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 37.8 0.0 23.3 24.3 0.0 26.9 8.7 0.0 13.4 14.0 17.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 88.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 Initial Delay(0),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BackOfQ(50%),vehM 9.1 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 5.6 0.1 0.0 4.4 1.3 3.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 126.0 0.0 24.0 24.3 0.0 35.8 8.8 0.0 14.4 14.8 18,6 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C C D A B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 267 245 314 502 Approach Delay, slveh 104.6 35.6 14.2 17.9 Approach LOS F D B B Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (GaY *Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y+RC), s 6.0 60 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l l ), s 4.8 11.0 22.0 2.3 9.4 13.8 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.5 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 37.7 HCM 2010 LOS D Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnsa Page 15 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 16 39.1 36.5 46.3 45.1 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) OD 0,0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (prh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq,ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.15 2.07 2.32 2.51 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 16 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26)2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be perlarmed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thilmsa Page 17 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 //Yellow * I «A 4 4+ 4 it Lane Configurabons Volume (vph) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.91 Fit 0.986 0.850 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.960 0.998 0.996 0.985 Sato. Flow(prot) 0 1579 0 0 1609 1397 0 1727 0 0 1526 1278 Flt Permitted 0.655 0.989 0.969 0.842 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1070 0 0 1594 1356 0 1671 0 0 1299 1163 Right Tom on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 125 1 139 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 9.0 Conft. Peds.( #/hr) 6 13 13 6 45 16 16 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 3% 0% 6% 0% 2% 00/0 6% 2% 0% 8% 3% 4% Parking ( #Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow (vph) 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 282 5 41 92 139 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 334 0 0 165 125 0 315 0 0 133 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thm Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 PosiSon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI-Ex CIiEx CI-Ex CI-Ex CItEx CI.Ex CI-Ex CI.Ex CI-Ex CI *Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Defector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posilion(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI *Ex CI.Ex CI-Ex CI.Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312612015 --► 7 ~ t ♦ I Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split 1%) 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58,8% 413% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% Maximum Green (s) 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Yellow Time (a) 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 LeadlLag Lead -Lag Opfimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (a) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7,0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dent Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #1hr) 19 19 19 19 19 61 61 61 61 61 Ad Effct Green (s) 31.9 31.9 31.9 36.1 36.1 36.1 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.45 We Ratio 0.78 0.26 0.20 0.42 0.23 0.23 Control Delay 33.5 155 3.1 19.3 11.9 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.5 15.5 3.1 19.3 11.9 1.8 LOS C B A B B A Approach Delay 33.5 10.1 19.3 6.7 Approach LOS C B B A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset', 57 (71%), Referenced to phase 2'.NBTL and 6:SB11, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vie Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay 18.2 Intersection LOS'. B Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 � 7 i~ t I /W '* 1 r Lane Configurations 2 4+ 6 8 4 F 41.8 4+ 41.8 Change Period (Y +RcL s 4 D Volume(veh(h) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Inifial Q (Qb), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adi 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.94 0.98 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /hlln 1693 1708 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1773 1744 1676 1603 1611 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 282 5 41 92 139 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, vehlh 388 33 40 52 767 661 78 581 10 196 396 520 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0,40 0.67 0.67 0.67 Sal Flaw, vehlh 683 73 88 13 1712 1475 71 1445 24 340 986 1293 Grp Volumejv), vehlh 334 0 0 165 0 125 315 0 0 133 0 139 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmlln 844 0 0 1724 0 1475 1540 0 0 1326 0 1293 Q Serve(g_s),s 25.5 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 30.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 11.8 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 0.83 0.10 0.03 1.00 0.09 0.02 0.31 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 460 0 0 819 0 661 668 0 0 592 0 520 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.22 0,00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), vehm 521 0 0 929 0 756 668 0 0 592 0 520 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 upstream Filler(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 22.3 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.3 17.8 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 8.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 Initial 0 Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0,0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh1ln 7.5 0.0 0.0 12 0.0 1.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d)slveh 27.7 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.6 20.2 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 9.7 LnGrp LOS C B B C A A Vol, vehlh 334 290 315 272 Delay, slveh 27.7 13.6 20.2 9.4 LOS C B C A Assigned Phis 2 4 6 8 Phis Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 38.2 41.8 38.2 41.8 Change Period (Y +RcL s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gri s 27.0 41.0 27.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +Ii), s 13.8 32.1 5.4 6.7 Green Ext Time(p_c), s 4.3 3.7 5.5 7.4 .�.�,x am�.r; .mss ararv�..a ,u.. a v .a-u -a Win; =.ter= °• - x�.�:x HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 18.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312612015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 29.8 32.2 28.2 35.0 Crosswalk Width ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right- Left Flow Rate (pi 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pi 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sgR) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - PedestrianDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.04 2.06 1.94 2.26 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be perfonned on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flanna`gan Dr 3/26/2015 ~ 4- � * I A / 1 Lane Configurations tj f. Q fir Q• Volume(vph) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Ideal Flow hphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (N) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit 0,933 0.850 0.991 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.966 0.996 0.987 Said Flow (prof) 1472 1536 0 0 1560 1475 0 1918 0 0 3177 1433 Flt Permitted 0.731 0.740 0.919 0.662 Said. Flow (pen) 1133 1536 0 0 1184 1475 0 1770 0 0 2130 1433 Right Tom on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said, Flow(RTOR) 52 45 7 68 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 Cord. Pads.( #Ihr) 17 17 3 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 14% 9% 10% 0% 13% 0% 20% 1% 0% 2% 4% 4% Adj. Flow(vph) 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 68 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 35 160 0 0 40 45 0 681 0 0 509 68 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 0 11 Link Offset(N) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 110 0.94 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 running Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thm Left Thro Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detectors Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector l Delays) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posibon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI.Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Penn NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Splits) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 220 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 Total Split 1%) 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C-Min C -Min Walk Time 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Cells (*r) 17 17 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 52.1 52.1 52.1 Actuated 9/C Rai 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.65 v1c Ratio 0.15 0.46 0.17 0.14 0.59 0.37 0.07 Control Delay 24.1 21.0 24.5 7.6 10.7 3.5 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.1 21.0 24.5 7.6 10.7 3.5 0.2 LOS C C C A B A A Approach Delay 21.6 15.5 10.7 3,1 Approach LOS C B B A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 44 (55 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.5 Interseclum LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6'. Jefferson St & Weller Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannigan Dr 3126/2015 - 7 i~ t 4� I /W 1 1 4/ Approach Vol, vehlh 195 85 681 577 Approach Delay, slveh 29.5 26.4 2.7 Lane Configurations 111 T. C 4 r A Q. .; 0 in Volume(vehm) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0(0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(ApbT) 0.97 23.4 0.98 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh /In 1560 1625 1778 1736 1671 1736 1761 1786 1761 1753 1694 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 68 Adj No, of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap,vehlh 218 186 149 188 66 319 109 915 71 424 1155 894 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, vehlh 1093 829 661 495 292 1420 96 1463 113 561 1848 1430 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 35 0 160 40 0 45 681 0 0 217 292 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh4n 1093 0 1490 787 0 1420 1672 0 0 945 1464 1430 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.5 1.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 7.5 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.9 0.0 7.5 8.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 7.5 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 0.70 1.00 0.09 0.07 0.62 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 218 0 335 253 0 319 1094 0 0 664 915 894 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.00 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.14 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.32 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 314 0 466 359 0 444 1094 0 0 664 915 894 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 090 0.90 uniform Delay (d), sNeh 32.2 0.0 26.9 27.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 7.0 5.9 Incr Delay (d2), sNeh 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 %ile BackOfO(50 %),vehM 07 00 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.2 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 32.8 0.0 28.7 27.7 0.0 25.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 8.1 7.8 61 Approach Vol, vehlh 195 85 681 577 Approach Delay, slveh 29.5 26.4 2.7 7.7 Approach LOS C C A A .; Assigned Pica 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 56.0 24.0 56.0 24.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 43.0 25.0 43.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 2.0 12,9 9.9 10.6 Green Ext Time (p c), s 27.2 1.8 23.4 2.0 1s` MV -1 HCM 2010 Chi Delay 9.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Comer Size A (ft) Right Comer Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area ( sq.ft) Paid. Left -Right Flow Rate (p /h) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p /h) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) Veh. Pen. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (vi Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped ( sq.ft) Right Corner Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Scare Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline tolmsa 59.0 45.3 40.1 58.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 4 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 o 0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 90 9,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40 0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.22 2.06 2.32 2.44 8 8 0 B Synchro 8 Report Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612016 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/26/2015 < < 1 1 s Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 86 41 179 92 86 320 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (it) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane jul. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Fit 0.850 0.949 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Saki. Flow(prot) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (a) 3,1 5.5 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 8% 4% 0% 10% 8% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 45 195 100 93 348 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 45 295 0 0 441 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 14 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 125 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free d.: Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thilmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 Int Delay, s /veh 3.4 Vol, veh/h 86 41 179 92 86 320 Conflicting Peds, tlmr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, M 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 93 45 195 100 93 348 Conflicting Flow All 606 147 0 0 295 0 Stage 1 245 - - - - - Stage 2 361 - - - - - Criflcal Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - - - - - Followup Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 415 867 - - 1221 - Stage 1 755 - - - - - Stage 2 658 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 376 867 - - 1221 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 376 - - - - - Stage 1 755 - - - - - Stage 2 596 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 15 HCM LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 12 Capacity (vehlh) - - 376 867 1221 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 0.077 - HCMControlDelay(s) - - 17.7 9.4 8,2 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2612015 t 1 I \� 1 Volume (vph) 67 158 467 161 251 184 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade 1%) 0% -6% 4% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Fit 0.905 0.965 Flt Protected 0.985 0.972 Satd. Flow (prot) 1494 0 1666 0 0 3034 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.972 Saul Flow (pen) 1494 0 1666 0 0 3034 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 303 394 350 Travel Time (s) 6.9 9.0 8.0 Conft. Peds.(#/hr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 73 172 508 175 273 200 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 245 0 683 0 0 473 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Leff Median Width(ft) 12 15 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.10 1.10 1.17 1.17 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3126/2015 lint Delay, slveh 27.1 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Vol, ve" 67 158 467 161 251 184 Conflicting Peds, Whir 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 73 172 508 175 273 200 Conflicting FlowAll 1291 665 0 0 733 0 Stage 1 645 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 167 459 - - 872 - Stage 1 521 - - - - - Stage 2 485 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 101 433 - - 857 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 101 - - - - - Stage 1 499 - - - - - Stage 2 306 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 142.3 0 6.6 HCM LOS F .. ,ss , ,.. re Capacity (veh(h) - - 219 857 - HCM Lane VIC Rabo - - 1.117 0.318 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 142.3 11.2 0.5 HCM Lane LOS - - F B A HCM 95th %tile D(veh) - - 11.3 1.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 ♦ Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 15 Grade 1%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.908 0.881 0.999 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1593 1674 0 1676 1477 0 1578 1659 0 1593 3185 1568 Flt Permitted 0.638 0.344 0.396 Said. Flow (pen) 1070 1674 0 1676 1477 0 571 1659 0 664 3185 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow(RTOR) 55 137 1 205 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 188 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 240 90 0 0 172 0 58 545 0 71 522 188 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.14 1.14 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thor Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type ChEx CI«Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI «Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex Cli CI-Ex Detectors Channel Detector i Extend (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm-pt NA pm *Pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI msa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 ` • • / ~ w % * I I + Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 SWtch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split(a) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 O Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (a) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 &0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (a) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls( #mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.20 0.36 0.12 0.69 0,22 0,44 0.26 Control Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.3 17.2 9.8 20.1 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.3 17.2 9.8 20.1 3.2 LOS E B A A B A C A Approach Delay 51.8 9.7 15.9 15.1 Approach LOS D A B B Area Type: CBD� Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length. 80 Offset: 8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2,NBTL and 6 SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle, 80 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.3 Intersection LOS C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: Jefferson St 8 Reserve Ave * \101 1 02 11 ~0p 05 + 06 ~ Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 --* --* 'r-- 4- 4\ 1/� `► 1 W Volume(vehlh) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(ACbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehmM 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 254 153 240 90 75 293 540 807 7 380 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1087 612 962 1171 299 1171 1637 1700 16 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 240 0 90 0 0 172 58 0 545 71 522 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmM 1087 0 1574 1171 0 1470 1637 0 1716 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g s), s 12.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2,1 9.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c), s 20.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2.1 9.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 V/C Raflo(X) 0.95 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.11 0.00 0.67 0.19 0.44 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.82 0.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (it) s /veh 35.9 0.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 25.5 8,8 0.0 10.7 14.3 18.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 44.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.3 0.0 3.6 1.1 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehdn 8.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 8.3 1.0 4.5 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),sNeh 80.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 29.7 9.1 0.0 14.3 15.4 19.9 0,0 LnGrp LOS E C C A B B B Approach Vol, veh /h 330 172 603 593 Approach Delay, s/veh 65.1 29.7 13.8 19.3 Approach LOS E C B B Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +I1),s 4.1 18.2 22.0 3.3 11.8 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 1.9 + HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 27.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Sin A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (k) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad, Left -Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Pod. Right- Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (Wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.14 2.04 2.42 2.55 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intemec6an. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thl/msa Page 19 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 --j, --* #- *-- 4- -% 1 `► 1 Lane Configurations ._. 4 ?1 4, Volume(vph) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane Uhl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pact Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.94 Fit 0.993 0.850 0.996 0.850 Flt Protected 0.974 0.997 0.981 0.981 Geld. Flow Prot) 0 1641 0 0 1639 1397 0 1683 0 0 1579 1291 Flt Permitted 0.792 0.972 0.768 0.810 Sept. Flow (penal 0 1325 0 0 1597 1350 0 1307 0 0 1293 1214 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow(RTOR) 41 2 297 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 9.0 Conft. Peds.(#Ihr) 9 7 7 9 25 19 19 25 Conft. Bikes ( #mr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 3% Parking ( #81r) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 230 172 23 5 fib 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 425 0 0 73 35 0 177 0 0 363 297 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Widlh(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(8) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Third Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (R) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l Posieon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CbEx CI +Ex Cli CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detectors Channel Detector i Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posiflon(tp 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thimnsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 ~ 4- 4\ t A / Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Penn Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split 1%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34,0 34.0 Yellow Time (a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 60 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dort Walk (s) 180 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (#!hr) 16 16 16 16 16 44 44 44 44 44 Act Effct Green (s) 30.3 30.3 30.3 37.7 37.7 37.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.47 0.47 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.12 0.07 0.29 0.60 0.41 Control Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 16.2 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 110 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 16.2 2.3 LOS D B A B B A Approach Delay 39.1 11.7 15.7 9.9 Approach LOS D B S A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length. 80 Offset: 55 (69 %), Referenced to phase 2,NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.9 Intersection LOS'. B Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SY'Yellow Mountain Rd I I o2 �pq 06 ~ 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /rasa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 � � 1 !~ t 1 T /' 1� l Lane Configurations F- 4 jr ._. Q r Volume(veh/h) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehmlln 1693 1732 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1759 1744 1676 1666 1627 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 230 172 23 5 68 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, vehfn 313 197 25 67 657 577 210 287 13 280 416 619 Amive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.77 0.77 0.77 Sat Flow, vehlh 624 506 65 48 1685 1480 321 623 27 474 903 1345 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 425 0 0 73 0 35 177 0 0 363 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmlln 1194 0 0 1733 0 1480 971 0 0 1377 0 1345 Q Serve(g_s), s 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 27.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 6.5 Prop In Lane 0.54 0.05 0.07 1.00 0.38 0.03 0.38 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehm 535 0 0 724 0 577 509 0 0 696 0 619 VIC Rabo(X) 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 578 0 0 783 0 629 509 0 0 696 0 619 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 23.7 0.0 0,0 15.5 0.0 15.3 15.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.7 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BackORl(50 %),vehlln 10.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.6 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.3 16.8 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 8.4 LnGrp LOS C 8 B B A A Approach Vol, vehlh 425 108 177 660 Approach Delay, slveh 31.6 15.5 16.8 8.5 Approach LOS C B B A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G.Y +Rc), s 42.8 37.2 42.8 37.2 Change Pence! (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Tlme(g_ci11), a 15.3 29.2 10.8 4.1 Green Ed Time (p_c), s 7.4 2.0 8.2 6.1 HCM 2010 Ch! Delay 17.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report titl/msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 Crosswalk Length (ft) 29.8 32.2 28.2 35.0 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Paid. Left-Right Flow Rate (p /h) 0 0 0 0 Paid, Right -Left Flow Rate (p /h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flaw in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Fight Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sri 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.14 2.08 1.93 2.28 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be perlormed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchm a Report dli Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaagan Dr 312612015 * I Lane Configurabons Volume(vph) 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 13 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Uhl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Paid Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit 0.905 0.850 0.991 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.961 0.995 0.994 Satd. Flow (prop 1554 1534 0 0 1561 1341 0 1912 0 0 3253 1461 Fit Permitted 0.721 0.523 0.914 0.853 Said. Flow (pen) 1180 1534 0 0 848 1341 0 1757 0 0 2791 1441 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Salo. Flow(RTOR) 120 51 6 63 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 4 4 2 1 1 2 Confl. Bikes ( #mr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 8% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% 0% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 200 0 0 55 51 0 435 0 0 563 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 0 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Cmsswalk Width(f) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.10 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 0.94 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thor Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posidon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CH-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position (ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (a) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 460 46.0 Total Split 1%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% Maximum Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28,0 28.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Yellow Time (a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 60 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time(a) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21,0 Pedestrian Calls( %Ihr) 4 4 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 54.8 54.8 54.8 Actuated g,C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.68 0.68 0.68 vlc Ratio 0.26 0.57 0.39 0.19 0.36 0.29 0.06 Control Delay 29.5 18.2 35.3 8.8 5.4 2.1 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.5 18.2 35.3 8.8 5.4 2.1 0.2 LOS C B D A A A A Approach Delay 20.5 22.6 5.4 1.9 Approach LOS C C A A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 54 (68 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Stan of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Signal Delay: 7.8 Intersect on LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splittss and Phases: 6', Jefferson St & Weller Ave/Flanna an or mz �bM1 I 06 ma thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3126/2015 Lane Configurations yS A 6 8 4 F 25.7 4. 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4T r Volume(veh/h) 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial (Qb), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A -ii 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1647 1724 1778 1736 1681 1578 1761 1782 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehi 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Adj No, of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 207 139 242 207 37 328 109 868 64 228 1611 880 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehi 1175 564 981 508 151 1330 98 1438 106 286 2670 1459 Grp Volunni vehlh 51 0 200 55 0 51 435 0 0 284 279 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1175 0 1545 658 0 1330 1643 0 0 1468 1489 1459 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 0.0 9.0 2.8 0.0 2.4 00 0.0 0.0 5.6 12.8 2.8 Cycle Q Clew(g_c), s 15.0 0.0 9.0 11.8 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 12.8 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 0.82 1.00 0.10 0.06 0.23 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehi 207 0 381 244 0 328 1040 0 0 941 898 880 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.52 0,23 0,00 0.16 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.31 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), vehm 329 0 541 362 0 466 1040 0 0 941 898 880 HCM Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33,9 0.0 26.1 29.4 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 17.8 13.8 Incr Delay dz), s/veh 1.0 0.0 1.9 0.8 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.1 Initial Delay(d3) slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),vehlln 1.1 0.0 4.0 1.1 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 5.5 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 34.9 0.0 28.0 30.2 0.0 24.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.6 14.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C A B B B Vol, vehi 251 106 435 626 Delay, s/veh 29.4 27.2 1.2 17.9 LOS C C A B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G-Y +Rc), s 54.3 25.7 54.3 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.0 28.0 40.0 28.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g c-11) s 2.0 17.0 14.8 13.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 20.4 2.2 15.8 2.6 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/262015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 58.0 45.3 40.0 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area ( sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Left -Right Flow Rate (p)n) 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flow Rate (p /h) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p /h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vi 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad ( sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay(s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.23 2.03 2,30 2.40 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report ihl/msa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro B Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 < < t `► 1 Lane Configurafions aj jy ft. «T? Volume (vph) 72 35 152 97 135 383 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Red Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0.942 Flt Protected 0.950 0.987 Salo. Flow (Prot) 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.987 Sato. Flow (perm) 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Cana. Peds.( #Ihr) 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 2% 0% 0% 9% 2% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 78 38 165 105 147 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 78 38 270 0 0 563 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Wdth(ft) 14 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/26/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 12 Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 Vol, vehlh 72 35 152 97 135 383 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles ,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mi Flow 78 38 165 105 147 416 Conflicting Flaw All 720 137 0 0 271 0 Stage 1 218 - - - - - Stage 2 502 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 - PotCap-1 Maneuver 363 893 - - 1289 - Stage 1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 573 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 308 892 - - 1287 - MovCap- 2 Maneuver 308 - - - - - Stage 1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - a HCM Control Delay, s 16.9 0 2.4 HCM LOS C Capacity (vehlh) - - 308 892 1287 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.254 0.043 0.114 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.6 9.2 8.2 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Diver) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/26!2015 <<rP'.i Yn ' "C�aY'ti:'?ilYPt• ` ' • ^^ d='1�4r *>°' >'fi >{�+. l..a , 'u" Lane Configurations 14 $} Volume (vph) 192 128 274 66 201 415 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -6% 4% Lane UU. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Red Bike Factor Frt 0.946 0.974 Flt Protected 0.971 0.984 Satd. Flow(prot) 1540 0 1682 0 0 3072 Flt Permitted 0.971 0.984 Salo, Flow (pen) 1540 0 1682 0 0 3072 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 342 394 350 Travel Time (s) 7.8 9.0 8.0 Conft. Peds.(Rfhr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 209 139 298 72 218 451 Shared Lane Traffic (A) Lane Group Flaw (vph) 348 0 370 0 0 669 Enter Blacked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Leff Left Median Width(ft) 12 15 0 Link O6sel(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.10 1.10 1.17 1.17 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity UOlizaton 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thi msa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2612015 Int Delay, s/veh 71.6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Vol, veh/h 192 128 274 66 201 415 Conflicting Pads, #Ihr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 209 139 298 72 218 451 Conflicting Flow All 1047 404 0 0 420 0 Stage 1 384 - - - - - Stage 2 663 - - - - - CriticalHdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4,12 - Cntical Hi Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hi Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 238 646 - - 1139 - Stage1 688 - - - - - Stage 2 475 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -i Maneuver -166 609 - - 1120 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -166 - - - - - Stage 1 659 - - - - - Stage2 346 - - - - - >= <,:. z HCM Control Delay, s 279.1 0 3,3 HCM LOS F Capacity(veh /h) - - 234 1120 - HCM Lane V /C Ratio - - 1.486 0.195 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 2791 9 0.6 HCM Lane LOS - - F A A HCM 95th %tile C(veh) - - 20.6 0.7 - -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +#Computation Not Defined `: All major volume in platoon Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/262015 4\ ♦ 1 Lane Configuratons Volume (%ph) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 15 Grade (%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (N) 25 100 150 180 Lane U6I. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 095 1.00 Frt 0.899 0.875 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1593 1658 0 1593 1467 0 1578 1658 0 1593 3185 1568 Flt Permitted 0.511 0.701 0.321 0.517 Satd. Flow (perm) 857 1658 0 1175 1467 0 533 1658 0 867 3185 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said, Flow(RTOR) 58 200 1 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 309 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 86 0 5 240 0 12 420 0 37 562 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Wdtli 12 12 12 12 Link OHset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.14 1.14 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posi6on(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ff) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detectors Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI�Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CLEx CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Pen NA pri NA pm +pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312 612 01 5 ` ♦ / ~ *- 4N * A I Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36,0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 02 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dort Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11,0 110 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 200 48.0 38,0 34.0 30,0 30.0 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 vlc Ratio 0.99 0.19 0.02 0.47 003 0.53 0.09 0.47 0.40 Control Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.1 17.6 8.4 20.6 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.1 17.6 8.4 20.6 3.9 LOS F B C A A B A C A Approach Delay 68.8 9.7 17.2 14.4 Approach LOS E A B B Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2.NBTL and 6SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle, 80 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio'. 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73,1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave * \1e1 I ®2 �e9 F �e5 __. _. - _06(0.) -- 38 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3/26/2015 � i i ~ t 4N I /W '* 1 r Lane Configurations 'i U 9 H 'S it 'i T1 P Volume(veh)h) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qh), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 195 127 263 332 61 304 523 805 10 495 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1022 507 1051 1175 244 1218 1637 1694 20 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 211 0 86 5 0 240 12 0 420 37 562 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /hM 1022 0 1558 1175 0 1462 1637 0 1715 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.2 0.0 3.5 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 3.5 3.8 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 V/C Rabo(X) 1.08 0.00 0.22 0.02 0.00 0.66 0.02 0.00 0.52 0.07 0.47 0,00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiRer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 37.8 0.0 23.8 25.3 0.0 26.9 7.6 0.0 1.1 13.5 19.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 88.2 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.3 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %its BackOfQ(50 %),veh /In 9.1 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 5.6 0.1 0.0 1.0 BS 4.9 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 126.0 0.0 25.1 25.4 0.0 35.8 7.6 0.0 3.3 13.8 20.3 00 LnGrp LOS F C C D A A B C Approach Vol, vehm 297 245 432 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 96.8 35.6 3.4 19.9 Approach LOS F D A B g Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phis Duration (G+Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4,0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c +11), s 3.1 3.9 22.0 2.2 12.7 13.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 11.4 1.6 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 323 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 Crosswalk Width (ft) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Comer Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Paid. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pi Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pi Veh. Perm. L. Flaw in Walk (vm) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v)h) 85th pementle speed (mph) Right Comer Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (slp) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thli 39.0 36.4 47.2 48.1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 3 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.16 2.05 2.39 2.56 B e B B Synchro 8 Report Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 19 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312612615 -• 4% t `► 1 Lane Conflguradons 4. $ 4+ 4 r Volume(vph) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade 1%) 2% -6% -4% 4% Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.91 Frt 0.986 0.850 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.960 0.998 0.996 0.985 Said. Flow(prot) 0 1579 0 0 1609 1397 0 1727 0 0 1526 1278 Flt Permitted 0.655 0.989 0.969 0.842 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1070 0 0 1594 1356 0 1671 0 0 1299 1163 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Sato. Flow(RTOR) 125 1 139 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 9.0 Coni Peds.(#/hr) 6 13 13 6 45 16 16 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 6% 0% 2% 0% 6% 2% 0% 8% 3% 4% Parking ( #Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 282 5 41 92 139 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flaw (vph) 0 334 0 0 165 125 0 315 0 0 133 139 Enter Blacked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link O6set(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(fl) 16 16 16 16 Two way Lett Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1,12 1.22 1.22 1,28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector s Positionift) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI +Ex CI-Ex CI «Ex CI,Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex Cli CI +Ex CHEx CI-Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cli Cli Cli CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Pen NA Perm NA Perm Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612615 Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split l %) 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% Maximum Green (a) 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Made None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 19 19 19 19 19 61 61 61 61 61 Act Effct Green (s) 31.9 31.9 31.9 36.1 36.1 36.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.45 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.26 0.20 0.42 0.23 0.23 Control Delay 33.5 15.5 3.1 19.3 11.9 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.5 15.5 3.1 19.3 11.9 1.8 LOS C B A B B A Approach Delay 33.5 10.1 19.3 6.7 Approach LOS C B B A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length, 80 Offset: 57 (71 %), Referenced to phase 2,NBTL and 6',SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.2 Intersection LOS'. B Intersection Capacity U81ization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 5 fphts and Phases: 3: JeftersonlJefterson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd t02 -09 �- 06 06 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (i Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312612015 7 f- t 4\ 1 P \► 1 r Lane Configurations 334 Q+ 290 4 F 272 eH 27.7 Q F Volume(whih) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial (Ob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adi 0.99 6.0 0.99 1.00 27.0 0.99 0.96 0.94 0.98 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln 1693 1708 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1773 1744 1676 1603 1611 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 282 5 41 92 139 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, veh/h 388 33 40 52 767 661 78 581 10 196 396 520 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 045 0.40 0.40 040 0.67 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 683 73 88 13 1712 1475 71 1445 24 340 986 1293 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 334 0 0 165 0 125 315 0 0 133 0 139 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmM 844 0 0 1724 0 1475 1540 0 0 1326 0 1293 O Serve(g_s),a 25,5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Cycle D Clear(g_c), s 30.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 11.8 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 0.83 0.10 0.03 1.00 0.09 0.02 0.31 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 460 0 0 819 0 661 668 0 0 592 0 520 VIC Ratio(X) 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.22 0,00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), vahm 521 0 0 929 0 756 668 0 0 592 0 520 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 Upstream FiNer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 22.3 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.3 17.8 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 8.4 Incr Delay (d2), sNeh 5.4 0.0 0.0 01 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 Initial D Delay(d3)s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfO(50%),vehlln 7.5 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),stveh 27.7 0.0 0,0 13.7 0.0 13.6 20.2 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 9.7 I eGrn I OS C B B C A A Approach Vol, veh /h 334 290 315 272 Approach Delay, sNeh 27.7 13.6 20.2 9.4 Approach LOS C B C A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G *Y+RC), s 38.2 41.8 38.2 41.8 Change Period (Y+RC), s 6 0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 41.0 27.0 41.0 Max O Clear Time (g_cA1), s 13.8 32.1 5.4 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.3 3.7 5.5 7.4 x - a 1., .:. a Eft .. ^ HCM 2010 Ch! Delay 18.3 HCM 2010 LOS e Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl i AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 4 Crosswalk Length (ft) 29.8 32.2 28.2 35,0 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Lek -Right Flow Rate (1 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk y /h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40,0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.04 2.06 1.94 2.26 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS e B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 ♦ Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Ideal Flow(vphp1) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 095 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fd 0.933 0.850 0.991 0,850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.966 0.996 0.987 Sea. Flow (prat) 1472 1536 0 0 1560 1475 0 1918 0 0 3177 1433 Fit Permitted 0.731 0.740 0.919 0.662 Satd. Flow (perm) 1133 1536 0 0 1184 1475 0 1770 0 0 2130 1433 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(RTOR) 52 45 7 68 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 Confl. Puts.(tdhr) 17 17 3 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 14% 9% 10% 0% 13% 0% 20% 1% 0% 2% 4% 4% Adj. Flow (vph) 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 68 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 160 0 0 40 45 0 681 0 0 509 68 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 0 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 0.94 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thm Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector Ill) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(ff) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI«Ex CI *Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex CI.Ex UI Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector i Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Duane (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posidon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI/msa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 ♦ 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 Total Split 1%) 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (a) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (a) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dent Walk (a) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls(fklhr) 17 17 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 52.1 52.1 52.1 Actuated 9/0 Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.65 We Ratio 0.15 0.46 0.17 0.14 0.59 0.37 0.07 Control Delay 24.1 21.0 24.5 7.6 10.7 3.3 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.1 21.0 24.5 7.6 10.7 3.3 0.2 LOS C C C A B A A Approach Delay 21.6 15.5 10.7 3.0 Approach LOS C B B A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset 44 (55 %), Referenced to phase 2'.NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay 9.4 Intersection LOS'. A Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6'. Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Hanna an Ur I I mz ~N4 WW F 06 ea Baseline Synchro 8 Repel thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612015 i 7 i~ t'4\ I /0- \� j r Lane Configurations aj 'ia 85 Q F Approach Delay, s/veh 4, «T? F Volume(vehm) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Blue Adj(ApbT) 0.97 43.0 0.98 0.99 2.0 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Green Ext Time(p_c), s 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehmM 1560 1625 1778 1736 1671 1736 1761 1786 1761 1753 1694 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 fib Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, vehlb 218 186 149 188 fib 319 109 915 71 424 1155 894 Amive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh /h 1093 829 661 495 292 1420 96 1463 113 561 1848 1430 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 35 0 160 40 0 45 681 0 0 217 292 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhAn 1093 0 1490 787 0 1420 1672 0 0 945 1464 1430 0 Serve(g s), s 2.3 0.0 7.5 1,2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 7.5 1.5 Cycle 0 Cleadg c), a 10.9 0.0 7.5 8.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 7.5 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 0.70 1,00 0.09 0.07 0.62 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 218 0 335 253 0 319 1094 0 0 664 915 894 VIC Rabo(X) 0.16 0.00 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.14 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.32 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 314 0 466 359 0 444 1094 0 0 664 915 894 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filtedl) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.2 0.0 26.9 27.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 7.0 5.9 Inv Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.1 Initial Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfO(50 %),veh4n 03 0.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.4 3.2 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 32.8 0.0 28.7 27.7 0.0 25.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 8.1 7.8 6.1 LnGrp LOS _ C C C C A A A A Approach Vol, vehm 195 85 681 577 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.5 26.4 2.7 7.7 Approach LOS C C A A 'A "$ 8 4 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (GAY *Rc), a 56.0 24.0 56.0 24.0 Change Period (YeRC), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 43.0 25.0 43.0 25.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+l l ), s 2.0 12.9 9.9 10.6 Green Ext Time(p_c), s 27.2 1.8 23.4 2.0 e;:ci -96 :'t• t u�iv' =af ��_`�.<- s�a'..S �, 't!. �': HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 9.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Li AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (ft) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Comer Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area ( sq.ft) Paid. Left -Right Flaw Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped ( sq.ft) Right Corner Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 59.0 45.3 401 58.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 4 3 3 4 a 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9,0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.22 2.06 2.32 2.44 B B B B Synchro 8 Report Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2612015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalind Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/26/2015 4- t P �► 1 Lane Configurations 11 F TT. d7 Volume(vph) 86 41 179 92 86 320 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.949 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Said. Flow(prot) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 8% 4% 0% 10% 8% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 45 195 100 93 348 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 93 45 295 0 0 441 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 14 0 0 Link Gffsei(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 Int Delay, slveh 3 3.4 - 1 Vol, vehm 8 86 4 41 - 179 9 92 8 86 320 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control S Stop S Stop F Free F Free F Free Free RT Channelized - - S Stop - - N None - - None Storage Length 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - - 0 0 - - - - 0 Grade, % 0 0 - - 0 0 - - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 9 92 9 92 9 92 9 92 9 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 4 4 0 0 1 10 8 8 1 Mvmt Flow 9 93 4 45 1 195 1 100 9 93 348 m 1 Conflicting Flow All 6 606 m 147 0 0 0 0 2 295 0 Stage 1 2 245 - - - - - - - - - Stage 2 3 361 - - - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6 6.96 6 6.98 - - - - 4 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5 5.96 - - - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5 5.96 - - - - - - - - - Follow -up Hi 3 3.58 3 3.34 - - - - 2 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 4 415 8 867 - - - - 1 1221 - Stage 1 7 755 - - - - - - - - - Stage 2 6 658 - - - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 3 376 8 867 - - - - 1 1221 - MovCap- 2 Maneuver 3 376 - - - - - - - - - Stage 1 7 755 - - - - - - - - - Stage 2 5 596 - - - - - - - - - U1,I.'1 _ _ ..__ Baseline Synchro 8 Report ihllmsa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/26/2015 ♦ I Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 67 158 467 161 251 184 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -6% 4% Lane Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Pad Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0.965 At Protected 0.950 0.972 Satd. Flow (prof) 1593 1425 1666 0 0 3034 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.972 Send. Flow (pen) 1593 1425 1666 0 0 3034 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 303 394 350 Travel Time (s) 6.9 9.0 8.0 Conft. Peds. ( # /hr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 73 172 508 175 273 200 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 172 683 0 0 473 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 15 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(f) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.10 1.10 1.17 1.17 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free a,� a Area Type: CBD Control Type, Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3126/2015 lint Delay, sNeh 9.8 Vol, vei 67 158 467 161 251 184 Conflicting Pads, #Ihr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 73 172 508 175 273 200 Conflicting Flow All 1291 665 0 0 733 0 Stage 1 645 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Cntical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - FDIIDw-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 - PotCap-1 Maneuver 167 459 - - 872 - Stage 1 521 - - - - - Stage 2 485 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap- 1 Maneuver 101 433 - - 857 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 101 - - - - - Stage 1 499 - - - - - Stage 2 306 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 43.6 0 6.6 HCM LOS E Capacity (vehm) - - 101 433 857 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.721 0.397 0.318 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 102.4 18.7 11.2 0.5 HCM Lane LOS - - F C B A HCM 95th %tile Dlveh) - - 3,8 1.9 1.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 ` / ~ w \ r I A / I Lane Configurations yj j. 1 1. yS 14 K }} Volume(vph) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade (%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 Fit 0.908 0.881 0.999 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0,950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 1593 1674 0 1676 1477 0 1578 1659 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0.638 0,344 0.396 Said. Flow (pen) 1070 1674 0 1676 1477 0 571 1659 0 642 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 55 137 1 205 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 188 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow Ivor) 240 90 0 0 172 0 58 545 0 71 522 188 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(R) 12 12 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Lett Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector(ff) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l Posi6on(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detectors Type CI +Ex CI-Ex CREx CI-Ex CI-Ex CI *Ex CI.Ex CIHEx CI-Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector t Queue (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CHEx CI *Ex CI,Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (a) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm-pt NA pm-pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thpmsa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Lm AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 32612015 ♦ Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 60 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#rhr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 vlc Ratio 0.90 0.20 0.36 0.12 0.69 0.22 0.45 0.26 Control Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.3 17.2 10.0 20.4 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.3 17.2 10.0 20.4 3.2 LOS E B A A B A C A Approach Delay 51.8 9.7 15.9 15.3 Approach LOS D A B B Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle'. 80 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio', 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases'. 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave ♦ �01 Ie2 "' F 65 ae (R) 1 as Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmea Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 -il� 1 i~ t 1 1 /' �► Lane Configurations eS T. 4 I A 8 ai T. 44.0 'i 'I't P Volume(veh/h) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q lob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sal Flow, vehfh/In 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 254 153 240 90 75 293 540 807 7 380 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh /h 1087 612 962 1171 299 1171 1637 1700 16 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 240 0 90 0 0 172 58 0 545 71 522 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehRiM 1087 0 1574 1171 0 1470 1637 0 1716 1597 1593 1482 0 Serveg sj, s 12.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2.1 9.8 0.0 Cycle Q Cleadg c), s 20.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2.1 9.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 VIC Rato(%) 0.95 0.00 0.23 000 0.00 0.47 011 0.00 0.67 0.19 0.44 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.82 0.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 35.9 0.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 25.5 8.8 0.0 10.7 14.3 18.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 44.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.3 0.0 3.6 1.1 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh4n 8.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 8.3 1.0 4.5 0.0 LnGrp DalayjdJ,slveh 80.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 29.7 9.1 0.0 14.3 15.4 19.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C C A B B B Vol, veh /h 330 172 603 593 Delay, s/veh 65.1 29.7 13.8 19.3 LOS E C B B Assigned Phis 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 &0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c +11), s 4.1 18.2 22.0 33 11.8 10.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 1.9 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 27.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 18 Crosswalk Length (ft) 391 36.5 46.3 45.1 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sti 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pdt) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Pen. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq,ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.14 2.04 2.42 2.55 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B 8 8 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thilmsa Page 19 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 Lane Configurations 4sr 4 f 4- 4 fir Volume(vph) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (it) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% A% 4% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 099 0.99 0.94 Fit 0.993 0.850 0.996 0.850 Flt Protected 0.974 0.997 0.981 0.981 Said, Flow(prot) 0 1641 0 0 1639 1397 0 1683 0 0 1579 1291 Flt Permitted 0.792 0.972 0.768 0.810 Said. Flow (pen) 0 1325 0 0 1597 1350 0 1307 0 0 1293 1214 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 41 2 297 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (it) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 91 9.0 Conti. Peds. ( #Ihr) 9 7 7 9 25 19 19 25 Conti. Bikes ( #fir) i Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 3% Parking (Or) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 230 172 23 5 68 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 425 0 0 73 35 0 177 0 0 363 297 Enter Blacked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Leff Right Left Left Right Leff Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (it) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l PosiBan(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex Cli Cli CI-Ex CI *Ex CI-Ex CHEx CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CI,Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extends) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI msa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildoul (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 -i 7 i ~ t ♦ I Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA Penn Perm NA Perm NA Penn Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 400 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 500% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjusts) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18,0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls (tNhr) 16 16 16 16 16 44 44 44 44 44 Act Effct Green (s) 30.3 30.3 30.3 37.7 37.7 37.7 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.47 0.47 vlc Ratio 0.85 0.12 0,07 0.29 0.60 0.41 Control Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 16.2 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 16.2 2.3 LOS D B A B B A Approach Delay 39.1 11.7 15.7 9.9 Approach LOS D B B A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 80 Offset: 55 (69 %), Referenced to phase 2.NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle. 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio'. 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: JeflersonlJeflerson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd ts I I p2 �p4 �- I 1, 06 (R) e8 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ithli Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3126/2015 -ilp i 1 `► 1 -' Lane Configurations eT+ g F 4, tT jr Volume (veh/h) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehmlln 1693 1732 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1759 1744 1676 1666 1627 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 230 172 23 5 68 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, veh/h 313 197 25 67 657 577 210 287 13 280 416 619 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.77 0.77 0.77 Sat Flow, veh/h 624 506 65 48 1685 1480 321 623 27 474 903 1345 Grp Volurni vehm 425 0 0 73 0 35 177 0 0 363 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /hAn 1194 0 0 1733 0 1480 971 0 0 1377 0 1345 Q Serve(g s), s 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 6,5 Cycle 0 Clear(g c), s 27.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 6.5 Prop In Lane 0.54 0.05 0.07 1.00 0.38 0.03 0.38 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 535 0 0 724 0 577 509 0 0 696 0 619 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.35 0.00 000 0.52 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 578 0 0 783 0 629 509 0 0 696 0 619 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.7 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 15.3 15.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh /In 10.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 30 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 31.6 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.3 16,8 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 8.4 LnGrp LOS C B B B A A Approach Vol, veh /h 425 108 177 660 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.6 15.5 16.8 8.5 Approach LOS C B B A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 42.8 37.2 42.8 37.2 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 153 29.2 10.8 4.1 Green Ext Time(p_c), s 7.4 2.0 8.2 6.1 ,.173 HCM 2010 Old Delay HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2612015 Crosswalk Width (ft) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Tum Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh. Pen. