The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil Actions 03-16-2026 POWERS 43364-031626 City of Roanoke, Virginia CITY COUNCIL ROANOKE CITY SCHOOL BOARD March 16 2026 ROANOKE 2:00 P`M City Council Chamber 215 Church Avenue, SW AGENDA The City of Roanoke is a safe, caring and economically vibrant community in-which to live, learn, work, play and prosper. A vibrant urban center with strong neighborhoods set amongst the spectacular beauty of Virginia's Blue Ridge. NOTICE: City Council meetings will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursdays at 7:00 pm, and Saturdays from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm; and video streamed through YouTubetive at youtube.com/RoanokeVa. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the deaf or hard'of hearing. 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL. Council Member Volosin was absent. The Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Elizabeth N. H. Link, Executive Pastor, Second Presbyterian Church. The P-ledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Joseph L. Cobb. Welcome JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND THE ROANOKE CITY SCHOOL BOARD. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL. City Council — Council Member Volosin was absent. Roanoke City School Board - Trustees Jamison and Quintana were absent. WELCOME AND OPENING REMARKS. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/COMMENTS BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ROANOKE CITY SCHOOL BOARD. RECESS/ADJOURN - 3:20 pm. THE COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED TO CONSIDER THE REMAINING AGENDA ITEMS. (3:32 pm) ANNOUNCEMENTS: 2. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Mayor Cobb advised that, going forward, the 2:00 pm meeting would begin with the Council Members providing "shout-o ts" or announcing community events recently attended. The Council Membe s made the following announcements: Council Member Powers "shouted-out" downtown Roanoke and First Citizens Bank, who hosted the 2026 St. Patrick's Day Parade held on Saturday, March 14. Council Member Nash "shouted-out" the St. Patrick's Day Parade downtown and expressed pleasure with the energy of the safe and fun event. Vice-Mayor McGuire "shouted-out" the festive atmosphere at the recent Washington Park cleanup event and to the Friends of Mountain View tour on March 4 and expressed gratitude to the citizens who were willing to restore the building. Council Member Sanchez-Jones "shouted-out" the St. Patrick's Day Parade downtown and recent City events. Council Member Hagen commented that he enjoyed the Exit, Pursued by a Bear Theater. Mayor Cobb commented about the ribbon cutting for the Agape House for veterans, a vision 20 years in the making. Proclamation declaring Wednesday, March 18, 2026, as Small Business Development Center Day. Mayor Cobb presented the proclamation to Heather Fay, Director and Executive Regional Administrator, Greater Roanoke & New River Valley Small Business Development Center. 3. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: The City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard: All matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to the Council, as he may deem appropriate. Kevin Aagard appeared before the Council and spoke in support of funding for Roanoke City Public Schools. Laura McKeage appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the decrease in the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. Ellie Bundrick appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the potential school budget cuts, including the P.L.A.T.O. program. Jessica Blandy appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the decrease in the Roanoke City Public Schools Budget. Freeda Cathcart appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the financial and economic development issues at Fisburn Park and requested that the contract with the vanBlaricoms be reviewed. Angela Biard appeared before the Council and spoke in support of Roanoke City Public Schools funding and how the management of funds impacted children's future. Wani Moja h appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the decrease in the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. Kathleen Jennings appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the decrease in the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVED (6-0) C-1. Minutes of the regular meeting of City Council held on Monday, March 2, 2026. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Dispensed with the reading of the minutes and approved as recorded. C-2. A communication from Mayor Joseph L. Cobb requesting that Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the two upcoming vacancies on the Roanoke City School Board expiring June 30, 2026, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-3. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel employed by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel regarding a proposed encroachment permit, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-4. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-5. A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible acquisition of property in the Northeast part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Concurred in the request. C-6. A communication from the City Clerk advising of the resignation of Jared Rose as a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Commission, effective immediately. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accepted the resignation and received and filed the communication. C-7. Report of qualification of Matt Clark as a member of the Roanoke Valley- Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee for a three-year term of office commencing April 1, 2026, and ending March 31, 2029. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Received and filed. REGULAR AGENDA: BID OPENINGS: Bids to enter into a Parking Agreement for unreserved parking permits for the Center in the Square Garage located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia. Received one bid from The First National Exchange, LC. The sole bid was referred to the City Manager for review and recommendation to the Council. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 6. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: Presentation of a year-end update on Melrose Plaza. Richmond Vincent, Chief Executive Officer, Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, Inc. (Sponsored by Mayor Cobb) Received and filed. 7. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND THE CITY MANAGER: 1. City Manager: BRIEFING: Budget Briefing — External Agencies - 20 minutes ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR ACTION: a. Acceptance of Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) Community Flood Preparedness Fund (CFPF) Grant— Watershed Modeling for Peters Creek and Ore Branch Watersheds. Adopted Ordinance No. 43364-031626. (6-0) b. Authorization to submit an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the Peters Creek Flood Mitigation Project— Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Adopted Resolution No. 43365-031626. (6-0) c. Adoption of the redefined strategic goals, objectives and priorities for the City of Roanoke. Adopted Resolution No. 43366-031626. (6-0) COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER. The City Manager offered the following comments: Parks and Recreation will be piloting a noise-reduction initiative at the Shrine Hill pickleball courts. Staff have installed "Librarian (quiet) pickleball" receptacles filled with softer balls, along with informational signage for players. This effort responds to neighborhood concerns regarding the noise associated with pickleball, specifically the sharp "ping" sound produced during play. The use of softer balls is intended to help mitigate that noise while allowing continued use of the courts. RVTV will be filming educational promotional segments for this initiative in the coming weeks to help inform the public and encourage participation in the pilot program. In recognition of International Women's Day, the International City/County Management Association hosted the 2025 SheLeadsGov Virtual Forum on March 5. This year's forum, themed "Innovate, Inspire, Impact," brought together more than 1,200 participants who joined virtually or through organized watch gatherings across the country. The SheLeadsGov forums connect professionals committed to supporting one another, encouraging meaningful community change, and advancing innovation in local government. The event included conversations, collaborative sessions, and keynote presentations that provided practical strategies for strengthening local organizations and communities, while also fostering a strong sense of connection among participants. Here in Roanoke, more than 100 women employed by the City gathered Thursday morning, March 5th, to participate in a leadership development forum focused on strategic communication, self-advocacy, and leading during periods of change. Women currently represent 38.5 percent of the City's municipal workforce, including 23 individuals serving in senior leadership roles. Employees from multiple departments participated in the program to strengthen leadership capacity and build professional connections across the organization. The program also emphasized the continued advancement of women in public service and the preparation of future leaders here in the Star City. PUBLIC MATTERS FOLLOW-UP Kathryn Hedrick, Inclusive Services Manager, reported on the following matters from the February 17 and March 2 City Council Meetings: School Funding Seventeen residents, including six students, spoke regarding the proposed changes to the RCPS budget. Each speaker received an acknowledgment of their comments and gratitude for their commitment to education. Washington Park Five residents spoke on behalf of the Friends of Washington Park, specifically advocating for the restoration of the Caretakers Cottage. An inquiry was sent to the City Attorney regarding an insurance document submission, and all residents were contacted regarding their concerns. Tree Concern Dr. Manns is concerned about the impact a neighbor's tree is having on her health. Her address and concern were sent to the Code Compliance team, who reported that there are no code violations on the adjacent property that can be enforced. This update was sent to Dr. Manns. 2. CITY ATTORNEY: None. 3. DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION: None. 8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES: 1. Comments on certain Authorities, Boards, Committees and Commissions in which City Council serve as liaisons or appointees. Mayor Cobb reported that Greater Roanoke Transit Company will provide a Free Fare Day for the April 21, 2026, Special Election; and advised of progress on the new bus stop shelter at Valley View Walmart. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None. 10. INTRODUCTION AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: None. 11. MOTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1. Inquiries and/or comments by the Mayor and Members of City Council. None. 2. Vacancies on certain authorities, boards, commissions and committees appointed by Council. None. 12. RECESSED - 5:09 pm The City Council Meeting will stand in recess; and thereafter reconvene at 7:00 pm, in the City Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building. WIPWCity of Roanoke, Virginia CITY COUNCIL I� 7:00 m p ROANOKE City Council Chamber 215 Church Avenue, SW 13. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL. Council Member Volosin was absent. The Invocation was delivered by The Reverend Vannie Harrell, Lead Pastor, Church Alive International. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was led by Mayor Joseph L. Cobb. Welcome 14. PRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: None. 15. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. A report of the City Manager recommending execution of a Parking Agreement, subject to certain terms and conditions, to obtain up to twenty (20) parking permits for the use of not more than twenty (20) unreserved parking spaces in the City's Center in the Square Garage located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S.E. Adopted Ordinance No. 43367-031626. (6-0) 16. HEARING OF CITIZENS UPON PUBLIC MATTERS: The City Council sets this time as a priority for citizens to be heard. If deemed appropriate,.matters will be referred to the City Manager for response, recommendation or report to the City Council. Abby McDonald appeared before the Council and expressed concern about the cuts to the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. Kathleen Wooley appeared before the Council on behalf of Bus Riders of Roanoke Advocacy Group and spoke with regard to public transit services and budgeting. Monique Bishop appeared before the Council on behalf of Bus Riders of Roanoke Advocacy Group and spoke with regard to public transit services and budgeting. Megan McKnight appeared before the Council and spoke with regard to the importance of school funding, particularly how it impacts students with disabilities. Chanelle Henderson appeared before the Council and expressed concern about the cuts to the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. Richard Fife appeared before the Council and suggested that Council rescind or propose an alternate development plan for the Evans Spring property. Grace Brian appeared before the Council and expressed concern with regard to the decrease in funding to Roanoke City Public Schools. Dena Anderson appeared before the Council and expressed concern with regard to the decision to reduce funding to Roanoke City Public Schools. Christian Burnette appeared before the Council as President of the NAACP Youth Council and expressed concern about cuts to the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. Nazier Jackson appeared before the Council as Vice-President of the NAACP Youth Council and expressed concern about cuts to the Roanoke City Public Schools budget. RECESSED FOR CONTINUATION OF CLOSED MEETING - 7:49 PM. RECONVENED -8:13 PM. Certification of Closed Meeting. (6-0) RECESSED - 8:14 PM. The City Council Meeting will stand in recess until Monday, March 23, 2026, at 2:00 pm, for the presentation of the Proposed FY 2026-2027 Budget. -. Office of the Mayor t? YQ , /- I �` �4� �� h� �T�I �� 4 � , ® i SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS WHEREAS, SBDC Day is observed on the third Wednesday of March each year and, since its inception in 2017, has recognized the nationwide network of nearly 1,000 Small Business Development Centers and their collective accomplishments in helping America's small businesses succeed,. WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the tenth annual SBDC Day will unite SBDCs and the hundreds of thousands of clients they serve by sharing success stories and demonstrating, in real time, the significant impact SBDCs have on entrepreneurs and the broader small business community; WHEREAS, America's SBDCs serve as a proven and cost effective foundation for small business growth, helping clients secure $5.2 billion in financing, generate$5.1 billion in sales, create 68,003 new full time jobs, and achieve sales growth at twice the rate of average United States businesses, while 96 percent of clients would recommend SBDC services to others; WHEREAS, small businesses are the backbone of local economies, including the City of Roanoke, and SBDCs empower individuals to turn business ideas into , thriving enterprises that strengthen neighborhoods, create jobs,foster innovation, and contribute to long term economic vitality; .• WHEREAS, as new business applications continue to rise nationwide and emerging sectors such as medical care, wellness services, advanced manufacturing, and technology expand, SBDCs provide the guidance, education,' and resources necessary for aspiring and existing entrepreneurs to navigate challenges and seize new opportunities;and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joseph L. Cobb, Mayor of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby proclaim March 18, 2026, throughout this great eight-time , , All-American City, as Small Business Development Center Day. Given under our hands and the Seal of the City of Roanoke this sixteenth day of March in the year two thousand and twenty-six. ' Y f, Jose IL- o ayor A. I' r' � 'k> �j ATTEST. f jy CT o� /►�C a J* * celra F.McCoy, City Clerk() P !'' . r . y ;:, CITY OF ROANOKE io' ' -T r-A OFFICE OF THE MAYOR "�`—•t[`_ 215 Church Avenue,S.W., Suite 452 itft Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 ..k- Telephone: (540)853-2444 Fax:(540)853-1145 E-mail: JOSEPH.COBB@ROANOKEVA.GOV JOSEPH L.COBB Mayor March 16, 2026 The Honorable Vice-Mayor McGuire and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Vice-Mayor McGuire and Members of Council: This is to request that the Council convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the two upcoming vacancies on the Roanoke City School Board expiring June 30,2026, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Sincerely, pi4r,"(1._ 264._ Joseph L. glib Mayor JLC:ctw Iliii?Z. ROAN O KE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel employed by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel regarding a proposed encroachment permit, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting to consult with legal counsel employed by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal-advice by such counsel regarding a proposed encroachment permit, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(8), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Cam---.0, c.. ..174_0,. . Laura Carini, City Attorney ROANOKE Office of the.City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part Of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible'disposal of publicly owned property in the Central part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. Laura Carini, City Attorney ROANOKE Office of the City Attorney To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: A communication from the City Attorney requesting that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible acquisition of property in the Northeast part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The City Attorney requests that City Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussing possible acquisition of property in the Northeast part of the City, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body,pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3), Code of Virginia,(1950), as amended. Laura Carini, City Attorney �. ik CITY OF ROANOKE ,. �� ., OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (.....,, 1, : u 215 Church Avenue,S.W.,Suite 456 °' " Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 xr� Telephone: (540)853-2541 Fax: (540)853-1145 CECELIA T.WEBB,CMC CECELIA F.MCCOY,CMC E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov Deputy City Clerk City Clerk RUTH VISUETE-PEREZ,CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk March 16, 2026 The Honorable Mayor and-Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mayor Cobb and Members of Council: This is to advise that Jared Rose has tendered his resignation as a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Commission, effective immediately. Sincerely, ate ' Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC City Clerk Cecelia Webb From: Ruth Visuete Perez Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 2:59 PM To: Cecelia Webb Subject: 'FW: [EXTERNAL] Gun violence prevention commission Importance: High Best regards, Ruth Visuete Perez, CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Suite 456 Roanoke,Virginia 24011 540-853-2541 ruth.visueteperez(aroanokeva.gov From:Jared Rose<jared_Rose9@outlook.com> Sent:Thursday, March 5,2026 4:13 PM To: City Clerk<City.Clerk@roanokeva.