Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Actions 03-18-19ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MARCH 18, 2019 2:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA 1. Call to Order - -Roll Call. All Present. BESTPITCH 41399- 031819 The Invocation was delivered by Rabbi Kathy Cohen, Temple Emanuel Reform Congregation. Moment of Silence in honor of the late Robert A. Garland, former Vice -Mayor and Council Member of the City of Roanoke, who passed away on March 3, 2019. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Sherman P. Lea, Sr. Welcome. Mayor Lea. NOTICE: This afternoon's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursday, March 21 at 7:00 p.m., and Saturday, March 23 at 4:00 p.m.; and video streamed through Facebook Live at facebook.com /RoanokeVa. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. 1 ANNOUNCEMENTS: The Council of the City of Roanoke is seeking applications for the following current vacancies and /or upcoming expirations of terms of office: Board of Zoning Appeals — one vacancy Unexpired term of office ending December 31, 2021 Building and Fire Code Board of Appeals — one vacancy Building Representative term of office ending June 30, 2021 Fair Housing Board — one vacancy Unexpired term of office ending March 31, 2021 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board — one vacancy Three -year term of office ending March 31, 2022 Roanoke Cultural Endowment Board of Directors — one vacancy Unexpired term of office ending December 31, 2020 Access the City's homepage to complete an online application for the abovementioned vacancies. 2. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: NONE. 3. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard. All matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to Council, as he may deem appropriate. Dan Crawford, 2311 Kipling Street, S. W., appeared before the Council to request removing the name of Robert E. Lee in Lee Plaza. Barbara Andes, 2803 Rosalind Avenue, S. W., appeared before the Council regarding gender bias against sexual violence. Brenda Randolph, representing Hurt Park Neighborhood Alliance, 1745 Salem Avenue, S. W., appeared before the Council to request additional street lighting and expressed concern about the violence in the neighborhood. 2 Michael Miller, 1730 Lonna Drive, N. W., appeared before the Council to express concern about racial profiling by law enforcement in the City. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: (APPROVED 7 -0) All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Members of City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of the items. If discussion is desired, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. C -1 A communication from Mayor Sherman P. Lea, Sr., requesting that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the two upcoming vacancies on the Roanoke City School Board expiring June 30, 2019, pursuant to Section 2.2 -3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C -2 A communication from the City Manager requesting that Council schedule a public hearing to be held on Monday, April 15, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard as time permits, or at such later date and time as determined by the City Manager, to consider an amendment of the City Code regarding definitions of rental districts by the addition and removal of certain areas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C -3 A communication from the Director of Finance transmitting the FY2019 City Manager Transfer Report for the Second Quarter ended December 31, 2018. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. C -4 Reports of qualification of the following individuals: Latron Brown as the Zoo representative of the Mill Mountain Advisory Board for a three -year term of office ending June 30, 2021; Matthew Kelley as a member of the Parks and Precreation Advisory Board to fill the unexpired term of office of Troy Michael Rech ending March 31, 2021; and Jada Smith and Travis Barber as Law Enforcement representatives (members) of the Towing Advisory Board for terms of office ending October 31, 2021. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. 3 REGULAR AGENDA: 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE. 6. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: a. Update on Community Solutions Center activities. Pamela Irvine, Chief Executive Officer and President, Feeding America Southwest Virginia, Spokesperson. (Sponsored by Vice -Mayor Cobb and Council Member Price) Remarks received and filed. b. Presentation with regard to the Kiwanis Club Playground Project. Dr. Cheri Hartman, President, Kiwanis Club of Roanoke, Spokesperson. (Sponsored by the City Manager) Remarks received and filed. 7. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER: a. CITY MANAGER: BRIEFINGS: NONE. ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR ACTION: 1. Amendment of the City Code with regard to the procedure for altering or vacating city streets and alleys. Adopted Ordinance No. 41399 - 031819. (7 -0) 2. Authorization to implement a Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program. Adopted Resolution No. 41400 - 031819. (7 -0) 3. Approval of the GRTC fare adjustment for the S.T.A.R. paratransit monthly pass from $96.00 per month to $112.00 per month, effective April 1, 2019. Adopted Resolution No. 41401 - 031819. (7 -0) 2 COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER. The City Manager offered the following comments: Open House Community Meetinas • City staff will hold a series of Open House Community Meetings in March and April at city library branches to invite citizen input on the city's Comprehensive Plan 2020 -2040, which is being developed over the next several months. • Feedback from these meetings, as well as meetings with stakeholder groups and focus groups, will be used to create a draft plan. • The list of meeting dates and locations is posted on the PlanRoanoke.org website. • Questions about this process should be directed to Senior City Planner Wayne Leftwich at (540) 853 -1104. Opening of the New Franklin Road Bridge • This Friday, March 22, the city will hold a ribbon - cutting and dedication ceremony at 11:30 a.m. for the new Franklin Road Bridge. • The public is invited to attend this event. • In addition to creating wider lanes for pedestrians and bicyclists, a special feature of the bridge is the public art on the decorative gateway columns. • The artistic panels focus on specific architectural design elements and tell a story about the rich history of the Old Southwest neighborhood. • After the ceremony, the bridge will be open to serve the 9,600 motorists, along with many pedestrians and cyclists, who use this route. Installation of `Global Harmony' Public Art • On Wednesday, March 27, the City will dedicate a new sculpture at 11:00 a.m., in Entranceway Park at the corner of Williamson Road and Wells Avenue. • "Global Harmony" by Stephen Fairfield of St. David, Ariz., is the latest addition to the city's Public Art collection. • The dedication of this sculpture will end a year -long commemoration, "Ten Years of Public Art," organized by the Roanoke Arts Commission. • The public is invited to attend this event. 5 8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: a. A report of the Roanoke City School Board requesting appropriation of funds for various educational programs; and a report of the City Manager recommending that Council concur in the request. Donna Caldwell, Director of Accounting, Spokesperson. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 41402 - 031819. (7 -0) 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. 10. INTRODUCTION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: a. A resolution recognizing the continuing efforts of City staff and Roanoke citizens for their continued efforts in creating, implementing and maintaining targeted and effective local responses to the challenges of climate change. Adopted Resolution No. 41403 - 031819. (7 -0) 11. MOTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: a. Inquiries and /or comments by the Mayor and Members of City Council. b. Vacancies on certain authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council. NONE. 12. RECESSED - 3:33 P. M. THE COUNCIL MEETING WAS DECLARED IN RECESS UNTIL 7:00 P.M., TO CONVENE IN A CLOSED MEETING IN THE COUNCIL'S CONFERENCE ROOM, ROOM 451. 0 ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION MARCH 18, 2019 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AGENDA Call to Order- -Roll Call. Council Member Bestpitch was absent. The Invocation will be delivered by The Reverend David Sesay, Pastor, House of Love International Ministry. Moment of Silence in honor of the late Robert A. Garland, former Vice -Mayor and Council Member of the City of Roanoke, who passed away on March 3, 2019. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America will be led by Mayor Sherman P. Lea, Sr. Welcome. Mayor Lea. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED MEETING. (6 -0) The Mayor announced the following process for the selection of Roanoke City School Board Trustees to fill upcoming vacancies effective July 1, 2019: City Council received 12 applications for appointment to fill two vacancies on the Roanoke City School Board. 7 City Council will interview four candidates for the two vacancies. These candidates are Angela S. Penn, Natasha N. Saunders, Lutheria H. Smith, and Joyce W. Watkins. City Council will conduct the interviews in Council Chamber on Monday, April 15, 2019, beginning at 4:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter, following the afternoon session of City Council. City Council will receive public comments on these candidates at a public hearing on Monday, April 15, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be reached, in the Council Chamber. The City Clerk will advertise this public hearing as required by State and City Code. City Council extends its appreciation and thanks to all applicants. NOTICE: Tonight's Council meeting will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursday, March 21 at 7:00 p.m., and Saturday, March 23 at 4:00 p.m.; and video streamed through Facebook Live at facebook.com /RoanokeVa. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the hearing impaired. A. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Recognitions of the Patrick Henry High School Swim and Girls and Boys Basketball Teams. Adopted Resolution No. 41404 - 031819. (6 -0) Mayor Lea presented ceremonial copies of the resolution to the Principal and team coaches. Recognition of the William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team. Adopted Resolution No. 41405 - 031819. (6 -0) Mayor Lea presented ceremonial copies of the resolution to the Principal and team coaches. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Request of M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11 th Street and Pocahontas Avenue, N. E.; and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 304211, 304212, and 3042143. Matthew W. King, M & E Properties, LLC, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 41406 - 031819. (6 -0) 2. Request of M & E Properties, LLC, to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N. E., and a portion of the alley requested for vacation, from Light Industrial District, with conditions; Residential Mixed Density District; and Commercial - General District, with conditions, respectively; to Light Industrial District, with conditions, and Commercial - General District. Benjamin T. Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc., Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 41407- 031819. (6 -0) 3. Request of Richfield Living to rezone certain properties located at 1047 Mecca Street, N. E., and 0 Mecca Street, N. E., respectively, from Residential Single - Family District, to Institutional Planned Unit Development District. Corbin L. White, Caldwell and Associates, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 41408 - 031819. (6 -0) 4. Proposal of the City of Roanoke to authorize Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley, d.b.a., Total Action for Progress (TAP) to carry out functions of a Land Bank Entity for the City of Roanoke. Robert S. Cowell, Jr., City Manager. Adopted Ordinance No. 41409 - 031819. (6 -0) C. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard. All matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to Council, as he may deem appropriate. Shaheed Omar, 927 Wasena Avenue, S. W., appeared before the Council in regards to employment process of the City of Roanoke. D. ADJOURNED - 8:16 P.M. 9 The United States Department of Justice issued this guidance document on December 15, Identifying and Preventing Gender Bias in Law Enforcement Response to Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence The United States Department of Justice (department) is committed to assisting law enforcement agencies, including LOCAL agencies to improving their response to allegations of sexual assault and domestic violence, and are seeking assistance and support for these efforts. The Purpose of This Guidance is to: provide a set of basic principles that —if integrated into LEAs' policies, trainings and practices —will help ensure that agencies' efforts to keep victims safe AND hold offenders accountable are not undermined, either intentionally or unintentionally, by gender bias. The Department of Justice Encourages Law Enforcement Agencies to Consider These Principles and Integrate Them into: clear, unequivocal policies about the proper handling of sexual assault and domestic violence crimes; training for officers about these policies and about effective responses to sexual assault and domestic violence crimes more generally; and supervision protocols and systems of accountability to ensure that officers responding to sexual assault and domestic violence crimes act in accordance with these policies and trainings. To bring my comments to the present conversation in Roanoke and why I am again suggesting that our Chief of Police and possibly others are treading in dangerous legal territory for the City of Roanoke. Firstly, stated in the report "U.S. ConstitutionThe Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits discriminatory enforcement of the law. 67Discriminatory policing occurs when police officers and departments selectively enforce the law—or fail to enforce the law-- based on characteristics such as race, color, national origin, sex or religion. Denying police s$services to some persons or communities due to bias or stereotypes related to these characteristics is a form of discriminatory policing. According to the Supreme Court, the 14 tnAmendment "prohibits the states from denying to all persons within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Denying includes inaction as well as action, and denying the equal protection of the laws includes the omission to protect." Many courts have ssextended this principle to a law enforcement agency's under - enforcement of crimes that disproportionately affect women, where it is established that the agency has a policy, practice or custom of intentionally providing nequal protection to community members on the basis of sex, in the form of failing to respond with equal effort to victims of those crimes the same as it does with victims of other comparable crimes.70 I quote "In some cases, a police officer may discriminate against victims of sexual assault or domestic violence because of a general bias against women or LGBT individuals. More commonly, discrimination may be based on explicit stereotypes about women or LGBT individuals. Acting on stereotypes about why women or LGBT individuals are sexually assaulted, or about how a victim of domestic violence or sexual assault should look or behave, can constitute unlawful discrimination and profoundly undermine an effective response to these crimes. For example, if an officer believes a sexual assault to be less severe because the victim was assaulted by an acquaintance or was intoxicated when the assault occurred, or based on stereotypical assumptions about a victim who is a gay man or lesbian woman assaulted by his or her partner, that is gender bias and may constitute unlawful discrimination." I will repeat that last sentence For example, if an officer believes a sexual assault to be less severe because the victim was intoxicated when the assault occurred, that is gender bias and may constitute unlawful discrimination." Principles to Prevent Gender Bias in Policing Principle 1 Recognize and Address Biases, Assumptions and Stereotypes about Victims2s Principle 2 Treat All Victims with Respect and Employ Interviewing Tactics That Encourage a Victim to Participate and Provide Facts About the Incident3 Principle 3 Investigate Sexual Assault or Domestic Violence Complaints Thoroughly and Effectively Principle 4 Appropriately Classify Reports of Sexual Assault or Domestic Violence4 Principle 5 Refer Victims to Appropriate Services Principle 6 Properly Identify the Assailant in Domestic Violence Incident Principle 7 Hold Officers Who Commit Sexual Assault or Domestic Violence Accountable5 Principle 8 Maintain, Review and Act Upon Data Regarding Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence 8 Principles — 8 Principles — and none of them include asking victims to take responsibility for the actions of their assailant or rapist. In other words, Victim blaming is not a principle. As my city council, as my mayor and my vice mayor, as my city manager and my city attorney, you work for me, not for the Chief of Police. Please lead on this. Please let these principles guide you, not the tired, if not potentially implicitly biased practices, policies, and attitude of our current Chief, be a road block to serving and bettering the City of Roanoke. SHERMAN P. LEA, SR. Mayor CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 215 CHURCH AVENUE, S.W., SUITE 452 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 -1594 TELEPHONE: (540) 853 -2444 FAX: (540) 853 -1145 EMAIL: MAYOR @ROANOKEVA.GOV March 18, 2019 The Honorable Vice -Mayor Joseph L. Cobb and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Vice -Mayor Cobb and Members of Council: This is to request that the Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss appointments of two Trustees to serve on the Roanoke City School Board, for three -year terms, each, commencing July 1, 2019 and ending June 30, 2022, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Sincerely, Sherman P. Lea, Sr. Mayor SPL:ctw CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Request for Authorization and Advertisement of Public Hearing to Amend and Re- ordain Section 7 -34, Findings, designation of rental inspection districts, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979) as amended, to Amend the Definitions of the Districts By the Addition and Removal of Certain Areas Background: Pursuant to Section 36.1- 105.1:1,Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, localities are authorized to create rental inspection districts within designated areas of the community in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of occupants residing in rental dwelling units located within such districts, based upon findings made by the local governing body that the rental dwelling units within the district are blighted or deteriorating, or are in need of inspection to prevent such blight or deterioration, in order to ensure that such occupants and other residents living in such district, maintain safe, decent and sanitary living conditions. The City of Roanoke currently has several areas of the City designated as rental inspection districts. These districts are currently described as the Southwest Rental Inspection District, Northwest Rental Inspection District, Southeast Rental Inspection District, Westside Boulevard Rental Inspection District, Tinker Drive, N.E., Rental Inspection District, and the Williamson Road, N.E., Rental Inspection District. The boundaries of such districts are more specifically described in Section 7 -34, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979) as amended. The City proposes to amend the existing rental inspection districts, and establish a new rental inspection district, as follows: (1) Removal of the properties commonly known as the Morningside Manor and Indian Rock Village public housing developments from the Southeast Rental Inspection District, at the request of the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA), and removal of the Hurt Park public housing development from the Southwest Rental Inspection District. Rental inspections of these properties are no longer necessary because they undergo regular inspections from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and findings of blight and deterioration to the extent that pose a danger to the public health, safety, and welfare of occupants and residents of such districts can no longer be supported by the City, (2) Elimination of both the Westside Boulevard Rental Inspection District and Tinker Drive, N.E., Rental Inspection District entirely, as findings can no longer be supported by the City that the rental properties located within these districts are blighted and deteriorating to the extent that pose a danger to the public health, safety, and welfare of occupants and residents of such districts, (3) Expansion of the Northwest Rental Inspection District to include the corridor along 10 Street and Hunt Ave. N.W.; and (4) The addition of a new district, to be known as the Eastern Avenue, N.E., Rental Inspection District. Considerations: Pursuant to state law, before a locality may establish or amend rental inspection districts, a public hearing is required to be held by the governing body before it may consider the matter. The public hearing must be advertised once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper in general circulation. Recommended Action: Authorize the advertisement and scheduling of a public hearing to be held on April 15, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as time permits, or at such later date and time as determined by the City Manager, for City Council to consider this matter. -- - -- -------- - - - - -- obert S. Cowell, J r. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Evelyn Powers, City Treasurer Sherman Holland, Commissioner of Revenue Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Valuation Christopher Chittum, Director, Department of Planning, Building and Development Dan Webb, Codes Compliance Administrator 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT K" 1gg To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 15, 2019 Subject: FY 2019 City Manager Transfer Report Background: Under City Code section 2 -121, the Director of Finance shall report quarterly to City Council any City Manager Transfers in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) between funds, as well as between project and program accounts in the capital project fund and grant fund. Recommended Action: Receive and file the attached City Manager Transfer report for the 2 ^d quarter ended December 31, 2018. Amelia C. Merchant Director of Finance Distribution: Bob S. Cowell, City Manager Sherman M. Stovall, Assist. City Manager for Operations R. Brian Townsend, Asst. City Manager for Community Development City of Roanoke, Virginia Report of City Manager Transfers Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 (Unaudited) Transfer Number Date Explanation From To Amount CMT18 -00135 10/15/18 Transfer funds from E -911 Regular employee E -911 multi -year project 241,520 Wireless to multi -year E911 salaries and expendable account in capital projects upgrades hardware /Software equipment in general fund account fund Notes: Under City Code section 2 -121, the City Manager has authority to make transfers of any amount within or between funds during the fiscal year and after June 30th to ensure proper expenditure reporting and budgetary controls for the prior fiscal year. The scope of this report is limited to transfers in excess of $100,000 between funds and between project/program accounts in the Capital Project Fund and Grant Fund CMT's marked with an asterisk denotes that multiple lines of monies transferred amounted to be above the $100,000. All CMT's not marked with an asterisk have at least a single line item that amounted to over $100,000. STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov March 19, 2019 Nicole Ashby, Secretary Mill Mountain Advisory Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Ashby: CECELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Latron Brown has qualified as the Zoo representative of the Mill Mountain Advisory Board for a three -term of office ending June 30, 2021. Sincerely, W 1-4 . fL� �. Stephanie M. Moon F15eynol , MMC City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: I, LaTron Brown, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as the Zoo representative of the Mill Mountain Advisory Board for a three -year term of office ending June 30, 2021, according to the best of my ability. (So help me God.) fN LAVkQ.N, BROWN The foregoing oath of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by LaTron Brown this <<411day of M/Rct r o 1 9 Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court 1I v r STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkearoanokeva.gov March 19, 2019 Nicole Ashby, Secretary Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Ashby: CECELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy Cih, Clerk This is to advise you that Matthew Kelley has qualified as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to fill the unexpired term of office of Troy Michael Rech ending March 31, 2021. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Reyno s, M C City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: I, Matthew Kelley, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to fill the unexpired term of office of Troy Michael Rech ending M ch 31, 2021, according to the best of my ability. (So help me God.) MATTHEW KELLEY The foregoing oath of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Matthew Kelley this < l*' day of MAC 28 -$-" 20 !q Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court B u- , Clerk STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov March 19, 2019 Jeffrey A. Robertson, Chair Towing Advisory Board 336 Bowman Street Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Robertson: CECELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk This is to advise you that Jada Smith and Travis Barber have qualified as Law Enforcement representatives (members) of the Towing Advisory Board for terms of office ending October 31, 2021. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Rey ds, MMC City Clerk Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: I, Jada Smith, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a Law Enforcement representative (member) on the Towing Advisory Board for a term of office ending October 31, 2021, according to the best of my ability. (So help me God.) k J DA SMITH The foregoing oath of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Jada Smith this 1, day of rfiMdL2019. Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to -wit: I, Travis Barber, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a Law Enforcement representative (member) on the Towing Advisory Board for a term of office ending October 31, 2021, according to the best of my ability. (So help me God.) -TRAVIS BARBER The foregoing oath of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Travis Barber this _/ day of IZJI 2019. Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court By , Clerk SHERMAN P. LEA, SR. Mayor CITY OF ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, Suite 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 Council Members Email: clerk @roanokeva.gov William D. Bestpitch Joseph L. Cobb Michelle L. Davis Djuna L. Osborne Anita J. Price March 18, 2019 Patricia White -Boyd The Honorable Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mayor Lea and Members of Council: We jointly sponsor a request of Pamela Irvine, Feeding America Southwest Virginia to present an update on the Community Solutions Center activities, at the regular meeting of City Council to be held on Monday, March 18, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. Sincerely, Joseph L. Cobb Vice -Mayor Anita J. Price Council Member J LC /AJ P: ctw CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Presentation Regarding the Kiwanis Club Playground Project I would like to sponsor a presentation by Dr. Cheri Hartman of the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke, to provide an overview and update to their planning and fundraising efforts associated with the proposed Playground project in the Melrose Target Area. - - - - - -- --------------- -- Robert S. Cowell, Jr. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers 1,0, b. Kiwanis Centennial Playground Project Fact Sheet and Timeline Project's purpose: To Build CommUNITY through Play for ALL in Roanoke! Goal: to engage the community with the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke to build an inclusive playground in a high need neighborhood in Roanoke as the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke's signature project in honor of a century of service to the Roanoke Valley Strategic objective: using the community build approach a playground will be designed and installed in a high need neighborhood by no later than June 30th, 2020 Financial objective: Kiwanis funds will be leveraged to secure sufficient grants, partnerships and sponsorships to pay the costs of playground design, equipment and installation anticipating a possible cost of approximately $400,000 Site selection: property adjacent to Goodwill Industries /new Melrose library branch behind Forest Park Academy ( #2420201 on Tax map). Research by Dr. Liz Ackley of elementary students in Melrose- Orange Target Area (MOTA) neighborhood identifies high rates of obesity among children (higher than national rates are overweight or obese increasing their risk for serious chronic diseases (Type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease) • Poverty rate is high in Census Tract 24 of MOTA: 57% of families with children live in poverty, per capita income is $13,529, 61% of residents are unemployed • City has placed a high priority on investing in NW Roanoke (Melrose /Orange Target Area); library construction taking place in Goodwill building will result is a highly accessible, brand new community resource attractive to families in NW Roanoke • High crime rate in the neighborhood warrants increased attention to community strengthening antidotes such as well maintained, secure places for families to gather • Concentration of children in the neighborhood with limited access to facilities for play (958 children live in Census Tract 24) Our aim is to partner with relevant key stakeholders such as the City of Roanoke - the City Parks and Recreation Department, the library, the school system; as well as private partners like businesses and other civic groups interested in making an investment for this worthwhile project in NW Roanoke. The focus on inclusion of children with physical disabilities is a priority, designing the playground with sensory components for the visually impaired, the motorically challenged, and autistic children. The Kiwanis Centennial Playground invites ALL citizens in our Roanoke Valley community to join our effort to build a playground that can be enjoyed by persons of all abilities and ages with its variety of types of playground equipment. Please contact Cheri Hartman (540- 798 -7984) or Jackie Bledsoe (562 -2351) to find out how you can be involved! Timeline for Kiwanis Club of Roanoke Centennial Playground Project Currently underway: Initiate Planning through Committee of Kiwanis Plus Community Partners May 22nd, 2018: Playground Company interviews r June 8th, 2018: City Manager meeting June 26th: Centennial Playground Committee meeting (monthly meetings) By July 2nd: negotiate contract with Playground Company, engage with their consultants including their fundraising advisers By August 10th, 2018: establish a fundraising plan identifying donor level targets; grants application plans, fundraiser plans (how to link with Bocce Ball Tournament, Foundation support) By September 1, 2018: recruit complete complement of the Centennial Playground Committee, including community engagement design subcommittee, community build event planning committee By October 1st, 2018: hold a community engagement meeting to obtain input from Melrose /Orange Target Area neighbors and key stakeholders By October 15th, 2018: begin campaign for Centennial Playground project By February 15th, 2019: secure first level of major donors /sponsors — announce brick and pavers campaign to the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke membership at luncheon meeting Submit grant applications for playground equipment purchases from January through June 1st, 2019 for those funders in this cycle; submit grant applications for some Fall cycle grantors by December 31, 2019 By January 28th, 2020: secure all funds needed to complete the Centennial Playground Project By March 2020 - finalize plans for community build event to be held in June 2020 By June 8th or 15th, 2020: hold the Kiwanis Centennial Playground Community Build event at the 2600 block of Melrose Avenue in NW Roanoke — inviting Kiwanis Club members, other Capital District Kiwanis Clubs, neighbors, other civic groups, law enforcement, City Council, library and Goodwill, Roanoke Housing Authority, Melrose- Orange Target Area neighborhood group, Key Clubs and CKI, school systems, donors — all project partners to the community'build event. �o® b♦ z Krwanis Club of Roanoke Playygground - Option 3 �. Roanoke, VA Ise. -"�i ♦��� { - � Y R y. : . y q� ' spy t r 4 3 4 eco7'C1meI1d7I0"n off' RFIMI' 11.g Neighborhood -Levu Physical Activit�r` The MOTA neighborhood wants this!!! Dr. Ackley used the Community Healthy :. Living Index to. rve. ,resi nts. In 2017 she .r reported: MOTA families `desire afteritiori to'be`giveri' to: enhancing quality and availability of k parks, improved neighborhood safety, an expanded sidewalk infrastructure. Our own survey (less formal)revealed much support for playground. 100 neighbors have already indicated they would actually help with the building of it! 4 01 41110 1 �31 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41399- 031819. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Section 30 -14, Procedure for altering or vacating city streets or alleys; fees therefor, Article I, In General, of Chapter 30, Streets and Sidewalks, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. Chapter 30, Streets and Sidewalks, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, is hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Sec. 30 -14. - Procedure for altering or vacating city streets or alleys; fees therefor. Streets and alleys in the city may be altered or vacated on motion of the city council or on application of any person, in accordance with section 15.2 -2006, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, as follows: (1) Applications for the alteration or vacation of any street or alley shall be filed with the secretary to o the city -4e planning commission. (2) A fee, in an amount prescribed by city council, shall be charged by the city for processing of all applications for the alteration or vacation of any street or alley, which fee shall be in addition to all other expenses or costs, including advertising costs and the cost of notifying affected property owners. Fees for such application and advertising costs shall be as set forth in the City of Roanoke's Fee Compendium as adopted by city council. The fee shall be payable to the city-elerlk treasurer. The ^secretary to the city planning commission shall not accept any application unless such fee is paid. No fee shall be charged upon city council's own motion for the alteration or vacation of a street or alley, or upon the application of any state, federal or local governmental authority for the same. (3) Up An application for the alteration or vacation of a street or alley, shall be in writing on forms provided by the City, and filed with the secretary to the city planning commission, accompanied by payment of all fees. tThety= e secretary shall immediately refer the same to the city planning commission without further action of council. No viewers shall be appointed. (4) The city planning commission shall hold a public hearing on applications referred to it by the eity eler4 secretary to the city planning commission, after notice of the proposed alteration or vacation of a street or alley has been published twie�- with at least six (6) days elapsing between the first and seeend pubheati in accordance with the newspaper- published or- hm,ing general eir-e-ulation in the eit) requirements set forth in the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. and AeFwri ri * * °„ notiee has been mailed to the awner- or- ownefs of all of the pr-epefty dir-eefly affeeted b), the proposed alteration or- The cost of publishing said notices shall be paid by the applicant. All °a .,,bees shall s eeif , the time and plae° of the hearing at whieh p „gam „t °a .,, and present the ,,: °..,- 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage of this Ordinance. Pursuant to Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: City Clerk. 0 - Amend Sec.30 -14 2.4.19 v2.docx x CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT s To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Proposed amendments to Chapter 30, Streets and Sidewalks, of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended by amending and reordaining Sec. 30 -14. - Procedure for altering or vacating city streets or alleys; fees therefor; to make said procedure easier to use for its citizens. Background: The proposed amendments result from a LEAN project proposed by the City Clerk's Office and the Department of Planning, Building and Development to simplify the procedure for altering or vacating a street or alley. While the Department of Planning Building and Development performs most of the customer interaction related to the alteration or vacation of streets and alleys (consultations on feasibility of requests, review of likely conditions, determinations on a purchase price for right -of -way, etc.), the current code requires that the applications are filed with the City Clerk's office. Those applications are then routed back to Planning for further processing and development of legal notices, reports for the Planning Commission and City Council and other related activities. If a request is approved, the City Clerk's Office follows up with direction to complete the process. Considerations: The proposed amendments will simplify the process for an applicant as the entire application process would be handled through the Department of Planning, Building and Development. This eliminates the need for an applicant to work with planning staff prior to filling an application, then formally apply through the Clerk's office and then continue working with planning staff. This change would also allow for the tracking of all fees through the Planning, Building and Development permitting system, TRAKiT, and to better coordinate the payment of any fees for vacated right -of -way with the approval of plats vacating said right -of -way. The process change has been coordinated with the City Treasurer's Office and the Department of Finance. Recommendation: Adopt changes to Section 30 -14 of the City Code to simplify the application process for street and alley vacations, and to track subsequent payment information and plat approvals thus achieving a better customer service experience and reducing internal effort for the City of Roanoke. Robert S. Cowell, .Jr. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Timothy R. Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Wayne Leftwich, Senior City Planner 2 'I)L IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41400 - 031819. A RESOLUTION approving and authorizing the implementation of the Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program within the City of Roanoke ( "City "); authorizing the City to use Stormwater Utility revenues to purchase and demolish flooded structures; upon certain terms and conditions. WHEREAS since the Flood of 1985, the City has periodically purchased flood damaged properties via Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Pre - Disaster Mitigation grants in order to remove flood prone structures previously subject to damage as a result of rising flood water. The Pre - Disaster Mitigation grants involve the City paying twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total project cost and FEMA paying seventy -five percent (75 %). This process is very cumbersome and involves lengthy delays; therefore, the City is seeking an alternative path to fund acquisition of flood prone properties. The proposed Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program establishes a simple and expeditious method for the City to acquire said properties and enhance the riparian buffer area within the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City hereby approves and authorizes the implementation of the Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program which will use Stormwater Utility revenues to fund twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total project cost to purchase and demolish recently flooded structures, the remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) to be voluntarily supplied by the property owner's flood insurance proceeds after a high water event, upon the terms as more particularly set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated March 18, 2019. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any documentation required to implement and execute the Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program upon the terms as set forth in the above referenced City Council Agenda Report. ATTEST: 4400-� \1 A , -O qTq,60, City Clerk. R- Approving Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program 3.18.19.doc 2 � o CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Authorization for Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program Background: Since the Flood of 1985, the City has purchased more than 100 floodprone properties in large part by leveraging Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Pre - Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grants and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) grants as administered by the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM). Over $6.3M has been spent to date removing 118 floodprone structures previously subject to damage as a result of rising flood waters. There remain, however, 77 structures within City limits classified by FEMA as "repetitive loss" or "severe repetitive loss" resulting from flood damage. Over the past decade, the FEMA PDM and FMA grant processes have become more lengthy, complicated, and competitive due to grant award funding levels not having kept pace with the continued upward trend in annual storm damage costs across the country. Because the FEMA grant programs have a two to three year timeline and are ever more competitive, some parcel owners are unwilling, or financially unable, to wait for a FEMA grant award to break the repetitive loss cycle resulting from recurring high water events. To address this issue, the City's Stormwater Utility has identified the need to create a supplemental Flood Mitigation program that would facilitate timely acquisition and demolition of recently flooded structures without the need to rely upon FEMA's PDM and FMA grant programs. Financial risk to the City would be the same by funding a maximum of 25% of total project cost regardless of whether using the FEMA program or the new City supplemental program. The FEMA PDM grant structure is such that the City pays 25% of the total project costs including, but not limited to: fee simple purchase of the parcel, environmental assessment of the parcel and structure(s), remediation of any identified environmental hazards, demolition of the structure(s), grading and restoration of the parcel to become vegetated open space, and placement of a restrictive covenant on the parcel such that no future development would be allowed unless approved by City Council at the recommendation of the City Manager. The new Stormwater Utility flood mitigation program would result in the same project outcomes and would be similarly structured in that Stormwater Utility revenue would fund 25% of the total project costs, while the 75% traditionally paid by a FEMA grant, would likely be funded by a parcel owner's Flood Insurance proceeds after a high water event. Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution to authorize creation of a Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation program to facil' mel cquisition and demolition of flooded structures. Robert S. Cowell, .Jr. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Sherman M. Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operations Robert K. Bengtson, P.E., Director of Public Works Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Finance Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program Background Historically, the City of Roanoke (City) has purchased floodprone properties by leveraging Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Pre - Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grants and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) grants as administered by the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM). Since 1985, these grants have facilitated removal of 118 floodprone structures including those classified as Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) or Repetitive Loss (RL) based on National Flood Insurance Program claims. The FEMA PDM grant guidelines result in 75% federal funding and 25% City funding of the total project costs including, but not limited to: fee simple purchase of the parcel, environmental assessment of the parcel and structure(s), remediation of any identified environmental hazards, demolition of the structure(s), grading and restoration of the parcel to become vegetated open space, and placement of a restrictive covenant on the parcel such that no future development would be allowed unless approved by City Council at the recommendation of the City Manager. The most recent FEMA list of SRL /RL properties indicates, however, that 77 commercial and residential structures remain within City limits. Over the past decade, the FEMA grant process has become more competitive and complicated as a result of: • Two to three year timeline including grant application, review, and award as well as project acquisition, demolition, and completion • Limited FEMA funding available despite increases in annual storm damages nationwide • Required repetitive and significant flood insurance claims history to achieve SRL /RL status and be competitive against flood damages nationwide • Required Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan be enforce and in effect for a locality to submit an application. Creation of a new Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program would provide an additional option beyond leveraging FEMA grants to acquire developed parcels within City limits that are subject to repetitive property damage due to high -water (flood) events. Similar to a FEMA grant, the Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program would use Stormwater Utility Funds to provide 25% of the total project costs associated with the acquisition and demolition of flooded structures within the floodplain and floodway. The remaining 75% of the total cost under this new Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program would be funded by the parcel owner from flood insurance proceeds after a high water event or from some other source. The primary goal of this new program would be to facilitate timely acquisition and demolition of recently flooded structures without the need to rely solely upon FEMA's lengthy, complicated, and nationally competitive PDM and FMA grant programs. This program supplements the City's current process of acquiring vacant parcels using 100% utility funds. Under City ownership, debris removal from the stream channel could be performed on a routine basis without need for a maintenance easement or right -of -entry permit from a private parcel owner. Further under City ownership, the riparian buffer area along the stream channel of these vacant parcels could be enhanced to not only reduce downstream flooding but also improve water quality downstream as required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit's sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) action plan. Finally, open space parcels having deeded restrictive covenants in proximity to river and tributary floodplains add points towards the City's progressive floodplain management activities resulting in City residents being eligible for a 15% discount on flood insurance premiums as part of the National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating System (CRS). Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program Prerequisites: • Parcel owner shall have held title for a minimum of three (3) consecutive years to be eligible. • Parcel shall be in the floodplain to be eligible, however, priority order is given to parcels with structures as follows: Severe Repetitive Loss; Repetitive Loss; entirely in the floodway; partially in the floodway; entirely in the 100 -year floodplain; partially in the 100 -year floodplain, and entirely in the 500 -year floodplain. Program Eligibility for 75/25 Match: • Proceeds from flood insurance (including Increased Cost of Compliance proceeds) or other non - Stormwater Utility source shall cover 75% of the total project cost including, but not limited to: fee simple purchase of the parcel, environmental assessment of the parcel and structure(s), remediation of any identified environmental hazards, demolition of the structure(s), grading and restoration of the parcel to become vegetated open space, and placement of a restrictive covenant on the parcel to prevent future development. • Valuation for fee simple purchase of the property shall be the most recent total assessed parcel value used for real estate tax purposes. • Stormwater Utility funds are limited for this program and must be available to cover the City's 25% cost share. Maximum Stormwater Utility funds that may be available for this program's 25% match will be $100,000 per parcel and an aggregate of $250,000 per year. Program Acquisition and Mitigation Example for 75/25 Match: • Owner has held title for 3 years of parcel within the floodway where the structure has recently suffered flood damage from a high water event. • $100,000 Total project expenditures for acquisition and mitigation including: o $75,000 = City's fee simple acquisition offer based upon the total Real Estate assessed parcel tax value. o $25,000 = Total additional project costs for title closing, restrictive covenant, environmental assessment and remediation, demolition, grading, and restoration. • $100,000 Total project expenditures paid for as follows: o $75,000 = Parcel owner contribution from Flood Insurance Payout (including Increased Cost of Compliance flood policy proceeds). o $25,000 = City Stormwater Utility contribution to cover remaining project costs. • If parcel owner Deed of Trust payoff is less than $75,000, the remaining Flood Insurance Payout is returned to parcel owner at title closing as net equity. • If parcel owner Deed of Trust payoff is more than $75,000, the parcel would not be eligible to participate in this program, but would still be eligible to participate in upcoming FEMA flood mitigation grant award application. • If parcel is not encumbered by a Deed of Trust, owner equity may be used to achieve the 75% program match requirement. Program Application and Approval Process: • Application for participation in the program is available on the Stormwater Utility's website. • Application may be submitted online or delivered to Stormwater Utility staff for review. • Upon review of application and recommendation to proceed by Stormwater Utility staff, the City Manager's Office will review staff recommendation. • Upon concurrence from the City Manager's Office to proceed, authorization will be requested from City Council to pursue fee simple acquisition and mitigation. • Upon City Council authorization, the City Attorney's Office will assist Stormwater Utility staff with both parcel acquisition and restrictive covenant establishment. Stormwater Utility staff will coordinate other project details including environmental assessment of the parcel and structure(s), remediation of any identified environmental hazards, demolition of the structure(s), and grading and restoration of the parcel to become vegetated open space. Revised 3/12/2019 Stormwater Utility Flood Mitigation Program Application Please note: This Program is applicable to residential structures in the FEMA designated floodway or R�K floodplain, where other mitigation strategies are not a viable option. The information requested in this E form can be found on the City's Real Estate GIS, from a property's elevation certificate or surveyor, the 5TORMWATER NFIP flood insurance policy/insurance agent, and the mortgage lender. The City of Roanoke Stormwater Utility's webpage includes further program and policy information. Property Tax Map Number: Parcel Address: Date of Property Purchase: Tax Assessment: Land Value: Improvement Value: Total Value: Date of Assessment: Owner Information Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Email: owner phone number: Floodplain information: Is the property in the floodplain? ElYes 1-1 No Is the property in the floodway? 