Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Actions 10-20-25
MCGUIRE 43287-102025 City of Roanoke, Virginia CITY COUNCIL �� October 20 2025 ROANOKE 2:00 PM City Council Chamber 215 Church Avenue, SW AGENDA The City of Roanoke is a safe, caring and economically vibrant community in which to live, learn, work, play and prosper. A vibrant urban-center with strong neighborhoods set amongst the spectacular beauty of Virginia's Blue Ridge. NOTICE: City Council meetings will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursdays at 7:00 pm, and Saturdays from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm; and video streamed through YouTube Live at youtube.com/RoanokeVa. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the deaf or hard of hearing. 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL. All present. The Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Julio H. Reyes, Pastor, St. Gerard Catholic Church. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Joseph L. Cobb. Welcome - ANNOUNCEMENTS: 2. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Mayor Cobb advised that, going forward, the 2:00 pm meeting would begin with the Council Members providing "shout-outs" or announcing community events recently attended. The Council Members made the following announcements: Council Member Sanchez-Jones "shouted-out"the Melrose Fall Festival, Blue Ridge Literacy Celebration and presented a proclamation to the Philippino American community. Vice-Mayor McGuire thanked the Department of Parks and Recreation and all the teams that helped with GO Fest this past weekend. He also "shouted-out" Jason Raines and Paul Shaw, new parks service unit officers with the Roanoke City Police Department working in City parks and greenways. Council Member Hagen echoed the sentiments in acknowledging GO Fest and the Melrose Fall Festival. He looked forward to attending the great event next year. Council Member Nash "shouted-out" the Melrose Fall Festival and Mike Hamlar of Hamlar Curtis Funeral Home and Hamlar Properties, who successfully renovated an old on Loudon Avenue, NW, and will soon begin to renovate a second home. He thanked everyone who is helping the City to tackle the City's housing crisis and acknowledged all federal workers who have been furloughed due to the government shutdown. Council Member Volosin "shouted-out" all the City staff that helped put together the Virginia Municipal League Conference, which was held at the Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center and the Roanoke Blacksburg Regional Airport, because he was able to make it from the Uber to the plane in five minutes. Council Member Powers "shouted-out" the 30th Anniversary of the Discovery Shop and presented a proclamation in honor of the thirty years the shop has raised over ten million dollars for a cure for cancer. Mayor Cobb commented that he recently greeted guests who were in the City attending the Neonatal-Perinatal 9th Annual Collaborative Summit and was happy to share the great progress of the locally based organizations such as the Grove on Patterson, Huddle Up Moms, CHIP of Roanoke Valley and Urban Baby Beginnings. Proclamation declaring October 19-25, 2025 as National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week. Mayor Cobb read and presented the proclamation to Jillian Papa, Director of Planning, Building and Development and staff in attendance. 3. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: The City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard. All matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to the Council, as he may deem appropriate. Reverend Bryan Smith, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the possible casino and asked the Council to consider other ways to increase revenue. Brian McConnell, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to prospects for rapid transformation and governance and leadership within the City. Chris Craft, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the possible casino and expressed that he felt slapped in the face by the plan, asked the Council to consider collaborating with the City of Salem. Anita Atkins, appeared before the Council in opposition of the possible casino in the City of Roanoke. Ralph Smith, appeared before the Council and expressed concern regarding the possibility of a casino in Roanoke and asked for consideration of joining the City of Salem. Sarah Kohler, appeared before the Council and spoke in opposition of the possible casino in the City of Roanoke. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVED (7-0) C-1. Minutes of the regular meeting of City Council held on Monday, October 6, 2025. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Dispensed with the reading of the minutes and approved as recorded. C-2. A communication from the Mayor requesting that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the Council's Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as each Council Member's obligations thereunder as permitted, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-3. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding actual litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7), Code of Virginia. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-4. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-5. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-6. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding the City's legal options involving City property in the South Roanoke area of the City, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-7. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City of Roanoke, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-8. FY2026 City Manager Transfer Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. REGULAR AGENDA: 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 6. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: 1. Appropriation of funds as reimbursement to the City Treasurer as a Licensed Agency of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) — DMV Select Program. Adopted Budget Ordinance No. 43287-102025. (7-0) 7. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND THE CITY MANAGER: 1. City Manager: BRIEFINGS: Roanoke City and Alleghany Health Districts Annual Report— 15 minutes Received and filed. ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR ACTION: a. Acceptance and Appropriation of the FY26 "Four-For-Life" Payment. Adopted Ordinance No. 43288-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) b. Acceptance of Virginia Department of Emergency Management Pass- Through Funding. Adopted Ordinance No. 43289-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) c. Acceptance and Appropriation of Kinship Support Funds from the Virginia Department of Social Services. Adopted Ordinance No. 43290-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) d. Acceptance of the FY2026 Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) State of Good Repair Grant Award for ADA Ramp Improvements and Paving for Williamson Road NW. Adopted 43291-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) e. Acquisition of property rights in connection with Public Works Service Center improvements. Adopted Ordinance No. 43292-102025. (7-0) f. Acceptance and appropriation of the FY2026 Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Highway Safety Grant - City of Roanoke Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign. Adopted Ordinance No. 43293-102025. (5-0, Vice-Mayor McGuire and Council Member Sanchez-Jones abstained from the vote.) g. Execution of Amendment No. 3 to the contract (C22-4120-054) with Alta Planning and Design, Inc. Adopted Resolution No. 43294-102025. (7-0) h. Acceptance and Appropriation of Increased Funds for the Greater Roanoke and New River Valley Small Business Development Center for calendar year 2025. Adopted Ordinance No. 43295-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) i. Acceptance and Appropriation of Additional Funds for the Greater Roanoke and New River Valley Small Business Development Center for Fiscal Year 2026. Adopted Ordinance No. 43296-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez-Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) j. Acceptance and Appropriation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) PY25 Entitlement Funds. Adopted Ordinance No. 43297-102025. (7-0) k. Acceptance of the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant. Adopted Ordinance No. 43298-102025. (7-0) I. Approval and Acceptance of Parks and Recreation Five-Year Master Plan Update. Adopted Ordinance No. 43299-102025. (7-0) m. Approval of the Creation of New Full-Time Employee Positions. Adopted Ordinance No. 43300-102025. (7-0) COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER. The City Manager offered the following comments: On October 13, 2025, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) contractors began upgrading intersections along Hershberger Road, Lafayette Blvd, and Liberty Road. This work aims to enhance safety for motorists and pedestrians by implementing a combination of high-visibility backplates for traffic signals, ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions along Lafayette Blvd, pedestrian signals at signalized intersections, and crosswalk pavement markings. The City's Public Works Transportation Division and VDOT selected these corridors because of crash volume and limited transportation infrastructure. As college application season begins, support is being offered by the Williamson Road Branch Library to guide students through the difficult process. Workshops will be held to assist with FAFSA completion, essay writing, and career planning. These efforts will lead up to a local college fair this Wednesday, October 22, from 5 to 7 PM, where students and families will be encouraged to speak with representatives from area colleges. The goal is to reduce stress and make college planning more accessible for all. On October 10, 2025, the RPD iSTAR unit was recognized as the Virginia Crime Analysis Team of the Year by the Virginia Crime Analysis Network. Following a comprehensive review of crime analysis units across the Commonwealth, including several specialized State Police units, the iSTAR team was selected for this prestigious award in recognition of outstanding performance. The honor reflects the unit's success in solving and advancing numerous cases, producing strategic bulletins, conducting in-depth analysis, supporting problem-solving initiatives, and providing interagency assistance throughout the year. The team's work has made a measurable impact on crime reduction in the City of Roanoke, as well as among regional and federal partners. In addition, an RPD crime analyst received the Virginia New Analyst of the Year award for exceptional tactical analytical contributions that directly resulted in arrests and case closures. These recognitions highlight the continued excellence and regional influence of the department's crime analysis capabilities. The Public Works Transportation Division's Landscape crews have completed the annual fall aeration and overseeding of City medians and rights-of-way, a key component of the City's landscape maintenance program. Fall provides optimal growing conditions, with cooler temperatures and increased soil moisture promoting strong seed germination and root development. Aeration relieves soil compaction, improving oxygen, water, and nutrient penetration to the root zone, which supports deeper, more resilient turf growth. Overseeding addresses bare or thin areas, increasing turf density, improving uniformity, and enhancing the overall aesthetic of City corridors. Maintaining healthy, vibrant medians and rights-of-way not only contributes to community beautification and • civic pride but also has measurable economic impacts by creating attractive gateways that support property values, encourage business investment, and enhance the experience of residents and visitors alike. This proactive landscape work ensures long-term sustainability of the City's public spaces while reinforcing the visual identity and economic vitality of our community. PUBLIC MATTERS FOLLOW-UP. None. 2. CITY ATTORNEY: BRIEFINGS: None. a. Amendment of the City Code by Addition of New Section 2-206.1, Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment; Authorizing the Treasurer to Issue Refund of Erroneously Assessed Taxes That Have Been Paid. Adopted Ordinance No. 43301-102025. (7-0) b. Amendment of the City Code Section 32-101.31, Definitions, and Section 32-101.33, Abatement terms, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate • Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation. Adopted Ordinance No. 43302-102025. (7-0) c. Refund of Erroneously Assessed Taxes Previously Paid by Nicus Software, Inc. Adopted Ordinance No. 43303-102025. (7-0) 3. DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION: None. 8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: 1. Presentation of the Gun Violence Prevention Commission Annual Report. Received and filed. 2. Legislative Committee Meeting. 4:31 p.m. -4:57 p.m. 3. Comments on certain Authorities, Boards, Committees and Commissions in which City Council serve as liaisons or appointees. None. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None. 10. INTRODUCTION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: 1. Repeal and replace Ordinance No. 43260-090225 accepting and appropriating FEMA disaster assistance funds, to correct a scriveners' error. Adopted Ordinance No. 43304-102025. (6-0, Council Member Sanchez- Jones was not present when the vote was recorded.) 11. MOTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1. Inquiries and/or comments by the Mayor and Members of City Council. None. 2. Vacancies on certain authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council. None. 12. RECESSED -4:58 PM The City Council Meeting will stand in recess; and thereafter reconvene at 7:00 pm, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building. City of Roanoke, Virginia CITY COUNCIL 7:00 m p ROANOKE City Council Chamber 215 Church Avenue, SW 13. CALL TO ORDER -ROLL CALL. All present. The Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Vannie Harrell, Lead Pastor, Church Alive International. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Joseph L. Cobb. Welcome 14. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Presentation of the Ramey Art Collection. Sheila Umberger, City Librarian, presented the Ramey Art Collection and introduced staff that worked on the project. Proclamation declaring October 2025 as Arts and Humanities Month. Mayor Cobb read and presented the proclamation to Doug Jackson, Arts and Culture Coordinator and William Penn, Chair, Roanoke Arts Commission. Doug Jackson presented the Pilgrims at the Creek, 4th Floor Art Project and thanked the Roanoke Arts Commission. 15. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Request of CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, to: (1) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 3840 Stratford Park Drive, SW, Official Tax Map No. 5200122, enacted through Ordinance No. 33098 (2) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 0 Brandon Avenue, SW, Official Tax Map No. 5200104, enacted through Ordinance No. 25825 and (3) place conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive, SW, and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue, SW; bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 5200122 and 5200104, respectively. Ben Crew, Agent, Spokesperson. Adopted Ordinance No. 43305-102025. (7-0) 2. Request of Mar Roanoke, LLC, to rezone the property located at 5060 Valley View Boulevard, NW, Official Tax Map No. 2490111, from CG, Commercial- General District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District. Ben Crew, Agent, Spokesperson. Matter was continued until the November 10, 2025, City Planning Commission Meeting. 3. Public Hearing for Boundary Amendments to the City of Roanoke Enterprise Zone. Adopted Ordinance No. 43306-102025. (7-0) 16. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: The City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard. If deemed appropriate, matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to the City Council. Waynette Anderson, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the influx of unhoused citizens in the area. Monique Bishop, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to BRAGG and trying public transit. Virginia Pannabecker, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to BRAGG and the week without driving event. Jordan Bell, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to a potential urban renewal apology from the City of Roanoke. Emma Kauffman, appeared before the Council and spoke in opposition to the casino proposal in the City of Roanoke. Jessica King, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to her experience as a previous unhoused person and the resources of the Roanoke Valley. Ananya Mishra, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to caring for the unhoused population as a local physician and advocated for the unhoused population. Adam Mastrangelo, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to increased traffic volume caused by the new development along Brandon Avenue, SW. Rebekah Murphy, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to concerns about the location of the proposed casino and its ramifications on the citizens of Roanoke. Mary Frazier, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to fear of the unhoused population and reconsideration of the proposed casino in the City of Roanoke. Stephen Paul, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the curb and gutter workaking place in the City. Graeme Anderson, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to crime and the unhoused population. Tiffany Sandifer, appeared before the Council to serve as a voice for the unhoused population and spoke on poverty and social disease. Jessica Bookout, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the City's housing crisis. Keely Meadows, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the treatment of the unhoused and not to hate people. Rita Joyce, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to a request for funding for the FedUp organization. Gary Stein, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to housing on Apperson Drive and suggested a roundabout for the area. Danny Clawson, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to housing solutions and not dehumanizing the unhoused community. Catina Wright, appeared before the Council and spoke on behalf of the Virginia Harm Reduction Coalition to offer solutions with regard to the housing issue in Roanoke. Rob Kevin, appeared before the Council and spoke on behalf of the Virginia Harm Reduction Coalition to offer solutions with regard to the housing issue in Roanoke. Jessica Woods, appeared before the Council and spoke on behalf of the Virginia Harm Reduction Coalition. Doug Hancock, appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the rights of people. RECESSED FOR CONTINUATION OF CLOSED MEETING - 8:46 PM. RECONVENED -9:10 PM. Certification of Closed Meeting. (7-0) ADJOURNED - 9:11 PM. ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the Mayor requesting that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the Council's Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as each Council Member's obligations thereunder as permitted, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The Mayor requests that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the Council's Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as each Council Member's obligations thereunder as permitted, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney NW; ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding actual litigation, where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7), Code of Virginia. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding actual litigation,where such consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(7), Code of Virginia. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney I I Art drOZI ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City,where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. P—Thef David Collins, Deputy City Attorney ROANOKE Office of the'City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding the City's legal options involving City property in the South Roanoke area of the City, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel regarding the City's legal options involving stolen City property in the South Roanoke area of the City, pursuant to Section 2.2=3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended: ifitedi Timothy Spencer, City Attorney NIWR-w4gas iMeft ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City of Roanoke, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly.owned property in the Central part of the City of Roanoke, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney City Managers Report �� Submitted by: Margaret Lindsey Department of Finance ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: FY2026 City Manager Transfer Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Background: Under City Code Section 2-121, the Director of Finance shall report quarterly to City Council any City Manager Transfers in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) between funds, as well as, between project accounts in the capital project funds and special revenue fund. Recommended Action: Receive and file. Valmarie Turner, City Manager City of Roanoke,Virginia Report of City Manager Transfers Three Months Ended September30,2025 (Unaudited) Item Transfer Number Date Explanation 'From Fund/Unit/Prolect To Fund/Unit/Project Amount 1 1751895357342-ITC FUNDING-07-07-25 7/7/2025 ITC FUNDING General Fun d/101-1601-0000.52555-000000 General Fun d/201-1602.0000-53028-000000 140,087.00 2 1752683801404-Snow Equipment Rental Transfer 7/1/2025 Snow Equipment Rental Transfer General Fund/101-2641-0000-52419.000000 General Fund/101.264]-0000.52560-000000 900,000.00 General Fund/101-9410.0000.69027.005500 Capital Projects 308-B1200000.52010-300065&308- 3 172720239428B-New Budget Transfer 9/24/20242:20:46 PM 9/24/2024 Percent for the Arts 8120.0000.53005.300065 239,750.00 • $ 673,837.00 Notes: Under City Code section 2-121,the City Manager has euthorityto make transfers of any amount within or between funds during the fiscal year and afterJune 30th to ensure proper expenditure reporting and budgetary controls forthe prior fiscal year. The scope of thls report Is limited to transfers in excess of$100,000 between funds and between projed/program accounts in the Capital Projed and Grant Funds. * CMTs marked with an asterisk have multiple lines of monies transferred,amounting to over$100,000. CMTs not marked with en asterisk have at least one single line Item over$100,000. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43287-102025. AN ORDINANCE to appropriate funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation through the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles to be a License Agent called a DMV Select Office, amending and reordaining certain sections of the 2025-2026 General Fund and Grant Fund Appropriations, and dispensing with the second reading by title of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that the following sections of the 2025-2026 General Fund and Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: General Fund Appropriations Contingency 101-9410-52199 $ 8,000 Revenues DMV Fees- City Portion 101-1234-40932 8,000 Grant Fund Appropriations FICA 235-1234-51120-400001 2,500 Bonus and Separation Pay 235-1234-51153-400001 28,000 Administrative Supplies 235-1234-52030-400001 7,500 Expendable Equipment (<$5,000) 235-1234-52035-400001 15,000 Training and Development 235-1234-52044-400001 3,000 Revenues DMV Fees- Treasurer Portion 235-1234-44530-400001 32,000 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: ' c �C.-off!—7 City Clerk. _- ._ _ , mow Office of the Treasurer ROA N O K E October 20, 2025 Title: Appropriation of funds as reimbursement to the City Treasurer as a Licensed Agency of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) — DMV Select Program. Background: In February 2017, the City of Roanoke Treasurer's Office entered into an agreement with the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles to be a License Agent called a DMV Select Office. This agreement is on an annual basis from July 1 —June 30 of each year. The agreement is signed by the City Treasurer, the City Manager, and the Commissioner of DMV. The transactions that can be processed by the Roanoke City DMV Select are specifically authorized by DMV and any additional authorized transactions or duties to be assigned to the DMV Select Office will be identified in writing. The City Treasurer receives compensation monthly at a rate of 4.5% up to the first $500,000 in gross transactions and 5.00% over$500,000. This rate schedule starts over each July 1. The monthly compensation fees are split with the City receiving 20% and the City Treasurer receiving 80%. Considerations: City Council action is needed to accept and appropriate funds received for reimbursement to the City of Roanoke Treasurer for being a License Agency of DMV ("DMV Select"). Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to establish a revenue estimate in the amount of $40,000 with 20% or $8,000 going into the General Fund account 101-1234-40932 DMV Fees-City Portion and 80% or$32,000 into the Grant Fund, project 400001 DMV Fees- Treasurer Portion. Appropriate funding of$8,000 into the City Manager Contingency account 101-9410-52199 and the Treasurer's portion, $32,000, into the Grant Fund accounts to be established by the Director of Finance. yy �. f LA). Tasha Burkett, Chief Deputy Treasurer ROANOKE CITY . and ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICTS Your Partner in Community Wellness State of Roanoke City ' s Health October 2025 Cynthia B. Morrow, MD, MPH District Health Director, Roanoke City Health Department vi9HI;t1127MENT To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Quick Overview • A review of select data points • A overview of our services • Time to talk ! VDHO F EALTHNT To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. CountyHealth Rankings and Roadmap + Frederick • Baltimore — • Gp,therch„rr) Dover Rockville 'A • LO ' ",wie inapolis Yr Washington / Alexandria • w SH ' * PA Charleston >+\ ., i" • HI �&, , , OR , , , WE BA W CR ES RC NH 'NE 4" By HN AC g BC CM PO NK `',,I!,'',34,'Y:.''''' ,, ,,'', ' 'it MT .' LY CC NT T / i. OA PE PB PG Newoorl News DI TA BL • v,.. 2-1. :. NW SR • yyyy PU / CH DN •,, Nuvolk N� RU WY ' • c; LN SS '— Virginia Beach SM r... PI HL BR Chesapeake• LE SC WS GA CL PT *IV ME SU FR $�)�,, I BS C'R ,.:.� sj I DA POPULATION HEALTH AND WELL-BEING GROUP ----. NOT GROUPED(NA) LEAST HEALTHY IN US HEALTHIEST IN US CHRR CountyHealth Rankings and Roadmap ....i.,,,,,., .„ ,,,, ,+ .... E } ,..,.. ,_, , . ..„.,.,,,,,, ..,,,,,,,,..;,..„.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.:::.t.4.f.,, ,.. C ., , . .,.... RK l.i "'i : ea`.,. By s 3 r # t € 'V ,r, ','„A,',,,,,,,,,. 'F 'x'.i'.,,r4$ trw "� ',,',, s�r r . M AH.. 4 ka i' ' LV AP e RO 1 . :, i \ :as way t x a } . ;, 4 c R,q `r. rrz 8 > - i t as CA r. , POPULATION HEALTH AND WELL-BEING GROUPiii•L " -- NOT GROUPED(NA) LEAST HEALTHY IN US HEALTHIEST IN US CHRR ,, ; ,,,,,, x F. fin, *.4,1. _ l ?k` Roanoke City Population Health and Well-being. Download Chart Population health and well-being is something we create as a society,not something an individual can attain in a clinic or be responsible for alone.Health is more than being free from disease and pain;health is the ability to thrive.Well-being covers Roanoke City v both quality of life and the ability of people and communities to O contribute to the world.Population health involves optimal physical,mental,spiritual and social well-being. Least Healthy in US Healthiest in US ��` National Average , Roanoke City is faring worse than the average county in Virginia for Population Health and Well-being,and worse than State Average the average county in the nation. Trends Available Population Health and Well-being Virginia United States Length of life Premature Death 15,700 7,700 8,400 v County,State,add National Trends I Leading Causes of Death under age 75 in Roanoke City NGraph Disaggregation meas ure trend was found in Roanoke City for this Leading Causes of Death Deaths Under Age 75 measure. Download Graph Rate per in Roanoke City,Virginia 100.000 Years of Potential Life Lost(YPLL) < All Years Malignant neoplasms 452 163 e 000 Disaggregation by racialized group Value Error Margin § 14,000 12,000 �_ 15,700 14,800-16,600 Diseases of heart 430 155 t did �a--�_.�♦ Premature Death e'00 '—' ' . • i a t s l s a-s Accidents 297 107.1 1 000 e. Hispanic(all races) 7,400 5,400-10,000 s.ao0 •T Non-Hispanic Black 18,200 16,400-20,000 Diabetes mellitus 122 44 y.- •Roanoke Coy.wooda�unond Statee 15,800 14,600-17,000 COVID-19 99 35.7 ceaon the drne Wangle awaerob„b,,,w'COfBOP°"„rp Non-Hispanic White dais polM5 on ho county.wa end natiorW Nn 1. The 2024 Community Health Needs Assessment fc ),- Overweight/Obesity Chronic Disease Heart Disease Hypertension CC3 Mental Health Mental Health Challenges and Substance Use Substance Use 0 InjuryNiolence Interpersonal Violence Roanoke City : Cancer DH; ;kr;,., Virginia Cancer Incidence Rates per 100,000 Population - "" PDF Locality Level i Map Indicator Year Geography Locality Race Sex Cancer Site Incidence • 2017-2021 Locality None • All Races • Male&Female • All Sites i 8 / �(I Rate Ranges * ;„, 262.90-407.99 . " , 408.00-443.99 \\,1-/ 444.00-481.46 I 481.47 + I ti t This and the following slides are extracted from VDH public dashboards. VDHDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Roanoke City : Cardiovascular Disease Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalization Rates by Health District in Virginia, 2021 .t, / ,'< fl Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Rates � �� by Health District in Virginia,2021 r " j ,\\ '' f>7 ,41111111 .1 ---f---- - ? ' 1 i -,. , . I----\, .4,i4---\ m 2023 Mapbox^OpenStreetMap ('`^.\ / \ IlrL i� J VD�VIRGINIA DFEP ALTHNT To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Roanoke City : Other Chronic Diseases Hospitalizations with Hospitalizations with COPD, Asthma, Age-Adjusted Rate Hospitalizations with Chronic Age-Adjusted Rate per per 100,000 Kidney Disease, Age- 100,000 Adjusted Rate per 100,000 Mk I to/ I r''''°°.°.... .. 400 2000 0 3000 40 2000 • Roanoke city,VA (1,225.93) • Roanoke city,VA • Roanoke city, VA • Virginia(615.61) (2,300.54) (1,883.70) • Virginia(1,327.60) • Virginia (872.85) Hospitalizations with Hospitalizations with Hospitalizations with Hypertension, Age-Adjusted Diabetes, Age-Adjusted Rate Alzheimer's Disease,Age- Rate per 100,000 per 100,000 Adjusted Rate per 100,000 Ilir . ' & Z Iii\ 0 350 3000 7000 1000 4000 • Roanoke city,VA (111.84) • Roanoke city, VA • Roanoke city, VA • Virginia(66.74) (6,579.60) (3,375.06) • Virginia(3,691.96) • Virginia (1,799.52) Wi H)F VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTLTH To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Roanoke City : Substance Use Disorder , 2021 _ _ ____ BY SECTOR BY PAYER 1 Total 0 Lost Labor 0 Health Care 0 Crime/Other 0 Household 0 L Total Costs in Virginia `' $5.02 Billion la Economic Burden 111 of Opioids Per Person by Locality in Virginia,2021IIPP *4 A ,:, . $60 $345 per person Roanoke City • $1,510 per capita $345-$536 per person $149.111,567total $536 $790 per person Il $790-$1.92K per person11111 or ,ji. 'f VIRGINIA R E EALTHNT VDHO To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Deaths from Firearms Roanoke Cit number of deaths due to firearms per 100,000 population(age-adjusted) y� Interpersonal Violence Imago I i 2 2 10 No data 11111 Bedford Botetourt Craig Franklin Roanoke Roanoke City Salem City ,ottrce: National Vital Statistics System tti" "otorR `et'21.,t krcessed via SpartiMap. Figure 10.Assault Deaths Deaths from Assault number of deaths due to homicide per 100.000 population(age-adjusted. Hospitalizations with Assault Unintentional Injury Death, Injury, Rate per 100,000 Crude Death Rate Total Population (Per 100,000 Pop.) / V:rcun a Average iii I / 5.5 Nod** No data No data No data No data III No data Bedford Botetourt Craig Franklin Roanoke Roanoke City Satiem Uit. p 200 MirS 50 •,o,, z • Roanoke city,VA(134.3) ce National 20 l!':" • • Virginia(56.8) • Roanoke city,VA(48.00) United States(63.3) Key Drivers • Virginia(10.80) Community partners identified many key drivers of interpersonal violence, including lack of accountability, mental health and substance use challenges, lack of family/social support. lack of community connection,trauma and unhealthy relationships. Interpersonal violence can be very closely related to both SDOH and mental health and substance use challenges.further emphasizing the importance of cross-cutting strategies to address multiple health priorities. Carillon Clinic's 2024 CHA Roanoke City : interest Other conditions of Chlamydia Infection Rate (Per 100,000 Pop.) Gonorrhea Infection Rate (Per 100,000 Pop.) 0 2000 0 700 • Roanoke city, VA (956.05) • Roanoke city, VA (338.6) • Virginia (472.78) Virginia (158.3) United States (492.2) United States (179.0) VIHV1REPARTMENT OFL IA TH To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Roanoke City : Maternal and Child Health , 2023 ' Color Legend 0 2.3 -4.7 Virginia Teen 4.7 - 9.7 Pregnancy Rate per 9.7 - 19.8 19.8 -40.5 1 ,000 females aged 15- ■ >40.5 19 in 2023 15.2 . ,40, 4 �,i' �.'"/ \ ,� �r1 �...,. r \ r V D HOF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT T1 To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. ROANOKE CITY and ALLEGHANY Fr?. DISTRICTS Your Partner in Community Wellness V VIJHOf HEALTH .n. ROANOKE CITY Local Elected Officials Community Partners / and ALLEGHANY County Administrators HEALTH DISTRICTS City Managers Clinic&Family Early Emergency Environmental Population Women Administration Services Intervention Preparedness Health Epidemiology Health Vital Records Infants&Children Business Office Baby Care Medical Reserve Food Protection Reportable Maternal 8 Corps Diseases Child Health Case Management Community Human Resources Lead Program Health Service (teed a Re�.sl Improvement Quality/Process Onsite Program Substance Use Family Planning (Sewer/ Disorders Improvement Drinking well) Immunizations Rabies Recreational long-Term Water Core Screening (Pools) Newcomer Health Tourists (Refugees) (Hotels&Motels) Sexually Transmitted Infections Tuberculosis Management Highlights of the services weprovide : In 2024, the Roanoke City Health Department provided : • > 1500 family planning visits • > 3600 immunizations • > 900 STI encounters • 8 active TB case management • 80 services related to case management of people with elevated blood lead levels • >400 screenings for Medicaid covered long-term care services • > 350 service coordination for early intervention clients per month • - 300 disease investigations (other than COVI D ) D OF EALTHNT To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Highlights of the services weprovide : In 2024, the Roanoke City Health Department provided : • Almost 500 food permits • > 1000 food establishment inspection • >900 STI encounters • > 320 rabies investigations VDOF HARTMHNT To protect rile health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Highlights of the services weprovide : In 2024, the Roanoke City Health Department provided : • > 80 car seats and cribs • >900 Narcan education/ distribution • > 1700 fentanyl test strips • > 15 , 000 vital records • > 5000 WIC clients with services every month ! VDI-EFFLMHNT To protect the health and promote the well-being of all people in Virginia. Working together to Protect the Community's Health : What We Dlli ' '';}} � � ROANOKE CITY FVI a l le rS �_ ` �� ' and ALLEGHANY - - - - �� HEALTH DISTRICTS Your Partner in Community Wellness THAN K YOU ! IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43288-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing acceptance of the Commonwealth of Virginia,Department of Health FY26 Four-for-Life payment for Emergency Medical Services("EMS")made to the City of Roanoke; authorizing execution of any required documents on behalf of the City, appropriating funds detailed more fully infra, and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke does hereby accept the Commonwealth of Virginia,Department of Health FY26 Four-for-Life payment for EMS in the amount of$86,032,which funds are for the collection period March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025, with no local match, to be used for training, supplies, or other appropriate items used for EMS, as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to accept, execute, and file on behalf of the City of Roanoke any and all documents required to obtain such funding, as soon as the means for her to take such action are available due to the federal shutdown in place at the time of adoption of this ordinance. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required to implement and administer the foregoing grant. 4. The following sections of the Grant Fund appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Grant Fund Appropriations Expendable Equipment (<$5000) 235.3211.0000.52035.400171 $ 60,222 Training and Development 235.3211.0000.52044.400171 25,810 Revenues State Grants 235.3211.0000.40122.400171 $ 86,032 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke,the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: -1)f)4-,C-Crt City Clerk. = 1\ lirrAdl*."4.1; City Manager's Report Submitted by: David Hoback, Chief Fire -EMS ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and Appropriation of the FY26 "Four-For-Life" Payment. Background: Roanoke Fire-EMS has been notified that the City of Roanoke will receive the Fiscal Year 2026 "Four-For-Life"payment for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the amount of $86,032. These funds are for the collection period of March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025. These funds are to be utilized for training, supplies or other appropriate items used for EMS. There is no local match required. Considerations: City Council action is needed to formally accept and appropriate the FY26 "Four-For-Life" payment. Recommended Action: Accept the payment as described above and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any required grant agreements to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. Adopt the accompanying ordinance to establish a revenue estimate in the amount of$86,032, and appropriate funding in an account to be established in the Grant.Fund.by the Director of Finance. Valmarie Turner, City Manager it,; 6114 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department of Health Office of Emergency Medical Services 1-800-523-6019(VA only) 1041 Technology Park Drive 804-888-9100 Glen Allen,VA 23059-4500 FAX:804-371-3108 March 11, 2025 CITY OF ROANOKE 348 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke,VA VA 24016 Dear City/County Administrator: IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED Please return this report within 30 days Your locality will be receiving the Fiscal Year 2025 "Four-For-Life"payment for Emergency _ Medical Services (EMS)in the amount of $86,031.92 . These funds are for the-collection period March 01,2024 through February 28,2025. Guidelines for the use of these funds are attached and are available on our website: http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/emergency-medical-services/return-to-locality/ . Prior to distribution of these funds to the local government, this office must receive your Report of Expenditures on last year's distribution. The total amount that must be reported for last year's distribution is annotated on the enclosed report. The Four-For-Life program, as amended in 2000, stipulates that four additional dollars be charged and collected at the time of registration of each passenger vehicle,pickup or•panel truck. The funds collected,pursuant to Section 46.2-694; Code of Virginia,.shall be used only for emergency medical services. The law further states that the Department of Health shall return twenty-six percent(26%) of the registration fees collected to the locality wherein such vehicle is registered to provide funding for: 1. Training of volunteer or salaried emergency medical service personnel of licensed, non-profit emergency medical service agencies; or 2. The.purchase of necessary equipment and supplies for licensed,non-profit emergency medical service agencies. It is important to recognize two clauses in the Four-For-Life legislation: (1)non-supplanting funds and(2) failure to report the use of funds by any local governing body will result in funds being retained. The Assistant Attorney General, at our request has offered the following interpretation for use of the funds. "Any funds received from Section 46.2-694 by a non-state agency cannot be used to match any other funds derived from Section 46.2-694 by that same non- state agency" Simply put, funds returned to localities cannot be used as the matching share of any grants offered using Four-For-Life funds. "Each local governing body shall report to the Board of Health on the use of Four-For-Life finds, which were returned to it. In any case in which the local governing body grants the funds to a regional emergency medical council to be distributed to licensed, non-profit emergency medical and rescue services, the local governing body shall remain responsible for the proper use of the funds. If, at the end of any fiscal year, a report on the.use of Four-For-Life fiends for that year has not been received from a local governing body, any fiends due to that local governing body for the next fiscal year shall be retained until such time as the report has been submitted to the board" If you have any questions or need additional information,please do not hesitate to contact the Office of Emergency Medical Services at 804-888-9100. Sincerely, Nk,_\C.1: Michael D. Berg,MPA,NRP OFF REALM R a�ryeinR AL Th ;W(64331114#10rogrtari afr wavy*,virginia,p40011s IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43289-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) Pass-Through Funding and Reimbursements for the Hazardous Materials Response Team to the City from VDEM for FY25 and FY26; authorizing the City of Roanoke and Roanoke Fire-EMS to serve as the fiscal agents for the distribution of the grant funds; authorizing execution of any required documents on behalf of the City; appropriating grant funds detailed more fully infra; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke does hereby accept the VDEM Pass-Through Funding and Reimbursements for the Hazardous Materials Response Team to the City offered by VDEM for FY25 in the amount of$15,000 and for FY26 in the amount of$30,000, for a total of$45,000, with no local match, such funds to be used to support the activities of the regional hazardous materials response team that serves Region 6 of the Commonwealth, such grant funds being more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to accept, execute, and file on behalf of the City of Roanoke any and all documents required to obtain such funding. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City of Roanoke and Roanoke Fire-EMS are hereby authorized to be the fiscal agents for distribution of the grant funds. 4. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the acceptance of the foregoing funding or with such project. 5. The following sections of the FY25 and FY26 Grant Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Grant Fund Appropriations: FY25 Expendable Equipment (<$5000) 235.3211.0000.52035.400172 $ 12,000 FY25 Training and Development 235.3211.0000.52044.400172 3,000 FY26 Expendable Equipment (<$5000) 235.3211.0000.52035.400173 24,000 FY26 Training and Development 235.3211.0000.52044.400173 .6,000 Revenues: FY25 VDEM Grants - Federal Passthrough 235.3211.0000.40127.400172 $ 15,000 FY26 VDEM Grants - 235.3211.0000.40127.400173 30,000 Federal Passthrough ATTEST: Oxzeiz;,...4. 1171-441- City Clerk. -- City Manager's Report �� Submitted by: David Hoback, Chief Fire - EMS ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance of Virginia Department of Emergency Management Pass- Through Funding. Background: The City of Roanoke and Roanoke Fire-EMS are the fiduciary agents for the regional hazardous materials response team that serves Region 6 of the Commonwealth. The Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) provides annual "pass-through" funding, and also reimburses the City for all expenses associated with regional hazardous materials responses through the use of"pass-through" grant funds. In prior years the City of Roanoke and City of Salem shared fiduciary responsibility for the regional team. Beginning with FY26, the City of Roanoke is now the sole fiduciary for the regional team which increases the amount of pass-thru funding allocated annually. Considerations: - City Council action is required to accept and appropriate pass-through reimbursement funding from VDEM for FY25 totaling $15,000, and for FY26 totaling $30,000. Recommended Action: Adopt the attached Ordinance to accept the pass-thru reimbursement funding in the amount of $45,000, and to appropriate such funding into an account established by the Director of Finance. Valmarie Turner, City Manager COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA s " z Department of Emergency Management a 9711.Farrar Court,Suite 200,North Chesterfield,Virginia 23236 =1'44. ry '�• ' - TEL 804 267 7600 TDD 804.674.2417 FAX 804.272.2046 JOHN SCRIVANI State Coordinator of Emergency Management(acting) February 20, 2025 Battalion Chief Trevor Shannon Hazardous Materials Team Leader Roanoke Fire Department 704 Franklin Street Roanoke,Virginia 24016 Chief Shannon: The purpose of this letter is to announce the disbursement of the annual pass-through funding from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management to departments who participate in the Commonwealth's regional hazardous materials response team program.As per the agreement between the City of Roanoke and VDEM, an electronic transfer of$15,000 was made to the Treasurer of the City of Roanoke in January/February 2025.This transfer represents the pass-through funding for the July 2024—June 2025 team response period. The pass-through of these funds is to support the regional hazardous materials response team. Please note all funds provided to a regional hazardous material response team from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management shall be used only to provide for hazardous materials response program expenses and shall not be used to supplant or replace funds for any other program or activity. Please use this letter to verify proper allocation of these funds. I hope this information helps. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Respectfully, Thomas C.Jordan Chief,Technological Hazards Branch cc: HM Program files RHMO Brian Thurman,R6 Saving lives through effective emergency management and homeland security. "A Ready Virginia is a Resilient Virginia." Page I t • 1."' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA • `}'` 4. Department of Emergency Management , 9711 Farrar Court,Suite 200,North Chesterfield,Virginia 23236 = TEL 804.267.7600 TDD 804.674.2417 FAX 804.272.2046 • JOHN SCRIVANt State Coordinator of Emergency Management(acting) August 15,2025 • Battalion Chief Trevor Shannon Hazardous Materials Team Leader • Roanoke Fire Department • 704 Franklin Street Roanoke,Virginia 24016 Chief Shannon: The purpose of this letter is to announce the disbursement of the annual pass-through funding • from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management to.departments who participate in the Commonwealth's regional hazardous materials response team program.As per the agreement between the City of Roanoke and VDEM,an electronic transfer of$30,000 was made to the Treasurer of the City of Roanoke on 14 August 2025.This transfer represents the pass-through funding for the July 2025— June 2026 team response period. The pass-through of these funds is to support the regional hazardous materials response team. Please note all funds'provided to a regional hazardous material response team from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management shall be used only to provide for hazardous materials response program expenses and shall not be used to supplant or replace funds for any other program or activity. Please use this letter to verify proper allocation of these funds.. I.hope this information helps. Please feel free tocontact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Respectfully, ritO au C. 10441v • Thomas C.Jordan • . Chief,Technological Hazards Branch • cc:HM Program files RHMO Brian Thurman,R6 Saving lives through effective emergency management and homeland security. "A Ready Virginia is a Resilient Virginia." .. . Page I! IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43290-102025. AN ORDNANCE authorizing the acceptance of Kinship Support Funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services to the City of Roanoke,on behalf of the City of Roanoke Department of Social Services, authorizing execution of any required documentation on behalf of the City required to accept such funding; appropriating funds detailed more fully infra; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke does hereby accept Kinship Support Funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services in the total amount of$25,000 with a local match of 15.5%.The funds will be used to assist relatives in obtaining household goods,help with transportation to appointments, childcare costs or any other expense associated with children entering the home of a relative, as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to accept, execute and file, on behalf of the City, any and all documents required to accept such funds in a form approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as maybe required by the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services in connection with acceptance of the foregoing funds. 4. The following sections of the 2025-2026 General Fund be,and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: General Fund Appropriations: Kinship Support Funds 100% 101-5311-0000-53230 $ 25,000 Revenues: Kinship Support Funds 101-1234-0000-43230 $ 25,000 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke,the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: z • C.atat.:_eu City Clerk_ , _ —" 4-1 City Manager's Report Submitted by: Gwendolyn C. Coleman, Director . 1111111110 Department of Human/Social Services ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and Appropriation'of Kinship Support Funds from the Virginia Department of Social Services. Background: Starting on July 1, 2024, the Virginia Department of Social Services (VDSS) informed the local Departments of Social Services (LDSS) that it would be eligible to.receive Kinship Support Funds. The local Department of Social Services will be eligible for$250, including 15.5 percent local match, each time a child enters foster care and is placed with a kinship resource parent or when a child currently in foster care is placed with a kinship resource parent. Considerations: The Kinship Support funds will support the City of Roanoke Department of Social Service's ongoing efforts to place children with relatives and fictive kin who are or can become kinship resource parents. Increased placement of abused/neglected children with relatives and/or kinship resource parents decreases the length of time of a foster care episode.It improves overall outcomes for children in foster care. The funds increase the department's.ability to support and remove barriers preventing the placement of children with relatives and kinship resources parents. The funds will be used to assist relatives in obtaining household goods such as bedding and furniture, help with transportation to appointments and childcare costs while daycare is being arranged, or any other expense associated with children entering the home of a relative. . Recommended Action: Adopt an ordinance accepting the Kinship Support Funds from the Virginia Department of Social Services. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any forms required by the Virginia Department of Social Services to accept these funds, such as documents to be approved by the City Attorney. V Adopt the accompanying ordinance to establish a revenue estimate of$25,000 for Kinship Support Funds and appropriate funding in the same amount into an expenditure account to be established by the Director of Finance. Valmarie Turner, City Manager . IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43291-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the FY2026 State of Good Repair ("SGR") Grant Award from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") for the ADA Ramp Improvements and Paving along Williamson Road, N.W.; authorizing execution of the VDOT Standard Project Administration Agreement and any required documents on behalf of the City; appropriating funds detailed more fully infra; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts the VDOT FY2026 SGR Grant Award in the total amount of$1,492,633, with no local match required, which funds are to be used for locally administered ADA ramp installations and paving along Route 11/Williamson Road, N.W., between Flemming Avenue,N.W., and the City limits, as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to execute the VDOT Standard Project Administration Agreement for this project as approved to form by the City Attorney. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City, any requisite documents pertaining to the City's acceptance of the funds. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to take such further actions and execute all documents as may be necessary to implement and administer such funds consistent with the terms of this Ordinance, with any such documents being approved as to form by the City Attorney. 4. The following sections of the FY2026 VDOT SGR Grant Award appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Capital Projects Fund Appropriations: Construction—Paving and ADA Ramps 308-4110-0000-69065-300261 $ 1,492,633 Revenues: VDOT—State Revenues 308-4110-0000-40122-300261 $ 1,492,633 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: ~e - _ City Clerk. _ = — City Manager's Report �� Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance of the FY2026 Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) State of Good Repair Grant Award for ADA Ramp Improvements and Paving for Williamson Road NW. Background: In 2014, the General Assembly passed legislation providing that State primary routes maintained by municipalities can receive a portion of the reconstruction and paving allocations previously only distributed to interstate and state-maintained primary roads. This annual State of Good Repair(SGR) grant program requires application by localities based on eligibility via VDOT pavement condition assessment. Segments within the City of Roanoke that may be eligible, depending upon VDOT's assessment, may include Route 11, Route 117, Route 460, etc. The City of Roanoke will administer this ADA ramp and repaving project entirely. No local match is required for SGR grant awards. Considerations: For FY2026, the City of Roanoke applied for funds through this program and has been awarded the eligible street segment of Route 11/Williamson Road NW between Fleming Avenue NW and the City limits. The total cost of the City-administered SGR curb ramp and pavement work will be $1,492,633.00. • UPC 127684 -#SGR26LP— Roanoke— Primary Extension — Paving - $833,259.00 • UPC 127685 -#SGR26LP — Roanoke— Primary Extension —ADA- $659,374.00 Recommended Action: Accept the SGR grant award for the locally administered ADA ramp installations and paving along Williamson Rd NW, which is valued at $1,492,633.00. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the VDOT Standard Project Administration Agreement for this project as approved to form by the City Attorney. Valmarie Turner, City Manager IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43292-102025. AN ORDINANCE providing for the acquisition of real property rights needed by the City of Roanoke ("City") in connection with Public Works Service Center improvements; authorizing City staff to acquire such property rights by negotiation for the City; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute appropriate acquisition documents; and dispensing with the second reading of this Ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City wants and needs to acquire certain required sidewalk and temporary construction easements from a private property owner as set forth in the City Manager's report dated October 20, 2025, to construct a new sidewalk along Courtland Road, N.E., from Wayne Street, N.E., to Thurston Avenue, N.E., as part of a Public Works Service Center improvement project ("Project"). The proper City officials and City staff are hereby authorized to acquire by negotiation for the City the necessary real property interests and appropriate ancillary rights with respect to the real property parcel referred to in the above-mentioned City Manager's Report, and any other real property interests that may later be determined by the City as needed for the Project. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized for and on behalf of the City to execute appropriate acquisition documents for the property owner identified in the above- referenced City Manager's Report, and such additional property owners that may later be identified, for such consideration as deemed appropriate for the necessary interests provided, however, the total consideration offered or expended including costs, title search fees, appraisal costs,-recordation fees, and other related costs shall not exceed the funds available in the Project's account for such purposes, without further authorization of City Council. Upon the acceptance of any offer and upon delivery to the City of appropriate acquisition documents, approved as to form by the City Attorney, the Director of Finance is authorized to pay the respective consideration to the owners of the real property interests conveyed, certified by the City Attorney to be entitled to the same. 3. All documents necessary for this conveyance shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this Ordinance, by title, is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: City Clerk. r /may 2 �� City Manager's Report ' Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acquisition of property rights in connection with Public Works Service Center improvements. Background: The City is planning to construct new sidewalk along Courtland Road, NE from Wayne Street, NE to Thurston Avenue, NE as part of a Public Works Service Center improvement project. In order to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed sidewalk, the City will need to acquire real property rights from a property owner along the corridor. Considerations: City Council action is necessary to authorize the acquisition of real property rights needed for the sidewalk Improvements. The real property rights needed are outlined below but are subject to minor variation of location and extent pending final engineering design details. Funding for acquisition of these real property rights will be available:in project account 300177 - PWSC —Wash House & Refueling Center. Tax Map Address Owner Required Property Rights Parcel Number .. • 3070320 0 Courtland Baker, Katherine Real Sidewalk & Temporary Road, NE Trustee Esworthy Dana Lee Construction Easements Baker Trustee Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate with the above-identified property owner and such additional property owners that may later be identified, to acquire the aforementioned real property interests needed for the project. All acquisition documents shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney. . Valmarie Turner, City Manager . Public Works Service Center (PWSC) Improvements ♦1 y'�"jg ,., . R � `' � yV .'"fir'-. -_.',✓°' Sj ".^ '•4,�, �, w`,rt Thurston . .' ( T. 4 , ,► - �` Ave -' 30?02 ' +gig , e s �070 3 � : . 1 '�p ._ p ,t....w `, Courtland cp '" `." Road 023 ilk,. p c>'CA 0. W ,. t, ' ' '4. Proposed o o . .. '. -, ^ _ � o' .Sidewalk 1`) . Q' a, v PWSC to..' , 4 ti _ a, r �, y s;v, �,,,< . 1 r' '� c_' - .4 -. Sycamore 0,' + , �- Ave k` ' 30. W . k e s 11 .40r . ^ a "S6r r ` v. - ' s , . h . i 1 \..tea. ^ . . . .k. �-- • (PI: � ' r� 7., ;' `. Wayne �' . .. Street �.4 9 ! y� ¢ �I - � IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43293-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the FY2026 Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles ("DMV") Highway Safety Grant Funds from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to the City of Roanoke ("City") for the Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign, authorizing execution of any required documents on behalf of the City, appropriating funds detailed more fully infra, and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts the FY2026 Virginia DMV Highway Safety Grant from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to the City for the Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign in the amount of $300,000, with a 25% in-kind local match of $75,000, allowing the Transportation Division to hire a consultant to develop and implement the campaign, including producing materials and purchasing media, as more specifically outlined in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to accept, execute, and file on behalf of the City any and all documents required to obtain such funding. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the acceptance of the foregoing funding or with such project. 4. The following sections of the Grant Fund appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Grant Fund Appropriations: Fees for Professional Services 235-7583-0000-52010-400174 $ 200,000 Marketing 235-7583-0000-53066-400174 100,000 Revenues: Virginia Department of Motor 235-7583-0000-40127-400174 $300,000 Vehicles—Federal Pass Through Funds 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: City Clerk. �� �/ STATEMENT OF CONFLICTOF INTEREST I, Vivian Sanchez-Jones, state that I have a personal interest in agenda item 7(f) regarding acceptance and appropriation of the FY2026 Department of Motor Vehicles Highway Safety Grant-City of Roanoke Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign which benefits Roanoke City Public Schools because I am an employee of Roanoke City Public Schools and as an employee, I have a personal interest in this transaction. Therefore, in accordance with Virginia Code Section 2.2-3112, I will refrain from participation in this matter. I ask that the City Clerk accept this statement and ask that it be made a part of the minutes of this meeting. Witness the following signature made this 20th day of October, 2025. (Seal) i ian Sanche Jones, Roanoke Ci ncil STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST I, S. Terry McGuire, state that I have a personal interest in agenda item 7(f) regarding acceptance and appropriation of the FY2026 Department of Motor Vehicles Highway Safety Grant-City of Roanoke Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign which benefits Roanoke City Public Schools because I am an employee of Roanoke City Public Schools and as an employee, I have a personal interest in this transaction. Therefore, in accordance with Virginia Code Section 2.2-3112, I will refrain from participation in this matter. I ask that the City Clerk accept this statement and ask that it be made a part of the minutes of this meeting. Witness the following signature made this 20' day of October, 2025. b_l - (Seal) S. Terry McGuir , Vice- or, R,,anoke City Council City Manager's Report �111P3W� Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROA N O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and appropriation of the FY2026 Department of MotOr Vehicles (DMV) Highway Safety Grant - City of Roanoke Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign. Background: The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) administers pass-through grant funds from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to support activities that improve highway safety in Virginia. The City's Transportation Division has applied for this grant annually for the. past six years, funding campaigns such as Every Corner is a Crosswalk, No Need to Speed- Together We Can Make Our Streets Safer, No Need to Speed.—Keep Students Safe, Change Lanes to Pass, Keep Each Other Safe, and Focused Driving, Safe Arriving. In 2025, staff submitted a seventh DMV Highway Safety Grant application to fund the Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign. This campaign aims to enhance the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists, emphasizing slowing down in school zones and promoting safe transportation habits. It addresses DMV safety funding priorities, including speeding and pedestrian/bicycle safety, and builds on prior initiatives like No Need to Speed, School Zone Safety; and Keep Each Other Safe. The campaign focuses on education and outreach to create safer environments around schools, ultimately improving safety for the traveling public in Roanoke. Considerations: The DMV approved the City's application and awarded $300,000 to launch this citywide media and education campaign. The grant will allow the Transportation Division to hire a consultant to develop and implement the campaign, including producing materials and purchasing media. A 25% match ($75,000) is required, which will be met through the DMV's Paid Media one-to- one match policy and staff time spent managing the campaign. Recommended Action: Accept the FY2026 DMV Highway Safety Grant (Walk and Roll to School Spring Safety Campaign) and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant agreement and -related documents, all approved as to form by the City Attorney. Adopt the accompanying ordinance to set a revenue estimate of$300,000 from grant revenue and allocate the same amount into accounts established by the Director of Finance in the Grant Fund. Valmarie Turner, City Manager IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43294-102025. A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager's issuance and execution of Amendment No. 3 to the City of Roanoke's ("City's") Contract with Alta Planning and Design, Inc., to increase the Department of Motor Vehicles Pass-Through Grant Funds from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to take certain other actions in connection with such Amendment No. 3. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to issue and execute Amendment No. 3 as may be necessary to the City's Contract with Alta Planning and Design, Inc., to increase the Department of Motor Vehicles Pass-Through Grant Funds from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to support a citywide pedestrian safety media and education campaign; all as more fully set forth in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The form of such Amendment No. 3 shall be approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to provide for the implementation, administration, and enforcement of Amendment No. 3. ATTEST: City Clerk. /i i City Manager's Report 111Wellinqm Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Execution of Amendment No. 3 to the contract (C22-4120-054) with Alta Planning and Design, Inc. Background: The Virginia Department.of Motor Vehicles (DMV) administers pass-through grant funds from the National. Highway Traffic Safety Administration to support activities that improve highway safety in Virginia. The City's Transportation Division has successfully applied for this grant for the past six years. Past safety campaigns funded through this program include: Every Corner is a Crosswalk, No Need to Speed— Together We Can Make Our Streets Safer, No Need to Speed—Keep Students Safe, Change Lanes to Pass, Keep Each Other Safe, and Focused Driving, Safe Arriving. On November 14, 2022, the City entered into Contract C22-4120-054 with Alta Planning and Design, Inc. to provide all materials, labor, and services for a Pedestrian Safety Marketing Campaign funded by the DMV Safety Grant (FY23). The contract had an initial one-year term with up to four renewal periods and a not-to-exceed amount of$200,000 per year. Two amendments have since updated the scope for the FY24 and FY25 campaigns. The FY26 DMV.Grant Award has increased from $200,000 to $300,000. Amendment No. 3 is necessary to increase the contract by$100,000, exceeding 25% of the original contract value, fora total not-to-exceed amount of$300,000. This will allow additional work to support the City's and DMV's goals of improving safety for the traveling public in Roanoke. Considerations: In conjunction with the acceptance of the FY26 DMV Grant Award for $300,000, Council approval is required to amend the contract to reflect the increased not-to-exceed amount. This funding will support a citywide pedestrian safety media and education campaign. Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 3, approved as to form by the City Attorney,-to amend the contract with Alta Planning and Design, Inc. in accordance with the terms outlined in the amendment. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take any additional actions and execute documents, approved as to form by the City Attorney, necessary to implement, administer, and enforce Amendment No. 3. Valmarie Turner, City Manager IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43295-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of increased funds for calendar year 2025 for the Greater Roanoke and New River Valley Small Business Development Center("SBDC")award issued by George Mason University from the United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") to the City of Roanoke ("City"); appropriating calendar year 2025 Grant Funds detailed more fully infra; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute any necessary documents necessary to accept such Funds; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts the increased funds for the calendar year 2025 SBDC award issued by George Mason University from the SBA to the City for funding associated with salary and benefits for SBDC's four employees,as well as operational expenses in the amount of$120,399, for the period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025, all of which is more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute and file, on behalf of the City, the grant agreement and all necessary documents required to accept such grant. All documents shall be upon form approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the City's acceptance of this grant 4. The following sections of the calendar year 2025 Grant Fund be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Grant Fund Appropriations: Employee Wages 235-1211-0000-51002-400010 $72,460 FICA 235-1211-0000-51120-400010 5,782 Dental 235-1211-0000-51126-400010 115 Health 235-1211-0000-52144-400010 1,971 Life 235-1211-0000-51130-400010 1,014 Disability 235-1211-0000-51131-400010 43 Travel 23 5-1211-0000-583 52-400010 4,081 Supplies 235-1211-0000-52030-400010 200 Consultants 235-1211-0000-55095-400010 30,250 Program Activities 235-1211-0000-52066-400010 4,483 Revenues: Federal Grant 235-1211-0000-40121-400010 $120,399 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: (46¢- c-ate J-; CIY&?4,- City Clerk. City Manager's Report Submitted by: Heather Fay, Director Greater Roanoke & NRV Small Business Development Center ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and Appropriation of Increased Funds for the Greater Roanoke and Now River Valley Small Business Development Center for calendar year 2025. Background: The Greater Roanoke and New River Valley (NRV) Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is a local subsidiary of the Virginia Small Business Development Center program, an organization of twenty-five offices across the Commonwealth providing professional business advising, education, research, and business resources to help start, grow, and transition Virginia businesses. This network represents a partnership between the United States Small Business Administration (SBA), George Mason University (GMU), and local host organizations. Local partners include academic institutions, chambers of commerce, municipalities, economic development organizations, and private companies. The SBDC provides services to the greater Roanoke area, Franklin County, Alleghany Highlands, and the New River Valley. Because the SBDC operates on a calendar year, the date range for this acceptance of funds is January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. This increase in funding is the appropriation of$120,399.00 for the Greater Roanoke and NRV to continue to perform on a subaward issued by George Mason University under its award from The United States Small Business Administration. This increase in funding is associated with the salary and benefits for SBDC's four employees, as well as operational expenses. Considerations: City Council action is needed to accept and appropriate funds associated with the City's role as local host for the SBDC. Recommended Action: Accept and appropriate the increased funds in the attached budget ordinance to the Grant operation fund of$120,399.00 and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any required agreements or documents, such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. Docusign Envelope ID:9F0A2A38-E734-4723-BD12-837E02B5B5B6 SUBAGREEMENT MODIFICATION BETWEEN GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY AND CITY OF ROANOKE Subaward Number: E2068359 Modification Number: 02 WHEREAS City of Roanoke is continuing to perform on a subaward issued by George Mason University under its award from The United States Small Business Administration for the project titled, `2025 SBA CORE-VA State Small Business Development Center,"award number, SBAOEDSB250172-01-00, CFDA number 59.037, the following changes to the agreement are mutually agreed to: 1. Paragraph 3A Budget: Increase funding by$120,399.00 Total before this Modification: $ 98,509.00 This Modification: $120,399.00 Cumulative to date: $218,908.00 2. Key Personnel: Subcontractor's Principal Investigator responsible for the conduct of the work related to this Agreement is Mrs.Heather Fay, Director. hfay@roanokesmallbusiness.org All other terms and conditions of the subcontract remain unchanged. IN WITNESS,THEREOF,the parties have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers on the date herein set out: GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY CITY OF ROANOKE DocuSigned by:, B : (µS66C 9/26/2025 B Y L asBceAFcoolcAD.3... Y _ Michael Laskofski Heather Fay Associate Vice President, Research Services Docusign Envelope ID:9F0A2A38-E734-4723-BD12-837E02B5B5B6 r Er' E206835 9 v k 'd ,, z nSBA SHARE .x ,,City:of Roanoke , 2251,1stCtt r=,. 23!!2nd CR� u35%3rd CR Total Obkgatedto Date" Personnel- $,' ,131,746.79 $ :,.28,985 00 $ ,• 30,3,02.00 $ . 72;459.79, $ 131,746.79 Fringe'" $-- 16,227.06 .$ " 3,570.00 $ •, ''3,732.00 $• - _ " 8,925.06" $ _ , •16,2271)6 Travel : :.$ 7,420.001 $ . 1,632.00 •S :_. 1,707.00 $:. :. • 4,081.00 $ ... 7,420.00 Equipment, . ' $' .- . ' - $ $i. - $ _ _ Supplies.. $` : 364;15 ,$ 80.00 $ ,, 84.00 $ _ 200.15 $ 364-15 Contractual $` . ..,_ . $ .- . , $ $ Consultants $ 55;000 00."$ 12,100:00`:$'" 12,650.00 $' 30,250.00 $-' - 55,000-00 Other ; ; $ °,,, 8,150.00 '$ :- :. ' 1,793.00. $ 1,874.00 $*- , 4,483.00 $: 8,15000 Iota[Direct'Cost . $_ .. ' : 218 808.-00"'$ 48,160.00 $ ,'50,349.00 $ ,;_ 120,399.00 $ g 218,908,00; .' $ -r Total-SBA .,$, 218 908 D0:`$ 41060.00 $'. .1: 50,349.00 $ '120,399.00 S. .,, 218,908.00; C SH _ '.CillVi2VGITIEDD Ei t'k l°' .127'22 � == ]Obliga edl[ Personnel $ 131,746.76 $ 28,984.29 $ " 30,301.75 $ 72,460.72 $ 131,746_76 Fringe $ 16,227.05 $ 3,569.95 $ 3,732.22 $ 8,924.88 $ 16,227.05 Travel . $ $ - $ - $ - $ , Equipment $ ,. _ $ . . - $ - $ • $ - Supplies $ 26.19 $ " 5.76 $ " - 6.02 $ 14.40 $ r ' 26.19 Contractual $ $ - $ - $ - `$ Consultants $ 32,500.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 7,475.00 $ _ 17,875.00 $ 32,500.00 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -- T'OrT Cash,Mat-Oh 180,500.00:;0 3S7.10?00 $ ° '415,15t000 0'; 99,275A0 j 180,500A4 ry IN-KIND MATCH ' City of Roanoke , 22%1st CR ' 23°I 2nd CR 55%'3rd CR Total Obligated to Date Personnel..•'. $ .". - - $ _ $ - $ $ Fringe:, , . . $- :. $ $ $. $ Travel :.$,'. - :$ $.. . .. - $ - $. "_ Equipment. ,. . - ' -$. .. ._ : '$ .. $ . . . , .- . $ . .-.. $: :. Supplies- ', $ : , $ $ $ $ Contractual'. •$ $ $ $ $ Consultants 's.,' ' - :•$. " - - $ . $ $:: - Other : 5" ' -" 69,931.20 :$': " -• 15,384.86" $' 16,084.18 $ " 38,462.16 $ ' 69,93120 Total In-kind $ 69 931.2_ '$ 15,384.86 $ 18,084.18 $ 38,462.16- $- 69,931.20 Tcta[ irec dfCost $`. _' $ $ S . .. Docuslgn Envelope ID:9F0A2A38-E734-4723-BD12-837E02B5B5B6 Date: Date: IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43296-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of additional funds for the FY2026 Greater Roanoke and New River Valley Small Business Development Center("SBDC") award issued by George Mason University from the United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") to the City of Roanoke ("City"); appropriating FY2026 Grant Funds detailed more fully infra; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute any necessary documents necessary to accept such Funds; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts the additional funds for the FY2026 SBDC award issued by George Mason University from the SBA to the City for providing contractual advising services to expand capacity and ensure local businesses continue to receive timely,high- quality support, in the amount of$33,146, for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, all of which is more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute and file, on behalf of the City, the grant agreement and all necessary documents required to accept such grant. All documents shall be upon form approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the City's acceptance of this grant 4. The following sections of the FY2026 Grant Fund be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: { Grant Fund Appropriations: Consultants 235-1211-0000-58352-400175 $33,146 Revenues: State Grant 235-1211-0000-40122-400175 $33,146 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke,the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. -• r ATTEST:eto_eit;_i, City Clerk. • ' - • v• f 111 City Manager's Report IMMO� Submitted by: Heather Fay, Director Greater Roanoke & NRV Small Business Development Center ROA N O K E October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and Appropriation of Additional Funds for the Greater Roanoke and New River Valley Small Business Development Center for Fiscal Year 2026 Background: The Greater Roanoke and New River Valley (NRV) Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is a local subsidiary of the Virginia Small Business Development Center program, an organization of twenty-five offices across the Commonwealth providing professional business advising, education, research, and business resources to help start, grow, and transition Virginia businesses. This network represents a partnership between the United States Small Business Administration (SBA), George Mason University (GMU), and local host organizations. Local partners include academic institutions, chambers of commerce, municipalities, economic development organizations., and private companies. The Greater Roanoke and NRV SBDC provides services to the greater Roanoke area, Franklin County, Alleghany Highlands, and the New River Valley. Funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia through Virginia Education and General (E&G) Funds enables.George Mason University, on behalf of the Virginia SBDC Network, to issue a subaward to the Greater Roanoke and NRV SBDC for Fiscal Year 2026 (July 1, 2025 -June 30, 2026). For this period, $33,146 has been appropriated to support the ongoing delivery of SBDC services in the greater Roanoke area, Franklin County, Alleghany Highlands, and the New River Valley. This project operates as a distinct funding stream and is maintained separately from the federal operations grant, local cash match contributions, and program- specific projects. The funds will be used to provide contractual advising services to expand capacity and ensure local businesses continue to receive timely, high-quality support. Considerations: City Council action is needed to accept and appropriate funds associated with the City's role as local host for the .SBDC. Recommended.Action: Adopt the attached ordinance to accept the additional funds, establish a.revenue estimate in the Grant Fund of$33,146, and,authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any - required agreements or documents, such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. . uocusign tnveiopelu:338Ubbf r-u5rU 448b-92132-UUyrty3u61112 '\„JIM GEORGE MASON Purchasing Department 4400 University Drive,MS 3C1,Fairfax,VA 22030 UNIVERSITY. Phone:703.993.2580;http://fiscal_gmu.edu/purchasing/ Scope of Work [SOW] Template Contractors or departments may use this form or use their own format that contains the same data elements.-This form should be submitted along with the Proposal for Service form found in the Fiscal Services Forms&Instructions page. "Contractor Name: City of Roanoke ;Project Name: Virginia SBDC-State E&G Funding Department this project will be 1Fcompletedfor: Virginia SBDC - Mason Enterprise Contractor Period of (Performance: July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026 I. PROPOSED PRICE STRUCTURE(select one): It A Finn-Fixed-Price of S 33,146 . Neither the contractor nor Mason shall adjust the price based on the actual hours worked to perform the contractually agreed upon deliverables (scope changes impacting price are still permitted with a Change Order/PO modification). The contractor may submit progress invoices after project milestones are completed.Firm-Fixed-Price is only suitable where there are exact deliverables listed in section IV. ❑ An hourly rate of S ,with a Not-to-Exceed(NTE)price of S . Contractor shall list hours worked, along with a summary of services performed on all invoices. II. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Explain this project and what the contractor will be doing for the University. !Virginia SBDC is led and managed by George Mason University-Mason Enterprise in partnership ;with US SBA to deliver business advising and training to small businesses and entrepreneurs in Virginia. Mason subcontracts with 13 organizations that establish a local SBDC office and hire staff to deliver advising and training. SBDC activities are recorded in a common client data base and reported in aggregate to funding sponsors including SBA, Commonwealth of Virginia and local funders. M. CONTRACTOR EFFORT AND TECIL ;CAL REQUIREMENTS:Describe how the work will be conducted and the methods that will be used.Explain how many contractor personnel are estimated on this project and what are the expected number of hours each for one.Please describe any travel that is expected and why the travel is necessary for the project. Greater Roanoke and NRV SBDC office has staff that deliver confidential 1-on-1 business advising, organize and host training programs for small businesses, and make introductions and connections !to other business assistance providers and resources to support business growth. The SBDC office will use the funding to expand capacity (hours of advising, number of training, number of clients advised). 1V. DELIVERABLES/SCHEDULE:What are the deliverables expected from this project?What is the format of each deliverable? What documentation will accompany the deliverables?What format will the deliverables be provided in (e.g., PDF, Word, digital files)? What is the timeline for each deliverable? How will you communicate progress on deliverables and at what frequency?All projects must have at least one deliverable. Deliverable#1-Describe this deliverable in detail: 11-on-1 business advising will be delivered in person or virtually and documented in the Virginia w (SBDC CRM with session notes by date that document business issue, discussion topics, and next steps; hours of advising delivered. Page 1 of 2 Revised January 2025 uocusign tnvelope lu:iitSUbbr1--ubrU-44a5-9. t -ULart93ub1UZ • GEORGE MASON Purchasing Department }{{ 4400 University Drive,MS 3C1,Fairfax,VA 22030 ,. }t }i UNIVERSITY'. Phone:703.993.2580;http://fiscal.gmu.edu/purchasing/ Deliverable#2-Describe this deliverable in detail: Training events will be delivered virtually or in-person and documented in the Virginia SBDC CRM with event title, date of training, topic of training, presenter,training content, number of registrations and attendees, and attendee evaluations. Deliverable#3-Describe this deliverable in detail: Deliverable#4-Describe this deliverable in detail: Deliverable#5-Describe this deliverable in detail: • j 1 Heather Fay Contractor Printed Name Signature Date Page 2 of 2 Revised January 2025 Docusign Envelope ID:338066FF-D5FC-4485-92B2-DC9FE93D6102 Purchasing Department gres0 R-G E 4400 University Drive,Mailstop 3C5 ON Fairfax,VA 22030 Phone:703.993.2580 I Fax:703.993.2589 UNIVERSITY http://fiscal.gmu.edu/purchasing/ Proposal for Services Please note: This document is an offer to provide services to George Mason University(GMU). Work performed under this proposal may only be awarded upon the contractor's receipt of an eVA purchase order, beginning with the prefix"EP". 1. Initiating Office/Principallnvestigator: Virginia SBDC / Jody Keenan George Mason University Address/Phone: M S N 1 B6; 703.5990636 2. Scope of Service: Please attach either a)the contractor's written proposal or b) a separate document outlining the scope of work. 3. Period of Performance: July 1 , 2025 - June 30, 2026 4. Proposed Compensation/Terms:Net 30 (see 5d below): $33,146 5. Certifications:The Proposed contractor warrants that they: • a. Will perform as an independent contractor/company, not as a GMU employee,and will be liable for all insurance and taxes. b. Either as an individual or as a company, have no personnel who are currently employees of GMU or the Commonwealth of Virginia. In addition, no individual has received a W-2 from GMU in the last 12 months. c. If reimbursements for expenses or travel are included in the contract,contractor shall invoice at cost,actual (not estimated) expenses in accordance with Mason travel and per diem guidelines. Contractor shall provide line item documentation for each expense. Receipts shall be retained by the contractor should further review be necessary. d. Contractor agrees to send invoices electronically to acctpay@gmu.edu and sign up for free direct deposit through Paymode at http://www.paymode.com/gmu. e. I understand as the proposed contractor/contractor's authorized signer, I am not authorized to perform any work issued by phone,email or other means of communication until I receive an eVA purchase order starting with the prefix"EP".Work performed prior to receipt of a purchase order is subject to non-payment and/or administrative set-off. Revised September 13,2021 uucusign CnVelope 1u.3.souoorr-uorV-44t55-aLtsL-uVartaiutilUL STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS: A. APPLICABLE LAW AND CHOICE OF FORUM:This Contract shall be construed,governed,and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. All disputes arising under this Contract shall be brought before an appropriate court in the Commonwealth of Virginia. B. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION: By entering into this Contract Contractor certifies to the Commonwealth that they will conform to the provisions of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964,as amended,as well as the Virginia Fair Employment Contracting Act of 1975, as amended, where applicable, the Virginians With Disabilities Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act and §§ 9&10 of the Governing Rules. If Contractor is a faith-based organization,the organization shall not discriminate against any recipient of goods,services,or disbursements made pursuant to the Contract on the basis of the recipient's religion,religious belief,refusal to participate in a religious practice, or on the basis of race, age, color, gender or national origin and shall be subject to the same rules as other organizations that contract with public bodies to account for the use of the funds provided;however,if the faith-based organization segregates public funds into separate accounts, only the accounts and programs funded with public funds shall be subject to audit by the public body. (Governing Rules, §36). In every contract over$10,000 the provisions in 1.and 2.below apply: 1. During the performance of this Contract,the Contractor agrees as follows: a. The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, or any other basis prohibited by state law relating to discrimination in employment,except where there is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the Contractor. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. b. The Contractor, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor,will state that such Contractor is an equal opportunity employer. c. Notices,advertisements and solicitations placed in accordance with federal law,rule or regulation shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of meeting these requirements. 2. The Contractor will include the provisions of 1. above in every subcontract or purchase order over$10,000,so that the provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or Contractor. C. ANTITRUST:By entering into a contract,the Contractor conveys,sells,assigns,and transfers to the Commonwealth of Virginia all rights,title and interest in and to all causes of action it may now have or hereafter acquire under the antitrust laws of the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia, relating to the particular goods or services purchased or acquired by the Commonwealth of Virginia under said contract. D. ASSIGNMENT:Neither party will assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations under this Contract without both parties'prior written consent. Any attempted assignment,transfer,or delegation without such consent is void. E. AUDIT: The Contractor shall retain all books, records, and other documents relative to this Contract for five (5)years after final payment, or until audited by the Commonwealth of Virginia,whichever is sooner.The agency,its authorized agents,and/or state auditors shall have full access to and the right to examine any of said materials during said period. F. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: It is understood and agreed between the parties herein that the agency shall be bound hereunder only to the extent of the funds available or which may hereafter become available for the purpose of this agreement. G. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: The signatory for each Party certifies that he or she is an authorized agent to sign on behalf such Party. H. BACKGROUND CHECKS: Contractor's employees (including subcontractors) performing services on any Mason campus must have successfully completed a criminal background check prior to the start of their work assignment/service..As stated in Administrative Policy Number 2221 — Background Investigations, the criminal background investigation will normally include a review of the individual's records to include Social Security Number Search,Credit Report(if related to potential job duties),Criminal Records Search(any misdemeanor convictions and/or Revised September 13,2021 uocuslgn tnvetope lu:33nnubbf r-Ubrc-44kib-U213Z-UUyrt93Ub1UZ felony convictions are reported)in all states in which the employee has lived or worked over the past seven years,and the National Sex Offender Registry.In addition,the Global Watch list(maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of The US Department of Treasury)should be reviewed. Signature on this Contract confirms your compliance with this requirement. CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT: Mason reserves the right to cancel this Contract, in part or in whole, without penalty,for any reason,upon 60 days written notice to the Contractor.Upon written notice of cancellation from Mason, Mason shall be fully released from any further obligation under the Contract and Contractor agrees to directly refund all payments, for services not already performed, to Mason, including any pre-paid deposits,within 14 days. Any contract cancellation notice shall not relieve the Contractor of the obligation to deliver and/or perform on all outstanding orders issued prior to the effective date of cancellation. J. CHANGES TO THE CONTRACT:Changes can be made to the Contract in any of the following ways: 1. The parties may agree in writing to modify the scope of the Contract..An increase or decrease in the price of the Contract resulting from such modification shall be agreed to by the parties as a part of their written agreement to modify the scope of the Contract. 2. George Mason University may order changes within the general scope of the Contract at any time by written. notice to the Contractor. Changes within the scope of the Contract include,but are not limited to,things such as services to be performed, the method of packing or shipment, and the place of delivery or installation. The Contractor shall comply with the notice upon receipt. The Contractor shall be compensated for any additional costs incurred as the result of such order and shall give George Mason University a credit for any savings. Said compensation shall be determined by one of the following methods: a. By mutual agreement between the parties in writing;or b. By agreeing upon a unit price or using a unit price set forth in the Contract,if the work to be done can be expressed in units, and the contractor accounts for the number of units of work performed,subject to the George Mason University's right to audit the Contractor's records and/or to determine the correct number of units independently;or c. By ordering the contractor to proceed with the work and keep a record of all costs incurred and savings realized. A markup for overhead and profit may be allowed if provided by the Contract. The same markup shall be used for determining a decrease in price as the result of savings realized.The contractor shall present George Mason University with all vouchers and records of expenses incurred and savings realized.George Mason University shall have the right to audit the records of the Contractor as it deems necessary to determine costs or savings. Any claim for an adjustment in price under this provision must be asserted by written notice to George Mason University within thirty(30)days from the date of receipt of the written order from George Mason University. If the parties fail to agree on an amount of adjustment,the question of an increase or decrease in the Contract price or time for performance shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures for resolving disputes provided by the Disputes Clause of this contract or,if there is none,in accordance with the disputes provisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia Purchasing Manual for Institutions of Higher Education and Their Contractors. Neither the existence of a claim nor a dispute resolution process, litigation or any other provision of this Contract shall excuse the Contractor from promptly complying with the changes ordered by George Mason University or with the performance of the contract generally. K. CLAIMS:Contractual claims,whether for money or other relief,shall be submitted in writing no later than 60 days after final payment. However, written notice of the Contractor's intention to file a claim shall be given at the time of the occurrence or beginning of the work upon which the claim is based. Nothing herein shall preclude a contract from requiring submission of an invoice for final payment within a certain time after completion and acceptance of the work or acceptance of the goods.Pendency of claims shall not delay payment of amounts agreed due in the final payment. 1. The firm must submit written claim to: Chief Procurement Officer George Mason University 4400 University Drive,MSN 3C5 Fairfax,VA 22030 2. The firm must submit any unresolved claim in writing no later than 60 days after final payment to the Chief Revised September 13,2021 uocus gn tnveiope lu:iiaU001-t--u51--e;-44255-132UL-UCUI-I 93utilUL Procurement Officer. 3. Upon receiving the written claim,the Chief Procurement Officer will review the written materials relating to the claim and will mail his or her decision to the firm within 60 days after receipt of the claim. 4. The firm may appeal the Chief Procurement Officer's decision in accordance with§55 of the Governing Rules. L. COLLECTION AND ATTORNEY'S FEES: The Contractor shall pay to Mason any reasonable attorney's fees or collection fees, at the maximum allowable rate permitted under Virginia law, incurred in enforcing this Contract or pursuing and collecting past-due amounts under this Contract. M. COMPLIANCE: All goods and services provided to Mason shall be done so in accordance with any and all applicable local,state,federal,and international laws,regulations and/or requirements and any industry standards,including but not limited to:the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act(FERPA),Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act(GLB), Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards(PCI-DSS),Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA),and Federal Export Administration Regulations.Any Contractor personnel visiting Mason facilities will comply with all applicable Mason policies regarding access to,use of,and conduct within such facilities.Mason's policies can be found at https://universitypolicy.gmu.edu/all- policies/and any facility specific policies can be obtained from the facility manager. N. CONFIDENTIALITY OF .PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION: The Contractor shall ensure that personally identifiable information("PH")which is defined as any information that by itself or when combined with other information can be connected to a specific person and may include but is not limited to personal identifiers such as name, address, phone, date of birth, Social Security number, student or personal identification numbers, driver's license numbers, state or federal identification numbers, biometric information, religious or political affiliation, non-directory information,and any other information protected by state or federal privacy laws,will be collected and held confidential and in accordance with this agreement,during and following the term of this Contract,and will not be divulged without the individual's and Mason's written consent and only in accordance with federal law or the Code of Virginia. O. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Contractor represents to Mason that its entering into this Contract with Mason and its performance through its agents,officers and employees does not and will not involve, contribute to nor create a conflict of interest prohibited by Virginia State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act(Va. Code 2.2-3100 et seq),the Virginia Ethics in Public Contracting Act (§57 of the Governing Rules),the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act (Va. Code 18.2—498.1 et seq)or any other applicable law or regulation. P. DEBARMENT STATUS: As of the effective date, the Contractor certifies that it is not currently debarred by the Commonwealth of Virginia from submitting bids or proposals on contracts for the type of services covered by this Contract,nor is the Contractor an agent of any person or entity that is currently so debarred. Q. DEFAULT: In the case of failure to deliver goods or services in accordance with any resulting contract terms and conditions,George Mason University,after due oral or written notice,may procure them from other sources and hold the contractor responsible for any resulting additional purchase and administrative costs.This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedies which George Mason University may have. R. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE: Contractor has, and shall have in place during the performance of this Contract, a drug- free workplace policy(DFWP),which it provides in writing to all its employees,vendors,and subcontractors,and which specifically prohibits the following on company premises, during work-related activities,or while conducting company business:the sale,purchase,manufacture, dispensation, distribution possession,or use of any illegal drug under federal law(including marijuana).For purposes of this section,"drug-free workplace"covers all sites at which work is done by Contractor in connection with this Contract. S. ENTIRE CONTRACT:This Contract constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes all prior oral or written contracts with respect to the subject matter herein. This Contract can be modified or amended only by a writing signed by all of the Parties. T. EXPORT CONTROL: 1. Munitions Items: If the Contractor is providing any items,data or services under this order that are controlled by the Department of State,Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,International Traffic in Arms Regulations ("ITAR"),or any items,technology or software controlled under the"600 series"classifications of the Bureau Revised September 13,2021 uul:UDlyll GIVCIUFJC Iu.oJouoor r-u rI,-440D-`JLDL-ul.`Jr tasuo iuL of Industry and Security's Commerce Control List("CCL")(collectively,"Munitions Items"),prior to delivery, Contractor must: a. notify Mason(by sending an email to export n,gmu.edu),and b. receive written authorization for shipment from Mason's Director of Export Controls. The notification provided by the Contractor must include the name of the Mason point of contact, identify and describe each ITAR or CCL-controlled commodity, provide the associated U.S. Munitions List (USML) category nummber(s)or Export Control Classification Number,and indicate whether or not the determination was reached as a result of a commodity jurisdiction determination, or self-classification process. The Contractor promises that if it fails to obtain the required written pre-authorization approval for shipment to Mason of any Munitions Item, it will reimburse Mason for any fines, legal costs and other fees imposed for any violation of export controls regarding the Munition Item that are reasonably related to the Contractor's failure to provide notice or obtain Mason's written pre-authorization. 2. Dual-Use Items:If the Contractor is providing any dual-use items,technology or software under this order that are listed on the CCL in a series other than a "600 series", Contractor must (i) include the Export Control Classification Number(ECCN)on the packing or other transmittal documentation traveling with the item(s)and, (ii)send a description of the item,its ECCN,and the name of the Mason point of contact to:exportagmu.edu U. FORCE MAJEURE: Mason shall be excused from any and all liability for failure or delay in performance of any obligation under this Contract resulting from any cause not within the reasonable control of Mason,which includes but is not limited to acts of God,fire,flood,explosion,earthquake,or other natural forces,war,civil unrest,accident,any strike or labor disturbance,travel restrictions,acts of government,disease,pandemic,or contagion,whether such cause is similar or dissimilar to any of the foregoing. Upon written notification from Mason that such cause has occurred, Contractor agrees to directly refund all payments to Mason, for services not yet performed, including any pre-paid deposits within 14 days. V. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986:By entering into this Contract Contractor certifies that they do not and will not during the performance of this Contract employ illegal alien workers or otherwise violate the provisions of the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. W. INDEMNIFICATION: Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless George Mason University the Commonwealth of Virginia, its officers, agents, and employees from any claims, damages and actions of any kind or nature,whether at law or in equity,arising from or caused by the use of any materials,goods,or equipment of any kind or nature furnished by the Contractor/any services of any kind or nature furnished by the Contractor,provided that such liability is not attributable to the sole negligence of Mason or to the failure of Mason to use the materials, goods, or equipment in the manner already and permanently described by the Contractor on the materials, goods or equipment delivered. X. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Contractor is not an employee of Mason, but is engaged as an independent contractor.The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia,Mason,and its employees and agents,with respect to all withholding,Social Security,unemployment compensation and all other taxes or amounts of any kind relating to the Contractor's performance of this Contract. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed as authority for the Contractor to make commitments which will bind Mason or to otherwise act on behalf of Mason,except as Mason may expressly authorize in writing. Y. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCESS ACT: Computer and network security is of paramount concern at George Mason University. The University wants to ensure that computer/network hardware and software does not compromise the security of its IT environment. Contractor agrees to use commercially reasonable measures in connection with any offering your company makes to avoid any known threat to the security of the IT environment at George Mason University. All e-learning and information technology developed,purchased,upgraded or renewed by or for the use of George Mason University shall comply with all applicable University policies,Federal and State laws and regulations including but not limited to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act(29 U.S.C. 794d),the Information Technology Access Act, §§2.2-3500 through 2.2-3504 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, and all other regulations promulgated under Title II of The Americans with Disabilities Act which are applicable to all benefits,services,programs,and activities provided by or on behalf of the University.The Contractor shall also comply with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(WCAG)2.0. For more information please visit http://ati.gmu.edu,under Policies and Procedures. Revised September 13,2021 uccusign tnvelope I u:3mum 1-r-uot- 446 IuL-UUM-L95ub1u1 Z. INSURANCE:The Contractor shall maintain all insurance necessary with respect to the services provided to Mason.The Contractor further certifies that they will maintain the insurance coverage during the entire term of the Contract and that all insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current reasonable A.M.Best's rating authorized to sell insurance in the Commonwealth of Virginia by the Virginia State Corporation Commission.The Commonwealth of Virginia and Mason shall be named as an additional insured. 1. Workers' Compensation insurance for statutory benefits and Employers' Liability with limits of at least $100,000.In some cases,Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance may not be required. Workers' Compensation insurance is required when the contractor has three (3) or more employees. 2. Commercial General Liability- $1,000,000 per occurrence. Commercial General Liability is to include bodily injury and property damage, personal injury and advertising injury, products and completed operations coverage.The Commonwealth of Virginia and Mason must be named as an additional insured and so endorsed on the policy. 3. Automobile Liability-S 1,000,000 combined single limit. (Required only if a motor vehicle not owned by the Commonwealth is to be used in the performance of the contract. Contractor must assure that the required coverage is maintained by the Contractor(or third-party owner of such motor vehicle.) By requiring the above minimum insurance,the University shall not be deemed or construed to have assessed the risk that may be applicable to the Contractor.The Contractor shall assess its own risks and if it deems appropriate and/or prudent,maintain higher limits and or broader coverage. AA. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Contractor warrants and represents that it will not violate or infringe any intellectual property right or any other personal or proprietary right and shall indemnify and hold harmless Mason against any claim of infringement of intellectual property rights which may arise under this Contract. 1. Unless expressly agreed to the contrary in writing,all goods,products,materials,documents,reports,writings, video images,photographs or papers of any nature including software or computer images prepared or provided by Contractor(or its subcontractors)for Mason will not be disclosed to any other person or entity without the written permission of Mason. 2. Work Made for Hire. Contractor warrants to Mason that Mason will own all rights,title and interest in any and all intellectual property rights created in the performance or otherwise arising from the Contract and will have full ownership and beneficial use thereof, free and clear of claims of any nature by any third party including, without limitation, copyright or patent infringement claims. Contractor agrees to assign and hereby assigns all rights,title,and interest in any and all intellectual property created in the performance or otherwise arising from the Contract, and will execute any future assignments or other documents needed for Mason to document, register,or othenvise perfect such rights.Notwithstanding the foregoing,for research collaboration pursuant to subcontracts under sponsored research Contracts administered by the University's Office of Sponsored Programs, intellectual property rights will be governed by the terms of the grant or contract to Mason to the extent such grant or contract requires intellectual property terms to apply to subcontractors. BB. NON-DISCRIIVIINATION: All parties to this Contract agree to not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age (except where sex or age is a bona fide occupational qualification,marital status or disability. CC. PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS: The Contractor shall take the following actions upon receiving payment from Mason:(1)pay the subcontractor within seven days for the proportionate share of the total payment received from Mason attributable to the work performed by the subcontractor under that Contract;or(2)notify Mason and subcontractor within seven days, in writing, of its intention to withhold all or a part of the subcontractor's payment with the reason for nonpayment. b. If an individual contractor, provide social security number in order to receive payment. c. If a proprietorship, partnership or corporation provide Federal employer identification number. d. Pay interest to subcontractors on all amounts owed by the Contractor that remain unpaid after seven days following receipt by the Contractor of payment from the Institution for work performed by the subcontractor under that Contract, except for amounts withheld as allowed by prior notification. e.Accrue interest at no more than the rate of one percent per month. f. Include in each of its subcontracts a provision requiring each subcontractor to include or otherwise be subject to the same payment and interest requirements with respect to each lower-tier subcontractor. DD. PUBLICITY: The Contractor shall not use, in its external advertising,marketing programs or promotional efforts,any Revised September 13,2021 UocusIgn Envelope IL):338U661-F-Ubl- 448b-92B2-DG9FE93D6102 data, pictures, trademarks or other representation of Mason except on the specific written authorization in advance by Mason's designated representative. EE. REMEDIES: If the Contractor breaches this Contract, in addition to any other rights or remedies,Mason may terminate this Contract without prior notice. FF. REPORTING OF CRIMES.ACCIDENTS.FIRES AND OTHER EMERGENCIES: Any Mason Employee, including contracted service providers,who is not a staff member in Counseling and Psychological Services(CAPS)or a pastoral counselor, functioning within the scope of that recognition, is considered a"Campus Security Authority(CSA)."CSAs must promptly report all crimes and other emergencies occurring on or near property owned or controlled by Mason to the Department of Police&Public Safety or local police and fire authorities by dialing 9-1-1.At the request of a victim or survivor,identifying information may be excluded from a report(e.g.,names,initials,contact information,etc.).Please visit the following website for more information and training:http://police.gmu.edu/clery-act-reporting/campus-security- authority-csa/." GG. RESPONSE TO LEGAL ORDERS, DEMANDS, OR REQUESTS FOR DATA: Except as otherwise expressly prohibited by law, Contractor will: i) immediately notify Mason of any subpoenas, warrants, or other legal orders, demands or requests received by Contractor seeking University Data; ii)consult with Mason regarding its response; iii) cooperate with Mason's reasonable requests in connection with efforts by Mason to intervene and quash or modify the legal order,demand or request;and iv)upon Mason's request,provide Mason with a copy of its response. If Mason receives a subpoena,warrant,or other legal order,demand(including request pursuant to the Virginia Freedom of Information Act) or request seeking University Data maintained by Contractor,Mason will promptly provide a copy to Contractor. Contractor will promptly supply Mason with copies of data required for Mason to respond, and will cooperate with Mason's reasonable requests in connection with its response. HH. SEVERABILITY: Should any portion of this Contract be declared invalid or unenforceable for any reason,such portion is deemed severable from the Contract and the remainder of this Contract shall remain fully valid and enforceable. II. SOVEREIGN IlvIVIUNITY: Northing in this Contract shall be deemed a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth of Virginia and of Mason. JJ. SUBCONTRACTS: No portion of the work shall be subcontracted without prior written consent from Mason. In the event that the Contractor desires to subcontract some a part of the work specified herein,the Contractor shall furnish Mason the names, qualifications and experience of their proposed subcontractors. The Contractor shall,however, remain fully liable and responsible for the work to be done by its subcontractor(s)and shall assure compliance with all requirements of this Contract.This paragraph applies to,but is not limited to,subcontractor(s)who process University Data. KK. SWaM CERTIFICATION: Contractor agrees to fully support the Commonwealth of Virginia and Mason's efforts related to SWaM goals. Upon contract execution, Contractor(as determined by Mason and the Virginia Department of Small Business and Supplier Diversity) shall submit all required documents necessary to achieve SWaM certification to the Department of Small Business and Supplier Diversity within 90 days. Vendors currently SWaM certified agree to maintain their certification for the duration of the Contract and shall submit all required renewal documentation at least 30 days prior to existing SWaM expiration at https://www.sbsd.virginia.gov/. LL. UNIVERSITY DATA:University Data includes all Mason owned,controlled,or collected PII and any other information that is not intentionally made available by Mason on public websites,including but not limited to business,administrative and financial data, intellectual property, and patient, student and personnel data. Contractor agrees to the following regarding University Data it may collect or process as part of this Contract: 1. Contractor will use University Data only for the purpose of fulfilling its duties under the Contract and will not share such data with or disclose it to any third party without the prior written consent of Mason, except as required by the Contract or as otherwise required by law. University Data will only be processed by Contractor to the extent necessary to fulfill its responsibilities under the Contract or as otherwise directed by Mason. 2. University Data, including any back-ups, will not be accessed, stored, or transferred outside the United States without prior written consent from Mason. Contractor will provide access to University Data only to its employees and subcontractors who need to access the data to fulfill Contractor's obligations under the Contract. Contractor will ensure that employees who perform work under the Contract have read,understood,and received appropriate instruction as to how to comply with the data protection provisions of the Contract and to maintain the confidentiality of the University Data. Revised September 13,2021 uocusign tnvelope lu.oitounorr-uoru-44i55-uttsz-uuurt9:iutnul 3. The parties agree that as between them, all rights including all intellectual property rights in and to University Data shall remain the exclusive property of Mason,and Contractor has a limited,nonexclusive license to use the University Data as provided in the Contract solely for the purpose of performing its obligations under the Contract.The Contract does not give a party any rights,implied or otherwise,to the other parry's data,content, or intellectual property,except as expressly stated in the Contract. 4. Contractor will take reasonable measures,including audit trails,to protect University Data against deterioration or degradation of data quality and authenticity.Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that University Data, per the Virginia Public Records Act, is preserved, maintained, and accessible throughout their lifecycle, including converting and migrating electronic data as often as necessary so that information is not lost due to hardware,software,or media obsolescence or deterioration. 5. Contractor shall notify Mason within three business days if it receives a request from an individual under any applicable law regarding PII about the individual, including but not limited to a request to view, access, delete, correct,or amend the information.Contractor shall not take any action regarding such a request except as directed by Mason. 6. If Contractor will have access to University Data that includes"education records"as defined under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act(FERPA),the Contractor acknowledges that for the purposes of the Contract it will be designated as a "school official"with "legitimate educational interests" in the University education records, as those terms have been defined under FERPA and its implementing regulations, and the Contractor agrees to abide by the limitations and requirements imposed on school officials.Contractor will use the education records only for the purpose of fulfilling its duties under the Contract for Mason's and its end user's benefit,and will not share such data with or disclose it to any third party except as provided for in the Contract,required by law,or authorized in writing by the University. 7. Mason may require that Mason and Contractor complete a Data Processing Addendum("DPA"). If a DPA is completed,Contractor agrees that the information in the DPA is accurate. Contractor will only collect or process University Data that is identified in the DPA and will only handle that data(e.g.,type of processing activities, storage,security,disclosure)as described in the DPA. If Contractor intends to do anything regarding University Data that is not reflected in the DPA,Contractor must request an amendment to the DPA and may not take the intended action until the amendment is approved and documented by Mason. MM. UNIVERSITY DATA SECURITY: Data security is of paramount concern to Mason. Contractor will utilize, store and process University Data in a secure environment in accordance with commercial best practices, including appropriate administrative,physical, and technical safeguards, to secure such data from unauthorized access,disclosure, alteration, and use. Such measures will be no less protective than those used to secure Contractor's own data of a similar type,and in no event less than reasonable in view of the type and nature of the data involved.At a minimum,Contractor shall use industry-standard and up-to-date security tools and technologies such as anti-virus protections and intrusion detection methods to protect University Data. 1. Immediately upon becoming aware of circumstances that could have resulted in unauthorized access to or disclosure or use of University Data,Contractor will notify Mason,fully investigate the incident,and cooperate fully with Mason's investigation of and response to and remediation of the incident.Except as otherwise required by law, Contractor will not provide notice of the incident directly to individuals who's PII was involved, regulatory agencies,or other entities,without prior written permission from Mason. 2. Mason reserves the right in its sole discretion to perform audits of Contactor, at Mason's expense, to ensure compliance with all obligations regarding University Data. Contractor shall reasonably cooperate in the performance of such audits. Contractor will make available to Mason all information necessary to demonstrate compliance with its data processing obligations. Failure to adequately protect University Data or comply with the terms of this Contract with regard to University Data may be grounds to terminate this Contract. NN. UNIVERSITY DATA UPON TERM tNATION OR EXPIRATION: Upon termination or expiration of the Contract, Contractor will ensure that all University Data are securely returned or destroyed as directed by Mason in its sole discretion within 180 days of the request being made.Transfer to Mason or a third party designated by Mason shall occur within a reasonable period of time, and without significant interruption in service. Contractor shall ensure that such transfer/migration uses facilities and methods that are compatible with the relevant systems of Mason or its transferee, and to the extent technologically feasible,that Mason will have reasonable access to University Data during the transition. In the event that Mason requests destruction of its data, Contractor agrees to destroy all data in its possession and in the possession of any subcontractors or agents to which the Contractor might have transferred University Data. Contractor agrees to provide documentation of data destruction to the University. Revised September 13,2021 uocusign tnveiope Iv:3stSuoo1-r-uol-U-44750-9LUL-UU -t93UblUZ Contractor will notify the University of any impending cessation of its business and any contingency plans. This includes immediate transfer of any previously escrowed assets and University Data and providing Mason access to Contractor's facilities to remove and destroy Mason-owned assets and University Data. Contractor shall implement its exit plan and take all necessary actions to ensure a smooth transition of service with minimal disruption to Mason.Contractor will also provide a full inventory and configuration of servers,routers,other hardware, and software involved in service delivery along with supporting documentation, indicating which if any of these are owned by or dedicated to Mason. Contractor will work closely with its successor to ensure a successful transition to the new equipment,with minimal downtime and effect on Mason,all such work to be coordinated and performed in advance of the formal,final transition date. 00. UNIVERSITY REVIEW/APPROVAL: All goods,services,products,design,etc.produced by the Contractor for or on behalf of Mason are subject to Mason's review and approval. PP. WAIVER: The failure of a party to enforce any provision in this Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such right. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HERELN: City of Roanoke Name of Contractor/Company Name Heather Fay Authorized Signer Name(please print) Title Authorized Signer Signature Date Revised September 13,2021 General Assembly Budget Greater Roanoke&NRV SBDC FY2026 State Funding Allocation:$33,146 Description Amount Salaries - Fringe - Travel - Supplies - Contractual .. $33,146 Advising Consultants - Other Expenses - Total 33,146.00 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43297-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing acceptance and appropriation of the Program Year 2025 Entitlement Funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Program, and Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG); appropriating 2025-2026 Grant Funds detailed more fully infra; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts the Program Year 2025 Entitlement Funds from HUD,with no local match required from the City of Roanoke,in the amount of$2,540,900. This amount includes $1,805,116 for CDBG funds, $159,190 for ESG funds, $576,594 for HOME funds, a total of $2,540,900, as further referenced in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any and all requisite documents required to accept any documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the City's acceptance of such funding. 3. The following sections of the Program Year 2025 Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and re-ordained to read and provide as follows: Grant Fund Appropriations: HOME: Salaries 235.3412.0000.51002.400085 $42,972 City Retirement 235.3412.0000.51005.400085 1,237 FICA 235.3412.0000.51120.400085 391 Medical Insurance 235.3412.0000.51125.400085 998 Dental Insurance 235.3412.0000.51126.400085 43 Disability 235.3412.0000.51131.400085 18 Training 235.3412.0000.52044.400085 2,000 Fees for Prof. Services 235.3412.0000.52010.400085 7,000 Admin Supplies 235.3412.0000.52030.400085 3,000 Program Activities 235.3412.0000.52066.400085 518,935 CDBG: Salaries 235.3412.0000.51002.400082 $223,704 City Retirement 235.3412.0000.51105.400082 21,686 401H Match 235.3412.0000.51117.400082 507 FICA 235.3412.0000.51120.400082 7,910 Medical Insurance 235.3412.0000.51125.400082 17,460 Dental Insurance 235.3412.0000.51126.400082 800 Life Insurance 235.3412.0000.51130.400082 1,294 Disability 235.3412.0000.51131.400082 162 Training 235.3412.0000.52044.400082 12,000 Fees for Prof. Services 235.3412.0000.52010.400082 60,000 Admin Supplies -Neighborly 235.3412.0000.52030.400082 7,000 Advertising 235.3412.0000.52015.400082 4,000 Admin Supplies 235.3412.0000.52030.400082 1,200 Equipment 235.3412.0000.52035.400082 3,000 Prof. Memberships 235.3412.0000.52042.400082 300 CDBG Program Activities: RH-319 Dale 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 $115,180 RA-BFTA Rehab 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 75,000 RA-Citywide Rehab 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 200,000 BGCSWVA- Out of School Time 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 45,000 BFC-Mental Health Svs 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 54,583 Children's Trust-CAC 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 36,646 Children's Trust-CASA 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 54,538 FSRV-BLOC Counseling 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 80,000 Sidewalk Improvements 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 133,146 Housing Rehab 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 100,000 Acquisition of Foreclosed 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 300,000 Properties Public Safety 235.3412.0000.52066.400082 250,000 ESG: Salaries 235.3412.0000.51002.400084 $6,373 City Retirement 235.3412.0000.51105.400084 1,173 401H Match 235.3412.0000.51117.400084 56 FICA 235.3412.0000.51120.400084 488 Medical Insurance 235.3412.0000.51125.400084 942 Dental Insurance 235.3412.0000.51126.400084 46 Life Insurance 235.3412.0000.51130.400084 144 Training/Development 235.3412.0000.52044.400084 768 Admin Supplies-Neighborly 235.3412.0000.52030.400084 1,000 ESG Program Activities: CCS-Rapid Re-Housing 235.3412.0000.52066.400084 $25,000 CCS-HMIS 235.3412.0000.52066.400084 25,000 CCS-Homelessness Prevention 235.3412.0000.52066.400084 53,200 FPGR-Shelter Services 235.3412.0000.52066.400084 45,000 Revenues: Community Development Block 235.3412.0000.40121.400082 $1,805,116 Grant 2025 - Federal HOME Investments Partnership 235.3412.0000.40121.400085 576,594 Program 2025 - Federal Emergency Solutions Grant 235.3412.0000.40121.400084 159,190 2025 - Federal 4. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: Yne-e-br City Clerk. City Manager's Report �� Submitted by: Jillian Papa, Director Planning, Building, & Development ROA N O K E October 20, 2025 Title: Acceptance and Appropriation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) PY25 Entitlement Funds. Background: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has awarded the City of Roanoke their annual entitlement funds: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). CDBG provides annual funding to support community development activities and can be used for housing, infrastructure, public services, and economic development, as long as activities primarily benefit low- and moderate-income residents. HOME provides annual funding to create affordable housing for low-income households through activities such as building, buying, rehabilitating, or providing rental assistance. ESG provides annual funding to support programs that serve individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing their housing. City Council voted to approve the 5-year strategic Consolidated Plan as. well as the Annual Action plan on August 4th, 2025, which outlines the priorities and spending plan for these funds. Total awards for Program Year 2025: • CDBG: $1,805,116.00 • HOME: $576,594.00 • ESG: $159,190.00 Program Year period of performance is July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. Considerations: In addition to the annual allocation of PY25 entitlement funds, included with the budget ordinance are carry-over funds from prior program years: • CDBG: $2,511,338.00 • HOME: $801,227.00 • ESG: $1,663.00 Recommended Action: Accept the entitlement funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any forms required by HUD in order to accept these funds; such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. Adopt the accompanying ordinance to establish a revenue estimate for$2,540,900 in federal grant funds and appropriate $2,540,900 into expenditure accounts to be established by the Director of Finance. Valmarie Turner, City Manager IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43298-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response ("SAFER") Grant Funds made to the City of Roanoke ("City") by the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA"), authorizing the execution of any required documentation on behalf of the City, appropriating Fiscal Year 2024 Grant Funds detailed more fully infra, and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke does hereby accept the SAFER Grant Funds made by the FEMA in the amount of$1,197,887, with a local match of 25% of the award in the amount of$299,472 for years one and two; and a local match of 65% of the award in the third year in the amount of$778,627, for the expansion of Fire-EMS staffing levels by nine new positions, such grant being more particularly described in the City Manager's Report, dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute and file on behalf of the City any and all documents required setting forth the conditions of this grant. All such documents are to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required to implement and administer the foregoing Grant. 4. The following sections of the Fiscal Year 2026 Grant Fund appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: General Fund Appropriations Transfer to Grant fund—local match 101.9310.0000.59535.00000 (299,472) Grant Fund Appropriations Employee Salaries 235.3211.0000.51002.400176 $ 1,274,202 FICA 235.3211.0000.51120.400176 32,463 Retirement 235.3211.0000.51105.400176 89,708 401H 235.3211.0000.51117.400176 4,244 Health Insurance 235.3211.0000.51125.400176 87,264 Dental Insurance 235.3211.0000.51126.400176 3,283 Life Insurance 235.3211.0000.51130.400176 5,007 LTD 235.3211.0000.51131.400176 1,188 Revenues Federal Grant 235.3211.0000.40121.400176 1,197,887 Local Match General Fund 235.3211.0000.40126.400176 299,472 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: Cettet; J-• City Clerk =_ 1 City Managers Report �111W4� Submitted by: David Hoback, Chief Fire EMS ROA N O K E October 20, 2025 Title: . Acceptance of the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant. Background: The Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants (SAFER)was created to provide funding directly to fire departments and volunteer firefighter interest organizations to help.them increase or maintain the number of trained, "front line"firefighters available in their communities. Roanoke Fire-EMS will receive FY24 funding in the amount of$1,-197,887, such funds to be allocated for the expansion of Fire-EMS staffing levels by nine new positions. Considerations: . SAFER grant acceptance requires that the City provide matching funds amounting to 25% of the award in years one and two, and 65% of the award in the third year. Recommended Action: Accept the grant as described above and authorize the City Manager to execute any required grant agreements to be approved asto form by the-City Attorney. Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to establish a revenue estimate in the amount of $1,197,887, transfer local match funding from the grant match account, and appropriate such funding into accounts to be established in the Grant Fund by the Director of Finance. a Angela O'Brien,Deputy City Manager Sent:Thursday,September 25, 2025 12:44 PM To:Valmarie Turner<vatmarie.turner@roanokeva.gov> Cc:Andy Foley<andy.foley@roanokeva.gov>;Tasha Burkett <tasha.burkett@roanokeva.gov>; Helen Ferguson <helen.ferguson@roanokeva.gov>; Valmarie Turner<valmarie.turner@roanokeva.gov>; Rebecca Smith <rebecca.smith©roanokeva.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Award Notification (Application Number: EMW-2024-FF-01701) CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders. Dear Valmarie, Congratulations!Your grant application submitted under the Grant Programs Directorate's Fiscal Year(FY)2024 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant has been approved for award. Please use the FEMA GO system at https_://go.ferna.gov to accept or decline your award. Please note that you will have thirty(30) days from the date of this award notification to either accept or decline the award, and that the award must be accepted or declined by an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR)within the FEMA GO system. Instructions for registering within the system and becoming an AOR are available at https://www.fema.gov/gmm-training-resources. Once you are in the system and made an AOR for your organization,your home page will be the first screen you see.You will see a section entitled My Grants. In this section, please select the award acceptance link for EMW-2024-FF-01701 under Fiscal Year (FY)2024 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant.View your award package and indicate your acceptance or declination of award. If you wish to accept your grant,you should do so immediately.When you have finished,we recommend printing your award package for your records. If you have questions on using the FEMA GO system, please reach out to the FEMA GO Help Desk(1-877-585-3242). For programmatic questions about your grant, please reach out to the AFG Helpdesk(firegrants@fema.dhs.gov/1-866-274-0960). Sincerely, Grants Management Branch Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Department of Homeland Security/FEMA 9/25/25,9:43 AM FEMA-FEMA Grants Outcomes Submitted to FEMA EMW-2024-FF-01701 : Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Staffing for Adequate .Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant CITY OF ROANOKE Period of performance • _.__-_______._y_^_ __ _ _u._— �_--- — Federal resources awarded • Required non-federal resources Federal resources disbursed to recipient $0.00 • Pending disbursements to recipient $0.00 Balance of federal resources available $1,197,887.23 My to do list Description Status Date of status Due date Action - . Organization : CITY.OF ROANOKE g This information is current of SAM.gov as of: 09/07/2025 Registration summary UEI-EFT NBFNAEXRHD76 DUNS 006704316 Registration status Active https:/Igo.fema,gov/grant/EMW-2024-FF-01701 1/3 9/25/25,9:43 AM FEMA-FEMA Grants Outcomes Registration last update date 08/18/2025 ! t Registration expiration date -I Has active exclusion? No Debt subject to offset? N • Business Information Doing business as name . Physical address - 215 CHURCH,AVE SW STE 364 ROANOKE, VA 24011 . Mailing address P 0 BOX 1451 ROANOKE; VA 24011 . _ . ; Financial reports Report Due date Status Date of status Action Performance progress reports - ' Report Due date Status Date of status Action . Closeout reports r. Report Due date Status Date of status Action r Request for Information • https:l/go_fema.gov/grant/EMW-2024-FF-01701 2/3 9/25/259:43mw pswoA-rsMA Grants Outcomes --------- ---- ------ -------- T ) RFU number Request date Status Date of status Action i | /�`---'-- ~--------~^- —~- -' '-~'~--�--~~-~- ----~�'-'~`---~----'�-^-`' '— '-----~--~^ '--~' - / ' � ` � IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43299-102025. AN ORDINANCE approving the Five-Year Update to the Master Plan for the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Roanoke ("City"), authorizing the City to execute any required documentation on behalf of the City; and dispensing with the second reading of this Ordinance by title. WHEREAS,the Parks and Recreation Department contracted with BerryDunn to complete the Five-Year Update to the Master Plan to assess progress and identify any shifts in community priorities midway through the 10-year timeline; and WHEREAS, these updates to the Five-Year Update to the Master Plan serve as a critical check-in point ensuring that the Department remains on track to meet its goals while staying responsive to the evolving needs of our residents. WHEREAS, such updates are more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke does hereby approve the Five-Year Update to the Master Plan for the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute and file, on behalf of the City, all necessary documents required to approve the Five-Year Update to the Master Plan. All documents shall be upon form approved by the City Attorney. 3. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: City Clerk. - - . City Manager's Report Submitted by: Cindy McFall, Director Parks and Recreation ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Approval and Acceptance of Parks and Recreation Five-Year Master Plan Update. Background: In 2019, the Parks and Recreation Department completed a comprehensive Master Plan to guide the next ten years of programming, operations, and facility.improvements. This plan was designed to serve as a clear, user-friendly roadmap that reflects the community's values and. supports informed decision-making by the City. In alignment with industry best practices, the Department initiated a five-year update to the Master Plan to assess progress and identify any shifts in community priorities midway through the 10-year timeline. This update serves as a critical check-in point—ensuring that.the Department remains on track to meet its goals while staying responsive to the evolving needs of our residents. Beginning in 2023, the Parks and Recreation Department contracted with BerryDunn to completethe five-year update to the Master Plan, which included multiple public engagement opportunities including public input meetings, stakeholder meetings, leadership interviews, statistically-valid surveys, and digital online engagement tools. Considerations: Consideration, Approval and Acceptance of the Parks and Recreation Five-Year Master Plan Update as presented by BerryDunn. Recommended Action: City Council approve and accept the Roanoke Parks and Recreation Five-Year Master Plan Update as attached, highlighting the following key priorities: 1. Invest in Current Infrastructure and Address Aging Facilities . 2. Improve and Enhance Programming and Service Delivery 3. Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies 4. Enhance and Diversify Funding Sources - 5., Sustain Funding to Meet Maintenance and Operational Needs Angela O'Brien, Deputy City Manager -.......,.. --,0' . . .. .. - •,'" - ..,.. 4 4. '16•J • • .?" . . . •• • • .'. ''' 'IV. ..lie'ii• . • . ' . . • ' :.. - • ..- '''1'' / 4-c''''..-1.: ''''.-y,',40*, -.2-.:4ii, *-,,,-•••• .tois-i... - , 9,---* - • A , ••,4,„ ..., . ..-,,,.. . . *4...-14, 0-7 ...,.j....• _ • 4 . - .,- .• , ,444*4,40.• .-..;-1. •• . .41.,:ile • ' ,.... .. ...,, 7- -- . t: -.. .- 1 yo',, —-7 f• ''''' ` /4t, C ., , • "4 4''', .I: . .. ....14 ,,,. .... .. --, 4 a,.1...., - - •c..,..t 4. .4., =1/40 . . . ....,.....4...,, . :. . ......- • •.. „IL. .. . .„.• • . ., . ..,:lp .. .., .... -., • IC*, • • 4 ,.'••.' . .,..; . • . • 44 .;Ai;-, ,,e?4E,-*-.,.•.,. . 4111611SA: ..-.'",;',-1*. - i.'' -,,..'1..;14j,".4 1**• . '' 111" - .... .,. • • . ' • .,--, "r - - -• -4•;.,!:'• - : '., ;1111M111111111 lir 1111111111."; /tilt II.WI WiIt:Ii•••:t„H.,,.444. 44 ., ..41*.-.'7;• -4fIlt • ' ' -- •-- , „•:i,il it • ti: ,,,,i! - .. . .,.., ,, :1:',.• '''II! e* *1! .,. 1 ii ' IIII4.••• v •'WI!, e•It.-- . - -- . . . ..--. IiIIIIIII''411,14iiiiiiiiiIIPO;,i; £ , . ' PLAY IN PROGRESS ,:'• CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE ...... ..___. ,„, _ _______. __ __ _ .., , . . , , •.. - -' -- ,. 4 • , zr ,-.•-'''"'",-*'.- . it/.)... .4! ........4 •4.'s _ '.. 0 1 J- l 4 jo--.0. . .,, -1—' i il,r4`,111176L-,--251•Ulffit.:'7_ _ . — . — -. . • .- -1 i i la ...... --7-1,0"--- - ir • — _. . . fir . 1•1.4%1r - 1 6,,, I- - 4,* e , — 4111110„. .1.r. 11 . . 4 '. a„,- ' A.i , ' 14 -At r'• ' .1-__-s• _ ...., _ . 11,1.r.',:.''' ,.... - - - .. -_ irj triF' - _ ,-,• 1.,), .,e,,,,,,, ,t-4!-,--:-A--.4 ,r--• .. 4 ,- .•_ -- . , - - - -. --; -- . -7«. ---y.,- . ,, 0,, !! irr4' • 1F '— • '•-et' ' '- - :''• •,,i. ,' ••• _ . j, _ ,•,„ A, . . -- , - -_ ;vsk ,,...”1/ .'.,U,... '•- ,1,,ir vo.- ..• - ---4.,1' ' ' - - A ' t I • A.• . •' /Or *- •' - . Ir'.,- •7 * . -_-'''- • -- .,i,-, : ' '74.4.!`•*4'-, .t` P.,4i.-4' - 'I .- i!i!.' ".1:1111' 'A-- I* ....,,,.... , 70, ,, • .._ t 7., , .„. _ . .._ ..._ , • . •., . ., • .. " "..-- , : -- -Oa -)•,." -. '' .., ' __.• . 1 - 4.- .,---4-1'' .:„.10;,,-'' •r , ,. ,• ,... - __ 4,,___ 4:7 , ..4-'-. .- •,, ., --`,.-L.- -, '1,.,;=' ;...- ''.',, -, - - , , . :-.' j-*., 417. 7 ,-'- , P"-----e. ' . , '1 f‘. -411"" ; ler- ' -:_•44,-.,k, . .7,7,...„ , .-,,,,4.: ; . , "0„, ....• 1 - : .11 4, 4 ,' s . . . '•-• 24 ...4St .... , ....i,4 r:1 b '4" „:4,41.414,44;,07, .- .. • • . Submitted by: Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC 2211 Congress Street, Portland, ME 04102 207.541.2200 Chad Snow Principal I Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC csnow@berrydunn.com s\ONcoR accREo�a Art Thatcher, Project Manager AWIR.41 Manager I Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC C A'R A ArtThatcher@berrydunn.com ACCREDITED ROANOKE Submitted On: PARKS AND RECREATION 1"0PErREA1IoNP°�`' August 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 D. Random Invitation Community Needs A, Purpose of this Plan 4 Assessment Survey Executive Summary 42 B. Planning Process Summary 5 Overview 42 C. Goals and Objectives 6 Methodology 42 1.0 Introduction to the Planning Context 8 Parks and Facilities Use 42 A. Purpose of This Plan 8 Benefits, Importance, and Improvements B. Parks and Recreation Department Overview 8 to Parks and Recreation 43 C. Department Mission,Vision, and Values 9 Priorities for Facility Investments 45 D. Phases of this Planning Process 9 Priorities for Program Investments 46 E. Progress Since 2019 10 E. Online Community Engagement: Social Pinpoint Summary 48 2.0 Next Steps - Goals, Objectives, Recommendations, and Action Table 13 Introduction 48 A. Action Plan and Prioritization 13 Survey 49 B. Recommendations 21 Budget Responses 52 C, Implementation Guidelines/Strategies 29 Mapping Tool 53 3.0 What We Want - Our Community, Trends, and Conclusion 54 Identified Needs 32 F. Benchmarking 54 A. Demographic Profile 32 Employees in the Workforce 55 Population Characteristics 34 Expenditures and Revenue per Capita 55 Age Distribution 34 Conclusion 56 Racial Diversity 34 4.0 Operations, Maintenance, and Program B. Current Trends 34 Assessments 57 Park and Recreation Influencing Trends 34 A. Operations and Maintenance 57 Local Trends 35 Introduction 57 National Trends 36 Roanoke Park Maintenance 57 Age-Related and Generational Trends 37 Key Findings 59 C. Community and Stakeholder Input 38 B, Recreation Program Analysis 59 Introduction 38 Introduction 59 Community Engagement Goals 38 Essential Takeaways 60 Desired Community Engagement Outcomes 38 Program Assessment and Strategy 60 Community Engagement Summary 38 Program Action Table 62 Focus Group Feedback 39 Community Workshop Feedback 41 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY r E w 3. ♦ Ri` l y ,( { xa I it.1 s 1/4 - {-- .t 5: lei IJ 1 s ., . • , ,' ?j)i` • - +a•..• :., •. .0 „r t;,-- s` v,� a 1 j . f5 �.r T ` �� y47 �•C t ./ wr �v 1 # 4,4 , e — - �_; �L.te' _ _ i '_ 4 A . t{ l /. > a � _ r.. V -v tomN a �• 9 A. �R�f (( 1. 1 re C - . 'Wi - �a . rvy'1 x • • 4 t} '�. , K ' t 'L . r9iw,. )fir >� .et' W ! _'w. O ." y: tom ty' ' ,'I ` `, t•- w 4 i r , : ate-- .`.. ,t` s ' 4 ' 41 1}k • ♦ 9 t . '• { }ti= F _ k .l ,, • 1/4 , ,: t r C.am. ��, t < _>1 R ., t { L i Executive Summary -tv .7.- - A. Purpose of this Plan This Parks and Recreation Master Plan is an update of the Roanoke 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Development of this updated plan took place from October 2023 to July 2025 and included community engagement, leadership interviews, and a needs assessment survey; inventory and level of service (LOS) review; operational, program, and maintenance analysis; and financial review.The Master Plan Update provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of the City of Roanoke's (the City's) growing community. 4 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. Planning Process Summary This project has been guided by a Roanoke Parks and Recreation project team made up of the City's Department of Parks and Recreation (Department) staff.This team provided input to the BerryDunn consulting team throughout the planning process.This collaborative effort created a plan that draws upon the consultants'expertise while incorporating the local knowledge and institutional history that only staff and community members can provide.The project consisted of the following tasks: Discovery Needs Assessment • Review of previous planning efforts and • Consideration of the profile of the community City historical information and demographics, including population growth • Review of accomplishments from the 2019 • Research of trends related to Roanoke Master Plan and American lifestyles to help guide the Department's efforts over the next several years Community Engagement Operational and Marketing Analysis • Extensive community involvement effort including focus groups, meetings with key • Analysis of Parks and Recreation programming stakeholders, and a community-wide public and service delivery meetings • Organizational strengths, weaknesses, • Leadership interviews with City officials opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis • Social Pinpoint interactive project website • In-depth assessment of overall parks operations and maintenance • Statistically valid community interest and opinion survey Recommendations: Goals, Objectives, Assessment and Analysis and Action Plan • Identification and categorization of • Review and assessment of relevant plans recommendations into themes with goals, • Benchmarking of current services compared objectives, and an action plan for implementation to like-sized communities in the United States • based on the 2024 National Recreation and Park Development of an action plan for operational and capital improvements, including time frame Association (NRPA) Park Matrix data to support the implementation of the plan • Exploration of finance and funding mechanisms to support development and sustainability within Other Plan Elements the Parks and Recreation system • Review of current staffing and recommendation for future growth potential MASTER PLAN UPDATE 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY C. Goals and Objectives The following goals and objectives are made based on the entirety of the Master Plan Update process,which was inclusive of community members.The public was given many opportunities to participate through focus groups, stakeholder meetings, public meetings and workshops, an invitation and open link survey,and an interactive website (Social Pinpoint).The operations and maintenance analysis and program assessment also provided feedback considerations for staff. This section identifies goals and objectives to enhance the LOS and Roanoke's quality of life with improvements through updated parks, services, facilities, and amenities, a dedication to customer service, improved programming and service delivery,organizational efficiencies, and increased financial opportunities. The following goals were identified for the City to focus on: 1. Invest in current infrastructure and address aging facilities. 2. Improve and enhance programming and service delivery. 3. Continue to improve organizational efficiencies. 4. Enhance and diversify funding sources. Table 1: Master Plan Goals and Objectives Goal 1: Invest in current infrastructure and address aging facilities. Objective 1.1 1111 Maintain and upgrade existing facilities, parks,trails,water access, and open spaces. Objective 1.2. Add indoor recreation space. Objective 1.2. ; Renovate and upgrade existing outdoor aquatic facilities. Objective 1.3 IRenovate and replace outdated or failing facilities,amenities, parks,trails,water access,and open spaces. Objective 1.4 Upgrade comfort,convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities. Objective 1,5 I Expand open space and parks. Objective 1.6 Explore opportunities to add trails for walking and bicycling. Objective 1. Develop additional outdoor recreational facilities and amenities. Objective 1.8 Develop new amenities at existing parks based on LOS analysis. Objective 1.9 Address current and future needs for athletic fields. a Objective 1.10 Monitor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)access to parks,trails, river access,and facilities. 6 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Goal 2: Improve and enhance programming and service delivery. Objective 2.1ii Enhance special event programming. Objective 2.2 Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. Objectiven Continue to grow programs and services accessible to citizens of all abilities. Objective 2.4 Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community. Explore opportunities for non-traditional recreation and serve as the primary gateway for citizens Objective 2.5 and visitors to access. Goal 3:Continue to improve organizational efficiencies. Objective 3.1 I Maintain existing LOS goals. Objective 3.2 Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. Objective 3.3 Continue to be good stewards of the natural environment, Objective 3 Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. Objective 3 Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Policies. Objective 3.6 II Increase potential partnerships within the community. Goal 4: Enhance and diversify funding sources. Objective 41 - Explore additional funding through the pursuit of grants. Objective 4.2 Continue current cost recovery and revenue generation practices. Objective 4.3 Partner with other service providers,when possible,to develop programs, services, and facilities 4miiill to meet demand and growing trends. 11111111 Objective 4.4 Increase City budget and staffing dedicated to parks and recreation, maintenance, and trails. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING CONTEXT w. x • :: . ., • . • *a s -Aiwa, .., , i ,,,to , ' , ,. .... kb a s: 1.0 Introduction to the Planning Context A. Purpose of This Plan This Parks and Recreation Master Plan is an update Additionally, this update is to affirm the current course of Roanoke 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. of action and address any new park and recreation Development of this updated plan took place from desires from residents. The update will assess current October 2023 to July 2025 and included community staffing numbers,facilities, programs, services, and engagement, leadership interviews,and a needs projects and make any necessary recommendations assessment survey; inventory and LOS review; and/or changes.The updated plan will continue to operational, program, and maintenance analysis; and serve as the Department's guide as it seeks to both financial review.The Master Plan Update provides the maintain its accredited status and become an NRPA framework to respond to the evolving needs of the Gold Medal Award winner. City's growing community. B. Parks and Recreation Department Overview The Department is a nationally accredited municipal Throughout Roanoke's history,the City has cherished parks and recreation agency through the Commission its rich natural environment and has been a champion on Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies of providing a wide variety of park and recreational (CAPRA) and NRPA. Currently,the Department has services. City leadership began intentionally planning 70 park properties, over 100 miles of natural surface for leisure services in 1928, moving into a more modern and paved multi-use trails, eight recreation centers, methodology in 1981 and culminating in the most and two outdoor aquatic facilities.The Department is recent plan in 2019. redeveloping one recreation center(Eureka Center) and one aquatic facility(Washington Park Pool). 8 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING CONTEXT C. Department Mission, Vision, and Values Figure 1: Department Mission, Vision, and Values MISSION VISION Building a welcoming Be the reason people community through PLAY choose Roanoke VALUES The Department holds the following core values: • Health and Well-Being • Inclusion • Service Excellence • Sustainability D. Phases of this Planning Process This project has been guided by a City of Roanoke Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff.This team provided input to the BerryDunn consulting team throughout the planning process.This collaborative effort created a plan that draws upon the consultants'expertise while incorporating the local knowledge and institutional history that only staff and community members can provide. The project consisted of the following phases: Figure 2: Project Phases Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Discovery Engagement —7 Analysis —7 Visioning Finalization MASTER PLAN UPDATE 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING CONTEXT f ,, --- -:- - I.' II,'," .. ,,, . ,... --. ,.- „,: , , - e ` � � ...., " s— F7 4 * , ,' a t,v,gL tf f ` . w .,. t "A a Y y ,. " 4tk to% ' '11,','''' ',.' '', ,.. . ,.,.., ..,,,,Jit, it. a , �' q � ♦ fit„tir ^ Y '� ... H fi r \iv, a. 4 . .ter.v .-„.4 ..-.. 4 f � t— . F to - N y IA"40. . k :. r '' , Y Y. .:.i` it ,f.Y R e d C ..ew r. aY1,, . CY yy j 't�• t' y'�rF �,e, �,f• ?� Matt'II _ - - q , y 3.rr — ; * at a E. Progress Since 2019 Over the last five-years,the Department has made significant progress to implement the recommendations from the Roanoke 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Many of the capital project identified for the first five-years, 2019-2024 have either been completed or are currently funded and in progress.The City has used a variety of funding sources to accomplish the implementation of these recommendations for a total of $51,788,500. In addition to Capital Funding,the City has leveraged American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)funds, additional federal grants and state grants, and private project-specific donations.The next chart will illustrate those projects from the first five years and the projects identified for the next five years, 2025-2030. 10,.- CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING CONTEXT Accomplishments Since 2019 Capital Projects 2025-2030 Additional 9+ miles of natural surface / multi-use Washington Park amenity improvements$1,250,000 trails built by staff in FY 25-26 Reconstructed Washington Park Pool ($3,995,413) - Deferred Maintenance Improvements$1,200,000 open Summer of 2025 FY27 Renovated/expanded Eureka Park Recreation Northeast Greenways ADA compliance Center ($14,450,000) - opening Spring 2026 improvements $400,000 in FY28 In-River Park Construction began Summer 2025 ($6,494,490) Improve Neighborhood Walkability to Parks Bennington Trailhead Roanoke River Blueway ADA Enhance Blueway System access point completed in 2023 ($331,653) 10 Playground Equipment Replacements Completed 2022-2024($1,340,000) Finish Phase 2 Tinker Creek Greenway Trail Bennett Springs Trailhead Lot Reconstruction at Replace Antiquated Play Areas Cravins Cove, startine Winter 2026 ($312,500) Bridge the Gap completed July 2023 ($7,210,000) Create Inner Park Paved Walking Trails Phase 2A of Tinker Creek Greenway completed October 2024 ($7,637,500) Improve Small Community Centers River's Edge North inner park paved walking loop completed ($117,500) Improve Mountain Bike Facilities Eureka Park inner park paved loop under construction Improve Dog Parks Roanoke River Greenway East A/E design at 60% ($835,000) (construction unfunded) Redevelop Skate Park Deferred Maintenance Improvements ($4,315,342): Vision Plan for Mountain View Recreation Center including court refurbishment and ADA updates completed 2023 and $1.5M in CIP Funding allocated 2021-2024 ($2,975,000) for FY28 Riverland Rd /Garden City Greenway to Star Trailhead (Mill Mountain Trail) neighborhood connection, construction starting Fall 2025($1,198,410) Skatepark replacement began Spring 2025, construction still in progress ($1,610,000) Mountain View Vision Plan ($95,000) Mill Mountain Trail Construction in progress ($345,000) MASTER PLAN UPDATE 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING CONTEXT Since the adoption of the 2019 Parks and Recreation funds ($13,770,535),one-time American Rescue Plan Master Plan,the City has invested $48,655,702 Act (ARPA) funds($12,579,397),state funds($3,587,911), in capital projects identified from the plan.This and donations ($2,245,800). Additionally, moving funding has come from a diverse variety of sources. forward the City has designated another$4,350,000 Allocations from the City's General Funds have equaled in capital funding for additional projects. Below is an $16,472,059. Other funding sources include federal illustration of the capital funding by source. Diversified Capital Funding Sources $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Local Ill Federal ARPA II State 11 Donation 12 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE :: 00. ��� �_ 44 1 \ ii,' . .' , _, y t /'11 --...„ - _ _, v. /_. -ram . r - 6'�.. �► ! �% "jillir. 2.0 Next Steps - Goals, Objectives, -Mg Fr Recommendations, and Action Table Residents and community leaders are increasingly recognizing that parks and recreation facilities, programs, and services are essential to creating and maintaining communities where people want to live,work, play, socialize, recreate, learn,and visit.These amenities should be investments in the long-term vitality and economic sustainability of any active and desirable community. Roanoke is committed to providing comprehensive, high-quality parks, waterways, trails, programs,facilities, and services to the community.The following section outlines the complete list of recommendations and action plans that will position the City toward the future of maintaining and improving the quality of life for its residents and visitors. A. Action Plan and Prioritization The following goals, objectives, and action items for the recommendations are drawn from the public input, inventory, LOS analysis,findings feedback, and information gathered during the master update planning process. The primary focus is maintaining, sustaining, and improving Roanoke parks, waterways,trails,facilities, programs, and services. Funding availability, staff buy-in, and political and community support will play significant roles in future planning efforts. The time frame to complete is designated as: • Short-term (up to 3 years) • Mid-term (4- 6 years) • Long-term (7 - 10 years) • Ongoing (occurs on a continuous basis) MASTER PLAN UPDATE 13 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Table 10: Goals and Objectives Timelines Goal 1: Invest in current infrastructure and address aging facilities. Objective 1.1 - Maintain and upgrade existing facilities, parks,trails, water access, and open spaces. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.1.a - Continue to monitor the condition of existing parks,trails, open spaces, water access, and facilities and compare to baseline established in the 2019 Master Plan's Ongoing Facilities Assessment. Priorities for future maintenance projects for these areas should be developed and reviewed regularly. 1.1.b - Prioritize allocation of staffing resources to help ensure that continuous maintenance of these areas is a priority. Add seasonal staff as needed to meet current and future Short-Term demand for services. 1.1.c - All facility inspections should follow current SOPs. Ongoing 1.1,d - Maintenance projects and annual maintenance needs should be funded on a regular schedule based on the Facilities Assessment from the 2019 Master Plan. Priorities Short-Term for future maintenance projects for these areas should continue to be developed and Ongoing reviewed regularly. Objective 1.2.a - Add indoor recreation space. Actions i Time Frame to Complete 1.2.a - Continue renovation planning schedule from the 2019 Master Plan for existing Short Term recreation centers. Ongoing 1.2.b - Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, a top priority of the community is additional indoor recreation space. Continue to explore Mid-Term opportunities to add additional indoor multipurpose recreation space either through Long-Term partnerships, purchase of an existing facility,or construction of a new facility. Objective 1.2.b - Renovate and upgrade existing outdoor aquatic facilities. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.2.b - The community prioritized and identified the need and desire for updated aquatic Short-Term facilities. Continue to renovate Fallon Pool as identified in the CIP based on the 2019 Mid Term Master Plan and current community desires. 14 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Objective 1.3 - Renovate and replace outdated or failing facilities, amenities, parks,trails,water access, and open spaces. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.3.a - Continue to use the 2019 Facilities Assessment and park ratings from the 2019 Master Plan to update and create a plan to replace outdated playgrounds, renovate Short-Term outdated sports fields and sport court surfaces, upgrade or replace existing restroom facilities, and address the inconsistency and aging signage in parks,trails, water access, Ongoing and open spaces. Objective 1.4 - Upgrade comfort, convenience, and customer service amenities to existing facilities. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.4.a - A top priority from public engagement and the community survey was the need to address ADA accessibility to parks, playgrounds, amenities, and facilities. As renovations Short-Term and upgrades occur,continue to make accessibility a top priority and address non- Ongoing compliant conditions identified in the 2019 Master Plan's Facilities Assessment. 1.4.b - As the Department makes upgrades to and improves existing facilities, it should explore opportunities to add restrooms, security lighting, storage, and other amenities at existing parks and facilities, as these value-add features were high priorities in community Ongoing feedback. 1,4.c - As parks and facilities are upgraded and renovated, continue to look for Ongoing opportunities to add public art. Objective 1.5 - Expand open space and parks. 'Time Frame to Complete 1.5.a - Add passive open space tactically to meet stormwater mitigation and other Long Term sustainability goals, as well as 10-minute walk and equitable park access goals. Objective 1.6 - Explore opportunities to add trails for walking and bicycling. Actions r Time Frame to Complete 1.6.a - Coordinate with the County and other surrounding municipalities to connect to Short Term existing, develop, or expand bicycle paths and walking trails to connect neighborhoods to Ongoing parks and connect parks to parks. 1.6.b - A priority list for improving and adding internal walking loops in existing parks Short-Term should be developed and maintained. Ongoing 1.6.c - Strengthen coordination with internal departments to expand and connect bicycle Short-Term paths and walking trails. Ongoing MASTER PLAN UPDATE 15 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Objective 1.7 - Develop additional outdoor recreational facilities and amenities. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.7.a - Continue to explore investment in development of existing facilities to meet demand Ongoing and increase outdoor programming opportunities. 1.7.b - Develop facilities and amenities to help ensure all citizens have safe access to a recreation space within a 10-minute walk from their residence as outlined in the 2019 Ongoing Master Plan. 1.7.c - Explore opportunities at existing parks to add adventure sports and outdoor activities such as all-wheels parks, pump tracks, skate bowls and parks,futsal, nature- Short-Term based programs, and river sports to increase programming and attract new users. Ongoing Objective 1.8 - Develop new amenities at existing parks based on LOS analysis. Actions Time Frame to Complete 1.8.a - Using the 2019 Facilities Assessment and updates,the Department should seek Short Term opportunities to add new features to existing parks where the LOS falls below the desired threshold. Ongoing 1.8.b - Working with internal departments, look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in redevelopment areas Ongoing Objective 1.9 - Address current and future needs for athletic fields. • ionsITime Frame to Complete 1.9.a - Invest in high level maintenance of existing (River's Edge Sports Complex) and Short-Term future athletic fields to maintain top class conditions. Mid-Term 1.9.b - As existing parks are renovated,explore opportunities to add rectangle and Short-Term diamond fields to meet increases in need and demand. Mid-Term 1.9.c - Increase field time with the addition of sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to the lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. Mid Term Objective 1.10 - Monitor ADA access to parks, trails, river access, and facilities. • on' Time Frame to Complete 1.10.a - Continue to work to make programs and services accessible to all people of all Short Term abilities. Continued self-evaluation of ADA standards must be a high priority for the Ongoing Department,especially in terms of access. 16 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Goal 2: Improve and enhance programming and service delivery. Objective 2.1 - Enhance special event programming. Actions Time Frame to Complete 2.1.a - Expand opportunities and enhance existing special event programming based on Mid Term demand and trends in community demographics. 2.1.b - Continue to work with neighborhoods,cultural organizations, and other service providers to explore new community and cultural events. Ongoing Objective 2.2 - Utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. • -ton' ime rame-o `omp e e 2.2.a - Continue to use a mixed-method approach to communicating with the public about programs, services, and opportunities such as social media,the Department website,and Ongoing mobile marketing. Objective 2.3 - Continue to grow programs and services accessible to citizens of all abilities. [Time Frame to Complete 2.3.a - Continue to evaluate current offerings for people with disabilities through Short Term partnership with Roanoke County.As opportunities arise and facilities become available, Ongoing consider additional adaptive and accessible programs. 2.3.b - Annually review the number of programs and distribution of programs for people with disabilities and look for opportunities to increase and/or more equitably distribute Ongoing programs and services. Objective 2.4 - Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community. Actions 4 i:Time Frame to Complete 2.4.a -Continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. Ongoing 2.4.b - Look for opportunities to increase programs for tweens,teens, people with Ongoing disabilities, and seniors. 2.4.c - Fitness and wellness programming and services were another top priority from the public engagement process; look for opportunities to install outdoor fitness equipment to Short-Term help meet demand. 2.4.d - Continue to monitor participation and demand for family centered recreational Ongoing programs and adjust to meet the needs of the community. 2.4.e - Continue to provide afterschool programming through PLAY Afterschool. As staffing Short-Term and community demand allow, look to possibly expand to middle school programming. Ongoing MASTER PLAN UPDATE 17 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Objective 2.5 - Explore opportunities for non-traditional recreation and serve as the primary gateway for citizens and visitors to access. Actions Time Frame to Complete 2.5.a -A top priority identified by the community was to increase and provide more adventure-based programming such as paddle boarding, kayaking, mountain biking, Short-Term hiking,and rock climbing. 2.5.b - Consider non-traditional recreation programming such as all-wheel events, Mid Term pickleball,and disc golf for new and additional programming opportunities. 2.5.c - Consideration should also be given to non-sports programming such as Short Term instructional programs,life skills,virtual programming,gaming, and STEM opportunities. 2,5.d -Consider becoming the innovator for new activities by offering introductory classes and clinics,along with rental equipment to allow citizens and visitors to try and Mid-Term explore new sports. Goal 3: Continue to improve organizational efficiencies. Objective 3.1 - Maintain existing LOS goals. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.1.a - Continue the 2019 Master Plan overall planning goal of 12 acres of park land per Ongoing 1,000 population (1.5 Neighborhood Parks, 5 Community Parks and 5.5 Regional Parks). 3.2.b- Continue the 2019 Master Plan overall planning goal of 2 square feet of indoor Ongoing facility space per 1,000 population. Objective 3.2 - Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.2.a - Continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities.The Department Short-Term should develop and maintain a Deferred Maintenance and Life Cycle Replacement Ongoing programs to track success. Objective 3.3 - Continue to be good stewards of the natural environment. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.3.a - Partner with Stormwater Management staff to develop and implement a plan to Short Term control runoff from athletic fields, parks,amenities and facilities to increase water quality and protect the Upper Roanoke River Watershed. Ongoing 18 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE 3.3.b -As development and redevelopment continues to occur in the City,take steps Short Term to obtain and preserve open space for the future and to help maintain the City's unique Ongoing features. 3.3.c - Continue to employ best practices to reduce environmental impacts and create a sustainable ecosystem.The City has been designated a Bee City; a top priority should be Short Term increasing the use of native plantings, no-mow areas in parks, and green infrastructure. Objective 3.4 - Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.4.a - As new facilities, amenities, and services are developed and existing parks, water access,trails,and facility upgrades are implemented, it is important to ensure that staffing Ongoing levels are adequate to maintain current performance standards. 3.4.b - Continue to evaluate programming and maintenance priorities based on community demand. Include strategies to include contracting services,realigning existing Short-Term staff and/or gradually increasing staffing to meet expectations. Ongoing 3.4.c - Review the current volunteer program and look for additional opportunities to engage volunteers. Continue to seek ways to collaborate and partner with outside Ongoing agencies and organizations to meet current and future needs. Objective 3.5 - Maintain and keep current the Department SOP and policies. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.5.a - Continue to review and update all departmental policies, procedures, and Ongoing processes regularly. 3.5.b -As part of that review,the Department should engage staff in the review process. Ongoing 3.5.c - Continue to review the City code chapter for parks and recreation every five years Ongoing and recommend updates as needed. Objective 3.6 - Increase potential partnerships within the community. Actions Time Frame to Complete 3.6.a - Build on existing partnerships. Ongoing 3.6.b-Continue to review partnership agreements and work with the School Division and other community partners to increase access to facilities,amenities, programs,and Ongoing services. 3.6.c - Ensure all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed Short Term agreement and reviewed regularly. Ongoing MASTER PLAN UPDATE 19 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Goal 4: Enhance and diversify funding sources. Objective 4.1 - Explore additional funding through the pursuit of grants. Actions Time Frame to Complete 4.1.a - Continue to pursue grant opportunities at the federal,state, regional,and local levels.To be successful and timely,funding should be established in the CIP for"matching Ongoing fund" requirements for most grants. 4.1.b - Look for opportunities to diversify current and future funding based on opportunities Ongoing identified in the master plan. Objective 4.2 - Continue current cost recovery and revenue generation practices. Actions Time Frame to Complete 4.2.a - Review current cost recovery philosophy and policy regularly. Update as needed. Objective 4.3 - Partner with other service providers, when possible, to develop programs, services, and facilities to meet demand and growing trends. Actions Time Frame to Complete 4.3.a -Continue to look for opportunities to expand programs,services, and amenities while working with the School Division,the County and other municipalities,and other Ongoing service providers within the community,and continue to formalize these agreements in writing. Objective 4.4 - Increase City budget and staffing dedicated to parks and recreation, maintenance, and trails. Actions Time Frame to Complete 4.4.a - Additional staff are needed to meet current demand for maintenance and programming. Increase staffing as budget will allow. 4.4.b -Competition within the region is high for full-time and part-time employees. Use the outcome from the citywide salary survey to help ensure that Roanoke remains competitive Short-Term in the market. 20 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE B. Recommendations The following recommendations provide more detail to how the previous section was developed and were made based on the entirety of the Master Plan Update process, which was inclusive of members of the community. The public was given many opportunities to participate through focus groups, stakeholder meetings, public meetings and workshops, an invitation and open link survey, and an interactive website (Social Pinpoint).The operations and maintenance analysis, the Recreation Program Analysis, and the Benchmarking Report also provided feedback considerations for staff. This section describes ways to enhance the LOS and Roanoke's quality of life with improvements through updated parks, services, facilities, amenities, a dedication to customer service, improved programming and service delivery, organizational efficiencies, and increased financial opportunities. The following goals were identified for the City to focus on: 1. Invest in current infrastructure and address aging facilities. 2. Improve and enhance programming and service delivery. 3. Continue to improve organizational efficiencies. 