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Gun violence prevention commission Importance: High You don't often get email from jared rose9@outlook.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders. Dear Members of the Roanoke Gun Violence Prevention Commission, Please accept this letter as my formal resignation from the Roanoke Gun Violence Prevention Commission, effective 3-4-2026. - Serving on the Commission has been a meaningful and important experience for me. I am grateful for the opportunity to work alongside dedicated community members who are committed to addressing violence prevention and strengthening our city.The conversations, collaboration, and shared efforts toward public safety have been impactful and deeply important to me both professionally and personally. - Due to increasing professional responsibilities and time commitments in my role as a Veteran Justice Specialist with the Virginia Department of Veterans Services, I am unable to continue serving in a way - 1 - that gives the Commission the time and energy it deserves.After careful consideration, I believe stepping down is the most responsible decision at this time. I remain fully committed to the mission of reducing violence and supporting prevention efforts in our community. I look forward to continuing to collaborate in ways that align with my professional role and capacity. Thank you for the opportunity to serve. Respectfully, Jared Rose CPRS 540-330-5124 Radford,VA • ,. 4 CITY OF ROANOKE C7 r s. ., 1. t .+wr ��"�4_ �:e_ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK r r 215 Church Avenue,S.W.,Suite 456 ,, 2 Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 ` „r • Telephone: (540)853-2541 -- - ' Fax: (540)853-1145 CECELIA F.MCCOY,CMC E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov CECELIA T.WEBB,CMC City Clerk Deputy City Clerk RUTH VISUETE PEREZ,CMC Assistant Deputy City Clerk March 17, 2026 Virginia Mullen Office Manager Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Mullen: This is to confirm that Matt Clark has completed the oath of office for appointment to the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee and will serve a three-year term from commencing April 1, 2026, and ending. March 31, 2029. Sincerely, Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC City Clerk , Oath or Affirmation of Office Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Roanoke, to-wit: I, Matt Clark, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that,I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as a member of the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee for a three-year term of office, commencing April 1, 2026 and ending March 31, 2029, according to the best of my ability. (So help me God.) 1 V pi i .. MATT CLARK The foregoing oat of office was taken, sworn to, and subscribed before me by Matt Clark this t day oW-POOLCCl`— 2026. Brenda S. Hamilton, Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk 44 ry CITY OF ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL 7 215 Church Avenue,S.W.,Suite 456 a / sx Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 Telephone: (540)853-2541 Fax: (540)853-1145 JOSEPH L.COBB E-mail: clerk@roanokeva.gov Council Members Mayor Stephen T.McGuire Phazhon Nash Nicolas Hagen Vivian Sanchez-Jones Peter J.Volosin Evelyn W.Powers March 16, 2026 The Honorable Mayor and Members of Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Members of Council: I am sponsoring a presentation by Richmond Vincent, Chief Executive Officer, Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, Inc., to provide a year-end update with regard to Melrose Plaza, at the regular meeting of City Council to be held on Monday, March 16, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Sincerely, Joseph L. Cobb Mayor JLC:ctw i 3 I , tt .1 MELROSErn" ,^ JJark ` 1 . , r s ryyr +1 'a:. PLAZA 2025 : , .... e , \ t �f ,,Q a„,,, ,,, ,, At 4 ,,,,,, t '1 k / firs#, -.4ttice 9 4.,?. .‘t*). ,,,,,. ''' ' ., . . , -,: i ‘ ik .4.- 4" '• :-.61',000e . "‘ sr. ‘ isi, 41. • ,ht i, 111 -41,4 . e' 'Ai , .(Iti .. A.,-/ „.ff-, ,IP.,r 4 ' ADVANCING v.,.. . se 40:1,,e0e,,,401„ _ ..:,... .. , it„.,. , :il i jt.. i';4 ' 4 * ' 4'. '1" it * q itili%— 1 ' ‘ ' COMMUNITY _ - 1 , . • _ il 01 if . . $ .,,, r 3[) utOrIt 141aill):ibor Initiatives promoting health and social support in NW Roanoke " "" n BJONOMICSTABIIJTY MARKET ON MELROSE r 7 s , Z—.."T.: 6 : —fir-- "fir _ - • — 1 :8 ! ' `" GoonOnllC Stability&Access 14"4",• +P' ,•� '$ ''"1N?!:, _____ 4#I''''''40''. ‘ '41r ; • Aims to enhance economic stability � � l 4 10,.. "' ' v by providing access to nutritious �,- i �' '' {� � , , foods and job opportunities. L. r r q g , ..: Iiii\ ' ..........mo% Finanal Overview a I g�[) • - The market generated $2,565,468 in .4 '�= :* ,-: . " t .. . -- /044. ' sales but reported a net loss of '" ° - r " �- $1,555,801. `4,: i' r t t Employment ,�•.� , - .1, r Half of the employees are residents ti. 0 � ' *0. a$ `i .• ' . ‘•.ml. from area code 24017. - -Z''` E"`r S°`yg " `�vt'FCR "3 .�_ 0E S ; n on's S'f ti4 :, N ps NA u.. ._ t.. ee',the 7 WEALTH-BUILDING INI11Al1VES - - . BANK OF BOTETOURT �u ��m , e. 11 . : wile fl f gr 4 e Economic Stability Focus = e 1 ,n, ��‘- ._ y , �:', , Targets economic stability by offering wealth- -t . building knowledge and financial opportunities. .,",, , -` 1 i' -- ' ,.' ; Customer Base Overview L �' + '-* ,11 1 The bank serves 161 consumer and 18 business 11 "'''4 • ' � ` ; w . �� % customers, demonstrating community engagement. r 'l oil, New Deposit Accounts 1 , ,� / ,, i� Recent growth includes 252new consumer and 26 , t new business deposit accounts. �' l Loan Activity ' 11 The bank issued 26 new consumer loans and no 01t ' new business loans in the period. HEALTHCARE 1. WELLNESS CENTER \\27r t Proactive Family Health , Promotes a proactive approach to maintaining - . . family health through various activities. t `'" (e---) M, ,v,„. Healthy Activities Offered ; . A total of 78 healthy activities are conducted to 1- / encourage community participation and wellbeing. } , i 4140 03mmunity Er igayemerit ' !*x, , it „„„ 344 attendees participate in healthy activities, rf . I demonstrating strong community engagement. Health Services Usage 22 individuals utilize health services at the wellness center for their healthcare needs. ,41 ,ti I 1., 4, , 1 II 'ri ' , ,4 it 111' i '.e.: .1 41 ''s.‘,... rr y T r , _ .1,. .. . J 4, , , ‘ , .1i . , ir , , , , .. , , , _ . ., .. , , , ,,,,,!,,,,...,,,,„;, ...,6,. , , \ ' , _ • 1 i..., . 4 \ • i� i ' ` i �" 1 rat/ ` II i� t ' r t ile , ,fir _,� t '� - �.1, , -„.. jr, '� i L \ 1 :, 1 , '''I,"' ` ' 4YT _ w `r k .v�. _ �" r 'I .. M s ) a Of ,0 .•,-.,..1.„7..ar:liC k4. !'i L.1741,4 i 0, .. 133UCATIONAL Adult Education Focus OP PO�NMIES Excel Center focuses on providing adults access to high school diplomas and career � credentials. THE EXCEL Enrollment Statistics CENTER Currently, the center has 81 enrolled students pursuing education and career goals. Career Pathways Offered Excel Center offers 47 career paths to help students gain relevant employment skills. FOSTERING LEARNING AND COMMUNITY MELROSE LIBRARY 44 Center of Learning Functions as a knowledge repository and hub for educational resources and learning opportunities. 1.7 Service Impact Melrose Library supports over �. , , ,r �rr ,, �._ „_ 93,000 patrons, serves 15,500 meals, and hosts 461 activities, showcasing its broad community impact. f CxJLTU RAL ,,° �`„.4 BVGAGEMENT fi,` f -, HARRISON MUSEUM — -Ia kill t� k- ip,,,,, N - •, Museum's Cultural Mission The museum aims to raise N. awareness and appreciation of » �, y. i,,, contributions by people of African x' �; - descent. r , 4. sZ, ljpiv. Visitor and Youth Engagement =� ,.,�~^ ,,r 'i ' `I1 " ''-41,, i i`"`ii 0 ° i mi t;'' 1 ° A-� - The museum had 378 visitors and ti, \* served 62youth, fostering community r,, " �`� I °` involvement and education . a''- \ ` ir.r COMMUNITY acnvmEs& PARTICIPA110N Total Activities There are 461 community activities offered, providing many opportunities ,• — C. for engagement across different ��. ,..�,r., � r1110 -.' interests. w ',k .,� ' 1 ,II .-:1 •'•— ---- Healthy Activities `, == L ter= , =-_— LIMN*� , ►�a&is rro, •,&kcmTSTe " -�-' aoi _ ---, , ,___, i i�i im iy Out of the total activities, 78 focus on �' = ! ° :M _ !i health, promoting wellness and active EE Ens _ 1FL .i4 IN r., , EN Va ` i 16 �S lifestyles. �' ! �' � n- — ill in Eli 0 ..-. !AID „ Imp III r i� ■'. is ire II. as .. _id . rm., L,14, m tip+ Participation in Healthy Activities rv, w These healthy activities attracted 344 F attendees, demonstrating strong 1 ,,,t ,4•,, , , ii community interest in wellness. qq�. � `' , :, , _ .i._ -1,,, . ...oa ww /1.r1 __,_.t_i_z_ nr: __-_ . GIANTS OF _ CULTURE&CHANGE _ am i� 1 t_i ill r av- ..._s R S f F d N fi 4 WELLNESS _ '! , ON MEINOSk s f � l=„_ t_ 1 ! r vi, r 4 01,Fiii no 4 is 1-IL t� ,v F a Ai '. _ CONCLUSION Integrated Initiatives Enhancing Wellbeing Stronger Community Impact Melrose Plaza combines various Efforts focus on improving These combined efforts support a initiatives to comprehensively economic, educational, healthcare, healthier and stronger NW address social determinants of and cultural wellbeing in NW Roanoke community for the future. health. Roanoke. External Agencies Agenda • History • Updated Process • Applications • Recommendations for Funding • Questions Updated Process • The goal was to develop an equitable and transparent process that would allow residents to see how the funds were distributed to agencies in the city that received general funds. • The process opened on November 17, 2025, and closed on January 9, 2026. • The same requirements were used from previous years, with a few additional requirements. • Council's 2006 requirements for agencies receiving funding over $25,000 were instituted. • Risk evaluation scores were completed. Risk Scores • An Organization's Risk Score evaluates: • Experience with grants • Financial audits • Staff turnover and changes within the organization • Previous monitoring results within the city and from other agencies • Ability to meet the project goals and financial goals Applications • Applications were scored, regardless of whether they were completed. • All agencies that were recommended for funding, but submitted incomplete applications, must submit the required documentation in order to be funded. • Applications were put into three (3) categories. • Regional Agreements • Institutional Alignment • Competitive External Agency Regional Agreements • Applicants consisted of agencies that have a formal agreement with the City, a city ordinance, or state code that champions the City of Roanoke's support for the agency. • Quick Facts • Average Score: 65 • Highest Score: 81 • Lowest Score: 22 • Average Risk: 8 Institutional Alignments • Applicants consisted of agencies that maintain operational stability and foundational public assets. • Quick Facts • Average Score: 73 • Highest Score: 93 • Lowest Score: 62 • Average Risk: 8.4 Competitive External Agency • Applicants consisted of agencies that sought funding to support their work in the community. Their applications were reviewed as part of a competitive application process. • Applications had to receive a 70 to be considered for funding. • Quick Facts • Average Score: 81 • Highest Score: 97 • Lowest Score: 37 Lk • Average Risk: 8.3 Recommendations for Funding • Regional Agreements • Request: $11 ,899,685 • Recommendation: $11 ,920,080 • Institutional Alignment • Request: $256,054 • Recommendation: $248,554 • Competitive External Agency • Request: $2,064,748 kk. • Recommendation: $652,000 4 4 5 « r}} rK r, ,,,#�,ok r h v , �S �y r > 'f ;�R � �4 s ter § Y.0 p�4 At 5 ts+F,�� 'tY� a t,`,::.,,,,17:::, pr �. .� � xy t��fg a`"i'N�i$ I i b 'o�n1�3�a.�n1-� 4�t�w{.�t iT y 1 as ` �v$. ` 'r9 K 1_'a7�1 r _ " b"� ur �b, f4'".. ash' -.-z rzr Thank Helen Ferguson 540-853-6357 g ra nts@roano keva.g ov IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 16th day of March 2026. No. 43364-031626. AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation ("DCR") funding from the Community Flood Preparedness Fund ("CFPF") grant to the City of Roanoke ("City"), authorizing execution of any required documents on behalf of the City, appropriating funds detailed more fully infra, and dispensing with the second reading of this ordinance by title. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. The City does hereby accept the Virginia DCR funding from the CFPF grant in the total amount of$2,434,800 to survey and model the Peters Creek and Ore Branch watersheds to support the development of detailed watershed plans. The DCR is providing $2,191,320 with a local match from the City in the amount of$243,480. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to accept, execute, and file on behalf of the City any and all documents required to obtain such funding, as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated March 16, 2026. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 3. The City Manager, or designee, is further directed to furnish such additional information as may be required to implement and administer the foregoing grant. 4. The following sections of the Stormwater Utility Fund appropriations be and the same are hereby amended and reordained to read and provide as follows: Stormwater Fund Appropriations: Fees for Professional Services 503-3010-0000-52010-370003 $ 2,434,800 Reclassification Contingency 503-3010-0000-51152-000000 (243,480) Revenues: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation - State Revenues 503-3010-0000-40122-370003 $ 2,191,320 5. Pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter of the City of Roanoke, the second reading of this ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. ATTEST: Wte-0-eret City Clerk. 2 City Manager's Report �linPrO' Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROAN O KE March 16, 2026 Title: Acceptance of Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation(DCR) Community Flood Preparedness Fund (CFPF) Grant-Watershed Modeling for Peters Creek and Ore Branch Watersheds. Background: The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has awarded funding from the Community Flood Preparedness Fund (CFPF) to survey and model the.Peters Creek and Ore Branch watersheds to support the development of detailed watershed plans.The first step to c• reate accurate models of both watersheds is to complete an inventory and survey of the stream and stormwater systems in each watershed. Once the stream and stormwater system asset inventory is completed and thoroughly reviewed,the data will be imported into a modeling program to build an accurate model for each watershed. The models will be used to simulate various rainfall and flooding scenarios.The results will inform the City's plan for future capital projects, determine effects of future development; aid in public outreach and education activities and help with emergency preparedness. Considerations: The City Manager approved application for the grant via signature on November 20, 2025. DCR notified the City of grant award on January 15, 2026, under agreement CFPF-25-06-44 for a total project budget of$2,434,800.00. The DCR is providing $ 2,191,320.00 (90% of project budget) and the City's local match requirement is $ 243,480.00 (10% of project budget). The local match will be allocated from the Stormwater Utility Fund. Recommended Action: Adopt the accompanying ordinance authorizing the following actions: 1. Accept DCR's award of$2,191,320.00 of Community Flood Preparedness Funds. 2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the DCR Grant Agreement documents, and other such documents as necessary to obtain; accept, implement, administer, and use funds identified above. Such documents shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. 