1-1 Yes F]No is there an elevation certificate on file? F]Yes [—] No What is the Base Flood Elevation? What is the elevation of the top of the bottom floor? Has this property been improved in the last 5 years? � Yes F—] No If so, what was the improvement value? Does the property have a specific flood insurance policy beyond homeowners insurance? E]Yes EINo Is Increased Cost of Compliance part of the policy? FlYes � No Insurance Claim information Date of Insurance Claim #I- Total Amount of Claim- Date of Insurance Claim #2: Total Amount of Claim: Date of Insurance Clain, #3: Total Amount of Claim: Date of Insurance Claim #4: Total Amount of Claim: Mortgage Information Do you have a mortgage? OYes F]No If yes, what is the payoff amount? Date payoff amount was obtained? Floodplain Management Section (to be corr, pieted by City Staff) SFHA Zone: Watershed: What mitigation options are available on this property? Is this property considered to be in a SRL/RL/SDF area? Yes 1-1 No ❑ Total number of losses: Total Payout Amount: Average Payout Amount: Date: Loss #1 Payout Amount: Date- Loss #2 Payout Amount: Date: Loss #3 Payout Amount: Date: Loss #4 Payout Amount: Storm Recurrence Interval: Storm Recurrence Interval: Storm Recurrence Interval: Storm Recurrence Interval: G IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41401 - 031819. A RESOLUTION approving /establishing a revised S.T.A.R. Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass fee schedule for the Greater Roanoke Transit Company (GRTC), dba Valley Metro; and authorizing the City Manager to take any necessary action to accomplish the implementation of such fare schedule. WHEREAS, on March 18, 2019, the GRTC Board of Directors approved and adopted a revised S.T.A.R. Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass fee schedule as set forth in Attachment 1 to the City Council Agenda Report dated March 18, 2019, to this Council; and WHEREAS, GRTC has requested that City Council approve /establish such revised S.T.A.R. Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass fee schedule pursuant to Section 34 -22 (a) of the Code of the City of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. City Council hereby approves /establishes the revised S.T.A.R. Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass fee schedule that was approved and adopted by the GRTC Board of Directors, all as set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated March 18, 2019, and Attachment 1 to such Report, such new fee to be effective April 1, 2019. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take any necessary action to accomplish the implementation of such fee schedule. 3. The City Clerk is directed to certify a copy of this Resolution to the General Manager of GRTC. ATTEST: YV ?1 9 A4." City C l e V CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT 5 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Greater Roanoke Transit Company Fare Adjustment for STAR Paratransit Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass Background: Effective January 1, 2018, Greater Roanoke Transit Company (GRTC) increased the one -way fixed route fare from $1.50 to $1.75. The cost of the associated fixed route passes was also adjusted. In addition to the fixed route transit fare increase, the one -way trip fare for the STAR paratransit service was increased from $3 to $3.50. As with the fixed route service, a monthly pass for the STAR service is available for $96. At the time the fixed route fare increase was being evaluated, consideration was being given to a 52 ride pass for the STAR paratransit service as a substitute monthly pass option. After public input was received and reviewed, it was determined that the 52 ride pass option should not be implemented and the STAR monthly pass remain in its current form. In an effort to align the cost of the STAR monthly pass with the fixed route monthly pass, an adjustment in the cost from $96 to $112 is required. Considerations: Pursuant to Section 34 -22 (a) of the Code of the City of Roanoke, City Council approval of the fare adjustment is required. Attached to this City Council Agenda Report is a copy of the GRTC Board of Directors Report. The GRTC Board approved the adjustment as recommended. Recommended Action: Approve the GRTC fare adjustment for the STAR paratransit monthly pass from $96 per month to $112 per month, effective April 1, 2019, as outlined in the GR]TC B . ctors Report. -- -- -- -------- - - - - -- Robert S. Cowell, Jr. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Sherman M. Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operations Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Finance Kevin L. Price, General Manager, GRTC Greater Roanoke Transit Company Board of Directors Meeting Action Item March 18, 2019 The Honorable William D. Bestpitch, President, and Members of the Board of Directors of Greater Roanoke Transit Company Roanoke, Virginia Dear President Bestpitch and Members of the Board: Subject: Approve Proposed STAR Monthly Pass Fee Increase $96 to $112 At its November 19, 2018 meeting, the Greater Roanoke Transit Company (GRTC) Board of Directors authorized holding a public hearing on a proposed fee increase to the STAR Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass from $96 to $112. The public hearing was held on January 31, 2019, Notice of the hearing was advertised via legal notice which was published twice in the Virginia Section of the Roanoke Times, January 15, 2019 and January 22, 2019. No comments were received at the public hearing. Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution to approve the proposed STAR Monthly Unlimited Ride Pass fee increase from $96 to $112, effective April 11-t, 2019, subject to the approval of Roanoke City Council, as required pursuant to Section 34-22, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended. fitted, GqKeral Manager Greater Roanoke Transit Company P O Box 13247 Roanoke, Wr&r a 24432 Fhccne; (54'1X382 -0305 Fax, 1'5401 932-27.'3 www valley�.�etrn cc -n Cc: Vice President of Operations Assistant Vice President of Operations Treasurer Secretary GRTC General Counsel Municipal Auditor Greater Roanoke Transit Company P.0 Box 13247 Rcancke, Virgirkj .14032 Phcne! (540) 982 MC5 Fax: ( J C) 9 32 ?? "3 ;cm J(` IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41402- 031819. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the Commonwealth and federal grant for various educational programs, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2018 -2019 School Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2018 -2019 School Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations Technology Personal Services Revenues Federal Grant Receipts State Grant Receipts 302 - 110 - 0000 - 1070 - 316N - 61100 - 46650 - 3 - 09 302 - 110 -1101 - 1000 -137N- 61310 -42201 -0 -01 302 - 000 - 0000 - 0000 - 137N - 00000 - 38365 - 0 - 00 302 - 000 - 0000 - 0000 - 316N - 00000 - 32220 - 0 - 00 $ 8,000 161 $ 161 8,000 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. t*;th.y�� March 18, 2019 The Honorable Sherman P. Lea, Sr., Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mayor Lea and Members of Council: As a result of official School Board action on Tuesday, March 12, 2019, the Board respectfully requests that City Council approve the following appropriation requests: Revised Appropriation Requests Title III, Part A, Limited English Proficient (LEP) 2018 -19 r State Operated Programs: Juvenile Detention Home and Child Development Clinics 2018 -19 Additional Award $ 160.56 $8,000.00 On behalf of the School Board, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Cindy H. Poulton, Clerk pc: Dan Callaghan Bob Cowell Amelia Merchant Annette Lewis Rita D. Bishop Kathleen Jackson Holli Salyers (w /details) ROANOKE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Strong Students. Strong Schools. Strong City. School Board Annette Lewis Chairman Mark K. Cathey Vice Chairman William B. Hopkins, Jr. Elizabeth C. S. Jamison Laura D. Rottenborn Lutheria H. Smith Dick Willis Dr. Rita D. Bishop Superintendent Cindy H. Poulton Clerk of the Board www.rcps.info p: 540.853.2381 f: 540.853.2951 P.O. Box 13145 Roanoke VA 24031 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: School Board Appropriation Request Background: As the result of official Roanoke City School Board action at its March 12, 2019 meeting, the Board respectfully requested that City Council appropriate funding as outlined in this report. The 2018 -19 Juvenile Detention Home and Child Development Clinics grant award of $8,000 constitutes educational services provided at the Roanoke Valley Juvenile Detention Home and the Virginia Department of Health's Roanoke Child Development Clinics. This appropriation aligns the total with the revised award amount. This grant will be reimbursed by State funds and will end March 31, 2019. This is a continuing program. The 2018 -19 Title III, Part A, Limited English Proficient grant award of $161 supports programs to improve the education of limited English proficient children and youth by helping them learn English and meet challenging state content and achievement standards. This appropriation aligns the total with the revised award amount. This grant will be reimbursed by Federal funds and will end September 30, 2020. This is a continuing program. Recommended Action: We recommend that Council concur with this report of the School Board and adopt the attached budget ordinance to establish revenue estimates and to appropriate funding as outlined. 5';-a! Robert S. Cowell, Jr. City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Rita D. Bishop, Superintendent, RCPS Dan Lyons, Assistant Superintendent for Operations, RCPS Kathleen M. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer, RCPS Amelia C. Merchant, Director of Finance IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41403 - 031819. A RESOLUTION recognizing the actions of the City and its citizens in responding to the challenges of climate change and encouraging national leaders to engage in substantive discussions to develop an appropriate, effective, and sustainable global response to reduce carbon emissions. WHEREAS, for more than 10 years, the City of Roanoke and its citizens have been leaders in creating and promoting effective, targeted efforts to reduce carbon emissions in the environment; WHEREAS, City staff has created innovative strategies to engage, educate, and empower our businesses and citizens to implement local actions to reduce carbon emissions in their business operations and in their homes; WHEREAS, the City actively participates in strategic partnerships and alliances to collaborate and develop additional local responses to the challenges confronting our environment; WHEREAS, the City's continued commitment to implement tangible actions at the local and regional level were reaffirmed by the 2016/2017 Community and Municipal Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and Energy Summary provided to Council at the December 17, 2018, Council session; WHEREAS, various citizens' groups throughout the Roanoke Valley, including the Greater Virginia Green Building Council, Resilient Virginia, and the Citizens' Climate Lobby, are actively engaged in educating the public about the irreparable impacts of climate change on our community and advocating for action by our national leaders, including the enactment of legislation to establish a carbon fee to stem the damage that climate change threatens our environment, economy, and quality of life; WHEREAS, Congressional leaders are promoting several options to address climate change, including H. R. 7173, a bill to establish a carbon dividend trust fund to encourage market- driven energy efficient technologies to reduce the harmful effects of carbon pollution, and the recently developed Green New Deal; WHEREAS, the critical issue of climate change is a global challenge that demands a response from leaders throughout the world; and WHEREAS, national leaders should assume their responsibility to protect our environment by initiating meaningful debate to address the challenges of climate change with the established goal of implementing an appropriate, effective, and sustainable response to climate change. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. City Council recognizes the continuing efforts of City staff and Roanoke citizens for their continued efforts in creating, implementing, and maintaining targeted and effective local responses to the challenges of climate change. 2. City Council encourages our national leaders to initiate the necessary debate and discussion on the challenges of climate change with the stated objective of achieving an appropriate, effective, and sustainable solution to address the detrimental effects of carbon emissions in our global environment. ATTEST: �V YID ' OM n0 ti. City Clerk. e� IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41404- 031819. A RESOLUTION recognizing, congratulating, and honoring team and individual performances of students at Patrick Henry High School during the winter season of 2018 -2019. WHEREAS, the Patrick Henry High School student athletes from several sporting events during the 2018 -19 winter season Team demonstrated great determination, spirit, and commitment by practicing long hours, maintaining their academic commitments, and giving their best performances throughout the 2018 -19 season; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Swim Team, led by its stellar 400 free relay team of Caroline Kulp, Shelby Stanley, Brooke Knisely, and Whitney Hamilton, captured its 4th consecutive State Championship and Caroline Kulp completed her unblemished state competition career by remaining undefeated in her two individual events; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team completed a successful season, winning the River Ridge District regular season and tournament titles, and losing in the Blue Ridge District Championship to its crosstown rival, William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Boys Basketball Team completed its successful 2018 -19 campaign with winning the River Ridge District Championship; WHEREAS, Patrick Henry student athlete Noah Bowers won individual State championships in the 100 butterfly and the 100 back stroke events in the recent State Swimming championship; WHEREAS, Patrick Henry student athlete Chauncey Wilson was 2018 -19 Regional Champion wrestler and Second Place wrestler at the 2018 -19 State Championships in his weight division; and WHEREAS, these achievements warrant recognition and applause by the City of Roanoke and its citizens. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Council adopts this resolution as a means of recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Swim Team, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team, and the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Boys Basketball Team for their successful seasons, and recognizing, congratulating, and honoring Patrick Henry High School student athletes Noah Bowers and Chauncey Wilson for their personal achievements in their chosen sports. 2. The City Clerk is directed to forward attested copies of this resolution to Kathy Duncan, Principal at Patrick Henry High School, Patricia Sheedy, Director of Athletics at Patrick Henry High School. ATTEST: -, ryin 970P , City Clerk. Cd C9990hZaaa IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41404- 031819. A RESOLUTION recognizing, congratulating, and honoring team and individual perfomnances of students at Patrick Henry High School during the winter season of 2018- 2019. WHEREAS, the Patrick Henry High School student athletes from several sporting events during the 2018 -19 winter season Team demonstrated great determination, spirit, and commitment by practicing long hours, maintaining their academic commitments, and giving their best performances throughout the 2018 -19 season; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Swint Team, led by its stellar 400 free relay teant of Caroline Kulp, Shelby Stanley, Brooke Knisely, and Whitney Hamilton, captured its 4th consecutive State Championship and Caroline Kulp completed her unblemished state competition career by remaining undefeated in her two individual events; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Teant completed a successful season, winning the River Ridge District regular season and tournament titles, and losing in the Blue Ridge District Championship to its crosstown rival, Williant Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Boys Basketball Team completed its successful 2018 -19 campaign with winning the River Ridge District Championship; WHEREAS, Patrick Henry student athlete Noah Bowers won individual State championships in the 100 butterfly and the 100 back stroke events in the recent State Swimming championship; WHEREAS, Patrick Henry student athlete Chauncey Wilson was 2018 -19 Regional Champion wrestler and Second Place wrestler at the 2018 -19 State Championships in his weight division; and WHEREAS, these achievements warrant recognition and applause by the City of Roanoke and its citizens. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of'Roanoke that: 1. Council adopts this resolution as a means of recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Swim Teant, the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team, and the 2018 -19 Patrick Henry High School Boys Basketball Team for their successful seasons, and recognizing, congratulating, and /honoring Patrick Henry High School student athletes Noah Bowers and Chauncey Wilson for their personal achievenents in their chosen sports. 2. The City Clerk is directed to forward attested copies of this resolution: to Kathy Duncan, Principal at Patrick Henry High School, Patricia Sheedy, Director of Athletics at Patrick Henry High School. Sherman P. Lea, Sr. Aid& Mayor Attest: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds City Clerk Ao� IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41405 - 031819. A RESOLUTION recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for its successful season. WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Team, comprised of 13 players, demonstrated great determination, spirit, and commitment in practicing long hours, maintaining their academic commitments, and giving their best performances throughout the 2018 -19 basketball season; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Team, the 2018 -19 Blue Ridge District Co- champions, defeated its crosstown rival, Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for the Regional Championship on February 26, 2019, and completed its successful season as a quarterfinalist in the VHSL Girls State championship competition; WHEREAS, during its regular season, the 2018 -19 Team defeated Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team to win the Mayor's Cup; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Team members achieved numerous distinguished personal recognitions including Kensey Ferguson, named a First Team All Blue Ridge member, First Team All Regional team member, Regional Player of the Year; Taniah Johnson, named a First Team All Blue Ridge District team member and a First Team All Regional team member; Shakara Anderson, named a Second Team All Blue Ridge District team member and a Second Team All Regional team member; and Victoria Board, named a Second Team All Blue Ridge District team member; WHEREAS, Coach Richard Wilson was named Regional Coach of the Year based on the outstanding performance of his 2018 -19 Team throughout the 2018 -19 season; and WHEREAS, these achievements warrant recognition and applause by the City of Roanoke and its citizens. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Council adopts this resolution as a means of recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team and their coaches for completing a very successful season that culminated with a quarterfinal spot in the VHSL Championship. 2. The City Clerk is directed to forward attested copies of this resolution to Head Coach Richard Wilson and Assistant Coaches Ataijah Taylor, Larry Bishop, Bryan Ashford, William Hankins, and Davell Hash. ATTEST: UCv erk. � ✓%ao /ctioro IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41405 - 031819. A RESOLUTION recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for its successful season. WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Team, comprised of 13 players, demonstrated great determination, spirit, and commitment in practicing long hours, maintaining their academic commitments, and giving their best performances throughout the 2018 -19 basketball season; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Team, the 2018 -19 Blue Ridge District Co- champions, defeated its crosstown rival, Patrick Henry High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for the Regional Championship on February 26, 2019, and completed its successful season as a quarterfinalist in the VHSL Girls State championship competition; WHEREAS, during its regular season, the 2018 -19 Team defeated Patrick Henry High Sc /tool Girls Varsity Basketball Team to win the Mayor's Carp; WHEREAS, the 2018 -19 Teana members achieved numerous distinguished personal recognitions including Kensey Ferguson, named a First Teant All Blue Ridge member, First Team All Regional team member, Regional Player of the Year; Taniah Johnson, named a First Team All Blue Ridge District team aneuaber and a First Teaan All Regional team member; Shakara Anderson, named a Second Team All Blue Ridge District team member and a Second Teant All Regional team member; and Victoria Board, named a Second Team All Blue Ridge District team member; WHEREAS, Coach Richard Wilson was named Regional Coach of' the Year based on the outstanding performance of his 2018 -19 Team throughout the 2018 -19 season; and WHEREAS, these achievements warrant recognition and applause by the City of Roanoke and its citizens. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Council adopts this resolution as a means of'recognizing, congratulating, and honoring the 2018 -19 William Fleming High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team and their coaches for completing a very successful season that cuhninated with a quarterfinal spot in the VHSL Championship. 2. The City Clerk is directed to forward attested copies of this resolution to Head Coach Richard Wilson and Assistant Coaches Ataijah Taylor, Larry Bishop, Bryan Ashford, William Hankins, and Davell Hash. Sherman P. Lea, Sr. Mayor Attest: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds City Clerk STET ANIE: M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC Cite Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E-mail: clerk(rroanokeva.gov Matthew W. King M & E Properties, LLC P. O. Box 3511 Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 Gentlemen: March 20, 2019 CEC EL.IA F. MCCOY Deputy Cite Clerk CECEL,IA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Wilbert Snider, President Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke 950 Orange Avenue, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 41406 - 031819 permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing a public right -of -way in the City of Roanoke located between 11th Street, N. E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143, as more particularly described hereinafter. Furthermore, the applicant shall, upon a certified copy of Ordinance No. 41406 - 031819 being recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, file with the City Engineer for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Clerk's receipt, demonstrating that such recordation has occurred. Lastly, if all of the above conditions have not been met within a period of one year from the date of the adoption of this ordinance, then such ordinance shall be null and void with no further action by City Council being necessary, unless extended by the Agent for the Planning Commission for an additional six (6) months prior to the end of the one year period. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, March 18, 2019, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. incerel s Stephanie = MIt oon Reynol M City Clerk Enclosure pc: David M. Jones, 4422 Laurelwood Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RYT, LLC, 210 Carver Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 May Ram, LLC, 6022 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041 Fredrick Murray, 113 Preston Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 e �,r PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED ADJACENT TO OFFICIAL TAX MAP NOS. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143 PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF ROANOKE IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41406 - 031819. AN ORDINANCE permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing a public right -of -way in the City of Roanoke located between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143, as more particularly described hereinafter; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Matthew W. King, on behalf of M &E Properties, LLC, filed an application with the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ( "City Council "), in accordance with law, requesting City Council to permanently vacate, discontinue and close a certain public right -of -way described hereinafter; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §30 -14, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after having conducted a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on such application by City Council on March 18, 2019, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §30 -14, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were afforded an opportunity to be heard on such application; WHEREAS, it appearing from the foregoing that the land proprietors affected by the requested closing of the subject public right -of -way have been properly notified; and 1 WHEREAS, from all of the foregoing, City Council considers that no inconvenience will result to any individual or to the public from permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing such public right -of -way. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, that the public right -of -way situated in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3042101. be, and is hereby permanently vacated, discontinued and closed, and that all right and interest of the public in and to the same be, and hereby is, released insofar as City Council is empowered so to do with respect to the closed portion of the right -of -way, reserving however, to the City of Roanoke and any utility company or public authority, including, specifically, without limitation, providers to or for the public of cable television, electricity, natural gas, telephone service, or stormwater, an easement for sanitary sewer and water mains, television cable, electric wires, gas lines, telephone lines, stormwater facilities, and related facilities that may now be located in or across such public right -of -way, together with the right of ingress and egress for the maintenance or replacement of such lines, mains or utilities, such right to include the right to remove, without the payment of compensation or damages of any kind to the owner, any landscaping, fences, shrubbery, structure or any other encroachments on or over the easement which impede access for maintenance or replacement purposes at the time such work is undertaken; such easement or easements to terminate upon the later abandonment 2 of use or permanent removal from the above - described public right -of -way of any such municipal installation or other utility or facility by the owner thereof. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the applicant shall submit to the Subdivision Agent, receive all required approvals of, and record with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, a subdivision plat, with such plat combining all properties which would otherwise dispose of the land within the right -of -way to be vacated in a manner consistent with law, and retaining appropriate easements, together with the right of ingress and egress over the same, for the installation and maintenance of any and all existing utilities that may be located within the right -of -way. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that prior to receiving all required approvals of the subdivision plat referenced in the previous paragraph, the applicant shall give to the Treasurer for the City of Roanoke a certified check or cash in the amount of one thousand, seven hundred and seventy dollars ($1,770) as consideration pursuant to § 15.2- 2008, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, for the vacated right -of -way. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the applicant shall, upon meeting all other conditions to the granting of the application, deliver to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, a certified copy of this ordinance for recordation where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, indexing the same in the name of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, as Grantor, and in the name of the applicant, and the names of any other parties in interest who may so request, as Grantees, and pay such fees and charges as are required by the Clerk to effect such recordation. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the applicant shall, upon a certified copy of this ordinance being recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Q Virginia, where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, file with the City Engineer for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Clerk's receipt, demonstrating that such recordation has occurred. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that if the above conditions have not been met within a period of one year from the date of the adoption of this ordinance, then such ordinance will be null and void with no further action by City Council being necessary, unless extended by the Agent for the Planning Commission for an additional six (6) months prior to the end of the one year period. BE IT FINALLY ORDAINED that pursuant to the provisions of §12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: 94% t K City Cl_. . Vacate right of way with money pocahantas and orange.doc 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 1 1 th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 30421 10, 3042111, 30421 12, and 3042143. Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Monday, March 1 1 , 2019. By a vote of 7 -0, the Commission recommended approval of the vacation of right - of -way as requested, contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit to the Subdivision Agent, receive all required approvals of, and record with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, a subdivision plat, with such plat combining all properties which would otherwise dispose of the land within the right -of -way to be vacated in a manner consistent with law, and retaining appropriate easements, together with the right of ingress and egress over the same, for the installation and maintenance of any and all existing utilities that may be located within the right -of -way. 2. Prior to receiving all required approvals of the subdivision plat referenced in the previous paragraph, the applicant shall give to the Treasurer for the City of Roanoke a certified check or cash in the amount of one thousand seven hundred and seventy dollars ($1,770) as consideration pursuant to §15.2-2008, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, for the vacated right -of -way. 3. The applicant shall, upon meeting all other conditions to the granting of the application, deliver to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, a certified copy of this ordinance for recordation where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, indexing the same in the name of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, as Grantor, and in the name of the applicant, and the names of any other parties in interest who may so request, as Grantees, and pay such fees and charges as are required by the Clerk to effect such recordation. 4. The applicant shall, upon a certified copy of this ordinance being recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, file with the City Engineer for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Clerk's receipt, demonstrating that such recordation has occurred. 5. If the above conditions have not been met within a period of one year from the date of the adoption of this ordinance, then such ordinance will be null and void with no further action by City Council being necessary, unless extended by the Agent for the Planning Commission for an additional six (6) months prior to the end of the one year period. Application Information: Request: Vacation of a portion of undeveloped alley between 1 1 `" Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. Applicant: M & E Properties, LLC Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC Owner: M & E Properties, LLC Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC City Staff Person: Wayne Leftwich, Senior City Planner Official Tax Nos.: A portion of undeveloped alley adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 30421 10, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143 Site Area: +/- 1,066 s.f. Relevant Plans: Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan Filing Date: January 28, 2019 Background: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11 th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101 , 30421 10, 30421 1 1, 30421 12, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. Proposed Use /Development: The vacated right -of -way will be used to support the expansion of a motor vehicle repair or service establishment. The existing undeveloped alley is currently being encroached upon with outdoor storage for the existing business. King Tire wishes to expand with construction of an additional one - story 7,500 s.f. +/- storage building with employee and vehicle parking. The vacation request is accompanied by a rezoning request that would allow the properties to be re- platted and the expansion of King Tire to occur. Considerations: Impact of Alley Vacation to Public Accessibility: The alley of which a portion has been proposed for vacation appears to have never been developed. The existing topography dropping from the area to be vacated to 1 111 Street would likely prohibit any future development as an alley. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: Vision 2001 -2020 and the Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan support the utilization of industrial sites with expansions that provide sufficient land to operate in a manner that has minimal impact on adjoining properties. Policy/Action ED Al 8 Identify underutilized industrial sites and promote redevelopment as part of Roanoke's economic development strategy. Economic development policies recommend that industrial uses should have sufficient land to operate and have minimal impact on adjoining properties. Efficient use of land to avoid expansion of commercial districts and rezoning of underutilized land are also encouraged. Comments on Application: Plan I Applicability to matter Comprehensive Plan', pg. 61 Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan', pg.48 The vacation of undeveloped alley will allow for an expansion of an existing industrial use. The proposed development allows the business operational room while avoiding impact to adjacent residential areas. Public Utilities: Western Virginia Water Authority approved the request and had no additional comments. No comments were received from Roanoke Gas, Appalachian Power Company, or Verizon. Vision 2001 -2020. City of Roanoke. 2001 ' Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan, City of Roanoke, 2007 3 Planning Commission Work Session: No comments. Public Comments: Staff has received no public comments. Planning Commission Public Hearing: No comments. Conclusions and Recommendations: The application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan, and would help expand an existing industrial use that would not create an inconvenience to residents and business owners in the area. Ja es E. Smith, Chair City Planning Commission Attachment A, Location Map Distribution: Robert S. Cowell, Jr., City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning Building & Development Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Timothy Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Matthew W. King, M & E Properties, LLC Nancy C. Alcom, Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc. rd Vacation of Alley near Pocahontas February 5, 2019 1:1,066 1 0.0075 0.015 0.03 mi 0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 km aty of Roanoke, EagleView (Sty of Roanoke ROANOKE APPLICATION STREET OR ALLEY VACATION Rr- "VED JAN 2 9 mig To: Office of the City Clerk Fia"OKE Fourth Floor, Noel C. Taylor Municipi ciry j iLpiNQ & 215 Church Avenue, S.W. 13MMLOPMENT Roanoke, VA 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax (540) 853 -1145 PCs/ q - 0a0l Date: January 28, 2018 ■ Original Application a Amended AppNcation No. All submittals must be typed and Include all required documentation and a check for the filing fee. Application is hereby submitted for street or alley vacation for the property located at: Location and description of street or alley to be closed: Westem Portion of Ming Public Alley that Is adIawl to tax City of Roanoke tax parcels 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. Alloy area to be vacated is further defined by the provided Ito description and alley vacation exift attached to this request. It is our undenstanding that Soothem classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC is not Interested m oblrninglisking possession of their portion of On aMey being requested to be vacated and Ws oonlinnalb Is provided with diair signature below. Proposed use of vacated street or alley: The vaulted aley Is currently being utilized for access across the site la serve the exiOng use. The area will be contbwe to be used forecoess and vehkie par" to serve the existing use. Name of Applicant/Contact Person: WE Prope"ies, LLC a sotemm Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC P.O. Box 3511 Mailing Address: Blustlaid, WV 24701 Telephone: ( ) 3043m75 Fax ( ) 304s25y572 E -mail: Tir""n"GHotmaA.com A p cant signature(s)- This application has been reviewed for completeness by Wayne Leftwich, Senior City Planner. The 1,066 square feet of alley to be vacated is valued at $1,770. B &A JOB #04180100.00 DESCRIPTION UNDEVELOPED ALLEY COMMENCING AT A POINT AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY INTERSECTION OF POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. AND 10TH STREET, N.E., THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S79 °56'33 "W 103.73', THENCE LEAVING POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. AND WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN TAX MAP #3042110 & #3042111 A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S00 °36'25 "E 127.39' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A 10' UNDEVELOPED ALLEY N78 °46'06 "E 17.59', THENCE WITH THE SAME S66 °46'57 "E 88.76', THENCE WITH A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S23 °13'03 "W 5.00', THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S66 °46'57 "E 0.23', THENCE WITH A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S23 °13'03 "W 5.00' TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX MAP #3042143, THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ALLEY N66 °46'57 "W 85.89', THENCE WITH THE SAME S78 °46'06 "W 20.61' TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042101, THENCE WITH THE SAME ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH RADIUS 217.50'A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N09 °15'14 "W 5.00' TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042110, THENCE WITH THE SAME N78 °46'06 "E 5.01', THENCE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042110 N00 °36'25 "W 5.09' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.025 ACRE AND BEING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY SHOWN ON "PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPERTY BELONGING TO ROBERT L. OFFUTT" RECORDED IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IN MAP BOOK 1, PAGE 1261. SAID PROPERTY BEING LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. �yc U �o 2 i m & L- maTRw ac La INST. 1110010416 r.Al /A?42111 17.59 N78'46'p6 E 2 so s�83- C h 5,01 ss6; 20.61, 46'01_ N SOUTHERN CLASSIC AUTO WASH OF RaWOKE C7 INSTRUMENT /0000000 10 1 T.AL1304214J L =5.00' R= 217.50' ,d=1'19'02' Chord Brg= N09.15'141W Chord Dist =500' Tan =2.50' ALLEY VACATION EXHIBIT FROM RECORDS SHOWING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 10' ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN ROANOKE CITY TAX PARCEL NUMBERS 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, & 3042143 TO BE VACATED CONTAINING 0.025 ACRE (1,066 S.F.) AND BEING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY SHOWN ON "PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPERTY BELONGING TO ROBERT L. OFFUTT" MAP BOOK 1, PAGE 1261 CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DATED 01 -03 -19 JOB #04180100.00 SCALE: 1" = 10' M & E AWERDES LLC hwr 1110010416 TM /30{2112 886 . TAT _70- '9C o= I W I Q� ENO � \ i LINE TABLE LINE— BEAR /NG /ST NCE L f S23'13 03 5.00 L2 S6646 57 E 0.23 L3 S23.1303 5.00 LEGEND 0 PLATTED CORNER V � O =off v110- ro F� N,F N X� DRN:MSS k ~ CHK:SCB I TEL: 540 - 772 -9580 FAX: 540 - 772 -8050 PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS Balzer & Associates, Inc. 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke Va. 24018 00 gg� n-4 wl BARER & ASSOCIATES Vacation of Alley near Pocahontas February 5, 2019 1:1,066 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 mi 0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 km aty of Roanoke, EagleView Qty of Roanoke Adjoining Property Owners for Alley Closure Adjacent to 915 Pocahontas Avenue, NE and others including TM #s 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143 TAXID MailAddress MailCity St Zip LocalAddress LocalCity Zip Ownerl 3042133 6022 COLUMBIA PIKE FALLS CHURCH VA 22041 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE MAY RAM LLC 3042143 950 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 950 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 SOUTHERN CLASSIC AUTO WASH OF ROANOK 3042114 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042112 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 1015 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042111 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042110 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042109 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 1001 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042108 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042101 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 915 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042101 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 915 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3061321 934 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 934 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24000 WILCOX DAVID ALAN 3061323 938 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 938 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE NIPPER DAVID L & KELLY B 3061324 806 DAY AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24016 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE BAREFOOT HOMES LLC 3061325 806 DAY AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24016 1404 10TH ST NE ROANOKE 24012 BAREFOOT HOMES LLC 3042008 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 816 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE RYT LLC 3042007 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 811 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 RYT LLC 3042004 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE R Y T LLC 3042003 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE RYT LLC 3041221 4422 LAURELWOOD DR ROANOKE VA 24018 812 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 JONES DAVID M 3061313 113 PRESTON AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE MURRAY FREDRICK 3061314 113 PRESTON AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE MURRAY FREDRICK 3061315 912 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 -5832 912 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE JOHNSON DELORIS J 3061316 3891 HYDE PARK DR ROANOKE VA 24018 916 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 BOWYER NICOLE R 3061317 920 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE IVA 124012 1920 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE STANLEY RICHARD K 3061318 924 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE IVA 124012 924 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 LEWIS GENIENNE 3061320 930 POCAHONTAS AVE ROANOKE VA 24012 930 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 MORGAN KELLI D CITY OF ROANOKE - PDB Attn Tina Carr STEPHANIE MOON, CITY CLERK 215 CHURCH AVE, SW, SUITE 456 ROANOKE, VA 24011 The Roanoke Times Account Number Roanoke, Virginia 6011439 Affidavit of Publication I - Date ___-- - - -_._ March 05, 2019 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/05/2019 Legal Notices PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised hi 1 x 175 L 1,666.00 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A was published in said newspapers on the following dates: 02/26. 03/05/2019 The First insertion being given ... 02/26/2019 Newspaper reference: 0000902517 Billing Representative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, March 5, 2019 Notary Public .� n... State of Virginia *� < City/ un of Roanoke My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast comer of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM- 1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3041143) in Ordinance No. 31731- 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial - General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single/Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses Proposed are an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853 -2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals (902517) L.C. C•� cr Cr. CrI: rte' J PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674 - 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3042143) in Ordinance No. 31731- 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial- General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single /Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses proposed arc an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853 -2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot. Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, February 26, 2019, and Tuesday, March 5, 2019. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 tini.carr;u roanc�kcvu.�;ov Donna M. Payne Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 cloilna xt nckbroanokeva ov Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, NIMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkCroanoke%a.gov Matthew W. King M & E Properties, LLC P. O. Box 3511 Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 Gentlemen: February 28, 2019 CECELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Depute' City Clerk Wilbert Snider, President Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke 950 Orange Avenue, N. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding your request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary and from the southeast corner along the southern boundaries, terminating at its intersection. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on Monday, March 11. If you have questions regarding the Planning Commission public hearing, please contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. Questions regarding the City Council public hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Reyn s, M Q�.(,(y7• City Clerk Enclosure STEPHANIE NI. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC Cite Clerk David M. Jones RYT, LLC May Ram, LLC Fredrick Murray Deloris J. Johnson Nicole R. Bowyer Ladies and Gentlemen: CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkCroanokeva.gov CECELIA F. IIICCOY Depute City Clerk February 28, 2019 CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Richard K. Stanley Genienne Lewis Kelli D. Morgan David Alan Wilcox David L. and Kelly B. Nipper Barefoot Homes, LLC A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding a request of M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary and from the southeast corner along the southern boundaries, terminating at its intersection. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on March 11. This letter is provided for your information as an interested party and /or adjoining property owner. If you have questions regarding the Planning Commission public hearing, please contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. Questions regarding the City Council public hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541. Sincerely, n' ne. C Stephanie M. Moon Rey n , M City Clerk Enclosure STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E-mail: clerk(Wroanokeva.gov January 28, 2019 Tina Carr, Secretary City Planning Commission Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Carr: CE:CELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Pursuant to Chapter 30, Streets and Sidewalks, Article I, In General, Section 30 -14, Procedure for altering or vacating city streets or alleys fees therefor, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, I am attaching a copy of an Application for Street or Alley Vacation received in the City Clerk's Office on January 28, 2019, from Benjamin Crew, Associate, Balzer & Associates, representing the M &E Properties, LLC and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, requesting that the western portion of existing public alley, adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110 - 3042112, respectively, and 3042143, be permanently vacated, discontinued and closed. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MM City Clerk Enclosure PC: Matthew W. King, M &E Properties, LLC and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, P. O. Box 3511, Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 Benjamin Crew, Associate, Balzer & Associates, 1208 Corporate Circle, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Bob S. Cowell, Jr., City Manager Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Luke E. Pugh, P.E., City Engineer Susan S. Lower, Director, Real Estate Valuation Wayne Leftwich, Senior City Planner pay Ce6 %I q ROANOKE APPLICATION STREET OR ALLEY VACAT (ON R` " VED JAN 2 9 2019 To: Office of the City Clerk cmr, "o� OKE Fourth Floor, Noel C. Taylor Municip ILDiNa s 215 Church Avenue, S.W. 131AMLOPMENT Roanoke, VA 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax. (540) 853 -1145 p6sll-o001 Date: January 28, 2018 ■ Original Application a Amended Appleation No. Alt submittals must be typed and Include all required documentedon and a check for the flung fee. Application Is hereby submitted for street or alley vacation for the property located at: Location and description of street or alley to be closed: Westem Portion of ExistMhg Pubiks May that is adjacent to lax City of Roanoke tax parcels 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. ANey area to be vacabd Is further defined by the p vvbdsd OMW devApUon and alley vacation sxhW attechsd to this request. It b our uundersbmdhhg that Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC is not Interested sn ab>tatnkhgltaking possessksn of their portion of the ahiey being requested to be vacated and this contirmaton Is provided with their signature beb or, Proposed use of vacated street or alley: The vacated aW Is currently being utiized forsocess across the ale b serve the existing use. Th s area wUl be continue to be used foracoses and veWe parting to serve the exis ft use. Name of ApplicantiContact Person: MME Propa+"e, t_b.0 a sowhern classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC P.O. Box 3511 Mailing Address: 8ksetleld, WV 74701 Telephone: ( ) 3043250575 Fax: ( ) 3043250572 E -mail: Tireman88®Holmaib.com This application has been reviewed for completeness by Wayne Leftwich, Senior C'Ity Planner. The 1,066 square feet of alley to be vacated Is valued at $1,770. B &A JOB #04180100.00 DESCRIPTION UNDEVELOPED ALLEY COMMENCING AT A POINT AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY INTERSECTION OF POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. AND 10TH STREET, N.E., THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S79 °56'33 "W 103.73', THENCE LEAVING POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. AND WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN TAX MAP #3042110 & #3042111 A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S00 °36'25 "E 127.39' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A 10' UNDEVELOPED ALLEY N78 °46'06 "E 17.59', THENCE WITH THE SAME S66 °46'57 "E 88.76', THENCE WITH A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S23 °13'03 "W 5.00', THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S66 °46'57 "E 0.23', THENCE WITH A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ALLEY S23 °13'03 "W 5.00' TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX MAP #3042143, THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ALLEY N66 °46'57 "W 85.89', THENCE WITH THE SAME 578 °46'06 "W 20.61' TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042101, THENCE WITH THE SAME ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH RADIUS 217.50'A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N09 °15'14 "W 5.00' TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042110, THENCE WITH THE SAME N78 °46'06 "E 5.01', THENCE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF TAX MAP #3042110 N00 °36'25 "W 5.09' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.025 ACRE AND BEING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY SHOWN ON "PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPERTY BELONGING TO ROBERT L. OFFUTT" RECORDED IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IN MAP BOOK 1, PAGE 1261. SAID PROPERTY BEING LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. 11 0 .0 t, + 1 5, 01 Zi U 0 5 a m 2 YR f AAADUAT[LC ru /Mail/ 615T. ///a910/l6 E 17.59 N7g46'06 p ?A9�• O O 2 h Y i £ HR2"ER/,ES 1LC � p Ayr. 1110010110 S66• U /. WI12 61 cs 20.61 RsS�E a W 5-46'06'W 886 , \ Q� SOUME CLASSIC A WASH of RaWL,KE Cl -1-1 aa INSIRUMNr 10000000lo1 T.M400V42143 L =5.00' R= 217.50' A-179102" Chord ft—N09-15'14 -W Chord Dist =5.00' ran-2.50' ALLEY VACATION EXHIBIT FROM RECORDS SHOWING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 10' ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN ROANOKE CITY TAX PARCEL NUMBERS 30421100 BE VACATED42112, & 3042143 CONTAINING 0.025 ACRE (1,066 S.F.) AND BEING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY SHOWN ON 'PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPERTY BELONGING TO ROBERT L. OFFUTT" MAP BOOK 1, PAGE 1261 CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DATED 01 -03 -19 JOB #04180100.00 SCALE: 1" = 10' 1p +� 63g3,P' rgss�� ��pp�S Np �F� p�FO J O T L1 S23'1303 5.00 L2 S65'46 57 0.23 L3 I S23'13 03 5.00 LEGEND O PUTTED CORNER v 2 v, ro NF n y !- ORN:MSS CHK:SCB TEL: 540- 772 -9580 FAX: 540 - 772 -8050 yZ r i r2�a PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS BAI "'Li1 Balzer & Associates, Inc. 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke Va. 24018 & ASSOCIATES Main Heating & Air Conditioning SUNTRUST BANK 1930 PATTERSON AVENUE, SVV 68- 002/510 ROANOKE, VA 24016 342 -1160 �IlI�nt,r; Treasurer itvofRoanoke P.O. Box 1451 Roanoke, VA 24007 17097 ?J�2019 "'`250.00 a a C a Fee for Alley Legal Advertisement��Cl�! -.'] 11'0 170 9 711■ 1:0 5 X0000 201: 000 71. 3 3 7 311' STI PNANIE M. MOON REVNOLD5, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerk(dlroanokeva.gov CF.CELIA F. MCCOV Deputy City Clerk March 20, 2019 CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Benjamin T. Crew Balzer and Associates, Inc. 1208 Corporate Circle, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Crew: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 41407 - 031819 rezoning certain properties located at 915, 0 (zero), 1001, 0 (zero), 0 (zero), 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N. E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels from 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 31674- 092793, adopted September 27, 1993, and 31731 - 102593 adopted October 25, 1993, to the extent that they placed certain conditions on the subject properties. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting IYeld on Monday, March 18, 2019, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. ASt incerel e anie M. Moon Reynold MMC City Clerk Enclosure pc: P. M. Properties, Inc., P. O. Box 385, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105 David M. Jones, 4422 Laurelwood Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RYT, LLC, 210 Carver Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 M & E Properties, LLC, P. O. Box 3511, Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 May Ram, LLC, 6022 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041 Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, 950 Orange Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., P. O. Box 2437, Smyrna, Georgia 30081 Deloris J. Johnson, 912 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Fredrick Murray, 113 Preston Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Nicole R. Bowyer, 3891 Hyde Park Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Genienne Lewis, 924 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Richard K. Stanley, 920 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Benjamin T. Crew March 20, 2019 Page 2 PC: Kelli D. Morgan, 930 Pocahontas Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24012 David Alan Wilcox, 934 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Barefoot Homes, LLC, 806 Day Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016 David and Kelly Nipper, 938 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission Robert S. Cowell, Jr., City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Christopher Chittum, Director, Planning Building & Development Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Brenda Hamilton, Circuit Court Clerk Timothy Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Evaluation Luke Pugh, City Engineer 40r IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41407 - 031819. AN ORDINANCE rezoning certain properties located at 915, 0 (zero), 1001, 0 (zero), 0 (zero), 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial- General District, with conditions; to I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial- General District, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 31674- 092793, adopted September 27, 1993, and 31731- 102593 adopted October 25, 1993, to the extent that they placed certain conditions on the subject properties; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Matthew W. King, on behalf of M &E Properties, LLC, has made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ( "City Council "), to have properties located at 915, 0 (zero), 1001, 0 (zero), 0 (zero), 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143, respectively, rezoned from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District, and to repeal Ordinance Nos. 31674- 092793, adopted September 27, 1993 and 31731 - 102593 adopted October 25, 1993, to 1 the extent that they placed certain conditions on the subject properties, bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, and 3042143; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on March 18, 2019, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of the subject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that Ordinance Nos. 31674- 092793, adopted September 27, 1993, and 31731- 102593 adopted October 25, 1993, to the extent they placed certain conditions on the subject properties, be repealed, and that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated February 15, 2019. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Ordinance Nos. 31674 - 092793, adopted September 27, 1993, and 31731- 102593 adopted October 25, 1993, to the extent that they placed certain conditions on properties located at 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101 and 3042143, respectively, are hereby REPEALED, and that Section 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect such action. 2. Section 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143, located at 915, 0 (zero), 1001, 0 (zero), 0 (zero), 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., respectively, and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels be, and is hereby rezoned from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to I -1, Light Industrial District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and CG, Commercial- General District, without conditions, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated February 15, 2019. 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: A4va", M. 1. t Crk. Rezone and repeal and replace proffers - pocahantas and orange.doc 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: M & E Properties, LLC, requests to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., bearing Official Tax Parcel Number: 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, and the portion of the alley requested for vacation, from 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. Summary: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 11, 2019. By a vote of 7 -0, the Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request, finding that the Amended Application No. 1 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan, and Zoning Ordinance as the subject property will be redeveloped and used in a manner appropriate to the surrounding area. Application Information: Request: Rezoning, not otherwise listed Rezoning, with conditions Applicant: M & E Properties, LLC. Owner: M & E Properties, LLC. Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC Agent: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c/o Ben Crew City Staff Person: Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Address: 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. Official Tax Nos.: 3042101 , 3042108, 3042109, 30421 10, 30421 1 1 , 3042112,3042143 Site Area: Relevant Plans: Proposed Land Use: Future Land Use: Filing Date: Background: +/- 5.4246 acres Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan Motor vehicle repair or other service Car wash Light Industrial General Commercial Single /Two family residential Original Application: January 29, 2019 Amended Application No. 1 : February 15, 2019 The proposed rezoning and repeal and proffer of conditions relate to two distinct business operations: 1. King Tire operating on property owned by M & E Properties, LLC - current parcels identified as Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 30421 10, 30421 1 1 , 30421 12. 2. Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke - current parcel identified as Official Tax No. 3042143. As shown on the development plan included in the application M & E Properties, LLC, is working with Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke to adjust the lot line between their properties. The M & E Properties, LLC, property that contains the primary King Tire operation (Official Tax No. 3042101) was rezoned from RM -1, Residential Multi- family, to LM, Light manufacturing, with conditions, in 1993 by Alan L. Amos Inc. for use as a contractor's shop. Over time, Alan Amos acquired the remaining properties extending to the east along Pocahontas Avenue. In 2007, Alan L. Amos, Inc., rezoned four of the more easterly properties (Official Tax Nos. 3042114 - 30421 1 7) from RM -1 , Residential Mixed Density to 1 -1, Light Industrial, with conditions. In 201 1 , M & E properties acquired the various properties owned by Alan L. Amos, Inc., and converted to the current use as a motor vehicle repair or service establishment. M & E Properties is now ready to develop the properties adjacent to its primary operation (3042108, 3042109, 30421 10, 3042111, and 30421 12) as there are no longer any residential occupants on the property. These parcels requested to be rezoned in this application are surrounded on 3 sides by the parcels rezoned in 1993 and 2007. The application also includes: • Rezoning a portion of this property to CG, Commercial General for transfer to and use by Southern Classic Auto Wash. 2 • Rezoning a portion of the Southern Classic property to 1 -1, Light Industrial, for use by M & E Properties. • Rezoning of a vacated portion of an alley to 1 -1, Light Industrial • Repeal of conditions on the main parcels (Official Tax No 3042101 and 3042143). • Applying new conditions to the entire property that will be zoned 1 -1. The tract of land currently identified by Official Tax No. 3042143 was rezoned from LM, Light Manufacturing, to C -2, General Commercial, with conditions, in 1993. The conditions limited the development of the property to a car wash use to be developed in a manner as shown on a proffered site plan. The current car wash building was constructed on the parcel in 1995 and has remained the same since that time. As part of this action, the conditions are proposed to be removed from this parcel. Proposed Use /Development: The proposed uses will remain that of a motor vehicle repair or service establishment and car wash. King Tire wishes to expand its current use by rezoning Official Tax Nos. 3042108-3042112 to support construction of an additional one -story 7,500 s.f. +/- storage building with employee and vehicle parking. Existing outdoor storage will remain, screened by a 6' earthen berm and double row of evergreen trees measured from the residential side of Pocahontas Ave. A 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed along the Pocahontas frontage west of the property entrance with a portion of the property being dedicated as public right -of -way. The development plan that is proffered shows the locations of existing and proposed buildings, driveways, parking, outdoor storage areas, and landscaping /screening. King Tire and Southern Classic Auto Wash wish to modify their existing property line between Official Tax No. 3042101, 3042143, and the vacated alley to better serve their uses and the existing topography. As part of this modification, both property owners wish to repeal the conditions established during the 1993 rezonings of both properties and establish new conditions on only the portion of the property to remain with M & E Properties, LLC (Area A as shown on Attachment C of the amended application). The conditions proposed to be repealed for Official Tax No. 3042101 are as follows: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition as Exhibit B, subject to changes required by the City during site plan review; 2. The property will not be used for laboratories or testing facilities, or scrap materials recycling establishments; 3. The property will not be used for outdoor advertising; 3 4. That a vegetative screen or hedge at least (6) six feet in height will be provided between any buildings located on the site and both Orange Avenue and Hollins Road; 5. That a ten (10) foot wide landscaped buffer which provides a dense, year - round visual and noise obstruction, not less than six (6) feet in height, will be provided along the Pocahontas Avenue right -of -way; 6. If no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from LM, Light Manufacturing District to RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the First Amended Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. The conditions proposed to be repealed for Official Tax No. 3042143 are as follows: 1. The property will be used for an automatic automobile washing facility and for no other purpose; 2. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; and 3. If no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from C -2, General Commercial District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District. The conditions proffered for Official Tax Nos. 3042101 (portion), 3042108, 3042109, 30421 10, 3042111, 30421 12, 3042143 (portion), and included vacated alley are as follows: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., entitled "King Tire Exhibit A" dated .January 26, 2019, subject to any changes that may be required by the City of Roanoke during comprehensive development plan review. 2. The property shall be used for only the following and additional uses: a. Business service establishment, not otherwise listed b. Employment or temporary labor service c. Financial institution d. Laboratory, dental, medical or optical e. Laboratory, testing and research f. Office, general or professional g. Office, general or professional, large scale h. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, no outdoor pens or runs i. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, with outdoor pens or runs ** j. Caterer, commercial k. Kennel, no outdoor pens or runs 0 I. Kennel, outdoor pens or runs ** m. Studio /multimedia production facility n. Contractor or tradesman's shop, general or special trade o. Internet sales establishment p. janitorial services establishment q. Motor vehicle repair or service establishment r. Welding or machine shop s. Workshop t. Fire, police, or emergency services u. Government offices or other government facility, not otherwise listed v. Wireless telecommunications facility, small cell on existing structure w. Wireless telecommunications facility, stealth x. Accessory uses, not otherwise listed in this table y. Outdoor storage z. Portable storage container ** Indicates a use permitted only by special exception. The majority of Southern Classic Auto Wash property (Areas B and D on Attachment C to the amended application), with the exception of the portion to become part of the King Tire property (Area C on Attachment C to the amended application) is proposed to have no conditions. Considerations: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses: The Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan proposes rezoning for residential uses over commercial /industrial as priority. The Plan's land use map recommends a mixture of light industrial, general commercial, single /two family residential for the area applying to be rezoned. While the properties north of the site along Pocahontas Avenue are residential, the properties surrounding the remaining three sides are commercial and industrial. The applicant has proffered conditions that the property will be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan and the property shall be limited to a number of uses. While outdoor storage exists on a portion of the residential parcels, the activity was not legally established and is located too close to the residential properties across the street. The proffered plan shows that a new building will house much of the material currently stored in outdoor shipping containers, moves the outdoor storage proposed to be in conformance with the current code by locating the outdoor storage behind the proposed building line, and adds a 6' berm with particular landscaping for screening. The list of additional uses are limited to those that would not significantly increase traffic, noise disturbance, emissions, or extend business hours beyond that of the current use so as not to jeopardize the character of the neighborhood. 5 Removing conditions from the Southern Classic Car Wash property is appropriate as the neighborhood plan calls for land use as general commercial and the current zoning ordinance has development standards that did not exist when the property was originally rezoned in 1993. Applicability /Appropriateness of Proposed Zoning District: The proposed change in zoning district is appropriate as an expansion of the current industrial use. The larger portion of the property has been operating as manufacturing or industrial since construction in 1993. Continued development of a block which is already largely industrial and commercial supports clustered development outlined in the Vision 2001 -2020 Comprehensive Plan and Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan design principles. The proposed buffer and landscaping will comply with Commercial Center and Corridor design principles that reduce parking spaces and maintain trees along street frontages. Industrial Center guidelines will also be upheld by shielding storage from public view and providing attractive perimeter fencing. Availability of Other Property: King Tire has been operating in its current location expanded to acquire adjacent properties to support lots are mostly vacant and difficult to be developed surrounding industrial and commercial businesses. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: for decades. It has its growth. The acquired to residential use due to the Both Vision 2001 -2020 and the Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan recognize that existing businesses should be supported in their growth in a manner that protects the character of the surrounding residential areas. Policy/Action ED P1. Economic base. Roanoke will have a sustainable, diverse economic base that supports target industries in biotechnology, optics, information, technology /software, transportation - related manufacturing and services, and supporting business services. ED P5. Industrial Development. Underutilized and vacant industrial sites will be evaluated and redevelopment encouraged. Local Plan I Applicability to matter Comprehensive Plan', pg. 59 Vision 2001 -2020, City of Roanoke. 2001 Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan, City of Roanoke, 2005 Rezoning will support the expansion of an existing industry in a clustered industrial /commercial area. The proposed development will also utilize vacant lots that are already surrounded on three sides by industrial use. While the parcel itself is not in an enterprise zone, it is adjacent to enterprise zone properties that are R Policy/Action policies and incentives and state economic incentives will strengthen the businesses and industries in the Enterprise Zones and provide jobs. Priority Initiative. Residential Development: Encourage new development per the Future land Use map and, in certain undeveloped areas, consider rezoning for residential development rather than commercial or industrial. Residential development policies promote new development that wisely uses limited land resources and promote appropriate new development on vacant parcels, while retaining neighborhood character. Economic development policies recommend that industrial uses should have sufficient land to operate and have minimal impact on adjoining properties. Efficient use of land to avoid expansion of commercial districts and rezoning of underutilized land are also encouraged. Comments on Application: Planning Commission Work Session: Plan I Applicability to matter The following items were discussed in the Planning Commission Work Session and should be addressed for compliance with City policy and ordinances. 1 . List of proposed uses in conjunction with doubling the area of property creates too intensive a use and industrial traffic next to residential; a list of less intensive and trafficked uses is more appropriate. Any uses proffered that are special exception uses in 1 -1 should be noted as "by special exception only" on the list. 2. We have not found in our records that the existing outdoor storage was ever legally established and it does not meet code as proposed, therefore, amend the development plan to comply with zoning ordinance. 17 targeted for economic revitalization. Hollins /Wildwood The residential portion of Area Plan, pg. 2. the property proposed to be Land use Map pg. rezoned will not be 13. developed in accordance with the future land use map. Hollins /Wildwood The proposed development Area Plan, pg. utilizes land that may 47. otherwise not be developed as residential. It also adheres to the current neighborhood character and development patterns. Hollins /Wildwood The proposed development Area Plan, pg. allows the business 48. operational room while utilizing land to avoid expansion. Impact on adjacent residential should be minimal, and is eased with screening berm and proffers. The following items were discussed in the Planning Commission Work Session and should be addressed for compliance with City policy and ordinances. 1 . List of proposed uses in conjunction with doubling the area of property creates too intensive a use and industrial traffic next to residential; a list of less intensive and trafficked uses is more appropriate. Any uses proffered that are special exception uses in 1 -1 should be noted as "by special exception only" on the list. 2. We have not found in our records that the existing outdoor storage was ever legally established and it does not meet code as proposed, therefore, amend the development plan to comply with zoning ordinance. 17 3. Berm height and screening should be measured from residential side of berm. Please show this on the development plan. Interdepartmental Comments: General comments were provided from the Fire Marshal's Office and Planning, Building, & Development related to the change of use, comprehensive development plan process, and other zoning items. Public Comments: No comments received. Planning Commission Public Hearing: Chris Craft, President of the Wildwood Civic League, stated that the organization recently expanded to include these properties and that they are making a positive recommendation on this and would request that the application for rezoning be approved. Conclusions and Recommendations: The proposed change in zoning allows an existing business to expand through the utilization of properties that will be difficult to develop as residential due to close proximity to commercial and industrial uses. The addition will allow better utilization of the site and indoor storage will improve compliance with the zoning code. The proposed development will be screened on the residential side by a 6 ft. berm with landscaping on the eastern side of the entrance, and will include right -of -way dedication and sidewalk improvements to the west of the entrance. With the conditions proffered limiting uses and additional measures to protect the adjacent residential use, the change is appropriate for the neighborhood. .James E. Smith, Chair City Planning Commission Enclosure: Attachment A, Zoning District Map Distribution: Robert S. Cowell, ,Jr., City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning, Building, & Development Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Timothy R. Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Matthew W. King, M & E Properties, LLC Nancy C. Alcom, Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc. .M.- 4- E u C13 4-J Z N 0 i z O 0 > oti; �L<%,*;; o 0 u CD V I m in o O er > 44 0 0 CD dQti 60-0 0 C4 IL 41 CD m R O LLI C�z -a o MN 1 6 4) LL C� 04 Z, 2, EL IL m L7 fo oj a m 4 'I LL LL U. CM o > U 4) *0 lb E ID 0 IV v c 2 K D cc x L) u x b 0 z CL M 0- o LC cc 03 < fx cr m m D U 1 10110 Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Filing Date: 2../S ZO 0. ® Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed Click Here to .Pnttt Submittal Number aA?�°NDFifj Amw4ftftf /vo, x❑ Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 915, 0,1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue NE, 950 Orange Avenue NE Official Tax No(s),: 13042101,3042108,3042109,3042110,3042111,3042112,3042143 - Portion of Existing Alley Existing (1 RM -1 Residential Mixed Density ❑x Without Conditions (1) Ordinance n/a zoning: (2 1 -1, Light Industrial ❑ With Conditions (2 & 3) No(s). (If (2) 31674- 092793 (3) CG- Commercial General Ej Planned Unit Development applicable): (3) 31731- 102593 Requested x❑ Without Conditions (2) Proposed Zoning: g (1 f -1, Light Industrial X With Conditions (1) ❑ Land Use: (1) Motor Vehicle Repair or Service (2 CG- Commercial General (No Conditions) E] Planned Unit Development (2)Car Wash 1 Name: M & E Properties, LLC Phone Number: +1 (304) 325 -0575 mail: ireman68 @Hotmaii.com Name: Address: n/a I Phone Number: E -mail: I — kppie ssian*m Name: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c/o Mr. Ben Crew Phone Number: +1 (540) 772 -9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 E -mail: Bcrew @Balzer.cc 215 Church Avenue, S'W, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) .853.1730 Filing Date. 'Z 15- f .2-01 Submittal Number [ Rezoning, Not Otherwise:t.isted' Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development fl Establishment of Comprehensive Sign overlay District Address; 0, 0,1.015 Pocahontars Avenue N5,950 ❑ Amendment of Proffered. Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan (Q Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District ue NE Official Tax No(s).i 042101, 304210$, 3042709, 3042110, 31642111, 21642112, 3042143' - Portion of Usting Ailey Existing 11 RMA Residential nixed Density 7 Without Conditions 0) ordinance (1) n/a Zoning: (2) 1 -1, Light industrial With Conditions (2 & 3) No(s): (if (2) 31674092793 (3 ) CG- Commercial General j] Planned Unit Development applicable). (3) 3x731- 102593 Requested Without Conditions A Proposed Zoning:.0)1 -1, Light Industrial 0 With Conditions (1) Land Use: (7) Motor Vehicle Repair (2 (CG - Cornmeraal General (No Conditions) 0 Planned Unit Development or Service (2) Car wash Name: Southern ClWlc Auto Wash of Roanoke, L LG Phone Number., ?40.580;7454 Address; 9 Avenue NE . Roanoke, VA 24012 E -maxi; Name: 'F& Properties, LLC c%Mr..Niatt King Phone Number: ±1 (304).325 =0575 Address: P.O. Box 3511 Rtuefteid, WV 24701 E -mail: Tireman68 @Hotmaii.com� Name: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c% Mr. Ben Crew Phone Number. +1 (540) 772 -9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circie'Roanake, VA 24018 E: mail: Bcrew @Baizer.cc Feb 14 19 12:51p Owner 540- 382 -1450 Zoning Amendment Application Department of Planning, Bulding and Development Room 170. Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Fling DatW 12/15/ 2019 R ONO "Oct all that nipho: ❑x Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed Submittal Number: Amended Application No. t px Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District P.1 Click Here to Print ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign overlay District Address: 1915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue NE, 950 Orange Avenue NE O{ficial Tax No(s).: 30,42101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143 - Portion of Existing Alley Existing (1 ) RM -1 Residential Mixed Density x Without Conditions (1) Ordinance (1) n/a Zoning: (2) I -1, Light Industrial (fix With Conditions (2 & 3) No(s). (If (2) 31674 -092793 (3 ) CG- Commercial General ❑ Planned Unit Development applicable). (3) 31731 - 102593 ® Without Conditions (2) Proposed Requested Zuni 1 Zoning: { } _l, Light Industrial x With Conddions (1) ❑ land Use. (1) Motvrveervi Repair or Service (2 (CG - Commercial General (No Conditions) [) Planned Unit Development (2) Car Wash PrQRem ffwner lnfannatione Name: Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC Phone Number. 540.560.1454 Address: 950 Orange Avenue NE Roanoke, VA 24012 E-mail: Name: f1A & E Properties, LLC c% Mr. Matt King Phone Number. +1 (304) 325-0575 Address: P.O. Box 3511 Bluefield, WV 24701 E -mail: lireman68 @Hotmail.com its S+r^A- uthoriized Ag nt Information ioMicablo Name: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c/o Mr. Ben Crew Phone Number. F+�1 (540) 772 -9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 E -mail: 1Bcrevv@Ba1zer,cc PROJECT NARRATIVE: The purpose of this request is for the construction of an additional one -story 7,500 s.f. +/- building for King Tire to consolidate inventory on -site. The request as outlined below is contained in two different parts: 1. The first part of the request is to remove existing proffered conditions for Tax Parcel 3042101 (Existing Zoning I1 with Conditions) and to amend the zoning on Tax Parcels 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, and 3042112 (Existing Zoning RM -1) located at the intersection of Hollins Road NE and Pocahontas Avenue NE. The overall tax parcel of 3042143 was rezoned by Ordinance # 31674- 092793 in 1993 by the former owner. M &E Properties, LLC (Owner and Applicant) purchased the property in November of 2011 to further expand their business of King Tire. Since 2011 the business has operated continuously on -site as a Motor Vehicle Repair or Service Establishment as outlined by the City of Roanoke zoning ordinance. All of the former residential buildings along Pocahontas Avenue on parcels owned by M &E Properties, LLC have been removed due to age /condition. The current application is proposing an additional storage building on -site along with employee and vehicle parking to serve the existing business. All of the above I1 with conditions and RM -1 zoned parcels are included in the proposed zoning designation of I1 - Light Industrial District with conditions to accommodate the proposed improvements. The existing alley being requested to be vacated under separate public hearing request will be amended to the same I1 zoning district with conditions. The adjacent property owner (Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC) is working with M &E Properties, LLC regarding a land swap of miscellaneous perimeter property to each party. These areas are outlined within the legal descriptions and are indicated to be rezoned as noted. 2. The second part of the request is to remove existing proffered conditions on Tax Parcel 3042143 from existing Ordinance # 31731 - 102593. This property is currently and will continue to operate a Southern Classic Car Wash. The zoning will remain as CG- Commercial General for the parcel. The two property owners (King Tire & Southern Classic Auto Wash) are working together to modify their existing property line to better serve and practically divide the existing properties based on the topography challenges of each parcel. Four legal descriptions have been provided that outline the specific zoning area. The Exhibit B plan provided as part of this request outlines the existing parcels and alley. The proposed one -story 7,500 s.f. +/- building will house the existing tire stock that are currently being stored in multiple storage containers on -site. The proposed building will comply with all building codes for construction including fire code requirements. These various building and site improvements will be provided during the comprehensive development plan phase of the project and provided to the City of Roanoke for review /approval. The building may contain additional service bays based on inventory stock. As the business has grown, additional storage needs have been identified along with parking for vehicles receiving service. The proposed configuration of improvements and design of the site have been provided as indicated on the development plan (Exhibit A). Exhibit A indicates the final development pattern and final lot configuration after combining subject parcels and the vacation of a portion of the adjacent public alley being requested under separate action. Exhibit B indicates all the existing parcels and alley to be vacated. The proposed improvements and sensitivity to the neighborhood to the north was an important consideration as the plan was developed. The building location, orientation and grading of the site were all taken into account to `mold' the development into the existing area of the business to limit any impacts on adjacent property owners. A combination of earthen berms and landscaping is proposed along the existing roadway directly in front of the proposed parking area, building, and existing outdoor storage area to provide a buffer between the proposed improvements and residents in the area. The improvements on -site will include grading the site to match the general grade of the existing buildings and parking areas on -site. This allows for the site to have a maximum screening between the property and Pocahontas Avenue and will provide for a more attractive overall development. The site is located within the neighborhood planning district of Hollins/Wildwood and this project exemplifies many of the qualities and attributes expressed within the neighborhood plan for future projects. This project further develops underutilized commercial property in an appropriate location and a site design that is sensitive to the surrounding properties. This project will be developed in accordance with all applicable regulations including, but not limited to, the Roanoke City Zoning Ordinance. In addition to the standard zoning requirements, the owner is providing a 6' tall landscape berm along with plantings along the existing right of way of Pocahontas Avenue. All Roanoke City Stormwater Management Design Manual requirements shall also be met for the project. PROFFERS TO BE REPEALED: (M & E Properties, LLC) The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number 3042101: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; 2. The property will not be used for laboratories or testing facilities, or scrap materials recycling establishments; 3. The property will not be used for outdoor advertising; 4. That a vegetative screen or hedge at least (6) six feet in height will be provided between any buildings located on the site site and both Orange Avenue and Hollins Road; 5. That a ten (10) foot wide landscaped buffer which provides a dense, year -round visual and noise obstruction, not less than six (6) feet in height, will be provided along the Pocahontas Avenue right -of -way; 6. If no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from LM, Light Manufacturing District to RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the First Amended Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. PROFFERS TO BE REPEALED: (Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke Valley, LLC) The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 31731 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number 3042143: 1. The property will be used for an automatic automobile washing facility and for no other purpose; 2. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; and if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from C -2, General Commercial District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. PROFFERED CONDITIONS: The applicant hereby agrees to proffer the following conditions as they apply to the overall future parcel area of 3.70 acre +/- parcel identified as Official Tax Numbers 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, including the vacated alley (Provided by separate request) 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. entitled "King Tire — Exhibit A" dated January 26, 2019, last revised February 14, 2019, subject to any changes that may be required by the City of Roanoke during comprehensive development plan review. 2. The property shall be used for only the following and additional uses: a. Business service establishment, not otherwise listed b. Employment or temporary labor service c. Financial institution d. Laboratory, dental, medical or optical e. Laboratory, testing and research f. Office, general or professional g. Office, general or professional, large scale h. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, no outdoor pens or runs i. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, with outdoor pens or runs ** j. Caterer, commercial k. Kennel, no outdoor pens or runs I. Kennel, outdoor pens or runs ** m. Studio /multimedia production facility n. Contractor or tradesman's shop, general or special trade o. Internet sales establishment p. Janitorial services establishment q. Motor vehicle repair or service establishment r. Welding or machine shop s. Workshop t. Fire, police, or emergency services u. Government offices or other government facility, not otherwise listed v. Wireless telecommunications facility, small cell on existing structure w. Wireless telecommunications facility, stealth x. Accessory uses, not otherwise listed in this table y. Outdoor storage z. Portable storage container ** Indicates a use permitted only by special exception. '3'N `133111S H104 r ♦ % I a - - -d , a 1 m Noil�nls7 � loN 3d n W013A30 navNia X ,p 3N 31N3/V SV1NOtlOOd SRaj- � � Q W 3NII ONH e a g '3'N `133111S H104 r ♦ % I a - - -d , a 1 Sy € €-`-- -� W z W g LU � m- Qa° - -- -- i Z z =a y i -- � x� �• it �~ ui W x- gg qtr •� .�� to - " - - -- ` / I fit— S N,K wv Sy N,K wv li All i : 3 €r# 0 �Ru W o li All i 3oa §g rxoexwuwnnun m o � R ms ay tC " NOLLoA1JVN D ilOd lON 1191HX3 9NINOZ 9NIlSIX3 `'X,`/ A2idNIWil3iJd ,.<o�$ 3N3fIN3AtlSW1NOHtlOOdSl6 W; I!. w 3MUL ONIm Mo. s i - -� "A •09 '3'N `133Hl.S H104 1 •_ 4` y 1 p 1 �aY I Y �_- - - I �~1 Y W z w z UA a3 a° r z O a U O a S1// I z ♦ zln Kzxv x3 ■ � 3 Y 6 "zrxrriszsums � 1- _ , ' � \ �, • R s1r2,-,a +\ `� ■ w � fp.o''- zu.`�'w ��ynli >t Z ao \ I • �,. J �4. ■ -' ► -F,10/ • J NIgPt �e Y a� 3� =h=am F �ry 5 �n w� -y VZ7 Vh vary n a v N o w o w w �e Y a� 3� 3'N `133NIS H101 8 v _•-- a6 '• . -- t—.ma� .aszsrcavJe_�_ Will i Ilk; ° • -arnv 3atTmr =- _ _ • g EN _____ SL j k Yg 6� S ■ � ��. i •R � t S 8 � `S ` � 0 1V dFNU � 2� r Z -- �z �i I 1 Q . Lu ox • � �fa'r MA' �- ••/ ROAp,p• / .mow nnnia • • Y nin' H� vnR" _ wa o $ n A; R Y _ &� S. -o for_ _fir N y S. .,.M - ao mss° ��_a�, ��_a� x�_.� ��° wo' ❑ -1 ❑ 1-1 W Q (' < < < < z W W W W W < < < < uu Q Q Q < s y NouonalsNO0 ao=1 loN NVId AD NOI1dIaOS34 lV931 AiItlNIWil32id X ,. wE 3N3NN3AVStlLJOHV00dSt6 8 WG lea= l` 31111 N MOP ff 3'N `133NIS H101 8 v _•-- a6 '• . -- t—.ma� .aszsrcavJe_�_ Will i Ilk; ° • -arnv 3atTmr =- _ _ • g EN _____ SL j k Yg 6� S ■ � ��. i •R � t S 8 � `S ` � 0 1V dFNU � 2� r Z -- �z �i I 1 Q . Lu ox • � �fa'r MA' �- ••/ ROAp,p• / .mow nnnia • • Y nin' H� vnR" _ wa o $ n A; R Y _ &� S. -o for_ _fir N y S. .,.M - ao mss° ��_a�, ��_a� x�_.� ��° wo' ❑ -1 ❑ 1-1 W Q (' < < < < z W W W W W < < < < uu Q Q Q < AREA A: (Rezoning Property from I -1 with conditions & RM -1 to 11 with conditions See Ex -C 'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 3.5533 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 003'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 141.81 FEET; THENCE N 13 °08'52" W A DISTANCE OF 113.75 FEET; THENCE N 01 011'43" W A DISTANCE OF 105.62 FEET TO POCAHONTAS AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD AND WITH POCAHONTS AVENUE N 89 °23'35" E A DISTANCE OF 381.62 FEET; THENCE N 79 °56'35" E A DISTANCE OF 194.33 FEET; THENCE S 67 °23'25" E A DISTANCE OF 29.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING POCAHONTAS AVENUE S 09 °49'35" W A DISTANCE OF 168.38 FEET; THENCE N 66 °46'57" W A DISTANCE OF 88.76 FEET; THENCE S 78 °46'06" W A DISTANCE OF 17.59 FEET; THENCE S 00 °36'25" E A DISTANCE OF 5.09 FEET; THENCE S 78 °46'06" W A DISTANCE OF 5.01 FEET; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 114.22 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF S 05 °07'55" W, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 112.91 FEET; THENCE S 54 046'58" W A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET; THENCE S 70 °10'23" W A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE S 82 °45'45" W A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE S 32 °20'39" W A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE S 78 °57'11" W A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 3.5533 ACRES OR 154,783 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA B: (Rezoning Property from 11 with conditions to CG See Ex -C 'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 0.3439 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 003'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 °57'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 °20'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 82 °45'45" E A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE N 70 010'23" E A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE N 54 °46'58" E A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET; THENCE WITH A A CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 387.84 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF S 71 °15'39" W, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 338.46 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 0.3439 ACRES OR 14,978 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA C: (Rezoning Property from CG with conditions to 11 with conditions See Ex -C 'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 0.1263 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 °03'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 °57'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 °20'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE N 82 °45'45" E A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE N 70 °10'23" E A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE N 54 °46'58" E A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 109.22 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF N 05 °47'26" E, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 108.08 FEET; THENCE N 78 °46'06" E A DISTANCE OF 20.61 FEET; THENCE S 66 °46'57" E A DISTANCE OF 85.89 FEET; THENCE WITH A LINE S 54 °46'58" W A DISTANCE OF 134.71 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 0.1263 ACRE OR 5,501 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA D: (Rezoning Property from CG with conditions to CG See Ex -C "Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 1.4190 ACRE TRACT: BEGINNING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 059'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 °03'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 021'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 °57'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 °20'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 387.84 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF N 71 °15'39" E, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 338.46 FEET; THENCE N 54 046'58" E A DISTANCE OF 134.71 FEET; THENCE S 10°03'28" W A DISTANCE OF 245.65 FEET; THENCE N 88 °50'32" W A DISTANCE OF 5.94 FEET; THENCE S 03 °33'27" E A DISTANCE OF 29.72 FEET; THENCE S 78 °14'06" W A DISTANCE OF 69.11 FEET; THENCE S 84 °57'33" W A DISTANCE OF 100.66 FEET; THENCE S 78 °23'56" W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 1.4190 ACRES OR 61,811 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. CITY OF ROANOYE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (703) 981 -2541 MARY F. PARKER City Clerk, CMC/AAE October 1, 1993 File #51 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney Woods, Rogers and Hazlegrove Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Layman: SANDRA H. EARN Deputy City Clerk I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 31674 - 092793 rezoning a 3.25 acre tract of land located at the southeast intersection of Hollins Road and Pocahontas Avenue, N. E. , described as Official. Tax Nos. 3042104 - 3042107, inclusive, and 3042121 - 3042129, inclusive, and an unnumbered circular parcel surrounded by Fairmont Place, from RM -1, Residential Multi - family, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioners. Ordinance No. 31674 - 092793 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on first reading on Monday, September 13, 1993, also adopted by the Council on second reading on Monday, September 27, 1993, and will take effect ten days following the date of its second reading. Sincerely, —1 P'4'_ Mary F. Parker, CMC /AAE City Clerk MFP: sm Enc . ` Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney October 1, 1993 Page 2 PC : Southern Classic Soft Cloth Auto Wash, Inc., 2855 N. Franklin Street, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073 Ms. Mary C. Gardner, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Fredrick Murray, 113 Preston Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. George S. Plaganes, 916 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Terry P. Griswold, 924 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. and Mrs. Mark A. Smith, 930 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Brabham Petroleum Company, P. O. Box 218, Vinton, Virginia 24179 Ms. Elizabeth B. Gibson, 3621 Poplar Drive, S. W. , Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Mr. Allen B. Fine, P. O. Box 13326, Richmond, Virginia 23225 Mr. Howard Kirby, 25 Westbury Drive, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003 Neva H . Smith, Executive Director, City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 2624 Salem Turnpike, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation William F. Clark, Director of Public Works Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Charles M. Huffine, City Engineer Ronald H. Miller, Building Commissioner John R. Marlles, Agent, City Planning Commission Evelyn D. Dorsey, Acting Zoning Administrator Doris K. Layne, Real Estate Appraiser Aide IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 27th day of September, 1993. No. 31674- 092793. AN ORDINANCE to amend §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304, Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, to rezone certain property within the City, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant. WHEREAS, application has been made to the Council of the City of Roanoke to have the hereinafter described property rezoned from RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, which after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by $36.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on said application at its meeting on September 13, 1993, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 536.