4. Enhance and diversify funding sources. ^ttel Goal 1: Invest in current infrastructure and address 0 oa aging facilities. -11-1111 1.1: Maintain and upgrade existing Maintenance projects and annual maintenance needs facilities, parks, trails,water access, and open should be funded on a regular schedule based on spaces. the Facilities Assessment from the 2019 Master Plan. Maintenance of facilities and amenities should remain Priorities for future maintenance projects for these a top priority.The Department should continue to areas should continue to be developed and reviewed monitor the condition of existing parks,trails and regularly. pathways,water access, and facilities, as residents Objective 1.2.a: Add indoor recreation space. have identified these resources as highly important to the quality of life in Roanoke. Consider adding staff Based on feedback from survey and focus group and resources to provide continuous maintenance of participants, a top priority of the community is these areas. Monitor maintenance staffing and add additional indoor recreation space.The Department seasonal staff as needed to meet current demand for should continue renovation planning from the 2019 services. Continue regular inspections of all facilities, Master Plan for existing recreation centers and explore parks,trails, water access, and open spaces. Inspect all opportunities to add indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, facilities at a minimum of twice a year. or construction of a new facility. The community MASTER PLAN UPDATE 21 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE has identified the need and desire for an indoor Objective 1.5: Expand open space and parks. multipurpose recreation facility with gymnasiums, A top priority of leadership interviews, survey fitness and weight areas, indoor track, class and respondents, focus groups, and other public meeting spaces, and wellness/yoga spaces.The engagement respondents was the expansion of typical facility size to house these functions would be open spaces and parks in Roanoke. While there is 40,000 - 60,000 square feet. a community perception that additional park land Objective 1.2.b: Renovate and upgrade outdoor is needed, a more current need and effective use aquatic facilities. of available funding would be to use current dollars toward replacement/upkeep. Add passive open space The community prioritized and identified the need tactically to meet stormwater mitigation and other and desire to renovate and upgrade existing aquatic sustainability goals,as well as 10-minute walk and facilities.The City should conduct a feasibility study equitable park access goals. to determine if Fallon Pool should be renovated and upgraded as identified in the 2019 Master Plan or if it Objective 1.6: Explore opportunities to add trails should be completely replaced. for walking and bicycling. Objective 1.3: Renovate and replace outdated or Community members identified walking and biking failing facilities, amenities, parks,trails,water connectivity as a high priority during the engagement access,and open spaces. process. Based on trends and demand,the City should coordinate with Roanoke County and other Using the Parks Assessment and park ratings from the surrounding municipalities to develop, expand, and 2019 Master Plan,continue to plan to replace outdated connect to existing bicycle paths and walking trails. playgrounds; renovate outdated sports fields and court The Department should develop and maintain a priority surfaces; upgrade or replace existing restroom facilities; list for improving and adding internal walking loops in and address the inconsistency and aging signage in existing parks. Continue to work with and strengthen parks,trails, and open spaces. Restrooms were a top coordination with internal departments to expand and priority from both focus group participants and survey connect paths and walking trails. respondents.As part of any individual park master plan, permanent restroom facilities should be included for Objective 1.7: Develop additional outdoor community and regional parks. recreational facilities and amenities. Objective 1.4:Upgrade comfort,convenience,and Continue to explore expansion of existing facilities to customer service amenities to existing facilities. meet demand and increase outdoor programming opportunities: add outdoor fitness gyms, playgrounds, A top priority from public engagement and the Ninja courses, splash pads, and all-wheels parks community survey was the need to address ADA to meet the needs identified in the master planning accessibility to parks, playgrounds,amenities,and process. Facilities and amenities should be developed facilities.As renovations and upgrades occur,continue to help ensure everyone has safe access to a recreation to make accessibility a top priority and address non space within a 10-minute walk from their residence as compliant conditions identified in the 2019 Master Plan's identified in the 2019 Master Plan. Facilities Assessment.Additionally, as the Department upgrades and improves existing facilities, it should A high priority for focus group participants,teens, and explore opportunities to add restrooms, security lighting, survey respondents was access to outdoor adventure storage,and other amenities.Also continue to look for sports.The Department should further explore opportunities to add public art in parks and at facilities. 22 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE opportunities at existing parks for adventure sports opportunities to add new features to existing parks and outdoor activities such as all-wheels parks, pump where the LOS falls below the desired threshold. tracks, skate bowls and parks, small-sided soccer/ futsal, Ninja courses, nature-based programs, and river Objective 1.9: Address current and future needs sports to increase programming and attract new users, for athletic fields. As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add When asked about new and additional facilities rectangle and diamond fields.To help increase field time, and amenities,focus group participants and add sports field lighting to new facilities and improve the survey respondents prioritized new and upgraded lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. playgrounds, additional water access (specifically kayak and paddleboard launches), and dog parks. Objective 1.10: Monitor ADA access to parks, trails, waterways, and facilities. Objective 1.8: Develop new amenities at existing parks based on LOS analysis. The Department should continue to work with Roanoke County to make its programs and services accessible Demand for usage of parks,waterways, trails, and to all people of all abilities. Ongoing self-evaluation athletic facilities continues to grow. Using the 2019 of ADA standards must be a high priority for the Facilities Assessment and updates,the Department Department, especially in terms of access. Focus group should look for opportunities to add new amenities to participants and survey respondents indicated the enhance user experiences.Additionally, based on the need for accessible playgrounds. Facilities Assessment,the Department should seek y `, - , .tip• :�,t ., -4 �7^r+,' •A- .i - :... f � Y "l 1 j'1 Off 'i, 1dti a1:' 1 �� �.'1 tt _ fix: M's‘ %'.4 It n;ker Creek •w use \ 1902-1N+StenM !'Itr�.�--. 1 Roanoke.4 A:1Ct1 V • hf v.. , e .„ ii 9vji:M.^ s. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 23 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE a Goal 2: Improve and enhance programming and service delivery. Objective 2.1: Enhance special event Objective 2.3: Continue to grow programs and programming. services accessible to citizens of all abilities. Focus groups and survey respondents identified The Department should continue to evaluate current expanded opportunities and enhanced special offerings for people with disabilities. As opportunities event programming as a priority.The Department arise and facilities become available,consider should continue to work with neighborhoods, additional adaptive and accessible programs. Annually cultural organizations, and other service providers to review the number of programs and distribution of explore new community and cultural events, possibly programs for people with disabilities and look for themed by the community or season of the year.The opportunities to increase and/or more equitably Department should continue to look for opportunities distribute programs and services. to expand events and activities based on the demands and trends of the community demographics. Objective 2.4:Continue to address recreational programming and activity needs of the community. Objective 2.2: Utilize technology to improve The Department should continue to look for customer service and efficiencies. opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs The Department should continue to use a mixed- and activities.The community would like to see method approach to communicating with the public additional programs for tweens, teens, people with about programs, services, and opportunities.This can disabilities,and seniors. Fitness and wellness include social media,the Department website, and programming and services were another top priority mobile marketing. from the public engagement process. Look for 3� �, t • ' -- - ti .T1�j ../ . A. 111 -:W"p .., �, Elmwood Park _; . , ROA N O K E & Mill Mountain Greenway - PARKS AND RECREATION w,,'- -.,..,. ...... ;*t "�,' �' � - ,ma r. �'' i ' r �:::".. r '. : . a f • y 24 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE opportunities to install outdoor fitness equipment to natural environment. Additionally,the City should help meet demand. consider non-traditional recreation such as bike events, pickleball, and disc golf for new programming As new programs are developed, continue to opportunities. Consideration should also be given monitor recreational trends to stay current with to non-sports programming, such as instructional programming and demand. As popularity in program programs, life skills,virtual programming, gaming, and offerings and activities increases,continue to look for Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) opportunities to expand programs around working opportunities. hours and commuting schedules. Continue to monitor participation and demand for family centered As new programs and services are developed, continue recreational programs and adjust to meet the needs to monitor recreational trends to stay current with of the community. Afterschool programming through programming and demand. Consider becoming the PLAY Afterschool was very popular with community innovator and initiator for new activities by offering members; the Department should continue to provide introductory classes,clinics,and rental equipment to this, and as staffing and community demand allow, look allow citizens and visitors to try and explore new sports. to possibly expand to middle school programming. Objective 2.5: Explore opportunities for non- traditional recreation and serve as the primary gateway for citizens and visitors to access. A top priority the community identified in the public engagement process was the desire to increase and provide more adventure-based programming such as paddleboarding, kayaking, mountain biking, hiking, and rock climbing.The City has an abundance of adventure opportunities with the diversity of the A Z. . - r . - $ • MASTER PLAN UPDATE 25 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE Goal 3: Continue to improve organizational efficiencies. Objective 3.1: Maintain existing LOS goal. Objective 3.3: Continue to be good stewards of Roanoke currently has an LOS that is 12 acres of active the natural environment. park land per 1,000 population (1.5 Neighborhood As development and redevelopment continues to occur Parks, 5 Community Parks, and 5.5 Regional Parks) in the City,take steps to obtain and preserve open as defined in the 2019 Master Plan.The 2019 Master space for the future and to help maintain the City's Plan further establishes a LOS for indoor facilities at unique features. Continue to employ best practices to 2 square feet per 1,000 population.The Department reduce environmental impacts and create a sustainable should continue to work to achieve those goals achieve system of parks,trails, rivers, and facilities. The City those established goals. has been designated a Bee City; to maintain that designation, a top priority should be increasing the use Objective 3.2: Maintain existing quality of native plantings, no-mow areas in parks,and green standards for facilities and amenities. infrastructure. The public strongly emphasized the need for Parks and Recreation to maintain and enhance existing facilities. Objective 3.4: Staff appropriately to meet The Department should continue to improve and current demand and maintain established upgrade existing facilities and amenities as identified quality of service. in the 2019 Master Plan. Additionally,the Department As new facilities, amenities, and services are developed should develop and maintain Deferred Maintenance and existing parks, river access,trails, and facility and Life Cycle Replacement programs to track success. upgrades are implemented, it is important to ensure F. itir , _ rt % - It- _----------: - - _ ____, \ , I . ., i if i 1 I{ 7 » #r t :' In _ , , _ _ l sis 26 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE that staffing levels are adequate to maintain current and where appropriate, include user and staff surveys performance standards.The intensity of maintenance and feedback. practices required for upgraded facilities and amenities requires additional labor to be focused in this area.This Since the Parks and Recreation Department is governed would indicate the need for additional resources and by City code and internal standards of operations and most likely new maintenance positions within policies,the Department should continue to review the the Department. City code chapter for parks and recreation every five years and recommend updates as needed. In order to ensure high skill level and up-to-date competencies of current and future staff, update job Objective 3.6: Increase appropriate descriptions,duties,and training curriculums to include partnerships within the community. advancements in the industry and to remain cutting-edge. The Roanoke Parks and Recreation Department Ensure that staff have adequate and appropriate tools to currently partners with a number of agencies to perform their jobs.Continue to assess the advantages provide programs and activities to the community. and disadvantages of using contractual services for Continue to review partnership agreements and work part-time,seasonal,and instructional positions. Review with the School Division and other community partners the current volunteer program and look for additional to increase access to facilities, amenities, programs, opportunities to engage volunteers. Ensure proper and services. training accompanies all volunteer positions. Objective 3.5: Maintain and keep current the Department SOP and policies. The Department should regularly review and update all departmental policies, procedures, and processes. The Department should engage staff in the review process, zr .�i U sz�, z - " i�-,`r'o-�' ",, .11e � � � .-�`� � =`�� �" V 4 r - MASTER PLAN UPDATE 27 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE COD Goal 4: Enhance and diversify funding sources. Objective 4.1: Explore additional funding Objective 4.3: Partner with other service through the pursuit of grants and other means. providers, when possible,to develop programs, The Department currently takes advantage of services, and facilities to meet demand and grant opportunities available for programming and facility growing trends. improvements.The Parks and Recreation Department The Department currently partners with many should continue to pursue any and all grant opportunities organizations to provide recreational opportunities for at the federal,state, regional,and local levels. the community and visitors. As popularity of parks, trails, river access, program offerings, and activities The Department should consider new grant increase, continue to look for opportunities to expand opportunities available for programming and parks, programs, services, and amenities while working trails, river access, and facility improvements. One with Roanoke County, other municipalities, and other opportunity many communities are taking advantage service providers within the community and region. of is combining recreation facilities with emergency Continue to formalize these agreements in writing. shelter projects to be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) and state emergency Objective 4.4: Increase City budget and management funds. staffing dedicated to parks and recreation, maintenance, river access,and trails. To be successful and timely with grant opportunities, funding should be established in the CIP for"matching Maintenance, upkeep, improvements to existing parks funds" requirements for most grants. and facilities, and increased programming were all identified as priorities from the public engagement Objective 4.2: Continue current cost recovery process. Based on the Operations and Maintenance and revenue generation practices. Assessment and the Recreation Program Assessment, The Department currently has a cost recovery policy a major factor in addition to a backlog of deferred and procedure in place.The Department should review maintenance was lack of staffing. the policy and percentage levels regularly to help Additional staff are needed to meet the current demand ensure they are meeting the desired goals. and increased need as facilities are upgraded and new Many parks and recreation departments around the amenities added.Additionally, competition within the country have a mechanism to collect activity fees region is high for full-time and part-time employees. and use those fees to lower the subsidy from the The City is recently conducted a citywide salary survey General Fund and grow recreational opportunities that should be used to make Roanoke competitive in for the community. the market for skilled workers in the parks and recreation field. 28 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE $ i 4r lit iI. � � } 5 1• *tit 0,.. -1) •- :„. -*lilt. / , 1 `A. t ,r y" ) t)41 ' i - ' it C. Implementation Guidelines/Strategies The following is a listing of suggestions for successful implementation of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update. These elements represent the commitment and discipline required to integrate the process into daily operations, now and in the future: • The Parks and Recreation Master Plan becomes partners and community members to provide a the road map for the Department. When quick snapshot of the plan. decisions or responses to the community are • needed,the plan becomes the reference point A staff member or team should have for decision-making and whether new issues responsibility of being the project manager or or responses to the community are of higher "champion" of the plan's implementation to help importance than what has been established as ensure success.This champion is responsible existing direction. for monitoring the plan's progress and works with other staff, City management, and other • The Parks and Recreation Master Plan should be departments to effectively integrate the plan provided as part of the new employee orientation within operations. program. • A staff member or team should be assigned • Post the Executive Summary of the plan on the accountability for each recommendation.The Department website and track results on the site. project lead will have responsibility for tracking This will assist in providing the community with progress of the plan. information about the Department's strategic direction and its commitment to results. It may • The Department should regularly report on also be helpful to print a color brochure of the master plan progress. Divide the plan into Executive Summary to distribute to interested separate fiscal years and report one year at a MASTER PLAN UPDATE 29 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE time, as an ongoing annual work plan. Each dates, and the name of the staff member action item for the year should include a list responsible for the action item's completion. of strategies that support its completion.The strategies should be developed prior to each • At the end of the year, perform an annual review year for the upcoming list of action items and of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and developed by the staff members involved in document any changes to objectives and action completing the action item. It is the project items to reflect changes in priorities.This process leader's responsibility to report on their action can be included at an annual review meeting in items in a quarterly report. A suggestion is to which successive years'objectives and action enter each year's data on a spreadsheet or items are discussed as part of the annual budget strategic planning software that lists the goals, process. Action items will tie into both the objectives, action items, start dates, completion operating and capital budget process. Figure 24: Implementation Guidelines: Strategies for Success O Plan becomes the guide Establish a staff member Each member reports on post for the department. of team to serve as project his/her action item in a champions. quarterly report. Implement knowledge of plan for new employee Assign member or team orientation program. recommendations and hold accountable. Knowledge Base Conquer and Divide Reporting and Formatting 4 6 Post Executive Summary Divide the plan into Develop a spreadsheet or of the plan on the Agency's separate fiscal years and use strategic planning website. report 1 year at a time as software listing goals, ongoing work plan. objectives, action items, start Print a color brochure of the dates, completion dates, and Executive Summary. Develop strategies for each staff member's name. action item. 30 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 2.0 NEXT STEPS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACTION TABLE • Update major stakeholders on the plan's • If there are ideas for new strategies that arise implementation and results on an annual basis. throughout the year, include them on a written "parking lot" and review them as part of the annual • Conduct staff meetings on a quarterly or just-in-time review to determine if they change or semiannual basis to review progress on replace any existing strategies or action items. implementation of the plan. • At the five-year mark of the plan, complete • Post a chart of each year's recommendations on a shortened update, including repeating the office walls in administrative areas with a check-off statistically valid survey and demographic column designating completion as part of a visual projections. Adjust existing recommendations as management program. necessary. o 9 0 At the end of the year, perform Conduct staff meetings on a If new ideas arise throughout annual review of the plan quarterly or semi-annual basis the year include them on and document changes to to review progress. a written "parking lot"and objectives and action items review to see of they add to or and note priority changes. replace existing initiatives. Tell the Story Monitor and Revise Review and Renew 8 10 12 Update major stakeholders on Post a chart of each year's At the five-year mark of the plan's implementation on an recommendation on office plan, complete a shortened annual basis. walls in administrative areas update including a repeat of with check-off column. the statistically valid survey and demographic projections. Adjust recommendations as necessary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 31 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS lit .. a... _. _ ._ k, .' - 4. • (j ~' i -i .all. APCit p rr 3.0 What We Want - Our Community, Trends, and Identified Needs A. Demographic Profile BerryDunn provided a demographic review of BerryDunn sourced population, age distribution, Roanoke, offering a detailed analysis of household income, race/ethnicity, and other household and economic data as part of the Master Plan Update characteristic data from ArcGIS Business Analyst process. using February 2024 U.S. Census estimates. Roanoke's boundaries were used as the geographic area for this This analysis offers insight into the potential market review. BerryDunn also compared Virginia and U.S. for community parks,trails, waterways, and recreation data,where applicable,for additional context. programs/services by highlighting where and how the community is projected to change. 32 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3,0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Figure 3: Roanoke Demographics Older Adults 55-74 Senior 75 Age Distribution 24.248.7% 2023 0-4 years 6.0% 5-9 years Youth 6.1% 22.9% 10-14 years 5.8% Adult 35-54 15 19 years 25.2% 5.0% Young Adult 20-34 19.1% Population Change 100,064 100,460 2000-2028 97,032 94,94 200C 2010 2028 Racial Diversity 2.9% 2010-2028 2028 54.2% 28.8% 8.9% 5.8% 2.6% 2023 56.2% 27.7% 2.8% 2.8% 2.4% 2010 64.3% 28.5% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ■ White . Two or More Races InBlack or African American ■ Other Races IIAsian *Hispanic origin(regardless of race)also increased by 3.5%Yo between 2010 and 2023 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 33 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Population Characteristics Racial Diversity In 2023, Roanoke's population was an estimated The City has become more diverse between 2010 and 100,064 residents—a 5.3% increase from 2000 (94,941 2023, as indicated by the 8.1%decrease in the white residents). Future projections suggest minimal growth, population and the 5.1% increase in those who identify with an anticipated population of 100,460 by 2028. as two or more races.The number of residents who Age Distribution identify as being of Hispanic origin (regardless of race) also increased by 3.5%. Between 2023 and 2028,there The median age of residents is 40 years, which is will be minimal changes in racial diversity, with the similar to the median age (39) of both VA and the largest difference being a 2.1%decrease in the white United States. The age groups composing the largest population. percentages of Roanoke's population are adults (35 - 54 years) at 25.2%, older adults(55 - 74 years) at 24.2%, and youth (0 - 19 years) at 22.9%. B. Current Trends Recreational trends and preferences evolve over Park and Recreation time, and this report highlights current parks and Influencing Trends recreation trends locally and across the United States. The following pages summarize some of the key trends Local trends are analyzed using Esri ArcGIS Business that could impact Roanoke over the next 5 - 10 years. Analyst, while national trends are drawn from sources The information contained in this report can be used such as the Sports and Fitness Industry Association by staff when planning new programs,considering (SFIA),the American College of Sports Medicine additions to parks and new park amenities, and (ACSM), and NRPA.The report provides Roanoke creating the annual budget and capital improvement with a high-level overview of trends in facilities, plan. Understanding trends can also help an programming, policies and procedures,engagement, organization reach new audiences and help determine and participation. By exploring these trends, Roanoke where to direct additional data collection efforts. can gain valuable insights into communities' evolving recreational habits and preferences, helping identify In addition, Esri Business Analyst provides estimates areas for growth, opportunities, improvement, and for activity participation and consumer behavior based inclusivity. on a specific methodology and survey data to make up what Esri terms "Market Potential Index." 34 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Local Trends Figures 4 and 5 compare participation levels for fitness and outdoor recreation activities, respectively,for Roanoke and VA. Of all activities measured,the most popular for City residents were walking for exercise, swimming, hiking, and road biking.The trends among City residents mirror that of VA, with differences in participation being minimal (less than 2%). Figure 4: Local Participation in Fitness Activities 40% 35% 32.3% I 30% 25% 20% 15% 13.5% 12.9% 10% 8.1% 10.0% 10.3% 5% III II I2.6% 3.1% 0% MN Aerobics Jogging or Pilates Swimming Walking for Weight Yoga Zumba Running Exercise Lifting Roanoke VA Figure 5: Local Participation in Outdoor Recreation 25% 20% 16.2% 15% 11.5% 10 2% 10% 7.0% 0 5% 2.3% 3.1% 3.2 5/o .0 . % 1.5% 2.2% 0% k ,c `c1i\ \ 0 cr: .‹.4 .c,4 .c.0r1 cA ro �\ 4oa �e • <<keg , ` � 0 QcG QaG JQ` o oe � e .cZ � � o H cA �c) G'D � 5'Zk ,li � Q e� a \ �, � oG \moo, 10a \c,� G,Goe < cs ` ct, `� � a mos Roanoke VA MASTER PLAN UPDATE 35 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS National Trends Table 2 demonstrates the change in time over the past five years(2018 - 2023)for sports that are relevant to planning from the SFIA 2024 Topline Report'This data was gathered from the U.S. population age six and over. Table 2: National Top Sports by Activity 2023 Participation (Millions) Five Year Growth (2018 - 2023) TEAM SPORTS Basketball 29.7 M +4.3% Baseball 16.6 M +1.0% Football (Flag) 7.2 M +2.0% Lacrosse 1.9 M -1.0% Soccer (Outdoor) 14 M +4.3% Softball (Fast Pitch) 2.3 M +0.9% Swimming on a Team 3.3 M +2.1% Volleyball (Court) 6.9 M +2.3% RACQUET SPORTS Tennis 23.8 M +6.3% Pickleball 13.5 M +35.7% AEROBIC EXERCISE Running/Jogging 48.3 M -0.5% Walking 114 M +0.5% OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES Bicycling (BMX) 4.4 M +5.4% Bicycling (Mountain/Non-Paved Surface) 9.2 M +1.4% Bicycling (Road/Paved Surface) 42.2 M +1.8% Camping 38.5 M +7.5% Camping (RV) 16.4 M +1.0% Hiking (Day) 61.4 M +5.3% 1 SFIA.February 27,2024.-SFIA's Topline Participation Report Shows Strong Positive Trends Across All Sports And Fitness Categories'Sports&Fitness Industry Association.SFIA's Topline Participation Report Shows Strong Positive Trends Across All Sports And Fitness Categories. 36 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Age-Related and Generational Trends Table 3: Generation Age Ranges Generation Age Range Generation Alpha Born 2010 - Present Generation Z Born 1997- 2010 Millennials Born 1981 - 1996 Generation X Born 1965 -1980 Baby Boomers Born 1946 - 1964 Silent Generation Born 1928 -1945 Activity participation varies based on age, but it also varies based on generational preferences.The SFIA issues a yearly report on generational activity. In the 2024 SFIA report, inactivity declined in every age group in the last year; across each generation,the most participation was seen in fitness and outdoor activities. Figure 6 reflects SFIA participation data by generation. Figure 6: Activity Participation by Generation (2024) 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% I ' . 11 II II Fitness Individual Outdoor Racquet Team Sports Water Sports Winter Sports Sports Sports Sports Sports •Baby Boomers Generation X •Millennials •Generation Z MASTER PLAN UPDATE 37 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS C. Community and Stakeholder Input Introduction Desired Community Engagement Community engagement is a key element in local Outcomes government planning and development, creating • Achieve participation that represents a two-way process between the residents of the Roanoke's diverse residents and their community and the local agency. Effective community varying recreational interests. engagement offers a platform for people to voice their • Gather input for the final plan that provides opinions and inform the agency of decisions that clear guidance and priorities from Roanoke impact their quality of life. staff and residents. Collaborative community engagement processes have Community Engagement Summary the capacity to create a shared vision of the agency's A collaborative team of City staff and consultants plan, and when successful, help to create an outcome conducted the information gathering process,which that reflects the community's values and likely consisted of a series of four community focus groups, increases their support. two public engagement workshops,and leadership The City worked closely with the BerryDunn team to interviews from September 25 to 27, 2025. In total, 164 hold community focus groups,two public workshops, individuals participated in the process. and leadership meetings, City staff did an exceptional job reaching the Community Engagement Goals community,engaging multiple populations and regions. • Design an engagement process that captures They used a mixed-method approach from social the public's perceptions and interests regarding media, email,website posts, and phone calls.This the current and future needs for Roanoke's parks, approach yielded great turnout. facilities, and programs. The focus groups were open conversations with • Engage stakeholders who represent multiple community members, key stakeholders, partners, demographics and interests. and special interest user groups to understand key strengths, challenges, and areas for opportunity in Roanoke. During the public engagement workshop, attendees received a high-level overview of the Master Plan Update project and were given an interactive opportunity to prioritize activities,facilities, and programs they are most interested in. Figure 7: Community Engagement Summary Staff Focus Leadership Public SWOT Groups Interviews Workshops 51 54 12 47 38 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Focus Group Feedback This section summarizes comments from the focus group discussions. Figure 8: Additional Programs/Activities to Pursue Adaptive and Intro to Sports Intro to Therapeutic Tennis Programs (All Adventure Programs Lessons Sports Camp) Sports Urban Camping Outdoor Arts and Programs and Recreation Active Adult Cultural Field Trips Programs Programs Programming Outdoor Open Preschool Recreation Recreation Programs Figure 9: Additional Facilities Natural Trails More Athletic Splash Pads with Nature- Community Fields Based Education Garden (Rectangular Fields) Add Convenience Update or Bike Racks Amenities to Replace Current In Parks and Shade Structures Current Parks Pool That Needs In Event Venues and Fields Servicing Trailheads Climbing Beginner- Camping Facilities Camping Friendly Trails Facilities (Outdoor Facilities Bouldering) MASTER PLAN UPDATE 39 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Figure 10: Top Priorities Provide Additional Resources Creative and Planning to Keep Dedicated to Parks Inclusive Programs Roanoke in the And Recreation, With Convenience Forefront of Maintenance, and Amenities Innovation Trails Be Creative in Using Geographical Natural Elements to Equity of Resources Assist in Providing More Restrooms to Include Parks, Sources of Fun Amenities, and Trails Spaces Balance of Sustaining What Plan for Growth Is Working and Increase Arts in the Developing Support Parks of What Needs to be Enhanced 40 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Community Workshop Feedback This section summarizes feedback from the two community workshops. Figure 11: Prioritize Recreation Center Space Large neighborhood recreation center anywhere in the City, with more amenities to 19 include gym space, fitness areas, and program space. Renovated small neighborhood center, with a community space for out of school programs 10 and small gatherings in North Roanoke Renovated small neighborhood center with space for out of school programs and 2 gatherings in Southwest Roanoke Figure 12: Prioritize City Investment for Youth Spaces Spreading investments more broadly by replacing several parks and older playgrounds 23 with new ADA compliant equipment. Focusing investment in a single new specialty 4 nature play style playground Focusing investment on a single 2 new splash pad MASTER PLAN UPDATE 41 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS D. Random Invitation Community Needs Assessment Survey Executive Summary Overview ETC Institute administered a Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey for the City of Roanoke, VA during the fall of 2024.The purpose of the survey was to help determine parks and recreation priorities for the community. Methodology ETC Institute mailed a survey packet to a random sample of households throughout Roanoke. Each survey packet contained a cover letter, a copy of the survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. Residents who received the survey were given the option of returning the survey by mail or completing it online. The survey aimed to collect a minimum of 400 completed responses from residents, and this target was surpassed with 413 completed surveys collected.The overall results for the sample of 413 residents have a precision of at least +/-4.81%at the 95% level of confidence. Additionally, ETC Institute administered the 2019 Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey; this allowed for a comparison of the data across the two surveys (2019 and 2024).The following graphics show the changes between the two surveys. Parks and Facilities Use Facility Use: Eighty-nine percent (89%)of respondents indicated that they have visited a department facility in the past year. They selected all the facilities they have used/visited in the past year.The most used/visited facilities were: paved trails/greenways (76%), regional parks (66%),and Elmwood amphitheater(62%). Based on the sum of top-three choices, the facilities that respondents visited the most were: paved trails/greenways (50%), neighborhood park(30%), and natural surface trails/greenways (27%). Respondents also rated the level of maintenance of the parks/facilities they visited: 20% rated excellent, 48% rated good, 24% rated fair, and 8% rated poor. Program Use: Twenty-eight percent(28%) of respondents indicated that they have participated in programs in the past year.They selected the number of programs they participated in: 31% participated in 1 program, 50% participated in 2 - 3 programs, 16% participated in 4 - 6 programs, 3% participated in 7 - 10 programs, and 1% participated in 11+ programs. Respondents selected the primary reasons why they participated in these programs. The common reasons were location of program facility(44%),friends participate (43%), and quality of program content (30%). Lastly, respondents rated the overall quality of the programs they participated in, as 28% rated excellent, 55% rated good,11% rated fair, and 5% rated poor. phCITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Figure 13: ETC Survey Question 2 Q2. Have you/your household visited any of the City of Roanoke's Parks and Recreation facilities during the past year? by percentage of respondents 2024 2019 No 11% No des Yes 89'° 82% Benefits, Importance, and Improvements to Parks and Recreation Importance: Respondents rated how important it is that Roanoke Parks and Recreation develops,designs, and maintains management standards that will help the City evaluate amenity/facility life cycles and better understand the true costs for routine maintenance and upkeep. Of total respondents, 65% rated this as very important, 15% rated somewhat important, 18% rated important, 1% rated not important,and 0% rated not at all important. Support for Actions to Improve Parks and Recreation System: Respondents rated how supportive they would be of each of the actions (listed in the survey)that the City could take to improve the Parks and Recreation system. The actions that respondents supported the most were to upgrade existing neighborhood and community parks (78%), develop new and connect existing trail system (71%), and upgrade existing trails (71%). Based on the sum of top-four choices,the actions that respondents would be most willing to fund with their tax dollars were to upgrade existing neighborhood and community parks (35%), upgrade existing trails (29%), and develop additional trails and connectivity of trails throughout the community(29%). Support for Developing Facilities/Amenities: Respondents rated how supportive they would be of the City developing each of the facilities/amenities (listed in the survey)to improve the Parks and Recreation system.The facilities/amenities that respondents supported the most were paved multi-use trails (77%), additional restrooms at existing parks (74%), and all-inclusive playgrounds for children (ADA compliant) (69%). Based on the sum of top-four choices, the facilities/amenities that respondents would be most willing to fund with their tax dollars were additional restrooms at existing parks (36%), paved multi-use trails (36%), and all-inclusive playgrounds for children (35%). MASTER PLAN UPDATE 43 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Figure 14: ETC Survey Question 15 Q15. Please indicate how supportive you would be of each of the following major actions that the city could take to improve the Parks and Recreation system. by percentage of respondents Upgrade existing neighborhood&community parks 53% 25% 17% 5% Develop new&connect existing trail system 50% 21% 21% 8% Upgrade existing trails 52% 19% 23% 6% Acquire open space for passive activities 43% 25% 23% 9% Develop trails&connect trails throughout the community 53% 16% 25% 7% Repurpose inactive parks/amenities to create new facilities 41% 25% 28% 7% Improved ADA accessibility at current facilities 40% ' 24% 30% 7% Developing the river as a recreational opportunity 40% 23% 30% 8% Upgrade existing youth/adult athletic fields 31% 26% 32% 11% Upgrade existing outdoor pools 32% 23% 33% 12% Upgrade fishing&kayak/canoe access 31% 23% 35% 10% Acquire open space for active activities 24% 29% 32% 14% Redevelop/develop recreation centers 25% 28% 36% 11°% Explore new camping opportunities 26% 21% 37% 16% Improve Rivers Edge Sports Complex-North 23% 25% 40% 13% Develop a large sports complex 24% 17% 40% 19% Upgrade/redevelop existing outdoor tennis courts 16% 23% 41% 20% Consolidate parklands&remove certain parks 14% 16% 48% 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■Very Supportive ■ Somewhat Supportive ■ Not Sure Not Supportive 44 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Figure 15: ETC Survey Question 20 Q20. Please indicate how supportive you would be of the City developing each of the following facilities/amenities to improve the Parks and Recreation system. by percentage of respondents Paved multi-use trails 55% 22% 199''o 5% Additional restrooms at existing parks 47% 28% 23% 3% All-inclusive playgrounds for children 49% 20% 25% 6% Natural surface trails 45% 23% 26% 6% In-river paddling park 34% 22% 32% 12% Indoor recreation space 27% 27% 34% 11% Outdoor pools 26% 27% 34% 13% Sports fields 25% 26% 36% 13% Skatepark 23% 25% 35% 17% Indoor pools 25% 23% 38% 15% Additional camping space 23% 23% 39% 16% BMX/bike park 17% 27% 39% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■Very Supportive ■Somewhat Supportive ■ Not Sure Not Supportive Priorities for Facility Investments Priorities for Facility Investments: The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC Institute to provide organizations with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on recreation and parks investments.The PIR equally weighs the importance that residents place on facilities and how many residents have unmet needs for the facilities. Based on the PIR,the following facilities were rated as high priorities for investment: • Paved greenway trails (PIR=154) • Large community parks (PIR=139) • Natural areas/wildlife habitats (PIR=134) • Indoor swimming pools (PIR=126) MASTER PLAN UPDATE 45 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS The chart below shows the PIR for each of the 29 facilities assessed in the survey. Figure 16: ETC Top Priorities for Investment for Facilities/Amenities Based on PIR Top Priorities for Investment for Facilities/Amenities Based on Priority Investment Rating Paved greenway trails 154 Large community parks 139 High Priority Natural areas/wildlife habitats 134 125+ Indoor swimming pools 126 Small neighborhood parks 124 Mountain bike&hiking trails 123 Walking trails 120 Recreation centers 118 Outdoor pools/water parks 106 Large regional parks 106 Camping facilities 105 Indoor walking&running tracks 105 Medium Priority Kayak/canoe areas 103 75-124 Outdoor spray parks 99 Playgrounds gg Outdoor adventure park 94 Youth baseball&softball fields 88 Skateboard park 84 Outdoor amphitheater 81 Fishing areas 75 Dog parks 73 Soccer/football/Lacrosse fields 64 Outdoor tennis courts 64 Low Priority Indoor volleyball&basketball courts 60 74 or Less Outdoor sand volleyball courts 53 Outdoor basketball courts 52 Adult softball fields 31 0 50 100 150 200 Priorities for Program Investments Based on the PIR,the following programs were rated as high priorities for investment: • Adult fitness and wellness programs (PIR=200) • Canoeing, kayaking, paddle sports (PIR=176) • Nature programs (PIR=193) • Outdoor adventure programs (PIR=165) - Adult art, dance, performing arts (PIR=181) • Youth sports programs (PIR=151) • Special events (PIR=178) 46 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3,0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS The chart below shows the PIR for each of the 23 programs assessed in the survey. Figure 17: ETC Top Priorities for Investment for Programs/Activities Based on PIR Top Priorities for Investment for Programs/Amenities Based on Priority Investment Rating Adult fitness&wellness programs 200 Nature programs 193 Adult art,dance,performing arts 181 Special events 178 Canoeing, kayaking, paddle sports 176 Outdoor adventure programs 165 High Priority Youth sports programs 151 125+ Adult day trips 123 Adult sports programs 106 Youth summer camp programs 95 ff I I. Water fitness programs 95 After school programs 95 Medium Priority 75-124 Adaptive programs for disabled 89 Youth fitness&wellness programs 87 Teen&young adult programs 86 Youth learn-to-swim programs 79 Youth art,dance, performing arts 73 Pre-school programs 69 Low Priority Martial arts programs 59 74 or Less Before school programs 59 Tennis lessons 45 0 50 100 150 200 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 47 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS E. Online Community Engagement: Social Pinpoint Summary Introduction Social Pinpoint is a powerful tool that helps agencies gather feedback and insights from community stakeholders. Online Engagement Utilizing the engagement features on Social Pinpoint allows by the Numbers agencies to easily collect and analyze feedback from a 1,459 Site Visits range of community stakeholders including residents, customers, businesses, and employees. 1,074 Visitors This analysis will provide the City with insights that can 456 Total Contributions inform decision-making and help the City better understand and meet the community's needs and expectations.These 204 Total Contributors insights can lead to recommendations that drive change and improve outcomes for all stakeholders. Roanoke's 140 Survey Responses Social Pinpoint site included a survey, interactive mapping tool, and a budget prioritization tool. 210 Interactive Mapping Tool Comments The Social Pinpoint site for the City of Roanoke's Master 105 Budget Prioritization Tool Responses Plan Update was active from July 26, 2024, to November 21, 2024, and the site received over 1,400 visits. During this time, the site generated 456 contributions from 204 community members, including 140 survey responses, 210 interactive mapping tool comments, and 105 budget prioritization tool responses. Figure 18: The City of Roanoke Social Pinpoint Landing Page Welcome! Mori Uptloor PIT".... I CAPRA LAY City * _ 12( )KE maim.Pr.•YN.r. I .warlrAM.rw.w«r trA01 AAA . • +.-. ,.ar..aYM:..•.s•..+VI+V..%M.•Ma ?r..w A•Iw year-, •. ,• .:.I..r u•... h..rr..F.Isw....wars.I..+a►V man w ♦....wan.wa..•.~WON..w..M*....rl.M. w.w•4. •. .,:•.war•y,w.•.... -...ry 7..M Vow..n.r.Ir.•..s.►•d..M• ?.raw elm.a....rr..a+ 1Mw Q.r Cort•nl Wp.r Plan SHARE YOUR FEEDBACK! rr...Pie.PA" Nos I ollow us nu a..c ral media' I rol Olmmt 48 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Survey Respondents were asked to indicate how their engagement with City recreational facilities has evolved.A small percentage of respondents (4.5%) report visiting City recreation centers like the Discovery Center, Mountain View, or Eureka less frequently. In contrast, 14%of respondents are using natural surface trails more frequently, and 14.8%are visiting larger regional parks such as River's Edge, Mill Mountain, and Carvins Cove more often, indicating a growing preference for outdoor and regional recreational spaces. When it comes to recreation programming, about 10.2% of respondents have visited a City park they had never been to before due to a recreational program, while another 10.2% participate in more organized sports league programs. Additionally, 10.7%have tried a new sport, hobby, or activity inspired by a City recreational program, reflecting increased exploration and involvement in recreational opportunities. Next, respondents were asked to select the top three park amenity priorities they would like to see more of in City parks.The most desired amenities included bathrooms (17.2%), natural surface trails (16%),trees (11.5%), and shade structures (11.5%). Figure 19: Question 3 - Which park amenities are your top three priorities that you would like to see more of in City parks? (choose up to three) Bathrooms 17.2% Natural surface trails 16.0% Trees 11.5% Shade structures 11.5% Other(please specify) mimmi 10.4% Playgrounds 8.0% Hard surface courts (basketball, tennis, pickleball, etc.) mm=mim 7.7% Public art imommo 6.2% Indoor recreation facilities 5.6% Multi-purpose fields (soccer, football, etc.) Nommi 2.7% Large event spaces simim 2.1% Baseball fields EN 0.9% Kiosks ■ 0.3% MASTER PLAN UPDATE 49 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS The majority of respondents,49%, indicated they would use a large neighborhood recreational center anywhere in the City, with more amenities like gym space, fitness areas, and community room programming space, but that might require respondents to travel outside their neighborhoods to access it. Figure 20: Question 9 -Which type of recreational center space do you think the City should prioritize funding for next, based on what you currently use or would use the most? A large neighborhood recreational center anywhere in the City, with more amenities like gym space, fitness areas, and community room programming space, but 49.0°0 which might require me to travel outside my neighborhood to access it A renovated small neighborhood center, with a community space for out of school time programs and 21.2% small gatherings in *Southwest* Roanoke A renovated small neighborhood center, with a community space for out of school time programs and 19.2% small gatherings in *Southeast* Roanoke A renovated small neighborhood center, with a community space for out of school time programs and 10.6% small gatherings in *Northeast* Roanoke t jr. #,. � , � X , ''.. ,• c -,. r-. ` t}1 ,.� '�. R T .. . ` .: ro< im ►� a :s r' i I.. s a ma ` s • y ti ti • a F � � ' , � ;E.�. y� y r ,. �' 1 - ' r �• . , 6. ": . y f 50 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS The majority of respondents, 52.2%, prioritized spreading investments more broadly by replacing several parks' older playground equipment with new, ADA-compliant equipment for children's play spaces. Figure 21: Question 10 -Which of these is your highest priority for the City's investments in play spaces for children? Spreading investments more broadly by replacing several parks' older playground equipment with new, 52.2% ADA-compliant equipment Focusing investment in a single new splash pad 28.3% Focusing investment in a single new, specialty nature 15.9% play style playground Focusing investment in a single new, inclusive playground (universal accessibility design above and II 3.5% beyond minimum ADA standards) III IIIIJ All ' / s t a fi % 1 440 . -V''.'• ' . . 44410fN 1.5' . .'4.dit .. . .. t. 7 I , , ° ! i ,k--1 ,1 1 '4:-.- , 4i: . ., 4( 41r ' f• - —11r •••+ _ +i��� b MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Budget Responses The budget feature gathered insights on how stakeholders would prioritize funding for key facilities, amenities, and programs. Participants were given a virtual budget of$100 to allocate across various items. A total of 105 responses were received, resulting in a combined budget allocation of$10,406. Among the priorities, natural surface trails and amenity improvements received the highest allocation at$2,123,followed by splash pads at$1,836 and greenways and paved walking paths at$1,400 (Figure 22). Categories such as arts and culture, athletics, special programs and events, park and facility improvements, playgrounds, aquatics, and afterschool programs received no funding and are therefore not included in Figure 22. Figure 22: Budget Responses Summary Natural Surface Trails and Amenity Improvements $2,123 Splash Pads $1,836 Greenways and Paved Walking Paths $1,400 Playgrounds $1,131 Roanoke River Access and Blueway Amenity Improvements $920 Outdoor Sports Courts and Fields $766 Pools $753 Existing Recreation Center Renovations $575 Large Outdoor Special Event/Performance Spaces $491 Indoor Gym and Fitness Space $411 $- $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 52 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Mapping Tool The interactive mapping tool allowed community members to share their feedback and suggestions regarding parks and recreation around the City. Respondents were able to pin their comments to their desired locations within City boundaries and view other submissions on the platform anonymously.A total of 210 comments were received, and the distribution of comments can be seen in Figure 23.The the most frequent themes were connectivity,dog parks, greenway safety, sports facilities, maintenance and accessibility, natural areas, and park improvements. Figure 23: Map Comments Overview • Read Maunlaln Wolow Green e Preserve 1 Rock Roanoke 8ia:_ksb y ad Falrf,eId Iron&SAes by • Marriott Roanoke Seem PROW P100• AIRIEE COURT YARDLEY b 03y(.DM SOUARt WVit nr W `\ a Blur Hills Gall Chr. ® Chlc- A 4 t TER • 1 A 0 WESI VIEW 1 Vat ey V=ew Mall O • SWARTMMORE I.. PEACE t H• ,. Freight O"'rr •Roanoke Country Club 4 AYENDAI E ARR WASMINGTO WIT +� PARR OUR •f YEI ROSE RUGRv Qnto PARS +weA•aw se S -' Vinton t i&envI Museum of Art wArvtAa ©S Ie* VA Med-vat Ctr V q,rka Musl un k O ! L.'.. of Tr)n=„,Or," on ®. c N _Garr �+�V • S ratch Blscu 1 ny O • . r iv 7Yw1 REEMawt K I i r CO Black Dog Salvage f 94 ''�"'**tt10M COURt; OE0$•. EST /` • GREATER \ �� ",,,, DEYERII b ( . r ' .- { WINDSOR Mill ,._ • M, •aUrltd^•Ste' '0 I JapiP .. r•�� WOODC LIEF .teakNAt W IL OO wooD WINDSOR vast 1 sr..; o+'T • • t t S Hit ESTATESAI WO _as Battyhack Golf Club We' l ONE • f Prr.P t`�. $ Td"gtenood M I a G r IN Gil Cite *' Gh,,.k f A P •. ••eo: 'r© Shrttey:Bid ea r • and Breakfast / AIOOMA PARR Cane Spr-g 0 it ,_,. Boob St Oto..h if ,� "ARt ING/TON MNIS i — MASTER PLAN UPDATE 53 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Conclusion Benchmarking does not aim to make direct comparisons, as each jurisdiction has its own unique The findings from the survey illustrate a community identity, ways of conducting business, and distinct that values diverse and inclusive recreational community needs.The political,social,economic, and opportunities while emphasizing the importance of physical characteristics of each community make the maintenance, accessibility,and natural preservation. policies and practices of each parks and recreation Key takeaways include a growing preference for agency unique. outdoor and regional recreational spaces, with notable increases in the use of natural surface trails and For this study, BerryDunn used 2023 NRPA Park regional parks. Community members expressed strong Metrics data to compare the City of Roanoke's quartile support for enhancements to park amenities, including data (lower, median, upper quartiles)to that of eight bathrooms, shade structures, and ADA-compliant comparable agencies in Virginia. Those agencies equipment, which reflects a commitment to making include: spaces more welcoming and functional for all. • Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Investment in connectivity, particularly in greenway Cultural Activities systems, is a recurring theme, highlighting the need • City of Chesapeake Parks and Recreation for safer bike lanes, improved pedestrian pathways, • Lynchburg Parks and Recreation and expanded trails that link neighborhoods and • Newport News Parks and Recreation parks. Safety concerns, especially around greenways and parks, underscore the need for lighting, security • Norfolk Department of Recreation, Parks & Open measures, and revitalization efforts to foster a sense of Space comfort and usability. • Suffolk Parks and Recreation The community also expressed enthusiasm for new ▪ Virginia Beach Department of Parks and amenities, such as dog parks, splash pads,fitness Recreation parks, and disc golf courses, alongside increased • Winchester Parks and Recreation Department opportunities for sports, hobbies, and organized activities. Maintenance and upkeep of existing facilities, The following study looks at several metrics: such as tennis courts and playgrounds, emerged as • Population and jurisdiction size critical priorities, with a focus on equitable distribution • Acres of parks per 1,000 residents and ensuring long-term sustainability. • Full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per 10,000 population F. Benchmarking • Operating expenditures Benchmarking is an effective tool that enables . Percentage of agency's total operating comparison with other agencies, allowing the City expenditures of Roanoke to understand areas of opportunity • or saturation. Benchmarking fosters a deeper Operating expenditures per FTE understanding of other service providers in the area, • Programming offered by parks and recreation clarifying how other agencies manage their budget, agencies generate revenue, offer programs, and run their facilities. 54 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS It is important to contextualize all data in a benchmarking study. Although benchmarking can be a great comparative tool, it does not necessarily lend itself to being a decision-making tool. Tables throughout this report highlight Roanoke in blue. Charts in this report, however, intend to provide a visual benchmarked comparison of where Roanoke ranks compared to the lower, median, and upper quartiles of the benchmarked agencies. Employees in the Workforce The following section analyzes the City's total number of FTEs. Roanoke had an estimated 169 FTEs, which lies between the lower and median quartiles. Roanoke has 8 FTEs per 10,000 population, which is slightly lower the median. Table 4: Total Number of FTEs and FTEs per 10,000 Population Lower Roanoke Median Upper Total Number of FTEs 75,2 169.0 173 238.4 FTEs per 10,000 Population 6.8 8,0 9.6 11.8 Operating Expenditures and Capital Budget Overview The following section reviews operating expenditures and capital budgets. Data from the study indicates that operating expenditures were typically between $6 million and $27 million; capital budgets ranged from $3 million to $15 million. For both the expenditures and budget, Roanoke fell below the lower quartiles. Table 5: Agency Operating Expenditures and Capital Budgets (2023) Roanoke Lower Median Upper Operating Expenditures $6,404,772 $6,480,000 $17,037,606 $27,029,930 Capital Budget $3,400,000 $4,619,750 $6,662,500 $15,768,995 Expenditures and Revenue per Capita This section compares the agency's overall operating expenditures and the total revenue to total operating expenditures as a percentage. Table 6 illustrates the ratio of total revenue to total operating expenditures.This ratio can provide a basis for understanding the overall cost recovery for the agency; it does not, however, provide for a detailed comparative analysis. Roanoke is above the upper quartile at 34.8%(15.2%above the median). In this case,the higher the ratio, the better the agency is at minimizing expenses relative to revenue. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 55 3.0 WHAT WE WANT - OUR COMMUNITY, TRENDS, AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS Table 6: Average Expenditures and Revenue per Capita (2023) Roanoke Lower Median Upper Operating Expenditures per Capita $63 $69 $107 $156 Total Revenue to Total Operating Expenditures 34.8% 10.0% 19.6% 23.0% Conclusion This benchmarking analysis provides insights into the position of Roanoke's Parks and Recreation relative to peer agencies and highlights potential areas for improvement or expansion. Key Takeaways 1. Staffing: Roanoke's Parks and Recreation has slightly fewer FTEs than the median peer agency, with 8.0 staff per 10,000 residents compared to the median of 9.6 staff per 10,000 residents. 2. Capital Budget: Roanoke's Parks and Recreation has a lower capital budget and operating expenditures. 3. Operating Expenditures: The City's operating expenditures and capital budget are lower than the lowest quartile. Roanoke's total revenue to total operating expenditures is higher than the upper quartile, meaning the City is doing an excellent job at minimizing expenses relative to revenue compared to the benchmarked agencies. 4. Opportunity for Additional Programs: Roanoke offers a diverse range of programs and services,as do other benchmarked agencies, although opportunities for expansion exist. Programs and services that the majority (over 50%) of other agencies offer that Roanoke does not yet offer include racquet sports, martial arts, aquatics, performing arts, visual arts, natural and cultural history activities, and programs for people with disabilities. As noted, although benchmarking is a valuable comparative tool, it should not be the sole basis for decision-making. Local needs, demands, and resources must also be considered in the master planning process. 56 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 4.0 Operations, Maintenance, and Program Assessments A. Operations and Maintenance Introduction Roanoke Park Maintenance In the summer of 2024, BerryDunn conducted an BerryDunn analyzed the City's park maintenance analysis of the Roanoke park system maintenance based on discovery sessions with staff,observations of operations.The Roanoke park system is primarily park maintenance staff, and detailed site inspections. maintained by the City.The assessment included: This analysis focused on the maintenance of the parks • SWOT staff discovery session and associated amenities that City park maintenance staff provide. BerryDunn developed the maintenance • On site tours and inspections inventory and tasks required,frequency, and unit • Individual staff interviews/discovery sessions personnel hours with assistance from City staff.The • Documentation review (of information applicable analysis was specific to the entire parks system to operations) maintained by six specific groups: The purpose of this analysis is to provide an outside • Trails and Greenways Operations (two crews) perspective review to help improve the success of park • Parks Cleaning Operations maintenance operations.The maintenance assessment . Landscape Management Operations serves to understand current practices, identify • Urban Forestry Operations strengths and weaknesses, and explore opportunities for potential efficiencies, including an analysis of • Parks Management Operations current policies, procedures, processes, and business • Athletic Fields Maintenance planning efforts.This assessment is considered a detailed review of the Roanoke park system. The project team developed detailed maintenance task lists for each group,specific to their daily, weekly, Additionally, BerryDunn completed on-site operation monthly, and annual routines; these detailed task inspections at a particular point in time during the lists are part of the Park Maintenance Assessment 2024 summer season.This means variables that impact Final Report that was provided as a staff document. operations, such as weather,type of programming Coordinators'tasks for each area were not included or service taking place, on-site staff experience, in the tables because the majority of their work is maintenance functions, and other factors may have supervisory and administrative. influenced the findings in this report. However, BerryDunn also reviewed historic data and future Based on the analysis and data,the Department is planning considerations as part of this effort. currently understaffed in several areas. Most notably Parks Cleaning Operations that currently have five staff and the workload would recommend 16 staff, a shortage of 11 FTEs.Trails and Greenways Operations follows with four staff and a recommended seven staff MASTER PLAN UPDATE 57 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS to achieve the workload.The last two areas are Urban Forestry Operations (9 staff) and Landscape Management Operations (14 staff), which are understaffed by 3 and 2 staff, respectively. Table 7: Roanoke Parks Maintenance Staffing Recommendations Recommended Staffing Levels Current Staffing Recommended Staffing Section Level (FTEs) Levels (FTEs) Trails and Greenways Operations 4 7.15 Parks Cleaning Operations 5 16.06 Landscape Management Operations 14 16.07 Urban Forestry Operations 9 11.99 Parks Management Operations 4 4.71 Athletic Fields Maintenance 6 6.17 58 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS Key Findings • Consider investing in additional equipment: Based on the maintenance analysis,the parks - New trimmers maintenance that City staff perform systemwide - Backpack blowers generally meets or exceeds the needs of services provided. BerryDunn identified the following key - Mowers findings during discovery sessions and site visits. - Inventory of routine parts Opportunities for improvement: • Allow more staff involvement in special event • Staffing: pre-planning. - Collect and document the institutional B. Recreation Program Analysis knowledge and experience of the City's long- tenured employees,to prepare for staff turnover. Introduction - Improve compensation or incentive to advance. The Recreation Program Assessment was completed through an extensive staff and community engagement - Work to improve staff morale, process facilitated by BerryDunn and Department - Provide additional cross-training opportunities. staff.The process offered multiple opportunities for community engagement and aimed to learn - Create additional opportunities for training to from residents and stakeholders about how they allow advancement. Provide compensation for recreate within the City today and how they hope certifications. to in the future. Residents have many opportunities - Improve communication up and down the to participate in recreational activities—from taking organization. quiet walks along park trails to participating in fishing, - Improve staff recruitment and retention fitness, special events, and competitive sports. practices. The assessment reviewed Department programs and - Allow more time for training and cross training service offerings through a series of analyses with of staff. a global perspective. It was essential to hear from a wide variety of residents, program providers, and - Add additional staff for tree care and staff to help ensure their experiences and insights maintenance. were captured.The goal of the Recreation Program - Develop a succession plan for full and part Assessment is to guide the delivery of programs and time employees. services that contribute to the local community with the opportunity to enhance regional programming. • Improve/upgrade irrigation systems. The reports and data used to conduct this assessment • Address aging infrastructure. included participation data,focus group and • Increase Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budgets stakeholder interviews, an open online survey, and to upgrade and repair parks, amenities, and a statistically valid survey compiled by ETC Institute. facilities. Consider contracting to rehabilitate Internal meetings were held with Department staff and parts of parks that staff cannot dedicate enough key leadership to provide insight into existing programs time to for proper renovation, then return for the analysis and service recommendations. maintenance to park staff. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 59 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS Essential Takeaways - Empowering staff to continue implementing Equity Action Plans as referenced in the City The City ranks eighth in population density in Virginia, Council 2024 - 2025 Strategic Plan and its natural diversity provides residents and visitors with well-rounded recreation experiences. • Considering the restructure of existing The City realizes the need to revisit recreation and programming to drive energy toward parks programming areas to stay relevant with today's programming places and spaces; repurposing changing society. and re-envisioning underutilized spaces to maximize the potential of new programs Observed challenges include: These opportunities provide a strong foundation in • Managing operations and maintenance of parks determining current or future programming services Helping ensure sustainable funding and pricing and management.The evaluation is aligned with the • practices for services City's strategic plan and can serve as a guide for the Department over the next five years. • Addressing outdated and underutilized facilities Program Assessment and Strategy • Addressing health disparity outcomes through Recreation programs are core services of parks and programming opportunities recreation agencies. Program type varies across several • Providing more security in community facilities factors, including facility space,staff/instructor availability and at parks/recreation facilities and expertise,alternative service providers in the area, Maintaining a cutting edge philosophy for benefit to the community,and program demand. • recreation trends and innovation Department-identified core program areas are captured However, challenges also present opportunities in Table 8 and categorized by age group or market that often serve as the guiding light for new growth. segments within the Department. Each program area's Potential opportunities are: focus is categorized as either primary(noted with "P") in yellow or secondary(signifying a service gap or a • Developing a program vision on how to best service already offered by a nearby town or municipality) serve residents and visitors in gray.These areas may also be considered for new • Sustainably delivering programs and activities— programming opportunities for staff. alongside staff and partners—and evaluating current fee-based program services by way of reviewing privatization opportunities and challenges 60 CITY OF ROANOKE-PARKS AND RECREATION 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS Table 8: City Core Program Area Focus Preschool Youth Teens Adults Ages Seniors All Age Core Program Area <5 Ages 6-12 Ages 13-17 18+ Ages 55+ Programs Adult Athletics P P Arts and Culture P Environmental Education P P Events P Fitness and Wellness P Outdoor Recreation P Trips and Tours P Youth Athletics P P Youth Development P As evidenced in the core program analysis, a service gap exists for youth (ages 6 - 12),teens (ages 13 - 17), and adults (ages 18 - 54).The following opportunities to expand, enhance, or modify programming should be considered: • Expand Early Childhood Programs: Introduce dedicated programs for children under five to engage in activities suited to their developmental stage with parental involvement. • Balance Offerings for Teens: Work to ensure sufficient program opportunities for teens while maintaining a strong focus on outdoor social and challenge programs or events, including eGaming. • Promote Inclusive Events: Increase the variety and accessibility of events for all age groups, working to ensure broad participation and engagement across different interests. • Evaluate Program Effectiveness: Regularly assess program impact and participation to help ensure they meet the needs of the community and adjust as necessary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 61 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS Program Action Table A programming action table is a strategic tool that helps organize and prioritize the planning,development, and execution of recommendations over a certain amount of time. By breaking down the actions into immediate, near- term (two years), mid-term (two to eight years), and long-term (eight or more years) the table provides a clear road map for creating impactful programs that foster engagement, economic growth,and a strong sense of place for the Department. Ensuring that both short-term needs and long-term visions are addressed positions the City for the opportunity to build momentum,sustain progress, and adapt to changing circumstances while achieving its broader objectives. Through a well-structured action plan, communities can effectively mobilize resources, measure success, and create positive and lasting outcomes for residents and visitors alike. The action table for programming can be found on the next few pages. Table 9: Program Action Table i V2 L CD + Program Action Table V N E IT E IT E c z Connect Locally and Regionally 1.A Goal Partner with other local or regional organizations to increase programming offerings for residents. A A1.1 Roanoke County and other towns and municipalities V A1.2 Library V A1.3 Healthcare V A1.4 School system V A1.5 State of Virginia V A1.6 YMCA V A1.7 Local art and cultural organizations V A1.8 Roanoke Outside V 62 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS i (n 03 co } } } + Program Action Table N co E co cii IT a) E co 1 co c Z 1,B Goal Offer non-traditional sporting events and activities that diversify sports tourism. B B1.1 Include non-traditional sporting events on trails, greenways, and blueways, such as the river for regional participation. 81.2 Add kayaking/canoeing instruction and excursions along the river or nearby lakes for residents and visitors. V B1.3 Develop disc golf courses for tournaments. V 81.4 Create road races and other events such as triathlons. V V B1.5 Add more rock climbing and tubing opportunities. V V B1.6 Revisit adult fitness and wellness program opportunities for enhancements. V B1.7 Offer accessible on-ramping programs for adventure sports. V V 1.0 Goal Add diverse and enriching special events. C C1.1 Review demographic breakdown and consider special event opportunities for those age groups most impacted. V 2.0 Create Immersive, Nature-Based Adventure Experiences 2.A Goal Capitalize on the City's diverse natural resources by developing programs that provide Immersive, adventure-based experiences in nature. A A2.1 Add guided wilderness adventures such as backcountry hiking, rock climbing, and white-water rafting with guides. V V A2.2 Provide survival skills workshops that focus on skills like foraging, shelter building, and navigation. Can be conducted in partnership with outdoor experts who can provide both V educational and experiential value. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 63 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS e CIS Cl) co } } 1 co Program Action Table N N E 8 '7 co ITE cn c z A2.3 Add eco-challenge events that combine outdoor adventure with environmental stewardship, such as trail cleanups, orienteering, and scavenger hunts focused on local flora and V fauna. 3.0 Develop Inclusive and Multigenerational Programming 3.A Goal Design programs that cater to a wide range of age groups and abilities, fostering community engagement and inclusivity. A A3.1 Create family adventure days and offer activities for all ages, such as family friendly zip-lining, obstacle courses, and nature scavenger hunts. Include educational components V about local ecology in a fun, interactive way. A3.2 Develop programs specifically designed for individuals with disabilities, such as modified adventure courses. Partner with V organizations specializing in adaptive sports. A3.3 Offer gentle adventure activities suitable for older adults, such as guided nature walks, bird watching tours, and light kayaking. Focus on safety,enjoyment, physical activity, and V social interaction. A3.4 Collaborate with local artists and cultural organizations to host exhibitions, performances, and cultural programs. V 4.0 Goal Leverage Technology for Enhanced Engagement 4,A Use technology to enhance the adventure experience, streamline access, and engage with participants in innovative ways, A A4.1 Develop and enhance trail experiences where visitors can use augmented reality(AR)to access interactive content such as information on local wildlife, historical facts, and virtual V challenges. 64 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS i V2 co ` coL } } + Program Action Table v N op -- g i3 IT CD 17 E 73 CD z A4.2 Create a mobile app that offers trail maps, real-time updates on trail and weather conditions, and features like geo-cach- V ing badges for completing certain activities. A4.3 Offer a variety of virtual reality(VR)experiences that simulate adventure activities, like rock climbing or white- water rafting,for those who might not be able to participate physically.This can also be used a tool for planning training V and informational purposes before engaging in real-life adventures. 5.0 Goal Enhance Wildlife Observation Opportunities 5.A Improve and expand wildlife observation opportunities by leveraging Roanoke's diverse ecosystems and natural areas A A5.1 Identify and develop new wildlife observation sites in key natural areas. Help ensure the sites have amenities like observation decks, informational signage, and safe viewing V distances to maximize wildlife encounters. A5.2 Upgrade current observation facilities with features such as elevated platforms, better access to trails, and educational V kiosks providing information about local wildlife species. A5.3 Promote seasonal events by hosting wildlife observation events or guided tours focusing on different species migration patterns, breeding seasons, or other notable V behaviors. Partner with local wildlife experts and clubs to offer educational content and enhance visitors' experience. B B5.1 Offer targeted educational and interpretive programs by de- veloping a deeper understanding of local ecosystems. V V B5.2 Implement youth-focused and family friendly educational programs that encourage early interest in wildlife and nature conservation. Suggested examples are junior ranger pro- grams, wildlife day packing, and tracking. MASTER PLAN UPDATE 65 4.0 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS N COT. CO } CO } } co + Program Action Table N co E co IT a� IT E � v c' Z B5.3 Conduct regular surveys regarding wildlife observation ex- periences. Focus on accessibility, educational content, and overall satisfaction. Use the feedback to make data-driven V improvements. 6.0 Goal Enable Access to Water Opportunities 6 A Analyze the LOS throughout the City and consider investing in the development and upgrading of swimming facilities to offer diverse, equitable swimming experiences and programming for residents and visitors. A A6.1 Expand access to water opportunities, including pools and splash pads, in key urban locations for equitable access. V V A6.2 Enhance access to the river by developing designated safe access points. V 6.B Organize community and recreational swimming events. B B6.1 Host swim meets, competitions, and casual swim meetups to attract swimmers of varying skill levels and ages. Consider V offering swim-a-thons, family swim days, and relay races. B6.2 Organize themed pool parties, summer festivals, movie nights, or fitness classes to create a fun and lively atmo- V sphere. 66 CITY OF ROANOKE—PARKS AND RECREATION BerryDunn"is the brand name under which Berry,Dunn,McNeil&Parker, LLC and BDMP Assurance, LLP,independently owned entities,provide professional services in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct BDMP Assurance,LLP is a licensed CPA firm that provides attest services,and Berry,Dunn, McNeil&Parker,LLC,and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory,and consulting services. Berry, Dunn, McNeil&Parker,LLC leases professional and administrative staff to BDMP Assurance, LLP. These individuals work under the direct control and supervision of BDMP Assurance LLP which is solely responsible for their performance. The entities failing under the BerryDunn brand are independently owned and neither entity is'tablet for the services provided by the other entity. Our use of the terms "our Firm"and"we"and"us"and terms of similar import denote the alternative practice structure of Berry,Dunn, McNeil&Parker,LLC and ROMP Assurance,LLP ©2025 BerryDunn i All rights reserved. b BerryDunn With offices and employees located in 40+states— wherever you are based,we look forward to working together. berrydunn.com IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43300-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the addition of four new, full-time,permanent positions for the City of Roanoke;authorizing the City Manager,or designee,to execute any documents necessary for the addition of these positions;appropriating funds detailed more fully infra;and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. City Council hereby authorizes the addition of four new, full-time, permanent positions, including a Director of Transit, Tourism Specialist, Grants Manager, and Sustainability Manager, in accordance with the City Manager's letter to Council dated October 20, 2025. 2. The City Manager is authorized to take such action as may be necessary to implement the addition of the above-referenced positions and establish an expense estimate in the amount of $518,442 from the 2025-2026 General Fund. 3. The following sections of the 2025-2026 General Fund Appropriations be, and the same are hereby, amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: General Fund Appropriations: Employee Salaries -Transit 101.1211.0000.51002.000000 $ 127,745 FICA 101.1211.0000.51120.000000 9,772 Retirement 101.1211.0000.51105.000000 27,005 401H 101.1211.0000.51117.000000 1,277 Health Insurance 101.1211.0000.51125.000000 9,696 Dental Insurance 101.1211.0000.51126.000000 365 Life Insurance 101.1211.0000.51130.000000 1,507 LTD 101.1211.0000.51131.000000 358 Employee Salaries—Grant Manager 101.1211.0000.51002.000000 84,150 FICA 101.1211.0000.51120.000000 6,437 Retirement 101.1211.0000.51105.000000 17,789 401H 101.1211.0000.51117.000000 842 Health Insurance 101.1211.0000.51125.000000 9,696 Dental Insurance 101.1211.0000.51126.000000 365 Life Insurance 101.1211.0000.51130.000000 993 LTD 101.1211.0000.51131.000000 236 Employee Salaries - Tourism 101.8120.0000.51002.000000 68,297 FICA 101.8120.0000.51120.000000 5,225 Retirement 101.8120.0000.51105.000000 14,438 401H 101.8120.0000.51117.000000 683 Health Insurance 101.8120.0000.51125.000000 9,696 Dental Insurance 101.8120.0000.51126.000000 365 Life Insurance 101.8120.0000.51130.000000 806 LTD 101.8120.0000.51131.000000 191 Employee Salaries - Sustainability 101.1260.0000.51002.000000 84,150 FICA 101.1260.0000.51120.000000 6,437 Retirement 101.1260.0000.51105.000000 17,789 401H 101.1260.0000.51117.000000 842 Health Insurance 101.1260.0000.51125.000000 9,696 Dental Insurance 101.1260.0000.51126.000000 365 Life Insurance 101.1260.0000.51130.000000 993 LTD 101.1260.0000.51131.000000 236 Contingency 101.9410.0000.52199.000000 ($ 340,717) Transfer to GRTC 101.9310.0000.59527.000000 ($ 177,725) 4. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke,the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ti ATTEST: - „ , City Clerk. City Manager's Report 1111PW1111.1-gm Submitted by: Angie O'Brien, Deputy City Manager Office of the City Manager ROA N O K E October 20, 2025 Title: Approval of the Creation of New Full-Time Employee Positions. Background: To continue improving the City of Roanoke's operational effectiveness and ability to deliver high-quality services to residents, the addition of four full-time staff positions is:proposed. These positions are strategically aligned with the City's goals in public transportation, economic development, sustainability, and fiscal resource expansion: The Director of Transit will provide dedicated leadership and coordination of transit services across the City, ensuring more effective delivery and regional collaboration. This position is cost-neutral and will be created by reallocating existing responsibilities and resources. The Tourism Specialist will focus on enhancing tourism as a key economic development strategy. By increasing promotion of local attractions, events, and amenities; this position will support growth in visitor spending and local business activity. The Grants Manager will be responsible for coordinating and overseeing the City's efforts to identify, apply for, and manage grant funding. This position will improve the City's ability to secure competitive grants, reduce reliance on local tax dollars, and ensure compliance with funding requirements. The Sustainability Manager will lead the City's efforts related to environmental responsibility and implementation of the Climate Action Plan. This role will ensure that sustainability goals are incorporated into operations and that energy efficiency and cost-saving opportunities are pursued. Considerations: Director of Transit: This position will provide focused leadership to improve transit planning, coordination, and service delivery. It is cost-neutral, created through reallocation of existing resources. Creation of this position will add an additional Pay Grade 20 to the City's classification and compensation plan. Tourism Specialist: Responsible for developing and executing strategies to promote tourism and drive economic activity. Creation of this position will add an additional Pay Grade 14 to the City's classification and compensation plan. Grants Manager:Will manage the City's grant-seeking strategy and assist departments in securing and managing external funding. Creation of this position will add an additional Pay Grade 16. Sustainability Manager: Will guide citywide sustainability efforts and ensure implementation of the City's Climate Action Plan. Creation of this position will add an additional Pay Grade 16. Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to establish four (4) new full-time staff positions: • Director of Transit (Pay Grade 20) • Tourism Specialist (Pay Grade 14) • Grants Manager (Pay Grade 16) • Sustainability Manager (Pay Grade 16) Adopt the accompanying budget ordinance to establish an expense estimate in the amount of $518,442 in the General Fund, and appropriate $518,442 into the expenditure accounts to be established by the Director of Finance. Valmarie Turner, City Manager IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43301-102025. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Article IX, City Treasurer, Chapter 2, Administration, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979) as amended, by the addition of new Section 2-206.1, Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment, authorizing the City Treasurer to issue a refund up to the amount of$10,000 for local taxes previously overpaid by any taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment; providing for an effective date; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3981, Code of Virginia, provides that upon certification by the Commissioner of Revenue, with the consent of the City Attorney, the governing body shall direct the City Treasurer to refund any excess amounts previously overpaid by a taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment; and WHEREAS, in lieu of obtaining the approval of the governing body in each instance a refund is due a taxpayer as a result of an overpayment of taxes due to an erroneous assessment, Section 58.1-3981, Code of Virginia, allows the governing body to authorize the City Treasurer to issue a refund of taxes previously overpaid by a taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment, up to the amount of$10,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Article IX, City Treasurer, Chapter 2, Administration, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979) as amended, is hereby amended and reordained by the addition of new Section Section 2-206.1, Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment, to read and provide as follows: Sec. 2-206.1 - Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment. Upon certification of the commissioner of the revenue that they have erroneously assessed a taxpayer with any local tax and a refund is just and proper, the treasurer is hereby authorized to refund a taxpayer any taxes overpaid as a result of such erroneous assessment, regardless of fault, up to the amount of $10,000 together with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%), or the maximum amount permitted by applicable law, from the date of such overpayment. 2. This Ordinance shall be effective as of the date of its adoption. 