3. Establish, a new expenditure account as follows with revenue estimates for the funding sources identified above; appropriate funding in the same amount: (503-3010-0000- 52010-300XXX), Peters.Creek and Ore Branch Modeling. Valmarie Turner, City Manager Stefanie K.Taillon Frank N.Stovall Secretary of Natural and Historic Resources Deputy Director ci-'S for Operations ti Andrew W.Smith 1; '� Darryl Glover Acting Director ''' tit Deputy Director for ' Dam Safety, Floodplain Management and �r 7 7 A Soil and Water Conservation COMMONWEALTH of j'I RGI �f IA Laura Ellis Deputy Director for DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION Administration and Finance January 15, 2026 Valmarie Turner 215 Church Avenue SW Roanoke,Virginia 24011 valmarie.turner@roanokeva.gov Re: Community Flood Preparedness Fund(CFPF) CY2025 Round 6 Grant Application: 3742 Grant Number: CFPF-25-06-44 Application Category: Study Community Name: City of Roanoke CID: 510130 Primary Contact: Marcus Aguilar Primary Contact Email Address: marcus.aguilar@roanokeva.gov Requested Grant Amount: $2,191,320.00 Approved Grant Amount; $2,191,320.00 Dear Valmarie Turner: This letter is to advise you that the Department of Conservation and Recreation(DCR) received your request to fund a Study application. If the application category listed above is different from the initial application, a change was necessary based on DCR's assessment of the project or activity. A change in application category may have resulted in the recalculation in the CFPF and match percentages represented above. DCR, in consultation with the Secretary of Natural and Historic Resources and the Chief Resilience Officer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has reviewed you application and your request for funding is approved. The total approved funding is as follows: • Approved CFPF Approved Amount: $2,191,320.00 • Approved Match Amount: $243,480.00 • Approved Total Project Cost: $2,434,800.00 In the coming weeks,you will receive an award package and grant agreement from Virginia Resources Authority(VRA)that will include an Award Letter detailing any changes in award amounts and conditions related to the award. Grant specific conditions, if any,will be incorporated into your award document and are as follows: 600 East Main Street,24th Floor I Richmond,Virg nia 23219 1804-786-6124 State Parks•Soil and Water Conservation•Planning and Recreation Resources Natural Heritage•Dam Safety and Floodplain Management•Land Conservation • Match is to come from City Funds.Please provide documentation showing that this funding is available. The above condition(s)must be completed and returned to DCR within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If more than 30 days is needed to fulfil these condition(s),please notify DCR. Your Grant Agreement will include all requirements related to this award including information on how to receive reimbursement, submit reports, and requirements for final deliverables for completed projects or activities. This package must be signed and returned to VRA within 90 days of receipt or funds will be rescinded. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at Jake.Shaw@dcr.virginia.gov. Sincerely, Jake Shaw Grants Manager, Dam Safety and Floodplain Management cc: Darryl M. Glover, Deputy Director,DCR Angela Davis, Division Director,DCR Tony Leone,VRA IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 16th day of March 2026. No. 43365-031626. A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") for the Peters Creek Flood Mitigation Project — Conditional Letter of Map Revision ("CLOMR") and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to take such further actions and execute such further documents as may be necessary in connection with this application. WHEREAS, the City is developing a flood mitigation project along Peters Creek and a small tributary to Peters Creek with the objective of reducing flood risk to adjacent property owners in the project area; WHEREAS, the project would establish vegetated floodplain benches along the sides of the channel to absorb floodwaters reducing flood impacts to nearby buildings and roadways; and WHEREAS, once the flood mitigation project is completed, a final Letter of Map Revision ("LOMR") application will be submitted to FEMA establishing the revised flood boundaries and flood depths. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit the application to FEMA for the Peters Creek Flood Mitigation Project— CLOMR, and any documents necessary to complete the final LOMR application, as more particularly described in the City Manager's Report dated March 16, 2026. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is further authorized to take any such further actions and execute such further documents as may be necessary to submit the above applications and to furnish such additional information as may be required for such applications. All such documents to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. ATTEST: `1,1-0-e--errt City Clerk. ; • 111111111.4 -qmCity Manager's Report Submitted by: Ross Campbell, PE, Director Department of Public Works ROA N O K E March 16, 2026 Title: Authorization to submit an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the Peters Creek Flood Mitigation Project - Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Background: The City of Roanoke is developing a flood mitigation project along Peters Creek and a small tributary to Peters Creek (known as "Tributary C")with the objective of reducing flood risk to adjacent property owners in the project area. The proposed project would establish vegetated floodplain "benches" along the sides of the channel to absorb floodwaters thereby reducing flood impacts to nearby buildings and roadways. In general, the project will decrease flood depths in the area during the 1% annual chance flood (sometimes referred to as the "100-year flood") and will not result in any increased risk to existing structures. The project is located adjacent to Peters Creek Rd: NW, generally between Northwood Dr. NW and Peach Tree Dr. NW Considerations: Due to the size of this project and its impacts to the floodplain, the project will need to be approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through a "Conditional Letter of Map Revision" (CLOMR) process. This process includes hydraulic modeling of the proposed changes to the streams and the development of a technical report describing these changes and certifying that there is no net increase in risk. Once the flood mitigation project is completed, a final submittal to FEMA called a "Letter of Map Revision" (LOMR) will establish the revised flood boundaries and flood depths resulting from the project. Section 36.2-333. — Floodplain Overlay District (F). of the Code of the City of Roanoke requires that this CLOMR application to FEMA be accompanied by a resolution adopted by the City Council, endorsing such application. Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution endorsing the CLOMR application to FEMA. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit the necessary documents required for CLOMR application to FEMA and any other such documents that may be necessary to complete the final LOMR application once the flood mitigation project has been completed. Valmarie Turner, City Manager CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION REQUEST PETERS CREEK AND PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C/SPEC-22161/ FEBRUARY 2026 J MCADAMS PETERS CREEK AND PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) REQUEST PROJECT NUMBER: SPEC-22161 ANALYZED BY: R. STUBBS, PE M. TORRES M. JAVELLANA or DATE: FEBRUARY 2026 `rrO ,ALTJ>< oF ��' • c, „ S• REBECCA STUBBS • Z Lic.No.062131 i • • ap o�mor +' �6ecce MCADAMS oa o`° r to SNbbs r-US S`� ♦'L 6.J2.061'2.41-05o, 621 HILLSBOROUGH STREET, SUITE 500 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 NC Lic. # C-0293 1 NARRATIVE 2 MT-2 APPLICATION FORMS 3 PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION 4 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE 5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 6 CERTIFIED TOPOGRAPHIC WORK MAP 7 EFFECTIVE MAPPING DATA 8 ;EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA 9 'PROPOSED PLANS 10 REVISED MAPPING DATA �111 MCA DAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C Flood Study GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Peters Creek Floodplain Mitigation project is located along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C in Roanoke, VA.The project limits include: • The section of Peter's Creek that extends from Northwood Drive approximately 1,560 linear feet to the confluence with Tributary C • The section of Tributary C that begins at the City property line near the cul-de-sac on Laura Road and extends approximately 865 linear feet to the confluence with Peter's Creek. Peter's Creek and Peter's Creek Tributary C flow from north to south in the area and have a defined Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and Regulatory Floodway as shown on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 51161C0142G (September 28, 2007). Relevant effective data is provided in Section 7. The effective model as mapped on the referenced FIRM was used for the preparation of this report. At the time of this report, a preliminary model has also been created but has not yet been made effective. The preliminary model was made available to the public in November of 2025. It is anticipated that the work proposed on the Peter's Creek Floodplain Mitigation project will begin in October of 2026. Construction is currently expected to be completed by June of 2027. Because it is expected that the construction in the floodplain will begin, and potentially end, before the new preliminary model becomes effective, all models, maps, and effective data used for this study are based on the current effective model rather than the preliminary model. The proposed floodplain mitigation includes floodplain benching, stream improvements, and proposed stormwater wetlands. These proposed measures will include impacts in both the SFHA and the Regulatory Floodway. See the attached grading plan for more information. This analysis was performed to determine the impacts of the proposed floodplain mitigation measures on the water surface elevations of Peter's Creek and Peter's Creek Tributary C. As shown in the Summary of Results section of this report, the proposed development will result in increases and decreases to the 1% Annual Chance and Regulatory Floodway water surface elevations on both flooding sources. For this reason,and per 44 CFR§60.3 sections(c)and (d), a Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR)is requested for both Peter's Creek and Peter's Creek Tributary C.A LOMR will be submitted following the approval of the CLOMR and construction of the proposed floodplain mitigation. HYDROLOGIC METHODOLOGY ■ The hydrology for Peter's Creek and for Peter's Creek Tributary C was not revised as part of this analysis. The effective flow rates and boundary conditions found in the effective models were used in the corrected effective and proposed models. HYDRAULIC METHODOLOGY—GENERAL Within the area of revision,the hydraulic models were updated to best reflect current existing conditions, best practices of hydraulic modeling set forth by FEMA guidelines, correspondence with the city, and to remove any errors such as crossing profiles. The effective models originally used HEC-RAS version 3.0.1,which has known issues with calculations creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway,Durham,NC 27713/919.361.5000 �� MCADAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 around bridge crossings. Therefore, version 6.3.1 was used for this analysis. All changes are outlined in the sections below. • A combination of topographic survey by H&B Surveying and Mapping, on January 26, 2024 and LiDAR obtained from NOAA Data Access Viewer was used to revise the Corrected Effective cross section geometry.The existing conditions survey is provided in Section 8 of this report.The proposed topography is from the proposed grading for the floodplain mitigation project. A topographic work map is provided in Section 6. All elevations are in the North American Vertical Datum of 1988(NAVD88). • The area of revision for this analysis extends from effective cross sections 19832 to 18077 for Peter's Creek, and 2066 to 436 for Peter's Creek Tributary C. All geometry data outside of the area of revision remains unchanged from the effective models. Errors in the Effective models outside of the area of revision (such as crossing profiles or negative floodway surcharges) were not corrected for this study. • The Effective floodplain and floodway delineations were obtained from the Roanoke County FEMA shapefiles. The effective models were obtained from FEMA and were found to have been modeled in HEC-RAS version 3.0.1. Since version 3.0.1 is no longer accepted by FEMA, the models used for this report were rerun in HEC- RAS version 6.3.1. • The Proposed Conditions floodplain and floodway delineations were mapped in the RAS Mapper application of HEC-RAS version 6.3.1 using proposed grading for the Peter's Creek Floodplain Mitigation project and existing conditions survey.The floodway was manually modified in between cross sections to create smooth transitions that generally represent the shape of the channel. HYDRAULIC METHODOLOGY—PETER'S CREEK ■ A single HEC-RAS version 6.3.1 model containing plans for Duplicate Effective,Corrected Effective,and Proposed Conditions for Peter's Creek was prepared for this submittal. A digital copy of this model is provided as part of this submittal. Peter's Creek Model Summary Model Plan File Geometry File Steady Flow File Duplicate Effective Effective Multiple Duplicate Effective Duplicate Effective Duplicate Effective Floodway Effective Floodway Corrected Effective Multiple Profiles Corrected Effective Corrected Effective Corrected Effective Floodway Floodway creating experiences through experience 2 of 8 'J MCA DAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 Proposed Conditions Multiple Profiles Proposed Proposed Conditions Conditions Proposed Conditions Floodway Floodway Duplicate Effective • The effective model for Peter's Creek was run in HEC-RAS version 6.3.1 to create the Duplicate Effective model. Corrected Effective • The Duplicate Effective geometry for Peter's Creek was copied and modified as outlined below to create the Corrected Effective geometry. • The stream centerline was adjusted to better reflect the surveyed topography. • Cross sections 18077 through 19832 were renumbered (now 18075 through 19821)to reflect the change in the stream centerline. Effective river stationing was maintained for cross sections upstream of the area of revision. Corrected Effective river stationing will be used from here on. • Cross sections 18075 through 19821 were updated as described below for the Corrected Effective model. • RS 18561, 18960, and 19373 were deleted from the geometry. • RS 18277, 18450, 18665, 18759, 19339, 19415, and 19495 were added to the geometry. • RS 18075 and 19580 were recut on new terrain. • Multiple blocked obstructions were placed on cross sections throughout the area of revision to reflect existing buildings in the floodplain. • Surveyed data for the bridge modeled at RS 19616 (Northwood Dr NW) did not match the effective model.The bridge's geometry, both the culvert and deck information, and manning's n values were updated to site survey data. • The new cross sections were originally cut at a length consistent with the effective model. However, with the new terrain,the floodplain on Peter's Creek was found to be not fully contained by the limits of the cross sections for RS 18665, 18759, 18872, and 19339. There were also multiple points of crossing profiles within the area of revision. Therefore, cross sections in the area were updated to cross both Peter's Creek and Peter's Creek Tributary C. For cross sections 18075 — 19415, cross sections were cut over the entire width of the floodplain. Flood areas outside of the main area of flow for Peter's Creek were made ineffective in order to model the stream separate from Trib C. This includes the floodplain area for Peter's Creek Tributary C as well as the roadway for Peter's Creek Road. Please see the Ineffective Flow Area (IFA) Exhibits in Section 6 of this report. For the Peter's creating experiences through experience 3 of 8 '� MCA DAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 Creek Tributary C model, the exact same cross sections were used, but the Peter's Creek Tributary C flow area was made effective flow area while Peters Creek was made ineffective. More detail for this can be found below. • Manning's n values were chosen to match the effective values within the area of revision, except for where the bounding cross sections for the bridge modeled at RS 19616(Northwood Dr NW)were updated with site survey conditions. • Floodway stations were modified from RS 18075 to 19644 as necessary to maintain surcharges between 0 and 1 feet. The floodway was widened at RS 18075, 18872, 19339, 19580, and 19644. Floodway stations on new cross sections were placed to create a consistent width of the floodway throughout the area of revision as much as possible. Proposed Conditions • The Corrected Effective geometry for Peter's Creek was copied and modified as outlined below to create the Proposed Conditions geometry. • The stream centerline was adjusted to reflect the proposed stream restoration grading. • Cross sections 18277 through 19821 were renumbered to reflect the change in the stream centerline(now 18278 —19822). Proposed Conditions river stationing will be used from here on. • The station-elevation data for river stations 18075 through 19495 was updated