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/n) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Corner Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (slp) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline t l/msa 29.8 32.2 28.2 35.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81,00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.14 2.08 1.93 2.28 B B A B Synchro 8 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/26/2015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3t2612015 Lane Configurations yj 'N Q Volume(vph) 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Ideal Flow(vphpq 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (tt) 13 14 14 11 11 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length ft) 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Pad Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit 0.905 0.850 0.991 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.961 0,995 0.994 Said. Flow (Pratt 1554 1584 0 0 1561 1341 0 1912 0 0 3253 1461 Flt Permitted 0.721 0.523 0.914 0.853 Satd. Flow (perm) 1180 1584 0 0 848 1341 0 1757 0 0 2791 1441 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sac. Flow (RTOR) 120 51 6 63 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 Cana. Peds.( #Ihr) 4 4 2 1 1 2 Cord. Bikes ( #ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 8% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% 0% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 51 200 0 0 55 51 0 435 0 0 563 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Lett Right Median Wdth(fi) 13 13 0 11 Link ORsedift 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk W i th(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1,05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.10 0.94 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thor Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posidon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(i) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CREx CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI-E% CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Positlon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(l) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312612615 Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 &0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split 1%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% Maximum Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (a) 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 54.8 54.8 54.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.68 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.56 0.40 0.19 0.36 0.29 0.06 Control Delay 29.6 17.9 35.5 8.9 5.4 2.0 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.6 17.9 35.5 8.9 5.4 2.0 0.2 LOS C B D A A A A Approach Delay 20.2 22.7 5.4 1.8 Approach LOS C C A A «' x �_, ra4 4..t.. Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length. 80 Offset: 54 (68 %), Referenced to phase 21NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle'. 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio, 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay. 7.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6'. Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Fianna an Dr 102 � ®9 �- 06 08 thl/msa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/26/2015 -� 1 `► 1 Lane Configurations yS 1+ 4 iy «A 4+ Volume(vehi 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Number 7 4 14 3 6 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Ob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh4n 1647 1724 1778 1736 1681 1578 1761 1782 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 207 139 242 207 37 328 109 868 64 228 1611 880 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehRi 1175 564 981 508 151 1330 98 1438 106 286 2670 1459 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 51 0 200 55 0 51 435 0 0 284 279 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),vei 1175 0 1545 658 0 1330 1643 0 0 1468 1489 1459 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 0.0 9.0 2.8 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 12.8 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.0 0.0 9.0 11.6 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 12.8 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 0.82 1.00 0.10 0.06 0.23 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 207 0 381 244 0 328 1040 0 0 941 898 880 VC Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.52 0.23 0.00 0.16 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.31 007 Avail Cap(c_a), vehm 329 0 541 362 0 466 1040 0 0 941 898 880 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2,00 2.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 33.9 0.0 26.1 29.4 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 17.8 13.8 Ina Delay IQ), alveh 1.0 0.0 1.9 0.8 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0,0 00 0.0 Do 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nile BackOfQ(50 %),vehlln 1.1 0.0 4.0 1.1 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 5.5 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 34,9 0.0 28.0 302 0,0 24.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.6 14.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C A 8 B B Approach Vol, vehlh 251 106 435 626 Approach Delay, slveh 29.4 27.2 1.2 17.9 Approach LOS C C A B .; I, s A Sid !1 T,. .. ^e" r: .'.1t+. -ur Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 54.3 25.7 54.3 25.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.0 28.0 40.0 28.0 Max O Clear Time (g_c +11), s 2.0 17.0 14.8 13.8 Green Ext Time (p-c), a 20.4 2..2 15.8 2.6 HCM 2010 Ctd Delay 15.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaoan Dr 3/26/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 59.0 45.3 40.1 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (prh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p)h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (prh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flaw in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flaw in Walk (W) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow In Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.23 2.03 2.30 2.40 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 6126/2016 Two Way Analysis cannot be perfonned on Signalized Intersecbon. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2612015 4- 1 P �► l Volume (vi 72 35 152 97 135 383 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.942 Flt Protected 0.950 0.987 Satd. Flow(proh 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Ftt Permitted 0.950 0.987 Sand. Flow (pen) 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 ConB. Peds. ( #Ihr) 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1 %) 2% 0% 0% 9% 2% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 78 38 165 105 147 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 38 270 0 0 563 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(R) 14 0 0 Link Oftset(k) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 312612015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 12 y._ Int Delay, slveh 3.5 Vol, veh/h 72 35 152 97 135 383 Conflicting Pees, #fnr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvnnt Flow 78 38 165 105 147 416 Conflicting Flow All 720 137 0 0 271 0 Stage 1 218 - - - - - Stage 2 502 - - - - - CriticalHdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4,14 - Critical Hi Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 222 - PotCap -i Maneuver 363 893 - - 1289 - Stage1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 573 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap - 1 Maneuver 308 892 - - 1287 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 308 - - - - - Stage 1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 16.9 0 2,4 HCM LOS C Capacity(vehi - - 308 892 1287 - HCM Lane V1C 1 - - 0.254 0.043 0.114 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.6 9.2 8.2 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Civet) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2612015 t t i' �► 1 Lane Configurations 4 F H -TT Volume(vph) 192 128 274 66 201 415 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -6% 4% Lane UK Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0.974 Flt Protected 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow (prat) 1593 1425 1682 0 0 3072 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow (perm) 1593 1425 1682 0 0 3072 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 342 394 350 Travel Time (s) 7.8 9.0 8.0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 209 139 298 72 218 451 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 139 370 0 0 669 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 15 0 Link Offsef(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widlh(fl) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.10 1.10 1.17 1.17 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2612015 HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 1.257 0.228 0.195 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 209.5 12.7 9 0.6 HCM Lane LOS - - F B A A HCM 95th %tile Diver) - - 11.9 0.9 0.7 - -.-a -: Volume exceeds capacity $. Delay exceeds 300s t: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon Baseline Synchro 8 Report lhllmsa Page 14 Int Delay, s/veh 34.4 192 128 274 66 201 415 Vol, vei Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wort Flow 209 139 298 72 218 451 ur.� . �� - s.'i»a=z:�ara s .,4° .a &i�� %t 'aa '•°"- i�m'�'a Conflicting Flow All 1047 404 0 0 420 0 Stage 1 384 - - - - - Stage 2 663 - - - - - CdticalHdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow -up Hi 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 238 646 - - 1139 - Stage 1 688 - - - - - Stage 2 475 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap -1 Maneuver -166 609 - - 1120 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -166 - - - - - Stage1 659 - - - - - Stage2 346 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 130.8 0 3.3 HCM LOS F HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 1.257 0.228 0.195 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 209.5 12.7 9 0.6 HCM Lane LOS - - F B A A HCM 95th %tile Diver) - - 11.9 0.9 0.7 - -.-a -: Volume exceeds capacity $. Delay exceeds 300s t: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon Baseline Synchro 8 Report lhllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Lane Con6gura on5 Volume (vph) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane '1(ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade (%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.899 0.875 0.998 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prod) 1593 1658 0 1593 1467 0 1578 1658 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0.511 0.701 0.321 0.517 Satd. Flow (pen) 857 1658 0 1175 1467 0 533 1658 0 838 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 58 200 1 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 309 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 86 0 5 240 0 12 420 0 37 562 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link OHset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thor Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Cli CI-Ex CI«Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI,Ex CI +Ex CI,Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Pen NA pm-pt NA pm +pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Li PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126/2015 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 100 36.0 36.0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 Last Time Adjust (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (a) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated i Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 vlc Ratio 0.99 0.19 0.02 0.47 0.03 0.53 0.09 0.49 0.40 Control Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.2 17.6 8.5 20.9 3.9 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.2 17.6 8.5 20.9 3.9 LOS F B C A A B A C A Approach Delay 68.8 9.7 17.3 14.6 Approach LOS E A B B Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset:8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73,1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases'. 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave ♦ \901 I m2 X09 F as me (R) me Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3126 /2015 -," � -'V !� *- ', r \* 1, Lane Configurations xf A '•S A I A 'i TT F Volume (veh/h) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q lob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 195 127 263 332 61 304 523 805 10 495 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1022 507 1051 1175 244 1218 1637 1694 20 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 211 0 86 5 0 240 12 0 420 37 562 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hAn 1022 0 1558 1175 0 1462 1637 0 1715 1597 1593 1482 Q Serve(g s), s 8.2 0.0 3.5 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c), s 20.0 0.0 3.5 3.8 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 VIC Ratio(X) 1.08 0.00 0.22 0.02 0.00 0.66 0.02 0.00 0.52 0.07 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 37.8 0,0 23.8 25.3 0,0 26.9 7.6 0.0 1.1 13.5 19.0 0,0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 88.2 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.3 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s /veh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh /In 9.1 0.0 1.6 Of 0.0 5.6 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.5 4.9 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 126.0 00 25.1 25.4 0.0 35.8 7.6 0.0 3.3 13.8 20.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C C D A A B C Approach Vol, veh /h 297 245 432 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 96.8 35.6 3.4 19.9 Approach LOS F D A B waliffmillIWIi, 4 y c z 3 C s -, ..1" 11- - r,," Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phis Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g _all), s 3.1 3.9 22.0 2.2 12.7 13.8 Green Exl Time (p c), s 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 11.4 1.6 HCM 2010 Chid Delay 32.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Repel thimea Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Li PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2612015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 18 Crosswalk Length (ft) 39.1 36.5 46.3 45.1 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Per. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Paid. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pl i) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.16 2.05 2.39 2.56 PedesMan Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/26/2015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 19 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/2712015 Lane Configurations 41 4 4. 4 Volume(vph) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Wdth (ft) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -6% -0% 4% Lane Utll. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Red Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.91 I'd 0.986 0.850 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.960 0.998 0.996 0.985 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1579 0 0 1609 1397 0 1727 0 0 1526 1278 At Permitted 0.655 0.989 0.969 0.842 Bald. Flow (pen) 0 1070 0 0 1594 1356 0 1671 0 0 1299 1163 Right Tom on Red No Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 125 1 139 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 9.0 Cool. Peds.( #/hr) 6 13 13 6 45 16 16 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 0% 6% 0% 2% 0% 6% 2% 0% 8% 3% 4% Parking ( #lhr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 2B2 5 41 92 139 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 334 0 0 165 125 0 315 0 0 133 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(f) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thou Left Thou Right Left Thou Left Thou Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posmon(tt) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI,Ex CI,Ex CNEx CI+Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex CI,Ex Cli CI-Ex CI,Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posifion(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI-Ex Cli CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tom Type Perm NA Penn NA Perm Penn NA Perm NA Perm Baseline Synchro 6 Report thimnsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Vellow Mountain Rd 3/27/2015 i 4,, 1 % j -' Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Swtch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 58.8% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% Maximum Green (s) 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ali Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C-Min C -Min Walk Time (a) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Donl Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls( #Ihr) 19 19 19 19 19 61 61 fit 61 61 Act Hot Green (s) 31.9 31.9 31.9 36.1 36.1 36.1 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.45 vlc Ratio 0.78 0.26 0.20 0.42 0.23 0.23 Control Delay 33.5 15.5 3.1 19.3 12.0 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.5 15.5 3.1 19.3 12.0 1.8 LOS C 8 A B B A Approach Delay 33.5 10.1 19.3 6.8 Approach LOS C B B A rt Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset 56 (70 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6'.SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio'. 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay'. 18.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3'. Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St Yellow Mountain Rd I tat 00 �p4 F I 06 (R) 1 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thpmsa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summa920 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 3127/2015 Lane Configurations T. eT r «k• N r Volume (vehlh) 254 21 32 5 147 115 26 259 5 38 85 128 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.94 0.98 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /i 1693 1708 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1773 1744 1676 1603 1611 Adj Flaw Rate, vehuh 276 23 35 5 160 125 28 282 5 41 92 139 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, veh/h 388 33 40 52 767 661 78 581 10 196 396 520 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.40 040 0.40 0.67 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, vehi 683 73 88 13 1712 1475 71 1445 24 340 986 1293 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 334 0 0 165 0 125 315 0 0 133 0 139 Grp Sat Flow(s),vei 844 0 0 1724 0 1475 1540 0 0 1326 0 1293 0 Serve(g_a), s 25.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 30.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 11.8 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 0.83 0.10 0.03 1.00 0.09 0.02 0.31 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 460 0 0 819 0 661 668 0 0 592 0 520 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.47 0.00 0.00 0,22 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 521 0 0 929 0 756 668 0 0 592 0 520 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 upstream FiRer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sNeh 22.3 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.3 17.8 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 8.4 Incr Delay (d2), sNeh 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s 1veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOf)(50%),veh4m 7.5 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 27.7 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.6 20.2 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 9.7 LnGrp LOS C B B C A A Approach Vol, vehlh 334 290 315 272 Approach Delay, sNeh 27.7 13.6 20.2 9.4 Approach LOS C B C A Ln << 1 , k" .a. lit '- �' 4 :t� � 111 "', Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 38.2 41.8 38.2 41.8 Change Period (Y.Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 41.0 27.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +I1),a 13.8 32.1 5.4 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.3 3.7 5.5 7.4 & HCM 2010 CM Delay 18.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thimusa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/27/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (ft) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Turn Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p/h) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) Veh, Perm, L. Flow in Walk (v /h) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vm) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Comer Area per Ped ( sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area ( sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thl /rasa 29.6 32.4 28.2 33.7 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81,00 81.00 81.00 81.00 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40,0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.04 2.06 1.94 2.26 B B A B Synchro 8 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312712015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thilmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312712015 -'* 7 'r ~ t 4\ I Lane Configurations I T. «T jT YS A ai it Volume(vph) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 40 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 50 25 Lane Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Paid Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit 0.933 0.850 0.989 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.966 0.950 0.950 Said, Flow(prot) 1472 1536 0 0 1560 1475 1348 1666 0 1632 1685 1433 Flt Permitted 0.731 0.740 0.526 0.357 Said. Flow(penn) 1133 1536 0 0 1184 1475 746 1666 0 613 1685 1433 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow(RTOR) 52 45 8 68 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 Confl. Peds.(#Ihr) 17 17 3 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 14% 9% 10% 0% 13% 0% 20% 1% 0% 2% 4% 4% Adj. Flow(vph) 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 68 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 160 0 0 40 45 59 622 0 135 374 68 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Rght Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 12 23 Link Offset(b) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.15 1.15 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thm Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector l Posmon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detectors Type CI-Ex Cli CI.Ex CI-Ex CI.Ex CHEx CI *Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-E% C4Ex CI +Ex Cli Detector 2 Channel Baseline Synchm 8 Report tlhUmsa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/27/2015 ♦ Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA Peon Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Svnlch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 Total Split 1%) 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38.8% 38,8% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% 61.3% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /tag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C-Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dort Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #Ihr) 17 17 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.46 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.57 0.34 0.34 0.07 Control Delay 24.1 21,0 24.5 7.6 7.7 10.4 5.4 3.2 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.1 21.0 24.5 7.6 7.7 10.4 5.4 3.2 0.2 LOS C C C A A B A A A Approach Delay 21.6 15.5 10.2 3.3 Approach LOS C B B A Area Type: CBD Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset 44 (55%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio'. 0.57 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.4 Intersection LOS'. A Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases'. 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Fianna an or I I X99 !- I 06 gn ma Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summ,,2920 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 312712015 i i i~ t4\ I /0 "* i Lane Configurations 3j Tx 4 F I H I 1 F Volume(vehm) 32 82 65 26 11 41 54 530 42 124 344 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (ob), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A -i 0.97 0,98 0,99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1560 1625 1778 1736 1671 1736 1468 1745 1761 1718 1685 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 89 71 28 12 45 59 576 46 135 374 68 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 20 1 1 2 4 4 Cap, vehi 218 186 149 188 66 319 554 997 80 550 1053 894 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, vehi 1093 829 661 495 292 1420 743 1595 127 736 1685 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 35 0 160 40 0 45 59 0 622 135 374 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1093 0 1490 787 0 1420 743 0 1722 736 1685 1430 Q Serre(g s), s 2.3 0.0 7.5 1.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Cycle Q Clear(gc), s 10.9 0.0 7.5 8.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 0.70 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 218 0 335 253 0 319 554 0 1077 550 1053 894 VIC Ratio(X) 0.16 0.00 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.14 0.11 0.00 0.58 0.25 0.36 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), vehi 314 0 466 359 0 444 554 0 1077 550 1053 894 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 32.2 0.0 26.9 27.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s /veh 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.3 0.9 0.8 0.1 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackCdQ(50 %),vehlln 0.7 0.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.1 1 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 32.8 0.0 28.7 27.7 0.0 25.2 0.4 0.0 2.3 0.9 0.8 0.1 LnGrp LOS C C C C A A A A A Approach Vol, vehi 195 85 681 577 Approach Delay, s1veh 29.5 26.4 2.1 0.8 Approach LOS C C A A 9 4v> ,....,'.1. 3 i ..l. r:, ! Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 56.0 24.0 56.0 24.0 Change Period (Y +RcL s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 43.0 25.0 43.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c,11), s 2.0 12.9 2.0 10.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 26.3 1.8 26.3 2.0 A xisi.: v:.':•, ky# t} �m:M'. "'0 15¢4'rT'6...`'y,:'. 4kt`t HCM 2010 Cut Delay 6.4 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/27/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 * Crosswalk Length (ft) 56.7 45.4 45.1 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 4 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sg.R) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pth) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (0) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (um) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sgR) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (so ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.22 2.06 2.42 2.44 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Builcout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/27/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2712015 t `► 1 Lane Configurations yj jr 0 Q} Volume(vph) 86 41 179 92 86 320 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Util, Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I'd 0.850 0.949 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Sand. Flow (mot) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flaw (perm) 1604 1537 2783 0 0 2930 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 8% 4% 0% 10% 8% 1 % Adj. Flow (vph) 93 45 195 100 93 348 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow(vph) 93 45 295 0 0 441 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Widtlt(ft) 14 0 0 Link Gftset(fl) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Widnh(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free sp- Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/27/2015 ... :cnar�.�:t.._ �a,m �. ,r • ;:e ='+�. ..mss- .=*:zz3��*� 5.:- -: Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) - - 376 867 1221 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 Vol, vehm 86 41 179 92 86 320 Conflicting Pees, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 93 45 195 100 93 348 Conflicting Flow All 606 147 0 0 295 0 Stage 1 245 - - - - - Stage 2 361 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Still 2 5.96 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 415 867 - - 1221 - Stage1 755 - - - - - Stage2 658 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap -1 Maneuver 376 667 - - 1221 May Cap-2 Maneuver 376 - - - - - Stage1 755 - - - - - Stage 2 596 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) - - 376 867 1221 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 0.077 - HCM Control Delay (a) - - 17.7 9.4 8.2 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Divehi - - 1 0.2 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3127/2015 * I f i Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 67 158 467 161 251 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 11 11 11 11 Grade 1%) 0% -6% 4% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 170 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (fl) 25 50 Lane Ufil. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Red Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0.965 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(proQ 1593 1425 1611 0 1509 3018 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1593 1425 1611 0 1509 3018 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (N) 303 394 350 Travel Time (s) 6.9 9.0 8.0 Com. Puts. ( #mr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 73 172 508 175 273 200 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 172 683 0 273 200 Enter Blocked intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.15 1.15 1.22 1.22 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free P ~�:v'iy ,may. Aj �. #:)'..'F %° -,'XeR'e C'. :dK?.$yA'j�....-..y« "." i 'C✓ Area Type: CBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thimnsa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2712015 Int Delay, slveh 91 Vol, vehlh 67 158 467 161 251 184 Conflicting Pads, ft/hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - 170 - Veh in Median Storage, p 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 73 172 508 175 273 200 Conflictng Flow All 1291 665 0 0 733 0 Stage 1 645 - - - - - Stage 2 646 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sty 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 167 459 - - 872 - Stage1 521 - - - - - Stage 2 485 - - - - - Platoon blacked, % - - - MovCap -i Maneuver 108 433 - - 859 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 108 - - - - - Stage 1 499 - - - - - Stage 2 326 - - - - - a HCM Control Delay, s 39.8 0 6.4 HCM LOS E Capacity (vehm) - - 108 433 859 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.674 0.397 0.318 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 89.5 18.7 11.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - F C B - HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 3.5 1.9 1.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312712015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 15 Lane Configurations "i j. 1j H xj T. K }} r Volume(vph) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade (%) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Udl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 FA 0.908 0.881 0.999 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1593 1674 0 1676 1477 0 1578 1659 0 1540 3079 1568 Fit Permitted 0.638 0.344 0.396 Saki. Flow (pen) 1070 1674 0 1676 1477 0 571 1659 0 642 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 55 137 1 205 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 188 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 90 0 0 172 0 58 545 0 71 522 188 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link Oftset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thm Left Thou Lett Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector Posifion(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Positon(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Penn NA pm+pt NA pm +pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3127/2015 ~ A, \ I /� \� + 4/ Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 80 Offset: 8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2.NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio'. 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases'. 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave ♦ \I01 IO2 �b4 F 05 06 (R) 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report MI /msa Page 16 PenniBed Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12,0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Last Time (a) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( #Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38,0 34,0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.20 0.36 0.12 069 0.22 045 0.26 Control Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.4 17.6 10.0 20.4 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.5 12.7 9.7 4.4 17.6 10.0 20.4 3.2 LOS E B A A B A C A Approach Delay 51.8 9.7 16.3 15.3 Approach LOS D A B B Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 80 Offset: 8 (10 %), Referenced to phase 2.NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio'. 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases'. 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave ♦ \I01 IO2 �b4 F 05 06 (R) 08 Baseline Synchro 8 Report MI /msa Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summ�V920 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3127/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ihl/msa Page 17 Lane Configurations 1j T. yj A t. K ?? r Volume (veh/h) 221 32 51 0 32 126 53 497 5 65 480 173 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qi veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehm4n 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 240 35 55 0 35 137 58 540 5 71 522 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 254 153 240 90 75 293 540 807 7 380 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 020 0.63 0.63 0.05 0.38 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1087 612 962 1171 299 1171 1637 1700 16 1597 3185 1482 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 240 0 90 0 0 172 58 0 545 71 522 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi 1087 0 1574 1171 0 1470 1637 0 1716 1597 1593 1482 0 Senne(g_a), s 12.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2.1 9.8 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), a 20.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.3 0.0 16.2 2.1 9.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.80 1.00 001 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 VIC Ratio(X) 0.95 0.00 0.23 0,00 0.00 0.47 0.11 0.00 0,67 0.19 0.44 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 254 0 393 90 0 367 540 0 815 380 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.84 0.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 35.9 0.0 23.9 0,0 0.0 25.5 8.8 0.0 10.7 14.3 18.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), sNeh 44.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.3 0.0 3.7 1.1 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3)slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh4n 8.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 8.3 1.0 4.5 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 80.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 29.7 9.1 0.0 14.4 15.4 19.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C C A B B B Approach Vol, veh /h 330 172 603 593 Approach Delay, s/veh 65.1 29.7 13.9 19.3 Approach LOS B B WMINIENIIiIi �,s qE i. 4...a sin4 �yy :::a Hit 1. * .'"1°'.@a ACC y 8F.«- % .' .inc� i ry,AS 4 +&g G:1 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G +Y +RC), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_cdi ), s 4.1 18.2 22.0 3.3 11.8 10.0 Green EM Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 1.9 HCM 2010 Chi Delay 27.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ihl/msa Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 312712015 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (ft) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Tum Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Corner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Red. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p/n) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (prh) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 3 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o a 0.0 40.0 40,0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.14 2.04 2.42 2.55 8 B B B Synchro 8 Report Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3127/2018 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thI /msa page 19 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & RA in) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/ Yellow Yellow MountainRd 3127/2015 ~ ",- w \ * I A / I + Lane Configurafions .T. •T jr .j. Volume(vph) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (tt) 12 16 12 10 10 10 12 16 12 11 11 10 Grade (%) 2% -fi% -4% 4% Lane Udl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.94 Fit 0.993 0.850 0.996 0.850 Flt Protected 0.974 0.997 0.981 0.981 Said. Flow (prot) 0 1641 0 0 1639 1397 0 1683 0 0 1579 1291 Flt Permitted 0.792 0.972 0.768 0.810 Said. Flow (pen) 0 1325 0 0 1597 1350 0 1307 0 0 1293 1214 Right Turn on Red No Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 41 2 297 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 368 600 400 394 Travel Time (s) 8.4 13.6 9.1 9.0 Confl. Pecs. ( #fhr) 9 7 7 9 25 19 19 25 Confl. Bikes ( #Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1%) 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 0% 0% 1% 3% Parking ( #/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj. Flow(vph) 230 172 23 5 68 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 425 0 0 73 35 0 177 0 0 363 297 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link OHset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.16 1.13 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.22 1.28 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector(fi) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Posifion(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(fl) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector l Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CI-Ex CHEx CI-Ex CI-Ex Detectors Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Posilion(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Sue(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CHEx CI-Ex CLEx CJ-Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St Mountain 3/2712015 //Yellow ~ A_ A_ * I I + ., Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA Penn Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 400 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.01A 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 340 34.0 34.0 Yellow Times) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjusts) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time 60 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dent Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) ifi ifi 16 16 16 44 44 44 44 44 Act Effct Green (s) 30.3 30.3 30.3 37.7 37.7 37.7 Actuated glC Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.47 0.47 We Ratio 0.85 0.12 0.07 0.29 0.60 0.41 Control Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 17.1 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 15.1 4.5 15.7 17.1 2.8 LOS D B A B B A Approach Delay 39.1 11.7 153 10.7 Approach LOS D B B B Area Type'. CBD Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length'. 80 Offset: 55 (691 Referenced to phase 2.NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type, Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.2 Intersection LOS'. C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3'. Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SWellow Mountain Rd 192 X94 r I 96 (RI 98 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection SRlIAMftildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 312712015 _j*� -,* 4- - 4_ 4\ t `► 1 -' Lane Configurations 425 4. 108 4 r 31.6 4. 15.5 4 F Volume (wh1h) 212 158 21 5 63 32 63 96 5 128 206 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (01h), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(ApbT) 0.99 Green Ext Time (pc), s 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehi 1693 1732 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1759 1744 1676 1666 1627 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 230 172 23 5 fib 35 68 104 5 139 224 297 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, va" 313 197 25 67 657 577 210 287 13 280 416 619 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.77 0.77 0.77 Sat Flow, vehlh 624 506 65 48 1685 1480 321 623 27 474 903 1345 Grp Volume(v), vehm 425 0 0 73 0 35 177 0 0 363 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehmM 1194 0 0 1733 0 1480 971 0 0 1377 0 1345 Q Serve(g_s), s 25,1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 27.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 6.5 Prop In Lane 0.54 0.05 0.07 1.00 0.38 0.03 0.38 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 535 0 0 724 0 577 509 0 0 696 0 619 VIC Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 578 0 0 783 0 629 509 0 0 696 0 619 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 23.7 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 15.3 15.0 0.0 0.0 5,9 0.0 5.7 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 %ile BwkOfQ(50 %),vehlln 10.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.8 LnGrp Delay(d6sNeh 31.6 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 15.3 16.8 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 8.4 Approach Vol, vehlh 425 108 177 660 Approach Delay, slveh 31.6 15.5 16.8 8.5 Approach LOS C B B A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +RC), s 42.8 37.2 42.8 37.2 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c +11),s 15.3 29.2 10.8 4.1 Green Ext Time (pc), s 7.4 2.0 8.2 6.1 r, 4 ACM 2010 Ctd Delay 17.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/27/2015 :uxa -t �& c---rs rsw. »�„ s� +xRm. € .. ,•b aS �_ ... -,Y.� Y:s _.. Crosswalk Length (ft) 29.6 32.4 28.2 33.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 B Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad (sq.ft) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Cade - - PedestrianDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.14 2.08 1.93 2.28 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS 8 B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 3/27015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaagan Dr 3/27/2015 • ♦ ~ w \ * I I + `..e'3k� ram° A'• '- aNk..,' S�� "e` 1: ^ � S IiiR 3a &ll;;.r'2. Lane Configurations aj T. 4 if at A rj Volume(vph) 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 13 14 14 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 Grade 1%) 0% -3% -6% -5% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 40 80 0 85 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 50 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit 0.905 0.850 0.989 0.850 Fill Protected 0.950 0.961 0.950 0.950 Seat. Flow(prot) 1554 1584 0 0 1561 1341 1617 1631 0 1665 1718 1461 Flt Permitted 0.721 0.523 0.450 0.520 Said. Flow (perm) 1180 1584 0 0 848 1341 766 1631 0 911 1718 1441 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow(R70R) 116 51 7 53 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (it) 138 151 350 1530 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.4 8.0 34.8 ConB. Peds. ( #ihr) 4 4 2 1 1 2 Confi. Bikes (#thr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles 1 %) 8% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% 0% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 200 0 0 55 51 42 393 0 66 497 63 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 13 13 12 23 Link DBSet(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(N) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Tom Lane Headway Factor 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.17 1.17 1.12 1.15 1.15 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thin Right Left Thru Left Thm Right Leading Detector (it) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectors Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex Detector Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector l Queue (s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI+Ex Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thimusa Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3,2712015 Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tom Type Perm NA Penn NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Svdtch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 Minimum Split (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Total Split (-/.) 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Yellow Times) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 60 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18,0 21.0 21,0 21,0 Pedestrian Calls(idhr) 4 4 3 3 3 Act Effct Green (s) 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 54.8 54.8 54.8 54.8 54.8 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 vlc Ratio 0.26 0.56 0.39 0.19 0.08 0.35 0.11 0,42 0.06 Control Delay 29.5 18.4 35.3 8.8 5.9 6.4 1.8 5.9 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.5 18.4 35.3 8.8 5.9 6.4 1.8 5.9 0.5 LOS C B D A A A A A A Approach Delay 20.7 22.6 6.3 4.9 Approach LOS C C A A Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 32 (40 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6'. Jefferson St & Weller AvelFlanna an or 102 1 -011,q �- ®6 06 miumsa Page HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection SZl MWIdout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/27/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 ,,T w: _�,aaz40Yli5t3:deas: • mu:.r« .a�:srwr Lane Configurations i 1. Volume(vehlh) 47 67 117 41 9 47 39 336 26 61 457 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 initial (01 veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adl(ApbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sal Flow, vehlhlln 1647 1724 1778 1736 1681 1578 1761 1709 1761 1753 1718 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehrh 51 73 127 45 10 51 42 365 28 66 497 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Van, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 3 0 2 2 Cap, vehlh 203 138 239 204 37 325 370 948 73 652 1041 884 Arrive On Green 0,24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehlh 1175 564 981 502 150 1330 800 1564 120 928 1718 1459 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 51 0 200 55 0 51 42 0 393 66 497 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhAn 1175 0 1545 651 0 1330 800 0 1684 928 1718 1459 0 Serve(g_s),s 3.3 0.0 9.0 2.8 0.0 2.4 1.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 20.5 2.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 15.1 0.0 9.0 11.8 0.0 2.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 4.7 20.5 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 203 0 377 241 0 325 370 0 1021 652 1041 884 VIC Rato(%) 0.25 0.00 0.53 0.23 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.00 0.39 0.10 048 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 298 0 502 333 0 432 370 0 1021 652 1041 884 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filterfl) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 34.1 0.0 26.3 29.7 0.0 23.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 14.5 20.8 13.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 2.0 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.1 0.3 1.4 0.1 Initial O Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 OD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOf0(50 %),vehlln 1.1 0.0 4.0 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.3 1.3 10.2 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 35.2 0.0 28.2 30.5 0.0 24.2 5.4 0.0 1.1 14.8 22.2 13.9 LnGrp LOS D C C C A A 8 C 8 Approach Vol, veh /h 251 106 435 626 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.7 27.4 1.5 20.5 Approach LOS C C A C Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +RC), s 54.5 25.5 54.5 25.5 Change Period (Y +RC), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Seteng (Gmax), s 42.0 26.0 42.0 26.0 Max O Clear Time g c +11),s 24.4 17.1 22.5 13.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 12.1 1.9 13.1 2.4 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 Hi 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & RI: in) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/2712015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 56.7 45.4 45.1 58.4 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 4 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (1 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flaw Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (vth) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. CirculationArea (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay b1p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.23 2.03 2.41 2.40 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 3/27/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/27/2015 4- 1 �► 1 Volume(vph) 72 35 152 97 135 383 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 14 15 10 10 10 10 Lane Url. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0942 At Protected 0.950 0.987 Said. Flow(prot) 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.987 Said. Flow (pen) 1699 1599 2760 0 0 2977 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 138 244 240 Travel Time (s) 3.1 5.5 5.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 0% 9% 2% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 78 38 165 105 147 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 38 270 0 0 563 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 14 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.05 1.01 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: �HCBD Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 11 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 3/2712015 Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 HCM Lane VIC Raho - - 0.254 0.043 0.114 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.6 9.2 Vol, vehfi 72 35 152 97 135 383 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, It 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mi Flow 78 38 165 105 147 416 „r. Conflicting Flow All 720 137 0 0 271 0 Stages 218 - - - - - Stage 2 502 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 363 893 - - 1289 - Stage1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 573 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCaliManeuver 308 892 - - 1287 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 308 - - - - - Stage1 797 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - I HCM Control Delay, s 16.9 0 24 HCM LOS C HCM Lane VIC Raho - - 0.254 0.043 0.114 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.6 9.2 6.2 0,4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3/2712015 i t I /� 1� i Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 13 Lane Configurations TT Volume(vph) 192 128 274 66 201 415 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (1t) 12 12 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) 0% -6% 4% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 170 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 50 Lane U01. Factor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Red Bike Factor Fit 0.850 0.974 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(proQ 1593 1425 1626 0 1509 3018 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1593 1425 1626 0 1509 3018 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (fl) 342 394 350 Travel Time (s) 7.8 9.0 8.0 Com. Pars. (#/hr) 50 20 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 209 139 298 72 218 451 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 139 370 0 218 451 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.14 1.15 1.15 1.22 1.22 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 13 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Fit in) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 3127/2015 lot Delay, s/veh 27.7 § Vol, vah/h 192 128 274 66 201 415 Conflicting Peds, #mr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - 170 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 209 139 298 72 218 451 Conflicting Flow All 1047 404 0 0 420 0 Stage 1 384 - - - - - Stage 2 663 - - - - Cohost Hdwy 6.63 6,23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow -up Hi 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 238 646 - - 1139 - Stage 1 688 - - - - - Stage 2 475 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 181 610 - - 1122 - Mov Cali Maneuver -181 - - - - - Stage 1 659 - - - - - Stage 2 377 - - - - - `:€.�.. a -e11� _.1.. s� 7+• °� m _,x�- �. a'c' . HCM Control Delay. s 105 0 2.9 HCM LOS F Capacity (veh /h) - - 181 610 1122 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.153 0.228 0.195 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 166.6 12.6 9 - HCMLaneLOS - - F B A - HCM 95th We O(veh) - - 10.7 0.9 0.7 - :_ii+: 1.^ r.�h� "� ., ...... Z .lis;,..mt :�++v1. e �.xr. *k..r'.YU .;:i«,.,. i`'%rr` :5 •t.. ,,:, -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s ,: Computadon Not Darned All major volume in platoon Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2712015 7 i ~ ♦ I /� 1 Lane Configurations xj j. yf j+ yS 14 Volume (vph) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 15 15 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 15 Grade ( %) 0% 0% -5% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 100 0 220 80 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 100 150 180 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fit 0.899 0.875 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow(prot) 1593 1658 0 1593 1467 0 1578 1658 0 1540 3079 1568 Flt Permitted 0.511 0.701 0.321 0,517 Said. Flow (pen) 857 1658 0 1175 1467 0 533 1658 0 838 3079 1568 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sets. Flow (RTOR) 58 200 1 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 551 718 1530 504 Travel Time (s) 12.5 16.3 34.8 11.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flaw (vph) 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 309 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flaw (vph) 211 86 0 5 240 0 12 420 0 37 562 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Lek Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 11 11 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wdth(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.01 1.01 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.01 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thor Right Leading Detector 111) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (it) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Positlon(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector Type CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex CI +Ex CI-Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Positiondt) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI-Ex CI-Ex CI+Ex CI +Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm +pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2712015 � --* #- A_ -. t r l -' Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 30.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 18.0 36.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 44.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split 1%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 12.5% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 12.0 38.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 6.0 6.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max C -Min Max C -Min C -Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 38.0 34.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.60 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.19 0.02 0.47 0.03 0.53 0.09 0.49 0.40 Control Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.1 15.4 8.5 20.9 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 92.0 11.8 23.0 9.4 5.1 15.4 8.5 20.9 3.9 LOS F B C A A B A C A Approach Delay 68.8 9.7 15.1 14.6 Approach LOS E A B B Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length'. 80 Offset: 71 (89 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.6 Intersection LOS'. C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 3pllts and Phases: 14: Jefferson St 6 Reserve Ave * \101 102 X04 r 1 es ms tRt pe Baseline Synchro 8 Report BII /msa Page 16 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection SROWEVildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2712015 Lane Configurations 'f A 86 71 H 240 'f A 420 I TT F Volume(veh /h) 194 26 53 5 37 184 11 382 5 34 517 284 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial (ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 6.0 1.00 1.00 4.0 1.00 1.00 12.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h4n 1676 1744 1778 1676 1676 1710 1718 1718 1753 1676 1676 1744 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 211 28 58 5 40 200 12 415 5 37 562 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 195 127 263 332 61 304 523 805 10 495 1194 556 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.95 0.95 0.05 038 0.00 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 211 0 86 5 0 240 12 0 420 37 562 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh /h4n 1022 0 1558 1175 0 1462 1637 0 1715 1597 1593 1482 O Serve(g s), s 8.2 OD 3.5 03 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 20.0 0.0 3.5 3.8 0.0 11.8 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 10.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 6.0 0.67 1.00 4.0 0.83 1.00 12.0 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh /h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 V/C Ratio(X) 1.08 0.00 0.22 0.02 000 0.66 0,02 0.00 0.52 0.07 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh /h 195 0 390 332 0 365 523 0 815 495 1194 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 37.8 0.0 23.8 25.3 0.0 26.9 7.6 0.0 1.1 13.5 19.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 88.2 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.3 1.3 0.0 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfO(50 %),veh /In 9.1 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 56 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.5 4.9 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 126.0 0.0 25.1 25.4 0.0 35.8 7.6 0.0 3.3 13.8 20.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C C D A A B C Approach Vol, veh/h 297 245 432 599 Approach Delay, s/veh 96.8 35.6 3.4 19.9 Approach LOS F D A B Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 10.0 44.0 26.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 38.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9 c +11), s 3.1 3.9 22.0 2.2 12.7 13.8 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 11.4 1.6 L 1. 'A & « "F_. a 1�`v^ii�a 'wadi Walkawk HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 32.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /rasa Page 17 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2712015 Crosswalk Length (it) 39.0 36.5 46.2 45.1 Crosswalk Width (11) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 3 4 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Curb Radius (it) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Left-Right Flow Rate (p)i 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flaw Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flaw in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sqR) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 400 400 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Scare 2.16 2.05 239 2.56 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 18 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave 3/2712015 Two Way Analysis cannot be pedonned on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro B Report thllmsa Page 19 APPENDIX D SimTraffic Reports Queuing and Blocking Report ':xt]ItA•. Y..:HO:�`r': <ssj•J:}`.',N.' us'iaY '.>.'iiaV'.w' -fR 2015 Existing AM Baseline T TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 3I26I2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 79 99 Average Queue (11) 33 0 8 Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R 40 62 Maximum Queue (ft) 189 121 67 162 86 66 211 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Average Queue (ft) 80 51 29 73 32 27 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 95th Queue (ft) 142 97 57 132 72 58 Link Distance (ft) 330 568 568 368 672 672 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (11) 51 54 54 37 204 152 88 88 Average Queue (ft) 14 24 18 12 100 56 21 24 95th Queue (ft) 42 50 46 34 174 117 63 63 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 114 114 672 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penally (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 011imillois ':xt]ItA•. Y..:HO:�`r': <ssj•J:}`.',N.' us'iaY '.>.'iiaV'.w' -fR Directions Served L T TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 58 6 79 99 Average Queue (11) 33 0 8 16 95th Queue (ft) 58 0 40 62 Link Distance (ft) 35 200 200 211 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraKc Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2015 Existing AM Baseline 3/26/2015 11: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 22 SimTratfc Report thllmsa Page 2 Directions Served L TR TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 319 92 134 177 332 128 142 123 82 Average Queue (ft) 141 28 57 29 145 56 64 54 6 95th Queue (ft) 243 70 105 106 248 102 115 103 52 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 0 19 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 10 0 3 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 22 SimTratfc Report thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2015 Existing PM Baseline 3126/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 264 Average Queue (ft) 115 95th Queue (ft) 206 Link Distance (ft) 330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 60 Storage Blk Time ( %) 108 Queuing Penalty (veh) 88 LT R LTR LT R 70 31 131 166 108 25 5 52 72 43 60 22 108 135 88 568 568 368 672 672 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L T Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 52 55 63 62 153 157 132 56 Average Queue (ft) 20 23 16 19 60 57 39 15 95th Queue (ft) 47 44 45 48 121 126 101 45 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 114 114 672 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 4 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage BIk Time ( %) 1 0 Queuing Penaty(veh) 1 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave SimTraffic Report thllmsa Page 1 Directions Served L T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 55 4 43 124 59 Average Queue (ft) 28 0 4 26 2 95th Queue (ft) 54 3 23 81 27 Link Distance (ft) 35 200 200 211 211 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2015 Existing PM Baseline 3/26/2015 Intersection: 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave MINNIMMIM12 .. 7,... -. Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 299 74 28 142 28 227 81 153 131 85 Average Queue (ft) 136 26 4 70 5 105 35 84 57 5 95th Queue (ft) 245 60 19 120 22 185 70 134 107 47 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 8 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 7 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 17 SimTraKc Report thl /msa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report L R TR LT T 2020 Background AM Baseline 11 68 110 11 Average Queue (ft) 3126 /215 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 0 95th Queue (ft) 58 8 40 fib .: Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R 211 Upstream BIk Time ( %) Madmum Queue (ft) 159 116 67 162 91 77 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Average Queue (ft) 81 54 30 75 34 30 95th Queue (ft) 138 102 56 133 78 62 Link Distance (ft) 330 568 568 368 672 672 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr .' utg`& K> k rY�.3:'v�i,Y'.''re'�'••.._._.. ®,-"tea d'. a.'�%wMx'}3x. Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Madmum Queue (ft) 56 fit 56 46 230 174 110 70 Average Queue (ft) 17 27 18 13 108 62 27 20 95th Queue (ft) 44 53 47 37 188 131 75 55 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 114 114 672 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 4 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Bilk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L R TR LT T Mi durum Queue (ft) 58 11 68 110 11 Average Queue (ft) 31 0 7 17 0 95th Queue (ft) 58 8 40 fib 8 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 200 211 211 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Sin-Traffic Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 2020 Background AM 3/2fi/015 Intersection: 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Directions Served L TR TR L TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 299 163 158 178 317 129 132 110 Average Queue (ft) 157 34 61 27 146 61 62 43 95th Queue (ft) 292 136 112 98 256 107 109 86 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 220 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 0 17 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 9 2 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty '. 