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this Ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: -e-C-e- �-ate City Clerk imm Office of the City Attorney ROANOKE October 20, 2025 Title: Amendment of the City Code by Addition of New Section 2-206.1, Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment; Authorizing the Treasurer to Issue Refund of Erroneously Assessed Taxes That Have Been Paid. Background: At the request of the Commissioner of Revenue and City Treasurer, I recommend that City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending the City Code by the addition of new Section 2-206.1, Authority to refund taxes paid due to erroneous assessment. If adopted, the proposed amendment authorizes the City Treasurer to issue refunds of local taxes that have previously been paid as a result of an erroneous assessment, together.with interest, provided such refunds do not exceed $10,000. Section 58.1-3981 of the Code of Virginia authorizes governing bodies of localities to direct local treasurers to issue`refunds of taxes that have previously been overpaid by a taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment, regardless of fault, upon certificate of the commissioner of revenue with the consent of the city attorney. In lieu of obtaining authorization from the governing body each time a refund is requested, the governing body may authorize the treasurer to approve and issue any refund up to $10,000 as a result of an overpayment due to an erroneous assessment. Considerations: - Adoption of the attached ordinance will result in efficiencies as a result of City Council not having to adopt an ordinance directing the treasurer to issue a refund each time there is an overpayment of taxes due to an erroneous assessment. For refunds due to erroneous assessments that exceed $10,000, City Council approval will be required. Recommended Action: We ask that Council adopt this Ordinance to make these changes effective upon adoption. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43302-102025. AN ORDINANCE amending and reordaining Section 32-101.31, Definitions, and Section 32-101.33, Abatement terms, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), to clarify that new construction of hotels on vacant land may only occur if the property is located in a redevelopment or conservation area or rehabilitation district and provide for certain other changes;providing for an effective date; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Section 32-101.31, Definitions, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation, Code of the City of Roanoke(1979), is hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Sec. 32-101.31. Definitions. As used in this division: Hotel means a building or group of buildings offering lodging accommodations to the public for compensation, including extended stay hotels, motels, inns, and similar establishments. New hotel construction means a hotel developed from the ground up on previously vacant or redeveloped land,provided such new hotel construction is located in a redevelopment or conservation area or rehabilitation district. Program administrators means the director of real estate valuation, and the city manager or their designee, which includes the director of economic development, who reports to and acts under the authority of the city manager. Substantial rehabilitation means the conversion of an existing structure that is not a hotel into a functioning hotel. III I. 2. Section 32-101.33, Abatement terms,Division 5C,Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), is hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Sec. 32-101.33. Abatement terms. (a) The abatement shall apply only to the increase in assessed value of the improvement resulting from the qualifying construction or rehabilitation of a structure. (b) Duration: The exemption shall last: (1) Five(5)years citywide for all qualifying properties. (2) An additional ten (10) years shall be granted for qualifying properties located within an Enterprise Zone, Redevelopment or Conservation Area, or Rehabilitation District. (3) No exemption provided under this division shall exceed fifteen(15) years. (c) The exemption shall begin July 1 following the completion of construction or rehabilitation as determined by the director of real estate valuation. (d) The tax abatement program shall remain in effect until a cumulative total of five hundred (500)hotel rooms has been approved for abatement,based on the number of rooms added or replaced through qualifying projects. Once the five hundred (500) room threshold is met, or July 1, 2030 arrives, whichever occurs earlier, the program shall be deemed concluded and this division shall terminate. 3. This Ordinance shall be effective as of the date of its adoption. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter,the second reading of this Ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: CiAJZed" City Clerk -.ow Office of the City Attorney ROAN O K E October 20, 2025 Title: Amendment of the City Code Section 32-101.31, Definitions, and Section 32-101.33, Abatement terms, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation. Background: With the concurrence of the Director of Real Estate Valuation. I recommend that City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Section 32-101.31. Definitions, and Section 32- 101.33. Abatement terms, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II, Real Estate Taxes Generally, Chapter 32, Taxation, to clarify that the partial exemption from real estate taxes for the construction of new hotels on vacant land is limited to property located in a redevelopment or conservation area, or rehabilitation district. The Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program is designed to incentivize new hotel development or other conversion of a commercial property into a hotel to offset the number of hotel rooms lost since 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A partial tax exemption is provided on property for the construction of new hotels or the rehabilitation of existing structures into hotels that meet the eligibility requirements under the ordinance. Under the state enabling legislation, the partial tax exemption is generally provided for property on which any existing structure or other improvement has undergone rehabilitation, renovation or replacement, however rehabilitation, renovation or replacement of an existing structure is not required to meet the eligibility criteria for the exemption if the new construction is on land located in a redevelopment or conservation area, or rehabilitation district. Considerations: Adoption of the ordinance will clarify that the partial tax exemption for the construction of new hotels on vacant land is limited to properties located in a redevelopment or conservation area. or rehabilitation district. Recommended Action: For the above reasons, I recommend that City Council adopt the attached amending Section 32-101.31, Definitions, and Section 32-101.33, Abatement terms, Division 5C, Hotel Real Estate Tax Abatement Program, Article II. Real Estate Taxes Generally_, Chapter 32, Article IX, City Treasurer. Chapter 2, Administration. Code of the City of Roanoke. If adopted. the proposed City Code amendment would be effective immediately. Timothy Spencer, City Attorney IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43303-102025. AN ORDINANCE directing the City Treasurer to refund Nicus Software, Inc. ("Taxpayer") the principal amount of$14,730.16, and $13,391.06, together with interest at the rate of 10% from the date such taxes were paid, as a result of the erroneous assessment of certain taxes in 2024 and 2023, respectively; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3981, Code of Virginia, provides that upon certification by the Commissioner of Revenue, with the consent of the City Attorney, City Council shall direct the City Treasurer to refund any excess amounts previously paid by a taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment, regardless of fault; WHEREAS, as a result of an erroneous assessment of certain taxes through no fault of the Commissioner of Revenue, Taxpayer overpaid the City Treasurer the principal amount of $14,730.16, and $13,391.06 in certain taxes assessed in 2024 and 2023,respectively; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Revenue, together with the consent of the City Attorney and the Director of Finance, has certified that such payment was made by Taxpayer due to an erroneous assessment, and recommends that City Council adopt this ordinance directing the City Treasurer to refund Taxpayer the principal amount of$14,730.16 and $13,391.06, together with interest at the rate of ten percent(10%) from the date such taxes were paid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City Treasurer is hereby directed to refund Nicus Software, Inc., the principal amount of$14,730.16 and$13,391.06, together with interest at the rate of ten percent(10%) from the date such taxes were paid, as a result of the erroneous assessment of certain taxes in 2024 and 2023,respectively. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: f _; tind4Cr- ' City Clerk. Cecelia Webb From: Cecelia Mccoy Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 8:28 AM To: Cecelia Webb Subject: FW: Large Abatement Causing a Refund Attachments: Memorandum - 5 Sep 2025 - Refund on Erroneous Assessment.pdf Categories: Susie McCoy FYI Susie lvlcCoy City Clerk Ext. 6358 From: Ryan LaFountain<ryan.lafountain@roanokeva.gov> Sent:Thursday,September 11, 2025 8:17 AM To:Valmarie Turner<valmarie.turner@roanokeva.gov>; Cecelia Mccoy<susie.mccoy@roanokeva.gov>; David Collins <david.collins@roanokeva.gov>; Margaret A. Lindsey<margaret.lindsey@roanokeva.gov>;Timothy Spencer <timothy.spencer@roanokeva.gov>;Tasha Burkett<tasha.burkett@roanokeva.gov> Cc:Jonathan Taylor<Jonathan.Taylor@roanokeva.gov> Subject: Large Abatement Causing a Refund Good morning all, Attached is a memorandum regarding a large abatement causing a refund in excess of$10,000.The certification and a redacted version thereof for council agenda will be sent under separate cover to Mr. Collins for inclusion on the agenda for the 1st,council meeting in October. Thank you, Ryan Ryan S LaFountain Commissioner of the Revenue Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue Room 251, Noel C Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Ave SW, Roanoke,Virginia 24011 Direct: (540) 853-5256/Office: (540) 853-2521 /Fax: (540) 853-1115/Cell: (706)424-6561 ryan.lafountain@roanokeva.gov/www.roanokeva.gov/commissioner CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This email message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential information.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete all copies of the original message.Confidential taxpayer information is protected by Va.Code Ann.§58.1-3.In addition,unauthorized access or use of any federal confidential taxpayer information may be a violation of Title 18,U.S.Code,Section 1030,and may subject the individual to criminal and civil penalties pursuant to Title 26,U.S.Code,Sections 6103,7213,7213(A),and 7431. 1 IN MEW Office of the City Attorney ROAN O KE October 20,2025 Title: Refund of Erroneously Assessed Taxes Previously Paid by Nicus Software, Inc. Background: As background, Section 58.1-3981, Code of Virginia, provides that upon certification by the Commissioner of Revenue and the City Attorney, City Council is required to direct the City Treasurer to refund any amounts previously paid by a taxpayer as a result of an erroneous assessment. Under applicable law, a refund is required to be issued with interest at the rate.of 10% regardless of whether the error was the fault of the taxpayer or the assessing official. The Taxpayer filed an appeal with the.Commissioner of Revenue for a refund of certain taxes it previously paid the City.Treasurer as a result of an erroneous assessment for taxes in 2023 and 2024, due to no fault of the Commissioner of Revenue.The Commissioner of Revenue and my office reviewed the appeal, and the information submitted by the Taxpayerin support of its appeal, we found the refund to be proper and in order. I previously submitted a copy of the certification dated September 5, 2025 authorizing the refund to the Taxpayer endorsed by the Commissioner or Revenue, Director of Finance and myself to each of you under separate cover.Due to confidentiality of the taxpayer information contained therein, which is protected from,disclosure pursuant to Section 58.1-3, Code of Virginia, this certification is not being enclosed with this report. Considerations: City Council action is needed to adopt the attached Ordinance: Recommended Action: . For the aforementioned reasons, I recommend that City Council adopt the attached ordinance directing the City Treasurer to refund the Taxpayer the principal amount of$14,730.16, for the overpayment of erroneously assessed taxes in 2024, and the principal amount of$13,391.06, for the overpayment of erroneously assessed taxes in 2023, together with interest at the rate of 10% from the date such taxes were paid, pursuant to Section 58.1-3981, Code of Virginia. Laura Carini, Deputy City Attorney �`o xeree proz(c) ... Ott �Q Gun Violence ,, ,,, PreventionCommission �0,if/miSsta� w. . y w so IPA am .n per OW .."+ � a! �. �' i .. • '� "- 'ate 7ti' / r AY � " � ! v KKK.»..- `. _ MIM alb ,7y ! • • . r' »4w w. . 411111M agar ,. � .4, 1 to m}...., we . ,, ',� . ' " ,�, Rom. ...-.....,.. �^.• �iM 4 Y a Report th ity Counci ." .„ , . What story .4: 41:4,',' ..00","11, ''' : '''''''''''''. ''''' 1'4'.'"''"-,,,, :„.,..i..„:' '.,.., ..,.., . :...„ ,.-,"'.'',,`„ .:, ,,,,,.' ''''''',;,''''''''''''''''''' ' - do we tell . . ,..3.,... -, ... , . ..:. ..„,, , ,., : o u rselvesO .. �. _.�..� _. - _a ,+«Xa.l , ,; .' e 4, lit"Int about . • ,• , ,,,.. ..... . . , .....,....._.... 1i �r i..,_ . , , , _ 06,77,,,,,.:,, ,........T. .. , � t ,. ourselves ? 41 m --- '"°t.n ••" , . .r _ . •` . t a * ,e .'. ;,fir it ---'+ u .,..., r .- A story of significant progress... 2023 vs. 2024 FATAL SHOOTINGS HOMICIDE AGGRAVATEDASSAULT i =55 55O/ 4 � 2024 10 A CI2024 24 witNON-FATAL SHOOTINGS 2023 �� � 43 " +� AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS EiDOMESTIC !AIL AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS ,,,„ „_,, ,,,„,,,„ , . , .,.„ .., , ,_ „ ,.., . ., „,. „, ., ., .., im44 ifik 444 gir FROM PREVIOUS YEAR ...that continues YTD September 14 2025 HOMICIDES HOMICIDE ,,, t, ..vit,04,,.. to 4. A . , ...., . . . . , CO MPARED TOSAVE 2025 GN\ \ , 14 PERIOD LAST YEA R , , 0') , ,. AGS ASSAULTS „ , ONCE,DOMESTIC, 2024 6 20214aii . iii%44441:4.-40 ' 4 : . , COMPARED-05;41E PERIOD I-STY EAR = .,. GUN VIOLENCE INCIDENTS BY LOCATION , _ 1,-.. ,. . - •T'' V ., '. ZONE 1-SE ZONE 244E ) . . . . „.,. .. ..., , .. . . ....... t ,;• , , ';.'• .-14-A _-.4 - 1„..t, stif .. ,- A A'S - — i ZONE 3-SW ZONE 4-NW . '.i. •, ,,,., „. .,, ,,,, „„, • ,, . .. .. ... .,.... _ , • . . -•: ' • -- 2 A 4. ...4-• , r #. ..... ., PLANTING PEACE . . . . -.• - ..-'. i'' ., „. . , Jamie LeVar Penn,Sr. , ,d"^", 1 ..dosott7 r,„„,,,, j dr ', RonNoKE ''.^"..,,,02 Yet much work remains... .., ,„..,,. „... ............ ....„, especially in NW Roanoke .., ,,, A concern that needs more attention : Firearm suicide FIREARM SUICIDES • BY LOCATION SUICIDE ZONE 1-SE ZONE 2-NE 2025 1 1 c? sigt 2024 7 t ZONE 3-SVV ZONE 4-NW 1 �, t � i 1 • 4• •.."Rae.. . 1 ` .. i►i�/�• �• '{ .y t :i '. • iik r, , i. �oY^ /^� . .• + �� +ram • . �� - r. t rio .... :..s—I.; .4:''' .01--- '. ,.,,,,...,,, 44 r 6 ^NiriiittiPb • c fed • , 4W . ,.7. .....,. .:..,,, . . .. ..,.. ,,, ;., „ ..,..,,,,., _.• .. • . __„,i. ,, . ,,.... ... } a JO ,,. f - h Tfir- ., 1 - �+! {{ ^-. ° ^, 9 __ . .... ,, . . . {�� I y ii r . r7 lr• • • J• t Gc .. A storyof multi -disciplinary p Y \erce pr° t, --se Allifft11"11.11PP* 1 ? '3O x- ANOkFf ` of y 5 6 bt °I RQA N O K E FED P * , cs.;N1 EN 7./0, 1 STREET Ile.SET Families Expecting Deliverance Using Prayer TEAM RAPID ENGAGEMENT OF SUPPORT IN THE EVENT OF TRAUMA _% E 0 , ;'` STTA. y AWARENESS. GROCERIES EDUCATION. F. GROCERIES N0(f ��RV N�` SAFEACTION. Ea A GUN BUYBACK EVENT goa Thebottom line . • ort The gun violence we mos o ten encounter involves impulsive decisions made in the "heat of the moment." Ready access to a firearm enables life- altering actions. Any barrier that exists between anger and a gun can save lives. P I What makes angry 01 , 4 ' ' social media posts • ib � poss I e? • Impulsive actions Ilk i , 4 , 'N:'.% ..,,o, ' e _ it � tiliti • An enablingtool .. oth. a • How many of us have deleted an angry, How do you delete a impulsive social bullet once it leaves media post? the gun? THE UNE%PECTE1 -- - '' , ,:�, " If 1 cou�d give you back j �.st ORIGINS ' � AMERICAN GUN VI 10 WtIiVIiI/CI.eS of jovr 1,1,ves, a$� 20 � of you wou.I,d vk,ot be here. " UNFORGIVI ,..,, PEA � Darrien McKinney *'' pi ��� Supervisor Ai. � Cook Count Juvenile Temporary Detention Center JENS LUD PREVENTION INTERVENTION RESPONSE PREVENTION Preventing gun violence before it happens PREVENTION • Use a gun lock. _r , • Become a gun lock ambassador. • Groceries Not Guns. • Don't leave guns in your car. • Stratified Policing strategies; Chiefs walks, relationship building ( RPD) • Teen Apprenticeship program (RESET) • Cognitive Behavior Therapy programs Health and Safety Peer Reviewed Literature Consensus : More Guns= More Death More Guns=More Homicides More Guns=More Suicides Handguns pose a greater risk than long guns Is it Is it legal? safe? E 2 .,k • 1 A RFt. I FVLJF r!,soGLEN CCTV • 1 c- • C50 ! ' �, 0 • • COLONIAL Xi 111, - TRAIL 0 N. ss • • • v�' • • • • dip • ,petloib • • • • • 0 0 •S. % das dit t 0 . ' ti to • ., • •• 4�M1* •• • 1,,1,4. •°C) • 0 • e 0 •rr• • .. • .51, 0 V!N 1 c N C • 0 or • ,v (:::::) • le to 0 el 0 tr:? t '" iaUNQ * C r o s t h tti.D ' , a VGIN Esn, 1ornTorn, Gammon, ph 1_,e7oT. .h-1,Icsgr�s. Inc, `IFTI/NASA USCi!ik)1 _ US ;� • PARKWAY ReASEll YTD (8/31 ) Impact RAPID ENGAGEMENT OF SUPPORT IN THE EVENT OF TRAUMA • C - pions of I - n • - Boxing = 30+ youth enrolled; grand • e • a • �wich Q = ut in July 2025. • 20 • +�` outh erve • In Programs v �. • tte . . . Matters • . o gra • uation readiness im . ovemen • Wa er onfidenc = (Swim I nstructio • • Voices from the Neig . or oo •., odcast - amplifying youth INTERVENTION targeted , non - punitive actions designed to interrupt cycles of violence by engaging individuals and groups at the highest risk of being involved in gun violence INTERVENTION • Group Violence Intervention/PIVOT (Joe Carucci) • Youth and Gang Violence Prevention (Chris Roberts) • Credible messengers in the community • Positive interactions between RPD and Community peas swap 1'N3Aa/� aowe �(anfui Q� *l2 y } 6u ao }finesse peeie - un6 ...4)N 0 ` � � e flOL !M sy }uow vz ..00 : (4.0111 6uiuiJsiiijsejii INV3J. >taann gad sivawa6e6ua £- L . 2 1332115 a s;uai10 3ni1,0e 6Z • LN3I%3 NOLLN3AèI3 .LNI RESPONSE coordinated , rapid, and short - term actions taken during and immediately after a gun violence incident to minimize harm and provide support to those affected RESPONSE • Improving clearance rates (70%) • RESET • FEDUP • Violent Injury - Recovery and Support Program (Carillon) • Hot spots policing • Planting Peace RijellISE111 YTD (8/31 ) Impact RAPID ENGAGEMENT OF SUPPORT IN THE EVENT OF TRAUMA • 29 Deployment 8 homicides, 7 GSW clusters) • 364+ Residents ngage • • 62 Gunlocks Distributed • 128 Child ID Kits Provided .:4 ., I r'3, 3 . le GLEN COVE • , !, • 0 • ' , 0 . o o le • 0•0,' ',,, -o 0 0 • :: . . \ • l a o , • : / • Tano t, . __ o • ' ,,---" • at , 0 0 Sp % • IV AK MO e. 4:1:10 , 0 Mi alb Ink .railh ‘LAII'')441110 c t 7, . " `Via.Xal Cra la,n-wra.,-,3 • • -‘1 "S .,-, 4.1a33,11113 `‘' , ..,d IVille • 0 • • 41111:ax i 'igAl.' Mat ' 0 a• . 0 irr.....) :T.,31,113Z31.0 n31 ,,EAT' m, 0 oo. Allt Pt• •ta sa,a1.3,/ e.J. Fri,'1 dar; I.1 •!;.; 1-4',r,q . ill NO IN la 0 di IN Icigliatatiell ftelltsrato • ,op , 0 Neighborhood%Canopy , . 'waft , Mil 80-100% , 130W6st i4.0 0 I 1(.. 111111 so•too lir Crooth.i.,fir , ,' 41h um 20-40% 0-20% 0 0.5 1 2 M VG3N.Esn, lorninnn,Ganrron ph 1.-ir,:lioi.enotrigi44 ' flail nil .--. .. . ... . . N <. w 1 For every one deg U , decrease in temperature ." R.,, ffi: 1 . ''' �� we s e e a one percent Wea,,� 71 MLEIDZMV ti °l',,,,,I ' ell7aV iZO s ,_7R53 � : decrease in u n violence. �, Tree canopies help reduce crime by: • Cooler temperatures lead to .......if Nolg' °°°°x`'°°py ill eo•,00x cooler heads. \N. LNG ` • Creatinginvitin laces for people �� , . '°F �� g p p p 4 0 : v= _4tor-•�.90 - to be out and about, providing 41. ..v rn • '�• potential witnesses to criminal behavior. Violent Injury - Recovery and Support Program Identifyatients at risk of , . 1 p dm, , repeat violent injury nda Iinkthemwith hospital .,.. ,. and community- based bli67. 1 resources aimed at addressing underlying under) in risk �\����.�pECOVERy44{0 .... _� 0 _ factors for violence. O 9 ,_., � C KILIoNCLINIC 0 y/pa, KE MEM�.s, WHAT CAN YOU DO ? • Share a meal with your neighbors. � • Use a gun lock. . • Become a gun lock ambassador. • Groceries Not Guns. • Don't leave guns in your car. • Donate to FEDUP • Volunteer with RESET. RECOMMENDATIONS • Continue funding existing Gun Violence Reduction initiatives. • Funding FEDUP. • Funding and managing Planting Peace, including coordination with news media to highlight open cases. • Funding Groceries Not Guns. • A public communication/public health campaign on the importance of gun locks and preventing gun suicide, including managing Gun Lock Ambassadors. How can we tell the story together? * ..... . . . . _ .. ..... .• .. • ... . ,, .,. • ,7; • ,, _ .. .. QUESTIONS? iE r ,"' mac...• *AM.. , .11,111111,..r ' N �. � ,. ter . •,�,. . .4 7 r .. GUN LOCK AM B I ' i ; l l Gun Safety Guide Did you know... Every 3 days in the US a child is shot and killed unintentionally.' In the US, there are 350 unintentional shootings by children yearly.2 Homes with guns have 2X higher risk of homicide.3 Homes with guns have 3X higher risk of suicide.4 For every one gun homicide in Roanoke City, there is one gun suicide.5 Keeping guns locked lowers these risks!6 Get FREE GUN LOCKS and spread the word: Gun locks save lives. Become a Roanoke City Gun Lock Ambassador. Sign up here: i bit.ly/lockambassador ,\o\ence 1)/.0 LOCK IN iA SAFETY. 3 .xy HI 1111 HI \I The Story Behind Roanoke's Gun Lock Ambassadors Camden Brown, better _.- - known as "Stink" to everyone who knew him, was a little guy with a big1,7 smile and a big personality, who was always busting out x, ,. - ... a dance move. His favorite -I , .color was red, he liked cars _ + 1 and trucks. ij On August 2, 2021, I Camden was tragically shot Sand killed because there ' o / . ,�• was a loaded, unlocked gun y` at his friend's house. % Almost right away his mom, Da'Naisha Jackson and other family members started talking about how gun locks could prevent this kind of tragedy from happening to another family. At Camden's first birthday in heaven celebration on May 6, 2022 they handed out free gun locks. We want to always lift up and honor Da'Naisha Jackson and her family as the inspiration for Gun Lock Ambassadors, which seeks to empower regular Roanoke City community members with gun locks and gun safety education to spread the word in their circle about the life saving power of gun locks. I ,32, Gun Lock Use Video https.//www.youtu be.com/watch?v-T2v-u UA4KDk Resource links: 1.CDC Wonder database 2020-2023 2.Brady analysis of Gun Violence Archive data https://w w w.bradyunited.org/resources/research/unintentional-shootings- increaolidays 3.https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2022/04/handguns-h omicide- risk.html 4.https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/06/hand Lr- N r ,.+ I'1 5J,�1 a-WI,;1-mUc'-higher-suicide-risk.html 5.CDC Wonder datahacP 9ni d_Ono' Gun Violence Prevention Commission Report to City Council October 20 , 2025 \ence J40 > C '� c; N� 00, m , ss,� The Roanoke Gun Violence Prevention Commission (GVPC) was formed to address the growing concern of gun violence in the city through a comprehensive framework of prevention, intervention, and response strategies. Prior to this year the Commission, in coordination with the Roanoke Police Department and Roanoke City Council and city government, focused on the creation of a rapid response team (RESET), the establishment of a Youth and Gang Violence Prevention Unit, the formation of a Gun Violence Intervention Strategy (now called PIVOT), a media campaign entitled What's Good Roanoke, and the distribution of free gun locks available in Roanoke City Schools. For several years, the Commission worked on developing a format for the application and distribution of grants (through ARPA funding) to area nonprofits for community programs focused on youth development, mental health and trauma informed counseling, workforce development, neighborhood safety and outreach as well as victim services and the development of conflict resolution skills. Roanoke began seeing a rise in gun related homicides in 2019 through 2023. From 1999-2018, Roanoke averaged just over 6 homicides per year. Gun homicides peaked in 2023with 22 homicides and 43 aggravated assaults. By 2024 with many of these programs firmly established, and the arrival of the new Roanoke City Police Chief, Scott Booth, Gun related homicides dropped by an unprecedented 55% and aggravated assaulted fell by 44% (10 homicides and 24 gun related assaults). The numbers of gun related incidents for 2025 are roughly in line with those of 2024. Unfortunately, during this past year there has been an increase in the number of suicides. Nevertheless, Roanoke continues to struggle with the prevalence of gun violence, particularly in the Northwest section of the city. According to Thomas Abt (discussed below) not only does each homicide create tremendous emotional agony and pain for families, friends, and nearby residents, there is also a tremendous economic and social cost for each violent death — ranging between 10-19 million dollars. These costs are reflected in lost labor, higher insurance premiums, increased taxes, medical and justice system costs, diminished quality of life, lost sales tax and property revenue. Money invested by localities to curb gun violence can be a tremendous savings in terms of mitigating emotional pain, and social as well as economic loss. Through the recommendations of Chief Booth, the GVPC has spent more time this year studying the issue of gun violence causes as well as data driven responses in the works of Thomas Abt and Jens Ludwig. Both are experts in the field though they approach it from different backgrounds. Thomas Abt is a prominent American author, crime researcher, and public policy expert known for his work on violence reduction and criminal justice reform. He holds a BA in economics from the University of Michigan and a JD from the Georgetown Law Center. His career highlights include serving as a Manhattan prosecutor, Chief of Staff for the US Department of Justice, Justice Programs, co-founder of National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention, Deputy Secretary for Public Safety for the State of New York, Senior Fellow and Chair of the Council of Criminal Justice and author of the book Bleeding Out: The Devastating Consequences of Urban Violence — and a Bold New Plan for Peace in the Streets. Abt's main concepts are: 1. Focus on Urban Violence o Abt emphasizes that most gun violence in the U.S. is concentrated in urban areas, particularly among a small number of individuals and locations. • He describes this violence as "sticky," meaning it clusters in specific neighborhoods and among specific groups. 2. Treat Violence Like a Public Health Crisis • He advocates for treating gun violence with the urgency of a public health emergency, similar to how we treat epidemics or trauma in emergency rooms. 3. Smart-on-Crime Approach • Abt promotes evidence-based, cost-effective strategies that don't require sweeping new laws or massive budgets. o He argues for targeted interventions rather than broad, punitive policies. 4. Three Core Principles: Focus, Balance, and Fairness o Focus: Target the small number of people and places driving most of the violence. • Balance: Combine law enforcement with social services and community support. • Fairness: Ensure that interventions are just and equitable, avoiding over-policing or racial profiling. 5. Community Engagement and Intervention • He supports community-based programs that engage individuals at risk of violence, offering alternatives and support (e.g., job training, counseling). • Encourages "focused deterrence" strategies, where law enforcement and community leaders work together to warn high-risk individuals of the consequences of their current life choices, while also offering help to redicrect their lives in more productive and safer endeavors. 6. Hot Spot Policing o Advocates for precision policing in areas with high rates of violence, rather than blanket surveillance or aggressive tactics. 7. Opposition to Overly Broad Gun Control o While not against gun control, Abt argues that reducing violence directly is more effective than focusing solely on gun laws. o He believes that policies should differentiate between non-violent gun ownership and violent gun use. 8. Data-Driven Policy • Abt stresses the importance of using data and research to guide policy decisions. We have also investigated the work of Jens Ludwig. Jens Ludwig is a prominent German-American economist known for his influential work in social policy, particularly in the areas of urban poverty, crime, education, and housing policy. Ludwig has a BA in Economics from Rutgers College as well as an MA and PhD in Economics from Duke University. He currently serves as a professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. He is also the director of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Co-Director of the National Bureau of Economic Research Working Group on the Economics of Crime. Ludwig's work integrates behavioral science and data science to address real-world social problems. His research has led to evidence-based policy changes in education and criminal justice, collaborations with government agencies, including the Chicago Police Department and New York City Mayor's Office, development of pretrial risk tools and data-driven management strategies to reduce gun violence. He postulates the following: 1. Gun Violence Is Largely Impulsive, Not Premeditated o Ludwig argues that most shootings in the U.S. are not the result of rational, calculated decisions by "bad people" or economically desperate individuals. Instead, they often stem from interpersonal conflicts that escalate in the heat of the moment, particularly when a gun is readily available. 2. Behavioral Interventions as a Solution o Rather than waiting for sweeping societal changes or relying solely on punitive measures, Ludwig advocates for targeted, low-cost behavioral interventions. These include: 3. Conflict de-escalation training 4. Community-based programs 5. Environmental changes that reduce stress and increase public presence (e.g., encouraging people to spend more time outside) • These interventions aim to interrupt the chain of events that lead to shootings, especially in high-risk neighborhoods. 6. The Role of Place and Stress • Ludwig emphasizes the importance of place-based stressors—such as exposure to violence, novertv. and lack of social infrastructure—that erode mental bandwidth and increase impulsivity. His research in Chicago neighborhoods showed that even areas with similar socioeconomic profiles could have vastly different gun violence rates, suggesting that contextual and behavioral factors play a critical role. 7. A Pragmatic, Hopeful Approach Despite the grim statistics, Ludwig remains optimistic. He believes that gun violence is more solvable than commonly thought, especially if we focus on changing behavior in the moments and places where violence is most likely to occur. His work at the University of Chicago Crime Lab has tested and supported many of these ideas with rigorous data. The GVPC continues to focus on the strategies of prevention, intervention, and response. Reducing gun violence effectively depends on preventive strategies such as secure firearm storage and robust community-based programming; targeted interventions for individuals at higher risk, including life skills development and engagement with credible messengers; and well-developed response protocols that minimize harm and provide support for victims. Several impactful events have occurred this year in response to these strategies. The city has completed the renovation of the Norwich Recreation Center. • The Norwich Recreation Center was renovated to serve as the hub for Roanoke's Youth and Gang Violence Prevention Unit under the leadership of Chris Roberts. This street unit has served 29 individuals this year with 1-3 engagements per week. During the past two years there has not been a gun related assault or injury among the clients served. •It includes a "Champions of Change Boxing" program and a private conflict resolution room. • Outreach efforts shifted in 2023 to target high-risk youth directly, especially those already involved with the juvenile justice system. • Since the strategic pivot, the program has reported no new gun-related charges or homicides among participants. The Gun Violence Intervention Program, now called PIVOT, has been reestablished under the leadership of Joe Carucci. • The Group Violence Intervention (GVI) program identifies and supports individuals most at risk of committing violent acts. The program offers services and accountability, aiming to intervene before violence keep all Roanoke citizens safe, alive, and free. The RESET team, under the leadership of Lloyd Merchant, continues to build trust in the community as they reach out to residents. The Roanoke RESET program short for Rapid Engagement of Support in the Event of Trauma is a community-based initiative led by the Roanoke Police Department. Its mission is to provide restorative support to neighborhoods affected by gun violence or other traumatic events, rather than serving as an investigative tool. From 1/1/25 -8/30/25 the RESET team had 29 deployments and met over 364 residents, distributing 62 gun locks and 128 Child ID Kits as part of their work. Key Features of RESET: •Community Volunteers: The team is made up of volunteers, coordinated by a RESET Coordinator funded by a grant from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services. • Neighborhood Walks: After a traumatic event or in areas with ongoing criminal activity, the RESET Team walks through neighborhoods to offer emotional support, resources, and connections to services. • Collaborative Effort: The team often works alongside other city departments including the Roanoke Police Department, Roanoke Sheriff's Office, Roanoke Fire- EMS, and social services. • Healing Focus: Their goal is to help residents heal from trauma, build trust, and foster safer communities through presence and engagement. • Proactive Outreach: In some cases, the team visits areas identified as high-risk before violence occurs, aiming to deter crime through community engagement. The GVPC continues to support the excellent work of FEDUP (Families Expecting Deliverance Using Prayer) as it helps family members of gun violence victims deal with trauma. FEDUP is a Roanoke-based nonprofit founded by families affected by gun violence. FEDUP provides: •Support for grieving families •Community education and advocacy •Prayer and memorial services • Resource connections (funeral assistance, housing, food, clergy) Additionally, the GVPC received funds from the 2024 Safer Communities Grant to establish two innovative programs, Planting Peace and Gun Lock Ambassadors. The Planting Peace program planted 12 trees (including two trees planted as backup in case some of the trees did not live) in Horton and Washington Park. Eight memorial ceremonies (remembering a total of nine victims) were held, each highlighting an unsolved murder case. This program brought comfort to the families and spotlighted the case, hoping that new leads would be reported. Additionally, both FEDUP and RPD were at the ceremonies offering support. Even though their cases had not been solved, the family members left these ceremonies feeling that the city cared about them and their loved one. We hope to continue this program each year. The Gun Lock Ambassador Program formed to have credible messengers emphasize the importance of locking up guns. Each Ambassador watched a 15 minute training video, received an Ambassador Shirt, gun locks and cards with gun lock information and lists of Roanoke City services, and is expected to distribute the locks to members of the community. The Ambassadors each receive a $100 grocery card as a thank you for their services. This is an ongoing program. We hope to have 50 active Gun Lock Ambassadors. We continue to be very concerned about the correlation between higher temperatures and higher gun violence. Roanoke has been part of national studies examining the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect, which reveals how certain neighborhoods experience significantly higher temperatures due to urban infrastructure and lack of green space. According to the Roanoke Island Mapping Campaign, Belmont, Avondale, and Gainsboro are among the hottest areas within the city. These neighborhoods have dense concrete infrastructure, fewer trees and green spaces and higher concentrations of low-income and minority populations. The study found temperature differences of up to 15°F across the city, with cooler zones in shaded, park-rich areas and hotter zones in urbanized, less vegetated neighborhoods. There is a strong Correlation Between Temperature and Gun Violence. Multiple national studies have established a statistical link between elevated temperatures and increased gun violence The key findings from national research include: • A JAMA Network study. found that 6.85% of all shootings in 100 major U.S. cities were associated with above-average temperatures. [jamanetwork.com] • The risk of shootings increased steadily with temperature, peaking around the 84th percentile of the temperature range. • Even moderately hot days (not just heatwaves) were linked to higher shooting rates. There are two main theories that explain why heat increases gun violence. The Temperature-Aggression Theory postulates that heat increases irritability and aggression, leading to more violent confrontations. The Routine Activities Theory suggests that warm weather brings more people outdoors, increasing interactions and opportunities for conflict. The Local Implications for Roanoke are important. Roanoke's Northwest quadrant, which includes some of the hottest neighborhoods, also experiences the highest rates of gun violence. In mid-2025, 9 out of 15 gun-related incidents occurred in Northwest Roanoke. These areas generally overlap with heat islands, suggesting a geographic and environmental correlation between temperature and violence. There are several Mitigation Strategies that the GVPC suggests that City Council consider: •Expanding tree canopy in vulnerable neighborhoods •Creating green spaces to reduce ambient heat • Aiding those in the hottest and economically depressed neighborhoods to receive aid for the expense of lowering the temperatures within their homes Peer-reviewed studies consistently find a correlation between higher rates of firearm ownership and increased incidents of homicide and suicide, with handguns carrying particular risks. Ongoing attention to legal and safety considerations remains essential for effective policy development and implementation. During the coming year we hope to have shareholder meetings in various quadrants of the city. The first will be on October 21 at The Hill Church in Northwest Roanoke. Even as we have seen a significant decrease in gun violence since 2023, we hope for further reductions through continued cooperation of all involved organizations, community involvement and city funding. Recommendations Based on our research, we make the following recommendations to City Council: 1. We request a working session with Council to further discuss priorities and funding based on the research provided in this report. 2. We strongly recommend that all current programs continue to be funded as their effectiveness is proven through real data. 3. We recommend City Council provide funding for FEDUP, as it provides a critical response strategy through its various programs. 4. Continued funding and aiding in the management of Planting Peace, including coordination with news media to highlight open cases. 5. Funding Groceries Not Guns. 6. A public communication/health campaign on the importance of gun locks for preventing gun homicide and suicide. including funding and aiding in the management of Gun Lock Ambassadors.Y v 7. A budgeted line item that allows for the implementation of new evidence-based gun violence reduction programs (after such program is approved by City Council). Furthermore, our goals for the coming months include: 1. Continued research into socio-economic factors ("root causes") that contribute to gun violence, and how those might be addressed. 2. Extreme Risk Protective Orders and the workplace 3. Addressing and reducing gun suicides We appreciate the great support that City Council has had for this work. GVPC Commissioners: Rabbi Kathy Cohen, Co-Chair Dr. Catherine Koebel, Vice-Chair Josh Johnson, Secretary Reverend Amy Hodge Valerie Koeppel Robert Lamour Elliott Major Jared Rose AGENDA FOR LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Date: October 20, 2025 Time: 2:00 P.M. Place: City Council Chamber Presiding: Council Member Terry McGuire I. Call to Order, Roll Call H. Opening Remarks of Chair McGuire III. Approval of Minutes IV. Discussion of the Legislative Items V. Upcoming Meetings VI. Other Business VII. Adjourn Next 2026 Legislative Committee meeting: November 3, 2025 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43304-102025. AN ORDINANCE to repeal and replace Ordinance No. 43260-090225, adopted September 2, 2025, to correct a scriveners error in the budget appropriations and revenue account numbers and adopting an Ordinance correcting the error, in connection with the acceptance of the Virginia Department of Emergency Management("VDEM")Disaster Assistance funds to the City, amending and reordaining certain sections of the Disaster Assistance funds appropriations, as detailed more fully infra; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. Ordinance No. 43260-090225, adopted September 2,2025,is hereby REPEALED. 2. The City of Roanoke hereby accepts reimbursement from the VDEM Disaster Assistance funding in the anticipated amount of $163,368 for expenses incurred by the Transportation Division for cleanup efforts and repairs completed on the Wiley Drive Bridge in Wasena and the roofs of several City facilities,as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated September 2, 2025. 2. The City Manager,or designee,is hereby authorized to execute and file on behalf of the City of Roanoke any and all documents required setting forth the conditions of this grant in a form approved by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required to implement and administer the foregoing Grant. 4. The following sections of the VDEM Disaster Assistance program fund appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Appropriations: Debris Removal 235-4110-0000-52010-400163 $114,466 Emergency Protection Measures 235-4110-0000-52010-400163 5,211 Road and Bridges 235-4110-0000-53064-400163 26,544 Buildings and Equipment 235-4110-0000-53057-400163 9,367 Administrative Costs 235-4110-0000-52030-400163 7,780 Revenues: Virginia Department 235-4110-0000-40127-400163 $163,368 of Emergency Management— Federal Pass-thru 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke,the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. /1 l: ATTEST: City Clerk's f, t , ; ! ` , ri { - i. THE DAVID RAMEY COLLECTION ..�, .-,,. _.7 1; I ...... 1 -, --- x . ,,._ -. •' - ,,. 1 . , .,,, . . fir ; � .. - - C • On September 30, 2025, Roanoke Public Library Foundation acquired :,.+ the David Ramey Collection, consisting of over 600 pieces of artwork, framed pieces, and manuscripts capturing Gainsboro's past ,ArtAs4 • Library staff began digitizing and indexing the collection, supported by deep historical research to preserve Gainsboro's cultural and �-- i -g, social legacy V `s 5 �t , �r >k. C sc ' � , i • Ramey's expressive ink and pencil art vividly documents pre-Urban Renewal Gainsboro, showcasing iconic places like Henry Street and I ' I t IIi' 4 AI , , " reflectingthe im act of community transformation ;1 y1 +g R P 111N9111.1111t011 �, �- - - , -, q� � ROANOKE PUBLIC LIBRARY" ��.., TAUB1�1AN �..v FOUNDATION �.0 1�;-.t, . o MUSEUM OF ART ROANOKE F uavea�IO RO"14Cli ARTSoNO of N ` , , : , , , y l J PUBLIC LIBRARIES 4 _t s o • 0. , 4, 1 . David ' 1 ',i I!- - 1- y 0 v �� 1, • cIt11t ? ciicIT1 v ``I 3 l ' 17 e1 L' s _ ,.. _ ' �M ' 1i This image shows the active demolition of Henry Street. I II lira a y t A, @, � An orange bulldozer is at the center of the image; it . ,. , ■ '� w ,12 i. =�—; � �: pushes away bricks and other debris. A sign in the -) i ' �,�7g,��if,,1 ". La p °f.'!toll ` bottom left reads, "Nicks," referring to Nick's Cafe on `1J � r 4. 'F' Henry Street. The Ebony Club is still standing on the right `{ �`, . ,-, , ,,�,.a ��l CI ;��`A _ side of the image. The power line has been cut off and is Iv �I ��s' +'' wrrrv.w,..... ,� _ „ 4. , ; _. , o dangling toward the ground on the demolition site. ?' ` :'Ai?A l�P". , ,-L?]. fit , Several workers are at the scene. Tall buildings are in the \��' �, ;\ tiA ,I background as well as a dump truck and a crane with a wrecking ball attached. R P Ijii,tlKE PUBLIC LIBRARY TAU B MAN �� T MUSEUM OF ART ROANOKE F FOUNDATIO ROANOKE BOBLPC EMMMIES nvr 4 lgxv ARTS COMMISSIOM '� s!-x's11,' ,.. .,. L.: . . , *, , ,. ,:,., . . ..tmr-,iton..... . ,L,:. , ___.,_, ..,..i_.„.1 ,71,m.:Tir-.17.11-.2.,..e.i..L.,...,,,4 -..:-. , ,.. ,. 1,i,. I�Y S 1 , ----i: IF. ,. .. ,i,, ;,.‘4.,.., : 1!-- !, !!! __!!!, 1 .fir , a y il ,� R :+! IE. 1 ♦ . 1� , Y a4 e, �> fi . j # /I *i64 fi e �y - ' a er•ill , # I _ 1 , "` .I .. J, , , , . , ,, , - - ''- v‘a, ,` �< 1 il .ir'-' at..)--! t - '-''. 11 / ..r ir ,.., 1 M ..,_� fir~ _' a Y tl -4. . "T ip �� _ _t 'iTi J a t�. I r sue' ' : -.1i�j,LTho.=:!.c 1 rw R P Ri u.vgce��K LIBRARY - TAUBMAN I;, T FOUNDATION MUSEUM OF ART ROANOK� F „�a, RO oNC>Mi c., ._ - I yyy���CCC _ _ a ... 99 'ill IyA d.>> P 4`r✓� __. _�rl tl. o W r'.""-mot ` — -_.. l.. F 1 1 1 I 1 41. t' I 1 r? 1 r a, f: " y v i , I' ,�� I � � C ,a. � 1 C' I , I. �,..... '1 "� I I' i �� - /-( 4r' 'w T }z- 1, `, 1 r... i / - 7 A' tar MK -"I I�Y _ A �'. 'F Y � ' f )''t , .. y , .: . `• it Y b i i s..rr. i'• ' i . ,�s� „I 1 J { u y` •r # A a"- Li, i it TAUBMAN � R P �1iKEPUBKUNrtAaY �i�h�1 `saTa r , MUSEUM OF ART ROANOKE F e0U DATI• ROANOKE P.N. 61 rT w LAWNS c.,.vewWxn Axis COMMISSION Al. '; ° CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK '� 215 Church Avenue,S.W., Suite 456 / Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 N.' GdN1 `1 Telephone:(540)853-2541 .b -k Fax:(540)853-1145 CEC_ELIA F.MCCOY,CMC E-mail: clerk@coanokeva,gov CECELIA T.WEBB,CMC City Clerk Deputy City Clerk RUTH VISUETE PEREZ,CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk October 23, 2025 Ben Crew, Agent Balzer and Associates, Inc. 1208 Corporate Cir SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Crew: I am enclosing copy of Ordinance No. 43305-102025 to repeal Ordinance No. 33098- 090396, adopted September 3, 1996,. to the extent that it placed certain conditions on a portion of certain property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S. W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, (ii) to repeal Ordinance No. 25825-112381, to the extent that it placed certain conditions on certain property located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, and (iii) to place new conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S. W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue, S. W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated September 18, 2025. The abovereferenced measure was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, October 20, 2025, and is in full force and effect upon its passage. Sincerely, Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC City Clerk Enclosure pc: Whitney Living Trust, 3820 Belle Aire Circle, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Denise Kennedy, 3814 Belle Aire Circle, SW, Roanoke, Virginia'24018 TLC Properties Inc., 1545 Patrick Road, NE, Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Jerry and Karen Conner, 426 N. Market Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Anama Enterprises, LLC, 4119 Brandon Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, 3807 Brandon Avenue, SW, Suite 245, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 MCBAL Corporation, 1208 Corporate Circle, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Ben Crew, Agent Balzer and Associates, Inc. Page 2 Pc: Lee-Hy Manor Associates, 3760 Stratford Park Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Lee-Hy Manor - Elderly Apts, Stratford Village Apts, 3780 Stratford Park Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc., 3807 Brandon Avenue, SW, Suite 2440, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 City of Salem, Planning and Zoning, 21 South Bruffey Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Norfolk Southern Railroad, 650 W. Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Julianne, LLC, 1213 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Hickey Patrick, 4424 Worthington Circle, Palm Harbor, 'Florida 34685 3764 Peters Creek Road, LLC, c/o Bill Toro, 8045 Hardy Road, Hardy, Virginia 24101 L&S Pauley Properties, LLC, PO Box 7, New Castle, Virginia 24127 Mer Mar Enterprises of Roanoke, PO Box 20269, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Db Property Roanoke, LLC, 110 Lynchpin Lane, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501 Ready Mix Property Holdinds, LLC, 3830-B Blue Ridge Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Layman Real Estate Holdings, LLC, 1630 W. Main Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Virginia Varsity Storage Apperson, LLC, 2087 Apperson Drive, Salem, Virginia 24153. Sibila Family, LLC, PO Box 20109, Canton, Ohio 44701 The Honorable Brenda Hamilton, Circuit Court Clerk Valmarie H. Turner, City Manager Timothy Spencer, City Attorney Kelvin Bratton, Director of Real Estate Valuation Angie O'Brien, Deputy City Manager Laura Carini, Deputy City Attorney Luke Pugh, City Engineer Jillian Papa, Director, Planning Building and Development Emily Clark, Secretary, City Planning Commission IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43305-102025. AN ORDINANCE (i) to repeal Ordinance No. 33098-090396, adopted September 3, 1996, to the extent that it placed certain conditions on a portion of certain property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S.W.,bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, (ii)to repeal Ordinance No. 25825-112381, to the extent that it placed certain conditions on certain property located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W.,bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, and(iii)to place new conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, and the entirety of 0 Brandon Ave S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104; and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. WHEREAS, CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to repeal Ordinance No. 33098-090396, adopted September 3, 1996, to the extent that it placed certain conditions on a portion of the property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122; WHEREAS, CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to repeal Ordinance No. 25825-112381, adopted November 23, 1981, to the extent that it placed certain conditions on the property located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W.; bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104; WHEREAS, CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, have made application to the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("City Council"), to place new 1 conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, and the entirety of 0 Brandon Ave S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated September 18, 2025; WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after giving proper notice to all concerned as required by §36.2-540, Code of the City of Roanoke(1979), as amended, and after conducting a public hearing on the matter,has made its recommendation to Council; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by City Council on such application at its meeting on October 20, 2025, after due and timely notice thereof as required by §36.2-540, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, at which hearing all parties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard,both for and against the proposed amendment; WHEREAS, this Council, after considering the aforesaid application, the recommendations made to this Council by the Planning Commission, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the matters presented at the public hearing, finds that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice, require (i) the repealing of Ordinance No. 33098-090396, adopted September 3, 1996, to the extent it placed certain conditions on a portion of the property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, 'S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122; (ii) the repealing of Ordinance No. 25825-112381, adopted November 23, 1981,to the extent it placed certain conditions on the property located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104; and (iii) the placement of new conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, and the entirety of 0 Brandon Ave S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, and is of the opinion that such properties remain zoned RMF-Residential District, with conditions as set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated September 18, 2025. 2 THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. Ordinance No. 33098-090396, adopted September 3, 1996, to the extent it placed certain conditions on a portion of the property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, is hereby REPEALED, and that the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be amended to reflect such action. 2. Ordinance No. 25825-112381, adopted November 23, 1981, to the extent it placed certain conditions on the property, located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, is hereby REPEALED, and that the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended,be amended to reflect such action. 3. That conditions set forth in the Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated September 18, 2025, are accepted and placed on a portion of the property located on 3840 Stratford Park Drive, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200122, and the entirety of the property located on 0 Brandon Avenue, S.W., bearing Official Tax Map No. 5200104, and that such property remain zoned RMF-Residential District, with conditions proffered by the applicant, and as follows: a. The applicant shall provide two (2) vehicular access points for the proposed development to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles. b. The applicant shall provide pedestrian sidewalks within the development to ensure pedestrian circulation internally and these sidewalks shall connect to the existing public right of way of Brandon Avenue. 4. Section 36.2-100, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, and the Official Zoning Map, City of Roanoke, Virginia, dated December 5, 2005, as amended, be 3 amended to reflect the conditions proffered by the applicant, as set forth in Zoning Amendment Amended Application No. 1 dated September 18, 2025. 5. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: Tea • City Clerk 4 1, - 77 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT \ ., f}W31 s 11 ii ti / ff To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting:- . October 20, 2025 Subject: Application by CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC, to: (1) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW, Official Tax Map No. 5200122, enacted through Ordinance No. 3.3098 on September 03, 1996, related to: the development plan; building form, number of dwelling units, and street design and maintenance; (2) repeal all conditions proffered as. part of a previous rezoning on property located at 0 Brandon Avenue SW, Official Tax Map.No. 5200104, enacted through Ordinance No. 25825 in 1981 ; and (3) place conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue SW; bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 5200122.and 5200104, respectively, related to:. access and sidewalks. The zoning of the property:is proposed to remain RMF, Residential Multifamily, with most of the property being zoned RMF, Residential District, with conditions. Summary: By a vote of 4-0, with one vacant seat on the board and Commissioner N. Maddox Dempah and Chair F. Martin absent, the Commission recommends . approval of the request to repeal proffered conditions and place new proffered conditions. The Commission finds Amended Application No_1 is consistent with the general principles within the City's Comprehensive.Plan, Greater Deyerle Neighborhood Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance as the property will be developed and used in a manner that supports the goals and purposes of these plans an.d regulations. Application Information: Request: Repeal of existing proffered conditions Place new conditions Owner/Applicant: Paige Lester, CSW Associates Roanoke, LC Agent: Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc. City Staff Person: Colette Baumgardner, Project Planner Address: 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and 0 Brandon Ave SW Official Tax No: 5200122.and 5200104 Site Area: +/- 27.78 acres Relevant Plans: Greater Deyerle Neighborhood Plan Proposed Land Use: Residential with conditions Future Land Use: Mixed Residential Filing Date: Original Application: August 25,.2025 Amended Application No.1 : .September.1,8, 2025 Public Notification and Outreach: • Cardinal News and Roanoke Rambler Legal Advertisement (runs twice) Required Public Notice - • Letters to Property owners abutting subject. State of Virginia Code property (includes across street/alley) . • Direct notice by mail includes neighboring localities if applicable Required Public Notice - • Posting a sign on the subject property with City of Roanoke Zoning hearing date and contact for additional Code information • Posting applications - applications received are posted on the PBD-Board & Commission page, providing instant access to the full application and supporting documentation • CivicSend Notices - Email notification subscription to share information with citizens and stakeholders according to their preferences. Land Use Applications touch PBD Outreach,Beyond the inbox of subscribers at least 2 times - State/City Code 1) Application filed, 2) Agenda and Staff Requirements Report Posting; 3) Amended Information, if applicable •. Neighborhood Leaders and=Civic. Stakeholders Email Notice - Direct email to leaders to share information; coincides with CivicSend Notices • CivicSend Notices to stakeholders subscribed to notices from the Planning Commission and PBD calendar • All applicants are strongly advised to discuss project with area neighborhood PBD Recommended ._. ' Applicant Outreach organizations and/or civic leagues and adjoining property owners and/or tenants 2 • The applicant presented at the Greater Applicant Outreach Deyerle neighborhood meeting on September 18, 2025. Background: The proposed zoning action spans two parcels 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW.. and 0 Brandon Ave SW, Tax Map Nos. 5200122 and: 5200104 respectively. Both parcels. have an underlying, zoning of RMF, Residential district, and the zoning action would repeal existing proffered conditions and place new proffered conditions on the parcels. Both parcels are currently undeveloped, and they are under the same ownership as the Brandon Point Apartments on the adjoining parcel- 3805 Stratford Park Drive SW, Tax Map No. .52001 11 ..The proposed change supports the development of the parcels into .a 1'95-unit-townhome community. The parcel known as 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW is approximately26.91 acres and has frontage on both Brandon Ave SW and Peters Creek Rd SW_ The parcel is currently undeveloped, with the exception of a maintenance building that serves the Brandon Point Apartments_ The entire property has the base zoning district of RMF, Residential, with generally the eastern part of the property conditionally zoned. The 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW property is divided between a western and an eastern portion by Barnhart Creek. The majority of the western portion it within the 100-year and 500-year floodplain, and this area is not subject to conditional zoning. The eastern portion of the parcel is governed by proffered conditions put into place in 1996 that relate to prospective residential development on site. The proffered conditions also extend into some of the western portion of the parcel to include the frontage onto Brandon Ave SW. The parcel known as O Brandon Ave SW, Tax Map No. 5200104 is undeveloped, with a large stormwater basin located within the right-of-way along the Brandon Ave SW. The basin was constructed in the mid-1990s as part of a street- widening project on Brandon Ave. The location of the stormwater basin resulted. in the parcel having a U-shaped front property line.-Most of the parcel is within the floodway and floodplain areas of Barnhart Creek.This parcel is zoned RMF, Residential, with conditions. Both parcels contain areas that would be subject to the zoning requirements of the Floodplain Overlay District and River and Creek Corridors Overlay District. The parcels also contain areas in the Windsor Lake Dam Inundation zone, which would be considered during the development review process. 3 Proposed Use/Development:. The proposed change would remove the conditions restricting the development of the property into a 195-unit townhome :community. The concept plan shows development on both sides of Barnhart Creek with two bridges crossing the creek on the northern and southern ends of the development.,At this time, the applicant is intending to sell the townhomes as individual homeownership opportunities.. First, the applicant proposes to repeal all proffered conditions at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and 0 Brandon Ave SW, Tax Map. Nos. 5200122 and 5200104 respectively. Both properties have a base zoning district of RMF, Residential. The proffered conditions at 3840 Stratford Park Drive-SW, Official Tax Map No:. 5.200122, were enacted through_Ordinance No. 3309.8 on September 03, 1996, and relate to: the development plan, building form, number of dwelling units, and street design and -maintenance. The project consisted of 32 townhomes :spread across four buildings and 60 apartments units in one three-story building. The development was intended to serve as an .expansion of the Brandon Point Apartments, but was never built. The 0 Brandon Ave SW property is zoned RMF with' conditions: The conditions were put into place through Ordinance No..25825 in 1981 when the property was rezoned from C-2, General CommercialDistrict, to LM, Light Manufacturing District. No development occurred On the parcel,'and the property was rezoned - to RMF during the City's comprehensive rezoning in 2005. The ordinance containing the proffered conditions cannot be located, so the applicant is requesting to repeal all conditions within Ordinance No. 25825. Additionally, the applicant has proposed to proffer conditions on a portion of 3840'Stratford Park Drive SW and all of 0 Brandon Ave SW_ The conditions would not extend to the area of 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW where the machine shop is located. The machine shop area of the parcel is planned to be combined with 3805 Stratford Park Drive SW and to continue to house maintenance equipment for the Brandon Point Apartments. The proposed proffered conditions relate to site access and sidewalks throughout the development_ It is Of criticalimportance from an emergency vehicle:perspectiveto have at least two access locations to the development. Proffered Conditions Requested to be Repealed:_ The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 33098 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number: 5200122. 1 _ That the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Balzer=and Associates, Inc:,: dated May 9, 1996, and 4 revised June 3, 1996, a copy of which is attached to the Petition for Rezoning as Exhibit B, subject to any changes required during site plan review. The three-story building shall contain no more than 60 units. The footprint of the building may change to accommodate minor changes in unit size and arrangement, but it will retain it's basic shape of two wings with a central lobby and elevator access core. 2. That the new portion of Stratford Park Drive will be constructed with curb and gutter to a minimum width of thirty feet, face of curb to face of curb and parking lots and road will be paved with a minimum thickness designed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation standards using the Vaswani. method. Sidewalk will be placed on one side of the new portion of the road. 3. That the extension of Stratford Park Drive will be constructed so that the roadway is above the 100 year base flood elevation. 4. That CSW Associates, and its successors and assigns, shall construct and maintain a hard surface connection, providing access for emergency vehicles from Lee Highway, access Official Tax Number 5200106, to Official Tax Numbers 52001 1 1 'and 5200122, in a location, of a width, and of a type approved by the Fire Marshall, between the North side of Delta.Plaza parking lot and Stratford Park Drive. The applicant hereby requests that all existing proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 25825 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number: 5200104 1 . All conditions enacted by Ordinance 25825 adopted by the City of Roanoke City Council on November 23 1981 Proffered Condition Requested to be.Adopted: The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as they pertain to a portion of Official Tax Number 5200122 and all of Tax Number 5200104. 1 . The applicant shall provide two (2) vehicular access points for the proposed_ development to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles. 2. The applicant shall providepedestrian. sidewalks within the development to ensure pedestrian circulation internally andthese sidewalks shall connect to the existing public right of way of Brandon Avenue. 5 Considerations: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses: The property is located just north of the Brandon Ave SW commercial corridor with the City limit on the western edge and the railroad tracks to the north. Given the geographic constraints and the property's size, the housing development would operate as an independent community with some connectivity to the residential area to the east. Zoning District Land Use North 1-2: Heavy Industrial and I-1 : Light Railroad, concrete plant, Industrial wholesale building supplies and materials South R-12: Residential Single-unit dwellings, vacant land East RMF: Residential; MX: Mixed Use Multi-unit dwellings, general or professional office buildings West* BCD: Business Commerce District; Vacant land, wholesale HBD: Highway Business District; distribution center; self-storage LM: Light Manufacturing facility; day care center *Located in City of Salem The future land use plan from the City Plan 2040 designates this area for mixed residential use_ As part of the application, the applicant provided a traffic impact study. The study provides current and projected estimates of the traffic counts and turning movements at the adjoining intersections. The study concluded, with validation of the City Traffic Engineer, that no traffic signal is warranted as a result of the development A right and left turn-lane are warranted with PM traffic, but not with AM traffic. A right turn-lane was found to create additional conflicts with pedestrians and is not recommended by the City Traffic Engineer_ A left turn- lane is already in place on Brandon Ave SW, and additional study may be needed on the functionality of the current conditions. Notably, residential development is currently permitted on Tax Map Number 5200122. The incremental traffic produced as a result of the proposed development is minimal as compared to what would be permitted under the current zoning conditions. Approximately 100 dwelling units are permitted in the proffered development plan and additional multifamily development are permitted in the area not subject to proffered conditions. Applicability/Appropriateness of Proposed Zoning District: The purpose of the RMF District is to provide for unified development of ten (10) or more dwellings. The subject property currently has the base zoning district of 6 RMF, and the property is guided in the neighborhood and comprehensive plans for residential multifamily or mixed residential, respectively. The RMF District is often located in the suburban character districts of the City', which is where the subject property is located.,The RMF district has . basic dimensional regulations for height, impervious surface, tree canopy, and setback. However, it does not have any supplemental regulations for building design, parking location, or glazing, which are.more necessary in the urban a areas of the City. The proposed proffered conditions require that sidewalks and two points of access be provided'to the.development. Both of these elements could not be required during the comprehensive development review process, but they are important for the functionality and longevity of the development. Availability of Other Property: The subject property is the only land available in the immediate area zoned for medium to high density residential use. Additionally, limited land is available across the City for development of this size and scale. The proposed townhome development would be the first of this size in the City of Roanoke. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: City Plan 2040 and Greater Deyerle Neighborhood Plan guide this property for residential development.. Policy/Action Plan Applicability to matter IE Priority Three: Neighborhood Choice Cornprehensiv The predominate housing Policy 4: Develop varied and affordable e Plane, type in the Greater Deyerle housing options in each neighborhood Interwoven Neighborhood is single unit Equity Theme dwellings. Large multifamily i dwellings are also present to the east of the site. The repeal of existing proffered j conditions and placement of I new conditions would allow development of a new housing type for the area in the form of townhomes"and increase the accessibility to l the area to a broader range of i citizens. The proposed concept plan Comprehensiv LBE Priority Four: Housing_ expand l Policy 3: Enable a range of housing would 1 ' City Plan 2040 I City Design: Urban Design - Plan Roanoke 2 City Plan 2040, Interwoven Equity Theme, City of.Roanoke, 2020 7 I Policy/Action Plan Applicability to matter types in each part of the community to e Plana, Livable homeownership opportunities achieve inclusive, livable Built by bringing forward a housing neighborhoods that prosper over time. Environment product missing within the Theme City, especially the Greater Deyerle area. HNP Priority Two: Tree Stewardship Comprehensiv The proposed concept plan Policy 1 : Increase the percentage of e Plan4, would remove most of the tree canopy within the City to 60% Harmony with trees on site and result in a Nature loss of tree canopy. Under the River and Creek Corridors Overlay District, vegetation would be preserved for 50 ft from the top of the bank on • either side of Barnhart Creek. Additionally, a 10% canopy would be required throughout the development. The Comprehensive Plan encourages tree canopy to be dispersed throughout the City and not to rely on large wooded sites to serve as the canopy for the City. New Development: Require new Greater With the proposed proffered developments to incorporate Deyerle conditions, sidewalks would amenities (e.g. sidewalks and curbs) Neighborhood be incorporated throughout Plan, p. 475 the development. Housing Clusters: Support the Greater This property is designated in rezoning of vacant or underutilized Deyerle the Greater Deyerle plan as large sites for mixed density housing Neighborhood being for multi-unit residential provided that it is consistent with the Plan, p. 486 development. The design guidelines of Vision 2001- development will be required 2020, preserves some green space to to provide a buffer along buffer existing development, and Barnhart Creek. Additionally, minimizes environmental impacts. the concept plans provides open space areas throughout the development for shared amenities. 3 City Plan 2040, Livable Built Environment Theme, City of Roanoke, 2020 City Plan 20401 Themes: Harmony with Nature - Plan Roanoke Greater Deverle Neighborhood Plan, City of Roanoke, 2006 6 Greater Deyerle Neighborhood Plan, City of Roanoke, 2006 8 Comments on Application: Planning Commission Work Session: The Planning Commission discussed the proposed rezoning at.their-work session on September 5, 2025. The Commissioners discussedconsiderations for how the development would relate to the adjoining Brandon Point apartments_ They also discussed the circulation of the development, site .lines to the development for exiting traffic, and the results of the traffic impact study. The applicant submitted Amended Application No. 1 offering proffered conditions for pedestrian amenities. The updated concept in Amended Application No. 1 also shows the planned open spaces throughout the development, however such elements on a concept plan are not proffered conditions and the design related to non-proffered elements may change. Interdepartmental Comments: General comments were provided from the Fire department and the Planning Building and Development department related to: site access, fire code standards, building and zoning subdivision requirements, the permitting process, and future planning efforts. The Planning comments also highlighted the importance for adequate site circulation for pedestrians, personal vehicles, and emergency vehicles. The Transportation Department provided cornments- about the results of the traffic impact study and how to align the findings with pedestrian access. Amended Application No. 1 addressed the comments from staff with the proposed proffered conditions and updated application. Public Comments: A property owner adjoining Windsor Lake contacted the City Emergency Management Department to inform theCity that the project area is within the Dam Inundation Zone for Windsor Lake. The Dam Inundation Zone information would be considered during the development review process. Public Hearing: Two residents of the Greater Deyerle neighborhood spoke at the public hearing _ regarding the traffic impact of the project. Both residents support the project overall, but expressed concerns about the additional pressure multiple recent projects along Brandon Avenue will put on the roadway network in the Greater Deyerle neighborhood:. Speakers specifically noted the need for additional sidewalks and bicycle infrastructure in the neighborhood and a.desire to work 9 with the City on a review of the transportation needs within the entire Greater Deyerle neighborhood. The Planning Commission asked questions of the applicant regarding housing cost, on-street parking, and traffic study results. The applicant responded that the project is currently planned to be market rate housing for fee simple sale to provide homeownership opportunities in the City. In the current concept plan, no on-street parking is anticipated, but guest parking is dispersed throughout the community. Regarding traffic, the applicant supported the results of the traffic study and highlighted the City Traffic Engineer concurred with the results. The Planning Commission had minimal discussion on the application. Some Commissioners expressed concerns about the traffic impacts of the project, but concluded that the proposed zoning action would be an overall benefit to the City by diversifying and increasing housing options. Conclusions and Recommendations: The principal consideration is whether the proposed change is consistent with City.Plan 2040 and Greater Deyerle Neighborhood Plan_ Both of the plans support the residential use of this property_ The proposed repeal of all existing proffered conditions and placement of new proffered conditions, with the underlying zoning of the property proposed to remain RMF, Residential, is in keeping with the overall goals of these plans. Z7. 54 u Pamela D. Smith, Vice-Chair City Planning Commission Enclosure: Attachment A, Zoning District Map Distribution: Ms. Valmarie Turner, City Manager Angela O'Brien, Assistant City Manager Jillian Papa, Director of Planning Building and Development R. Wayne Leftwich,Jr., Planning Manager Katharine Gray, Planning Commission Agent Timothy Spencer, City Attorney Laura Carini, Senior Assistant City Attorney Paige Lester, CSW Associate Roanoke, LC Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc. 10 Attachment A ZONING DISTRICT MA ' Addresses:3840 Stratford Drive SW �, en e • - - .-ago r��, �; �e q . e q &0 Brandon Ave SW Tax Nos: 5200122&5200104 "" �� Legend = Area to be Rezoned Streets j Zoning • - 1 AD:Airport Dev 'l-s_.d 4:. a:�k, .,a,.. la CG:Commercial-General ~ 1.t a_F 9'`f' {' CLS: Commercial-Large Site • *: F ..t. CN:Commercial-Neighborhood jail D: Downtown e I-1: Light Industrial mow w�.a s ® +++4+e°es°'o 4 a°'iey°eaNEN I-2: Heavy Industrial 'ei4'i s,, 1ao' °+s ''�a°e*e*a°° e+i'e+e+e� I � +:s•e +______________________________________ +,,'q''.'"+ 00 .40 r Man 4;44. ....4 1. �4•!''i;h�#+AOINPUD:Institutional Planned Unit Dev ++ +"a' y�' ?•**** 40+b4ree+e40'+ee++' ri r+++++ +++ O MN IPUD: Industrial Planned Unit Dev ,�41+*++++.4*** ++• �44+ u b R p eee ♦e+•rb++ + " MX: Mixed Use + ,....................to.+ O ram' , r'' a �. •. { Is •e•♦•eee♦e+ +4i 'r d e +e+e♦ t rt w �, MXPUD: Mixed Use Planned Unit Dev „�+e�++�+e+ ,�+,,+ i� ��.,� c�" ��. R-12: Residential a t+++ +*► •0, RiyF,des, r§ *+°+++°+ ++++i+e +++�+fir+ .� E- i R 3: Residential ►a ` +o�+o� . ,,y, ,• ,Multifarnuiy t r.x M 1 R-5: Residential ++°e ++ `+++++ire +i�o'r '' ,- ' 01 i .�+++e++*++ ee+i ,„ R-7: Residential a 41O+O# + '' t1 .^ tV c.' °. ,•,w f4 r RA:Agricultural A4 ++eye 4, g /� RaltScl RM-1: Residential ►x+•4141► �{ z. . . Nlultifa , -•.foci•,,r,IS I ,' n< sry - RM-2: Residential SZ 7 Y ite a � RMF: Residential 0 Res S '� `�, R 12: RA: .•;901G1 q ROS: Recreation and Open Space Single-Family KIII Res-Agricultural1. UF: Urban Flex 40 t , s �`I� �� v€.€i .0 " '• m ;& !''° ark . I aa: . ., ' ® UC: Urban Center GRA\°' 020I E o "' , ,a , ," c `� ,i Outside of City Limits " ra o i & , :D g�J 51g03 i : Res M,, „ztimr[y-', 0 225 450 900 Feet ` 5180303 L Contli#onal #. i I t I i i I .� . 180118 518012u 5180334' ., ,r.., ',„ ;-•), 1., 4®[ iJ .Am --. mer . - AppIca ®i. , _•Dep artment of Buildend Planning, Building andDevelopment Room 170,Noel C Taylor Municipal Building • , - 215:Church Avenue,S.W. . Roanoke,Virginia 24011_ Click Here to Print Phone:.(540)853-1730 Filing.Date: 7 /9 2o,20 :Submittal'Number: Amended Application No.1 - L 4j!SCx1 5(4, f.eit.,di-?Egi _l t Rezoning,Not Otherwise Listed 0 Amendment'of Proffered Conditions :( 'Rezoning,Conditional. ❑Amendment of Planned Unit Development Plan 0 Rezoning to Planned Unit Development ❑Amendment'of Comprehensive Sign Overlay District [:Establishment of_Cornprehensive Sign Overlay District Address: 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW-&0 Brandon Avenue.SW . Official Tax No(s). 5200104 so portion of 5200122 . Existing 0 Without Conditions Ordinance #33098&025825 - Zoning:: RMF,.Residential Multifamily ©,With Conditions No(s),(If' 0-Planned.Unit.Development applicable): . Requested ` Without Conditions Proposed Dwellings Zoning:. RMF,Residential Multifamily .With Conditions Land User: • D.Planned,Unit Development _ - P .o C Vi . � �t teIQ,JC7 . a �. Name: CSW Associates Roanoke,LC//CSW Brandon Frontage,LLC Phone Number. +1 (540)989-3653 \._ress; 3807 Brando venue SW uite 245 Roanoke,VA 24018.Th E-mail: 4111IMIIIMEMOD CLQ t A,C/{ l Cy'ci(kt Sir r a Name: Phone:Number: Address: E-mail: -Appk..rssiratn: . Y(4-' %C _`i :C .A..17=af lii l-rii i1• ail E1..7 ft- 1`-ft- . Name: fBalzer and Associates,Inc c%o flen Crew �Phone.Number: +1 (540).772-9580 Address: 1208.Corporate Circle Roanoke,VA 2401.8 , E-mail:. 40.......00_ . . Autadied Awn Si sgre: . r , one g Amendmen . @Ccil CD ec .- 71112 Ralwati AM o-,@glikiltu tbi a*.,,-ft-itocilv, . ,ig Completed application form and checklist 'tg Written neriative.explainiN the reason for the request. L5 Metes and bounds description,if appliCable• . . V Filing fee. • - • kti:"&i ItaUffittil tiffsil oilliggftirds.<1,ch-g fcatervgjfebtm fig atioiliffire4; r Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item.2(cy in Zoning Amendment Procedures, littC0.iftli tk,TO.Atit,tite. lb Vitt RIO gtlt 1.0 c.I.Nrolica ' . _ .... . ,. .. . . . . - RWritten proffers., See-the-Citys_Guide to Proffered Conditions Concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of item'20'in Zoning Amendment Procedures. Please Jabal as 'development plan'if proffered. • tijkattiallittin cttid:p.ii.0 ft,tlig fd1w814 coo gi )111 atAiditt:* . . r Development plan meeting the requirements of Section-36.2-326 of the City's Zoning Ordinance; _.. , ,.. ... . .... FIT g.1E:tillff.g.1.1aigvg MA(m1.49 66'4'0,(IT@ ittope fifitio it§ago-tit-at r Comprehensive Signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2-306(d)(2)of the City's Zoning Ordinance. ., . .. . . .. _ IRy ail Erairo if!ori p-ditic6gad. 0 --.,iR4fribriffq cfrnM1).-1,,))tgbfiligt. ' Amended development Or concept plan meeting the Application Requirements of awn''2(c)'in Zoning Amendment Procedures, if applicable. r- Written proffers to be-aMended. Seethe City's dulde tO Proffered Conditions: :r Copy of previously adopted Ordinance., , Rof t,tfitiva amT kvidtptail?MtVraiti,Big tItom.11.q: mg al.M5:2-,alb-4(M' ,r Amended development plan meeting the requirements of Section 36,2-326ef the City's Zoning Ordinande. ,i--- Copy of previously adopted Ordinance. . ,. . . _ ift.ga),Till'Efiv..0 0'0 0920 RagiTiliMAk,UM'ftlitivilig iititg gtrD, itGagnitigt ✓ Amended comprehensive signage plan meeting the requirements of Section 36.2-836(d)of-the City's Zoning Ordinence. 1"- Copy of previously adopted OrdinanCe. . _ . . . . _ . irol ffi fp@fpDXli illTX rquii-G-, •@(;cdrg&vat agclrix;atiVatilkail g) ljl'a,glisyn tra NI cadlq iialgi olko)tc:,at ithottgy, ✓ A Traffic Impact Study in compliance with Appendix B-2(e)of the City's Zoning OrdinanCe. rft-f t.?10,04 ca....4 tem rcgorm ti.fii-ag firag e9m3,0_@ l'ict al illytfla t v[\WI r,tftft.011(040 rfat--1 gao lill,witiltligt: • •I Cover sheet. • . 1 Traffic impact analysis. . ✓ Concept plan. • ' ✓ Proffered condition ,if applicable. r'Required fee. . . - *An electronic copy of this application and checklist can be found at www.roattokeva.gOv/plannIngdommission. A complete packet must besubitittedIaohlimeenapplication is amended,:unless otherwise Specified'by-staff:7:- -1 • .-..-- •. .• . Brandon Station - Project Narrative: Introduction: CSW Associates Roanoke, LC and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC (Owner/Applicant) is requesting a zoning amendment on two (2) parcels that are currently zoned Residential Multi-Family District with Conditions for the construction of approximately 195 townhouse dwellings. Existing Tax Parcel and Zoning Summary: Tax Parcel:5200122 Owner: CSW Associates Roanoke, LC Existing Zoning: Residential Multi-Family District(RMF)with a portion having Conditions (Existing Ordinance 33098)and a portion without conditions. Proposed Zoning: Residential Multi-Family District(RMF) Tax Parce1:5200104 Owner: CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC Existing Zoning: Residential Multi-Family District(RMF)with Conditions (Existing Ordinance#25825) Proposed Zoning: Residential Multi-Family District(RMF) All existing proffered conditions related to tax parcels (5200122 and 5200104) and the associated existing ordinances (33098 and 25825) are being requested to be removed. The area to be rezoned is approximately 27.78 acres. This is comprised of a portion of tax parcel 5200122 and all of 5200104. Approximately 1.28 acres is being combined with the adjacent tax parcel 5200111 as it contains an existing maintenance building that serves the existing Brandon Point Apartments community. The two (2) existing tax parcels are currently vacant except for the previously mentioned maintenance building and associated service area. Community Vision and Details: The Brandon Station community within the City of Roanoke is planned to be located on vacant parcels with access from Brandon Avenue. These parcels are not without development challenges, and the proposed development plan has been carefully crafted to react to on-site conditions including Barnhardt Creek and topographical challenges while creating a new community within the City for new residents. Two exhibit plans have been provided including a civil concept plan as Exhibit A and an architectural perspective for the proposed townhouse dwelling units indicated as Exhibit B. Both are included as part of the overall amendment request. The civil concept plan indicated as Exhibit A outlines the proposed exterior improvements for the project to complement the proposed architectural style of the townhomes. The Page 1 of 3 Brandon Station community boasts approximately 195 units of new construction within the proposed project. Primary vehicular and pedestrian access is being provided from the public right of way of Brandon Avenue. A secondary access point is being proposed to be connected to Stratford Park Drive (Private Drive) as part of the project. See the attached traffic study for additional details related to transportation/traffic. An internal network of private drive aisles are being proposed as a loop drive within the development to serve the proposed residential units. The project will be served by public water and sanitary sewer utility services by the Western Virginia Water Authority. There is already an existing sanitary sewer main that crosses the site flowing south to north. Brandon Avenue public right of way contains a public 12" waterline that will be extended to serve the site. The development will contain standard improvements related to stormwater management and other dry utilities to serve the project. The project contains two overlay districts including Floodplain and River and Creek Corridor which are shown on the attached development plan and have been carefully considered as part of the project to ensure compliance and meet the requirements of these overlay district and supplemental regulations associated with each. On-site vehicle parking will be within the garage and/or provided driveway for each unit. Additional guest parking spaces are being provided in strategic locations throughout the development to meet this need. Brandon Station will provide amenity areas as part of the project including recreational areas, dog park, open space, and natural community areas adjacent to Barnhardt Creek. Public concrete sidewalks are existing and in place along Brandon Avenue. In addition to this, the applicant has chosen to extend private sidewalk along the entry drive from Brandon Avenue into the development (Private) for additional pedestrian accommodations and connectivity to the community. The pedestrian connectivity will continue within the community with a network of sidewalks that will loop thru the development. The owner/applicant is anticipating a partnership with a highly reputable builder for the construction of the townhomes. The proposed units are clustered in blocks of four(4)to eight(8)in each building. The units are anticipated to be a mix of two-story slab construction with some units including an additional basement level based on final grading for the site. The townhouses are anticipated to include approximately 3 bedrooms/2 bathrooms/1 car garage with approximately 1,450 sf. Each unit has front/ground level entry either through the covered porch or garage. Future Land Use: City Plan 2040 Future Land Use (FLU) map identifies this area as Mixed Residential which aligns with the current zoning district of Residential Multi-Family (RMF). The overall district remains the same with removal of the existing proffered conditions for the current development plan. This project supports the FLU by providing an overall use that is Page 2 of 3 complementary to these goals and associated improvements with access from Brandon Avenue. Neighborhood Planning: The site is located within the Northeast section of the Greater Deyerle neighborhood planning district which has a variety of uses/sub-development areas within this planning area of residential, commercial, and industrial. The area of the project is mainly surrounded by commercial, industrial, and multi-family dwellings. The proposed density of the project and underlying zoning district supports the proposed use including a well-balanced neighborhood with various uses which includes supporting a range of housing options to serve the neighborhood and greater community. City of Roanoke Development Regulations: This project will be developed in accordance with all applicable regulations including, but not limited to, the Roanoke City Zoning Ordinance and Roanoke City Stormwater Management Design Manual. The project is located within two overlay districts including the River and Creek Corridor and Floodplain districts. Each of these districts have specific requirements as defined in the City of Roanoke Zoning Ordinance which have been considered and will be followed as part of the Comprehensive Development Plan process. Transportation: As part of this project, we have provided a traffic impact study to evaluate the impact of the proposed project and the existing traffic network in the area of the proposed access points. The attached traffic study was previously provided/submitted to the City of Roanoke for initial review as the project was being developed to confirm direction, scope, and understandings regarding potential impacts. The road infrastructure currently in place along Brandon Avenue is able to support the proposed project. Additional details are contained within the provided traffic study which outlines these specifics. The private entry drive into and throughout the development will be designed/constructed to support emergency vehicles and their associated access. Summary: The project reinforces the goals of the base zoning district, future land use map, and meets the intent of neighborhood for this area. The Roanoke area continues to need and supported by the demand of additional housing options. While all types of housing are needed,there are already a number of apartments in the area. CSW believes this townhouse project is ideal as it would provide entry level home ownership options for the area with a variety of home types to the community. Page 3 of 3 PROFFERED CONDITIONS TO .BE REPEALED BY TWO (2) ORDINANCES: (1) The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions enacted by.Ordinance No. 33098 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number: 5200122 1. That the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated May 9, 1996, and revised June 3, 1996, a copy of which is attached to the Petition for_Rezoning as Exhibit B, subject to any.changes required duringsite plan review. The three-story building shall contain no more than 60 units. The footprint of the building may change to accommodate minor changes in unit size and arrangement,-but it will retain it's basic shape of two wings with a central lobby and elevator access core. 2. That the new portion of Stratford Park Drive will be:constructed with curb and gutter to a minimum width of thirty feet, face of curb to face of curb and parking lots and road will be paved with a minimum thickness designed in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation standards using the Vaswani method. Sidewalk will be placed on one side of the new portion of the road. 3. That the extension of Stratford Park Drive will be constructed so that the roadway is above the 100 year base flood elevation. 