with proposed grading. • All vegetation impacted by the proposed floodplain benching is intended to be replanted to match existing conditions.Therefore, manning's n values were retained from the Corrected Effective geometry. • All IFAs set in the Corrected Effective geometry were maintained in the Proposed Conditions geometry. • Floodway stations were modified from RS 18450 to 19822 as necessary to maintain surcharges between 0 and 1 feet. The floodway was widened at RS 18450, 18550, 18666, 18760, 19580, 19645, and 19822. The floodway width was decreased at RS 18872. HYDRAULIC METHODOLOGY—PETER'S CREEK TRIBUTARY C • A single HEC-RAS version 6.3.1 model containing plans for Duplicate Effective,Corrected Effective, and Proposed Conditions for Peter's Creek Tributary C (Trib C) was prepared for this submittal. A digital copy of this model is provided as part of this submittal. Peter's Creek Trib C Model Summary Model Plan File Geometry File Steady Flow File Duplicate Effective Duplicate Effective Duplicate Effective Effective Multiple creating experiences through experience 4 of 8 1I J MCADAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 Duplicate Effective Floodway Effective Floodway Corrected Effective Multiple Profiles Corrected Effective Corrected Effective Corrected Effective Floodway Floodway Proposed Conditions Multiple Profiles Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions Floodway Floodway Duplicate Effective • The Effective model for Trib C was run in HEC-RAS version 6.3.1 to create the Duplicate Effective model. Corrected Effective • The Duplicate Effective model for Trib C was copied and modified as outlined below to create the Corrected Effective geometry. • RS 436, 879, and 1054 were deleted. • Cross sections from the Peters Creek model were imported into the Trib C model and placed on the Trib C stream centerline. These cross sections became RS 118, 279, 438, 556, 609, 666, 1030, and 1148 on the Trib C model. Bank stations were relocated to be placed on the survey located banks of the Trib C stream. IFAs were removed from the Trib C main flow path and were placed on Peters Creek's flow path in order to model the stream separate from Peters Creek. • Manning's n values were updated to place the stream manning's n within the Trib C channel banks. All overbank values were left to match those used in the Peters Creek model, which also were consistent with the range used for the Trib C Effective model. • Multiple blocked obstructions were placed on cross sections throughout the area of revision to reflect existing buildings in the floodplain. • Floodway stations were modified from RS 123 to 2066 as necessary to maintain surcharges between 0 and 1 feet. The floodway was widened for RS 438, 1030, 1228, 1556, 1627.5, 1652.5, 1718, and 2066. The floodway width was decreased for RS 1409. Floodway stations on new cross sections were placed to create a consistent width of the floodway throughout the area of revision as much as possible. creating experiences through experience 5 of 8 11. MCA DA MS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 Proposed Conditions • The Corrected Effective geometry for Peter's Creek Trib C was copied and modified as outlined below to create the Proposed Conditions geometry. • The stream centerline was updated to reflect the proposed grading. • The Proposed Conditions Cross sections from RS 123, 279, 438, 556, 609, 666, 1030, and 1148 were imported from the Peters Creek Proposed Conditions model to capture the effects of the floodplain benching and ensure that all geometry matches between the models. • IFAs, bank stations, and blocked obstructions were updated to match the Trib C Corrected Effective geometry. • All vegetation impacted by the proposed floodplain benching is intended to be replanted to match existing conditions.Therefore, manning's n values were retained from the Corrected Effective geometry. • Floodway stations were modified from RS 123 to 1718 as necessary to maintain surcharges between 0 and 1 feet. The floodway was widened for RS 123, 279, and 438.The floodway width was decreased for RS 1148 and 1718. SUMMARY OF RESULTS The Summary of Results comparison tables are found in Section 5. The Effective and Proposed Conditions floodplain and floodway delineations are shown on the topographic work map provided in Section 6. Effective vs. Duplicate Effective Peters Creek Table 1 in Section 5 provides a comparison between the published effective data and the Duplicate Effective model output. Differences in water surface elevations are less than 0.5 ft throughout the model except where the Effective WSELs are defined by the backwater from Roanoke River, which is outside the area of revision. Effective vs. Corrected Effective Peters Creek Table 2 in Section 5 provides a comparison between the published effective data and the Corrected Effective model output. The maximum decrease in the Floodplain and Floodway water surface elevations are 0.60 and 1.37 ft, respectively, at RS 19821. An increase of 0.21 ft occurs in the floodplain Water Surface Elevation (WSEL) at RS 20571. This increase is attributed to the change in model version from HEC-RAS v 3.0.1 and v 6.3.1. Since HEC-RAS v 3.0.1 was discontinued due to its errors in bridge modeling,this rise is attributed to erroneous calculations in the effective model. The same cross section (RS 20571) shows a rise in the floodway elevation of 0.15 ft. Corrected Effective vs. Proposed Conditions Peters Creek Table 4 provides a comparison between the Corrected Effective and Proposed Conditions model results.The maximum decrease in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs are 2.48 and 1.58 ft, respectively, both at RS 18872. There is a rise in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs of 0.11 and 0.06 ft at RS 18277. There is a rise of 0.11 ft on River Station 18278.This rise was evaluated extensively because there is an existing structure in the floodplain at 1721 Peter's Creek Road, approximately 80 feet upstream of the cross section. However,due to the creating experiences through experience 6 of 8 1111 MCA DAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 decrease of 0.72 ft at the next upstream River Station 18550,the interpolated water surface elevations at the structure itself decreases from Corrected Effective to Proposed Conditions. Effective vs. Proposed Conditions Peters Creek Table 5 shows a comparison between the Effective and Proposed Conditions model results.The maximum decrease in WSELs in the Floodplain and Floodway values occurs at RS 19340 and is 2.45 and 2.34 ft, respectively. The 0.21 ft rise in the floodplain model and 0.14 ft rise at RS 20571 is maintained from the Corrected Effective comparison.This rise is unchanged from the Corrected Effective to Effective comparison and is therefore still attributed to the change in HEC- RAS versions from the Effective model. Effective vs. Duplicate Effective Trib C Table 6 in Section 5 provides a comparison between the published effective data and the Duplicate Effective model output. Differences in water surface elevations are less than 0.5 ft throughout the model, except where the Effective WSELs are defined by the backwater from Peter's Creek. Effective vs. Corrected Effective Trib C Table 7 provides a comparison between the published effective data and the Corrected Effective model output. The maximum decrease in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs are 0.41 and 1.11 ft, respectively, at RS 1718 and 1254.The maximum increases are a rise of 0.01 in the Floodplain WSEL at RS 2066, and a rise of 0.34 in the Floodway WSEL at RS 1556. Corrected Effective vs. Proposed Conditions Trib C Table 9 provides a comparison between the Corrected Effective and Proposed Conditions model results.The maximum decrease in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs are 0.81 and 0.72 ft, occurring at RS 279 and 438, respectively. The maximum increase in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs are 0.34 and 0.38 ft respectively, both at RS 609.These rises do not impact any existing structures. Effective vs. Proposed Conditions Trib C Table 10 shows a comparison between the Effective and Proposed Conditions model results. The maximum decrease in the Floodplain and Floodway WSELs are 0.41 and 1.16 ft, respectively, at RS 1718 and 1254.The maximum increases are a rise of 0.01 in the Floodplain WSEL at RS 2066, and a rise of 0.33 in the Floodway WSEL at RS 1556. 7of8 creating experiences through experience 'J1 MCADAMS FLOOD STUDY > SPEC-22161 CONCLUSION The developments proposed with the Peters Creek Floodplain Mitigation project will result in changes to the 1%Annual Chance and Floodway water surface elevations. The proposed changes have been modeled through accepted FEMA methodology as described in this narrative and presented in this report. If the proposed project is constructed as outlined in this report,the requirements set forth in 44 CFR§60.3 will be met without additional flood management facilities. Modifications to the proposed development may require that this analysis be revised. Some modifications that would require this analysis to be revised include: 1. The proposed grading in and adjacent to the stream differs from the grading considered in this report. 2. The location or design of floodplain improvements differ from those considered in this report. The above modifications may result in the assumptions within this report becoming invalid. The computations within this report will need to be revisited if any of the above conditions are met as design of the site moves forward. creating experiences through experience 8 of 8 .. Y o. N 21704 /1/ "• �a Oh 4. 0a ti� Legend \ 0 i 2,��0 ^ U . Area of Revision .� Effective Cross Sections Peters Creek Effective Stream Centerlines a i Effective 100yr Floodway : -ANS C'/1, Effective 100yr Floodplain �o�e V12' 4N� ...wok 20581 \ ti� Qua!!pr NW 29e h a�� '19 3 ti `oarR y Qua1 N y m Westview •V Terrace �31 0�4, �� 1\4 1!! ti �� I Telliep Rd tta •tioti� .s'' �'W ♦rrz8ft a V.466'411%.411....„ #1,..../i/1 l N 1 1a96„, i .,,,, Tribe-nary C 1 40 No\ ,. tc a Peachtree Norwood I 9�'PiPro� ba ;hJt a Ise NW ¢ Applet pPdeb l.soli r,* q NW Mountain View Rd NW ;g ' iri3t t '' �• �-,,tor,Airbus DS,USW1 NGA,NASA,CGIAR,N Robinson, NC -�f NLS, •',,;MA,Geodatastyrelsen,Rijkswaterstaat,GSA,Geoland, !! Intermap,and the GIS user community,Sources:Esri,TomTom, sari•.i:,a ,�613zr USGS,S OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User - Community 1 J N AREA OF REVISION 0 150 300 600 II. A PETERS CREEK Feet PROJECT#: SPEC-22161 1" = 300' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA M L A nA M S k MT-2 APPLICATION FORMS Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency OVERVIEW & CONCURRENCE FORM OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 1 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0 § 552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA) February 15, 2006, 71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE: The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however, failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). A. REQUESTED RESPONSE FROM DHS-FEMA This request is for a(check one): CLOMR: A letter from DHS-FEMA commenting on whether a proposed project, if built as proposed,would justify a map ro oseainyarrolo changes(See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60,65&72). All CLOMRs require documentation of compliance with the P p Y 9Y 9 q p Endangered Species Act. Refer to the Instructions for details. LOMR:A letter from DHS-FEMA officially revising the current NFIP map to show the changes to floodplains, regulatory floodway or flood elevations. (See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60, 65&72). B. OVERVIEW 1. The NFIP map panel(s)affected for all impacted communities is(are): Community No. Community Name State Map No. Panel No. Effective Date 510130 City of Roanoke VA 51161C0142 0142 SEP 28, 2007 G 2. a. Flooding Source: Peters Creek b.Types of Flooding: Ei Riverine [ Coastal ❑ Shallow Flooding(e.g.,Zones AO and AH) ❑ Alluvial Fan [ Lakes ❑ Other(Attach Description) 3. Project Name/Identifier: Peters Creek Floodplain Mitigation and Constructed Wetlands 4. FEMA zone designations (choices: A,AH,AO, A1-A30,A99,AE,AR,V,V1-V30,VE, B, C, D,X) a. Effective: AE b. Revised: AE MT-2 FORM 1 Page 1 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) 5. Basis for Request and Type of Revision: a. The basis for this revision request is(check all that apply) [X Physical Change n Improved Methodology/Data �X Regulatory Floodway Revision Base Map Changes ❑ Coastal Analysis U Hydraulic Analysis [] Hydrologic Analysis XE Corrections Weir-Dam Changes 0 Levee Certification Alluvial Fan Analysis El Natural Changes E New Topographic Data Other(Attach Description) Note: A photograph and narrative description of the area of concern is not required, but is very helpful during review. b. The area of revision encompasses the following structures(check all that apply) Structures: ❑X Channelization Levee/Floodwall Bridge/Culvert ❑ Dam 111 Fill 111 Other(Attach Description) 6 ❑X Documentation of ESA compliance is submitted (required to initiate CLOMR review). Please refer to the instructions for more information. C. REVIEW FEE Has the review fee for the appropriate request category been included? QX Yes Fee amount: $ 6,500 ❑ No,Attach Explanation - Please see the DHS-FEMA Web site at http://www.fema.gov/forms-documents-and-software/flood- map-related-fees for Fee Amounts and Exemptions. D.SIGNATURES 1. REQUESTOR'S SIGNATURE All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Name: Company: Mailing Address: Daytime Telephone: Fax No.: E-mail Address: Date: Signature of Requestor(required): 2.COMMUNITY CONCURRENCE As the community official responsible for floodplain management, I hereby acknowledge that we have received and reviewed this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)or conditional LOMR request. Based upon the community's review,we find the completed or proposed project meets or is designed to meet all of the community floodplain management requirements, including the requirements for when fill is placed in the regulatory floodway, and that all necessary Federal, State, and local permits have been, or in the case of a conditional LOMR, will be obtained. For Conditional LOMR requests, the applicant has documented Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance to FEMA prior to FEMA's review of the Conditional LOMR application. For LOMR requests, I acknowledge that compliance with Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA has been achieved independently of FEMA's process. For actions authorized,funded, or being carried out by Federal or State agencies, documentation from the agency showing its compliance with Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA will be submitted. In addition, we have determined that the land and any existing or proposed structures to be removed from the SFHA are or will be reasonably safe from flooding as defined in 44CFR 65.2(c),and that we have available upon request by FEMA,all analyses and documentation used to make this determination. Community Official's Name and Title: Mailing Address: Community Name: Daytime Telephone: Fax No.: E-mail Address: Community Official's Signature(required): Date: MT-2 FORM 1 Page 2 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) 3.CERTIFICATION BY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND/OR LAND SURVEYOR This certification is to be signed and sealed by a licensed land surveyor, registered professional engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information data, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and any other supporting information as per NFIP regulations paragraph 65.2(b) and as described in the MT-2 Forms Instructions. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Certifier's Name: Rebecca Stubbs, PE License No.: 062131 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 McAdams Mailing Address: Company Name: 621 Hillsborough Street Telephone No.: 919.361.5000 Fax No.: Suite 500 -Raleigh, NC 27603 E-mail Address: rstubbs@mcadamsco.com Rebecca Dlgey signed by Rebecca Signature: ONtcnnn�elbbeoee Stubbs,c.US, January 28, 2026 Stubbs Date 20Z8 01 28 13 27.11.0590' Date: Ensure the forms that are appropriate to your revision request are included in your submittal. Form Name and(Number) Required if... `a,‘ NLT H 0../O•F, X Rivenne Hydrology and Hydraulics Form(Form New or revised discharges or water- O� �� 7 C Y 9Y Y 2) 9 i surface elevations • � Ci I •O i n Riverine Structures Form(Form 3) Channel is modified, addition/revision of •v REBECCA STUBBS • ' •0 bridge/culverts,addition/revision of ♦ ♦ levee/floodwall,addition/revision of dam • Lic.No. 062131 i El '6Coastal Analysis Form(Form 4) New or revised coastal elevations rm ��;� ❑ Coastal Structures Form(Form 5) Addition/revision of coastal structure 0 S G 'r %j I ONAL ��o�` n Alluvial Fan Flooding Form(Form 6) Flood control measures on alluvial fans OA f•'tldfal) MT-2 FORM 1 Page 3 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency RIVERINE HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS FORM (FORM 2) OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0§552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA)February 15, 2006, 71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE: The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however,failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). Flooding Source:Peters Creek Note: Fill out one form for each flooding source studied A. HYDROLOGY 1. Reason for New Hydrologic Analysis (check all that apply): ❑X Not revised(skip to section B) ❑ No existing analysis ❑ Improved data ❑ Alternative methodology ❑ Proposed Conditions(CLOMR) ❑ Changed physical condition of watershed 2. Comparison of Representative 1%-Annual-Chance Discharges Location Drainage Area(Sq. Mi.) Effective/FIS(cfs) Revised(cfs) 3. Methodology for New Hydrologic Analysis (check all that apply) ❑ Precipitation/Runoff Model -s Specify Model: Duration: Rainfall Amount: n Statistical Analysis of Gage Records ❑ Regional Regression Equations ❑ Other(please attach description) Please enclose all relevant models in digital format, maps, computations(including computation of parameters), and documentation to support the new analysis. 