22 SimTrafAC Report thUmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Background PM Baseline 312612015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 234 Average Queue (ft) 119 95th Queue (ft) 202 Link Distance (ft) 330 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 68 Storage Slk Time ( %) 108 Queuing Penalty (veh) 89 LT R LTR LT R 79 40 123 182 126 33 7 56 83 46 68 29 108 155 89 568 568 368 672 672 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaoan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave ' %:. &.. s&. '4 `'r x. ssiN. a' .`i $§"& -! ix ..!4 •,. Directions Served L TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 49 56 53 56 132 141 128 62 Average Queue (ft) 20 25 17 16 60 56 42 17 95th Queue (ft) 46 48 44 43 115 119 99 46 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 114 114 672 1440 1440 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 4 Queuing Penalty (van) 3 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave ' %:. &.. s&. '4 `'r x. ssiN. a' .`i $§"& -! ix ..!4 •,. Directions Served L TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 52 43 172 25 Average Queue (ft) 29 5 30 1 95th Queue (ft) 54 26 96 18 Link Distance (ft) 35 200 211 211 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 9 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report thl/msa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Background PM Baseline 3/26/2015 Intersection: 12: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L T T R Miami Queue (R) 271 75 28 169 33 301 85 168 153 55 Average Queue (R) 135 28 3 76 5 109 34 90 59 2 9581 Queue (it) 238 60 18 138 23 222 70 143 111 29 Link Distance (it) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time (°h) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 100 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 5 9 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 8 Network Summary Network vnde Queuing Penalty: 20 SimTrafOc Report thl /rasa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM Baseline 3126/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan Sf7Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 327 133 76 200 126 68 Average Queue (ft) 135 58 35 100 54 31 95th Queue (ft) 242 109 61 175 107 58 Link Distance (ft) 329 568 568 368 324 324 Upstream Blk Time (°%) 0 Queuing Penafty(van) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty(veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 68 79 58 310 356 307 172 Average Queue (ft) 15 39 28 24 218 154 56 12 95th Queue (ft) 42 68 63 54 346 326 212 66 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 119 119 291 1440 1440 0 Upstream Blk Time (h) 6 23 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 20 0 37 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (van) 1 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave M*WOMLikk- ;,H Directions Served L R T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 68 26 6 102 206 132 Average Queue (ft) 37 1 0 24 55 6 95th Queue (ft) 62 14 4 73 152 57 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 200 200 211 211 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 14 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraftic Report thlfmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM Baseline 3/2612015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr Directions Served LR TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 295 293 276 76 Average Queue (ft) 206 75 123 7 95th Queue (ft) 347 212 228 43 Link Distance (ft) 268 324 291 291 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 32 0 0 56 Queuing Penatty(veh) 0 2 1 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 33 120 71 2 Storage Blk Time ( %) 266 73 118 57 Queuing Penalty (veh) 72 187 143 30 Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 87 SimTraftic Pound thllmsa Page 2 Directions Served L TR TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 304 93 144 70 284 93 237 180 56 Average Queue (ft) 154 36 64 25 131 33 120 71 2 95th Queue (f) 266 73 118 57 235 72 187 143 30 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 0 11 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 6 0 6 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 87 SimTraftic Pound thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM Baseline 3126/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr 'i±'� « �;'.i -Icy •':�fi. , "" i4!i_ Directions Served k Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 302 75 52 140 232 102 Average Queue (ft) 160 28 14 66 121 45 95th Queue (ft) 265 64 39 119 202 81 Link Distance (ft) 329 568 568 368 323 323 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 39 Link Distance (it) 35 35 119 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 0 Storage BIk Time ( %) 10 26 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr 'i±'� « �;'.i -Icy •':�fi. , "" i4!i_ Directions Served gam; ".. «ice' ^, . .�..@i'i Cd)is: —. e Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 53 57 90 75 242 173 128 54 Average Queue (ft) 20 40 34 27 114 66 21 12 95th Queue (ft) 47 61 78 61 208 145 75 39 Link Distance (it) 35 35 119 119 292 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 9 22 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 26 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage BIk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraftic Report thl /msa Page 1 Directions Served L TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 62 120 214 155 Average Queue (ft) 35 24 61 6 95th Queue (ft) 61 80 149 57 Link Distance (ft) 35 201 211 211 Upstream BIk Time (%) 15 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraftic Report thl /msa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM Baseline 3/26 /215 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave walyt!PWZI! �. i Directions Sewed LR TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 354 60 179 65 Average Queue (ft) 264 11 66 4 95th Queue (ft) 416 42 133 31 Link Distance (ft) 307 323 292 292 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 53 203 33 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 202 186 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Average Queue (ft) 162 36 Storage BIk Time (%) 82 6 98 Queuing Penalty (veh) 122 82 17 Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave walyt!PWZI! �. _. .. Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 308 93 28 203 33 204 48 202 186 145 Average Queue (ft) 162 36 5 82 6 98 22 122 82 17 95th Queue (ft) 295 70 21 153 25 173 48 187 159 91 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (van) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 7 0 5 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 1 0 16 0 Network vdde Queuing Penalty: 61 SimTrafflc Report thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM Baseline 3/2612015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 264 Average Queue (ft) 138 95th Queue (ft) 228 Link Distance (ft) 329 Upstream Blk Tim ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 106 Storage Blk Time ( %) 199 Queuing Penalty (veh) 60 LT R LTR LT R 134 71 229 130 67 56 35 111 49 31 106 62 199 102 60 568 568 368 324 324 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (it) 50 68 70 58 292 361 277 80 Average Queue (ft) 18 41 23 19 212 145 42 13 95th Queue (1t) 44 67 57 50 334 292 173 56 Link Distance (it) 35 35 119 119 279 1440 1440 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 6 22 0 5 Queuing Penalty (van) 5 19 0 34 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave SimTraKc Report thli Page 1 Directions Served L R T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 68 26 13 114 218 146 Average Queue (it) 39 1 0 24 62 10 95th Queue (ft) 65 11 6 81 165 70 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 200 200 211 211 Upstream Blk Time (%) 15 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (van) 9 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraKc Report thli Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM Baseline 3/26/2015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Emir Network wide Queuing Penalty: 82 thl /msa SimTraf6c Report Page 2 Directors Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 190 213 282 269 167 Average Queue (it) 72 65 72 124 16 95th Queue (ft) 160 148 194 242 97 Link Distance (ft) 268 268 324 279 279 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) 0 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 2 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave M Directions Served L TR TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (it) 364 87 143 132 288 72 189 173 58 Average Queue (it) 154 36 62 26 124 30 113 71 1 95th Queue (fl) 281 71 113 77 232 63 176 139 21 Link Distance (it) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 220 80 Storage BIk Time ( %) 2 11 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 0 5 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 82 thl /msa SimTraf6c Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM Baseline 3/2612015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 0 Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 308 90 49 144 198 106 Average Queue (ft) 166 31 16 65 105 44 95th Queue (ft) 270 68 40 120 182 83 Link Distance (ft) 329 568 568 368 323 323 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 0 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time (%) 8 Queuing Penalty (van) 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 28 0 0 Storage BIk Time ( %) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage BIk Time ( %) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 51 59 107 82 271 194 152 74 Average Queue (ft) 21 42 35 24 109 62 23 11 95th Queue (ft) 48 65 81 59 221 149 83 47 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 119 119 279 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time (%) 8 24 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 28 0 0 Storage BIk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 85 Storage BIk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave SimTratfic Report thllmsa Page 1 Directions Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 54 9 100 226 188 Average Queue (ft) 33 0 24 89 21 95th Queue (ft) 56 6 75 211 111 Link Distance (ft) 35 35 200 211 211 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 12 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (van) 7 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTratfic Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM Baseline 3/26/2015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave v Directors Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 310 238 75 194 126 Average Queue (ft) 149 74 18 67 9 95th Queue (ft) 299 227 56 140 55 Link Distance (ft) 307 307 323 279 279 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 10 7 95 18 122 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 231 71 18 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 30 173 44 193 161 Storage Blk Time ( %) Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1440 467 467 Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Network Summary Netmrk wide Queuing Penalty: 61 SimTrafiic Report thllmsa Page 2 Directlons Served L TR L TR L TR+ L T T R Maximum Queue (it) 253 94 28 162 36 233 46 215 185 142 Average Queue (ft) 134 36 3 75 8 95 18 122 83 13 95th Queue (ft) 231 71 18 139 30 173 44 193 161 78 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 4 6 0 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 15 0 Network Summary Netmrk wide Queuing Penalty: 61 SimTrafiic Report thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM Baseline 312712015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 272 149 75 201 134 84 Average Queue (ft) 137 61 34 106 49 31 95th Queue (ft) 232 116 62 179 103 66 Link Distance (ft) 329 568 568 368 324 324 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R L TR L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 69 77 63 89 265 141 79 39 Average Queue (ft) 22 44 26 22 35 140 59 14 6 95th Queue (ft) 55 65 63 51 86 245 114 50 27 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 113 113 279 1440 1440 Upstream BIk Time (% 8 21 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 19 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 40 85 Storage BIk Time (%) 8 22 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 47 12 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave '"kN,: Directions Served L R T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 62 26 8 100 215 94 Average Queue (f) 37 1 0 25 55 9 95th Queue (ft) 61 12 4 76 154 65 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 200 200 211 211 Upstream alk Time (% 5 0 0 Queuing Penalty (van) 3 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Sin-Traffic Report Whose Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff 2SBT & Rt in) AM Baseline 312712015 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Directions Served L R TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 151 123 133 188 31 12 Average Queue (ft) 55 51 41 92 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 114 94 104 159 17 13 Link Distance (ft) 269 269 324 33 279 279 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 113 52 199 61 142 177 Queuing Penalty (veh) Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 467 467 170 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 119 SimTraffc Report thllmsa Page 2 Directors Served L TR TR L TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 261 91 147 62 265 72 157 211 145 Average Queue (ft) 135 37 62 23 108 30 81 104 33 95th Queue (ft) 238 79 113 52 199 61 142 177 132 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 7 14 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 25 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 119 SimTraffc Report thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM Baseline 3/2712015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (11 305 84 44 150 229 88 Average Queue (it) 162 28 16 73 106 42 95th Queue (it) 263 68 40 130 194 73 Link Distance (it) 329 568 568 368 324 324 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R L TR L T R Maximum Queue (it) 49 68 85 70 89 172 71 108 55 Average Queue (ft) 24 46 32 24 27 77 30 26 5 95th Queue (it) 53 61 68 56 69 148 64 73 26 Link Distance (t) 41 41 113 113 279 1440 1440 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) 8 24 0 Queuing Penaty( veh) 9 27 0 Storage Bay Dist (fl) 40 85 Storage BIk Time ( %) 3 15 0 0 Queuing Penalty (vah) 12 6 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave .� Directions Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (it) 54 40 131 226 188 Average Queue (t) 32 4 27 94 18 95th Queue (it) 54 24 85 209 102 Link Distance (R) 41 41 200 211 211 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 4 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraifc Report thl/msa Pagel Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln & MOD Jeff FULL 2SBT & Rt in) PM Baseline 3/27/2015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr y: Directions Served Directions Served L R TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 221 134 77 104 39 39 Average Queue (ft) 106 43 14 48 4 4 95th Queue (ft) 200 90 48 87 23 24 Link Distance (ft) 308 308 324 95th Queue (ft) 279 279 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 177 44 146 218 Queuing Penalty (van) 0 0 505 681 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 467 467 170 upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 14: Jefferson St & Reserve Ave Network Summary Netwad< wide Queuing Penalty: 106 Sinai Report thllmsa Page 2 y: Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L T T R Ammum Queue (ft) 357 181 28 160 32 213 46 189 321 145 Average Queue (ft) 177 41 3 76 7 100 16 84 125 54 95th Queue (ft) 365 117 18 134 29 177 44 146 218 167 Link Distance (ft) 505 505 681 1440 467 467 upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (vent 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 220 80 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 7 0 17 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 1 0 48 Network Summary Netwad< wide Queuing Penalty: 106 Sinai Report thllmsa Page 2 APPENDIX E Conceptual Jefferson Street Layout ❑����no6ol lonldaauod laasl5 os a)la' ��� s o si..anew w.: ,uw� i I. g k II /I It lid I i J r, APPENDIX F Left and Right Turn Lane Warrants (VDOT Road Design Manual) F -53 Warrants for Left Turn Storage Lanes on Two -Lane Highways Advancing volume and opposing volumes (VPH), speed and percent left turns are used to determine whether a left turn storage lane is warranted on two -lane highways. The warrants in table below are taken from the 2011 AASHTO Green Book, Page 9 -132, Table 9-23. They were derived from Highway Research Report No. 211, Figures 2 through 19, for required storage length determinations. WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON TWO -LANE HIGHWAYS TABLE 3 -1 Source: Ada led from 2011 AASHTO Green Book, ch ,ate IARA Page 9 -132, Table 9 -23 C Ec VDLNE1w19 4— y ADVANCING VOLUME VPH UiT -TURN OPPOSING V1x111E (4919 VOLUME 5% 10%% 20% 30% LEFT TURNS LEFT TURNS LEFT TURNS LEFT URNS 40d PH DESIGN SPEED' 800 330 240 180 160 600 410 305 225 200 400 510 380 275 245 200 640 470 350 305 100 720 515 390 340 50 -MPH DESIGN SPEED' 800 280 210 165 135 600 350 280 195 1 170 400 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 60-MPH DESIGN SPEED' 800 230 170 125 115 800 290 210 180 140 400 365 270 200 175 200 450 330 250 215 100 505 370 275 240 TABLE 3 -1 Source: Ada led from 2011 AASHTO Green Book, ch ,ate IARA Page 9 -132, Table 9 -23 C Ec VDLNE1w19 4— y F NMWEM9 UiT -TURN VOIIR[NR19 V1x111E (4919 Example: Two-lane highway with 40 -MPH operating speed Opposing Volume (VPH) - 600 Advancing Volume (VPH) - 440 left -Turn Volume (VPH) - 44 or 10% of Advancing Volume With opposing volume (VPH) of 600 and 10% of advancing volume (VPH) making left turns, and advancing volume (VPH) of 305 or more will warrant a left -turn lane. • USE DESIGN SPEED IF AVAILABLE, When the Average Running Speed on IF NOT USE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT. an existing facility is available, the corresponding Design Speed may be obtained from IIM LD- 117. Rev. 1/14 120 100 0 x x n 80 J _U S W > 60 S2 40 x a F -74 PHV APPROACH TOTAL, VEHICLES PER HOUR Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Riaht Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total <300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of Flow Note: An average of 11 % for K x D will suffice FIGURE 3 -26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2 -LANE HIGHWAY) Zoning Amendment ECEIVED ` atleh Department of Planting, Building and Development' MAR 272015 ROANOKE Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building CITY OF ROANOKE 215 Church Avenue, S.W. PLANNING BUILDING 6 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 DEVELOPMENT Girl Noe b Pant Phone: (540) 85 }1730 Fax (540) 853 -1230 Date: March =2013 Submittal Number Amended Application No .2 Regues[_(9eleet all flirt apply): Rezoning. Not Othewse listed ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan Rezoning b Planned Unit Development ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay Distract ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Property Information. Address: I2012,efferson Street, S.E, Roanoke, VA 24011 Offxdal Tax Nvr$)l Part of 9060502 — —— Existing Base Zoning: ❑ With Conditions If mull: le zones, lease manual) enter all districts ROS. Recreation and Open Space ( p p Y �) F%I Without CondAbns Ordmance No(s). for Existing Conditions (If applicable): ] J ❑ With Conditions Pro F Requested Zoning: 5eeattached sheet pos 'iSeeattached heet ___ _ F1 Without Condwons Land Use Proparty9xmer Ipformatfon: Name: Western Virginia Water Authority, Attn: Mr. Gary Robertson Phone Number: +1(540)853 -5749 Address 601 S.' R on Street, S.W., Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24 E -M all ' �gary.robertsonQwestemvawate Property Owner's nature: Applicant Information (if . different from owner): Name'. Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, Attn: Mr. Curtis Mills Phone Number j �t(540)981 -7204 Address. 13 South Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 �... emu'► /t�/'� E -Mal: kemdls?carilionclinic.org - J Applicant's S \ - Alildierbaid ASOW Llformation (If applicable): Name: Maryellen F. Goodlane, Esq. Phone Number [ :1(540)224 -8018 Address Glenn, Feldmann, at al., P. O. Box 2887, Roanoke, VA 24001-1 E -Mail' CmgoodlatteBglennfeldmano.com Authorized AgeniC45ignature Zoning Amendment TfxioNowing must be submitted for an applications: R OA N O K E P Complefedapplicaaon form and checklist. F Written narrative explaining the reason for the request. !x Metes and bounds descdption, a applicable. Ix Filing fee. For a mirroring not otherwise listed, the •ollowi g must also be submitted r Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of ttem'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures For a conditional rezoning, the following must also be submitted r- Written proffers. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of tern 2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as r 'development plan' d proffered. For a planned unit development, the fol'owing must also be submitted: F Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance . For a comprehensive sign overlay district, the following most be submitted. r Comprehensive sgnage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the City's Zoring Ordinance. For an amenchm n of proffered conditions, the blbwbg must also be submitted. Amended development or concept plan me the Application Requirements of aem'2(c)' �n Zonno Amendment Procedures. F eting ffapplicable. F Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For a planned unit development amendment, the following must also be submtted. _ Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the Ciys Zoning Ordinance . (- Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. nor a comprehensive sign overlay amendment the (ollowing must also be submitted: F Amended comprehensne sgnage plan meeting me requirements of Section 36.2 - 336(4) of the City a Zoning Ordinance. Copy of previously adopted Ordinance For a proposal rho requires a traffic impact study be submitted to the City, the foilomng must also be submitted: F A Traffic Impact Study in compliance with Appendix B -2(e) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. For a proposal that requires a traffic impact analysis be submitted to VDOT, the following must also be submitted: r Corersheet. i- Traffic impact analysis. F- Concept plan. F Proffered conditions. A applicable F- Required fee. "An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at wws.roanokeva.gov /plod by selecting'Planning Commission' under 'Boards and Commission'. A complete packet must be submitted each One an application is amended. unless otherwise specified by staff ATTACHMENT TO ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC Requested Zonin¢: INPUD (2.0379 ac.) IN (0.2518 ac.) 1 -2 (0.4453 ac.) Proposed Land Use: hospital and related uses (2.0379 ac.) pump house (W V WA) (0.2518 ac.) water filtration facility (W V WA) (0.4453 ac.) o< v 3 x< Q 9 - mE Do opz qo o &E n I - I s i I I � 3 3 a 3 3 3 I 0 3 - 3 � 3 I 53�c o !? E - cS LY c u 0 I6 3 = o< v 3 x< Q o< v 3 NARRATIVE As part of a larger transaction, the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Water Authority ") and Carilion Clinic ( "Carilion ") have agreed to subdivide the 27� acres which constitute tax parcel 4060502 in order to create three parcels — two of which would be retained by the Water Authority (the "Pump Station Parcel" containing 0.2518 acre and the "Residue Parcel" containing 24.9954 acres) and one of which would be conveyed to Carilion (the "Carilion Parcel" containing 2.0379 acres). The Carilion Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Pump Station Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Residue Parcel is currently zoned ROS and I -2. While the majority of the Residue Parcel is zoned ROS, its I -2 zoned portion encompasses the area near the intersection of Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street within which the Water Authority's filtration plant is located. This application seeks to (I) rezone the Pump Station Parcel from ROS to IN; (2) rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD; and (3) rezone a 0.4453 acre portion of the Residue Parcel from ROS to I -2. Metes and bounds descriptions for all three parcels are provided. Crystal Spring, along with other historic and operational buildings of the Water Authority, is located on the Residue Parcel. Water from the spring has been pumped to an underground water storage cistern located on the Carilion Parcel. Because of significant leakage problems, the old cistem on the Carilion Parcel is in the process of being replaced by a new one under construction on the Residue Parcel. The pump house building located on the Pump Station Parcel will continue to house the pumping machinery needed to transfer the water from Crystal Spring through the Water Authority's systems. No changes to the exterior of the building on the Pump Station Parcel are needed or anticipated. Because the reduced size of the Pump Station Parcel is no longer conducive to an ROS zoning designation, and because the Pump Station Parcel cannot be classified as a "utility lot". a rezoning of that small parcel to IN is sought. Other than the zoning designation, no changes in the current use or design of that 0.2518 acre parcel are anticipated. In addition to the underground water storage cistem, the Carilion Parcel also includes tennis courts. As part of the larger transaction, those courts would be removed and would be replaced with new courts on City-owned land on Reserve Avenue. The Carilion Parcel adjoins Carillon's Roanoke Memorial Hospital, located on 18+ acres (tax parcel no. 406030 1) (the "Hospital "). The Hospital consists of six towers/buildings as follows: - North Tower — Built 1925, 5 stories - East Tower — Built 1956, 7 stories - Old Nursing School Building — Built 1959, 3 stories - West Pavilion - Built 1971,15 stories - Mountain Tower— Built 2003, 5 stories - South Tower — Built 1993, 10 stories originally with 5 stories added in 2007 The oldest structures are located on the north end of the Hospital parcel. The Mountain and South Towers, the newest structures are located on the south end of the Hospital parcel and house the Emergency Department (including the Trauma Center), Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, high tech specialty services, and imaging Past and future medical developments coupled with aging structures and facilities that no longer meet life safety codes, will require Carilion to remove the older structures as structural and technical issues will not allow them to be renovated or repurposed. In addition, expanding medical education activities — including new educational programs being created by Carillon's affiliation with Virginia Tech and the Jefferson College of Health Sciences as well as significantly increased utilization of clinical services (particularly Emergency Department and Trauma Services) require more parking capacity. This is especially true in the campus zone on the south side of the Hospital, close to one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the state, where few parking spaces we available forcing patients and families to walk farther than reasonable to and from their cars to reach needed clinical services. Although the Hospital parcel consists of 18+ acres, its steep topography and challenging shape makes even more intensive utilization of that parcel for hospital use realistically impossible and certainly undesirable because of their massive disruptions to major clinical and ancillary support operations. The Carilion Parcel, then, represents the optimal location to support the hospital's construction of more modern facilities, allowing orderly and cost - effective replacement of clinical patient care and ancillary support functions from existing obsolete structures before the old, antiquated structures can be demolished. While the planning for such a renovation will take many years, the timing associated with the larger transaction among the Water Authority, the City, and Carilion, requires that the Carilion Parcel be rezoned at this time in order to lay the foundation for that future planning and eventually optimal reconfiguration and modernization of the Hospital ensuring effective use of that community resource for future generations of Roanoke and the region's residents. Consequently, Carilion seeks to rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD. As delineated on the INPUD Development Plan, the uses would be those typical of hospital uses. In order to provide adequate current and future off -street parking, the hospital building constructed on the Carilion Parcel would include structured parking. During the planning phase provisions would be made to connect the building proposed for the Carilion Parcel to the existing Hospital. The exterior finish materials and architectural design of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be similar to those used on the current Hospital buildings. The maximum height of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be 200 feet, so as to be compatible with those on the Hospital parcel. In order to mesh with both the buildings on the Hospital parcel (where the towers are located towards the rear of the parcel) and neighboring buildings on Jefferson Street (where the Fairfax, at the comer of Jefferson Street and Yellow Mountain Drive, for example, is five stories high), the INPUD Plan requires that the upper floors of the building (i.e. the floors above the fifth floor) be set back at least twenty feet from the front fagade of the building along Jefferson Street. This will allow the higher section of the building to be located towards the rear of the parcel similar to the configuration of the Hospital parcel. The Building Design conditions detailed on the Development Plan are consistent with the key elements of the City's Public and Institutional design standards. The building's exterior finish materials (masonry, brick, and granite) will not only be in keeping with the character of the Carilion campus, but will also harmonize with nearby development. Adequate parking to serve the needs of patients, visitors, staff and students/residents is needed and will be provided on the lower five floors of the building. The current South Tower houses one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the Commonwealth, but has very few readily accessible parking spaces. About half of those spaces are on land adjacent to the tennis courts and leased from the Water Authority. Those spaces will be lost when development begins on the Carilion Parcel. Carilion plans to move the Emergency Department into the new building where it will be updated and redesigned to more efficiently handle the growing number of emergency and trauma patients with all required parking for those patients accessible in the same building. Outpatient services are expected to relocate to the new building which will allow the parking for those patients to be easily accessible. The structured parking provided in the building will also absorb those spaces lost when the older garage on Belleview Avenue is either replaced, repurposed, or renovated. Finally, in order to avoid a small ROS -zoned strip between the Carillon Parcel and the I -2 zoned portion of the Residue Parcel, we also seek to rezone the 0.4453 acre parcel from ROS to I -2. Except to remove that portion of the tennis courts now located on the 0.4453 acre parcel, no change in its current use or development is anticipated. It will continue to be owned and operated by the Water Authority. RECEIVED MAR 3 7 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PUNNING BUILDING a DEVELOPMENT INPUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS Applicant Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, hereby requests that the development standards set forth on the INPUT) Development Plan dated Much 26, 2015 be imposed on the 2.0379 acre parcel: USES THE PROPERTY SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING LAND USES LABORATORY, DENTAL, MEDICAL, OR OPTICAL LABORATORY, TESTING AND RESEARCH MEDICAL CLINIC HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER HOSPITAL PARKING, OFF -SITE THE HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER USE SHALL BE ANCILLARY TO THE HOSPITAL USE, SHALL BE LIMITED TO HOSPITAL STAFF ONLY, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,000 SQ FT IN SIZE. STRUCTURED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE LOWER FLOORS (AS HEREINAFTER DEFINED) OF THE BUILDING. APPROXIMATELY 800 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. PARKING EGRESS, CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL SPACES WILL BE DETERMINED AS NECESSARY DURING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. VEHICULAR ENTRANCES TWO ENTRANCES WILL SERVE THE SITE. ONE PRIMARY ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON STREET SERVING THE LOWER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION WILL BE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE SERVING THE HIGHER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE THE ENTRANCE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE. BUILDING DESIGN THE BUILDING SHALL FRONT JEFFERSON STREET PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY AND SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. TO FACILITATE IMPROVEMENTS TO JEFFERSON STREET WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ROANOKE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, THE BUILDING MAY BE SET BACK FURTHER FROM JEFFERSON STREET THAN SHOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 200 FEET. THE FIVE (5) LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING (THE "LOWER FLOORS ") WILL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 S.F. EACH, PRINCIPALLY AS PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT HUNDRED (800) PARKING SPACES. FLOORS OF THE BUILDING ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS (THE "UPPER FLOORS ") SHALL HOUSE THE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND SHALL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 50,000 S.F. EACH. THE UPPER FLOORS SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM JEFFERSON STREET SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO A LOBBY WHERE ELEVATORS TO THE UPPER FLOORS WILL BE LOCATED. A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISLAND SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EXIT DRIVES FROM JEFFERSON STREET. THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CARILION CAMPUS AND THE VERNACULAR DESIGN OF THE SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CORRIDOR, AS FOLLOWS: LOWER FLOORS. THE LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CLAD IN MASONRY, A COMBINATION OF BRICK AND GRANITE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE INTERRUPTED WITH WINDOW WALL ELEMENTS FOR FENESTRATION. THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET WILL HAVE A MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY OR GLAZING OF AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT (50 %) FOR THE GROUND FLOOR AND AT LEAST TWENTY FIVE PERCENT (25 %) FOR FLOORS TWO THROUGH FIVE. WINDOWS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS BEGINNING AT A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE ON JEFFERSON STREET. THE VERTICAL FACADES OF THE LOWER FLOORS SHALL INCORPORATE INTERVALS OF ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION AT LEAST EVERY SIXTY (60) FEET OVER THE LENGTH OF THE APPLICABLE FACADE, UTILIZING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: VARYING THE ARRANGEMENT, PROPORTIONING, OR DESIGN OF GARAGE FLOOR OPENINGS; INCORPORATING CHANGES IN ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING TEXTURE AND COLOR; OR PROJECTING OR RECESSING PORTIONS OR ELEMENTS OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE FACADE. UPPER FLOORS. AS THE BUILDING RISES ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS AND STEPS BACK FROM JEFFERSON STREET, THE CLADDING WOULD TRANSITION TO A CURTAINWALL SYSTEM THAT WOULD UTILIZE BOTH GLASS AND METAL PANEL AS INFILL ELEMENTS. THOSE MATERIALS WOULD VISUALLY TIE THE NEW TOWER BACK TO THE EXISTING ROANOKE MEMORIAL, AS WELL AS CONNECT IT TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF RIVERSIDE CENTER. TO FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF STAFF, SUPPLIES AND PATIENTS, SKYWAYS AND POTENTIALLY OTHER CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDINGS ON TAX PARCEL 4060301 MAY BE PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (IF ANY) SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO JEFFERSON STREET THAN 60 FEET AND HAVE EXTERIOR BUILDING FINISHES SIMILAR TO THOSE ON THE LOWER FLOORS. PROJECT SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE "CG" ZONING DISTRICT. GROUND SIGNS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE EXEMPT DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AS DEFINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. UTILITIES ALL UTILITIES ON SITE AND ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THAT SERVE THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AFFECTED BY BUILDING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED AND /OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED, PER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARILION CLINIC AND WVWA. SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO BE ABANDONED AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED BY WVWA DUE TO WVWA WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES. ALL STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED SHALL MEET ALL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ALL SANITARY, ELECTRIC, GAS IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPING IN ORDER TO SOFTEN THE EDGES OF THE BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREETS, A ROW OF LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES AND A ROW OF SHRUBS WILL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 36.2 -649 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE AREA DENOTED BY HATCHING ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BARRIER LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE CURB AND THE PEDESTRIAN WAY IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING TO FUNNEL PEDESTRIANS FROM THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE IN THE BUILDING TO THE JEFFERSON STREET S.E. MID -BLOCK CROSSING. RECEIVED MAR 8 7 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT 4b# oG§ � e9 �E< �CK } ( \ } ) \ e = - \\ )& ' \ \!) /.\ ( \jam )! \ ;RIP \ : } {� /� \ .% 20 . w ®� .� Lli Fm ( /�^ \ x • li _� \ _ : } {� /� \ .% 20 za�zw�mc:J !mm - (m \ UP . w ®� .� Lli Fm ( /�^ \ za�zw�mc:J !mm - (m \ UP e � -•�< . w ®� .� Fm x e � -•�< | | | |U .... ;y. ,cg» , \` Z6 =1 - § /\ — K ®s . <§2 (7 7 - D% / _ /j_ \ a& \} a nay 28 ! ;� - Q �t$} | | | |U .... ;y. ,cg» , \` Z6 =1 - § /\ — K ®s . <§2 (7 7 e r e . �' ' ANY MEFNE MEy0Fi �1,tOGt) R N 9 t PG. aE. VARIES) I ASPNALI I, 1. 1 I aA:y! ASPNAL4 PARKING A -Sbv ~ ad M/ FAGIA g� • • • • • • — - - OM RETAINING WALL p1Yi}[0 50' 1T 0 50' TRACT H -1 —C IC�4TCQ� ® 24.9954 AC. SCAiZ t' = so' (1,0949W Sr.) CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING A POR17ON OF NOIE TRACT "B -1 -C" (24.9954 ACRES) MACT 1- ISCL aY BENG REZOYM BEING REZONED FROM BE OENOIES AREA 10 ROS TO I -2 RMNM Fl ROS TO F2 ON THE PROPERTY OF (19,.795 SF. - aOW All) THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY SMATED AT 2012 JEFFERSON ST., S.E. CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA MAR 8 7 2015 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 2.0379 AC. TO BE REZONED TO INPUD The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -1 -B' being subdivided out of Tract 'B -1', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at comer 'F', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located N 200 11' 22" E, 272.17 feet from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E. for the following four courses: N 200 11'22" E, a distance of 135.07 feet to a point designated Comer'2', Thence N 250 54' 00" E, a distance of 50.25 feet to a point designated Comer'3', Thence N 200 11'22" E, a distance of 70.08 feet to a point designated Comer'4', Thence N 21019'07" E, a distance of 21.15 feet to Comer'B', the southwesterly comer of proposed Tract'B -1 -A', Thence leaving said Jefferson street, S.E. and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the southerly and easterly lines of said Tract 'B-1-A' for the following two courses: S 710 26'24" E, a distance of 111.46 feet to a point designated Comer'A', Thence N 15 47'55" E, a distance of 32.50 feet, to a point designated Comer 10, located on the southerly property line of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1. Page 2804 Thence with the southerly property lines of said Tract "A -1" for the following three courses: S 55 51'00" E, a distance of 196.55 feet to a point designated Comer'l 1', Thence S 220 15'50" E, a distance of 81.83 feet to a point designated Comer'12', Thence S 120 16' 44" W, a distance of 115.01 feet to a point designated Comer '13', located on Northerly property line of the Western Virginia Water Authority Tract "B -1 ", Thence leaving said Tract "A -1" and with four new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority for the following four courses: N 440 54'44" W, a distance of 21 .60 feet to a point designated Comer'C', Thence N 76° 57' 18" W, a distance of 54.60 feet to a point designated Comer'D', Thence S 13° 02'42" W, a distance of 54.14 feet to a point designated Corner'E'. Thence N 76° 57' 18" W, a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Corner'F', the Point of Beginning and containing 88,773 square feet, 2.0379 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B-1-C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". RECEIVED MAR a 7 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.2518 AC. TO BE REZONED TO IN The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -1 -A' being subdivided out of Tract 'B-l', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at comer W, a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 548.72 feet northerly from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, S.E. and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., N 210 19' 07" E, a distance of 90.38 feet to a point designated Corner's', said point being located at the southeasterly corner of the intersection of Jefferson Street, S.E. and Weller Lane and being the southwesterly property corner of the property of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804. Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Weller Lane and said Tract "A -I" for the following five courses: Run a distance of 23.49 feet along the arc of curve to the right, said curve having a Delta Angle of 530 50' 4l ", a radius distance of 25.00 feet, a tangent distance of 12.70 feet, a chord bearing of N 680 49' 16" E, and a chord distance of 22.64 feet to a point designated Corner'6', Thence S 660 19' 36" E, a distance of 25.37 feet to a point designated Corner 7, Thence S 740 10'48" E, a distance of 42.26 feet to a point designated Corner'8', Thence S 660 19'36" E, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point designated Comer'9', Thence S 150 47' 55" W, a distance of 70.58 feet to a point designated Corner'10', Thence leaving said Weller Lane and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the proposed easterly and southerly lines of said Tract 'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 150 47'55" W, a distance of 32.50 feet to a point designated Comer'A', Thence N 710 2624" W, a distance of 111.46 feet, to a point designated Comer'B', the Point of Beginning and containing 10,967 square feet, 0.2518 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B-1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". RECEIVED MAR 8 7 2015 CITY OF BOANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.4453 AC. TO BE REZONED TO 1 -2 The following is a description of the proposed area to be rezoned from ROS to I -2 on a portion of the land designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson Street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 211.70 feet northerly from the Northeasterly corner of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.E., said point also being the approximate zoning line between the current I -2 zoning on the south and ROS zoning on the north. Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson Street, S.E., N 200 11' 22" E, a distance of 60.47 feet to a point designated Comer 'F, said point being the southwesterly property comer of the property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Tract "B -1 -B" being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC., dated February 18, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -13" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "13-1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Tract " B -1 -B ", S 76° 57' 18" E. a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Corner'E', on said plat. Thence leaving said Tract " B -1 -13", S 010 50' 38" E, a distance of 62.08 feet to a point, on the approximate original I -2/ROS zoning line. Thence with said approximate original zoning line (I- 2/ROS), N 760 57' 18" W, a distance of 335.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 19,395 square feet, 0.4453 acres, and said proposed rezoning to be continuous with the existing I -2 zoned area. REr f -1111/ ,'D MAR 2 7 2015 Cn v pp Rp,,,.OKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT V `JXIO11O6'JXIXNYIJ 3MMtlOtl AAlI] slat c $ aaw (13A13038 —N-11.1— 1-3 „X,� ra�oxu'aNONroa 'J'd'S3d,tlIJOSSY N30SW[l'1 =1onl 3.ow � R s gg7g o ' r .. � aiaYSYtiS�iQSQS B �yi � i� �gG �?,�aSa�gg�Rq F S o C E• F 2� off' F U J F N U se R°peiellC- �•• 2 T aEa e 'a k�k4 pi�Fi pgS a Y g e e G €SeM � ��F � eq$ � gipp � e i 9 � : .� eS��� ¢� $Iegga3 I$ 1 F ipIfin ®St ��ka" l i `1$€ 9 f $$ lediFii Qae ii2 pge8 ye 5 Nil M $Ki4 e a k Ai ap 1142 41N, I y k 2@ sa 1 iaaQ•gN� 9 �1��e gi$a® 5!1 g 3 $ ��� i$Qg$ iS egda S € #k�g¢ Se iilrq� i a y Q$Yi y� $ ""o y �G�y��jgill r$y! �€ s ipyi4 a aSgg� "gl i$IIa I,g1$g� ¢ i sfk 6 e�S1•NIi$i1Ic €jjjjp; a age k_II qE$ pE s i 91qpf�( !Ye $ i ppp k g 51 Sit; e i$l8 IiItj6eaQ ii � � �v$i$�Q18$pQ�!a�N.I f�'E Phildp'pli E9i[9y6j�ygCq ° 2Fg''F8a i9 @gpgAe g "$i�kee �QF$iii k8$a� kkAl�gl� a � i E - �4 if$$g6:Ni���g$����Eg..�$i.$e�i: uawaoi3/aa vaximme�aruma arorrvoe aouo Do L8N" GRU303a a�wrn��mv.im.� ow.x YWI�ll1A'3NONY011 e Stl3 -SIIOA3AN(ISSN33N1'JN m �av(�ossrNaaswn I � n f •4fl 15� !! §� ��V �f6 e <� M Ee ,e l / 911 �h �R =bf sR ¢ ? ipip i- n ° C m g f 5m ��P &e a m 2 ! N o °�'� z Z Sm� �• � e3 � B €ef�r6 :e�� `e` �`S�'' %_�• €iniS�gi � €��a$ts�� w x E oy� 3����¢�3•�pt ®cf99'_g!_ .._n..:..a,.s °Cn° fvQt sgY'�¢Zia $` S IRS z' Ogg qi of y v Fe ONE U J w i ax f e �m9 �q ;gnu; �s IN 1111 �, ii �d2 I� §f Egg •�� 'i effe5r >e�'3yYf� f �� uawaoniaa f wximineawi,wvm erarvoenu° SIR L9 M/N UMM03a VINIONIA'3NONVON wvw ��Id-SNOA3AUI153tl8WON3 Od'S3LVIOOSSV N30SMI oildA „ :ee��f � Ina; �9 °•i r-- - - - - -- Z— esi •- M I �1��� d laQ/ €' r ,� -••• i p e —11 l�s� Eta € ° Ig 2 11 ge� a i9 SS93ai� I Q �pq qq @iw � o y • ((jj®� � e r^i S, W b a y � �3+ O y�gyatgSY 99 ` /.i 4•• .m. rm /i dl <$ Gq FG i/$n�: 1x3Y4b13h30 v vavnne vxixxvia 3MGM'Otl AALJ SIOZ L 6 NtlN ms3nv....ou�w.nm`mi SJdNS IdVIDOdNf15N3as 1'JN3 �d S3.LtlIJ0.CSV N34SWf17 �_u�r +a il�il r p e hY I I I Fee 4 t 1.5 N ¢eF !! _F ;4�5 �i 12 �1�• � `1�¢Q El gp4pp2x • (I © o AkNhR ! o oS 0 0 <x F F L 3WtlJl a e IU➢119�NINNr1! 3NOxtlOtl MAL] s�oa t s aun C7_�✓���:�3ii .m..mm.m...,m.., .,oa r�woaiA'3aorrvoa Od _ SN3NNtl'Id-SLOA3ANf15-Stl33N10N3 ^� Jd'S3dVIJOSSV oil f S99 i i � N m � Au m' Illiki ?€ G 11,11€ C1 a€ € 4 € € s 1� pp � qqgg ° I WMgMk4g � C �m w. U U WHO t ZONING DISTRICT MAPS` Portions of 2012 Jefferson Street SE; Official Tax Parcel: 4060502 .?, yioaoani E3Area to be Rezoned — Conditional Zoning OQ Zoning an Q RA (Residential- Agriculture) f <C R -12 (Res. Single- Family) ,. R -7 (Res. Single - Family) h _ »„ Ey PN 5 R5 (Res. Single- Family) U p R -3 (Res. Single - Family) "'C• �' RM -1 (Res. Mixed Density) 7 RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) -' RMF (Res. Multi- Family) CN (Commercial- Neigh) CG (Commercial - General) CLS (Commercial -Large Site) 1 -1 (Light Industrial) s"x," �• �, H ., -2 (Heavy Industrial)c� . .. 0 D (Dovvtown) IY MX (Mixed Use) 4 <� W IN (institutional) ROS (Rec80pen Space) 'Y' i AD (Airport ) ittutional MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev) - 4 o ti Planned Unit Devi NPUD (I s 4 IPUD ( Industnal Planned Unit Devi ",",'P OF (Urban Flex) 4• .. Y yN 0 100 200 Feet ---- � Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Fax (540) 853 -1230 Date: Match]9,2015 ❑x Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed ❑ Rezoning, Conditional RECEIVED MAR 19 2015 CirY OF ROANOKE Submittal Number: iwtion No. t ROANOKE pick Here to Print ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditons ❑ Amendment of Planed Unl Development Plan 0 Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Amendment of Comp- ehensive Sign Overlay D:strlct ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E, Roanoke, VA 24011 Official Taxl9i Partof4060502 Exist ng Base Zoning: ROS, Recreation and Open Space ❑ With Cond bons (If multiple zones. please manually erter all disidcis) W thout Condtions Ordinance No(s). for Existing Conditions (If appliwble): El W th Conditions proposed Requested Zoning: See attached sheet See attached sheet E] Without Conditions Land Use Name: Western Vlrgirla Water Authority, Attn: Mr. Gary Robertson Adtlrej: 601 rJ ftrs on Str9pt, S.W, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Name: anion Clinic Properties, LLC, Attn: Mr. Curtis Mills Address: 13 South Jeff erson Street Roanoke Virginia 24011 Applicant's Signature 11'�L_� L.0 AusbitTzwl'po� -. - EE,rl�m- ur•• -a_ Phone N,.mber: +1(540)853.5749 E -Ma a gary.robertson@westemvawatera Phone Number: +1(540)961 -7204 E -Mad cemilis@cadlionciintcorg Name: IMaryellen F. Goodlatte, Esq. Phone Number. +1 (540) 2x4 -6018 AdI Glenn, Feldmann, et al., P.O. Box 2887, Roanoke, VA 24001 -2887 E -Mal. mgoodWtte@glennfeldmann,com /IIlU 2,Lrr.. F /q� Authorized Agerift Signature. r F I rig fee. Tor rezoning not othernlsalistetl, th_e following must alsob_e subitted:i r Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)':n Zoning Amendment Procedures. For a con8h7ofial rem�`Sfi og, the Iblov& must also he subs i Rd. F- Written proffers See the Ciys Guide to Proffered Condtions. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of tem'2(c)'.n Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as r 'development plan' if proffered. Fora ended u'nt!_tle`vebploent,the following must also be submitleda r Development plan meefng the requirements of Section 36.2.326 of the City's Zoning Ordina ^ce. 'Vor a compra(iansive sign overlay district the following must be submiltedj r- Comprehensive signage Plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d))2) of the C ys Zom-g Ordinance. ran amendment oipro&ered oondiiTons, the following must also be submllfed r Amended development or concept plan meeting the Applcation Requireme1s; of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Proced„res, napplicable. F- Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. r- Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. ;For a planned soft devafgpment amendment, the folowing must also be submitted; r Amended development plan meeting the requ remerts of Section 36.2 -326 of the Ciys Zon'-g Ordnance. r Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For a com"P._h_ ensl sl n overlay amendment the following must also be submitted; r Amended comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d) of t "e C ys Zoc'ng Ordimi ce. F Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. ,Fora ro ffftat ___ p pose requiresafraficfmpadstudybesubmittedtolhe�ity, thefdlowingmustalsobesubrnYdail G A Traffic Impact Study in compliance with Appendix B -2(e) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. lFor a Proposal -that requil a i etc Impact analysis be submitted to-vi the following must also—be subm tted: t r Covershee _ F- Traffic impact analysis. r Concept plan. F- Proffered conditions, if applicable. F- Required fee. 'An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www.roanokeva,gov'bbd by selecting 'Planning Commission' u °der 'Boards and Commissions'. A complete packet must be submmtted each time an application is amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. ATTACHMENT TO ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION _Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC Requested Zoning: INPUD (10379 ac.) IN (0.2518 ac.) I -2 (0.4453 ac.) Proposed Land Use: hospital and related uses (2.0379 ac.) pump house (W V WA) (0.2518 ac.) water filtration facility (WV WA) (0.4453 ac.) RECEIVED MAR 19 2015 CITVOFROANONE PLANNING BUILDING y DEVELOPMENT ja _ � � � Q iY 9 - � "s torn =' o .. v"<- c EI a� e¢� i� �` L S E ¢� 2 � � i x 0 n° _ m �oR m m vu a Iz � _ � —_ —_ y� ;� I� _ 3 �j r .� _- �� � - � "I �� � � � I� �I q - a; s F 5 =. a W A�= �.E �''..�:� > o N ��fi y$ i Y � cY$ W zc__ ¢ o _ a =_ �m��� q - a; W °° �'> > o N ��fi y$ � `a a W Ol ¢ o _ 6S2' _.. J� I -i MAR 19 2015 NARRATlVG CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUiLDINO 6 As part of a larger transaction, the Western Virginia Water Authority (PrcaAulhori(y-') and Carilion Clinic ("Carillon ") have agreed to subdivide the 27- acres which constitute tax parcel 4060502 in order to create three parcels — two of which would be retained by the Water Authority (the "Pump Station Parcel" containing 0.2518 acre and the "Residue Parcel" containing 24.9954 acres) and one of which would be conveyed to Carilion (the "Carilion Parcel" containing 2.0379 acres). The Carilion Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Pump Station Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Residue Parcel is currently zoned ROS and 1-2. While the majority of the Residue Parcel is zoned ROS, its 1 -2 zoned portion encompasses the area near the intersection of Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street within which the Water Authority's filtration plant is located. This application seeks to (1) rezone the Pump Station Parcel from ROS to IN; (2) rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD; and (3) rezone a 0.4453 acre portion of the Residue Parcel from ROS to 1 -2. Metes and bounds descriptions for all three parcels are provided. Crystal Spring, along with other historic and operational buildings of the Water Authoritv, is located on the Residue Parcel. Water from the spring has been pumped to an underground wafer storage cistern located on the Carilion Parcel. Because of significant leakage problems. the old cistern on the Carilion Parcel is in the process of being replaced by a new one under con,truction on the Residue Parcel. The pump house building located on the Pump Station Parcel will continue to house the pumpine machinery needed to transfer the water from Crystal Spring through the Water Authority's systems. No changes to the exterior of the building on the Pump Station Parcel are needed or anticipated. Because the reduced size of the Pump Station Parcel is no longer conducive to an ROS zoning designation, and because the Pump Station Parcel cannot be classified as a - utifity lot ", a rezoning of that small parcel to IN is sought. Other than the zoning designation. no changes in the current use or design of that 0.2518 acre parcel are anticipated. In addition to the underground water storage cislem, the Carilion Parcel also includes tennis courts. As part of the larger transaction, those courts would be removed and would be replaced with new courts on City -owned land on Reserve Avenue, The Carilion Parcel adjoins Carilion's Roanoke Memorial Hospital, located on I8+ acres (tax parcel no. 4060301) (the "Hospital "). The Hospital consists of six towers/buildings as follows: - North Tower Built 1925, 5 stories - Gast Tower — Built 1956, 7 stories - Old Nursing School Building— Built 1959, 3 stories - West Pavilion - Built 1971,15 stories - Mountain Tower Built 2003, 5 stories - South Tower— Built 1993, 10 stories originally with 5 stories added in 2007 The oldest structures are located on the north end of the Hospital parcel. The Mountain and South Towers, the newest structures are located on the south end of the Hospital parcel and house the Emergency Department (including the Trauma Center), Intensive Care Units. Operating Rooms, high tech specialty services, and imaging Past and future medical developments coupled with aging structures and facilities that no longer meet life safety codes, will require Carilion to remove the older structures as structural and technical issues will not allow them to be renovated or repurposed. In addition, expanding medical educaucin activities — including new educational programs being created by Carilion's affiliation with Virginia Tech and the Jefferson College of Health Sciences as well as significantly increased utilization of clinical services (particularly Emergency Department and Trauma Services) require more parking capacity. This is especially true in the campus zone on the south side of the Hospital, close to one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the state, where few parking spaces are available forcing patients and families to walk farther than reasonable to and from their cars to reach needed clinical services. Although the Hospital parcel consists of 18- acres, its steep topography and challenging shape makes even more intensive utilization of that parcel for hospital use realistically impossible and certainly undesirable because of their massive disruptions to major clinical and ancillary support operations. The Carilion Parcel, then, represents the optimal location to support the hospital's construction of more modern facilities, allowing orderly and cost - effective replacement of clinical patient care and ancillary support functions front existing obsolete structures before the old, antiquated structures can be demolished. While the planning for such a renovation will take many years, the timing associated with the larger transaction among the Water Authority, the City, and Carilion, requires that the Carilion Parcel be rezoned at this time in order to lay the foundation for that future planning and eventually optimal reconfiguration and modernization of the Hospital ensuring effective use of that community resource for future generations of Roanoke and the region's residents. Consequently, Carilion seeks to rezone the Carillon Parcel from ROS to NPUD, As delineated on the NPUD Development Plan, the uses would be those typical of hospital uses. In order to provide adequate current and future off-street parking, the hospital building constructed on the Carilion Parcel would include structured parking. During the planning phase provisions would be made to connect the building proposed for the Carilion Parcel to the existing Hospital. The exterior finish materials and architectural design of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be similar to those used on the current Hospital buildings. The maximum height of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be 200 feet, so as to be compatible with those on the Hospital parcel. In order to mesh with both the buildings on the Hospital parcel (where the towers are located towards the rear of the parcel) and neighboring buildings on Jefferson Street (where the Fairfax. at the comer of Jefferson Street and Yellow Mountain Drive, for example, is five stories high), the NPUD Plan requires that the upper Moors of the building (i.e. the floors above the fifth floor) be set back at least twenty feet from the front fagade of the building along Jefferson Street. This will allow the higher section of the building to be located towards the rear of the parcel similar to the configuration of the Hospital parcel. The Building Design conditions detailed on the Development Plan are consistent with the key elements of the City's Public and Institutional design standards. The building's exterior finish materials (masonry, brick, and granite) will not only be in keeping with the character of the Carilion campus, but will also harmonize with nearby development. Adequate parking to serve the needs of patients, visitors, staff and students /residents is needed and will be provided on the lower five floors of the building The current South Tower houses one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the Commonwealth, but has very few readily accessible parking spaces. About half of those spaces are on land adjacent to the tennis courts and leased from the Water Authority. Those spaces will be lost when development begins on the Carilion Parcel. Carilion plans to move the Emergency Department into the new building where it will be updated and redesigned to more efficiently handle the growing number of emergency and trauma patients with all required parking for those patients accessible in the same building. Outpatient services are expected to relocate to the new building which will allow the parking for those patients to be easily accessible. The structured parking provided in the building will also absorb those spaces lost when the older garage on 13elleview Avenue is either replaced, repurposed, or renovated. Finally, in order to avoid a small ROS -zoned strip between the Carilion Parcel and the 1 -2 zoned portion of the Residue Parcel, we also seek to reione the 0.4453 acre parcel from ROS to 1 -1 Except to remove that portion of the tennis courts now located on the 0.4453 acre parcel, no change in its current use or development is anticipated. It will continue to be owned and operated by the Water Authority. RECEIVED MAR 19 2015 1NPUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS ANDARDS CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT Applicant Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, hereby requests that the development standards set forth on the INPUD Development Plan dated March 16. 2015 be imposed on the 2.0379 acre parcel: USES THE PROPERTY SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING LAND USES: LABORATORY, DENTAL, MEDICAL, OR OPTICAL LABORATORY, TESTING AND RESEARCH MEDICAL CLINIC FIEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER HOSPITAL PARKING, OFF -SITE PARKING STRUCTURED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE LOWER FLOORS (AS HEREINAFTER DEFINED) OF THE BUILDING. APPROXIMATELY 800 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. PARKING EGRESS, CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL SPACES WILL BE DF,TERM NED AS NECESSARY DURING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 7 "0 MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. VEHICULAR ENTRANCES TWO ENTRANCES WILL SERVE THE SITE. ONE PRIMARY ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON STREET SERVING THE LOWER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION WILL BE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE SERVING THE HIGHER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE THE ENTRANCE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE. BUILDING DESIGN THE BUILDING SHALL FRONT JEFFERSON STREET PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY AND SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. TO FACILITATE IMPROVEMENTS TO JEFFERSON STREET WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ROANOKE CI "IY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, THE BUILDING MAY BE SET BACK FURTHER FROM JEFFERSON STREET THAN SHOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 200 FEET. THE FIVE (5) LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING (THE "LOWER FLOORS ") WILL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 S.F. EACH, PRINCIPALLY AS PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT HUNDRED (800) PARKING SPACES. FLOORS OF THE BUILDING ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS (THE "UPPER FLOORS ") SHALL HOUSE THE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND SHALL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 50,000 S.F. EACH. THE UPPER FLOORS SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST'F W ENTY (20) FEET FROM THE FRONT FAgADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM JEFFERSON STREET SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO A LOBBY WHERE ELEVATORS TO THE UPPER FLOORS WILL BE LOCATED. A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISLAND SI4ALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN "FHE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EXIT DRIVES FROM JEFFERSON STREET. THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED N KEEPNG WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CARILLON CAMPUS AND THE VERNACULAR DESIGN OF THE SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CORRIDOR, AS FOLLOWS: LOWER FLOORS. THE LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CLAD IN MASONRY, A COMBINATION OF BRICK AND GRANITE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE INTERRUPTED WITH WINDOW WALL ELEMENTS FOR FENESTRATION. THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET WILL I4AVE A MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY OR GLAZING OF AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT (50 °a) FOR THE GROUND FLOOR AND AT LEAST TWENTY FIVE PERCENT (25 °6) FOR FLOORS TWO THROUGH FIVE. WINDOWS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS BEGINNING AT A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN EN "1RANCE ON JEFFERSON STREET. THE VERTICAL FAtrADES OF THE LOWER FLOORS SHALL INCORPORATE INTERVALS OF ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION AT LEAST EVERY SIXTY (60) FEET OVER THE LENGTH OF THE APPLICABLE FAI;ADE, UTILIZING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: VARYING THE ARRANGEMENT, PROPORTIONING, OR DESIGN OF GARAGE FLOOR OPENINGS; INCORPORATING CHANGES IN ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING TEXTURE AND COLOR; OR PROJECTING OR RECESSING PORTIONS OR ELEMENTS OF THE PARKING S "TRUCTURE FACADE. UPPER FLOORS. AS THE BUILDING RISES ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS AND STEPS BACK FROM JEFFERSON STREET, THE CLADDING WOULD TRANSITION TO A CURTANWALL SYSTEM THAT WOULD UTILIZE BO'I "H GLASS AND METAL PANEL AS INFILL ELEMENTS, THOSE MATERIALS WOULD VISUALLY TIE THE NEW TOWER BACK TO THE EXISTING ROANOKE MEMORIAL, AS WELL AS CONNECT IT TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF RIVERSIDE CENTER. TO FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF STAFF, SUPPLIES AND PATIENTS, SKYWAYS AND POTENTIALLY OTHER CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDINGS ON TAX PARCEL 4060301 MAY BE PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (IF ANY) SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER 'FO JEFFERSON STREET THAN 60 FEET AND HAVE EXTERIOR BUILDING FINISHES SIMILAR TO THOSE ON THE LOWER FLOORS. PROJECT SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE CITY ZONING ORDNANCE FOR THE "CG" ZONING DISTRICT. GROUND SIGNS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE EXEMPT DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AS DEFINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCF. UTILITIES ALL UTILITIES ON SITE AND ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THAT SERVE '111E WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AFFECTED BY BUILDING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED AND OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED, PER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARILION CLINIC AND WVWA. SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO BE ABANDONED AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED BY WVWA DUE TO WVWA WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES. ALL STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS REQC[RED SHALL MEET ALL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ALL SANITARY, ELECTRIC, GAS IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPING N ORDER TO SOFTEN THE EDGES OF THE BUILDING VISIBLE. FROM THE PUBLIC STREE "I "S, A ROW OF LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES AND A ROW OF SHRUBS WILL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 36.2 -649 OF THE ZONING ORDNANCE WITHIN THE AREA DENOTED BY HATCI [NG ON THE; DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 3H.5 e: n a s' N-7tt a H �x 1 e ' t a gz�3�el d� a '� ga ff t 5 °4 # s A'� i�l ads re. g e� � x$33 a . 