4. That CSW Associates, and its successors and assigns, shall construct and maintain a hard surface connection, providing access for emergency vehicles from Lee Highway, access Official Tax Number 5200106, to Official Tax Numbers 5200111 and 5200122, in a location, of a width, and of a type approved by the Fire Marshall, between the North side of Delta- Plaza parking lot and Stratford - Park Drive. (2) -The applicant hereby requests that all existing proffered conditions enacted by Ordinance No. 25825 be repealed as they pertain to Official Tax Number: 5200104 - 1. All conditions enacted by Ordinance 25825 adopted by the City of Roanoke City Council on November'23, 1981 Proffered Conditions to be Adopted: The applicant hereby requests that the following proffered conditions be adopted as they pertain to a portion of Official Tax Number 5200122 and all of Tax Number 5200104 1. The applicant shall provide two (2)vehicular access points for the proposed development to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles. 2. The applicant shall provide pedestrian sidewalks within the development to ensure pedestrian circulation internally and these sidewalks shall connect to the existing public right of way of Brandon Avenue. - WPS Job#R0062372.00 PP A Dated 07-29-2025. 1 ak .' _A . B JS,j r]ER METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE REZONED & ASSOCIATES BEING A PORTION OF CITY OF ROANOKE TAX MAP PARCEL ID 5200122, PER PLAT RECORDED AT PiANNERS/ARCHITECTS MAP BOOK 1, PAGES 1896 AND 1897 IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT CITY OF ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS a Westwood Company ROANOKE,VIRGINIA AND ALL OF CITY OF ROANOKE TAX MAP PARCEL ID 5200104,, PER DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED AT INSTRUMENT#24003084 IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE 1208 Corporate Circle VA Roanoke,VA 24018 CIRCUIT COURT OF CITY OF RONOAKE,VIRGINIA 540.772.9580 www.balzer.cc BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF LEE HIGHWAY, BEING THE MOST SOUTH Roanoke WESTERLY CORNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; Richmond . New..iver Valley THENCE DEPARTING THE NORTH LINE OF LEE HIGHWAY, N08a58'17"E A DISTANCE OF 392.56 FEET Shenandoah Valley WITH TAX ID 5200103 AND 5200101 TO A POINT; THENCE N82°20'33"W A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET WITH TAX ID 5200101 TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG WITH CITY OF SALEM TAX ID 281-1-2.5, 280-1-1,AND 280-1-1.1 N08°06'00"E 959.82 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE N&W RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE WITH THE N &W RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FOLLOWING TEN COURSES: N87°25'00"E A DISTANCE OF 1437.26 FEET TO A POINT, N88°31'00"E A DISTANCE OF 98.52 FEET TO A POINT, S89°11'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.60 FEET TO A POINT, S85°59'00"A DISTANCE OF 97.43 FEET TO A POINT, S83°18'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.48 FEET TO A POINT, S80°12'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.32 FEET TO A POINT, S77'09'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.45 FEET TO A POINT, S74°22'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.47 FEET TO A POINT, S71°22'00"E A DISTANCE OF 97.40-FEET TO A POINT,- S67°58'00"E A DISTANCE OF 127.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWEST LINE OF PETERS CREEK ROAD, S.W. (PLATTED AERIAL WAY DRIVE); THENCE WITH PETERS CREEK ROAD,S.W.(PLATTED AERIAL WAY DRIVE) RIGHT OF WAY S23°38'10"W A DISTANCE OF 85.22 FEEET TO A POINT,THENCE.WITH A CURVE TO.THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 612.96 FEET,A LENGTH OF 10.96 FEET,AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF 523°07'26"W 10.96 FEET TO A POINT, T [O THENCE LEAVING THE RIGHT OF WAY OF PETERS CREEK ROAD, S.W.(PLATTED AERIAL WAY DRIVE) m FOLLOWING TAX ID 5200112 THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: 'F N75°01'00"W A DISTANCE OF 313.89 FEET TO A POINT, S17°56'00"E A DISTANCE OF 9.33 FEET TO A POINT, o. o E 0) c 'c .g •9 c w p41Ak ji BALER THENCE WITH THE TAX ID 5200108 FOR THE FOLLOWING SIX COURSES: & ASSOCIATES N74°50'24"W A DISTANCE OF 272.33 FEET, 'PLANNERS/ARCHITECTS N85°59'00"W A DISTANCE OF 92.30 FEET, ENGINEERSISURVEYORS N89°11'00"W A DISTANCE OF 92.80 FEET, S88°31'00"W A DISTANCE 37.48 FEET, S24°40'00"W A DISTANCE OF 210.00 FEET, S24°51'17"W A DISTANCE OF 2.40 FEET; THENCE WITH TAX ID 5200111 THE FOLLOWING SEVEN COURSES: A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET,A LENGTH OF 325.13 FEET,AND A CHORD BEARING.AND DISTANCE OF N81°07'55"W 320.06 FEET TO A POINT, S08°28'53"E A DISTANCE OF 58.49 FEET TO A POINT, A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 470.00 FEET,A LENGTH OF 503.23 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S50°50'44"W 479.53 FEET TO A POINT, N69°49'30"W A DISTANCE OF 36.43 FEET TO A POINT, N84°18'00"W A DISTANCE OF 56.80 FEET TO A POINT, S01°54'17"W A DISTANCE OF 356.46 FEET TO A POINT, S11°02'00"W A DISTANCE 89.70 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE THROUGH TAX ID 5200122 S11°02'00"W A DISTANCE OF 190.00 FEET TO A POINT WITH TAX ID 5200104; THENCE WITH TAX ID 5200104,S78°58'00"E A DISTANCE OF 134.67 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH TAX ID 5200105,S70°59'00"W A DISTANCE OF 80.19 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH TAX ID 520105 AND 5200125, S05°08'00"E A DISTANCE OF 266.47 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH TAX ID 5200124,574°33'00"W A DISTANCE OF 57.59 FEET TO A POINT ALONG LEE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THIENCE WITH LEE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY THE FOLLOWING 5 COURSES: N15°08'38"W A DISTANCE OF 141.74 FEET TO A POINT, N39°32'58"W A DISTANCE OF 73.80 FEET TO A POINT, N72°38'27"W A DISTANCE OF 117.38 FEET TO A POINT, >. S31°28'27"W A DISTANCE OF 175.95 FETTO A POINT, N83°10'S0"W A DISTANCE OF 110.61 FEET POINT OF BEGINNING. 12 . 0) .y N o TOTAL AREA TO BE REZONED: 27.788 ACRES(1, 210,463 FT), MORE OR LESS. o • *DESCRIPTION HEREON IS COMPILED FROM DOCUMENTS OF RECORD AND MAY e BE AFFECTED BY THE RESULT OF A CURRENT BOUNDARY SURVEY. O W Page 2 of 2. • • z VP�_ JJ/` rr ..;.z# "'Fart 3 ' y7 =T �, Y,•z '�.� .? t„ `': ,w `.Sr i r , .: n 4 E- £+. .. t t •/. r r ,r■ unn , r+ 3 ' r r !' 9'- r @,;. .t4s7r r,7-t r1.iLF! i" �i�ieri iruw - ? J � j ,,p � "�� t, n ipn f r f '�� �"`�. �'t t',pi i� 4-tit,.5}���� I I€JI 11U7` %`0 J 11 `,q $l q 5i s � c11 J l aril r r0{Si knit E 1_ , S' € . ' it. 1. j am.. --.7.:i '.te r �•r�. c3, yL t , r ,aY �j -1y . " !,�!,o. �.'„,,,ct"1]41 iiittt4333 `,.. ' s z'' �` £i kP -, I p4 ; .fib YJii,1 !I [ it 1� _ `r �';1 .• T ot@ d # GEl- .1 0; ,7 {$r, I J i ff i8 (�j� nglLtt /r * �3 • �ir . 4 j$'/y , f. ' B �j� yt Will' LTF[P n� r 4' c ' I � �S' ,,Z , 3e.' a .s-• le, A^ �.yxe*r �,,, ��1 :rTr414 'f -�, ^`«r ��''. ,a R 7.7 J" t X r > x e�•' �, 4 t ., F�Ir:;-,-s,�qp'� i 11, t 'r ��}� 1 -,114 t,t i s yy�� ; - F•,:, , r., _w, T r! f rItgq l i e?,-- f ,., #.k`,r y � :y, �v'Y ,� At t ;:;.. � w,.. � dlJ::Pe.i���, - t4'1�,.\•:' aiLl: � iS�}•if iY- S'r ' r rrr •■ , ,t 'd t e i- '� - 3 / t% a�ry *tea', i [ ...,-,,,,,, 'k- a z n S + ,. " ,, j„e�w Bey .,,,., - 1--- ,• 6 �Ar ., i �t) 9--(([t ,�}®aft � ■ .I r 'j� F ? !T r. "� . . tYr,i i2 l J: p @!1: +- ICI.w'IS�.t z3 {3L� } ,I/Lti '`�`"4 > "" �i rwa r r #_D iT.` '6x;�1.61 }. I F Tlr r ^'' fA S i Ei� J i 7 ir. � , -.s C"`,i� ., / ,i *{r i ..}' °t K 41a-; I. LC , x: Y '.r t "��t�I\r ,� f' �ri-� _■,11. aErERtE . f 1 4i 1 �:Ig, ., r 6C �` b' L� gig J t ' '� ozo -� U'{jy� ,r. j°" £ J i n�� +�1 � + LQ�" B � S r .� � no � _ '-> / �ter :^ �r�: ) . �.�, '...'"I'''''''' p S - ,A ti '4 td , r - i�fi ti 'i {v l +fr�4 ,,,it, . t r "*-r r+ -r r s 55 :b �, r - st 2 , 5i 1�ift1 �r�.�j y•.at \ 7J x-t HOC N" ,,i,,y xi i T, ,,,,, /� § .. Jli s f �J 'jt;.d *s� . ♦�. • �� �- 3F �j. 1�r ��69` .�� 'Hit - - 1. -4# a. �? �Ki;�� N3 r-t .f� ., \ �� 1 S;fd$i Yrs#I �-_�. �•-. ■, t 7 If-1;--•--1'"- -'7;-----'•:;,..1‘7j.'•e'"t--. ' ---1-1r4—:;-';':,A:•-,feAs 1 .i _-.--*'--_1:-:'`..,,..!34,.;, _••.•:',;.*44.": tii•-•-r r-'•;4; no-% •$.'i '. . - ,t�� �' F'A-'its) o'',��z «++fft .,x f �',V -,�P�e I.F '.' €s� i 4 �♦ T � '4 `N. i }q is £ t ,,, .....,,,, ..,` "" i R JJf .aY -t s r ' ' dr ate -•+'� a '� 8 a� s c a, I:.+dt> -;.-1 1 ... t7- a .;�r*. f.�"i ,� fy� ♦ �' -u g� - . , ;,�v + +`,,. R '' • . tip- ',S�". ��� e ... �2 t T> �i \c l'i•'' s ,- •° • a e t -.., •s 1'r,`r+ - = , psi t` s ., .{4.. ,_ '"T„-y s' ,C .. ec 4, a t, ti ,, . .a, BA '� • s s Yy \ ,. 1 i rT s,.e ire✓� . 4,. ai —II ' 1i.-:. ''fib --.:tI i-1- - �i,... -,.--,,A.t.. "r.. .._._.!_L:.- ---,— '' I F a fir_F 4a A € Y € € g a s ` xy ti� a"0 t J s ' 4 * j J i i*" ^ dAti R v 111 a E _ St aA gE -% ;g rr s r ; _ a - s- 'f ( t: ` ,�1t,Z3 ,, ,z, .yg�r. �4 i s i z& 4 ^ " 8 1 c ' g } ! fi "7 E.K. o a' - -�`r x�1 .tN p 7. -gF, a • ,-,..,: t ,. ' ; ; 11 ti . .1L...; ''..::,4..,.-:_ .:..1.,:'..4.!,;11„,....7:,..3,;:s.'''';'. F.,,,f,,, -,,,,,,, - . . Q w r t o 43d 1$t' ,•;7 u I • j 6 ,. r - ._ ° ' 8 °R' 's� y2 ill; d°� ''fit- a 'gy'k $ 3 --'F~" �7j" 'J ii.. iqi4 r- ' 's it t f ,r r I E u < d d .' t i. . F - s 5 g . _ May - 3..� 4 t ilr ..gyp r"In in ILI gm 3 g I BRAND ON STATION h;w ., a>( 3= CONcePTPLaN PRELIMINARY € s m % .NOT FOR CON57RliCT_ION 5:3 !F .i 6 id iA ana....»was.. ,--ik\, . / `. ! N#UMW le \ 1 -, - /14, 40, /�\ 1 1 I. - bd2� - bd21 - bd21 -�- - j�` \II ` / 1 1 r — — ,-,, - �- 1 '' E Og 611r.--.__II_ink ., ,..... ...._ ok.. ...........- ___.___,.....„______ _ i \ ._..., • 8" BAN. e II / �/ ' - ``\j�� \\ '- 1r1v� 6 r - r \ \\ 6_ • 4. � . + . I ram: bda - - _ - - °dI \ Od, , ,� c3.v I 1 i�C rah „... ^ ,�i , y. \ y I �:- _ Off. \� its N o.`0 9� r \, 4k , *n i •A 2 CS len- N -,.... I it, Mail 11 II CD-CO, 01 `„1 3• _ Z �S9\ \\-, \ A. l li f / `'� cz '� \\ 2 1 i 11 _t — ( ,-dimi ' _ \ti - oo \,...7 z' \\ : et \ A , • ,........ _.,..... .. .,...... \\ . , ..., . . \ t�' ahhhhhtkjFJfljj1fl r s' ; / ' / - 8a-tn-zr......1141 li gilibil ,i : # , . 1 ---- tt..........,„„„. , • . 0 I \ !.. i ft i i ii, . 1 i \ it so ,rl I 1 ttd / I \`, 1 I il II 1 ` :I3w,Np 8 ' -- -121 I _I. i i ,,,,,,, -I _ . .. , , , ,,,,,,,„ nil , 1 , —�� 4 ,� 1 17/S 4 1 1 i\` �1,7/�([S/O�,9��iyff07 S53N/S/!g �,'� =- \ I �r/ r �fy.�71 Obi O.9 - J O,�g ';�N/NOZ i' - /:+ -- Ill' - .. ((I `�� SON/�70y 1 'Xb1 �\ /,n32/�'ONb7 �, , 1i+ 1 \ 1 r i I'11.1 \ r 1 .� �lodit ; �' 4" ce, " J i .C1/444 Op. - -— -----"t'''''.14,' ' ''''''''N'S7'r''7.14;.*0*fr17.,Y''',;',.44'4_ q 4, , '-_, la,-- ... e ii., - ;//{ .fJ'..�" - -'•: Jam.. �`' .r _ ...,w�-� � "� ;+m�. . 3 I a. ..,r.-.-'.--r F mu - .., p. f .S. .� - 1 Ate'�..� t . , + q w is pp iii7,.. , q t,. I 11 ,- ,t1,,,,,,, ___. a -I:4h .__ ' - r _ • •' -- -,. _- r* $r 8ru. ..---1 , ,.arW= --11i1�111i C r O'S RRRRfr1'. ',;, ._..-.,+» t-H t,sumo 'IIIlIRd119M [ ©!!R. A1lbi.!!•t---� r�iti'it «' }"• m, -4 :- .,;• +' , _�,,ter -. °t .r.-.� .,_,. r " .._ A ' nwf'.HI—MI /f{ p o1..� r -, L� , B Z , •r'�.-. ..41-it Si—L'� — _ ' ,t--. s: s. K�v • • randon Station - Exhibit B A rchitectural Perspective Rendering Alr7IIIP ., ..1 ROANOKE .The City of Roanoke, VA Parcel Id: 5200122 Property Address: t . - ono 3840 STRATFORD PARK DR SW. _ - ROANOKE,VA 24018 `` y .,f , :'',,,,.:...:::37,,,,,,- i.,,' „:„ SUMMARY: . Mailing Address: Zoning: RMF 3807 BRANDON AVE SW 245 STE Property Acreage: 26.9133 ROANOKE, VA 24018 Property Sq. Footage: 1172385 Neighborhood: 940-Brandon Property Frontage: 50 Property Class: 400- Property Depth: 999.00 Commercial/Industrial Legal Description: NEW PARCEL A ROANOKE RIVER FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: ' Special Flood Hazard Area: IN Firm Panel: 51161C0144G Floodway: FLOODWAY OWNERSHIP HISTORY: . Sale Date " , Sale Amount Grantee ,. '' `Grantor , Document'Number,�.. 1998 06-291 $345,000.00 C S W ASSOCIATES ;C S W ASSOCIATES 10980010376 — -- 1 1 ! _ _ (Inactive) �j N/A , i_ ry- $0.00'=C S W ASSOCIATES `� ___ _ _y __._ 41.� _ __ _ — , I(Inactive) 1 i ASSESSMENTS: [Valuation Date Land Value _ Improvement Value Tot-at Value i 2025-01-01 _ $528,800.00; $69,100.00 - $597,900.001 2024-01-011 $528,800.00 $69,100.001 $597,900.001 2023-01-01 $528,800.00' $64,600.001 $593,400.00' 2022-001-01 $528,800.00 $58,700.00L $587,500.00! 1 of 4 5200122 7/11/2025 7:57:43 AM j _ 2021-01-011 m $480 700 0 $53,400.00 $534,100,00 RESIDENTIAL.DWELLING:DETAIL: Primary Photo: Primary Sketch: ma {`s' , -....- __ ;1sFr, Slab 74 . 99.',. ,;04;;;.. il'i t'' e,t 7 --,..ittirs,-. :,. : .1 . wp-S s � a§= ;,: % ° � r� 9s ,. 1 �- ;naask�= -� - { Pf��° � r,. � f %pAl IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVEMENTS 1 . ;` 1 Story Structure: Roof: Year Built: 1995 Roof Style: 4 Number of Stories: T Roof Cover: - Construction Exterior: Plumbing: Foundation: 2 Fixture: Structure: Wood Frame 3 Fixture: Size S/F: 1998 4 Fixture: Lower Split 5 Fixture: Level/Foyer: Lower Finished: Heating I Air: Total Bedrooms: Heating Type: 0-sf - Total Rooms: .. 0 Central Air: N Attic: Fireplaces: • NO Attic S/F: None Porches: 2 of 4 7/1 1/2025 7:57:43 AM Attic Fin S/F: Enclosed Porch: Basement: Open Porch: Basement S/F: Wood Deck: Basement Fin S/F: Other Improvements Garage Attached-Garage: Detached Garage: Attached Carport: Basement Garage: 3 of 4 7/11/2025 7:57:43 AM PROPERTY MAP: Y.+ t t,,C• , ,t t •. ;(f- .air l r y k S t g t' Y t} 3a 4 a?1 4s1"Z } tom t u -, '-,t. ' t 9 __.. '' 7i 4y & l`';J t 1'S2 ! t+ _."Se,-"*.:' ,;5 1`•i'.`r _ 1 ff + : s 9 t 1— r �r�-: £�' s 4 'C^RA { r'!f Rn s- r 4eV 3 3 a L.,,,.."SY4 ..S a ,@ k, k h Nam` -w. .�s 5 - • -� x ,�1� r�r r t ++st�f;j0 !t 3i�e a't tin{�,. o-:,y fr . 't^°...,� n .: , ' *'-�'. ecYt� 2 4 1G-i! zf E t J !; e ,x� # .' ° } , a•. :i ,'t`1,ti, ', r a T.:, ks aa'3 g. .. x' }y' v, 4, x, r; . i ;t"z h.. v his .•i,3ti.7;1`� -,--4,,,,::?-,,,..,.. .~w s}s `' 7. Sx�,1- b - a i" ♦ y a _ -t �.,�'¢T n1' xt.�r `° .t, '{., F•.0 ,i�/4e -` ( '�i f !, ., w{ i Y' 1 %. M r 4 N. ,� --z4� ' a` $ ,,, t., C .' r s7. +P c;. a - z w1 s..`4s ..s - *.1.'° ?'; ,, T` tt �A g 4 tfi j > t Sr�'t• ?;rt- -0 .�# a :, - , ..4 X, ;k. ',.y„f ,'t r 'lam r- x _ \.# .3 t q'_ .' } i,•,,Z„I. _.,, ...t.,,,.i,,4, ..,.m., ,-1, 1_,,,,fi. -‘,.; ,.„... . rwNoriD 4''''''‘-''''"--",r SI ‘' - . -• '''. '' "" " r-41" 4:..- f` 1-.4...7 i' " ''E. I Z • ^,rr ' Jk a r- k a^ ; ' a'-,• _ ', c y„...• rt. $,X 4- ° "fin . •n 5d w +� ". y a a� ` : _ s�§Z a 1 {` �} _ t t�: ,, -r - .t i J' ' } � tF $ .- ,'f',.Mil '-V''"31*i** 'If, .1,, . ' e:4*'-' J,'''.--*f 1 t �'ti ri ' r�'rY 7 '- 3:'- € L- ��� ,� "4.1�*#t � �^e W � y and �� �t-{? �i`, � .1.,r ^A-x � �'� t 4�i, i. ,. . . C f§Tt . :, °"`fit `� ' ,,a, • foe};-pr ,r, °,k "stt. ".'J r,k'_ ,, spa ,','t ".45 :ti1.�` 4.;3�r� a . r• £`•+ f 1^# ��e f. . 'fit ` .�A }, - 1 „,, ..d 4- 7>.-•' t`.,i t.S', t �!�.J CJ'},1." * 4 j tam".:m ti : - 4 of 4 7/11/2025 7:57:43 AM PrAIP7-1. "-iiiimi .:,4411111110 WE ROANOKE The City of Roanoke, VA Parcel Id: 5200104 No Photo Aveitable Property Address: 0 BRANDON AV SW ,,40 ,q 4:. . :-,, _ ..,„ _, ,,., ROANOKE,VA 1 '•: - F., , , ..,,,, . „, ._,,,.,,$,. ,.,i, SUMMARY: Mailing Address: Zoning: RMF 3807 BRANDON AVE SW STE 245 Property Acreage: 1.8868 ROANOKE, VA 24018 Property Sq. Footage: 82194 Neighborhood: 940- Brandon' Property Frontage: 523 Property.Class: 140-Commercial Vacant Property Depth: 314.00 Legal Description: 1.908 ACRES . ROANOKE. RIVER FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: Special Flood Hazard Area: IN Firm Panel: 51161C0144G Floodway: FLOODWAY OWNERSHIP HISTORY: ;Sale Date ,:..Sale Amount ` ! .Grantee ,.- . Grantor _ Document.Number 2024-04-081 $90,000.00 1 CSW BRANDON ;BARON ENTERPRISES 1240003084 I i IFRONTAGE LLC IOF VIRGINIA INC _ 1 2005-10-11 $55,000.00`BARON 'BRANDON AVENUE- 1050019628 - ENTERPRISES OF ,LITTREAL(Inactive) I { I VIRGINIA INC 1 • , 1986-07-11 i •$90,500.00{BRANDON AVENUE- ILITTREAL MASON H & } - ILITTREAL(Inactive) - ELIZABETH N (Inactive) l 1983-01-181 $90;000.00;LITTREAL MASON H IWINSTON GERTRUDE I &ELIZABETH N C(Inactive) i(Inactive) w H 1982-12-151 $75,000.00 WINSTON "=APPERSON DRIVE 1 'GERTRUDE C I DEVELOPERS (Inactive) I- ., 1(Inactive) 1 i = I 1 of 3 5200104 _. 7/11/2025 7:58:38 AM 1981-05-21 $90,000.00 APPERSON DRIVE EA. I REALCO INVESTMENT — — — DEVELOPERS CORP (Inactive) i 1 1 '(Inactive) 1 N/A $0.00,REALCO I INVESTMENT CORP C J(Inactive) ASSESSMENTS: Valuation-Date Landlue Va Improvement Value- Total•ValueY ' 2025-01-01 $74,100.001 $O.Op $74,100.00! - ' 2024-01-01 $74,100.00 $0.00 $74,100.001 2023-01-01! $74,100.00 $0.001 $74,100.00 . 2022-01-01 . $74,100.001 $0.00( $74,100.00 2021-01-011 . $67,400.001 $0.001 $67,400.001 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING DETAIL: Primary Photo: Primary Sketch: • Is g).11 ) . ' ' , r., IMPROVEMENTS: 2 of 3 7/11/2025 7:58:38 AM PROPERTY MAP: ale ,y,.F;ii} tiY Yam q.t . dy a fi .. µ ., w k '. a :V- ` . - . t e. -t •s�- s$ - . _° �� ° 1 *' xx fit:: u:'4 • i ,x y', •sue;. "m •- .. ,..�'. r as . } t¢ p¢ ::' it.• 'f . 1° '.�« s; _., . , ' ' r; +=e� .,. 4 k " ' "., ..mow _ a a 2. ' .` ° ' a + i' a `ca'4a q ,r' -11 ., . at } r 1. .' z . `f 5tr 4 1 b" '' -, roa` - _. 3 of 3 7/11/2025 7:58:38 AM $ U. F * , 6 H EQ. . S r 1,r • --_- ' , r i j _. �,� .' 1`t $ x r r -... t is - t 4`" 'S o- " � ", • ' r t �.= � m: _ �1 • y > 4 }y 5` ^7 uw` 1 - i s Y •3 ,'.+i. t 1 +' '"ri i` '• F .,. s , ,te r s�Y ems. '. �}4..-- ,�•#ter -: ems'6 q°< - c t Y •e-- - . '�• _ I .41 %; ' +"; i is - - a j • - - - . 'f-- .,r... ` '. _ 1f J)t . • ' l •-..•.-.....• I,ILI,1...:.-,g,.j,Y',;;.','.;,,4:-.,,.,,'.f.:,,+..r:-..:.,,.:--.'..‘-.-:.;A.....'•-.—.t.;,,-.1..;:..''„;*,•t-,.'.:•v,:*,r._'','--:ifJ4'.'•,..'."i:'.%.--,...r„*,,'-".,..--A'/f .� i y ' hk V rya .T.: .+ r (1I - s ' r 1 , ' t ,, ,1 e. I 1 r Yam.#` I F y't . 1 I S -- I c __ �' _ s': x- r Ytn 4,, _ I 1 O 1 st/ P.411 I3ALZER ®Is & ASSOCIATES g4 ` vim Traffic Impact -;Stud: ' -- . ' ' .. .., .„. i . 1 , „.. .. . , ., " . _ , -,,-, ...,.--.....-„,..,. :: ,,...,,„ A. . . . ‘, B&A Project #04230044..00 . , . .. . Date: June 4, 2025 -� " _ . : . f. - • ., ,- j / -'1 ; • /- / i s-- r. -j • .r 11' . s / , E �• f j Planners I Architects I Engineers I Surveyors 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, VA 24018 www.balzer.cc TRAFFIC STUDY . . - - - FOR BRANDON STATION - - . in. - . City.of Roanoke, Virginia . T.M.-#5200104 & 5200122 . -Brandon Avenue - Date: June 4, 2025 _ - -Job No. 04230044.00� E••+« i s_..,,,--,.:-, , . e,..,...L.,__Pr.;\ • : - _ 4 = :. ' . ... ; . . ' 17 - ----. . -.: ,--. . :-_ . s. .J Oji:-- ' . - • 11� 6/4/2 'a _ - �, BAKER . - - - .• ,,,,,,,,4%44___.„,..;••„_,,,.. . .-. ., ASSOCIATES ` . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . • . ..• •r• . , . ., . 1208 Corporate Circle • Roanoke,VA 24018 540.772.9580 •• ' . •Fax: 540.772.8050 • • alp . . auaoue Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction, 1 2. Analysis of Existing/Background Conditions 4 3. Trip Generation 8 4. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment 9 5. Analysis of Future Conditions with Development .11 6. Intersection Analysis 13 7. Turn Lane Requirements 17 8. Conclusions 18 Appendix A—Vicinity Map 19 Appendix B—Existing Traffic Data 21 Appendix C—Turn Lane Worksheets 32 Appendix:D—Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 Intersection Analysis Data 35 Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis 36 Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis 47 Background AM Peak Hour Analysis 58 Background PM Peak.Hour Analysis 69 Buildout AM Peak Hour Analysis 80 Buildout PM Peak Hour Analysis 92 Appendix E—Concept Plan 104 a ASSOCIATES List of Figures Fig. 1 —2025 Existing Turning Movements 5 - Fig. 2—2025 Heavy Vehicle Percentages 6 Fig. 3-2030 Background Turning Movements ,7 Fig.4—Site-Generated Turning Movements 10 Fig. 5-2030 Buildout Turning Movements 12 List of Tables Table 1 —LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections(HCM) 2 Table 2_-LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM) 2 Table 3—Site-Generated Traffic V 8 - Table 4-Brandon Avenue&Peters Creek Road LOS&Queuing Summary • .13 Table 5—Apperson Drive&Keagy Road LOS&Queuing Summary 14 Table:6-Brandon Avenue&Site Entrance LOS&Queuing Summary 15 V Table 7=Brandon Avenue&Deyerle Road &Corporate Circle.LOS&Queuing Summary 15 . Table 8-Brandon Avenue&Stratford Park Drive LOS&Queuing Summary 16 SI, . eraesocuTca • • • 1. Introduction • - CSW Associates, LLC is proposing to develop approximately 26 acres of land located-along Brandon Avenue in the City of Roanoke (see Appendix A for vicinity map): The proposed development will include approximately 195 townhomes as shown on the concept plan included •in Appendix B. • The site is located along the north side of Brandon Avenue between Keagy Road.and Peters Creek Road. The property is-described as City of Roanoke Tax Parcels-#5201004 and . - 5200122. The site is zoned RMF, Residential Multi-Family and RMF(c), Residential Multi-Family • with conditions. The proposed development includes the following proposed access points: • Full Access Entrance on Brandon Avenue • • Proposed Cross Access Connection to Tax Parcel 5200111 As discussed with the City of Roanoke at the, pre-scoping meeting, the following . intersections will be analyzed to determine how levels of service and queue lengths are •-.impacted by this development: • • Brandon Avenue and•Keagy Road (Signalized) • •- 'Brandon Avenue and New Site Entrance (Unsignalized) • Brandon Avenue and Corporate Circle and Deyerle Road (Unsignalized) • Brandon Avenue and Stratford Park Drive (Unsignalized) • • Brandon Avenue and Peters Creek Road (Signalized) Brandon Avenue is a four-lane undivided roadway with a two-way left turn lane that provides access between the City of Salem to the west and the City of Roanoke to the east. The posted speed on this roadway is 35 mph in front of. the -site. To the west of the property, Brandon Avenue crosses into the City of Salem and'becomes Apperson Drive. It also reduces to a two- lane roadway within the City of Salem. Peters Creek Road is a four-lane divided roadway that provides access between Peters Creek Road at the southern end and Williamson Road at the northern end. The speed limit on the southern portion of this roadway is 35 mph. Corporate Circle and Deyerle Road are two-lane local roadways within the City of Roanoke with posted speed limits of 25 mph. Deyerle Road does see some cut-through traffic between Brandon Avenue and destinations to the south. Traffic Study 1 • Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA • .A June 4,2025 . &BAiZER Keagy Road provides access between Apperson Drive and Electric Road, Route 419, as well as access to the Lewis Gale medical campus and residential areas. The posted speed limit on this roadway is 25 mph. Three scenarios will be analyzed: 2025 Existing Condition, 2030 Background Condition and 2030 Buildout Condition to determine the effects of the proposed development on the levels of service at the existing intersections. Level of service (LOS)'for signalized and unsignalized intersections is evaluated based on control delay per vehicle and the driver's perception of those conditions. Control delay is the portion of the total delay attributed to the control at the intersection. Table 1 depicts the LOS scale with corresponding control delay per vehicle, with LOS"A" representing,the best operating conditions and LOS "F" representing the worst. Level of Service Criteria for_ • Signalized Intersections (HCM) Avg:Control Delay Level Of Service Sec. Veh A , B >:10-20 C _35 > 35—;55 E - > 55— p >80 Table 1: LOS'Criteria for Signalized Intersections(HCM) Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM) Level Of service Avg. Control Delay (Sec.%Veh)-.. B >:10-15 C >.15- 25 p > 25 35 35 F > 50 Table 2: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM) • The Synchro 11 and SimTrafiic 11 softwares were used for all modeling and analysis. Synchro 11 was utilized to calculate the expected delay and the'SimTraffic 11 software was Traffic Study 2 , Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA .j June 4,2025 utilized to determine all queue lengths. This procedure was_used for all scenarios to provide a consistent analysis for comparison purposes. This study was undertaken by Balzer and Associates, Inc: to: • determine the total number of vehicle trips: generated by the potential development to be added to the'adjacent street network; • determine the impacts to level of service and queue lengths at the existing - intersections as a result of the proposed development; • determine if any roadway or intersection improvements are warranted as a result of the proposed development; • and to determine turn lane requirements at the proposed entrance to the site on Brandon Avenue. • Traffic Study 3 Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA .a/ June 4,2025 IBAIZER 6fA760CIAT65 2. Analysis of Existing/Background Conditions The site is currently vacant and mostly wooded. A creek traverses the property from north to south toward Brandon Avenue. The development is proposed to have a new full access entrance on Brandon Avenue to the west of Corporate Circle. A cross access connection to the Stratford Park property to the east is also proposed with this-development to facilitate internal movements between the two properties and provide additional access options. In addition to the VDOT published traffic count data, manual traffic counts were performed at two of the study intersections. The counts were performed on Tuesday, January 28, 2025 from 7:00 AM — 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM — 6:00 PM.to capture the AM and PM peak hours. 12-hour counts were performed at the intersection of Brandon Avenue and Corporate-Circle and Deyerle Road. All turning and through movements were counted to facilitate analysis .of the intersections. The manual traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. As shown in the traffic count data, the AM peakhour occurred from7:15 AM — 8:15 AM.and • the PM peak hour occurred from 4:30 PM = 5:30 PM. These time periods were utilized for the analysis. Figure 1 graphically depicts the existing peak hour traffic volumes and Figure 2 shows the heavy vehicle percentages obtained from the counts. A 1% growth factor was applied to bring the 2025 volumes to the buildout year of 2030. Figure 3 graphically depicts the Background traffic with the growth factor applied. The Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 softwares were used to analyze delays, level of service, and_queue lengths for background weekday AM and PM peak hours. The Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 results are included in Appendix D. . . • Traffic Study 4 Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA June 4,2025 li3AiZER &A700CIATB5 • Z y aW • ZZ 01m g W �� mQ PICO mr) alma .--' I )133110 S21313d . v,s/;iTJ -i I 4l4/l6£ yO.0 rota �< 00 I x as 11 ¢a oh Ln 41...11111 in co noo L0/o MS 3A1aa J I L r L0 MS 0V021 ID )121bd O21Od1V211S oti/6£1 -1 1 r 111H lVldOd Z sz/6i, _ \.y 010 limC O •Ol 01 0 0 as • Z <a 0 N Iftift Z to N��m f \n -0/z L£6/L6l yMs 3131113 __I I L. r£z/6b Ms avo i 31V21Od21O3 Zvo J -1 I I— 31113A3a £/0— Vm°' W MA i rim On O N 0101 ? co W " N XI 0_0_a Ny .r 0 w M N O �-6S£/osZ M My v, + —o/o 0 33NVa1N3 J I L r gg/86 la o 30VHOIS AlISaVA No J —I I r 0VO8 AOV3)1 0 z/0 1 ���i M Z a 00 p N W o0 Z ii i�y/ W X .. C., \ W � as J XIlk el Qa 4 . a C � x m .. XI X m No o L o�/oR - as m as —o%/ox cb a KEAGY ROAD -' I I— r°9`Am VARSITY STORAGE. _ I ox/ox 1 -' 1. r. . ' ENTRANCE. E a ox/ox— f'$ F °x/ o-a xa' - C 1 � o�o o o.xo.fMI nil CA_ `r b m NA Lox/ox N ii fi —ox/ox DEYERLE -J I I— r dz/° CORPORATE Z :.. . ROAD SW V J CIRCLE SW 111 ox/ox -1 1 r ox/ox— f'2 2 a ox/ox, 2 o o • oxox NC N V lc N .. .� . - - ra �.. 53 ac u •L O/ux rn I--POPLAR HILL -I I � STRATFORD. PARK b ROAD SW DRIVE 'SW ox/ox J 1 1 rni ox/o% 1 \O O - V N� CIo_ 4 • CI V a: A .. . �O 1 _ ni - . a Lj L a�%ate y 1 r PETERS CREEK I r- ROAD op Nm to CN o0 mg Z . mZ D 0 Z • FIGURE 3: 2030 PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS LEGEND xx/xx: AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic gWbe � v a III 4 W cc Ir ,41 v V coIA g N n i 3/0 o.-o --461/559 \\\ 22/9 N v APPERSON; -� L. I-448/377 _907/895 \\ L35/47 � 1/0 J f L 14/38" R& --946/s?0 . \ DRIVE r J L o/o. & L 5/2 J , 487/419 497/547; 1 r 14/3 1 '1 r 0 r ... L `-565/523 AM PHF: 0.94 87/88-f o 778/932— N\04 13/12 j 'l r 0/1-3 B RAN D PM'PHF: 0:98 "� 29/83, N a c 947/1023-- c 511/407-� ON N AM PHF:' 0.90 N 0/0, 457/640-. AVENUE SW PM PHF: 0.97 AM PHF: 0.88 PM PHF: 0.97 AM PHF: 0. 5 PM PHF: 0.95 I W3 ia � = 3 • 11 WO � y uai oCD t �' 5e IX . 0. 3. Trip Generation Trip generation for this study was based on the proposed use shown on the Concept Plan. The policies and procedures found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip' Generation Manual, 11th Edition, were employed, to determine,the potential site generated traffic volumes for the proposed development for the average weekday-and AM and PM 'peak hours. Trip generation calculations were performed using the average rates provided in the ITE • manual because equations were not available for this specific use. Table 4 shows the potential site-generated traffic for this development. Trip Generation Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Proposed ITE Independent Enter Exit Total Enter Exit 'Total Total ' Development Code Variable, Multi-Family 220 195 Dwelling 20 63 83 66 38 104 1,325. Housing(Low-Rise) , : Units Table 3: Site-Generated Traffic • • Traffic Study 8LP Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA .� June 4,2025 gpER 4. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment The distribution of potential site generated traffic was completed by observing the existing directional splits along this corridor from the traffic count data and by applying engineering judgement based on knowledge of the proposed use, as well as the surrounding area. The directional percentages were then applied to the site-generated traffic to determine the anticipated ingress/egress movements for each entrance and in each direction. This development is proposed to have one full access entranceon Brandon Avenue and one cross access connection proposed to Tax Parcel #5200111 to the east.This parcel has a full access connection to Brandon Avenue at Stratford Park Drive. It is anticipated that the majority of site-generated traffic will utilize the new entrance. For entering traffic, it was assumed that 100%of vehicles from the west will enter at the new entrance. It was assumed that 50% of traffic from the east will enter at the Stratford Park Drive location and 50% will enter at the new entrance. :. For exiting traffic, it_was assumed-that 100% of vehicles exiting to the west'will exit from the new entrance. It was assumed that 30% of traffic exiting to the east will exit at the Stratford Park Drive location and 70%will exit from the new entrance. After distribution of trips to the roadway,trips were distributed at each intersection based on' • existing traffic- patterns and engineering judgement. Traffic assignment for the site-generated traffic is shown graphically in Figure 4. • • Traffic Study V 9 Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA - , June 4,2025 BALZER ' tr AMOOIAT6O FIGURE 4: SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC LEGEND xx/xx: AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic ) C.) a W a. Hgg GCv W Z ~ C v H FZ Qy ix iii 0 > CO fg I .- I- W Ill SITE O. -i N M• Z W O. 0 W B W N o V a. W v N OIn —18/11 8 o APPERSON • rt7/8 J I— L6/17 —8/16 L. 8/18 1 --8/18 DRIVE 8/19— fl 9/32 J 18 12— -I 18/12- 10/8 J BRANDON 1 0 8/7— AVENUE SW n AM PHF: 0.94 AM PHF: 0.90 PM PHF: 0.98 PM PHF: 0.90 AM PHF: 0.88 AM PHF: 0.85 PM PHF: 0.97. PM PHF: 0.95 0 J _J Ix oe 0 W0 10 C oC p W hg a. 5. Analysis of Future Conditions With Development The buildout traffic was calculated by adding the projected Background traffic (Figure 3) to the site-generated traffic (Figure 4). The Buildout traffic for each of the study intersections is shown in Figure 5. The intersections were then modeled and evaluated using Synchro and SimTraffic software. Peak hour factors were revised to 0.92 where appropriate, in accordance with the procedures outlined in the TOSAM. The Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 output can be found in Appendix D. . . As shown in the model data, the existing intersection and proposed access location will function at acceptable levels of service with. the proposed development. Minimal impacts to delay are anticipated as it relates to this development. It should be noted that.there are higher delays for some of the turning movements at the minor street intersection approaches. These are generally a result of vehicles turning left onto Brandon Avenue from minor street approaches and the high volumes of existing traffic on Brandon Avenue during the peak hours. These conditions already exist and are not significantly affected by the development. • Traffic Study 11 - IP441 Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA June 4,2025 .. 1BAiZER -. St A93O61AT63 i a n�°i x i X m. mO o z q O �- . o N� L 0/2. CD OiN —1/3 C KEAGY ROAD -j I i- r°/4 VARSITY STORAGE. 1osp71 J � I. r ENTRANCE E . 0 °/°— ri 276 90 --Iwmo � oww o XII CD 0 n 'm`` lilt1 I_ 10 L r°%73 SITE ENTRANCE el rCII N C V i 10 �COA L0, 9 0 1 I a7 DEYERLE - '-- r°�3 - CORPORATE C ROAD SW 51/25 1 -1 I r CIRCLE SW = ~ 1111. 2/0— s+'+N 207/98-1 m m m. . . alii \-. 0 • 0 \0 \ o�:N Li 20/26 �. POPLAR HILL -I I '- r49/48 STRATFORD PARK —7 I r ROAD SW o/i J DRIVE SW 0 . - 0/0 1 O D 4. 0.- ic w' a, L w.2. y�2O. vL ';is5° I �-v r3s PETERS CREEK y - I r ROAD IC W • m � zz " z • - 6. Intersection Analysis Each intersection was analyzed for 2025 Existing Conditions, 2030 Background Conditions, and 2030 Buildout Conditions to identify impacts of the proposed development. The results of the analysis are summarized below for each of the study intersections in the network. The ' detailed Synchro 11 and SimTrafc 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Brandon Avenue and Peters Creek Road AM PEAK HOUR: -• PM PEAK HOUR - •LANE LANE Overall LANE;. Overall, CONDITION " STORAGE Max.` Max.. GROUP LOS LOS. LOS LOS • (delay) • Queue Queue (delay) (delay). (delay) EBL 250 .0(31.8) 232 C(25.2) 205 EBT -- A(9.4) 190 A(8.5) 173 Existing WBT -- C(30.9) 272 C C(24.3) 243. B 2025 WBR 550 B(13.1) 208 ' - (22.5) B(10.7) 167 (17.2) Condition SBL -- C(24.1) 224 C(24.1) 287 SBR "350 C(23.7) .203 B(11.5) 167 EBL 250 C(29.3) 230 C(28.6) 198 Background EBT -- - A(8.7). 157 A(9.9). 178 2030 WBT . -- C(29.4) . 263 B - C(26.4) 256 B Condition WBR 550 .B(13.2) 241 (19.9) B(10.2) 190 (19.7) SBL -- C(23.9) 220 C(23.9) 375 SBR 350 B(11.9) 191 C(21.1) 330 EBL 250 C(29.6) 230 C(29.3) 188 EBT -- A(8.7) 140 - B(10.0) 168 Buildout WBT -- C(29.9) 287 C C(26.8) 260 C 2030 WBR 550 B(13.3) 226 (20.1) B(10.2) 181 (20.0) Condition SBL -- C(24.2) 232 C(24.3) 377 SBR 350 ' B (12.0) 191 C(21.6) 330 Table 4: Brandon Avenue & Peters Creek Road LOS &Queuing Summary This intersection results in very little difference in overall delays and level of service. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection as a result of the development. The detailed Synchro 11 and SimTraic 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Traffic Study '. 13 �d Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA • .� June 4,2025 BALZER . es A!SOCIA763 Apperson Drive and Keagy Road AM PEAK HOUR °PM PEAK HOUR • LANE :Overall LANE Overall CONDITION STORAGE LANE LOS Max. _ - .. Max. GROUP - LOS . LOS = LOS • (delay) Queue Queue (delay) (delay) (delay) EBL 200 D(38.5) 54 C(34.1) 46 EBTR -- B(17.0) 212 B(15.2) 208 WBL 200 C(26.9) 162 C(25.8) 140 Existing 2025 WBTR - A(7.4) 86 B A(7.4) 87 B Condition NBL -- C(32.2) 106 C(30.0) 87 (17 9) (16.3) NBT 150 -- -- -- -- NBR 150 B(17.4) 104 B(18.5) 127 SBLT -- D(35.7) 24 D(37.5) 41 SBR -- -- - -- EBL 200 D(40.4) 31 C(34.8) 24 EBTR - B(17.7) 256 B(15.8) .327 WBL 200 C(27.1) 178 C(26.0) 145 Background WBTR -- A(7.3) 99 A(7.4) 109 2030 NBL - C(33.5) 121 B C(30.6) 108 B Condition NBT 150 __ __ (18.3) -- _ (16.5) NBR 150 B(17.4) 135 B(18.5) 148 SBLT -- D (36.7) 22 D(38.5) 36 SBR -- -- -- -- - EBL 200 D(40.8) 33 D(35.3) 16 EBTR -- B (18.0) 250 B(16.0) 286 WBL 200 C(27.3) 185 C(26.3) 152 Buildout WBTR -- A(7.4) 92 A(7.4) 116 2030 NBL -- C(33.8) 112 B C(31.0) 85 B Condition NBT 150 __ __ (18.4) _- - (16.7) NBR 150 B(17.4) 135 B(18.7) 150 SBLT -- D(37.1) 19 D(39,0) 36 SBR -- -- -- -- - Table 5: Apperson Drive & Keagy Road LOS & Queuing Summary Under Buildout conditions, this intersection functions as an overall LOS B in both the AM and PM peak hours, which is the same as the level of service in the Existing condition. There is very little difference in delays and no improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. The detailed Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Traffic Study 14 I4 Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA Si, June 4,2025 BARER tr A76OCIA7 Brandon Avenue and Site Entrance LANE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ' CONDITION . _. STORAGE LANE LOS Max: LANE LOS -: Max. GROUP: . ;(delay) Queue.. (delay) . ; : .' Queue Buildout 2030 EBL -- B (10.4) 34 B (10.3) 46 Condition : SBLR -- D(27.8) 68 D(28.4) 59 Table 6: Brandon Avenue & Site Entrance LOS &Queuing Summary The proposed new access point will function appropriately during Buildout conditions and does not negatively impact traffic along the Brandon Avenue corridor. The detailed Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Brandon Avenue and Deyerle Road and Corporate Circle - 'AM PEAKHOUR .PM PEAK HOUR CONDITION LANE STORAGE LANE LOS Max .. LANE LOS. Max " GROUP • (delay) Queue (delay) Queue EBL 150 ' B(10.2) 34' A(9.7) 19 Existing WBL 130 A(9.6) 30 B(10.4) 44 2025 NBLT -- F(78.8) 98 F(67.9) 58 Condition NBR 60 B(14.9) 97 B(13.4) 78 SBLTR -- -- -- E(38.5) 72 EBL 150 B(10.3) 30 A(9.9) 18 Background WBL 130 A(9.7) 26 B(10.7) 48 2030 NBLT -- F(90.9) 109 ' F-(82.3) 65 Condition . NBR 60 C(15.3) 103 B(13.9) 73 SBLTR -- -- = E (46.0) 60 EBL - 150 B(10.3) 27 A(9.9) 19 Buildout WBL 130 A(9.8) 28 B(10.7) 54 2030 NBLT -- F(98.5) 130 F(89.0) 62 Condition NBR 60 C(15.6) 105 B(14.0) 73 SBLTR -- -- -- E (47.9) 68 Table 7: Brandon Avenue & Deyerle Road & Corporate Circle LOS &Queuing Summary The development has very little impact on the function of this intersection. It should be noted that left turns from minor approaches along: Brandon Avenue experience longer delays during the peak hours,-which is not uncommon along these types of corridors. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. The detailed Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Traffic Study 15 IP41 Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA OA June 4,2025 BARER &ASSOCIATES Brandon Avenue and Stratford Park Drive . AMPEAK HOUR • - PM PEAK HOUR LANE CONDITION , ROU STORAGE LANE LOS ' • . 'Max. LANE.LOS Max. • GROUP - (delay) . Queue (delay). ,. Queue Existing EBL -- B(10.5) 34 B (10.4) 43 2025 SBL -- F(65.0) 93 E (46.9) 87 Condition SBR -- B(12.3) 33 B (11.7) 42 Background EBL -- B(10.6) 42 B (10.6) 34 2030 SBL -- F(66.2) 89 F (55.4) 83 Condition SBR -- B(12.4) 35 B (12.0) 41 Buildout EBL -- B(10.6) 48 B (10.8) 41 2030 SBL -- F(77.4) 106 F (63.0) 110 Condition . SBR -- B(12.4) 31 B (12.1) 37 Table 8: Brandon Avenue & Stratford Park Drive LOS &Queuing Summary The development has very little impact on the function of this intersection. It should be noted that left turns from minor approaches along Brandon Avenue experience longer delays during the peak hours, which is not uncommon along these types of corridors. No improvements are warranted or recommended at this intersection. The detailed Synchro 11 and SimTraffic 11 reports are included in Appendix F. Traffic Study 16 01441 Brandon Station-City of Roanoke,VA .� June 4,2025 BAiZER a AMOCIArce • 7. Turn Lane Warrants Turn lane warrants were performed for the new entrance on Brandon Avenue. This entrance was evaluated inithe Buildout condition. The analysis to determine turn lane requirements were completed by following the procedures and methodologies found in the VDOT Road Design Manual, Volume I, Appendix F. Traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. Right-Turn Lane at New Site Entrance on Brandon Avenue AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 6 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Brandon Avenue -Approach Volume = 964 VPH Brandon Avenue - Right Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: No Turn Lane or Taper Warranted(please see Appendix C). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 17 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Brandon Avenue -'Approach Volume= 955 VPH Brandon Avenue - Right Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Taper Warranted(please see Appendix C). Left-Turn Lane at New Site Entrance on Brandon Avenue AM Peak Hour Analysis: = 9 Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Brandon Avenue - Opposing Volume = 964 VPH Brandon Avenue - -- Left Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: - No Turn Lane Warranted(please see Appendix C). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 32 Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Brandon Avenue • -Opposing Volume = 955 VPH Brandon Avenue -- Left Turn Lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual,Appendix F: 75' Turn Lane Warranted(please see Appendix C)_ Traffic Study 17 Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA .� June 4,2025 . - 1BAlLZER -tr'mOCIAT6§ 8. Conclusions Based on the data collected, the assumptions made, and the potential site generated traffic, the results of the analysis,are: • The proposed development will increase traffic on the adjacent roadway network. • The roadway network and study intersections appear to function at an, acceptable level of service in the Buildout condition with minimal increases in delay. • The volumes generated by the proposed development warrant a right turn taper at the new entrance location on Brandon Avenue. Based on the VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, the taper should be a minimum of 100' long. • 'The volumes generated by the proposed development warrant a.75' left turn lane. Based on the VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F, a minimum 100' long taper should be provided as well. The existing two-way left turn lane can be re-striped to accommodate this turn lane and taper. . Traffic Study 18 �� Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA ' .� June 4,2025 13AIZER &Al6OCIA765 Appendix A Vicinity Map Traffic Study ,�Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA 0 June 4,2025 19 • et' VAI i 171: i r ..' �' ; 7t 4r. 4 s - -4`'- ' _ i r �e�tB -7.t''L .�' �dq.st -tyd a `r {} • f r-' ,t'R'a'".•. +•i. _x aim _ _ f t.- ' .- 1 4 _ fr'0 Irt:' * . -ts i 'ti.5' � �.�.ti_........ ... � of f �:'� * - ,.aa+.. , III"' • �_ �•4 4.f ...1, .. Is,..-,.„,' ..r +' : '�`_ ` _� •'•,a, _d ..r%` - . } ! CCr,,s,y .' e C ---.-.... '' . *. _ .rr ;4 •. , �_ C -4F *.' w,.9 g•te . kN''ITy 'e_ 4 's>'�i % 4 ® • N. 5. 4 4 ,. p;; ,.,.-,7.'.1 : — '; ♦ ; ,,-ss o,�r}} .may -? ty `1'"^' *'` .may. u. :/' _ ,t } _ '�....Nj L '. ` F rr di 7. • ti "`mot 1'*{ r 4` .1�i,7 c— :J-":x ,i '- ,. 11 •f: - i'r, s ' - ` yj h • •. '. 1 a.r. SITE + L -�. �, yet.: r • . • . 7"" a •'}, .ma s r,., r . 3 t ,,.. - . yt ir•!«n \' '--•-•'c r it`^ !r" � to�,4 - f �� �' '".,�`', , • x.�1.-• 4 fi?r�5„ • • -- Y'. `�-:,"�w.- �.•=''' rF � • � . *� � � t ..'��'� .} .a ..`.�!f. :y rJ'kks�d. yc s. .1 � - •w.L-r";".,.,Z„' - - • • • • Traffic.Study Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA • _' June 4,2025 - - 20 BA1ZFR -Appendix B Existing Traffic Data Traffic Study , 4114 Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA —' June 4,2025 21 B !AT 5 1OI A A A.A + N Ot.N 3 N A A A.A IiW V.�I �l V + N m Ol ap 0) y,v M y 0 o 4 O N S S 4' G A W G O O S S W O . S i y 0 a o W o Us 0.y o �i1 40' N o ±�'�i o t�i1 4u fn �'cn o ••t yy�'� =Ot N cNt tT Uc O O CO' Npp N N N App A A =O'm•0 m m O.O co. m co' m mp V V -14 R t .O A O N O.Gt S i ll O W O W O N O W n g O -g O W O E g O N O N 0 UA1,O W N - N N N N + CO 0 + + O 0 + 0 ,Q ,W N O O + A + N 0 0 0 0 O + 0 G_ yy r.' Z 'N!N W A W 01 0 0 0 N 0 + + + ..? ,'0 + + + 0 0 0 O + 0 O. O , ,S 0 O 0. C �C Tn y 6 O 'AA A W N OD'O + + N O O + U W + 0 0 0 41 N + 0 0 0 0 O.O . "O 3 t m ' Q s G m ' 00000 00.0000000 t7 0.0,000 000000000 aa. ap Z . A .. O m m cD t0 Ot p 0 + N W O N N M C W A + + N m co••W O O + O•O + C P. Z ppc�tt pf p� p ..... .-I 0�. p ygO. "'I . m V cD f11 21 m W m A .-1 N N A m N n, V O V O O V 4 2 OO:m 2 2 m m Y R y • . - I 0 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 'V�--1 . 0W � + O O W N O + 0 0 0 O O • 3 • o 8 W m O 5 + N 5 .0c� N V.m W m + + N V. W . • • W Ot W W V � �j N N + O V O O W O W W V � � V t0 W A N m � ti O 0 0o000 00000000'o p 00000 .000000000 c ' km " t oV V m ' - Non LI282; 2 N V .1T00cog 4 '• , ' N AN A - CD' co W O 0 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 O.+ O C7 .'to N N W A 0 K20 0 0 N O � + ; �'g'0 6 •• A Nm tN bN b 5 $ y 2 $ ] 'W WW g'A O V + + + O 0 'n c , . • N + O cWD + N W tAt1 N c+ O A A W 5 16 0 N N A N W N N V O W c8 m m 1� ,?a C 3 N. . N • • .O : O O O,O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. •. ,' O.+ + + + + 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 fO mm2 V O �'.WiVN62:88at mV N V it88888 „ Tm ', '0 . + cV0 A W O 0 0 0 W W W'N V O .6A .'W N m + 8 m A O-O N O A tai.0 . = 7 tJ� ON1 O1 pp tpJ� y .t O j W V Ot V O W m + N N O O_ Q A O AW co t N'm V 0 P + N,4I -4 A N g a m ' N to co,cT O co co O W co co co O b• C.' `1Ir . NNN'N + W + 00 + + 000 a01A0101W O) WOON N + 00 4 g gm 4.._....:....:.:v .. . 1:4..........,..... , ,. 'O .0 0 0 0 o O O O O O A O co a O :ie m00a0,0 O O O O O AO O'pG O . ftjA . g m F.; m g s A 'A m m .Wi'm 8 ,a o (._I '•ti1 m a m a ' N r9 N 'm $ t i 0 g m (t t'� a (f (f tt . co co tD an d W W N .AI V b to-N N A N V V Ol c+� Lt A..tu N .A.cc v it:.Wa ♦♦•-y • ' 88888 A w O A + W N W ° A m m N W O W N t0 O V N Q + f m9 r 1 _ • • • • • HEAVY TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT—SUMMARY • • Counted by:VCU • /7l Intersection of:Apperson Drive Date:January 28,2025 Tuesday • and:Keagy Road Weather.CooilSunny• /, Location:Salem,Virginia - Entered by:CP . Star Rating:4 (�l/p 'TRAFFIC FROM NORTH - TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST TOTAL on: Keagy Road on: Kaagy Road on: Appereon Oliva on: Apportion Drive - N+S TIME RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E+W • AM - 7:00-7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0- -0 ' 0 0 0 1 7:15-7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 ' 0 0 2 0 .0 2 - 0 0 0 0 0 2 7:30-7:45 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 . 0 1 0 0 1 4 7:45-8:00 0 0 0 ..0 ' 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 8:00-8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 8:15-8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 - 5 8:30-8:45 0- .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 • 8:45-9:00 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 2HrTotaly 0 0 ."0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 7 . 0 0 7 18 1 lir Totals 7:00-8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' " 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 7 7:15-8:15 • 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 7 - 7:30-8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 10 7:45:8:45 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 .2 0 0 2 0 ' 6 0 0 6- 8 8:00-9:00 0 0 0 ' .0 0 0 0 ' 0 .' 0 0 0 .5: .0 0 5 0 6 0 0 8 11 PEAK HOUR - ,a. =8' I , e 0 `el r f] fi; r r r r l 4 i� r� J 0 H .a .00., .LOP'! I.I;' 00;• - rr'. rr?/a 01U;- 0.0°. •00;'. .,_ IA.". 1.07: .10;. 0.:;• 0r.:, r.r•. - PM 4:00-4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 ' 1 0 0 1 0 0 -0 0 0 1 - 4:15-4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30.4:45 ' 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 '0 0 0 4:45-5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 5:00-5:15 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OQ 0 0 0 0 . 0 5:15-5:30 0 0 .0 . 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 5:30.5:45 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 5:45-6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0" 1 - 0 0 0 0 0 1 2HrTotaIs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 4 1 Hr Totals 4:00-5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0. ' 0 0 1 3 4:15-5:15 0 . 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 .0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 4:30-5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ' 1 1 0 0 0 " 1 2 4:45-5:45 0 0 0 0 •0 -0 " .0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 . 1 2 • 5:00:6:00 0 0 0. 0 - 0 0 0 • Cr 0 0 0 1 0 • 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -. PEAK HOUR -O = = Q= :v —�-- Gl'l%i5 1 r'x OA 't I• ,,'! 1 r r , f 4�`1;'�5 ,i•, 1C1@% u1L ,i-.; r r"r5 71:4:h +'i'a5 r Ir'h ''2r.5` -- - -- 23 - - ' • N W W OD W 01 N 01 en A A A A co co co co N N N N + + + N N N N + + + 0 0 0 0 0 co co CD co a) co W V V V V '01 = A 6 G A C +-O A 6 O A 6 O A 6 O A. 6 '• O W O A 6 ' O A 6 O g C O A fn1 U o A W O ut O 01 O 0) o Cn O In o 01 O 01 O en O N o N o 0) 0 01 0 & 0 01 O rn O 01 O of O cn O 1 o 01 O N O 01 O Cif Co 01 0 oV O) O) O) CO 01 CO 01 01 A A A A CO CO f0 CO N N Al N • • • • • • • • • • • C CO CO CD CO CO OD Co co V V V m r O A 6 -. O A 6 O L. fJ O A fJ O A 41 o A 6 .'O N N N N -- + 0 0 0 O A 6 O A 6 O A W 0 O 01 r O CA O N O 0) O N O 01 O O O 01 O-01 O Vf O N O 01 O A fP -+ o A g + O A W 0 01 0 m O m O ut O m O N F ut O,N O Vt O Ut O W O G11 , F C A + + + + CO CO Cn CD N N CO N N CO O N Al CO W O O + O W + CO + W + A N N -- + O N O + + + + O -+ O O O O M = O at Xlz_' r a a Z a 3 u O 8 - 0 -. Dom, + N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 0 0 0 N -- 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0. 0 0 Cl�,> G :..: T ° E m° e�e a 0 ▪ O CO Al N A A A Cn co O O W + N + W W O + W + N N N O + + O A O + + O O N N O O N + W 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 m D O E C 0 — ex, M C.400000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co Z a d 3 —1 e o w m m n V• N A A CO CO CO C 'O 0 N r...) 01 W V 01 N A A A + A N 01 N A A CA N 8 N L.) N + N A W + + CO Al CO Ca 0 0 O N -. 0 0 % C + + N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co A Co A Co N P a m —1 V + N CO Co N V + + N CO O V O) 0) N 10 O Oo A CO N W N Al V 0) W Al A O. O O) CD 01 CD V o A A N N + 0) C A A -1 ~ 73 6 N ti m-. •0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 + + +O -- + 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 -- O 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 + + 0 0 + 1 0 ' i -3 ur. r T1 v • co N co tD co V A O Co Co �t Co 8 Al O 0W N O) co O vt Co V + V Co 0A N A co O Co co [n d) to O N N N [O 6", i".; O T O TJ . y 3 1 w e O O O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O :.1 y S ▪ N N N N N W N W N CO to N N N N co co N N N N co N N N N N N N N N N�1 N Cu W N W Co 0) O) CO W 4 m O7 - A Co V CO CO N O V A Co N CD CA CO A 01 A N 01 V 01 A N CO C 0 O CO O N V A W N O N W V Co A 01 + Co O D M O (- r N . i . A 0 0 0 0 O N -- N N N O N N N + WNNN A O N N W N O N + 0 -. -- N O + N + N O 0 0 + W N 01 CO Cn O O _' j O 6 _ N1�1 N N W V m m m CD CD N N A o N N + �CO -) U a in a [n coA Cn W COA V a a A N N'coN A AcoA coW a to A Cn A 10 A N tD Ut x a 8 0011Co01 C S; C W N [D � N 01 O .I A Of Co A O CO V W N N V V A m DI -` O W O N A W V A CO O) � O V O CO O V 0) Co Ol N N CO 01 O r C �Cyy ��.11 eD O � N N V + N V N V O O W + m W N E 1D V V V V O A m A A CNn N } A N m m Cn A N 0 01 10 + + A 01 co N + 0) A co m rn m 3 4 N N . C N + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 '0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0-0 0,0 O 0 0 Z y A 0(D1 N N N N + -+ N N + + N QQJ� pNp 0Cn1 �jaa pp�� pp11 pW� 01 N pN (Nt + + W " — V N V COn W m (E N W V 2111 COJ N N W D) N N V 1VD v O) 0 0 E 10D V 0) A W E CD V W T. N + [Wn E N N N N A COW D O • = y A WrVNNA + NNWN1OW0ODAALD O U al O OWmA N wN DO N W o O A N + + + -�1 �1 N 1� + N a y N C o O O A Ol p t0ts2 N + N oN N N m to -4 O) Co O) A Co A N O) CO 0) N'6 Ol [n N N O N fn W. W Ol N A D) OOD W g W N W'W t N + O.d O W O m*V 01 A A W O W W o R A E V V OW 01 W A N N V W 01 N D1 8 N V C O 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 N O + 0 0 0 N CM N N + + 0 CA A + + A CO W 0 O + N C. 0 + 0 0 N 0 + 0 O N A 01 01 + N + b A f0 O A 0 3 c N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DO O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 yx -1 �1ti • NN no IV p 01 p (y pp�� 0001 pppp C� C.� C� y C� C� •i `'fie W O N V 01 N N A % N r LAi v v 0 O A E N A ER A N CWn N W m 2 8 8 N N m W N w W A f8O N CI En. W am CN.t A m D • N CO N CCO O C[.D� O N r . i [NJ1 (Nn N CW11 A N r 2 0 C+ j LI cot .' cWp w A r CWi1 W CO CO o p A m Co V C Co W.I pW CO N m co o le A 1ND CWa v A C.f W + j W + +R O W 01 A N 1D N CD N W tD V m O O D7 V 01 to A W W 1D A V OI O V A O O 0) Ol O A N t0 O 01 A N N O> W S. co g I.._9 0 E0 0 N N N N A A A A W 9? 9? W N N N N + + + N.N + + + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0@ 0 0 m V V V V + R 8 0 8 O A 0 a O A 0 0 A 8 0 A 8 0 A 0j 0 .P. G1 8 A 8 8 0 0 N 0 A CO 0 0 A CO 0 = 3 IIIJJJ O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O . . . . N O N O N C. N O -4 A 0 • i= V 0 P 0 0 N N 9? ttl' A A A A W W W W N N N N ,,,.. .a + • , • • • + _ + 0 0 0 O O 0 ce /0 0 0 m 0 O m r A O N O N O f011 O N O;N O N O f071 O N 0 0 0 N O N 0 i O N O N O tn.- O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O �p M l j C A CO 0 A NN N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 V 8 0 0 A + A co V 0 co 0 0 C 0 0 0 A A co W A W A co co N + + 0 N co g •Z r Z n P N '+'W'W co co CO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 + + N N N N + + O N co W N CO N N 0 N N W W + + 0 0 + + + ... 0 0 1 I D Q > > 0 C a m R R. O E ppp ma oxi g m 0 E,�J V + N A V 0 N 0 0 A 0 V V CO V V V co V 0 V 0 N A Co Co N co N 0 N N W A A A A co 0 V to A + 0 0 ta O 7 0 m =a O o o T_a o m S '� m Q - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + + + N N N N + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C n z P ' Ia a 7 •..' AA Nt� y m O 0 B W'8 2 ( t b t8J 0Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0'N 0 V 0 0 - N 0 0 N 0 0 N o V V CO CO 0 O' 8 0 0 V 0 0 0 co O N L O 0 9- K 0 Z 2 E V O. t0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 cc, 0 co 0 V Co Co Co Co CO CO CO 0 0 0 V V V 0 N 0 0.mil V V V Co Co 0 O -„ N V . 0 P 0 m A N O 0 -1. CO N CO N NA CO CO 0 + N O N CO NA V 01 CO N O N C. 0 + A N + O 0 O N . NV O `` R y O y a. Co 2 or 0 0 + + -+ + 0 N N W W tP tJ Al A, N + + + 0 0 N N N + Cl O - N N N N + P . C C C 0 D 2E�]13 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W W N N N N N N Nt� + + N N N N N N N N W A A A , F �t�t ['1 +.0 A W W@ W 0 N V A W A V O O N O O A W 0 -+ W 0 0 N V 0 W 0 O N N N (A @ V 0 W O M 3 e o L. Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . . . . O O .. .. . . . . .. .. .. y 2 C. pp N W + + f00 O pp + O + + O O 00i N A m N A N W 0mi W N O + W N +`A N r m O A.N N N V 0 CO O V 0 N N A W A V N V 0 N W N W W@ O N ? 0 0 A C 1e O N CO 0 0 O 0 N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W N 0 V V N co A co A A A N A 0 p 0 V 0 A 0 " 8 W N.0 S 9 = pa p 1 ,p p1 F. p0I �f pf p1 00 pp�� ��ff 0t�1 /�1 tt�� (� ppop pp .. p� m .. A g.A N O tVO O@1 t0il o E t0O 0l F. Fog A N E F. + A A A + + Ol.'SiAl c10 v V V § A V its 01 .4 V w ii, ;° Oi s E.$ O O C III�ilJJ O A.0 V N N A V 0 N A A 0 O 0 A 0 N 0 A W A 0 0 O N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 O V V@ O N N W N C o'n S 6Cf s,r C 0 V mm N A W W(�f o N V@@ 2tp 2fp 0 E 0 V V V gl 0 23 VO 0 23 0 N N 0 P N N it N -� + N ' m aK 9 7 m ` O@ A fO N O A W W O! C m + @ V A m ill W N N t() f0 A t0 A + + N W O -• 0 O N rd3 N E C CO p lb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + + + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i (T^} (.f 0 0 tp p W A 0 W p� - y o + - E tD g to t00 m O@ V0 N CO 0I V V N m N 8 N Co A V A O T CO 0 g CO COO O CO CO N A ? 0 N .• O V m p U6C1 W A N 0 0 V V V 0 0 0 A W A A A W W A A fb1 W A A A A W W N N N N.W W W td W N N N O mV O 0 Q 0D 0 fD N N N t1D 0 + 000 N��� (0�� 0 V 0 + it 0 O OP W V + 0 N 0 V W N 01 0 O V 0 A W 0 y@ O A A + CO 0 CO V Cr t0D CVO O0f 0 N O Ft CO CO -4 A N O CO V o N m N CO O N N A CD LI O + W O too O A 00) CO O A % 4 a a a = d n< .b k - O N N co W + + N N A co to. co A to 0 co 0 0 0 +O.0 A CO CO L.) 0 + + CO N CO W + 0 0 0 N W 0 a d A a O A m 3 0il + + + + e g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C 1 pQp1 yet p• Wt� pA� pA� p {{�� Ot�1 pp pp�� — (�T''!j cc,: ri t0O 0 A N al W A f.n A +1 V tWo N O tNO O pi C + O i...23 N A V foil A A 0O A N N + too N T N 341 0+ .-8 V ,_ N Zy �?M�y CO -• N A 0 V 0 0 CO 0 CO CO CO p Vp CO 0 p 0p N N A A A N 0 CO N0 N A ttA�o CO 8 CO N N {(0� N N W N CO COA A 0 0 0 0 +++ +(�" ONE. A O 8 t011 8 0 W 2 0. V 0 A + O A A w v N 0 tND W 0D 8 60i 0 N 0+ W 01 8 tAD N 8 8 OD 0+ CO@ CON V CO r 9 9 S 2 T T O O V 0 8 N n i♦ .- a es, .- .- a M el r N N a 0 M .- M N .•• N 0 CI a M N VI a a M N O 0 .- 1- 0 .- o .- O O r O N I-z it _ _ O O .- — -- N M v.-O - N O O O co N�.- O .- M .- M .- O O .- 0 0 .- O .- .- O N O 0'O O O O .- 0 0 0 0 n- 0 `` + g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 .t . .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >. o Fa.' 4 r E C y N I- 0 0 .- ... t0 N O ^ ,- N O O O M O N .- O , M •,- M , 0 0 ,- 0 0 .- O .- .- O N O O O a-O O , 0 0 0 O , O 2 r a, E• 1 0 0 0 0 0'o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'gg a N O O N O M O .- O .- a of O N N .- N N M O .- .- O .- O M 0 .- N 0 0 .- 'r O O O ', O a 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 0. 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 yyy��g g O 1 F op T E g 7 ill 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N• c a ' .- a N O O N a M 0 e- O r a In O 'N N P N N M O r r o +- O M O P N O O , , 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 > 400 Qi . . . 0 . . 0 . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0 . 0 . . . . . 0 . 0 . . . .. 0 . . 0 . 0.. . 0 . . . . . 0 0 m § s W. F O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 co R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 o a 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- Ure 8 O i 1 0 0 0 0 coo 0 0 c Z a a▪ to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W • 0 0 0-0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o o cocoa a o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o a o 0 0 coo coo 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W m m A 41 U > a 3 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 9° QE .� a'm r z g O B i U - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , ' $ m 0 KOm. FO A i Q' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 act O O o o 'O, O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uN o Ct-O S V & o O O O O O a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o O O O O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 5 ce 0 a 0 o In o N 0�n o In E— . O 0 O In o N O In O In O M a O S : O M v O In.O In O 0 O an a ` a In O In O In a an O of o en.o o O 4 •-•co d; O 11 0 0 !0 a 4 o C C .- �- .- .- N N CN CV 4 m v, a M V O C7 V O M V O r P d; O M a O i W C 1+ 1� 1: Ifl m CO CO GI di di co r r 'r r r r r . . r r r r r N /V N {V el fai f'f el a a 0 a an Yj an In f0 , fC co N lV G4 O p O 0 0 In o In O N O an O o 0 O N O In O an O an o O In 0 In O N N O an O O N O In o In O N O N O an O M a O ,- M a O M O M a o IO V O M O I!7 Ir. O M a O s- M a O s- N1 V O s- P V O M sir� N. F 1-• l CO 0 0 CO CO Ci co 6 646 o o .- iV CV N V, .- CV CV N N ib C9 coCd a a a a YI 6 .1) to i to CO CO ,N-• •yl 9 Ol w N ill N A A A<A W W W W N•N N N + + + '+ > O O O O O O m OD C? W �1 �l �l V m '�1 G i+. <D C,A 4./ O A 4.1 O A 4.f G A 4/ O ,'N N 0 .P W G A 4f G Zjj O N O A 4f G 4 W - .O = ' i X• 0 C1 0 w O N O co O co O N O N'O N O O.O.N..O N O N e. N O co 0 N O N O , N O.co O co O.N O .� ' Yr :'}{r O•J W Ci`C) O/ N N t. N A A A A W 0 P., 0 N'N N N W O„O O O mfD m:5. W OD OD Q! C m .. • A O it O V O N O F. O N O N O N O N O A O N O p'"w O NO AN W wO g NN O N O fA O N O y TI 01 0. »� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 O�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C�" a 0 � =? 0000000.00000.0000000000:00000.00000.0000'O.O0000000 •`'.1, S1 ; a � ' C J ,! 000 0 0 0 o o a o 0 o 0 0•a o 0 0 0 0.o 0 0 0 0'o 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0'o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o ' a . ° ar a o • - 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N y e , O 1k jl_-7 0 a0.0 0 o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0•0 0,•0 0 1 2 : m p c m • �i •z . 1t) „ 000000000000000000000,00000, 00. 00000000.00000,0000 4. 4 r°n, —1 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0.0.0 0 0 0 0,o 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0,0 0 a 0.0,0 o 0 0 0 a , S',:, . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0.0 0 Oo O,o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , y ' r0 e 0 0 o o e e e o 0 o e e 0 o e e 0 e' 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 o e e e o 0'0 0 0 0 o•o e e e.e i ,..' ' E . ' v, 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 o a 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o 0 0 I 0 • • • • 1_� s+r, 0000000;000000000000000.00000.000000o00oa0000 "o00 .10 . $ a a • h - ) 0 � .. '+ + N N N W.W W . A A A N W N N . N 0 N V . . . A A W V a +a 8 . N A A N N N A A V 1 O C -9� ,i 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 AP �= 0 0 0 '0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0;0 0 000 0 0 0 0 00 0 00.0 ' F 00;0o00'oaaaac0000'0aaaaaaaaaOcaaOaoaacc,aaao0a,0a L • i, 4 U S-. 0 , _ N N N W W b) Cl A A A N W N CI C3 N 0 N N C)'C) N A A W V 0 0 0 CJ'N A A N N N.A 0 N N '" , 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 O.O.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 O.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 , ,,,) + O .... + ... + O.0 0.N N W A N W N + N +•+ N A co .0.0 w w A W Ci N W W N (.4 A: A w 0 co N w W N a . E , 's ' o 0 0'c o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o0'0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0.0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0• .0 0 0 0 0 0 0' • ai O.A 0 3 • • i . a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 1t A + e + + + >`.O O O N N W A N W N •-! N > -` N A N co a co A co e;N•W W NI W A A' w co 0 N co co N gi � m • . z 0 • • w. + NNWN: DC CVWNtO0 ) 4w00W ., Ct0tDcD M4 ' ♦ F tii ��900II00II N A A A A + N N N N N A A A A g'���9��IIIIIIIIII m V V V V +,N.m 0 00 0 V V V V 0 C0 A W 0 S S A. 0 0 A 0 0 0 A 0 0 2 2 A 0 0 A 0 O O O N O N O i y N O N O N O N 0 .O O N O N O N O N O N O N O d 2 00 N N tT'N g g N N N N N A A A 3 p S ID 00 m .. 00 g Q IO O) m Ol O V V V '41 0 o A 40 o O A 6 o P Gf �4 0 o P 6 O g o A W G A 6 UJ ,p p O N O N O m po O N O N O N O N CUUU�L11i C O.N O N O rig O N O N O N O N N + N DI O UAI W N A +O N 00 A .a . 3. V A 00 ID V W N + CO W A A 00 A 0 Z a Z/� V• 0 o O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oj 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l' 1 o.> > . • gii = a a i O I� pp p W VV y0 A W.w 8 V O � O V N 00 O) A O + V W 0 S W A 2 A N V V W N 00 Ia 00 la l'O i g 2 m �II ,y Z ,, a 3 m o 0000 + + 0000000 L-1 o0000 000000000 _<. e� ii p� + Nr} O, p� (/� o m O N 2 2 OI V b 00 O O A A V_N �'.J is 2 m'8 2 + o8f N W 10 d) N N A up m C —4.__ O —I O 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 C O O O O O 000000000 P. g 2 N o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o OE 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 E 3 i n �o + 0 + + + N + 0 0 0 0 + O O O 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 9 g , i 100000 000000000 CII'' O O O O O 000000000 f, + + I ~ . 0 + N + 0 0 0 0 + O O ,a' O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lioi O pp pp p W00 ((+�� N�0 yI.0 �0 yI� O�CO 1 pe N V N A W 2 m + N A 0 0 + W [Jr ID 8 N W V N N00V • VN ! J "'� m ��! d < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 1 A { c o o c o 000000000 O; cacao o ccOoO o o c o c c o c N 8A88O im 1 N6WD0 0 OE1VW4p :4NNNN Oampp l .. + o o o o . + 0 0 o o o o 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 I I V A V 8 N E N W N N N N N @ e O ID 00 O ppl0 W to 8 V 00 N A A s 00 00 W V N V O O V N N co ` co N N A W N O 00 ID 00 0 + o (f Q 'D f 111 j j +.N V A A N N W + N 01 co Wtl A O A N W r CO W W N N V u W Q ^1` � 00 + O0 + 00000 ,O + 000 0 moo 0000 a '4~�'` 0 CO 0 00 O N N N N,N N (( V o co co co (o . N N N N 0 yp~ V t8J 2 2 2 '� N 81 V 8 `2 r.LI S l'J' o m m W �l Ol m S I• �' 'm A' 1' A m y 8 f0 V 00 .2NOOANp fA O A ` A O 00 ID 00 % ti 8.2 j IC N8 ♦i i El A N ‘2 .2 O W V Po V N DO ID V 2 2g + O N 0" OAOO A W D 1 is O , P2 • t�0 by 4 f♦.. .- a a 4- O o N N a 01 O.A m A O O O '3- 0 .- O .- 0 N N N �' �._ 0 0 .- . 0 N N 0 t0 0101 .00 a rj 0 0 0 0 0 - 0.0 .- 0 0 .- .- .- .�, �• $ a- i q 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 o c. 000000000 00000 o q - 0 a il ma • i c 1 Q ,ND•/ 000000000 00000 000000000 00000 OO • li a$$i.Q Q, , N m t2= 'g;{ ' O O - - O N N O 10 N N a .n a C h 0,0 0 0 0 . 0 0 , 0 0 r ., ` • '~' N ~m 9 a 1111 -IPl o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 1 G . 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 C 1 .«..g......�....0 N O O - O No_-_,A_0 0 o- 0 A �,. .� O 0,0 O O O .- N ... I 2 W F 000000000 00000 CO 000000000 00000 d +. 10 ' 6 0 N XS O ® C Ey$ 000000000 00000 a 000000000 00000 00, N 94 777 yg, 0 9 O !f� gg p a O F 31' O N O O , o.N n .O P7 r l0 Id ,,,,$, O O O .- 0 0 o r N • w. Om e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a >. I b. 000000000 00000 0 000000000 00000 ..a. N • to i1 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 toq 0 0 0 o a o 0 o a 00000 0 n p . . 000000000 00000 _ g 000000000 00000 - o 2 it 0 CC 3 000000000 00000 - g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 - o 0 _ boo. 0 V6 O 000000000 0000 .0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 .0.0.0 O g ILI 4.2 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 a ' a d O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W c C o1 2 a > R • , 0 o 0 o o o o o o , 0 o o a o a a o o o o d o o o o o d o 0 0 `q0 .a 2 ® x= E. zacc m, C 0° ' - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000,00 00 000000000 00000 . 0. n cs, 0E , 0 S.• o1 °,u.b a 000000•000 00000 0-a o0.0000000 00000 00 ra - VN • • X0 $ J c 0} . 0 . 0 . . 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0.. CC F O O a.o N. O of O X y O of O o o= on .n O N o to O .n O 1 3 0 .n O of O 4 O • a s o M a o =y.S o M a, 0 0 M a, o 2 a 0 8 to o n a o6 - 01 •..1' N. N. t0 in 0 0 0) 0 C 0 6 .0-co 0) W.. V'.a a Yf in N L0 m p p in h N .fl a a - X . . . . . . . H f . . . ._ d . . . . . . . . f- f.. . . . .S 1 s1' W F, O 00,01010 O .0 O .0 O .n O Y� YJ, a O U] O Y] O N o U] .. .miaow O Y� Q. O T9 �'O CO a = = O O V A r O M a o 0 a = O:. CO V. C ci. .�. A. h I. I: 0 0 0 0 N r IL. N. 1. n m 1 " d' 4 4 4 ui .f7 V) 6 N , 4 4 4 a 0 d 4' IA w A A A A -• N en en.N N A A P A 'O CO .I V V V Al o! CO 02 CO V V V V 0 fi0 O A fJ 6 S S g W G Si. O G O A W 6 A 6 6 A [J - G �I O O In d w O -. -. O N O fn O N O , O fn O N O �I .1 N d 01 O Ili O fn O N =Ol N to Ih'fn O O w UI to N w A A'A 3{¢;j =m w m Ol o% I O m 01 OD OJ co. •V -1 -.1 k M i t O 6 A G Fr ES O f.1 O iS A f f G [S o a iS o wCA O F O u to d yS d f'i1 a to d �n a N - $ d to d 15 w o.In d N d �iI d in XI A 03 F(.f W A (.1 V [so, W W W Ol '".__'" D. g 2 m 2 w V m O + w O d w �''iI m m V V V W o V N m m 01 = S' Z u W w'A W W W w m N a, m V + w •m N A V m W W 01 w w 01 N. 0 8 a o O 0 0 0 0 0 .. . . . . . . . . 0i o 0 0 0 0 000000000 1 C . (IADA1I ((pPnn n� g y 4 Q , !J1 + W N m r ' co N V A fwn )6 N V W W W W N V a 8 trail 0~1 w' ,� O N.2 m ^, �i �i � k' � w oW m I2 'o as E azA O5 IT! O 00000 000000000 0., 00000 000000000 y S tQ I a• o c 0 ti a A0A . le NAWm + malVl C N D -6 I• t N•8 N A W .m D 00 N P z 0 00000 000000000 0. 00000 000000000 f p CO C Z O 00000 000000000 ;} 00000 000000000 y - • 0 . . . . O O C) 0 0 0 O O O ' 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 .6. 00000 000000000 C O 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 O O _0- ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O DJ 0 W j W W AA W V t : W CA A A A w + -.. G ; C O ea. N CI .4 v 5 A V tiO O ' N m N fA 4 N v N V a' L •N Of O g ; 1 jP ' 4AOpp A A A A p Ao (GpO AA W A 01 N CA m p W yy -0 O m C w 2422 T fn W + + fn + m N + 53 V m N w m N m V 2 W G 61 9 C C C 5�[ 0 C. . m C, Ca O O d 0 O O O d d d 0 0 0 O'O O O O 000000000 a A G D N O 00000 000000000 c' -, O O o -,. N --O 0 0 0 0 0 + y y VV i ® VCAOCONa •+ CO m V CA Al V O N D CO V V It W d O lmwWNf0A �' O m $ V W V m I➢ yAJ A O O O I Onn O 000000000 ,C-' .00000 p 000000000 .,= 5 N COD V A G O fNi1 ttoo N W O V, 0. N m W N ID O+ N N . Qdl N C. O ,IIII �1 p 23 j�`,q] po W Q? C-. g Y`p c. . W CO /AII W N A N • O 0'GCO 0, O8..0 O ? ONO A "' C O a^ _• c o o 0 0 o.o 0 0 00000o 000000000 z -I i CO m U m fo N N N N.N N N V CO CO CO CO l ) N_ yN N N a ~ ar .4'i 3i m ¢A' `+ A• a gym++ N,CD n m two ,C .nAl 'i O N `A' 2 t2i1 ra t it o g ndi nNi co v'w en . m w + ^� °' 9'' �", `�° ow'erI frail Doi I� traila s s O D • • HEAVY TRUCKS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT-.SUMMARY -- - Counted by:VCU - • Intersection of Brandon Avenue Date:JanGary 26,2025 Tuesday `�' /7f- .and:,Peters Creek Road - Weather:Cool/Sunni ,' - ' iUl�� . • Location:Roanoke,Virginia . Entered by:CP . ..: Star Rating:4 / t' __ ' - "TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH -- TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST (TOTAL ' on: .Peters Creek Road on:. _ on: Brandon Avenue " - on: Brandon Avenue - N+S . - TIME ... . .. . .. . + _.. • RIGHT THRU. LEFT U•TN, TOTAL RIGHT THRU- LEFT. U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL J E*.W • AM , , - . . 7:00-7:15 1, , 0 >.0 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0. 0 1 - . 7:15-7:30 : 3 0 0 •3 0 1 1 0. 2 0 0 _ 0 0 5 . 7:30-7:45 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 1 . 0' 1 - 3 7:45-8:00 0 -"1 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 .1 0 1 5 • 8:00-8:15' 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 0 8:15-8:30 2 0 0 - 2 0... 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 - 8:30-8:45 0- 1 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 _ 0 1 2 - 0 3 4 8:45-9:00 0' 1 0 1- - 0 .0 . 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 HrTotals 8 0 3 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 " 0: 0 8 0 2- . 4 0 6 - 25 _'1 Fir Totals ' 7:00-8:00- 6 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 -• 0 0 4 1 0 - 0 5 0 0 - 2 0 2 l' 14 7:15-8:15 5 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 2 _0 - 2 ' 13 7:30-8:3D 4 ,0 1 0 5- 0 0 0 0 0 ,4 0 0 0 ., 4 0 1 2 0- 3 12 7:45-8:45 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 — 0- ...0 0 4 •0 0.: 0 4 0 2, 3 0 5 13 ."8:00-9:00' 2 0 .2 ".. 0 4 0 0 -0.' 0 0 1 : .2 0: - 0 3 0 2. - 2 0 4 ' 11 ' . ,. PEAK HOUR _ 0 + 0 I81�4,12° U?0 0, 0 PM . 4:00=4:15 0 : 0 '- 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 4:15-4:30 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 1 4:30-4:45 0 - 0 0 -0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 °, 0 1 .4:45-5:00 : 1 - 0 0 1 - o - `o" 0 . . o - -0 0 0 0 _ _.0 ` 1 5:00,5:15 0 1 . .0-- 1 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:15-5:30. 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 ' ' 5:30-5:45 - 0 0 0 0 • 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5:45-6:00 , - 1 0 0 -1 _ • - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2HrTotals 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 _ 1 - 6 1 HrTatals . . - -- 4:00-5:00 1 0 . 0 ' 0. 1 0 0 0 , 0 0 1 1 . 0- 0 2 0 0.' 0 0 0 3 4:15-5:15 1 .0 1 0 2 0 ' 0 0 0 0 1' 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4:30-5:30 1 0 1 0 2: ' 0 -0 . 0 0 0 0 1 0 .0' 1 0 0 1 0 1 . 4 4:45-5:45 - 1 0 1 0 2 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 . 5:00-6:00 1 0 1 0- 2 0 0• ,•,-0 -0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 .0 1 0 1 3 , -PEAK HOUR .. ..if ri , 11 _ _,._l.-kJ I _PI__ 51 �c. __ L._(0 I 0 �Sl ._._5 . ,. _I 51__ �._,4,..d n`_ 6"'v. 4 -E a "-' a e..� i P.'r: ...'1 e e,, b t.}, t,.. I i, t r•'. t, ',d , r.+.i. I I. , 1-(1: ,, a� re u° - - - - 31 Appendix C Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets Traffic Study • Brandon Station—City of Roanoke,VA June 4,2025 32 EiAIZ Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-89 RIGHT TURN LANE WARRANT - BRANDON AVENUE @ SITE ENTRANCE " s.y{2K:� , y tP 1 `"„9 ^!" ..b3•.•.. cYg. 4 :.. 100 `° ' n: FUL .44.44 L—WIDTH TURN LANE AND TAPER REQUIRED r J, .. l3 r,. :fa: i ,J,?� cc �r.tr ;riy; g . 80 ••• w. : ' J , U �"iN w3 �x c 60 .T'APER•RE•.UIRED.' �;.. : � .:. Zco _.� � Q • : ?x mo•. 3R;�^ I 4 C7 0 Q x a. • 20 . . .. ....... : TAPERS`REQU1RElD IA 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 PHV APPROACH TOTAL,VEHICLES PER HOUR FIGURE 3-27 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (4-LANE HIGHWAY) Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV- - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. When right turn facilities are warranted,�see Figure 3-1 for design criteria; Rev. 1/15 33 Road Design Manual Appendix F Page F-66 LEFT TURN LANE WARRANT - BRANDON AVENUE © SITE ENTRANCE Warrants for Left Turn Storage Lanes on Four-Lan.e Highways 1800 , At-Grade, Unsignalized 1600 \ \ ,\, intersections� . \\�� S=Storage Length Required 1400 `\1�\ Note: S=100' Min. (See Figure 3-1) 1200 110111116 --j) /000 iitill 10 o F ! ‘1101100s IO,,,,„„,,,,r, i , 1 4rl 600(.. .. 800 !1,.. Fil; ' it4 5=4000 400 + '14 % , . 1 gi A i 0 5=450' kk414 S=200 i , • _,, „ , k ,o , st,, � 1 00' 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 VL LEFT TURNING VOLUME (VPh') FIGURE 3-3 WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON FOUR LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 3-3 was derived from Highway Research Report No. 211. Opposing volume and left turning volume in vehicles per hour (VPH) are used for left turn storage lane warrants on four-lane highways. For plan detail requirements when curb and/or gutter are used, see VDOT's Road Design Manual, Section 2E.3 on the VDOT web site: http://www.virginiadotorq/business/locdes/rdmanual-index.asp. 34 Appendix D Synchro 11 & SimTraffic 1•1 Intersection-Analysis Data Traffic Study Brandon Station City of Roanoke,VA —' June 4,2025 35 BI ZER HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon.Ave & Peters Creek Rd 02/19/2025 Movem t; EBBLiB1TWi3T 'WBR SBL SBR b m. p° ;4 Lane Configurations 44 ► r r Traffic Volume(vph) 486 435 538 463 334 391 Future Volume(vph) 486 435 538 463 334 391 Ideal Flow(vphpl) ,. , 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1:00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 FItFIt Protected 0.95 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 ° 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00' 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0,85 0.85 . 0.85 0.85 0.85; Adj. Row(vph) 572 512 633 545 393 460 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 7 0 311 Lane Group Flow(vph) 572 512 633 538 393 149 Heavy Vehicles'(%)' 0% 0% ` 0% 1%' 0% 1%" Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Actuated Green,G(s),. 19.7.. 47.1 21.0 45.2 °24.2 24°2 Effective Green,g(s) 19.7 47.1 21.0 45.2 24.2 24.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.56 0.25 0.54 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 824 2031 905 997 1012 462 u/s Ratio Prot ' c0.16 0.14 c018 c0.16 0.11 • v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.09 t/c Ratio 0.69', 0.25 0.70 0.54 0.39 0.32 Uniform Delay,d1 29,2 9.3 28.5 12.5 23.8 23.3 Progression Factor 1.00. 1.00 1.00 . '1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.6 0.1_ 2.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 Delayjs) 31.8 9,4 30.9 13.1 °24.1 23.7 Level of Service C A C B C C Approach Delay(s) 21.2 22.6 23.9 Approach LOS C C C ntersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000°Volume to Capacity ratio, 0.68, Actuated Cycle Length(s) 83,7 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.1%.' ICU Level of Service u A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2025 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report CPB - Page 1 36 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance &Apperson Dr 02/19/2025 Movement . a, , SE_ SET3.11,Et NW W N , NEL� E�TfVERSWL Wf SINK Lane Configurations 1 41, 111 44, ) + r 4, Traffic Volume(vph) ' ; 5: 473 91, 425'. 439 • 3 98 0 260 0 1 0 Future Volume(vph) 5 473 91 425 439 3 98 0 260 0 1 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 s 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor-- . .1.00 0.95 . a 0.97: 0.95 100 1.00 1.00 . 1 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected .° 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 . 0:95 `, ,° 100 ' ° 1,00 j Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3522 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Fit Permitted 0.95 .1.00 0.95 ` 1.00 0,95 1.00 "M 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3522 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Peak-hour factor;PHF ;0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 - 094 094_ 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow(vph) 5 503 97 452 467 3 104 0 277 0 1 0 RTOR Reduction(vph), 0. 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 `' 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 5 591 0 452 470 0 104 0 91 0 1 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% , 0% 0%;. 0% 1% , 0% 0% 0%.= 0% 0% 0% 0°A Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split pm+ov NA Protected Phases 5 2Ea° 1. _ 6 3. 3 . 1 4 4 Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green,G(s): . . 1.1° 27°5 15.6.: 42°0 . 8.2 23,8 1.1 Effective Green,g(s) 1.1 27.5 15.6 42.0 8.2 23.8 1.1 !Actuated.g/C Ratio 0.02 '0.38 :0.22' 0.58 011 . 0.33 - 0.02 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3°0 3.0 3°0` 3°0 3.0 b3°0 ° 3.0 -° Lane Grp Cap(vph) 27 1337 754 2071 204 530 28 liIs Ratio Prot. 0.00 c0.17` c0°13; 0.13 c0°06 ° ., 0.04 . c0 00 , v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.44 0.60 0.23 0.51 4 0.17 004 Uniform Delay,d1 35.2 16.7 25.6 7.3 30.2 17.3 35.1 Progression Factor 1:00 1.00, 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00' Incremental Delay,d2 3.3 0.2 1.3 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.5 Delay(s) 38.5 "17.0: 26.9 7.4 32.2 17.4< 35.7 Level of Service D B C A C B D 'Approach Delays) 17.1 17.0' 21.5 ° 35.7 Approach LOS B B C D ;ntersection Sum arty. K .. . ., , 4 HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity.ratio 0.49 - Actuated Cycle Length(s) 72.4 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service " A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2025 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report- CPB Page 2 37 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave : 02/19/2025 ntersection° Int Delay,s/veh 3.7 avement ` EBR '- VON BR l'-L (LE GLEIr NBR SBL 3° Lane Configurations ++ ' r 4 1 4, Traffic Vol,vehih 13 740 28 13 863 21 49 2 197 0 0 0 Future Vol,vehlh 13 740 28 13 863 21 49 2 197 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr : 0 '0 0 0 . 0 .0 0 0. 0 a 0. „ 0 0 = 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop tT Channelized - , None - None - None: - None Storage"Length 160. - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - Vleh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0- - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90- 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow ., 14 822 31 14 , 959 23 54 2 219 0 ° 0 0 Major/Minor ajorl Maio Minorl - Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 982 0 0 853 0 '0 1374 1876 427 1427 1868 480 Stage 1 - - - - 866 866 ° . - 987 987° Stage 2 - - - - - - 508 1010 - 440 881 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 41 - 7.5 :6.5; 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - PriticalHdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.5 5.5' - 6.5 ;5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 ' - - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 711 - 795 106 72 582 97 73° 537 Stage 1 - - - - - - 319 373 - 269 328 - Stage 2 - - = , 521. 320 571 367 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 711 - - 795 - - 103 69 582 57 70 537 May Cap-2 Maneuver- - - - - - 103 69 - 57 70 - 1 ' Stage 1 ' - - ' - - . - ` - 313 366 - 264 322 ' -_ ` ` Stage 2 - - - - - - 512 314 - 347 360 - 4pproach [ND E D HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0.1 28 0 HCM LOS : D A �litinor La a/M_`aior My t NBLrn'1 NBL'2 EBL EBT EBR WBL BT 1NBRSBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) '' 101 582 711 - -- ,:795 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.561 0.376 0.02 - - 0.018 - - HCM Control Delay(J 78.8' 14.9 10.2 - - 9.6 0 HCM Lane LOS F BB - - A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.6 1.7 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2025 Existing AM Synchro 11'Report' CPB -Page 1 38 HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr 02/19/2025 Int.Delay,s/veh 1.5 ovemen N SEL Lane Configurations f t 14 r r Traffic Vol,vehlh 12 901- 900 33 ° 39. 19 Future Vol,vehlh 12 901 900 33 39 19 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None . None • Storage Length 250 - - 200 0 0 Weh in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 14 1024. 1023 38 44 22, ajar/Minor Eajor1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1061 0 - 0 1563 512 Stage 1 - - 1023 Stage 2 - - - 540 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.8° '6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.8 1 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - . - - , 104 '512 Stage 1 - - - - 312 . Stage 2, - 554 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - - °"102 `512 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 102 - Stage 1: 305 Stage 2 - - - - 554 - pproach C3 WB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 47.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lar"n'Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SELr'1 SELrri2 Gapacity(vehlh) 664 - _,. - 102 512 1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.434 0.042 HCM Control Delay!(J 10.5 - - 65 ,12.3 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F B IICM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1.8 0.1 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2025 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 39 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Summary of All Intervals iiNumber 9 R @ 4121 0 , Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 End Time. • 8:15 ` 8:15 8:15 - 8:15.,- ° 8:15 - 8:15 T_ ,, 8:15 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 ime"Recorded(min) _ 60 60 T' (�) � ` 60 ° 36D . 60 ' :. 60 F; 8tl #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 _#of Recorded Intervals 4 , ' 4 4 4 4 4 ;4 Vehs Entered 3101 3124 3002 2965 2923 3037 3019 Vehs Exited 3092 3108 3002 2997 1- 2935 "' 3061- 3015 Starting Vehs 73 73 88 92 71 100 66 Ending Vehs' . 82 89 ' °. 88 60 wR 59 76 70 Travel Distance(mi) 2121 2134 2069 2062 1985 ' 2090 2119 .Travel Time(hr) s, 92.8. 91.2 87.5 86.7 .t 83.7 .- 88.9 90.2 - Total Delay(hr) 30.5 28.3 26.8 26.1 25.4 27.4 28.0 Total Stops ` 2987 2924 2874 2746 2712 2817 " 2850 Fuel Used(gal) 79.7 79.1 77.1 75.9. 73.8 77.7 78.9 Summary of All Intervals "un Number 8 9 10 Avg , Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 End Time 8:15 815` 8:15 815 ' 1 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded(min) : 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals 4. 4' 4 : 4 y „ Vehs Entered 2977 3024 2971 3015 Vehs Exited 2966 , 3034 2976" 3019 ° , Starting Vehs 71 87 77 79 Ending Vehs ,` 82 77 72: 70 , Travel Distance(mi) 2018 2060 2058 2071 Travel Time(hr) 85.3 88.0 86.9 88.1 3 Total Delay(hr) 26.0 • 27.3 26.5 27.2 Total Stops 2741 2805 2794 2828 Fuel Used(gal) 75.3 77.0 . 76.4 77.1 Interval #0 Information- Seeding Start Time t 7:00 End Time 7:15 Total Time(min) 15 - ._ Volumes adjusted by Growth.Factors,Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. '. , I • 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB - Page 1 • 40 SimTraffic Simulation Summary -2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Interval #1 Information, Recording :Start Time - • 7:15 „ , - End Time 7:30 Total Time(min) 15 - ', Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. =unNumber• ° . 9 g K_ 6 .@ 0 _ . Vehs Entered 708 752 733 696 690 665 738 Veils Exited ',. 712`. 753 736 . 714 700 y 682 711 Starting Vehs 73 73 88 92 71 100 66 Ending Vehs ' 69 72` 85 74 e 61 •83 ` 93 Travel Distance mi) 486 536 517 483 482 483 512 (Travel Time(hr) 20.8 22.8 21.5 . 20.1 19.7 . 19.5 ' " 21.5 Total Delay(hr) 6.6 7.1 6.4 5.9 5.6 5.5 6.3 Total Stops , 664 717 `. 696 653 . 634 609 714 Fuel Used(gal) 18.2 19.8 19.0 17.8 17.6 17.4 19.0 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time • • 7:15 End Time 7:30 Total Time(min) . 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Numbe 0 Q 90 ` Avg Vehs Entered 707 728 707 712 _ Vehs Exited , 706 737 707 , 716 Starting Vehs 71 87 77 79 Ending Vehs °.,, 72 ' .. 78 77 . .,74 Travel Distance(mi) 470 515 508 499 'Travel Time(hr) 19.7 21.6 21.2 20.8 Total Delay(hr) 5.9 6.5 6.3 6.2 Total Stops . . • .646= 690 686 , . 668•; . - Fuel Used(gal) 17.8 18.9 18.6 18.4 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB • Page 2 41 , SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Interval#2 Information Recording Start Time ;' _ . 7:30 , _ End Time 7:45 Total Time(min) •15 ` Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un N her 9 g ,. gi. 4 @ 0 ..._ w Vehs Entered 783 702 677 709 764 707 723 Vehs Exited • ' 772 698 694 . 703 ` 750 717 729 Starting Vehs 69. 72 85 74 61 83- 93 Ending Vehs 4 80 . 76 68 80 =- .; 75 73 87 Travel Distance mi) - , 517 . 465 '472 - 500 508 487 506 Travel Time(hr) 21.6 .19.0 -: 19.5. 20.5 21.4 , 20.3 , , 21.2 Total Delay(hr) 6.4 5.3 5.6 5.9 6.5- 5.8 6.5 Total Stops, 705 627 656 634 `683 657 ` 6811 Fuel Used(gal) 19.0 17.0 17.7 18.0 18.9 18.0 18.6 Interval #2 Information Recording - Start Time, 7:30 . End Time - - 7:45 Total Time(min) f` 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. _ - - 'un Number 0.. 