4. Review/Approval of Analysis If your community requires a regional,state, or federal agency to review the hydrologic analysis, please attach evidence of approval/review. 4. HEC-RAS File Description**: 5. Impacts of Sediment Transport on Hydrology Is the hydrology for the revised flooding source(s)affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No,then attach your explanation. Page 1 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) B. HYDRAULICS 1. Reach to be Revised Description Cross Section Water-Surface Elevation(ft.) Effective Proposed/Revised Downstream Limit* Peters Creek 18077 1026.20 1026.07 Upstream Limit* Peters Creek 20226 1034.10 1033.79 *Proposed/Revised elevations must tie-into the Effective elevations within 0.5 foot at the downstream and upstream limits of revision. 2. Hydraulic Method/Model Used: HEC-RAS 6.3.1 Steady State Unsteady State �X One-Dimensional n Two-Dimentional 3. Pre-Submittal Review of Hydraulic Models* DHS-FEMA has developed two review programs, CHECK-2 and CHECK-RAS, to aid in the review of HEC-2 and HEC-RAS hydraulic models, respectively. We recommend that you review your HEC-2 and HEC-RAS models with CHECK-2 and CHECK-RAS. 4. HEC-RAS File Description**: Models Submitted Natural Run Floodway Run Datum Duplicate Effective Model* File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Peters Creek Duplicate Effective PetersCreek Duplicate NAVD88 pEffective FW Corrected Effective Model* File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Peters Creek Corrected Effective Peters Creek Corrected Effective NAVD88 Floodway Existing or Pre Project File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Conditions Model Revised or Post Project File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Conditions Model Peters Creek Proposed Conditions Peters Creek Proposed Conditions NAVD88 Floodway Other-(attach description) File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: * For details, refer to the corresponding section of the instructions. **See instructions for information about modeling other then HEC-RAS. ❑X Digital Models Submitted?(Required) C. MAPPING REQUIREMENTS A certified topographic work map must be submitted showing the following information (where applicable): the boundaries of the effective, existing, and proposed conditions 1%-annual-chance floodplain (for approximate Zone A revisions) or the boundaries of the 1%- and 0.2%- annual-chance floodplains and regulatory floodway(for detailed Zone AE, AO, and AH revisions); location and alignment of all cross sections with stationing control indicated; stream, road, and other alignments(e.g., dams, levees, etc.); current community easements and boundaries; boundaries of the requester's property; certification of a registered professional engineer registered in the subject State; location and description of reference marks;and the referenced vertical datum(NGVD, NAVD, etc.). Topographic Information: ❑X Digital Mapping (GIS/CADD)Data Submitted(preferred) Source: Field Survey by H&B Surveying and Mapping 1 Date: Jan 26, 2024 Vertical Datum: NAVD88 Spatial Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Virginia South Accuracy: Note that the boundaries of the existing or proposed conditions floodplains and regulatory floodway to be shown on the revised FIRM and/or FBFM must tie-in with the effective floodplain and regulatory floodway boundaries. Please attach a copy of the effective FIRM and/or FBFM, at the same scale as the original, annotated to show the boundaries of the revised 1%-and 0.2%-annual-chance floodplains and regulatory floodway that tie-in with the boundaries of the effective 1%-and 0.2%-annual-chance floodplain and regulatory floodway at the upstream and downstream limits of the area on revision. EX Annotated FIRM and/or FBFM (Required) FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) Page 2 of 3 D.COMMON REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS* 1. For LOMR/CLOMR requests,do Base Flood Elevations (BFEs)or Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs)increase compared to the effective BFEs? E Yes No If Yes, please attach proof of property owner notification. Examples of property owner notifications can be found in the MT-2 Form 2 Instructions. 2. For CLOMR requests, if either of the following is true. please submit evidence of compliance with Section 65.12 of the NFIP regulations: • The proposed project encroaches upon a regulatory floodway and would result in increases above 0.00 foot compared to pre-project conditions. • The proposed project encroaches upon a SFHA with or without BFEs established and would result in increases above 1.00 foot compared to pre-project conditions. 3. Does the request involve the placement or proposed placement of fill? 0 Yes n No If Yes, the community must be able to certify that the area to be removed from the special flood hazard area, to include any structures or proposed structures, meets all of the standards of the local floodplain ordinances, and is reasonably safe from flooding in accordance with the NFIP regulations set forth at 44 CFR 60.3(A)(3), 65.5(a)(4),and 65.6(a)(14). Please see the MT-2 instructions for more information. 4. Does the request involve the placement or proposed placement of fill? E Yes No If Yes, attach evidence of regulatory floodway revision notification. As per Paragraph 65.7(b)(1) of the NFIP Regulations, notification is required for requests involving revisions to the regulatory floodway Elements and examples of regulatory floodway revision notification can be found in the MT-2 Form 2 Instructions. 5. For CLOMR requests, please submit documentation to FEMA and the community to show that you have complied with Sections 9 and 10 of the Endangered Species Act(ESA). For actions authorized,funded,or being carried out by Federal or State agencies, please submit documentation from the agency showing its compliance with Section 7(a)(2)of the ESA. Please see the MT-2 instructions for more detail. ESA Compliance is currently under permitting. 401/404 and USFWS permits and correspondence will be provided as available prior to final approval . Page 3 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency RIVERINE STRUCTURES FORM (FORM 3) OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0§552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA)February 15, 2006, 71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE:The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however,failure to provide the information requested may delay or Flooding Source:Peters Creek Note: Fill out one form for each flooding source studied A. GENERAL Complete the appropriate section(s)for each Structure listed below: Channelization: complete Section B Bridge/Culvert: complete Section C Dam: complete Section D Levee/Floodwall: complete Section E Sediment Transport: complete Section F(if required) Description Of Modeled Structure 1. Name of Structure: Peters Creek Stream Enhancement Type (check one): n Channelization E Bridge/Culvert n Levee/Floodwall ❑ Dam Location of Structure: within stream Downstream Limit/Cross Section: 18075 Upstream Limit/Cross Section: 18450 2. Name of Structure: Type (check one): I I Channelization E Bridge/Culvert U Levee/Floodwall n Dam Location of Structure: Downstream Limit/Cross Section: Upstream Limit/Cross Section: 3. Name of Structure: Type (check one): n Channelization n Bridge/Culvert n Levee/Floodwall ❑ Dam Location of Structure: Downstream Limit/Cross Section: Upstream Limit/Cross Section: NOTE: FOR MORE STRUCTURES,ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NEEDED. Page 1 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) B. CHANNELIZATION Flooding Source:Peters Creek Name of Structure: Peters Creek Stream Enhancement 1. Hydraulic Considerations The channel was designated to carry 5056 (cfs)and/or the -year flood The design elevation in the channel is based on (check one): • Subcritical flow ❑ Critical flow ❑ Supercritical flow ❑ Energy grade line If there is the potential for a hydraulic jump at the following locations,check all that apply and attach an explanation of how the hydraulic jump is controlled without affecting the stability of the channel. ❑ Inlet to channel ❑ Outlet to channel ❑ At Drop Structures ❑ At Transitions ❑ Other locations(specify): 2. Channel Design Plans Attach the plans of the channelization certified by a registered professional engineer, as described in the instructions. 3. Accessory Structures The channelization includes(check one): U Levees[Attach Section E (Levee/Floodwall)] ❑X Drop structures ❑ Superelevated sections ❑ Energy dissipater ❑X Transitions in cross sectional geometry ❑ Debris basin/detention basin [Attach Section D (Dam/Basin)] ❑ Weir Other(Describe): 4. Sediment Transport Considerations Are the hydraulics of the channel affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes ❑X No If yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No, then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. C. BRIDGE/CULVERT Flooding Source: Name of Structure: 1. This revision reflects(check one): ❑ Bridge/Culvert not modeled in the FIS ❑ Modified Bridge/Culvert previously modeled in the FIS ❑ Revised analysis of Bridge/Culvert previously modeled in the FIS 2. Hydraulic model used to analyze the structure(e.g., HEC-2 with special bridge routine,WSPRO, HY8): If different than hydraulic analysis for the flooding source,justify why the hydraulic analysis used for the flooding source could not analyze the structures. Attach justification. 3. Attach plans of the structures certified by a registered professional engineer. The plan detail and information should include the following(check the information that has been provided): n Dimensions(height,width, span, radius, length) ❑ Distance between Cross Sections ❑ Shape(culverts only) ❑ Erosion Protection ❑ Material 0 Low Chord Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Beveling and Rounding ❑ Top of Road Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Wink Wall Angle ❑ Structure Invert Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Skew Angle ❑ Stream Invert Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Cross-Section Locations 4. Sediment Transport Considerations Are the hydraulics of the channel affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No,then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 2 of 9 D. DAM/BASIN Flooding Source: Name of Structure: 1. This request is for(check one): ❑ Existing Dam/Basin I I New Dam/Basin E Modification of existing Dam/Basin 2. The Dam/Basin was designed by(check one): ❑ Federal Agency n State Agency ❑ Private Organization n Local Government Agency Name of the Agency or Organization: 3. The Dam was permitted as(check one): [ Federal Dam ❑ State Dam Provide the permit or identification number(ID)for the dam and the appropriate permitting agency or organization Permit or ID number Permitting Agency or Organization a. E Local Government Dam n[ Private Dam Provided related drawings, specification and supporting design information. 4. Does the project involve revised hydrology? LI Yes n No If Yes,complete the Riverine Hydrology&Hydraulics Form(Form 2). Was the dam/basin designed using critical duration storm? (must account for the maximum volume of runoff) n Yes, provide supporting documentation with your completed Form 2. ❑ No, provide a written explanation and justification for not using the critical duration storm. 5. Does the submittal include debris/sediment yield analysis? Ei Yes El No If Yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport). If No, then attach your explanation for why debris/sediment analysis was not considered? 6. Does the Base Flood Elevation behind the dam/basin or downstream of the dam/basin change? U Yes n No If Yes,complete the Riverine Hydrology&Hydraulics Form(Form 2)and complete the table below. Stillwater Elevation Behind the Dam/Basin FREQUENCY(%annual chance) FIS REVISED 10-year(10%) 50-year(2%) 100-year(1%) 500-year(0.2%) Normal Pool Elevation 7. Please attach a copy of the formal Operation and Maintenance Plan E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL 1. System Elements a. This Levee/Floodwall analysis is based on (check one): Upgrading of A newly Reanalysis of an existing constructed an existing n levee/floodwall n levee/floodwall U levee/floodwall system system system b. Levee elements and locations are(check one): n Earthen embankment, dike, berm,etc Stationed to n Structured floodwall Stationed to Other(describe): Stationed to Page 3 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) c. Structural Type(check one): - Monolithic cast-in place reinforced concrete ❑ Reinforced concrete masonry block ❑ Sheet piling n Other(describe): d. Has this levee/floodwall system been certified by a Federal agency to provide protection from the base flood? Yes [ No If Yes, by which agency? e. Attach certified drawings containing the following information(indicate drawing sheet numbers): 1. Plan of the levee embankment and floodwall structures. Sheet Numbers: 2. A profile of the levee/floodwall system showing the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), levee and/or wall crest and foundation,and Sheet Numbers: closure locations for the total levee system. 3. A profile of the levee/floodwall system showing the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), levee and/or wall crest and foundation,and Sheet Numbers: closure locations for the total levee system. 4. A layout detail for the embankment protection measures. Sheet Numbers: 5. Location, layout, and size and shape of the levee embankment features,foundation treatment, Floodwall structure, closure Sheet Numbers: structures, and pump stations. 2. Freeboard a. The minimum freeboard provided above the BFE is: Riverine 3.0 feet or more at the downstream end and throughout ❑ Yes n No 3.5 feet or more at the upstream end ❑ Yes ❑ No 4.0 feet within 100 feet upstream of all structures and/or constrictions U Yes I No Coastal 1.0 foot above the height of the one percent wave associated with the 1%-annual-chance stillwater surge elevation or maximum wave runup(whichever is greater). ❑ Yes ❑ No 2.0 feet above the 1%-annual-chance stillwater surge elevation ❑ Yes [ No Please note,occasionally exceptions are made to the minimum freeboard requirement. If an exception is requested,attach documentation addressing Paragraph 65.10(b)(1)(ii)of the NFIP Regulations. If No is answered to any of the above, please attach an explanation. b. Is there an indication from historical records that ice-jamming can affect the BFE? [J Yes [ No 3. Closures a. Openings through the levee system (check one): n Exists n Does not exist If opening exists, list all closures: Channel Station Left or Right Bank Opening Type Highest Elevation for Type of Closure Device Opening Invert (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference) Note: Geotechnical and geologic data In addition to the required detailed analysis reports, data obtained during field and laboratory investigations and used in the design analysis for the following system features should be submitted in a tabulated summary form. (Reference U.S.Army Corps of Engineers [USACE] EM-1110-2-1906 Form 2086.) Page 4 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 4. Embarkment Protection a. The maximum levee slope land side is: b. The maximum levee slope flood side is: c. The range of velocities along the levee during the base flood is: (min)to (max) d. Embankment material is protected by(describe what kind): e. Riprap Design Parameters(check one): U Velocity n Tractive Stress Attach referrences Reach Sideslope Flow Velocity Curve or Stone Riprap Depth of Toedown Depth Straight D1oo D5o Thickness Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference each entry) f. Is a bedding/filter analysis and design attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No g. Describe the analysis used for other kinds of protection used(include copies of the design analysis): Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 5. Embarkment and Foundation Stability a. Identify locations and describe the basis for selection of critical location for analysis: Overall height: STA: ,height ft. n Limiting foundation soil strength: Strength 4)= degrees,c= psf Slope: SS= (h)to (v) (Repeat as needed on an added sheet for additional locations) b. Specify the embankment stability analysis methodology used(e.g., circular arc, sliding block, infinite slope,etc.): c. Summary of stability analysis results: FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-278) Page 5 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 5. Embarkment and Foundation Stability(continued) Case Loading Conditions Critical Safety Factor Criteria(Min.) End of construction 1.3 II Sudden drawdown 1.0 III Critical flood stage 1.4 IV Steady seepage at flood stage 1.4 VI Earthquake(Case I) 1.0 (Reference: USACE EM-1110-2-1913 Table 6-1) d. Was a seepage analysis for the embankment performed? I I Yes ❑ No If Yes, describe methodology used: e. Was a seepage analysis for the embankment performed? ❑ Yes ❑ No f. Were uplift pressures at the embankment landside toe checked? ❑ Yes ❑ No g. Were seepage exit gradients checked for piping potential? ❑ Yes ❑ No h. The duration of the base flood hydrograph against the embankment is hours. Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 6. Floodwall and Foundation Stability a. Describe analysis submittal based on Code(check one): ❑ UBC (1988) ❑ Other(specify): b. Stability analysis submitted provides for: ❑ Overturning ❑ Sliding ❑ If not, explain: c. Loading included in the analyses were: ❑ Lateral earth @ PA= psf; p = psf ❑ Surcharge-Slope @ n surface psf ❑ Wind @ P,= psf ❑ Seepage(Uplift); ❑ Earthquake @ Pep= %g ❑ 1%-annual-chance significant wave height: ft. n 1%-annual-chance significant wave period: sec. d. Summary of Stability Analysis Results: Factors of Safety. Itemize for each range in site layout dimension and loading condition limitation for each respective reach. Criteria(Min) Sta To Sta To Loading Condition Overturn Sliding Overturn Sliding Overturn Sliding Dead&Wind 1.5 1.5 Dead&Soil 1.5 1.5 Dead, Soil, Flood,& Impact 1.5 1.5 Dead,Soil, &Seismic 1.3 1.3 (Ref: FEMA 114 Sept 1986; USACE EM 1110-2-2502) Note: (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference) FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-278) Page 6 of 9 E.LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) e. Foundation bearing strength for each soil type: Bearing Pressure Sustained Load(psf) Short Term Load(psf) Computed design maximum Maximum allowable f. Foundation scour protection ❑ is, ❑ is not provided. If provided,attach explanation and supporting documentation: Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 7. Settlement a. Has anticipated potential settlement been determined and incorporated into the specified construction elevations to maintain the established freeboard margin? b. The computed settlement range is ft.to ft. c. Settlement of the levee crest is determined to be primarily from : ❑ Foundation consolidation r Embankment compression ❑ Other(Describe): d. Differential settlement of floodwalls E has ❑ has not been accommodated in the structural design and construction Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 8. Interior Drainage a. Specify size of each interior watershed: Drainage to pressure conduit: acres Drainage to ponding area: acres b. Relationship Established: Ponding elevation vs.storage ❑ Yes n No Ponding elevation vs.gravity flow ❑ Yes ❑ No Differential head vs.gravity flow ❑ Yes ❑ No c. The river flow duration curve is enclosed: 0 Yes ❑ No d. Specify the discharge capacity of the head pressure conduit: cfs e. Which flooding conditions were analyzed? Gravity flow(Interior Watershed) n Yes n No Common storm (River Watershed) n Yes ❑ No Historical ponding probability ❑ Yes No Coastal wave overtopping ❑ Yes n No If No for any of the above,attach explanation. f. Interior drainage has been analyzed based on joint probability of interior and exterior flooding and the capacities of pumping and outlet facilities to provide the established level of flood protection. Yes ❑ No If No, attach explanation. g. The rate of seepage through the levee system for the base flood is : cfs h. The length of levee system used to drive this seepage rate in item g: ft. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102 (formerly 086-0-27B) Page 7 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 8. Interior Drainage(continued) Will pumping plants be used for interior drainage? ❑ Yes E No If Yes,include the number of pumping plants: For each pumping plant, list: Plant#1 Plant#2 The number of pumps The ponding storage capacity The maximum pumping rate The maximum pumping head The pumping starting elevation The pumping stopping elevation Is the discharge facility protected? Is there a flood warning plan? How much time is available between warning and flooding? Will the operation be automatic? U Yes U No If the pumps are electric;are there backup power sources? Li Yes U No (Reference: USACE EM-1110-2-3101, 3102, 3103, 3104, and 3105) Include a copy of supporting documentation of data and analysis. Provide a map showing the flooded area and maximum ponding elevations for all interior watersheds that result in flooding. 9. Other Design Criteria a. The following items have been addressed as stated: Liquefaction n is ❑ is not a problem Hydrocompaction ❑ is ❑ is not a problem Heave differential movement due to soils of high shrink/swell ❑ is ❑ is not a problem b. For each of these problems,state the basic facts and corrective action taken: Attach supporting documentation c. If the levee/floodwall is new or enlarged,will the structure adversely impact flood levels and/or flow velocities floodside of the structure? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Sediment Transport Considerations: Was sediment transport considered? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, then fill out Section F (Sediment Transport). If No,then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. 10. Operational Plan and Criteria a. Are the planned/installed works in full compliance with Part 65.10 of the NFIP Regulations? E Yes ❑ No b. Does the operation plan incorporate all the provisions for closure devices as required in Paragraph 65.10(c)(1)of the NFIP regulations? ❑ Yes T No c. Does the operation plan incorporate all the provisions for interior drainage as required in Paragraph 65.10(c)(2)of the NFIP regulations? ❑ Yes ❑ No If the answer is No to any of the above, please attach supporting documentation. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 8 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 11. Maintenance Plan Please attach a copy of the fomal maintenance plan for the levee/floodwall 12. Operational and Maintenance Plan Please attach a copy of the formal Operations and Maintenance Plan for the levee/floodwall. CERTIFICATION OF THE LEVEE DOCUMENTATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a licensed registered professional engineer authorized by law to certify elevation information data, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and any other supporting information as per NFIP regulations paragraph 65.10(e)and as described in the MT-2 Forms Instructions. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Certifier's Name: License No.: Expiration Date: Company Name: Telephone No.: Fax No.: Signature: Date: E-mail Address: CERTIFICATION OF THE LEVEE DOCUMENTATION Flooding Source: Name of Structure: If there is any indication from historical records that sediment transport (including scour and deposition) can affect the Base Flood Elevation (BFE); and/or based on the stream morphology, vegetative cover, development of the watershed and bank conditions, there is a potential for debris and sediment transport(including scour and deposition)to affect the BFEs, then provide the following information along with the supporting documentation: Sediment load associated with the base flood discharge: Volume acres-feet Debris load associated with the base flood discharge: Volume acres-feet Sediment transport rate (percent concentration by volume) Method used to estimate sediment transport: Most sediment transport formulas are intended for a range of hydraulic conditions and sediment sizes; attach a detailed explanation for using the selected method. Method used to estimate scour and/or deposition: Method used to revise hydraulic or hydrologic analysis(model)to account for sediment transport: Please note that bulked flows are used to evaluate the performance of a structure during the base flood; however, FEMA does not map BFEs based on bulked flows. If a sediment analysis has not been performed, an explanation as to why sediment transport(including scour and deposition)will not affect the BFEs or structures must be provided. Page 9 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency OVERVIEW & CONCURRENCE FORM OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 1 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0§552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA) February 15, 2006,71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE:The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however,failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a (NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). A. REQUESTED RESPONSE FROM DHS-FEMA This request is for a(check one): ❑ CLOMR: A letter from DHS-FEMA commenting on whether a proposed project, if built as proposed,would justify a map proposea nyttrrology changes(See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60, 65&72). All CLOMRs require documentation of compliance with the Endangered Species Act. Refer to the Instructions for details. ❑ LOMR:A letter from DHS-FEMA officially revising the current NFIP map to show the changes to floodplains, regulatory floodway or flood elevations. (See 44 CFR Ch. 1, Parts 60,65&72). B. OVERVIEW 1. The NFIP map panel(s)affected for all impacted communities is(are): Community No. Community Name State Map No. Panel No. Effective Date 510130 City of Roanoke VA 51161C0142 0142 SEP 28, 2007 G 2. a. Flooding Source: Peters Creek Tributary C b. Types of Flooding: ❑X Riverine ❑ Coastal [ Shallow Flooding (e.g.,Zones AO and AH) ❑ Alluvial Fan [ Lakes ❑ Other(Attach Description) 3. Project Name/Identifier: Peters Creek Floodplain Mitigation and Constructed Wetlands 4. FEMA zone designations (choices: A,AH,AO,A1-A30,A99,AE, AR,V,V1-V30,VE, B,C, D, X) a. Effective: AE b. Revised: AE MT-2 FORM 1 Page 1 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) 5. Basis for Request and Type of Revision: a. The basis for this revision request is(check all that apply) ❑X Physical Change Improved Methodology/Data QX Regulatory Floodway Revision ❑ Base Map Changes Coastal Analysis E Hydraulic Analysis E Hydrologic Analysis E Corrections Weir-Dam Changes Levee Certification E Alluvial Fan Analysis El Natural Changes E New Topographic Data Li Other(Attach Description) Note: A photograph and narrative description of the area of concern is not required, but is very helpful during review. b. The area of revision encompasses the following structures(check all that apply) Structures: n Channelization n Levee/Floodwall n Bridge/Culvert n Dam Fill Other(Attach Description) 6 0 Documentation of ESA compliance is submitted (required to initiate CLOMR review). Please refer to the instructions for more information. C. REVIEW FEE Has the review fee for the appropriate request category been included? E Yes Fee amount $ 6,500 ❑ No,Attach Explanation - Please see the DHS-FEMA Web site at http://www.fema.gov/forms-documents-and-software/flood- map-related-fees for Fee Amounts and Exemptions. D. SIGNATURES 1. REQUESTOR'S SIGNATURE All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code,Section 1001. Name: Company: Mailing Address: Daytime Telephone: Fax No.: E-mail Address: Date: Signature of Requestor(required): 2.COMMUNITY CONCURRENCE As the community official responsible for floodplain management, I hereby acknowledge that we have received and reviewed this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)or conditional LOMR request. Based upon the community's review,we find the completed or proposed project meets or is designed to meet all of the community floodplain management requirements, including the requirements for when fill is placed in the regulatory floodway, and that all necessary Federal, State, and local permits have been, or in the case of a conditional LOMR, will be obtained. For Conditional LOMR requests, the applicant has documented Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance to FEMA prior to FEMA's review of the Conditional LOMR application. For LOMR requests, I acknowledge that compliance with Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA has been achieved independently of FEMA's process. For actions authorized,funded, or being carried out by Federal or State agencies, documentation from the agency showing its compliance with Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA will be submitted. In addition, we have determined that the land and any existing or proposed structures to be removed from the SFHA are or will be reasonably safe from flooding as defined in 44CFR 65.2(c),and that we have available upon request by FEMA,all analyses and documentation used to make this determination. Community Official's Name and Title: Mailing Address: Community Name: Daytime Telephone: Fax No.: E-mail Address: Community Official's Signature(required): Date: FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) MT-2 FORM 1 Page 2 of 3 3.CERTIFICATION BY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND/OR LAND SURVEYOR This certification is to be signed and sealed by a licensed land surveyor, registered professional engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information data, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and any other supporting information as per NFIP regulations paragraph 65.2(b) and as described in the MT-2 Forms Instructions. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Certifier's Name: Rebecca Stubbs, PE License No.: 062131 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 Company Name: McAdams Mailing Address: 621 Hillsborough Street Telephone No.: 919.361.5000 Fax No.: Suite 500 Raleigh, NC 27603 E-mail Address: rstubbs@mcadamsco.com Rebecca Epdaly signed by Rebecca DN;cn=Rebecca Stubbs,c=US. January 28, 2026 Signature: Stubbs o=Ute.naftO2026.0 1�ated Date: Da 28 13 26 52.05'00' Ensure the forms that are appropriate to your revision request are included in your submittal. Form Name and(Number) Required if... �•`� 'tiA"H of/Oo, Riverine Hydrology and Hydraulics Form(Form 2) New or revised discharges or water- = O� L"'P�: surface elevations =O4 Cif x Riverine Structures Form(Form 3) Channel is modified, addition/revision of • REBECCA STUBBS • bridge/culverts,addition/revision of ♦ ♦ levee/floodwall,addition/revision of dam Lic.No. 062131 • • • E Coastal Analysis Form(Form 4) New or revised coastal elevations 1 t.. i O:, <v v 7 Coastal Structures Form(Form 5) Addition/revision of coastal structure e S ,.40 e ,R %.JONAL 2 ,; �� L Alluvial Fan Flooding Form(Form 6) Flood control measures on alluvial fans ggAl.0040) MT-2 FORM 1 Page 3 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-100(formerly 086-0-27) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency RIVERINE HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS FORM (FORM 2) OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0 §552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA)February 15, 2006, 71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE:The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however,failure to provide the information requested may delay or prevent FEMA from processing a determination regarding a requested change to a(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). Flooding Source: Peters Creek Tributary C Note: Fill out one form for each flooding source studied A. HYDROLOGY 1. Reason for New Hydrologic Analysis (check all that apply): ❑X Not revised(skip to section B) ❑ No existing analysis ❑ Improved data ❑ Alternative methodology ❑ Proposed Conditions(CLOMR) ❑ Changed physical condition of watershed 2. Comparison of Representative 1%-Annual-Chance Discharges Location Drainage Area(Sq.Mi.) Effective/FIS(cfs) Revised(cfs) 3. Methodology for New Hydrologic Analysis (check all that apply) ❑ Precipitation/Runoff Model-' Specify Model: Duration: Rainfall Amount: n Statistical Analysis of Gage Records ❑ Regional Regression Equations [ Other(please attach description) Please enclose all relevant models in digital format, maps,computations(including computation of parameters), and documentation to support the new analysis. 4. Review/Approval of Analysis If your community requires a regional,state,or federal agency to review the hydrologic analysis, please attach evidence of approval/review. 4. HEC-RAS File Description**: 5. Impacts of Sediment Transport on Hydrology Is the hydrology for the revised flooding source(s)affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes LI No If yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No,then attach your explanation. Page 1 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) B. HYDRAULICS 1. Reach to be Revised Description Cross Section Water-Surface Elevation(ft.) Effective Proposed/Revised Downstream Limit* Peters Creek Tributary C 123 1021.40 1020.59 Upstream Limit* Peters Creek Tributary C 2458 1040.70 1040.67 *Proposed/Revised elevations must tie-into the Effective elevations within 0.5 foot at the downstream and upstream limits of revision. 2. Hydraulic Method/Model Used: HEC-RAS 6.3.1 E Steady State E Unsteady State �X One-Dimensional n Two-Dimentional 3. Pre-Submittal Review of Hydraulic Models* DHS-FEMA has developed two review programs, CHECK-2 and CHECK-RAS, to aid in the review of HEC-2 and HEC-RAS hydraulic models, respectively. We recommend that you review your HEC-2 and HEC-RAS models with CHECK-2 and CHECK-RAS. 4. HEC-RAS File Description**: Models Submitted Natural Run Floodway Run Datum Duplicate Effective Model* File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Trib C Duplicate Effective Trib C Duplicate EffectiveNAVD88 Floodway Corrected Effective Model* File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Trib C Corrected Effective Trib C Corrected Effective NAVD88 Floodway Existing or Pre Project File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Conditions Model Revised or Post Project File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: Conditions Model Trib C Proposed Conditions Trib C Proposed Conditions NAVD88 Floodway Other-(attach description) File Name: Plan Name: File Name: Plan Name: * For details, refer to the corresponding section of the instructions. **See instructions for information about modeling other then HEC-RAS. Digital Models Submitted?