6 1, d �j F c w`v m I. a LCLJ t y I N d 6 D � }i•) fit$ Q {q � tƒ ( ƒ( } /) z \: @ . ~: %sG ^Q \ \�- \-\«, �.. PO NUKE NEp�0.Up 00'PFOR T LS (R/W VgRIES) 1 SCI �&E ' c � � esPXA�r x u�2 �q .15PXALi PARKING � 120 F /POIP �\ o K 176.• �� .. � • ' ' K RETAIN so o SCALE 1' = so' sa' TRACT B -1 —C 24.9954 AC. (T.owoo Sr) CONCEPT PLAN SNOWING A PORTION OF TRACT "B -1 —C" (24.9954 ACRES) BEING REZONED FROM ROS TO 1 -2 ON THE PROPERTY OF THE WESTERN VIRGINIA HATER AUTHORITY SITUATED AT 2012 JEFFERSON ST., S.E. CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DATE. NOTE TRACT B -1 —B IS CURRENTLY BEING REZOVED TO •INPUO'. DENOTES AREA TO BE REZONED FROM ADS TO 1 -2 • • (19.795 SF. — OM AC.) Ili �r,�P9` ia" 1'� x ' I'1 11 RErF:iVED MAR 19 2015 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 2.0379 AC. TO BE REZONED TO INPUD CITY OF NOANOnE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPJMFNT The following is a description of proposed Tract '13-1-13' being subdivided out of Tract 'B -1, 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, properly of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at comer'', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a vari.lble width right -of -way, said point being located N 200 11' 22" E, 272.17 feet from the Northeasterly corner of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.E.. Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E. for the following four courses: N 20° 11' 22" E, a distance of 135.07 feet to a point designated Comer'2', Thence N 250 54' 00" E, a distance of 50.25 feel to a point designated Corner'3', Thence N 20" 1 P 22" E, a distance of 70.08 feet to a point designated Corner'4', Thence N 21`19'07" F., a distance of 21.15 feet to Comer'B', the southwesterly comer of prvp. „ed Tracl'B -1 -A', Thence leaving said Jefferson street, S.E. and with two new division lines through the propee; of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the southerly and easterly lines of said Tract'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 71 ° 26' 24" E, a distance of 111.46 feet to a point designated Corner'A', Thence N 15 47' 55" E, a distance of 32.50 feel, to a point designated Comer 10, located on the southerly properly line of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804 Thence with the southerly property lines of said "tract "A -1" for the following three courses: S 55 51' 00" E, a distance of 196.55 feet to a point designated Comer'l F, Thence S 22- 15'50" E, a distance of 81.83 feet to a point designated Corncr' 12', Thence S 120 16' 44" W, a distance of 11.01 feel to a point designated Comer '13', located on Northerly property line of the Western Virginia Water Authority Tract "B-1 " Thence leaving said Tract "A -1" and with four new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority for the following four courses: N 44 54' 44" W, a distance of 21.60 feet to a point designated Corner'C', Thence N 760 57' 18" W, a distance of 54.60 feet to a point designated Corner 'D'. Thence S 13 02'42" W, a distance o(54.14 feet to a point designated Corner'E', Thence N 760 57' 18" W, a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Comer F, the Point of Beginning and containing 88,773 square feet, 2.0379 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubd.vision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B - I -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.2518 AC. TO BE REZONED TO IN The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -1 -A' being subdivided out of Tract 'B -I', 27.2651 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at corner 'B', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 548.72 feet northerly from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, S.E. and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., N 210 19'07" E, a distance of 90.38 feet to a point designated Comer'5', said point being located at the southeasterly comer of the intersection of Jefferson Street, S.E. and Weller Lane and being the southwesterly properly comer of the properly of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804. Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Weiler Lane and said Tract "A -1" for the following five courses: Run a distance of 23.49 feet along the arc of curve to the right, said curve having a Delta Angle of 53- 50' 41 ", a radius distance of 25.00 feet, a tangent distance of 12.70 feet, a chord bearing of N 68'49' 16" E, and a chord distance of 22.64 feet to a point designated Corner'6', Thence S 66° 19'36" E. a distance of 25.37 feet to a point designated Corner 7, Thence S 74 10'48" E, a distance of 42.26 feet to a point designated Corner'8', Thence S 66r 36" E, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point designated Corner'9', Thence S 15' 4755 W, a distance of 70.58 feet to a point designated Corner' 10', Thence leaving said Weller Lane and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority aL,ng the proposed easterly and southerly lines of said Tract 'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 15 47' 55" W, a distance of 32.50 feet to a point designated Comer 'A', Thence N 71' 26' 24" W, a distance of 111.46 feet, to a point designated Corner B% the Point of Beginning and containing 10,967 square feet, 0.2518 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 28)1 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0251 8 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B' (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.4453 AC. TO BE REZONED TO I -2 The following is a description of the proposed area to be rezoned from ROS to 1 -2 on a portion of the land designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson Street, S.E., a variable width right -of -way, said point being located 211.70 feet northerly from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, ST, said point also being the approximate zoning line between the current 1 -2 zoning on the south and ROS zoning on the north. Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson Street, S.E., N 200 I F 22" E, a distance of 60.47 feet to a point designated Comer F, said point being the southwesterly property corner of the property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Tract "11-1 -13" being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC., dated February 18, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M. B. I, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "11-1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24 9954 Acre,), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". 'I hence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Tract " B -1 -B ", S 76° 57' 18" E, a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Corner'E', on said plat. Thence leaving said Tract " B -1 -B ", S 01' 50' 38" E, a distance of 62.08 feet to a point, on the approximate original I -2 /ROS zoning line. "Thence with said approximate original zoning line (1- 2lROS), N 760 57' 18" W, a distance of 335.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 19,395 Square feet, 0.4453 acres, and said proposed rezoning to be continuous with the existing 1 -2 zoned area. Rma A/b em/eRr n M yr x wn nsa�v azmr `aeiw v.m n m°v � R.rra oivm[ eoimr nm`. vm axuomrwv n Flmxt xmvamev r.v.nav ®wusn•s�m sx�armin exneQa aAm�vav u�wmn.mmvmsmmw m eea nrvers.vevvemnarnvn •vienvev�iav`�°°na•as mvmavm•a e.ecamc aesm •wew vsw m�v..•n �sai� s.mmvw wmnw+nw wvotl vevarws m rsvnva I6RAJ MViM tl)fA AVONN]Y OM£? sxty D l • vx•mn _ m nanemov s�— WenosWwrnvvRm prone• m ara mesm °em� vxm rur.wwx�� � vaae s omcva. truer a -/ (n zev Ac•ss) RS4VHRN/5 /ON /OR 9ffi' [r/Y OL ROANO6T. YNCA'G R/.� P0.TAI1 Cf]M]) THE WESTERN MGAZ4 WATER AVMM .. (Z. TRACT "B -1 -A" (0.2518 ACRES) TRACT "B- 1- B �(2.0399 ACRES) • TRACT "B -1 -C" (2 (24.9954 ACRES) 9N.IFD Ir NI] FiRRAN Fr. S[. C11'Y OF R OR MGA jaa �4Y 2 s Y 0 LLJ e '$. LU W I D oo 00 0 0mr moo_ 0m0 0®m O�e prone• m ara mesm °em� vxm rur.wwx�� � vaae s omcva. truer a -/ (n zev Ac•ss) RS4VHRN/5 /ON /OR 9ffi' [r/Y OL ROANO6T. YNCA'G R/.� P0.TAI1 Cf]M]) THE WESTERN MGAZ4 WATER AVMM .. (Z. TRACT "B -1 -A" (0.2518 ACRES) TRACT "B- 1- B �(2.0399 ACRES) • TRACT "B -1 -C" (2 (24.9954 ACRES) 9N.IFD Ir NI] FiRRAN Fr. S[. C11'Y OF R OR MGA jaa �4Y 2 s Y 0 LLJ e '$. LU W I TRACT B -1 -C w 24 4 AJ 1\ 1$ xx A `1 ru/°mm xxv MJpna r xrnTHaH¢ IsrzxmaxL cxvxm sc,�,e TRACT "B -I -B" (2.0379 ACRES) ~ a TRACT "B -I -C" (2=24 ACRES) • Cr E -1 -H fRY OP .WAIN6. ten. / TRACT B -1 -C w 24 4 AJ 1\ 1$ xx A `1 ru/°mm xxv MJpna r xrnTHaH¢ cxvxm sc,�,e TRACT "B -I -B" (2.0379 ACRES) ~ a 7g N w, aw. � °na�>rH'rNaw rr owxuc mxcr a -r (nsm, �uusl xescen,nsrox rox r� crrc or xaxoa, vaemxca THE WESTERN MGINIA HATER AUTHORITY 3 5 9 LU e o0 lo W c° Ir TRACT "B -1 -A "(0.2518 ACRES) cxvxm sc,�,e TRACT "B -I -B" (2.0379 ACRES) ~ a TRACT "B -I -C" (2=24 ACRES) q.9954 x ru -p n fRY OP .WAIN6. ten. 3 5 9 LU e o0 lo W c° Ir n r TRACT 8-1 u 2.0379-k- 60 9ON ru laeant - JI MR17ON OF aRICdI.L= s ... ..... _ Rerr r I �1i PL9 I © .2961 K' I TRACT 9 -1 -C ...... 24.9954 AC. �\ M1oezass) arrsr -. rur>awa me ..aw,mmrc wniwniwiz�1'inu°c.1°°"®ns� -- • wrlax v e ow�9vu men 9 -i fn.sesr ,IC9n/ �"'o...umv.e.wu.vea.a. I x9su9unzarox ne."g`: �oe�we99ea, vren9vu THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY rum r TRACT "B -1p A" (0.2519 ACRES) E TRACT "B -1 -B" (2.0379 ACRES) 7 m TRACT "B -1 -C" (24.9954 ACRES) acm or o��xom.vwcmtiE- g� I c I � _ i Psi �s� I j CxpPNC 9C-VE I I .I I I j e o8 W ¢g c rv' v^m1mnEe{8E I '' iTRACT R 1 E-' 20998 AC , m�wa Iwmu M, TRACT 24.9954 AC. a..r sa ��mraxsw ar \ •:: �: owcmu. rxen s -i (n.zm, .�I ;° xssveoMOOry mx ra cer a rtoexaa, vwcmu F THE WESTERN VIRGINIA HATER AUTHORITY ' TRACT 'R -I -A' (0.2518 ACRES) TRACT -B-1-B" (2.0379 ACRES) �w TRACT "B-1-C" (24.9954 ACRES) oe Ro,xals. vusuai e. in, jF NOW 1 l cuarmc scu,c _ I —1 I UJ o 0Y. ui W oY � a � ilk o rw�wn,nr..n � ar�.noravr.A9rrwC ?�Y r,orsvwAS�rrtns -�� 9 "a tb TRACT B -1 -A �IM 0.2515 AC.�® iWM, YJ _ 9i a yvw� I '' iTRACT R 1 E-' 20998 AC , m�wa Iwmu M, TRACT 24.9954 AC. a..r sa ��mraxsw ar \ •:: �: owcmu. rxen s -i (n.zm, .�I ;° xssveoMOOry mx ra cer a rtoexaa, vwcmu F THE WESTERN VIRGINIA HATER AUTHORITY ' TRACT 'R -I -A' (0.2518 ACRES) TRACT -B-1-B" (2.0379 ACRES) �w TRACT "B-1-C" (24.9954 ACRES) oe Ro,xals. vusuai e. in, jF NOW 1 l cuarmc scu,c _ I —1 I UJ o 0Y. ui W oY � a n" - MRM* RE F IFj P' TRACT B -1 -C 24.9954 AC. n.. ®r<.I vur sm.""ia."nvsi oa¢mu, m.n a -r � acsneartwn � e er¢ c � TBE tIESTERN VIRGINIA ? TRACT "B -i -AQ TRACT °B -I -B. 6 TRACT "B -1 -C" (2 m \w •cxml uaewwv roe. vmcmu� 4 A=ORIT ACRES) ACRES) e ACRES) ur. 1 ' cawwc scua I TRACT B -1 -A e. 0.2518 AC, 0 MNIY Ia 0 t �I i °' •' •' -ice. ,CT e_i-B 0399 AC — � -�- 9am P4` ,z �I O 0 hod W e oY. ZONING DISTRICT MAF Portions of 2012 Jefferson Street SE; Official Tax Parcel: 4060502 Area to be Rezoned Conditional Zoning Zoning RA (Residential- Agriculture) R -12 (Res. Single- Family) R -7 (Res. Single - Family) R -5 (Res. Single - Family) R -3 (Res. Single - Family) RM -1 (Res. Mixed Density) RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) RMF (Res. Multi - Family) CN (Commercial- Neigh) CG (Commercial - General) CLS (Commercial -Large Site) 1 -1 (Light Industrial) I 1 -2 (Heavy Industrial) D (Downtown) MX (Mixed Use) IN (Institutional) ROS (Rec 8 Open Space) AD (Airport Dev) MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev) INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Dev) WILD (Industrial Planned Unit Dev) OF (Urban Flex) 0 100 200 Feet i I HT� MUM A , J- P .k N O f F 4 x . �� r AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT: Western Virginia Water Authority/Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC LOCATION: 2012 Jefferson Street, SE /Official Tax No. Part of 4060502 REQUEST: Rezoning/Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Plan COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) TO -WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Tina M. Cart, first being duly swom, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first- class mail this 30 � day of 2015, notices of a public hearing to be held on this J day of 2015, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: Tax No and Owner's Name and Address 2012 Jefferson Street SE— Adjoining Property Owners TAXID Ownerl MailAddrm MailCity MallState MailZip 1041002 ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA 24025 1041003 ROANOKE HOSPITAL ASSN PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025-2385 1041004 ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA 24025 1050601 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 2101 JEFFERSON ST ROANOKE VA 24014 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050305 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025-2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUL -H WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060505 CITY OF ROANOKE PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4060601 THE FAIRFAX CONDOMINIUM 4519 BRAMBLETON AVE SUITE 200 ROANOKE VA 24018 4060602 BANDY LLC PO BOX 4143 ROANOKE VA 24015 4060603 MORGAN PATRICIA BTRUSTEE OF THE PAT 5 STONEGATE DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 4060604 WORKMAN STEPHEN M & FLORENCE T 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 103 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060606 JUSTICE JAMES C III PO BOX 2178 BEAVER WV 25813 4060607 JUSTICE JAMES C III PO BOX 2178 BEAVER WV 25813 4060608 SHERRY RICHARD G & CARPENTER JUDY 1371 SUNSET RUG WATERTOWN NY 13601 4060609 SAUNDERS WILLIAM DABNEY & LEE CAROL 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 108 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060610 4060611 4060612 4060613 4060614 4060615 4060617 4060618 4060619 4060620 4060621 4060622 4060623 4060625 4060626 4060627 4060628 4060629 4060630 4060632 4060633 4060634 4060635 4060637 4060638 4060639 4070201 4070504 4070505 4070511 4070514 MORRIS MARGARETJ TRUSTEE THE FIRST MILLS CURTIS E JR & DONNA H BANDY LLC G & P JEFFERSON LLC MALONE PATRICK A POLLARD DORIS W WESTWIN OF ROANOKE LLC SOLTIS LISA B WESTWIN OF ROANOKE LLC BAKER J FRED TUSTEE GRAYSON RICHARD 1 LONG DARRELL W & NANCY C BAILEY BARBARA REID EDWARD ALLEN KAPPUS AND ELIZABETH DO BRENNER BRUCE N & JOAN F SMALLWOOD THOMAS H & EUGENIA H ARLEDGE ELLEN MARIE THE A P KIRBY TRUST POE WILLIAM D TESSENDORF RONALD MCDONALD THOMAS R & PERDUE MELINA THE CAROL BEWLEY DALHOUSE REVOCABLE GOYETTE EDWARD M FINISCASTLE LLC CAUDILL DAVID & CYNTHIA SMITH GARNETT E BOWMAN GARLAND L II BOLLING W CHAN & KAE N DUDLEY LEMAN GANDY SUZANNEN KILGUS MARK D & REBECCA L & PO BOX 3890 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 110 APT PO BOX 4143 1994 MERRIMAN WAY 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD UNIT 201 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 202 UNIT 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE #205 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE 443 JOHNSON AVE UNIT 501 6313 LAKE CHARLENE DR 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 209 2512 JEFFERSON ST SE 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 212 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 213 UNIT 2830 LONGVIEW AVE SW 2923 ROSALIND AVE SW 9030 STONY POINT PKWY STE 460 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD 9304 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 306 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 307 3514 RIVER BIRCH UN 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 309 9030 STONY PRINT PKWY 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 312 UNIT 1994 MERRIMAN WAY 2201 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 2341 WOODCLIFF RD SE 1710 DAWN LN 2310 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 2303 MACK CHICK RD SE NORFOLK VA 23514 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24015 MONETA VA 24121 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ATLANTA GA 30306 ROANOKE VA 24014 ATLANTA GA 30306 CAPE CANAVERAL FL 32920 PENSACOLA FL 32506 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 RICHMOND VA 23235 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 RICHMOND VA 23235 ROANOKE VA 24014 MONETA VA 24121 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 4070515 FREY MICHELLE M 2301 MACK -CHICK RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 ` 4070516 BARON GEORGE P JR 2301 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070517 HOWARD JONES 1R REVOCABLE TRUST 2225 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070518 COLE ROBERT H & CAROL E 2231 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070519 JPR PROPERTIES 4818 GRANDIN RD SW ROANOKE VA 24018 -1930 r Tina M. Can SUBSC IBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this ✓� day of %Ir4 (A 12015. v ;1` M—UMAill CANDACE R. MARTIN NOTARY PUBUC CommanweelN of Virg nm Reg. #282078 M Commi:.. Exprtea CITY OF ROANOKE - PLANNING Alin TINA CARR 215 CHURCH At$ SW ROOM tee ROANOKE, VA 24011 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication RECEIVED APR B 2015 Account Numaer 6029306 Dste April 07, 2015 CITYOFROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT Oak Category Oe.crSa�on Ad 4ze TolalOOr9 0410712016 Lgjal Notice: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Ali pubic hranres edve6sed hen 1 x 188 L 7.1134.96 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, )the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AI was published in said newspapers on the following dates: Bnl➢1 0910712015 The First insertion being given ... 0j /s120t5 Newspaper reference: 0000150595 �k� 6�� Billing Representative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, Apr117, 2016 Notary PiAltc State of Virginia CitylCounty of Roanoke My Commission expires �7 X 1 THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE All page belrheld, t eCit advertised C Xl herein Chambtt, fauna floor. Room cW. Neel C. Taylor Municipal Ilral 215 Chuck Ay.1, S.W. goaW4e. V,Miw. All appl,canom are aMllable her revle. to the Planning. graham and Uaftimanent .(lice, Roam 1% 215 Church Aven., S.W., Random. Wroinla, Any ny anon.] actommodetiotn toga e 0 ffd a s Ne WWarty for, Palk ar pallicMte In dg hearings should gesMnge Manapemenl plan 3. ,hatut AaWkg, Bulging am Time AC Cart Pl Se hhaN- City mnino pavebphroM at W) EMIR M bad CaMmssgn hire days Abt to she schelWlN hearing. City Caun[d.1 and publk hemlap, M- Th, Oil of ROLId,Y ANM1Ig an ft agradard woo Ln AC's Cbnnurillon will hod Wage her, is manors maybelgdrC�assmn as Fe a April 13. An,- et 1'.10 P.m, or v non as the mailers nay be heart W Stationary M. Moon Reyeadds. MMC cmald¢rdk5¢apAratiWS: city Clara Appileallon by the City of generate to (I5M931 vacate Cmtal Spring Park and d "to'. by ublic's right to use Crystal Sprig an A whom M ran peoperty brand by the Western Viroina Water AMhadty, high rcM prop¢rtY IMated at NO Jeffers. Street. S.E., am dasgmted en of vial Tae Mapha AlfineW Aberration by the White- gaRinia Water AuthedlV aR Codgen Clinic MSS We of Me corner ., Imm AA h, RECEIVED APR 8 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE All public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All applications are available for review in the Planning, Building and Development office, Room 166,215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the hearings should contact Planning, Building and Development at (540) 853 -1730 at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold public hearings on April 13, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, to consider these applications: Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The proposed uses of that portion of the property are hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off -site. The application is also to rezone a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility distribution. The application is also to rezone a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to I -2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility treatment. The land use categories permitted in the INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory; with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of lot area. The land use categories permitted in the IN District include accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The land use categories permitted in the I -2 District include commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Park: Resource Management Plan 3. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid applications on April 20, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, March 31, 2015, and Tuesday, April 7, 2015. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Coordinator Planning, Building & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1330 tina.carr(a-),roanokeva.gov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 L.� ]7 RE -E I Sorb3 Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 156, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Fax: (540) 853 -1230 Date: Febmary23,2015 ❑+ Rezoning, Not Olhermse Listed FEB S 0 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT Submittal Number: Original Application ❑ Rezoning, Conditional v❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Click Here b Pdef ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 2012 Jefferson Street 5.E, Roanoke, VA 24011 Official Tax No(s).: Part of40e0502 Existing Base Zoning; ❑ With Conditions ROS, Recreation and Open Space (If muldplo zones, please manually enteral) disldclsJ ❑x Without Conditions Ordnance No(s). for Existing Conditions (If applicable): See attached sheet ❑ With Conditions proposed ee attached sheet Requested Zoning: Without Conditions; land Use: Name: lwevtem Virginia Water Authority, Attn: Mr. Gary Robertson Phone Number: +1(540)853 -5749 601,$. Jef(gson Street, S.W. Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 and Co- Applicant Name: Carillon Clinic Properties, LUC, Attm Mr. Curtis Mills Address: 1213 jath J¢ffefscyt Street Roanoke, Virginia 24011 E -Mail: ary"bertson@wenemvawater.o Phone Number. +1 W01991 -72aa E-Mad: oemllls®carilionclinicon7 For rarilix Name: Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Esq. Phone Number. +1(540)224 -ante Address: Glenn,Feldmann,at al, P.O. Box 2887, Roanoke, VA24001 -2887 E -Mail mgoodlattwglennfekfinenn.com 171a/Lt A.Uo�, �• Authorized Agents Signature r Metes and bounds description, d applicable. r Filing fee. r Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of Rem'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. C f�ZC g lls - f Written prefers, See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of Bem'2(c)'In Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as F 'development plan' ff proffered. R o I r Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. F- Comprehensive sl rage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(dx2) of the Oty§ Zonng Ordnance. r Amended development or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of hem 2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures, r if applicable. f Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. F— of previously adopted Ordinance. F Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 362-326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, (Copy of previously adopted Ordnance. f-- Amended comprehensive signage plan meeting the requiemems of Section 36.2- 336(d) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. • Copy of previously adopted Ordnance. G A Traffic Impact Study in compliance Bath Appendix &2(e) of the Chy's Zoning Ordnance. r Cover sheet. F Trafficimpact analysis. F Concept plan. • Proffered conditions, 6 apprcable. • Requlredfee. 'An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www.roanokmmgovlpbd by selecung'Planning Commission' under 'Boards and CemmISSiDris'. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application is amended, unless othenxise specified by staff. ATTACHMENT TO ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC Requested Zonine: INPUD (2.0379 ac.) Rd (0.2518 ac.) Proposed Land Use: hospital and related uses (2.0379 ac.) pump house (WV WA) (0.2518 ac.) RECEIVED FEB 8 0 2015 CITY OF NOANOKE PLANNING BUILDING g DEVELOPMENT e e e�e p ¢ 6 .q eea 6� � i• �° d0i i °8 9E�` ' y: pli loll pp t1I � �P � i �}} { g� g 6Qe� i� � A i7jp•ygy'° ,e� f � e7� }iql i.f }4 �3i���i� , r 1 f CCY 1 I W ff [p d {I l t E" • •�c l a, ter- m THe FRDPERTreHAltEUa ® ONLY roR MFQUpwNal.wo uaea pa°T� ld LPDA LAWMTORY. DBRAI. NEDfJL, OR OPTMJLL IMOMTOR/. TRaTIHOMDRF9FARCN l.lM1D PLAN 4DEQON A• 0 . • Q Q[ A L a HFAt1NATRTFlTNE86OBLIE/T 1006 E.Mbsn�.a. A6 9 PARNNR.OFT -artE GIMbMM[. NaMY • NTTTNadll•1 •aI asaloa . w. aaa alro Rm1O1DRlD Wuamo mu E PRwloenaxMlaTER LLwe wM wnnlxa wPPRpowTarep wplxowAOESwuEmwlofa. vvaNQE[aaae, pYVbMMTNNANDTR .LLYIl.6wILLE0ElbOE!!D AaMC2ai�RY p1aNa EIBOPNQ(T RI1N peNEIY TO MEETlLLL APPLICAaIE RIPQV IDD. TWDBTIRANCPdmLLaERYEMartL; OIt PRYIRrEMW WQ WLLELDIATFDON JlFI W pi 611E£T aEIRA N0 TN! LON!!t OF M A11aT FNE lE�d M aCQONd1RV EIOMNCEATA NbliETi HEVATMa WILLS LOCATED DN WELLER IANEBEm/•a TIE Nli1N1 OF TIT! FNBTFry! LELII.R TIE WEpxD1WLFRORJEWBISp1 aTRtiT PARNIltlO THE ROADWAYANaNWI. PIIONOF PEDERPoAH ItIEfIiRCN1lEFL81CNcewR JCALON6.lEfFERBON RNRT_ al."Um NWNT aW!LNOTtl10E0 FlFTERI 11a1ROOA& WHICH WMIEQHT OP WE TALIprTONaRONTAR�•P tMPRt LD WITEtTiOpb OFMaUEDPq W LL COMAN A YA%MY 01 EpOP a.F_ Gpl, NMNOPIILY AB PMRiq FOR A TOTK OF AApObIMT[LY lIDx[NI•bR ®I[PPIPAwQNDaPAOE THl1114lR1lH Rw PLOpla Df lNB BIIEgNO C W L NDYE M D1116t PG W R1FD lAY3 AND axNL CplTAN A NA1P1•IY OFwAaE aF. EADIt 1Mi uPRNTEx OO1iW WiOFM aURONONV1LaeaETNN1[Ar IEAaTTWEMY DOIFETFApNMFAORFA ('110EOFTXEaMRaNOAL0116�WON SmEEr THE PIMSI RPJI ERIRNX'l FIE M JIPI W pJ RIMLT aMNl PR W IDS NDC�B TO A IDEY WT6N ®E VATOO TO THE IIPP®i aTQNPd DF 9 E all LLLDA mLL E LOp1TlD_ M IUPtlNpaMLLE0EBb1'EOIx IEEPND WITHM GIIIRACTEROF IEGWILbx CAMPW AIOIIE V WYaIaIYEDlEb11DFM aDVIHJEMEDMIN HiRETOgVtlDdl, AE POLLgN& 0 �-' UJ a w waADEIREMWIFOWRNwNDOWwALL61EPlERaFplFbiIRMTNILRw1LL Jill Fu TRACr -�W ACRM 0.00! AIEmMDpNamLLElbpmp lMLLYAM1rbNIFMLYILp! ®YIIMOROIFC (2.OM W " }} THltOWlIt FN6WIT.00IIa OFTN6 aYaQNO BNNtE �-' RAnoNOFFNCNAMdIN1RLMFRWFTOLITW gxO waADEIREMWIFOWRNwNDOWwALL61EPlERaFplFbiIRMTNILRw1LL ORV®APMENI'PLLN MVE AMMMIMTRNECAIE? RXOR OIAtIND OFATLWETFFlEF111NpIPfIC @FTiiA TRACr -�W ACRM 0.00! AIEmMDpNamLLElbpmp lMLLYAM1rbNIFMLYILp! ®YIIMOROIFC (2.OM 0.0Pl mrwwa EFPRQUNDATANENIMTMDOIOdAl9 lTiWlTIRED P) FEFAaQY£M A{gND ]ZFFgEION gI'R88T FNNN ®FLDpt EIEVAIbNOF 11E P ®ESINNI ERIOW CE W J9iERBp16REET. en.w+Fn yplpO.R,t WPNIIaHfaI iLOONL Aa THE a4lDINOM ®NQY£M PMODNOi1OppAlO aTep aACA Fp�1 DP9MON a1REi, THE QADaap NV 111D lRNIaRIOM TO A dIRAMWLL1MT91 TIY1r WdND NNl1E BOMQIAE M1DLEfAL PJlELA61fFLL ELEYEM6IMDEIMTEl1Ytf WODLDYIMY1lLY Tlf MIlW TCMRIaACKTO ixf IXIRNDROV�IENEMDMIL AB WELLAEdxNEer ITTO THEAR6IRBLRUREOF RIrlflaQf CENT6t TD PAQNTAre M NDVEIHIT QF RAPP, YPPL Y Axp MT W ia, bw1VAY• MO PDIBlIWLYQDEI CDNIaDTpaIOM NILpNE Ox TA%PAALIL•PaO01 MAYS PMT CP 1Na FlNAL QNIOPMQRMN. 0111lHIER plpOMae3 EF NF1191 W L MVE ERENQR apLgHO FINIMa aNl W i TD TIQ[ELMMIpNIIIRVEl61 FlLpO6TE sillYH0. a pM0! aIIALL CONFORN T D TNe FEDMpFalEMl6 aF M ROANON! dtt ualNa OIEINANCEFORMYa'ZWIx6 paIRNT. GRODM abNiaNNl xOTEOEElDIO INlxupe o rucrbNU ealuoe. IrtamE wuuretns aRarte ANDA•aowreoEAa9eNlaTiWraeRYE TNe wasnDN YNDNN YMTbiAMHYTRRYTIWMYA)A9lCl®RaW10aA ANO aR! OONRRICTIDNaMALLE Rl1Dd1TED MaIDR R@ Vf� N RBONIR ®.1ER IpIEBERI6 aETREHI DMLI ON OLMbAM WVIYAaQERRRai aMOM1AR6 tOaaAW✓DOREDAIat APE.NO WRIER gfOMF ®aYwYM p61ONV WAPMr9l iYR®I DPOWIfa. Nta10M1 WNTlR RaMVExOQa RMIaRmmYM1 YE[ALLCDYANDRAre ALL aANRAR.ELECiWy Ma AlROVFMENia>L[LLM6t ALLp1YRW111REEBRi. M n 1C0 y gry 7 �3'7M ,OL xe-- xJ II p { �f `Lu O F s d �y W Y w r I 2, W r' tul voz �% v V e • as 3 g[s s; s Bdgg 4gg9�p3p3 �3'7M ,OL xe-- xJ II p { �f i J 1 C � L s d �y W Y w r I 2, W r' voz �% v a oa�o" N m 1 V UAL- � NARRATIVE As part of a larger transaction, the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Water Authority") and Carillon Clinic ( "Carilion ") have agreed to subdivide the 27+ acres which constitute tax parcel 4060502 in order to create three parcels — two of which would be retained by the Water Authority (the "Pump Station Parcel" containing 0.2518 acre and the "Residue Parcel" containing 24.9954 acres) and one of which would be conveyed to Carilion (the "Carillon Parcel" containing 2.0379 acres). This application seeks to rezone the Pump Station Parcel from ROS to IN and the Carillon Parcel from ROS to INPUD. Crystal Spring, along with other historic and operational buildings of the Water Authority, is located on the Residue Parcel. Water from the spring has been pumped to an underground water storage cistern located on the Carillon Parcel. Because of significant leakage problems, the old cistern on the Carilion Parcel is in the process of being replaced by a new one under construction on the Residue Parcel. The pump house building located on the Pump Station Parcel will continue to house the pumping machinery needed to transfer the water from Crystal Spring through the Water Authority's systems. No changes to the exterior of the building on the Pump Station Parcel are needed or anticipated. Because the reduced size of the Pump Station Parcel is no longer conducive to an ROS zoning designation, and because the Pump Station Parcel cannot be classified as a "utility loP', a rezoning of that small parcel to IN is sought. Other than the zoning designation, no changes in the current use or design of that 0.2518 acre parcel are anticipated. In addition to the underground water storage cistern, the Carilion Parcel also includes tennis courts. As part of the larger transaction, those courts would be removed and would be replaced with new courts on City-owned land on Reserve Avenue. The Carillon Parcel adjoins Carilion's Roanoke Memorial Hospital, located on 18+ acres (tax parcel no. 4060301) (the "Hospital'. The Hospital consists of six towers/buildings as follows: -North Tower —Built 1925, 5 stories - East Tower — Built 1956, 7 stories - Old Nursing School Building — Built 1959, 3 stories - West Pavilion - Built 1971,15 stories - Mountain Tower —Built 2003, 5 stories - South Tower — Built 1993, 10 stories originally with 5 stories added in 2007 The oldest structures are located on the north end of the Hospital parcel. The Mountain and South Towers, the newest structures are located on the south end of the Hospital parcel and house the Emergency Department (including the Trauma Center), Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, high tech specialty services, and imaging Past and future medical developments coupled with aging structures and facilities that no longer meet life safety codes, will require Carilion to remove the older structures as structural and technical issues will not allow them to be renovated or repurposed. In addition, expanding medical education activities — including new educational programs being created by Carilion's affiliation with Virginia Tech and the Jefferson College of Health Sciences as well as significantly increased utilization of clinical services (particularly Emergency Department and Trauma Services) require more parking capacity. This is especially true in the campus zone on the south side of the Hospital, close to one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the state, where few parking spaces are available forcing patients and families to walk farther than reasonable to and from their cars to reach needed clinical services. Although the Hospital parcel consists of 18+ acres, its steep topography and challenging shape makes even more intensive utilization of that parcel for hospital use realistically impossible and certainly undesirable because of their massive disruptions to major clinical and ancillary support operations. The Carillon Parcel, then, represents the optimal location to support the hospital's construction of more modem facilities, allowing orderly and cost - effective replacement of clinical patient care and ancillary support functions from existing obsolete structures before the old, antiquated structures can be demolished. While the planning for such a renovation will take many years, the timing associated with the larger transaction among the Water Authority, the City, and Carilion, requires that the Carillon Parcel be rezoned at this time in order to lay the foundation for that future planning and eventually optimal reconfiguration and modernization of the Hospital ensuring effective use of that community resource for future generations of Roanoke and the region's residents. Consequently, Carilion seeks to rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD. As delineated on the INPUD Development Plan, the uses would be those typical of hospital uses. In order to provide adequate current and future off -street parking, the hospital building constructed on the Carilion Parcel would include structured parking. During the planning phase provisions would be made to connect the building proposed for the Carilion Parcel to the existing Hospital. The exterior finish materials and architectural design of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be similar to those used on the current Hospital buildings. The height of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be no greater than those on the Hospital parcel. In order to be compatible with both the buildings on the Hospital parcel (where the towers are located towards the rear of the parcel) and neighboring buildings on Jefferson Street (where the Fairfax, at the comer of Jefferson Street and Yellow Mountain Drive, for example, is five stories high), the INPUD Plan requires that the height of the building be no more than five stories within twenty feet of Jefferson Street. This will allow the higher section of the building to be located towards the rear of the parcel similar to the configuration of the Hospital parcel. The Building Design conditions detailed on the Development Plan are consistent with the key elements of the City's Public and Institutional design standards. The building's exterior finish materials (masonry, brick, and granite) will not only be in keeping with the character of the Carilion campus, but will also hannonize with nearby development. Adequate parking to serve the needs of patients, visitors, staff and students/residents is needed and will be provided on the lower five floors of the building. The current South Tower houses one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the Commonwealth, but has very few readily accessible parking spaces. About half of those spaces are on land adjacent to the tennis courts and leased from the Water Authority. Those spaces will be lost when development begins on the Carilion Parcel. Carilion plans to move the Emergency Department into the new building where it will be updated and redesigned to more efficiently handle the growing number of emergency and trauma patients with all required parking for those patients accessible in the same building. Outpatient services are expected to relocate to the new building which will allow the parking for those patients to be easily accessible. The structured parking provided in the building will also absorb those spaces lost when the older garage on Belleview Avenue is either replaced, repurposed, or renovated. RECEIVED FEB E 0 2015 CITY Ot NUAWKE PLANNING BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 2.0379 AC. TO BE REZONED TO INPUD The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -I -B' being subdivided out of Tract 'B-l', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at comer 'E', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right-of-way, said point being located N 20° 1l' 22" E, 272.17 feet from the Northeasterly comer of Yellow Mountain Road, SE and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E. for the following four courses: N 20° 11'22" E, a distance of 135.07 feet to a point designated Comer'2', Thence N 250 54' 00" E, a distance of 50.25 feet to a point designated Comer'T, Thence N 200 11'22" E, a distance of 70.08 feet to a point designated Comer'4', Thence N 21 019'07" I~ a distance of 21.15 feet to Comer'B', the southwesterly comer of proposed Tract'13-1 -A', Thence leaving said Jefferson street, S.E. and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the southerly and easterly lines of said Tract'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 71" 26' 24" E, a distance of 111.46 feet to a point designated Comer'A', Thence N 15 47'55" E, a distance of 32.50 feet, to a point designated Comer 10, located on the southerly property line of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804 Thence with the southerly property lines of said Tract "A -1" for the following three courses: S 55 51' 00" E, a distance of 196.55 feet to a point designated Cumer'l l', 'thence S 22° 15' 50" E, a distance of 81.83 feet to a point designated Comer '12', Thence S 120 16'44" W. a distance of 115.01 feet to a point designated Comer'13', located on Northerly property line of the Western Virginia Water Authority Tract "B -I ", Thence leaving said Tract "A -l" and with four new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority for the following four courses: N 440 54'44" W, a distance of 21.60 feel to a point designated Comer'C', Thence N 76° 57' 18" W, a distance of 54.60 feet to a point designated Corner'U, Thence S 13" 02'42" W, a distance of 54.14 feet to a point designated Corner'F,', Thence N 76° 57' 18" W, a distance of 311.53 feet to a point designated Comer F, the Point of Beginning and containing 88,773 square feet, 2.0379 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B. 1, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tmel "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -13" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". RECEIVED FEB 8 0 2015 Cr Y Or NOANOKE PLANNING BUILDING& DEVELOPMENT METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 0.2518 AC. TO BE REZONED TO IN The following is a description of proposed Tract 'B -1 -A' being subdivided out of Tmct 'B -1', 27.2851 Acres, designated Roanoke City Tax Number 4060502, property of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Beginning at comer 'B', a point located on the easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., a variable width right- of-way, said point being located 548.72 feet northerly from the Northeasterly corner of Yellow Mountain Road, S.E. and Jefferson Street, S.E., Thence with said easterly side of Jefferson street, S.E., N 21" 19'07" E, a distance of 90.38 feet to a point designated Comer'5', said point being located at the southeasterly comer of the intersection of Jefferson Street, S.E. and Weller Lane and being the southwesterly property comer of the property of Roanoke Hospital South Wing, Tract "A -1" as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 2804. Thence leaving said Jefferson Street, S.E. and with said Weller Lane and said Tract "A -1" for the following five courses: Run a distance of 23.49 feel along the are of curve to the right, said curve having a Delta Angle of 530 50' 41 ", a radius distance of 25.00 feet, a tangent distance of 12.70 feet, a chord bearing of N 680 49' 16" E, and a chord distance of 22.64 feet to a point designated Comer'6', Thence S 66" 19'36" F., a distance of 25.37 feet to a point designated Comer'T, Thence S 74° 10'48" E, a distance of 42.26 feet to a point designated Corner'8', Thence S 660 19'36" E, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point designated Comer'9', Thence S 150 47'55" W, a distance of 70.58 feet to a point designated Comcr'10', Thence leaving said Weller Lane and with two new division lines through the property of the Western Virginia Water Authority along the proposed easterly and southerly lines of said Tract 'B -1 -A' for the following two courses: S 150 47'55" W, a distance of 32.50 feet to a paint designated Comer'A', Thence N 710 26'24" W, a distance of 111.46 feet, to a point designated Comer'B', the Point of Beginning and containing 10,967 square feet, 0.2518 acres and being more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 12, 2015, entitled "Plat Showing the Subdivision of as Portion of Original Tract B -1 (27.2851 Acres), Resubdivision for the City of Roanoke (M.B, t, Pages 2801 -2803) Property of The Western Virginia Water Authority, Creating New Tract "B -1 -A" (0.2518 Acres), new Tract "B -1 -B" (2.0379 Acres), and new Tract "B -1 -C" (24.9954 Acres), situated at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., City of Roanoke, Virginia ". RECE1Vr- O FEB E 0 2015 CRY OF NO.. ..,t PLANNWGS W. ta.�ue INPUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS Applicant Car lion Clinic Properties, LLC, hereby requests that the development standards set forth on the INPUD Development Plan dated February 13, 2015 be imposed on the 2.0379 acre parcel: USES THE PROPERTY SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING LAND USES: LABORATORY, DENTAL, MEDICAL, OR OPTICAL LABORATORY, TESTING AND RESEARCH MEDICAL CLINIC HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER HOSPITAL PARKING, OFF -SITE PARKING STRUCTURED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE LOWER LEVELS OF THE BUILDING. APPROXIMATELY 800 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. PARKING EGRESS, CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL SPACES WILL BE DETERMINED AS NECESSARY DURING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. VEHICULAR ENTRANCES TWO ENTRANCES WILL SERVE THE SITE. ONE PRIMARY ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON STREET SERVING THE LOWER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION WILL BE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE SERVING THE HIGHER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. BUILDING DESIGN THE BUILDING SHALL FRONT JEFFERSON STREET PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY AND SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED FIFTEEN (15) FLOORS, WHICH IS THE HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST TOWER ON TAX PARCEL 4060301. THE FIVE (5) LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING WILL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 S.F. EACH, PRINCIPALLY AS PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT HUNDRED (800) PARKING SPACES. THE UPPER TEN (10) FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL HOUSE THE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND SHALL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 50,000 S.F. EACH. THE UPPER TEN (10) FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM JEFFERSON STREET SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO A LOBBY WHERE ELEVATORS TO THE UPPER STORIES OF THE BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED. THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CARILLON CAMPUS AND THE VERNACULAR DESIGN OF THE SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CORRIDOR, AS FOLLOWS: LOWER FIVE (5) FLOORS. THE LOWER FIVE (5) FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CLAD IN MASONRY, A COMBINATION OF BRICK AND GRANITE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE INTERRUPTED WITH WINDOW WALL ELEMENTS FOR FENESTRATION. IT WILL HAVE A MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY OR GLAZING OF AT LEAST FIFTEEN PERCENT (15 %) PER FLOOR AND WINDOWS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS BEGINNING AT A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE ON JEFFERSON STREET. UPPER TEN (10) FLOORS. AS THE BUILDING RISES ABOVE THE PARKING FLOORS AND STEPS BACK FROM JEFFERSON STREET, THE CLADDING WOULD TRANSITION TO A CURTAINWALL SYSTEM THAT WOULD UTILIZE BOTH GLASS AND METAL PANEL AS INFILL ELEMENTS. THOSE MATERIALS WOULD VISUALLY TIE THE NEW TOWER BACK TO THE EXISTING ROANOKE MEMORIAL, AS WELL AS CONNECT IT TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF RIVERSIDE CENTER. TO FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF STAFF, SUPPLIES AND PATIENTS, SKYWAYS AND POTENTIALLY OTHER CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDINGS ON TAX PARCEL 4060301 MAY BE PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (IF ANY) SHALL HAVE EXTERIOR BUILDING FINISHES SIMILAR TO THOSE ON THE LOWER FIVE (5) FLOORS OF THE BUILDING. PROJECT SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE "CG" ZONING DISTRICT. GROUND SIGNS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE. UTILITIES ALL UTILITIES ON SITE AND ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THAT SERVE THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AFFECTED BY BUILDING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED AND /OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED, PER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARILION CLINIC AND WVWA. SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO BE ABANDONED AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED BY WVWA DUE TO WVWA WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES. ALL STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED SHALL MEET ALL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ALL SANITARY, ELECTRIC, GAS IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. RECEIVED FEB 8 0 2015 CITY OF ROANDKE PLANNING BUILDING& DEVELOPMENT Ii3 ; ;a3� 99 .. N tits VIA e e a�91xa°pig @ i ,� "ii�i�l 4' IN I ;e� ei��s as A e ORR I.T. "os� °fis gR 9 � °>S �■�ia�5 a ��agi.! " a t�s p�a 3 !e � i A ! p F ®A ! � d�� a a � �1a� ■$ � x �`,! ' i oil x l R 4 All' 1pyaa Jill !11 Jill, a ' e.al !!IA M � it do v { 1i•t •�• 4! .t a gg e 0a ■ VV t@ S y as 3 � §�z.`� Fi�� 9 laWzl�ReRiaeep. /%� a Qgq + N at, E l�s is �i �1all .:I- m e 4 m V ye tip E 3v "ny 14ID1p LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES,PC 7777. — ENGINEEPSSVRYEYORWLANNERS uw¢�m "�� YYy`L°1'iswi.LSYs It0ANC1IE VIRGINIA RECEIVED FEB 8 0 2015 ury ov AouwKF xa�xwa EUaoixoa OEVELOPYFM Hui . •�\ r) ��■ 4 a;3 � W, I � \ ` a !f§ %\ + �) �\ ! \� .�� =f mw: |� � ,in, |■ Al /\ ) § §)/ � W, I � \ ` a !f§ %\ + �) RECEIVED �\ ! � -- .�� =f ■ |� � RECEIVED �\ ! � -- .�� =f � RECEIVED ^�C rn > $S A if — >���� eD ltli�3il�� 1[! RR 9 tl I � i � g�a I 1 -v S 4.0 a C CCCO I FTt a L MSDEN ASSOCIATE$ P.0 we w i a.. ENGINEERS- SURYETOR.S-PLAN l ROAN01(B, YIRGINIA RECEIVED FED 2 0 2015 CR OF.NONE OFVELCpIEM MIN 91 "RIM � e�iiNNi y ` / P lia ® i6ie 9+ eaq y �a ^� 9 Al , o e I _ LUMSDEN ASSOCIA7 P.0 PuMM w w ENCI E.N,Nt ?E 1 NEftS w.,nwe ft0 YIftCIAIA RECEWED FEB Z 0 2015 Cln pe ri0µ0NE WµxIX. Wl01X66 EEYELpNEM a��|�© (/2/� � � I ��,. all }l 6� $ % k� �§��.�m� � �� �t� - � I Jill � . [ � 2 ; 2' _ Cs o erm TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS For Carilion Clinic Medical Building On Jefferson Street City of Roanoke, VA For Carilion Clinic 231 Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24011 February 23, 2015 Commission No. 3507 MICHAEL S. AG Uc. No. 15232 Ak 02/23/15 ,00**v � Mattem &Craig ENfIN�ERSEVRVFYORS 701 FIRST STREET, S.W. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 (540) 345 -9342 FAX: (540) 345 -7691 CARILION CLINIC MEDICAL BUILDING TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document presents the results of the traffic impact analysis performed for a proposed 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in the upper ten levels. The proposed development is located between Flannagan Drive and McClanahan Street east of Jefferson Street in the City of Roanoke, VA. The medical facility will be a part of the Roanoke Memorial Hospital complex. The development is proposed by Carilion Clinic The primary access to the proposed development is via Jefferson Street; a secondary access will be from Flannagan Drive. Jefferson Street is an urban collector street serving as a main connection for daily commuters from the Crystal Spring neighborhood to downtown Roanoke. Jefferson Street is currently operating adequately for the existing traffic volumes during the AM and PM peak hours; current ADT is approximately 7,000 vehicles per day. Trip generation for the proposed development was performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 91s Edition. The land use of the proposed development is represented by land use code 610 — Hospital in the Trip Generation Manual. The proposed development includes parking consisting of 800 spaces. The parking will serve medical facility employees, patients, and the general public. Although the parking structure itself does not generate trips, it will result in parking turnover as patients and the general public utilizes the space and visit other facilities within the Roanoke Memorial complex. This turnover traffic is estimated to be 75 trips into and 75 trips out of the parking structure per hour. These additional trips are considered in this study. The study analyzes 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, and 2020 Build -out traffic operations with the new development Analysis is provided for the two existing signalized intersections on Jefferson Street at McClanahan Street and Flannagan Drive and for both a single lane and multilane access at the proposed development site. The study analyzes level of service and delays, vehicle queue lengths, potential improvements to the Jefferson street typical section, and pedestrian accommodations. Overall, level of service and delays are acceptable for all study scenarios within the public right- of-way at the signalized intersections studied and at the proposed entrance on Jefferson Street. After analysis of the study network as described above, the following recommendations are offered: 1. Provide separate left and right turn lanes for vehicles exiting the proposed development to Jefferson Street. 2. Provide full access entrance from Jefferson Street. Provide secondary access to the Jefferson Street/Flannagan Drive intersection traffic signal. 3. Reduce on -street parking on northbound Jefferson Street such that appropriate sight distance from the site entrance is available. 4. Provide a mid -block crosswalk with pedestrian refuge area at the Jefferson Street site entrance. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Proposed Development ............................. ..............._ ... ...................... ............... .... .................. ............1 — Site Specific Location Map ................................ ... ................._. ...... ........ .............. 3.0 February 2014 Existing Conditions ...................................................................... ............................... 1 4.0 Background Traffic Volumes..... .................. .................. .... 4 5.0 Projected Development Volumes .......................................................................... ............................... 4 5.1 Trip Generation ............ .. ................... .. ................. .. ..... .............. ..... ........_..... ........ .................... ......... 6 5.2 Trip Distributions ................................................................................................ ............................... 6 6.0 2020 Build- Out Volumes ...... ...................................... .................... ....... ........._.. .... .... ......_..............11 — Site Trip Distribution (Land Use 610) PM Peak Hour ............................ ..............................8 7.0 Level of Service Anal ysis .................................................................................... ............................... l l 7.1 Specific Intersection Analysis ......... .................................................................. ............................... 20 7. 1.1 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & McClanahan Streer Yellow Mtn. Rd. .......... .... 20 7.1.2 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive ....... ...............20 7.1.3 Unsignalized Intersection of Evans Mill Road & Weller Avenue .............. ............................... 20 7.1.4 Unsignalized Intersection of Jefferson Street and Site Entrance ................ ............................... 20 8.0 SimTraffic Queue Length Analyses ................................................................... ............................... 21 9.0 Conclusionand Recommendat ions_ ................ ......................... ..................... ....................... ......... 27 List of Figures Figure 1.1 — Site Specific Location Map ................................ ... ................._. ...... ........ .............. ..... ... ........2 Figure 3.1 — 2015 Existing AM /PM Peak Hour .............. ... ....... ......... ......................... .. ........................... .3 Figure 4.1 — 2020 Background Existing AM/PM Peak Hour ..................................... ............................... 5 Figure 5.1 — Site Trip Distribution (Land Use 610) AM Peak Hour.. ................................ __ .................... 7 Figure 5.2 — Site Trip Distribution (Land Use 610) PM Peak Hour ............................ ..............................8 Figure 5.3 — AM Peak Hour (Land Use 610) Trip Distribution ........... .... ....................... .......................... 9 Figure 5.4 — PM Peak Hour (Land Use 610) Trip Distribution.... .......................................................... __ 10 Figure 5.5 — Parking Garage Turnover AM Peak Hour Figure 5.6 — Parking Garage Turnover PM Peak Hour. Figure 6.1 — 2020 Buildout AM /PM Peak Hour ........... List of Tables Table 3.1 — Directional Distribution on Jefferson Street ................... Table 5.1 —Trips Generated (Land Use 610 — Hospital) .................. Table 7.1 —Level of Service and Delay ..... .. .................... ................ Table 7.2 — Level of Service per Movement by Approach.- ............ Table 8.1 — Critical Movement Queue Lengt h ............. ..._ ............... . Table 8.2 — Build -Out Scenarios Queue Length Comparison .... _ ... . Appendices Appendix A — Proposed Development Layout Appendix B — Turning Movement Counts by The Traffic Group Appendix C — Synchro Reports Appendix D— SimTraffc Reports .................. 12 .................. 13 .................. 14 4 6 ....... 15 16 22 _ ..... 26 M &C Comm. N 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carbon Clinic 1.0 Introduction Mattern & Craig, Inc. was commissioned by Carillon Clinic to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis for a proposed medical facility in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. The medical facility is scheduled to be constructed and fully occupied by 2020. Figure 1.1 depicts the location of the proposed development and the surrounding area. This report includes discussion of existing and projected traffic volumes in the study area, trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed medical building, level of service analyses, queuing analyses, and identification of warranted geometric improvements. This study will analyze two weekday peak hour periods: AM and PM 2.0 Proposed Development The proposed development is a 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in upper ten levels located on a portion of Parcel 4060502. The parking is proposed to include 800 spaces and the medical facility is proposed to encompass 500,000 square feet of medical use space. The parking will be for employees and for the general public; public parking will be free. The primary, full - movement access location is from Jefferson Street between McClanahan Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive; a secondary access location is from Flannagan Drive. The proposed development layout is provided in Appendix A 3.0 2015 Existing Conditions Three -hour AM (6:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM (3:00 — 6:00 PM) classification turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, February 3, 2015 by The Traffic Group, a sub - consultant to Mattern & Craig. Turning movement classification counts included pedestrians and bicycles. The counts were performed at the signalized intersections of Jefferson Street and McClanahan Street/Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive; and at the unsignalized intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue. The traffic volumes include the existing percentage of heavy vehicles trucks and buses, within the study network. The existing traffic counts are included in Appendix B. The AM and PM peak hours of Route 460, as indicated by the coming movement counts, are 7:30 — 8:30 AM and 4:45 — 5:45 PM, respectively. Existing AM and PM peak hour volumes on the street network are presented in Figure 3.1 ^ � � \v � /�� �`� � a f� \�./ 4N, SITE LOCATION G)o�jk- 7 � 11 .1 o W I +� Jy N\M .���Q /d� �l. L"'5 y I J ^rocs —W125 _W /� 1 y ,_ A WE(LER aYE. /fir I} 30/45— FLWNAGAN OR. 1 I\Ny 0 55 oil, ll µD O if 90/45 —� 30155 o � Nj5 M Leoiro Q � J1 I Il lm/sa _ �5/5 HcCLVmm S sm. IBO /180 YE( YWNTWN R0. 20/150 —� N l �^ � SIfl�+N2ed Mprsallon � Unsi9/4/IImE INersallpn W X/Y A1l/PN Ws D.ry Peak 4 W H., Tlefk JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2015 EXISTING AM /PM PEAK HOUR mvw.xa zsw Nrs rxuRC zl M &C Comm. # 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic These volumes were used to quantify the existing traffic within the network and to determine the directional distribution of existing peak hour traffic. The directional distributions for the AM and PM peak hours along Jefferson Street are delineated in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 — Directional Distribution on Jefferson Street Peak Hour Northbound Percentage Southbound Percentage AM 70% 30% PM 40% 60% 4.0 Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic is that which would be anticipated to be utilizing the existing street network when the proposed development is expected to be completed, but without the traffic volume from the new development. The proposed medical facility is projected to be complete and fully operational by 2020. It was mutually agreed upon in the February 18, 2015 Pre - Scoping meeting with City of Roanoke that an annual growth rate of 1.0% be utilized between 2015 and 2020. The existing, balanced 2015 traffic counts were converted to 2020 background traffic volumes by utilizing the annual growth rate of 1.0% from year 2015. 2020 background traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. 5.0 Projected Development Volumes Trip generation was performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9'" Edition. Site trip generation was determined as agreed upon in the City of Roanoke Pre - Scoping meeting on February 18, 2015. The land use of the proposed development is described in Section 2.0 and is represented by land use code 610—Hospital in the Manual. Based on size of the facility and the peak hour, the Manual provides an estimate of the new trips generated by the proposed development. Trip generation and projected distributions are discussed in section 5.1 and 5.2. o `152 ` �631 J l53 I L 21/26 WEI R NE. 1 I F( N*M DR. 32/41 9214h 5 y11Y p0 65� 32158 a m., " C 89111 I I L F-5/5 3 _/II �5/5 NxC vfm S .sx.. Ir I/-� YELl1M' MIXl 4M RD. IB9 /I89J � I 2l/I56 -- l p 32/218 � a (te1✓d �^ � 51D/bllze0 MxmYlm 0 uNlgpllze ldvb lw K W X/Y Hwr T Wf1c Pent w Rcvr mm�� JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2020 BACKGROUND AM /PM PEAK HOUR M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carilion Clinic 5.1 Trip Generation Table 5.1 provides the number of trips generated by the proposed land use. Table 5.1 — Trips Generated (Land Use 610 — Hospital) 5.2 Trip Distributions Site trip assignment and distribution on the existing street network are based on the existing traffic distributions as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Furthermore, during the February 18, 2015 PreScoping meeting it was agreed that 80% of trips will use the Jefferson Street entrance and 20% the Flannagan Drive entrance. The Flannagan Drive entrance will primarily serve medical facility employees and potentially emergency services; the Jefferson Street entrance will be the primary access for patients and the general public. Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2 provide the anticipated site trip distributions by percentage for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Site trip distributions are provided in Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Additionally, during the February 18, 2015 Pre-Scoping meeting parking turnover at the proposed five levels of parking within the proposed development was discussed. As mentioned previously, the parking area will serve medical facility employees, emergency services, patients, and the general public. Some of the parking spaces will turnover more frequently than others due to the nature of the visits generated by the medical facility. At the Pre- Scoping meeting, it was mutually agreed that 300 of the 800 available parking spaces can be expected to turnover three times per 12 -hour period (6AM — 6PM). This logic results in 900 vehicle turnovers at the parking structure over the 12 -hour period and 75 turnovers per hour evenly distributed. The entering and exiting of these movements are all assumed to occur at the Jefferson Street entrance. The 75 entering and 75 exiting trips are distributed to and from the site based on existing traffic distribution as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Parking turnover trip AM Weekday Peak PM Weekday Peak Hour of Adjacent Hour of Adjacent Street Street ITE Land Land Use Use Code Size Entering ting 314 LE HEntering 04 Hospital 610 500,000 SF (63 %) 2 %) TOTAL 499 491 5.2 Trip Distributions Site trip assignment and distribution on the existing street network are based on the existing traffic distributions as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Furthermore, during the February 18, 2015 PreScoping meeting it was agreed that 80% of trips will use the Jefferson Street entrance and 20% the Flannagan Drive entrance. The Flannagan Drive entrance will primarily serve medical facility employees and potentially emergency services; the Jefferson Street entrance will be the primary access for patients and the general public. Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2 provide the anticipated site trip distributions by percentage for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Site trip distributions are provided in Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Additionally, during the February 18, 2015 Pre-Scoping meeting parking turnover at the proposed five levels of parking within the proposed development was discussed. As mentioned previously, the parking area will serve medical facility employees, emergency services, patients, and the general public. Some of the parking spaces will turnover more frequently than others due to the nature of the visits generated by the medical facility. At the Pre- Scoping meeting, it was mutually agreed that 300 of the 800 available parking spaces can be expected to turnover three times per 12 -hour period (6AM — 6PM). This logic results in 900 vehicle turnovers at the parking structure over the 12 -hour period and 75 turnovers per hour evenly distributed. The entering and exiting of these movements are all assumed to occur at the Jefferson Street entrance. The 75 entering and 75 exiting trips are distributed to and from the site based on existing traffic distribution as described in Table 3.1 for the AM and PM peak hours. Parking turnover trip N w 4 W C J7 37. DR. FIPNNAGM' DR. �h I I .............. ' { 9% PROF. sRE o h ... M ahh �J I L McCLP Mm S .sx.. 1 YELLOW MWN MN RD, IS% L� W� 519/aliied IMw'sacll9n W� 1/rui9mllzeC lMVSecIlon JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION LAND USE 610 AM PEAK HOUR GWKXA AT$ flGl/flE 5.l 1Y1/ w 4 W J% I L r - -3% FLWNI }IAGIIA(N'�OR. II('� WELlER PYE. 8%' 6�. Sol h m J - - - - -- - - - - -- 3D% PROP. (� s� o ism JIJ�z% McC(AN m S .SW. I I YEaW M WN RD. 5% G W Slpmllm IMNSe w W� Unslgmllzed INasedlm JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION LAND USE 610 PM PEAK HOUR LYWY.MO. MI5 FWY 5.2 JvN o w I 1 � i L 20 0 s � O �AGAN R. � � r WELTER AVE � oilU- RD 5 L—ros 1 •------- ------- 45 PROP. r r sRE °e I L �29 YcCLa Mm S .SY. ]5 YE( Y WWN RD. h W� 519/bllzeC INez�1lpn WOm'I9YZllz IA®'sx11Yn JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA AM PEAK HOUR LAND USE 610 TRIP DISTRIBUTION J50] J �1{ 2 C I L 1 �/5 A FLNIN1AG/N'�OR. WEfIER PYE, 39 yILL NCO ^p'1N ^IYYS 1� Im � /77 1 y • PRc . SITE O o P M J I L NcClA mm S .5m.. 1 u JR I YEUM MO WWN RD.. wS /GRZI /zed Were lw w� UreI9R]llzed INerssllm JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE 610 TRIP DISTRIBUTION �'eiro' ]A/ M$ FMLRf S1 J M&C Comm. # 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carlson Clinic distributions are provided in Figure 5.5 and Figure 5.6 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. It is anticipated that pedestrians accessing their vehicles parked in the lower levels of the medical facility will be going to and leaving from other facilities within the Roanoke Memorial campus. This project proposes a mid -block crosswalk with a pedestrian refuge area located just south of the proposed site entrance on Jefferson Street. Therefore, for the 2020 Build -Out conditions, pedestrians are conservatively estimated to cross Jefferson Street at a rate of 50 pedestrians per hour in both the AM and PM peak hours. Further, 20 pedestrians per hour are estimated to cross the proposed site entrance in both the AM and PM peak hours. 6.0 2020 Build -Out Volumes The 2020 Build -Out volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are determined by summing the 2020 Background projected traffic volumes (Figure 4.1), site generated trips (Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4) and the parking turnover trips (Figure 5.5 and Figure 5.6). The resulting 2020 Build -Out volumes are presented in Figure 6.1 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 7.0 Level of Service Analysis Synchro traffic software was used to analyze the operational conditions for the study area for all study scenarios. Synchro reports operational Level of Service (LOS) at an intersection with a letter designation and with an average delay time in seconds for vehicles stopped at the intersection. Level of service is a quantitative measure of driver perception of delay (waiting time) experienced at an intersection, and LOS is based on the delay thresholds specified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). LOS conditions range from "A" (little delay) to "F' (very long delay). Table 7.1 reflects the delay ranges in seconds drivers may experience for a corresponding level of service for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. The criteria used to measure LOS for signalized intersections are different from the criteria used for unsignalized intersections. LOS for signalized intersections is based on control delay per vehicle. Control delay, as defined by HCM, includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay and final acceleration delay. According to this definition the minimum design acceptable delay is °O" for design purposes, particularly in a more developed area. For signalized intersections, LOS F indicates that more than one signal change cycle may be required for a driver to pass through the intersection. For unsignalized intersections, levels of service are based on critical gap, the minimum time interval in the major street traffic stream that allows entry for one minor street 12 o 4 W a 5 C �0 O —B JAGAN r OR. ;�\ WELLER ME. 0� 1 PRS �1LL pD E✓ I ........ . . . . . .' 22 PROP. f (� - - -.sue .. oM JIB LB YGCL Mm 5.sm. � 25 f YELLOW MOUI wN RD. w■ f� sraRUnnd rMersecNOn u� Unslv^oNZed MersecNw JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PARKING GARAGE TURNOVER AM PEAK HOUR ��'�' ]571 ATS FMIRE SS 12 M o �I7 �1 J AIIN DR. � I� 30 • . . . . . .. ....... y �45 PROP. SITE o� hQ Q J J �5 McCL Mm ST.SM. l5 I YEL U3W7N RD. 4 W� 519/blheG lMxsedlm wI♦ Unslgmllzed IHe-sztlm JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PARKING GARAGE TURNOVER PM PEAK HOUR ]50! M o 4 W I i r� - -efinz J I L A .14 DR. WElIER AVE. � I r 65/39 � r 32/42 E✓ oS W11L 9 64 /ll2 \ \ \ No � h a �� Ise /IZa ........ ...... U/roe �-- PROP. SITE i r r ...... N m n `llb /Z6 J I L F5/5 63 � NcC(NMm 9 .sm. I r YE( N W wm RD. 269/229 2I 1ISB 3212I--- y h F" � Slplpllzed Mersxilm 2 � Urelpmllie0 IRm'cec1lai 4 X/Y MIPN Wa aw Peck w Haar Traffic JEFFERSON (CARILION) TRAFFIC STUDY ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2020 BUILDOUT AM /PM PEAK HOUR ���' Hr5 FNrYIflE Gl JYn 1 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Canlion Clinic vehicle from an intersection, particularly critical being the left turn vehicles. Level of service "E" is generally considered to be the minimum design standard. At an unsignalized intersection, LOS F occurs when there are not enough minimum gaps to allow the movements on the minor street to enter the major street in a "reasonable" amount of time. Table 7.1 — Level of Service and Delav Unsi nalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 0 -10 A 0 -10 B 10 -15 B 10 -20 C 15 -25 C 20-35 D 25 -35 D 35 -55 E 35 -50 E 55 -80 F >50 F >80 Synchro traffic software was used to analyze all signalized and unsignalized intersections in this report. SimTraffic simulation software was used in conjunction with Synchro to further analyze vehicle queuing results. The procedures used by Synchro and SinaTraffic are in accordance with the methodologies stated in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for intersection analysis. SinnTraffic analysis results are summarized in Section 8.0. Analysis results for signalized intersections provide level of service calculations for all approaches as well as an overall intersection level of service. Please note that analysis results for unsignalized intersections do not provide level of service results for all approaches or an overall intersection level of service, but rather a level of service for movements and/or approaches that have a conflicting movement. In this .study, level of service is the basis for the evaluation of existing and background traffic conditions and the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed site on the existing roadway network. Two alternates for design of the parking garage exit were analyzed for this study; a one lane exit and a two lane exit with separate left and right turn lanes. LOS and delay are summarized for the 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, 2020 Build -out (Single Lane Site Exit), and 2020 Build-out (Two Lane Site Exit) study network scenarios per intersection (see Table 7.2). See Appendix C for detailed Synchro HCM LOS Reports. Table 7.2 Input by PYBPCD Checked by TCD /BSM Level of Service per Movement by Approach overall (Delay In seclveh) Inlersedion Scenario LDS Eastbound Westbound NoRM1bouna Soulbbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT AM A A q A q q 2015 Eineing AM A (9 4) (6A (6.5) (85) (8.1) A(9 4) A(6.6) A (8.5) A (7 .6) 5 A A A A A A 2020 Background A AM 3) (9.5) (6.6) (6.3) (9.0) (] 87 (8.2) (e A(9.5) A (6 5) A(9.0) A(8.1) 0 f B A A B 8 B 2020 BWmN B a (Single Lou AM (11.7) (11.9) (8 3) (62) (15.3) (12.4) (12.9) B(11.9) A(6.3) (15.3) B(12.6) N B A A B B ad 2020 Builduut B (Double L,) AM (11 ]) (11.9) (6.3) (B 2) (15.3) (124) (12.9) B (11.9) A(6.3) B(153) U PM u A A A A A Al A 2015 Existing PM A PHP.Lg2 (8 1) A(8B) 8 6) (6.9) (5.8) (]]) (8.4) fA A(6.0) A (7 ]) A(8.3) 0 12 A A A A A A N y 2020 Background A (8.6) (5.9) (57) (8 2) PM (Rq) A(8.6) A(5.9) A(8 2) A(8 8) 'H B A A B CO 2020 BUlmom (Single tn)PM B (11.8) (13. 1) . . (11B 3 ) . (11B N 8(13.1) A(8.1) B(11.3) B(11 ]) B A A B B B 2020 Bulldout B (Double Lo)PM (11,8) (13.1) (8 1) (].9J (11 3) (11.9) (11.4) B(13.1) A(8 t) B (11.3) BIt1 7) Input by PYBPCD Checked by TCD /BSM Table 7.2 (cons) brut by PVB/TCD Checked by TCD /RSM 1) Level of Service per Movement by Approach (Delay In seclveh) Intersection Scenario Ovemll LOS E.tUauntl Westbound NortM1bountl Southbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT AM B A A A A A A A 2015 existing AM A 6.1) (9 6) (9.0) (8.6) (8.57 (6S) (5.0) (4.9) (47) A(8 2) A(85) A(6.9) A(4 9) B B A A A A A A reuna 2¢20 BoCMg 8 (10 2J (9.5) (9.0) (9.0) (T.1) (5.0) (4.9) (4 7) A ( ) A(9]) A(9.0) A(Z1) A(4.9) m m c B 8 B B A B A A q 2020 Buneout A (15.5) (14.0) (12 3) (124) (].5) LL (Single Ln)AM (8 0) B(14.3) B(124) A(].5) A(5.1) y Q B B B B A B A A 2020 guilty"' A (15b) (1411) (123) (124) []5) (56) (5➢) (44) N (Double Led AM (8,0) 8114x3) B(12.4) A (7 5) A(5.1) 3 3 PM y A A A A A A A A c 2015 Existing PM A (]]J (].0) 16.5) (6.5) (6.4) 15.81 15.91 I5.3) (6.3) A (7 2) A(65) A(6 0) A (5.8) A A A A A A A A V 2020 Background A (80J (85) y PM (6 4) A(].5) A (6.8) A (6.5) A(5.8) q c m B B A A A A A A h 202¢ Buudout A (12.0) (10.1) (9.8) (a 7) (6.0) (Single Ln) PM (7,2 ) B(10 5) A(9.3) A(6 8) A (5.8) B B A A A A A q 2020 Buimout A (120) (10.1) (9.8) (BJ) 1 (6.8) (5.8) 18 0) (5.1 ) (Double Le) PM (72) B 110 5) A(9.3) 1 A(6 B) A (5.8) brut by PVB/TCD Checked by TCD /RSM 1) Table 7.2 )cont.) Input by PVB/TCD CM1e<keh by. TCD /RSM 18 Level of Service per Movement by Approach Ovemll (Delay In seclveh) Intersection Scenario Eastbound Westhountl Na7bountl Bouthbountl LOS LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT AM B A q 2015 Existing AM (13.6) (9.1) B (12.5) B A A 2020 ezckgmune _ (14.6) - (9.2) (8.9) - � AM - B(12.8) - - > Q G A A 2020 euuaout - N (Single Lip AM (177) (9.4) (62) etI G A A 2021 ealleam - - _ IOOUbIa LnI AM (17,7) (9,4) - C(15.9) - - A c PM > C q A W 2015 Existing PM (15.4) (9 -0) - (79) 9 - B(139) - N re C A A 2020 Background - - PM (16.1) 19.9) P.BI C - B(14.5) - J C A A 2020 Budd-n ISingle Ln) PM (20.4) (9 2J (8.1) C (16]) C A A 2020 Bwleout - - (26.4) (2 4) - (9.2) - (8.1) - Daub C(16 7) Input by PVB/TCD CM1e<keh by. TCD /RSM 18 Table 7.2 (cop4) Input by PYB/TCD Checked by TCD /RSM 19 Level of Service per Movement by Approach O' Dela In sedveh) Intersection Scenario LOS' Eaetbountl Westbountl Nortbbountl SoWHbountl LT TH RT LT I TH FIT LT TH FIT LT TH RT AM E 8 zero Buileoul - - pnd, M L.) AM (46.3) - E(45.3) m y D C S l 2020 BuOeour - - y (Double Lnl AM - (31 5) (19.8) - C(23.3) _ c v PM L A x ewleom <' Sing (Single LnI PM (142.8) (99 ) - F(142.B) - - F B A zpzp Bn - � i PI IDOUble Lin PM - - (804) (128) - F(59A) Input by PYB/TCD Checked by TCD /RSM 19 M &C Contra. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic 7.1 Specific Intersection Analysis The following subsections discuss the data presented in Table 7.2. 7.1.1 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & McClanahan Street/Yellow Mountain Road The signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and McClanahan Drive/Yellow, Mountain Road experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. 7.1.2 Signalized Intersection of Jefferson Street & Weller Avenue/Flannagan Drive The signalized intersection of Jefferson Street and Weller Avenue/Flannagan experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. The northbound approach is modeled as a single lane for left, thou, and right movements. There is currently approximately 26 feet of lane width at the intersection approach and traffic has been observed utilizing the wide lane space for right turn movements adjacent to thou and/or left turn movements. Per Synchro reports, the approach operates acceptably as modeled and a right turn lane at the approach only improves operations. 7.1.3 Unsignalized Intersection of Evans Mill Road & Weller Avenue The unsignalized intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue experiences acceptable LOS for all approaches during all study scenarios and peak periods. 7.1.4 Unsignalized Intersection of Jefferson Street and Site Entrance The entrance to the proposed development along Jefferson Street experiences undesirable operations (LOS E) at the exit from the parking structure in the single exit lane scenario. Delays are greater than 45 seconds in the AM peak hour and greater than 140 seconds in the PM peak hour. The LOS for movements entering the site from Jefferson Street is acceptable. The entrance experiences acceptable LOS in the AM peak hour at the exit from the parking structure in the (separate left and right) two lane exit scenario. The exit from the parking structure experiences undesirable operations (LOS F) in the two lane PM peak hour. The LOS for movements entering the site from Jefferson Street is acceptable. 20 M &C Comm. It 3507 Caution Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic 8.0 SiniTraffic Queue Length Analyses Queue lengths associated with the 2015 Existing, 2020 Background, 2020 Build -out (Single lane site exit), and 2020 Build -out (Two lane site exit) conditions were analyzed within the study area. The maximum queue length was determined as detailed in Section 7.6 of the VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook, Version 1.1. See Appendix D for detailed SimTraffic Queue Reports for all intersections and movements. Table 8.1 provides a summary of the maximum queue length in relation to the storage length available at the approaches to the study intersections. M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carilion Clinic Table 8.1 — Critical Movement Queue Length Scenario Peak Hour Intersection Movement Maximum Queue Length (ft) Storage Length Available ([) 2015 Existing AM Jefferson St & McClanahan/Yellow Mtn. EB LTR 126 300 WB LT 91 500 WB R 58 150 NB LTR 110 350 SB LT 84 615 SB R 69 615 Jefferson St A, WsOer/Plvwagan EB L 64 70 EB TR 58 80 WB LT 56 100 Will 28 100 -'. NB LTR 165 615 SB LT 103 1,000+ SBT 60 11000+ SB R 58 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WB L 62 60 WEI R 9 50 NB T 40 200 NB TR 40 200 SB LT 84 250 SB T 84 250 PM Jefferson St& McClanahan /Yellow Mtn. EB LTR 220 300 WB LT 70 500 WB R 35 150 NR LTR 119 350 SB LT 142 615 SB R 88 615 Jefferson St & WelledFlannagan EB L 49 70 EB TR 61 80 WB LT -WB 55 100 R 60 100 NB LTR 128 615 SB LT 97 1,000+ SB T 80 1,000+ SB R 56 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WBL 57 60 WBR 9 50 NB T 4 200 NB TR 35 200 SB LT 80 250 SBT 80 250 22 M &C Comm. N 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg, T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic 2020 Background AM Jefferson St & McClanahan/Yellr w Mtn. EB LTR 141 300 WB LT 115 500 WB R 54 150 NB LTR 131 350 SB LT 70 615 SB R 65 615 lefferaon St & WeOedFlannagan EBL 48 70 EB TR 58 80. . W T 57 " 100. WBR 39 100 NB GTR 162 615. SB LT 95 1,000+ SB T 70 1,000+ SB R 56 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WBL 68 60 WBR 25 50 NB T 48 200 NB TR 48 200 SB LT 65 250 SB T 65 250 EM Jefferson St& McClanahan/Yellow Mtn. EB LTR 180 300 Will LT 65 500 Will 31 150 NB LTR 100 350 SB LT 143 615 SB R 98 615 Jefferson St& Weni,,F ,or,a" EB L 58 70 EB TR 54 80 WB LT 48 100 WBR 62 100 NB LTR 125 615 SB LT 110 ---F 00+ SB T 90 1,000+ SB R 56 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WB L 59 60 WBR 27 50 NB T 4 200 NB TR 29 200 SB LT 95 250 S13 95 250 23 M &C Comm. it 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic 2020 Build -out lane AM Jefferson St & MCClanahan/YellOw, Mtn. EB LTR 210 300 WB LT 100 500 WB R 66 150 NB LTR 197 350 SB LT Ito 370 SB R 85 370 Jeffenion St $ WelledF7xnnagan BB L 57 70 EB TR "68 80 WB LT -- 68 100 W9 R 52 100 NB LTR. 146 250 SB LT 191 1;000+ SB T 74 1000+ SB R' 61 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WBL 66 60 WEIR 26 50 NB T 4 200 NB TR 65 200 SB LT 185 250 SB T 83 250 Jefferaon St & Site Emr. (Single lane site exit) W11 [;R 270 270 NB TR 125 370 SB LT 170 250 SB T 48 250 (Single site exio FM Jeffetsoa St & McClanahan/Yellow Mtn. EB LTR 260 300 WB LT 67 500 WB R 36 150 NB LTR 171 350 SB LT 192 370 SB R 95 370 Jefferson St & Weller/Flannagan EB L 46 70 EB TR 64 80 WB LT 60 100 WB R 60 100 NB LTR 193 250 SB LT 137 1,000+ SB T 91 1,000+ SB R 50 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WB L 62 60 WEIR 17 50 NB T 61 200 NB TR 61 200 SB LT 162 250 SB T 29 250 Jefferson St & Site Entr, (Single lanc site exit) WB LR 311 270 NB TR 1119 370 SB LT 119 250 SB T 40 250 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carillon Clinic 2020 Build -out (Two lane site AM Jefferson St& McClanahan/Yellow Mtn. EB LTR 196 300 WE LT t00 500 WB R 60 150 N13 LTR 217 350 SB LT 119 370 SB R 71 370 Jefferso —t &'. Weller/Flannigan EB L 59 70 EB TR 70 80 WB LT 65 100 WB'R 53 100 NB LTR 236 250 SB LT 197 1.0001 SB T 72 1.000+ SB R 62 85 Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave WB L 66 60 WB R 25 50 NB T 4 200 NB TR 78 200 SB LT 212 250 SB T 135 250 Jefferson St &.Site Batt. (wo Lane Site Exit) WBL 119 ..270 °. WB R 113 270 NB TR 148 370 SB LT 136 - 250 SB `R 42 250 exit) PM Jefferson St & McClanahan/Ycllow Mo. EB LTA 246 300 WB LT 78 500 WB R 71 150 NB LTR 196 350 SB LT 194 370 SB R 99 370 Jefferson St& Weller/Flannagan EB L 44 70 EB TR 63 80 WE LT 83 100 Npe R 64 100 NB LTR 208 250 SB IT 187 1.000+ SB T 123 1,000+ SB R 55 85 Evans Mill Rd & Wellcr Avc WE L 57 60 WB R 33 50 NB T 4 200 NB TR 99 200 SB LT 165 250 SB T 66 250 Jefferson St & Site Ent, (Two Lane Site Exit) WB L 277 270 WB R 182 270 NB TR 133 370 SB LT 165 250 SB T 83 250 `i M &C Comm. N 3507 Carillon Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Carilion Clinic The reported maximum queue lengths at the westbound left turn lane at the intersection of Evans Mill Road and Weller Avenue exceed the available storage beginning in the 2015 Existing AM peak hour conditions. Weller Avenue between Evans Mill Road and Jefferson Street is only 60 feet from edge of pavement to edge of pavement. All other public streets in the study network do not exceed their available storage lengths. The proposed site entrance exiting trips will experience excessive queue lengths based on the projected traffic volumes in the AM and PM peak hours. The queues will stack back into the proposed parking garage. The two lane exit scenario produced considerably shorter queue lengths than the single lane exit scenario. Table 8.2 compares the two scenarios. Table 8.2 — Build -Out Scenarios Queue Length Comparison leffersoa St & Site Emr. AM (Single lane site exit) WB LIZ 270 270 AM Jefferson St & Site Eno. WB L 119 270 (Two lane site exit) WB R 113 270 Jefferson St & Site Eno. PM (Single lane site exit) WB LR 31 I 270 PM Jefferson St & Site Env. WB L 277 270 (Two lane site exit) WB R 182 270 M&C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For: Caution Clinic 9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations This study analyzes existing traffic operations of the study street network and impacts to these operations that might be expected upon completion of the proposed 15 story building with parking in the five lower levels and medical facilities in the upper ten levels. The study evaluates the impacts to vehicle level of service and delays, vehicle queue lengths at the study intersections, pedestrian accommodations, potential improvements to the Jefferson Street typical section, and site entrance lane configuration. The medical facility is scheduled to be constructed and fully occupied by 2020. The study evaluates the proposed site entrance from Jefferson Street with two options. Option #I provides a single exiting lane for left and right turn movements; option #2 provides two exit lanes, one each for left and right turn movements. The operational and queueing analyses indicate that option #2 with two separate turn lanes will operate with less delay and less queue length than option #1. It is recommended that option #2 (two exit lanes) be implemented for exiting the site to Jefferson Street. It is recommended that a full -access be provided for the new entrance on Jefferson Street with all turning movements being allowed. Further, Jefferson Street should continue to operate in the current manner, one lane northbound and two lanes southbound. Existing on- street parking to the south of the new entrance should be eliminated to provide adequate sight distance for drivers exiting the parking structure. Replacement free public parking will be available in the new parking structure. Potentially, several on- street parking spaces could remain in service north of the new entrance. To promote the concept that northbound Jefferson Street is a one lane only approaching the new entrance after the on- street parking has been removed, a portion of the roadway can be striped out. Ideally, the curb line could be moved in toward the centerline to provide to provide a physical restriction to one lane. Reconstruction of the curb would improve safety for pedestrians. Pedestrians are projected to leave from and go to the proposed medical facility and parking area as they access other medical facilities within the Roanoke Memorial complex. This study predicts and models 50 pedestrians per hour crossing Jefferson Street; 20 pedestrians per hour are predicted to cross the proposed site entrance parallel to Jefferson Street. It is recommended that a mid -block crosswalk be constructed parallel to the south edge of the new site entrance. Additionally, the construction of a pedestrian refuge island in Jefferson Street is recommended. The anticipated increase in pedestrians due to the proposed development does not cause adverse effects to vehicular operations within the study network. An in -road sign for motorist to yield to pedestrians within crosswalk (Sign RI -6, Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD) may be placed at the crosswalk location. Depending on actual pedestrian volumes upon implementation 27 M &C Comm. # 3507 Carilion Clinic Medical Bldg. T.I.A. For Carilion Clinic of the proposed facility, additional steps may be taken to protect pedestrians, including possibly implementing pedestrian actuated flashing beacons in advance of the crosswalk. Should undesirable LOS at the exit from the parking structure be realized during actual operations, it is anticipated that drivers would use the secondary entrance to Flannagan Drive and the Jefferson Street traffic signal. This signal has adequate capacity to handle such additional traffic. Carilion prefers to provide a full - access entrance on Jefferson Street and allow drivers to make left turns out of the parking structure during all hours of the day, realizing that inconvenience due to delays at the exit during peak hours may be a consequence. Queueing of this exiting traffic will be on Carilion property and not on public right of way. This analysis indicates that the existing study network provided adequate vehicular traffic capacity to accept the proposed development, so long as the afore mentioned measures are implemented for the site entrance from Jefferson Street and for pedestrian accommodations at a mid -block crosswalk. 28 APPENDIX A Proposed Development Layout i" 3 - 5 Y r4 [ $ 9 g } $ a E 1 1 F I 1 I i 1 � _ a a Y e" g. 1 2. RMEAM HIM € !4q s $ 1a� 3 4i !y 33S�a a d"AM � p .... F5 SIIII .._ad.� l �SI 6,!319 = I � 1 � ■ 1 p. 1 s 1 • 1 I • f 1 1hhil Ij + � �S�II • �d� m aJ�i N ul 3 n w {f r a, 1 a � ° I Fpm ds - a w� 0 0 °i I I I I 1 I i i 1 5 I I� U 'a APPENDIX B Turning Movement Counts by The Traffic Group SPEED LIMIT DM 25 iu �o Complex °C off Gnma� �2 eaA �• MOC,/ d zN a °ah 9 s• ��, t 2qs, SPEED LIMIT 25 °nay ss' 0 O t First Presbyterian � �R• cnurcn ,, � o Y MIT 2ss t� a / %ti M/ 25 �� zss J�0 a R °aa � m o� Building C9' 25 777, S. Jefferson Street FIFLDerowaee JW/JH JOHNO.: 2o15-0106 at DMMS .: FB DDN NUnE: AkCnnahvn �+s. Je�kraonrgn McClanahan Street DA E: Feb" 10, 2015 LOCaT*E: RDarrOPe county, VA W&E: N/A SHEEFNO.: 'j OF '/ .m rvr nen ru nrvrunoaa uvurvl aVmMNFiT Cou niM GY VCV� oC an E: P3 1 9LOCeINIOXne S.Jdlenan 51rx1 MCC"reM1 an SVeel aI nlort4a e . VVPInuT : Deic FeLruary06, 2015 We E* Mere2 b ' : 5SuH n ny'CdE0 E TueaEay 5M10 ep r PnaaiunEIfi r,(g_ „ I �/%II/Y�6 IMM 4E 1--tl nPeOne F ,JeXernon sVen 0 :* mxaC o l5 re e ro6 ro X ls ro T ] 5 6fi d 0 I I 0 6611p50 30 ] p 4 14 p 10 p p 25 630. 6tl5 B 1 16 p 16 6 p 22 9 IS 0 p 6 p 0 SJ 116 645 -]:p0 ]:IS -]:3p ]'9p -74S in 1] 20 IS 1p 16 0 1 3 2 p 1 p 0 0 R iR 30 36 p p p 2d 33 d3 d ] 9 9 p p 0 Rp dR 52 10 I] 6 24 5 Jd p p p 0 p Z< ] 01 69 0 3 ] 12 5 2 R6 36 29 p 0 p 30 3d 33 BIW - 0:15 29 15 3 p p 57 19 0 33 3d 21 p 5! 13 6 dd 16 3 0'90 5 dJ 33 dd 29 0 0 I9a 0 -Gd5 12 p d0 36 p $5 0 Sd 1p 146 ll I 3 MRT 'ea 1 OTn1aM ] 166 121 21 0 0 3 33 2 0 .2 ]3 2 4 23 10 142 201 p 4 6 5] 57 d39 a9 55 564 1 1)03 _ 90 21 2l p 6t 4 9 p 66 25 66 0 6 5 12 0 25 912 57!15 m P9 p fig 61 p ]9 3d 69 0 116 13 133 163 4pd 63p d40 645 4p ]: 15 ]2p- 3 ]r45 -10.5 53 61 ]B 89 92 3d 2 51 61 6 0 0 p p p 119 40 162 I 64 0 p p 5] ]1 ]5 16 8 P9 31 9 34 dl 0 10 p p 5 100 206 210 20 0 30 )e W 69 24 99 32 136 3 119 p 0 p p p p p 0 0 151 193 2 220 93 IS 16 29 29 30 9 2 P3 PS 2p 21 24 1dd 115 IB1 199 p 0 0 p p IBp 164 0 20 2451 p 561 696 Bp Bp p -9pp PV HOUR 01 11 5 ] ]:30 0:30 ' 09 2 p 162 1 I]5 34 0 1p 61 130 1 0 R2p W 21 1]4 p R25 el] M �8 J90- :15 29 p 1 45 Q II ] 0 3 p p 21 16 5] 0 )] 161 330 335 34 3 1p 54 p 13 OR 0 27 6 5 14 0 1 18 5 14 3] 0 6 17 2 O1 00 4',115 - 1 4 4s d45 111 510 51b 5:15 fi30 90 506 -600 olela 52 36 5➢ 44 36 29 t5p 6 19 2] d] 4p abd 2 e 1 8 21 1 p p p p p p ]6 60 ] 9 p2 73 8 66 1 0 2 p 19 25 1 9 V 10 199 ) ifi I6 25 2 p 138 p 0 o 0 p 0 p 31 22 31 34] 36 10 936 ] 1 6 13 ] 23 1 I 4 3 5 18 x 2 3 4 Sp I]6 1 p 1 0 0 Y 0 p 1 p 8 19 380 1 24 14 p 229 6 ] 5 7 6 1p 6 19 19 ao 2 616 43 2 3' 4 42 62 3 0 p 60 3 ] 3 8] 6 11 ]p 193 1]4 2q0 2a3 �11 21681 6 ppT 1 - p 3a0 - 431 4n5 p 500 4 30 30 -5:15 W -6'.W GK MOOR P4'.46� 156 63 9 51 60 58 69 Bp 9 Id2 ¢5 28 48 62 66 66 0 p p 0 1 226 a 25p Pp 201 3 559 3 1 2 J 1 52 65 3 3 69 6B 49 44 50 56 44 p 0 p 0 0 0 4 �I] 12 1Rb 131 119 19 51 19 50 4 3 7 71 Z 14 57 p 1 p p 0 0 p 70 0] 81 9 e 1 2p 16 70 140 14 03 82 163 1]6 1B1 I73 p p 1 2 92 pBl 188 296 313 9 60¢ X29 ] 7 9 645 IEAVV TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY - co.m.E by: VCU mw.eemn M: s s.00n.,.00 leet Sets amn,ar, m. NIS Tuesday .,E: MCCIamh.n sleet Weane,aunnY,Clld o Loteem: XO.nose. Vnemb E..ly'. sN sm Fxnnaa AMMI.CTS � I 11111T I *o a.IMAE.eas- ene aw......... e s. :1 TIME In m _ CEr u _. TOTAL RM as p s 71 73 4 0 1 C 5 Tea A u ]tl5 -B 00 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 1 10 991 1 0 9 > 0.5.9'.00 1 0 3 p p p 0 5 IX'WI: ' t] . I 0 33 5 2 0 ] C . 0 0 3 1 16 0 19 52 Xr T700 -]00 1 p 1 0 0 p 5 9 aCls -]:ls 0 1 4 p 0 p 11 Eao -a30 ] o o ] p 0 0 o 0 s 6:.s a.5 1 0 p a z 0 0 1 . 0 5 ?00 1 ss ] 1 0 9 p o o C z o s o e t ]3p -B3p . 1 0 ] p 0 ? t 0 ] 2a ]35.940 ] 0 C 9 0 0 0 3 0 9 0:00 - 2 C 0 11 0 3 1 C . 0 0 ' o Tea A u 11 21 11 12 BICYCLES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY -- enP Imervec/m, M sJ.X.nun q/M01 o./.: F.e.u,ryas,zals ruesa.y 7 %ri�r /i . NOCIan.M1en g4.e1 Lon4on:P VXpinla aey: SX Fly, qIC FIR yIN� AN T ATTIC FROM SOUTH O MS. a. /.n.�.eESm:/U.OmX ,00./ s.,l.m,..a�1re�m ,o .lo.r m10PX:o.ma. P.w umo.`:`�. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �0 0 0 0 <s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o mOS a:oa 0 a 0 o a 0 a �0o aas 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 a/s aao 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]'so -rOS o 0 0 o a a 0 0 0 2:31 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s4s a:as 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 noo -e. 0 0 0 a 0 a o a zls e�s a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 n0 a 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]05 P9s : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 800 -990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIM 1 HIT' (PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE OBSERVATIONS - SUMMARY - coumM by: vcu mmxtuon uL S. Jeftmon street ..l.: f.e.uory Of zo6 .on : N.no,b, n51m1 w.,m.,: SUnnVlCOle no.nou., vesml. Ellobecl evax NQUHLEG A. 630 4� Ob LEO sler boo,5 5]5 -630 631.6 ::::F-- 3:05 -< 51s 95 -] a p <3p ].31 -]:<p5 O ] 745 8 9]5 3 4 5 11 1 If p ses 5 330 6 10 LEO PIL- _ p n.w.v sler boo,5 5]5 -630 631.6 ::::F-- 95 -] ] ]5 11 5 -] ].31 -]:<p5 ] 745 8 9]5 3 4 ly 5 330 6 10 <:I5 IIl 501.5]5 10, b S- IS -SDp PIL- _ p n.w.v L,I»m �.� Tom= o o I I I sler boo,5 ::::F-- 9 L,I»m �.� Tom= o o I I I 1 I p 0 6 9 1 I p 0 TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY oY^ en eon.: Fw mureee o1a.Jm.rsw sl,rel AM 00. m16 Tuese., '7r FORM M Vl glnlal EA ... I Ey: RN SOr PelinP 5 - -- M i Tx"ME T xa 6 n, w RME V - u0m Toeu n olrt mxu L[ - O Ill TOTAL i NIM ow 006:15 6 O 615 -6 0 6 9' fiJ0 -6:<5 ] 16 6 6 1 4 0 51 117 6:<5 -T ➢0 1. 18 0 22 0 27 Tp0 -]']5 I< 1 IF 6 135 ).15 -]9p 21 ill 0 J4 0 33 0 42 8 21 1 p 11 1 1 IF 0 q 160 ]:3p -]. 3 p a0 0 0 39 19t le 21 0 14 OF 8 15 25 15 3 p 32 0 fi0 209 5 0 29 0 0 6] 2] 66 1� B:f5 -990 2 0 44 0 p fib 3 X5T.Ma 5 120 25 0 354 32 80 2 4 2 205 1 0 02B 59 50 411 SBJ V95 6:OOT 7 pp 2] 11 1 51 81 B 5 321 6J5 -7 J2 10 0 104 13 10 415 6:00 -1 :30 06 0 09 0 0 I85 502 6Afi -TAS I10 0 11] 0 1 152 0 169 5]] 1 10 8 6 1 0 0 I28 0 bB 69 126 0 0 0 IS] ]9 135 1 20 15] 0 21 77 - 30 3 % 64 36 0 216 01 229 32 21 1]9 039 141 4� 99 60 0 tET 73 195 29 34 031 0 -300 : 110 a0 15 p 1 145 35 2 1 ME, 1 0 152 21 26 .1 1 2 TS] ax HOUR 1 71C El 14 12 0 111 1 n0 11 1 211 l4l 1 0 Ill 32 21 179 D 232 P. 0 3:15 34 p 21 01 3515 990 06 19 12 0 0 6d 159 3M 3Y5 0] % 0 9 0 0 19 5 0 0] 1]B 345.4 p0 53 21 0 0 45 0 ]2 400 - J6 0 l7 11 C ol is _ 35 1 2 19 ] I8 1 29 1 )B 32 ] 6 - 19 20 16 0 p 0 6 - - 51 J] IB 25 p 0 515 -530 46 40 18 0 104 0 24 5 10 1 36 42 25p sl� SAfi -6:00 p ]5 10 3 is 10 12 02 476 260 156 0 9 211 141 0 141 10 A 1 0 212 13 310 569 0 All 2432 1 H iota. 1 00 -4:W 25 0 32 -4a5 2. 0 fl ;Ill ]5] C :99 J Pop -5:00 135 80 I 0 314 1 Y15 il5 160 929 66 0 331 0 64 0 90 66 0 14 IB 21 05 J24 B]] 4.80 530 8 66 0 3]1 6 ]0 0 1 52 13] 1]9 934 M6 4Afi -5145 36 p 3B0 2 61 p 136 60 0 ]3 19 0 191 350 94] ➢p -6 65 133 60 0 3 70 45 0 1 58 1 0 7" 140 97 0 344 899 N77, S. Jefferson Street n6LDwo9N9Y. JW/JH noeno,: 2015 -0106 lye at oanwu By: p/2D oory Wane s✓ern. :w sr er wcue,.epn [/� Weller Avenue I Flannagan Drive DATE: Febmary 10, 2015 LOCATION', ROET ke, VA scALE: N/A SHEETNO.: 2 OF 3 SPMET 25 1ri It 10. A t Gate m Carillon t0 11,4— Existing Roanoke Traffic 9.5' Memorial 11' F Signal 10 .5 Hospital 12' '' �►10' Welled Flannagan W13 O Drive Clinic i _ *_ T 14' 19.5' i sreeo d Line Removed for 1 Lane LIMB 25 cl 0 N77, S. Jefferson Street n6LDwo9N9Y. JW/JH noeno,: 2015 -0106 lye at oanwu By: p/2D oory Wane s✓ern. :w sr er wcue,.epn [/� Weller Avenue I Flannagan Drive DATE: Febmary 10, 2015 LOCATION', ROET ke, VA scALE: N/A SHEETNO.: 2 OF 3 CARSTURNNG MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY - - - - - n C•. HY 4, VCU 14 1 1.0 9] 33 SB 4 R 5] 66 79 70 ]3 666 196 6 120 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 1U B0 . 3 ll, ] B 9 2 6 65 37 61 53 56 56 64 6]0 3 0 20 iIYF m1•..em•Y m: s.Jmeaon slr..1 n•9••O,w.. w.ne. Loollon: Po.••ke,VI,91n1. YTM1r.•n SlreH �n. a.e••e 9. JeM r.an Slreel Yiw n.l.: we•me,S" RIRHrel b,: Feb,.., 03. xols "o. SX Flvnvyn orrvu Ea�om 21 93 21 12 7 I6 14 1 0 B 196 T ... d, lt., N.11•9:I We Y�are nue 1 � . G/NIP X. 3E AM 32 4 2a 25 21 390 TMX u0 _ 1 30 11p 445 3 -6Ii, a_ p 3'90 . 5:45 - PEFII 6 HOUP rM ]xP 00 63 3] 40 ulx 284 286 2]5 380 0 p9 2] 231 4t 2R 219 225 219 15 $ uTM 6 249 e Ilwu 11 6 6 8 5 25 =] 24 23 EJ9µ ]l 66 5] 2 33 Te 51 50 56 51 40 34 fi00 -6 0 0 p 0 2 ]SB] ]]3 ]5] 264 B In p Zlrt 6:fE -6:3p 0 1i 2➢ 0 0 630 -6:6 ID 0 33 0 0 p Ixx i65 -].90 0 0 p 8 0 1p9 ]90 -]1 0 a5 p 59 2 0 It6 191 6 p 24 16] ]a0 -]'q5 1 5 2fi 51 2 9p 0 6 E B 0 11 g p 22 f9J ]'A 6 -3'. ➢0 0'00 -0:15 23 5 W 0 II 0 60 15 0 0 106 9 2 0 9 5 6 6 2t O m 0:13 -B90 6 Ip 61 5 109 5 6 UI i 1 29 0 B20 -BN3 19 9 66 1 6 ] pp 19 3 sDo x H, m1m 1.1Tem• ne 2 PSS 13n p 5 5 . 14 0 03 9W 52 13 06 p 12 1p3'ss a .1 ]4 o 0 19 2f3 11016 600 7 -w 6 1 7 fi<p 245 6: 5 -T 1 38 42 3e 42 0 47 47 pp 66 02 ill 136 1 78 ]6 ros 1 I]9 236 2 o Q p 171 s 14 19 2 ] ] 1 ] 0 1s 23 al s 23 ] N 11 16 2 29 ax A ]1 Bp 334 J91 31. 536 ]00 -B:0 5 -BaE ;O1 0 49 360 0 I6 0 2 33 27 p 0] 06 ] 1. ]64 741 030 6'.00 -990 PEM HOUR 00 01 13 0 126 40 0 16 p 2 46 8 392 33] 343 ] 0 0 p 46 363 22 2 25 3 IB 12 3 0 4] 41 23 $E 3] 0 06 81 34 25 ]52 PY 0 -3a5 - 30 3 p -345 3:45 -49p 490 430 415- 4:3p -4:45 5 5:00 530 645 iil1 ] H1".i. 1H i41np OW 14 1 1.0 9] 33 SB 4 R 5] 66 79 70 ]3 666 196 6 120 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 1U B0 . 3 ll, ] B 9 2 6 65 37 61 53 56 56 64 6]0 3 0 20 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 6] ] 6 14 9 5 B 5 B p 32 9 fi 5 5 9 9 10 6 3 0 1 p p 21 93 21 12 7 I6 14 1 0 B 196 5 11 10 B 0 11p] I B 15 17 16 6 14 13 6 5 1 1 2. 14 0 1 61 0 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 0 32 4 2a 25 21 390 I65 2 206 106 1]9 _ 1 30 11p 445 3 -6Ii, a_ p 3'90 . 5:45 - PEFII 6 HOUP 46 44 34 3] 46 53 2 165 IB9 206 Rap P9 00 63 3] 40 0 0 0 p 284 286 2]5 380 0 p9 2] 231 4t 2R 219 225 219 15 $ 0 0 0 6 249 36 26 2] 11 6 6 8 5 25 =] 24 23 p p 0 0 0 0 ]l 66 5] 2 33 Te 51 50 56 51 40 34 17 64 66 61 4 ] O6 0 0 p 0 135 112 152 142 11] ]SB] ]]3 ]5] 264 HEAVV TRUCKS TUflNING MOVEMENT CGUNT- SUMMARY o p 6 t o a z 1 21 a p 9 - 6 6 a 3 96 - z s � 21 0 0 0 p o 0 s s 0 I 0 0 p 0 0 0 p p p p 3 2 3 3 2 p o 6 0 p o p p p s p 0 0 0 p o 1 p o p 6 p p p 0 p p 6 s 0 [aunletlby:VC11 0 p p p s s 6 2 p 1 1 1 1 19 p p s s 0 2 6 2 < 9] 0 -E p0 _ 4 -4 is 3 30 9p 3: <5 -0 400 -5 115 -i16 30 -6Po EAKHOUR� 1 1 t ] s 1 0 In lenetllon ol: FS. Jetlenon Sreal na9a n ONVe�W¢Iler gven ue Lotallm:goanoFa.VOpinla mn 54eergZnerso Ef tnerpN Oale: WeelM1ar: En1erM Ey: Febmary0]2015 bunnylCdJ SN Fle repan E`IVe EOmwom 6 ) 0 0 0 0 0 p iueaEay -. Palln q wellOar Pwno (� /Ji( idlpl/I 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0E:W �ue M1 0 0 0 0 0 3� � 6 0 3 1 1 1 I 0 0 p 6 s 5 a < 0 p 0 0 0 0 9 B ] 36 36 20 5 6.30 0 0 69E 30.6:05 p p p 5 - 1:00 1 2pp -0:IS 1 0 0 0 0 ]30 -0AS p 0 p 800.0:6 0 I 2 :IS - 64 B 30 0 3 0. 2 0 9 s.90p 2RrtT. 12 > 0 25 r r3 p 0 0 ] 0 0 p p I 0 1 0 Q 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 p 0 ] 0 0 p 0 5 10 Om p 0 0 0 3 0 r 0 5 p 0 12 5 5 6 3 Ip 600T.le ]p0 p p I -]:IS 2 630 yap a z p 4 0 O. B00 6 9 0 0 IS IS -B p _1'0 -SIOp 5 0p ASSNS 5 PEAK HOUR 5 0 0 1 PEgK MOOD I 2 I p p 1 4 z 2 6 1 p ] 1 p 0 0 5 < 3 6 6 ] B : 0 0 1 I I 0 p o 1 r 1 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 3 z 2 t p 2 2 3 ] p 0 1 r t 3 3 1 ] e 0 2 p p p 0 10 ID 10 0 1p s 23 t0 t6 .W 9'15 ]1 .5.330 5 345 -a:p0 4.1 ms 4 sons -s � sns -v s90 -Sas To 1 N o p 6 t o a z 1 21 a p 9 0 0 0 p o s p 0 6 6 a 3 96 0 0 p 1 p z s � 21 0 0 0 p o 0 s s 0 I 0 0 p 0 0 0 p p p p 3 2 3 3 2 p o 6 0 p o p p p s p 0 0 0 p o 1 p o p 6 p p p 0 p p 6 s 0 t 0 p p p s s 6 2 p 1 1 1 1 19 p p s s 0 2 6 2 < 9] 0 -E p0 _ 4 -4 is 3 30 9p 3: <5 -0 400 -5 115 -i16 30 -6Po EAKHOUR� 1 1 9 9 8 7 ] s 1 0 0 p 0 0 1 1 IS 6 I 0 J 6 ) 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 196 1 B ] 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0E:W 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 3� � 6 0 3 1 1 1 I 0 0 p 6 s 5 a < 0 p 0 0 0 0 9 B ] 36 36 20 BICYCLES-TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY c eanv: 'cu �}/IT,,q;` S.J Ile 5 D caoo s C0 WM 0 E:FI nok u •W OPve O W L o o :S . a n o do J ] 20 IS a T a o E o a G/% mo / IJM L Roanoke, V E . � n aA ..E'o w E oCeT TOTALI S J sannryn U ek av a o,:e . Mssas O ] . 141145 0 0 0 0 0 0 fi45 -]:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 aas o 0 o a o 0 0 7 3 aas n 0 1 o o E a s880 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 -900 0 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -7, o a o a o 0 o a 645 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 7 E0 ' a a 0 0 0 o a 0 naa -eaa o 0 0 0 o a o 0 o a o 0 0 �. s -e:as o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a 0 0 a o 11 441 1 TOTALS mre, :nm.I...yMADnb.., ..e: Pi....e..ux... wartre..... v,y,m, 0 C ounbtlby:vN o.,.: w..m.,: ebn P.b,..ry m,z0s s...mc.a sx 7 ; AE n]p a!m 11 411 4 9]0 eas z p 0 1 141 15 p 1 11 0 �l p.5 45 45.6:00 TOTALS 0 p 33 7 30 745 0 141 11 A 0 z 0 0 s 9]as 5.830 0 0 TOTALS 6:00.6]5 0 AM 7 ; n]p a!m 11 411 4 9]0 eas z p 0 1 TOTALS 15 p 1 11 0 p.5 45 45.6:00 TOTALS 0 p 33 AM 6:00.6]5 0 7 ; n]p a!m 11 411 9]0 eas z 0 0 0 Tm,d,y 71 v1,A EL G 0 0 0 0 WEST LEM A I p 0 � p 11 411 141 S 11 1 TOTALS 15 0 0 0 Tm,d,y 71 v1,A EL G 0 0 0 0 WEST LEM A I p 0 � p TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY -� 17 R D 41 Nu,..ei oc s. JaParson 51tte1 11 41 4 li 11 oua:'Iss.ry Ole 3015 I iu.aJry ..I.nn.4.n Utl..- AMIMA.C... WnBIa:...n.¢oIJ LFCTM R ybMM ,,/f/.� l 9 : nak. E e by; OR 5 P" I "- sisi .x 6nJUe TO 78 11 0 n 8 2 uE -.. . m AM ii A b is 3. ]en 3 a2 0 3p 6 ]:15 1p 17 34 0 0 69 3 2 0 6 B 9 1 _ _ 10 10 39 3 8 p 1] 13 <5 p % 0 p p 2015 -]2p 15 5] 12 6 2 8 Ix 53 12 6 6 8 ]:<5 0.00 12 3 9 10 2J9 0 -8:16 x5 16 0 6 ] B:IS "8'Jp 0 ?9 6< 96 9 1 160 12 6] 895 -900 61 7 » 85 13 22 101 3Xr ioYla 4 26] 141 0 592 156 »6 17 C 9 51 t2] l0 0 I 62 69 B4 0 2 180] TOM 600 ]p0 73 186 8 16 369 _ -]'15 71 ]9 19 5 x9 680 -]3 162 ] 33 19 24 0 77 530 - - 200 65 Z36 Ip 3d 66 609 "0 .pp 0 x14 5p 3]4 49 25 0 9] ]l4 ]:I6 "0.15 0 xal 51 0 424 0 4] 0 96 ]'9p -080 123 43 C 296 f0 p 452 0 10 0 35 0] 52 ]45 -0. 48 0 l92 I' 4149 2 2 33 34 42 121 52 257 33 349 9 9 25 3 14 60 4 2] 1 0 94 ]84 N 17 R D 41 11 41 4 li 11 11 lb I 67 3 545 TO 78 11 0 101 8 2 N 17 R D 41 11 0 17 saEeG LIMIT 25 x m 0 x I I m c x ! t W .5,10, 1 O x Weller Lane /Avenue � N Y x 11 F to a „• 0 Flashing 12, Yellow y Signal 13' 11l tlJ�► Clinic ,0' ,0' ,0' ,i• v 0 i I I x W i GPET LIMB 25 MREvans Mill Road %LGMWR .n" /," 1--0, 201°11 at IXUNM BY: VRD OGNN E EwuFN9RaNOf Wey,[ E Weller Avenue 0P1E FeNNary 10, 2015 LGG m: RGawke, VA sruE: M/A WE W i Gr 3 CARS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT- SUMMARY C[unl.- VCY InCxocloM oC Hana MenueE ne, e0rvary .11 3015 iueaaay Lo[a11w:POenoMe, VbBlnle En1ereO by SN TAR, i A TRAFFIC FROM CRT. TRAFFIC F80M A.L- TRAFFIC FROM Ailly TO AT TIME 1 TRIM. 11 T 44A AI TI I HEAVY TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT -SUMMARY ne cu EMMMea �: y �/i,p'` Inlenecllon al: EVene MIIIPwE Febueryp3x015 Tueaaay Irgn Mna:w.u.,menw AMCZu onnncma , / ",M w: Roanoke. virmnlM En,mea by: SP 51., Pe0n9:d G/%/(, /' FROM TME e..n. mu Pwe ,4 P TRAFFIC .,,o.,,rc3. 6:oo. els PIOM� .o0r., M�.a MM ,aa. wo»< _ .00, _ o-o tMTALE,W A. goo ans p p ]ns -a3o 0 0 0 0 0 Sao -]s o p o 0 0 'TO 10 o o p p 0 p o 0 e�s -eso z p a p 0 p i z o z p p o eao -aas o 0 o o o 0 p o o x o 3PermaM p la ] p w re 0 0 o Iz , o to o I o p o C C 6:OO ra. z 0 a 0 1 o x 1 2 p p 3 7 15 p s 2 7 0 630 -]30 p B 0 p d 0 0 0 6:J5 -]:ds x p 0 p ] 0 3 p 0 I9 9d 0 0 0 0 ]30 dap 0 p ] 0 a p ] p p 0 p ]d5 -B9s 0 0 ] p D0 0 s 0 0 ^6. ' 6 3 0 P d 0 0 0 d , 0 5 p 0 0 0 0 Z9 CC 0 11 1 13 41 141 1 BICYCLES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY E': mw�nm. o" 6....M, x..e .. r.",..c 6e, mi s T.a �T�T/!]]-pR. „Ill^ T. A6. TRAFFIC FROM WEST LA ..".M E.... WHIM.....a TWE MOW THIS LAFT U-W TOTAL W.W THEW LEFT ULTE TOTAL MOW THEM I.EFT UTH TWIL RICK THEM LEFT U-M TOTAL E.W e.00 -11s o C 0 0 0 0 0 o a o C o a o a 0 C 0 o a: o bas -6 o0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 o a 0 roo -r:�s o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C a a a 0 745-800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o a o 0 o a o 0 0 o a B:1i1.030 0 0 0.." 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 THr7cH la 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Mr T,:,. IIF 7 o0 a a o a a o a o o O o o C o o 0 o a eis is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o a o C a o 0 s3o To 0 0 0 o a o a o o a 0 0 0 0 141 141 0 0 a 0 0 a o a 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a z6a -6'3a 0 0 0 0 nas -e <s o 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 fi:oo -s C a C 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 6:15 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM 3:00 -3:1E 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 F C o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:<s -c00 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 aoo -sis o o a a 0 0 o a a o a o o a o 0 0 a o a C 1 0 D a a a a o a o 0 0 0 o a a s -s oo a 0 0 0 o a o o a U C 0 0 0 o a o o a 0 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 0 o a a 0 C o 1 a o C a 0 0 n L?ioo o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:o0 -so0 0 U 0 C 0 S D 0 0 0 0 1 0 F 0 0 To 5 0 0 0 aas -s:as a 0 a 0 0 C a 0 o a C o a a o 0 0 0 0 o a o PH HOUR 4,30 -v:80 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 1 1 0 �O—ED—ESTBIANAND BICYCLEOBSENVATIONS-SUMMABY - Counl s MIIF tl OuaryO Y L (/oc L a4 INE - W M1 nN Catl e Il E retl Y I nB;i <.lNQP A. 0 6:x .5 Orie Bc01en 0 0 0 6'5 6d0� Oc � Nep rc fiJ0 -645 0 p p 0 y9s o 5.600 0 e:pp _6 a a fiTl 615 0 0 015 b3 4 ]0 0 0 T 45 45. oo o o p 4 -4:15 p 4p p p 0 asap 0 0 0 0 soar sp EASTILEG p -6:15 Pwen nanx4P filcYnes PaCennanz WEBi 3Ea Bipvlex AM 105.690 13 141 0 fi30 -6R5 $00 W -6'15 S A00 'Ms 3 55 T95 p 4:45 - 41400 0 4 15 5 4:3p 95 0p bo0 -m's 1 sls -sso � p s'.30 .595 LO6 TOTALSTURNING MOVEMENTOOUNT.SUMMAHV c ... me er: vcU ]0° M :15 SIS 3]0 9D 345 5- -4:1s a pI5 4 30 a41 445 4 5'4° -55 pp5 11 5'.30.545 1 11 5'AS -6:00 oYX 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 ]2 93 90 ]] tm ]5 1 6° 1045 5 R 19 19 R2 30 16 19 16 299 p ° 0 p o 0 p B] 105 101 °5 R1 p6 120 9] 134 Ill 6 ]6 19B 15 16 IS xz 15 19 ]p 183 B 35 30 33 33 43 32 404 mbn.nlon oc Er... uW qo.a .oa: w.n., n..o.e Royal III TIME .. Mliiwda ]P p p p o ° p 0 01b.N1,11,03.2015 we III EII M,I E: q. M�ii P..e 4om�R" RI ip us MEp wi.a, n...r 0 0 p °0 0 0 p 19 1B 3 4 p 17 14 60 ivesa.r 01., Rl4 mnrElc EaoM wESLEO.'s` /r M;M' rZor - nM p 5 0 0 TOTAL 0 p p p 0 pp 0 0 1]3 3o5T4 400 10 130 5 445.545 500 -110 `VEGM XO UP. 0 1 0 0 ]26 361 310 3 364 309 P 0> B1 p 0 0 0 ui. .. wom- 0 p ' p 0 `p 1 195 R 23 2 2tp5 210 '9l IOIAL 0 0 p p 0 p 6W 0 p 0 6:35.6. p 9 0 13 p 9 - 0 10 1 10 1 5 0.15 B 0'30 665 I6 90E45 U 5 -9:00 4R 0 3XR.M1Ie p 641 114 0 0 p p 0 R° 33 39 a4 60 105 82 0] R 5 ]54 1d 119 63 9 sz 55 66 3] R] R9 2] 66] p 0 0 p 0 0 33 p 65 0 BR o 59 0 ]1 0 0 J 0 < 0 40 p 616 13 4 B 5 0 69 0 0 p p ] 1] 19 10 t9 16 I56 0 0 0 R 3 23 2p a 219 p 0 p p 0 1 0 0 0 0 p p p ° 0 0 0 0 p p 0 p 0 0 p 0 p 0 p p 0 p 0 o 2039 ] 1 tl5 114 I6a49 6 °i'�e 11 -]105 0 f25 630 -]:3° 41 645 -]45 0 91 4] '.Op -0. 0 46 ]:15 -B. 0 30 30 p ep - 0 e1 VEU[xnun 39 0 0 166 1 318 366 393 346 294 162 IB 3, 246 212 220 205 1 145 11 0 0 p 2]6 0 265 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 14 I] 23 26 3 23 0 p 0 p 37 4] 50 ]6 ] ]9 ]6 o p 0 0 oB 61 75 99 Ip2 99 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 9B 64 ]12 ]54 }q0 5S2 ]0° M :15 SIS 3]0 9D 345 5- -4:1s a pI5 4 30 a41 445 4 5'4° -55 pp5 11 5'.30.545 1 11 5'AS -6:00 oYX 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 ]2 93 90 ]] tm ]5 1 6° 1045 5 R 19 19 R2 30 16 19 16 299 p ° 0 p o 0 p B] 105 101 °5 R1 p6 120 9] 134 Ill 6 ]6 19B 15 16 IS xz 15 19 ]p 183 B 35 30 33 33 43 32 404 0 p 0 0 p ° p p p o ° p 0 46 46 46 ss 5E 45 90 9 5 3 4 5 3 3 5 0 0 p °0 0 0 p 19 1B 3 4 p 17 14 60 0 p 0 o p 0 0 R 32 1 0 p p p 0 ° p 5 0 0 0 0 p p p 0 pp 0 0 1]3 3o5T4 400 10 130 5 445.545 500 -110 `VEGM XO UP. 0 1 0 0 ]26 361 310 3 364 309 P 0> B1 p 0 0 0 a3B <39 4 a52 3° 66 60 75 49 123 14 144 155 0 0 p ' p 0 0 p 0 0 0 1 195 R 23 2 2tp5 210 '9l 19 ID 0 0 p p 0 p ]2 64 55 44 42 I, 0 0 0 p 1 B -p 6 566 6 59 55 2 0 p 0 0 p 1 0 0 p p ° p 0 0 0 0 p 0 ° 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 p pp20 715 ] 1 Fill 4 ]0 5:]0 333 APPENDIX C Synchro Reports HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/20/2015 7"(,. 4- -% t \- 1 Volume(vehlh) 180 20 30 5 140 80 25 185 5 15 60 95 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Ini8al0 (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehm /In 1693 1707 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1771 1744 1676 1612 1676 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 196 22 33 5 152 87 27 201 5 16 65 103 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, whit 460 52 49 115 693 597 148 509 12 178 492 478 Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 666 128 120 13 1710 1473 81 1423 33 143 1375 1335 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 251 0 0 157 0 87 233 0 0 81 0 103 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehMn 914 0 0 1723 0 1473 1536 0 0 1518 0 1335 0 Serve(g_s), s 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 8.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.8 Prop In Lane 0.78 0.13 0.03 1.00 0.12 0.02 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 560 0 0 809 0 597 669 0 0 671 0 478 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.15 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.22 Avail Cep(c_s), vehlh 1425 0 0 2286 0 1873 1408 0 0 1383 0 1145 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.3 8.2 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 7.6 Ina Delay (d2), sNeh 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 Initial Delay(d3fa /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfO(50%),vehAn 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 9.4 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 6,5 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 7.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh /h 251 244 233 184 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 6.6 8.5 7.6 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phis 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 16.1 17.7 16.1 17.7 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 43.0 29.0 43.0 Max O Clear Time (g_c +11),s 5.7 10.3 3,8 4.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 2.3 32 2.3 3.3 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.1 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page t HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 Baseline hllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.1 32.0 28.2 39.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Right Caner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Redius(ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pod. Left -Right Flow Rate (ph) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pith) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p)h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vfi) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v /h) 0 0 0 0 88th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Coma Quality of Service - - - Pad. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestnan Crosswalk Score 1.98 2.04 1.88 2.16 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS A B A B Baseline hllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StNellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 rvo Way Analysis carrot be performed on Signalized Intersedon. Baseline thllmsa Synchrc 8 Page 3 Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/20/2015 Lane Configurations xf T. 6 8 Q r 12.9 4. 12.9 Change Pence! (Y +Rc), s 44 jr Volume(ve1 30 40 30 20 10 20 10 395 40 85 120 60 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 11 10 (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1500 1625 1778 1736 1664 1736 1761 1807 1761 1753 1699 1685 Adj Row Rate, vehlh 33 43 33 22 11 22 11 429 43 92 130 65 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, vahm 481 235 180 393 154 398 121 681 67 554 810 675 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, vii 1073 847 650 740 556 1435 11 1441 142 745 1714 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehm 33 0 76 33 0 22 483 0 0 115 107 65 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehi073 0 1498 1296 0 1435 1595 0 0 990 1469 1430 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.4 7.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.3 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 0.67 1.00 0.02 0.09 0.80 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 481 0 415 547 0 398 868 0 0 670 694 675 VIC Rado(X) 0.07 0.00 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.15 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a),"hm 890 0 985 1038 0 944 2646 0 0 1718 2346 2284 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream 1`1111 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (it), sNeh 9.6 0.0 8.8 8.5 0.0 8.5 64 0.0 0.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 Ina Delay (d2), sNeh 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.1 Inifial D Delay(d3J,slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %is Back0fQ(50 %),vehU.2 0.0 0.5 02 0.0 0.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),elveh 9.6 0.0 9.0 8.6 0.0 8.5 6.9 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.9 4.7 LnGm LOS A A A A A A A A Approach Vol, vehlh 109 55 483 287 Approach Delay, sNeh 9.2 8.5 6.9 4.9 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs DumSwi (G +Y +Ro), s 19.1 12.9 19.1 12.9 Change Pence! (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Selling (Gmax), s 51.0 21.0 51.0 21.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 9.3 4.0 3.8 3.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.8 0.7 5.8 0.7 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.7 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 55.0 42.8 39.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Righl-Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Paid. Left -Right Flow Rate (Pm) 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flow Rate (oh) 0 0 0 0 Pod. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vfh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 65th pemenftle speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Comer Area per Pad(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Ouardy of Service - - - - Pad. Circulation Area ( sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (si 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.18 2.02 2.16 2.32 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/20/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline thllmsa Synchro H Report Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 212012015 Int Delay, slveh 2.1 Vol, vehlh 60 20 170 60 40 305 Conflicting Peds, pmr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Slarage Leng01 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 65 22 185 65 43 332 Capacity (vehrh) - - 486 896 1270 - Conflicting Roam All 470 125 0 0 250 0 Stage 1 217 - - - - _ Stage 2 253 - - - _ Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 426 Critical Hdwy 5.96 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - _ _ _ _ Follow -up Hdwy 3.68 3.34 - - 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 507 896 - - 1270 _ Stage 1 781 Stage 2 748 - - - - _ Platoon WDcked, % - - - MovCap- i Maneuver 486 896 - - 1270 - MovCap-2Maneuver 486 - - - - - Stage 1 781 Stage 2 717 - - HCM Control Delay, s 12.5 0 1 HCM LOS 8 Capacity (vehrh) - - 486 896 1270 - HCM Lane VX Ratio - - 0.134 0.024 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.6 9.1 7.9 0.1 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A A HCM 95th %tile Divehi - - 0.5 0.1 0.1 - Baseline thllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 --I' � --* "- t 4- t /� `► 1 -' Volume (whlh) 180 150 20 5 60 10 60 70 5 70 135 175 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial (01b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.0 0.99 0.99 0.0 0.99 0.98 0.0 0.94 0.97 0.0 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0,90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln 1693 1734 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1762 1744 1676 1665 1692 Adj Flow Rate, vehth 196 163 22 5 65 11 65 76 5 76 147 190 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peals Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, WO 395 269 30 132 689 594 289 263 14 268 409 484 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 381 0 0 70 0 11 146 0 0 223 0 190 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehltuln 1306 0 0 1744 0 1480 1156 0 0 1510 0 1387 O Serve(g_s), s 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 3.3 Cycle 0 Clp*g_c), s 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.3 Prop In Lane 0.51 0.06 0.07 1.00 0.45 0.03 0.34 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehih 894 0 0 821 0 594 566 0 0 678 0 484 Vc Ratio(x) 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.39 Avail Cap(c a), vehlh 1843 0 0 2354 0 1936 1239 0 0 1519 0 1295 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiOer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sNeh 7.9 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 5.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 7.9 Ina Delay (Q), sNeh 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 Initial Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back010(50%),wMn 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 13 LnGrp Delay(d),sNeh 8.6 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 5.8 7.7 0.0 0.0 8.1 00 8.4 InGrp LOS A A A A A A Approach Vol, vehi 381 81 146 413 Approach Delay, sNeh 8.6 6.0 7.7 8.3 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phis 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+RC), s 15.2 16.9 15.2 16.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmaz), s 30.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g c+11), s 5.4 9.7 5.3 2.8 Green Ed Time (p c), s 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 HCM2010Cbl Delay 8.1 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl/msa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StNellow Mountain Rd 2/20/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) Crosswalk Width (a) Total Number of Lanes Crossed Number of Right -Tum Islands Type of Control Corresponding Signal Phase Effective Walk Time (s) Right Como Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Pad. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) Pod. R Sidewalk Flow Rate (pfi) Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. Penn. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vfh) 85th Pocentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Pad (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped, Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswak Cimubdion Cade Pedestnan Delay (s /p) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS 30.1 32.0 28.2 39.8 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 None None None None 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 400 40.0 Poo Poor Poor Poor 2.06 2.05 1.88 2.17 8 8 A B Baseline Synchro 8 Repent thlfmsa Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SWellow Mountain Rd 2/20/2015 rvro Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline thllmsa Synchro a Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 � 7 ~ t 4N 1 /er \� j r Lane Configurations aj 1. 4 If 4. ?4 if Volume("Iwb) 45 45 55 25 5 30 5 230 25 35 295 55 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q lob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.W 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehi 1583 1731 1778 1736 1679 1578 1761 1778 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 49 49 60 27 5 33 5 250 27 38 321 60 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehm 571 221 271 516 73 417 141 644 58 219 1146 564 Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, velvh 1153 708 867 853 233 1334 8 1405 150 147 2961 1458 Grp Volumejvj, vehlh 49 0 109 32 0 33 282 0 0 193 166 60 Grp Sat Fbw(s),vetuh8n1153 0 1575 1086 0 1334 1562 0 0 1619 1489 1458 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.7 Cycle Q Clar c), s 2.3 0.0 1A 1.4 0.0 0.5 3.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.0 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 0.84 1.00 0.02 0.10 0.20 1.00 Lam Grp Cap(c), vehrh 571 0 492 689 0 417 742 0 0 789 576 564 VIC Ratlo(X) 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.29 0.11 Avail Cap(c a), vehi 1337 0 1538 1392 0 1303 2816 0 0 2819 2573 2521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FlBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.6 00 6.8 6.4 0.0 6.5 6.1 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.6 5.2 Ina Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile Back01Q(50%),valri 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),sPoeh 7.7 0.0 7.0 6.5 0.0 6.5 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.9 5.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A Approach Vol, vehlh 158 65 282 419 Approach Delay, slveh 7.2 6.5 6.4 5.8 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G.Y.Rc), s 14.3 12.3 14.3 12.3 Change Period (YaRC), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 46.0 26.0 46.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c *11),a 5.6 4.3 4.1 3.4 Green Fat Tune (pc), s 4.6 1.1 4.6 1.1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 12010 Signals- Pedestrians 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Crosswalk Length (ft) 55.0 42.8 39.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (it) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (0) 0 0 0 0 Ped, Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rafe (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L Flow in Walk (Wm) 0 0 0 0 Vain. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Dually of Service - - - Ped. Circulation Area ( sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - PedestrianDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.19 2.00 2.17 2.32 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS 8 B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/20/2015 Tvm Way Analysis cannot be performed on signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro B Report thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2015 Existing PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 2/20/2015 Int Delay, s /veh 2.3 Vol, veh/h 50 15 145 55 90 365 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 54 16 158 60 98 397 Conflicting Flow All 582 111 0 0 217 0 Stages 188 - - - - - Stage 2 394 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - CdBpl Hdwy Sig 1 5.84 - - - - - CriUcal Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 444 927 - - 1350 - Stage 1 825 - - - - - Stage 2 650 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % _ _ - Mov Cap - 1 Maneuver 402 925 - - 1348 - Mov Cap- 2 Maneuver 402 - - - - - Stage1 825 - - - - - Stage 2 589 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 0 1.7 HCM LOS B Capacity(veh/h) - - 402 925 1348 - HCM Lune V/C Ratio - - 0.135 0.018 0.073 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.4 9 7.9 0.2 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/2012015 urp Volume(v), Vehlh 263 -• 0 165 0 91 244 t 0 85 1 -' Lane Configurations 904 .T+ 0 1723 a' 1474 1535 2/1. 0 1514 •T if Volume(vahlh) 189 21 32 5 147 94 26 194 5 16 63 100 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0 0.98 0.99 0 0.98 0.95 0 0.94 0.96 0 0.94 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhdn 1693 1707 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1771 1744 1676 1611 1676 Adj Flow Rate, veh4t 205 23 35 5 160 91 28 211 5 17 68 109 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap,vefuh 461 52 50 112 718 618 144 498 11 175 479 467 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 urp Volume(v), Vehlh 263 0 0 165 0 91 244 0 0 85 0 109 Grp Sat Fl*s),vdAAn 904 0 0 1723 0 1474 1535 0 0 1514 0 1333 0 Serve(g s), s 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.0 Prop In Lane 0.78 0.13 0.03 1.00 0.11 0.02 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehh 564 0 0 830 0 618 653 0 0 654 0 467 VIC Rabo(X) 0.47 0.00 0.00 020 0.00 0.15 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a),*M 1404 0 0 2278 0 1869 1329 0 0 1304 0 1076 HCM Platoon Raba 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstreai FOtra(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 uniform Delay (d), sNeh 8.9 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 6.2 8.7 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 8.0 Ina Delay (d2), sNeh 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 010 0.3 Initlal Q De1ay(d3),sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50 %),veh4n 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.8 Lrarp Delay(d),slveh 9.5 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.3 9.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 8.2 Approach Vol, vehm 263 256 244 194 Approach Delay, sNeh 9.5 6.5 9.0 8.1 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 16.1 18.6 16.1 18.6 Change Period (Y +Rc), a 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Selling (Gmac), s 28.0 44.0 28.0 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_a11), s 6.1 11.0 4.0 4.1 Green E)d Time (p c), s 2.3 3.4 2.4 3.5 HCM2010CMDek 8.3 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thVmsa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/2012015 Gr0SSwalk Length (ft) 30.1 32.0 28.2 39.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 8 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Left -Right Flow Rate (1 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 85th perce ile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Comer Area per Pad (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - Pad. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.99 2.04 1.89 2.17 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS A B A B Baseline hllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St /Yellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 Tm Way Analysis cannot be perlonied on signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 --* -►--v "- ~ 4- 4\ t'* `►l 4/ Lane Configurations I T. 4 r 4 4. 8 Phs Duration (G +Y+Rc), s fT r Volume ("hub) 32 42 32 21 11 21 11 415 42 89 126 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A -pbT) 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1,00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h4n 1500 1625 1778 1736 1662 1736 1761 1807 1761 1753 1699 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 46 35 23 12 23 12 451 46 97 137 68 Adj No, of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Car, ve" 465 234 178 376 155 394 116 698 70 545 813 694 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 049 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 Sat Flow, vehra 1072 851 647 719 562 1433 12 1438 144 718 1674 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 35 0 81 35 0 23 509 0 0 118 116 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh)100072 0 1498 1281 0 1433 1594 0 0 923 1469 1430 Q Serve(g_a), s 0.9 0,0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), 5 2.3 0.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.4 8.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.5 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 0.66 1.00 0.02 0.09 0.82 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 465 0 412 531 0 394 884 0 0 644 713 694 VIC Ratlo(X) 0.08 0.00 0.20 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.16 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh)h 811 0 896 946 0 857 2572 0 0 1608 2283 2223 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream RBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.2 0.0 9.3 9.0 0.0 8.9 6.5 0.0 0.0 4.9 4.8 4.6 Ina Delay (d2), sAreh 0.1 0.0 0.2 01 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 00 0.0 %16 Back0fQ(50 %),vehIW.3 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 10.2 0.0 9.5 9.0 0.0 9.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.9 4.7 Vol, vehlh 116 59 509 302 Delay, alveh 9.7 9.0 7.1 4.9 LOS A A A A Baseline thllmsa Synchro B Report Page 4 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y+Rc), s 20.2 13.2 20.2 13.2 Change Period (Y.Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Salting (Gmax), s 52.0 20.0 52.0 20.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c +11), s 10.0 4.3 4.2 3.4 Green Ext rime (p c), s 6.2 0.7 6.3 0.7 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.8 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline thllmsa Synchro B Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 55.0 42.8 39.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Tom Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A(8) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Size B(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Caner Cab Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Red, IsR -Right Flow Rate (P/h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p/n) 0 0 0 0 Pod. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh, Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (mh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Pad(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Pad. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - PedestrianDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.19 2.03 2.17 2.33 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline thllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page e 5 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 Two Way Analysis carrot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 212012015 Capacity (veh/h) - - 468 887 1256 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.146 0.026 Int Delay, sNeh 2.1 HCM Control Delay (a) - - 14 9.2 8 0.1 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A A HCM 95th %file O(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.1 - Vol, vdvh 63 21 179 63 42 320 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 68 23 195 68 46 348 Conflicting Fbw All 494 132 0 0 263 0 Stage 1 229 - - - - - Stage 2 265 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Cried Hdwy Stg 1 5.96 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - - - - - Foflo up Hdwy 3.58 134 - - 2.28 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 490 887 - - 1256 - Stage 1 770 - - - _ - Stage2 738 - - - - - Plataon blocke4 % - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 468 887 - - 1256 - MovCap- 2 Maneuver 468 - - - _ - Stage 1 770 - - - - - Stage 2 705 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 0 1 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) - - 468 887 1256 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.146 0.026 0.036 - HCM Control Delay (a) - - 14 9.2 8 0.1 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A A HCM 95th %file O(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StNellow Mountain Rd 2/29/2015 �� l !