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to the Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, be amended in the following particular and no other: A 3.25 -acre tract of land located at the southeast intersection of Hollins Road and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and designated on Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, as Official Tax Nos. 3042104 - 3042107, inclusive, and 3042121 - 3042129, inclusive, and the unnumbered circular parcel surrounded by Fairmont Place, be, and are hereby rezoned from RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to the following proffers: (1) the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; (2) the property will not be used for laboratories or testing facilities, or scrap materials recycling establishments; (3) the property will not be used for outdoor advertising; ( 4 ) that a vegetative screen or hedge at least six (6) feet in height will be provided between any buildings located on the site and both Orange Avenue and Hollins Road; (5) that a ten (10) foot wide landscaped buffer which provides a dense, year -round visual and noise obstruction, not less than six (6) feet in height, will be provided along the Pocahontas Avenue right -of -way; and (6) if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from LM, Light Manufacturing District to RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, without further action required + by City Council, as more fully set forth in the First Amended Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. ATTEST: City Clerk. MARY F. PARKER City Clerk, CMC /AAE CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (703) 981-2541 October 26, 1993 File #51 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney Woods, Rogers and Hazlegrove P. O. Box 14125 Roanoke, Virginia 24038 Dear Mr. Layman: SANDRA H. EAKIN Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 31731 - 102593 rezoning a tract of land located at the northeast corner of Hollins Road and Orange Avenue, N. E., bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042143 and 3042120, from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2, General Commercial District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioner. Ordinance No. 31731 - 102593 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on first reading on Monday, October 11, 1993, also adopted by the Council on second reading on Monday, October 25, 1993, and will take effect ten days following the date of its second reading. Sincerely, C/AAE Mary F . Parker, C City Clerk MFP : sm Enc . pe : Ms. Mary C. Gardner, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E . , Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Brabham Petroleum Co., P.O. Box 218, Vinton, Virginia 24179 Mr. and Mrs. John S. Robertson, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. James R. Shively, P. O. Box 8691, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Mr. Robert L. Offutt, 405 Pomona Drive, Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney October 26, 1993 Page 2 PC- Mr. and Mrs. John E. Thornhill, 3915 Winding Way Road, S. W . , Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Exxon Corporation, P. O. Box 53, Houston, Texas 77001 Virginia Foundry Company, P. O. Box 12806, Roanoke, Virginia 24028 Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 300 Technology Court, Smyrna, Georgia 30082 W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation Doris K. Layne, Appraiser Aide, Real Estate Valuation William F. Clark, Director of Public Works Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Charles M. Huffine, City Engineer Ronald H. Miller, Building Commissioner John R. Marlles, Agent, City Planning Commission Evelyn D. Dorsey, Acting Zoning Administrator sj IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 25th day of October, 1993. No. 31731- 102593. AN ORDINANCE to amend 536.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304, Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, to rezone certain property within the City, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant. WHEREAS, application has been made to the Council of the City of Roanoke to have the hereinafter described property rezoned from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2, General Commercial District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, which after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by 536.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on said application at its meeting on October 11, 1993, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 536.1 -593, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to the Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, be amended in the following particular and no other: A tract of land located at the northeast corner of Hollins Road and Orange Avenue, N.E., and designated on Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, as Official Tax Nos. 3042143 and 3042120, be, and is hereby rezoned from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2 General Commercial District, subject to the following proffers: (1) the property will be used for an automatic automobile washing facility and for no other purpose; (2) the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; and (3) if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from C -2, General Commercial District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. ATTEST: City Clerk. ZONING DISTRICT MAP 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0,1015 Pocahontas Ave NE, & 950 Orange Ave NE, & Alley Req. to be vacated Official Tax Parcels: 3042101,3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143 & Alley Req. to be Vacated C3 Area to be Rezoned Zoning AD: Airport Dev - CG: Commercial - General - CLS: Commercial -Large Site CN: Commercial- Neighborhood - D: Downtown ® 1 -1: Light Industrial ® 1 -2: Heavy Industrial - IN: Institutional M3 INPUD: Institutional Planned Unit Dev - IPUD: Industrial Planned Unit Dev ® MX: Mixed Use MXPUD: Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev R -12: Res Single - Family R -3: Res Single - Family R -5: Res Single - Family R -7: Res Single - Family RA: Res - Agricultural RM -1: Res Mixed Density RM -2: Res Mixed Density RMF: Res Multifamily ROS: Recreation and Open Space - UF: Urban Flex Conditional Zoning N 0 100 200 Feet i 2 i i --i A Adjoining Property Owners for 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, NE and 950 Orange Avenue, NE TAXID MailAddress MailCity St MailZip LocalAddress LocalCity Zip Ownerl 3030403 PO BOX 385 ALLENTOWN PA 18105 815 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24016 P M PROPERTIES INC 3041221 4422 LAURELWOOD DR ROANOKE VA 24018 812 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 JONES DAVID M 3042003 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE RYT LLC 3042004 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE IR Y T LLC 3042007 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 811 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 RYT LLC 3042008 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 816 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE RYT LLC 3042101 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 915 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042101 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 915 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042108 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE jM & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042109 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 1001 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042110 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 24701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042111 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 124701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042112 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 124701 1015 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042114 PO BOX 3511 BLUEFIELD WV 124701 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE M & E PROPERTIES LLC 3042133 6022 COLUMBIA PIKE FALLS CHURCH VA 22041 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE MAY RAM LLC 3042134 6022 COLUMBIA PIKE FALLS CHURCH VA 22041 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE MAY RAM LLC 3042142X 6022 COLUMBIA PIKE FALLS CHURCH VA 22041 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE MAY RAM LLC 3042143 950 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE VA 124012 950 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 SOUTHERN CLASSIC AUTO WASH OF ROANOK 3050207 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 124012 1109 HOLLINS RD NE ROANOKE 24012 R Y T LLC 3050315 PO BOX 2437 SMYRNA GA 30081 1021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC 3061313 113 PRESTON AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE MURRAY FREDRICK 3061314 113 PRESTON AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE MURRAY FREDRICK 3061315 912 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 -5832 912 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE lJOHNSON DELORIS J 3061316 3891 HYDE PARK DR ROANOKE VA 124018 916 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 BOWYER NICOLE R 3061317 920 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 920 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE STANLEY RICHARD K 3061318 924 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 924 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 LEWIS GENIENNE 3061320 930 POCAHONTAS AVE ROANOKE VA 24012 930 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 MORGAN KELLI D 3061321 934 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 934 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE 24000 WILCOX DAVID ALAN 3061323 938 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE VA 124012 938 POCAHONTAS AVE NE ROANOKE NIPPER DAVID L & KELLY B 3061324 806 DAY AVE SW IROANOKE VA 24016 0 POCAHONTAS AV NE ROANOKE BAREFOOT HOMES LLC 3061325 1806 DAY AVE SW IROANOKE VA 124016 11404 10TH ST NE ROANOKE 124012 BAREFOOT HOMES LLC J PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3042143) in Ordinance No. 31731 - 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial- General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single /Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses proposed are an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single- Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853 -2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot. Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, February 26, 2019, and Tuesday, March 5, 2019. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 tina.carr�cr roanokcva.g Donna M. Payne Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 ci�mna.t)aync(ebroatiokeva.L,ov_ Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 CITY OF ROANOKE - PDB Attn Tina Carr STEPHANIE MOON, CITY CLERK 215 CHURCH AVE, SW, SUITE 456 ROANOKE, VA 24011 The Roanoke Times Account Number Roanoke, Virginia 6011439 Affidavit of Publication _.. - - -- - - - - - -- l Date March 05, 2019 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/05/2019 Legal Notices PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised hi 1 x 175 L 1,666.00 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A was published in said newspapers on the following dates: 02/26, 03105/2019 The First insertion being given ... 02/26/2019 Newspaper reference: 0000902517 Billing Representative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, March 5, 2019 Notary Public State of Virginia City/ un of Roanoke My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E.. and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from 1.1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM- 1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1.1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3042143) in Ordinance No. 31731- 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial - General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single/Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses Proposed are an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853.2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals (902517) LX Lr i CI" rp STEPHANIE NI. MOON REYNOLDS, NINIC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkCroanokeva.gov CECELIA F. NICCOY Deputy City Clerk February 28, 2019 CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Benjamin T. Crew Balzer and Associates Inc. 1208 Corporate Circle, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Crew: A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding your request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, respectively, from Light Industrial District, with conditions; Residential Mixed Density District; and Commercial - General District, with conditions; to Light Industrial District, with conditions; and Commercial - General District. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on Monday, March 11. If you have questions regarding the Planning Commission public hearing, please contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. Questions regarding the City Council public hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541. Sincerely, Stephanie M. Moon Reyno MMC City Clerk Enclosure c: Wilbert Snider, President, Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke Valley, LLC, 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Matthew W. King, M & E Properties, LLC, P. O. Box 3511, Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 STEPHANIE 111. MOON REYNOLDS, NINIC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE RYT, LLC OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May Ram, LLC 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Genienne Lewis Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Kelli D. Morgan Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 David Alan Wilcox Fax: (540) 853 -1145 David L. and Kelly B. Nipper E -mail: clerkCa roanokeva.gov CECELIA F. NICCOY Deputy City Clerk February 28, 2019 CECELIA T. NN EBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk P. M. Properties, Inc. RYT, LLC David M. Jones May Ram, LLC Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. Genienne Lewis Fredrick Murray Kelli D. Morgan Deloris J. Johnson David Alan Wilcox Nicole R. Bowyer David L. and Kelly B. Nipper Richard K. Stanley Barefoot Homes, LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding a request of M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, respectively, from Light Industrial District, with conditions; Residential Mixed Density District; and Commercial - General District, with conditions; to Light Industrial District, with conditions; and Commercial - General District. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on March 11. This letter is provided for your information a: owner. If you have questions regarding the contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Questions regarding the City Council public Office at (540) 853 -2541. Enclosure an interested party and /or adjoining property Planning Commission public hearing, please Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Sincerely, .4, Stephanie M. Moon Reynol M City Clerk Department of Planning, Building and Development / Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building JAN 2 8' 2019 �� ZA q " 00� �f r 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 CITY OF ROANOKE Click Here to Print Phone: (540) 853 -1730 PLANNING BUILDING 8 Filing Date: anuary 28, 2019 �1 Submittal Number: Original Application I ® Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed ❑Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District _ .. '.,4...14 _ 11.i'- ±.1_1,1.._. I _':AT ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 1915, 0,1001, 0, 0,1015 Pocahontas Avenue NE, 950 Orange Avenue NE Official Tax No(s).: 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143 - Portion of Existing Alley Existing (1 ) RM -1 Residential Mixed Density ❑x Without Conditions (1) Ordinance (1) n/a Zoning: (2) 1 -1, Light Industrial ❑ With Conditions (2 & 3) No(s). (If (2) 31674 - 092793 (3) CG- Commercial General ❑ Planned Unit Development applicable): (3) 31731- 102593 Requested ❑x Without Conditions (2) Proposed Zoning: (1) 1-1, Light Industrial Q With Conditions (1) Land Use: (1) Motor Vehicle Repair (2 (CG - Commercial General (No Conditions) [] Planned Unit Development or Service (2) Car Wash Name: Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke Valley, LLC Phone Number: 540.580.1454 Address: 950 Orange Avenue NE Roanoke, VA 24012 E -mail: �— Name: M & E Properties, LLC c/o Mr. Matt King Phone Number; +1(304) 325 -0575 Address: P.O. Box 3511 Bluefield, WV 24701 E -mail: ireman68 @Hotmail.com J AoCB h $gllebltK Name: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c/o Mr. Ben Crew Phone Number: +1(540) 772 -9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 E -mail: Facrew@Balzer.cc Auftmed tWe SgnsWm:. Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 Filing Date:lanuary 28, 2019 Submittal Number: Frl�lnal Application Rsast [seitaet �!l:L.i�.Rl>l�t ® Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed ❑x Rezoning, Conditional ❑ Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District 71_1 _ r7u-7777 3 Z 1. Click Hereto Print ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign overlay District Address: 1915,o, 1001,0, 0,1015 Pocahontas Avenue NE, 950 Orange Avenue NE Official Tax No(s).: 13042101,3042108,3042109,3042110,3042111,3042112,3042143 -Portion of Existing Alley Existing 0 RM -1 Residential Mixed Density ❑x Without Conditions (1) Ordinance ) n/a Zoning: (2 I -1, Light Industrial 0 With Conditions (2 & 3) No(s). (If (2) 31674- 092793 (3) CG- Commercial General ❑ Planned Unit Development applicable)' 3 31731 - 102593 Requested x❑ Without Conditions (2) Proposed Zoning: 1 1 -1, Light Industrial ( 9 ❑x With Conditions (1) Land Use (1) Motor Vehicle Repair or Service (2 1 CG - Commercial General (No Conditions) ❑ Planned Unit Development (2)Car Wash Name: M & E Properties, LLC I Phone Number. 1+1 (304) 325 -0575 Address: P.O. Box 3511 Bluefield, WV 24701 E -mail: ireman68 @Hotmail.com �� /ld Name: n/a Phone Number: -�� Address: E -mail: Name: Balzer and Associates, Inc. c/o Mr. Ben Crew Phone Number. +1 (540) 772 -9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 E -mail: Screw @Balzer.cc PROJECT NARRATIVE: The purpose of this request is for the construction of an additional one -story 7,500 s.f. +/- building for King Tire to consolidate inventory on -site. The request as outlined below is contained in two different parts: The first part of the request is to remove existing proffered conditions for Tax Parcel 3042101 (Existing Zoning Il with Conditions) and to amend the zoning on Tax Parcels 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, and 3042112 (Existing Zoning RM -1) located at the intersection of Hollins Road NE and Pocahontas Avenue NE. The overall tax parcel of 3042143 was rezoned by Ordinance # 31674- 092793 in 1993 by the former owner. M &E Properties, LLC (Owner and Applicant) purchased the property in November of 2011 to further expand their business of King Tire. Since 2011 the business has operated continuously on -site as a Motor Vehicle Repair or Service Establishment as outlined by the City of Roanoke zoning ordinance. All of the former residential buildings along Pocahontas Avenue on parcels owned by M &E Properties, LLC have been removed due to age /condition. The current application is proposing an additional storage building on -site along with employee and vehicle parking to serve the existing business. All of the above I1 with conditions and RM -1 zoned parcels are included in the proposed zoning designation of I1 - Light Industrial District with conditions to accommodate the proposed improvements. The existing alley being requested to be vacated under separate public hearing request will be amended to the same I1 zoning district with conditions. The adjacent property owner (Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC) is working with M &E Properties, LLC regarding a land swap of miscellaneous perimeter property to each party. These areas are outlined within the legal descriptions and are indicated to be rezoned as noted. 2. The second part of the request is to remove existing proffered conditions on Tax Parcel 3042143 from existing Ordinance # 31731 - 102593. This property is currently and will continue to operate a Southern Classic Car Wash. The zoning will remain as CG- Commercial General for the parcel. The two property owners (King Tire & Southern Classic Auto Wash) are working together to modify their existing property line to better serve and practically divide the existing properties based on the topography challenges of each parcel. Four legal descriptions have been provided that outline the specific zoning area. The Exhibit B plan provided as part of this request outlines the existing parcels and alley. The proposed one -story 7,500 s.f. +/- building will house the existing tire stock that are currently being stored in multiple storage containers on -site. The proposed building will comply with all building codes for construction including fire code requirements. These various building and site improvements will be provided during the comprehensive development plan phase of the project and provided to the City of Roanoke for review /approval. The building may contain additional service bays based on inventory stock. As the business has grown, additional storage needs have been identified along with parking for vehicles receiving service. The proposed configuration of improvements and design of the site have been provided as indicated on the development plan (Exhibit A). Exhibit A indicates the final development pattern and final lot configuration after combining subject parcels and the vacation of a portion of the adjacent public alley being requested under separate action. Exhibit B indicates all the existing parcels and alley to be vacated. The proposed improvements and sensitivity to the neighborhood to the north was an important consideration as the plan was developed. The building location, orientation and grading of the site were all taken into account to `mold' the development into the existing area of the business to limit any impacts on adjacent property owners. A combination of earthen berms and landscaping is proposed along the existing roadway directly in front of the proposed parking area, building, and existing outdoor storage area to provide a buffer between the proposed improvements and residents in the area. The improvements on -site will include grading the site to match the general grade of the existing buildings and parking areas on -site. This allows for the site to have a maximum screening between the property and Pocahontas Avenue and will provide for a more attractive overall development. The site is located within the neighborhood planning district of Hollins /Wildwood and this project exemplifies many of the qualities and attributes expressed within the neighborhood plan for future projects. This project further develops underutilized commercial property in an appropriate location and a site design that is sensitive to the surrounding properties. This project will be developed in accordance with all applicable regulations including, but not limited to, the Roanoke City Zoning Ordinance. In addition to the standard zoning requirements, the owner is providing a 6' tall landscape berm along with plantings along the existing right of way of Pocahontas Avenue. All Roanoke City Stormwater Management Design Manual requirements shall also be met for the project. PROFFERS TO BE REPEALED: (M & E Properties, LLC) The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number 3042101: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; 2. The property will not be used for laboratories or testing facilities, or scrap materials recycling establishments; 3. The property will not be used for outdoor advertising; 4. That a vegetative screen or hedge at least (6) six feet in height will be provided between any buildings located on the site site and both Orange Avenue and Hollins Road; S. That a ten (10) foot wide landscaped buffer which provides a dense, year -round visual and noise obstruction, not less than six (6) feet in height, will be provided along the Pocahontas Avenue right-of-way; 6. If no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from LM, Light Manufacturing District to RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the First Amended Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. PROFFERS TO BE REPEALED: (Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke Valley, LLC) The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 31731 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number 3042143: 1. The properly will be used for an automatic automobile washing facility and for no other purpose; 2. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; and if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from C -2, General Commercial District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. PROFFERED CONDITIONS: The applicant hereby agrees to proffer the following conditions as they apply to the overall future parcel area of 3.70 acre +/- parcel identified as Official Tax Numbers 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, including the vacated alley (Provided by separate request) 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. entitled "King Tire — Exhibit A" dated January 26, 2019, subject to any changes that may be required by the City of Roanoke during comprehensive development plan review. 2. The property shall be used for only the following and additional uses: a. Business service establishment, not otherwise listed b. Employment or temporary labor service c. Financial institution d. Laboratory, dental, medical or optical e. Laboratory, testing and research f. Office, general or professional g. Office, general or professional, large scale h. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, no outdoor pens or runs i. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic, with outdoor pens or runs j. Caterer, commercial k. Kennel, no outdoor pens or runs I. Kennel, outdoor pens or runs m. Studio /multimedia production facility n. Building supplies and materials, retail o. Commercial motor vehicle rental establishment p. Commercial motor vehicle sales and service establishment, new q. Commercial motor vehicle sales and service establishment, used r. Contractor or tradesman's shop, general or special trade s. General service establishment, not otherwise listed t. Internet sales establishment u. Janitorial services establishment v. Lumberyard w. Manufactured or mobile home sales x. Motor vehicle rental establishment, without inventory on -site y. Motor vehicle rental establishment, with inventory on -site z. Motor vehicle repair or service establishment aa. Nursery or greenhouse, commercial bb. Recreational vehicle or boat sales cc. Retail sales establishment, not otherwise listed dd. Storage building sales ee. Building supplies and materials, wholesale ff. Commercial printing establishment gg. Contractor's shop, heavy construction hh. Electrical component assembly, wholesale distribution ii. Manufacturing: Beverage or food processing, excluding poultry and animal slaughtering and dressing jj. Manufacturing: General, not otherwise listed in this table kk. Manufacturing: Steel or metal production, fabrication, or processing II. Manufacturing: Wood products mm. Motor vehicle or trailer painting and body repair nn. Welding or machine shop oo. Workshop Pp. Distribution center, not otherwise listed qq. Warehouse rr. Eating establishment ss. Eating and drinking establishment, abutting a residential district ft. Health and fitness center uu. Microbrewery or microdistillery vv. Park or playground ww. Recreation, indoor xx. Recreation, outdoor yy. Theater, movie of performing arts zz. Artist studio aaa. Educational facilities, business school or nonindustrial trade school bbb. Educational facilities, industrial trade school ccc. Educational facilities, school for the arts ddd. Fire, police, or emergency services eee. Government offices or other government facility, not otherwise listed fff. Military reserve or National Guard center ggg. Post office hhh. Supply pantry iii. Training facility for police, fire, or emergency services A. Airport or airport- related commercial and personal service uses kkk. Bus maintenance, including repair and storage III. Limousine service mmm. Motor freight terminal or truck terminal nnn. Taxicab business 000. Wireless telecommunications facility, small cell on existing structure ppp. Wireless telecommunications facility, stealth qqq. Wireless telecommunications facility, not otherwise listed rrr. Accessory uses, not otherwise listed in this table sss. Outdoor storage ttt. Portable storage container Page 212 ,&O-41nw vig &ASBOCIATBB Lu EX-A S §4�7 ul� POCAHONTAS AVENUE, N.E. w4 K . S 0 E S2 RIM !!m 4fft LEGEND AREA A; AREA B: El AREA C: AREA 0: 1-1 1 - vi Lu cc N- ......... SME: 1* - M' oRjk9Gv -tAuf &PA�LATBG 0 EX-C AREA A: (Rezoning Property from 1 -1 with conditions & RM -1 to 11 with conditions See Ex- C'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 3.5533 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 °03'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 141.81 FEET; THENCE N 13 °08'52" W A DISTANCE OF 113.75 FEET; THENCE N 01 011'43" W A DISTANCE OF 105.62 FEET TO POCAHONTAS AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD AND WITH POCAHONTS AVENUE N 89 °23'35" E A DISTANCE OF 381.62 FEET; THENCE N 79 °56'35" E A DISTANCE OF 194.33 FEET; THENCE S 67 °23'25" E A DISTANCE OF 29.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING POCAHONTAS AVENUE S 09 °49'35" W A DISTANCE OF 168.38 FEET; THENCE N 66 046'57" W A DISTANCE OF 88.76 FEET; THENCE S 78 °46'06" W A DISTANCE OF 17.59 FEET; THENCE S 00 °36'25" E A DISTANCE OF 5.09 FEET; THENCE S 78 °46'06" W A DISTANCE OF 5.01 FEET; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 114.22 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF S 05 °07'55" W, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 112.91 FEET; THENCE S 54 °46'58" W A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET; THENCE S 70 °10'23" W A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE S 82 °45'45" W A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE S 32 °20'39" W A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE S 78 °57'11" W A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 3.5533 ACRES OR 154,783 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA B: (Rezoning Property from 11 with conditions to CG See Ex- C'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 0.3439 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 003'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET, THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 °57'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 020'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 82 °45'45" E A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE N 70 °10'23" E A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE N 54 °46'58" E A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET, THENCE WITH A A CURVE TURNING TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 387.84 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF S 71'15'39" W, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 338.46 FEET, WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 0.3439 ACRES OR 14,978 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA C: (Rezoning Property from CG with conditions to 11 with conditions See Ex- C'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 0.1263 ACRE TRACT: COMMENCING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 °59'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET; THENCE N 18 003'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 °57'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 °20'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE N 82 °45'45" E A DISTANCE OF 83.49 FEET; THENCE N 70 °10'23" E A DISTANCE OF 214.16 FEET; THENCE N 54 °46'58" E A DISTANCE OF 44.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 109.22 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF N 05 °4726" E, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 108.08 FEET; THENCE N 78 °46'06" E A DISTANCE OF 20.61 FEET, THENCE S 66 °4657" E A DISTANCE OF 85.89 FEET; THENCE WITH A LINE S 54 °46'58" W A DISTANCE OF 134.71 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 0.1263 ACRE OR 5,501 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. AREA D: (Rezoning Property from CG with conditions to CG See Ex- C'Legal Description Key Plan' for additional location details) DESCRIPTION OF 1.4190 ACRE TRACT: BEGINNING AT A POINT ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE AVENUE, N.E. AT ITS NORTHEASTERY INTERSECTION WITH HOLLINS ROAD, N.E.; THENCE WITH HOLLINS ROAD N 59 059'08" W A DISTANCE OF 49.11 FEET; THENCE N 22 °02'27" W A DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET, THENCE N 18 °03'30" W A DISTANCE OF 5.97 FEET; THENCE N 31 °48'10" W A DISTANCE OF 6.77 FEET; THENCE N 18 °21'04" W A DISTANCE OF 44.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING HOLLINS ROAD N 78 057'11" E A DISTANCE OF 62.43 FEET; THENCE N 32 °20'39" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE WITH A CURVE TURNING TO THE LEFT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 387.84 FEET, WITH A RADIUS OF 217.50 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF N 71 °15'39" E, WITH A CHORD LENGTH OF 338.46 FEET; THENCE N 54 °46'58" E A DISTANCE OF 134.71 FEET; THENCE S 10 003'28" W A DISTANCE OF 245.65 FEET; THENCE N 88 °50'32" W A DISTANCE OF 5.94 FEET; THENCE S 03 °33'27" E A DISTANCE OF 29.72 FEET; THENCE S 78 °14'06" W A DISTANCE OF 69.11 FEET; THENCE S 84 °57'33" W A DISTANCE OF 100.66 FEET; THENCE S 78 °23'56" W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 1.4190 ACRES OR 61,811 SQUARE FEET AND LYING IN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. CI3'Y OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone; (703) 981 -2541 MARY F. PARKER City Clerk, CMC /AAE October 1, 1993 File #51 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney Woods, Rogers and Hazlegrove Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Layman: SANDRA H. EAKIN Deputy City Clerk I am attaching copy of Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 rezoning a 3.25 acre tract of land located at the southeast intersection of Hollins Road and Pocahontas Avenue, N. E. , described as Official Tax Nos. 3042104 - 3042107, inclusive, and 3042121 - 3042129, inclusive, and an unnumbered circular parcel surrounded by Fairmont Place, from RM -1, Residential Multi - family, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioners. Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on first reading on Monday, September 13, 1993, also adopted by the Council on second reading on Monday, September 27, 1993, and will take effect ten days following the date of its second reading. Sincerely, ,_- � _y' pa��_ Mary F. Parker, CMC /AAE City Clerk MFP: sm Enc . Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney October 1, 1993 Page 2 PC: Southern Classic Soft Cloth Auto Wash, Inc., 2855 N. Franklin Street, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073 Ms. Mary C. Gardner, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Fredrick Murray, 113 Preston Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. George S. Plaganes, 916 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. Terry P. Griswold, 924 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. and Mrs. Mark A. Smith, 930 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Brabham Petroleum Company, P. O. Box 218, Vinton, Virginia 24179 Ms. Elizabeth B. Gibson, 3621 Poplar Drive, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Mr. Allen B. Fine, P. O. Box 13326, Richmond, Virginia 23225 Mr. Howard Kirby, 25 Westbury Drive, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003 Neva H. Smith, Executive Director, City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 2624 Salem Turnpike, N. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24017 W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr . , City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation William F. Clark, Director of Public Works Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Charles M. Huffine, City Engineer Ronald H. Miller, Building Commissioner John R. Marlles, Agent, City Planning Commission Evelyn D. Dorsey, Acting Zoning Administrator Doris K. Layne, Real Estate Appraiser Aide IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 27th day of September, 1993. No. 31674- 092793. AN ORDINANCE to amend §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304, Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, to rezone certain property within the City, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant. WHEREAS, application has been made to the Council of the City of Roanoke to have the hereinafter described property rezoned from RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, which after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on said application at its meeting on September 13, 1993, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 536.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to the Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that 936.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, be amended in the following particular and no other: A 3.25-acre tract of land located at the southeast intersection of Hollins Road and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and designated on Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, as Official Tax Nos. 3042104 - 3042107, inclusive, and 3042121 - 3042129, inclusive, and the unnumbered circular parcel surrounded by Fairmont Place, be, and are hereby rezoned from RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, subject to the following proffers: (1) the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition as Exhibit H, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; (2) the property will not be used for laboratories or testing facilities, or scrap materials recycling establishments; (3) the property will not be used for outdoor advertising; ( 4 ) that a vegetative screen or hedge at least six (6) feet in height will be provided between any buildings located on the site and both Orange Avenue and Hollins Road; (5) that a ten (10) foot wide landscaped buffer which provides a dense, year -round visual and noise obstruction, not less than six (6) feet in height, will be provided along the Pocahontas Avenue right -of -way; and (6) if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from LM, Light Manufacturing District to RM -1, Residential Multifamily, Low Density District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the First Amended Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. ATTEST: City Clerk. MARY F. PARKER City Clerk, CMC /AAE CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Telephone: (703) 981-2541 October 26, 1993 File #51 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney Woods, Rogers and Hazlegrove P. O. Box 14125 Roanoke, Virginia 24038 Dear Mr. Layman: SANDRA H. EAKIN Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 31731 - 102593 rezoning a tract of land located at the northeast corner of Hollins Road and Orange Avenue, N. E., bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042143 and 3042120, from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2, General Commercial District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioner. Ordinance No. 31731 - 102593 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on first reading on Monday, October 11, 1993, also adopted by the Council on second reading on Monday, October 25, 1993, and will take effect ten days following the date of its second reading. Sincerely, Mary F. Parker, C C /AAE City Clerk MFP : sm Enc . pe : Ms. Mary C. Gardner, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E . , Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Brabham Petroleum Co., P.O. Box 218, Vinton, Virginia 24179 Mr. and Mrs. John S. Robertson, 1001 Pocahontas Avenue, N. E . , Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mr. dames R. Shively, P. O. Box 8691, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Mr. Robert L. Offutt, 405 Pomona Drive, Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 Daniel F. Layman, Jr., Attorney October 26, 1993 Page 2 pc: Mr. and Mrs. John E. Thornhill, 3915 Winding Way Road, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Exxon Corporation, P. O. Box 53, Houston, Texas 77001 Virginia Foundry Company, P. O. Box 12806, Roanoke, Virginia 24028 Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 300 Technology Court, Smyrna, Georgia 30082 W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney Steven J. Talevi, Assistant City Attorney Willard N. Claytor, Director of Real Estate Valuation Doris K. Layne, Appraiser Aide, Real Estate Valuation William F. Clark, Director of Public Works Kit B. Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations Charles M. Huffine, City Engineer Ronald H. Miller, Building Commissioner John R. Marlles, Agent, City Planning Commission Evelyn D. Dorsey, Acting Zoning Administrator sj IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 25th day of October, 1993. No. 31731 - 102593. AN ORDINANCE to amend §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304, Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, to rezone certain property within the City, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant. WHEREAS, application has been made to the Council of the City of Roanoke to have the hereinafter described property rezoned from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2, General Commercial District, subject to certain conditions proffered by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, which after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by 536.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on said application at its meeting on October 11, 1993, after due and timely notice thereof as required by 536.1 -693, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to the Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that §36.1 -3, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, be amended in the following particular and no other: A tract of land located at the northeast corner of Hollins Road and Orange Avenue, N.E., and designated on Sheet No. 304 of the Sectional 1976 Zone Map, City of Roanoke, as Official Tax Nos. 3042143 and 3042120, be, and is hereby rezoned from LM, Light Manufacturing District, to C -2 General Commercial District, subject to the following proffers: (1) the property will be used for an automatic automobile washing facility and for no other purpose; (2) the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan attached to the Petition, subject to any changes required by the City during site plan review; and (3) if no building permit has been issued or construction commenced within three (3) years from the effective date of this rezoning, the subject property will automatically revert from C -2, General Commercial District, to LM, Light Manufacturing District, without further action required by City Council, as more fully set forth in the Petition, filed in the Office of the City Clerk on August 11, 1993, and that Sheet No. 304 of the Zone Map be changed in this respect. ATTEST: City Clerk. STE1111ANIF, M. MOON REYNOLDS, MMC City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: eerk@,roanokeva.gov March 20, 2019 Corbin L. White Caldwell White Associates 4203 Melrose Avenue, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Mr. White: CECELIA F. MCCOY Deputy City Clerk CECEL.IA T. WEBB, CM(' Assistant Deputy City Clerk I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 41 408 - 031 81 9 rezoning certain properties located at 1047 Mecca Street, N. E., and 0 (zero) Mecca Street, N. E., from R -5, Residential Single - Family District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, March 18, 2019, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. incere y, Sep anie M. Moon Reyno MMC City Clerk Enclosure pc: Brazos River Group, LLC, P. O. Box 18, Salem, Virginia 24153 Trustees of East End Baptist Church, 1030 Mecca Street, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Erin D. Manning, 1012 Mecca Street, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Deborah Wiseman Thornhill, 114 Moyerwood Road, Rocky Mount, Virginia 24151 Terry L. McGhee, 4033 Mockingbird Hill, Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Nettie E. Jessee, 1031 Mecca Street, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Samer Sati 2918 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dawn Bennett, 2926 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Mark E. Lawhorn, 2934 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Isaac A. and Anne S. York, 3006 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Andrew L. Dicarlo, 3006 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Jackie L. Ramsey, Jr., 3018 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Thomas C. and Gloria J. Ferris, 3026 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Harold N. and Cynthia P. Lacks, 3034 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Corbin L. White March 20, 2019 Page 2 PC: Rebecca G. Johnson, 3056 Cannaday Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 South Jefferson, LLC, 2901 Orange Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 RYT, LLC, 210 Carver Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Richard J. Joachim, 2913 Orange Avenue, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 White Birch Holdings, LLC, 10 South Jefferson Street, S.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Douglas E. Caton, P. O. Box 5306, Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 Hickory Woods Apartments, LLC, 3006 Hickory Woods Drive, N.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Cherie Grisso, Richfield Living, 3615 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Melanie Obenchain, Executor for Estate of Karen Mills, Rebecca Manning, and Debbie McGhee, 4054 Mockingbird Hill Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Tina Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission Robert S. Cowell, Jr., City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Christopher Chittum, Director, Planning Building & Development Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Brenda Hamilton, Circuit Court Clerk Timothy Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Susan Lower, Director of Real Estate Evaluation Luke Pugh, City Engineer Aw� IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41408- 031819. AN ORDINANCE to rezone certain properties located at 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 (zero) Mecca Street, N.E., from R -5, Residential Single - Family District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Cherie Grisso, on behalf of Richfield Living, has made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ( "City Council "), to have the property located at 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 (zero) Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, rezoned from R -5, Residential Single- Family District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter, has made its recommendation to City Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on March 18, 2019, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §36.2 -540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed rezoning; and WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendation made to City Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require the rezoning of the subject property, and for those reasons, is of the opinion that the hereinafter described property should be rezoned as herein provided. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 36.2 -100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect that Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, located at 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 (zero) Mecca Street, N.E., respectively, be and is hereby rezoned from R -5, Residential Single - Family District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment, Amended Application No. 2, dated March 11, 2019. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: �Y) City Clerk. Rezone without proffers - Mecca - update - kg.doc • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District Summary: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 11, 2019. By a vote of 7 -0, the Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request, finding that the Amended Application No. 1, as amended at the hearing and subsequently submitted as Amended Application No. 2, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan, and Zoning Ordinance as the subject property will be redeveloped and used in a manner appropriate to the surrounding area. Application Information: Request: Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Applicant: Cherie Grisso; Richfield Living Owner: Melanie Obenchain, Estate of Karen Mills Debbie McGhee Rebecca Manning Agent: Corbin White, Caldwell White Associates City Staff Person: Katharine Gray, Land Use and Urban Design Planner Address: 1047 and 0 Mecca Street, N.E. Official Tax Nos.: 7080102 and 7090401, respectively Site Area: +/- 13.56 acres Relevant Plans: Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan Proposed Land Use: Group care facility, nursing home, and Group care facility, congregate home, elderly Future Land Use: Single- family, High Density Filing Date: Original Application: January 28, 2019 Amended Application No. 1: February 15, 2019 Amended Application No. 2: March 14, 2019 Background: Early aerial photos from 1953 show that the area south of Orange Avenue along Mecca Street was developed as single family residential with large swaths of undeveloped property along Orange Avenue to the north, King Street to the east, and the area around Gus Nicks Boulevard to the west. Over time, further aerial photos show that those large swaths of property have been developed with commercial and industrial development along Orange Avenue to the north, apartment complexes to the east, and mixed commercial and residential uses to the west. The applicant wishes to develop the 13.56 acre property on the eastern side of Mecca Street between the existing single family residential development to the south and commercial /industrial development along Orange Avenue to the north with a continuum of care community with independent living, assisted living, and a nursing home. The applicant wishes to amend the zoning of the property to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The purpose of the INPUD District is to encourage harmonious development of institutional uses while providing flexibility for creative development, to minimize potential negative impacts of institutional uses on neighboring uses, and to recognize the special complexity and interrelationships of land uses and activities. The applicant held multiple neighborhood meetings to solicit input on their design of the site for such uses. The main questions asked by surrounding neighbors were regarding the traffic impact of such change on their community, the scale and proximity of the built structures to their existing homes and apartment complexes, and the desire for the most active part of uses on the site (parking /loading) to be located on the commercial side of the site. Proposed Use /Development: The PUD development plan shows a consolidation of property that is being acquired from an existing parcel with a single - family residential dwelling to be demolished along the eastern side of Mecca with an unbuilt residential area to the northeast to create a new lot. The development plan shows two phases of development. The first phase includes a new nursing home building located on the western portion of the new lot nearest Mecca with a single driveway entrance from Mecca Street. The parking is located to north toward the side of the property that abuts commercial development. The second phase of the project includes a second independent and assisted living building on the eastern portion 2 of the site with some underground parking. Open space is located around the perimeter of the property with area to remain undisturbed noted on the plan. Transportation improvements in phase one include a sidewalk connection to the bus stop at Orange Avenue, additions to the emergency traffic control, and interconnections with other Orange Avenue intersection controls. Traffic improvements in phase two include a new three -way traffic signal at Mecca. Building elevations are included for phase one of the PUD development plan. The elevations depict a three -story building broken into multiple smaller elements that enclose a secure courtyard; shingled hip roofs; a mixture of shingled siding, horizontal siding, and brick on the fa4ades; traditional patterning of windows and door openings; and a canopy feature at the front entry. No building elevations or other details are included for Phase 2 of the project. Any substantial change would require the PUD development plan to pass through another public process. The lack of detail for the Phase 2 building is a concern as without any detail on the plan, there is no measure for compatibility of the scale, mass and design of the building with the surrounding development at the time of development, aside from the footprint and location on the lot. Considerations: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses: The property is located on Mecca Street just south of the commercial and industrial development along Orange Avenue. It is surrounded by CG, Commercial - General District, and 1 -1, Light Industrial District, to the north; RMF, Residential Multifamily District, to the east; CG, Commercial - General District, IN, Institutional District, and MX, Mixed Use District, to the west; and R -5, Residential Single - Family District, to the south, as shown on the Zoning Map Excerpt enclosed as Attachment A. The future land use map from the Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan envisioned this property for single - family, high density development. The location of the retirement community is an appropriate transitional use and built form between the intensive commercial and industrial uses along Orange Avenue and the residential development along Cannaday Road to the south. As described above, the development plan situates the proposed buildings towards the center of the property while providing open space around the perimeter of the property with area to remain undisturbed noted on the plan. The first phase building is broken into smaller elements with shingled hipped roofs, a mixture of traditional residential siding materials, traditional patterning of windows and door openings. The second phase building is described in the narrative, but not on the development plan and would not be enforceable. 