(Required) C. MAPPING REQUIREMENTS A certified topographic work map must be submitted showing the following information (where applicable): the boundaries of the effective, existing, and proposed conditions 1%-annual-chance floodplain (for approximate Zone A revisions) or the boundaries of the 1%- and 0.2%- annual-chance floodplains and regulatory floodway(for detailed Zone AE, AO, and AH revisions); location and alignment of all cross sections with stationing control indicated; stream, road, and other alignments (e.g., dams, levees, etc.); current community easements and boundaries; boundaries of the requester's property; certification of a registered professional engineer registered in the subject State; location and description of reference marks; and the referenced vertical datum(NGVD, NAVD,etc.). Topographic Information: 111 Digital Mapping(GIS/CADD)Data Submitted (preferred) Source: Field Survey by H&B Surveying and Mapping I Date: Jan 26, 2024 Vertical Datum: NAVD88 Spatial Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Virginia South Accuracy: Note that the boundaries of the existing or proposed conditions floodplains and regulatory floodway to be shown on the revised FIRM and/or FBFM must tie-in with the effective floodplain and regulatory floodway boundaries. Please attach a copy of the effective FIRM and/or FBFM, at the same scale as the original, annotated to show the boundaries of the revised 1%-and 0.2%-annual-chance floodplains and regulatory floodway that tie-in with the boundaries of the effective 1%-and 0.2%-annual-chance floodplain and regulatory floodway at the upstream and downstream limits of the area on revision. ❑X Annotated FIRM and/or FBFM (Required) FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) Page 2 of 3 D.COMMON REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS* 1. For LOMR/CLOMR requests,do Base Flood Elevations (BFEs)or Special Flood Hazard Areas(SFHAs)increase compared to the effective BFEs? [ Yes ❑ No If Yes, please attach proof of property owner notification. Examples of property owner notifications can be found in the MT-2 Form 2 Instructions. 2. For CLOMR requests, if either of the following is true. please submit evidence of compliance with Section 65.12 of the NFIP regulations: • The proposed project encroaches upon a regulatory floodway and would result in increases above 0.00 foot compared to pre-project conditions. • The proposed project encroaches upon a SFHA with or without BFEs established and would result in increases above 1.00 foot compared to pre-project conditions. 3. Does the request involve the placement or proposed placement of fill? [ Yes n No If Yes, the community must be able to certify that the area to be removed from the special flood hazard area, to include any structures or proposed structures, meets all of the standards of the local floodplain ordinances, and is reasonably safe from flooding in accordance with the NFIP regulations set forth at 44 CFR 60.3(A)(3), 65.5(a)(4),and 65.6(a)(14). Please see the MT-2 instructions for more information. 4. Does the request involve the placement or proposed placement of fill? N Yes E No If Yes, attach evidence of regulatory floodway revision notification. As per Paragraph 65.7(b)(1) of the NFIP Regulations, notification is required for requests involving revisions to the regulatory floodway Elements and examples of regulatory floodway revision notification can be found in the MT-2 Form 2 Instructions. 5. For CLOMR requests, please submit documentation to FEMA and the community to show that you have complied with Sections 9 and 10 of the Endangered Species Act(ESA). For actions authorized,funded,or being carried out by Federal or State agencies, please submit documentation from the agency showing its compliance with Section 7(a)(2)of the ESA. Please see the MT-2 instructions for more detail. ESA Compliance is currently under permitting. 401/404 and USFWS permits and correspondence will be provided as available prior to final approval . Page 3 of 3 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-101 (formerly 086-0-27A) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency RIVERINE STRUCTURES FORM (FORM 3) OMB Control Number: 1660-0016 Expiration: 1/31/2024 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response. The burden estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing, reviewing, and submitting the form. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collections Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472 , Paperwork Reduction Project (1660-0016). Submission of the form is required to obtain or retain benefits under the National Flood Insurance Program. Please do not send your completed survey to the above address. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY: The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448,as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234. PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): This information is being collected for the purpose of determining an applicant's eligibility to request changes to National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). ROUTINE USE(S): The information on this form may be disclosed as generally permitted under 5 U.S.0§552a(b)of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. This includes using this information as necessary and authorized by the routine uses published in DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA-1 National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP); Letter of Map Amendment(LOMA)February 15, 2006,71 FR 7990. DISCLOSURE:The disclosure of information on this form is voluntary; however, failure to provide the information requested may delay or Flooding Source:Peters Creek Tributary C Note: Fill out one form for each flooding source studied A. GENERAL Complete the appropriate section(s)for each Structure listed below: Channelization: complete Section B Bridge/Culvert: complete Section C Dam: complete Section D Levee/Floodwall: complete Section E Sediment Transport: complete Section F(if required) Description Of Modeled Structure 1. Name of Structure: Peters Creek Tributary C Stream Enhancement Type (check one): n Channelization E Bridge/Culvert E Levee/Floodwall El Dam Location of Structure: within stream Downstream Limit/Cross Section: 123 Upstream Limit/Cross Section: 438 2. Name of Structure: Type (check one): n Channelization E Bridge/Culvert E Levee/Floodwall E Dam Location of Structure: Downstream Limit/Cross Section: Upstream Limit/Cross Section: 3. Name of Structure: Type (check one): U Channelization ❑ Bridge/Culvert n Levee/Floodwall U Dam Location of Structure: Downstream Limit/Cross Section: Upstream Limit/Cross Section: NOTE: FOR MORE STRUCTURES,ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NEEDED. Page 1 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) B. CHANNELIZATION Flooding Source: Peters Creek Tributary C Name of Structure: Peters Creek Tributary C Stream Enhancement 1. Hydraulic Considerations The channel was designated to carry 654 (cfs)and/or the -year flood The design elevation in the channel is based on (check one): ❑X Subcritical flow ❑ Critical flow n Supercritical flow ❑ Energy grade line If there is the potential for a hydraulic jump at the following locations, check all that apply and attach an explanation of how the hydraulic jump is controlled without affecting the stability of the channel. n Inlet to channel ❑ Outlet to channel E At Drop Structures E At Transitions ❑ Other locations(specify): 2. Channel Design Plans Attach the plans of the channelization certified by a registered professional engineer,as described in the instructions. 3. Accessory Structures The channelization includes(check one): ❑ Levees[Attach Section E (Levee/Floodwall)] [ Drop structures E Superelevated sections ❑ Energy dissipater U Transitions in cross sectional geometry E Debris basin/detention basin [Attach Section D (Dam/Basin)] ❑ Weir n Other(Describe): 4. Sediment Transport Considerations Are the hydraulics of the channel affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes U No If yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No, then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. C. BRIDGE/CULVERT Flooding Source: Name of Structure: 1. This revision reflects(check one): ❑ Bridge/Culvert not modeled in the FIS ❑ Modified Bridge/Culvert previously modeled in the FIS ❑ Revised analysis of Bridge/Culvert previously modeled in the FIS 2. Hydraulic model used to analyze the structure(e.g., HEC-2 with special bridge routine,WSPRO, HY8): If different than hydraulic analysis for the flooding source,justify why the hydraulic analysis used for the flooding source could not analyze the structures. Attach justification. 3. Attach plans of the structures certified by a registered professional engineer. The plan detail and information should include the following(check the information that has been provided): ❑ Dimensions(height,width,span, radius,length) [ Distance between Cross Sections ❑ Shape(culverts only) ❑ Erosion Protection ❑ Material ❑ Low Chord Elevations -Upstream and Downstream n Beveling and Rounding ❑ Top of Road Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Wink Wall Angle ❑ Structure Invert Elevations -Upstream and Downstream n Skew Angle ❑ Stream Invert Elevations -Upstream and Downstream ❑ Cross-Section Locations 4. Sediment Transport Considerations Are the hydraulics of the channel affected by sediment transport? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport)of Form 3. If No, then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 2 of 9 D. DAM/BASIN Flooding Source: Name of Structure: 1. This request is for(check one): n Existing Dam/Basin New Dam/Basin E Modification of existing Dam/Basin 2. The Dam/Basin was designed by(check one): E Federal Agency State Agency ❑ Private Organization n Local Government Agency Name of the Agency or Organization: 3. The Darn was permitted as(check one): El Federal Dam n State Dam Provide the permit or identification number(ID)for the dam and the appropriate permitting agency or organization Permit or ID number Permitting Agency or Organization a. n Local Government Dam Private Dam Provided related drawings, specification and supporting design information. 4. Does the project involve revised hydrology? ❑ Yes No If Yes, complete the Riverine Hydrology&Hydraulics Form(Form 2). Was the dam/basin designed using critical duration storm?(must account for the maximum volume of runoff) • Yes, provide supporting documentation with your completed Form 2. U No, provide a written explanation and justification for not using the critical duration storm. 5. Does the submittal include debris/sediment yield analysis? n Yes [ No If Yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport). If No,then attach your explanation for why debris/sediment analysis was not considered? 6. Does the Base Flood Elevation behind the dam/basin or downstream of the dam/basin change? Li Yes _ No If Yes,complete the Riverine Hydrology& Hydraulics Form (Form 2)and complete the table below. Stillwater Elevation Behind the Dam/Basin FREQUENCY(%annual chance) FIS REVISED 10-year(10%) 50-year(2%) 100-year(1%) 500-year(0.2%) Normal Pool Elevation 7. Please attach a copy of the formal Operation and Maintenance Plan E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL 1. System Elements a. This Levee/Floodwall analysis is based on (check one): Upgrading of A newly Reanalysis of Ei an existing constructed an existing levee/floodwall 1-1 levee/floodwall U levee/floodwall system system system b. Levee elements and locations are(check one): ❑ Earthen embankment,dike, berm,etc Stationed to ❑ Structured floodwall Stationed to ❑ Other(describe): Stationed to Page 3 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102 (formerly 086-0-278) E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) c. Structural Type(check one): (— Monolithic cast-in place reinforced concrete E Reinforced concrete masonry block ❑ Sheet piling C Other(describe): d. Has this levee/floodwall system been certified by a Federal agency to provide protection from the base flood? n Yes [ No If Yes, by which agency? e. Attach certified drawings containing the following information(indicate drawing sheet numbers): 1. Plan of the levee embankment and floodwall structures. Sheet Numbers: 2. A profile of the levee/floodwall system showing the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), levee and/or wall crest and foundation,and Sheet Numbers: closure locations for the total levee system. 3. A profile of the levee/floodwall system showing the Base Flood Elevation (BEE), levee and/or wall crest and foundation,and Sheet Numbers: closure locations for the total levee system. 4. A layout detail for the embankment protection measures. Sheet Numbers: 5. Location, layout, and size and shape of the levee embankment features,foundation treatment, Floodwall structure,closure Sheet Numbers: structures, and pump stations. 2. Freeboard a. The minimum freeboard provided above the BFE is: Riverine 3.0 feet or more at the downstream end and throughout ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.5 feet or more at the upstream end n Yes ❑ No 4.0 feet within 100 feet upstream of all structures and/or constrictions ❑ Yes ❑ No Coastal 1.0 foot above the height of the one percent wave associated with the 1%-annual-chance stillwater surge elevation or maximum wave runup(whichever is greater). ❑ Yes (— No 2.0 feet above the 1%-annual-chance stillwater surge elevation ❑ Yes n No Please note, occasionally exceptions are made to the minimum freeboard requirement. If an exception is requested,attach documentation addressing Paragraph 65.10(b)(1)(ii)of the NFIP Regulations. If No is answered to any of the above, please attach an explanation. b. Is there an indication from historical records that ice-jamming can affect the BFE? ❑ Yes n No 3. Closures a. Openings through the levee system (check one): ❑ Exists ❑ Does not exist If opening exists, list all closures: Channel Station Left or Right Bank Opening Type Highest Elevation for Type of Closure Device Opening Invert (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference) Note: Geotechnical and geologic data In addition to the required detailed analysis reports, data obtained during field and laboratory investigations and used in the design analysis for the following system features should be submitted in a tabulated summary form. (Reference U.S.Army Corps of Engineers [USACE]EM-1110-2-1906 Form 2086.) Page 4 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 4. Embarkment Protection a. The maximum levee slope land side is: b. The maximum levee slope flood side is: c. The range of velocities along the levee during the base flood is: (min)to (max) d. Embankment material is protected by(describe what kind): e. Riprap Design Parameters(check one): Velocity Tractive Stress Attach referrences Reach Sideslope Flow Velocity Curve or Stone Riprap Depth of Toedown Depth Straight D1oo D50 Thickness Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to Sta to (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference each entry) f. Is a bedding/filter analysis and design attached? I I Yes ❑ No g. Describe the analysis used for other kinds of protection used(include copies of the design analysis): Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 5. Embarkment and Foundation Stability a. Identify locations and describe the basis for selection of critical location for analysis: n Overall height: STA: , height ft. Limiting foundation soil strength: Strength it,= degrees,c= psf Slope: SS= (h)to _ (v) (Repeat as needed on an added sheet for additional locations) b. Specify the embankment stability analysis methodology used (e.g.,circular arc, sliding block, infinite slope,etc.): c. Summary of stability analysis results: Page 5 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 5. Embarkment and Foundation Stability(continued) Case Loading Conditions Critical Safety Factor Criteria(Min.) End of construction 1.3 II Sudden drawdown 1.0 III Critical flood stage 1.4 IV Steady seepage at flood stage 1.4 VI Earthquake(Case I) 1.0 (Reference: USACE EM-1110-2-1913 Table 6-1) d. Was a seepage analysis for the embankment performed? ❑ Yes H No If Yes,describe methodology used: e. Was a seepage analysis for the embankment performed? ❑ Yes ❑ No f. Were uplift pressures at the embankment landside toe checked? ❑ Yes Li No g. Were seepage exit gradients checked for piping potential? ❑ Yes ❑ No h. The duration of the base flood hydrograph against the embankment is hours. Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 6. Floodwall and Foundation Stability a. Describe analysis submittal based on Code(check one): ❑ UBC(1988) ❑ Other(specify): b. Stability analysis submitted provides for: ❑ Overturning ❑ Sliding ❑ If not,explain: c. Loading included in the analyses were: ❑ Lateral earth @ PA= psf; P,= _ psf f Surcharge-Slope @ ❑ surface psf ❑ Wind @ P. = psf ❑ Seepage(Uplift); ❑ Earthquake @ P,= %g ❑ 1%-annual-chance significant wave height: ft. ❑ 1%-annual-chance significant wave period: sec. d. Summary of Stability Analysis Results: Factors of Safety. Itemize for each range in site layout dimension and loading condition limitation for each respective reach. Loading Condition Criteria(Min) Sta To Sta To Overturn Sliding Overturn Sliding Overturn Sliding Dead&Wind 1.5 1.5 Dead&Soil 1.5 1.5 Dead, Soil, Flood,& Impact 1.5 1.5 Dead, Soil, &Seismic 1.3 1.3 (Ref: FEMA 114 Sept 1986; USACE EM 1110-2-2502) Note: (Extend table on an added sheet as needed and reference) FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 6 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) e. Foundation bearing strength for each soil type: Bearing Pressure Sustained Load (psf) Short Term Load(psf) Computed design maximum Maximum allowable f. Foundation scour protection ❑ is, ❑ is not provided. If provided,attach explanation and supporting documentation: Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 7. Settlement a. Has anticipated potential settlement been determined and incorporated into the specified construction elevations to maintain the established freeboard margin? b. The computed settlement range is ft.to ft. c. Settlement of the levee crest is determined to be primarily from : ❑ Foundation consolidation Embankment compression ❑ Other(Describe): d. Differential settlement of floodwalls has ❑ has not been accommodated in the structural design and construction Attach engineering analysis to support construction plans. 