~ t 4\ T P v 1 r Lane Configurations 4- 4 it 4. A r Volume(vehm) 189 158 21 5 63 11 63 74 5 74 142 184 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial (ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A -pi 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehmlln 1693 1734 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1761 1744 1676 1665 1692 Adj Flaw Rate, vehlh 205 172 23 5 68 12 68 80 5 80 154 200 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, whi 399 276 31 128 713 615 277 251 12 263 400 473 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, velph 563 665 75 28 1718 1481 347 734 37 340 1171 1386 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 400 0 0 73 0 12 153 0 0 234 0 200 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlMn 1303 0 0 1745 0 1481 1118 0 0 1511 0 1386 0 Serve(g_s), s 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), 5 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 3.7 Prop In Lane 0.51 0.06 0.07 1.00 0.44 0.03 0.34 1.00 Lane Grp Capitol, vehi 707 0 0 842 0 615 540 0 0 663 0 473 VIC 1 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.42 Avail Cap(c a), vehlh 1796 0 0 2299 0 1889 1190 0 0 1481 0 1263 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FlBer(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 7.9 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.7 7.9 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 8.3 Ina Delay (12), sAteh 0.7 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Initial De1ay(d3),s1veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Is BadcG10(50 %),vehM 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.5 LnGrp Delay(d)slveh 8.6 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 5.7 8.2 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 8.9 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A Approach Vol, vehm 400 85 153 434 Approach Delay, si 8.6 5.9 8.2 8.8 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (GW.RC), s 15.2 17.7 15.2 17.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 O 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green SetBng (Grni s 30.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 Max O Clear Time( g_c«I1), s 5.7 10.3 57 2.8 Green Fxt Time (p_:), s 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 12010Cbl Delay 8.4 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report mli Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/2012015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.1 32.0 28.2 39.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Caner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped, R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm, L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - PedestdanDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.08 2.06 1.88 2.18 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 220/215 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr 2/2012015 � �--�V ,(- ~ '1 � I /i � 1 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 Lane Configurations kj T. 4 j0 4. ?f r Volume ("hi 47 47 58 26 5 32 5 242 26 37 315 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial O (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adi 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1583 1731 1778 1736 1679 1578 1761 1778 1761 1753 1722 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehnt 51 51 63 28 5 35 5 263 28 40 342 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap,"" 556 219 271 505 69 415 136 559 59 215 1175 579 Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow,"" 1151 704 870 844 221 1334 8 1407 148 147 2958 1458 Grp V01ume(v), veh/h 51 0 114 33 0 35 296 0 0 205 177 63 Grp Sat FI*sfwhlhM1151 0 1574 1065 0 1334 1563 0 0 1616 1489 1458 0 Serve(g s), s 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.7 Cycle 0 Clear(gc), s 2.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.5 3.8 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.2 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 0.85 1.00 0.02 0.09 0.20 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 556 0 490 574 0 415 754 0 0 799 591 579 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.11 Avail Cap("), veh/h 1247 0 1434 1295 0 1215 2789 0 0 2785 2550 2498 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upsheam F9ler(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.D0 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 8.0 0.0 7.0 6.7 0.0 6.7 6,1 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 5.2 Ina Delay (d2), stieh 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 tribal Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Me 8ackOfO(50%),vehi 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 02 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.9 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 8.0 0.0 7.3 6.7 0.0 6.8 6.5 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.9 5.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 165 68 296 445 Approach Delay, sNeh 7.5 6.8 6.5 5.8 Approach LOS A A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), a 14.9 12.5 14.9 12.5 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Meet Green Setting (Ginni s 47.0 25.0 47.0 25.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c +11), s 5.8 4.5 4.2 3.5 Green Ed Time (p_c), s 5.0 1.1 5.0 1.1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.4 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr D20/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 Crosswalk Length (it) 55.0 42.8 39.0 48.7 Crosswalk WMth (IQ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(it) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Caner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flaw in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Comer Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.19 2.01 2.18 2.33 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 212012015 Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 0 1.8 HCM LOS 8 Capacity (veh /h) - - 382 919 1335 - Conflicting Flow AN 612 116 Vol, velub 53 16 152 58 95 383 Conflicting Peds, #dtr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 58 17 165 63 103 416 HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 0 1.8 HCM LOS 8 Capacity (veh /h) - - 382 919 1335 - Conflicting Flow AN 612 116 0 0 228 0 Stage 1 197 - - - - - Stage 2 415 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow -op Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 425 921 - - 1337 - step 1 817 - - - - - Stage2 635 - - - - - Platoon backed, % - - - MovCap -1 Maneuver 382 919 - - 1335 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 382 - - - - - Stage 1 817 - - - - - Stage 2 571 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 0 1.8 HCM LOS 8 Capacity (veh /h) - - 382 919 1335 - HCM Low V/C Ratio - - 0.151 0.019 0.077 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 9 7.9 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %file Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 0.3 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/2012015 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehduln 872 0 0 1724 0 1478 1547 0 0 1416 0 1324 Lane Configurations 153 4+ 0.0 0.0 4 jr 1.6 a'+ 0.0 0.0 4 jr Volume ("Mr) 289 21 32 5 147 116 26 289 5 38 85 128 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.95 0.00 0.93 0.97 0.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1693 1708 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1773 1744 1676 1603 1676 Adj Flow Rate, vehrh 314 23 35 5 160 126 28 314 5 41 92 139 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 (192 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Van, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, vehlh 508 38 42 83 882 761 101 465 7 194 355 421 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehduln 872 0 0 1724 0 1478 1547 0 0 1416 0 1324 Q Serve(g_s), s 153 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Cycle Q Clea(g_c), s 18.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 2.2 91 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.84 0.09 0.03 1.00 0.08 0.01 0.31 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veMb 588 0 0 965 0 761 573 0 0 549 0 421 V1C RabD(X) 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), vshrh 971 0 0 1658 0 1361 976 0 0 892 0 776 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1M 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiWI) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 10.8 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 6.1 14.2 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 12.4 Ina Delay (d2), slveh 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %6e BackOfQ(50%),veMn 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.9 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 11.9 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 6.2 15.3 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 12.9 LnGrp LOS B A A B B B Approach Vol, vehm 372 291 347 272 Approach Delay, sAmh 11.9 6.3 15.3 12.6 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19.2 28.6 .19.2 28.6 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 44.0 28.0 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 11.2 20.2 5.8 4.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 3.3 4.5 3.6 4.9 HCM 2010 CM Delay 11.7 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Li AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan SVYellow Mountain Rd 212012015 Baseline Synchro 8 Report th0msa Page 2 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.5 32.2 28.2 36.8 CoDiur c Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Caner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ft) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped. Left -Right Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate od) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm, R. Flow in Walk (vi 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crossi Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (sip) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Pm Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.06 2.06 1.95 2.28 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report th0msa Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StNellow Mountain Rd 2/2 012 0 1 5 Two Way Matysis cannot be padormed on Signalized Intersedon. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/2012015 -'o � --* < '- 4- 4\ t / \*► -' Volume(vahlh) 32 82 64 26 11 41 54 530 42 114 191 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 IniBel 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(Ay6T) 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1500 1625 1778 1736 1671 1736 1761 1786 1761 1753 1698 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehfi 35 89 70 28 12 45 59 576 46 124 208 68 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Vet, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, vefuh 341 212 167 284 94 363 139 841 64 529 818 798 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, vehm 1052 836 657 551 368 1426 84 1508 115 644 1468 1430 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 0 159 40 0 45 681 0 0 124 208 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh4iM1052 0 1493 919 0 1426 1707 0 0 644 1468 1430 0 Serve(g 6), s 1.2 0.0 3.8 0.1 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 3.8 3.9 0.0 1.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 3.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 0.70 1.00 0.09 0.07 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 341 0 380 378 0 363 1044 0 0 529 818 798 V/C Radii 0.10 0.00 0.42 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.25 0.09 AvaB Cap(c_a), vei 544 0 667 611 0 637 2191 0 0 1030 1829 1783 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FWI) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 15.4 0.0 13.2 12.2 0.0 12.2 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.3 4.8 4.4 Ina Delay (d2), sM1eh 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 OA Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOIQ(50 %),veh @0.4 0.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 0.4 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 15.5 0.0 14.0 12.3 0.0 12.4 7.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.0 4.4 LnGrp LOS B B B B A A A A Approach Vol, vehi 194 85 681 400 Approach Delay, s1veh 14.3 12.4 7.5 5.1 Approach LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 27.7 14.8 27.7 14.8 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Mac Green Setting (Gmi s 53.0 19.0 53.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), is 14.0 7.1 7.3 5.9 Green Ext Time (pc), s 9.7 1.1 10.0 1.2 HCM 2010 Cbl Delay 8.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 54.7 42.8 40.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12A 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Caner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Total Area (sci t) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Red. Left4light Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Red, Right -Left Flow Rate (p)h) 0 0 0 0 Red, R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh, Pam. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk(vm) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Red (sq.ft) 0.0 Off 0.0 0.0 Right Coma Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Gradation Cade - - Pedestrian Delay (slip) 400 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poi Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.22 2.06 2.27 2.39 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnsa Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 Tu Way Analysis cenrwt be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 2/2012015 Ind Delay, s/veh 3.4 HCM Control Delay, s 15 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) - - 376 867 1223 - Confiding Flow All 605 147 Vol, veiuh 86 41 179 91 86 320 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storm Length 0 0 - - Stage 2 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 93 45 195 99 93 348 HCM Control Delay, s 15 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) - - 376 867 1223 - Confiding Flow All 605 147 0 0 293 0 Stages 244 - - - - - Stage 2 361 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - CriticalHdwyStg 1 5.96 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.96 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 415 867 - - 1223 - Stage 1 756 - - - - - Stage 2 658 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 376 867 - - 1223 - MovGsp -2 Maneuver 376 - - - - - Stage 1 756 - - - - - Stage 2 596 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 15 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) - - 376 867 1223 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 0.076 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.7 9.4 8.2 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tlle 0(veh) - - 1 0.2 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 2)202015 Baseline Synchm 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 Int Delay, slveh 9.4 Vol, vehm 67 158 467 227 97 184 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wind Flow 73 172 508 247 105 200 Conflicting; RmAll 992 701 0 0 804 0 Stages 681 - - - - - Slage 2 311 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - FoBow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 257 438 - - 820 - Stage 1 502 - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - Platoon docked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 207 413 - - 806 - MovCep -2 Maneuver 207 - - - - - Stage1 481 - - - - - Stage 2 601 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 45.3 0 3.8 HCM LOS E Capacity(vehm) - - 319 806 - HCM Lane WC Ratio - - 0.767 0.131 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 45.3 10.1 0.4 HCM lane LOS - - E B A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 6 0.4 - Baseline Synchm 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 212012015 Lane Configurations 4. 4 jn .j. B jt Volume(vai 229 158 21 5 63 26 63 109 5 128 206 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1693 1731 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1758 1744 1676 1666 1692 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 249 172 23 5 68 28 68 118 5 139 224 297 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, vehlh 395 231 28 97 728 632 177 244 9 276 378 563 Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, vehm 647 541 65 36 1707 1481 193 603 21 423 935 1394 Grp Volunni vehlh 444 0 0 73 0 28 191 0 0 363 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhM 1254 0 0 1743 0 1481 808 0 0 1358 0 1394 O Sewe(g_s),s 13.4 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 Cycle 0 Clea(g_c), s 14,7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 12.2 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 7.6 Prop In Lane 0.56 0.05 0.07 1.00 0.36 0.03 0.38 1.00 Lana Grp Cap(c), vehM 654 0 0 825 0 632 430 0 0 654 0 563 VIC Rabo(X) 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.53 Avail Cr a), vehm 1094 0 0 1430 0 1161 807 0 0 1127 0 1033 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 11.9 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 7.9 10.5 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 10.7 Ina Delay (d2), slush 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.8 Initial D Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back0o(50 %),veh4n 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 13.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 7.9 11.3 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 11.4 LnGrp LOS B A A B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 444 101 191 660 Approach Delay, s1veh 13.1 8.1 11.3 11.7 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +RC), s 23.1 24.1 23.1 24.1 Change Period (Y-RC), s 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 37.0 35.0 37,0 Max O Clear Time (g_al1), s 14.2 167 12.3 3.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.9 3.4 5.0 3.9 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/20/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.5 32.2 28.2 36.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right -Tum islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Comesponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Caner Size A(1) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size 6(it) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Cana Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81,00 81.00 81.00 Pod. Left -Right Flow Rate(pfi) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (p /h) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (pfi) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (vrh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Pam. R. Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk(vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percerndk speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Caner Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 400 40.0 Pedestrian Compiianra Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.15 2.08 1.94 2.29 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report Ohl /msa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 � 7!~ t 4\ T P\� 1 r Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19A 13.9 19A 13.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 Lane Configurations sj T. 48.0 XG Q jr Max G Clear Time gl 1), a 4- 7.3 5.3 4+ jr Volume(velvh) 47 67 112 41 9 47 39 336 26 56 394 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (Db), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Audi Sat Flow, vehm4n 1583 1724 1778 1736 1681 1578 1761 1782 1761 1753 1723 1718 Atli Flow Rate, vehlh 51 73 122 45 10 51 42 365 28 61 428 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, wh i 413 172 287 378 63 394 155 691 50 234 1302 676 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 046 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, vehrh 1130 580 969 614 212 1332 78 1491 108 217 2808 1459 Grp Volume(v), vehRi 51 0 195 55 0 51 435 0 0 256 233 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),v"An1130 0 1549 826 0 1332 1677 0 0 1535 1489 1459 O Sewe(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 3.4 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.8 Cycle 0 Ckx(g_c), s 53 0.0 3.4 4.0 0.0 0.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.3 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 0.82 1.00 0.10 0.06 0.24 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), when 413 0 458 441 0 394 896 0 0 846 690 676 VIC Rafio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.43 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.34 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), vrehrh 894 0 1117 926 0 961 2459 0 0 2237 2148 2104 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstrearn FlBer(I) IM 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 11.9 0.0 9.4 9.6 0.0 8.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 5.0 Ina Delay (d2), shah 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 Initial O Delay(d3),sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %He Back010(50%),wMr0.4 0.0 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 12.0 0.0 10.1 9,8 0.0 8.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 6.0 5.1 LnGrp LOS B B A A A A A A Approach Vol, vehlh 246 106 435 552 Approach Delay, sNeh 10.5 9.3 6.8 5.8 Approach LOS B A A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19A 13.9 19A 13.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.0 XG 48.0 24.0 Max G Clear Time gl 1), a 7.9 7.3 5.3 6.0 Green Ext Time (pi s 7.6 1.7 7.6 1.8 HCM 2010 CM Delay 7.2 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thli Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/29/2015 Red, Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 OA 0.0 Crosswalk Length (1f) 541 42.8 40.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 - 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number W Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Caner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(it) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (fit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Red. Left -Right Flow Rate (pi 0 0 0 0 Pad. Right -Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0 0 Pad. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (Wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vm) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Red isg.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Red, Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Cale - - - - Pedestrian Delay (s /p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Pax Pedestrian Crosswalk Scare 2.22 2.03 2.28 2.38 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thUrnso Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2)2012015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 2/20/2015 Int Delay, slveh 3.5 Baseline thllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 7 Vol, vem 72 35 152 94 133 383 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 78 38 165 102 145 416 ConMc6ng Flow All 713 136 0 0 267 0 Stage 1 216 - - - _ _ Stage 2 497 - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - CriBcal Hdwy Sig 1 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 - - _ - - FoRow-up Hdwy 3.52 33 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 366 894 - - 1294 - Stage 1 799 Stage 2 577 - Platoon bbcJced, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 312 893 - - 1292 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 312 - - - - Stage 1 799 - Stage 2 492 HCM Control Delay, s 16.7 0 2.4 HCM LOS C Capacity (vehlh) - - 312 893 1292 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.251 0.043 0.112 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.4 9.2 8.1 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile Diver) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Baseline thllmsa Synchro 8 Report Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 2/20/2015 Int Delay, slveh 38.2 Vol, vem 192 128 274 90 133 415 Conflicting Pads, # /hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Stome LengM 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 209 139 298 98 145 451 Conflicting Flow Al 912 417 0 0 446 0 Stage 1 397 - - - - - Stage 2 515 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Foflow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 288 635 - - 1114 - step1 678 - - - - - Stage2 565 - - - - - Plataon blocked, % - - - MovCap -7 Maneuver 223 598 - - 1095 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 223 - - - - - Stage 1 650 - - - - - Stage 2 457 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 142.8 0 2.5 HCM LOS F Capacity(vehm) - - 298 1095 - HCM Lene V/C Ratio - - 1.167 0.132 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 142.8 8.8 0.5 HCM Lane LOS - - F A A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 15 0.5 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 212012015 --* � -V 4,- ~ 'I- 4N 1 /� `► 1 W Volume(whrh) 289 21 32 5 147 116 26 289 5 38 85 128 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 tribal Q (Qi veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 3.3 0.99 1.00 4.9 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.97 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /h /In 1693 1708 1693 1761 1728 1761 1744 1773 1744 1676 1603 1676 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 314 23 35 5 160 126 28 314 5 41 92 139 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Vet, % 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 Cap, whth 508 38 42 93 882 761 101 465 7 194 355 421 Arrive On Green 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, with 717 73 82 10 1713 1478 61 1464 22 299 1117 1324 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 372 0 0 165 0 126 347 0 0 133 0 139 Grp Sat Flow(s),vai 872 0 0 1724 0 1478 1547 0 0 1416 0 1324 Q Seve(g s), s 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Cyde Q Dw(g_c), s 18.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 22 9.2 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.84 0.09 0.03 1.00 0.08 0.01 0.31 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 588 0 0 965 0 761 573 0 0 549 0 421 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), vehth 971 0 0 1658 0 1361 976 0 0 892 0 776 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream F8[ert) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.8 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 6.1 14.2 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 12.4 Ina Delay (d2), si 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q De1ay(d3),s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BwkOfQ(50 %),veh4n 4.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.9 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1A LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 11.9 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 6.2 15.3 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 12.9 Approach Vol, veh /h 372 291 347 272 Approach Delay, si 11.9 6.3 15.3 12.6 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19.2 28.6 19.2 28.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green SetBng (Grew), s 28.0 44.0 28.0 44.0 Max O Clear Time (g_a11), s 11.2 20.2 5.8 4.4 Green Fxt Time (pc), 5 3.3 4.5 3.6 4.9 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.7 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 2/20/2015 Phase Right Caner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Caner Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Pod. Left -Right Flaw Rate (pth) Pod. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Welk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flaw in Walk (wh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Pod (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (slp) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9A 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Irxr =rxr =rA =rxt) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.06 2.06 1.95 2.28 B B A B Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.5 32.2 28.2 36.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right-Tum]stands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Phase Right Caner Size A (ft) Right Corner Size B (ft) Right Caner Curb Radius (ft) Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) Pod. Left -Right Flaw Rate (pth) Pod. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) Veh. Penn. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Welk (wh) Veh. RTOR Flaw in Walk (wh) 85th percentile speed (mph) Right Corner Area per Pod (sq.ft) Right Comer Quality of Service Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) Crosswalk Circulation Code Pedestrian Delay (slp) Pedestrian Compliance Code Pedestrian Crosswalk Score Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS Baseline thllmsa 6 2 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 9A 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Irxr =rxr =rA =rxt) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Poor Poor Poor Poor 2.06 2.06 1.95 2.28 B B A B Synchro 8 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 212012015 Two Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 4- ~ 'I- \ 1 / Lane Configurations 11 T. 85 681 400 d F 4. 7.5 5.1 Approach LOS -TT f Volume(veh1h) 32 82 64 26 11 41 54 530 42 114 191 63 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1500 1625 1778 1736 1671 1736 1761 1786 1761 1753 1698 1685 Adj Flow Rate, vehm 35 89 70 28 12 45 59 576 46 124 208 68 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 14 9 9 13 13 0 1 1 1 4 4 4 Cap, ve" 341 212 167 284 94 363 139 841 64 529 818 798 Amive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, vehlh 1052 836 657 551 368 1426 84 1508 115 644 1468 1430 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 35 0 159 40 0 45 681 0 0 124 208 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),wKMnl052 0 1493 919 0 1426 1707 0 0 644 1468 1430 Q Serve(g s), s 1.2 0.0 3.8 0.1 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.9 Cycle Q Gear(g_c), a 5.1 0.0 3.8 3.9 0.0 1.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 53 3.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 0.70 1.00 0.09 0.07 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h 341 0 380 378 0 363 1044 0 0 529 818 798 VIC Raeo(X) 0.10 0.00 0.42 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.25 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), vaIVh 544 0 667 611 0 637 2191 0 0 1030 1829 1783 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiBer(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 010 0.00 1.00 00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.4 0.0 13.2 12.2 0.0 12.2 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.3 4.8 4.4 Irmr Delay (d2), sNeh 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Delay(0),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wle Back0IQ(50 %),veMr0.4 0.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 0.4 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 15.5 0.0 14.0 12.3 0.0 12.4 7.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.0 4.4 Approach Vol, vehlh 194 85 681 400 Approach Delay, sfveh 14.3 12.4 7.5 5.1 Approach LOS B B A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs DwvWn (G+Y +Rc), s 27.7 14.8 27.7 14.8 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 53.0 19.0 53.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c +11), s 14.0 7.1 7.3 5.9 Green E)d Time (p-c), 5 9.7 1.1 10.0 1.2 HCM 2010 Get Delay 8.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report IhI /msa Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 54.7 42.8 40.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Turn Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (a) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Caner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area(sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Ped Left -Right Flow Rate 1 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right- Left Flow Rate(plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (vii 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped(sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Service - - - - Ped. Circulabon Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - PedestrianDelay(slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.22 2.06 2.27 2.39 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thimosa Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Teo Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 2120/2015 HCM Larre V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 0.076 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.7 9.4 8.2 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %file Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 Int Delay, slveh 3.4 Vol, vehlh 86 41 179 91 86 320 Conflicting Pods, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 8 4 0 10 8 1 Mvmt Flow 93 45 195 99 93 348 Conflicting Flow Al 605 147 0 0 293 0 Stage 1 244 - - - - - Stage 2 361 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.96 6.98 - - 4.26 - Critical Hi Sig 1 5.96 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.96 - - - - - Folbw-up Hdwy 3.58 3.34 - - 2.28 - PotCap-1 Maneuver 415 867 - - 1223 - Stage 1 756 - - - - - Stage 2 658 - - - - - Platoon Mocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 376 867 - - 1223 - MovCap-2Maneuver 376 - - - - - Stage 1 756 - - - - - Stage 2 596 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 15 0 2 HCM LOS C HCM Larre V/C Ratio - - 0.249 0.051 0.076 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.7 9.4 8.2 0.3 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %file Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 0.2 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 2/2012015 Capacity(veh/h) - - 207 413 806 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.352 0.416 Int Delay, s /veh 5.3 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 31.5 19.8 10.1 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - D C B A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 1.5 2 0.4 - Vol, vehth 67 158 467 227 97 184 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 - -6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 73 172 508 247 105 200 Conflicting Flow All 992 701 0 0 804 0 Stages 681 - - - - - Stage 2 311 - - - - - CnBcal Hri 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - CnBcal Hdwy Stilt 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 257 438 - - 820 - Stage 1 502 - - - - - Stage 2 717 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 207 413 - - 806 - Mov Cap-2 Marreuver 207 - - - - - Stage 1 481 - - - - - Stage 2 601 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 23.3 0 3.8 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) - - 207 413 806 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.352 0.416 0.131 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 31.5 19.8 10.1 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - D C B A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 1.5 2 0.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 8 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 212012015 Lane Configurations 444 4+ 101 191 660 4 jr 4. 11.3 11.7 Approach LOS 4 F Volume(wh1h) 229 158 21 5 63 26 63 109 5 128 206 273 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial D (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh /hdn 1693 1731 1693 1761 1761 1761 1744 1758 1744 1676 1666 1692 Adj Flow Rate, vehlf 249 172 23 5 68 28 68 118 5 139 224 297 Adj No. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 02 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 3 Cap, vehm 395 231 28 97 728 632 177 244 9 276 378 563 Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, vehlh 647 541 65 36 1707 1481 183 603 21 423 935 1394 Grp Volume(v), veh /h 444 0 0 73 0 28 191 0 0 363 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),vei 1254 0 0 1743 0 1481 808 0 0 1358 0 1394 D Serve(g_s), s 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 Cycle G Clear(g_c), s 14.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 12.2 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 7.6 Prop In Lane 0.56 0.05 0.07 1.00 0.36 0.03 0.38 1.00 Lane Grp Copts), veh/h 654 0 0 825 0 632 430 0 0 654 0 563 VIC Ratio(X) 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c a), veh1h 1094 0 0 1430 0 1161 807 0 0 1127 0 1033 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 upstream FiBer(Q 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s /veh 11.9 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 7.9 10.5 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 10.7 Ina Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.8 Initial O Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 %ite Back0fD(50 %),veh4n 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s /veh 13.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 7.9 11.3 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 11.4 Approach Vol, vehlh 444 101 191 660 Approach Delay, srveh 13.1 8.1 11.3 11.7 Approach LOS B A B B Assigned Phis 2 4 6 8 Pro Duration (G +Y +Rc), a 23.1 24.1 23.1 24.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), a 35.0 37.0 35.0 37.0 Max O Clear Time (g-c +ll), s 14.2 16.7 12.3 3.2 Green Ext Tana (p_c), s 4.9 3.4 5.0 3.9 HCM 2010 Chi Delay 11.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Baseline Synchm 8 Report thl/msa Page 1 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St /Yellow Mountain Rd 2120/2015 Ped, Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Length (ft) 30.5 32.2 28.2 36.8 Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 2 3 2 3 Number of Right-Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Carrier Size A(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B(ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Garner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Pad. Left -Right Flow Rate (pm) 0 0 0 0 Ped. Right -Left Flow Rate (plh) 0 0 0 0 Ped. R Sidewalk Flow Rate (p1h) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (wh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v)h) 0 0 0 0 85th percende speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped, Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Circulation Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slp) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.15 2.08 1.94 2.29 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B A B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan StNellow Mountain Rd 212012015 Two Way Analysis cannot be perfomn:d on Signalized Interseclion, Baseline Synchro 8 Report thllmsa Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 212012015 �--* f-~ 4- 4N 1 /� 1►1 / Volume(veh1h) 47 67 112 41 9 47 39 336 26 56 394 58 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial D (Db), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(AybT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhMn 1583 1724 1778 1736 1681 1578 1761 1782 1761 1753 1723 1718 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 51 73 122 45 10 51 42 365 28 61 428 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 0 0 0 0 10 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, veli 413 172 287 378 63 394 155 691 50 234 1302 676 Amive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow veh/h 1130 580 969 614 212 1332 78 1491 108 217 2808 1459 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 51 0 195 55 0 51 435 0 0 256 233 63 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlMn1130 0 1549 826 0 1332 1677 0 0 1535 1489 1459 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 3.4 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.8 Gyula D Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 3.4 4.0 0.0 0.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.3 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 0.82 1.00 0.10 0.06 0.24 1.00 Lane Grp Capitol, vehfi 413 0 458 441 0 394 896 0 0 846 690 676 VIC Rado(X) 0.12 0.00 0.43 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.34 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a)," M 894 0 1117 926 0 961 2459 0 0 2237 2148 2104 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filler(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 11.9 0.0 9.4 9.6 0.0 8.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 5.0 Ina Delay (d2), shreh 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Badc01D(50 %),vehdt0A 0.0 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.3 LnGm Delay(d),slveh 12.0 0.0 10.1 9.8 0.0 8.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 6.0 5.1 Approach Vol, vehlh Approach Delay, sfveh Approach LOS 246 10.5 B 106 9.3 A 435 552 6.8 5.8 A A Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phis Duration (G +Y +Rc), s 19.4 13.9 19A 13.9 Change Period (Y +Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gina), s 48.0 24.0 48.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c-11), s 7.9 7.3 5.3 6.0 Green 6d Time (p_c), 5 7.6 1.7 7.6 1.8 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.2 HCM 2010 LOS A Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 4 HCM 2010 Signals- Pedestrians 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2120/2015 Crosswalk Length (ft) 54.7 42.8 40.0 48.7 Crosswalk Width (n) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 3 3 4 Number of Right -Tum Islands 0 0 0 0 Type of Control None None None None Corresponding Signal Phase 6 2 4 8 Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Size A (1) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Right Comer Curb Radius (ftl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00 Red. Left -Righl Flow Rate (pfi) 0 0 0 0 Red. Right -Left Flaw Rate (p!n) 0 0 0 0 Red. R. Sidewalk Flow Rath (pih) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. Perm. R. Flow in We& (vlh) 0 0 0 0 Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (vlh) 0 0 0 0 85th peroenWe speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Right Corner Area per Red (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Right Comer Quality of Seance - - - Red. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Ckculalion Code - - - - Pedestrian Delay (slip) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor Poor Pedestrian Crosswalk Scare 2.22 2.03 2.28 2.38 Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B B B Baseline Synchro 8 Report thlfmsa Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr 2/2012015 Tu Way Analysis cannot be performed on Signalized Intersection. Baseline Synchro 8 Repod thllmsa Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave 2)2012015 Capacity (vehm) - - 312 893 1292 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.251 0.043 Int Delay, s /veh 3.5 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.4 91 8.1 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Vol, veldh 72 35 152 94 133 383 Conflicting Fees,#)hr 0 0 0 2 2 0 Sign Control Stop Slop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 9 2 0 Mvmt Flow 78 38 165 102 145 416 Conflicting Flow AN 713 136 0 0 267 0 Stage 1 216 - - - - - Stage 2 497 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.9 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - FMlowap Hdwy 3.52 3.3 - - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 366 894 - - 1294 - stage1 799 - - - - - Stage2 577 - - - - - Platoon Mocked. % - - - MovCap- 1 Maneuver 312 893 - - 1292 - MovCap- 2 Maneuver 312 - - - - - Stage1 799 - - - - Stage 2 492 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 16.7 0 2.4 HCM LOS C Capacity (vehm) - - 312 893 1292 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.251 0.043 0.112 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.4 91 8.1 0.4 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A A HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - - 1 0.1 0.4 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /rasa Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 2120/2915 Int Delay, s /veh 16.5 HCM Control Delay, s 59.4 Conflicting Flow All 912 417 Vol, va" 192 128 274 90 133 415 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 50 0 0 20 20 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 6 - - 4 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 209 139 298 98 145 451 HCM Control Delay, s 59.4 Conflicting Flow All 912 417 0 0 446 0 Stage 1 397 - - - - - Stage 2 515 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.83 - - - - - Foll w up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 288 635 - - 1114 - Stage 1 678 - - - - - Stage 2 565 - - - - - Platoan blocked, % Baseline - - - MovCap -1 Maneuver 223 598 - - 1095 May Cap-2 Maneuver 223 - - - - - Stage 1 650 - - - - - Stage 2 457 - - - - - HCM Control Delay, s 59.4 0 2.5 HCM LOS F Capacity(vehlh) - - 223 598 1095 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.936 0.233 0.132 - HCM Control Delay (a) - - 90.4 12.8 8.8 0.5 HCM Lane LOS - - F B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 8 0.9 0.5 - Baseline Synchro 8 Report thl /msa Page 8 APPENDIX D SimTmffic Reports Queuing and Blocking Report 2015 Existing AM Baseline 212072015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 126 91 58 110 84 69 Average Queue (ft) 65 43 26 57 28 25 95th Queue (ft) 109 79 52 98 66 53 Link Distance (ft) 328 568 568 368 673 673 Upstream Blk Time (%) 95th Queue (to 43 45 48 31 135 Queuing Penalty (veh) 47 43 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 673 258 258 Upstream Bill Time (%) 2 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Pen lly (veh) 1 1 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L R TR Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 64 58 56 28 165 103 60 58 Average Queue (ft) 15 18 16 10 79 45 18 16 95th Queue (to 43 45 48 31 135 84 47 43 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 673 258 258 Upstream Bill Time (%) 2 2 Queuing Penalty (van) 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty, (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network vide Queuing Penalty: 3 SimTrathc Report thUrnsa Page 1 Directions Served L R TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 62 9 40 84 Average Queue (ft) 32 0 1 12 95th Queue (ft) 59 7 15 48 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network vide Queuing Penalty: 3 SimTrathc Report thUrnsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report L TR LT R 2015 Existing PM Baseline T R Maximum Queue (ft) 212012015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd 55 60 128 97 80 56 Average Queue (ft) Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 220 70 35 119 142 88 Average Queue (ft) 88 24 7 52 63 37 95th Queue (ft) 164 58 28 97 115 69 Link Distance (ft) 328 568 568 368 673 673 Upstream Blk Time 1%) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 49 61 55 60 128 97 80 56 Average Queue (ft) 18 19 14 18 54 41 32 18 95th Queue (ft) 41 46 41 48 104 80 65 46 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 673 258 258 Upstream Slk Time 1%) 1 2 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penaty: 3 Sim Traffic Repel thllmsa Page t Directions Served L R T TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 57 9 4 35 80 Average Queue (ft) 28 0 0 2 18 95th Queue (ft) 52 0 3 17 57 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 204 212 Upstream Bit Tans ( %) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penaty: 3 Sim Traffic Repel thllmsa Page t Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 2020 Background AM 2/2012015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow, Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Madmum Queue (ft) 141 115 54 131 70 65 Average Queue (ft) 65 45 26 60 26 28 95th Queue (ft) 114 86 52 110 59 53 Link Distance (0) 328 568 568 368 673 673 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 12 84 46 19 19 Queuing Penalty (veh) 41 51 47 35 139 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 53 47 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 Storage Blk Time ( %) 120 673 258 258 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 2 0 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 68 48 65 Average Queue (ft) Directors Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Madmum Queue (ft) 48 58 57 38 162 95 70 56 Average Queue (ft) 16 22 17 12 84 46 19 19 951h Queue (11) 41 51 47 35 139 84 53 47 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 673 258 258 Upstream BM Time ( %) 2 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 0 Storage Bey Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 68 48 65 Average Queue (ft) 31 3 11 95th Queue (ft) 60 22 41 Link Distance (ft) 41 204 212 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penally (veh) Network Summary NeNvork Wde Queuing Penalty:4 SimTraffic Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Background PM Baseline 2/2012015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Sewed LTR LT R LTR LT R 59 27 Maximum Queue (ft) 180 65 31 100 143 98 2 21 Average Queue (ft) 86 25 7 48 62 41 41 41 95th Queue (ft) 146 56 27 85 111 76 Link Distance (ft) 328 568 568 368 673 673 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Mstimum Queue (ft) 58 54 48 62 125 110 90 56 Average Queue (ft) 20 24 13 19 53 45 34 21 95M Queue (ft) 47 52 39 48 97 82 72 47 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 673 258 258 Upstream BIk Time ( %) 2 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage BIk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty, (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L R T TR LT Madmum Queue (ft) 59 27 4 29 95 Average Queue (ft) 31 1 0 2 21 95th Queue (ft) 55 12 3 18 65 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 204 212 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 5 SimTraffic Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) AM Baseline 2/2012015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Miadmi Queue (ft) 210 100 66 197 110 85 Average Queue (11) 105 45 31 98 49 35 95th Queue (ft) 181 86 56 172 100 65 Link Distance (ft) 326 568 568 368 369 369 Upstream Blk T'mie (%) 18 134 75 17 19 Queuing Penalty (veh) 48 70 53 44 223 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 49 48 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 Storage Blk Time ( %) 120 248 258 258 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 14 0 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directors Served L R T TR LT T Matomum Queue (ft) 66 Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 57 Be 68 52 246 191 74 61 Average Queue (ft) 19 42 21 18 134 75 17 19 95th Queue (ft) 48 70 53 44 223 142 49 48 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 248 258 258 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 4 14 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 12 2 Storage Bay Diet (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Pan*iveh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directors Served L R T TR LT T Matomum Queue (ft) 66 26 4 65 185 83 Average Queue (ft) 39 2 0 9 41 3 95th Queue (ft) 62 15 3 40 119 36 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 204 212 212 Upstream Blk Time, (%) 5 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) ihllmsa SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildoul (Single Ln) AM Baseline 2/20/2015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr Directions Served LR TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 270 125 170 48 Average Queue (ft) 107 34 51 4 9% Queue (ft) 224 91 113 25 Link Distance (ft) 268 369 248 248 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penally (veh) Network Summary Ni vide Queuing Putty: 21 SimTraBic Report thllmsa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM 2/26/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 260 67 36 171 192 95 Average Queue (ft) 119 23 10 70 98 49 9%Queue(4) 205 55 32 135 164 80 Link Distance (ft) 326 568 568 368 369 369 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 21 85 62 32 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 65 55 51 151 Slarage Bay Dist (ft) 68 47 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 Storage Blk Time ( %) 120 248 258 258 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 8 Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannaaan Dr Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 62 17 Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 64 60 60 193 137 91 50 Average Queue (ft) 20 36 25 21 85 62 32 20 95th Queue (ft) 46 65 55 51 151 117 68 47 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 248 258 258 Upstream Bkc Time(A) 3 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Directions Served L R TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 62 17 61 162 29 Average Queue (ft) 35 1 7 40 2 95th Queue (ft) 57 11 37 116 30 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 212 212 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 0 6 Queuing Penalty (van) 3 0 0 Storage Bay Dist ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report thhmse Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Single Ln) PM Baseline 2/20/2015 11 : Jefferson St & Site Entr Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 15 SinnTraffic Report thl /msa Page 2 Directions Served LR TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 311 199 119 49 Average Queue (ft) 165 16 44 4 95th Queue (ft) 306 58 92 22 Link Distance (ft) 306 369 248 248 Upslrean Bk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 15 SinnTraffic Report thl /msa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM Baseline 2120/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Mai Queue (ft) 196 100 60 217 119 71 Average Queue (ft) 103 42 31 99 50 33 9561 Queue (11) 171 80 56 176 97 61 Link Distance (ft) 326 568 568 368 369 369 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 258 0 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 16 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 2 0 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penaty (veh) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Marimum Queue (11) 59 70 65 53 236 197 72 62 Average Queue (ft) 18 41 19 20 133 78 17 16 95th Queue (ft) 46 69 50 46 215 150 51 44 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 236 258 258 0 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 16 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 14 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Repel thli Page 1 Directions Served L R T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 66 25 4 78 212 135 Average Queue (ft) 38 1 0 11 52 10 95th Queue (ft) 65 11 3 47 149 73 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 204 212 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Repel thli Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) AM Baseline 212012015 Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr Network Wde Queuing Penalty: 24 SimTrattic Report thl /rasa Page 2 Directions Served L R TR LT T Marimum Queue (it) 119 113 148 136 42 Average Queue (1t) 48 49 40 53 4 95th Queue (ft) 92 90 105 111 25 Link Distance (9) 268 268 369 236 236 Upstremn BM Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Wde Queuing Penalty: 24 SimTrattic Report thl /rasa Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM Baseline 2120/2015 Intersection: 3: Jefferson /Jefferson St & McClanahan St/Yellow Mountain Rd Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T Directions Served LTR LT R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 246 78 71 196 194 99 Average Queue (ft) 132 24 21 86 83 41 95th Queue (ft) 250 59 74 229 172 84 Link Distance (ft) 326 568 568 368 369 369 Upstream Blk Time 1%) 8 10 17 8 17 Queuing Penalty (van) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 41 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Jefferson St & Weller Ave /Flannagan Dr Directions Served L TR LT R LTR LT T R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 63 83 64 208 187 123 55 Average Queue (ft) 17 39 40 17 102 103 68 17 95th Queue (11) 46 64 107 49 202 228 206 46 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 120 120 236 258 258 204 Upsheem Blk Time ( %) 3 24 15 10 17 17 17 Queuing Penalty (van) 4 28 0 41 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 Storage Blk Time ( %) 18 0 Queuing Penally, (veh) 10 0 Intersection: 7: Evans Mill Rd & Weller Ave Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SinnTraRc Report thllmsa Page 1 Directors Served L R T TR LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 57 33 4 99 165 66 Average Queue (ft) 36 1 0 36 69 2 95th Queue (ft) 57 13 3 151 189 36 Link Distance (ft) 41 41 204 204 212 212 Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 0 16 17 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SinnTraRc Report thllmsa Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline Intersection: 11: Jefferson St & Site Entr 2020 Buildout (Dbl Ln) PM 2/20/2015 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network Bride Queuing Penalty: 224 SimTraKc Report thl /msa Page 2 Directions Served L R TR LT T Miudmum Queue (ft) 277 182 133 165 83 Average Queue (ft) 154 93 54 86 48 95th Queue (ft) 312 272 231 215 198 Link Distance (ft) 306 306 369 236 236 Upstream Bilk 7mre 1%) 20 18 9 18 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 34 49 49 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network Bride Queuing Penalty: 224 SimTraKc Report thl /msa Page 2 ZONING DISTRICT MAP Portions of 2012 Jefferson Street SE Official Tax Parcel: 4060502 ® Area to be Rezoned Conditional Zoning Zoning RA (Residential - Agriculture) R -12 (Res. Single - Family) R -7 (Res. Single - Family) R -5 (Res. Single - Family) R -3 (Res_ Single - Family) RM -1 (Res. Mixed Density) RM -2 (Res. Mixed Density) RMF (Res. Multi - Family) CN (Commercial- Neigh) CG (Commercial - General) 3 CLS (Commercial -Large Site) 1 -1 (Light Industrial) - 1 -2 (Heavy Industrial) D (Downtown) MX (Mixed Use) IN (Institutional) ROS (Rec & Open Space) } AD (Airport Dev) MXPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev) INPUD (Institutional Planned Unit Dev) IPUD (Industrial Planned Unit Dev) = OF (Urban Flex) u 0 100 200 Feet +L I I i S loacaol' f s / Wk QwgoB Oescro.n Ad SUe Tclal CCat 05/1112015 Mundkal Noll a PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Tfe C4y ot Roanoke PMnnng C, 1 x 140 L 1.3 6b0 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Then, a dally newspaper published in Roanoke, In the State or Virginia, do cenily that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TWOS published in said newspapers on the following dates: Nab, 051x52015 The First insertion being given... 04 062015 Newspaper reference: 0000160404 Illing Re resentati Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, May 6, 2016 "d The Roanoke Times Aceounl NumMr Roanoke, Virginia 6011439 Notary lic Affidavit of Publication nE01x49 RECEIVED mot. CITY OF ROANOKE - PDV IyIQY �� ?�i5 May 06, 2015 A6n T. M. Cwr 215 CHURCH AVE CITY OF ROANOKE ROOM 168 PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT ROANOI@, VA 24011 Wk QwgoB Oescro.n Ad SUe Tclal CCat 05/1112015 Mundkal Noll a PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Tfe C4y ot Roanoke PMnnng C, 1 x 140 L 1.3 6b0 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Then, a dally newspaper published in Roanoke, In the State or Virginia, do cenily that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TWOS published in said newspapers on the following dates: Nab, 051x52015 The First insertion being given... 04 062015 Newspaper reference: 0000160404 Illing Re resentati Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, May 6, 2016 "d Ai�T,,1 I JNIpinn nl F.- r \ .�� ale '(1iWfAfi Notary lic nE01x49 State of Virginia Roanoke mss_ yountyof My Commission expires � � � MCo ��..antK*`� \O THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU Ta Cllr of li Mamwy tamNSSbn maho aWlra a lmoNtW amb At No hew In Uo EX urtfe Roan. Room 159. Rod C. Tayw WNtlpd 4Ndnyy, its Dail nremm, S.W, RUM , WpINL Pluse rook Mat Ilia IN It [hams U bpwn hr Me WW HIS Waml'q timNrNmpolkaWm��ry. IR tapytadms ale awl W o w avW. in to mamm. duWAW wo CUeb t Mom Room I6L p15 Coach immle, S.W. Mai *aR My prom Who dsa0iSry temwnp w PMltluteNa in IM Ruth elwum pmad PWNep, M , Me OeWdWl at lSaW 611110 at bad Rsm dan RNW U AM Idealu bui The Ciry or Pmmk Pwmlm mmMnbn nil i abut aadn05 m Wry 11,1015.atuo k W sum W the a daa may No hi w comida lase aygk . aw "a sae atwmimddlons and pap WIN, .mW w: a+smgy aM enlatfi rod uwk WMullnUl and ..Ity focni VOlkdltahnm Mi ty;apdeoRUraE aMatwamy. The ate es PvmaM Uel3 mAdIt Iilow m ld, nlad Inmo"IN mM9 an di WAWW pI:pdaM ak n , ec mmMly Yues V."alo. u aUSwn. The [.Uw n ioh RW Me many fla PWL RoMmoAWgemull � ea CgUaal Spt N of Pak Wue to WleWedm Wb"ill Pttouehyaal SPNy ANN on a modan of row MIAMI by De Vkilao WWway Wales "Vi MN red W"" IMAM at m" mkroo S"& S . and desqukd as Official Tn IWPNO.t0f066. Tin k w, SumWm, tl1Y PkmWy Cammlssw 04 Liam it Will hold Pow iRmMp m Ue IlMoMw am tbm ad mdws m Way m mm at m Pm. u UMu tome mW R, aae. M Ile CRY C CaN No. IOWA Rm, Room W. Wel G Tayw S.W.iW mW0lnp, ilSUWm pWnp, S.W..ROtoow,VirpNt Skeane M. Ilona "Na, i Ciry CkU IlfWO0 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Roanoke Planning Commission public hearing advertised herein will be held in the EOC Conference Room, Room 159, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Please note that this is a change in location for the May 2015 Planning Commission public hearing only. All applications are available for review in the Planning, Building and Development office, Room 166, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the hearings should contact Planning, Building and Development at (540) 853 -1730 at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold public hearings on May 11, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, to consider these applications and request: Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development plan. The proposed uses of that portion of the property are hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off -site. The application is also to rezone a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility distribution. The application is also to rezone a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to I -2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed use of that portion of the Property is utility treatment. The land use categories permitted in the INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory; with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of lot area. The land use categories permitted in the IN District include accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The land use categories permitted in the I -2 District include commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Park: Resource Management Plan 3. Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Application by Shaker's Restaurant Corporation to rezone property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N. W, bearing Official Tax Number 2380110, from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, with conditions. The proposed use is a retail sales establishment. The land use categories permitted in the CLS District include accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Large Scale Commercial, but does not specify density. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid applications and matters on May 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, April 28, 2015, and Tuesday, May 5, 2015. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Can Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Coordinator Planning, Building & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1330 tina.carr@broanokeva. gov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noet C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 S "I'EPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Morrill: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 1 "elepOma: (540) 853-2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E n ail: derkG,'.... eva.8ov May 19, 2015 JONA'I'IIAN L CRA fr, CMC Depnl,y City Clerk CECELIA "1'. WEBB, CIVIC Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 40246 - 051815 vacating Crystal Spring Park as a public park for recreational and open space uses and releasing the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park; authorizing you to execute documents and to take any and all actions necessary to effect City Council's intent. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. Sinc ely, e> e1iaT. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: Gary Robertson, Executive Director, Water Operations, Western Virginia Water Authority, 601 South Jefferson Street, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Curtis Mills, Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC, 213 Jefferson Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Tax Department, P. O. Box 12385, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 First Presbyterian Church, 2101 Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Christopher P. Morrill May 19, 2015 Page 2 PC: City of Roanoke Mill Mountain, P. O. Box 1451, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Fairfax Condominiums, 4519 Brambleton Avenue, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Bandy, LLC, P. O. Box 4143, Roanoke Virginia 24015 Patricia B. Morgan, Trustee, 5 Stonegate Drive, Bellaire, Florida 33756 Stephen and Florence Workman, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Suite 103, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 James Justice, III, P. O. Box 2178, Beaver, West Virginia 25813 Richard Sherry and Judy Carpenter 1371 Sunset Road, Watertown, New York 13601 William and Lee Saunders, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 108, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Margaret Morris, P. O. Box 3890, Norfolk, Virginia 23514 G & P Jefferson, LLC, 1994 Merriman Way, Moneta, Virginia 24121 Patrick Malone, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 201, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Doris Pollard, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 202, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Westwin of Roanoke, LLC, 1125 Berkshire Road, N. E., Atlanta, Georgia 30306 Fred Baker Trustee, 443 Johnson Avenue, Unit 501, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 Richard Grayson, 6313 Lake Charlene Drive, Pensacola, Florida 32506 Darrell and Nancy Long, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 209, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Barbara Bailey, 2512 Jefferson Street, S. E., 24014 Edward and Elizabeth Kappus, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 212, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Bruce and Joan Brenner, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 213, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Thomas and Eugenia 2830 Longview Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Ellen Marie Arledge, 2923 Rosalind Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The A P Kirby Trust, 9030 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 460, Richmond, Virginia 23235 William Poe, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 304, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Ronald Tessendorf, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 306, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Christopher P. Morrill May 19, 2015 Page 3 PC: Thomas McDonald and Melina Perdue, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 307, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Carol Bewley Dalhouse Revocable Trust, 3514 River Birch Lane, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Edward Goyette, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 309, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 David and Cynthia Caudill, 2125 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Unit 312, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Garnett Smith, 1994 Merriman Way, Moneta Virginia 24121 Garland Bowman, II, 2201 Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Chan and Kee Bolling, 2341 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Leman Dudley, 1710 Dawn Lane, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Suzanne Gandy, 2310 Yellow Mountian Road, S .E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Mark and Rebecca Kilgus, 2303 Mack Chick Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Michelle Frey, 2301 Mack Chick Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 George Baron, Jr., 2301 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The Howard Jones, Jr., Revocable Trust, 2225 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Robert and Carol Cole, 2231 Woodcliff Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24014 JPR Properties, 4818 Grandin Road, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Susan S. Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation Philip C. Schirmer, City Engineer Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Ian Shaw, Agent, City Planning Commission Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission IN THE COUNCIL OF TIIF, CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40246- 051815. AN ORDINANCE vacating Crystal Spring Park as a public park for recreational and open space uses and releasing the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park; authorizing the City Manager to execute documents and to take any and all actions necessary to effect City Council's intent as evidenced by the adoption of this Ordinance; and dispensing with the second reading of this Ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Crystal Spring Park is an open air park consisting of six (6) tennis courts, a shelter, two (2) picnic tables, restrooms, and related amenities, located at 2012 Jefferson Sheet, S. E., bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, between Weller Lane, Jefferson Street, S. E., and Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia; WHEREAS, Crystal Spring Park is shown in Vision 2020, the City's Comprehension Plan, as a public park; WHEREAS, by deed dated October 30, 2004, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, as Instrument No. 040019281, ownership of Crystal Spring Park was transferred from the City of Roanoke ( "City") to the Western Virginia Water Authority ( "WVWA "); WHEREAS, pursuant to subsection (g) of Section 3.7, Title to Real Property, of Article III, REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE LOCALITIES, of the Operating Agreement Among the WVWA, and City of Roanoke, Virginia, and County of Roanoke, Virginia, dated June 30, 2004, the City agreed to maintain Crystal Spring Park, notwithstanding the transfer of ownership by deed dated October 30, 2004, referenced above; WHEREAS, it is the intent of the WVWA to transfer a portion of Official Tax Map No. 4060502, which portion includes Crystal Spring Park, to Carillon Services, Inc. ( "Carilion "), for the construction of certain iIn provemcrus and ¢soa consistent with the operation of a medical facility; WHERI',AS, construction and installation of the improvements will preclude the use of C'ayslal Springs Park as a public park; WHEREAS, Carilion has agreed to pay to the City the sum of $250,000.00 upon vacation of the Pads, said amount to be paid in cash to the City or as a credit as a part of the consideration due from the City to Cari I i on in the event that the City exercises its option to acquire certain real property owned by Carilion, situated at 709 Jefferson Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia, and bearing Official "tax Map No. 1020510, in accordance with the terms of an Option Agreement between the City and Carilion dated October 21, 2014, and authorized by Ordinance No. 40086 - 102014, adopted by City Council on October 20, 2014; WHEREAS, the City Administration has filed an application pursuant to Section 15.2 -2232 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, requesting that Crystal Spring Park be vacated and that the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park be released; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by Section 15.2 -2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on May 18, 2015, after due and timely notice thereof as required by Section 15.2 -2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the application; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience and general welfare, require thevacation of Crystal Spring Park and the release of the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described application should be granted. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: Crystal Spring Park is vacated as a public park for recreational and open space uses. 2. 'The public's right to use Crystal Spring Park is released. 3. The City Manager is authorized to execute any and all documents, the form of all of such documents to be approved by the City Attorney, and to take any other actions consistent with the intent of City Council to vacate the Park and release the rights of the public to use the Park as evidenced by the adoption of this Ordinance. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this Ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATT,FS i i q /&J4v* /City Clerk. STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1, David B. Trinkle, state that I have a personal interest in agenda itc7 2 for the Regular Session of City Council set for Monday, May 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. regarding the request to vacate and release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park located on property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, situated at 2012 Franklin Road, S.E., bearing Official Tax Map No. 4060502, because my employer, Carilion Clinic, is affiliated with Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, the entity that has an agreement to acquire a portion of this property from the Western Virginia Water Authority. My only interest with Carilion Clinics is an employment interest. Therefore, pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3112, I must refrain from participation in this matter. I ask that the City Clerk accept this statement and ask that it be made a part of the minutes of this meeting. Witness the following signature made this IS" day of May, 2015. 4avidSeal) /alrine, ice Mayor and Council Member 6� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2 01 5 Subject: Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Monday, May 11, 2015. By a vote of 5 - 0 (2 of the 7 members recused themselves) the Commission recommended approval of the vacation and release request, finding that The Application for vacation of Crystal Spring Park located between Roanoke Memorial Hospital and the Western Virginia Water Authority Crystal Spring water treatment facility is a reasonable request. The existing tennis courts within the park were constructed on top of an m- ground concrete storage tank that had been used for storing treated water. Due to leaks, the tank is being replaced and will be decommissioned. The concrete tank is no longer needed for water supply purposes and the space is required for a needed expansion of the hospital, and the tennis court facilities will be located to nearby park space on Reserve Avenue, S.W. Planning Commission Public Hearing: Barbara Duerk asked the Planning Commission to consider relocating the tennis courts within the City in their recommendation to City Council. �ut -d 4. 1l�Z/L ff f7 L� Chad A. Van Hyning, Chair City Planning Commission cc: Chris Morrill, City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Ian D. Shaw, Planning Commission Agent Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Planning Commission c/o Ian Shaw, Agent of the Planning Commission Planning, Building and Development Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 170 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re: Application for vacation of Crystal Spring Park and release of public's right to use Crystal Spring Park Dear Planning Commission: Crystal Spring Park ( "Park ") is an open air park consisting of six (6) tennis courts, a shelter, two (2) picnic tables, restrooms, and related amenities. The Park is located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S. E., between Weller Lane, Jefferson Street, S. E., and Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia, and is shown in Vision 2020, the City's Comprehension Plan, as a public park. By deed dated October 30, 2004, and recorded In the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, ownership of the Park was transferred from the City of Roanoke ( "City ") to the Western Virginia Water Authority ( "WVWA "). Pursuant to an Operating Agreement dated June 30, 2004, among the City, the WVWA, and Roanoke County, the City remained responsible for maintenance of the Park. The WVWA intends to transfer a portion of Official Tax Map No. 4060502 which includes the Park to Carilion Services, Inc. ("Carillon "), for the construction of certain improvements and uses consistent with the operation of a medical facility. Construction of the Improvements will preclude the use of the Park as a public park. The six (6) tennis courts will be relocated to Rivers Edge Park on Reserve Avenue. Pursuant to an Option Agreement dated October 21, 2014, between the City and Carillon, Carillon will either (i) pay the City the sum of $250,000.00 upon vacation of the Park; or (11) credit the City the sum of $250,000.00 towards the City's acquisition of property owned by Carillon situated at 709 Jefferson Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia, and bearing Official Tax Map No. 1020510, if the City exercises its option to acquire such property from Carillon. armor TNrcm w,rucm WBROrm ]6t SbB ., .,". 2011 REMVED ROANOKE MAR 12 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE March 12, 2015 PLANNING BUILDING a DEVELOPMENT Planning Commission c/o Ian Shaw, Agent of the Planning Commission Planning, Building and Development Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 170 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re: Application for vacation of Crystal Spring Park and release of public's right to use Crystal Spring Park Dear Planning Commission: Crystal Spring Park ( "Park ") is an open air park consisting of six (6) tennis courts, a shelter, two (2) picnic tables, restrooms, and related amenities. The Park is located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S. E., between Weller Lane, Jefferson Street, S. E., and Yellow Mountain Road, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia, and is shown in Vision 2020, the City's Comprehension Plan, as a public park. By deed dated October 30, 2004, and recorded In the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, ownership of the Park was transferred from the City of Roanoke ( "City ") to the Western Virginia Water Authority ( "WVWA "). Pursuant to an Operating Agreement dated June 30, 2004, among the City, the WVWA, and Roanoke County, the City remained responsible for maintenance of the Park. The WVWA intends to transfer a portion of Official Tax Map No. 4060502 which includes the Park to Carilion Services, Inc. ("Carillon "), for the construction of certain improvements and uses consistent with the operation of a medical facility. Construction of the Improvements will preclude the use of the Park as a public park. The six (6) tennis courts will be relocated to Rivers Edge Park on Reserve Avenue. Pursuant to an Option Agreement dated October 21, 2014, between the City and Carillon, Carillon will either (i) pay the City the sum of $250,000.00 upon vacation of the Park; or (11) credit the City the sum of $250,000.00 towards the City's acquisition of property owned by Carillon situated at 709 Jefferson Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia, and bearing Official Tax Map No. 1020510, if the City exercises its option to acquire such property from Carillon. Planning Commission Page Two March 12, 2015 The City,Administration files this application pursuant to Section 15.2 -2232 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, requesting that the Park be vacated and that the public's right to use the Park be released. Such action is necessary to allow Carillon to expand. City Council authorized the filing of this petition at its meeting on March 2, 201 S. Accordingly, the City Administration respectfully requests that this matter be scheduled for the City Planning Commission's April 13, 2015 meeting, and that the City Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the Park be vacated as a public park and that the public's right to use the Park be released. Res ectfully submitted, ClTristopher Morrill City Manager cc: R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Ian Shaw, Planning Commission Agent Tina Carr, Planning Coordinator Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney 4 SI t PNANIE AI. MOON R"NOI,D5, MMC OtyClerk Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Morrill: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Tekph.. (540)851 -3541 M Fee. (W)}IW 4.Wi: akrk@ nake ,. , March 9, 2015 RECEIVED MAR 18 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT JONATHAN C CBAFr, CMC Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. SVEBB, CMC Aelflaal M,1, City Clark At the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Roanoke held on Monday, March 2, 2015, on motion, duly seconded and adopted, you were authorized to submit the appropriate request to the Planning Commission to release and vacate the right of the City to maintain and operate, the right of the public to use Crystal Spring Park, and execute such other documents and take such other actions as are necessary to effectuate, implement, and administer the request to vacate and release of the City's right to maintain and operate, and the right of the public to use the Park, in accordance with applicable law. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC City Clerk pc: Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Steven Buschor, Director, Parks and Recreation X I Shaw, Agent, City Planning Commission ✓Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission DepaNcenl of Planning, Building and Devalepment Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 8531730 Fax (540) 8531230 ROANOKE CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT Ck_kHWe to orbit Dale: arch x,2015 Submittal Number. Amended Application N0.2 Q Rezoning Not Otherwise Listed ❑ Rezoning, CondNonal Q Rezoning to Planned Unit DeveWpmenl ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Pr_" ftirjA rfiaititYa;. Address: 12012 Jefferson Street S.E. Roanoke, VA 24011 Official Tax No(s).: ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehenstve Sign Overlay District Existing Base Zoning: With Condibi Ini$, Recreation and Open Space (If multiple zones, please manually enter all districts.) Without Conditkrns Ordinance No(s). for Existing Conditions (If applicable): El With Conditions Requested Zoning: See attached sheet Land See attached sheet �WMOUt COnOttions Land Use:i Name: �Fe—ern Virginia Water Authority, Attn: McGaryRobertsci Phone Number: +1(540)853 -5749 Addressi 601S. ff on Street, S.W., Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24 E -Mail gary.rabedson westemvawat Property Ovmees ' nature: 9�41ixs __, a ��1,R- ��gJ.fig�Tii from era• Name: Cadlion Clinic Properties, LLC, Attn: MC Curtis Mills Phone Number: +t (540)981 -]204 Address: 213 South Jefferson Street, Roanoke ,Virginia 24011 E -Mal: cemlllsEariliondinicorg Applicants 5i ., '�i[I!F\lRlattatsfHmoli DIe1S Name: Maryellen F. GOOtllatte, Est,. Phone Number +7 (5q0) 22443018 Addressn Glenn, Feldmann, att�al.,,�P..((0. Box 2887, Roanoke, VA 24001- E -Mail: mgoodlatte@glennf kftnwn.com Authorized Agent6Signalure r Fling fee. Bprloiale�WV **h : r Concept plan meeting tih s Application Requirements of hem'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures F- Written proffers. See the Gays Guide to Proffered Conditions. Concept plan meeting the Applcation Requirements of ifem'2(cy in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as F- 'development plan' ff proffered. r Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the Clys Zoning Ordinance . r Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2-336(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Fdy*j ..§ fN1 j` Lb suhndtled: Amended development or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of bem'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. F- ff applicable. r Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. I Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. f- wap,J,aj!!! be submitted: r Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the Ciys Zoning Ordinance. r Copy of previously adopted Ordiname. Fofa+i�aYa ffPt e bslaobesuhgtl�: Id F Amended comprehensive sgnege plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 - 336(4) of the Citys Zoning Ordinance. Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. Foarooga hdg dY h 1B @Y�wn9 ob p oY � 6:.;. F- A Traffic Impact Study in compliance with Appendix B -2(e) of the Citys Zoning Ordinance. Fora . *OdfabreftIay*0116arysie be WIKWed to VOOT the WOWinp Moral also besutinllled: F- Cover sheet F- Traffic impact analysis. r Concept plan. F- Proffered wndgki it applicable. F- Required fee. 'An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www.roanokeva.gov /plod by selecting'Planning Commission' under 'Boards and Commissions'. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application is amended, unless oUermse specified by staff. ATTACHMENT TO ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION Applicant: Western Virginia Water Authority Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC Requested Zonine: INPUD (2.0379 ac.) IN (0.2518 ac.) I -2 (0.4453 ac.) Proposed Land Use: hospital and related uses (2.0379 ac.) pump house (WVWA) (0.2518 ac.) water filtration facility (W V WA) (0.4453 ac.) - p _- Lij I (; \ - . . , - p _- Lij I (; \ - . NARRATIVE As part of a larger transaction, the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Water Authority ") and Carilion Clinic ( "Carilion ") have agreed to subdivide the 27+ acres which constitute in parcel 4060502 in order to create three parcels — two of which would be retained by the Water Authority (the "Pump Station Parcel" containing 0.2518 acre and the "Residue Parcel" containing 24.9954 acres) and one of which would be conveyed to Carilion (the "Carilion Parcel" containing 2.0379 acres). The Carilion Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Pump Station Parcel is currently zoned ROS. The Residue Parcel is currently zoned ROS and I -2. While the majority of the Residue Parcel is zoned ROS, its I -2 zoned portion encompasses the area near the intersection of Yellow Mountain Road and Jefferson Street within which the Water Authority's filtration plant is located. This application seeks to (1) rezone the Pump Station Parcel from ROS to IN; (2) rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD; and (3) rezone a 0.4453 acre portion of the Residue Parcel from ROS to I -2. Metes and bounds descriptions for all three parcels are provided. Crystal Spring, along with other historic and operational buildings of the Water Authority, is located on the Residue Parcel. Water from the spring has been pumped to an underground water storage cistern located on the Carilion Parcel. Because of significant leakage problems, the old cistern on the Carilion Parcel is in the process of being replaced by a new one under construction on the Residue Parcel. The pump house building located on the Pump Station Parcel will continue to house the pumping machinery needed to transfer the water from Crystal Spring through the Water Authority's systems. No changes to the exterior of the building on the Pump Station Parcel are needed or anticipated. Because the reduced size of the Pump Station Parcel is no longer conducive to an ROS zoning designation, and because the Pump Station Parcel cannot be classified as a "utility lot ", a rezoning of that small parcel to IN is sought. Other than the zoning designation, no changes in the current use or design of that 0.2518 acre parcel are anticipated. In addition to the underground water storage cistem, the Carilion Parcel also includes tennis courts. As part of the larger transaction, those courts would be removed and would be replaced with new courts on City -owned land on Reserve Avenue. The Carilion Parcel adjoins Carilion's Roanoke Memorial Hospital, located on 18+ acres (tax parcel no. 4060301) (the "Hospital "). The Hospital consists of six towers/buildings as follows: - North Tower— Built 1925, 5 stories - East Tower — Built 1956, 7 stories - Old Nursing School Building — Built 1959, 3 stories - West Pavilion - Built 1971,15 stories - Mountain Tower — Built 2003, 5 stories - South Tower— Built 1993, 10 stories originally with 5 stories added in 2007 The oldest structures are located on the north end of the Hospital parcel. The Mountain and South Towers, the newest structures are located on the south end of the Hospital parcel and house the Emergency Department (including the Trauma Center), Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, high tech specialty services, and imaging Past and future medical developments coupled with aging structures and facilities that no longer meet life safety codes, will require Carilion to remove the older structures as structural and technical issues will not allow them to be renovated or repurposed. In addition, expanding medical education activities — including new educational programs being created by Carilion's affiliation with Virginia Tech and the Jefferson College of Health Sciences as well as significantly increased utilization of clinical services (particularly Emergency Department and Trauma Services) require more parking capacity. This is especially tine in the campus zone on the south side of the Hospital, close to one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the state, where few parking spaces are available forcing patients and families to walk farther than reasonable to and from their cars to reach needed clinical services. Although the Hospital parcel consists of 18+ acres, its steep topography and challenging shape makes even more intensive utilization of that parcel for hospital use realistically impossible and certainly undesirable because of their massive disruptions to major clinical and ancillary support operations. The Carilion Parcel, then, represents the optimal location to support the hospital's construction of more modern facilities, allowing orderly and cost - effective replacement of clinical patient care and ancillary support functions from existing obsolete structures before the old, antiquated structures can be demolished. While the planning for such a renovation will take many years, the timing associated with the larger transaction among the Water Authority, the City, and Carilion, requires that the Carilion Parcel be rezoned at this time in order to lay the foundation for that future planning and eventually optimal reconfiguration and modernization of the Hospital ensuring effective use of that community resource for future generations of Roanoke and the region's residents. Consequently, Carilion seeks to rezone the Carilion Parcel from ROS to INPUD. As delineated on the INPUD Development Plan, the uses would be those typical of hospital uses. In order to provide adequate current and future off - street parking, the hospital building constructed on the Carilion Parcel would include structured parking. During the planning phase provisions would be made to connect the building proposed for the Carilion Parcel to the existing Hospital. The exterior finish materials and architectural design of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be similar to those used on the current Hospital buildings. The maximum height of the building on the Carilion Parcel would be 200 feet, so as to be compatible with those on the Hospital parcel. In order to mesh with both the buildings on the Hospital parcel (where the towers we located towards the rear of the parcel) and neighboring buildings on Jefferson Street (where the Fairfax, at the comer of Jefferson Street and Yellow Mountain Drive, for example, is five stories high), the INPUD Plan requires that the upper floors of the building (i.e. the floors above the fifth floor) be set back at least twenty feet from the front facade of the building along Jefferson Street. This will allow the higher section of the building to be located towards the rear of the parcel similar to the configuration of the Hospital parcel. The Building Design conditions detailed on the Development Plan are consistent with the key elements of the City's Public and Institutional design standards. The building's exterior finish materials (masonry, brick, and granite) will not only be in keeping with the character of the Carilion campus, but will also harmonize with nearby development. Adequate parking to serve the needs of patients, visitors, staff and students/residents is needed and will be provided on the lower five floors of the building. The current South Tower houses one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the Commonwealth, but has very few readily accessible parking spaces. About half of those spaces are on land adjacent to the tennis courts and leased from the Water Authority. Those spaces will be lost when development begins on the Carillon Parcel. Carillon plans to move the Emergency Department into the new building where it will be updated and redesigned to more efficiently handle the growing number of emergency and trauma patients with all required parking for those patients accessible in the same building. Outpatient services are expected to relocate to the new building which will allow the parking for those patients to be easily accessible. The structured puking provided in the building will also absorb those spaces lost when the older garage on Belleview Avenue is either replaced, repurposed, or renovated. Finally, in order to avoid a small ROS -zoned strip between the Carlion Parcel and the 1 -2 zoned portion of the Residue Parcel, we also seek to rezone the 0.4453 acre parcel from ROS to I -2. Except to remove that portion of the tennis courts now located on the 0.4453 acre parcel, no change in its current use or development is anticipated. It will continue to be owned and operated by the Water Authority. RECEIVED MAR 8 7 2015 CIrVOFROANOKE PUNNING BUILDING 8 DEVELOPMENT INPUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS Applicant Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, hereby requests that the development standards set forth on the INPUD Development Plan dated March 26, 2015 be imposed on the 2.0379 acre parcel: USES THE PROPERTY SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING LAND USES LABORATORY, DENTAL, MEDICAL, OR OPTICAL LABORATORY, TESTING AND RESEARCH MEDICAL CLINIC HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER HOSPITAL PARKING, OFF -SITE THE HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER USE SHALL BE ANCILLARY TO THE HOSPITAL USE, SHALL BE LIMITED TO HOSPITAL STAFF ONLY, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,000 SQ FT IN SIZE. PARKING STRUCTURED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE LOWER FLOORS (AS HEREINAFTER DEFINED) OF THE BUILDING. APPROXIMATELY 800 PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED. PARKING EGRESS, CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL SPACES WILL BE DETERMINED AS NECESSARY DURING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. VEHICULAR ENTRANCES TWO ENTRANCES WILL SERVE THE SITE. ONE PRIMARY ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON STREET SERVING THE LOWER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION WILL BE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE SERVING THE HIGHER OF THE FIRST FIVE LEVELS. EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE THE ENTRANCE LOCATED ON WELLER LANE. BUILDING DESIGN THE BUILDING SHALL FRONT JEFFERSON STREET PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY AND SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. TO FACILITATE IMPROVEMENTS TO JEFFERSON STREET WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ROANOKE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, THE BUILDING MAY BE SET BACK FURTHER FROM JEFFERSON STREET THAN SHOWN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 200 FEET. THE FIVE (5) LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING (THE "LOWER FLOORS ") WILL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 S.F. EACH, PRINCIPALLY AS PARKING FOR A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT HUNDRED (800) PARKING SPACES. FLOORS OF THE BUILDING ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS (THE "UPPER FLOORS ") SHALL HOUSE THE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND SHALL CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF 50,000 S.F. EACH. THE UPPER FLOORS SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET. THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FROM JEFFERSON STREET SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO A LOBBY WHERE ELEVATORS TO THE UPPER FLOORS WILL BE LOCATED. A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISLAND SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EXIT DRIVES FROM JEFFERSON STREET. THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CARILION CAMPUS AND THE VERNACULAR DESIGN OF THE SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CORRIDOR, AS FOLLOWS: LOWER FLOORS, THE LOWER FLOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CLAD IN MASONRY, A COMBINATION OF BRICK AND GRANITE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE INTERRUPTED WITH WINDOW WALL ELEMENTS FOR FENESTRATION. THE FRONT FAQADE OF THE BUILDING ALONG JEFFERSON STREET WILL HAVE A MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY OR GLAZING OF AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT (50 %) FOR THE GROUND FLOOR AND AT LEAST TWENTY FIVE PERCENT (25 %) FOR FLOORS TWO THROUGH FIVE. WINDOWS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS BEGINNING AT A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE ON JEFFERSON STREET, THE VERTICAL FACADES OF THE LOWER FLOORS SHALL INCORPORATE INTERVALS OF ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION AT LEAST EVERY SIXTY (60) FEET OVER THE LENGTH OF THE APPLICABLE FACADE, UTILIZING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: VARYING THE ARRANGEMENT, PROPORTIONING, OR DESIGN OF GARAGE FLOOR OPENINGS; INCORPORATING CHANGES IN ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING TEXTURE AND COLOR; OR PROJECTING OR RECESSING PORTIONS OR ELEMENTS OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE FACADE. UPPER FLOORS. AS THE BUILDING RISES ABOVE THE LOWER FLOORS AND STEPS BACK FROM JEFFERSON STREET, THE CLADDING WOULD TRANSITION TO A CURTAINWALL SYSTEM THAT WOULD UTILIZE BOTH GLASS AND METAL PANEL AS EVFILL ELEMENTS, THOSE MATERIALS WOULD VISUALLY TIE THE NEW TOWER BACK TO THE EXISTING ROANOKE MEMORIAL, AS WELL AS CONNECT IT TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF RIVERSIDE CENTER. TO FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF STAFF, SUPPLIES AND PATIENTS, SKYWAYS AND POTENTIALLY OTHER CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDINGS ON TAX PARCEL 4060301 MAY BE PART OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES (IF ANY) SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO JEFFERSON STREET THAN 60 FEET AND HAVE EXTERIOR BUILDING FINISHES SIMILAR TO THOSE ON THE LOWER FLOORS, PROJECT SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE "CG" ZONING DISTRICT. GROUND SIGNS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE EXEMPT DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE AS DEFINED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. UTILITIES ALL UTILITIES ON SITE AND ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THAT SERVE THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AFFECTED BY BUILDING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED AND /OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED, PER AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARILION CLINIC AND WVWA. SOME UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO BE ABANDONED AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED BY WVWA DUE TO WVWA WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES. ALL STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED SHALL MEET ALL CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ALL SANITARY, ELECTRIC, GAS IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPING IN ORDER TO SOFTEN THE EDGES OF THE BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREETS, A ROW OF LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES AND A ROW OF SHRUBS WILL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 36.2 -649 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE AREA DENOTED BY HATCHING ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT: Western Virginia Water Authority/Carillon Clinic Properties, LLC LOCATION: 2012 Jefferson Street, SE/O iclal Tax No. Part of 4060502 REQUEST: Rezoning /Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Plan COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) TO -WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Tina M. Carr, first being duly swom, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first- class mail this go-,-,- day of / /Itvuyf 2015, notices of a public hearing to be held on this / J* day of 2015, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: Tax No and Owners Name and Address 2012 Jefferson Street SE- AdJolning Property owners TAXID OwneYl MailAddmw Mail city MaIlState MallZip 1041002 ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA 24025 1041003 ROANOKE HOSPITAL ASSN PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 1041004 ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA 24025 1050601 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 2101 JEFFER5ON ST ROANOKE VA 24014 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4050306 CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060301 ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING PO B0X 12385 ROANOKE VA 24025 -2385 4060505 CITY OF ROANOKE PO B0X 1451 ROANOKE VA 24007 4060601 THE FAIRFAX CONDOMINIUM 4519 BRAMBLETON AVE SUITE 200 ROANOKE VA 24018 4060602 BANDY LLC PO BOX 4143 ROANOKE VA 24015 4060603 MORGAN PATRICIA B TRUSTEE OF THE PAT 5ST0NEGATE DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 4060604 WORKMAN STEPHEN M & FLORENCE T 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 103 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060605 JUSTICE JAMES C III PO B0X 2178 BEAVER WV 25813 4060607 JUSTICE JAMES C III PO BOX 2178 BEAVER WV 25813 4060608 SHERRY RICHARD G & CARPENTER JUDY 1371 SUNSET ROG WATERTOWN NY 13601 4060609 SAUNDERS WILLIAM DABNEY & LEE CAROL 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 108 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060610 MORRIS MARGARET I TRUSTEE THE FIRST PO BOX 3890 NORFOLK VA 23514 4060611 MILLS CURTIS E JR & DONNA H 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 110 APT ROANOKE VA 24014 4060612 BANDY LLC PO BOX 4143 ROANOKE VA 24015 4060613 G & PJEFFERSON LLC 1994 MERRIMAN WAY MONETA VA 24121 4060614 MALONE PATRICK A 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD UNIT 201 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060615 POLLARD DORIS W 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 202 UNIT ROANOKE VA 24014 4060617 WESTWIN OF ROANOKE LLC 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE ATLANTA GA 30306 4060618 SOLTIS LISA B 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE #205 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060619 W ESTWIN OF ROANOKE LLC 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE ATLANTA GA 30306 4060620 BAKER FRED TUSTEE 443 JOHNSON AVE UNIT 501 CAPE CANAVERAL FL 32920 4060621 GRAYSON RICHARD 6313 LAKE CHARLENE DR PENSACOLA FL 32506 4060622 LONG DARRELL W & NANCY C 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD S£ UNIT 209 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060623 BAILEY BARBARA REID 2512 JEFFERSON ST SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4060625 EDWARD ALLEN KAPPUS AND ELIZABETH DO 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 212 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060626 BRENNER BRUCE N & JOAN F 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 213 UNIT ROANOKE VA 24014 4060627 SMALLWOOD THOMAS H &EUGENIAH 2830 LONGVIEW AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24014 4060628 ARLEDGE ELLEN MARIE 2923 ROSAUND AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24014 4060629 THE A P KIRBY TRUST 9030 STONY POINT PKWY STE 460 RICHMOND VA 23235 4060630 POE WILLIAM D 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD #304 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060632 TESSENDORF RONALD 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 306 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060633 MCOONALD THOMAS R &PERDUE MELINA 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 307 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060634 THE CAROL BEWLEY DALHOUSE REVOCABLE 3514 RIVER BIRCH UN ROANOKE VA 24014 406D635 GOYETTE EDWARD M 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 309 ROANOKE VA 24014 4060637 FINISCASTLE LLC 9030 STONY PRINT PKWY RICHMOND VA 23235 4060638 CAUDILL DAVID &CYNTHIA 2125YELLOW MOUNTAIN RDSE312UNIT ROANOKE VA 24014 4060639 SMITH GARNETT E 1994 MERRIMAN WAY MONETA VA 24121 4070201 BOWMAN GARLAND L II 2201 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070504 BOLLING W CHAN & KAE N 2341 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070505 DUDLEY LEMAN 1710 DAWN UN ROANOKE VA 24018 4070511 GANDY SUZANNE N 2310 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070514 KILGUS MARK D & REBECCA L & 2303 MACK CHICK RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070515 FREY MICHELLE M 2301 MACK -CHICK RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 ` 4070516 BARON GEORGE P 1R 2301 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070517 HOWARD JONES JR REVOCABLE TRUST 2225 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070518 COLE ROBERT H & CAROL E 2231 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4070519 JPR PROPERTIES 4818 GRANDIN RD SW ROANOKE VA 24018 -1930 r Tina M. Can SUBSCBIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this 30 - day of rf' 104 4 .2015. CANDACE R. MARTIN NOTARY PUBLIC Commonm.fth of Virg "me Rep. #28M7 (,`ommLSSmI 1I8$ Wk, (>le9ory De'.0 n Ao Sre TOIal Cast 051112615 Munuilei Nolme PUBLICHEARINGNOTICL The OIyolRwnoke PlanningG 1r1401- 1.646bo Publisher of the Roanoke Times 1, )the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Than. a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, In the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE T was published In said newspapers on the following dates: 0426,05/052015 The First insertion being given... o4R6r2olb Newspaperreference: 0000150404 [ling Re resentataa Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, May 5, 211M Notary Rublic State of Virginian 1,962z rvrt6. My City/County Commissif Roanoke ._ary OT OS COmrtrssfen expires N01ARV �e I HIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE, THANK YOU The Roanoke Times Aec punt NUmGr Roanoke, Virginia 6611039 Affidavit of Publication RECEIVED Del. CIN OF ROANOKE- POW Alin Tim M. Cart MAY - 7 2015 May 65, 2016 215 CHURCH AIA ROOM 166 CITY OF ROANOKE ROANOKE, VA 24611 PLANNING aUILDING b DEVELOPMENT Wk, (>le9ory De'.0 n Ao Sre TOIal Cast 051112615 Munuilei Nolme PUBLICHEARINGNOTICL The OIyolRwnoke PlanningG 1r1401- 1.646bo Publisher of the Roanoke Times 1, )the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Than. a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, In the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE T was published In said newspapers on the following dates: 0426,05/052015 The First insertion being given... o4R6r2olb Newspaperreference: 0000150404 [ling Re resentataa Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, May 5, 211M Notary Rublic State of Virginian 1,962z rvrt6. My City/County Commissif Roanoke ._ary OT OS COmrtrssfen expires N01ARV �e I HIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE, THANK YOU PUBLIC NEARING NOMCE The City M MamYe Meminy M WW AMS wd M4 oft Cone lew" Mbpe M,dm M.411W rommertW; atWemy and Main WN M Rep M We EM WfVlWmenb publk MtkulN "I and CaMemm< Rowe. ARM 359, N"1 C. ce.itY WNW; %muh taw.; Tayb, Meta &pMep, tls CbunR IIYb�apdmpinL eMacrosewY. The A. . S.W. Roaeoke. MMINt Wevuatmorks pwmRdOln debt PIMM mk that IN, Is a sNW in IYStrld NeYWe [wnneNN, indeMML Idmtbn her the Nay M15 Manoip Weeeke Mll and dstWetlee PW Cammkelm Pablk Madq mly. Red com ygMIN&L denfpwtetl AYap,AiraldnsartwNNMC krreNew aueseaq. The mm eteml. Man In 1 PNmrnp. Rd" led deslputes Me W." for Pete MnpMlmd M., Rppm I% 315 Reeamee mee9 Reem"m11 R� Avenue. S.W. RoaeoNe. w"l App�Ibn by the Met RavnM to YMMe CbMM Sham PWY aM to MY WSW WNb A MMMYtY,aA33bMi0 ,Ne,M tle M-0Mc's equduu Crysdl any sedd adammodMkn to anew spdm Pete W a amen 01 WN or whelped N the b" M1M, OWN WWI RwnM by the Wmtwe ea Ret M m 0WWe9 d WmNe Wed, AetMMM seN real MelopmaN M ISM) 651 -I3MM last P.Wdy Iwedd M MM ledwim five days New to the W eddel SbeM. M IN duloM1N as OtMlal faadnv. Tae Nap Ne.eo6LL5o3. s,wM haminG Wlse M MN pma m Mw 11, tots. M LM pm. W w Ww as A. Hutt" mey be be"J. m cmftr theme amp me aM re x tine M. CM,, Secmla,e a, PWM, C,Wm ad CMmW wlll Etld P(.k hawker, m we eNrtsaw apolMtkm a i madwa en Met M MIS w ]M p.m.. ,e. M Me netms am, M YMN. k IM CRy CMYd Mender. feWi MWdpalc. Rom 3630.aMNe C. Toyl r S.W.. RnamM. WrpNA SWOMne M. Mann ReYwN". MMC Cld ad (1604") PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Roanoke Planning Commission public hearing advertised herein will be held in the HOC Conference Room, Room 159, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Please note that this is a change in location for the May 2015 Planning Commission public hearing only. All applications are available for review in the Planning, Building and Development office, Room 166, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the hearings should contact Planning, Building and Development at (540) 853 -1730 at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold public hearings on May 11, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, to consider these applications and request: Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.B., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, in accordance with a Planned Unit Development plan. The proposed uses of that portion of the property are hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off -site. The application is also to rezone a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility distribution. The application is also to rezone a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to I -2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility treatment. The land use categories permitted in the INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory; with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of lot area. The land use categories permitted in the IN District include accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The land use categories permitted in the 1 -2 District include commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Park: Resource Management Plan 3. Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Application by Shaker's Restaurant Corporation to rezone property located at 1909 Valley View Boulevard, N.W., bearing Official Tax Number 2380110, from CG, Commercial - General District, to CLS, Commercial -Large Site District, with conditions. The proposed use is a retail sales establishment. The land use categories permitted in the CLS District include accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Large Scale Commercial, but does not specify density. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid applications and matters on May 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, April 28, 2015, and Tuesday, May 5, 2015. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Coordinator Planning, Building & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1330 ti na. carr(ebroanokeva. gov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 540/853 -2541 AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT: City of Roanoke LOCATION: Crystal Spring Park ("the Park") 2012 Jefferson Street, SE, between Weller Lane, Jefferson Street, SE, and Yellow Mountain Road, SE REQUEST: That the Park be vacated and that the public's right to use the Park be released COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) TO -WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE The affiant, Tina M. Carr, first being duly mom, states that she Is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such Is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first- class mail this 30 day of 2015, notices of a public hearing to be held on this /W day of — 014O, 2015, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out below: 2012 Jefferson Street SE— Adjoining Property Owners TAXID 1041002 1041003 1041004 1050601 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4050306 4060301 4060301 4060301 4060301 4060301 4060505 4060601 4060602 4060603 4060604 4050606 4060607 4060608 4050609 4060630 4060611 406DS12 4060613 4060614 4060615 4060617 4060618 Owllerl ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS ROANOKE HOSPTTALASSN ROANOKE MEMORIAL HOSPITALS FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN CITY OF ROANOKE MILL MOUNTAIN ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING ROANOKE HOSPITALSOLTTH WING ROANOKE HOSPITALSOUTH WING ROANOKE HOSPITAL SOUTH WING CITY OF ROANOKE THE FAIRFAX CONDOMINIUM BANDY LLC MORGAN PATRICIA B TRUSTEE OFTHE PAT WORKMAN STEPHEN M & FLORENCE JUSTICE JAMES C III JUSTICE JAMES C III SHERRY RICHARD G & CARPENTER JUDY SAUNDERS WILLIAM DABNEY & LEE CAROL MORRIS MARGARET TRUSTEE THE FIRST MILLS CURTIS E 1R & DONNA H BANDY UL G & PJEFFERSON LLC MALONE PATRICK A POLLARD DORIS W WESTWIN OF ROANOKE LLC SOLTIS USA B MallAddr Malloty MaRState MaImp PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 12385 TAX DEPT ROANOKE VA 2103 JEFFERSON ST ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 R12ANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 12385 ROANDKE VA PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA PD BOX 12185 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 12385 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 4519 BRAMBLETON AVE SUITE 200 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 4143 ROANOKE VA 5 STONEGATE DR BELLEAM FL 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 103 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 2178 BEAVER WV PO BOX 2178 BEAVER WV 1371 SUNSET ROG WATERTOWN NY 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 108 ROANOKE VA PO BOX 3890 NORFOLK VA 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 110 APT ROANOKE VA PO BOX 4143 ROANOKE VA 1994 MERRIMAN WAY MONETA VA 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD UNIT 201 ROANOKE VA 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 202 UNIT ROANOKE VA 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE ATLANTA GA 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 4205 ROANOKE VA 24025 24025 -2385 24025 24014 24607 24007 24007 24007 24007 24007 24007 240D7 24607 24007 24025 -2385 24025 -2385 24025 -2385 24025.2385 24025 -2385 24007 24018 24015 33756 24014 25813 25813 13601 24014 23514 24014 24015 24121 24014 24014 30306 24014 4060619 4060620 4060621 4060622 4060623 4060625 4060626 4060627 4060628 4060629 40W630 4060632 4060633 4060634 4060635 4060637 4060638 4060639 4070201 4070504 4070505 4070511 4070514 4070515 4070516 4070517 4070518 4070519 W ESTWIN OF ROANOKE LUC BAKER J FRED TUSTEE GRAYSON RICHARD l LONG DARRELL W & NANCY C BAILEY BARBARA REID EDWARD ALLEN KAPPUS AND EUZABETH DO BRENNER BRUCE N & JOAN F SMALLWOOD THOMAS H & EUGENIA H ARIEDGE ELLEN MARIE THE A P KIRBY TRUST POE WILLIAM D TESSENDORF RONALD MCDONALD THOMAS R & PERDUE MEUNA THE CAROL BEWLEY DALHOUSE REVOCABLE GOYETFE EDWARD M FINIS CASTLE LLC CAUDILL DAVID & CYNTHIA SMITH GARNETT E BOWMAN GARLAND L II BOWNG W CHAN & KAE N DUDLEY LEMAN GANDY SUZANNEN KILGUS MARK D & REBECCA L & FREY MICHELLE M BARON GEORGE P JR HOWARD JONES JR REVOCABLE TRUST COLE ROBERT H & CAROL E JPR PROPERTIES 1125 BERKSHIRE RD NE ATLANTA GA 30306 443 JOHNSON AVE UNIT 501 CAPE CANAVERAL FL 32920 6313 LAKE CHARLENE DR PENSACOLA FL 32506 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 209 ROANOKE VA 24014 2512 JEFFER50N ST SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 212 ROANOKE VA 24014 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 213 UNIT ROANOKE VA 24014 2830 LONGVIEW AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24014 2923 ROSALIND AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24014 9030 STONY POINT PKWY STE 460 RICHMOND VA 23235 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD 43114 ROANOKE VA 24014 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 306 ROANOKE VA 24014 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 307 ROANOKE VA 24014 3514 RIVER BIRCH LN ROANOKE VA 24014 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE UNIT 309 ROANOKE VA 24014 9030 STONY PRINT PKWY RICHMOND VA 23235 2125 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE 312 UNIT ROANOKE VA 24014 1994 MERRIMAN WAY MONETA VA 24121 2201 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2341 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 1710 DAWN W ROANOKE VA 24018 2330 YELLOW MOUNTAIN RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2303 MACK CHICK RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2301 MACK -CHICK RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2302WOODCUFFRDSE ROANOKE VA 24014 2225 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 2231 WOODCLIFF RD SE ROANOKE VA 24014 4818 GRANDIN RD SW ROANOKE VA 24018 -2930 Tina M. Can SUBSCRIB D AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this 30�` day of E , 2015. Notary Public CANEACE R. MARTIN NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virgin" Reg.t28207 M COMMin n Ex p= CITY OF ROANOKE - PLANNING Ann TINA CARR 215 CHURCH AVE SVJ ROOM 166 ROANOKE, VA 24011 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication RECEIVED APR 8 2015 Account NumMr 6020306 Dale April 07, 2015 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING s OEVELOPMBNT Dale Calegm Descnplmn Ad Sze TafalCOSt 0410712015 Legal Notices PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE All pubic heanrgs wwnud hen 1 x 106 L 1.054.96 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE At was published in said newspapers on the following dates: Mt 04/07/2015 The First Insertion being given ... 031314015 Newspaper reference: OODDIS0593 Billing Representative tl Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, April 7, 2016 �.1L Notary Pidlic Stateof Virginia 'Gz ONNO.. City /County of Roanoke 1049623 MY Commission expires �� iQ1 "^E�Ib s Om .i ' C, ' NO7ARY /ppgn. nOp�P,� THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NI Wbk hnalati ade,imil herein ppMNed in the IN Msp,l Incke aeN he hem In the City Council a:wmmodallons ad gaup %AV, Chamber. WIN fli Room 150. NON wmmerWl; assembly aM G Taylor Yu W" WWdq. 115 _ "dal ry Olao"110 W"a"! ad cfta i AvaWe, SW, hots ,MUmn . vimbal Ahappllcatlons... hk utyNy: aprkWWM;andalttSWry. The kr u,,. W the Pkming. ddldng and Wduse useporkz perm,bd In the l.i Development Why. oo 1% 215 Otshiet kme , W: "'Mal '. Church Awn,, SW. poamke, wrehoupiN and dsMkaloo: WNk vi,;mx M,dW bC01111 hyafty N Wrdpald Ara person "h it dahility reei acccomi The mnw larf rve Nan airy, speNN u[OmmodYi. k oil deslgnNes D, propedy for PMk or p,tldp,e In Ne hoofivs should NtlC,RManapWOenlPbS puntazt pknulop, fldldhN aM at 5514 &}5230Mbest Ta, K Cart. Sttrttm, City Planning fin day, fin dYS Prim to the uhdkd CWNWSS,n hesd� City C 61 vWl hold Whit hea,gs The (Sty N Roanoke Bancorp on the ah resa l appuo, do Will C.wmdssbn will hold pil ML.ngs wtters erd. as soonMWe Wi April 11 MS. at I:So p.a4 or u may be llp soon as the make. My be heart k C,altl¢r1111seapW,dpn, Stepmeh, M. atuon pmwds. MMG City Clod Appikalkn by the City of Rel,hp to vacate Crysld Sprisq Pak and m 11505911 Meats Me ic's NpMto usecmim Sprhp Park on a ppdion N red property caned by the Witi Virpima WAS, A,ihWity. wN mN Propeay loealed N rosy JNferacn sheet. S.E. Said d egoated as widef TaowphodM0501 RECEIVED APR 8 2016 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING 6 DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE All public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All applications are available for review in the Planning, Building and Development office, Room 166, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the hearings should contact Planning, Building and Development at (540) 853 -1730 at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold public hearings on April 13, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard, to consider these applications: Application by the City of Roanoke to vacate Crystal Spring Park and to release the public's right to use Crystal Spring Park on a portion of real property owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority, such real property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., and designated as Official Tax Map No. 4060502. Application by the Western Virginia Water Authority and Carilion Clinic Properties, LLC, to rezone three portions of the property located at 2012 Jefferson Street, S.E., bearing Official Tax Number 4060502. The application is to rezone a 2.0379 acre portion of the property in the northwest corner adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS, Recreation and Open Space District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The proposed uses of that portion of the property are hospital; medical clinic; laboratory, dental, medical, or optical; laboratory, testing and research; health and fitness center; and parking off -site. The application is also to rezone a 0.2518 acre portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.E., from ROS to IN, Institutional District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility distribution. The application is also to rezone a 0.4453 portion of the property in the northwest comer adjoining Jefferson Street, S.P., from ROS to I -2, Heavy Industrial District. The proposed use of that portion of the property is utility treatment. The land use categories permitted in the INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory; with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 1,800 square feet of lot area. The land use categories permitted in the IN District include accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The land use categories permitted in the I -2 District include commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Park: Resource Management Plan 3. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid applications on April 20, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as the matters may be heard. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, March 31, 2015, and Tuesday, April 7, 2015. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning Coordinator Planning, Building & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1330 tina.carr @roanokeva.gov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 h� Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 'I elcpLonc (54018532541 1 :1x. (540) 853 -1145 SIIiPI IAN I H M. MOON RLYNOIDS, MM(. Iimad olork(mou'4'ca.g °v JONA "I I IAN If.( RAVI,('M(' City Clerk D,Lry City Clerk May 27,2015 (1(F1]AI We1311,(M(' y A,n sfaat Deputy ('Ity Clerk Harvey D. Brookins c/o Freedom First Bank 5240 Valleypark Drive, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Brookins: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40247- 051815 approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints you to be one of three City of Roanoke representatives and that your initial term will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on June 30, 2016. Furthermore, upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose term expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. After the Oath has been administered, please return one copy to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were appointed. For recordkeeping purposes, complete the online application at www.roanokeva.gov, under Upcoming Vacancies on Council- appointed Bodies. Harvey D. Brookins May 27, 2015 Page 2 Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve as a City of Roanoke representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board. Sincerely, Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosures PC: Gayle Shrewsbury, Secretary, Western Virginia Water Authority Board of Directors, 601 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Thomas C. Gates, Roanoke County Administrator, P. O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Kathleen Guzi, Botetourt County Administrator, One West Main Street, Box 1, Fincastle, Virginia 24090 Sam Darby, Authority Counsel, Glenn, Feldmann, Darby and Goodlatte, P. O. Box 2887, Roanoke, Virginia 24001 -2887 Richard E. Huff, II, Franklin County Administrator, 1255 Franklin Street, Suite 112, Rocky Mount, Virginia 24151 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Cecelia T. Webb, Assistant Deputy City Clerk, and as such Assistant Deputy City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council, which was held on the eighteenth day of May 2015, HARVEY D. BROOKINS was appointed as a City of Roanoke Representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board for an initial term of office ending June 30, 2016. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty- seventh day of May 2015. N Assistant Deputy City Clerk John P. Bradshaw, Jr. 3132 Burnleigh Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Mr. Bradshaw: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40247 - 051815 approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints you to be one of three City of Roanoke representatives and that your initial term will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on June 30, 2017. Furthermore, upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose term expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. After the Oath has been administered, please return one copy to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were appointed. For recordkeeping purposes, complete the online application at www.roanokeva.gov, under Upcoming Vacancies on Council- appointed Bodies. CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avanue, S. W., Suite 456 a Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1536 1'u1cp1 (5411) N1 J41 1 rvr. 15 411, 153 1 4 5 tiII P1IANII M. MOON I0 YNOI.OS, MM(' li,nv.1 dmWn munnkavu. pnv 111NAI IIAN I'.. (RM-1. ('M(' City ('Ievk 0anu1, (i1,('I�d May 2015 Y ('1('IHA I Wf 1313,('M( A—s Lknt Ugniry('i ry Cluk John P. Bradshaw, Jr. 3132 Burnleigh Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Mr. Bradshaw: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40247 - 051815 approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints you to be one of three City of Roanoke representatives and that your initial term will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on June 30, 2017. Furthermore, upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose term expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. After the Oath has been administered, please return one copy to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were appointed. For recordkeeping purposes, complete the online application at www.roanokeva.gov, under Upcoming Vacancies on Council- appointed Bodies. John P. Bradshaw, Jr. May 27, 2015 Page 2 Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve as a City of Roanoke representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board. Sincerely , -- / Oeca T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosures PC: Gayle Shrewsbury, Secretary, Western Virginia Water Authority Board of Directors, 601 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Thomas C. Gates, Roanoke County Administrator, P. O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Kathleen Guzi, Botetourt County Administrator, One West Main Street, Box 1, Fincastle, Virginia 24090 Sam Darby, Authority Counsel, Glenn, Feldmann, Darby and Goodlatte, P. O. Box 2887, Roanoke, Virginia 24001 -2887 Richard E. Huff, 11, Franklin County Administrator, 1255 Franklin Street, Suite 112, Rocky Mount, Virginia 24151 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Cecelia T. Webb, Assistant Deputy City Clerk, and as such Assistant Deputy City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council, which was held on the eighteenth day of May 2015, JOHN P. BRADSHAW, JR., was appointed as a City of Roanoke Representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board for an initial term of office ending June 30, 2017. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty- seventh day of May 2015, Assistant Deputy City Clerk Wayne F. Bowers 3618 Colonial Green Circle, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Bowers: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40247 - 051815 approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints you to be one of three City of Roanoke representatives and that your initial term will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on June 30, 2019. Furthermore, upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose term expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. After the Oath has been administered, please return one copy to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were appointed. CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF TI IF CITY CLERK 215 C'harch Avcnuc, S. W., Sailc 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 1dq+hanc 15401A51 2541 Pus (54(gU1 -1145 N I IFPIIANIH M. MOON Ii LYNOI_US, MM( I: -mull. cl rkBnvannkcvu_g "° IONAII I AN ('RAVI',('M(' ('iry ('Ink Ocpwy City ('Im k May 27. 