3 Based on the concern expressed from the public during its initial community meetings and the need to provide a formal traffic study as part of the development review process, the applicant decided to perform and submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) as part of the rezoning application. A detailed analysis of the study from the Transportation Division's traffic engineers is included as Appendix A. In summary, the traffic generated from the proposed development would be similar to that if the property was developed for single family residential use. However, that level of traffic cannot be accommodated without improvements. The TIA recommends a three -phase signal as part of the second phase and is specifically noted on the development plan. This is important due to the proposed phasing of the project. As noted in the TIA, each phase of the project when looked at independently would not trigger analysis and could allow phased development to occur without the signal creating traffic issues on Mecca Street and Orange Avenue. The TIA showed that two 3 -way signalized intersections at Granby Street and Mecca Street would operate better than a 4 -way signalized intersection at Granby Street. A signal at Mecca Street would not only accommodate the additional traffic generated by the development but could benefit the adjacent neighborhoods by providing alternatives to King Street and Gus Nicks. The neighborhood did express concern over the potential for cut - through traffic turning left from Orange Avenue onto Mecca to pass through the neighborhood on their way to the final destination, bypassing the congested intersections of King Street and Gus Nicks Boulevard. The attractiveness of Mecca Street as a cut - through is very limited given the narrow lane widths and the number of stop signs encountered along the way. In addition, VDOT has awarded $2,500,000 for intersection improvements on Orange Avenue including the intersection of Orange and King. This project, set for construction in 2024 - 2025, will improve the level of service and that could further reduce the attractiveness of cut - through traffic. Applicability /Appropriateness of Proposed Zoning District: The proposed INPUD District allows the applicant flexibility to develop site - specific standards for the location of the larger institutional buildings on a deep lot while respecting the nearby residential dwellings. The flexibility in the development standards created by the INPUD requires conformance with the development plan adopted. The district is appropriate for a congregate home facility located between the existing commercial /industrial development of the Orange Avenue corridor and the single - family residential dwellings to the south. Availability of Other Property A group care facility that provides for a continuum of care requires a combination of uses that is only permitted in a limited number of districts; RMF or MX by special exception, or in a PUD by- right. This type of community requires a sizeable property with careful placement as to not substantially impact traffic on local streets. There are no properties within the eastern side of Roanoke where the applicant desires to construct a new facility near a commercial artery that meet this combination of requirements and are available for purchase. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: Both Vision 2001 -2020 and the Hollins /Wildwood Area Plan recognize the need for infill housing that is compatible with the surrounding area. The site is a large property that is bordered by commercial along Orange Avenue to the north and single - family residential to the south. The change in zoning will allow for a development that provides housing options for this part of the city and provides a better transition from smaller single family residential to commercial development along the Orange Avenue portion of the property than currently exists. Policy/Action Plan I Applicability to matter NH P1. Sustainable population. Comprehensive The proposed congregate Roanoke will have a balanced, Plan', pg. 40 home facility will allow sustainable population. Roanoke will existing residents to age in promote its urban assets, diversity, place within their convenience, and affordability to retain community. existing residents and attract new ones. NH P5. Housing choice. The City will Comprehensive The proposed congregate have a balanced, sustainable range of Plan, pg. 40 home facility will allow housing choices in all price ranges existing residents to age in and design options that encourage place within their social and economic diversity community. throughout the City. Neighborhood Character: Established Hollins/Wildwood The proposed congregate neighborhoods should retain their Area Plan', pg.46 home facility is an current character and development appropriate transition from patterns. Higher density residential the commercial corridor to development should be concentrated the north and west, multi - on the edges of commercial develop- family to the east and single ment and closer to arterial streets. family area to the south. New development: New development Hollins /Wildwood The development proposes should be well - planned and use Area Plan, pg. 47 a sidewalk and signal limited land resources wisely. coordination in phase one Infrastructure should be installed in of the project to address conjunction with new development, pedestrian and emergency including street improvements to service access to Orange address added traffic. Avenue. A 3 -way traffic signal is proposed in phase Vision 2001 -2020, City of Roanoke, 2001 2 HollinslWildwood Area Plan, City of Roanoke, 2005 5 Policy /Action Comments on Application: Planning Commission Work Session: Plan I Applicability to matter two of the project to address the increase in trips to /from the property. The added signal at Mecca provides connectivity for the local neighbors to the Orange Avenue corridor and relieves congestion at the existing connections of King and Gus Nicks. The following items were discussed in the Planning Commission Work Session and should be addressed for compliance with City policy and ordinances. 1) Current application lists different information on the different front application pages. Amend application to correct application pages to matching information. 2) Massing and detailing of building 2 is not included in application, amend application to describe. 3) Stormwater ponds in the front of the property along Mecca are a concern. Include description of the ponds in the development plan. If they are dry ponds, it would be best for them to be shallow ponds that disappear into the landscape. If they are wet ponds designed to be permanent features in the landscape, it would be best that they be filled and decorative at all times. The moving of the stormwater ponds may also provide the opportunity to move the parking from between the building and Mecca Street to the larger parking area to the side of the building. 4) The traffic study did not fully address all questions. Please address the following: a. Please review signal timing and phasing in Synchro. For example, the phase sequence at King Street is different than modeled. There is lead /lag phasing for the left -turns on Orange Avenue and the McDonalds split phase is first before King Street. b. Please remove the Auto Dealership, which is currently depicted as forming a 4 -way intersection with NB Mecca Street, from the TIA, including any analysis, graphics, data collection, etc. c. The comparison of traffic impacts on Orange Avenue of a 4 -way (and thus 4- phases) signalized approach at Granby Street, previously discussed during the pre - scoping meeting, is not evaluated against a 3 -way signalized at Mecca Street and needs to be. d. No neighborhood traffic is shown as being diverted to utilize a potential 3 -way signal at Mecca Street, versus using King Street and Gus Nicks Blvd. Planning requested that be studied and should be 2 factored in the TIA. A methodology should be proposed to us on how the split of traffic is developed. e. The TIA counts right -turn traffic as meeting signal warrants and the MUTCD only states that should occur if there is conflict with the major street. Within 150 -200 feet of the intersection, there is 28 to 32 feet of pavement and that should allow plenty of space to maneuver in position to turn if lanes were striped as part of this development. Additional analysis is needed to justify their full inclusion. f. Does the developer have any thoughts as to where traffic their development will generate would flow? At Mecca Street, current 40%/30% left -turn split during the AM /PM is based on standard left /right turn ratios and several other factors could affect that distribution versus other neighborhood traffic that is currently using that intersection. Since 1 -581 and the majority of Roanoke City is located west of the Mecca intersection, I would think more Richfield traffic would come from the west, thus altering that distribution and the number of left -turns from Mecca onto Orange Avenue. Traffic between the new Richfield campus here and the other location in Salem would also likely go westbound on Orange based on Google Maps' estimate of travel time. g. If a signal is still warranted at Mecca Street, please include a recommendation to have the signal interconnected via Fiber with the adjacent signal at Granby Street given the close proximity and the benefits of running one controller. The amended application addresses some of these comments by updating the front application pages, adding information on the stormwater ponds, revising the traffic study to address all of the transportation questions, but did not fully address the concerns regarding the detailing of the second building on the development plan. Interdepartmental Comments: General comments were provided from the Fire Marshal's Office and Planning, Building, & Development related to the change of use, comprehensive development plan process, and other zoning items. Public Comments: Dennis Cronk, manager of White Birch Holdings, LLC, sent a letter expressing his concern that a new light at Mecca Street could impact the future development potential of his 2 -acre commercial property on Orange Avenue across from Granby Street. He also states that the addition of a light at Mecca Street could increase traffic on that street and falls outside of the VDOT standards for spacing of signalized intersections. Chris Craft, president of the Wildwood Civic League, sent a copy of their letter requesting that an adjacent property owner along Orange Avenue allow access 7 through their property to address safety concerns of the proposed development with access from Mecca. He also sent a letter from that same property owner offering to donate an easement permitting Richfield Living to access an intersection at his property for a second access point. Susan Brubaker, Senior Property Manager of Hickory Woods Apartments, is very supportive of the proposed Richfield project that is planned as an adjacent neighbor to Hickory Woods Apartments. That said, they also requested an increase of the 10 feet undisturbed buffer to 25 feet between their property and the Richfield project property. Plannina Commission Public Hearin Chris Craft, President of the Wildwood Civic League, stated that they have met with the applicant several times and the main concern of the community has been traffic on Mecca. He stated that he understood that the traffic study recommended the light at Mecca and that the applicant has worked hard to address all of the concerns of the community and that they recommended approval of the rezoning application. Dennis Cronk, manager of White Birch Holding, LLC, stated that he is concerned that the proposed traffic light at Mecca for the Richfield development could impact the future development of his property along Orange Avenue across from Granby Street. A comprehensive development plan was under review at the time of the rezoning of his property in 2006 that showed plans for a 4 -way light at Granby, but the development was never built and would now have to go through the comprehensive development process again. Mr. Cronk stated that he is concerned the spacing of the light falls outside of the VDOT standards for spacing of signalized intersections. He also stated that he continues to market his property and is concerned that the proposed development by Richfield would have to be included in any new traffic study that would evaluate the future development of a light at Granby. He stated that other than the requirement for the addition of the light at Mecca, he is in favor of the project proposed and it is something the community needs on that side of town. Hong Liu and Michael Damolin, Transportation Department, stated that the distance between multiple signals in Roanoke fall below the VDOT guideline for spacing; the guideline is for ideal conditions and not regulatory. They stated that the proposed changes to the lights at Mecca and Granby are proposed to be linked and therefore operate with the same timing (effectively as one large signal) to prevent degrading traffic on Orange Avenue. They noted that the future development of property at Granby will need to be evaluated based on the existing conditions at the time of development and that a four -way light at Granby will always present concerns that could cause significant delays on Orange Avenue and would need to be carefully evaluated. Mr. Hale stated that he planned to vote to approve, but was concerned that the requirement of the light could affect the future development of Mr. Cronk's property. Mr. Martin also stated that the requirement of a light in phase two of the proposed development and the potential impact on Mr. Cronk's property was concerning, but that the proposed development overall was fantastic and he intended to vote in favor of this. Ms. Smith stated that she agreed. Conclusions and Recommendations: The proposed development plan achieves many of the policies noted from the plans. It uses a mostly undeveloped property for a mixed density development along a major commercial corridor. The developer sought input from the nearby community and the design is sensitive to the adjoining neighbors' concerns about retaining the residential character of property to the south through placement of the buildings towards the center of the site, keeping active uses on the commercial side of the proposed building, building forms that reflect a traditional residential nature, and adding appropriate traffic control mechanisms as needed. The proposed group care facility is an appropriate addition to the Hollins /Wildwood area in this location along a major commercial corridor. The three -way signal proposed at Mecca in the second phase of the development is important to address the overall impact of traffic from the entirety of the development. When projects are phased, the sequential impacts of development can fall below the threshold that would require the developer to incorporate the transportation improvements needed to mitigate all of the impacts of the traffic from the overall development. Therefore, large multiple phased projects are evaluated holistically so that the City and surrounding community do not bear the cost burden of those improvements. Jarfies E. Smit , Ch it City Planning Commission Enclosure: Attachment A, Zoning District Map Distribution: Robert S. Cowell, jr., City Manager R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager Chris Chittum, Director of Planning, Building, & Development Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney Timothy R. Spencer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Cherie Grisso.; Richfield Living 9 Melanie Obenchain, Estate of Karen Mills Debbie McGhee Rebecca Manning Corbin White, Caldwell White Associates 10 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Trip Generation: Transportation Division review of the proposed Richfield Development included an assessment of the traffic volume expected to be generated by the development and the potential impact of that projected traffic volume on adjacent street traffic. The existing 13.56 acre parcel where the development would be built is zoned as an R -5 Residential District and a comparison is first made of the potential trip generation between the developer's by- right -use of single family detached residential and the proposed use of a retirement community under the rezoning request. In the R -5 Residential Distract, the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a 5,000 square feet minimum lot area per dwelling unit. Once the percentage of roadway (assumed to be 15% on average), which would need to be constructed if this parcel were developed as single family residential, were discounted from the developable area, approximately 11.53 acres are developable. If lot sizes were built at the 5,000 square feet minimum lot size, the total number of potential dwelling units constructed would be 100. Based on these two potential assumptions, a traffic comparison can be made with the developer's proposal using the Institute of Transportation Engineering's Trip Generation Manual, which is the national standard by which traffic volume projections are made for various types of land uses. The construction of 100 single family dwelling units would result 76/100 vehicle trips during the AM /PM Peak hour. Due to the unique nature of the Richfield senior living development, which consists of a mix of skilled nursing beds, senior independent living apartments, and assisted living units, and the lack of trip generation data in the ITE Manual from similar retirement campuses, a decision was made to establish local trip generation rates based on traffic counts collected from a similar Richfield development in Salem, VA. Once these rates are factored, the estimated trip generation for the proposed Richfield development is 72 AM and 104 PM peak trips. Thus, the traffic generated from this rezoning request to a senior living development is nearly the same as what the developer could develop as single family residential. Traffic Impact Analysis: With the proposed senior living development increasing peak hour (PM) traffic more than one hundred (100) vehicles and the general concern expressed from the neighborhood regarding traffic impacts, a traffic impact study (TIA) was commissioned. A preliminary plan provided to Transportation Division showed the development accessing Orange Avenue through the transformation of the existing 3 -way signalized intersection at Granby Street into a 4 -way signalized intersection. Such access has two profound implications. First is that any new leg at the Granby Street intersection would serve as a private entrance and access to Orange Avenue for the proposed senior living development and any future development along that frontage of Orange Avenue; as a result, no neighborhood traffic could access that signal. Given the difficulty for traffic to turn left onto Orange Avenue due to lack of adequate gaps, most neighborhood traffic travels to the adjacent signalized intersections at King Street and Gus Nicks Boulevard in order to turn left onto Orange Avenue. The other option Traffic Engineering requested the TIA to study is the consideration of a 3 -way signalized intersection at Mecca Street where a fire signal currently exists. In contrast to access at Granby Street, Mecca Street is a public street and thus any signalized intersection would provide the neighborhood an alternative to traveling to King Street or Gus Nicks Boulevard to turn left onto Orange Avenue. In fact, a proximity analysis conducted by the TIA showed that 40 single - family homes would have a shorter travel distance to a signal at Mecca Street than traveling to adjacent signals. Another 50 homes are located such that a Mecca Street signal would provide a similar travel distance. In the NB direction, the Level of Service (LOS) at both the King Street and Gus Nicks Boulevard intersections for through and left - turn traffic are poor and are graded at Level E or F (see Table 1), indicating long delays and traffic operations that are approaching or exceeding available capacity of the intersection. Upon hearing this alternative, the neighborhood, however, did express concern over the potential for Orange Avenue traffic to utilize Mecca Street as a cut - through option through the neighborhood to avoid turning left on Orange Avenue in the WB direction at either King Street or Gus Nicks Boulevard on their way to their final destination. The LOS for WB left -turns at both intersections is very poor and demand currently exceeds capacity during both the AM and PM peak periods. A signalized intersection at Mecca Street with a protected left -turn could certainly become an option for cut - through traffic. The attractiveness of this cut - through is very limited, however. Potential cut - through traffic traveling on Mecca Street to connect to King Street would encounter four stop signs along the way, first when Mecca traffic merges with Cannaday Road, second at Richard Avenue, third at Belle Avenue, and lastly at King Street. Further, the pavement width along Mecca Street is very narrow for two -way traffic at between 20ft -22ft and that is not conducive to speeding. Other engineering options could limit the attractiveness of cut - through traffic by limiting the length of the protected left -turn phase at Mecca Street. Traffic Engineering also sought and was awarded $2.5 million dollars from VDOT for intersection improvements on Orange Avenue at King Street and Blue Hills Drive. Improvements at King Street are slated to be constructed in 2024 or 2025 and include extending the WB left -turn lane and the implementation of a protected - permitted phasing, which would in turn improve the LOS. The second implication to a 4 -way signalized intersection at Granby Street versus two 3 -way signalized intersections (the other at Mecca Street) is the need to accommodate through traffic and how split phasing (NB and SB approaches each have their own vehicle phase) may become necessary, as has become the standard along Orange Avenue (i.e. King Street, Gus Nicks) This limiting of vehicle phases at signalized intersections is becoming more common and VDOT is studying 12 potential applications throughout the region and statewide. In some potential applications, VDOT has modeled the reduction of vehicle phases to 3 by limiting the through movements and found these changes would result in greater travel time improvements along the corridor than adding a third through lane at a much higher cost. In this case here in Roanoke, if a new signal at Mecca Street were interconnected with the existing Granby Street signal, these signals would be able to operate concurrently to minimize delay to traffic traveling along Orange Avenue. The TIA study did find that the preferred signalized approach of Mecca Street would result in a "total combined delay along eastbound and westbound Orange Avenue at the Granby Street and Mecca Street signals (that) would be similar to the 2024 Background conditions and less than the total eastbound and westbound delay predicted under Option B (with a new fourth leg at Granby Street)." Summary: In summary, the vehicle volumes generated by the proposed development are very similar to what the developer is entitled to do if a single - family residential subdivision were constructed at the minimum lot sizes permitted in an R -5 Residential Zoning District. New traffic generated from the development cannot be reasonably accommodated without improvements. Both the adjacent King Street and Gus Nicks Boulevard intersections are already operating at or exceeding current capacity and additional traffic from this development could not be accommodated without extreme delay to this new traffic or by impacting traffic along Orange Avenue. Of the two mitigation strategies studied, the TIA showed that two 3 -way signalized intersections at Granby Street and Mecca Street would operate better than a 4 -way signalized intersection at Granby Street. A signal at Mecca Street would not only accommodate this additional traffic generated by the development but could benefit the adjacent neighborhoods by providing alternatives to King Street and Gus Nicks. The neighborhood did express concern over the potential for cut - through traffic turning left WB to pass through the neighborhood on their way to the final destination, bypassing the congested intersections of King Street and Gus Nicks Boulevard. The attractiveness of Mecca Street as a cut - through is very limited given the narrow lane widths and the number of stop signs encountered along the way. By the time Phase 2 of the Richfield Development is under construction and the intersection at Mecca Street is signalized, improvements will be forthcoming to King Street to improve the level of service and that could further reduce the attractiveness of cut - through traffic. Two critical assumptions are that fiber communication be provided between the two signals and that coordination along Orange Avenue be recalibrated to factor this new signal to be constructed in Phase 2. Without proper communication and coordination between these signals, the signals will not always act coordinated due to their internal coordination clocks drifting apart from each other and that would significantly impact coordination along Orange Avenue. These items are listed as requirements on the development plan. 13 �Q 0 0 10 I css� 01, A WA IRMiii iiiiiiiii+� �? iii1►ii11°iii� m � o � ° ti,�� ♦ii+ U G d MAO G1 ip ti •'' L'Y U O •, UO /�itU t HEIF 4 r d L1,91-0e x Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 166, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853-1730 Fax: (540) 853-1230 Date: I Submittal Number: ❑ Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed ❑ Rezoning, Conditional Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 1047 Mecca St. NE & 0 Mecca St NE. rAciz, Tax Nods' : 17(180 102 & 7090401 MAR 14 2019 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING & r DEIVEL013ME49-- Amended Application No. 2 ROANOKE ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Existing Base Zoning: With Conditions F.5, Residential Single-Famil - y Without Conditions (if multiple zones, please manually enter all districts ❑ Ordinance No(s). for Existing Conditions (if applicable): j Requested Zoning. IINPUD, Institutional Plannedf1w ❑ With Conditions Proposed Group Care Facility, Nursing Home and Conj E] Without Conditions Land Use e o Mills, Debbie McGhee, Rebecca Mannin Phone Number: Name: Estate __�Karen Address: 4054 Mockingbird Hill, Roanoke VA 24012 E-Mail. Property Owner's Signature: APhone Number: rr 5403806597 E-Mail C—gLrisso@-Rich-fieldli-vi'ng-.com- Name: IRichfield Living Ali 13615 W­ Ma - St Salem VA. 2- 4153---- Applicant's Signature: Name: Caldwell White Assoc. - Corbin White Phone Number: 54020461 81 Address: L - _ 4203 Melrose Ave. NW, Roanoke VA E -Mad: Ictaroa oaol.com Aithorized Agent's Signature: � t h� y ,. ,r ,.,G ..,r_ ... ..es.r<°,+.,.,,. >. �, , Stu. ,'� u. +a- "..,Uav ..i,+r. _...r,,, .�, , , ,_ r 1 [x Completed application form and checklist, F Written narrative explaining the reason for the request. fx Metes and bounds description, if applicable. fx Filing fee. r Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. F Written proffers. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item '2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as 'development plan' if proffered. fx Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, F Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Amended development or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures, r if applicable. i` Written proffers to be amended, See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. Copy of previously adopted Ordinance, i; a f Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. F Traffic impact analysis. F Concept plan. F Proffered conditions, if applicable. F Required fee. *An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www. roanokeva .gov /planningcommission. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application is amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. Narrative Richfield Living is pleased to submit the following narrative related to its proposed senior housing continuum project proposed on the 1047 Mecca Street and adjacent land Richfield Background. Mission and Long -Range Plan The Richfield Living Community traces its origins back to 1919 when a group of women decided to provide the rural citizens of Roanoke County and the surrounding area with a means of learning how to care for the sick. By February 1920, they had formed a nursing committee called the Roanoke County Nursing Committee and appointed Morgan Harris as public health nurse for the committee. Under Mrs. Harris's leadership, the committee started several innovative programs, including offering mobile clinics and providing instruction in home nursing and care for the sick throughout Roanoke County. After 10 years, the committee began offering patient care in a house on the County Farm west of Salem, employing a graduate nurse for the first two years of operation as accommodations were gradually expanded. Following the founding of the Roanoke Public Health Association in 1937, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors voted to turn the entire project over to the association to be run as a nursing home. Over the next 30 years, patients ranged in age from infants to octogenarians with a wide range of physical disabilities. As the services offered grew, the facilities were upgraded and expanded to include a new nursing care center built on the site of the original farm house in 1971 and an east wing addition in 1978. As the facility expanded its services to offer various levels of housing and care, the board elected to change the name of the facility to reflect the evolving community. The new name, Richfield, reflected the history of the land on which the facility was located. As a senior living community, Richfield has grown from its humble beginnings into a comprehensive life plan community providing independent retirement living, assisted living, rehabilitation and nursing care options. Located on approximately 50 acres, the Community currently consists of 84 independent living apartments (the "Knollwood Apartments ") and 14 independent living cottages ( "Richfield Lake Estates Cottages ") (collectively the "Existing Independent Living Units "), 136 assisted living beds (the "Assisted Living Beds "), 36 memory care beds (the "Memory Care Beds "), a 48 -bed transitional care facility (the "Existing Transitional Care Beds "), a 257 -bed nursing facility (the "Existing Nursing Beds "), along with supportive common areas. The Assisted Living Beds, Memory Care Beds, Existing Transitional Care Beds, and Existing Nursing Beds are collectively referred to as the "Health Care Center." Richfield has owned and operated the large bed nursing home in Salem, VA in an institutionally designed building for over 45 years. Within the skilled nursing building, most residents have semi - private rooms with bathrooms that are not handicap accessible. Richfield has had plans to reposition the building on its Salem campus for over 7 years. The first phase, to renovate a former assisted living building into a 48 -bed rehab center was completed and has operated since 2012. The Board of Directors has since then been evaluating renovating the existing building vs building a new building. Based on occupancy levels averaging 80% on its Salem campus, the Board decided to redevelop the Salem campus by building a new 76 bed nursing home to attach to its 48 -bed rehab center. Further, the Board decided to transition 116 beds to this new location in Roanoke. This strategy allows Richfield to position its existing campus and new campus with more homelike environments for the long -term care residents. Further, it relocates nursing beds into two smaller communities that are built to current building standards and a modern resident centered care service delivery model. In developing a Roanoke campus, the Board sought to find a site that would allow for development of a full continuum of care as market demands and consumer preferences have changed over time. The project concept plan includes Phase I development of 116 bed healthcare facility providing long term care, memory care and transitional rehabilitative care services. Future phases would include development of 70 assisted living apartments, 110 independent senior apartments and a campus town center integrating the community. Maior Desian Features Richfield has incorporated a resident centered care neighborhood model. The project will have 38 transitional care units and dedicated therapy space on the top floor which will be designed with a hospitality theme. The first two floors of the project will be split into 4 long term care households each containing 19 units around a shared community space for the household. Each long -term care household has a front porch accessing the household and a residential style kitchen as its central focus. The kitchen is adjoined to other life enriching activity spaces including a 4- season porch, living room, dining room and multi - purpose activity space. The resident rooms include a combination of private bedroom suites with private bath or private bedroom with a shared bath. The exterior of the building has been designed in a residential format with lap siding and a combination of brick with some stone accents. The design intent is to connotate a residential homelike environment. There are to be two designated outdoor areas for the enjoyment of residents in addition to the 4 season porches in each household. The area between the wings will be a secured courtyard with paths, landscape gardens, and sitting areas. In addition, there will be an outdoor patio to the side of the building for casual use and programed outdoor activity. The building and its households have been designed both for efficient size for staffing ratios, generous rooms sizes for resident enjoyment, and services spaces located to save steps for staff. Location of nursing offices, med rooms, housekeeping, and equipment storage are placed throughout the community for convenient access but also out of site to maintain the residential feel. A combination of hard surface and carpeted floors are used in combination throughout the community to create the home environment. The future senior housing building will include assisted living studio and one - bedroom apartments with kitchens and baths. The independent living units' range in size from studio, one bedroom, one bedroom plus den or sunroom, and two- bedroom apartments. The project will feature below building private parking for independent residents. The housing will be tied together with a community building called a "Town Center" that will feature a full commercial kitchen and multiple dinning venues, activity spaces, a large community room, exercise and wellness space, office and support spaces for the community. Amendment 1 Addition: Additional Building Massing exhibits have been added to address Zoning Amendment Comment item #2 dated of 2112119 Phase 11 improvements are depicted in the massing model for scale and relation to the Phase I project plan. The development will be designed with not less than 12% transparency on all building elevations. Building exterior materials will match Phase l and be in proportionate percentages. The addition of split face block, in a compatible color, will appear in areas where the garage foundation walls are exposed. This condition does not exist on Phase L A pitched roof with gables and dormers to break up the roof mass will be incorporated. An Additional exhibit has been added to address Zoning Amendment Comment item #3 dated of 2/12119 The City of Roanoke Planning Commission's Work Session Recommendation #3 states that placement of the required stormwater management facility along Mecca Street, NE may be a concern, it seems, from an aesthetic standpoint. Through the process of due diligence site design, we have evaluated the stormwater management requirements that will be necessary to meet 9VAC25- 870 -66, specifically the Flood Control and Channel Protection requirements. In order to reduce the amount of direct runoff that would bypass the new SWM facility, it is necessary to place the impoundment as near as possible to the low point on the site. Given that our only point of interconnection to the existing storm drain system is by means of extending a new public storm drain along Mecca Street, NE to the intersection of Mecca Street, NE and Orange Avenue, NE, the logical location for the basin is in the northwestern corner of the property, adjacent to the City Fire Station parcel. This will allow the majority of the site runoff to be captured in the basin and controlled in accordance with City and State requirements. We have included herein a depiction of the anticipated grading of the new SWM facility as well as a cross - section through the basin, based on our preliminary computations. As shown, the top of the control berm will be only slightly higher than the elevation of Mecca Street, thereby avoiding an unsightly embankment. While the formal design is not yet to the level of completion where we can proffer these sketches verbatim, we do believe that the final designs will be in general conformance with the attached. While it is understood that SWM facilities such as these are beneficial to control the rates of stormwater runoff to protect the general public, and are required by Code, it is also understood that these facilities are not always the most attractive features of a site. In order to reduce the visual impact of the facility, we propose to plant deciduous trees along the private side of the right -of -way adjacent to the new SWM facility. Given the presence of overhead utility lines, these trees may be limited to ornamentals rather than large shade trees, however, we will certainly coordinate with the City in choosing appropriate species. In addition to the new deciduous trees, we will plant a staggered strip of new evergreen shrubs intermingled with the trees, to aide in directing the public's view upward toward the new buildings rather than downward to the new basin. This landscaping will be provided as stated to the extent that it will not conflict with the Code required design of the new stormwater management facility. Lastly, there have been concerns regarding the aesthetics of the new outlet structure of the stormwater management facility. Again, while it is in our best interest to make this detention facility as attractive as possible, there are requirements for flood control that must be accounted for, and these require a certain size structure to control the ten -year storm from, in this case, an ultimate project area of approximately 10.4 acres. As shown on the attached, under the current level of design, the top of the outlet riser will be approximately 18" lower than the top of the outlet control, and the intent is to tuck the structure into the slope of the Mecca Street side of the pond to the extent possible. We will investigate different means of controlling the outflow, but with the top of the structure lower than the berm, the proposed landscaping should aide in screening the structure, regardless of the type of structure used. Location and Access The project is located on Mecca Street one block south of Orange Avenue (County RD 460) in the City of Roanoke. Orange Avenue is a main traffic collector road and heavily traveled. Public transportation is available throughout the area and there exists a current bus stop at the corner of Mecca and Orange. This is one block from the project site. As part of our development plan, anew sidewalk will be installed from the bus stop to the project to enhance staff and resident safety for use of public transportation. The 13 acres site is a wooded lot and the site plan has been developed to take advantage of the naturally treed site. Walking paths and sitting areas are planned throughout the project site for resident enjoyment. Neighborhood Community Planning Process Once the project land was under control, the owner and development team initiated a community planning process that included 2 neighborhood meetings and various meetings with individual neighbors. We communicated with the Wildwood Civic League to arrange for the public meetings in addition to mailing invitations to neighbors from a list provided by City planning staff. The first neighborhood meeting was designed for the owner and developer as an introduction and listening session. This gave Richfield Living and Baile Development the opportunity to share the organization's mission and experience in developing communities of this nature. It also introduced discussion of the concept, potential project size, and phasing contemplated by the design team. There were no plans developed or ready to share at that time, it was merely an opportunity to get an initial reaction to the project development and to hear neighborhood priorities and concerns. There were three primary themes from this neighborhood meeting. First and foremost was concern about traffic generated by any new development on what was perceived to be an overly taxed intersection at Mecca St and Orange Avenue. Second was an interest in the size and scale of the building in comparison to neighboring properties. Last was a concern for public safety related to a potential traffic conflict that might occur between the proposed use and the fire station. Other points about building appearance, areas on the site that might remain wooded, and how neighborhood and this project might interact in the future were also discussed. Approximately 50 people attended the first meeting. The second neighborhood meeting was designed to show the proposed initial site plan that met the goals of the owner for the development and was sensitive to the information shared at the first meeting. The site plan was shared showing various setbacks from the property line which met the objectives that were raised in the first meeting, identified areas of the site that would remain an undisturbed treed buffer and could be enhanced with additional landscaping as needed, showed how parking was located away from and shielded by the new building from the neighboring homes, and showed the primary access to the site from Mecca Street. It was also discussed that the development team was exploring an acquisition or easement of a neighboring property that might result in a second entrance at the intersection of Orange Avenue and Granby Street. We also shared at this meeting that at the encouragement of the City we had undertaken a full traffic study to address the traffic impacts of the project. Approximately 15 people attended the second neighborhood meeting, but it should be noted there was some confusion related to the location of the meeting. A few individuals assumed the second meeting was to be held at the same location as the first and went to the wrong location. A few follow up calls were made to individuals who went to the wrong location or otherwise could not attend. In addition to the neighborhood meetings, there have been several individual meetings with interested parties as well as information posted about the project on the Wildwood Civic League Facebook page. The development team believes we have generally addressed neighbor concerns raised while developing a project plan that meets Richfield Living objectives. The specific neighborhood concerns related to traffic impact are addressed within the 3`d party traffic impact study prepared by RKK Engineering. Subsequent to the neighborhood meetings, the above noted exploration of a second entrance to the site through an easement or acquisition was abandoned. The Owner /Developer were unable to negotiate an access point with the adjacent land owners. Traffic Study With the concerns raised by the neighborhood the Owner /Developer, with the City's encouragement, believed it would be appropriate to have a 3 d party traffic study completed to review a few factors associated with the development of the property. The objectives were to understand the impact and trips per day and peek travel impacts the surrounding road systems, intersections, and general function of traffic flow in the immediate project area. Further to study if there was warrants to support the addition of a full function stop light at the intersection of Mecca and Orange. The Owner engaged RKK Engineering to complete the study and it is included in the application exhibits related to this application. Analysis and recommendations can be found in the study. Amendment 1 Addition: Traffic study has been updated to address Zoning Amendment Comments, item #4 dated of 2/12/19 Traffic Study has indicated improvements to the intersection of Mecca St and Orange Avenue are recommended for both phase l and phase ll. The development will commit to: In conjunction to Phase l project improvements, the development will make additions to the existing emergency traffic control that will allow for emergency clearing of vehicles at the intersection and interconnects to other Orange Ave intersection controls In conjunction to Phase II project improvements, the development will convert the signal at Mecca St and Orange Avenue to a full 3 way controlled intersection Justification for the change The Owner /Developer believes this project is appropriate and support the change in Zoning for the following: The site is located between a heavily travel commercial area along and to the north of Orange Avenue and the Wildwood single family homes to the south. The proposed project represents a good transitional use with medium density housing that allows for a blending of and transition between the property types. Further, its use as a senior housing community has lower impacts (traffic, site lighting, allocation of greenspace, noise, etc.) than other transitional uses that might be proposed, including multi family housing or light commercial. With a very dramatic growth in senior population, the project addresses a community need currently and into the future. With the baby boomer generation entering retirement, there will be an ever - increasing need for senior communities of this nature. This site with its 13 -acre size allows for a senior housing continuum community that will serve the needs of residents as they age in place. With housing that serves very independent living individuals through full nursing care, residents and families will only need to make one community choice and allow them to stay as their housing and health care needs change. Many senior communities serve a singular element of the continuum while this proposed project meets the needs of a much broader resident profile in a rental format. The development type, senior housing, on a per unit basis has a lesser impact on the property for average unit size, parking need, ability to maintain green spaces that other potential uses. Effect of the development on the neighborhood Currently the subject property has vacant land and a single - family home that has been vacant for some time with few prospects for update renovation or reuse. The vacant property shows signs of dumping and use by trespassers. The project development would utilize the property for a highly needed community valued service by a non - profit sponsor. It would clean up the property and provide a well- maintained residential use. The proposed use, or any other potential development on the site will have impact on traffic in the surrounding area. This is addressed in the included traffic study. Unless it is assumed the property would remain vacant indefinably, traffic impacts will result from any development proposal and the Owner /Developer believe this use will be less impactful. It is common for the grounds and walking paths to be utilized by the neighbors for casual use. Richfield Living would expect and welcome this use by the neighboring properties. There will be activity associated with the services provided on site including delivery, trash removal, staff and visitor trips to the site, parking and lighting. The site plan has been designed with sensitivity to the location of those activities as to minimize their influence on adjoining properties. The neighborhood will also be impacted during the construction of the community with traditional construction related traffic and noise and the impacts to utility work that will be occurring on Mecca Street to provide services to the site. Every effort will be made to minimize these construction impacts while being efficient and orderly in getting the work completed. Lastly, the neighborhood will have the advantage of a new senior service provider in proximity for them or their family to utilize. Availability of similarly zoned properties Richfield Living through its real estate broker, did an extensive search of the area over the course of several months to find sites that could accommodate their project vision. Very few were available and those that were had site factors (neighboring uses, soil conditions, topography, site size, or access) that were unfavorable when compared to this project site. Due to this unique use, nearly all of them would have also required rezoning to accommodate a project such as the one proposed. Relationship of the proposed property to the City Comprehensive Plan and Hollins/Wildwood Neighborhood Plan The following factors related to the project are consistent and advance the initiatives outlined in the Compressive plan and Neighborhood plan Comprehensive Plan out lines six objectives 1. Roanoke's quality of life and economic development are integrally related. The proposed project provides a new senior community to enhance the quality of life for the residents it will serve while also creating and maintaining good employment opportunities for project staff with several tiers of employment/wages from part time to full time professional positions. 2. Roanoke is a city built using quality design principles The proposed project uses a residential design that promotes wellness and choice for the residents it serves. The physical site location allows for a good transition between commercial and neighborhood uses on each site. The site plan and building has been designed to fit the property, takes advantage of the naturally treed lot, creates walking paths and green space for the enjoyment of both residents and community members, and utilizes its location near a public transportation node with an added sidewalk for safe access to public transportation. 