9 90 . ._ Avg .4 . Vehs Entered 757 718 701 721 yehs Exited 715 681 703`, ' 715 ; Starting Vehs 72 78 77 74 Ending Vehs 114 115 °75. 82 Travel Distance(mi) 520 475 483 493 Travel Time(hr) ., 21.8 20.0 19.9 - 20.5 Total Delay(hr) 6.6 6.0 5.7 6.0 Total.Stops •, . . 699 633 659 665 - Fuel Used(gal) -19.1 17.9 17.8 18.2 • 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB - Page 3 42 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time, 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time(min) 15 _ Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. Run Number 9 @ 4. @ 0 Vehs Entered 887 872 865 836 814 909 817 Vehs Exited 857 869 830' 823 ' 786 876 = 784 Starting Vehs 80 76 68 80 75 73 87 Ending Vehs ` 110 79 , 103 =. 93 103. , 106 .126 Travel Distance mi 595 572 571 561 541 600 553 Travel Time_(hr) • e , -� 27.5 ; 25.4 25.0 24.5 .23.8' 26.6 ;24.0 Total Delay(hr) 9.9 8.4 8.2 8.0 8.0 8.9 7.8 Total Stops` 890 809 818 792 " '780 , 838 741 Fuel Used(gal) 22.7 21.5 21.6 21.1 20.4 22.7 20.8 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 . End Time 8:00 iTotal Time(min) 15'; Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. Number p 9 10 Avg £ Vehs Entered 797 850 822 848 Vehs Exited 813 871 814 ° 833 _. Starting Vehs 114 115 75 82 Ending Vehs .. 98 • 94 83 . 97 Travel Distance(mi) 558 576 550 568 Travel Time(hr) 24.1 .25.1. 24.2 25.0 Total Delay(hr) 7.8 8.1 8.0 8.3 Total Stops 762 793 - 786 = 801 - Fuel Used(gal) 20.8 21.4 20.8 21.4 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 43 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 e End Time 8:15 (Total Time(min) . 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. -unRiiikrT a ' 9 Q k3 a @ .o Vehs Entered 723 798 727 724 655 756 ' 741 Vehs Exited _ 751 788 742 757 699 786 791 Starting Vehs 110 79 103 93 103 106 120 Ending Vehs. 82T' 89 88 . 60 : 59 - 76 , 7Q Travel Distance(mi) 523 561 509 519 453 519 548 Travel Time(hr) 22.9 24.1 ` 21.5 21.6 18.8 22.6 23.5 Total Delay(hr) 7.6 7,6 6.6 6.3 5.4 7.2 7.5 Total Stops _ . 728 .771 704 667 :- 615 713 708 Fuel Used(gal) , 19.8 20.8 18.9 19.0 16.9 19.5 20.5 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time , 8:00 , - - End Time 8:15 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. Run Number ` ' 0 a• 40 'vg Vehs Entered 716 728 741 729 Vehs Exited 732 745 752 753 Starting Vehs 98 94 83 97 Ending Vehs° .. . 82 77 72 70 Travel Distance(mi) 470 494 516 511 (Travel Time(hr) .19.6 21.3 21.6 21.8 ; Total Delay(hr) 5.6 6.7 6,5 6.7 Total.Stops . 634 '689 -. 663 687 Fuel Used(gal) 17.6 18.8 19.2 19.1 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB . •Page 5 44 Queuing and Blocking Report . 2025 Existing AM 02/19/2025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave .. ovement E WB Directions Served L TR L - LT R Maximum Queue ft) 34 3 - Average Queue(ft) 6 0 5 32 48 95th Queue(ft) 23 - 2 22,: 69 80 ` Link Distance(ft) 2746 -407 - upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) . Storage�Bay Dist(ft) : 160 250 110 Storage BIk Time(%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0. Q Intersection: 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd ovement g13 13 El3 Ida SB i SB Directions Served L L T T T T R L L R Maximum Queue(ft) 229 232 190 142. 272 234: 208 224 177 203 Average Queue(ft) 122 134 50 75 166 118 93 126 54 77 �95th Queue(ft) 195 °205 : 127 122- 246 216 164 199 151 152 Link Distance(ft). 642 642 702 702 362 362 Upstream BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage;Bay-Dist;(ft) - 250 ,t 250 550 330 Storage BIk Time(%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 1 0 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr ovemen Qg Directions Served UL L R Maximum Queue(ft) 34 93 33 Average Queue(ft) 7 30 10 95th Queue U 28 72 29, Link Distance O 389 389 upstream Blk Time %) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Disti t) 250 Storage Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) p 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report. CPB ` Page 6 45 Queuing and Blocking Report 2025 Existing AM 02119/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr . NW,. NW G ` Movement ° , SE S` � ° NW NW` Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L R LTR Maximum Queue(ft) 54 212 175 , 152.. 162 97 86 106 104 24 Average Queue(ft) 6 114 65 69 90 13 28 49 46 2 95th Queue(ft) 32 187 142 124 140 53 67 94 81 12. Link Distance(ft) 432 432 2746 2746 224 upstream Blk Time<(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 200 200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 r , 0 0 0 0. Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty:'1 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr 2025 Existing AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 7 46 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd 02/19/2025 ;Mavement . EBL EBT 3 WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations " ft +4' r 11 r Traffic Volume(vph) 387= 609 498 399 545 414. Future Volume(vph) 387 609 498 399 545 414 Ideal Flow v h I 1900 1900 1900 1900' 1900 1900 Lp p) Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6.4 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 , 0.97 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 fit Protected 0.95 1.00 100 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(prat) 3502. 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 Fit Permitted` . 0.95 1`.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 Satd.Flow(perm). 3502 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 peak-hourfactor,PHF ` 0.95. 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 407 641 524 420 574 436 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 27 0 120 Lane Group Flow(vph) 407 641 524 393 574 316 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0%. 0% 0%` 0% 0%, Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+ov Prot pm+ov Protected Phases _ 5 2 6 4 4_ 5 .` Permitted Phases 6 4 actuated Green,G(s) 15.5 39.6 17.7 36.5 18.8 34.3 Effective Green,g(s) 15.5 39.6 17.7 36.5 18.8 34.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22. 0.56° 0.25' 0.52 ° 0.27 0.48 Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6.4 Vehicle Extensions) 3.0 3.0. 3.0 3.0' 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 766 2019 902 992 929 928 iris Ratio Prot c0.12 0.18. c0.15 0.11 c0.16• 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.12 k/c Ratio 0.53 0.32' 0.58'' 0.40 0.62 - 0.34 Uniform Delay,dl 24.4 8.4 23.3 10.4 22.8 11.3 Progression Factor 1.00 100; 1.00, 1.00 1,00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 ,0.7 0.1 1.0 0.3 1.2 0.2 17elay_(s) 25.2 8.5 24.3 10.7. 24.1 11.5 Level of Service C A C BC B Approach Delay(s) 14.9 18.2 18.6 Approach LOS B B li +.1-1/-:TTileill Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B iiCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58. Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.8 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/2812025 2025 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report. CPB • -Page 1 47 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance &Apperson Dr 02/19/2025 Movement ' :`... : SEL` ° SET.° ,SER NWL .NWF =„NWR NEL° ¢ NET='° NE 1: .-SWL . ° SWT° SWft Lane Configurations 1 +1, 1111 +1+ ; 'I + r 4+ Traffic Volume(vph) 2 . 520 84 359 532 0. 68 0 359. 4 3 Future Volume(vph) 2 520 84 359 532 0 68 0 359 4 3 2 Ideal:Flow(php,) 1900 ; 1900' 1900 ~ 1900 . 1900 1900 1900. ` 1900 , 1900 1900 1900. _;1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor f.00 0.95 0.97 ,0.95 '1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 Fit Protected `' 0.95 - 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98- Satd.Flow(prat) 1805 3530. 3502 3610 1805 1615 1803 Flt Permitted , ° 0.95 s 1.00 0.95 .1.00 0.95 .1.00 0.98: _ Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3530 3502 3610 1805 1615 1803 Peak-hour factor,PHF- , 0.98 ,0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98, 0.98 - 0.98 0.98 098 0.98 0,98 Adj. Flow(vph) 2 531 86 366 543 0 69 0 366 4 3 2 RTQR Reduction(vph); 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 259 °0 2 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 2 610 0 366 543 0 69 0 107 0 7 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) " 0%,• 0%. 1% 0% 0% 0%" 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%d Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split pm+ov Split NA Protected Phases 5 " 2 ' 1 n = -6 _ -3 3° : 1 ,° 4 , 4 Permitted Phases 3 3 Actuated Green,G(s), 1.1 27.1 , 13.1. .39.1 a 6.9. 20.0 . 1.1 Effective Green,g(s) 1.1 27.1 13.1 39.1 6.9 20.0 1.1 Actuated g!C Ratio _ - 0.02 :0.40 0.19 0.57 0.10 ` 0.29` ' 0.02 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 =' '3.0 ' °30 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 29 1402 672 2069 182 473 29 Vls Ratio Pint 0.00° c0.17 ° c0.10 0.15 c0.04 0.04 c0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 Vitt Ratio 0.07 -0.43 - 0.54 0.26 0.38 0.23 0.24 Uniform Delay,d1 33.0 15.0 24.9 7.3 28.6 18.2 33.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , 1.00 .1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.2 0.9 0.1 1.3 0.2 4.3 Delays) 34.1 15.2 - 25.8 7.4 30.0 `18.5 ° 375 Level of Service C B C A C B D Approach Delayfs) 15.2 , . 14.8 • 20.3 37.5 Approach LOS B B C - D ntersection Summary ' ' , . ¢ ,. '. , ._ - '° HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45 ' ° - Actuated Cycle Length(s) 68.2 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization , 58.4% - .ICU Level of Service , .B Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2025 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 48 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir.&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave 02/19/2025 intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2.2 Mo ement ;` EBL °EBT,' ERR WRL .WBT WBR BL NBT °NBR ``•Sl3t. ° SBT SBR Lane Configurations ft 4 r 4 r 4, Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 887 79 34. 852 9 23 0 93 12 3 18 Future Vol,vehlh 3 887 79 34 852 9 23 0 93 12 3 18 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 ° 0 -0 0 0 0. 0 = 0 0 0 0. 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RTChannelized - None ., - None - - None ' • -._None Storage Length 160 ` - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - Ueh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 -"., 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 914 81 35 878 - 9 24 0 96 12 3 19 +Mitajor/Minor . Majorl Major2 Minor1 ' `. s Conflicting Flow All 887 0 0 995 0 0 1472 1918 498 1411 1949 439 Stage 1 . . - - 961 . 961 -: 948 948: Stage 2 - - - - - 511 957 - 463 1001 Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 75 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 . - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 772 - - 703 - 90 . 68 523; 100 65 571 Stage 1 - - - - - - 279 337 - 284 342 - Stage 2 - - - 5.19 339 - 554 323° - Platoon blocked,% - - - - May Cap-11 Maneuver 772 - . 703 - - 80 . 64 523- 78 61 571 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 80 64 - 78 61 - Stage-1 - - - - - 278 336 - 283 325 Stage 2 - - - - - - 473 322 - 451 322 - approach 1111. SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.4 24.2 38.5 � HCM LOS C E itti La elMajar Mvmt NBLONBLn EBL'IEBT EI3R�tIVBL�1NBTi1NBR1S jr(111011111111.1111111.11111111.011111 Capacity(veh/h) . a 80 523 772 - 703 141 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.296 0.183 0,004 - - 0.05 - - 0.241 HCM Control Delay(s) 67.9 13.4 9.7 - . , - 10.4 - 38.5 HCM Lane LOS F B A - - B - - E HCM 95th%tile-Q(veh) 1.1 0.7 0 - 0.2 - 0.9 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2025 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 49 HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr 02/19/2025 ntersection Int Delay;s/veh 1.2 Movement -WBR SER Lane Configurations f+ ++ r r [Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 11 . 973 875 45 , ,40. 25 Future Vol,vehlh 1 11 973 875 45 40 25 'Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length - 250 - - 200 0 0 Veh!in Median Stora a # - . .0 0 - :. 0 . '. Grade,% - - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factory 97 " 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Julvmt Flow :1 11 1003 902 46 41 26 ajar/Mi or Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 902 •948 0 - 0 1428 451 Stage 1` ° ,; - 902 . Stage 2 - - - - - 526 - Critical Hdwy6.4 4.1, - - 6.8` 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.8 i Follow-up Hdwy 2.5 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 PotCap-1 Maneuver 390 732 - - 128 561 Stage 1 - - - - - 361 - Stage 2 - - - 563 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov•Cap-1 Maneuver 678 678 - - - 126 561 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 126 - Stage 1 - - . - 355 Stage 2 - - - - 563 - Approach 123 HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 33.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lra"n,e1,MaTifiM,,nt EBL EBT T BT WBR SELr'1 SELln2 'Nosy(veti/h) 678 - - 126 561 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.327 0.046 tiCM Control Delay O 10.4 - ' - 46.9 11.7 ; HCM Lane LOS B - - - E B HCM 95th%tile Q(vehL 0.1 a - - - 1.3 0.1 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2025 Existing PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 50 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 Summary of All Intervals 'un Number g . 83 4 0 W Start Time . 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time° - _ - 5:30 ` 5:30 ' 5:30;`- 5:30 5:30 T 5:30 ' '5:30 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded(min) _ 60 ,60 60 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals . 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 3359 3254 3162 3093 3191 3231 3161 Uehs Exited 3356 -.3236 :3170' 3098 3170 3240 315d Starting Vehs 92 85 98. 88 76 93 82 Ending Vehs `_ 95 = 103 90 °83 97 84 93 Travel Distance(mi) 2348 2256 2197 2125 2207 2245 2178 Travel;Time(hr); 99.5 . 93.9 °91.1 88.4 91.6 94.2 90.6 Total Delay(hr) - 30.7 27.6 26.6 25.9 27.0 28.3 26.5. Total Stops ° 3068 •_ 2848 2832 , 2749 2811 -- 2848 2785 Fuel Used(gal) 87.1 82.1 79.9 77.9 80.7 82.3 79.1 Summary of All Intervals un Number 0 .9 11D _ Avg Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time .; 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 Total Time(min) . .. 75 75 75 . 75 Time Recorded(min) 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals ' ,p 4 4 . - 4• 4 Vehs Entered 3213 3338 3141 3214 Webs Exited 3204 3331 , '3165 `' 3211 : Starting Vehs 92 81 93 88 Ending Vehs . - 101 ° 88 69 88 Travel Distance(mi) 2238 2330 2219 2234 Travel Time(hr) 93.6 98.0 - 92.6 93.3 Total Delay(hr) 28.0 29.6 27.6 27.8 Total Stops ` T 2828 t 2979 2875 2863' Fuel Used(gal) .82.1 85.1 81.3 81.8 Interval #0 Information Seeding . ,Start Time , 4:15 - End Time 4:30 Total Time(min) 15 `" . Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. ;No data recorded this interval. 1 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 51 SimTraffic Simulation Summary _ 2025 Existing PM 02119/2025 Interval #1 Information Recording ;Start Time 4:30 End Time 4:45 Total Time(min) 15 1 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors.%in Number Ea 4 g d Vehs Entered 866 854 846 789 833 790 795 Vehs Exited - 849 838 822 798, . ; . ° 822 tl, 780 - 789 Starting Vehs 92 85 98 88 76 93 82 Ending Vehs _ : ;:; . •e 109 101 - _� 122 -- ,79 : 87 103 89 Travel Distance(mi 595 571 579 553 565 545 546 Travel Time(hr)- : ° 25.0 24.0 24.6 23.3 . 23.8 22.8` ,-. 23 0: Total Delay(h9. 7.5 7.1 7.5 7.1 7.1 6.8 6.9 Total Stops 798 698 776 735, n 731: 696 7071 . Fuel Used(gal) 22..1 . 20.7 21.2 20.4 . 21.0 20.4 20.0 Interval #1 Information Recording . Start Time 4:30 End Time 4:45 Total Time(min) 15' Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. un Number ,. 0 0 9D Avg Vehs Entered 828 854 806 826 Vehs Exited 846 . 848 .805 .818 Starting Vehs - 92 81 93 88 Ending Vehs 74 .'87 94 93 Travel Distance(mi) 593 586 563 570 Travel Time(hr) 25.1 24.6 23.1 - 23.9. _ Total Delay(hr) 7.7 7.4 • 6.6 7.2 Total Stops - 756 759 686 735 - ' Fuel Used(gal) 21.7 21.2 20.5 20.9 • 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 52 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time • 4:45, _ . End Time 5:00 'Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Number- °_ - ', 9' : `3, .- '@ Q _ i ,p Vehs Entered 888 776 768 752 854 829 799 yetis Exited 873 771 817 741 854 850 807i Starting Vehs 109 101 122 79 87 103 88 Ending Vehs = r' 124 106 . 73 - 90 ,. • 87 82 80 Travel Distance mi) 618 567 550 502 583 576 556 Travel Time( 27.2 23.4 23.0 20.8 24.5 24.4 - 23:Q Total Delay(hr) 9.2 6.9 6.8 5.9 7.4 7.5 6.6 Total Stops 853 710 705 652 760 723 695 Fuel Used(gal) 23.4 20.6 20.3 18.5 21.4 21.0 20.0 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 fiotal Time(min) ' 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Number 8' :' 9" 10 . m Avg .Q Vehs Entered 819 837 789 810 Vehs Exited 791 822 781 810 Starting Vehs 74 87 94 93 Ending Vehs . 102 102 • 102 92 , . Travel Distance(mi) 574 592 547 567 Travel Time(hr) 24.2 25.3 23.1 ' 23.9 Total Delay(hr) 7.3 7.9 7.1 7.2 Total Stops 736 777, 726 730 . Fuel Used(gal) 21.1 22.0 20.2 20.8 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 53 SimTraffic Simulation.Summary 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth=Factors,Anti PHF. Nu her d 9 i3 `3. 4 p w ° Vehs Entered 778 801 785 759 777 825 804 Uehs Exited 809 817 779 753 782 800 787i Starting Vehs 124 106 73 90 87 82 80 Ending Vehs 93 90 79 96 82 : 107 97 Travel Distance(mi) 550 555 537 - 522 548 555 548 Travel Time(LT) 23.1 22.8 21.7 - . 21.5 e 22.6 23.4 229 Total Delay(hr) 6.9 6.5 6.1 6.1 6.6 7.0 6.7 .Total Stops 682, 695 677 " 657 , 709 733 719 Fuel Used(gal) 20.2 20.1 19.3 19.2 19.8 20.3 20.1 Interval #3 Information Recording StartTirne 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. gun Number 8 Q i) Avg. Vehs Entered .774 800 752 785 Vehs Exited 788 806 761 789 Starting Vehs 102 • 102 102 92 Ending Vehs°. 88 96 93 90 Travel Distance(mi) 553 555 538 546 Travel Time(hr) 22.6 23.1. 22.2 `' 22.6,. i u; Total Delay(hr) 6.5 6.8 6.5 6.6 Total Stops . : : .682 713. 716 : 697 . , Fuel Used(gal) 20.1 20.3 . . 19.6 19.9 • 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report:' CPB Page 4 SimTraffic Simulation Summary _ 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 - Interval #4 Information. Recording Start Time _; 5:15 - r End Time 5:30 TotatTime(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. ' IlIINumber , 9 g al Q 0 d ` Vehs Entered V V 827 823 763 793- 727 - 787 763 Vehs Exited 825 810T. 752 806 712 810 767E Starting Vehs 93 90 79 96 82 107 97 Ending Vehs` p E..v_95 `V 103 z 90 V: 83, . ::97 84 '.93 Travel Distance mi) 586 564 531 547 511 569 527 Travel Time(hr) 24.3 23.7 21.8 22.8 , 20.8 23.6 21.71 Total Delay(hr) 7.1 7.1 6.2 - 6.7 5.9 7.0 6.3 Tatal Stops 735 745- 674 705 611 696 ; 664' Fuel Used(gal) 21.4 20.7 19.1 19.9 18.6 20.7 19.1 Interval #4 Information Recording StartTime. 'q,- 5:15= , F, , End Time - 5:30 V Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. - 3r )Number 0 Q 43 Avg Vehs Entered - 792 ` 847 794 789 V Vehs Exited =779 855 818 ' - 795} Starting Vehs V 88 96 93 . 90 Ending Vehs ;. 4 '101 e, 88 69 .. 88;: , Travel Distance(mi) 518 598 569 552 Travel Time(hr) 21.8 25.0. 24.0 23.0 Total Delay(hr) 6.4 7.6 7.3 6.8 Total Stops 654 730 747 - ' ` 695 Fuel Used(gal) 19.1 21.6 21.1 20.1 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr - SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 55 Queuing and Blocking Report 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave n ,ement EB EB t 0 I D ) SB_ Directions Served L T TR L LT R LTR ilaximurn Queue(ft) 8 7 44 58 78 72 Average Queue(ft) 1 0 0 13 18 35 21 95th Queue(ft} . 9 6 5 36 46 58 53 Link Distance(ft) 2746 2746 407 192 upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist°(ttt)) 160 .-:250 110 Storage Blk Time(°/�° 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh)° �m 0 0 Intersection: 6: Brandon Ave& Peters Creek Rd Movement EB�EB�EBSEBSV'ItB WB�WB�SB) 11115,B Directions Served UL •L T T T TR L L R Maximum Queue(ft) 198 205 168 173 243 219 167 287 225= 167 Average Queue(ft) 103 116 74 99 156 102 - 72 181 116 72 95th Queue(ft) 166 177 135 155 225 197 130 260 217 128 - Link Distance(ft) 642 642 702 702 362 362 Upstream Blk Time(%) 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 250 550 330 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr ovement SE Directions Served UL L R Maximum Queue(ft). 43 87 42 Average Queue(ft 8 29 12 95th Queue(ft) 30 64 31 Link Distance(ft) 389 389 _ Upstream Blk Time-(%) Queuing Penalty(veh Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 Storage Blk Time(%) Que ing Penaltyjveh} 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 56 . . . Queuing and Blocking Report 2025 Existing PM 02/19/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr Movement „ SE RE= SE NW NW NW NW NE NE NE .' SW, Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L T R LTR Maximum`Queue`) :r 46 208 162 134 140 60 87 87 16 127 = 41 Average Queue(ft) 2 116 64 55 75 12 24 36 1 61 9 95th Queue(ft)N ° 23 183. 133 106 121 41 62 70 17 103 32.° Link Distance(ft) 432 432 2746 2746 278 224 upstream BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 200 `200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 . 0 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty:0 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr 2025 Existing PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 7 57 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd 05/13/2025 Movement, �: . qo® $, EB,L. •EBT WB�. WBR . � SBL .SBR ��. a ° i Lane Configurations 144 4 T r Traffic Volume(vph) ` -- 51=1° - =457 =°° 565 487 351 411 ., , Future Volume(vph) 511 457 565 487 351 411 Ideal Flow'(vphpl)_: . ° ° 1900 1900 _°x.1900 1900 _,1900 1900 ° Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6.4 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 -0.95 . 0,95 1.00 ` 0.97- 1:00 _ . Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected ' 0.95 '.1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1'.00 °' Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 it Permitted ° 0.95' '1.00 1.00 1.00' 0.95 1.00 ° Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0:92 Adj. Flow(vph) 555 497 614 529 382 447 RTOR Reduction(v-ph) 0 0 0 9 0 85 Lane Group Flow(vph) 555 497 614 520 382 362 Heavy Vehicles'(%o) 0% 0% 0% °'1% 0% 1% Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+ov Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 5 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 19.4 45.8 20.0 42.1 22.1 41.5 Effective Green,g(s) 19.4 45.8 20.0 42.1 22.1 41.5 Actuated,g/C Ratio , 0.24° 0.57 0.25 0.52 , 0.28 0.52 Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0:. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 846 2059 899 977 963 953 k/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.14 c0.17 c0.15 0.11 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.13 /c Ratio 0.66 0.24 0.68 .0.53 0.40 0.38 Uniform Delay,d1 27.4 8.6 27.3 '12.6 23.7 11.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 =' Incremental Delay,d2 1.8 0.1 2.2 - 0.6 0.3 0.3 Delays) 293 8,7 - 29.4 13.2 23.9 11.9 Level of Service C A C B C B Approach.Delay_(s) _19.5 21.9 ;, 17.5 . Approach LOS B C B ntersection Surnma y . HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B 'HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio - 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 80.3 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ° ICU Level of Service. B Analysis Period(min) 15 - c Critical Lane Group 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2030 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 58 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance &Apperson Dr 05/13/2025 ;Movement .:. ` ,... ' SEL 4'SET USER . NWL NWT NWR 'tVEL NEST NER S_1_N_L SWT SV4'I Lane Configurations I + + VI f1) ) + r 4, Traffic Volume:(vph) 5 497 °.:.97 446 461 •3 ,•103 ., , 0 273 .0 1 '. d, Future Volume(vph) 5 497 97 446 461 3 103 0 273 0 1 0 Meal'Flow(vphpl) .1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190t) Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor u 1.00 .0 95 `0.97 `0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected ° '0.95 . 1.00 - '0.95 1.00 ' 0.95 . C00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3522 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Fit Permitted. . .° - , 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 °_ 1 Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3522 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,94 `0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow(vph) 5 529 103 474 490 3 110 0 290 0 1 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) .. ' 0 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 192 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 5 623 0 474 493 0 110 0 98 0 1 0 Heavy Vehicles'(%) 0% ,0% 0% 0% -1% '0%o _ :.0% • 0% 0% .0% 0% ,Q%o Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split pm+ov NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 1 4 4 Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green,G(s) 1.0 ' 28.0 16.6 43.6 8.5 25.1 1.0 - Effective Green,g(s) 1.0 28.0 16.6 43.6 8.5 25.1 1.0 Actuated g/C°Ratio , 0.01 0:38 0.22 0.59 _ 0.11 0.34 = 0.01 ., Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s).. 3.0 °-3.0 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 -3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 24 1330 784 2101 207 547 25 r/iRatio Prot 0.00 c0.18 c0.14 0.14 c0 06 0.04 c0°00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 1c Ratio 0.21 0.47 - ° .0.60. 0.23 0.53 0.18 0:04 Uniform Delay,d1 36.2 17.4 25.8 7.3 30.9 17.3 36.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 ., 1.00 1:00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.3 0.3 1.3 0.1 2.6 0.2 0.7 Delay(s) 40.4 17.7 27.1 7.3 33.5 17.4 36.7 Level of Service D B C A C B D qpproach DelayJs) e. . 17.9 17.0 - 21.8 . 36.7 , Approach LOS B B C D )ntersection Summary, �� ' ` HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio. 0.51 - °', ...• Actuated Cycle Length(s) 74.1 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 Intersection,Capacity,Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A I Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group. 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 715 am 01/28/2025 2030 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 59 HCM 2010.TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir &Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave 05/13/2025 ntgrsecban ii' ° Int Delay,s/veh 4.1: utov'Tem t EBL EITMEBRaINBIWYBT WBR NBL NBAINBRitSBINSBT SBR Lane Configurations ++ r 4 I 4, Traffic Vol,-veh/h' 14 . 778 29 14 `907 22 51 2 207 0 0 0 Future Vol,veh/h 14 778 29 14 907 22 51 2 207 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 ` Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized �= None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 160 - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - Veh'in Median Storage,# 0 . - - 0 0 - - ,. 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92✓ 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MvrotFlow 15 846 32 15 986 24 55 2 225 0 0 0 ajarlMinor Maj0�r1M'ajor2Minor1, Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1010 0 0 878 0 0 1415 1932 439 1470 1924 493 Stage 1 - - ; -,_., - 892 892 _- 1016 1016 - J Stage 2 - - - - - - 523 1040 - 454 908 - Critical Hdwy 4,1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5. 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.5 5.5 65 .5.5 '` � Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver-" 694 - 778 - - 99- 67 57.1 90 68 . 527'. ° Stage 1 - - - - - - 307 363 - 259 318 - Stage 2 .° - 510 310 - 560 :357 Platoon blocked,% - - -May Cap-1 Maneuver , 694 778 - - 96 64 571 51 °` 65 .527 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 96 64 - 51 65 - Stage 1 _. - - - - - 300 355 253 312 Stage 2 - - - - - - 500 304 - 330 349 - pp ,ach , . ,211 NB SB . HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 .0.1 30.7 0 HCM LOS D A 'inor Lra e'/tulajo7ti1vmt NBLn NBL 2 EBL °ICI EBR ME, ZEU WBR SBLn1 `° Capacity(veh/h) .. 94 571 694 ` - 778;. - ~-- _ HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.613 0.394 0.022 - - 0.02 - - - JiCM Control Delay(s) 90.9 15.3. 10.3 -z , 9.7 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS F CB - - A - - A HCM95th%tile"Q(veh) 2.9 .1.9 0.1 0.1 - _ . 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2030 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 60 HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr 05/13/2025 nterseefion ` :: R;. vat aW Int Delay,s/veh 1.5 "ice'° °WBR° SEL SER Aux ,$ Lane Configurations A ft 44 r " r Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 947 946, 35 41 20 Future Vol,vehm 13 947 946 35 41 20 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT°Channelized - None None - None ` Storage Length 250 - - 200 0 0 Weh in Median Storage,# - 0 '0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 ` 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 14 1029 1028 38 45 22 ator/Minor:- a°, °Major1 Major2`° Minor2 0, Conflicting Flow All 1066 0 - 0 1571 514 �. Stage l - - - 1028 Stage 2 - - - - 543 - pritical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - Pleat'Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - '3.5 3.3 ;Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ,r 661 - - - 103 511. Stage 1 - - - - 310 - Stage 2 - - - 552 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 661 - - 101 , '511 . Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 101 - Stage.1,. . - - 303 Stage 2 - - - - 552 6pproach _ ,.�. W8 SE : HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 48.6 HCM LOS E pinor L /Major MVmt EBIREEBTiINBIr*SNBRTSEt! SELn2 Capacit Aveh h) — 661 - - = 101 511 —` HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.441 0.043 J-ICM Control Delay :10.6 - -, ,66.2. 12.4 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - - 1.9 0.1 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2030 Background AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 61 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Summary of All Intervals umber: N_ 3 Q R Q e ,Yi Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 End Time '8:15 8:15 8:15- 8:15 8:15 8:15- 8:15 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded(min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 6d #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 of Recorded Intervals ` 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 3278 3221 3173 3160 3067 3148 3090 Vehs Exited'•.` :_ -: 3237 3211`° 3190 3165 3048 3122 .' 3098 Starting Vehs 80 97 101 89 76 81 - 91 Ending Vehs . 121 107 84 84 95 107 85 Travel Distance(ng 2248 2231 2159 2170 2091 2141 2089 Travel Time(hr) 102.6 100.8 97.6 97.3. 94.5 97.6 : 94.6 Total Delay(hr) 32.4 31.0 30.2 29.4 29.4 30.6 29.0 Total Stops• '"- -il` 3063 ° ' 2973 2866 2886 2878 2930 2783 Fuel Used(gal) 87.1 85.8 82.8 83.1 _ 80.5 82.3 80.6 Summary of All Intervals un Number 0 9 '00 Avg Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded(min) r 60 60 60 ' 60 -. ' of Intervals 5 5 5 5 of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4°,. "' . Vehs Entered 3210 3180 3098 3163 Vehs Exited 1 3213 3176 3090 3155 Starting Vehs 97 83 '79 86 Ending Vehs. ° 94 87 87 94 Travel Distance(mi) 2197 2187 2113 2163 Travel Time(hr) :98.5 98.8 ; 95.5 97.8 Total Delay(hr) 29.8 30.5 29.5 30.2 Total Stops 2869 2913 2840 2898 A Fuel Used(gal) - 84.6 83.8 81.4 83.2 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:00 End Time 7:15. ;Total Time(min) ` • 15, ;. Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB - Page 1 62 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time .-' ,;: : _ 7:157 ;n > :'F - §. , End Time 7:30 Total Time(min) 15 _ _ Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. 15)Number 9 R @ a @ p Vehs Entered 807 798 812 745 718 723 750 Vehs Exited > --- 795 796 ..808 757 696 709 747 Starting Vehs - 80 97 101 89 76 81 91 Ending Vehs`; '` 92 99 =°105 77 - 98 95 94 Travel Distance mi 536 537 555 495 485 485 510 Travel Time(hr) F 24.9 24.0 25.1 22.4 _ 21.1 21.9 22.0 Total Delay(hr) 8.1 7.3 7.7 6.8 6.0 6.7 6.6 Total Stops 753 720 `748 687 647 656 658 Fuel Used(gal) 21.3 20.8 21.2 18.9 18.3 18.6 19.5 Interval #1 Information Recording. Start Time �. 7:15 . � , , - ��. End Time 7:30 Total Time(min) 15 1 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. gun Number D 0 49 Avg Vehs Entered 759 784 - 753 765 - Vehs'Exited- 773 791 728 759 Starting Vehs 97 83 79 86 Ending Vehs : . . : . , t, . F=.83 76 104 . 90 - Travel Distance(mi) 537 549 528 522 - Travel Time(hr) 23.8 24.5 23.3 23.3 - j Total Delay(hr) - 7.0 7.4 6.9 7.0 - Total Stops 689 719 679 695 Fuel Used(gal) 20.7 21.1 20.1 20.0 - 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTrafc Report CPB Page 2 63 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background AM 05113/2025 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time -: ° • 7:30` End Time 7:45 Total Time(min) 15u Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. o ur Number 9 Q 3 a 6 0 W Vehs Entered 791 723 751 789 771 739 793- yehs.Exited 790 756 762 �67. 777 743 799 a Starting Vehs 92 99 105 77 98 95 94 Ending Vehs ' .•-'d 93 - 66 94 '99-- • 92, ` 91 P 88 Travel Distance(mi) 554 527 520 532 538 - 498 537 Travel Time(hr) 24.8 23.0 23.4 238=. 24.2 -°' 22.2 24.6 Total Delay(hr) 7.5 6.6 7.2 7.2 - 7.5 6.6 7.8 Total'Stops 726 `°" 647 684 711=._ 739 690 7171 Fuel Used(gal) 21.2 19.9 20.0 20.2 20.9. 18.8 20.8 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time(min) .15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. gun Nu ber 8 . Q 10 Avg ._ Vehs Entered 801 780 739 -764 Vehs Exited 789 , 746 '756 766 = Starting Vehs - 83 76 104 90 Ending Vehs • 95 ,:: 110 . 87 92 Travel Distance(mi) 547 501 504 526 Traver Time(hr) 24.2 22.5 22.6 23.5 Total Delay(hr) - 7.2 6.9 6.8 7.1 Total Stops 705 688 716 701 Fuel Used(gal) 20.8 19.1 19.4 20.1 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr - - SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 64 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Interval #3 Information Recording Part Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 !Total Time(min) 4 _ 15.' w Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. °Alias1 tuber 9 II E3 a t3 0 Vehs Entered 895 868 818 830 837 894 839 Vehs Exited 888 826, 808 825 832 882 841 Starting Vehs 93 66 94 99 92 91 88 f=ndi'ng Vehs 100 ..!.' o 108 Z-104 104 97 103 . :.86 Travel Distance(mi) 628 588 541 573 571 595 550 Travel Time(hr) 29.1 27.1 24.6 257•.` 26.7 28.0 25:5 Total Delay(hr) 9.6 8.6 7.7 7.9 8.9 9.4 8.0 Total Stops v y 862 804 733 766,- 814 864 760 Fuel Used(gal) 24.2 22.5 20.7 22.2 22.2 22.9 21.5 Interval #3 Information Recording . Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total,Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. Number p g 93 Avg, Vehs Entered - 871 835 836 851 Wehs Exited 850 835 810 839 Starting Vehs 95 110 87 92 EndingVehs - s r 116 <„ ';a • 110 _113, 102 `.,. Travel Distance(mi) 572 587 555 576 Travel Time(hr) 26.1 26.7 25.7 26.5 . I Total Delay(hr) 8.1 8.3 8.4 8.5 Total Stops 1 766 765 742 789 Fuel Used(gal) 22.2 22.5. 21.6 22.2 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 65 - SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 , ,,s .. End Time 8:15 - Total Time(min) 15 i. Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. D mher ° 9 `r ai 44 F_ >3 0 Vehs Entered 785 832 792 796 741 792 708. Vehs Exited 764 833 812 816 743 788 709 Starting Vehs 100 108 104 104 97 103 86 Ending Vehs, :i 121 s 107 84 84 °-;95 107 `-85 Travel Distance(mi) 530 579 543 571 497 563 492 tTravel Time( 23.8 26.7 24.5 25.4 22.5 25.4 22.d Total Delay(hr 7.3 8.6 _ 7.6 7.6 6.9 7.9 6.5 Total Stops 722 802 701 722 678 720 ` 646 Fuel Used(gal) 20.4 22.6 20.9 21.8 19.2 22.0 18.8 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time, -., 8:00 End Time 8:15 Total Time(min) 15, Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. krA Number 0 0 9D Avg Vehs Entered 779 781 770 779 Uehs Exited ,801 . 804 "796 786 ° . Starting Vehs 116 110 113 102 Ending Vehs - '94 87, a ' .87 94 s : -. .1 Travel Distance(mi) 541 550 526 539 Travel Time(hr) 24.4 25.1 24.0 24.4 , 1 Total Delay(hr) 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.5 Total Stops 709 741 703 712 Fuel Used(gal) - 20.8 21.2 20.3 20.8 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 66 - Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave ovement ° EB L�uD'= NB NB ° Directions Served L L LT R ,Maximum Queue(ft) 30 26 `. 109 103 Average Queue(ft) 7 5 36 52 95th Queue(ft 25 22 80 90 Link Distance(ft) 407 upstream Bik Time O Queuing Penalty(veh) 'Storage Bay Dist(ft) ° 160 250 110 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty(veh)r 1 0 Intersection: 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd ovement ;,. EB IE);L EB .. ,_. WB .,. SB, SB Directions Served L L T T T T R L L R Maximum Queue(ft) 230 238 157 125 263 240 241 220' 180 191 ` Average Queue(ft) 131 140 47 71 171 120 111 135 64 67 95th Queue(ft) 202 211 111 116 243 213 199 205 165 135 Link Distance(ft) 642 642 702 702 362 362 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 250 550 330 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr ovement o WB , SE Directions Served UL R L R Maximum Queue(ft) 42 5 89 35 Average.Queue(ft) 8 0 30 10 95th Queue(iJ 30 4 68 29 Link Distance(ft) 389 389 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 200 Storage Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty((KO) 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 67 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Background AM 05/13/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr Movement SE SEAMI IIIKWAIIIMAIIIIIIIIIMIIIIII Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L T R •LTR aximum Queue°(ft)s 31 a 199 256 =s-`.170 178 . 117 99 ,--.121 44-` 135 22 ,.,- Average Queue(ft) 6 78 134 80 99 21 34 56 2 61 1 95th Queue(ft) 24 173 218 140 152 .: '70 77 98 40 - 110 12 Link Distance(ft) 432 2049 2049 281 223 Upstream Bik Time(5) , x3 Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ftj` .' 200 ` 200 200' 200 7 _ 150 <<1511 :.. Storage Blk Time(%) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection: 13: Apperson Dr ovement Directions Served Maximum Queue(ft) Average Queue(ft) 95th Queue(ft) Link Distance(ft) Upstream Blk Time(% e Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) Storage Blk Time(%) bueuing Penalty(veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty:5 2030 Background AM Peak Hr 2030 Background AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 7 68 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd 05/13/2025 �; .VIBR SBL • SBR .. 3•.' Movement ` _ `� EBL ' EBT WB1T .._• �a; Lane Configurations '' 14 ft r ',"i r Traffic Volume(vph) _ 407 '640 523 419. 573 1.,435 Future Volume(vph) 407 640 523 419 573 435 Ideal Flow(yphpl) . .. ° 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 -0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 -:1.00 1.00° , 1.00 0.95 100 Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00` Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 428 674 551 441 603 458 RTOR Reduction(vph)'. 0 . " 0 0 s°_ 39 0' <., 323 Lane Group Flow(vph) 428 674 551 402 603 135 Heavy Vehicles(%)' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+-ov Prot Prot Protected Phases ' 5 '._ 2 6 8 8 ;8 ° Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green;G s 15.9 ` 41.6 19.3 41.8 22.5 22.5. ° Effective Green,g(s) 15.9 41.6 19.3 41.8 22.5 22.5 Actuated g/C Ratio -e 0.21 0.54 0.25 0.55 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension(s)._' 3.0 ;' 3.0 3.0 ,30 3.0 , 3.0 ° - `; Lane Grp Cap(vph) 727 1963 910 1030 1030 475 :Ws Ratio Prot c0.12 =0.19 c0.15 0.11 c0.17 0 08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio . 0.59 .; 0.34 0.61 ; 0.39 0.59 0.28 Uniform Delay,d1 27.3 9.8 25.2 10.0 23.0 20.8 Progression Factor 4 1.00 ,100 1.00 100. 1.00 `,1.0D Incremental Delay,d2 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.9 0.3 Dela rL(s) 28.6. 99 26.4 10.2 23.9 21.1 - Level of Service C A C B C C Approach Delay(s) 17.1 19.2 22.7 Approach LOS B B C nteiseation Summa, . a :°4 ` . ,: . :. ' HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 76.5 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization . 58.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 . c Critical°Lane Group ' 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 69 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance &Apperson Dr 05/13/2025 Movement ` SEL SET SE NAIL-n' N T NWR ' -NEL•' NET. ;. NER MI, SWT S.R Lane Configurations vi +T, VI ft, li 4 r 4, Traffic Volume,(v l 2 547 .,(38 "377 , 559 0 71 '. . , 0 377 4 3 -. Future Volume(vph) 2 547 88 377 559 0 71 0 377 4 3 2 ideal Flow(v_phpl) 3 .,', 1900 1900 _ 1900 1900 ' 1900 1900 ` 1900 "..1900 1900 1900 1900 1990 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 •097 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 j Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 FIt Protected `. 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 _ 0.98 '- Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3530 3502 3610 1805 1615 1803 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 , 100 0.98 I Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3530 3502 3610 1805 - 1615 1803 Peak-hour factor;PHF . . 0.98 0.98 0.98 . 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 " 0:98. 0.98 0.98 0.98.° 0.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 2 558 90 385 570 0 72 0 385 4 3 2 RTOR Reduction(ph) e° 0' 7 0 ",= 0 • ," 0 0 . 0' ,a°.;11 269 0 2 .T U Lane Group Flow(vph) 2 641 0 385 570 0 72 0 116 0 7 0 Heavy Vehicles`(%)' :`,. 0% 0% 1% : °;0% 0% 0% 0% • ° 0% 0% 0% 0% ' ;0% Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Spilt pm+ov Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 ° 3 1 4 4 Permitted Phases 3 3 Actuated Green,G'(s)' 1.1 27.5 13.9 40.3 7.1 21.0 1.1 Effective Green,g(s) 1.1 27.5 13.9 40.3 7.1 21.0 1.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.40 ` 0.20 0.58 0.10 0.30 0.02 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensionn(s)• " . ° 3.0 3.0 -3.0� ; 3.0 3.0 3.0 , 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 28 1394 699 2090 184 487 28 girls Ratio Prot, 0.00 c0.18 c0.11 0.16 c0.04 ° 0:05 c0.00 ° v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 k/c Ratio • 0.07 0.46 ' 0.55 0.27 0.39 0.24 0.25 Uniform Delay,d1 33,7 15.6 25.0 7.3 29.2 18.3 33.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.2 0.9 0.1 1.4 0.3 4.7 Delay(s) 34.8 15.8 - 26.0 7.4 30.6 , 18.5 38.5- • '1 Level of Service C B C A C B D 'Approach Delay(s) 15.9 14.9 ` 20.4, 38.5 Approach LOS B B C D ntersection Summary-, HCM 2000 Control Delay 16,5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 ° ., . , Actuated Cycle Length(s) 69.6 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.4% ICU Level of Service B - Analysis Period(min) 15 b Critical Lane Group ' 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/2812025 2030 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 70 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir.&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave 05/13/2025 Int Delay,slveh 2.5 OVI116nt .0 e. ., EBL ,EBT EBRI SIMINBT INARROMI BT NBE SI SB- 6BR4;; - Lane Configurations ) tit r 4 r Traffic Vol,iyehtti A` _'3. ;'932. ' 83 36 895 .rv. 9: `" 24 , ;°' 0 A 98 : .13—, 3'°> ,",19: Future Vol,veh/h 3 932 83 36 895 9 24 0 98 13 3 19 Co Mlicting Peels,;#lhr ";.d b 0 0 "0. 0 '0 0. 0 ,0 r0 0. . . .0&: . Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Ghan ehaed" None —None._r r None None f Storage Length 160 - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - yeh in Median Storage,=#.,"4 =` °0 ° 0 0, Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour.'FaCtor 97 97 ` 97," " 97. 97 R 97.y 97" :e97 ;`,.97-. „97-, '97 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt-Flow r 3 961'. 86 -37 923 . 9 .- 1 25 0 40r1Minor,0 w 1 a1nr1I,``„: " `; .Y1061 r2 Conflicting Flow All 932 0 0 1047 0 0 1547 2016 524 1484 2050 462 'Stagel-°"— - -°.1010 1010 , 997," Stage 2 - - - - - - 537 1006 - 487 1053 - Cntical Hdwy -41 - :'4.1 ,` 7.5, '6.5. y:.6:9 "°7 5 6 5` fi.9.' Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - CriticahHdwy Stg=2 - 6 5;, -5 5 6:'5 5 5. Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 " 3.5 4 3.3 ` ,ppt Cap=1 Maneuver =° 743 r 4 .672 n 79° .o- 59 . 503 `" 88 7_I °5627 552 t. Stage 1 - - - - - - 261 320 - 265 325 - Stage 2 501 321 -536 306,; Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver-• -,743 • 672 70 56 503 7 53°53 552; Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 70 56 - 67 53 - Stage 1 ='` `260 ;° 319 264 -307- . Stage 2 - - - - - - 452 303 - 427 305 - Approach _ b. .';"EB :a .ti 1g HCM Control s a" , U:4_ . 27 4;" 46 "" HCM LOS D E rnar Lra ettula or Nlvmt - 'NBL'-`n1INBL EBL iEBI' EBF BNAVBT; ,VBRTSBL'n1 Capacity(vehlh};:.. r 70 -'503 743` . 672 . -123 7 1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.353 0.201 0.004 - - 0.055 - - 0.293 HCM'Contrrol'Dela, s -82:3'. 13.9 ;9 9 ' --a..10.7 - 46 HCM Lane LOS F BA - - B - - E HCM 95thy%tile Q(veh) a 1.3 ,0.7 ,0 0 2 7 1:9 ° 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 71 HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr 05/13/2025 Intersection nrsee on •� ° ar Int Delay,slveh 1.3 - EBUMEMEBTiWBTL1NBR SE1. 8ER 5a;" x¢ Lane Configurations tt 11 T r Traffic Vol,vehlh 1 ,12 1023 920 47 , 42' 26 Future Vol,vehlh 1 12 1023 920 47 42 26 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr -0 p. 0 0 0- 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RTChannelized . - None ° - None - -. None' Storage Length - .250 - - 200 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - , 0 Grade,% - - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 . 97 . '97 97 97 97 ] Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1' 12 1055 ° 948 48 43. 27 aJor/Mjnor. Major1 Major2 Minor2 3 = Conflicting Flow All 948 996 0 - 0 1502 474 Stage 1 ` - - . -. - 948 - Stage 2 - - - - - 554 - Critical Hdwy ' 6.4 4.1 - - 6.8 69 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 2.5 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 364 703 - - -115 542 Stage 1 - - - - - 342 - Stage 2 - - . ,a 545 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 652 652 - ' - ` - 113 542 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 113 - Stage 1�' - - - - ' 335 - Stage 2 - - - - - 545 - pproaeh BE = -;_ HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 38.8 HCM LOS E TrrapLane/Malor Mvmt EBL 1 31!' MT.WBR Capacity(vehlh) 652 113 542 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.383 0.049 HCM Control Delay(s) • 10.6 - 55.4 12 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.6 Q.2 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Background PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 72 SimTraffic Simulation Summary.. 2030 Background PM 05/13/2025 Summary of All Intervals nal Number 9 : , a 4) 0 0 Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time 5:30 ., 5:30 5:30 ,,_. 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30: Total Time(min) . 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded'(min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals ;- 4° 4 : ° 4 4, 4 4 ;:4 Vehs Entered 3371 3306 3321 3386 3349 3423 3437 Mehs Exited .r 3373 "` 3302 .3336 3398 3343 3446 ` 3416 Starting Vehs 107 101 96 96 98 117 94' Ending Vehs r. 105 ' 105 ° �—81 84 '' 104°` 94 .`115 Travel Distance(mi) 2353- 2333 2306 ' 2389 2357 2374 2393 Travel Time(hr) 105:4 102,4 101,6:` 105.5, 1139 : '104,1 106:5 . Total Delay(hr 36,2 34°2 34°2 35,5 45,0 34,4 36,3 Total Stops 3199 3107 ° 3011 '; 3123 3080 3096 - 3232, Fuel Used(gal) . ' -87.9 86.5 85.3 88.8 89,2 88.1 - 88.8 Summary of All Intervals ' Run Number , L ° . D . . = 10 ° Avg Start Time - 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time y. 5:30 : 5:30 o:,5:30,.` 5:30 j Total Time(min) 75 75 - 75 75 Time Recorded(min) , , . .. % -60 60 >> 60,. 60 , #of Intervals 5 5 .5 5 #of Recorded a Intervals ° ` 4 4 �° 4„• 4 Vehs Entered ' - 3386 3402 3292 3366 Uehs Exited ` ''' 3384 3412 x. 3313;' - 3372 u Starting Vehs 109 107 111 101 Ending Vehs Travel Distance(mi) 2376 2385 2309 2357 Travel Time(lit) 105.9 106,3 '102.0 , ' 105.4 ' Total Delay(hr) 36.4 36.4 34,2- 36.3 Total Stops n 3186 3195 3063'' "3129 , Fuel Used(gal) 88.8 88.6 85.7 87.8 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 4:15 I End Time 4:30 jfotal Time(min) 15 _Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. I 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB . Page 1 73 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background PM 05/13/2025 Interval #1 Information Recording tartTime'-= °= 4:30 End Time 4:45 Total Time(min) . :15 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. *un N mber 9 ° Vehs Entered 888 885 916 901 837 853 913 Vehs Exited 883 . 890 876 894 .827 851 881 Starting Vehs 107 101 96 96 98 117 94 Ending Vehs ° 112 96 136 : 103' , _108 119 =-126 Travel Distance mi) 614 627 626 638 581 573 610 Travel Time.(hrJ 29.0 28.0 .28.4 28.5 27.9 25.8 :27: Total Delay(hr 10.8 9.7 10.1 - 9.9 10.8 8.9 ; 9.3 Total Sto s 881 843 837 820 ` 739 824 830 Fuel Used(gal) 23.4 . 23.3 23.1 23.6 22.1 21.5 22.8 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time- 4:30 End Time . 4:45 Total Time'(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors: un Number D fl 93 Avg Vehs Entered 907 875 848 880 Vehs Exited 916 883 856 875 Starting Vehs 109 107 111 101 103 110°Ending Vehs 100° ' ° : :99 Travel Distance(mi) 624 619 591 610 lTravel Time( 29.5 28.0 26.8 , 27.9 Total Delay(hr) - 11.1 9.9 9.5 10.0 Total Stops 882 810 764 823 Fuel Used(gal) 23.8 23.0 • 22.0 22.9 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr ' ° SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 74 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background PM 05/13/2025 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 4:45 End Time 5:00 TotalTime(min) .' 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. %II Number 9 , i3 4 2 (3 ,® Vehs Entered 854 770 789 827 856 854 854 Webs Exited - 866 781 -; 820 847 843 , 862" ` . 869 Starting Vehs 112 96 136 103 108 119 126 Ending Vehs '. v, 100' , 85 :`105 • 83 •121 7. _ 111 �111 Travel Distance(mi 619 541 558 600 617 600 605 Travel Time(Ix) 27.3 23.0 25.3 27.1 332 ' 26.3 26.8 Total Delay(hr) 9.2 7.2 8.8 9.5 15.2 8.7 9.1 Total'Stops . - 790 ,.: 701 748 799 814 760 800 Fuel Used(gal) 23.1 19.9 20.9 22.7 24.1 ' . 22.1 22.1 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 4:45 1 End Time 5:00 Total Time(min) 15e Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. V - V Run Number O . fl - 9D &vg Vehs Entered 853 844 781 827 Uehs Exited 845 835 793 835 Starting Vehs 100 99 103 - 110 Ending Vehs :a. , . 108 °-. 108 -: <,91 Travel Distance(mi) 593 583 558 587 Travel Time(hr) 26.4 25.8 23.7 26.5 Total Delay(hr) 9.1 8.6 7.4 9.3 V finial Stops 825 772 V , 720 772 Fuel Used(gal) 22.2 21.5 20.5 21.9 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 75 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background PM `. . 05/13/2025 Interval #3 Information Recording ' _ Start Time 5:00 , End Time 5:15 Total Time(min) ' 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. 'un Number..` 9 Q .: &I 4 g . 13 W Vehs Entered 814 793 826 787 853 865 812 Vehs Exited 827 772 832 _ 796 868 868 814 Starting Vehs 100 85 105 83 121 111 111 Ending Vehs . =87 ` 106 `"°' ' 99- 74 ' 106 , 10B ` 101 Travel Distance(mi) 552 557 567 555 600 610 582 Travel Time(h 24.6 24.3 ` . 24.1 23.9 29 0 26.8 '=25.8 Total Delay(hr) 8.2 8,0 . 7.6 7.6 11.5 9.0 8.8 Total Stops ` 765 726 - ' 714 ` = 738 796 771 .' '.784 Fuel Used(gal) 20.4 20.4 20.7 20.7 22.5 22.7 21.5 Interval #3 Information Recording Start Time 5:00 End Time 5:15 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. i Number 8 0 . . 10. Avg Vehs Entered 803 849 827 820 Vehs Exited .826 847. 810 825 ' Starting Vehs 108 108 91 100 Ending Vehs ;: 4 , , 85 110 ; 108. , 98, Travel Distance(mi) 577 603 576 578 Travel Time(hr) 24.4 27.2 - 25.5°' ' 25.6 Total Delay(hr) 7.6 9,6 8.5 8.6 Tbtal Stops . 730 843 794. _. 765 Fuel Used(gal) - 21.2 22.6 21.4 21.4 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report. CPB Page 4 76 . SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Background PM 05/13/2025 Interval #4 Information. Recording Start Time _ 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. ;-un Number 9 : N a .. _ a a 0 Vehs Entered 815 858 790 871 803 851 858 Vehs Exited 797 ,-- 859 808 861 - 805 865 * `852 Starting Vehs 87 106 99 74 106 108 109 Ending Vehs . .. 105 105 81' °� 84 -.104 94.'. ,,115 Travel Distance(mi) 567 609 556 596 558 590 596 Travel Time(hr) 24.6 27.1 23.8 26.0 23.7 25.2 ` 26.7 Total Delay(hr) 7.9 9.3 7.7 8.6 - 7.5 7.8 9.2 Total Stops 763 837 712 766 a 731 741 ` 818 Fuel Used(gal) 21.0 22.8 20.6 21.9 20.5 21.7 .22.4 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 F End Time 5:30 'Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Number 0 p 10 Avg Vehs Entered 823 834 836 834 Vehs Exited 797 847 854 834 ` Starting Vehs 85 110 108 98 ,Ending Vehs . , s` ._ 111 ms. 97, . 90 .,;- 97 , ..,. I Travel Distance(mi) 582 581 583 582 Travel Time(hr) 25.7 25.3 26.1 25 . Total Delay(hr) 8.6 8.3 8.9 8.4 Total Stops 749 770 785 766 Fuel Used(gal) 21.5 21.6 21.7 21.6 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB. Page 5 77 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Background PM 05/1312025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave ove ant.°.§ a EB EB §EBuD;•¢ NB° .SB QA s Directions Served L T TR L LT R LTR Maximum Queue(ft) . 18 T..2 12 . 48 . 65 73 60 Average Queue(ft) 1 0 1 15 19 35 20 95th Queue(ft) 8 2 6 39 48 59 47 Link Distance(ft) 619 619 407 192 Upstream BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 160 250 110 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) .0 Intersection: 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd ovement3 EB C ,°. eL3' D, i33 SS Directions Served L L T T T T R L L R Maximum Queue(ft) 189 198 165 178 256 217 190 306 375 330 Average Queue(ft) 106 117 84 106 165 110 84 191 168 224 95th Queue(ft) 164 175 145 161 236 203 149 273 352, 352 Link Distance(ft) 642 642 702 702 362 362 Upstream BlkTime 0(/0) 0 5 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 250 550 330 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 3 4 ,Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 12 12 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr Movement 1E3 VD Directions Served UL R L R Maximum Queue(ft) 34 2 83 41 Average Queue(ft) 6 0 30 13 95th Queue(ft) 27 3 66 34 Link Distance(ft) 389 389 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 200 Storage BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 78 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Background PM 05113/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr _ovement ` FVON ui7 CEE Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L T R LTR Maximum Queue(ftf.... 24. 200 327 : 138 145 88 109 `'- 108 `.1'88;� 148 36. Average Queue(ft) 1 89 161 66 86 17 34 41 14 90 9 95th Queue(ft). 11 200 278 _ .`118 133 57 83 83 99 ` 146 31 Link Distance(ft) 432 2049 2049 281 223 Upstream Blk Time 5) 0 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist(ft). :- 200 200 - 200 :m200 150 :n , ..~ 150 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 3 0 0 1 Queuing Penally y(veh) 0 8 0 2 1 , Intersection: 13: Apperson Dr ovement Directions Served Maximum Queue'(ft).; Average Queue(ft) p5th Queue(ft) Link Distance(ft) Upstream131k Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) Storage Blk Time(%) . queuing Penalty(veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty:37 2030 Background PM Peak Hr 2030 Background PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 7 79 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd . 05114/2025 ,. 4- Movement: AF . , ° EBL 'EBT 3 WBT 1N .SR SBL SBR '1,' -` ,? Lane Configurations j' 44 14 r " r Traffic Volume v h '521 465 , 571 ., .487 ,351 '416 " Y Future Volume(vph) 521 465 571 487 351 416 Ideal Flow(vphpl) {. 1900 .1900 1900 ' 1900 , 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6,4 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 ° 0.95. 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 °` .` Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit-Protected ;p 0.95 `a1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00, ' Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 FIt.Permitted . 0.95. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 3610 3610 1599 3502 1599 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 . 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 566 505 621 529 382 452 ,RTOR Reduction(v;h) 0 0 , 0 8 0 3 83 ,° Lane Group Flow(vph) 566 505 . 621 521 382 369 Heavy Vehicles(%) ,'. -0% , 0% . 0% ' " 1% a. 0% . _ 1% , Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+ov Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 5 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green,G(s) ;° 19.8 =- 46.4 ,. 20.2 42.5 22.3 42.1 Effective Green,g(s) 19.8 46.4 20.2 42.5 22.3 42.1 i 'Actuated gfC Ratio°. 0.24 ='"0.57• 0.25 0.52 "7 0.27 0.52 °°°". Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 6.4 Vehicle Extension(s) _ 3.0 °,,, 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 854 2065 899 975 962 956 ills Ratio Prot ' c0.16 0.14 'c0.17 c0.15 0.11 0.09 Ws Ratio Perm 0.18 0.14 v/c,Ratio` e 0.66 0.24 ;`'0.69 0.53` 0.40 0.39 Uniform Delay,d1 27.6 8.6 27.6 12.8 23.9 11.7 Progression Factor,`: 1.00 1.00 . .1.00 ..: 1.00 1.00 1.00. Incremental Delay,d2 1.9 0.1 2.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 Delay_(s ' 29.6 8,7 29.9 13.3 24.2 12.0 ° Level of Service C A C B C B Approach Delay(s)` " 19.7 ' : 22.3 17.6 Approach LOS ' B C B lntersechon 5umma ° HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C ACM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio ,0.66 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 81.1 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection''Capacity Utilization 55.5% ICU Level of Service , B Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical°Lane Group 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/2812025 2030 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 80 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance &Apperson Dr 05/14/2025 `'r \ A :l r , / C i ' avement °` .SEL SET SER NWL. NWtf NWR NEL NEST NER S,INL S1N TiSV4!FA Lane Configurations 11 +1, III i4, 11 + r 4, Traffic Volume°(vph)." . '; 5 503 97 .. 463-479 ` 3 103 0 F 276 0 1 " ';= 0 Future Volume(vph) 5 503 97 463 479 3 103 0 276 0 1 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) ,°' , _` 1900 . 1900 1900 '1900' 1900 1900- 1900 1900 ° 1900 1900 1. 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor ,"1.00 0.95 xi _ ° 0.97• 0.95 1.00 ' , . 1.00 a 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.954 1.00 0.95 ' 1.00 - 1.00 I Satd.Flow(prot) 1805 3523 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Fit Permitted _ 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ti 0.95 ': 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3523 3502 3571 1805 1615 1900 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0:94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 '0.941 Adj. Flow(vph) 5 535 103 493 510 3 110 0 294 0 1 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 193 e 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 5 629 0 493 513 0 110 0 101 0 1 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) `0% 0% 0% 0% 1% = 0%.'' 0% . ;� 0%' 0% 0% ' 0% 0%0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split pm+ov NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3-' 1 4 4 Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green,G CO , 1.0 28.1 17.1 44.2 8.6 25.7 1.0 Effective Green,g(s) 1.0 28.1 17.1 44.2 8.6 25.7 1.0 Actuated qIC Ratio 0.01 0.38 0.23 0.59 0.11 0.34 0.01 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 , 3.0 3.0. -3.0 3.0 - 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 24 1323 800 2110 207 554 25 ills Ratio Prot ' 0.00 c0.18 c0.14 0.14 a c0.06 = 0.04 c0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 k/c Ratio 0.21 0.48 0.62 0.24 , ' 0.53 0.18 0.04 Uniform Delay,d1 36.5 17.7 25.9 7.3 31.2 17.2 36.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 ,1.00; 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.3 0.3° 1.4 0.1 2.6 0.2 0.7 Delayys) , , 40.8 18,0. 27.3 7.4 33.8 , 17.4 37.1 Level of Service D B C A C B D Approach.DelayJs) = _ 18.2 .' 17.1 . 21.8,. 37.1 Approach LOS B B C D ntersection Sum ,mary °``' HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 - ° ' Actuated Cycle Length(s) 74.8 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 intersection Capacity Utilization'. ° 551% -" ICU Level of Service l - B Analysis Period(min) 15 b Critical Lane Group ° 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/2812025 2030 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB ." Page 2 81 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir &Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave 05/14/2025 nterseption - • a Int Delay,slveh 4.3 Movement [° EBT EBR =1NBL WBT iWBRION6 41111NBIONBR SBL SBT SBR °," Lane Configurations 4'4' " 44 rr a' r Traffic Vol,vehlh 14 796 31 ' 14 913 " 22 51 -2 207 0 ° 0 ` 0 • Future Vol,veh/h 14 796 31 14 913 22 51 2 207 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr. 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0- ° 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - -None - None None Storage Length 160 - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - Veh in Median°Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - -0 - ' 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor .- 92 . 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 15 865 34 15 992 24 55 2 225 0 0 0 Major/Minor °.Majorl .,: ° Major2 ,a =°Minorl Minor2 r= M Conflicting Flow All 1016 0 0 899 0 0 1438 1958 450 1486 1951 496 Stage 1 - - - - 912 912 - 1022..1022 Stage 2 - • - - - - 526 1046 - 464 929 - pritical Hdwy : ' . 4.1 - - .. 4.1 7.5 "6.5 s6.9 , 7.5 - 6.5,, 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - ,Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.5 5,5 - 6.5 , 5.5'., - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ° 691 ' - 7647 95 64 562 - 88 65 ,525° ° Stage 1 - - - - - - 299 355 - 256 316 - Stage 2 - - -:, 508 308 - 553 349. Platoon blocked,% - - -May Cap-1 Maneuver. 691 - - 764 92 61 562 50 62, 525'° Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 92 61 - 50 62 - Stage 1' - - _'. 292 347 -..250' 310 -- - Stage 2 - - - - - - 498 302 - 322 341 - 6pproach ° . NB SB , , HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0.1 32.5 ~ 0 - HCM LOS D A ilinor Lat"ne/Maja7Mvmt NBLn11NBLn2M1EBlillEBABEBRILNBLWYBTi,WBRISBIET1 ° - • ° Capacity(veh/h) 90 562 ..691'V 764 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.64 0.4 0.022 - - 0.02 - - - HCM Control Delay(0 . . 98.5 15.6 `10.3 9.8 0 .. HCM Lane.LOS F CB - - A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3 1.9 , 0.1 = 0.1 . - ` - , 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/2812025 2030 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 82 HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave &Strafford Park Dr 05114/2025 intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2 Movement Luit' NIT. BR` gMl SER_ - Lane Configurations A tt ft r �. r Traffic Vol,vehth 13 965 952 40 49 20 Future Vol,veh/h 13 965 952 40 49 20 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop 13T Channelized` - None - None - None Storage Length 250 - - 200 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 , 0 Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 - 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 14 1049 1035' 43 ` 53 22 +ajor/Mino . Malorl Major2• inor2 Conflicting Flow All 1078 0 - 0 1588 518 - Stage 1 - 1035 Stage 2 - - - - 553 - ritical lid 4.1 6:8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.8 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -, - ;' - 5.8 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 655 101 508 Stage 1 - - - - 308 - Stage 2 - - 546 ) Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 655 - 99 508 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 99 - Stage 1` - _ 302 , Stage 2 - - - - 546 - pproach EB MD CM Control Delay,s - 0.1 0` 58.6 HCM LOS F Mino7La a/Major EBL EBT WBT WBR SELn SEL 2 Capacityr'(vehlh) ° ,655 - - -. `' 99 508 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - - 0.538 0.043 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.6 : - --, 77.4 12.4 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F B HCM 95th'%tile Q(veh) .01 2.4 0.1' 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 83 HCM 2010 TWSC 13: Apperson Dr & Site Entrance 05/14/2025 a. m ntersection ` • Int Delay,slveh 0.9 Movement EBLNIEBtTi11, BialVE j SBL SBR „ ° ,,` Lane Configurations fi+ tr Traffic Vol,vehlh .9 821 958 6 20 35 Future Vol,vehlh 9 821 958 6 20 35 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None ' -- None Storage Length 300 - - - 0 . - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 ° 0' Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 • - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 1 0 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 892 1041 7 22 38 _ajor/Mnor Major1 Major2 Minor2 .Conflicting Flow All 1048 0 - 0 1511 524 Stage 1 . - °1045' Stage 2 - - - - 466 - Critical Hdwy ° 4.1 - - 6,84; 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 •- - - 5.84, - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 672 - - - 111 498 Stage 1 - - - - 300 - Stage 2. 598 Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 672 - - - 109 498 7771 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 109 - Stage Stage 2 - - - 598 - Approach ° . EB Wf3 •, • • SE • �r HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 27.8 HCM LOS D Y iroRLane/Major [I 'jam E UriaBL61 Capacity�(vehlh) 672 - _ - 217 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.275 IICM Control Delay(s) 10,4 - - 27.8 HCM Lane LOS B - - - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - : 0 - = 1..1 , 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 7:15 am 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout AM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 3 84 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout AM 05/14/2025 Summary of All Intervals Run Number _ 9 6 0 0 .. Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 nd'Time 8:15 8:15. .Q 8:15 _-. 815a. ..8:15 , = 8:15:.. 8:15 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 - Tme Recorded"(min) 60 . 60 60 ' 60 60 60 6Q #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 of Recorded Intervals 4 , 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 3305 3321 3211 3228 3106 3240 3181 Vehs Exited 3317_ - `u 3311 3204 3244 ; 3091 '_ _' 3216 3170 Starting Vehs 98 87 102 109 91 96 83 Ending Vehs 86 . 97 109 93 106 . 120 . ;94 Travel Distance(mi) . - 2258 2306 2205 2240 2129 2253 2191 Travel Time(hr) 103.8 105.9 98.4 101 A 95.1 101.6 `97.8 Total Delay(hr) 33.4 33.9 29.9 31.7 28.9 31.6 29.5 Total Stops: 3069 ,, 3157 =2915 2965 2866 ' 3005' `2915 Fuel Used(gal) - . 87.5 89.2 84.4 86.0 81.8 86.4 83.8 Summary of All Intervals un 'umbe 13 9 _ Avg Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 End Time 8:15 8:15 3:15 8:15 Total Time(min) . 75 75 75 75 . pima Recorded(min) 60 . , 60 _° 60 60 #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals 4 :. 4 , 4 4 . Vehs Entered 3308 3228 3189 3233 Vehs Exited 3291 3209 . 3174 3221 I • Starting Vehs 81 85 97 90 Ending Vehs' 98 104 112 100 Travel Distance(mi) 2240 2207 2188 2222 Travel Time(hr) ; 103.4 100.0 e. 98.5 7 100.6 ,T °' Total Delay(hr) 33.5 31.0 30.2 31.4 Total Stops. 3161 3062 .2951 3006 Fuel Used(gal) 87.2 84.9 83.9 85.5 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time- 7:00 End Time 7:15 Total Time:(min) 15 , Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval. . 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 1 85 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout AM 05/14/2025 Interval #1 Information Recording 1 Start Time•, .a 7:15 :. End Time _ 7:30 Total Time(min) 15 - ._ _ Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. -un u her . 9 N . k3 4 0 . 0 Vehs Entered 837 823 789 775 755 772 758 Vehs Exited 838 801 794 787 753 790 7471 Starting Vehs 98 87 102 109 91 96 83 Ending Vehs : ' .',- 97 109; 97 ' 97 ... 93 •: 78 94 Travel Distance(mi) 568 561 548 545 506 545 534 Travel Time(hr) 26.6 25.9 24.6 24.6 ;22.5 24.7 23.2 Total Delay(hr) 8.8 8.5 7.6 7.6 6.6 7.8 6.7 (total Stops 804 780 705 y 725 666 739 698, Fuel Used(gal) 21.9 21.9 21.0 20.8 19.5 20.9 20.1 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time o- 7:15 ,. o. 1 End Time 7:30 )Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. -un Number 0 0 10 Avg Vehs Entered 804 789 795 - 789 Vehs Exited° 796 784 815 s 790 Starting Vehs 81 85 97 90 End ni g Vehs . t` 89; ' 90° - 77 . 93 Travel Distance(mi) 536 524 557 542 Travel Time(hr) 24.7 23.4 25.2 24.5 :. Total Delay(hr) 7.9 7.0 . 7.8 7.6 Total Stops 774 - 717 747 735 Fuel Used(gal) 20.9 19.8 21.5 20.8 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB 0 Page 2 86 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout AM 05/14/2025 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 7:30 End Time 7:45 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Number 9 g o3 Vehs Entered 788 787 756 741 749 801 792 Vehs Exited 793 790 772 750 ,°`774 793- 796 Starting Vehs 97 109 _ 97 97 93 78 94 Ending Vehs 92 106 ° 81 . 88. H 68 86 90 Travel Distance(ml) 559 _ 548 528 509 535 554 537 Travel Time(hr) 25.1 24 5 23.0 22.9 .23.4 25.0 24.3; Total Delay(hr) 7.7 7.4 6.6 7.0 6.8 7.7 7.4 Total Stops 728 731 663 670 700 750 741 Fuel Used(gal) 21.6 20.8 20.0 19.2 20.2 21.3 20.6 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time;. 7:30 I End Time 7:45 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. ;Ru Number 0 9 90 Avg Vehs Entered 806 798 743 775 Vehs Exited 817 813 722 782 Starting Vehs 89 90 77 93 Ending Vehs 78 `. 75 98 84 Travel Distance(mi) 549 564 505 539 Travel Time(hr) 25.3 26.1 22.3 242 Total Delay(hr) 8.2 8.4 6.5 7.4 Total Stops 779 805 670 - 722 Fuel Used(gal) 21.3 21.8 19.2 20.6 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 87 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout AM 0511412025 Interval #3 Information Recording 'Start Time,_ . a 7:45. End Time 8:00 " Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. N mber 9 Q 1 Vehs Entered 873 883 864 878 854 821 844 Vehs Exited 866 870 819 852 797 813 ;'817y Starting Vehs 92 106 81 88 68 86 90 Ending Vehs ;; 99 119 ; ,.126 114 125 ° v: . 94, ''117 Travel Distance(mi) 582 615 569 612 561 580 . 573. Travel Time( 27.2 28.7 25.5 27.8 26.0 26.2 25.7 Total Delay(hr) 9.1 9.5 7.8 8.9 8.5 8.2 ' 7.9 Total Stops 797 867 777 824 795 771 767 Fuel Used(gal) 22.6 24.0 22.0 . 23.7 22.0 . 22.1 .21.9' Interval #3 Information Recording ' Start Time.,. 7:45 End.Time 8:00 Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. . ,un Number 0 9 9D Avg Vehs Entered 872 856 862 859 Vehs Exited t 851 811, 850 834' Starting Vehs 78 75 98 84 Ending Vehs 99 R 120 ,' 110 111 Travel Distance(mi) 588 561 579 582 Travel Time(hr) 27.2 25.6 26.7 26.7 Total Delay'(hr) 8.9 8.1 8.6 8.5 Total Stops 800 795 •821. 798 . Fuel Used(gal) , 23.0 21.7 ' 22.2 22.5 . 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030.Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 88 SimTrafFc Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout AM 05/14/2025 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time.. _ ` 8:00 e.. End Time 8:15 Total Time(min) . 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un N mber 9 N R3 Q 0 . (3- W Vehs Entered 807 828 802 834 748 846 787 Vehs Exited' . 820 850 -819 . ..-.. 855 767 820 810; Starting Vehs 99 119 126 114 125 94 117 tnding Vehs a_ „ 86 ' -97 °.109 F , 93 106 120 %. x-94 Travel Distance mi) 550 582 560 574 527 575 547 Travel Time( 25.0 ' 26.8 �:25.3 26:1` 23.2 25.8 ' 24.5 Total Delay(hr) 7.8 8.6 8.0 8.2 6.9 7.9 7.6 TotalSto°s 740 779 '`770 746 705 745. 709 Fuel Used(gal) 21.4 22.6 21.4 22.3 20.2 22.1: 21.2 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 n,.. , End Time 8:15 ;Total Time(min) 15 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. Run Number 0 0 90 Avg Vehs Entered 826 785 789 803 Uehs`Exited ' ; 827 801 787 t. 813' Starting Vehs 99 120 110 111 'Ending,Vehs , 98 , 104 112 100 ' Travel Distance(mi) 567 557 548 559 Travel Time(hr) . 26.3 24.9 24.4 25.2 Total Delay(hr) 8.5 7.5 7.3 7.8 Total-Stop's 808 ` 745 713 - 744 Fuel Used(gal) 21.9 21.6 21.0 21.6 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 89 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Buildout AM 05114/2025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir &Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave ovement 1 a` .; a..[1.7 °° MO GAD GD , Directions Served L TR L LT Maximum (ft): 27 1 28 130 105 a Average Queue(ft) 6 0 5 39 55 95th Queue(ft) 23 0 22 90 93 Link Distance(ft) 619 407 Upstream Bik Time(5) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 160 250 110 Storage BIk Time(%) 1 0 Queuing Penalty(veh) 1 0 Intersection: 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd Ma�rement , ; „ ® ® D .NE) 14:3 . hQ .`SB Directions Served L L T T T T R L L R Maximum Queue(ft) 221 230 137 140 287 234 226 232 182 191 Average Queue(ft) 135 145 45 72 175 123 105 136 70 76 95fh Queue(ft) 205 213 105 119 253 217 187 213 174 147 Link Distance(ft) 642 642 702 702 362 362 Upstream BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) _250 .: 250 4 550 330 Storage BIk Time(%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penaltyjveh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr .ovement C •e , 9`1D I§2 Directions Served UL R L R Maximum Queue(ft) 48 5- 106 31 Average Queue(ft) 9 0 34 10 95th Queue(ft) 33 4 79 28 Link Distance(ft) 389 389 Upstream Blk Time'(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250. 200 Storage BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 90 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Buildout AM 05/14/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr ovemen ._. .SE 2 . ; yy NE .. NE NE SW Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L T R LT Maximum=Queue(ft). 33 181 250 - . 179 185 121 92 112 ; 26 135 19 Average Queue(ft) 4 70 126 88 104 19 30 53 1 63 1 95th Queue(ft) 20 163 214 158 164 70 73 95 19 112 9 Link Distance(ft) 425 2061 2061 281 222 Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storages Dist(ft)° - 200 ' . 200 `' 200 200 150 150 � . Storage Blk Time(%) 0 1 0 0 0 0 Q eu wing Penalty(veh) 0 2 0 0 0 0 Intersection: 13: Apperson Dr & Site Entrance oveme�f° E ,.. _ Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue(ft) 34 68 Average Queue(ft) 5 31 95th Queue(ft) 24 58 Link Distance(ft) 369 Upstream BlkTime(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay.Dist(ft)` 300 Storage BIk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty:4 u. 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout AM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 7 91 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd 05/14/2025 ,Movements:` EBL EBT k'WBT``°`°VIIBR °SBL ;•'•SBR � �• • Lane Configurations 'PM f t r Traffic Volume(vph)` 412 647 : 541 s;.'419° , 573 ° n; 450 Future Volume(vph) 412 647 541 419 573 450 Ideal Flow.(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lane Util Factor 0.97 0.95 - 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected _ _ 0.95 -: 1.00 `1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 3502 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 Flt Permitted • 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 3502 3610 3610 1615 3502 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 `0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 434 681 569 441 603 474 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 '° 37 0 .334 Lane Group Flow(vph) 434 681 569 404 603 140 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0%. 0% mA 0% _ oz 0% _t° 0% s 0% Turn Type Prot NA NA pm+ov Prot Prot protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 'Actuated Green,G(s) 16.2 42.6 .° 20.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 ° ° Effective Green,g(s) 16.2 42.6 20.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 Actuated g!C_Ratio>. 0.21 == 0.55 •'''0.26° 0.55 . 0.29 =`.0.29 Clearance Time(s) 6.4 5.4 5.4 7.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ . 3.0 3.0 • 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 727 1971 925 1035 1032 476 i/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.19 ° c0.16 0.12 c0.17 0.09 v!s Ratio Perm 0.14 vlc Ratio 0.60 ° 0.35 ' 0.62 0.39 0.58 0.29° ° Uniform Delay,d1 27.9 9.9 25.6 10.0 23.4 21.2 Progression Factor 1.00 .py°1.00 `,. 1.00 1.00 1.00 ° 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.3 0,1 1.2 0.2 0.8 0.3 Delays) 29.3. . 10.0 26.8 10.2 24.3 21.6 Level of Service C B C B C C gpproach'Delay(s1 17.5 19.6 23.1 Approach LOS B B C ntersectian Summary ` ' ' HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume.to Capacity.ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 78.0 Sum of lost time(s) 18.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 Critical.Lane Group 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 1 92 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Keagy RdNarsity Entrance.&Apperson Dr 05/14/2025 avement- ° :° SEL :,SET . • SER NWL NWI NUVR NEL N'E3T NER .SWL S'ftUiT S_YVI Lane Configurations 1 +1, vil 44► 11 le P 4+ Traffic Volume(vph) e 2 .°F- 566 •, 88 385 570 -: 0 71 0 ,390 4 : 3 ..' Future Volume(vph) 2 566 88 385 570 0 71 0 390 4 3 2 Ideal Flow(vphpl) _ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 . 1.00 1.00 .1.00 , Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 Flt Protected • . " 0.95 ` 1.00` '0.95 1.00 }', -°`'0.95 -1.00 0.98 `w 1 Satd.Flow(prat) 1805 3532 3502 3610 1805 1615 1803 Fit Permitted ` 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 -0.95 1.00 0.98 ` j Satd.Flow(perm) 1805 3532 3502 3610 . 1805 1615 1803 Peak-hour.factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 2 578 90 393 582 0 72 0 398 4 3 2 TOR Reduction(vph) 0 7 0 0 0 0 °, 0 0 '277 '. 0 a 2 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 2 661 0 393 582 0 72 0 121 0 7 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) .t; . 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% .., ,0% . .; 0% ` 0% ° 0% 0%. .0%0 .0% Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split pm+ov Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 1 4 4 Permitted Phases 3 3 !Actuated Green,G O 1.1 28.0 14.2 41.1 7.2 ? 21.4 = °1.1' Effective Green,g(s) 1.1 28.0 14.2 41.1 7.2 21.4 1.1 Actuated gIC Ratio.=-. ,, * 0.02 °° •0.40 - '0.20 , '0.58 -:* , ``0.10 0.30 _,,0:02 71 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) ° 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 :3.0 `Y Lane Grp Cap(vph) 28 1402 705 2104 184 490 28 r/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.19 , c0.11 0.16 c0.04 ° 0.05 c0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v!c Ratio 0.07' " 0.47 _ -0.56 '' 0.28 .`° 2 0.39 '0.25 .0.25 Uniform Delay,d1 34.2 15.8 25.3 7.3 29.6 18.5 34.3 Progression Factor 1.00 ; 1.00 1.00 , - 1.00 '. 1.00 ., ,'1.00 . e „ . 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.3 1.0 0.1 1,4 0.3 4,7 Delay(s) . 35.3 16.0 ' 26.3 7.4 31.0 18.7 39.0 Level of Service D B C A C B D Approach.belay(s) J 16.1 15.0` 20.6 '_:, ,39,0 '` Approach LOS B B C D ntersection Summa, .-. '.' y HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio • 0.48 . 1 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 70.5 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 c'° Critical Lane Group 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 93 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave 05/1412025 Intersection Int.Delay,slveh 2.6 ovement ca.ifar EBR WBR _{ G NBR SBR Lane Configurations ++ r a r 40 Traffic Vol,vehlh 3 944 84 36 911, 9 25 0 98 13 3 „.19 Future Vol,vehlh 3 944 84 36 911 9 25 0 .98 13 3 19 ''Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ ` 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free : Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - = None - - None Storage Length 160 - - 250 - 170 - - 110 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0. £" - 0 - - 0 - - ' , 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 . 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 973 87 °37 939 9 .26 0 101 13 3 20 ajor/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 948 0 0 1060 0 0 1568 2045 530 1506 2079 470 1,, Stage:1 , - - , - - 1023 1023. - 1013 1013 ,." - Stage 2 - - - - . - - 545 1022 493 1066 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -, - - - 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 732 . - - 665 ;= . - 76 57 499 85 54 `545 . - ,. Stage 1 - - - - - 256 316 - 260 319 - Stage 2 - - - - 495 316 532 301 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 732 , - - 665 - - 67 54 499 65 51 545 May Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - . 67 54 - 65 51 Stage1 - - 255 315 259 301 Stage 2 - - - - - - 446 298 - . 423 300 pproach Ni3GD , HCM Control Delay,s 0 , 0.4 29.2 47.9 HCM LOS D E inor L_Wie a`jor fN EBTiEI3R�tiUBL�IV STS1NBRISBL 1 Capacity`(vehlh) 67 499 732 -` - 665 - 119 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.385 0.202 0.004 - - 0.056 - - 0.303 HCM Control Delay s) 89 14 9.9 . _ - 10.7 - ° 47.9=. _ . A. HCM Lane LOS F B _ A - - B - - E HCM 95th%tile Qtveh) - 1.5 0.8 .0 0.2 - 1.2 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB - - " Page 1 94 . . HCM 2010 TWSC 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr 05/14/2025 ntersecbon Int.Delay,s/veh 1.6 Yo amen E43g1 (EL LU MT BR SEL SER Lane Configurations ++ f# T r Traffic Vol,,vehlh -1°° 12 1035 936 64 48 k 26 .. Future Vol,vehlh 1 12 1035 936 64 48 26 Conflicting Peds 4#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RTChannelied - ` - None = None None Storage Length - 250 - - 200 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# -_ - , 0 , 0 0 Grade,% - - 0 0 - 0 . Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 12 1067 965 66 49 27 ajar/Ming Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 965 1031 0 - 0 1525 _483 Stage'1 . 965 - - _ Stage 2 - - - - - 560 - Gritical'Hdwy 6.4 4.1 : - - 6.8 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - = 5.8 _ Fallow-up Hdwy 2.5 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 355. ;682.:- - -°' 111 535 °. Stage 1 - - - - - 335 - Stage 2 - - - 541 Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 632: 632 - - 109 535 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 109` - • Stage°1 _ - 328 _ �.• Stage 2 - - - - - 541 - pproach EB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 45.1 HCM LOS E ailli'Lane/E4ajor M mt l Mar Mr WBRt 91 SELn2 Capacity(vehlh) ,,. 632 - . - 109 535 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.454 0.05 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.8 � _ 63',`:12.1 : . ' 1 HCM Lane LOS B - - F B HCM 95th`%otile Q(veh) 0.1 ,- 2 0.2 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/28/2025 2030 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 2 95 HCM 2010 TWSC 13: Apperson Dr& Site Entrance 05/14/2025 ntersection° Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 loveme,t• EEL° EBT 'WBiTIWSRR SBLISB' Lane Configurations 4+ Traffic Vol.vehlh 32 : 1018 938 17 13 19 Future Vol,vehlh 32 1018 938 17 13 19 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 300 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage;# 0 0 0 _ Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 2 2 Mvrot Flow 33 '1049 `967 .18 14 21 _ajar/Minor Major! Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 985 0 - 0 1567 493 Stage1 ° - - 976 - Stage 2 - - - - 591 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - . Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Fallow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.52 • 3.32 Pot Cap-1°Maneuver. 709 - 102;,a 522 Stage 1 - - - - 326 - Stage 2 - ; - - 516 Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 709 - ° - - 97 522 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 97 - Stage 1 -: _ °. ,_ 311 ° ry . �'_ Stage 2 - - - - 516 - pproach [ D O HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 28.4 HCM.LOS D i nor Lane/Major ME11 EB IJ11 MN BR SBLn Capacity(/chlh) 709 -" 188 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - 0.185 HCM Control Delay(), 10.3 - - '28.4 £. HCM Lane LOS B - - - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - • _0.7 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 4:30 pm 01/2812025 2030 Buildout PM Synchro 11 Report CPB Page 3 96 SimTraffic.Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Summary of All Intervals -u Number 9 .1 @ 6, E3 • 0° Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 End Time .-, , . 5:30 . 5:30 , 5:30 „% 5:30 5:30 5:30 5 30 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Tme Recorded(min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 #of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehs Entered 3571 3512 3472 3386 3445 3491 3534 Vehs Exited ' P ` ` 357.0 3551 3486 . `:, 3386 3425 ' 3447. 353d Starting Vehs 106 122 123 112 82 75 - 108 Ending Vehs 107 83 109 ° 112 102 119 11.2. Travel Distance(mi) 2462 2442 2416 2380 2378 2379 2435 Travel Time(hr) 114.3 111.1 . 109.3 104.1 104.3 107.0 116.6' Total Delay hr) 41.8 39.2 38.3 34.3 34.7 36.9 45.2 Total Stops: e 3360 3306 3230 3138 3136 , 3321'- '33311 Fuel Used(gal) 93.0 92.0 91.0 88.1. 89.0 89.7 92.8 Summary of All Intervals Run Number -. p Avg Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 - End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 Total Time(min) 75 75 75 75 Time Recorded(min) , 60 60 60 60 . #of Intervals 5 5 5 5 of Recorded Intervals 4 ; ,4 4 ., -4 _ . Vehs Entered 3466 3452 3396 3474 Vehs Exited 3478 3441 3401 3472 Starting Vehs 115 104 99 100 Ending Vehs 103 115 94 ' ; 102 Travel Distance(mi) 2428 2385 2355 2406 Travel Time(hr) ' `115.1 109.9 105.9 109.8 '° Total Delay(hr) 44.0 39.5 36.6 39.1 Total Stops 3280 3240 3241 3259 .. Fuel Used(gal) .92.0 89.7 88.5 90.6 Interval#0 Information Seeding _ Start Time 4:15 End Time 4:30 Total The(min) 15 - . Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. No data recorded this interval.;. 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report. CPB Page 1 97 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Interval #1 Information Recording StartTime 4:30, End Time 4:45 Total.Time min)`: 15 ° Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. ;°: �:�2e3. _ =4 '�_� .,�' ��� n _. �•sag Vehs Entered 926 939 869 882 846 875 918 Vohs Exited. 936 933 : x 877 886° 834> 916 Starting Vehs 106 122 123 112 82 75 108 Ending yetis` :96 .128 108. :° 94e°, • 123' e ffi m 1.16 Travel Distance(mi) 647 641 619 614 570 568 627 Travel Time(tir) ° . +' 29.7 P 30.fi , m:28 7 °` °27.5 25.4 25.4° ' 30.0 Total Delay(hr) 10.7 11.7 10.6 9.5 8.7 8.8 12.2 Total Stops r - : ° ' , 878 843 816, 864° 766;.. 813 0 87S Fuel Used.(gal) 24.7 24.6 23.2 23.0 21.6 21.7 24.2 Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time f o 430` End Time 4:45 Volumes adjusted by PHF,Growth Factors. Run Number d.. fi�, I O`° Avg / Vehs Entered 895 873 873 890 Vehs_Exited 885, 886. 857 t� a ;;$84 ° Starting Vehs 115 104 99 100 Ending Vehs_ _� , 125 �`=91. 115• .: '° . 111 ° Travel Distance(mi) 636 617 592 613 Travel Time(hr),4, : ;; .34.2 -27.4 ,,.26.6 °;`•2&6, Total Delay(hr) 15.6 9.3 9.1 10.6 Total°Stops 845 812 836',. _ . 833 ... Fuel Used(gal) 25.2 23.1 22.2 23.3 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout.PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 2 98 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout PM . 05/14/2025 Interval #2 Information Recording . Start Time 4 45a - End Time 5:00 Total Time(min) z.15 °F, ., r Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. � � h��}we g- s(*',', # {t ' -c- !1' , `;' "--41 9 r : 3,i t�, t:"Ski"-4 say: 6. aa;prw, ° � �. �" A �'� _ t � �sf =ate$ .sK' Vehs Entered 872 848 813 824 921 850 907 Webs°Ecited . ° N ° .. ,. . 4 v .`,, 859 862' 814` °.817 ea°913- 882 ' '909 Starting Vehs 96 128 115 108 94 123 116 Ending .;.114 , 114 , '�115 . ' ;102` , . 91 ' - 114 Vehs : `° y ` •109 Travel Distance mi) 592 590 555 590 642 606 630 (T,ravel,Time( s , , .°h , ;: :26 5 . x` . 26.7 - , T=.24.5':`; ".°.25.2 • . 28.6" . 27.6 -_. '.'33:5 Total Delay(hr) 91 9,3 8.1 8.0 9.8 9.8 15.1 Total-Stops- . ,a ° L.°'810 , '826'_` .„ 737 • '., 766 879 ' 843▪ :T-834 Fuel Used(gal) 22.1 22.4 20.9 21.7 24.1 22.8 24.5 Interval #2 Information Recording SiertTime, , t .'4:45 'T. . , . End Time 5:00 Total Time(min) g.". . . : . 15 . ° :._ • ▪ .Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. stun Number °, • . - &-t ` 8 ` °g .- 0 ° d §Avg. `* .fit ::�fr '.•' Vehs Entered 843 869 812 856 yetis Exited- °...,s. o , ":866` . ° 833 ti-..834,. ..°; `` 1357, . . T ° "' 1 Starting Vehs 125 91 115 111 Ending Vehss ,'n -°'. t °--' -, ` 102 °o- ° 127 . 93; 105 . . : ... ,. Travel Distance(mi) 595 574 572 595 ITravel Time°(hr)- `, _�.' ;; a . 