2015 rh('I IIA'1, WI HH,( M(' Y Anle:nm uynny (s1, tl�.k Wayne F. Bowers 3618 Colonial Green Circle, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Bowers: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 40247 - 051815 approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints you to be one of three City of Roanoke representatives and that your initial term will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on June 30, 2019. Furthermore, upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose term expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015. After the Oath has been administered, please return one copy to Room 456 in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., prior to serving in the capacity to which you were appointed. Wayne F. Bowers May 27, 2015 Page 2 Pursuant to Section 2.2 -3702, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, I am enclosing copy of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act requires that you be provided with a copy within two weeks of your appointment and each member is required "to read and become familiar with provisions of the Act." On behalf of the Mayor and Members of City Council, I would like to express appreciation for your willingness to serve as a City of Roanoke representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board. Sim ly, Cecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosures PC: Gayle Shrewsbury, Secretary, Western Virginia Water Authority Board of Directors, 601 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Thomas C. Gates, Roanoke County Administrator, P. O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Kathleen Guzi, Botetourt County Administrator, One West Main Street, Box 1, Fincastle, Virginia 24090 Sam Darby, Authority Counsel, Glenn, Feldmann, Darby and Goodlatte, P. O. Box 2887, Roanoke, Virginia 24001 -2887 Richard E. Huff, II, Franklin County Administrator, 1255 Franklin Street, Suite 112, Rocky Mount, Virginia 24151 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) To -wit: CITY OF ROANOKE ) I, Cecelia T. Webb, Assistant Deputy City Clerk, and as such Assistant Deputy City Clerk of the City of Roanoke and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that at a regular meeting of Council, which was held on the eighteenth day of May 2015, WAYNE F. BOWERS was appointed as a City of Roanoke Representative of the Western Virginia Water Authority Board for an initial term of office ending June 30, 2019. Given under my hand and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this twenty- seventh day of May 2015. Assistant Deputy City Clerk IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40247- 051815. A RESOLUTION approving the reorganization and expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority ( "Authority ") by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder; and authorizing the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Franklin County, Virginia, ( "Franklin County'), the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (`Roanoke County "), and the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, (`Botetourt County') have or will determine that it is in the best interest of their citizens that Botetourt County, Virginia, join and become a member of the Western Virginia Water Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended (the "Act "); acrd WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, ( "Council ") desires to approve of Botetourt County, Virginia, becoming a member of the Authority by the adoption of this resolution concurrently (or in concert) with resolutions adopted or to be adopted by Franklin County, Roanoke County, and Botetourt County; and WHEREAS, after proper advertisement, a public hearing has been held by this Council in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.2 -5104 of the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1 "I- RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows. I. Council hcreby determines that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, that Botetourt County, Virginia, join and become a member ofthe Western Virginia Water Authority and approves the terns of the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority as contained in Section 6 of this resolution. 2. Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and attest or witness, respectively, such Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority in a form substantially similar to those set forth in Section 6 below, with such minor revisions and adjustments as the Mayor or the City Manager shall approve. 3. Council hereby agrees that the Authority shall be reorganized and expanded in accordance with the terns of the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority mentioned above upon the issuance of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement issued by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. 4. Council does hereby FIND as a matter of fact that inclusion in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority of preliminary estimates of capital costs, proposals for any specific projects to be undertaken by the Authority, and preliminary estimates of initial rates for services of such projects as certified by responsible engineers is impractical. 5. As provided for in the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Council hereby appoints the following three (3) 2 persons to be the City of Roanoke representatives and that such persons' initial terns will start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement and expire on the dates indicated next to their names. Roanoke City Appointees NAME ADDRESS OF M John P. Bradshaw, Jr. 3132 Bumleigh Road, S W _ Roanoke, VA 24014 Harvey D. Brookins Freedom First 6 ET 5240 Valleypark Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Wayne F Bowers 3618 Colonial Green Circle, S W Roanoke, VA 24018 Upon expiration of the initial term of office, and any future term of office, the Council shall appoint a person (who can be the same person whose tern expired) to be a member of the Board of the Authority for four (4) years from the date of the initial expiring term and any future expiring term of office. The total number of members that the City of Roanoke, Virginia, will have on the Board of the Authority will be three (3) members. 6. The Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority are set forth below. They shall be deemed amended, restated, and effective upon the date of issuance of a Certificate of Joinder and /or Restatement by the Virginia State Corporation Commission as provided for in Virginia Code Section 15.2-5112. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Board of Supervisors of Franklin County, Virginia, and the Board of 3 Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, as well as the Board of Directors of the Western Virginia Watcr Authority, have by concurrent resolutions adopted the following Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of' the Western Virginia Water Authority, pursuant to the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act (Chapter 51, Title 152 of the 1950 Code of Virginia as amended) (the "Act'). ARTICLE 1 The name of the Authority shall be the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Authority") and the address of its principal office is 601 South Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011. ARTICLE 11 The names of the political subdivisions participating in the Authority are Roanoke County, Virginia, the City of Roanoke, Virginia, Franklin County, Virginia, and Botetourt County, Virginia, (collectively the "Localities "), each of which hereby acknowledges, covenants, and agrees that these Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation shall not be further amended or changed without the express agreement of each of the governing bodies of each of the Localities. None of the following actions shall be taken or permitted to occur by the Board of the Authority without the affirmative vote of a majority of the members from the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County. (1) The inclusion of additional political subdivisions in the Authority; and (2) Additional agreement with other political subdivisions, entities, or persons, for the bulk sale of surplus water or for the acceptance and treatment of waste water. ARTICLE III The Board of the Authority shall consist of eight (8) members. The names, addresses, and terns of office of the initial members of the reconstituted Board of the Western Virginia 4 Water Authority are as follows: The initial term of each member shall start on the date of issuance by the Virginia State Corporation Commission of a certificate of joinder or restatement and expire on the date indicated below. Name Address Expiration of Term of Office John P. Bradshaw, Jr. 3132 Bumleigh Road, SW June 30, 2017 Roanoke, Virginia 24014 (Roanoke City Appointee) Donald L. Davis 1031 Halliahurst Avenue June 30, 2018 Vinton, Virginia 24179 (Roanoke County Appointee) Marc Fink Finks Jewelers June 30, 2015* 3545 Electric Rd Roanoke Virginia 24018 (Roanoke City Appointee) R. Gray Goldsmith Valley Bank June 30, 2015* 36 Church Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24001 (Roanoke County Appointee) Shirley B. Holland 161 Lila Lane June 30, 2018 Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 (Franklin County Appointee) Harvey Brookins Freedom First June 30, 2016 5240 Valley Park Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (Roanoke City Appointee) H. Odell Minnix 3314 Kenwick Trail June 30, 2016 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 (Roanoke County Appointee) TBA* June 30, 2017 *The appointments for the member positions of Mr. Goldsmith by Roanoke County and of Mr. Fink by the City of Roanoke and the appointment of Botetourt County's member have not been determined as of the date of advertisement of the public hearing on this 5 resolution and these Articles will be conformed to the appointments made prior to the tiling of these Articles with the State Corporation Commission in June, 2015. All terms will end on June 30 in the last year of the appointed terms. This note will be removed from these Articles when they are filed with the State Corporation Commission. Upon expiration of the foregoing terms of office, the governing body of the participating political subdivision that appointed the person whose term expired shall appoint, for the times set forth below, a person to be such participating political subdivision's appointee, which call be the same person whose term expired, and the total number of members for each participating political subdivision will be the number of members set forth opposite its name below: Roanoke County— Three, for terms of four years each City of Roanoke — Three, for terms of four years each Franklin County — One, for a term of four years Botetourt County — One, for a term four years The govenung body of each of the Localities shall be empowered to remove at any time, without cause, any member appointed by it and to appoint a successor member to fill the unexpired portion of the removed member's term, and shall be empowered to appoint a successor member to fill the unexpired term of a member such Locality appointed who may resign or no longer be able to serve. Each Board member shall be reimbursed by the Authority for the amount of actual expenses incurred in the performance of Authority duties. Upon expiration of the term of a member, such member will continue to serve until the governing body of the Locality appointing such member appoints a successor member, removes such member, or reappoints such member. ARTICLE IV The purposes for which the Authority is being reorganized are to exercise all the powers granted to the Authority to acquire, finance, construct, operate, manage and maintain water, waste water, sewage disposal, and stonmwater control systems and related facilities pursuant to 6 the Act. The Authority shall have all of the rights, powers, and duties of an authority under the Act. It is not practicable to set forth herein information regarding preliminary estimates of capital costs, proposals for specific projects to be undertaken, or initial rates for services of the proposed projects. ARTICLE V The Authority shall serve Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, Franklin County, and Botetourt County, Virginia, and, to the extent permitted by the Act and the terms of these Articles, such other public or private entities as the Authority may determine upon the terms and conditions established pursuant to appropriate contracts, either within or without Roanoke County, Virginia, the City of Roanoke, Virginia, Franklin County, Virginia, or Botetourt County, Virginia. ARTICLE VI The Authority shall cause an annual audit of its books and records to be made by an independent certified public accountant at the end of each fiscal year and a certified copy thereof to be filed promptly with the governing body of each of the incorporating political subdivisions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Board of Supervisors of Franklin County, Virginia, and the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia and the Board of Directors of the Western Virginia Water Authority have caused these Second Amended mud Restated Articles of Incorporation to be executed in their respective names, and their respective seals have been affixed hereto and attested by the respective secretaries and /or clerks of each. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 7 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY By: Slnrley B. Holland, Chair Attest: (SEAL) Gayle Slirewsbu y, Secretary ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: e. Jason Peters, Chairman, Board of Supervisors Attest: (SEAL) Deborah C. Jacks, Deputy Clerk to the Board BOTETOURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Dr Donald M. Scothom, Chairman, Board of Supervisors Attest: _(SEAL) Clerk to the Board CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By: David A. Bowers, Mayor Attest: (SEAL) Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, City Clerk FRANKLIN COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Chne Brubaker, Chairman, Board of Supervisors Attest: (SEAL) Sharon IC Tudor Clerk to the Board [End of Forum of Articles] 8 7. The Council further authorizes the Mayor and /or the City Manager to take any action and execute any documents, including the Application for Joinder, necessary to accomplish the matters set forth in this resolution and to cause the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to become effective so that Botetourt County, Virginia, becomes a member of the Authority. 8. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ATTEST: Stephanie M Moon Reynolds, CMC City Clerk. 9 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHOR CITY OF ROANOKE, CITY CLERK 215 CHURCH AVENUE. S W,, SUITE 456, NOEL C. TAYLOR ROANOKE. VA 2,1011 -1536 Account Number 6014690 Data May 29, 2015 Date Category De.crpbon A4 Size Total Cast 041612015 Munldpal Notices BOTETOURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, JOINING THE WESTERN 3x 3001N 62124 Publisher of the Roanoke Times K (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the _ & Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice BOTETOURT g k. COUNTY, VIRGINI was published in said newspapers on the $ i following dates: @ >Y 04116/2015 ¢ J1 F d f The First insertion being given ... 04/1612015 y �B , Newspaper reference: 0000155765 T a Billing Representative N Sworn to and subscribed before ma this Friday, May 29, 2015 € a, n Notary ubl a _ a a.. M HF� Staten Virginia P'.'•""., City/County of Roanoke 2P: N07ARv My Commission expires 'f�" L( 11 _ it .. COMMISSION FXi.REb._ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON BOTETOURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, JOINING THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Section 15.2 -5104 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, that the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, ( "Council ") will hold a public hearing on Monday, May 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. local time or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, 4 °i Floor, Room 450, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011, for the purpose of receiving public comment on the joinder of Botetourt County, Virginia, with the Western Virginia Water Authority and on the Council's approval of and authorization of execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority for accomplishing such joinder of Botetourt County, Virginia, together with any related matters. A copy of the proposed resolution to be adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, may be obtained from, or reviewed at, the Office of the City Clerk, Room 256, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011, and also at the Executive Offices of the Western Virginia Water Authority located at 601 South Jefferson Street, Suite 200, Roanoke, Virginia 24011. All interested persons and entities are invited to attend the above public hearing and be heard on the above matters. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this public hearing, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (540) 853 -2541, by noon on Thursday, May 14, 2015. Dated: April , 2015 Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, CMC City Clerk, Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia NOTE TO ROANOKE TIMES: Please publish in full, block style once in the Roanoke Times, Legal Notice Section, on Thursday April 16, 2015. Send publisher's affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Suite 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, VA 24011 -1536 Send bill to: Western Virginia Water Authority Mike McEvoy, Executive Director 601 S. Jefferson Street, Suite 200 Roanoke, VA 24011 -1536 Daniel. Callaghan City Attorney CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 464 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 215 CHORCH AVENUE, SW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 240141595 The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Roanoke, Virginia TFIFPHONE 540-853-2431 FAX 540.853 -1221 EMAIL ciryatth @roanokeva.gov May 18, 2015 Timothy R. Spencer Steven J. Talevi David L. Collins Heather P. Ferguson Laura M. Carini Assistant City Attorneys Re: Proposed joinder of Botetourt County with the Wester Virginia Water Authority [)car Mayor Bowers and Members of Council: BACKGROUND: Botetourt County has requested to become a part of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Each Jurisdiction is required to hold a public hearing authorizing the expansion of the Western Virginia Water Authority providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority; approving and authorizing the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder. Council authorized the publication of notice of a public hearing to consider the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Western Virginia Water Authority. Notice of the public hearing appeared in The Roanoke Times on Thursday, April 16, 2015. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing and receive comments from citizens and other interested parties regarding the proposed joinder of Botetourt County to the Western Virginia Water Authority ( "Authority"). Absent public comments needing further consideration, approve the reorganization and expansion of the Authority by providing that Botetourt County, Virginia, join the Authority. Approve and authorize the execution of a Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Wester Virginia Water Authority to accomplish such joinder. Authorize the appropriate public officials to take any actions and execute any documents, approved as to form by the City Attorney, necessary to accomplish such matters, all in accordance with Virginia Code Section 15.2 -5112. Sincerely, Davie aghaI City Attorney DJCAsc c: Council Appointed Officers Wayne Bowers, Director of Economic Development W E S T E R N V I R G I N I A WATER AUTHORITY ADMINISTRATION March 31, 2015 VIA EMAIL Mr. Christopher P. Morrill City Manager City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Re: Botetourt County Request to Join the Western Virginia Water Authority Dear Mr. Morrill Botetourt County has expressed interest in merging its utility operations with the Western Virginia Water Authority (Authority) by becoming a member locality. The Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act requires membership expansion be approved by the existing member localities through adoption of a resolution after first conducting a public hearing. On behalf of Botetourt County and the Western Virginia Water Authority, I respectfully request the City of Roanoke hold such a public hearing at its regularly scheduled meeting on May 18, 2015. The Authority will assume the cost for advertisement of the public hearing. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Michael T. McEvoy Executive Director, Wastewater Services cc: Gary Robertson, PE, Executive Director Water Operations Sam Darby, Authority Counsel, GFDG Attorneys Kathleen Guzi, Botetourt County Administrator Our Mission is Clear 601 5. Jefferson Street • Roanoke VA 24011 540-853 -1449 • 540- 863 -1600 (fax), www westernvawater. org d" CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenge, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540)953 -2541 Fox: (540) 853 -1145 8 1'F M IAN I E M.MOON REYNOLDS, MMC p:mnil: ele,k(ikaanoke,a.gov CECELIA F. MC'C'OY City Clerk Deputy City Clerk ('IXF'LIAT. WEDD, CIVIC Ae :istnnt Depnty City Clerk March 2, 2016 The Honorable Sherman A. Holland The Honorable Evelyn W. Powers Commissioner of the Revenue City Treasurer Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Holland and Ms. Powers: I am forwarding an attested copy of Ordinance No. 40248- 051815, which has been properly executed by Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP), for purposes of assessment and collection of the service charge established by this Ordinance. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Re nolds, MMC City Clerk Enclosure PC: Robin Haldiman, Chief Executive Officer, Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP), 1201 Third Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Susan Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation R.B. Lawhorn, Budget Administrator, Management and Budget tip CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 1 Or,[ ae: (5411)X53 -2541 Faa: (54)853 -1145 S I'HPIIANI R M. MOON REYNOLDS, MM(' F:mail: clerk(ri•rn:umkeen'I� °" .IONAI'BAN F:.('RAFI', CMC City Clerk Depaly ('try Clerk May 19, 2015 CECELIA 1. WF:RR, CHIC y Asfu4aal Dept) y City Clerk Robin Haldiman, Chief Executive Officer Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 1201 Third Street, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Ms. Haldiman: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 40248 - 051815 exempting from real estate property taxation certain property located at 1215 3rd Street, S. W., owned by Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP), an organization devoted exclusively to charitable or benevolent purposes on a non - profit basis, effective July 1, 2015. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 18, 2015; and is in full force and effect on July 1, 2015, if by such time a copy, duly executed by an authorized officer of the Applicant, has been filed with the City Clerk. Sin ely, ecelia T. Webb, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Enclosure PC: The Honorable Sherman A. Holland, Commissioner of the Revenue The Honorable Evelyn W. Powers, City Treasurer Christopher P. Morrill, City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Susan Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Management and Budget IN THE, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of May, 2015. No. 40248- 051815. AN ORDINANCE exempting from real estate property taxation certain property located at 1215 3rd Street, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, and depicted as Official Fax Map No. 1023008, owned by Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP) (hereinafter "the Applicant "), an organization devoted exclusively to charitable or benevolent purposes on a non -profit basis; providing for an effective date; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, the Applicant has petitioned this Council to exempt certain real property of the Applicant from taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia; WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens and other interested persons had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the Applicant's petition was held by Council on May 18, 2015; WHEREAS, the provisions of subsection B of Section 58.1 -3651, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, have been examined and considered by the Council; WHEREAS, the Applicant agrees that the real property to be exempt from taxation is certain real estate, including the land and any buildings acid improvements located thereon, identified as Official Tax Map No. 1023008, known as 1215 3rd Street, S_W., Roanoke, Virginia, (the "Property "), which Property is owned by the Applicant, and a portion of the Property is subject to a lease between the Applicant and Kuumba Community Health & Wellness Center, Inc., d/b /a New Horizons Healthcare, a Virginia non - stock charitable corporation ( "Tenant") for a term of two (2) years commencing as of March 1, 2015, with an option to renew the Lease for one additional term of three (3) years (the "Lease "), and that the entirety of the Property shall be used by the Applicant and /or the Tenant exclusively for charitable or benevolent purposes on a non - profit basis; WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Revenue has determined, based upon a report from the City Attorney to the Commissioner of the Revenue attached to the City Council Agenda Report dated May 18, 2015, that the Lease does not provide Applicant with a substantial net profit on the portion of the Property subject to the Lease, and that the rent paid by Tenant is not in excess of the fair market value rent for medical office space within the City; and WHEREAS, in consideration of Council's adoption of this Ordinance, the Applicant has voluntarily agreed to pay each year a service charge in an amount equal to twenty percent (20 %) of the City of Roanoke's real estate tax levy, which would be applicable to the Property were the Property not exempt from such taxation, for so long as the Property is exempted from such taxation. THERE FORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: I. Council classifies and designates Applicant, the Child Health Investment Partnership, as a charitable or benevolent organization within the context of Section 6(a)(6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, and hereby exempts from real estate taxation certain real estate, identified as Official Tax Map No. 1023008, known as 1215 3rd Street, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, and owned by the Applicant, a portion of which Property is leased to the Tenant pursuant to the Lease, and is used by the Applicant and /or the Tenant exclusively for charitable or benevolent purposes on a non -profit basis. Continuance of this exemption shall be contingent on the continued use of the Property by Applicant and /or the Tenant in accordance with the purposes designated in this Ordinance, as further stated in the City Council Agenda Report dated May 18, 2015. 2. In consideration of Council's adoption of this Ordinance, the Applicant agrees to pay to the City of Roanoke, on or before October 5 of each year, a service charge in an amount equal to twenty (20 %) percent of the City of Roanoke's real estate tax levy. 3. The tax exemption granted the Applicant pursuant to this ordinance shall be further conditioned upon the following: (a) Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it will immediately notify the City of Roanoke Commissioner of the Revenue in writing when any portion of the Property that is being exempted from taxation pursuant to this ordinance is leased to a third party, and that Applicant will provide the City a copy of such lease, (b) Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it will immediately notify the City of Roanoke Commissioner of Revenue in writing when any portion of the Property ceases to be used by the Applicant and /or the Tenant exclusively for charitable or benevolent purposes on a non- profit basis, and (c) Applicant agrees to include a provision in all leases of the Property to third parties that such third parties are responsible for paying the City applicable leasehold taxes assessed by the City. Applicant acknowledges that if the foregoing conditions are not met, the City reserves the right to terminate the tax exempt status of the Property in whole or in part at the City's discretion at any time. 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on July 1, 2015, if by such time a copy, duly executed by an authorized officer of the Applicant, has been filed with the City Clerk. 5. The City Clerk is directed to forward an attested copy of this Ordinance, after it is properly executed by the Applicant, to the Commissioner of the Revenue, and the City Treasurer for purposes of assessment and collection, respectively, of the service charge established by this Ordinance, and to Robin Haldiman, CEO, and the authorized agent of Child Health Investment Partnership. 6. Pursuant to Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. TF ,4 City Clerk. ACCEPTED, AGREED TO AND EXECUTED by Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP), thiqff�day of 17�12015. Child Health Investment Partnership By noted Name and Title O G� M CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: May 18, 2015 Subject: Tax Exemption Request - The Child Health Investment Partnership Background: The Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) is a Virginia, non - stock, not for profit corporation which owns certain real property located at 1215 3rd Street, S.W., Roanoke. Virginia, and designated as Official Tax Map No. 1023008 (Premises). The organization desires the Premises to be designated as exempt from real estate taxes pursuant to the provisions of Section 58.1 -3651 of the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended. CHIP is a Roanoke -based charitable organization that provides home visiting services to low income families with the primary goals of promoting children's physical and mental health and development; supporting and building parenting capacity in high -risk families; and building resilient children and self- sufficient families. At present, annual real estate taxes on the Premises are $7,006, based on a total assessed value of $588,700. On December 15, 2014, City Council granted CHIP a real estate tax exemption on an adjacent property CHIP owns located at 1201 3rd Street, S.W. Considerations: On May 19, 2003, City Council approved a revised policy and procedure in connection with requests from non - profit organizations for tax exemption of certain property in the City by Resolution 36331 - 051903, with an effective date of January 1, 2003. Based on this policy and procedure, the Child Health Investment Partnership has provided the necessary information required for applications for exemptions that would take effect July 1, 2015. Commissioner of the Revenue, Sherman Holland, has determined that CHIP is not exempt from paying real estate taxes by "classification" or "designation" under the Code of Virginia. The IRS recognizes the organization as a non -stock 501 (c) (3) tax - exempt organization. CHIP is current in the payment of its real estate taxes. In lieu of the $7,006 in real estate taxes, the organization would agree to pay to the City an annual service charge equal to twenty percent (20 %) of the tax levy on the parcel for as long as the exemption continues. In this case, based on the current assessed value of the Premises, the amount of the service charge would be $1,401. Consequently, the City would be foregoing $5,605 in annual real estate tax revenue. CHIP intends to use the Premises to offer psychological and other forms of counseling and mental health services to children and their families starting July 1, 2015. CHIP currently rents approximately 60% of the Premises to Kuumba Community Health and Wellness Center, Inc., d /b /a New Horizons Healthcare, a Virginia non -stock corporation (Tenant), pursuant to a lease agreement dated March 1, 2015 (Lease). The Tenant, a community based health care organization, headquartered in the City of Roanoke, which offers health care and related services to low income individuals, intends to use the portion of the premises it is leasing to provide mental health care clinicians and physicians to complement the services CHIP is providing at the Premises. The initial term of the Tenant's lease is two years with monthly rent of $2,767.33. The Tenant has the option to extend the term of the Lease for one additional three -year term, subject to annual rent escalations of three percent each year in the renewal term. A copy of the lease has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and discussed with the Commissioner of the Revenue. Based on an opinion letter provided by the City Attorney, the Commissioner of the Revenue has determined that the rent received by CHIP from the Tenant is not a substantial source of profit or revenue within the meaning of Section 58.1 -3603 of the Code of Virginia, that would otherwise make the portion of the property the Tenant is leasing from CHIP ineligible to be tax exempt. A copy of the opinion letter, with the endorsement of the Commissioner of the Revenue, is attached to this Council Report. Notification of a public hearing to be held May 18, 2015, was duly advertised in the Roanoke Times. Recommended Action: Adopt an ordinance to authorize the Child Health Investment Partnership's exemption from real property taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6 (a) 6 of the Constitution of Virginia, effective July 1, 2015. - -- --------------------- ristopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Honorable Sherman A. Holland, Commissioner of the Revenue Honorable Evelyn W. Powers, City Treasurer R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Sherman M. Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operations Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Management and Budget Robin Haldiman, CEO, CHIP of Roanoke Valley, 1201 Third Street, S.W., Roanoke, VA 24016 OF ROgry 4 ��F qrt �n Daniel .1. ('allaghan CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE, OI' TI IE CITY ATI ORNVY 464 VI NIL CN 191'11 PIN,; , 111 '. I2('.I I \\ l Nt'I , s \5' I(l)AAt TI'., bll'.[ 1N'IA' -It,II I;uS The Honorable Sherman A. Rolland Connn is.sioner of the Rei cIILie lot the City d ROUnokc. Virginia Nocl C'. Taylor Municipal Building "' 15 Church AVenUe. SAN'_ Room 25 1 RonnoLL1, VA _'4011 lI I1I'I ItINI �411N,1'4;1 I'AX 40s ',) "I I \1 MI'. ,. ..i.wru,uul.,'c... Mov 7.'01 12c; Real Cstatc Tay 1'xemptlun On Real Vwale Owned by C'1IIP Opinion Leiter on Detcn»insti0n of SuN'Llnlial Net Profit Deer Sherman. 'I inwth,N R. Spencer Stcvcn J. TalCAi DaNid 1.. Collins Heather 1'. Ferguson Lauri M. Carini Aosl¢Ia111 ( Ity An UI'a C }'S The Child I lculth Inecshncrtl Parmcrship I -( I IIP"). a nut Ibr pndit. 501(c)(3) olgani]Iltlon located in the ('Qv of Roinl4c. Vil �t inin, hos rcyucvtcd it real c3latc tnx exemption on properly it owns lucalcd ul I dl? 3" 1 Strecl ( "PtyIperl v' "). pursuant It, Section 5R,1 -?651 of the Code of Virginia ( 1250). us amended. ( HIP'S request kill be Tukcn befiac City Council It,, am <idcrxuion nn May I5. 2015. C'HIP'S Iuv cxcm1)(1011 ralucst is unusual heeuuse ('IIIP CtIOCnlly Ir,lsc< it 1)0111011 of file Property to Kuumhu Cm ununity Health and Wellnese Center Inc_ (I'll it \CVA I Iurizuns Healthcare ( "NeiA' I lorvuns" ), Ibr Much it tcceives tell(. Applicable authurilics require Ihat cunmfissionen of rcccnuo make the dum III Taalion that the uwner of tax exempt properly dues not receieC it "subslmatiol net prollf" betO IC un exemption may he grunted or maintained. the purlxtse of this ICRCI is to ryxn ide you with un opinion on which ynu may bust your (ICl CrmlIIII(i 111 Ihat ( 1111' does 1101 I`"CN c a "substantial net prnfil" from its Icase of it portion of the PropaYv to Ncty Horizons. Section 55.1 -3 (,03 of the Code of Virginia, pravideS Ihut when lend is used by (m otherwise lux exempt entity, such as CI -I IP, as it "source of I'Cb'Coate 01' profit ", the tax exemption is lust un That portion Of, the land from which the "source of rcvcnuc ur pndii' is (Icrived. 'file Virginia Attornev General ( "A60"') has Construed that phrase In mean file tux exempt ooncl must [-CC CivC it "substantial net prolil.. befbic the tax exemption is lost. [lie AG has opined that it is the duty Of file COnmIISS1011121 Of rcvcnuc Ibr it IOCUIlty IO MAC file ddelminut ion Of whether an uo'ncr receives a substantiol net pndit on ❑ Cost by ease basis. It is the opinion of this Ili iice that the income (leiIved by CI III, from Lhe (case ul it portion of the Property to New lioriions is not it "signilicunt sum-cc Of' rcvcnuc 01 prolif" Or provides (1 [11' with o "substantial net profit," 'I he rent rcvcnuc received by CHIP Prom Ncev I lorizuns is spent by CHIP on its expenses and business operations. Moreover, the tell[ paid by New I-lorizans is at the low end of the market range for medieval office space in Roanoke. This opinion is based on Infimnation received from CIIIP which included a copy of CIiIP's ICc C to Ncw Ilorizons, the property Iloor plan and square iitolage inlbnnation, documentation bunt CHIP stating how the rent I'CVCI1nC was m be used, and ielbrnmtion obtained the Cih's Department of Rcul YsI111C Valuation_ II you agree with this opinion, I rcqucst 6101 you indicalc your concurrence by cndmsing this letter where indicdItcd helocr. A more dtlailcd un il%'Iis of This iesuc is prescnlcd hcloty. BooAgrounr ('1111) is It not tor prolit. 501(0(3) olL'Llni /tmon located in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. N +hose pwposo is too provide coordination of various health care based services to loco incomes individuals in their curly childhood and their families. The selmCCs provided by Ct -III' include, and arc not limited to. providing help accessing nectled medical seniccs, assistance with the nmnacement of chronic conditions, and preventive scrviccs, devclopntental education, kiudcrgailen preparation and anticipatory child derclopment guldunec, employment Lill([ education support. ('1111' cullenlly osvus real estate in the City located Lit 1201 31d Sh'cet and 121 S ad Street. (CI111' preciously received a real aloha tux exanption by City ( OLn1Cll on its properly at 101 3al Strcct. and is note .ccc1<ing a real estate lux exemption on the 1215 3" Strcct properly which it acyuh-cd in November 1014 for the purpose of cspunding its 9CIv'ICCs, CIIIP informs my office that it is using the Property to Oder psychological and other fonds of counseling to children end their tLimilles. C'1111' Ibrdwr inform lily office that it is Ic;isiuc approsimWcly ow,, of the I'mperty to Ncw liorinnts. Nco I lorizons is a comnwnily based hculth cure organization. hcudyunrtcred in the City of Roanoke. with its main offices located lit 3716 Mchose AC'CIIUC. New I loriions offers heuhlt c;uro and reLned'CMILLes to low income individuals. Nccv I lon/ons is using the 1'nq)Cty to provide nsntal hculth C.nc' I'll clans and 1111- sicians to complement the screiccs provided by ('I I IP to ifs chents aI the Properly. Legal h micmorle Section 5g.1 -3651 of the Code of Virginia governs tax exemption of read estate. That section provides in relevant part a9 follows Pnr5ea111 In subsection 6 (al (6) of Article X of the CenStlmllei of Virginia, on and alter Jnnuwy I, 2003, any county, city, or [own niav by designation m classification exempt fium real or personal property taxes, or both, by ordinance adopted by the local governing body, the real or personal property, or both, owned by n nonprotit organization that uses such property for religious, charitable, patriotic, historical- benevolent crdtund, nr public pork and playground purposes. The ordinance shall state the specific use on which the exemption is based, and dmtinuance of the exemption shall be contingent on the continued use of the property in aCCerdaneC with the purpose tix lehich the organisation is classified or designated_. C(Iip has previously been determined by City ('ouncil to be a "nonprolit organization" that used its property Lit 13(11 3' i Strcct Ibr "religious, charitable, patriotic, histoncol, henewlent, cultural, or I public park and pllryground purposes'' mtbin the meaning of Section 58.1 -3651. Based on the CHIT' stated intentions tar use of the Property, I do not expect City Council to find differently fir the 1 1 15 Street propel ly. Fven though an organization nary Ile a yualificcl 11011/)/0111 organization that uses property tir religiOUS, charitable, and benevolent ptnpOSCS and uthenl'ise eligible to rescue the exemption pursuant to Section 53.1 -3651, it may lose the cxenlpliun it the land that is the ,subject 01 Ile exclaphon is a "Source of plot!( or income" fill the ooner within the meaning of Section 58.1 -3603 of file Code of V il'llilllu. Section 53.1 -3003 provides in relevant part as lilllnws: I xemptions not applicable when building is SOUrcC OfTCacnue A. Whenever ally building of land, 01 part thcrccl(, exempt lions Casatloo pursuant to this chapter and not belonginc to the C'onlnlomecalth is it source of 1CVCnuc or pnllit, lvhcthcl hl (case or otllcmisc, all of such buildings and and shall be liable to taxation as other land and buildings in the aallle county. city or town. II'hen a part Gut nut ul/ n /urn such baih/ol"" wr land. fun" I c, iv I suurc'c o/ rerertur wr' prolif. and thr' relnafrtder o/ vnclt huildiu,; ut' land i.c sued hr unr m;:oni_« tiwn eavuplrrl li'our lrlra[ion parwant to 1/11, chapter.lur its pmpo.vev, will sm'h purtiun rte is o source ul prulit of revenue shrill bc. liahlc /in' latotiun_ 13. In 2ssessin!, env huilcling and the land it oeeupks pue<uant la yubscetion A, the a,,C,,aing otf1CCl shall only assess for taxalion (bit[ portion Of the property as is a source o1' 1110111 01 rcconuc and the tax Shall be computed On the hask of the ratio of the space as is a suurCC of plant or rceenue to the CntirC propCIty. W'heu any such 111011erty is ICaSCd IM pnrtlons nt it veal the tax shall he computed on the basis of the avClage use of such plopeltY fir the preceding year. l ),tpi! ¢viv added(. . file AG has opined the phrase `source of I'cecnuc or pndif' to mean that the tax C.xclupt 0wncr must ICCClcc it "substantial IlCt 111061" hOol the use Of the land bclOIC 111c lax Cxcnl11tion is lost. Sao 1937 -1988 Op. Alty. Ocn. Va. 601(Hhurc the AG Opined that "real property may lust its tax- csempt stales to the omacr it a Subsranlial act pull!( is derived from a Ic[ise on the pnlperty. This is a fcmlual cIc(enninati0n to be made by the conunissionel of the tee'Cnue (111 a cn c- hy-case hasis"). Accordingly, in light of the tact that CHIP is (Casing the Ploparty, It must 01st be tICICII)WICd VA'hedlel' C111P is rccciVing a Substantial net profit fironl its (case of a pnninn of the Property. A Sunnnary 01 the infnrnulti0n received by CHIP and the Department of Real Estate Valuation loll0ms below. Rcic'IVatt Lertve ht/wr-mmiwa: The main provisions of CHIP's (case with uccv Horizons are as Iblltms: I. Tenn: the initial term is two years which Commenced March 1, 2015, through February 2S, 2017. The Icusc play he rencmed one additional thrice year term. 3 I. Rent. $2.767.00 fix the first imvo years. subject to annual rent Increases of 3 ",,, for each of the three renewal years. 3. The area oft lie PmpciIv New Horizons is leasing is 2,276 sq. it 4. 1 he area of the Properly that CHIP is occupying is I_SS6 sq. fl. 5. 'the net area of the PropertY is 3.862 sq. it 6. The total occupied space is 4,025 sq. ft. T CHIP indicates to the City that the intended purpose of file liatds it receives front rent payments by New Horizons is to expand services consistent with its Mission. This includes opening an euipntient counseling center fill ('11113 calcgivets and their children, paying the cost of nmdicul care by CIIIP patients due to their lack of innurence, pmviding Iransportatfon to appoinnncnLs, providing vol!inlcers tar childcare during the euregiver appointnicnt, and principol and interost payments on loans and occupancy costs iu e'UnnCLtn)n with the Property_ A copy of this communieltion to the City is attached as t:xhibit A. Rt lrrmn AlLoA't 6tlonr¢rdun: I3LSCd on the report I1oni Susan Lowe. Director of Rcal FStiltC VLlnahon, L copy of which is ullached to this Ictler as k0lbil ft, relevant markcl mothriiation obtained by Ms. Caucus office for medical office spucc is us lidluws: I. `file average muige of mallet lads fix nsdieal office spucc in file City of RnanOkC for FY 20I4- MI5 basal on the "income" method of assessment is hetwcen }1200 and 574,00 per square loot of lcta.lhlc ,spucc. ?. The rent that New lioriions pays CHIP for the leased Luca is approximately 514.511 pet ml, ft- placiup the rent thin ('l lP leeches front New l bm izons in the very tower range of this market average. Com lusm", tlascl on the information soled above, It is my opinion that the portion of the Property CIIIP is leasing to New Horizons is not a "source of revcnuc or protil" fire CHIP within the meaning of Section 58.1 -1603 of the Code of Virginia. This is evident in that the rent CHIP receives tfoni New Horizons is at the low end of the market range thr medical office space leases iu the City of Roanoke, Virginia. Moreover, based on C HIP's rcpresentatwns to my office on how it allocates rent avenue, the o elwhedming Majority, it not ell, of such revcnuc is placed in the operations of CHIP and the services it provides file community. Tlicrefore, it cannot be said that CHIP ICCCINCY a "substantial net profit" from its current Icascof a portion of the Property u, Ncw Horizons. W based nn the information I have provided you, it is your determination that CHIP does not receive a - substantial net moliC from its Icase of a portion of the Property to CHIP, please sign and date this letter where indicated below. Recause City Council will comider CHIP', request fix file 4 Property to he exempt from real estate tuxes at the May 18 City Council meeting, I request that you return this letter to me no later than 3:00 p.nt l hursday, May 14, 201 S Thank you lot your assistance with Ihis made. If you have any quCS11011s or would lilac in meet to further dISCUSS, please let me know. Sincclely, Dunicl J. ('a u"'i, City Attorney DJC /lsc cc. R.B3 LawllUrn, BLIdgcl'13usincss Analyst L Sherman A. I1ullanc, Cnnunissioner of Revmwe Inr the City ofRoanuke, Virginia. huvC reviewed III, letter and Ik anechmcnis. Bused on the intirrnmlinn pro%idal to nu by the City Attonwy. it is nry determination that the ]Case of a portion of the Property owned by CI IIP to KUnlnha Community Health and Wellness (Center, Ine_ I [),a New I loci /ons Ilndihctuc is not a sourer of >uhstantial net profit liar ('1111'. She man A. Holland and / 1 Coll oliS9100CI of RCA'Cnne City ofRoanoke. Virginia i Dale: X6 -/--, ___... EXHIBIT A From Robin Haldiman <Robin.Haldiman @chiprv.org> To. "'RB.Lawhofn @roanokeva.gov- <RB1awhorn @roanokeva.gov >, Date: 04/30/2015 10:59 AM Subject RE, Information Needed forTax Exemption Request Hi R.B., The intended purpose of the funds we receive from rent is to expand services consistent with our mission. We are opening an outpatient counseling center for our CHIP caregivers and their children. We know that the majority of our parents are uninsured and still do not obtain insurance through the ACA. Consequently we have no payer source for counseling, but are planning to provide it anyway knowing that over 70% of our caregivers suffer from depression; one of the many fallout factors of sustaining a life in poverty. We plan to provide transportation to appointments and provide volunteers for childcare during the caregiver appointment. I am not certain at this point if there will be many /any funds left, as we do have principal and interest payments in addition to occupancy costs with the new space as well. I hope this provides clarification, and would be happy to talk by phone or provide additional written clarification if needed. Best Robin Robin Haldiman CEO CHIP of Roanoke Valley 1201 Third St- SW Roanoke, Va. 24r16 (540) 857 -6993 x134 "It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" Frederick Douglass (1917 1895) -- Original Message---- - From: RB.Lawhorn @roanol(eva.gov [mailto :RB.Lawhorn @roanokeva.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:41 PM To Robin Haldiman Cc: RB.Lawhorn @roanokeva.gov Subject: RE: Information Needed for Tax Exemption Request Hi Robin, another information request has come up. There will be a meeting on Friday morning with members from the Commissioner of Revenue's Office and the City Attorney's Office to talk about the tax exemption request. The lease to New Horizons may have an impact on the outcome of the request. The monthly rent that CHIP receives from them is $2,767. Can you outline how that lease money is used by CHIP — is it used to pay for salaries for CHIP employees, to pay the building's utilities expenses, to pay for building maintenance, to pay for supplies, etc.? If you can let me know how that money is allocated that would be helpful for me to relay to them. Thanks again. -- R. B. EXHIBIT B — ,I REAL ESTATE VALUATION Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Ave., S.W. Room 205 ROANOKE Roanoke, Virginia 24011 PH: 540.853.2771 FAX 540.853.2796 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney CC: Honorable Sherman A. Holland, Commissioner of the Revenue Barbara A. Dameron, Director of Finance Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Management and Budget From: Susan S. Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Date: April 30, 2015 Subject: Parcel owned by Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP), located at 1215 3i° St S.W. also known as Tax Map number 1023008 (Property) At the request of the City Attorney, we reviewed the existing lease between CHIP and Kuurnba Community Health & Wellness Center, Inc. d /b /a New Horizons Healthcare, a Virginia non - protit corporation (New I lorizons) for appro.ximalcly 60% of the leasable area of the Property for a two year tern commencing March 1, 2015 (Lease), with one option to renew for an additional three year tern. The Lease indicates that the overall net rent is approximately $14.50 per square root of leasable space. For assessed value purposes, we consider all three approaches to value: the Income Approach, the Markel Approach and the Cost Approach. Using the Income analysis, our research for FY 2014 — 2015 indicates the range of market rents for medical offices to be between $12.00 and 524.00 per square fool of leasable space. See attached 2014 Income Matrix for 2015 Reval (Matrix). Based on this study and the Matrix for our assessment model of medical office space, the rent payable under the Lease appears to be in the lower range of this category. In assessing this property, we had assigned a market rent of $17.00 per square fool. If you have any further questions, feel free to call are ai 540 - 853 -1812. 2014 Income Matrix 2015 REVAL RENTS VACANCY EXPENSES RETURN LOADED RETURN Sector $ Rate Per SF Range Low Mid High %Vacancy and Collection Range Low Mid High % Expense Ratio Range Low Mid High Cap Rate Low Mid High . Cap Rate (Loaded +.119) Low Mid High Industrial $ 0.50 $ 3.50 $ 8.50 6% 10% 14% 5% 10% 15% 9.0% 1 10.5% 1 12.0% 10.19%111.69% 13.19% 'Flex' i Office $ 7.00 $ 12.00 $ 22.00 6% 8 %. 12% 25% 35% 45% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 9.19% 10.19% 11.19% General Retail 6.00 12.00 18.00 5% 8% 15% 10% 1 12% 15% 7.5% 9.0% 11.5% 8.69% 110,19% 12.69% Big Box Retail $ 4.00 $ 10.00 $ 16.00 5% 7% 8% 10% 12% 15% 7.5% 8.5% 9.5% 8.69% 9.69% 10.69% Medical Office $ 12.00 $ 16.00 $ 24.00 4% 6% 8% 25% 35% 40% 7.0% 1 8.0% 9.0% 8.19% 1 9.19% 10.19% NBHO Shopping Cntrs $ 6.00 $ 12.00 $ Z. 6% 8% 12% 10% 12% 15% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 9.19% 10.19%111.19% Restaurants $ 8.00 $ 12.00 $ 22.00 4% 7% 10% 10% 12% 15% 7.5% 8.5% 9.5% 8.69% 9.69% 10.69% Banks $ 12.00 $ 16.00 $ 24.00 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 15% 7.5% 8.5% 9.5% 8.69% 9.69% 10.69% The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK 215 CHURCH AVENUE, 5 W., ROOM 456 ROANOKE, VA 24011 Account Number 6009366 Date May 11, 2015 Data Category Description MSize Total Cosl 0511712015 Muniupal Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the 1 x 53 L 311.66 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Publisher of the Roanoke Times e.m., nr as Bonn may by heard. I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the it, e11, �zie Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the ao..'.doh"'" oi State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice NOTICE OF u 10 seeaon ss.l- ¢550), as 'ibe PUBLIC HEARING was published in said newspapers on the re4oest of ublic bre-t a following dates: ct 0 real property as vaWe of Ne City/County of Roanoke My Commission expires psrwy_ an`... r, 0511112015 cmm sns and otn ed M1ae bay. 11, o y 1. be heard and express their opinions on this matter. If a Berson with a d who d ns nodadofor tM1is needs pubkc Pa.—, c t the ORy Clerk's Office. (540) 853 -2541, be 13:00 noon on Thursday. May 14, 2015. GIVEN under my hand ehls 6t, day or May. 2015. arephanb no M. Moon Peylds, City Clerk The First insertion being given ... 05/11/2015 Newspaper reference: 0000165469 B ling Representa e Sworn to and subscribed before me this Monday, May 11, 2015 THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU pnt"�l�lI lo. r Nota ublic \,�raL1. MOriiv glF2. 0 State of Virginia d ! asDlsmanoN Ne. `. City/County of Roanoke My Commission expires i _ 7049823 MVC,MM PIKES- � = -, LC ( ' Oo ,,",rApy PU0�xC1C THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU el� NO'PICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing at its regular meeting to be held on Monday, May 18, 2015, commencing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, 4" Floor, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the question of adoption of an ordinance pursuant to Section 58.1 -3651, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, approving the request of Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP), for designation of its real property as exempt from taxation. The assessed value ofthe applicant's real property located at 1215 3rd Street, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, and known as Official Tax Map No. 1023008, is currently$588,700.00 and real estatetaxes in the amount of $7,006.00 were paid on such real estate in the most recent tax year. The loss of revenue to the City of Roanoke if the real estate tax exemption is granted will be approximately $5,605.00 annually, after a service charge in the amount of 20% of the annual real estate tax assessed on such real estate is levied in lieu of real estate taxes. Citizens and other interested persons shall have the opportunity to be heard and express their opinions on this matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this public hearing, contact the City Clerk's Office, (540) 853 -2541, by 12:00 noon on Thursday, May 14, 2015. GIVEN under my hand this 6c],i day of May, 2015. Note to publisher: Publish on Monday, May 11, 2015 K,V, 111 R11 II 1Y EXEMPT F1 NO Fl( (1 0' 2NI) 215 TARN STRI:I 19 I S IJOf Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, City Clerk Note to Publisher: Please publish once in the Roanoke Times, legal notices, on Monday, May 11, 2015. Please send bill to: Robin Haldiman, Chief Executive Officer Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 1201 3rd Street, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia, 24016 (540) 857 -6993 K NOTICES "01>` MAY N PH CHIP TAX EXEMPT 1215 THIRD STREET IPX Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia, 24011 cS� CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 'fo,flkoae: (540)853 -2541 1 (540)853 -1145 STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC E -mail: rlerk(anxnokevn . g °v JONATHAN E. CRAFT, CMC City Clerk Dcpmy City Clerk CECEL.IA T. WEB& CMC A,,Do at Deputy City Clerk April 8, 2015 Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Morrill: I am attaching copy of a petition from Child Health Partnership of Roanoke Valley (commonly known as CHIP of Roanoke Valley), a Virginia non - stock, not - for - profit corporation, dated April 7, 2015, which was filed in the City Clerk's Office on Wednesday, April 8, 2015, requesting exemption from real estate taxes for property located at 1215 Third Street, S. W., Official Tax Map No. 1023008, in order to promote the health of medically under -served children within the greater Roanoke Valley through its home visiting services. Petitions forwarded by the City Clerk to the City Manager by April 15 for evaluation and recommendation to City Council will have an effective date of July 1st. Petitions forwarded by October 15th will have an effective date of January 1st. Sincerely, Jonathan E. aft Deputy City Clerk Attachment PC: Ms. Robin Haldiman, CEO, CHIP of Roanoke Valley, 1201 Third Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016 The Honorable Sherman A. Holland, Commissioner of the Revenue Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Susan S. Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation R, B. Lawhorn, Budget Management Analyst, Office of Management and Budget VIRGINIA: IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE RE: PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FROM TAXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY PURSUANT TO ARTICLE X, SECTION 6(a)(6) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF VIRGINIA TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE: Your Petitioner, Child Health Investment Partnership (commonly known as CHIP), a Virginia, non - stock, not for profit corporation owns certain real property, located at 1215 Third Street, SW, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, which property is City of Roanoke Tax Map ID #1023008, with a total assessed value of $588,700 and a total of $7,006 in real property taxes that were paid or would have been paid in the most recent year, desires to be an organization designated pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 58.1 -3651, of the Code of Virginia, as amended, in order that the referenced real property, to be used, subject to paragraph 4 hereinbelow, exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes in promoting the health of medically under -served children within the greater Roanoke Valley through its home visiting services, be exempt from taxation under the provisions of Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia so long as your Petitioner is operated not for profit and the property so exempted is used in accordance with the purpose for which the Petitioner is classified. 2. The Commissioner of Revenue has determined the building at 1215 Third Street is not already eligible for tax- exempt status by classification or designation as evidenced by the letter attached hereto. CHIP does enjoy tax exempt status on its building at 1201 Third Street, next door. 3. Your Petitioner agrees to pay the City of Roanoke, an annual service charge in an amount equal to twenty percent (20 %) of the City of Roanoke tax levy, which would be applicable to this real estate, were our organization to not be tax exempt, for as long as this exemption continues. 4. A portion of the referenced real property is currently subject to a lease with Kuumba Community Health and Wellness Center, Inc., d/b /a New Horizons Healthcare, a Roanoke -based 501(c)(3) entity, as tenant. Your petitioner acknowledges and agrees that it will immediately notify both the City of Roanoke Commissioner of the Revenue and the City of Roanoke Treasurer in writing in each instance when the property, or any portion thereof, is being leased to any third party other than the current tenant and provide the City with a copy of the fully executed lease, if so requested. Your petitioner agrees to include a provision in all teases with tenants who are not tax exempt that such third parties shall be responsible for paying the City applicable leasehold taxes that may be assessed by the City. Petitioner acknowledges that if the foregoing conditions are not met, the City reserves the right to terminate the tax exempt status of the property. 5. Your Petitioner, if located within a service district, agrees to pay the City of Roanoke an annual service charge equal to the additional service district tax that would be levied for as long as this exemption continues. 6. Your Petitioner agrees to provide information to the Director of Real Estate Valuation upon request to allow a triennial review of the tax exempt status of your Petitioner. The following questions are submitted for consideration: I. (Q): Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c) of the Intemal Revenue Code of 1954. (A): Your Petitioner was granted exemption from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 on July 23, 1992. 2. (Q): Whether a current alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to such organization for use on such property. (A): No. 3. (Q): Whether any director, officer or employee of the organization has been paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services which such director, officer or employee actually renders. (A): No. 4. (Q): Whether any part of the net earnings of such organization inures to the benefit of any individual, and whether any significant portion of the service provided by such organization is generated by funds received from donations, contributions or, local, state or federal grants. As used in this subsection, donations shall include the providing of personal services or the contribution of in -kind or other material services. (A): No part of the net earnings of the organization inures to the benefit of any individual. Yes, Petitioner receives public and private support to fulfill its mission. Total unrestricted receipts (including in -kind contributions) in 2013 -2014 fiscal year - $1,030,552 Total restricted receipts in 2013 -2014 fiscal year - $13,000 Total 2013 -2014 state & federal grants - $261,518 5. (Q): Whether the organization provides services for the common good of the public. (A): Your Petitioner provides services for the common good of the public in as much as it provides home visiting services to low income families with the primary goals of promoting children's physical and mental health and development, supporting and building parenting capacity in high -risk families; and building resilient children and self - sufficient families. 6. (Q): Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. (A): No. 7. (Q): Whether any rule, regulation, policy or practice of the organization discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex or national origin. (A): No. 8. (Q): Whether there is a significant revenue impact to the locality and its taxpayers of exempting the property. (A): No. 9. (Q): Any other criteria, facts and circumstances, which the governing body deems pertinent to the adoption of such ordinance. (A): More than 77% of CHIP children served last year were from Roanoke City. CHIP provided preventative care coordination and family strengthening home visits to 1003 children last year, 776 residing in Roanoke City. 91% of CHIP families had an annual income under $10,999. During the last fiscal year, CHIP provided 6,442 home visits providing cost saving services that include: • 466 asthma assessments. 180 children received asthma case management during that time frame. • 98% of CHIP children had the required documentation to enter kindergarten • 277 Roanoke City received home visits targeting kindergarten readiness and preparation • 341 children received 473 dental varnishes • 276 received obesity prevention and nutrition education • 97% of CHIP children completed their humanization series by kindergarten entry or age 6 • 61% of CHIP children who use the ER showed a reduction in ER visits at annual recertification • This new building will provide space to operate an outpatient counseling center for CHIP enrolled children and their caregivers. The building is 4,025 sq. ft. CHIP will occupy 1,682 sq. ft. and another non -profit organization, New Horizons Healthcare will occupy the remaining 2,372 sq. ft. thus using the entire building for non -profit purposes. Note: A copy of this Petition is being delivered this day to the City Manager of the City of Roanoke, Virginia. THEREFORE, your Petitioner, Child Health Investment Partnership, respectfully requests to the Council of the City of Roanoke that this real or personal property of your Petitioner be designated exempt from taxation so long as your Petitioner is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used for the charitable purposes of providing home visiting services to low income families and children with the goal of promoting children's physical and mental health and development in the Roanoke Valley. Respectfully submitting this day of April, 2015. C• Roein Haldiman, CEO COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE CITY OF ROANOKE o , SHERMAN A. HOLLAND Commissioner GREGORI S.EMERSON 4I March 31, 2015 Ms. Robin R. Haldiman, CEO CHIP of Roanoke Valley 1201 Third Street, SW Roanoke, VA 24016 Re: Exemption of property located at 1215 Third St., SW Parcel No. 1023008 Dear Ms. Haldiman, We received your letter requesting tax exemption from real estate taxes from the City of Roanoke on the above captioned property. The above parcel is currently being taxed by the City of Roanoke for real estate taxes for the 2014 -15 tax year. Based on the information submitted, this property is not eligible for exemption by classification or designation. However, you may submit the application to the City Clerk's Office to apply for an exemption for non -profit organizations through City Council. Should you have any additional questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, '�10� Sherman A. Holland Commissioner of the Revenue SAH /jec Cc: Stephanie Moon Reynolds, City Clerk R.B. Lawhorn, Dept. of Management and Budget 215 Church Avenue SW, Room 251 r Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone (540) 853 -2521 * Fax (540) 853 -1115 x n, , oc,,mkesa -gov