3. To implement the plan's policies, a series of strategic initiatives are identified. The project addresses the targets sub sections of this objective • Village Centers The project and its proximity to Downtown grows the access to convenient senior services to the core City. • Multi- Service Facilities The project, as a full continuum (independent living though full skilled care) provides a multi service community which allows residents to remain in place as their needs change. Further it expands the not for profit Owners services into a new market region and integrates with other associated service providers. • New Housing Opportunities The project adds new multipurpose level housing services to Roanoke. • Selling Roanoke to Residents, Newcomers, and Visitors Continuing and improving senior services to Roanoke increases the likelihood families will be encouraged to stay to be close to elderly parents. • Improving Streetscapes The project will be adding sidewalk along Mecca Street to accommodate safe access to public transportation. Further, the grounds and landscaping along Mecca Street will now be developed and maintained at a higher level. • Healthy Community Seniors will be served in a health and wellness design environment that promotes choice and independence. 4. Roanoke is the heart of the region. The plan balances and links related elements and initiatives through a comprehensive regional and local development strategy. The project will serve as a regional service. While most residents will likely come from the immediate project area, some will migrate to Roanoke to be closer to family if they have a community such as this to serve their needs. 5. The continuing vitality and growth of Roanoke — like its development over the last 125 years — are dependent on individual and private actions, combined with public investment, to ensure quality of life amenities, infrastructure, and services. The Proposed project is sponsored by a Not for Profit provider advancing and providing high quality senior services in conjunction with local state and federal programs. It is a public private partnership to promote the well being and care of senior residents. 6. Roanoke's vision is to be a sustainable and livable community The project represents an economically viable and sustainable use of an under - utilized site. It promotes a healthy community that serves a demographic age group that is growing very quickly and will need services into the foreseeable future. Holland /Wildwood Neighborhood Plan 1. Infrastructure The project adds utilities, and site infrastructure to support the project and the neighborhood. Addition of a public sidewalk to Orange Avenue, adding convenient access to public transportation, and increasing residential development in a traditional location between commercial and neighborhood uses. 2. People The project will allow people to remain in the community and be served over many years as their needs change. The Neighborhood plan indicated the largest population segment for the neighborhood is the 35 to 64 age cohort at 25 %. This segment of the population is served in two ways by the proposed project. First, as the older portion of the age cohort will likely be seeking senior housing soon. Second, adult children in that age cohort will be seeking good alternatives for their parents near their homes. 3. Community design. The project design team has followed many of the Community design principals outlined in the Neighborhood plan include: Taking advantage of the site topography to design the buildings that fit the site. Adding medium site density that discourages urban sprawl. Including Improvements to the street scape though landscaping, curb and gutter additions, and public sidewalk. Maintained large areas of greenspace for private and casual neighborhood use. Adds to the residential stock in the neighborhood to balance the more dominant commercial uses. 4. Residential Development The building design, while multi occupant housing in nature, maintains a residential design with materials that match the traditional housing vernacular such as pitched roofs, lap and /or shake siding, accents of brick and stone and residential windows. 5. Promotes ongoing economic strength and growth. The project adds jobs at several wage tiers. 6. Improves the Infrastructure to serve the project as well as the neighborhood specifically in the area of traffic flow related to the improvements planned for the intersection of Orange Avenue and Mecca Street. In conclusion, Richfield Living believes the project to be a very worthy addition to the City of Roanoke and thank you in advance for your consideration the Re- zoning request. ZpJING AAENDMI£NT PRO:E55 CUPo£ — ITEM ZC — CONCEPT / DfMELQ°UEMT PLAN ° &O"T PROPERTY INFORMATION 91E PARId pA .. zamri®aln rwms ru mem,a rcrr ovww emrmo us � wxs _ no • ui�awew�nra�xwev�wue�nf mor•'�wn�iocz� x.�r ai�v[avimoo ez •.wm ..ar�n. xtOM.owt maw,rri: rna w4r� n cruo� .ne w.aaiec �.w� a nr aa[c+nxms.s 97E PAR27. BO ` a'>a� mew rrf �� its geww ravEmew �tl Al °YCUixr�wa�wmawrt ° rus.'a�'atw"rsaa .r oxt mu rau-w. rtam nex xo xemvr ra enw¢r.ar s[xa -m.•am wer w" Kn°A°O4cwe aMO,ae+°1air o.uisen�ro ®ner�.v r...ror�anww•r . y avFRASTRUCTUaE ccwMavrAar ua"��'K.°��,w °� ' uaew reeve °'whew dance,,. x. >x...w•,:a,.- x- .or.;n. >xPmex... P®.r. ar.%irzx-. amw �.n�.c mr+ srcwrnrtx�w.,wawwr- avirr u OOV(XAS E G RN MY tr 0 Srcq� pPAk .rar rAx vwtm X6WW I MYXpPY M7gD5 'w n<acECr wrcaa•o. PLAS E. 6 owaxrzr maa R -s r APAR1WIISILC PARf6 A9C�11 naaexrzY ZUED mis 111 n,[cu s� r .� rc �„rs xrtnRrm.' .x K[v srv¢� K. v w -a2 xw, .x,. sn� .ate xn Per x,�.rox K ^ 1prwoaesrc'� /; -"________--- --- `•�� � vawm.m..rs���4row: rw rw r. •, an..orzw.rs �, U��� .m w.zrw.arcw n<� ,rNAfNd�p/T�g Bulaw CONSMCWN CpIMENTARY� �• � '� ..w.c.�m .,o nman x�.�.as.,vum. m • �.,t§' i � �k' PNAY rvo M40HS _ ITT 97E�9WOE COMMENTARY e �.. 90PLD"TAL PLANTINGS COMMENTARY navrsl�wr .anuc�.�A �A�,r ws aw sn n• a w• rw• awwc scwc .b . v Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMM #63132 -18180 RICHFIELD RESIDENCE 1 ROOF HEIGHT 1012' -4" RESIDENCE I W 777� RESIDENCE SITE I Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/191 COMM#63132-18180 PROPERTY LINE 1001-01, - III 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1 7T�7 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 El I I— III III _-: E: Li r�::.:: Li W r�� Ll 1: Ll I ROOF 1 HEIGHT mL-, 1072'-2 ' 'r DWI LTC/ TCU - TT 21 2�0" PROPOSED LONG TERM CARE BUILDING A RICHFIELD O RESIDENCE J ,�NCE 2 ROOF HEIGHT II ENCE 2 III III III - RESIDENCE SITE 2 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMM#63132-18180 II I II I II PROPERTY LINE 80'-0" ROOF 11 HEIGHT 26 O M A I II 1 1=11 I PROPOSED LONG TERM CARE BUILDING T INDICHFIELD PROPERTY LINE 87_0„ 0 Z. N RESIDENCE 3 ROOF HEIGHT 1042'' -6" RESIDENCES —III III L 1015' -0" r ICI � i- RESIDENCE SITE 3 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMM #63132 -18180 ROOF 2 HEIGHT ok 1070' -6" ASSISTED LIVING LEVEL 1 1024' -0" i i i I—] 1 1 -1 1 1-1 1 1—f I PROPOSEDFUTURE ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING �f RICHFIELD RE�6 I I� ,!NCE I ROOF HEIGHT R.ES!,D NCE 4 1054' -0" �d 11-1 IF, IL-1 I (- RESIDENCE SITE 4 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMM#63132-18180 PROPERTY LINE 63'-11" 1 83'-0" cn ROOF HEIGHT 1095,_I0 3/4 1-11 IA T "IE 'o 7m 41', 1' 24 1� III III - III - III -III III PROPOSED FUTURE INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING N..r,7001 \Z7- RICHFIELD I I ■ ■ .. m m i Mal m 0 m ■ ■ ■ ■ — ��__'� ■! ■!- 1ilI ■ ■ ■' I ■ ■I— ail ■I— '�' -�-„ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .. CARE CENTER SITE 2 Roanoke, Virginia 02/13/19 1 COMM #63132 -18180 �t RICHFIELD CARE CENTER SITE 2 Roanoke, Virginia 02/13/191 COMM #63132 -18180 �t RICHFIELD CARE CENTER SITE 2 Roanoke, Virginia 02/13/19 1 COMM#63132 -18180 �f RICHFIELD F40�0 CALDWELL WHITE ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS / PLANNERS 4203 MELROSE AVENUE P.O. BOX 6260 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24017 -0260 (540) 366 -3400 FAX: (540) 366 -8702 Richfield Living — Mecca Street Site — City of Roanoke, VA Amended Application Number 1 Proposed Zoning Amendment for 1047 and 0 Mecca Street, NE — Tax Parcels 7080102 and 7090401 Exhibits Relative to Proposed Stormwater Management Facility The City of Roanoke Planning Commission's Work Session Recommendation #3 states that placement of the required stormwater management facility along Mecca Street, NE may be a concern, it seems, from an aesthetic standpoint. Through the process of due diligence site design, we have evaluated the stormwater management requirements that will be necessary to meet 9VAC25- 870 -66, specifically the Flood Control and Channel Protection requirements. In order to reduce the amount of direct runoff that would bypass the new SWM facility, it is necessary to place the impoundment as near as possible to the low point on the site. Given that our only point of interconnection to the existing storm drain system is by means of extending a new public storm drain along Mecca Street, NE to the intersection of Mecca Street, NE and Orange Avenue, NE, the logical location for the basin is in the northwestern corner of the property, adjacent to the City Fire Station parcel. This will allow the majority of the site runoff to be captured in the basin and controlled in accordance with City and State requirements. We have included herein a depiction of the anticipated grading of the new SWM facility as well as a cross - section through the basin, based on our preliminary computations. As shown, the top of the control berm will be only slightly higher than the elevation of Mecca Street, thereby avoiding an unsightly embankment. While the formal design is not yet to the level of completion where we can proffer these sketches verbatim, we do believe that the final designs will be in general conformance with the attached. While it is understood that SWM facilities such as these are beneficial to control the rates of stormwater runoff to protect the general public, and are required by Code, it is also understood that these facilities are not always the most attractive features of a site. In order to reduce the visual impact of the facility, we propose to plant deciduous trees along the private side of the right -of -way adjacent to the new SWM facility. Given the presence of overhead utility lines, these trees may be limited to ornamentals rather than large shade trees, however, we will certainly coordinate with the City in choosing appropriate species. In addition to the new deciduous trees, we will plant a staggered strip of new evergreen shrubs intermingled with the trees, to aide in directing the public's view upward toward the new buildings rather than downward to the new basin. This landscaping will be provided as stated to the extent that it will not conflict with the Code required design of the new stormwater management facility. Lastly, there have been concerns regarding the aesthetics of the new outlet structure of the stormwater management facility. Again, while it is in our best interest to make this detention facility as attractive as possible, there are requirements for flood control that must be accounted for, and these require a certain size structure to control the ten -year storm from, in this case, an ultimate project area of approximately 10.4 acres. As shown on the attached, under the current level of design, the top of the outlet riser will be approximately 18" lower than the top of the outlet control, and the intent is to tuck the structure into the slope of the Mecca Street side of the pond to the extent possible. We will investigate different means of controlling the outflow, but with the top of the structure lower than the berm, the proposed landscaping should aide in screening the structure, regardless of the type of structure used. \ LAI, i lo, ol Qa 5 ' ` $ o N S 0 1023.0 992.2 ` X / % 9s - \ % �` _ ." 's 50' 25' 0' 50' - _ - - - - - - 1' = 50' GRAPHIC SCALE % - PRELIM /NARY STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT GRADING ----- - - - - -- - - -- FOR --- - - - - -- -- --- - -- I _ _ RICHFIELD LI SING � \ SITUATE MECCA STREET - - -- _ I � � � ?� ` � / CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 1010 2019 -02 -12 Z SECTION THROUGH PROPOSED SWM POND Q RICHREW 2 - MECCA STREET 1" = 10' HORIZONTAL m 0) 11 � 3 N m U � U 2NV W 3 W o 6' MIN. TIES IN WITH 2H.• 1 V SLOPE UP TO ACCESS DRIVE TOP BERM = t 994.1 10101 •••I ../ PRELIMINARY SECTION THROUGH PROPOSED STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT FACILI TY FOR RICHFIELD L WNG SI TUA TE MECCA STREET CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ►-�&A —1 ,�OrO 0 RA: aricultural .� Commercial- Genera O> 7140123 i 1 -1: Light Industrial I f ROS: Recreation and .' Open Spaced i i i CG(c): Commercia • ♦ Conditional -O • Commercial-General al- General Ord #37486.071706 ~CG: �\ Commercial - General loll �� ♦ ♦� IN(c): Institutional ► ♦� CG(c): Con di t i onal ► ♦� Commercial-'General Ord #30265. • Conditional �� �� ♦ ♦ ♦� ♦� • Ord #2\ 7 l � .�: ♦: ♦: ♦:� jG�► �!1�i'�i�i�i�i• MX: Mixed Use 3� i CG(c): Commercial - General RMF: Res A% wConditional*4 Multifamily Ord #35538 - 082001 ` RMF(c): Res Multifamily Conditional Ord #29452 RMF: Res Multifamily. s ♦ ♦ RMF: Res' ' ♦ :Multifamily ♦� Res Multifamily ' ►I N. Conditional ► ♦�, Ord #27386 RMF:,Res Multifamil) Adjoining Property Owners for 1047 Mecca Street, NE and 0 Mecca Street, NE (Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401) TAXID MailAddress MailCity St Zip LocalAddress LocalCity Zip Ownerl 7070114 PO BOX 18 SALEM VA 24153 2843 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 BRAZOS RIVER GROUP LLC 7070115 1030 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE VA 24012 1030 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 24012 TRS EAST END BAPTIST CHURCH 7070309 1012 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE VA 24012 1012 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 24012 MANNING ERIN D 7070310 1114 MOYERWOOD RD ROCKY MOUNT VA 124151 1004 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 124012 THORNHILL DEBORAH WISEMAN 7080102 4033 MOCKINGBIRD HILL ROANOKE VA 24012 1047 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 24012 MCGHEE TERRY L 7080103 1031 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE VA 24012 1031 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 24012 JESSEE NETTIE E 7080106 2918 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2918 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 SATI SAMER 7080107 2926 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2926 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 BENNETT DAWN 7080108 2934 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2934 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 LAWHORN MARK E 7080109 3006 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 0 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE YORK ISAAC A & ANNE S 7080110 3006 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3006 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 DICARLO ANDREW L 7080111 3018 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3018 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 RAMSEY JACKIE L JR 7080112 3026 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3026 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 124012 FERRIS THOMAS C & GLORIA J 7080113 3034 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3034 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 LACKS HAROLD N JR & CYNTHIA P 7080114 3056 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3056 CANNADAY RD NE ROANOKE 24012 JOHNSON REBECCA G 7090401 4033 MOCKINGBIRD HILL ROANOKE VA 24012 0 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE MCGHEE TERRY L 7090405 2901 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2901 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 SOUTH JEFFERSON LLC 7090406 210 CARVER AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2945 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 RYT LLC 7090407 2913 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE VA 24012 2913 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 JOACHIM RICHARD J 7090408 10 S JEFFERSON ST SE STE 1200 ROANOKE VA 24011 0 ORANGE AV NE ROANOKE WHITE BIRCH HOLDINGS LLC 7090409 PO BOX 5306 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22905 2949 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE CATON DOUGLAS E 7090410 PO BOX 1451 ROANOKE VA 124007 11061 MECCA ST NE ROANOKE 24012 CITY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 124012 13021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 24012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 124012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC 7090521 3006 HICKORY WOODS DR NE ROANOKE VA 24012 3021 ORANGE AVE NE ROANOKE 124012 HICKORY WOODS APARTMENTS LLC CITY OF ROANOKE - PDB Attn Tina Carr STEPHANIE MOON, CITY CLERK 215 CHURCH AVE, SW, SUITE 456 ROANOKE, VA 24011 The Roanoke Times Account Number Roanoke, Virginia 6011439 Affidavit of Publication Date March 05, 2019 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/05/2019 Legal Notices PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised ho 1 x 175 L 1,666.00 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A was published in said newspapers on the following dates: 02/26, 03/05/2019 The First insertion being given ... 02/26/2019 Newspaper reference: 0000902517 Billing Representative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Tuesday, March 5, 2019 Notary Public, State of Virginia rE j� Citylqpuw of Roanoke f 31 My Commission expires ( / t THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM- 1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to 1 -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial - General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3042143) in Ordinance No. 31731- 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial - General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single/Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses Proposed are an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853 -2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals (902517) i' ur: Lill Hwy r. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any applications will be available for review in Planning, Building, & Development, first floor, Room 170, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March 11, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, to consider the following matters: M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to vacate an undeveloped portion of an alley between 11th Street, N.E., and Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., and adjacent to Official Tax Map Nos. 3042101, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, and 3042143. The portion to be vacated is approximately 10 feet in width and extends approximately 106 feet from the northeast corner along the northernmost boundary of Official Tax Map No. 3042143 and from the southeast corner of Official Tax Map No. 3042112 along the southern boundaries of Official Tax Map Nos. 3042112 and 3042111, terminating at its intersection with Official Tax Map Nos. 3042110 and 3402101. M & E Properties, LLC, and Southern Classic Auto Wash of Roanoke, LLC, request to rezone and repeal all conditions proffered as part of previous rezonings on property located at 915, 0, 1001, 0, 0, 1015 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E., 950 Orange Avenue, N.E., and the portion of alley requested for vacation between said parcels, bearing Official Tax Nos. 3042101, 3042108, 3042109, 3042110, 3042111, 3042112, 3042143, respectively, from I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; RM -1, Residential Mixed Density District; and CG, Commercial - General District, with conditions; to I -1, Light Industrial District, with conditions; and CG, Commercial- General District. The conditions requested for repeal on 915 Pocahontas Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax No. 3042101) in Ordinance No. 31674- 092793 restrict development to conformance with the site plan submitted with said rezoning; prohibit certain uses, including laboratories or testing facilities, ,scrap materials recycling establishments, or outdoor advertising; require particular landscaping; and include a zoning reversion clause. The conditions requested for repeal on 950 Orange Avenue, N.E. (Official Tax Map No. 3042143) in Ordinance No. 31731- 102593 restrict the use to an automatic automobile washing facility only, require development per the site plan submitted with said rezoning, and include a zoning reversion clause. The use classes permitted in the Light Industrial District include residential; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0. The use classes permitted in the Commercial- General District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; warehousing and distribution; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community facilities; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Light Industrial, Single /Two Family, and General Commercial. The primary uses proposed are an expansion of an existing motor vehicle repair or service establishment and continuation of an existing carwash. Richfield Living requests to rezone 1047 Mecca Street, N.E., and 0 Mecca Street, N.E., bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 7080102 and 7090401, respectively, from R -5, Residential Single - Family, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. The land use categories permitted in Institutional Planned Unit Development District include residential; accommodations and group Iiving; commercial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory with no maximum density specified and no maximum floor area ratio specified. The comprehensive plan designates the property for Single - family, High Density. The proposed use is a group care facility, nursing home and group care facility, congregate home, elderly. Tina M. Carr, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold public hearings on the aforesaid matters on March 18, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. Any person with a disability requiring any special accommodation to attend or participate in the public hearings should contact the City Clerk's office at (540) 853 -2541 at least five days prior to the scheduled public hearings. Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on March 13, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following application: Application by Calvin E. Carroll, Jr., for property located at 711 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 2112717, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2 -322, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to establish an outdoor storage lot. Donna M. Payne, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals Please publish in newspaper on Tuesday, February 26, 2019, and Tuesday, March 5, 2019. Please bill and send affidavit of publication to: Tina M. Carr Secretary to the Planning Commission Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 tine Carr {u roanol<cv�i.�ov Donna M. Payne Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals Planning, Building, & Development City of Roanoke Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 166 Roanoke, VA 24011 540/853 -1730 donna.t)avnctcbroanokeva,i-,ov_ Please send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 540/853 -2541 STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, NiMC Cite Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Fax: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkCroanokeva.gov February 28, 2019 Corbin L. White Caldwell White Associates 4203 Melrose Avenue, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Mr. White: CECELIA F. NICCOY Depute' City Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CHIC Assistant Deputy City Clerk A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding your request to rezone properties located at 1047 Mecca Street, N. E., and 0 Mecca Street, N. E., respectively, from Residential Single- Family, to Institutional Planned Unit Development District. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on Monday, March 11. If you have questions regarding the Planning Commission public hearing, please contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. Questions regarding the City Council public hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541. Sincerely, *OL, rn hd Stephanie M. Moon Reyno , MM City Clerk Enclosure c: Melanie Obenchain, Executor for Estate of Karen Mills, Rebecca Manning, and Debbie McGhee, 4054 Mockingbird Hill Road, N. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Cherie Grisso, Richfield Living, 3615 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 STEPHANIE M. MOON REYNOLDS, NIMC Citv Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 -1536 Telephone: (540) 853 -2541 Far: (540) 853 -1145 E -mail: clerkC;roanokeva.gov Brazos River Group, LLC Trustees of East End Baptist Church Erin D. Manning Deborah Wiseman Thornhill Terry L. McGhee Nettie E. Jessee Samer Sati Dawn Bennett Mark E. Lawhorn Isaac A. and Anne S. York Andrew L. Dicarlo Ladies and Gentlemen: February 28, 2019 CECELIA F. MCCOY Depute Cite Clerk CECELIA T. WEBB, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk Jackie L. Ramsey, Jr. Thomas C. and Gloria J. Ferris Harold N. and Cynthia P. Lacks Rebecca G. Johnson South Jefferson, LLC RYT, LLC Richard J. Joachim White Birch Holdings, LLC Douglas E. Caton Hickory Woods Apartments, LLC A public hearing has been advertised to be heard by the City Planning Commission on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W., regarding a request of Richfield Living to rezone properties located at 1047 Mecca Street, N. E., and 0 Mecca Street, N. E., respectively, from Residential Single- Family, to Institutional Planned Unit Development District. (See copy of the Public Hearing Notice attached.) Pursuant to provision of Resolution No. 25523 adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke on Monday, April 6, 1981, a public hearing also has been scheduled to be held on Monday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. before the Roanoke City Council in the Council Chamber, pending formal action by the City Planning Commission, which may be viewed on the City's webpage, www.roanokeva.gov, under "Roanoke Planning Commission News ", following its meeting on March 11. This letter is provided for your information as an interested party and /or adjoining property owner. If you have questions regarding the Planning Commission public hearing, please contact Tina Carr, Secretary to the City Planning Commission at (540) 853 -1730. Questions regarding the City Council public hearing may be directed to the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541. Sincerely, VA Ll Y%;• r f ( btM Ste hanie M. Moon Re no r Rey City Clerk Enclosure Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Atli 4al Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 863 -1730 FMng Dale: February 1S, 2019 ❑ Rezoning, Not aftwise listed Submittal Number. Amended Application No.1 ❑ Rezoning, Conditional Q Rezoning to Planned Unk Development ❑ UabWnent of Comprehaisive Sign Ovarfay District Address: 11047 Mecca St, NE & 0 Mecca St. NE ❑ Amendment Of Praftered Ctxr Mons Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Compr Sign Omiay Dstrict Official Tint No(s).: 17080102 & 7090401 EAsting ❑ Without Coalitions Ordnance Zoning: R -5, Residential Single -Family ❑ ti b Condkions No(s)• (9 ❑ Planned Unit Devftmai t applicahle)- Requested ❑ t CondiBoos Propowi Group Care Facility, Nursing Zoning: INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Develo ❑ With Conditions Land Use: Home and Congregate t l IM Planned Unk Oevebpmant me - Elderly Name, Estate of Karen Mills, Debbie McGhee, Rebecca Manning Phone Number; I Address: 14054 Mockingbird Hill, Roanoke, VA 24012 E -mail' r o- r 1i ii ic AK�� IW& A Name; Richfield Living - Cherie Grisso Phone Namber- L5403MS97 13615 W. Main St, Salem Va 24153 i E mail: Cgrissorg fiddlivingxoumj NpMx,9rysn; - -- Name: aldwell White Assoc. - Corbin White Phone Number- � 5401045181 Address: 203 Melrose Ave, NW. Roanok VA 24017 Ems; waroanokeeaolxcm (x Completed application form and checklist. fx Written narrative explaining the reason for the request. fx Metes and bounds description, if applicable. F Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Am Will Amended development or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item '2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures, F- if applicable. F Written proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. F Traffic impact analysis. F Concept plan. F Proffered conditions, if applicable. F Required fee. *An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www. roanokeva .gov /planningcommission, A complete packet must be submitted each time an application is amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. Narrative Richfield Living is pleased to submit the following narrative related to its proposed senior housing continuum project proposed on the 1047 Mecca Street and adjacent land Richfield Background Mission and Long -Range Plan The Richfield Living Community traces its origins back to 1919 when a group of women decided to provide the rural citizens of Roanoke County and the surrounding area with a means of learning how to care for the sick. By February 1920, they had formed a nursing committee called the Roanoke County Nursing Committee and appointed Morgan Harris as public health nurse for the committee. Under Mrs. Harris's leadership, the committee started several innovative programs, including offering mobile clinics and providing instruction in home nursing and care for the sick throughout Roanoke County. After 10 years, the committee began offering patient care in a house on the County Farm west of Salem, employing a graduate nurse for the first two years of operation as accommodations were gradually expanded. Following the founding of the Roanoke Public Health Association in 1937, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors voted to turn the entire project over to the association to be run as a nursing home. Over the next 30 years, patients ranged in age from infants to octogenarians with a wide range of physical disabilities. As the services offered grew, the facilities were upgraded and expanded to include a new nursing care center built on the site of the original farm house in 1971 and an east wing addition in 1978. As the facility expanded its services to offer various levels of housing and care, the board elected to change the name of the facility to reflect the evolving community. The new name, Richfield, reflected the history of the land on which the facility was located. As a senior living community, Richfield has grown from its humble beginnings into a comprehensive life plan community providing independent retirement living, assisted living, rehabilitation and nursing care options. Located on approximately 50 acres, the Community currently consists of 84 independent living apartments (the "Knollwood Apartments ") and 14 independent living cottages ( "Richfield Lake Estates Cottages ") (collectively the "Existing Independent Living Units "), 136 assisted living beds (the "Assisted Living Beds "), 36 memory care beds (the "Memory Care Beds "), a 48 -bed transitional care facility (the "Existing Transitional Care Beds "), a 257 -bed nursing facility (the "Existing Nursing Beds "), along with supportive common areas. The Assisted Living Beds, Memory Care Beds, Existing Transitional Care Beds, and Existing Nursing Beds are collectively referred to as the "Health Care Center." Richfield has owned and operated the large bed nursing home in Salem, VA in an institutionally designed building for over 45 years. Within the skilled nursing building, most residents have semi - private rooms with bathrooms that are not handicap accessible. Richfield has had plans to reposition the building on its Salem campus for over 7 years. The first phase, to renovate a former assisted living building into a 48 -bed rehab center was completed and has operated since 2012. The Board of Directors has since then been evaluating renovating the existing building vs building a new building. Based on occupancy levels averaging 80% on its Salem campus, the Board decided to redevelop the Salem campus by building a new 76 bed nursing home to attach to its 48 -bed rehab center. Further, the Board decided to transition 116 beds to this new location in Roanoke. This strategy allows Richfield to position its existing campus and new campus with more homelike environments for the long -term care residents. Further, it relocates nursing beds into two smaller communities that are built to current building standards and a modern resident centered care service delivery model. In developing a Roanoke campus, the Board sought to find a site that would allow for development of a full continuum of care as market demands and consumer preferences have changed over time. The project concept plan includes Phase I development of 116 bed healthcare facility providing long term care, memory care and transitional rehabilitative care services. Future phases would include development of 70 assisted living apartments, 110 independent senior apartments and a campus town center integrating the community. Maior Design Features Richfield has incorporated a resident centered care neighborhood model. The project will have 38 transitional care units and dedicated therapy space on the top floor which will be designed with a hospitality theme. The first two floors of the project will be split into 4 long term care households each containing 19 units around a shared community space for the household. Each long -term care household has a front porch accessing the household and a residential style kitchen as its central focus. The kitchen is adjoined to other life enriching activity spaces including a 4- season porch, living room, dining room and multi - purpose activity space. The resident rooms include a combination of private bedroom suites with private bath or private bedroom with a shared bath. The exterior of the building has been designed in a residential format with lap siding and a combination of brick with some stone accents. The design intent is to connotate a residential homelike environment. There are to be two designated outdoor areas for the enjoyment of residents in addition to the 4 season porches in each household. The area between the wings will be a secured courtyard with paths, landscape gardens, and sitting areas. In addition, there will be an outdoor patio to the side of the building for casual use and programed outdoor activity. The building and its households have been designed both for efficient size for staffing ratios, generous rooms sizes for resident enjoyment, and services spaces located to save steps for staff. Location of nursing offices, med rooms, housekeeping, and equipment storage are placed throughout the community for convenient access but also out of site to maintain the residential feel. A combination of hard surface and carpeted floors are used in combination throughout the community to create the home environment. The future senior housing building will include assisted living studio and one - bedroom apartments with kitchens and baths. The independent living units' range in size from studio, one bedroom, one bedroom plus den or sunroom, and two - bedroom apartments. The project will feature below building private parking for independent residents. The housing will be tied together with a community building called a "Town Center" that will feature a full commercial kitchen and multiple dinning venues, activity spaces, a large community room, exercise and wellness space, office and support spaces for the community. Amendment 1 Addition: Additional Building Massing exhibits have been added to address Zoning Amendment Comment item #2 dated of 2112119 Phase lI improvements are depicted in the massing model for scale and relation to the Phase I project plan. The development will be designed with not less than 12% transparency on all building elevations. Building exterior materials will match Phase I and be in proportionate percentages. The addition of split face block, in a compatible color, will appear in areas where the garage foundation walls are exposed. This condition does not exist on Phase 1. A pitched roof with gables and dormers to break up the roof mass will be incorporated. An Additional exhibit has been added to address Zoning Amendment Comment item #3 dated of 2/12/19 The City of Roanoke Planning Commission's Work Session Recommendation #3 states that placement of the required stormwater management facility along Mecca Street, NE may be a concern, it seems, from an aesthetic standpoint. Through the process of due diligence site design, we have evaluated the stormwater management requirements that will be necessary to meet 9VAC25- 870 -66, specifically the Flood Control and Channel Protection requirements. In order to reduce the amount of direct runoff that would bypass the new SWM facility, it is necessary to place the impoundment as near as possible to the low point on the site. Given that our only point of interconnection to the existing storm drain system is by means of extending a new public storm drain along Mecca Street, NE to the intersection of Mecca Street, NE and Orange Avenue, NE, the logical location for the basin is in the northwestern corner of the property, adjacent to the City Fire Station parcel. This will allow the majority of the site runoff to be captured in the basin and controlled in accordance with City and State requirements. We have included herein a depiction of the anticipated grading of the new SWM facility as well as a cross - section through the basin, based on our preliminary computations. As shown, the top of the control berm will be only slightly higher than the elevation of Mecca Street, thereby avoiding an unsightly embankment. While the formal design is not yet to the level of completion where we can proffer these sketches verbatim, we do believe that the final designs will be in general conformance with the attached. While it is understood that SWM facilities such as these are beneficial to control the rates of stormwater runoff to protect the general public, and are required by Code, it is also understood that these facilities are not always the most attractive features of a site. In order to reduce the visual impact of the facility, we propose to plant deciduous trees along the private side of the right -of -way adjacent to the new SWM facility. Given the presence of overhead utility lines, these trees may be limited to ornamentals rather than large shade trees, however, we will certainly coordinate with the City in choosing appropriate species. In addition to the new deciduous trees, we will plant a staggered strip of new evergreen shrubs intermingled with the trees, to aide in directing the public's view upward toward the new buildings rather than downward to the new basin. This landscaping will be provided as stated to the extent that it will not conflict with the Code required design of the new stormwater management facility. Lastly, there have been concerns regarding the aesthetics of the new outlet structure of the stormwater management facility. Again, while it is in our best interest to make this detention facility as attractive as possible, there are requirements for flood control that must be accounted for, and these require a certain size structure to control the ten -year storm from, in this case, an ultimate project area of approximately 10.4 acres. As shown on the attached, under the current level of design, the top of the outlet riser will be approximately 18" lower than the top of the outlet control, and the intent is to tuck the structure into the slope of the Mecca Street side of the pond to the extent possible. We will investigate different means of controlling the outflow, but with the top of the structure lower than the berm, the proposed landscaping should aide in screening the structure, regardless of the type of structure used. Location and Access The project is located on Mecca Street one block south of Orange Avenue (County RD 460) in the City of Roanoke. Orange Avenue is a main traffic collector road and heavily traveled. Public transportation is available throughout the area and there exists a current bus stop at the corner of Mecca and Orange. This is one block from the project site. As part of our development plan, a new side walk will be installed from the bus stop to the project to enhance staff and resident safety for use of public transportation. The 13 acres site is a wooded lot and the site plan has been developed to take advantage of the naturally treed site. Walking paths and sitting areas are planned throughout the project site for resident enjoyment. Neighborhood Community Planninq Process Once the project land was under control, the owner and development team initiated a community planning process that included 2 neighborhood meetings and various meetings with individual neighbors. We communicated with the Wildwood Civic League to arrange for the public meetings in addition to mailing invitations to neighbors from a list provided by City planning staff. The first neighborhood meeting was designed for the owner and developer as an introduction and listening session. This gave Richfield Living and Baile Development the opportunity to share the organization's mission and experience in developing communities of this nature. It also introduced discussion of the concept, potential project size, and phasing contemplated by the design team. There were no plans developed or ready to share at that time, it was merely an opportunity to get an initial reaction to the project development and to hear neighborhood priorities and concerns. There were three primary themes from this neighborhood meeting. First and foremost was concern about traffic generated by any new development on what was perceived to be an overly taxed intersection at Mecca St and Orange Avenue. Second was an interest in the size and scale of the building in comparison to neighboring properties. Last was a concern for public safety related to a potential traffic conflict that might occur between the proposed use and the fire station. Other points about building appearance, areas on the site that might remain wooded, and how neighborhood and this project might interact in the future were also discussed. Approximately 50 people attended the first meeting. The second neighborhood meeting was designed to show the proposed initial site plan that met the goals of the owner for the development and was sensitive to the information shared at the first meeting. The site plan was shared showing various setbacks from the property line which met the objectives that were raised in the first meeting, identified areas of the site that would remain an undisturbed treed buffer and could be enhanced with additional landscaping as needed, showed how parking was located away from and shielded by the new building from the neighboring homes, and showed the primary access to the site from Mecca Street. It was also discussed that the development team was exploring an acquisition or easement of a neighboring property that might result in a second entrance at the intersection of Orange Avenue and Granby Street. We also shared at this meeting that at the encouragement of the City we had undertaken a full traffic study to address the traffic impacts of the project. Approximately 15 people attended the second neighborhood meeting, but it should be noted there was some confusion related to the location of the meeting. A few individuals assumed the second meeting was to be held at the same location as the first and went to the wrong location. A few follow up calls were made to individuals who went to the wrong location or otherwise could not attend. In addition to the neighborhood meetings, there have been several individual meetings with interested parties as well as information posted about the project on the Wildwood Civic League Facebook page. The development team believes we have generally addressed neighbor concerns raised while developing a project plan that meets Richfield Living objectives. The specific neighborhood concerns related to traffic impact are addressed within the V party traffic impact study prepared by RKK Engineering. Subsequent to the neighborhood meetings, the above noted exploration of a second entrance to the site through an easement or acquisition was abandoned. The Owner /Developer were unable to negotiate an access point with the adjacent land owners. Traffic Study With the concerns raised by the neighborhood the Owner /Developer, with the City's encouragement, believed it would be appropriate to have a 3rd party traffic study completed to review a few factors associated with the development of the property. The objectives were to understand the impact and trips per day and peek travel impacts the surrounding road systems, intersections, and general function of traffic flow in the immediate project area. Further to study if there was warrants to support the addition of a full function stop light at the intersection of Mecca and Orange. The Owner engaged RKK Engineering to complete the study and it is included in the application exhibits related to this application. Analysis and recommendations can be found in the study. Amendment 1 Addition: Traffic study has been updated to address Zoning Amendment Comments, item #4 dated of 2/12/19 Traffic Study has indicated improvements to the intersection of Mecca St and Orange Avenue are recommended for both phase l and phase IL The development will commit to: In conjunction to Phase 1 project improvements, the development will make additions to the existing emergency traffic control that will allow for emergency clearing of vehicles at the intersection and interconnects to other Orange Ave intersection controls In conjunction to Phase 11 project improvements, the development will convert the signal at Mecca St and Orange Avenue to a full 3 way controlled intersection Justification for the chancre The Owner /Developer believes this project is appropriate and support the change in Zoning for the following: The site is located between a heavily travel commercial area along and to the north of Orange Avenue and the Wildwood single family homes to the south. The proposed project represents a good transitional use with medium density housing that allows for a blending of and transition between the property types. Further, its use as a senior housing community has lower impacts (traffic, site lighting, allocation of greenspace, noise, etc.) than other transitional uses that might be proposed, including multi family housing or light commercial. With a very dramatic growth in senior population, the project addresses a community need currently and into the future. With the baby boomer generation entering retirement, there will be an ever - increasing need for senior communities of this nature. This site with its 13 -acre size allows for a senior housing continuum community that will serve the needs of residents as they age in place. With housing that serves very independent living individuals through full nursing care, residents and families will only need to make one community choice and allow them to stay as their housing and health care needs change. Many senior communities serve a singular element of the continuum while this proposed project meets the needs of a much broader resident profile in a rental format. The development type, senior housing, on a per unit basis has a lesser impact on the property for average unit size, parking need, ability to maintain green spaces that other potential uses. Effect of the development on the neighborhood Currently the subject property has vacant land and a single - family home that has been vacant for some time with few prospects for update renovation or reuse. The vacant property shows signs of dumping and use by trespassers. The project development would utilize the property for a highly needed community valued service by a non - profit sponsor. It would clean up the property and provide a well- maintained residential use. The proposed use, or any other potential development on the site will have impact on traffic in the surrounding area. This is addressed in the included traffic study. Unless it is assumed the property would remain vacant indefinably, traffic impacts will result from any development proposal and the Owner /Developer believe this use will be less impactful. It is common for the grounds and walking paths to be utilized by the neighbors for casual use. Richfield Living would expect and welcome this use by the neighboring properties. There will be activity associated with the services provided on site including delivery, trash removal, staff and visitor trips to the site, parking and lighting. The site plan has been designed with sensitivity to the location of those activities as to minimize their influence on adjoining properties. The neighborhood will also be impacted during the construction of the community with traditional construction related traffic and noise and the impacts to utility work that will be occurring on Mecca Street to provide services to the site. Every effort will be made to minimize these construction impacts while being efficient and orderly in getting the work completed. Lastly, the neighborhood will have the advantage of a new senior service provider in proximity for them or their family to utilize. Availability of similarly zoned properties Richfield Living through its real estate broker, did an extensive search of the area over the course of several months to find sites that could accommodate their project vision. Very few were available and those that were had site factors (neighboring uses, soil conditions, topography, site size, or access) that were unfavorable when compared to this project site. Due to this unique use, nearly all of them would have also required rezoning to accommodate a project such as the one proposed. Relationship of the proposed property to the City Comprehensive Plan and Hollins/Wildwood Neiahborhood Plan The following factors related to the project are consistent and advance the initiatives outlined in the Compressive plan and Neighborhood plan Comprehensive Plan out lines six objectives 1. Roanoke's quality of life and economic development are integrally related. The proposed project provides a new senior community to enhance the quality of life for the residents it will serve while also creating and maintaining good employment opportunities for project staff with several tiers of employment/wages from part time to full time professional positions. 2. Roanoke is a city built using quality design principles The proposed project uses a residential design that promotes wellness and choice for the residents it serves. The physical site location allows for a good transition between commercial and neighborhood uses on each site. The site plan and building has been designed to fit the property, takes advantage of the naturally treed lot, creates walking paths and green space for the enjoyment of both residents and community members, and utilizes its location near a public transportation node with an added sidewalk for safe access to public transportation. 3. To implement the plan's policies, a series of strategic initiatives are identified. The project addresses the targets sub sections of this objective • Village Centers The project and its proximity to Downtown grows the access to convenient senior services to the core City. • Multi- Service Facilities The project, as a full continuum (independent living though full skilled care) provides a multi service community which allows residents to remain in place as their needs change. Further it expands the not for profit Owners services into a new market region and integrates with other associated service providers. • New Housing Opportunities The project adds new multipurpose level housing services to Roanoke. • Selling Roanoke to Residents, Newcomers, and Visitors Continuing and improving senior services to Roanoke increases the likelihood families will be encouraged to stay to be close to elderly parents. • Improving Streetscapes The project will be adding sidewalk along Mecca Street to accommodate safe access to public transportation. Further, the grounds and landscaping along Mecca Street will now be developed and maintained at a higher level. • Healthy Community Seniors will be served in a health and wellness design environment that promotes choice and independence. 