27.8 � �27:9, a,- - �°`25.3=�� a :27.4 -� °a � _ � ..`'` =) Total Delay(hr) 10.3 10.8 8.5 9.9 Total Staps ° 812 _ 782 775 .405 , Fuel Used(gal) 22.4 21.9 21.5 22.4 2030 Buildout PM.Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 3 99 SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Interval #3 Information,I Recording Start Time 5:00 R ] 'End Time 5:15 Total Time(min) 15 ,, , ' I Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. MD Nu her 9 Q @ 4 i°3 0 W Vehs Entered 887 829 903 819 829 876 848 yetis Exited . ; 884 845 904 819 838 859 849" Starting Vehs 109 114 114 115 102 91 114 Ending Vehs s 112 98 113 115 93 , 108 m.'113 Travel Distance(mi) 618 577 613 561 567 572 597 gravel Time(hr) 29.2 25.5 27.1 24:2 24.4 25.7 °27.0 Total Delay(hr) 11.0 8.6 9.0 7.7 7.9 8.6 9.5 Total Sto s 861 786 836 701 729 820 811 Fuel Used(gal) 23.5 21.6 22.9 20.8 21.0 21.5 22.4 Interval #3 Information Recording = . Start Time 5:00 End Time . 5:15 Total`Time(min) ,, .. 15 _ ' Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. . ,gun Nu ber 0 0 e.. E Avg Vehs Entered 872 856 883 860 Uehs Exited- 871 875 856 859 Starting Vehs 102 127 93 105 Snding Vehs 103,, 108 - - 120 105- -. - Travel Distance(mi) 620 593 591 591. Travel Time(hr) 27.8 26.8 ° 27.3 26.5 Total Delay(hr) 9.8 9.3 9.8 9.1 Total Stops 818 834 . 843 804 Fuel Used(gal) 23.3 22.2 22.3 22.1 2030 Buildout PMPeak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 4 'too . SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 End Time 5:30 Total Time(min) .15 _ . Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. Mil Number Q 13 g3 lea 0 Vehs Entered 886 896 887 861 849 890 861 Uehs Exited 891 , 911 891 864 840 879 .862 Starting Vehs 112 98 113 _ 115 93 108 113 Ending Vehs -.: 107 _. 83 "''109 112 102 119 ,. ` 1'1 Travel Distance(mi 605 634 628 615 599 632 582 Travel Time(hr) s 28.9 28.3 29.0 27.2 25.9 * 28.3 , 25.5 Total Delay(hr) 11.1 9.6 10.6 9.2 8.3 9.8 8.4 ITotal Stops 811 , 851 841 807 762 845 . 808 Fuel Used(gal) 22.8 23.5 23.9 22.6 22.2 23.7 21.7 Interval #4 Information Recording Start Time 5:15 , End Time 5:30 Total Time(min) .," 15. , ; Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors,Anti PHF. un Number 0 0 4p Avg Vehs Entered 856 854 828 865 Vehs Exited 856 847 854 869 Starting Vehs 103 108 120 105 Ending Vehs 103 .- 115 °°„-, `94 , 102, Travel Distance(mi) 577 601 600 607 Travel Time(hr) 25.3 27.8 , ''26.7 27.3 1 Total Delay(hr) 8.2 10.1 9.2 9.5 Total Stops - 805 812 787 8131 Fuel Used(gal) 21.2 22.6 22.5 22.7 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr SimTraffic Report CPB Page 5 101 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Intersection: 3: Deyerle Rd/Corporate Cir&Apperson Dr/Brandon Ave ovement E3 ED . RD VD SB Directions Served L TR L LT R LTR Maximum Queue(t) 19' 7 54, 62 73 , -> 68. Average Queue(ft) 1 0 16 20 36 22 95th Queue(It) 9 , __ 4 41 53 61 .: 54 Link Distance(ft) 619 407 192 upstream Blk Time(%)' Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(4 160 - . 250 110 .% Storage BIk Time %) 0 0 ueuing Penalty(veh) 0 -. Q 0 Intersection:.6: Brandon Ave & Peters Creek Rd M•vement I3 EB C 3 °.`° E: EDs°°.M3 MO „ , E3 m Directions Served. L L T T T TR L L R _ Maximum Queue(ft) 179 188 151 168 260 227 181 331 377` - 330 Average Queue(ft) 111 121 80 105 168 120 82 197 196 249 95th Queue(ft) 165 175 140 '158 238 - 215 149 286 398 370 Link Distance(ft) 642 642 702 - e 702 -362 362 jipstream'Blk Time.(%) . ; , Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 0 ;Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 250 550 330 Storage Blk Time(%) 5 9 Queuing Penalty(veh). 24 26 Intersection: 9: Brandon Ave & Stratford Park Dr ovement 1A1 SE I Directions Served UL L R - ' Maximum Queue(ft) 41 110 -37; ,. . Average Queue(ft) 6 36 13 - 95t Queue(ft) 26 - 78 32 - .' ' Link Distance(ft) - 389 389 - - Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Ba Dist(fit . , 250 Storage Blk Time(%) Storage Penalty(veh) . - 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr - SimTraffic Report CPB Page 6 102 . Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Buildout PM 05/14/2025 Intersection: 10: Keagy Rd/Varsity Entrance &Apperson Dr o ement= - SE SE SE NW ° NW NW °- NW NE NE NE SW :S , Directions Served L T TR L L T TR L T R LT R Maximum Queue(ft) 16 199 286 140 �� ,.152 88 116 :,. 85 234 150 _ 36 �6 Average Queue(ft) 1 85 147 68 86 17 34 41 24 95 6 2 95th Queue(ft) 8 187 245 119 134 57 84 , 77 134 155 24 15 Link Distance(ft) 425 2061 2061 281 222 222 Upstream Blk Time:(%) p - Queuing Penalty(veh) 0 ptorage Bayy Dist(ft) _ .200 200 °,F . 200 200 . ° 150 :150 Storage Blk Time(%) 0 2 0 1 2 Queuing penalty(veh) 0 5 0 4 1 Intersection: 13: Apperson,Dr & Site Entrance ovemerit IAD Directions Served L TR LR Maximum Queue(ft) 46 2 59 °a Average Queue(ft) 14 0 ° 23 95th Queue(ft) 40 2 52 Link Distance(ft) • 619 369 Upstream Blk Time(%) ; Queuing Penalty(veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) . 300 ° Storage Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty(veh) Network Summary J etworkwde Queuing Penalty:61 • 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr 2030 Buildout PM Peak Hr - SimTraffic Report CPB Page'7 103 • • • Appendix E Concept Plan Traffic Study - , Brandon Station-Cityof Roanoke,VA as June 4,2025 111-,111 104 aASSOCUIT ES . ' _. ... , • ,. ',.-,:.;-,--, '-7$.`"",-11 . " • •ir' .; s'� l 1 lit r, A"-.a# t t^,v,"""'.'""'"-- •^/ 9rn § ., ,. t,, m',o,�,r i (j ; , • a?• a ,:r r 11 rC w: . 1 t._,i,,- ' .;_ r� l /' ',` 0 "#,-'-..,,. .ti i, , iit o_-- m„Qo y = € .4,r, i , t . , C r r. w a'<'� nl` t t f t• ' 4 1'til tt 'r !`( y' -� .t,y, r'rl f7 ��jqy�,_ .i a `� �' f , -sai i r . •t F � $.� , ii tic. i .. �- lil�' fire L7f1 r � - i7 ',�A t t Il , .-;;�� _z 3;z l' Ta�,1 ':1 i !� �3. 1�'1 , t}.41)5 tj �d"j•41k�r�r�t�1 (( �•�u ;.r�-�,�e,.�,� s�i ,�, C,*s; xti# ii1. r" - J/!; : 0 1.ha, . 4 .; R,ix ig -, 'r • , r 1 1 • '; i'{ , 1lf E .lt /.•_-=•�^.,ti +;:+s, 1 Ls . :. 'w'�°rt-Jrr7j ,l1�� J1H5$ " i " r tt�,j� ., tø. } p e • a_ i. 3Cr , 1. - . g• 7wrxc `�1"' - t., i. *.. I , �/t hil C ''F+*e a•. a E�� _y i� �t 1', • , ,• -,+ „-F t: �> ,.t '.,-. Ka.x" /(( `r.i �S' i Ill '#\ 1,1.�ht .M ....� ., /+/ , : « { lki r � ;4 ri` , gyp# �+ ==` �1' I ., 3.` � E t , g, $ .sus...., r•x i , t 41L 41 s Ado-• r `Iv I , ril 7 11/1�V i y, �e7 f•c �,m,4 `". , ,- ,,,., ,. ;' r I t`.'€•» .-�r� J ie _$ Mt UiLII.�f ��j l�r,. 1'1.' �`-� /fey'4-471', ra`fS,t�' i.1 4"\y' `s' `:a M i'=^ liy i, Oltir tc � a- ;,,r6 14e'� 4t AjC1i;.1G C'E3n �y •''1. ; 1 ' ' "q/ f "s ni a „. _, m •" s."I 1 I ti, iil;i�ii'!+; r. %� �2 r • FFf-- 40)* `- '17/1 i ... 1'-` i 1 ram. t i lie I L d d f f -ei>, n`, ,� ��7.. .+t l r1.2 ,� s WF "T''4'a Ll e l' 1 L 3 g ' � rr,% t��>fl :� tT ' . , ^ , =�i ;L68 11 � .. $ /�L S ' E. ` w t- 1E9i1 x ,j ,. r' '> f'tea + �E. f a'r'(-' � �� .�L.40i.: ,d^j1 11, ,>":• !I:.- •Q1 1 xi 1 r r l r r-40%-^ "' 8,,1` f: U-V o z-,`-'•r •.--;•-' rI' q ; ,,, ,-. . ,. r riW"'a d#. d' r'r'a°-,3.- 'IS. _-.. r'-`i` „i 4.:>4. •�rS,,l i,•. $. .nr -- !, y r x �� •!r E'4'r ti t +E ,� 5 13 f It# I!� , G IL . T zr r ti-:•"•'r. 1 . 1. t Q V�{ j k P L. -, $. 1:.. F-- 91Y i l,�. # �� a 6 y✓ r t 3 . l$ . 1 Yft . k '.. L Y t•r .us Ji Y',•taw— °i r. i t r } ri' 'a •< � ! - . �,, E� 3 I ,C B r�C ;*i■E #3. `.t,,, '., `� ,1, ,�p•• y�S} :',--ram >t i- ¢rtar.rs: • r 1` b ,--;�t•* � EgC� �l e` � -, y5i 'lF xj t�'ar --.'�s•: ''' • _�`�p C^ tt% , t r y r y �r, , (.� � t .i. -- • • i t t g a r � r � � 9 t/ ;0 ` -�Uy7 1 t I , jti ,a2 0` 1.---.pp ,its, y �� 3 " `� nEq/ '�� y -t . 1 ,:.v •-' 17 ',.--a'� r f t i �`y„ r -.i r p -> \ i`'8fi t `*, �/ •\..0'(.} ip 4 g 1 ,1,•�1 ; `t` t i ,t> s:a- r 5 `• t r'T`d- �''IrS's���QQtr�'' /Id7�?] i-i it r - tfi - 1f 4. :=ti - Ilg. �t 4 r.� i /F.f{:r/� y t H ,I . .�-' • . Cr .. '1- r if £. `# i,,1,�• r, .r 's..k i :. :`: 1 3 „y�, 41 ,,,'', ?& , r il' r t ``r ,t ` c,t { :t • [I{(E .+ > s}r z Fit •n't'^ ,. \ °`,3,, ,K c x •' a ,. r --ic , tj:1r AW 1 1t• 1�;5y�{}�tt ,1." { - - j 'is„t y� c y • •, ice ^a j "R r.'1 .�c L T �v"`�/111UL-�l�,,1 .,-''%;----..8::,, ,'-'7,;',-.‘••;,. - • ." ".',..i.f‘t. ..,--‘,.IR— '-':',‘,'-""=:-=,_!•';;"'.:-.44..11,,,41i...i'-,A , , Yi. , ?v P r a3 ,�, y _ 6. . 1 J' 'fir 11 . ,x x 1 1 '„ ., .. n Y 4.V'2ra rr ,, `8,,,,y;31,',;r^ s� ,.., •�# :'"� >'' 1.„ y,-1..4,1 *,, ' s ^� r- V �7>.. r f f NV.' 4" •• •':'(., '- _ Y'`a„ .' cif:J. «�� A's ifyl ilzl /: !...• .. �• r �::YYr, v "' _> t•`I �ct�l!- 1 �, v u �+ s1 4$�, r as tL 4 4T`g 'k gq - t (fpp,'pp,'+? M ,g l .� '' ,q is Z' • ,, ) sr✓" ,,N a .•` i a; 4 .ram 4. '3, '* r r�. 's, �r '�„ }-.., s !:� s 4 it '" `.� qs•\ sI{} / S fpT ,`y v � ei°"fir . �`^� i , -140� ss. `,, ..gi ` -) ; fir z .� �xx �� xr :t\ r '� }tea . ' ` :. f ` 1, S • 3 e 8 c > n r. - .� ? IA!C d tXt 4, • 2 a ; _ 3fk r tr +• z. r;5 n r > fit a? yri#df••ii p : aI' i 8- • al; r ? q1 - t 1-! C i• t ra e.. o-£ r g t 1-' ' t /�.a#' Y' 2 S9 r _M1 ,C � bBX R. pl , ; . s. . l ' r '1f�a _ r "d 'it E4 yya ,;-'. oY `- tt =r l tQf '' <;. r,siif7 lz. by$ $ S > r ' ,t F1 a Y N r Ra �� y_E '5 ¢5 4i ,E,.. s'i t gt ,- �7 / - . - .18F§ s a y , rt ' �`" e .j t , • a£ af . . m e t$ :ERAV. NOON STATION gsp �.. ELOPMENTPLAN PRELIMINARY ��& i NOT FOR CONSTRUCT4 N h`I ,.<."`,, tnSi o I I 6 0 -ii\ ll ICJ J �. `\ \emu. Xa N \ ,, ,,,/i° . , .:. .., ,,,1 \ ::: -",-- da I - da - ! ,-I f \ ' '• \� fff\ , • _`� �I ' `,.i i•a _ ——`r- ----. ' --- ../, ::-_______....- , �\` #___ _ ' 'I V °� • f Yam'=� � • O ` \ ,r `\\N- , \dy O • ,• L 0 d • J o,_ y \ \ . 1 . _ 1-•• '\s,\ •,.r:ss,\., „.r. .. ........ . : . :::‘,...,.......• .. • ,,. ,,04 _. . . _ , •(.4 ,,........\,, \s., __ .,, . . • , . ,, ,,.. , ,, ,,\ \___ ,' . _, \r .o \ \bp - -_,dad rr - NM �`` I - 1 • t ... \\t, • et IX•II .. : J s :as-7— :Ed r� r \ , Q�7 z zJ 1. r \\ I. . � I ,� =_ . 111 0 ' -, KO:. --, 1 PITIN I I \ �/• 111111111111.j t i ! c g 8&=-s 4; ib I III 1 itti I, \ ig < ' r � .N \,, :,_:„. il �� e 7.Itittil , `i i„nil,, �/9 6 ---- — cam; • -�J1pNb'p�/2 _�i •] ]I j i\• _ / C 7/1115/O�j�rSi1,`l'0,7 SSSN/Sqg . �,'/ /�r I J ' �iYSIyS 9HOg.6 J O,7g •JN/NOZ. kill) / -' \ I t 077 SON/p70H �lb1Sa7 ° '�'1 �LL a r i I II II \ f \ - AFFIDAVIT REQUEST: Application by CSW Associates Roanoke, LC,and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC,to: (1) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW,Official Tax Map No. 5200122,enacted through Ordinance No.33098 on September 03, 1996, related to:the development plan, building form,number of dwelling units,and street design and maintenance; (2) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 0 Brandon Avenue SW,Official Tax Map No.5200104, enacted through Ordinance No.25825 in 1981;and (3) place conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park _ Drive SW and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue SW;bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 5200122 and 5200104, respectively, related to:access and sidewalks. The zoning of the property is proposed to remain RMF, Residential District,with most of the property being zoned to RMF, Residential District,with conditions.The land use categories permitted in the RMF District include residential;accommodations and group living;commercial; utility uses and structures;animal and agricultural; and accessory,with a maximum density of one dwelling unit and group living adult resident or room per 1,000 square feet of lot area.The comprehensive plan designates the property for mixed residential use. The proposed principal use of the property is dwellings in the form of townhouses. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) TO-WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE ) The affiant, Emily G. Clark, first being duly sworn, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first-class mail this cceFreA/ !p.e.- 1 �S, 2025, notices of a public hearing to be held on this OLIG.b'C� ' Li , 2025, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as et out on the attached. . • . ...I .._ • Emily G. CAW SUB �IBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this Mill day of /C*per , 2025. .�`�G•EUA T. l ,i, * TA R y.••� , R PUBcE .. 8. coMM S10 3 . *r. • PI N Notary Public %,may..,,...., ,`.„' i1idIiiiiit . AFFIDAVIT REQUEST: Application by Mar Roanoke, LLC, to rezone the property located at 5060 Valley View Boulevard NW, Official Tax Map No. 2490111, from CG, Commercial-General District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, subject to the development plan that specifies uses, location of buildings and infrastructure, and site design. The land use categories permitted in the proposed INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; assembly and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory, with a maximum density of dwelling units, group living adult resident or room, and maximum height as specified on the development plan. The comprehensive plan designates the property for commercial — large scale use. The proposed use is regional housing services, limited to residential substance use disorder treatment center licensed by the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services (DBHDS) and related supportive services. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) TO-WIT: CITY OF ROANOKE ) The affiant, Emily G. Clark, first being duly sworn, states that she is Secretary to the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and as such is competent to make this affidavit of her own personal knowledge. Affidavit states that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Roanoke, she has sent by first-class mail this teteki.474.-W,-- 2025, notices of a public hearing to be held on this 0 tle/10•"' 1 Li , 2025, on the request captioned above to the owner or agent of the parcels as set out on the attached. Emily G. Clark )i_ ....... /(J"I_�1 d f SU CRIIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, this fay o v10 b2)r , 2025. "II11I/� %N•�GEUA T. Will V.• NOTARY•'`•d'd0 1: ill 0 PUBLIC *: REG.#764g073 1 . O; -•° MISSION Notary Public ;• p •. :AI �• 0, .....•. .\ ',,�'FALT H O �`�` "fiptill", CARDINAL rNEWS SERVING SOUTHWEST AND MY VIRGINIA See Proof on Next Page AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Cardinal News P.O. Box 4455, Roanoke,VA 24015 (540) 467-2189 State of Florida, County of Orange, es: I, Edmar Corachia, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon oath depose and say that I am an agent of Column Software, PBC, duly appointed and authorized agent of the Publisher of Cardinal News, a publication that is a "legal(newspaper"as that term is defined in 8.01-324 of the Code of Virginia, and authorized as such by Order of the Circuit Court, that the full text of the attached notice was published in said publication and also at www.publicnoticevirginia.com, which is a searchable statewide repository of such notices, on the following dates. Publication Dates: • Sep 29, 2025 • Oct 6, 2025 Notice ID: vuWfobyklShcNhkYb2Lm Notice Name: Legal Ad - October 2025 - PC & BZA Publication Fee: $235.00 Now Goraohia Agent \\\\�\�PaYtlllp �i//// PAMELA BAEZ �0 Nota y Public-State of Florida' VERIFICATION A IIIIII _ Commission#HH 166700 9=� • E�cpireson October la,2o25 State of Florida ���/rl-'\\\p�\ County of Orange Signed or attested before me on this: 10/08/2025 Notary Public Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof. Legal Ad - October 2025 - PC & BZA I Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber,Fourth. Floor,Room 450,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke, Virginia.All persons shall be afforded an opportunity to speak and state their views con- cerning all aspects of these matters. Any applications will be available for review online at httpsJ/roanokeva.gov12019/Com- missions,may be obtained digitally by emailing planning OD roanokeva.gov,and by visiting the Planning,Building,.and Development Department,First-Floor,Room 170,Municipal South,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke.Virginia. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for any.public hearings advertised herein,please contact the City Clerk's Office,(540)853-2541,by noon,Oc- tober 10,2025.. Cecelia F.McCoy,CMC,City Clerk The City of Roanoke Planning"Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 14,2026.at 1:30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard,in the City Council Chamber,Fourth Roor,Room 450,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue,SW,Roanoke,Virginia,to consider the following applications.Citizens are_advised thatthe date on_which thes ejnatters will be(leardis a_departure.ftori the usual date on which such matters are heard by Planning Commission Application by CSW Associates Roanoke,LC,and CSW Brandon Frontage,LLC,. to:(1)repeal all conditions proffered as part of a;previous rezoning on property located at 3840 Stratford Park Drive_SW,Official Tax Map No.5200122,enacted through Ordinance No.33098 on September 03,1996,related to:the development plan,building form,number of dwelling units,and street design and maintenance; (2)repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property lo- cated at 0 Brandon Avenue SW,Official Tax Map No.5200104,enacted through Ordinance No.25825 in 1981;and(3)place conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue SW;bear- ing Official Tax Map Nos.5200122.and 5200104,respectively,related to:access and sidewalks.The zoning of the property is proposed to remain RMF,Residential District,with most of the property being zoned to RMF,Residential District,with conditions.The land use categories permitted in the RMF District include residen- tial;accommodations and group living;commercial;utility uaes and structures; • animal and agricultural;and accessory,with a maximum density of one dwelling unit and group living,adult resident or room per 1,000 square feet of lot area.The comprehensive plan designates the property for mixed residential use.The pro- posed principal Use of the property is dwellings in the form of townhouses. Application by Mar Roanoke,LLC,to rezone the property located at 5060 Valley View Boulevard NW,Official Tax Map No.2490111,from CG,Commercial-General District,to INPUD,Institutional Planned Unit Development District,subject to the. development plan that specifies uses,location of buildings and infrastructure,and site design.The land use categories permitted in the proposed INPUD include res- idential;accommodations and group living;commercial;industrial;assembly and entertainment;public,institutional and community;transportation;.utility;agricul- tural;and accessory,with a maximum density of dwelling units,group living adult resident or room,and maximum height as specified on the development plan.The comprehensive plan designates the property for commercial—large scale use. The proposed use is regional housing services,limited to residential substance use disorder treatment center licensed by the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services(DBHDS)and related supportive services. Physical copies of these_applications are available for public inspection in the Planning, Building,&Development Department,First Floor,Room 170,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia,24011.Citizens may also access the application at https:/hvww.roanokeva.gov/1088.All persons shall be afforded an op- portunity to address the Planning Commission at the public hearing.Written comments may be forwarded to the Secretary to the Planning Commission by mail to 215 Church Avenue SW,Room 170,Roanoke,VA,24011,or by email to planningcommission@ro- anokeva.gov. Emily G.Clark,Secretary.City Planning Commission City Council will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid matters on Monday,October 20, 2025,at 7:00 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard,in the City Coun- cil Chamber,Fourth Floor,Room 450, Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Legal Ad - October 2025 - PC & BZA I Page 2 of 3 Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia.All persons wishing to address City Council may sign-up online at www.roanokeva.gov/council.In order to sign up,the form to speak before City Council may be accessed under the tab"Sign Up Form to Speak Before Council"on the left of the screen.For further information,you may contact the Office of the City Clerk at (540)853-2541. Cecelia F.McCoy,CMC,City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on Wednes- day,October 15,2025,at 1:00 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber,Fourth Floor,Room 450,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia,to consider the following applications: Application by Quyen Tran-for property located at 1526 20 th Street NE,bearing! Official Tax Map No.3341213,zoned RM-1,Residential District,for a special excep- tion pursuant to Section 36.2-311,Zoning,Code of the City of Roanoke(1979),as amended,to permit a homestay. Application by Fritz Alderman,on behalf of Charter Foods Inc.,for property locat- ed at 2657 Peters Creek Road NW,bearing Official Tax Map No.6370101,zoned CG,Commercial-General District,with conditions,for a special exception pursu- ant to Section 36.2-315,Zoning,Code of the City of Roanoke(1979),as amended, to permit a drive-through facility. Physical copies of these-applications are available for public inspection in the Planning, Building,&Development Department,First Floor,Room 166,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia,24011.Citizens may also access the application at https://www.roanokeva.gov/1074.All persons shall be afforded an op- portunity to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at the public hearing.Written com- ments may be forwarded to the Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals by mail to 215 Church Avenue SW, Room 170, Roanoke,VA 24011,.or by email to planning@ roanokeva.gov. Emily G.Clark,Secretary.City Board of Zoning Appeals The City of Roanoke provides interpretation at no cost for all public meetings,upon re- quest.If you would like to request an interpreter,please let us know at least 24 hours-in advance by calling(540)853-1283. • La Ciudad de Roanoke proporciona interpretacion sin costo por todas citas publicas, previa solicitud.Si usted desea solicitar un interprete,haganoslo saber con al menos 24 horas de antelacion por Ilamar(540)853-1283. Ai la Roanoke linatoa huduma ya ukalimani bila malipo katika mikutano yote ya umma, inapoombwa.Iwapo ungependa kuomba mkalimani,tafadhali tujulishe angalau saa 24 kabla kwa kupiga simu(540)853-1283. Legal Ad - October 2025 - PC & BZA I Page 3 of 3 See Proof on Next Page AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Roanoke Rambler PO Box 323,Vinton,VA 24179 (540)307-1475 State of Florida, County of Orange, ss: I, Edmar Corachia, an authorized agent of Column Software, PBC,which is an authorized agent of the Publisher of the Roanoke Rambler, a publication that is a"legal newspaper"as that term is defined in•8.01-324 of the Code of Virginia, and authorized as such by Order of the Circuit Court, that the full text of the attached notice was published in said publication and also at www.publicnoticevirginia.com,which is a searchable statewide repository of such notices, on the following dates: Publication Dates: • Sep 29, 2025 • Oct 6, 2025 Notice ID: rX3ojci2DDCtAAe2RIDV Notice Name:Legal Ad-October 2025- PC & BZA Publication Fee: $110.00 54wir porAollia \\\\�PYIIIP� Agent PAMELA BAEZ " Notary Public-State of Florida VERIFICATION A;, 111111 'Q= Commission It HH 186700 State of Florida %/rF.oF Fy� Expires on October 14,2025 County of Orange Signed or attested before me on this:10/08/2025 04/741 Notary Public Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof. Legal Ad-October 2025-PC&BZA I Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE the property for commercial—large scale use.The proposed Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City use is regional housing services, limited to residential sub- stance use disorder treatment center licensed by the Virginia Council Chamber,Fourth Floor,Room 450,Noel C.Taylor Iviu- Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services uicipal Building,215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia.All (DBHDS)and related supportive services. persons shall be afforded an opportunity ity to speak and state their views concerning all aspects of these matters. Physical copies of these.applications ate available for public in- spection in the Planning,Building,&Development Department, Any applications Will be available for review online at https:// First Floor.Room 170.Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 roanokeva.gov/2019/Commissions,may be obtained digitally by Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia,24011.Citizens may also emailing planing@roanokeva.gov , and by visiting the Plan- access the applications at https://wwwroanokeva.gov/108S.All flung,Building,and Development Department,First Floor,Rooni persons shall be afforded an opportunity to address the Planning 170,Municipal South,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Commission at the public hearing. Written Comments may be Church Avenue SW Roanoke,Virginia. forwarded to the Secretary to the Planning Commission by mail to 215 Church Avenue SW,Room170,Roanoke,VA,24011,or If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations by email to planniugcommissionvroanokeva.gov. for any public hearings advertised herein,please contact the City Clerk's Office.(540)853-2541,by noon,October 10,2025. Emily G.CIark,Secretary,City Planning Commission Cecelia F.McCoy,CMC,City Clerk City Council will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid matters Tine City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a pub- on Monday,October 20,2025,at 7:00 p.m.,or as.soon thereaf- ter as the matters'May be heard,in the City Council Chamber, lic hearing on Tuesday, October 14,.2025, at 1:30 p.m., or as Fourth Floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, soon thereafter as the matters may be heard,in the City Council 215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke,Virginia.All persons wishing Chamber. Fourth Floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal to address City Council may sign-up online at www.roanokeva. Building. 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia, to con- goy/council.In order to sign up,the form to speak before City sider the folloWiug applications.Citizensiice_ad3ised_thattbe Council may be accessed under the tab"Sign nip Fonnn to Speak date on which these matters will be heard is a departure from Before Council"on the left of the screen.For further information, the usual date on which such matters are heard by Planning you may contact the Office of the City Clerk at(540)853-2541. Commission. Cecelia F.McCoy,CMC,City Clerk Application by CSW Associates Roanoke, LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage,LLC, to: (1) repeal all conditions prof- The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a pub- fered as part of a previous rezoning on property located lie hearing on Wednesday,October 15.2025,at 1:00 p.m.,or as at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW, Official Tax Map No. soon thereafter as the matters may be heard,in the City Council 5200122, enacted through Ordinance No. 33098 on Sep- Chamber, Fourth Floor, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal tember 03,1996,related to: the development plan,building Building.215 Church Avenue SW.Roanoke,Virginia,to consid- form,number of dwelling units,and street design and main- er the following applications: tenance; (2)repeal all conditions proffered as part of a pre- vious rezoning on property located at 0 Brandon Avenue SW, Application by Quyen Tran for property located at 1526 20 Official Tax Map No. 5200104, enacted through Ordinance th Street NE,bearing Official Tax Map No.3341213,zoned No. 25825 in 1981; and(3)place conditions on a portion of RM-1,Residential District,for a special exception pursuant the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and the entire- to Section 36.2-311, Zoning, Code of the City Of Roanoke ty of 0 Brandon Avenue SW;bearing Official Tax Map Nos. (1979),as amended,to permit a homestay. 5200122 and 5200104, respectively, related to: access and sidewalks.The zoning of the property is proposed to remain Application by Fritz Alderman,on behalf of Charter Foods RMF',Residential District,with most of the property being Inc., for property located at 2657 Peters Creek Road NW, zoned to RATE,Residential District,witlr conditions.The laud bearing Official Tax Map No.6370101,zoned CG,Commer- use categories permitted in the RVIF District include residen- cial-General District,with conditions,for a special exception tial; accommodations and group living; commercial; utility pursuant to Section 36.2-315,Zoning,Code of the City of Ro- uses and structures;animal and agricultural;and accessory, anoke(1979),as amended,to permit a drive-through facility. with a maximum density of one dwelling unit and group liv- ing adult resident or room per 1,000 square feet of lot area. Physical copies of these applications are available for public in- The comprehensive plan designates the property for mixed spection in the Planning,Building,&Development Department, residential use.The proposed principal use of the property is First Floor,Room 166,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Building,215 dwellings in the form of townhouses. Church Avenue SW Roanoke, Virginia, 24011. Citizens may also access the applications at https://www.roanokeva.gov/1074. Application by Mar Roanoke, LLC, to rezone the proper- All persons shall be afforded an opportunity to address the Board tv located at 5060 Valley View Boulevard NW, Official Tax of Zoning Appeals at the public hearing.Written comments may Map No. 2490111, from CG, Commercial-General District, be forwarded to the Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals by to 1_\PUD,Institutional Planned Unit Development District, mail to 215 Church Avenue SW.Room 176.Roanoke,VA 24011, -subject to the development plan that specifies uses,location or by email to plamning@roanokeva.gov. of buildings and infrastructure,and site design.The land use categories permitted in the proposed LNPUD include residen- Emily G.Clark,Secretary,City Board of Zoning Appeals tial; accommodations and group living; commercial;indus- trial; assembly and entertainment;public,institutional and The City of Roanoke provides interpretation at no cost for all community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and acces- public meetings,upon request.If you would like to request an sou,with a maximum density of dwelling units,group living interpreter,please let us know at least 24 hours in advance by adult resident or room,and maximum height as specified on calling(540)853-1283. the development plan. The comprehensive plan designates La Ciudad de Roanoke proporciona interpretation sin costo por todas citas publicas,previa solicitud.Si usted desea solicitor um Legal Ad-October 2025- PC &BZA I Page 2 of 3 interprete.haganoslo saber con al menos 24 horas de antelacion por llamar'(540)853-1283. Jiji la Roanoke linatoa huduuna ya ulalimani bila malipo katika mik-utano yote ya tunma,ii apoombwa.Iwapo ungependa kuom- ba mkalimani,tafadhali tujulishe angalau saa 24 kabla kwa kupi- ga simu(540)853-1283. Published on Roanoke Rambler (http://www.roanokerambler. coral):September 29;October 6,2025 • Legal Ad-October 2025- PC&BZA I Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Any public hearings advertised herein will be held in the City Council Chamber, Fourth Floor, Room 450,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia. All persons shall be afforded an opportunity to speak and state their views concerning all aspects of these matters. Any applications will be available for review online at https://roanokeva.gov/2019/Commissions, may be obtained digitally by emailing planning@a roanokeva.gov, and by visiting the Planning, Building, and Development Department, First Floor, Room 170, Municipal South,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for any public hearings advertised herein,please contact the City Clerk's Office, (540)853-2541,by noon, October 10, 2025. Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 14,2025, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Fourth Floor, Room 450,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW,Roanoke, Virginia, to consider the following applications. Citizens are advised that the date on which these matters will be heard is a departure from the usual date on which such matters are heard by Planning Commission. Application by CSW Associates Roanoke,LC, and CSW Brandon Frontage, LLC,to: (1) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW, Official Tax Map No. 5200122, enacted through Ordinance No. 33098 on September 03, 1996, related to: the development plan, building form,number of dwelling units, and street design and maintenance; (2) repeal all conditions proffered as part of a previous rezoning on property located at 0 Brandon Avenue SW, Official Tax Map No. 5200104, enacted through Ordinance No. 25825 in 1981; and (3) place conditions on a portion of the property at 3840 Stratford Park Drive SW and the entirety of 0 Brandon Avenue SW; bearing Official Tax Map Nos. 5200122 and 5200104, respectively, related to: access and sidewalks. The zoning of the property is proposed to remain RMF, Residential District,with most of the property being zoned to RMF, Residential District, with conditions. The land use categories permitted in the RMF District include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; utility uses and structures; animal and agricultural; and accessory,with a maximum density of one dwelling unit and group living adult resident or room per 1,000 square feet of lot area. The comprehensive plan designates the property for mixed residential use. The proposed principal use of the property is dwellings in the form of townhouses. Application by Mar Roanoke,LLC, to rezone the property located at 5060 Valley View Boulevard NW, Official Tax Map No. 2490111, from CG, Commercial-General District, to INPUD, Institutional Planned Unit Development District, subject to the development plan that specifies uses, location of buildings and infrastructure, and site design. The land use categories permitted in the proposed INPUD include residential; accommodations and group living; commercial; industrial; assembly.and entertainment; public, institutional and community; transportation; utility; agricultural; and accessory,with a maximum density of dwelling units, group living adult resident or room, and maximum height as specified on the development plan. The comprehensive plan designates the property for commercial— large scale use. The proposed use is regional housing services, limited to residential substance use disorder treatment center licensed by the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services (DBHDS) and related supportive services. Physical copies of these applications are available for public inspection in the Planning, Building, &Development Department, First Floor, Room 170,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia, 24011. Citizens may also access the application at https://www.roanokeva.gov/1088. All persons shall be afforded an opportunity to address the Planning Commission at the public hearing. Written comments may be forwarded to the Secretary to the Planning Commission by mail to 215 Church Avenue SW, Room 170, Roanoke, VA, 24011, or by email to planningcomrnission@a,roanokeva.gov. Emily G. Clark, Secretary, City Planning Commission City Council will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid matters on Monday, October 20, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the City Council Chamber, Fourth Floor, Room 450,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia. All persons wishing to address City Council may sign-up online at www.roanokeva.gov/council. In order to sign up,the form to speak before City Council may be accessed under the tab "Sign Up Form to Speak Before Council" on the left of the screen. .For further information, you may contact the Office of the City Clerk at(540)853-2541. Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC, City Clerk The City of Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, October 15, 2025, at 1:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matters maybe heard, in the City Council Chamber, Fourth Floor, Room 450,,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke,Virginia, to consider the following applications: Application by Quyen Tran for property located at 1526 20th Street NE, bearing Official Tax Map No.3341213,zoned RM-1, Residential District, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2-311, Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to permit a homestay. Application by Fritz Alderman, on behalf of Charter Foods Inc., for property located at 2657 Peters Creek Road NW, bearing Official Tax Map No. 6370101,zoned CG, Commercial-General.District, with conditions, for a special exception pursuant to Section 36.2-315,Zoning, Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended, to permit a drive- through facility. Physical copies of these applications are available for public inspection in the Planning, Building, &Development Department, First Floor, Room 166,Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia, 24011. Citizens may also access the application at https://www.roanokeva.gov/1074. All persons shall be afforded an opportunity to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at the public hearing. Written comments may be forwarded to the Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals by mail to 215 Church Avenue SW, Room 170, Roanoke, VA 24011, or by email to planning@roanokeva.gov. Emily G. Clark, Secretary, City Board of Zoning Appeals The City of Roanoke provides interpretation at no cost for all public meetings,upon request. If you would like to request an interpreter,please let us know at least 24 hours in advance by calling (540) 853-1283. La Ciudad de Roanoke proporciona interpretacion sin costo por todas citas publicas,previa solicitud. Si usted desea solicitar un interprete,haganoslo saber con al menos 24 horas de antelacion por llamar(540) 853-1283. Jiji la Roanoke linatoa huduma ya ukalimani bila malipo katika mikutano yote ya umma, inapoombwa. Iwapo ungependa kuomba mkalimani, tafadhali tujulishe angalau saa 24 kabla kwa kupiga simu(540) 853-1283. c,..1.5& _AI ,�,I jt4i&I���,nLa.i v1�y kk to:&I U9i c�°s�c uL l .a<a Ls1 y�I u171y J2 1J I-(540) 853-1283 . ,,L..e, c-)-L°'C9:.)-1';I J4 24 J91.v L0.1,-1 �1,411.1 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 20th day of October 2025. No. 43306-102025. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the proper City officials to make a boundary amendment to the City's Enterprise Zone One A that will add certain areas not currently in it; authorizing the City Manager,or designee,to apply to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development for approval of such boundary amendment, and to take such further action as may be necessary to obtain and implement such boundary amendment. WHEREAS,there are certain areas currently located outside the City's Enterprise Zone One A that are contiguous to it that are not currently a part of Enterprise Zone One A, but that can be added to it and that will benefit from the designation of those additional areas as part of Enterprise Zone One A, as set forth in the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025; WHEREAS, the Virginia Enterprise Zone Grant Program, as amended, authorizes the amendment of an existing Enterprise Zone,thereby making qualified business firms which locate or expand within such amended Zone eligible for significant Enterprise Zone benefits as referred to in the above letter; WHEREAS, the addition of certain areas of the City as part of the City's Enterprise Zone One A,as set forth above,has the potential to stimulate significant private sector investment within the City in areas where such business and industrial growth could result in much needed growth and revitalization; and WHEREAS, this Council, acting in its capacity as the governing body of the City of Roanoke,has held a public hearing on the proposed boundary amendment, at which public hearing citizens and parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard on the proposed boundary amendment to Enterprise Zone One A. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City of Roanoke is hereby applying for an amendment to the City's Enterprise Zone One A, which amendment will add additional areas which are currently outside it. This boundary amendment is more fully shown on the maps attached to the City Manager's Report dated October 20, 2025, and more fully described in such letter. 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to apply,on behalf of the City,to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development for a boundary amendment to the City's existing Enterprise Zone One A pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Virginia Enterprise Zone Grant Program,as amended,which boundary amendment will add to it certain areas not currently in Enterprise Zone One A, all as more fully set forth in the above-mentioned letter. 3. Council hereby certifies that it held a public hearing as required by the Virginia Enterprise Zone Program Regulations. 4. The City Manager,or designee,is authorized to submit to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development all information necessary for the application for the boundary amendment to the City's Enterprise Zone One A for the Department's review and consideration and to take such further action as may be necessary to meet other program requirements or to establish the boundary amendment as set forth above. The City Clerk is authorized to execute and attest any documents that may be necessary or required for the application or for the provision of such information. 5. Any such approved boundary amendment will be retroactive to January 1,2025,or as otherwise provided by such approval from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. ATTEST: • City Clerk. - r _ ✓ City Manager's Report s a Submitted by: Marc Nelson, Director Department of Economic Development ROAN O KE October 20, 2025 Title: Public Hearing for Boundary Amendments to the City of Roanoke Enterprise Zone. Background: Due to anticipated development of key properties which are not presently located within the Enterprise Zone, staff have identified a need to apply for boundary amendments to the City's Enterprise Zone One A. Such amendments, if approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development, will add approximately 25.3635 acres into the zone_ , where future development is anticipated into Enterprise Zone One A. A full list of additions and maps is attached to this report. In accordance with state regulations, each zone has a maximum acreage limit equal to seven percent of total City acreage, which for the City of Roanoke totals 1,922 acres. Zone boundary and incentive amendments are permitted by state regulations once a year. Considerations: A public hearing is required to be held by the City Council prior to the submittal and approval of any such amendments by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. Recommended Action: A public hearing is required to be held by the City Council prior to the submittal and approval of any such amendments by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. 0lBc1,,t9.4i\_) Angela O'Brien, Deputy City Manager qq North-Lakes � I,nview i .wr ,� - ~, Modified Enterprise Zone and Airport <) ?' ` v Districts : ' ROANOKE 8 Glen Cove • { Zoning Existing Uri , 1;• Via rd Litt ,_ i • Haller. �" �s 1' / Rd •:r Acres9 I . ): Court Arrowood '.1\0 ,�� - . .' ': yr Monterery,.-; , �i Westview° '"`_ ti�� Preston Park � olonial Trail ., � Terrace • -, `old Monterey / °,r 1, 1 • Golf Club o ea'chtree Norwood h • O Roundhill m • i ,, / ..1101 , _ • Fairland'" \., i'ra6o Washingtonr �i Heights :,�,• �11� � '�i�l pJ • -' Evans Spring !r .e'wood-Summit• .•. .._ . High - ANY _ � ,' • ..� , • •`.villa• a is 3 _ Hills 5o�h .' - , r r r r Mecca Gardens 1 '�'` . t Hollins ,. a ashington ti, -g , r Eastgate _-I W ., ` .Willi son l' •idgewood -- _. -- I Heights ,-• Melrose,RugbY Washington , ;\ . �'; = Y, Park . . ." i 5'' litr: --Park P - r :". - Wilmont-:, Shenandoah/mkt "�'.� -� .: .r,+ � � s... �® elrose _ . �� .;I -, : I - - 'w . . , 1.' f arrison - __ ° ��(Icy a��/ -'1 • ",, 1:: e r r WInut Ave '� Q� 71 ' Cherr `Hell w m. . n'sb�oro ,' 1''>: :Washingt Gal ' Salem VA y° ...� — .P��t�- .Hurt Park. rCb� , jJ ao , lo� r��• MedalCer ' " "li ®��• . _. /�:, lrN� aty .1�„ �* F�, i Md�,_ gay ��°���rw4unt , tr.7 ,'Mangy i�= MNaaM:►iv"A®©�� - Lc, Vinton - s _ Y ...__ ♦ .,i�f Y.a • , ~ l _ . rf".a `s.r1f I y Kenwood �� :1\ I ems ' am A �" l WasenF�' r; f I/ Old Southwest _•-if - ,�4 � `�. • Court4 i---�'r--•-r � .� ". � -_ ----Raleigh,�. ;,° asora� ''.,� � - �/ �� "� Morningside ii Zoning i MXPUD.Mused Uae e StN { � , • R/v a J +. Planned Unit Dev ,/ `-- South°-, } end E CG:Commercial- �, lr - r '�q}e , a i`� General R-5:Residential fi _ ,„111,1 • f • : ffersori / `IVi a a F b RM-1,Residential , ( -, CLS:Commercial- - Riverdal: ®Large Site .• RM-2:Residential 1 �,/ 22t • • a1/1!1 i' �� � a 220 ' lEastla�` 1,r i ' CN:Commercial- ROS:Recreation and rt•/: - M,0 U ii t3 I IT r R u ®Neighborhood Open Space r f, i' ' 1 i tro4 9 OM D Downtown UC(c):Urban Center -,' %? Qq ® Conditional cJ Franklin d ®I-I Light Industrial t Colonial . .If - UF:Urban Flex }� South Roanoke �. ,, r ' ./" - _ i -Eln 'cll.I-2:Heavy Industrial ; �r 0;': 0.5 1 Miles i+\ U,F(c)•Urban Flex ' , r ,l .• , [716] I • Dundee V IN:Institutional 3,, o Conditional INPUD,MIN <Institutional t. : . i *:- Esri NASA,NGA,USGS,PEMA,S irces, Esri TomTom .Garmin PAO4,41tAA,USGS,n OpenStreetMap CityLimits - I' , on�a� • "Ga,en City - contnlhu�tors and the.GIS User Communi y -f Planned Unit Dev °.�MX:Mixed Use \ - ti° 1 '_ •' 1 ����! `_ North..Lakes; inview. a / ,1 1 ; \ \ ;• Airport :,is-- '\ i-j, Roanoke City Enterprise Zone ®. a / �� \ \ ▪iI` • • ROANOKE 4.. Glen [ove ,., : L; 4t+ \ ) ,.. ! RGr�'an r'y 1 ' ..,•Little T 19 / ,\ / i �.- Miller.., R/ % : _• ` •, `' ! '' 'f' ' Court=Arrowood ', - --_ - ,'Manterery / '' /' � • ,Preston Park ' �_ olonial Trail" :kr s v / . Terrace'' ;� 1 �,,. '� > ( ld�- " }r a r \yi >�i J ", �t ti. I G S +.�lGolf Ctuhey r/ t� �. .,o'-. J Peachtree Norwood 81 // �� ' RoundhiII r v, . I .. I`. .1 ,/ 101 Falrland• ~v` I \ r`r�. - J jt Washington N J: 1 r ,. ~ ;; Heights: , , 4 l ;: ,:__i.- I. I; • .,, . ,Evans Spring I, c ; A t ' : - - ;.' -,, ,., •r;, -=:'.:;�... . - _ r : Villa Hei h'ts "1 _ '' ',� . +� '°f !{``• , f>'` '' } •' : Edge.wood.-Summit' :-• . \ • sr ;: 1' 3 Hills it g — f ''- ,Mecca G r ens 6 South - III Hollins \ 6 --.,: ) Washington . . ... a \qt �Ea'stgate'-:.J/ / ./ - ,Hei hts` Melrose-R ..:- �'�Willi on // /, / r Ridgewood • 9b Washington ,••; _ _ a r �, E } i -,wit Park •, _•i1. ` '• IP S�, • k , Wllmont=::" Shenand•ah z ''. ,' - :rose - - ' r - \. ;`.. •;; 1 f , . 1 1. -�. `' \ ,i RU r er / \-1Naflnut Ave n " 1 G o\� '1� -: hingtc ; 'a -' ''A 1 .Cherry,Hill , W , ._: ...,. :r Fallon Hurt Park ," w▪ i E, ; • i, ,Medical center ? -- ` �, ' . -ti E� i s r ains..r r z , r or \ w Vinton ; ' `--'. - '-7-"- ------T ,arer,� cad • `Mo. e i / ` alYa !tip I Kenwood \'s , ! ; l 1 " _ y I r ., f � � ., �s• , ,- ° ?._; -� -: / •._ _ :"1i O,'Id+"Southwest - , �'r -�•16,� � r %•� r� r Ral` gh Curt -6")° , 'r l �%'� • ��, 1 Greater i/ r,q� SNj '\ M� .ningside \\ y r So e ". p� , :D"eyer-le - :\ `� . r South r 1► + RiDerry S� �t ` r. i' Jefferson . ` ,. . l J ` �\ osed Additions-. Niagara 5I 1 f f �9; F f h V (. , SvN �n ,, .. 1 EMI!! r 25:6286 acres: �r 221 din; �� / /,r a .. < , N I. Gran „�I Grandin Court �� '� M,ountarn I' Current Boundary 1 ' { I• r l _,R� 1687.7019 acres ,1 \ /// Franklin's ,, r'` l,r s 1. ti • _. -•.t.Bower.;Rd _ ^- > 1/:- _ ,, ..,,Colonial rya ,F' • , - , ,,.. _ ,. . , � -� .: : , __ ,. .,,� .,% _ .0 , 0.5. ,,1.Miles . ,_, ,z. - :� , " , ,_ _ , • .:. • • ' -,South Roanoke; R - -� ., • n- ' 7e ^,7,:' ,1 j 221• = /.�., ! ;1. ' ,7iJ s'.•�`" /3' s i' r! /' 116. .!I 1.' �,•l�unde� •`K.. ;p? ['. Err it \ { • </.•'/ ,.J S ." ,,Q.-=_ resthlllp,'..;.i,- ,�.'•. , ,..',•:\ :.'/ 1 ;`/- ' \'.. �`•• 1 °; i 'e ,t r ,� r/, r ' fj!:..". , -I,,. ,v: -<0 1 ��• ,l`4 rEsri NA,,NGA,USGS .F'EMA,S�Ources, Esn TomTorn;Garrnm F �NOAA,USGS,©OpenStreetMap , — C 9�� •i f i ��a�' Garden City- ' con, -tors,and the G15 User;•'-'•:.,, }', °ckrRtl . • ,� ! .oc` z _/ \:*%'•, f\� 1! t ,f.y 1 1 North LakesAo4iii _ • •'i if `°� _ Ci / Enter rise Zo AIPne ' 4'lljAir•port LA\_, Roanoke "1 p ���_ ;ROANOKE ,;,i Glen Cove \ 1i --/ � FR '$+ �, �` .' _, •� ;/� I w t �r%ray Little Tr, -a Ra Acres I9 :p. ,;: • "'Miller'', ' �� ri i } I� �t,;ia ,d/ 1• :Courtr=Arr000d .\ .. 'i ,r �' 4� x ;if �'ri,}" +{*lMonterer / "^^i4 ' ' r',.f,� • • �\ • • Preston Park Y Westvlew \ ' T �olonlal rail :'� � "\ r / pd Terrace • ,' Old Monterey .,„:•/ •: �+. y •._,• .,` d! i j`- ,:� .•. i i Golf,Club' g J' ,0�` I eachtre -Norwood 4 _� ',' • z• L r« h , • o n Z l 101 Fai land II �'"l 1 hi 2 / 460 ` I _Washington;;+ 1` ;• ` k+' a � • Heights r -- .r 7 1 r j i l �:_. fi .. � • :Evans Spring t r: i.�. � I. mq 71 , ' . I �� � . , Villa Heights �! . ,i ▪ / `jl ' r.ewood-Summit', + p �.,- r ' }� I, ( " ,. _ ;,Hills ' -'®1� .. _ ' 'o ,',' , .• - f+ Mecca Gardens' , 3 • .. r South , • o,► , Hollans Ill,' . .z Washin ton"" ;;," :; r ,1 =,+� ,'Eastgate' ; , Id ewood Heights • i, Melrose Rugby- :I Wa hin g 9 s gton �.- �'Park �;, .?i' • -1!: !----- ��,','. 7' • r'1'' ;,`.1 '`~Park `3 'i._n �.. ' �° �'.j f i,✓.,;/fir^' _!`' � %' . ' - ,,1 . ,'..rr. ..'- r 1' gyp} '+ r -,'r ~�1•11 , Y� 'iP "'"�'i WIIdv ood ���(� .- t�1, , Wrlmont Shenandoah .� +. .wed ',r- ���®� "4elro- se I- ' :-- �j�� F I r R�.i; , , . ..:.�® -.• v`e , �i 4P ..:- •• .-• i aitison,` _ - )' � , ri • = w , „�; �' , ;,�,= _ +� � �. �'_ Enterprise Zone �?a (. + . . ®� =:y, . 'Walnut Ave Cherr �lll ®.erg Gainsboroi °`� ® • `, Parcels c a _ngt Sa`lemIVA Y ®az- Hurt_.Ptk , ���;� m \ ��,: '®it, , t b, W Shtn Medical Center, _ _—� �� 'ENE.;m "*'ms ® , /f; ®o < Fallon y=' Land.Use Description 1 1 d Q!a•`' ® ton".l�� _• °- ! �`,' � yc. —+®..� �'� ,s ,,��� • ®Vacant _ R . • M t;r- td / • Mo. �w=-. a r f,-,-Ir .• r - q ;:® Singleamily ,: Q� • � { Kenwood ® '`' ✓ . : —, �d r NLIt Family I J • • —✓�y � �i�• — Commercials �►iwiiir ! ` ` ) -• 'Wasen � y q t 24 l Other � , -• -!'r' t!? =J. "J.,'; Old Southwest + r�� � ��� , ('�� Jill _ CityLim1-, ,,; ,,:„_,,,.,-,.:-..' a „- -- ',:'•:-.... --..;-,,,,.;,,----:(7,--7„ -=', • "!� ,1/ -( Raleigh Court !7 i. �'� Mornln side a • Greater - 'Ave i� Vacant Acreage: 302 acres so � - g '''`, \;Deyerle • `'-' • ' ,�• W: f_ .south '// �' Single Family Acreage: '21 acres: • ,' = { / • Jefferson t - 'I / /v' !• Multi Famil Acreage: .120747. cres � • � Conunercial- crea e:° acre ;I n,�'. j- tiJ4 zz, zo ;' =Mi�i' `I Other Acreage: 27:acres Grandin Court � oURTai-R r M arcel data , fdr • .r :-'- ,;, - • r,�+ i, ,' � , I 'rid, '� , -Acreage based on p �: I a r- Total Enterprise Zone Acreage: 1913'acres T";. �}` %' Franklin' • s ,,',-,.a,,,.'.„.-_,-a1,,,:,.,3,,';:,,.,.,„--,.,-...,..L-,-_-....„_,„'..,4.a„':!:.:1,:_.,-0'',';:•;r:-.N"/!7;."Y:':'',:.::,/:,V:,>-<•;'-'';-,'';,-,'.;':'''•.r,r,O..,.,;/,,,•,..''.,,•.:'•1',';:,!'..:..'•..,-!:.,,''/. •':'./•. , • . \,,,,.'",'L-.. -Bower Rd / Colonial ,, Y s' ;dr ,X„ 0 0 5 .. 1 Mile `/ -z,.",'2:,': 4 i j i,'f T' , South Roanoke 1, 1.. a'.'rj r= i r' �.! 1 l + • :,: 116 I i`DUIICI`Y: n _ �� � � - ° * h,Il % ' r q ro-'--�=Crest 0.., .lt� r,,.:-.,,�' � ,� - �� i-Y� `� r ,,.;.•. •.. .,, (� e 'enStreetMa �� �•• •,- :� - /' „r i z _ , � � Esn„N�l•I,+NGA��US��•5 fE rces='Esn;TomTorn,Garrnln;PA •�N'bAA,USGS,Ca,OY'1 ,.; ,\ �_.;,I -�.Ar,,-,? ..., ; ,�; � ,, . ,.• . � ' , t •+�.:•�a� ::.Garden City � , con.. •ultors;and��the:GfS User GormmunlCy� 1 r. 1 _� '.,r; �,..,�• '�O .. ..- '_ . ,..de\�L� _` :_-.____1./. ..._-.I. _ _._- --. . _._ J.:Q' _...____._-'.-----3' -- _..�..____F_.__tiv'.f Enterprise Zone Amendments 2025 Enterprise Zone Additions 2025 Address Acreage Tax ID, 9th St SE :7.885 4170403 9th St SE 5.657 4170402 2845 Hershberger Rd NW 11.8215 - 6450104. . 1 lii Current Acreage 1887.7019 Additions 25.3635 Deletions 0 UC L' MiffrAfilca GYana aCJ an � ? Ag-o Allowable Acreage 1922 Available Acreage After Amendments -8.9346 Column OFFICIAL AD PROOF • This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in Cardinal News on the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (540) 467-2189. Notice ID:XQDqLXL7w3jgpUBcLbNB I Proof Updated:Oct.03,2025 at 02:42pm EDT Notice Name:2025 Enterprise Zone Hearing City of Roanoke See Proof on Next Page This is not an invoice.Below is an estimated price,and it is subject to change.You will receive an invoice with the final price upon invoice creation by the publisher. FILER FILING FOR Alicia Cundiff Cardinal News alicia.cundiff@roanokeva.gov (540)853-5405 Columns Wide: 1 Ad Class: Legals Total Column Inches: 12.98 Number of Lines: 104 10/07/2025:Government Notice Notice 100.00 10/13/2025:Government Notice Notice 100.00 Subtotal $200.00 Tax $0.00 Processing Fee $35.00 Total $235.00 2025 Enterprise Zone Hearing City of Roanoke- Page 1 of 2 NOTICE OF,PUBLIC HEARING talion at no cost for all public meetings, upon request.If you would like to request Notice is hereby given that the Council an interpreter,please let us know at least of the City of Roanoke will hold a public 24 hours in advance by calling(540)853- hearing on the matters set forth below at 1283 - its regular meeting to beheld on Monday, • October 20 2025, commencing at 7:00 La Ciudad de Roanoke proporciona inter- p.m.,local time,or as soon'thereafter as pretacion sin costo por todes citas publi- the matters may be heard,in the Coun- cas,previa solicitud.Si used desea solic- cil Chamber,-481 Floor,.Room 450,in the itar un interprets,haganoslo saber con al Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 menos 24 horas de anfelacion por!lamer Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,Virgin- (540)853-1283. - ia.:Further information is available in the Office of the City Clerk,(540)853-2541, Jiji la Roanoke linatoa huduma ya ukali- or from Marc Nelson,Economic Develop- mani bita malipo katika mikutano yote ya ment Director;(540)853-2717. umma, inapoombwa lwapo ungependa kuomba mkalimani,tafadhali tujulishe an- Pursuentto.the provisions of the Virginia galau saa 24 kabla kwa kupiga simu(540) Enterprise Zone Grant Act,Sections 59.1- 853-1283. 538,et seq.,Code of Virginia(1950),as amended,the City of Roanoke proposes All parties and•interested citizens may to make applications to the Virginia De- appear on the above date and be heard pertinent of Housing and Community De- on these matters.If you are a person with • velopment forthe matters set forth below. a disability who needs accommodations • for this hearing, please contact the"City A.To amend the boundaries of Enter- Clerk's Office,at(540)853-2541,before prise Zone One A by adding approxi- 12:00 noon on October 20,2025. mately 25.3635 acres GIVEN under my hand this 6th day of Oc- A copy of the maps,a list of Official Tax tober 2025. Map,numbers of the properties involved V in the amendments referred'to above, and the local-incentives currently offered Cecelia F.McCoy,CMG' in Zone One A are available for public City Clerk inspection in the City's Department of Economic Development Offices at 117 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,-Virgin- ia 24011, telephone number(540) 853- 2717.Please contact Marc Nelson at such address or telephone number to view pub- lic records related to a parcel of property involved in this matter. A copy of maps,and other documents de • - scribing the.proposed.areas of the Enter- prise Zone One A amendments,_and the _ other matters referred to above;are on file l and may be reviewed by the public after October 7,2025,in the Office of the City • Clerk, Room 456,Noel C.Taylor Munici- pal Building,215 Church Avenue,S.W., V Roanoke,Virginia,24011,during business hours. , Citizens interested in presenting their ' views at this public hearing should regis- ter to speak by contacting the City Clerk' s Office by telephone at(540)853-2541, by accessing the form to sign up to speak located on the.City Council's webpageat www.roanokeva.gov,or by email at clerk@ roanokeva.gov,by 12:00 p.m.,on Monday, October 20,2025. If you are a.person with a disability who needs accommodations for the public . hearing,please contact the City Clerk's Office at(540 853-2541, by Thursday, October 16,2025,at12:00 p.m. The City of_Roanoke provides interpre- 2025 Enterprise Zone Hearing City of-Roanoke- Page 2 of 2 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on the matters set forth below at its regular meeting to be held on Monday, October 20, 2025, commencing at 7:00 p.m., local time, or as soon thereafter as the matters may be heard, in the Council Chamber, 4th Floor, Room 450, in the Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.,Roanoke,Virginia. Further information is available in the Office of the City Clerk, (540) 853-2541, or from Marc Nelson, Economic Development Director, (540) 853-2717. Pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Enterprise Zone Grant Act, Sections 59.1-538, et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, the City of Roanoke proposes to make applications to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development for the matters set forth below. A. To amend the boundaries of Enterprise Zone One A by adding approximately 25.3635 acres A copy of the maps, a list of Official Tax Map numbers of the properties involved in the amendments referred to above, and the local incentives currently offered in Zone One A are available for public inspection in the City's Department of Economic Development Offices at 117 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011, telephone number (540) 853-2717. Please contact Marc Nelson at such address or telephone number to view public records related to a parcel of property involved in this matter. A copy of maps and other documents describing the proposed areas of the Enterprise Zone One A amendments,and the other matters referred to above, are on file and may be reviewed by the public after October 20, 2025, in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S. W.,Roanoke,Virginia 24011, during business hours. Citizens interested in presenting their views at this public hearing should register to speak by contacting the City Clerk' s Office by telephone at(540) 853-2541, by accessing the form to sign up to speak located on the City Council's webpage at www.roanokeva.gov, or by email at clerk@roanokeva.gov, by 12:00 p.m., on Monday, October 20, 2025. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for the public hearing, please contact the City Clerk' s Office at (540) 853-2541,by Thursday, October 16, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. The City of Roanoke provides interpretation at no cost for all public meetings, upon request. If you would like to request an interpreter,please let us know at least 24 hours in advance by calling (540) 853-1283. La Ciudad de Roanoke proporciona interpretacion sin costo por todas citas publicas, previa solicitud. Si used desea solicitar un interprete, haganoslo saber con al menos 24 horas de antelaci6n por llamar (540) 853-1283. Jiji la Roanoke linatoa huduma ya ukalimani bila malipo katika mikutano yote ya umma, inapoombwa. Iwapo ungependa kuomba mkalimani, tafadhali tujulishe angalau saa 24 kabla kwa kupiga simu (540).853-1283. 1 Ls° J1-41 )� jLo?,S a. ,j4 :bl cJ9.1.1 cs°soc L,I 4 4..4A L5U u1"13J v,y-' J. S.9'JJ J64 1-a) 540( 1283-853 u.s 0JL4,1 6.4)- '-,=.1--24 L i U i 'LL.I (.5.4 : vt"?_y, All parties and interested citizens may appear on the above date and be heard on these matters. If you are a person with a disability who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office, at (540) 853-2541,before 12:00 noon on October 20, 2025. GIVEN under my hand this 6th day of October 2025. Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC City Clerk • MVUciW ' Chop Week Without Driving Debrief Party Responses & Summary Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Description: The Week Without Driving Debrief Party was the culminating event for the Week Without Driving (September 29 - October 5, 2025). Local legislative leaders, and citizens from Roanoke City, Salem, Vinton, and Blacksburg were invited by Bus Riders of Roanoke Advocacy Group (BRRAG) and PedalSafe ROA to take the challenge to utilize transportation options other than driving for one week. Additionally, they were given the option to submit a "Share Your Story" video, documenting their experiences during the Week Without Driving.Three videos were highlighted during the Debrief Party to get participants excited and comfortable regarding sharing their personal experiences. The videos can be viewed at BRRAG's LinkTree, under the heading, "Share Your Story" (Link: https://linktr.ee/ weekwithoutdriving_BRRAG ). Additional stories were shared during the Debrief Party and the following three questions were asked of those present. Question 1: What was fun/easy? • Being outside • Free Exercise • Not worrying about Parking! • The joy of riding a bike • Slowing down enough to see • Amazing bus drivers! • Meeting New People while I waited or while on the BUS • Taking the time to Walk = a pleasant day! • Destinating lanes • Care from neighbors • Viewing The Trees & Flowers • 9th Street Lanes • The surprise encounters with strangers &friends • Planning my week's transportation • Stop + talk on my way... connected not isolated • Learning about other people's WWOD experiences • Walking down streets I haven't been on and seeing new parts of Roanoke - like a giant old willow with leaves to the ground • Love Shenandoah bike lanes • Getting lots of steps in • Friendly, kind bus drivers +co-passengers • It's nice that others are trying this at the same time • Getting around by bus • Cycling Makes the journey fun • Get to see more /feel like part of community • Being outside (nature, fresh air) Summary: "What was fun/easy?" People enjoyed being outside in nature, walking, and cycling, appreciating things like trees, flowers, and new sights in their city. They found joy in the freedom and simplicity of biking and walking, and the pleasant pace it offered. Many highlighted friendly interactions—with bus drivers, co-passengers, neighbors, and even strangers—as uplifting. Public transit was appreciated for being accessible, stress-free (no parking worries!), and social. Participants also enjoyed feeling connected to their community, discovering new places, and sharing the experience with others trying the same challenge. Planning their transportation and incorporating physical activity felt rewarding and easy. Question 2: What was hard or frustrating? • Sometimes my schedule does not allow me to Ride my bike • Infrequent bus schedule -too hard! • Traffic • There are schools in the city that you can only get to by car. Example: James Madison Middle School • Sometimes 3rd Street or being on the bus can be very loud - machine noise • I forgot my bus card one day and had to walk from Salem + 15th to Walnut Bridge - nice walk but I was carrying a lot - not driving means you have to bring everything for your day + it can get heavy • Williamson Road at THE 581 ON-ramp scares me (Bike) • Limitations of schedule/timing of transit • Contending with the Weather • Had to skip or delay errands and miss some activities b/c of time or no bus route • The bus routes are Very limited and time Consuming • Not leaving when I want to due to riding with others & Driving FAST • The time tax is a barrier to non-car transport. • Feeling Unsafe riding to/in some places • Tough choices involving time and safety tradeoffs • Takes a lot longer to get places • Summary: "What was hard or frustrating?" Participants found that time and scheduling were major challenges. Infrequent and limited bus routes, longer travel times, and having to plan around others' schedules made transportation less convenient. Some noted the "time tax" of walking, biking, or using transit, which led to missed activities or errands. Safety concerns were also significant—especially around busy roads, on-ramps, and in certain neighborhoods when biking or walking. Weather, noise, and carrying everything for the day without a vehicle added to the difficulty. Overall, the shift away from driving required more planning, flexibility, and physical effort, which wasn't always easy or practical. Question 3: What should change? • Peters Creek Bus Route from Hollins to Lewis-Gale • The intersection of Orange & Gainsborough is dangerous for bikers & walkers • More access to the County • Create a multi-college transept. Consortium • Bus frequency & Shelters • Add a Crosswalk/more visibility at Albermarle & Williamson (common pedestrian walkway) • Approve & adopt the Vision Zero Plan • Later Bus schedule till 11 pm; More Smart Way • Don't pile snow at corners and on sidewalks—dangerous to get on & off bus & to walk • Peoples Perception of who has the right of way on major streets • More access points for SmartWay • Cutting Trees Back off sidewalks • Every intersection with moderate traffic should be "protected"intersection that allows pedestrians &bikes to cross safely • Ability to transfer routes outside downtown • Transit into Roanoke County • more protected bike lanes • Implement good plans we've been discussing! • More route information on the buses • I should do better with catching the BUS, & not be afraid to do Something Different • Walk signs at Brandon + Franklin intersection - it's a mess for pedestrians • Bus passes that are "refillable" • The stigma connected with public transit • Illuminate Greenways more! • Expand bus routes towards Bonsack on 460 • Bus frequency (every 15 mins?) • Bus frequency - every 15 min • Expanded routes including partner w/ R County -can't get to Peter's Creek • Add sidewalks on Colonial by Towers + at least until VWCC • Bus stop shelters • Replace bike racks on buses to fit wider tires (similar to Smart Way) • Trim brush from bike lanes (especially Valley View Blvd & Shenandoah Ave) • More Frequent busses • Make walking, biking, bus riding lower friction + less stressful • More Shelters and sidewalks • More protected infrastructure Summary: "What should change?" Participants identified key improvements needed to make walking, biking, and public transit safer, more accessible, and more convenient. Transit Improvements: • Increase bus frequency(ideally every 15 minutes) and offer later service (until 11 p.m.). • Expand routes, especially to underserved areas like Roanoke County, Bonsack, and along Peters Creek Road. • Add more Smart Way access points and enable transfers outside of downtown. • Provide more route information, refillable bus passes, and better bus stop shelters. Safety and Infrastructure: • Create protected bike lanes and safe pedestrian intersections. • Address dangerous areas like Orange & Gainsborough and Brandon & Franklin. • Improve sidewalk coverage (e.g., Colonial near Towers, Albermarle & Williamson) and trim trees and brushblocking sidewalks and bike lanes. • Illuminate greenways and avoid piling snow on sidewalks and corners. s Culture and Policy: • Reduce the stigma around public transit and shift public perception about right-of-way for pedestrians and cyclists. • Implement existing plans (like Vision Zero) and push for collaboration across colleges and jurisdictions. • Encourage individuals to embrace alternative transportation, even when it feels unfamiliar or challenging. Overall, people want a more reliable, connected, and user-friendly transportation system—with a strong focus on safety, equity, and ease of use. Hosted special events: Transit \ We supported the Bus , Equity Day, ADA disability1 Operators and Mechanics `� anniversary, and more! i Union as they lobbied for 0 \\-- --__.�_ �. better pay and benefits c �S ® AA� 04‘ Citybudget discussion 2022: We 0j S�"� �,` �� brought up evening and Sunday (*Ws service and the city responded O 0,4‘‘) b romisin us MetroFLX! Yp g � Cit - - —__ Ablo‘b ' ; i+ cre teddget discussion 20��R�. the Sorriest 24' We ', 'r contest and Bus Sto J gat I responded city leaders P • P n r I ,,, dad by improving stops! f' 0 $ . ** 0 Ili t' • 41 City council campaign 2022: We got nearly all candidates to ride a bus, and put buses We are members of the I . on the agenda for discussion [ Virginia Conservation Network -- and TRUST (Transit Riders of / Wegot our ,`'�, ,unC11 Together) .'� - CM c° 024''vJe the United States Toge ) E 501(c)(3) ,� 2 'nonprofit status! ) - ca palgt again' _ did TOPS...NEXT S1 Advocating bus . . "Week Without -service in the Driving" county challenge Alb. Advotatillg A' 64• __ a for bettered...... 0 bus $to s ' . iri - LS° GET ON BOARD! ----------T--- ------ g VV' (j,LIU1. d, . 0� ! 6 , gas : a� . • Urban R newal in Virginia Urban landscapes and communities all across the state of Virginia still bear the`scars of U i ban Renewal J El P ` •,. • •i I J...I- , % � �• -- ir EI An Interactive Story Map Detailing Urban Renewal not only in Gainsboro and Roanoke, but the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia. Gainsboro12 /g, History __ Project ...., HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER F t f, 'M LINCOIN �_ �_ a �,: ,, « } 01 , . it • - . i te _ 0 ir—ttli r r � ,-- ,.: r Lincoln Theater.Courtesy of Roanoke Public Libraries. GAINSBORO' Complementing the History Project `" granite markers on the Central Walkway is the development of a mobile app titled - -.r,`.. I The Gainsboro o tntrod n an mroamm n;no.y nne wou;n9 m�.Jag;�a., I History Project: a n American inJWenre in RoonokeViryinia's niAonc interactive history Cnins6ora neignborhooE ! r �, r and walking tour of African American "sum Meet the influence in uLLir.mr` !Welt I Roanoke's Historic Gainsboro a u Q g 1 neighborhood. Utilizing text, graphics, El 42 and video, the app • •j'.'•.. provides stories reflecting . ti (1.uvslioRd til the contributions of the 'i"`o. Pm;�t i.lT,- •1 r. people who lived and M� }_ri, o worked in Gainsboro. Iwz,.' •AN. . gainsborohistorypro ect.or J g - M ; tea, : . r01 Central IIr Walkway I Plaza ROANOKE HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER 41, li- illb 0 I 1 Walkway rendering.Courtesy of Hill Studio The Walkway expands the campus footprint by connecting the main building with the Claude Moore Education Complex and provides green space, a brick walkway, wall seating,and an outdoor learning laboratory for culinary arts students. The Walkway is 110 feet in length and 14 feet wide, and built using firebricks.The entire plaza is over 10,000 square feet. , - x $4. 1 ,n x' is ,- --- .,...,,. c-A*---f5., t The RHEC campus is located within the historic Gainsboro neighborhood of Roanoke,which was once a thriving business and entertainment district for African Americans. A significant feature of the Central Walkway honors this rich legacy. RHEC staff worked with members of the local community to identify historical themes and events from 1835 to 1970 to engrave in the walkway. www.education.edu . . il - - (fr.o.curitlj. ()- ()-f-H.agit . . .',,' _ ,'' ... _ ...,.' ''' ':''- '1':„:. : ..''',,,, 1 ' . - . _ � . . AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL 'URBAN RENEWAL • AND REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS ON THREE -ROANOKE VIRGINLA NEIGHBORHOODS . a . m by t f . . .' REGINALD SHAREEF, PH.D AUGUST 1, 1991 . 333 :77. Sh23e , r '1195 :011487:0 .2 The preparation of this reportwas financially aided through a Federal grant to the 'Institute fbr Urban Affairs and Research , Howard University (Washington, DC) from the Department of Housing and' Urban Affairs -(H,UD) . • This research was conducted by: 1. Dr . - Reginald Shareef , Ph.D. , Assistant Professor of Political Science/Public Administration , . Radfor-d_ University, Radford , Virginia, Dr . Shareef `is also President of SCORE! Management Consultants , P.O. Box 5161, Roanoke, Virginia, 24012-; and 2. Mr . Shafiq Majied , 4032 Guernsey Lane , Roanoke , Virginia, 24017 This document was prepared by: Ms . L.D. .Pratcher QWIK-TYPE Word Processing Services Roanoke , Virginia III SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION Background of the Study Since World WarII , public policy has played a dominant role in rebuilding the obsolescent and deteriorating core areas of American cities. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has been the governmental institution responsible for administering federal housing and urban renewal programs . The goals of federal urban policy, however , have often been vague and confusing . For example, Wilson (1966) writes the following about urban policy: " We do not know what we are trying to accomplish. . . .Do we seek to raise standards of living , maximize the commercial centers of our cities , and surburban sprawl , eliminate discrimination , improve the quality of urban design , check crime and delinquency , strengthen the effectiveness of local planning , increasing citizen participation in local government? All of these objectives sound attractive - in part , because they are rather vague - but unfortunately they are in many cases incompatible" (p.10) . Dye (1978) suggests that the political agenda contributes to this confusing array of policies : "Government can maintain the support of competing groups in society by allowing different federal agencies to pursue incompatible goals and by permitting local communities to follow competing policies with federal money " ( p . 182 ) . To the politically uninitiated , these institutional arrangements of American government in urban policy may seem inefficient or ever unethical . Yet , these contradictory policies clearly reflect Madison ' s ( Federalist No . 10 ) 44 prescription for controlling the interests of various factions in a democratic society. - Dye (1978) describes the incompatible goals of two federal agencies and their impact on urban policy: hFor example, the two federal programs that account for the greatest expenditure of dollars for the physical improvement of cities are ( 1 ) the federal highway and transportation programs , ( 2 ) the federal housing and urban renewal programs . The first - is operated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the second by HUD. The urban .portion of the interstate system is costing billions of dollars ; the effect of these dollars is to enable people to drive in and out of th:e central city speedily , safely , and conveniently , and to open up suburban areas to business and residential expansion . Of course , these expressways also encourage middle-class (mostly white) families to move out of the central city and to enable commercial establishments to follow them. This leads to further racial segregation within the .metropolitan region in housing and schools , and reduces the number of service jobs available to the poor living in the city . . . . At the same time , the Federal Housing Administration ( in HUD) and the Veterans- Admi-nistration are encouraging home ownership by insuring mortgages , that are written on easy terms for millions of middle- class (mostly white) Americans. Most of • these mortgages are for new homes because it is cheaper to build on vacant land and because so many prospective homeowners want to move 'to the suburbs. So it turns out that these programs actually facilitate the movement of middle-class people out of the central city. In the meantime , the Urban Renewal Administration ( in HUD) is helping cities tear down slum dwellings , often displacing the poor who live there at .considerable hardship , in order to make way for office buildings , hotels , civic centers , -industrial parks , and middle-class luxury apartments. In part , this effort is intended to' lure 2 suburbanites back to the central city . Although urban renewal reduces the overall supply of housing to the poor in cities , the Housing Assistance Administration (in HUD) is assisting cities in building low-rent public housing units to add to the supply of housing for the poor" (pp.182-183) . Two caveats concerning the foregoing Dye passage. First , Madison ' s political philosophy notwithstanding , it is apparent that urban renewal policy has primarily benefitted a particular group ( faction) - White , middle-class Americans. This includes suburbanites as well as land developers . In fact , attracting private developers to these projects is crucial to the success of urban renewal . As Dye (1978) notes : "The key to success in urban renewal is to encourage private developers to purchase the land and - -make a heavy investment - in middle or high-income housing or in commercial or industrial use. In fact , before undertaking a project , urban renewal authorities frequently "-find a developer first , and then see what interests them . " The city cannot afford to purchase the land , thereby taking it off the tax rolls , invest in its clearance , and then be stuck without a buyer . - Moreover , the private developer must be encouraged to invest in the property and thus enhance the value of the central city . So over time a city can more than pay off its own investment in urban renewal by increased tax returns from renewed property and hence make "a profit" . Thus , many people can come out of a project feeling successful - the city increases its tax base and annual revenues , the private developer makes a profit , and mayors can point to the physical improvements in the city that occurred during their administration (p.187) . Second , these policies create win/lose socio/political situations with the disenfranchised usually being adversely effected by urban renewal . In fact , residential and commercial 3 neighborhoods are often destroyed in the relocation of residents. Jacobs (1961) has stated that when poor and black citizens are dislocated for the benefit of middle or high-income white residences , urban renewal simply becomes "negro removal" . Dye (1978) reported that small businessmen are especially vulnerable to relocation since they depend on small , well-known neighborhood patrons and do not usually fare as well when moved to other parts of the city. It is worth noting that the above Dye passage does not include poor (minority) urban dwellers among those who come out of urban renewal projects " feeling successful ." The Roanoke Urban Renewal Experience: Kimball , Gainsboro, and Northwest Between 1950 and 1980 , a number of renewal and redevelopment projects were undertaken in three minority communities in Roanoke , Virginia ., : These three areas are Kimball , Gainsboro, and Northwest. A brief overview of urban renewal in each area is presented next._ Kimball The site of the city' s major urban renewal clearance project that began in the mid-1950s . The area was almost completely cleared under urban renewal grants by the Roanoke Redevelopment Authority for commercial and industrial use . Most residents were relocated and scattered ' by the early 1970s. Gainsboro Initially , ' Gainsboro started as a redevelopment project under HUD' s Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) and was partly 4 cleared and new housing constructed (40 units) . A second phase shifted to rehabilitation but was handicapped resulting in (1) the loss of sound housing stock to clearance during the NDP phase and (2) the lack of funds. Northwest A large residential area which underwent major expansion of black population as a result of clearance in the Kimball and Gainsboro areas. Currently , housing stock is subject to disinvestment and parts of the area are undergoing rapid deterioration and decline. Background of the .Problem Dr . Walter S. Claytor is a prominent business and social leader in the Gainsboro community. Dr . Claytor is also (1) an original member of the Gainsboro Project Area Committee (PAC) - a citizen participation group that was supposed to be actively involved with local government officials in decision-making concerning urban renewal in Gainsboro and (2) a member of the Peoples Voters League. He , and other long-term residents/ business-people of Gainsboro, have contended for years that the original intent of urban renewal in Gainsboro was "neighborhood revitalization" and not "slum clearance. " Yet , these residents argue , clearance and the "death of the neighborhood" was all that urban renewal bought to the Gainsboro community. This group of' concerned citizens have taken their complaints and allegations to numerous elected government officials (Appendix 1) . specifically, the allegations concerning the urban 5 renewal project in Gainsboro can be categorized in - the following manner : . 1 . the - residents of Gainsboro were promised that urban renewal would revitalize and rehabilitate their neighborhood as opposed to slum clearance that had occurred in the Kimball area. In other words , these residents believed that at the completion - of urban renewal , Gainsboro would continue to be a viable community 'with its commercial , social , and cultural infrastructure strengthened. Instead , they argue that Gainsboro became another Kimball - with clearance and relocation the objectives of the urban renewal policy . They contend that : ( a) the entire black business community was destroyed by this public policy; (b) that the number of rehabilitated and/or new homes built in Gainsboro is minimal ; and (c) that the ultimate goal of the urban policy was to clear the land for use by private developers ; 2 . federal , fundsintended for Gainsboro revitalization have. been diverted to other renewal projects in Roanoke City, especially the Downtown projects; and 3 . there has been no accountability from either Roanoke City , the Roanoke Housing Authority or HUD concerning the destruction of the Gainsboro neighborhood. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this research is to conduct a preliminary study that assesses and seeks to better understand the impact of urban renewal on the Gainsboro neighborhood and its ( urban renewal ) spillover effects on the Kimball and Northwest areas . The fundamental question being evaluated is "Has urban renewal had a positive impact on the quality-of-life in the Gainsboro neighborhood of Roanoke , Virginia?" 6 SECTION II A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF URBAN RENEWAL IN GAINSBORO In order to understand the area being evaluated , a history of urban renewal in Gainsboro will be presented . Also , physical characteristics and a socio-economic description of the Gainsboro area is presented in this section . Topography The Gainsboro Neighborhood is located immediately north of Roanoke' s central business district and encompasses approximately 210 acres. The general boundaries for Gainsboro include Orange Avenue on the north , Interstate 581 and Williamson Road on the east , Shenandoah . Avenue on the south , and Fifth Street on the west. The Interstate highway and the Norfolk Southern Railroad ,. Gainsboro ' s eastern and southern boundaries , isolate the neighborhood from the rest of the city on the east and south. In spite of being characterized by predominantly steep topography, Gainsboro is primarily low density residential in character . However , the eastern side of the study area , the area east of Gainsboro Road , contains major non-residential uses , including the prestigious Hotel Roanoke , St. Andrews Catholic Church and campus , and the Orange Avenue Industrial Park . Offices for the Norfolk Southern Railroad are located just west of the Hotel Roanoke. Also , First Street , the old black Business District , contains some small dilapidated buildings of retail L use. The remainder of Gainsboro is residential and constitutes 7 Yj', the traditional Gainsboro Neighborhood . The area to the north of Rutherford Avenue , the Madison-McDowell area , has been redeveloped ' with new single-family and duplex homes. This area contains about 40 new houses that have been built between 1978- 1981 on land cleared through the city ' s past urban renewal efforts. These houses sold for $30 ,000. 00 to $38 ,000. 00 , mostly to Gainsboro residents who were displaced through past and present clearance activity. Federal displacement funds were used to make these houses affordable to neighborhood residents. There is vacant land along Rutherford Avenue that is available for new residential development. Single-family units are proposed for this area. South of Rutherford Avenue are two older neighborhoods-- Gilmer-Patton West and Wells-Loudon Avenues. Both are very old sections with substantial housing deterioration and vacant lots . Some housing in this area has been rehabilitated and some new in- fill housing is. planned . The Conservation/Redevelopment Plan seeks to maintain' the character of the neighborhood by saving those dwellings that are suitable for rehabilitation. The streets south of Rutherford Avenue and Rutherford Court are ready for the rehabilitation of the existing housing stock and the vacant lots are suitable for the development of an infill housing program to consist of single and multi-family dwellings. PAC projects are aimed at the development of the infill* housing program. 8 * The term " infill housing" as used here is to define the construction of dwellings on vacant lots that exist throughout the neighborhood. Appendix 2 provides a map of the City of Roanoke with the Gainsboro area highlighted-. The terrain of Gainsboro is now relatively level and • minimizes the 'development of land for the expansion and/or upgrading of the area' s housing supply. Socio/Economic Factors Table 1 outlines the income and housing characteristics of { Gainsboro as of May 1988 . TABLE 1 GAINSBORO INCOME OVER $12 ,000. 00 Percent above $12 ,000. 00 8% Percent below $12 ,000. 00 92% Total 100% COMPARISON OF HOMEOWNERS/TENANTS Number of Homeowners 86 Number of Tenants 103 Total 189 AVERAGE MONTHLY RENTAL $200 & above 6 5. 83% $199. 00 - 150. 00 14 13. 59 $149. 00 - 100. 00 • 33 32. 04 $ 99. 00 - 50. 00 46 44. 66 $ 49.00 & below 4 3. 88 Total 103 100 . 00% AVERAGE MONTHLY MORTGAGE $400 . 00 & above 1 1% $399. 00 - 300. 00 12 31 $299. 00 - 200. 00 8 20 $199. 00 & under 18 46 Total 39 100% Note: The average monthly mortgage is low due to many of those included in this category were recipients of Relocation Grants , and property acquisition when the neighborhood was under the total -Redevelopment Program for the Project 9 - Area. The new construction program was begun by the Neighborhood Development Corporation (15 dwellings) and average monthly mortgage was $327. 00. The Gainsboro Project Area: A Story Line. The Gainsboro Neighborhood 'is the oldest of Roanoke ' s Neighborhoods and was part of the urban renewal program in the 1960s and 1970s. A citizen' s participation organization , the Gainsboro PAC, was organized in 1969 and incorporated in 1975. Gainsboro was both a target of President Lyndon Johnson' s "War on Poverty" and a forum for community decision-making to stimulate active citizen participation (see e.g . , Selznick , 1949 ; Stivers , 1990) . Bosworth (1990) capsules redevelopment in the Gainsboro area : "Gainsboro , predominantly populated by blacks and the oldest neighborhood in Roanoke , was a likely target. Elderly people made up more - than half its population , many of the homes were more than 60 years old and many dilapidated houses were suffering the neglect of absentee .landlords. The initial plan envisioned total redevelopment and urban renewal , a term that had just popped into the nation' s vocabulary. Friendly bulldozers , with the blessing of City Council and under guidance of the city' s Redevelopment and Housing Authority , removed entire blocks of houses and shaved off the hills. Members of the Gainsboro Project Area Committee watched with satisfaction . Residents ,- given relocation grants when their homes were purchased , were sent to other parts of the city with the hope that they would return to Gainsboro when new homes were available. But for years , there were no new homes and 'nearly $7 million had been spent in 10 the neighborhood. Records also show that close to 900 families were uprooted .between 1969 and -1980. According to census data , the Gainsboro population fell from 2 , 200 to 990 . Without anyone thinking about it too much, Gainsbbro' s makeup was undergoing a drastic change . Before urban renewal , Gainsboro had been a neighborhood . Residents knew one another by name, and their children played together . There were small grocery stores , schools , churches and- other businesses. " Not everyone agrees that Gainsboro PAC members were happy with what was going on concerning the removal of homes and displacement of people from Gainsboro. To many this represented an abandonment of the initial urban renewal plan for Gainsboro and indicated that the area would become another Kimball . For • the Peoples Voters League and others , the policy shift from restoration/ revitalization to clearance/removal was the beginning of the end of Gainsboro as a viable community. As this shift continued ,, it appears that the PAC was divided between those who wanted Gainsboro to remain an intact neighborhood and others who felt that relocation was the most attractive option. The polarization of the Gainsboro community over urban renewal • nearly 20 years ago serves as the impetus for this research. Dr . Claytor has served as the People Voters League' s Chair 0.. for fact-finding concerning urban renewal and Gainsboro. He has written editorials in community newspapers (see Appendix 3) , petitioned City .Council on numerous occasions, and continued to press high-ranking government authorities for redress (Appendix 4) . 11 Finally, in 1988 Dr . Clayton approached Mr . Ted Edlich, Executive Director - of Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) to discuss a study, that assessed the impact of urban policy on Gainsboro. The Peoples Voters League elicited support from numerous elected officials and community organizations for this research (Appendix 5) . Mr . Edlich agreed that research should be conducted on this issue and contacted the Institute for Urban Affairs & Research (IUAR) at Howard University. The IUAR sent a researcher to -Roanoke , interviews were conducted , and a proposal was submitted to HUD to fund the project (Appendix 6) . HUD agreed to fund the study ; however , in the interim the researcher had left Howard University and a replacement was needed to complete the research. I was selected in August 1990 to be the senior researcher for the project. g- to 12 • SECTION III METHODOLOGY The methodology utilized in this research was a case study that combined qualitative and quantitative data called "mixed methodology" by Patton (1980) and "triagulation" by Jick (1978) . The utilization- of multiple sources of data provides a more exhaustive perspective of the problem. 'Additionally , the case study research approach is most appropriate when attempting to answer questions of " how" and "why" (Yin , 1984 ) . Here , the quantitative findings will compliment the qualitative outcomes. Consequently , the primary research methods used in this study included: 1. in-depth interviews of long-term residents and/or business- people of the Gainsboro area . One ranking city official also agreed to be interviewed. Limited archival .data was also utilized ; and 2 . census tract data from the 1970 and 1980 census reports. • The Sample The sample population consisted of a cross-section of business people and ( former) residents of the Gainsboro section. As previously mentioned , one city official agreed to be interviewed. No administrators from the Roanoke City Housing Authority would agree to be a participant in the study . Moreover , a number of officials in the City' s Planning Department declined to be interviewed for the study because they were not employees of the City when Gainsboro urban renewal was ongoing . A number of former Gainsboro residents refused to be interviewed 13 for this study as well. Data Collection Data for this research was collected using semi-structured interviews , census tract data , and limited archival data sources from the Gainsboro PAC. In-depth archival data collection was nullified because official documents pertaining to the various renewal projects were unavailable to the researcher . For example , I was told by the Planning Department of Roanoke that (a) the department had made several moves in the past 10 years and many of the records had been misplaced and (b) the remaining records were stored in boxes in the Municipal Building basement. A secretary at the Roanoke Housing Authority was also unable to produce any documents pertaining to any of the urban renewal projects under review. Administration of the Interviews Five of the interviews were conducted in the homes of the respondents and lasted approximately 1 hour . Two of the interviews were conducted via phone and also lasted approximately 1 hour . Separate interviews were conducted by both the senior researcher and the research assistant. Qualitative Analysis_ The semi-structured interviews are considered an excellent means of assessing the impact of organization change programs (Seashore, Lawler , Mirvis , Cammann ( 1983 ) . Semi-structured questions asked Of respondents covered four categories : (1) 14 pr. redevelopment of -Gainsboro ; ( 2 ) the City of Roanoke and Gainsboro; (3) Federal Funds and Gainsboro; and (4) success of the project. Specific questions in each -category included : I. Redevelopment in Gainsboro A. Has the Gainsboro area been revitalized a-s a result of the Federal Development Plan? B. Has the business eas a environment area improvedresult of redevelopment? C. Over-all , has redevelopment had a positive or negative effect on the Gainsboro area? II. The City of Roanoke and Gainsboro A. In' your opinion , did the City of Roanoke live up ,to the promises it made -to the citizens of Gainsboro? B. Did the citizens of Gainsboro have sufficient input into -the decisions that effected Gainsboro? C. In your opinion , who _deserves- credit for the success or failure of the Gainsboro Development ef-for-t,, - (1) the City of Roanoke ; (2) Citizens of- Gainsboro; (3) HUD; or (4) RHA? III . Federal Funds and Gainsboro A. Some residents contend that federal monies intended for Gainsboro were diverted to other redevelopment projects . How do you feel about this. assertion? B. Doyou think an independent audit should be conducted to determine if funds allocated for Gainsboro were properly spent? IV. Success of -the Project A. Successful ig , B. Moderately successful C. Unsuccessful 15 D. A Dismal failure A different set of questions were devised for the city official who agreed to - be interviewed . The eight questions are listed below: 1. Who is the culprit in the Gainsboro urban renewal plan? 2 . Is the Roanoke Housing Authority accountable to the City Council? 3. Did public policy concerning urban renewal shift during the Gainsboro project? 4. How was the Gainsboro project funded? 5. Was money earmarked for Gainsboro diverted to other urban renewal projects in Roanoke City? 6. Who was the most powerful political actor involved in the Gainsboro project? Why? 7. What , was the reaction of other communities to Gainsboro' s early success? 8. Has the new , Coca-Cola plant improved the economic opportunities for residents of Gainsboro? A pattern-matching technique was utilized to analyze the qualitative data that was collected from the semi-structured interviews . Yin (1984 ; p.103) writes the following concerning pattern-matching analysis : "For case study analysis , one of the most desirable strategies is the use of a pattern- matching logic. Miles and Huberman (1984 ; p . 216) writing about pattern- matching state ' that: "When one is working with text or less well- organized displays , one will often note recurring patterns , themes , or "Gestalts 'which pull together a -lot of seperate pieces • 16 of data . Something ' jumps out ' at you , suddenly makes sense. . . .Such patterns can often be found under the heading of repeated themes , causes/explanations , interpersonal relationships , and theoretical constructs." 17 SECTION 4 FINDINGS Tables 2-7 provide the responses to the questions asked during the interview. The responses can be summarized as follows : A. Question 1 - Three respondents were emphatic that revitalization had failed in Gainsboro while the other three felt -that the endeavor had mixed success ; B. Question 2 - All six of the respondents believed that urban renewal killed the black business community in Gainsboro; C. Question 3 - Two respondents did not respond to this question while two felt the overall impact was negative. The other two respondents believed that the outcomes were both positive and negative . Both of these respondents thought that the project should be completed ; D. Question 4 - Five respondents answered this question negatively while one interviewee reported mixed feelings on this issue ; E. Question 5 - Respondents did not think citizen participation had been effective ; F. Question 6 - Most respondents strongly believed that funds earmarked for Gainsboro had been diverted to other urban renewal projects in Roanoke City. G. Question 7 - All seemed to favor an independent audit of the City of Roanoke and Roanoke Housing Authority financial records. H. Question 8 - Again, most respondents did not feel that urban renewal in Gainsboro had been successful ; and I. Question 9 - The City of Roanoke and Roanoke Housing Authority were believed to be the cause for the unsuccessful Gainsboro urban renewal project by most respondents . 18 TABLE 2 Semi—Structured Interview Responses RESPONDENT A' 1. Gainsboro No. Black business and families were supposed to enjoy the Revitalization fruits of revitalization. That original prospect has been torn to pieces. 2. Business Negative. Not for black businesses, now a lot of white Impact businesses. Even if black ,businesses were allowed back, they would have nothing to fall back on because the community has been destroyed. 3. Redevelopment: Both. My business did good by relocating but we lost contact positive or with so many people. Negative 4. City Promises They certainly did not. They could have done a better job. 5. Citizen Whatever the people said, it seemed not to have much of an Participation effect. They didn't have input because there wasn' t a lot of knowledge about what the redevelopment people wanted to do. It seemed as if there were a concentrated effort to discourage people. 6. Federal Funds It went somewhere. It didn't go to Gainsboro. I do know downtown Roanoke became increasingly beautiful. 7. Independent I don't know if it would determine anything, don't know if Audit you can find it. Someone should call HUD. 8. Success of A dismal failure! It robbed our community of some of the Project richest things we had together. They held white communities together but destroyed Gainsboro. 19 TABLE 3 Semi-Structure3 Interview Responses RESPONDENT B • 1. Gainsboro There is much left to be done. Initially, money was sent Revitalization directly to Gainsboro but then the money was sent to the City. Gainsboro began to get smaller and smaller amounts. 2. Business Negative, there is nothing you can point to that is a plan Impact for revitalization. We moved because black businesses were not surviving in the area. The area became so crime-ridden and bad that people would not come there. 3. Redevelopment: Positive or Negative 4. City Promises The City did not really live up to its promises. Other areas began to say it wasn't fair for the money to go to Gainsboro so the City Fathers began to divide the funds. 5. Citizen Yes, initially everyone worked together. The Catholic Church Participation had input. Then the people found out their opinions had little impact because of the lack of funding. 6. Federal Funds I don't know if you could verify that funds were diverted. 7. Independent I think its too late. It was one of those things, no use in Audit crying over spilt milk. What purpose would it serve? 8. Success of Moderately successful. You can see what can be done in the Project federal system and improve on that. 9. Credit for The citizens of Gainsboro deserve credit for any success the Success or program had. Many times the Housing Authority backed down. Failure There were members who would not take any foolishness from the Housing Authority and it was a fight all the way because it was not an easy road. • 20 TABLE 4 Semi—Structured Interview Responses • RESPONDENT C 1. Gainsboro Two opinions. Where my store was there are now a church and Revitalization new homes, a much nicer looking place. Conversely, I don't think they worked with the people as they should have. 2. Business Negative, they moved all the people away and my income Impact suffered. Secondly, I thought there would be more help for business than moving expenses. 3. Redevelopment: Negative or - Positive 4. City Promises I don't think so, not one bit. I believe that money headed • for Gainsboro was used for other projects. 5. Citizen I think there should have been a committee to help the people Participation because some of them just didn't understand. 6. Federal Funds They did something else with the money. You can' t see it in Gainsboro. 7. Independent Yes, I favor that 100%. They do it on everything else, why Audit not on this? Let's make the public aware of what went on. Somebody has to have a record of what went on. It would make a lot of people feel better. 8. Success of Unsuccessful, the area as a whole has not been revitalized Project because once you leave the new area, the rest of Gainsboro is as it was. 9. Credit Failure belongs to HUD and the City of Roanoke. The City had the money, HUD should have watched where the money went. 21 TABLE 5 Semi—Structured Interview Itespmses RESPONDENT D 1. Gainsboro A thousand no's! ! Population gone, vacant land. Revitalization 2. Business Negative. Impact 3. Redevelopment: Overall, negative. Positive or Negative - 4. City Promises No, the city did not live up to its promises. 5. Citizen Input not listened to. Participation 6. Federal Funds I feel money was diverted, no way to prove. • 7. Independent It wouldn't do any good, "they" can always prove their point. Audit 8. Success of Unsuccessful Project 9. Credit Failure belongs to the City and Housing Authority. 22 TABLE 6 Semi-Structured Interview Responses RESPONDENT E 1. Gainsboro No, area was to be revitalized. Was not to be another Revitalization Kimball but that' s what it turned out to be. 2. Business Negative, urban renewal destroyed black business in Impact Gainsboro. • 3. Redevelopment: Negative, killed the neighborhood. Positive or Negative 4. City Promises City and Housing Authorities promised to revitalize the area; however, they had a hidden agenda to get the land from the people and turn it over to private developers. 5. Citizen Was supposed to be a joint partnership; however, our ideas Participation were not listened to. Ideas went into the City Manager's (Evert) Office and were not acted on. 6. Federal Funds - Money-for Gainsboro was transferred to other projects. No accountability, however, City points to Housing Authority and vice-versa. 7. Independent Yes, Yes. Audit 8. Success of Dismal failure, did not live up to its promises and killed Project neighborhood. 9. Credit Failure and blame belongs to the City of Roanoke and the Roanoke Housing Authority. 23 TABLE 7 • • Semi-Structured Interview Responses RESPONDED F 1. Gainsboro To some extent but not completed. Revitalization 2. Business Businesses were destroyed because of relocation. Impact 3. Redevelopment: Both positive and negative. New homes built for the elderly Positive or but business community destroyed. Negative 4. City Promises Yes and No. 5. Citizen PAC didn't have same info as City, effect of participation Participation minimized. 6. Federal Funds Can't answer if funds diverted. A lot of people have wondered about this. People can't figure out how Gainsboro urban renewal started first but other projects were completed sooner. 7. Independent What would be the result if one was conducted? Audit 8. Success of What has been done is good but more is needed. For example, Project the Coca-Cola plant destroyed homes and displaced people - are blacks being employed there? 9. Credit Couldn't assign blame to any group - too many people involved. • 24 Summary of Responses Overall , respondents were not pleased with the urban renewal effort in Gainsboro. Respondents did not feel that governmental officials had kept their promises to the citizens of Gainsboro. They contend that Gainsboro was to be revitalized but was turned into another Kimball clearance project . One respondent noted that the City' s implementation of urban policy in Gainsboro was malicious : " They come in with the bulldozers and began tearing houses down. The people saw this and began to think their area would be another Kimball . When relocation grants were offered , the residents believed they should get out while they had an opportunity . Rehabilitation of homes would have given Gainsboro residents a sense of security ; however the city and housing authority had another agenda. They wanted the land for the developers. " All respondents were also concerned with the blurred lines of accountability concerning urban renewal in Gainsboro . None were sure of who was in charge of the program. This remains a sore point for Gainsboro residents 20 years later. Table 8 contains the City Administrator ' s responses to the interview questions. His/her answers are categorized below: A. Question 1 - Accountability properly belongs to the Housing Authority because of the legislative mandate manifested in state statute; B. Question - 2 - The Housing Authority is not accountable to City Council ; C. Question 3 - A policy shift did occur because of dwindling - federal dollars . The shift was to rehabilitation; D. Question 4 - Project initially funded by NDP funds that 25 • went directly to Housing Authority and later by block grants to the City; E. Question 5 - There was an understanding between black community leaders and the City Manager ' s Office that a vibrant downtown Roanoke .was essential for viable black business in Gainsboro; F. Question 6 - Roy Henley , deceased Director of the Roanoke ' Housing Authority; G. Question 7 - Proponents of other renewal ,projects began to demand more grant money when the Gainsboro PAC utilized funds for excessive administrative costs; and H. Question 8 - The original agreement between Gainsboro PAC and Coca-Cola -became moot when new owners bought the plant. 26 TABLE 8 Semi-Structured Interview Responses RESPONDENT G 1. Who is the culprit Probably the Housing Authority, they were the only agency who in the Gainsboro 'had the power of eminent domain through legislative mandate. case Moreover, you can't get to their books. 2. Is the Housing No, under defacto control of Board of Commissioners. The Authority under Housing Authority is not like the School Board. control of City Council • 3. Did urban policy Yes, original funds for purchase and clearance of land. shift during Also, funds were available for relocation. Also, a lot of Gainsboro program money spent changing the geography of land. Around 1978 focus shifted to rehabilitation of houses. 4. How was the Initially, NDP funds went directly to the Housing Authority. Gainsboro project That changed in 1974 with the Housing and Community funded Development Act which made a single bloc grant available to cities. This money came to the City which contracted services out to the Housing Authority. This was Nixon's "New Federalism". 5. Was money diverted Bern Ewert (former City Manager) was hired by the business to the Downtown. community and needed local support for Downtown renewal. The Project Henry Street group understood the relationship between a viable black community and downtown Roanoke. Dr. Claytor and Ernest Green headed this committee of black businessmen. 6. Who was the most The deceased director of the Housing Authority - Roy Henley. political actor He co-opted the Gainsboro PAC. People who supported the in the Gainsboro Housing Authority's position were moved to the top of the Project list for relocation and were also given extra money for their property. The land was desired by developers and real estate people and Henley delivered the land to them. • 27 TABLE 8 (cont.) Seri-Structured-Interview Regis RESPONDENT G • 7. Were other Money from the Block Grants still went to Gainsboro but a lot communities of it began to be used for administrative costs: envious of consultants, staff, the old Fizer'Funeral Homes. Other Gainsboro's neighborhoods supported the PAC until they saw this. initial success 8. The new Coca-Cola Original agreement was between PAC and Wometco Bottling Co. plant: has it required hiring a certain percentage of minority employees. improved However, Wometco sold the plant to Consolidated Coca-Cola of employment Charlotte. They may not have understood the terms of the opportunities for agreement. For example, they didn't pay the correct amount Gainsboro of city taxes their first couple of years. PAC and residents Consolidated Coke are trying to reach agreement on the employment issue. • 28 Descriptive Statistics Table 9 outlines black population census tract data for the Kimball , Gainsboro , and Northwest areas for 1970 and 1980. This data was not available for the years 1950 and 1960. Census tract maps of these areas are found in Appendix 7. It is important to note that the census tracts do not correspond with the boundaries as defined by the specific urban renewal projects and should be viewed as approximations of population growth/decline in these areas. For example , the Gainsboro PAC considers Fifth Street the west boundary for the Gainsboro area; however , census tracts for the area extend to Tenth Street. The census tracts for 1970 and 1980 are found in Appendicies 8 and 9 . TABLE 9 Trend of Black Population: Kimball , Gainsboro and Northwest Areas AREA 1970 1980 Kimball 127 No tract 6 (Tract 6) Gainsboro 5 ,966 4 , 265 (Tract 7) Northwest 7 , 862 7 , 017 (Tracts 2 and -8) • After approximately 15 years of relocation , only 127 residents remained in Kimball in 1970 . Moreover , the entire - tract was eliminated in the 1980 census data since the area was zoned only for commercial and industrial use. 29 The census data for Gainsboro shows a marked decrease in the black population between the years 1970 (5 ,966) and 1980 (4 ,265) . The actual decline in population may even be more dramatic - a 1990 newspaper article stated that only 900 residents remain in Gainsboro (Bosworth , - 1990) . Most residents of Kimball and Gainsboro relocated to the lower Northwest section in the 1960s and 1970s. However , by 1980 higher income blacks were moving into upper Northwest (beyond Hershberger Road) and the census tract data reveals a decline in lower Northwest's black population in the years 1970 (7 ,862) and 1980 (7 ►017) . An assessment of black businesses in the Kimball , Gainsboro, and Northwest areas is presented in Table 10. This information was gathered from the Roanoke City Directory for the years 1950 , 1960 , 1970 , 1980 , and 1990. TABLE 10 AREA 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 Kimball 38 40 20 44 51 Gainsboro 96 70 51 68 48 Northwest 92 141 159 135 101 As Table 10 reveals , the number of businesses has increased in Kimball "since 1950 , especially since 1970 when only 20 businesses were located in the area . Since Kimball was a clearance project , this increase in business is not surprising . The number -of businesses in the Gainsboro area has been 30 reduced by 50% in :the last 40 years. Importantly, none of these businesses are on the lower Gainsboro Road-Henry Street area where black businesses traditionally flourished . Further research is required to determine the number of black businesses remaining in the Gainsboro area and the total number of minority workers employed in the area. The total number of businesses in the lower Northwest area shows a steady decline during the past 30 years. This decline comes at a time when the black population of the area also appears to be declining . CONCLUSIONS The political conflict that engulfed the Gainsboro project was a struggle between powerful personalities in the City of Roanoke and the Roanoke Housing Authority over control of scarce resources ( federal funding) . Control 'over these resources assured these bureaucrats a virtual monopoly in decisions concerning the direction of urban renewal in Gainsboro. This institutional arrangement guaranteed a win/win situation for local government agencies and a lose/lose proposition for Gainsboro residents. Until 1974 , urban renewal funding was made through grants- ' in-aid funding and monies for Gainsboro were sent directly to the Housing Authority. This enabled Director Henley to become the major power broker for renewal policy in Gainsboro . Morgan' s (1985) comments concerning resources , power , and administration provides a framework for understanding Mr . Henley' s position with 31 respect to Gainsboro: "Access to funds , possession of a crucial shell or raw material , control of access to some valued computer program or technology , or even access to a special customer or supplier can lend individuals considerable organizational power. If the resource is in scarce supply and someone is dependent on its availability , then it can almost certainly be translated into power . Scarcity and dependence are the keys to resource power : When we begin to talk about the power associated with resources , attention usually focuses on the role of money. For money is the most liquid of all resources , and usually can be converted into the others. A person with a valued skill , a supplier with a precious raw material , or a person holding information on a new project opportunity can often be persuaded to exchange their valued resource for an attractive price. Money can also be converted into promotions , patronage , threats , promises , or favors to buy loyalty, service , support, or raw compliance" (p.161) . There are indications that Mr . Henley used federal monies to influence citizens of Gainsboro and members of the PAC to accept his "vision" of urban renewal. This was a vision of clearance and relocation . As mentioned previously , one interviewee categorically stated that "Mr . Henley moved his supporters to the top of the relocation lists and made sure they got the maximum allowed for their homes - regardless of the actual value of the home. He also provided transportation to the doctor and grocery store for other supporters to ensure their loyalty." • The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 changed the funding procedure to block grants and funds were sent directly to the _City of Roanoke who then contracted out services. This funding shift also shifted power away from Mr . Henley and 32 the Housing Authority to the City Manager of Roanoke. Thus, the City Manager became the powerful controller of funds that flowed into Gainsboro. This new act also provided the City Manager with greater discretion in his spending authority . This component (discretionary spending) made the City Manager more powerful than the Housing Director had ever been . Again , Morgan ' s (1985) comments are instructive : " No wonder therefore that so much organizational politics surround the process of budgeting and the control and allocation of financial resources. As Jeffrey Pfeffer of Stanford University has suggested , the use of such- power is critically linked with one' s ability to control the discretionary use of funds . It is not necessary to have full control over financial decisions. One needs to have just enough control to pull the crucial strings that can create changes at the margin . . . . It is the ability of funds that gives power" (p.161) . The City Manager did have full control over urban renewal funding and Downtown renewal became his , and the business community that approved his hiring , pet project. Politically , Downtown renewal projects are more attractive because: (1) they are more profitable for developers; (2) the city gets better tax returns ; and ( 3 ) the effect of urban renewal is frequently to redistribute land from lower-income to higher-income purposes (Dye , 1978 ; p. 188 ) . Dye also notes that "Some urban groups- notably blacks ,and poor people - are distrustful of state and local decision making , and would .probably prefer the present arrangements (grants-in-aid programs) , however chaotic , to any 33 organizational shifts that would threaten their interests (p.192) . Unfortunately , PAC and the citizens of Gainsboro were innocent bystanders to the political manipulation of their community by urban policy makers. They were powerless against powerful political actors/institutions where the game ( urban renewal) was new and the rules ever-changing . For example , urban renewal policy has always included a collaborative arrangement between governmental institutions and land developers . Dye (1978) writes : "After World War II , the suburban exodus had progressed to the point where central cities faced gradual decay if large public efforts were not undertaken to rebuild obsolescent and deteriorating core areas. Urban renewal could not be undertaken by private enterprise because it was not profitable ; suburban property was usually cheaper than downtown property and it did not require large-scale clearance of obsolete buildings. Moreover , private enterprise did not possess the power of eminent domain that enabled the city to purchase many separately owned tracts of land and insure an economically feasible new investment. To save the nation ° s cities , HUD is authorized to match local monies to acquire blighted land , demolish or modernize obsolete or dilapidated structures , and make downtown sites available for new uses. HUD does not engage in these activities directly , but makes available financial assistance to local urban renewal authorities for renewal projects . When the sites are physically cleared of the old structures by the local urban renewal authority, they can be resold to private developers for residential , commercial , or industrial use" (pp.186-187) . The residents of Gainsboro did not understand that the 34 politics of urban renewal revolves around the profit margin for both land developers and the local government. These residents believed that urban renewal was based on the "public interest" for every American to live in quality housing in safe and clean neighborhoods . According to the interviewees , this is what government bureaucrats told them revitalization would mean for Gainsboro. They never realized or were aware their community was actually at the mercy of impersonal market forces. Citizen Involvement Citizen participation , the centerpiece of Jeffersonian democracy and a vaccine against the poison of administrative depotism (Bellah , Madsen , Sullivan, Swidler , and Tipton , 1985) , proved little protection for Gainsboro citizens against this coalition of public institutions and private developers . Specifically , community leaders were "co-opted" by government administrators . Cooptation is not an unusual phenomenon in attempts at citizen participation and was first identified by Selznick (1949) in his seminal TVA study : He defines and describes cooptation by stating : " Cooptation is the process of absorbing new elements into the leadership or policy determining structure of an organization as a means of averting threats to its stability or existence. . . .Cooptation tells us something about the process by which an institutional environment impinges itself upon an organization and effects changes in its leadership, structure , Or policy . . . . In general , the use of formal cooptation by a leadership does not envision the transfer of actual power . The forms of participation are emphasized but action is channeled so as to fulfill the administrative functions while 35 preserving the locus of significant decision in the hands of the initiating group. . . . In effect, those responsible for organizing the system , of committees or associations are under pressure to shape their actions according to the exigencies of the moment , and those exigencies have to do primarily with the needs of administration. As the needs of administrators become dominant , the tendency for democratic participation to be reduced to - mere .involvement may be expected to increase. At the extreme , the democratic element drops out and the cooperative character of- the organizational devices becomes identified with their entire meaning (1949 ; pp.219-226) . Both Mr . Henley and Mr . Ewert (the City Manager) coopted the PAC into accepting their visions for Gainsboro. Real democratic participation for PAC members was always minimal at best but , in time , became no more than (as one interviewee said) " a rubber stamp to approved options suggested by the bureaucrats . " Cooptation split the Gainsboro community into three factions : (1) those who accepted the City Manager ' s idea of rehabilitation of old homes ; (2) those who accepted Mr . Henley ' s vision of clearance and relocation ; and (3) those who were still committed to the original concept of community revitalization. Much of the dissatisfaction in Gainsboro today stems from these divide and conquer tactics . Cooptation , like alcoholism , proved an insidious and progressive disease. Summary Based on these outcomes , the research question "Has urban renewal had a positive impact on the quality-of-life in the Gainsboro neighborhood of Roanoke , Virginia?" must be answered in the negative. 36 RECOMMENDATIONS As a result - of this study' s findings , four recommendations are suggested and are aimed at : (1) facilitating a healing process between the Gainsboro community and the City of Roanoke/ Roanoke Housing Authority ; (2) addressing the aggrieved needs of Gainsboro residents ; and (3) enhanci_ng the success of citizen participation in future joint community-government decision- making ventures. The Recommendations 1 . An independent audit , by a reputable CPA firm, should be conducted to determine whether monies allocated and earmarked for Gainsboro were diverted to other renewal projects.- This audit should review the financial records of both .the City of Roanoke and Roanoke Housing Authority. Moreover , the proposed audit should be sanctioned by both of these governmental agencies . This process would clarify lines - of legal accountability that were blurred during the Gainsboro project; 2. An in-depth study of the entire Gainsboro urban renewal program should be funded by HUD and conducted by an independent researcher . City of Roanoke/Roanoke Housing Authority records pertaining to this project have to be made assessible to researchers. This type of information was not available to this researcher for this project . ( For example , the original application for urban renewal grants were not- available for this mini-study) ; 3. This report has documented that urban renewal (as public policy) inherently includes the attracting of private developers to purchase cleared land for residential , commercial, or industrial use . Residential use has traditionally meant an investment in middle or high-income housing . The residents of Gainsboro are (were) neither middle or high income and -did not expect their neighborhood to be cleared for commercial/industrial use. From comments reported in this research , it appears that residents were deceived concerning the goals of urban renewal . If this is actually the case , the residents of Gainsboro deserve : (1) an official apology from the City of Roanoke and Roanoke Housing Authorization , and 37 (2) compensation for past injustices. This process is not without precedent when governmental institutions are guilty of gross wrongdoings against American citizens. For example , American citizens of Japanese ancestry on the west coast were wrongly interned during World War II . Even though the U. S . Supreme Court upheld the internment procedures (Korematsu v. U.S. , 1943) , the Federal Government later issued an official apology to Japanese Americans followed by a lump--sum compensation to survivors. The apology is a powerful symbolic gesture , without it the mesage from the government is "You deserved the way you were treated ." In this case , compensation can also mean the completion of the Gainsboro revitalization project. 4. Organization Development (OD) training for citizen participation. Most citizens are ill-prepared for active citizen participation. This is especially true for the poor and disenfranchised . OD is behavorial science knowledge and practice , including microconcepts as leadership , group dynamics , communication skills , and negotiations. A number of empirical studies (see e.g . Shareef , 1989) have shown . that when managers/ employees or administrators/citizens embark on joint decision-making processes , the administratiive group tends to dominate the committee/board. Much of this domination could be alleviated by proper OD training for citizen participation. Simply placing citizens on a committee with professional government bureaucrats , without benefit of proper training - in human relations processes , and calling this arrangement "citizen participation" is unethical and undemocratic . In this vein , Thomas Jefferson said : "The further the departure from direct and constant control by citizens , the less has the government of the ingredient of republicanism. . . .Yet he also believed that the best defense of freedom was an educated . people activiely participating in government" (Wills , 1978) . Education here means citizen' s parity on committees/boards with local bureaucrats . OD training in interpersonal skills provides community residents with the necessary knowledge 38 required to participate as full stakeholders in these projects . Is this type of knowledge necessary in a free society? Jefferson believed so and argued that an educated citizenry was protection against governmental tyranny. Connor (1977) lists a number of benefits OD techniques have on constructive citizen participation: Citizen participation will always occur in decisions that people feel are important to them , but too often it is too late , too little, or too negative to be useful . Although politicians and planners can hardly choose whether or not to have citizen participation , they can help it to be positive. specifically, constructive citizen participation happens when : planners listen to residents concerning their attitudes , goals , fears , and factual suggestions; citizens (which may include visitors as well as residents) find early and convenient opportunities to make positive contributions; ▪ citizens learn from planners and others a broader and deeper knowledge and understanding of their environment , its potential , and its fragility ; ▪ individuals , interest groups , and agencies identify their own positions , ✓ ecognize those of others , and work toward a win-win solution cooperatively ✓ ather than become locked into a destructive win- lose or lose- lose pattern ; relationships between planners , politicians , and other people are strengthened so that communication barriers are breached , and mutual trust increases as a foundation for • communities to function more effectively in every way. 39 References 1. Bellah , R. , Madsen , R. , Sullivan , W. , Swidler , A. and Tipton , S. (1985) . Habits of the Heart. New York : Harper and Row. 2 . Bosworth , G. , "Gainsboro fighting back after well—meant upheaval ," Roanoke Times and World-News (July 26, 1990) . 3 . Connor , D. , "Constructive Citizen Participation" found in The 1977 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators published by University Associates . 4. Dye , T . , ( 1978 ) . Understanding Public Policy (Third Edition) . Englewood Cliffs Prentice-Hall , Inc. 5. Jacobs , J . (1961) . The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New. York : Random-House. 6. Jick , T. (1979 ) . "Matching Qualitative and Quantitative Methods : Triagulation in Action ," Administrative Science Quarterly, December . 7 . Madison , J . , . The Federalist Papers No . 10 (by) Clinton Rossiter , 1961. New York : New American Library. 8 . Miles , M. and Hubberman , M . ( 1984) , Qualitative Data Analysis , Beverly Hills : Sage Publication. 9 . Morgan , G. (1985) , Images of Organization , Beverly Hills : Sage Publications. • 10 . Patton , M. (1980) , Qualitative Evaluation Methods , Beverly Hills : Sage Publications. 11. Selznick , P . ( 1949) , TVA and the Grass Roots , Berkeley : University of California Press. 12. Shareef , R. ( 1989 ) , Assessing Organizational Change : Quality of.. Work Life Interventions and the United States Postal Service . Unpublished doctoral dissertation . Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 13. Stivers , C. (1990) . "The Public Agency As Polis: Active Citizenship in the Administrative State. Administration and Society, 21 (2) . 14 . Wills , -G . ( 1978 ) , Inventing America : Jefferson ' s Declaration o-f °.Independence , Garden City, NY: Doubleday. 15. Wilson, J. (1966) , "The War on Cities," The Public Interest , (Summer , 1966) . 40 16. Yin , R. (1984) , Case Study Research, Beverly Hills : Sage Publications. OIL WIite's S. Clays 41$ GAINSSORO ROA®. N. W. ROANOK[. VIRGINIA 24010 APPENDIX 1Til..r~IMV,S15.325W August 9, 1985 • Senator John W. garner Senator Paul S. Trible Congressman James R. Olin Re: Failure of the Urban Re-development Program in- Gainsboro. Gentlemen: ` The Congressional Oath of Of4ice says in part "that you will support and defend the Constitution df the United States against all enemies, foreign and dor;estic," and we trust you gentlemen collectively are up to the task. The task is a distasteful one, undesirable at best, fear- ful for some, but very necessary for what' s left of Gainsboro and the black population of Hoanoke in general. From the first funding year - (1970-71)--money has been rece ied in Roanoke for Gainsboro under the Neighborhood Development Progr (NDP) for the rehabilitation of this area. Fifteen ,years later we only show 72 new homes and 3 or 4 rehabilitated structures and practically a total loss of all businesses. This for a federal expenditure of something over $14 million is abso- lutely abominable. It appears that the money comes ijn for a cause - Gainsboro - but has been diverted, with the cause being circumvented and used for other purposes---Certainly it does not show in the Gainsboro area. Addi- tionally, it is alleged by some that there have been abridgements of constitutional rights, civil rights, destruction of private property dithout compensation, misdirection of Federal funds, discriminatory distribution of Federal funds, and possible fraud. The record keep- ing is so jumbled it makes a money trail hard to follow. A nagging belief by many--that the successes of Design '79 for downtown Roanoke was derived at the expense and failure of Design '69 - Gainsboro Ur- ban Renewal. Our collective beliefs at this time requests of you to institute a no • holds barred complete line item audit, with each year being complete unto itself with a required personal eye balling of all purchases, and contracted for items charged to this area as well as all loans, what they were used for and interest charged, as it relates to the Gainsboro Program. ( .e believe the proper term that the CPA' s use for this--is a Fraud Audit.) With these reports in hand, hopefully the next. steps to be taken ail1 be made clearer. • L Page-2 Gentlemen august 9, 1985 - ` with our community lying in shambles and the fabric cf family life being torn asunder, the businesses and neighborhood economy destroyed, we prayer- fully request that this action be taken so as to 'calm with trust all anxious hearts, and still our minds with truths convictions. ir. Aarner, as the ranking official, may we ask your office to take the lead in contacting Trible and Olin. Olin particular has first hand knowl- edge where-of we speak. Trusting we will hear from you soon in the affirmative, we are Cordially yours, W. S. Claytor, D.D.S. • A. Byron Smith, President People's Voters League Evangeline Jeffrey, ,President NAACP Held-. Charles T. Green Claudia dhitworth, r di.tor Roanoke Tribune ZC/b • APPENDIX 2 • Valley View 3} miles • C rvm7 Crossroadsj...... CITY OF ROANOKE 3 mi 1 e s ��. ORIENTATION MAP 1111,.............„ , i East Gate 3i miles — _ °cod r. e- i • Roanoke SalemP1aza ► Truer .� • 4 miles �,, :\.. j/ �`� ._ c\", SIP y-- 1‘, „Z. Itt -.' • • � �ii n 1 :h , a • ♦ I 1 5 ate;. 4 1 ,1yioJ01, _ a,. ,0,71R Ht., • 'i .. w, t' • _ 55f••tire•I 4 e. /• :; sta. ,;__,„ ' r / r1.- ;..„, _,... • \\��'�:' ',ILL IL -- k, %al%aR. a ftiti J Ankfil SALEM troa • i �....,�r ice -s 1 Kew ii4 i•�. ��.V;.,`:Ave. �: 1L...� •--_ . Nip -',;t;r;•�. ...o`�..�.wr * • .r ,tree• •V1NION ::: . rye �,_ ��. .. Roar+oke Rrrer .:--:._.. ---_�.. ,.,..- : �--� �`;:- , G a i n s b o.r o N b.,r� - ` • may= .•0..p. ei gh orhoc C) ( .." • 4:•••••••....0.- ---'—' •lir w, •• -=`,4 111111,...nurr — •'r7 ,' a... ,. ;.4, /Roanoke \ ••• f1 .Vroneon A., . II �` ��.• , • `'V�• °mow ' 4c 4'•41.4 _/ *-'. 11 _. r - ems. 44.., a'_ . `aI ' f r 4..041rtarnPPl Mountom VIRGINIA , �"c�Oj "r11 n �' / • Roanoke `• #� _ P. - Ili. '':-z%e?S.,v, '_ as eV.. • 11 • ROANOKE COUNTY US 220 N Tanglewood 5. miles * 10 .s. . . -.. -1.--- ffie ,:,'L'`..''.-_.:':'-:,i' 5.,.•, • ,: -if.-:-W.!''.r '4".::: •--:?...'•',--%,,,„„. .:,' : • . . 0 i • ,2, -'rlis '-ii ek' • - . it'S .i.'f'ilour.:,Turn .-.;-4, ,,,,K . .i.,J-44-.,;---;.-„,:,it..-'f,i -•.'Az'r.-..14,,: -.2;,i...t,;•.- .L,.,i,-,-.T..-,.., ,,'- • . -.. . ,., ... ._ • ,...14 J• " • •••••••-•r ';:-7-b.';•.4 VIO' '.3:*, 4;34`0.••_:,,.. ..: •'".1 il?... '.4 ''-r"airal•Iiill 1' i';fSti'l•'' ••:,..*: '''.k.'is„- ..: 1,.. --- '• • • • ''" '- . (Present or' Former) • ..- -. , - '.- '' '' ' - ' '''‘' ." '' t t i 8 ritAP1-ITI . .. 's . ' ' .: , .„.., ,....-- . APPENDIX 3 V. '' .',! z °.:;,:,•., 'e,---,.._, .- • _ - -.-' , ,, . . . ,,. , l • ' -Since publishing tti oor Deetmber 15. lesee the 4 i t•• .44 illectorial esters rst the hiotee controversial demolition of ' e• . t--i,-- I /be.R04NUICETRIBeINE plant ere/ equipment Li the :r, , ,. ..,,,,.. f-1:.-=r, .5- 4,, . - ,-,17.,.. . i i'i . City of,Reanoke. we beve. received lettere end phone 1 e e - ' ee,ei -'ss• . t'-'• • gills frontloes1 end outselsetate res.deres.Felloevine is •er- i, - - ' 1..4. .ze. se - '1144' 44::,;1•_!.• •-P. [.. . • ergt-4 - .4 N - one retch letter noel a tocai dentist esho le a native of the. Ai;• . • ' • • ' - -. Cia linain 0 sea:, .,- • • - - • ' .•-' - -4; -'445•46.- .....,:.7 tiltjt.* /eV..6'1'. \ ''•-•i;I. 1 I : 'el:leer Cliautila:- ' 4' ;.. • . .. . . --,-, . ---t,..._‘-i .i.ii•-&--S. te--nt-lt-' .ii...:-_v'';'-e- ti. :n.. -•:..;'..i--.:•..-':-. .7 • . ': . .-•tYcuf article in The TRIBUNE of Decemhor 15, 1983 .ma broug ..geieee: ' ht forth many nostalgic memories as wo a i! s the e-erteseei)jeN, ..p3s•ese •tess•,-...--es ce es.: •sr ..!,,e.... ,,,,..e, „ - - ' heightening of the pain that we have had to endure si rice -.reser,,..-1,7. .:.:e .:•-f '••4'...-•'','-"--77-,--'-•1;:`''' 4.-y,. f the City Council set out to help" us"here in Gainsboro. ee.,.; ..,s... ,se.., ..... ,see-Le... I.-. • To share a brief reflection with you on "the Claytor BEFORE AND AFTER 'NELPI—The Clayton horne- Family" that owned the property where The TRIBUNE , -• et ead in the early 40s Is pictured above while lower took its birth, the beginning was in 1923 when the homestead was formally openeddey Dr.&Mrs,J.B.Clay- , _.•pnotos show different shots of the home place and se j • tor, Sr. It was duly recorded in the 1923 August issue of service station portion of the estate before and after the - GaInsboro project came along to'help'area residents. ,e1 the Roanoke Church News (newspaper published by - i 1 . . , . ., .. our father's church-tee First Baptist) that "the home i •'• --..1.. .,..'.,, ' , .‘ - ,, • , ' , e -- . •,s, ,e- i was pronounced by all that attended the opening thet it ..• -•- , . ..„,;.. ,, • - ' . . ..... -.. . :- . i ..... - was a model home from every view point and a credit to • '4 sA .,-ij, '4..r ". •r • ., ; •.. . ,,- ,i' ,.< . • -N ' the owners,the builder,to the community,and the race". -: ••• _AAA.'. „ .-,- . ' • -- :es; ...., .• , .,...,Q-: From this focal point the eight children born to this • ,,•ieeeef:t.-..,,.- es. ..., ... _,,, •ee4i.: • . , .. .,,/ s ,• i...:- union had to work and were rotated between a lot of the ,-5,;A-”vhor, .-s• - '-. ,:v :- A• i - , • ':'-1 ---":". ----!•-lt--41,.• -iiii.q,” . ..•.p•".' ".:.1" ..`,,,, '., , ', v- f .,..;- : • business enterprises that were at one time or another, eeeeeseee"feeeseeseeeefee es,' .. s,..ei 4 ee . .., . located in this block. This gave them,the training, Ilefl_ke,';..Veeeseeffrerene,tipeej-Z.,,,eell„, .i. e• , , l expertise, and finances for further educatidn.in their', .;.'''f-fi-'-'estree.c:issee.lesteeete4\14..e,‘„.i,le",,,e'e7,44.46- ' 7 ! ' respective walks of life. - - s•e ' , - - - ' ...-etv-rWs"eceiree5.er.14,eeeerseeesesieeee't - , e-t-.• Wie.'-'11irltpeli4st-e- --: " e• ri The Ciaywood Service Station was already eee rf;•:.A.:q..„...t4-7-igtick - :•,..ye.1.1„, .....g.... mentioned by you In your previous k rile% and around ;-,....:`2-eeeefrapit-ilie'susiessela.W.'4, Miele ....t.". ‘ • e' the block from it was a drug store and litiarmacy, ,:g,ege:1-fe'iieeese-74-ez4V410 '.;„*.te-e,‘ „iteste‘Wes,_, et., -'''s - .,.•. : ,e, cafeteria barber and beauty 'shop pluniblne and eee ees - p-i•,..,,,(-se - , 7 'A." . , , • eiseeelee, seAseess . -e,?:-", e - tepee eseeess.. .. eete-esee - - heating company, electric repair shop, grocery,store, ''srert_z tie_es..,-..,,,In.,',eloete_relee,veZif;;,...•J.4.1.4.:11_, ,414itlet. :,. ._- , : , i physician, dental_ and accounting offices.These are the• seeefseeeseee'' w'. 4 esteeteere-ekeer' se- e•-- et/ ''' es-..se.e....le'511:a; ,4.t1Sii.t 1 •tf-''..4 it,:zr, 'ort• i,s,..-rt,...1-..,, , -.. -?..,•s • ..! t . . types of businesses that were located.in this area at ;6k-w e.: _ •q-Z.V,..e' ttlii:`:----,7 various stages-. Alcor•-me death of our parents OW A.,..4.t* ..., ...-", st-c:4....-..-.-:=,,-, -.. N,1-4, 4;4.. • homestead (or Claytoi. Menseeri as 3t was sometimes . -!.-4-.: ,..%,.. .i., ro,,tieT, l• .,4-;,... itr_, se..,.. .,--yiee,ele.,:i. ei =el,-le ....el-fee--•-•,e .- •,.eri>fi.ir 1•••-,esni,=_ .-i*'1-'77'eL7'1 j.. . - -' - ' --VV,..,... v;:,' '...„7... ',-. t this 'and businesses'tioenshed until me Amities. ; -.' iee • ..6,..t ..---. .Z. } City Council Gave the "Kiss Of Death" to the oitiren6 Cfri 1[41f:4;*' 1.,..--401/. ' t,- : r v,... iisper'i:,i;i t Gainsbore by eta itiri•g a re-deeve!apment projectwith the. ee Roanoke City Housing Autceit as tne sole deeloper 'bre y. - ---4....- -11,0,n,4,,jPtr-K---„,A.:-,2,:-'..-•- •,-.• ..,-.-:- From this action takes in 1971-72 al of the - - - es _ -nes eeeee ee;. e ' businesses in Gainsboro with few exceptions have • , either been closed or forced see of the neighborhood in ' — Recent Photos by RON WILLIAMS order to survive. Ail business and apartment rentors in this block with the exception of the dental and and Kimball projects were and they stood between us and the Housing Authority to protect our interest and ' accounting offices and a small church (Gospel Out . .. . . , . . , . gt. 'Waltet S. CiallOt 412 SAINS■ORo ROAD. N. W. ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 84018 APPENDIX 4 ,,C „Q 34$.ass July 17, 1989 Jack F. Kemp, Housing Secretary Department of Housing and. Urban Development 451 - 7th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20410 Dear Mr. Secretary: It is with great satisfaction to know that someone is finally connected with our government that carries a sense of responsibility, a conviction of honesty, and the integrity and willingness to do something about it. I believe government agency programs should be designed and administered to help the people and not merely to perpetuate the job, enlarge the agency, and in general make work of no redeeming value until the time uuweS for re- tirement--all at °the expense of the people that were supposed to be helped in the beginning. It's with little wonder that the poor keep getting poorer no matter how much money is thrown their way. Media reports show that you would like to see "a campaign to re-vitalize the nations urban neighborhoods." A worthy goal I assure you, but with ex- periences of the past, I don't believe all the rotten apples are in Washing- ton. The corruption runs deep and "the cover up" even deeper. A copy of an -appeal letter to my Congressmen is enclosed--one we got no action on--and I would like to know at this time if a fraud audit can be conducted into this matter. Previous requests to HUD fell on deaf ears and as it.turned out, it would have been putting 'the fox in charge of the hen house' anyway. An entire neighborhood of people and businesses have been torn asunder with Federal monies and under the present administration of programs there is little or no hope for this area 'of citizens to be re-vitalized. It would be factual to say that as a people we would have been better off if the Federal and local governments had not tried to help us. Trusting I will' hear from you in this regard in the near future, I am Sincerely yours, 5eA3 . W.S. Clayto D.D.S. WSC/b ROANOKE BRANCH NAACP P. O. Box 12362 Roanoke. Virginia 24025 1703) 344-2424 December 11, 1987 APPENDIX 5 Mr. Ted Edlich Executive Director - TAP 702 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Mr. Edlich: The Roanoke Branch concurs social , the financialf conducting a, study of the effects , physical , mental , etc , on businesses/residences remaining in the Gainsboro Area and those that have been relocated. The study should include the Commonwealth, Kimble and Gainsboro Projects , if it is to give a comprehensive picture of this section of the City. The Branch would support such a study upon reviewing administrative procedures and guidelines for conducting the study. Please let us know if we can be of assistance. Si.cerely, AOP ,filrAt-d7 Evangel a B. Jeffrey Presid t - Roanoke NAACP tKE ADC{,e ARACP ,va an w • Office of the Council CHARTERED+ealika4NaliCIEVIRGINIA, December 15, 1987 Mr. Theordore J. Edlich Executive Director Total Action Against Poverty APPENDIX 5 in the Roanoke Valley P. 0. Box 2868 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 Dear Ted: I has come to my attention that TAP may be willing to undertake a study concerning the affects on our City 's black communities of the urbanizing efforts of the City of Roanoke in the past . I would suspect .tii.is study would encompass the Kimball , Downtown East , Gainsboro and similar areas of our City, which 'either have resulted in relocation or renovation of existing housing for the respective residents. As one member of Council , I would be most interested in seeing the results of "this work. Please advise if Imay be of assistance to you, and would appre- ciate your keeping me informed of the scope of this study should TAP be willing to undertake same. Thank you for your time. Ver truly yours , mes G. Harvey, - II Council Member JGHII : rla� pc : i./ r• Walter S. C-iaytor, 413 Gainsboro Road, N. W. , Roanoke, Virginia 24016 • • 0--Aka, u.",,c.4,,,,1 rrh Avast SW P.w Mp VUninia 24611 imm 981-2541 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ,ems;=-, . III I, r,, 1, q . ,;J ) COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: J. GRANGER MACFARLANE `V''aVr4V+`�{,,.j=';;,�y: 0CCEAAL LAWS FIST f[NATO RIAL DISTRICT �?V)�+aY LOCAL GOVERNMENT D ANOKC COUNTY. EASTERN FART: CITY - \4T � TRANSPORTATION OF ROANOKe. ROE2 SENATE ■pANOK[. VIRGINIAA IA002 December 15, 1987 APPENDIX 5 Mr. Ted Edlich Executive Director T.A.P. P. 0. Box 2868 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 Dear Ted: Recently in discussions with Dr. Walter Claytor. and others, it was recommended, that TAP undertake a study, ta o he t of which would be to try and determine and comprehensively analyze the effect on, the black community in Roanoke, caused by changes in and the removal of neighborhood inf astructures - eg: stores and neighborhood gathering places. I personally think TAP is eminently qualified to do this type of study and to provide a document that will be helpful to all of us as we try to understand and improve life and activities in our inner city neighborhoods. I trust you will consider this worthy effort. I send my b- -t personal regards. Sincerely, / J. Granger c far+ e JGM:dj 1 cc: Dr. Walter C1aytor , COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES RICHMOND COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: 'TON A. (CHIP) WOODRUM COURTS os JU1T.ICE OM AAAAL LAWS P. \Olt 1971 gOANOKE. VIKDINIA 2A007 CORPORATIONS. INSURANCE AND \AM RIND CLAIMS SIXTEENTH DISTRICT December 1 , 1987 • APPENDIX 5 Mr . Theodore J. Edlich Executive Director. Total Action Against Poverty P. 0. Box 2868 Roanoke , .Virginia 24001 Dear Ted: I am writing-.to suggest the need for a study of the effect of "urban renewal and condemnation proceedings" on the viability of some of our neighborhoods in Roanoke . I understand that the redevelopment of certain -neighborhoods had an adverse impact on them. I. would appreciate your considering obtaining a grant for this purpose. With kindest- regards , I am Cordially your , i on Woodrum CAW/mw • • Tot 1 c i01. T n Shen z. .:, T. • APPENDIX 5 Aoa oke, V r`_ni _ 24C16' December 9, 19 Dear i,i�• J.-1�Cit 1 ,_e -roue re uesti�-�z - -. .study he ` e are :rou'' ��� :c e .1J-:a� ; t_ : jnst=tuted to d� termine the -influence .old effects on Blacks of T.-eighborhood T r an-De elonmeflts, such as has occurred in Roanoke . , t„ 'irLa'_ and nc'•; the Gains boro '--ro j ect . it the. Coy....:,.,+t e l �.�, __ -_, •'�.,n r e ' is r1e1 c that a r w,_, \+e:i-v on u_^_? T'�'o_ .ri r-_C .ri-•7r• , -+ •:.G..n �_., .i7__ ., + o •1:' e _, c1-7_ .;ocie t+ ' }.F - ♦rr t C di • Byron J.Alt /t may., r C am` ri T. Green 9-( • Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,702 Shenandoah Avenue, N. W., P. O. Box 2868, Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 December 15; 1987 Dr. Lawrence E. -Gary, Director APPENDIX 5 Institute for Urban Affairs and Research Howard University 2900 Van_ Ness Street; LW. Washington, D.C. 20008 Dear Dr. Gary: Since the 1960's the City of Roanoke has had four major urban renewal and redevelopment'projects each of which in some way has effected the Black community of this city which cut4.irises approximately 20% of the total population. Recently, leaders in the community have approached my organization; .Total Action Against Poverty, to assist them in obtaining an objective study of the effects of those urban initiatives on the Black family, the Black businesses, public infrastructure within the Black community and the Black community as a whole. Enclosed are letters fi�xn the Peoples Voters League and the Roanoke Branch NAACP documenting that request. TAP is a carmrnnity action agency of some distinction which has strongly supported the organizations of law-income and minority groups to articulate their needs and concerns. At present we do not have the capacity, nor the immediate funding to undertake such a study. However, I told Dr. Walter S. Claytor, the local dentist who first approached me, that we would be glad to help in finding some way to have such a study conducted. Dr. Claytor mentioned the Howard University Institute for Urban Affairs and Research as one that would inspire confidence with regard to objectivity throughout the community. Obviously the study would attempt to document the impact of the urban programs that have been undertaken in the city. Perhaps it could compare these initiatives with others that have benefitted cities and populations of similar size. Hopefully the study would contain guidelines for any future initiatives. Obviously there are several questions: 1) Is this type of study one that interest your department? 2) Do you have any available resources you could put toward such a study? 3) If not, do you have any suggestions as to organizations or agencies through which such a study might be funded? We certainly would be willing to work with you on a joint application. . Dr. Lawrence E. Gary December 15, 1987 Page 2 If this project has interest for you, what is the next step? It seems important that some of the local leaders be involved in the study :Lulu the beginning. r will be glad to arrange a meeting at your convenience. Looking forward to hearing fiL.n you, I am Sincerely yours, Tec' lich Executive Director TE/ljb Enclosures cc: Dr. Walter.S. Glaytor Mrs. Evangeline B. Jeffrey Mr. A. Byron Smith Rev. Charles T. Green • APPENDIX 6 AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL URBAN RENEWAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS ON THREE ROANOKE VIRGINIA NEIGHBORHOODS A Proposal Submitted By Housing and Community Development Studies Center Institute for Urban Affairs and Research Howard University December , 1988 PROPOSAL FOR EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL URBAN RENEWAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS ON THREE ROANOKE VIRGINIA NEIGHBORHOODS 1 . General Summary Between 1950 and 1980 , a number of renewal and redevelopment projects were undertaken in Roanoke , Virginia which had varying results on selected communities . The proposed research project will assess the impact of federal urban renewal programs on the three districts of Kimball , Gainsboro and Northwest. In addition , the proposed research will use current data , indicators and evidence to assess the influence of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development programs on the economic and social stability of target neighborhoods and use findings to suggest optional approaches to assist in future decisions and constructive actions by relevant public , private and civic interest groups to restore black community stability in Roanoke. A case study methodology and approach will rely on retrospective secondary data , supplemented with selected interviews with city officials and civic and neighborhood planning interest groups to assess changes between the initial investment periods and currently. / The project is planned for completion over an approximately L six month period and is budgeted for a cost of $2 ,500 . The following out'li,nes the anticipated scope of work, tasks and methodology , expected outcomes , and a timeline and a budget for completion of the research. 2 . Background Three target neighborhoods in Roanoke , Virginia: Kimball , Gainsboro and Northwest , underwent a renewal history similar to that of other older centrally located districts in smaller U .S. cities between the late 1950s through the late 1980s .1 Three phases of action were involved . An initial period emphasized renewal clearance during the 1960s under the 1949 Housing Act and Title II of the 1954 Housing Act resulting in demolition and clearance of . residential and mixed use areas for redevelopment into new economic. activities and civic centers. A second phase ® 1 represented a national shift in focus to rehabilitation and spot clearance, particularly on "fringe" and 'transitional residential • and high impact industrial zones (i .e . borders of transportation infrastructure) . A third -phase focussed mainly on rehabilitation , restoration and home repair in residential neighborhoods utilizing various U . S . Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs , and city-administered Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) during the late 1970s through the 1980s .2 Further , in Roanoke , as in other cities , various residential repair , restoration and other treatments , incorporated subsidies at different levels aimed at different capital maintenance and restoration and income class affordability needs. Included in housing subsidy programs were traditional public housing construction grants; rental mortgage subsidies in new and rehabilitated construction; home ownership mortgage and home repair subsidy programs under various HUD titles . 3 The housing subsidies were aimed at improving the quality of housing stock while simultaneously providing cost reductions for various income and ownership classes in the city. The renewal and redevelopment histories of the three Roanoke neighborhoods reflected these general policy and treatment trends of federal and local emphasis . Compiled from various local sources , these -neighborhood treatments were :4 1 . Kimball _and .Commonwealth The' site of the city' s major urban renewal clearance projects started during the 1960s. This was a predominantly black residential area . 'The area was almost completely cleared under urban renewal grants by the Roanoke Redevelopment Authority for commercial , industrial and reuse. Most residents were relocated and scattered by the early 1970s . - 2 2 . Gainsboro • A second predominantly black residential and small business. area underwent two stages. Initially Gainsboro started as a redevelopment project under the Hup Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) , and was partly cleared and some new housing constructed (40 units) . A second phase shifted to rehabilitation but was handi- capped, resulting in the loss of sound housing stock to clearance during the NDP phase, and to lack of funds . 3 . Northwest A large residential area which underwent major expansion of black populations , Northwest was probably impacted strongly by clearance in the black neighborhoods cited above. Currently housing stock is subject to disinvest- ment and parts of the area are undergoing rapid deterioration and decline. A visible loss of public services such as schools and local services and commerce has also occured. Present research is directed toward a number of issues raised by public officials , and civic and neighborhood interest groups in Roanoke regarding the current impact of the 20 years of renewal in the three neighborhoods as well as future approaches to make up for past costs incurred , particularly to black economic and social stability. Included are: 1 . Net housing stock losses as a result of renewal clearance and other demolitions which particularly affect low-income and' black residents; 2 . Continued rapid erosion and disinvestment in otherwise sound , viable housing stock; 3 . Relocation impacts and costs to resident populations and businesses from renewal and other demolitions in the target project areas; 4 . Loss of neighborhood services and institutions , including schools, shopping facilities , religious institutions and other service organizations; and 3 - 5 . Deteriorating environmental quality serving to reinforce • housing disinvestment and decline. The - proposed project will review the impact of various HUD financed redevelopment projects on neighborhood social and economic stability and impacted populations. The assessment will use widely accepted methodological approaches which focus particularly- on changes in the -demographic mix and relative social and economic status of populations , including family income and employment, housing occupancy and ownership -patterns and costs. 5 Because black populations tend to be most at risk due to greater disadvantage compared to other groups , the impact relative to economic status of other populations in the city will provide standardized indicators of levels of future investments reouired Ito achieve equity . A second set of indicators of imnactwill • focus on housing and neighborhood physical improvements resulting from the renewal projects . The data collected will be from currently available. secondary sources , including the City Redevelopment Agency , Vthe City Housing Authority, the Planning Commission and the Office of Community Development. The data will be analyzed as a retrospective case study and the resuit5 summarized for use to inform public policy makers of options ano to construct future actions to stabilize and revitalize black -aieA•ghboLnoods in Roanoke. The research contribution is consisteia, with stated Roanoke City policy to preserve and restore vitality to Roanoke neighborhoods.6 The evaluation will finally provide useful information to federal and state housing and development officials to support local efforts in Roanoke and_other smaller cities undergoing similar neighborhood restoration planning that is consistent with national and state goals . / _ 3. Tasks and Methodology The following outlines principal tasks comprising the scope of the project in three principal tasks: Task A: Data Collection A data base consisting of three types of data will be developed from current secondary sources: (1) population/census - 4 - data for tracts in the three study areas for 1950-1980 ; (2) housing and land use data prior to renewal and currently; and (3) data on housing and other investments made under various federal programs (NDAP , CDBG , housing construction , mortgage subsidy, ownership and repair programs ) . Listed below is a sample of traditional indicators utilized for social and economic impact of urban programs and projects ; 8 final indicators are subject to constraints of the . current project budget and availability of data in a form for reasonable analysis: (1) Social/Demographic - Target Census Tracts and Citywide for Census Periods 1950-1980 - population by race , family structure - median family income - homeownership, occupancy rates - rental levels , mortgage costs L (2) Physical/Economic Development 1950-1980 - Housing , including number of units , age, condition , costs (rent , mortgage) , occupancy , ,characteristics - Land use by type , including vacant land and structures , commercial and industrial land uses - Public services: schools , facilities (police , • fire, open space) i - ` - neighborhood social , religious , service institutions and commeice (churches, service stores, social services , health agencies , social and civic clubs) (3) Program Resources Invested 1950 to Present - Number of new, existing housing units con- structured , rehabilitated , repaired by HUD program category • - Current program resources in planning by program, use category - Current program resources available for use in Roanoke neighborhood revitalization at federal and state levels - Private sector financing available and/or committed to neighborhood revitalization • - 5 - In addition to the current Asecondary data ; selected • ' interviews will be conducted with relevant officials and civic and citizen leaders concerned with redevelopment in Roanoke. The purpose of the interviews , in addition to supplementing the above-mentioned data sources, is to identify current commitments and processes in planning . This will also include local capacity and options in progress aimed at undertaking new project initiatives to stabilize the target areas. Task B: Data .Analysis The data analysis will consist of two parts : (1) evaluation of the impact of urban renewal and housing programs (2) evaluation of current capacity/alternatives to undertake future stabilization actions . (1) Analysis of Impacts of Past Programs From secondary statistical data listed above , demographic and physical change will be analyzed to document changes between the start of renewal and the current period . Where possible , indicators will be selected which most capture the benefit-cost outcomes related to the we.Ll-being of residents in target areas compared to the Roanoke community as a whole . Percentage changes in each indicator will be calculated and displayed where data is lacking for more sophisticated statistical techniques . (2) Current Programs and Capacity for Stabilization Actions Interview and other materials will be the basis of a summary of current plans and commitments , as well as analysis of capacity for future constructive actions to stabilize and restore deteriorating housing and neighborhoods in Roanoke. These include : - current plans and commitments of city, state , federal resources - current uncommited resources potentially available in public, private sectors - identification of current mechanisms for development and planning., including collaborations with public, civic and citizen interests - 6 - L Task C: Dissemination Report - The final task consists of preparation of a final report of `findings for dissemination. -to relevant public, private and citizen interest groups. . 4 . Out...— comes -. It is anticipated that the results in the form of a report ' will be distributed to relevant public and private interest `' groups . To the extent that the report will display some distributional impacts of past actions , and document positive options , it can be used as a basis for renewed support for stabilization strategies in the target neighborhoods , and for new strategies that lead actions to enhance the quality of life for black neighborhoods in Roanoke , Virginia. 5 . Project Budget and Time Line 1 ,500 .00 1 Senior Consultant ($100/day X 15 days) $ 500 .00 2 . Research Assistant ($5.00/hr X 100 hrs) 3 . Other : secretarial assistance , travel 500 .00 and editorial assistance $ 2 , 500 . 00 ' TOTAL References - Scott , Mel, American City Planning, Berkeley, Ca. , University of California Press, 1969 , pg. 415-631; See also: Marris, Peter , "A report on Urban Renewal in the United States" , in Duhal, Leonard J. , (ed) , The Urban Condition, New York, Simon and Schuster , 1963 , p2. 113-134 , and Fried , March, "Grieving for a Lost Home" in Duhl , Leonard .J. (ed) Ibid , pp. 151-171. Scott , Mel, 1969 opt.cit. 415 Levitan , Sar A . , Programs in aid of the Poor for the 1980s, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980 , pp. 68-75. DeBell , Jeff , " Nixon Actions Cloud Neighborhood Plans , " Roanoke Times , December 7 , 1969; "Council O.K.s Planning Funds for Program in Gainsboro" , Roanoke times , December 11 , 1969 ; "Gainsboro Project Gets New Life , " Roanoke Times , December 14 , 1970 ; "Old Kimball Almost Gone , `' Roanoke Times, February 12 , 1971 ; Gilliland , Joe , "Gainsboro Group Wins Vote on Plan, " Roanoke Times , November 18 , 1971; Roff , Mag, "Authortity Hope for Funds to Finish Renewal Project , " Roanoke Times , April 11 , 1973 ; and Turner , Joel, "Tenants Complain of Too Many Repairs," Roanoke Times and World News , 1987 . Chapin , F. Stuart Jr. and Edwin Kaiser , Urban Land Use Planning , Chicago, University of Illinois Press, 1979 , (for approaches and methods to evaluation of physical investment plans and economic consequences, including benefit-cost distributions , pp 604-619) . Buckhurst Fish Hutter Katz , et.al . , Roanoke Vision , Comprehensive Development Plan for Roanoke , Virginia 1985-2005 , Roanoke VA. Roanoke Planning Commission and Office of Community Development , 1985 . Office of Policy Development and Research , "Fiscal Year 1988 , Research and Technology Programs ," U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C. , 1988 , p. 6 ,7. ( Standards for public infrastructure-- transportation , environmental systems--public services-- schools , police and fire-- , parks and open space, can be used to impact evaluations . One widely accepted standard in practice is that developed by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) . See Claire , William H . ( ed ) Urban Planning Guide , ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices No. 49 , New York , American Society of Civil Engineers, 1969 . For City Services impact evaluations developed for a case study of Oakland , California , see: Levy, Frank , Arnold Meltsner and Aaron Wildaysky , Urban Outcomes , Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1974) . (For methodological approaches to analyzing U.S. Census data and scheduled structured and focussed interviews , see: Nichmais , David , Public - Policy Evaluation, N.Y. , St. Martin's Press , 1979 , pp. 74-107 . - 8 - a s T I II f 6. i CENSUS TRACTS IN THE ROANOKE, VA. SMSA INSET A - ROANOKE AND VICINITY • •'/\,. 03- 7 . / / a • i i P) 'OIIV[R IAIMTI,t R' • NOI IINg 'QO . V, RO �1 . . ._RONNUICf 3 P 0 <�r� J e • 1 otir w• 1 • M W 2 5 _ �d H.f w O 7 , tli ? 1 sr..4,4,,,,,, "y _ ✓ t7 [ T .° _ / \ k H 9 8 7 -1 r° _d *RANGE AK �/ 1,1 how q PY •° t VINTON 5 H ROANORE R pONti- AV[ %` 7n 10 AI[°Ih '°R !C .N nJ 311 N \ e 1 11 1• \ / MAR•., io 19 oMl/,OA AV( i IAC.4.-----"%c'frr'9 t ¢ • 436 14 (PRIIN�IN 18 12 4, - AVEIAy �t <hT w E A l p� ifs �P .\ �I q•, q o P� P1 •^q •INOt. L.. 20 Q It/Willi T1k1 On (t-[, e� 4. tp i. 17 ( I • • ` 15 A t\„... \P 16 k liLit ? YELLOW MOUNTAIN R I •.Ki U 3114 ...kT•I11 I P I RRISON I . . I I Oti 0 P), I\d � 1970 Ct•nun of POIMIIl11O0 and H43*m q � � / S / CENSUS TRACTSROANO f STANDARD VA, 11 S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1 STANDA METROPOLITAN S7ATISTICA rind!Reim,t P11CCII 174 • Yy 3 ��F �✓/ \--,...._ . / ' 423 00 i =RSFiBERC�,Es ��� � 3 ,�L 6 m .L 22 v} g -J I.' •• � 7 i ê H I : �� • ���� > -t�``P IAP El1,1. ACE 0� � l�E AVEy , i V 1 ).4,..... 0, 4. 4. r �.�♦` ( i 18 C 1 o 'of /� `• 20 �.k pi \./., •"""....'"'" i %.- 0 v,. �` `• , i\..) ri.7 - . k • • #1 i owl , k-i I �4 iC IC ; 15ori ` . , • I J ' r % 10. •, % ++i , I C. ¶ o0 '- CENSUS . TRACTS ' MAP' PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE • STATISTICS MAPS, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, '� 10=1=304.,' BUREAU OF 'THE CENSUS. �►.001, /f / 6-26-82 NOT TO SCALE JLD ' _ V - • - Roonake Count .. - ' • _ - Y-Con. " Roo"- no• ke- -= Tract Trois Tract :Tract Tract • Trott . Trott ..Tract Tract ' Tract .Tract Tract Tract Tot ''0310'- 0311 • 0312 '0001. G1X17 -^0003 0004; °`0005 0006' 0007 - 000E - 0009 0010 001 RACE " v s - _ 7 TIS 6 347 4 it 4 541 4 013 5 099 6 052 -S 176 2 SI7. _ 6965- 4 111 - 2 004 6 If1 - 1 le White--------- -------- - ------------------- 2 966 6 051' 4-202 1 616 1 095 5.067 6 037' 5.529 2 403.. 394 - 579 1-976 - 4 743 7E Negro.. 39. 920 3 716 26 - .284 127 5 966. 4 146 -29. 2 139 - .3t Percent'Negro .......•„--_ -,__- 67 '-t.6 09 20.3 77.2_ 0.5 -. 4.9 5.0 93.7 88.6 1.A 31.0 31 AGE'f<T SEX - M.M,-r ors-----•••--••'• 1 609 2-967 2 111 2 132 2 325 3 365 2 815 2 770' 1..265 2.630 2 181 953 3 299 6C Under-5 years_,.___...--_-,-.:..-_ -.. ._.;_ 153 - 266' . -172 ` 178 - 230. 185 -, 171 264 '108' 356. 222 120 373 • - 3 and 4 years 67 1l'1 71• 66 lOG 70 S to 9 - 61 89, 46 128 92 57 136 years,___,___..-. - 5 years174' 272 156 265 222 120 289 228 126 345 6 Years------------------- ----------:.-- "76- 28352 40 263 54 30 - '40 Al 25 62 45 26 80 10 to Ia years `-18 -59 53 i5 -49 26 46. 54 33 53 47 24 - 184 279 270 20C• 328 255 - 1954 • 3 8 209 130 332 304 123 371 3 uyevn.-_-____,-_ _-.._.- .-"""-.:.., : '"-�)` 52 51 a0 a9 49 68 al 30 75 63 23 71 IS to 19 yebn.................... ........ , 135 - 269 180 181 353 210 293, 200 123 273 258 63 306. 4 15 years________..... ..,•,_-_-., --...-- - 34 47 36 38 47 48 61 46 24 • 49 - '56 20 68 16 years --------------.._..,- .--.;_',:. • i7- ' lI 32 43 55 • 45 -- 75 _ 42 : 79 62 59 - -21 60 17 years.,--•--• - _ 36 - 54•' 66 79 62 44 - 64 •34 24 68 58 15 65 18 years............................ .. • -'24' - SI 331 39 ai 44 70- 29 20 56 49 18 60 I 19 years.._...--....................... 24 40 13 32 42 29 23 49 26 38 36 9 53 7 20 to 24 years........................ ..........'- - I:0 • '-227• 98. 152 150 248 167 . 302 96 186 138 63 , 200 ' 7 20 years.. .... 27 59 78 50 12 32 4e 2 21' It 23 7a 6 a6 21 years _ 13 33 14 26 25 29 38 40 I4 39 30 ID' 24 . 1 25 to 34 yearn__................ . .._ - 716 472 291'- 299 269 312 340 417 148 229 192 116 400 :7 35 to dd years...................... 224 �]d 740 141 201 2'. 386 337 242 775 225 87 395 6 45 t054 years': 16C 334 2501 249 799 353 430 324 153 315 222 90 386 ' 9 55 to 59 years_-..._.-.. ,_•_ 78 - Iu 92 101 94 136 ISO 169 63 143 97 39 181 4 60 to 64 years,_____ 70 - 102 79 88 73 113 III 123 64 136 100 32 142 2 65 to 74 years___________ 79 -=.143 82 109 110 181 136 193 90 266 134 '47 161 6 75.years and over___=............................ 35 . . -80 35 88 45 72 82 57 79 104 62 20 81 2 Hvsde,el Ms-=-------------_ 1 376 3,340 2 125 2 409 2 US 2 714 3 157 3 OM1 272 3 53S 2 499 1 053 3 590 SS. Under S years....:...........................:.... • - 137 • '256 184 183 211 138 180 231 101 333 241 94 322 2 .3 and 4 rears - ---- .- Sc. 98 80 )a 90 49 86 85 47 136 91 as I 33 5 to 9 years.--..-.- -.- 138. 796 212 204 245 150 224 238 97 305 274 118 353 I. 5 years _-._---------- -----_ - • 23 55 42 46 47 30 37 Al 28 65 55 20 69 • •6 years -•_--- '28 .:'60 37 44 50 28 44 48 20 74 49 24 86 10 to 14 years-__.....................„_ .. 163 791 237 172 263 191 309 206 99 317 281 93 317 } 14 years.-_--_.-- 34- 48 47 42 52 . 42 -60 53 - 22 64 60. la 54 I( 15 to 19 years______________________„_.... ...... 14C 787 143 199 232 194 277 232 80 340 268 72 300 5 15 years____________ __ -..:.r 36 _. 55 34 55 45 38 79 41 18 71 54 20 63 16 rears__._ 76 . S6 33 34 44 . - 45 59 ' 17 years----------------------------------- -- 30 '66 37 45 50 46 20 65 56 16 56 52 59 43 20 70 53 16 SS It 18 yeon.---_-_----_•__ . -26 a6 26. 38 53 28 45' 43 19 66 60 10 64 2 19 years_._-__-__ 22 ' _ 64 13- 27 AO 31 - 35 56 8 68 43 10 62 I 70 to 24 years................_ . ;_._- 116 301 lal 703 - 186 315 202 376 107 274 173 91 290 5 70-yea.rs.--- 28: �•53 21 14 35 64 27 67 20 71 40 15 68 1 21 years---_;-._ 17 52 26 33 36 65 36 65 18 54 43 19 56 1 25 to 34 years,- - 225 - '.504 308 ,315 298_ 279 371 377 140 306 231 142 431 35 so.4a 707. -359. 336 271 3a65` .. . 30914 497 - 337 1551 316 237 107 404 6! 45 to 54 years=---__--•_-_--_........-_-_- .-.._. - 182 .39E 248 279 289 41a 440- 382 161 426 237 120 404 7; 55 to 59 years.:_,.__......_____„__...,•_•,_,_... 68 '.- 167- 77.' 104 124 158 166 162 86 186 118 51 178 3. 60io 64 years -_- ................. .. : 68, • 146 92 104 '85 178 137 191 65 200 81 39 169 3: 65 to 7t years.........................:.... 65 278_ '95 193 131 269 197 223 108 360 186 78 264 6e - 75 years and Oyer__....................... . 47 127 52 182 78 119 157 101 73 172 105 48 175 a: RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD ' -' . All Mites -----• •-- - 3 110 _•4 347 4 243 4 $41 4 113 5 0/9 6 052 5 126 2 537 6 365 4 681 2 004 6 119 1 16f In households._,_- = 3 164 6-347 4 191 4 447 a 754 5 099 5 961' 5 616 2 537 6 282 a 60C 2 006 6 802 98r Heed_of household 956 2 076 1 255 1426 1 359 1 892 1 961 '2 101 824 2 009 1 200 646 2 185 -45T Mead,of family. ____•___ 87C 1 798- 1173 1 237 1 197 l 516 1 760 I 723 694 1543 967 534 1 687 21! Primary mdivduol - 66 . -"278 87 189 162 376 221 378 130 466 233 112 498 23! Wile of 6eod.................. „.. 78.4 -•- I 1595. I 095 _ 1 pal 967 I 374 1 579 I 497 583 896 673 389 1 251 I35 Other relative of hear! . •I 3E4 - 2 604 _1 806I 1901 2 325 1 758 2 346 2 104 1 056 3 108 2 545. 953 3 139 32C Not related to head-_-___-__-__-------------,,.,. 72 '33• 73 103 125 75 114 34 269 182 18 - 227 '7C In yrcup auorters -------------- 52' 94 59 - 91 10 83 Cl 71 87 1 Fe•.sonsper hcusehol4____________________....._••' - 35' 206 314 312 350 270 3.04 277 3.08 3.13 3.83 3 11 311 22C TYPE OF FAMILY AND NUMEER OF OWN - - CHILDREN - - Al,wires -_-- _ : 070 1791 1 173 1 237 1 197 1 516 1 740 1 723 694 1 543 967 534 1 417 7:5 Writ cwr,ch,lOren under 18 years....--..-.......•. 487 976 699 620 672 672 940, 805 337 734 512 318 902 6 Num per of children .-_.- I C13 ! ?97 ' 441 1794 1529 1 220 1 771 1 504 707 1 812 1 538 737 2 069 14• N.sKi6.vife barrier--- • . 764. 1 59S 107S 1 047 967 1.324 1 579 1 497 SIT 196 473- 389 1 251 13 W,tn own th,ldren under 18 years........_,-•-,.:... 45' -E85 668 545 563 597 859 694 297 393 367 221 682 Number of ch,ldien - _ -937 - `:725 13E1 11'20 1 277 1 083 1 634 1 291 633- 914 1 121 504 1525 Percent of total.unaer I6 years........ ....... • 83: E5 4 69.4 78.5 71.8 . 84.1 87.8: 79.4 80 6 39 4 59.4 63.9 63 E f•as with ether 4. hoed 19 .36 26 46 43 36 25 24 91 44 11 79 With own children under 18 y6 4I ears_ 5 -;3 6 15 12 7 10 13 10 26 10 2 23 Number of ch,ldren 7 34 12 33 24 10 I4 27 16 67 16 3 43 brier vita feisele 1,440-- 67 167 S0 144 167 156 136 178 IS SS6 250 134 357 St With 0.n.children under 18 years_... .31 78- 22 60 97 68 _ 71 98 ' 30 313 135 95 197 2c Number of Children '• 69 133 'A8 141 228 127 123 186 58 831 401 230 491 5C Percent of total under l8 years--.---,..:,,-..--,- 6I '66 31 9.9 12.8 99 66 II 74 359 212 29.2 20.4 24.9 Persons under 18 years.............. . .........._ 1 128 ' 2.020 1 545 1 426 1 779 1 287 1 860 1625 785 7 317 1 888 789 2 406 20) MARITAL STATUS Mesa,14 years e4 s4 ever . •............. 1 142 2 211 1 495 1 149 1.617 1 496 2 213 2 116 937 1 921 1 491 600 2 323 521 ...................... _,----. -264 451 323 345 451 427 495 422 228 636 504 147 649 208 Marred ..................... ........... • .-'829 ,1.668 -1 121 . 1 118 1 063 1 385 1 638 1584 635 1 058 835 416 1 436 204 Separated .........:..... - - 18 - li. 6 16 40 • 15 21 35 21 '86 81 17 90 31 Naaowea - -25 4I 66 52 43 56 30 156 89. -16 94 52 D,vorcec - 35 26 45 37 ' 34 37 54 44 78 63 21 144 57 ferule,14 jesys i4 sod ow .. .......... 1 1.77 • 7 565 1 539 1 192 1 821 2 277 2'SO4 - 2 41 4 997 2 444 1 763 762' 3 452 491` • M .. --- ...... ......... ..... 194 'a19 254 - 357. 397 4t1, 450 392 146 711 513! 105. 544 138! 'ta ...:__--------- 840 , 1 120, 1 134 1154 1 213 1 398 1668- 1 617 639 1 213 896 457 1 494 196 34. II • , 34 63 3C 31 r..ed.r_ ::• . . 57 19 293 131 SI 139 9 Fcorcea.- ,-,_---- ---,:: . 23 7 91, i7� tGE 2'9 44s 39t 172 7t 131 438 146! - .. -..--..._ - - 172 .73 69. - 176 46: P-2 ROANOKE, VA.; SMSA - CENSUS T ' 'APPENDIX 8 Bl 69 •SS - OZl Lll EIL t 9% 901 •6E 'La - - panlan0 K 09 911 r[- LEZ Err 07L E I l (IL ESE 1 P6o9l6 ►1 OE Df rt 89 • 971 rL ES rL 6C5 - - 94 LI O1L S91 9SL LOP 191, S►L r60 Z91, 990E p0amae mom'mom Atop lOP P Z5I S I Z £LE 901? LE? E9► B I E a 1[6 L *VS L6l CSC I C06 1 t99 l 94K I 099 lib t AY F®sa6L fl'mom,: LI Cl 6E I 98 66 69 E9 6C 06► - pm+a!O Si S vL Sl OC rot gr aSE SIC 17490PAl 01 S 9E ' IE 19 Co 99 Er 6L ►6E pasties SO ELL 191 BrL BEY ELI 0►L 88r OIL BLI E Moran Mora'mow-opi 8S 901 Zli /Bl Ur COS 99/ ELL 611 LZS L *AS SQl LOP UP SLS L10 l In l 1E1t I KC UV - LSD 9 +"pa sar/SC•09- SOLYLS 1Yila9Y1V SZ S9l 910 Lr9 LK 611 E I E LSZ W 566 L crow g1 apui tow uvo to aquenp S l 86 58 I ZE 61 I 09E PS I 9L 1 ►E E9/ I- uou 81 a m ua411P 446 4p98 rt St1 to 111E Kt CIS Ca COt 99 ILl C td 944114149 se'a}*9444q 41444•11 ZS ESE SEI LIE 69£ 18L 901 88S E01 Ll l C sroaA gl/e91 1'slump woo iss ocra N 6Z Z61 65 611 IL1 LC oct 90E 09 8E5 l Look gl wan=49sP woo 49M LI 691 Ott LLL 66- 61p ELL 9Lr 191 9L6 L e4114141 e111s1.1slgg 61 5CS 19E Co1 I 5E9 ISO I 590 l 699 691 S0E 9 imeA81 mut u449.p 4.43 to apai6 9► 76Z 6/1 L I S 16i 016 115 L rr L6 801. C um(B 1 mptm ia49p UAW Ip9 611 1.06 LII /Z1 910 199 l KO l Pit 0K 06t 9 6111414 ) CO38 NMO 9O 3718ZI1 Ad UA1 AiWYi S I - - 51 - - - EO saca.o Orme u'amp SE - - - - - - r u rr wurw,n.to aWuy I L l 81 I 0C (PC 91 L E 61l a9+gs+Ib11 g 8 co 9 E9 EL 69 Et 91 06Z Si!+4ai 76410 ' CZ 5 SE 9 19 9E1 69 lE 1E SSE asro6S 91 S 65 LS 89 COL LS 6L 1E BLS aucp 64,41 OZ S 99 rS tat EEO 99 Pt EE 665 i0plo4as++o4 kl+oW654 09 SZ 071 r9 irC E1S SLL 86 86 96£ I 049044vg1 Z6 6E 0LL 61 56C SPL 8LE 691 891 091 L 59104919541 19 [ al M I.CZ 6L SU 09L Kt tul CU LLL C sirs pat•wet f9 mum 16.Z dr C ZL'E LE.E gl C IE'E ES'E 651 l0'E BYE *Lei Ad Soule O Z Ol-C E6 L 09 O 91 C 19Z LIE In ES'L 96.Z pptpong ad Hatay L LI C Si L I 9ZZ %Amore doll 4'Ja wO K L PI Ell 12wu4ysu•to atom - IL DE rB 16 191 80i 611 98 It 91'6 slump," 61,1 L69 869 61L 1 06V 1 LO0 L 996 l LIE 1 0LE E8I 01 HuIa1U awl ZL 1SZ OSI IEL L6C 91► LOL PIP 551 919 L oat IS 99 191 661 COZ P99 L61 LinrB L89 l - aux 0.9191 BS BC Sii 6LL LLL EtS 1EL 991 16 900 C -9159411044440roM 611 109 L I t r09 9L9 190 I ES0 I ►I L 09E 06E S +1910I911934 4lsci ul 619 L8t Es' 996 ►65 l MIL I 099 1Et 96E C 09Pla,r0f. 617 691 1 61► I 00►C 166 C OK ► 9S0 I L18 C LES 10L IC s99491,0194 M C1r 9L1 l 9t► I CM C 166 L fR 9 9511► PCS 1 I90 I 0f0 LL e.sad poi dOi91011Y8i W Y 30.1 lflOIBSCIOK 0'91 E'9C 0 I ELL L Et 5 Et L-ZE 0-gi L'6E 8'LZ uo9SW OS LE SSl 89 E9L 095 080 8El Ea 0S9 t Aso pm sa61 L9 68 OP 99l 61 KC Sr9 Ott 091 9£I CS8 t auo p00 sroal 09 161 98► L6I E11 LSO 1 6►9 1 LIP 1 5E6 E9E EES I too pla uoaA l0 961 EZS LK 0E9 11,1 I LL1 I IZS l 196 08E I/L 8 arm Poo uaM tit 00Z BPS LLS 918 LIZ I 699 I 609 I 6C0 l E6E Z69 9 am Po loin 9l / 9Z 81 CL 9L LS Cl 8r 9 9SE cart I pun t Pr 6 LP LC 9[ 661 66 Lr 65 SK aao puo seal SL I 61 OB 0C LrI LIZ 9£1 99 IS 0Z8 1a65 ti a S9 9L ZE ZL 61, 6L 1 L tE I EL 101 lS LEO I - s10aA/9 01 55 LL 65 99 09 SIC L6l 59i 1El 09 Z60 l scrA K sic S► rl 66 79 96 SS P61 99C 161 I OS 1 s+al n at SE IC ILL 001 LEE LIt 96Z E6Z I 1 E EL L10 L sea[K o4SL II El ZL LS 561 9l E61 PP L01 CE Sl l l ca>rl rL of 0O I 09 SB CI I 691 61L S I Z 8El L£ S/! I • trai a DI SI 81 68 [1 9L1 ISI OIL 9EL at 9E Ott l . snarl 11 0,1 01 11. 99 SS r9l CO ►0L StI L51 SL 6L0 l tool 6 W S Ll CL PP CBI 0g OEi r11 811 EZ 006 - s:oalS+aPKI On C 1 1 L9L Oa l Cltf 1 rfr i Ill L IIf I /S? K0 CI 'pay 8-II Z-SZ L BZ L 0L 9 IE v 0t L OE C LE L 01 9 9L u0'➢am III SS 69Z e6 6Ls 916 997 SLZ BSZ LEC C a60 9'-o L0M L9 LSI E9 76Z CI I 655 6L0 , ELS 19L 16L L11 E .a.o Fan uoaA O9 59E 6L8 699 791 I IE6 1 801 L LZS L 599 t 808 161 CI 'a"o po cmaA IL 6LE E68 896 i1E I 001 C 9E6 L 6r1 L LB( l 6n orr►1 a^o oil spaA 81 r8E LE6 1E0 i 98E I ESL L 101 E 576 Z 006 I 5LB EZE 5l a^O 7o spa^9t 6 E9 K 55t i9 6I: SB E6 EI 1EL spati r puo E 99 1 I 6L 9E SEI S'E n! 59 ►0l 188 ;sic pm spat SL 19 EL' Zr Er 09L 3E7 ►EZ 901 ILI 77E I moo-rL 01 S9 9S 19 6E 69 ISE 6L5 LP? Z61 9,1 Z68 t seal p at 55 Er 06 Li' E01 6LE ME 061 05L 61t 916 1 smolt 75 at sr 0r at EO 791 9LC PEE 58r 55E 58 690 L malt►r a SE BC 09E /L r7S 85E 016 LLS 655 IL1 LE9 E uoal r£oi SZ PE 601 Cl E8i 6ZZ ZZE 69Z Z11 91 ESB I smah rL oa Oi OZ I I l L9 091 ErE L6E 6Sr LIZ 0L 6[1 Z croak 61 01 S I 9Z 881 L9 99Z 11Z COP ZSr LLE 69 60E Z spurt 04 01 6Z ZSl CI 0LE SIZ 9LE Ett 962 ►S 960 Z Lc"6015 BL EL1 E6 E6E 0Ll L6O 'CZ IZZ 89 Z99 1 u0M S apyt CLIP 9LP I 90, l C09 I 166 C S9L r 9S0 r MI C C10 1 090 CC mead mei NY 6 E010 EL00 0100 6000 9000 L000 L000 1000 k° iqFS a?otrig u r el 1 w o �] +b+l u6+1 al coil u011 uo+l r�1 uo l +l 419 waPS 1F alramo8 �1 SAS US) [B puo y sorm rd0o au'slues 6 suoy.app AI .O0421P1l4 as'sp hs.o boom pi) •UOJ -096 L :suosjed- Vola io s311$11,43111043 ivauee '£-d algol ; -,. _ . 6 _XIQNadd�l - . -- DISCLAIMER Table 8, Page -27, Question 5 Respondent G lists Dr. Claytor and Ernest Green as heading a committee of • Black aisinessmen formed out of the Henry Street Group that .supported Bern Ewert--(the former City Manager.) This is totally incorrect. Mayor Taylor appointed the Henry Street Group on September 10, 1984 and neither men were a part of the appointees. Further, records will show that Ernest Green was eulogized on July 8, 1978. Ater S. , ytor, D.D.S. September 4; 1991