4. Roanoke is the heart of the region. The plan balances and links related elements and initiatives through a comprehensive regional and local development strategy. The project will serve as a regional service. While most residents will likely come from the immediate project area, some will migrate to Roanoke to be closer to family if they have a community such as this to serve their needs. 5. The continuing vitality and growth of Roanoke — like its development over the last 125 years — are dependent on individual and private actions, combined with public investment, to ensure quality of life amenities, infrastructure, and services. The Proposed project is sponsored by a Not for Profit provider advancing and providing high quality senior services in conjunction with local state and federal programs. It is a public private partnership to promote the well being and care of senior residents. 6. Roanoke's vision is to be a sustainable and livable community The project represents an economically viable and sustainable use of an under - utilized site. It promotes a healthy community that serves a demographic age group that is growing very quickly and will need services into the foreseeable future. Holland/Wildwood Neighborhood Plan 1. Infrastructure The project adds utilities, and site infrastructure to support the project and the neighborhood. Addition of a public sidewalk to Orange Avenue, adding convenient access to public transportation, and increasing residential development in a traditional location between commercial and neighborhood uses. 2. People The project will allow people to remain in the community and be served over many years as their needs change. The Neighborhood plan indicated the largest population segment for the neighborhood is the 35 to 64 age cohort at 25 %. This segment of the population is served in two ways by the proposed project. First, as the older portion of the age cohort will likely be seeking senior housing soon. Second, adult children in that age cohort will be seeking good alternatives for their parents near their homes. 3. Community design. The project design team has followed many of the Community design principals outlined in the Neighborhood plan include: Taking advantage of the site topography to design the buildings that fit the site. Adding medium site density that discourages urban sprawl. Including Improvements to the street scape though landscaping, curb and gutter additions, and public sidewalk. Maintained large areas of greenspace for private and casual neighborhood use. Adds to the residential stock in the neighborhood to balance the more dominant commercial uses. 4. Residential Development The building design, while multi occupant housing in nature, maintains a residential design with materials that match the traditional housing vernacular such as pitched roofs, lap and /or shake siding, accents of brick and stone and residential windows. 5. Promotes ongoing economic strength and growth. The project adds jobs at several wage tiers. 6. Improves the Infrastructure to serve the project as well as the neighborhood specifically in the area of traffic flow related to the improvements planned for the intersection of Orange Avenue and Mecca Street. In conclusion, Richfield Living believes the project to be a very worthy addition to the City of Roanoke and thank you in advance for your consideration the Re- zoning request. l°J s � o s • ( - AM7ElPg'CIA;W�YJAAfm alb AIBK Aff JW Ate/! 4" AKWK a �l SW AT /ll AW� e INiI� /M9< � iIC � 11 rgAlNIIY 2DIfD W _ Jr� I / /// ^� pfiavm W wmmm � rlr � �ll � T�PAq�riL71�Of� amts ), ZM R-5 ball r � MW RAA t R f AV , SW PAWa O �1 -Alec �I Ai1G At' � 0 0 K i6� OAM ral JUM A161pW PA a soar. o��o.��A me . �. Ai=dARE W m • AA m4Y a mBD 8� , Alf PAN= X Wgt MASA NI wx Pmm Amm E "mm G A'^Y✓�Y Mw arM daunmms FlO@I SOWM 8 Rm WE m - AAFYIroum my I awn AaAs n r AWIOE a S)M AS M V" AOM law �� /E 6t4m W71AE fieaWllOe ATM LtWBR$ 7D ARiIlAOAM1 Pam 4 ANI'AapIBB/W ABAAIE 10 = e 94 phYw� f-f— and m fl-d Pb AE VARW RN UW Wm AvE 7 summammm l;40 �A lifi QnAC _dA-T- EIeiN lqi A D4ne+efms and /omtiorm o1 trAe�adq m At NOW MP W f Lxo � � o/ aA adsthg DOUS pRavim E CAM TAM PAVM NNOW QAbWMr 2MM R-J n O-Xxft i ` ft ft Anrr +awgq�A !*WFY was ,Q„dw a t 1 i�r WW"s "0 0 10 ' / I� H 4k. I � L - n Z -,o r5 r n � 0 �C ti JJ � RICHARD J. JOACH /M TAX PARCEL 7090407 CURRENTL Y ZONED R -5 i 10 1 a' A co vi N IA I lip 'III +III III II YI it it I I I� I� I� S� 4b ARM N N II n N n N N n n N 0 a n p N N rl II n � n _ N Z n N Z N Z Z � O u �M 8 n N 1 1 ST RM hl 1 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 co 1 C i i 1 OU-rF- 460) o �mp NGE AV RAl _ i UJI, LU DEMO STORY SKILLED :ARE FACILITY - 6 z SE 2 4STORY INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILII pt, 2 STORY TOWN CENTER c -D C-1 0 3STORY X�XASSISTED LIVING, FACILITY OD N) c -D C-1 0 0 r- (-6 RESIDENCE 1 ROOF HEIGHT 1012' -4" PROPERTY LINE 87' -4" 1 100' -0" --]I- IF, RESIDENCE 1 is RESIDENCE SITE 1 _ E�U_ PF 198' -0" N d' Lo PROPERTY LINE R�ES8IDOENCE 2 ROOF HEIGHT rik RESIDENCE 2 999 -a -- - - RESIDENCE SITE 2 0 N RESIDENCE 3 ROOF HEIGHT 1042' -6" zo jh N RESIDENCE 3 1015' -0" — i RESIDENCE SITE 3 PROPERTY LINE 204' -4" RESIDENCE 4 ROOF H_ EIGHT 1094' -3" v M M 6 v RESIDENCE 4 - 1 II RESIDENCE SITE 4 PROPERTY LINE ' -11" 83' -0" c iY PR( INDEPENI 0 aim w■ gal 0 1 0 1 m m m m ■ ■ ■ ■ MINIM - - Ms s ircNVAL CALDA'V"ELL V H1TE AS�0C -1ATES ENGINEERS SURVE',_ORS PL_a N^.ER.S 4203 MELROSE aV"ENLTE P.0. BO} 6260 R03 ?OI *:E, VIRGII:IA 2401'-0260 (540) (540) 366 -3400 F- X: ( 540) 366 -8702 Richfield Living – Mecca Street Site – City of Roanoke, VA Amended Application Number 1 Proposed Zoning Amendment for 1047 and 0 Mecca Street, NE – Tax Parcels 7080102 and 7090401 Exhibits Relative to Proposed Stormwater Management Facility The City of Roanoke Planning Commission's Work Session Recommendation #3 states that placement of the required stormwater management facility along Mecca Street, NE may be a concern, it seems, from an aesthetic standpoint. Through the process of due diligence site design, we have evaluated the stormwater management requirements that will be necessary to meet 9VAC25- 870 -66, specifically the Flood Control and Channel Protection requirements. In order to reduce the amount of direct runoff that would bypass the new SWM facility, it is necessary to place the impoundment as near as possible to the low point on the site. Given that our only point of interconnection to the existing storm drain system is by means of extending a new public storm drain along Mecca Street, NE to the intersection of Mecca Street, NE and Orange Avenue, NE, the logical location for the basin is in the northwestern corner of the property, adjacent to the City Fire Station parcel. This will allow the majority of the site runoff to be captured in the basin and controlled in accordance with City and State requirements. We have included herein a depiction of the anticipated grading of the new SWM facility as well as a cross - section through the basin, based on our preliminary computations. As shown, the top of the control berm will be only slightly higher than the elevation of Mecca Street, thereby avoiding an unsightly embankment. While the formal design is not yet to the level of completion where we can proffer these sketches verbatim, we do believe that the final designs will be in general conformance with the attached. While it is understood that SWM facilities such as these are beneficial to control the rates of stormwater runoff to protect the general public, and are required by Code, it is also understood that these facilities are not always the most attractive features of a site. In order to reduce the visual impact of the facility, we propose to plant deciduous trees along the private side of the right -of -way adjacent to the new SWM facility. Given the presence of overhead utility lines, these trees may be limited to ornamentals rather than large shade trees, however, we will certainly coordinate with the City in choosing appropriate species. In addition to the new deciduous trees, we will plant a staggered strip of new evergreen shrubs intermingled with the trees, to aide in directing the public's view upward toward the new buildings rather than downward to the new basin. This landscaping will be provided as stated to the extent that it will not conflict with the Code required design of the new stormwater management facility. Lastly, there have been concerns regarding the aesthetics of the new outlet structure of the stormwater management facility. Again, while it is in our best interest to make this detention facility as attractive as possible, there are requirements for flood control that must be accounted for, and these require a certain size structure to control the ten -year storm from, in this case, an ultimate project area of approximately 10.4 acres. As shown on the attached, under the current level of design, the top of the outlet riser will be approximately 18" lower than the top of the outlet control, and the intent is to tuck the structure into the slope of the Mecca Street side of the pond to the extent possible. We will investigate different means of controlling the outflow, but with the top of the structure lower than the berm, the proposed landscaping should aide in screening the structure, regardless of the type of structure used. 0 Not �\ ?i 94.3 op ' C ' x 1023.0 992.2 x 4 - \ cA 50' 25' 0' 50' LAN M c"*� _ 50' GRAPHIC SCALE IPA\ - -- - - -- _ PRELIMINARY STORMWA TER / - - _ - - - MANAGEMENT GRADING _ - - - - -- __._ FOR - --- --- --- - - - - ; - I ,RICHFIELD Ll WNG \ SI TUA 7E MECCA STREET �' / CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Frolrol �Azd •�N 2019-02-12 SECTION THROUGH PROPOSED SMW POND RICHFIELD 2 - MECCA STREET 1" = 10' HORIZONTAL TIES IN W TH 2H.- 1 V SLOPE UP TO ACCESS DRIVE TOP BERM= f 994.1 �q 1010 iroTold mo •�w PRELIMINARY SECTION THROUGH PROPOSED STORMWA7ER MANAGEMENT FACILITY FOR RICHFIELD Ll WNG Sf TUA 7E MECCA STREET CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ►WO Em �! RA: - Agricultural A 000 Commercial- General \ Ii ROS: \ Recreation and Open Space I" 7140123 N I-1: Light_ � Industrial\ / P0, e - CG(c): Commercial - General ♦ Conditional V Comerc al- General Ord #37486:071706 m "CG: /\ � Commercial - General i s IN(c): Institutional CG(c): Conditional Ord #30265 Commercial-'General - .�1 Conditional •� `ooh • Ord #29277 e� ®� \,, MX fiiMii7 /Conditional ` Multifamily Ord #35538 -082 �. i RMF(c): Res f Multifamily Conditional Ord #29452 ��� RMF: Res Multifamily ° RMF: Res Multifamily\ ♦ . s of Res Multifamily Conditional 6, Ord #27386 kw�: Res Multifamil'i Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -1730 CITY OF ROANOKE PLANNING BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT Filing Date: January 28, 20191 Submittal Number: Original Application R.. ❑ Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed ❑ Rezoning, Conditional © Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 11047 Mecca Street, NE & Vacant Tract to the East /-'c, /-- /,-t/I- 0002— Click Here to Print ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Official Tax No(s).: 70 80102&7 090401 Existing ❑ Without Conditions Ordinance Zoning: R -5, Residential Single - Family ❑ With Conditions No(s). (If ❑ Planned Unit Development applicable): ❑ Without Conditions Proposed Requested p Group Care Facility, Nursing Zoning; INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Developme ❑ With Conditions Land Use: Home and Congregate Home ® Planned Unit Development - elderly Name: Estate of Karen L. Mills, Debbie McGhee, Rebecca Manning (see a4 Phone Number: Address: 4054 Mockingbird Hill, Roanoke, VA 24012 E -mail: F P"" 0"0%MrAn q,�nticant Intf�rsnation cif dif%t i�Qn>! oemerl: Name: Richfield Living - Cherie Grisso Phone Number: +1(540) 380 -6597 AddreA: 3615 W. Main Street, Salem VA 24153 E -mail: cgrisso @Richfieldliving.onm6 rid J►+o�nt 10"Mation (w an bb-)t Name: Caldwell White Assoc. - Corbin White Phone Number: +1 (540) 204 -6181 Address: 4203 Melrose Ave NW Roanoke, VA 240171 E -mail: cwaroanoke @aol.com A ""NAM" JQ liT &Aj Ah, I Department of Planning, Building and Development Room 170, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 8531730 Filing Date: ❑ Rezoning, Not Otherwise Listed Submittal Number: L Rezoning, Conditional Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑ Establishment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District yu I Cqok Lars to =Print ❑ Amendment of Proffered Conditions ❑ Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan ❑ Amendment of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: I104_ 0 Mecca Street Official Tax No(s).: j7080107 and Existing X Without Conditions Ordinance Zoning: R 5 ['-I With Conditions No(s). (If -] ❑ Planned Unit Development applicable): Requested ❑ Without Conditions Proposed Senior Living Community, Zoning: ❑ With Conditions Land Use: Skilled Nursing Facility, [x] Planned Unit Development Independent and Assisted Liv Name: Karen Mills, Debbie L McGhee, Rebecca L Manning Phone Number: qVC: Address: E-mail: I trol"i'lwh o, 11 1�1 n (5. !�I(t Aell -It - - - - __ — _ Wa44OLVeLl e- . f"V jOr �twcSt�,*' ;M�;, t 4015 Name: Phone Number +1 (540) 3804500 Richfield Living Address: L3615 W Main St, Salem, VA - 24153 1 E-mail: l�t_" 41111;1k��'IIAL'Xi�' 6 Name: r&rle Grisso, CFO Phone Number: +1(540) 380.6587 r—'__ —. Address: 36115 W Main St, Salem, VA 24153 E-mail: cgr�sso@richfieldliving.com i (cgrisso @richfieldliving.com __j The following must be submitted for all applications: R Completed application form and checklist. • Written narrative explaining the reason for the request. • Metes and bounds description, if applicable. • Filing fee. For a rezoning not otherwise listed, the following must also be submitted: F Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item '2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. For a conditional rezoning, the following must also be submitted: F Written proffers. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditwns. Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please label as r 'development plan' if proffered. For a planned unit develo funent, the following must also be submitted: 5Z Development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. For a comprehensive sign overlay district, the following must be submitted: r— Comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. For an amendment of proffered conditions, the following must also be submitted: Amended development or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'2(c)' in Zoning Amendment Procedures, r if applicable. F- proffers to be amended. See the City's Guide to Proffered Conditions. f` Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For a planned unit development amendment, the following must also be submitted: F Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2 -326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. I— Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For a comprehensive sign overlay amendment, the following must also be submitted: F mended comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2- 336(d) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. F Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. For a proposal that requires a traffic impact study be submitted to the City, the following must also be submitted: R A Traffic Impact Study in compliance with Appendix 6 -2(e) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. For a proposal that requires a traffic impact analysis be submitted to VDOT, the following must also be submitted: r Cover sheet. F- Traffic impact analysis. I— Concept plan. t" Proffered conditions, if applicable. r- Required fee. *An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www. roanokova .gov /planningcommisslon. A complete packet must be submitted each time an application is amended, unless otherwise specified by staff. Narrative Richfield Living is pleased to submit the following narrative related to its proposed senior housing continuum project proposed on the 1047 Mecca Street and adjacent land Richfield Background, Mission and Long-Range Plan The Richfield Living Community traces its origins back to 1919 when a group of women decided to provide the rural citizens of Roanoke County and the surrounding area with a means of learning how to care for the sick. By February 1920, they had formed a nursing committee called the Roanoke County Nursing Committee and appointed Morgan Harris as public health nurse for the committee. Under Mrs. Harris's leadership, the committee started several innovative programs, including offering mobile clinics and providing instruction in home nursing and care for the sick throughout Roanoke County. After 10 years, the committee began offering patient care in a house on the County Farm west of Salem, employing a graduate nurse for the first two years of operation as accommodations were gradually expanded. Following the founding of the Roanoke Public Health Association in 1937, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors voted to turn the entire project over to the association to be run as a nursing home. Over the next 30 years, patients ranged in age from infants to octogenarians with a wide range of physical disabilities. As the services offered grew, the facilities were upgraded and expanded to include a new nursing care center built on the site of the original farm house in 1971 and an east wing addition in 1978. As the facility expanded its services to offer various levels of housing and care, the board elected to change the name of the facility to reflect the evolving community. The new name, Richfield, reflected the history of the land on which the facility was located. As a senior living community, Richfield has grown from its humble beginnings into a comprehensive life plan community providing independent retirement living, assisted living, rehabilitation and nursing care options. Located on approximately 50 acres, the Community currently consists of 84 independent living apartments (the "Knollwood Apartments ") and 14 independent living cottages ( "Richfield Lake Estates Cottages ") (collectively the "Existing Independent Living Units "), 136 assisted living beds (the "Assisted Living Beds "), 36 memory care beds (the "Memory Care Beds "), a 48 -bed transitional care facility (the "Existing Transitional Care Beds "), a 257 -bed nursing facility (the "Existing Nursing Beds "), along with supportive common areas. The Assisted Living Beds, Memory Care Beds, Existing Transitional Care Beds, and Existing Nursing Beds are collectively referred to as the "Health Care Center." Richfield has owned and operated the large bed nursing home in Salem, VA in an institutionally designed building for over 45 years. Within the skilled nursing building, most residents have semi - private rooms with bathrooms that are not handicap accessible. Richfield has had plans to reposition the building on its Salem campus for over 7 years. The first phase, to renovate a former assisted living building into a 48 -bed rehab center was completed and has operated since 2012. The Board of Directors has since then been evaluating renovating the existing building vs building a new building. Based on occupancy levels averaging 80% on its Salem campus, the Board decided to redevelop the Salem campus by building a new 76 bed nursing home to attach to its 48 -bed rehab center. Further, the Board decided to transition 116 beds to this new location in Roanoke. This strategy allows Richfield to position its existing campus and new campus with more homelike environments for the long -term care residents. Further, it relocates nursing beds into two smaller communities that are built to current building standards and a modern resident centered care service delivery model. In developing a Roanoke campus, the Board sought to find a site that would allow for development of a full continuum of care as market demands and consumer preferences have changed over time. The project concept plan includes Phase I development of 116 bed healthcare facility providing long term care, memory care and transitional rehabilitative care services. Future phases would include development of 70 assisted living apartments, 110 independent senior apartments and a campus town center integrating the community. Maior Desion Features Richfield has incorporated a resident centered care neighborhood model. The project will have 38 transitional care units and dedicated therapy space on the top floor which will be designed with a hospitality theme. The first two floors of the project will be split into 4 long term care households each containing 19 units around a shared community space for the household. Each long -term care household has a front porch accessing the household and a residential style kitchen as its central focus. The kitchen is adjoined to other life enriching activity spaces including a 4- season porch, living room, dining room and multi - purpose activity space. The resident rooms include a combination of private bedroom suites with private bath or private bedroom with a shared bath. The exterior of the building has been designed in a residential format with lap siding and a combination of brick with some stone accents. The design intent is to connotate a residential homelike environment. There are to be two designated outdoor areas for the enjoyment of residents in addition to the 4 season porches in each household. The area between the wings will be a secured courtyard with paths, landscape gardens, and sitting areas. In addition, there will be an outdoor patio to the side of the building for casual use and programed outdoor activity. The building and its households have been designed both for efficient size for staffing ratios, generous rooms sizes for resident enjoyment, and services spaces located to save steps for staff. Location of nursing offices, med rooms, housekeeping, and equipment storage are placed throughout the community for convenient access but also out of site to maintain the residential feel. A combination of hard surface and carpeted floors are used in combination throughout the community to create the home environment. The future senior housing building will include assisted living studio and one - bedroom apartments with kitchens and baths. The independent living units' range in size from studio, one bedroom, one bedroom plus den or sunroom, and two- bedroom apartments. The project will feature below building private parking for independent residents. The housing will be tied together with a community building called a "Town Center' that will feature a full commercial kitchen and multiple dinning venues, activity spaces, a large community room, exercise and wellness space, office and support spaces for the community. Location and Access The project is located on Mecca Street one block south of Orange Avenue (County RD 460) in the City of Roanoke. Orange Avenue is a main traffic collector road and heavily traveled. Public transportation is available throughout the area and there exists a current bus stop at the corner of Mecca and Orange. This is one block from the project site. As part of our development plan, a new side walk will be installed from the bus stop to the project to enhance staff and resident safety for use of public transportation. The 13 acres site is a wooded lot and the site plan has been developed to take advantage of the naturally treed site. Walking paths and sitting areas are planned throughout the project site for resident enjoyment. Neighborhood Community Planning Process Once the project land was under control, the owner and development team initiated a community planning process that included 2 neighborhood meetings and various meetings with individual neighbors. We communicated with the Wildwood Civic League to arrange for the public meetings in addition to mailing invitations to neighbors from a list provided by City planning staff. The first neighborhood meeting was designed for the owner and developer as an introduction and listening session. This gave Richfield Living and Baile Development the opportunity to share the organization's mission and experience in developing communities of this nature. It also introduced discussion of the concept, potential project size, and phasing contemplated by the design team. There were no plans developed or ready to share at that time, it was merely an opportunity to get an initial reaction to the project development and to hear neighborhood priorities and concerns. There were three primary themes from this neighborhood meeting. First and foremost was concern about traffic generated by any new development on what was perceived to be an overly taxed intersection at Mecca St and Orange Avenue. Second was an interest in the size and scale of the building in comparison to neighboring properties. Last was a concern for public safety related to a potential traffic conflict that might occur between the proposed use and the fire station. Other points about building appearance, areas on the site that might remain wooded, and how neighborhood and this project might interact in the future were also discussed. Approximately 50 people attended the first meeting. The second neighborhood meeting was designed to show the proposed initial site plan that met the goals of the owner for the development and was sensitive to the information shared at the first meeting. The site plan was shared showing various setbacks from the property line which met the objectives that were raised in the first meeting, identified areas of the site that would remain an undisturbed treed buffer and could be enhanced with additional landscaping as needed, showed how parking was located away from and shielded by the new building from the neighboring homes, and showed the primary access to the site from Mecca Street. It was also discussed that the development team was exploring an acquisition or easement of a neighboring property that might result in a second entrance at the intersection of Orange Avenue and Granby Street. We also shared at this meeting that at the encouragement of the City we had undertaken a full traffic study to address the traffic impacts of the project. Approximately 15 people attended the second neighborhood meeting, but it should be noted there was some confusion related to the location of the meeting. A few individuals assumed the second meeting was to be held at the same location as the first and went to the wrong location. A few follow up calls were made to individuals who went to the wrong location or otherwise could not attend. In addition to the neighborhood meetings, there have been several individual meetings with interested parties as well as information posted about the project on the Wildwood Civic League Facebook page. The development team believes we have generally addressed neighbor concerns raised while developing a project plan that meets Richfield Living objectives. The specific neighborhood concerns related to traffic impact are addressed within the 3rd party traffic impact study prepared by RKK Engineering. Subsequent to the neighborhood meetings, the above noted exploration of a second entrance to the site through an easement or acquisition was abandoned. The Owner /Developer were unable to negotiate an access point with the adjacent land owners. Traffic Study With the concerns raised by the neighborhood the Owner /Developer, with the City's encouragement, believed it would be appropriate to have a 3`d party traffic study completed to review a few factors associated with the development of the property. The objectives were to understand the impact and trips per day and peek travel impacts the surrounding road systems, intersections, and general function of traffic flow in the immediate project area. Further to study if there was warrants to support the addition of a full function stop light at the intersection of Mecca and Orange. The Owner engaged RKK Engineering to complete the study and it is included in the application exhibits related to this application. Analysis and recommendations can be found in the study. Justification for the change The Owner /Developer believes this project is appropriate and support the change in Zoning for the following: • The site is located between a heavily travel commercial area along and to the north of Orange Avenue and the Wildwood single family homes to the south. The proposed project represents a good transitional use with medium density housing that allows for a blending of and transition between the property types. Further, its use as a senior housing community has lower impacts (traffic, site lighting, allocation of greenspace, noise, etc.) than other transitional uses that might be proposed, including multi family housing or light commercial. • With a very dramatic growth in senior population, the project addresses a community need currently and into the future. With the baby boomer generation entering retirement, there will be an ever - increasing need for senior communities of this nature. This site with its 13 -acre size allows for a senior housing continuum community that will serve the needs of residents as they age in place. With housing that serves very independent living individuals through full nursing care, residents and families will only need to make one community choice and allow them to stay as their housing and health care needs change. Many senior communities serve a singular element of the continuum while this proposed project meets the needs of a much broader resident profile in a rental format. • The development type, senior housing, on a per unit basis has a lesser impact on the property for average unit size, parking need, ability to maintain green spaces that other potential uses. Effect of the development on the neiehborhood Currently the subject property has vacant land and a single - family home that has been vacant for some time with few prospects for update renovation or reuse. The vacant property shows signs of dumping and use by trespassers. The project development would utilize the property for a highly needed community valued service by a non - profit sponsor. It would clean up the property and provide a well - maintained residential use. The proposed use, or any other potential development on the site will have impact on traffic in the surrounding area. This is addressed in the included traffic study. Unless it is assumed the property would remain vacant indefinably, traffic impacts will result from any development proposal and the Owner /Developer believe this use will be less impactful. It is common for the grounds and walking paths to be utilized by the neighbors for casual use. Richfield Living would expect and welcome this use by the neighboring properties. There will be activity associated with the services provided on site including delivery, trash removal, staff and visitor trips to the site, parking and lighting. The site plan has been designed with sensitivity to the location of those activities as to minimize their influence on adjoining properties. The neighborhood will also be impacted during the construction of the community with traditional construction related traffic and noise and the impacts to utility work that will be occurring on Mecca Street to provide services to the site. Every effort will be made to minimize these construction impacts while being efficient and orderly in getting the work completed. Lastly, the neighborhood will have the advantage of a new senior service provider in proximity for them or their family to utilize. Availability of similarly zoned properties Richfield Living through its real estate broker, did an extensive search of the area over the course of several months to find sites that could accommodate their project vision. Very few were available and those that were had site factors (neighboring uses, soil conditions, topography, site size, or access) that were unfavorable when compared to this project site. Due to this unique use, nearly all of them would have also required rezoning to accommodate a project such as the one proposed. Relationship of the proposed property to the City Comprehensive Plan and Hollins /Wildwood Neighborhood Plan The following factors related to the project are consistent and advance the initiatives outlined in the Compressive plan and Neighborhood plan Comprehensive Plan out lines six objectives 1. Roanoke's quality of life and economic development are integrally related. The proposed project provides a new senior community to enhance the quality of life for the residents it will serve while also creating and maintaining good employment opportunities for project staff with several tiers of employment /wages from part time to full time professional positions. 2. Roanoke is a city built using quality design principles The proposed project uses a residential design that promotes wellness and choice for the residents it serves. The physical site location allows for a good transition between commercial and neighborhood uses on each site. The site plan and building has been designed to fit the property, takes advantage of the naturally treed lot, creates walking paths and green space for the enjoyment of both residents and community members, and utilizes its location near a public transportation node with an added sidewalk for safe access to public transportation. 3. To implement the plan's policies, a series of strategic initiatives are identified. The project addresses the targets sub sections of this objective • Village Centers The project and its proximity to Downtown grows the access to convenient senior services to the core City. • Multi- Service Facilities The project, as a full continuum (independent living though full skilled care) provides a multi service community which allows residents to remain in place as their needs change. Further it expands the not for profit Owners services into a new market region and integrates with other associated service providers. • New Housing Opportunities The project adds new multipurpose level housing services to Roanoke. • Selling Roanoke to Residents, Newcomers, and Visitors Continuing and improving senior services to Roanoke increases the likelihood families will be encouraged to stay to be close to elderly parents. • Improving Streetscapes The project will be adding sidewalk along Mecca Street to accommodate safe access to public transportation. Further, the grounds and landscaping along Mecca Street will now be developed and maintained at a higher level. • Healthy Community Seniors will be served in a health and wellness design environment that promotes choice and independence. 4. Roanoke is the heart of the region. The plan balances and links related elements and initiatives through a comprehensive regional and local development strategy. The project will serve as a regional service. While most residents will likely come from the immediate project area, some will migrate to Roanoke to be closer to family if they have a community such as this to serve their needs. 5. The continuing vitality and growth of Roanoke — like its development over the last 125 years — are dependent on individual and private actions, combined with public investment, to ensure quality of life amenities, infrastructure, and services. The Proposed project is sponsored by a Not for Profit provider advancing and providing high quality senior services in conjunction with local state and federal programs. It is a public private partnership to promote the well being and care of senior residents. 6. Roanoke's vision is to be a sustainable and livable community The project represents an economically viable and sustainable use of an under - utilized site. It promotes a healthy community that serves a demographic age group that is growing very quickly and will need services into the foreseeable future. Holland /Wildwood Neighborhood Plan 1. Infrastructure The project adds utilities, and site infrastructure to support the project and the neighborhood. Addition of a public sidewalk to Orange Avenue, adding convenient access to public transportation, and increasing residential development in a traditional location between commercial and neighborhood uses. 2. People The project will allow people to remain in the community and be served over many years as their needs change. The Neighborhood plan indicated the largest population segment for the neighborhood is the 35 to 64 age cohort at 25 %. This segment of the population is served in two ways by the proposed project. First, as the older portion of the age cohort will likely be seeking senior housing soon. Second, adult children in that age cohort will be seeking good alternatives for their parents near their homes. 3. Community design. The project design team has followed many of the Community design principals outlined in the Neighborhood plan include: Taking advantage of the site topography to design the buildings that fit the site. Adding medium site density that discourages urban sprawl. Including Improvements to the street scape though landscaping, curb and gutter additions, and public sidewalk. Maintained large areas of greenspace for private and casual neighborhood use. Adds to the residential stock in the neighborhood to balance the more dominant commercial uses. 4. Residential Development The building design, while multi occupant housing in nature, maintains a residential design with materials that match the traditional housing vernacular such as pitched roofs, lap and /or shake siding, accents of brick and stone and residential windows. 5. Promotes ongoing economic strength and growth. The project adds jobs at several wage tiers. 6. Improves the Infrastructure to serve the project as well as the neighborhood specifically in the area of traffic flow related to the improvements planned for the intersection of Orange Avenue and Mecca Street. In conclusion, Richfield living believes the project to be a very worthy addition to the City of Roanoke and thank you in advance for your consideration the Re- zoning request. n94� C,E AVE NS �� I. a Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMMN63132 -18180 RICHFIELD .� RESIDENCE 1 ROOF 11FJOHT 4 1012'-' .l RESIDENCE K 9, -0' PROPERTY LINE �.......... 87'Ji RESIDENCE SITE 1 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMM863132 -18180 ROOF 1 HEM J� 1077 -2 T LTC1TCU- LEVEL I 0� 1027- 7 PROPOSED LONG TERM CARE BUILDING lr- RICHFIELD PROPERTY LINE lip x RESIDENCE 2 ROOF HEIGHT + �, t018-0' ,�_RESIOENCE2 - 1 � 989'-0" RESIDENCE SITE 2 W-V j T ! PROPOSED LONG TERM CARE BUILDING ROOF t NEW 107?-? Richfield Living Site 2 - Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 1 COMMg83132 -18180 RICHFIELD PROPERTY UNE 204W 1 I i RODF2HEMAii,j,, j 1070'-' I i1 RESIDENCE 3 ROOF HEIGHT i 1047.8' I rASSISTED LIVING LEVEL I RESIDENCE 3 . _ _. _ . � 1D2,r -V 1015''-0' RESIDENCE SITE 3 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke, VA 01/28/19 j COMMM63132 -18180 PROPOSED FUTURE ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING w� RICHFIELD i RESNENCE 4 ROOF REI T 1w-T RESIOM 4 1054'•0° PROPERTY LINE 63' -11' W-O" . RESIDENCE SITE 4 Richfield Living Site 2 Roanoke,VA 01128/19 1 COMMN63132 -18180 ROOF REGrT J 1005'-10314' T PRKG LEVEL.J 1024'd' `7T PROPOSED FUTURE INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING lyi- RICHFIELD EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH Al 1 " = 20' -0" ii i � 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH U1" = 20' -0" CARE CENTER SITE 2j�' Roanoke, Virginia �- 01/28/19 i COMMA63132 -18180 RICHFIELD EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1" = 20' -0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1" = 20' -0" CARE CENTER SITE 2 Roanoke, Virginia 01(28/19 i COMM863132 -18180 RICHFIELD IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 21st day of October, 2013. No. 39790 - 102113. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Ordinance No. 38708- 011910, permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing, an alley off of 8h Street, N.W., adjacent to parcels bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 2032001, 2030801 and 2030803, under certain conditions, to extend the time period to November 20, 2013, in which to satisfy certain conditions of Ordinance No. 38708- 011910; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. WHEREAS, by adopting Ordinance No. 3 8708-0119 10 on January 19, 2010, City Council intended to allow the permanent vacation, discontinuance and closure of a certain portion of public right -of way situated in the City of Roanoke, under certain conditions, such portion of right -of -way being more particularly described as follows: An alley off of 8 1 Street, N.W., adjacent to parcels bearing Tax Nos. 2032001, 2030801 and 2030803; WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 provided that the ordinance would be null and void, with no further action by City Council being necessary, if a certified copy of Ordinance 38708- 0 119 10 was not recorded, and if the Clerk's receipt, demonstrating recordation had occurred, was not filed with the City Engineer for the City of Roanoke, all within twelve (12) months from the effective date of that ordinance; WHEREAS, the effective date of Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 was January 19, 2011, and no such recordation or filing occurred; WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees for Pilgrim Baptist Church filed a request dated September 3, 2013, requesting that Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 be amended and reordained to 1 extend the deadline for meeting certain conditions in such ordinance for a period of 30 days to allow all of such conditions to be met; WHEREAS, extending the time to November 20, 2013, for all conditions set forth in Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 to be met will effectuate the purpose of Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing consistent with Section 30 -14 of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, has been published for a public hearing before City Council on October 21, 2013. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the last four (4) paragraphs of Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 are amended to read and provide as follows: BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the applicant shall, upon meeting all other conditions to the granting of the application, deliver to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, a certified copy of Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910, adopted on January 19, 2010, and a certified copy of any ordinance amending Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910, for recordation where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, indexing the same in the name of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, as Grantor, and in the name of the applicant, and the names of any other parties in interest who may so request, as Grantees, and pay such fees and charges as are required by the Clerk to effect such recordation. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the applicant shall, upon a certified copy of Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910 being recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, where deeds are recorded in such Clerk's Office, file with the City Engineer for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, the Clerk's receipt, demonstrating that such recordation has occurred. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that if the above conditions have not been met before November 20, 2013, then such ordinance, and any ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3 8708- 011910, shall be null and void with no further action by City Council being necessary. BE IT FINALLY ORDAINED that pursuant to the provisions of § 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910, as amended herein, is reordained. BE IT FINALLY ORDAINED that pursuant to the provisions of § 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: _ Ity ler Ord -- Pilgrim Baptist Church vacate alley- REORDAIN AND EXTEND.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 21, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, fourth floor, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following: Request from Nathan Tuning on behalf of the Board of Trustees for Pilgrim Baptist Church to amend conditions of Ordinance No. 38708- 011910 adopted by City Council on January 19, 2010, and to amend and reordain Ordinance No. 38708 - 011910, to allow more time for the vacation of an alley off of 8th Street, N.W., adjacent to parcels bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 2032001, 2030801 and 2030803. A copy of the request is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All parties in interest and citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on the matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at 853 -2541, before noon on the Thursday before the date of the hearing listed above. GIVEN under my hand this 26thday of September , 2013. Stephanie M. Moon, MMC City Clerk. Notice to Publisher: Publish in the Roanoke Times on Friday, October 4, and Friday, October 11, 2013. Send affidavit to: Stephanie M. Moon, MMC, City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S. W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (540) 853 -2541 Send Bill to: Nathan Tuning, Chairman Trustees of Pilgrim Baptist Church 1415 8th Street, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 (540) 342 -5058 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: October 21, 2013 Subject: Amendment and Reordainment of Ordinance No. 38708-011910, Permanently Vacating, Discontinuing and Closing an Alley off of 8`h Street, N.W., Adjacent to Parcels Bearing Tax Nos. 2032001, 2030801 and 2030803, to Provide Additional Time to Meet all Conditions for the Closure to Become Effective Background: On January 19, 2010, City Council approved Ordinance 38708-011910 permanently vacating, discontinuing, and closing an alley off 8th Street, N.W., adjacent to parcels bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 2032001, 2030801, and 2030803. With the exception of recording a certified copy of the ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, all the required conditions of vacating the alley were met. By letter dated September 3, 2013, Nathan Tuning, Chairman, Trustees of Pilgrim Baptist Church, requested that Ordinance No. 38708-011910 be amended and reordained to allow additional time to meet all conditions for vacating, discontinuing and closing the subject portion of the alley. Planning staff has reviewed the request and has no objection to it. Recommendation: Amend and reordain Ordinance No. 38708-011910 to extend the deadline to November 20, 2013 to allow additional time within which to satisfy all conditions of Ordinance No. 38708-011910. f ----------- Christopher P. Morrill City Manager Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Rev. Dwight O. Steele Sr. Senior Pastor PILGRIM BAPTIST CHURCH pilgrimbaptistchurchroanoke. com I415 8th Street, NW • Roanoke, Virginia 24016 a' ; i�° ;;i Gr^'t:' 13 SEEP 0 ��' Phone: 540.342.5058 • Fax: 540.343.4325 pi lgrimbaptistchurch(averizon.net September 3, 2013 Ms. Stephanie M. Moon City Clerk 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Suite 456 Salem, Virginia 24011 Dear Ms. Moon: On January 19, 2010, City Council approved Ordinance 38708-011910 permanently vacating, discontinuing and closing an alley off of 8`" Street, N.W., adjacent to parcels bearing Official Tax Numbers 2032001, 2030801, and 2030803. With the exception of recording a certified copy of the ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, all of the required conditions of vacating the alley were met. It was recently called to our attention that the ordinance had not been recorded. This letter is to request the reinstatement of the existing ordinance and the extension of the effective date for a period of 30 days. Thank you for the consideration of this request. Sincerely, ia4thang Tuning Chairman, Board of Trustees Richfield Living Site 2 Traffic Impact Analysis CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Prepared by: RK K Responsive People • Creative Solutions January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis For Richfield living Site 2 City of Roanoke, Virginia Prepared for: Richfield Living 3615 West Main Street PO Box 3240 Salem, VA 24153 Prepared by: Riw fc Gesponslvt People I beet Mt $e'utlons RK &K 2100 East Cary Street, Suite 309 Richmond, Virginia 23223 January 28, 2019 TN OF Lr� 0r�Z 0 v JEFFREY SCOTT KUTTESCH ,d Lic. No. 047612 W IONA Jeffrey S°"""'"`�„""d 4 R".se°ryf pMwh Kuttesch pne "I°e1L 1Y11 --NOIR RK &K Richmond, Virginia TRAFFIC ENGINEER Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis EXECUTM SUMMARY This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) evaluates the projected transportation impacts of a proposed retirement community, Richfield Living Site 2, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. This study was developed based on a request from the City of Roanoke Planning Department. Study Contents: The study includes background information and a description of the development site; analysis of existing (2019) conditions; estimates of site trip generation, distribution, and assignment; and analysis of future scenarios with and without the development in 2021 (completion of Phase 1) and 2024 (completion of Phase 2). The study also includes recommended improvements to mitigate traffic impacts from the proposed development. Description of Site and Proposed Development: Richfield Living Site 2 is a proposed senior living community in the City of Roanoke bounded by Hickory Woods Drive NE to the east, Cannaday Road NE to the south, US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) to the north, and Mecca Street NE to the west. The development is anticipated to be completed in two phases. At full build out, the proposed development will consist of a 116 -bed skilled nursing facility (to be completed in Phase 1), 110 senior apartments (independent living) and 70 assisted living units. The two latter facilities are planned to be built in Phase 2 of the project. Study Area: The study area for this TIA includes the following study intersections: 1. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / Gus W Nicks Boulevard NE / Shopping Mail Driveway 2. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / Mecca Street NE / Automotive Driveway 3. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) at Granby Street NE 4. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / King Street NE / McDonald's Study Results: Capacity and queuing analyses were conducted for existing (2019), 2021, and 2024 conditions using Synchro Version 10 (HCM Methodology) and SimTraffic. Currently, all signalized intersections operate at LOS D or better overall during both peak periods, with some movements operating at LOS E or F. The northbound (Mecca Street NE) approach at the unsignalized intersection with US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour. Under 2021 Background conditions, which includes the approved residential development (apartments and single - family homes) along the north side of Orange Avenue in the study area, no major changes from existing conditions in terms of LOS, delay or queuing at the study intersections are anticipated. The stop - controlled northbound Mecca Street approach at the intersection with Orange Avenue would continue to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour, though delay would increase compared to existing conditions due to increased traffic projected along Orange Avenue. Under 2021 Build conditions, the first phase of Richfield Living Site 2 would be completed with a 116 -bed skilled nursing facility which is expected to generate approximately 23 new trips during the AM peak hour and 21 new trips during the PM peak hour. With this development in place, the stop - controlled northbound Mecca Street approach would operate at LOS F with increased delay compared to background conditions. However, the maximum projected queue would not be substantially impacted which is indicative of the low additional volumes exiting the facility. Under 2024 Background conditions, only slight changes to LOS, delay or queuing at the study intersections are anticipated. The Orange Avenue / King Street intersection is projected to degrade from LOS D under existing conditions to LOS E during the PM peak hour. Additionally, the stop - controlled northbound Mecca Street approach at the intersection with Orange Avenue would continue to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour, with continued increases in delay due to increased traffic projected along Orange Avenue Under 2024 Build conditions, both phases of Richfield Living Site 2 would be completed with a 116 -bed skilled nursing facility, 110 independent living units, and 70 assisted living units. This would generate approximately 72 new trips during the AM peak hour and 104 new trips during the PM peak hour. With this Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis development in place, the stop - controlled northbound Mecca Street approach would operate at LOS F with increased delay compared to background conditions. Additionally, the maximum projected queue along this approach would increase to over 400 feet during the PM peak hour with the added site traffic. A signal warrant analysis was conducted for the Orange Avenue / Mecca Street NE intersection. This signal warrant analysis found that a traffic signal is not currently warranted at this intersection for existing 2019 conditions and would not be warranted by 2021 with Phase 1 of the Richfield Living Site 2 development in place. However, by 2024 with full build out of Phases 1 and 2 of Richfield Living Site 2, Warrant 2 (Four - Hour Vehicular Volume) would be satisfied at this intersection. Another analysis was run for 2024 Build Conditions with a traffic signal in place at the Orange Avenue / Mecca Street NE intersection. Overall the intersection would operate at LOS A during the AM peak hour and LOS B during the PM peak hour. The northbound Mecca Street approach would operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour, but the resulting delays would be less than 2024 Background (no development) conditions. C lueue lengths would not be expected to impact the upstream driveway at the fire station located Mecca Street. Additionally, with the new traffic signal, emergency pre - emption upgrades are recommended to help flush traffic off Mecca Street when emergency response is required to facilitate access to Orange Avenue. Recommended Improvements: Based on the results of analysis, no transportation improvements are recommended for Phase 1 of the Richfield Living Site 2 development in 2021. Based on the results of the analysis, the following improvements are proposed to mitigate the traffic impacts of the Richfield Living Site 2 development at Build Out (completion of Phase 2) in 2024. Further evaluation of the available right -of -way, utility conflicts and other design considerations, beyond the scope of this study, is needed to assess the feasibility of the recommended improvements. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / Mecca Street NE / Automotive Driveway • Installation of a traffic signal 2 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2018 Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................ ..............................4 II. Site Description and Background Information ................................................... ..............................4 III. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................. ..............................6 IV. Existing Safety Performance ............................................................................. .............................11 V. Development of Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment ....................... .............................14 VI. Background Traffic Volumes (2021 and 2024) ................................................. .............................21 VII. Build Traffic Volumes (2021 and 2024) ............................................................. .............................21 VIII. Traffic Analysis (2021 and 2024) ...................................................................... .............................26 IX. Recommended Improvements .......................................................................... .............................40 X. Conclusions ....................................................................................................... .............................40 Appendix A — 2019 Intersection Turning Movement Counts Appendix B — Local Trip Generation Study Appendix C — 2019 Existing Synchro / SimTraffic Output Appendix D — 2021 Background Synchro / SimTraffic Output Appendix E — 2021 Build Synchro / SimTraffic Output Appendix F — 2024 Background Synchro / SimTraffic Output Appendix G — 2024 Build Synchro / SimTraffic Output Appendix H — Signal Warrant Analysis Appendix I — 2024 Build Mitigated Synchro / SimTraffic Output TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location and Study Intersections ........................................................... ..............................5 Figure 2. Existing Lane Configurations and Storage Lengths ....................................... ..............................7 Figure 3. 2019 Existing AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes .................................................. ..............................8 Figure 4. Crash Locations and Types (January 1, 2015 — December 31, 2017) .......... .............................13 Figure 5. Richfield Living Campus in Salem and Buildings Locations .......................... .............................16 Figure 6. Trip Distribution: Phase 1 .............................................................................. .............................17 Figure 7. Trip Distribution: Phase 2 .............................................................................. .............................18 Figure 8. Trip Assignment: Phase 1 .............................................................................. .............................19 Figure 9. Trip Assignment: Phase 2 .............................................................................. .............................20 Figure 10. 2021 Background AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................. .............................22 Figure 11. 2024 Background AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................. .............................23 Figure 12. 2021 Build AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................... .............................24 Figure 13. 2024 Build AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................... .............................25 3 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis 1. Introduction This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) evaluates the traffic impacts of a proposed senior living community, Richfield Living Site 2, in Roanoke, Virginia. This study was developed for the City of Roanoke Planning Department. The study includes background information and a description of the development site; analysis of existing (2019) conditions; estimates of site trip generation, distribution, and assignment; and analysis of future scenarios with and without the development Including 2021 (completion of Phase 1), 2024 (completion of Phase 2). The study also includes recommended improvements to mitigate traffic impacts from the proposed development. 11. Site Description and Background Information Richfield Uving Site 2 is a proposed senior living community to be located the City of Roanoke bounded by Hickory Woods Drive NE to the east, Cannaday Road NE to the south, US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) to the north, and Mecca Street NE to the west. A schematic depicting the site location and study area is shown in Figure 1. The development includes two phases. In Phase 1, a 116 - bed skilled nursing facility would be built and is anticipated to complete by 2021. In Phase 2, which is expected to be completed by 2024, 110 senior apartments (independent living) and 70 assisted living units would be added to the site. Study Area The study area shown in Figure 1 includes the following study intersections: 1. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / Gus W Nicks Boulevard NE / Shopping Mall Driveway 2. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / Mecca Street NE / Automotive Driveway 3. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) at Granby Street NE 4. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) / King Street NE / McDonald's US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) is a four -lane US highway; two travel lanes are provided in each direction, separated by a raised grass median within the study area. Auxiliary turn lanes are provided at intersections. US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) is classified by VDOT as other principal arterial and has a posted speed of 35 miles per hour south of 24th Street NE and 40 miles per hour in the rest of the study area. According to published VDOT data, in 2015, US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) carried 29,000 vehicles per day within the study area. Gus W Nick Boulevard NE is a four -lane undivided roadway from north of Idlewild Boulevard NE to US 460 (Orange Avenue NE); two travel lanes are provided in each direction. Gus W Nick Boulevard NE is classified by VDOT as a minor arterial and has a posted speed of 35 miles per hour in the study area. According to published VDOT data, in 2015, Gus W Nicks Boulevard NE carried 19,000 vehicles per day. Mecca Street NE is a local roadway south of US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) which terminates at Cannaday Road NE. Granby Street NE is a local two -way undivided roadway north of US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) east of Mecca Street NE. This roadway terminates at Nicholas Avenue NE. 4 &W, . k m 6Li'idlpp-- '� -1 1 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis 111. Existing Conditions The existing lane configurations and storage lengths at the intersections included in this study are shown in Figure 2. April 2017 traffic counts for the all the intersections but one (US 460 at Mecca Street NE) were obtained from the City of Roanoke. Traffic counts for the intersection of US 460 at Mecca Street NE were performed in January 2019. The AM peak hour occurs between approximately 7 and B AM and the PM peak hour occurs approximately between 3:30 to 4:30 PM. The existing AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 3. The raw turning movement counts are provided in Appendix A. The study intersections were analyzed using Synchro 10, a macroscopic analysis software implementing the Highway Capacity Manual's (HCM) methodology for intersections, and SimTraffic 10, a micro - simulation software application used to model queuing. The existing lane configurations and traffic volumes were coded into the models. Existing traffic signal timings were obtained from the City of Roanoke and utilized for this analysis. The remaining traffic analysis assumptions for existing conditions are consistent with the VDOT Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM). The Synchro HCM analysis results for signalized and unsignalized intersections are summarized in Table 1. The SimTraffic queuing analysis results are summarized in Table 2. 6 N s < � N r- N J CA m g Q fS a� t t M W YYW M rn t t .00Z Z. a N cc 0�1 .OVZ -4 .OS[ t t M c cod Nm C CC Ll rA toe) tx —► anti\ $ 6 8FZ > i c W Qe c z G 4 torn et J t (oxu Eo 8 Al 39 06) �— o (0) L1� 6W a (6) 0 (W o —► (0t, m Gr R� 97(M -6(84 l r 666047) y (6E) 8 W z i Richfield Uving Site 2 January 2019 Traffic impact Analysis Table 1. Synchro HCM Analysis Results - Existing Conditions 1 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ Gus W Nicks Blvd NE EB L 119.5 84.3 T 30.2 33.6 C C R 6.8 13 A, WB L T 104.2 10 72.3 34.1 A g C TR NB L 69.3 85.1 D D LT 67.7 83.3 R 40.5 49.9 SB L 74.5 77.8; TR 77 108 Overall 28.8 39.8 C D 2 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ Mecca St NE (Unsignoiized) EB LT 0.2 1.2 A A TR - - - - WB L 11.1 16.9 B C T _ _ _ _ TR - - - - NB LTR 20.8 67.5 C 9' SB LTR 0 10.1 A 3 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ Granby St NE EB L 52.3 15.7 D a T 1.5 6 A A WB T 3.7 9.7 A A R 0.2 5.1 A A SB L R 76,2 59.1 84x3 61.1 Overall 7.7 13.4 A d 4 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ King St NE EB L 64A 64.6 T 45.3 65 D R 0.1 0.2 A A WB L 77.1 99 T 29.9 19.8 C B R 15.3 11.4 8 i! NB LT 73.5 96,8 E R 63.8 77.2 SB LTR 74.9 90.3` E' Overall 43.5 51.4 D D * Orange Avenue approaches are eastbound and westbound. Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis l The Synchro HCM analysis results indicate that the signalized intersections each operate at LOS D or better overall under existing conditions during both peak periods, with some movements operating at LOS E or F. The northbound (Mecca Street NE) approach at the unsignalized intersection with US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) currently operates at LOS F during the PM peak period. Table 2. SimTraffic Queue Analysis Results — Existing Conditions Number i Intersection US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ Gus W Nicks Blvd NE Approach' EB Lane Group L 5irn I raftic [Tla)(IM ANI 120 LIM !9,LJeLIe M PM 210 Available — Storage (ft.) 210 T 465 965 - R 230 230 - WB L 95 95 95 T 495 975 - TR 505 955 - NB L 380 295 - LT 360 285 - R 240 240 240 SB L 50 145 150 TR 100 325 - 2 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) Mecca St NE (Unsignalized) EB LT 50 455 - TR 15 380 - WB L 65 135 215 T _ _ _ TR - 0 - NB LTR 75 100 - SB LTR - 30 - 3 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ Granby St NE EB L 190 240 250 T 110 425 - WB T 180 300 - R 65 95 330 SB L 210 380 - R 160 200 200 4 US 460 (Orange Ave NE) @ King St NE EB L 300 300 300 T 550 700 - R 340 340 340 WB L 400 400 400 T 670 720 - R 50 40 - NB LT 235 250 250 R 330 475 - SB LTR 170 165 - * Orange Avenue approaches are eastbound and westbound. ## Maximum queue is the same length as available storage. This often is noted in SimTraffic when the queue from the adjacent through lane extends beyond the turn lane. 10 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis IV. Existing Safety Performance Based on data obtained from VDOT's online Crash Analysis Tool (Tableau), a total of 16 crashes were reported along US 460 at the intersections of Mecca Street NE and Granby Street NE between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Crash descriptions were reviewed, and several collision types were recategorized to better represent the actual crash events. The 16 total crashes included seven rear -end crashes, four angle crashes, two fixed object — off -road crashes, one sideswipe — same direction crash, one deer crash, and one crash because of equipment (tire) failure. Crash severity included two visible -injury (Type B) crashes, one non - visible injury (Type C) crash, and 13 property damage only (PDO) crashes. The location and type of crashes within the study area are summarized in Figure 4. At the intersection of US 460 and Mecca Street NE, seven collisions occurred; all the crashes were PDO and no adverse weather conditions were present during those incidents. One of the seven crashes involved a driver under the influence of alcohol. Nine collisions were recorded at the intersection of US 460 and Granby Street NE. Crashes were more severe at this intersection than at the intersection of US 460 and Mecca Street NE, resulting in two visible (Type B) and one non - visible (Type C) injuries. Six of the nine total crashes occurred under good weather conditions, while three crashes occurred under rainy or misty conditions. Crashes were summarized by collision type and by year for each intersection to identify any changing trends within the three -year analysis period. The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. US 460 at Mecca Street NE All four rear -end crashes occurred in the eastbound lanes of US 460 approaching the Mecca Street NE intersection. The crash descriptions indicated that two of these crashes were related to a vehicle slowing or stopping to turn at this intersection (where no exclusive right or left turn lane is provided), and the following vehicle striking that turning vehicle (or the vehicle behind it) from behind. The two other rear -end crashes occurred because the following vehicles failed to stop prior to hitting the slowing lead vehicles that were approaching the intersection (potentially slowing due to the downstream signalized intersection at Granby Street). One crash occurred because the driver fainted and hit a car on a private property, another crash was because the driver (under the influence of alcohol) ran off the road and crashed into a telephone pole, and the remaining collision was due to equipment failure. Table 1. Crash History at US 460 and Mecca Street NE (January 2016 through December 2017) US 460 at Granby Street NE All the three reported angle crashes involved southbound left- turning traffic and westbound through traffic. These collisions resulted from red light violations; in two crashes, drivers of the westbound moving vehicles failed to stop for the red indication and in one crash the southbound left -turn driver did not comply with the red light. 11 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis Three rear -end crashes were reported along the US 460 eastbound approach at Granby Street NE. Distraction of the drivers in the following vehicles was the main reason for these crashes, in each case eating /drinking, fatigue, or not keeping eyes on the road resulted in stopping late or not stopping at all. The remaining crashes involved hitting fixed objects, deer, or a side -swipe collision. Table 2. Crash History at US 460 and Granby Street NE (January 2015 through December 2017) 12 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis V. Development of Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Trip Generation The proposed development will consist of a 116 -bed skilled nursing facility in Phase 1 (anticipated to complete by 2021) and 110 senior apartments and 70 assisted living units in Phase 2 (expected to complete by 2024). Due to the types of uses proposed for the development, the City of Roanoke requested that a local trip generation study be conducted at a similar site and that these local trip generation rates be used for this study in lieu of ITE Trip Generation Manual rates. For this purpose, RK &K conducted a trip generation study at the Richfield Living campus located in Salem, VA. This site incorporates each of the specific uses proposed for the Richfield Living Site 2 campus in the City of Roanoke. The following buildings were studies as part of this local study: 1. Knollwood Apartments — Independent Living 2. Joseph Thomas Center— Assisted Living 3. Recovery & Care Center — Skilled Care Facility The Richfield Living campus in Salem and the location of these buildings is presented in Figure 5. For each facility, the entering and exiting vehicle trips, as well as any drop off activity, between 7 AM —11 AM and 2 PM — 6 PM were observed and the highest 4 consecutive 15- minutes periods within the 4 -hour peak periods were identified as the peak hour of the generator for the trip generation purposes. The trip generation rates for the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic (to correspond to the AM and PM peak hours analyzed for this study were also calculated). The local trip generation field data are presented in Appendix B. The total anticipated AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the Richfield Living Site 2 in Roanoke is provided in Table 3. Table 3. Richfield Living Site 2 Trip Generation Trip Distribution Access to the proposed development will be provided via Mecca Street NE. Traffic volumes traveling through on Orange Avenue NE at Mecca Street NE as well as the existing turning ratios to and from Mecca Street NE were compared, and a reasonable assumption was made for distributing the trips that construction of Richfield Site would generate, so that the entering and existing turning ratios to the Mecca Street would follow a similar pattern as the US 460 (Orange Avenue NE) eastbound and westbound trips. Assumed trip distributions for new trips resulting from the completion of Phase 1 and Phase 2 are summarized in Figure 6 and Figure 7 respectively. 14 Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis Irip Assignment New site trip assignments based on the overall trip distributions for phase 1 and phase 2, are summarized In Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. 15 .d%,% *Wip '1: (N a 0 *A too, ' } ��« > \«\ .d%,% *Wip '1: (N a 0 *A too, ' $ � ■ ! \ � a � w ! c c ■ | _ _im � § � } � ■ _ ■ Q_ �. $ �f �� ■ §| a § c - � w | a q �& ■ � K_n, | _ »_ », , .4 ! f � ! _ 40. , ■¥ i 2 _< ■ � r ! � ! Moo %0 � ! ■ � � % / ■ ! A ¥ CY / t ^ it !a || § § 2 | q �& © �f (%01)%S | | G _ _, ! ®(D%) %(30%) I ■ 44 ! ƒ � | _%0 �• & %$Ke � |§ 10% (5%) � $ f(%0)_ � � ! ■ ! � m co a Ern $6 cm N p F N 3 � r , co) , $ 7 (a o r N C �• � t (t1 0 4(g) 0(o) 3 (4) ti` NO -41. Z 8s� o�o , On im t� o (ao� --0- 9 W o� d LL C�� cm ' N h- N n 0) C C0 F- � N M � U y a (0) 0 p ♦ ♦7 0 N N z -✓ 1 � '0e Z� S_y 16 (41) 0 (0) 11 (18) o cr m (0 0 � ^ z (1) Wo t m W 2 s 6 O Richfield Living Site 2 January 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis VI. Background Traffic Volumes (2021 and 2024) Background traffic volumes for the analysis years (2021 and 2024) were developed to compare against the conditions within the development. Background developments were created by assuming a reasonable annual growth rate of 1 % per year through 2024 and applying this to the existing traffic volumes. This rate accounts for general traffic growth and other potential unknown development along the corridor. In addition to the annual growth rate assumed, there are two approved, but not yet completed residential developments within the study area. These developments are expected to be completed by 2021 and are located along the north side of Orange Avenue NE, between 24th Street NE and Granby Street NE. One development consists of 324 apartment units and the adjacent property next to it would include 36 single family homes. The City of Roanoke provided the traffic impact studies for these developments. The peak hour trip generation and assignment for these two developments were obtained from the traffic impact studies and were included as part of the background traffic volumes. The background traffic volumes for 2021 and 2024 conditions are summarized in Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively. VII. Build Traffic Volumes (2021 and 2024) The off -site trips for Phase 1 and Phase 2 depicted in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively, were added to the background volumes shown in Figure 10 (for 2021) and Figure 11 (for 2024). The Total Build Traffic volumes for the analysis periods 2021 and 2024, are summarized in Figure 12 and Figure 13, respectively. 21 0 d ffi ' U. rn CIA o, m V c v 8 F 8 tp Q 358 (403) G 1 .f.._ 10(8) 118(124) ,a V a � tlos U t ac J N 00ic A H uj a c n E roou u aeu s► �• s & w 8t 40 (37) 0 (0) $ � � 8 (4) (0) 0 Wa ---► a e '02(104 $ f— 8(35) 5750541 (5q 11 (69) OZ —� wo e W z i E co ir = N Q ' N d C 6) C 369 � (415) �. 1 20 W 123 (,26) S� MA w a ui tm rq a L J a N 220 LL t (Art) 0 o 6 1i 41 (8) C 0 (0) 8 6 (4) a 14 x ,(1 (0) 0 �• is / �o W0 — ?E Wo Gt +� 106 (105) 6(96) w 564 06A �Z t (00 at � (99) ti ---► (t4)9 W s e & 2 ! � § , % 0 2 « m a $ !k■ �� 2 N q 0024) �5 3 _\ ! f « at «lam #_ §2 § / �• w 2 k� ■ A � ■ ix � - !■ q _w _ om `k ON to m. ƒ 2 , m — § § 2 k ` ! me �.a �57 � «_— (!f +. fa ■ ! � Richfield Living Site 2 January 2018 Traffic impact Analysis Appendix 1 - 2024 Build Mitigated Synchro / SlmTraHic Output oj_f�7� IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 18th day of March, 2019. No. 41409 - 031819. AN ORDINANCE authorizing Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley, d.b.a. Total Action for Progress, a non -stock Virginia corporation (TAP) to carry out the functions of a land bank entity for the City of Roanoke, pursuant to the Virginia Land Bank Entities Act, for the purpose of acquiring and facilitating the revitalization of vacant, abandoned, and /or tax delinquent properties located in the City, for the purpose of creating affordable housing and /or home ownership opportunities; authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with TAP for such purposes; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. WHEREAS, the Virginia Land Bank Entities Act, Sections 15.2 -7500 through 15.2 -7512 Code of Virginia (1950), as amended (Act), authorizes localities to designate an existing non- profit organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and its governing board to carry out the functions of a land bank entity for the purpose of acquiring and facilitating the revitalization of vacant, abandoned, and /or tax delinquent properties, WHEREAS, TAP, an existing Virginia non - profit organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, with its registered office located in the City of Roanoke, was deemed the most responsive to a Request for Proposals issued by the City seeking proposals from qualified existing nonprofit agencies to carry out the functions of a land bank entity under the Act, WHEREAS, the governance structure, articles of incorporation, charters, bylaws, and other corporate documents of TAP are sufficient to enable TAP to perform the functions of a land bank entity under the Act; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been duly advertised and held as required by the Act for Roanoke City Council to consider this matter. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: The City finds that the governance structure, articles of incorporation, charters, bylaws, and other corporate documents of TAP are sufficient to enable TAP to perform the functions of a land bank entity under the Act. 2. Pursuant to the Act, TAP and its governing board are hereby authorized and designated to carry out the functions of a land bank entity, for the purpose of acquiring and facilitating the revitalization of vacant, abandoned, and /or tax delinquent properties for the purpose of creating affordable housing and /or home ownership opportunities, and for such other purposes allowed under the Act, as more fully set forth in the City Council Agenda Report dated March 18, 2019, and the attachment to such report. 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with TAP, substantially in the form to the Memorandum of Agreement attached to the City Council Agenda Report dated March 18, 2019, to govern the terms and conditions under which TAP will carry out the functions of a land bank entity, and all other documents necessary to allow TAP to carry out the functions of a land bank entity under the Act. All such documents shall be upon form approved by the City Attorney. 2 4. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, all real property acquired by TAP for the purpose of carrying out the functions of a land bank entity under the Act shall be exempt from real property taxation unless and until such real property is no longer owned by TAP, or used by TAP for carrying out the functions of a land bank entity. 5. This Ordinance shall be in force and effect upon adoption. 6. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this Ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. 3 ATTEST: I T > 0 'kti/ City Clerk. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT k. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting: March 18, 2019 Subject: Designation of a Land Bank Entity for the City of Roanoke Background: The Land Bank Entities Act, as codified at Chapter 75, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia (Sections 15.2 -7500 through 15.2- 7512), 1950, as amended, authorizes cities to designate existing non - profit organizations and its governing board to carry out the functions of a land bank entity. In August, 2018, Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley (TAP) responded to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of Roanoke seeking proposals from qualified existing non - profit agencies to carry out the functions of a land bank as set out in the State Code. The TAP proposal has been deemed to be responsive to the RFP by the city administration. A Memorandum of Agreement has been drafted which TAP has reviewed and is agreeable to execute. The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) provides the terms and conditions under which TAP will carry out the Land Bank functions for the City, as authorized under the State Code. The MOA outlines the responsibilities of TAP for the operation and administration of the Land Bank; opportunities for the receipt of funding to be used to support the Land Bank's operations; guidelines for the acquisition, maintenance, and disposition of real property; and other provisions related to the term of the MOA and conditions under which the Land Bank entity function could terminate. A copy of the proposed MOA is attached to this report for City Council's information. Considerations: Pursuant to Section 15.2 -7502 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, a public hearing is required to be held by City Council prior to the adoption of an ordinance designating an existing non - profit entity and its governing board to carry out the functions of a land bank entity. The notice of public hearing was published in The Roanoke Times once a week for two consecutive weeks as required by State Code. Recommended Action: Upon closing of the public hearing, and consideration of the comments received at the public hearing, adopt an Ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Agreement designating Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley (TAP) and its governing board to carry out the functions of a Land Bank entity on behalf of the City of Roanoke, in a form in substantial conformity to the Memorandum of Agreement which is attached to this report. Such Memorandum of Agreement to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. r" - - - -- --------------- - - - - -- Robert S. Cowell, jr. City Manager Attachment Distribution: Council Appointed Officers Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Chris Chittum, Director, Planning Building and Development Dan Webb, Codes Compliance Administrator David L. Collins, Assistant City Attorney 2 DRAFT 11/05/18 Memorandum of Agreement This Memorandum of Agreement ( "MOA ") is dated _________________ ___, 2018, by and between the City of Roanoke, a Virginia municipal corporation, 364 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ( "City "), and Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley, d.b.a. Total Action for Progress, a non -stock Virginia corporation, 302 Second Street, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ( "TAP "), (collectively "the Parties "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the City supports and encourages the increased use of land banks as a method for increasing development of affordable housing in the City and reducing the number of blighted and vacant properties; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Land Bank Entities Act, codified at Chapter 75, Title 1 5.2, Chapter 75 (Sections 15.2-7500 through 15.2-7512 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, ( "Land Bank Statute ") the City may designate an existing non - profit organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and eligible to receive donations from a locality pursuant to Section 15.2-95 3 of the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, and its governing board to carry out the functions of a land bank entity; WHEREAS, the City issued a "Request for Proposals From Existing or Proposed Non - Profit Organizations" ( "UP ") ", dated June 4, 2018, seeking proposals from qualified existing nonprofit agencies to carry out the functions of a land bank set forth in the Land Bank Statute ( "Land Bank Functions " "), and received and opened such proposals on August 1, 20181 WHEREAS, TAP was a responsive proposer, and is an existing non - profit organization duly incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, with its registered office located in the city of Roanoke, Virginia, and is exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and eligible to receive donations from the City pursuant to Section 1 5.2- 953(B)(vi) of the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended; and, WHEREAS, pursuant and City of Roanoke Ordinance No. _________________________1 adopted on ___________________ ___, 2018, after a public hearing was advertised and held where Roanoke City Council considered the matter, TAP was designated to carry out the Land Bank functions for the City, in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this MOA. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the above recitals which are incorporated herein by reference, and other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose and Duties The Purpose of this MOA is to provide the terms and conditions under which TAP will carry out the Land Bank Functions for the City. The Parties acknowledge and agree that TAP's duties pursuant to this MOA shall include, and not be limited to, performing those tasks authorized by applicable law, including and not limited to the Land Bank Statute, to enable TAP to acquire and facilitate the revitalization of vacant, abandoned, and /or tax delinquent properties located in the City of Roanoke, or vacant surplus properties owned by the City e, resulting in the creation of affordable housing (as defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Roanoke Region) and /or home ownership opportunities for subsequent purchasers from TAP performing the Land Bank Functions. 2. Term This MOA shall continue in effect unless and until it is terminated by either of the parties. This MOA may be terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon ninety days written notice to the other party. If notice of termination is provided by City to TAP pursuant to this section, TAP shall be given sufficient time to wind down the performance of its Land Bank Functions as provided for herein. Notice to the City shall be given to the City Manager. Notice to TAP shall be given to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. 3. Operation/ Administration TAP shall perform the Land Bank Functions pursuant to (1) the provisions of Section 15.2 -7506 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended which are incorporated herein by reference, (2) TAP's response to the RFP dated ,June 4, 2018, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and (3) this MOA. TAP shall provide to the City of Roanoke, on or before May l It of each year an annual plan detailing the goals and objectives for the upcoming fiscal year regarding the performance of Land Bank Functions hereunder. The annual plan shall address, at a minimum, the following: • Goals and Objectives for acquisition and disposition of properties for the fiscal year forthcoming; • Criteria for the identification of properties for acquisition including general location, method of acquisition, and proposed use of such properties for subsequent revitalization and disposition; • Financial / Budget Plan to support the acquisition, administration, maintenance, and disposition of such properties identified in the annual plan; and, • Identification of partner organizations and agencies, and their specific roles, for the implementation of the annual plan. In administering its performance of the Land Bank Functions, TAP agrees that, to the extent applicable, it shall follow the Virginia Public Procurement Act (Section 2.2 -4300 et seq,. Code of Virginia (1950) as amended) in obtaining all goods and services, except as where may be otherwise provided under applicable law. 4. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations TAP agrees that it shall observe, obey and comply fully with all present and future, federal state and local laws, rules or regulations, applicable to or affecting directly or indirectly all property held by TAP for its performance of the Land Bank Functions. 5. Source of Funds TAP may receive funding through grants from the City, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the federal government, and any other public or private sources. TAP may also receive and retain payments for services rendered, rents, lease payments received, proceeds from the disposition of property, proceeds from insurance coverage losses incurred, investment income, and any other asset and activity lawfully permitted under Section 15.2 -7509 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, subject to the specific limitation below. TAP acknowledges and agrees that it will not receive any portion of real property taxes collected on real property conveyed by TAP in administering or performing the Land Bank Functions hereunder that may 7. otherwise be available to TAP, performing Land Bank Functions, as provided in Section 15.2-7509 (C) of the Land Bank Statute. Tax Exemption Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 15.2 -7510 of the Land Bank Statute, TAP performs a public function by performing the Land Bank Functions on behalf of the City of Roanoke, and shall not be required to pay real property taxes upon property acquired, held, or used by TAP for the performance of the Land Bank Functions pursuant to this MOA. Acquisition and Maintenance of Real Property TAP may acquire, and will maintain, real property pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-7507 of the Land Bank Statute, subject to the following: Nothing herein shall be construed to require the City to convey real property to TAP, or to prohibit the City from transferring real property to other non - profits or other entities or individuals in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. All title to real property TAP acquires for Land Bank Functions shall be held in the name of TAP. TAP specifically agrees to maintain all property it acquires for Land Bank Functions in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, resolutions and ordinances controlling air, water, noise, solid waste and other pollution, and relating to the use, storage, transportation, release or disposal of hazardous material substances or waste. TAP shall be solely responsible for all maintenance obligations with respect to such Land Bank properties held by TAP hereunder, including payment of any and all utility charges. 8. Indemnification To the extent permitted by law, TAP agrees and binds itself, and its officers, employees, agents, volunteers, and representatives, its successors and assigns to indemnify, defend, keep and hold the City and its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives free and harmless from any liability on account of any injury or damage of any type to any person or property growing out of or directly or indirectly resulting from any act or omission of TAP, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives in the performance of the Land Bank Functions pursuant to this MOA, including and not limited to, the exercise of any right or privilege granted by or under this MOA; or the failure, refusal or neglect of TAP or its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives to perform any duty imposed upon or assumed by TAP and its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives by or under this MOA. In the event that any suit or proceeding shall be brought against the City or any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or representatives at law or in equity, either independently or jointly with TAP on account thereof, TAP upon notice given to it by the City or any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or representatives, will pay all costs of defending the City or any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or representatives in any such action or other proceeding. In the event of any settlement or any final judgment being awarded against the City or any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or representatives, either independently or jointly with TAP, then TAP will pay such settlement or judgment in full or will comply with such decree, pay all costs and expenses of whatsoever nature and hold the City or any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or representatives harmless therefrom. 9. Disposition of Real Property TAP will hold and dispose of real property pursuant to Section 15.2-7508 of the Land Bank Statute, subject to the following: • TAP shall maintain an inventory of all property held by TAP for Land Bank purposes pursuant to this MOA, and shall make such inventory available for public review and inspection at all times. TAP shall provide the City Council and City Manager no later than January 31 St of each calendar year, a report of such inventory. • TAP shall develop, maintain, and make available for public review policies, procedures, eligibility guidelines, and documentation requirements for organizations or individuals (whether for - profit or non - profit) seeking to acquire, renovate, or develop real property held by TAP for Land Bank purposes pursuant to Section 15.2-7508 (C) of the Land Bank Statute. Such information shall be sufficient to evaluate the current capacity of any such organization or individual to develop or revitalize /rehabilitate the real property in accordance with the purpose of the Land Bank and the goals and objectives of its annual plan. 10. Financial Interests of Board Members and Land Bank Employees Participating in the Performance of Land Bank Functions No member of the Board or employees of TAP shall acquire any interest, direct or indirect in real property held by TAP for Land Bank Functions, or in any real property to be acquired by TAP, or from TAP. No board member or employee of TAP shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or proposed contract for materials or services to be furnished to or used by TAP for Land Bank purposes. TAP's Board may adopt supplemental rules and regulations addressing potential conflicts of interest and ethical guidelines for members of the board and employees of TAP not inconsistent with the Provisions of Section 15.2-7505 of the Land Bank Statute. 11. Amendment of MOA The Parties acknowledge and agree that this MOA may be only be amended upon mutual agreement of the Parties in writing, subject to approval of Roanoke City Council. 12. Dissolution of TAP or Termination of TAP's Performance of Land Bank Functions In the event of the termination or expiration of this MOA, and or the termination of TAP's performance of the Land Bank Functions by TAP, or the dissolution of TAP, all properties acquired by TAP performing Land Bank Functions pursuant to this MOA in which a legally cognizable property interest in the real estate has not been conveyed shall become the property of the City, or its designee. TAP agrees to execute all documents necessary to effectuate a transfer of such real properties to the City or its designee. The Parties agree that prior to any cessation by TAP of the Land Bank Functions or the dissolution of TAP, termination of this MOA by TAP, or the dissolution of TAP, TAP shall satisfy all of its outstanding obligations under this MOA and other applicable law with respect to the properties TAP acquires in its performance of the Land Bank Functions, or otherwise have disposed of such real properties. In addition to the foregoing requirements, TAP agrees that it will prepare a detailed written plan detailing how TAP will dispose of the assets acquired in the performance of its Land Bank Functions and the manner in which TAP will wind down the performance of its Land Bank Functions. Such plan shall meet the City's written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this MOA to be duly executed intending thereby to be legally bound. TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY By :------------------------ - - - - -- By:----------------------------- Name: --------------------------- Name:-------------------- - - - - -- Title:---------------------------- Title:--------------------------- Date:---------------------------- Date :--------------------- - - - - -- Approved as to Form:------------------------------- City Attorney Approved as to Execution:---------------- - - - - -- City Attorney The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication SHERMAN M STOVALL, ASSISTANT CITY MGR Alin R. BRIAN TOWNSEND, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 215 CHURCH AVE SW, ROOM 364 ROANOKE, VA 24011 Account Number 6017304 Date March 11, 2019 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/10/2019 Legal Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Roanoke propose 1 x 81 L 808.72 Publisher of the Roanoke Times I, (the undersigned) an authorized representative of the Roanoke Times, a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING was published in said newspapers on the following dates: 02125. 03/04/2019 The First insertion being given ... 02/25/2019 Newspaper reference: 0000899972 Billing Representative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Monday, March 11, 2019 T411C IC NAT A lall 1 01 PACK DAY COMA INVnIL•P T14AKIV Ynl l I-1-000- Notary Public State of Virginia "' ' <2 City Coun of Roanoke 12� 14,TA ky P4t3UC My Commission expires 3) Ftc- sazsa�9 MY c ()V V S : 0'+ �XpiR4S P� 113 1!2C21 .............. .+ T411C IC NAT A lall 1 01 PACK DAY COMA INVnIL•P T14AKIV Ynl l I-1-000- NOTICE OF PWUC NEMING The City of Roanoke proposes to designate Total Action Against Poverty In the Roanoke Valley, db a. Total Action for Progress, a ran -stock Virginia corporation (TAP), and its governing board W carry out the functions of a land bank entity for the City of Roanoke, pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Land Bank Entities Ad (115.2.7900 et sea. Code of Virginia (MM as amended). to enable TAP to acwke and facilitate the revita0mtion of vacant, abandoned. and/or tax delinquent properties located in the City of Roanoke, for the purpose of creating affordable housing and/or lame ownership opportunities for subsequent purchasers from TAP, and such other purposes authorized by law under the Virginia land Bank Entities Act. The terms and conditions governing TAP In its performance of fond bank functions are set forth In a proposed Memorandum of Agreement between TAP and the CRY of Roanoke. As a nonprofit entity performing the public functions of a lend bank, TAP Is exempt from the payment of real estate taxes for all real property It acquires in Its performance of land bank functions. Copies of the proposed Memorandum of Agreement and the proposed Ordinance are available for public inspection in the Office of the 00 Clerk for the City of Roanoke, Noel C. Taylor Mtmldpel Building, Rodin 456, 215 Church Avenue, S.W, Roanoke, Virginia 2401L on and after Monday. February 29, 2019. Pursuant to the requirements of §15.2• 7502, Code of Virginia (1950), as amenft notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on the above matter at Its regular mending to be held on Malay, March 18, 2019, commencing at 7:00 p.rn., or as soon tbereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, 4th Floor, Room 450. Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011. All parties and Interested entities may appear on the above date and time to be heard on the above matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 00 853-2541, before 12:00 Noon on Thwiday. Mardi -14, 2014._. _ GIVEN under my hand this 25th day of inlnudty 2Di9. Stephanie. M. Moon iteynold% MMC City Clark (899972) M11F NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Roanoke proposes to designate Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley, d.b.a. Total Action for Progress, a non -stock Virginia corporation (TAP), and its governing board to carry out the functions of a land bank entity for the City of Roanoke, pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Land Bank Entities Act ( §15.2 -7500 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950) as amended), to enable TAP to acquire and facilitate the revitalization of vacant, abandoned, and /or tax delinquent properties located in the City of Roanoke, for the purpose of creating affordable housing and /or home ownership opportunities for subsequent purchasers from TAP, and such other purposes authorized by law under the Virginia Land Bank Entities Act. The terms and conditions governing TAP in its performance of land bank functions are set forth in a proposed Memorandum of Agreement between TAP and the City of Roanoke. As a nonprofit entity performing the public functions of a land bank, TAP is exempt from the payment of real estate taxes for all real property it acquires in its performance of land bank functions. Copies of the proposed Memorandum of Agreement and the proposed Ordinance are available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Roanoke, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, Room 456, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011, on and after Monday, February 25, 2019. Pursuant to the requirements of § 15.2 -7502, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on the above matter at its regular meeting to be held on Monday, March 18, 2019, commencing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chamber, 4th Floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011. All parties and interested entities may appear on the above date and time to be heard on the above matter. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (540) 853 -2541, before 12:00 Noon on Thursday, March 14, 2019. GIVEN under my hand this 25th day of February 2019. PH- designate TAP as Land Bank entity for City (3.19.19) Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC City Clerk Notice to Publisher: Please publish twice in the Roanoke Times, Legal Notices, on Monday, February 25, 2019, and Monday, March 4, 2019. Send affidavit of publication to: Stephanie M. Moon Reynolds, MMC, City Clerk 4th Floor, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Room 456 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -2541 Send Invoice to: R. Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development 3rd Floor, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Suite 364 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Phone: (540) 853 -2333 PH- designate TAP as Land Bank entity for City (3.19.19) OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building P� ��rvlhlk 215 Church Avenue, SW, Suite 364 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ROA N O K E www.roanokeva.gov www.roanokeva.gov April 1 1 , 2019 Mr. Shaheed Omar 927 Wasena Avenue, S.W., Apt. 2 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Dear Mr. Omar: This letter is a follow up to your comments made at the March 18, 2019 meeting of City Council regarding the employment applications you submitted and the assistance you received from the Department of Human Resources. With respect to the comment that you were not informed of the status of your applications, the Department of Human Resources has a record of notifying you via email. Specifically, notifications were sent to you for applications you submitted for Codes Compliance Inspector I, Intake Worker, Treasurer Clerk I, Library Assistant II, Library Assistant I, Family Services Specialist, and Client Services Specialist I. The notifications were sent to the email address listed on your employment application. The employment application serves as the primary document for screening and evaluating applicants. The resume' provides information which supplements the employment application. In reviewing your employment application and resume', the recommendations provided to you by staff from Human Resources are prudent and sound, given your recent work history. It should be noted that the recommendations from Human Resources staff were intended to be constructive and helpful, not critical. The hiring process, including applicant screening and selecting applicants for interviews, is very competitive. It is very important that the information provided on the employment application is sufficiently detailed and the information on the resume' aligns with the position that is being applied for. Thank you for considering my comments above. incerel Robert S. Cowell, Jr. City Manager c: City Council Stephanie Moon - Reynolds, City Clerk Daniel J. Callaghan, City Attorney