8. Interior Drainage a. Specify size of each interior watershed: Drainage to pressure conduit: acres Drainage to ponding area: acres b. Relationship Established: Ponding elevation vs. storage n Y• es ❑ No Ponding elevation vs.gravity flow n Y• es ❑ No Differential head vs.gravity flow ❑ Yes ❑ N• o c. The river flow duration curve is enclosed: n Y• es ❑ No d. Specify the discharge capacity of the head pressure conduit: cfs e. Which flooding conditions were analyzed? Gravity flow(Interior Watershed) n Y• es ❑ No Common storm (River Watershed) Yes n N• o Historical ponding probability n Yes n No Coastal wave overtopping ❑ Yes n N• o If No for any of the above,attach explanation. f. Interior drainage has been analyzed based on joint probability of interior and exterior flooding and the capacities of pumping and outlet facilities to provide the established level of flood protection. U Yes No If No,attach explanation. g. The rate of seepage through the levee system for the base flood is : cfs h. The length of levee system used to drive this seepage rate in item g: ft. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 7 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 8. Interior Drainage(continued) Will pumping plants be used for interior drainage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, include the number of pumping plants: For each pumping plant, list: Plant#1 Plant#2 The number of pumps The ponding storage capacity The maximum pumping rate The maximum pumping head The pumping starting elevation The pumping stopping elevation Is the discharge facility protected? Is there a flood warning plan? How much time is available between warning and flooding? Will the operation be automatic? ❑ Yes (i No If the pumps are electric;are there backup power sources? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Reference: USACE EM-1110-2-3101, 3102, 3103, 3104, and 3105) Include a copy of supporting documentation of data and analysis. Provide a map showing the flooded area and maximum ponding elevations for all interior watersheds that result in flooding. 9. Other Design Criteria a. The following items have been addressed as stated: Liquefaction n is [ is not a problem Hydrocompaction ❑ is [ is not a problem Heave differential movement due to soils of high shrink/swell ❑ is [ is not a problem b. For each of these problems, state the basic facts and corrective action taken: Attach supporting documentation c. If the levee/floodwall is new or enlarged,will the structure adversely impact flood levels and/or flow velocities floodside of the structure? ❑ Yes ( I No d. Sediment Transport Considerations: Was sediment transport considered? ❑ Yes n No If Yes,then fill out Section F(Sediment Transport). If No,then attach your explanation for why sediment transport was not considered. 10. Operational Plan and Criteria a. Are the planned/installed works in full compliance with Part 65.10 of the NFIP Regulations? fl Yes n No b. Does the operation plan incorporate all the provisions for closure devices as required in Paragraph 65.10(c)(1)of the NFIP regulations? ❑ Yes ❑ No c. Does the operation plan incorporate all the provisions for interior drainage as required in Paragraph 65.10(c)(2)of the NFIP regulations? ❑ Yes Li No If the answer is No to any of the above, please attach supporting documentation. FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102(formerly 086-0-27B) Page 8 of 9 E. LEVEE/FLOODWALL(CONTINUED) 11. Maintenance Plan Please attach a copy of the fomal maintenance plan for the levee/floodwall 12. Operational and Maintenance Plan Please attach a copy of the formal Operations and Maintenance Plan for the levee/floodwall. CERTIFICATION OF THE LEVEE DOCUMENTATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a licensed registered professional engineer authorized by law to certify elevation information data, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and any other supporting information as per NFIP regulations paragraph 65.10(e)and as described in the MT-2 Forms Instructions. All documents submitted in support of this request are correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1001. Certifiers Name: License No.: Expiration Date: Company Name: Telephone No.: Fax No.: Signature: Date: E-mail Address: CERTIFICATION OF THE LEVEE DOCUMENTATION Flooding Source: Name of Structure: If there is any indication from historical records that sediment transport (including scour and deposition) can affect the Base Flood Elevation (BFE); and/or based on the stream morphology, vegetative cover, development of the watershed and bank conditions, there is a potential for debris and sediment transport(including scour and deposition)to affect the BFEs,then provide the following information along with the supporting documentation: Sediment load associated with the base flood discharge: Volume acres-feet Debris load associated with the base flood discharge: Volume acres-feet Sediment transport rate (percent concentration by volume) Method used to estimate sediment transport: Most sediment transport formulas are intended for a range of hydraulic conditions and sediment sizes; attach a detailed explanation for using the selected method. Method used to estimate scour and/or deposition: Method used to revise hydraulic or hydrologic analysis(model)to account for sediment transport: Please note that bulked flows are used to evaluate the performance of a structure during the base flood; however, FEMA does not map BFEs based on bulked flows. If a sediment analysis has not been performed, an explanation as to why sediment transport(including scour and deposition)will not affect the BFEs or structures must be provided. Page 9 of 9 FEMA FORM FF-206-FY-21-102 (formerly 086-0-27B) Sediment Transport Considerations Statement Following is the required documentation to satisfy Sediment Transport Considerations as listed on MT-2 Form 3, Page 2 of 11, Section C—Part 4. Based on the existing conditions of Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C, and the proposed design of the restored stream channel, the hydraulics of the stream are not likely to affect sediment transport in a way that would promote scour or deposition that would affect the Base Flood Elevation. The restored channel dimensions and riffle-pool sequences provide energy dissipation, bank stabilization, and will maintain the stream's natural sediment transport processes. Structure No-Impact Certification This is to certify that I am a duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in the State of Virginia. This further certifies that no structures* are located in the areas that would be affected by base flood elevation increases for Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C in Roanoke,VA, associated with the proposed floodplain benching, stream improvements, and stormwater wetlands along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C as part of the Peters Creek Floodplain Mitigation and Constructed Wetlands project. *A structure, as defined by FEMA 44 CFR 59.1, is a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank,that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. Structure, for insurance purposes, means: (1)A building with two or more outside rigid walls and a fully secured roof that is affixed to a permanent site; (2)A manufactured home ("a manufactured home,"also known as a mobile home, is a structure: built on a permanent chassis, transported to its site in one or more sections, and affixed to a permanent foundation}; or (3) A travel trailer without wheels, built on a chassis and affixed to a permanent foundation, that is regulated under the community's floodplain management and building ordinances or laws. Rebecca =abliY agned by Rebecca ON:c=Rebecca Stubbs.ctUS. Stubbs Data:2028 01.28 13:28:10-05'00' N/A (Case Number) (Signature) January 28, 2026 Practice Lead, Stream Restoration (Date) (Title) Seal: `a, 4, PLTH o fr ,' • O� � • o • REBECCA STUBBS• •• • Lic.No.062131 • • • 0.,ONAL v;01- i `~ 1••••44. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 Public Notification for Peters Creek Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) The Roanoke Times-https://roanoke.com/ads/community/announcements/legal/ The City of Roanoke is proposing a floodplain "bench" project along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C near Northwood Dr. NW, Meadowbrook Rd. NW, Laura Rd. NW and Peters Creek Rd. NW. The objective of the proposed project is to to reduce flood impacts to roadways and buildings in the area. In accordance with National Flood Insurance Program regulation 65.7(b)(1),the City of Roanoke hereby gives notice of intent to revise the 1-percent annual chance floodway, floodplain and corresponding flood elevations(known as the"Base Flood Elevations", BFEs)along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C from approximately 0.4 miles downstream of Cove Rd. NW to approximately 600 ft. upstream of Peach Tree Dr. NW in the City of Roanoke.The flood hazard revisions are being proposed as part of Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) Case No. [insert Case No.] for the proposed floodplain project along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C. These changes will be reflected in the Community's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) which depict the floodplain-the area that has been determined to be subject to a 1-percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year.The regulatory floodway is the portion of the floodplain that includes the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land area that must be reserved to discharge the base(1-percent-annual-chance)flood without cumulatively increasing the water-surface elevation by more than a designated height.The FIRM portrays the floodplain and floodway and is used to help the community with floodplain management. Once the project has been completed, a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR) request will be submitted that will, in part, revise the following flood hazards along Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C: 1. the floodway and 1-percent annual chance floodplain variably widens and narrows, 2. the 1 percent annual chance water-surface elevations will increase and decrease variably within the area of revision Maps and detailed analysis of the revision can be reviewed online at [ArcGIS WebMap URL here]. For questions about the study, please contact the Stormwater Utility at (540) 853-5900. For general questions regarding building and development, please contact the Department of Planning, Building, & Development at(540)853-1730. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE Permits that comply with the ESA requirements of the CLOMR application are currently being pursued.The 401/404 permit and coordination with US Fish and Wildlife will be provided when they are received, prior to final approval of the CLOMR application. SUMMARY OF RESULTS PETERS CREEK Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C—Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 F a _ I } F 2 " gliF 8188 88 , , . 88 , 888888 , . , 8 88 8 818 8� ,i .E , 8' ,1 8 . , 8 , . , cod 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 Oi0 0 0 O.O oI j O O O a t NN m tiry 0 , NM8 ,0 I I .K• d [m 0 0 0 8 $ , 0 8 , , , 0 0 0 0 0 0; , „ 0 0 0 0 0 o o . . 8 , , , . L 0o0 qQ oo do0000{ 00000oO� 1 o I o a a °o j iv *A 10180 , . . , '60 , , , 06 , , , 000'00881 , o000000l ,! o{ .i I00 , ,38 , . , , v` Id id o 010 o 0 0 0 0 O 0 oi o 0 0 0 0 0 0� of , 'to Id 3 y I I j 1 , I 1 ,nio;o ,n 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 ,n o , ,n o o ,n1 , o O p ,n O 0 0 ,nj010 0 o O 0p 0 0 N Fl! O !,-4 O -4 1 �' . S -4 -4 .a-, .rn-, ,-5 . . . .M O M -4€ m ti n l9 l0 .a-. rn-. -,-i ,-, .-1I e-,,. N N , m m N m �i I1 ! Iil l i u yn i .gcrti..t Ory ry § OQ QgmgiK ni rn R A K R Q R R R K Q A I O 8 O 8 § 2 m'R. S S R P i i 00. 0000. . 0000000 .. in 000000 .rn .. vi,n ,.. in ininu ,. .. . .. .. .1 . .. .. ....n. n ' ui. I 01 •1 - o; ew vg v 01 0I 1 01 v vv .,01 v v 00 0 01 m 00i00 00 °mv°clv m m c 0l 01 ` 0th v v?10 v . . v ew1..m v E E u �_ R,NR , SS; . M1288 , 836leat , 8g651 6468 , �° 8R .1R8fi88; o1P: `S,6`,.fi8c�`!9c^ ^ 86d p 73. z O I O�10 O 00 O'O O O O 0 0 0 0000000 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-i O !0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O'.4 0 ` i O c I II { I d m ry, ry pp� 1�[[1 �p 8 m o p 8ppi m p m' [8 m tp ! pp A{pp Q U t W.-. 0 O YO N 0 of 01 W N n o s m ni d C ri l N 0 Mf,0 O r i,nii M N O W W C N M m v 10;n ff ni 01 01 y1 00 0 00 e. n n ui ni O to v 10 m in I lC O e o cf en (en nI ry C ri en lU ui ui den ni O121S S Sp1 rn o1 S pp Spp pp S n n n n n 81.8 8 g81 8 6 6 v v m M m im m M m N N NUN 8 N 8 8 1 e i.l'y!O O 0 0 O O�O o Oi0 0 0 0 0 0 Of0 O 0�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 10fo1oo Eo 0:010 0 0 0,0 °i 1p LL � 1 1 E l I ;ac 0 n M v O m Pk? rnon{nu ry Q rvrnm 1 �, �rnn m m M �. -- _ �m n � 0°.+ ', JA pO , Op n n .i rt0 , O n4 0 mni v , ni ONm1aOmC e 1�nNnNNN `Ell �� ssss ss ssss sss ss = _ sssssis.s II j I 3 p lS''S p O O . . 8• S , n R in 8 8 m . . ,On;Lnio O an O , s �l� i I I I ! f i 1 "m ! i t r ( € q o:,0;0 0 pp 0 pp p o 0 0,0 m 8O p p $ V r. rn O10 , , , 1n S O, n Ci S OI.S O S O N!.-, S 0 S� 00 , 01 9 O .i{ -, o m 0 0 O N O .-r .ti .y 0 0!O O ..4 O ..0 O I O O _> I 7 1 "'I O10 O ' OO 8p 8oO I O�O!O8p Ol8O i ' O 1 p 1 O ' ' �$ W -' I - SFv O n Qi 8i S . O ,n i O O,r l0 Ot C N M 0 ' m.-i n d v m �= $ig;§ g o 0 0 0 1-1 ,o o o,1-1 o o o o I jI w8 1 s = a c 0 0 0 0 0 000000 8p 00000 0 0 0 F., _ a m N S ,n C r S O m.-a OJ O .n S 00 to m n N E N ,n n F m O .' GO , ut N o N m N m l0 O to V m , , N , l0 a E - - � 8 s� ' ins ss2H - ill s -i sN Ns E E ag E. N X _ , 1 , c I 4 LL W a o o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oCo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,n o an o 0 0 0 0�0 0 090(0 000;o an u, o 0 0 0.0 : O .-i C pNp N �pn� O vi n o ni f V Ei p. m ."i.a 1Z 01 m m .a 00 !.Q Q s Epp k.o N r‹II N ft r: p9.-i I n ton vn r�i ui �sg u O "' m n*i § ,n uni N �l g� R R % n n 0 Iv N 6 S o 8 7A.N Uie .M vt n P 0 t71 N . 8 2 P 1Iry, ,fit m m1t� 8 to . V iO t, .7, .--+ `u �Smwwwl —,Dintn ,n,ntui ,n ,nui .nvavmmNNNNNN .� .-, �'!o 8i l�+i�i bi moa 7So ,-, .n-, n .r-, .r-,(r-, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i N N N NIN N N N N N N N N N N N N N NIrV .", .-Ii.-,,..i .-, . .-1 .-, ti O K I I I V. k 2 , J i Dc. m N N N �Np W opD D ' pup, " M T 01 1M1p - (W W �qp tfi �gl 7, 2 o m Epp N N N W yw pw oA A ib. . . . . .. . . . . . 23 pap gyp ma dap dap vvi vvii ts, pv�pi 6�1 c, R !..' '`.', N I N A 01 N § N Vi 01 O 01 N v1 A 10 o vl ,- 01 A W z 81 t0 4 8 6 ,2 L N S v1 1A-' v1 O W ql A 4q pp A W DI-+ si! m 2: 2 00 V V 0 O0 M P 011 0 W 0 h' N A W N W W W N V o N 0 N W cri0 L O O O!' 00 0 0 O 0 'n 0 00 ,n 0 V O T x 000000000000000000000ofnt000O000PP000lnom000tnoin0000ioo 8 s I I ! II il o m xl U _ Lq • • , MM • , OvsMUgg , • g ill 88sss • mod. $80000 `8080 $°08000 o8o $ o g 00000 2 ag n N 24 n n �p �p�p �p i o , m 4 4 4 4 4 W M W 1§ ID:D tD��ypq 8 i 8 S O O O O —at vi • 01 V V M W t0 • • . W Cil A 01 00 N a V W O 10 S m ' �7i CW r0 N u1 M t d N F+V V1 V 1-+ V N N W �o � 000 �� 000 �� 0000 o8og8 0 88l300 _ _ 0 3 ; _e o o P o o p Ppp tp+O �O{pp t-' P�p {o{pp t+pPQ� �O�pp p Ppp f o{pp�+ pPpp O Ppp r o 0 {0p o O 1+ P o O • • O O O O P O O 8 8 8 8 o O P o S 0 0 O 8 0 O O O O 8 V ^O1 t. R v R c 0 ..+1 .pJ1.J �Np 4y.1 ,pp,tpa pN,i A,1, AW1�1 yW gyp+Oo pp+ .p f+!,O.t �Q p� 1NY .J pN !W± ^ 2 O • • O O O W 01 P • O P N O O P O w 01I8 • 61 to "' O W a M W W O W cc G s }Q �Wp tp �Q tp X v1p1 01 01 G1 t�01N0 t.10 . W r ,Gi �t�S �Q ...B pp Ap pp j !M+.� y1yJ y vy11 pp {p �V1 {(pp pp pp pp{tpp K��+11 8 S S 8 S 8 S S 8 S S S S S 8 A ib A tto 81 A 00 W K 01 @ m W W V 1�N 1V bl IW+A V OI 01 l0 O O V N N F+ W A d ' a to ' V1 @ 00 tO M+ N N a V V o pp 1Y pp�� pppp pp N V M N pp��.... Claw , d V1 W V ....? C f O 00 Ol W 01 CO W 4p 00 V 01 O 00 O D W n i 35 `53`3 `3 `MID - 8383 83�� 1�i� ffi83 St � S2 lg •- •• 21 1 2 3 �Wp {Qp� �4p� {lpp ltpp 14pQ 35 p �p � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,,R ut 01 01 01 V V OD 00\D t+ N W W A A m W O N!A Ol V V W O O N N N 1� A. F+ , 1+1� M+ V OO F+ N N W N' 0p T V lO W g ♦+ t V U1 gp� tpp p� 1+�V 00 V - N° I- pp W pp t/� !�t'pp� Oppp V �V1 M+ N�Ntpp N A A �V�+ai V1 Vyy1 MO+�i{S/71 O� �5t�pp1 pNp W ! ('� V A O M+b 01 b W W t0 01 A V l0 W V V M+ O 1 N A N A M+ O N $ O1 M W MF+ 01 W MW+ 0 0 V t0 N i I 00'© W 00 W W ....2 * 1D i 1 1 0 ' O F. O A P P P P P r P P P P P P P 0 P P P P P P O P P 0 0 0 O P P P P P P P P P P PPAPPOP ^ o v. a SN NWWw`1IE8GW `9t91g 41R8183ffleTeffl6 c.2a �3G28881ao" 8e RES ' 13M ' 13t4�.+ K11Ea0�° °°' a 0 vy n . n R I 1 1 1 .... AA A A A A A D D A A A D'A . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . pppp pp D A D D D D A A D D D A A A A A D°t➢1 At°R A'tR A .. . ... . AD V1 D D A A .1 C - rgN § °V2mmV„ g �;mNo t ,b8 22 `N , NN • N000V. 0 � a0 o^ 0 0 0to00000 ioo 00oVvNoVV ootoo oo 0 o A3NIo .I _ v1 to N W vt N ut to to N v1 to v1 M vt v1 to vi 1n u1 v1 v1 to vi to v1 v1 to to to to to to M to v1 M M f v+ v1 v1 v1 v1 v1 l to v1 #S ]° 3 3 iin I 8 N N N N W N W W W M-., ,, N N M+ M+., M+ M+ ., N N N W W !! 8p�8 8�p W pppp�p W W S N N N p O D p1 i O a 01 8{ 8 gq G to g w W 8 8 0 V • V V • V A W 0 A M-W O S S O O O W vl O O O O O V1 O.O O O v1 v1 M+ M+ ...... o . ... 2.0 O m W pp o 00 N i i 1 E X. 3. P o p 0 p 0 o P o P O p 0 o p P O P P op 0 P P P P a P P P P = = g g . S 0 8 N W N o.>W N W N$ N t9 W O A P S O 8 . W • O O p o g S 8 N 1+ S L W O R 1n o itG B. O P o o O P P P O P O O O O P P o 0 0 p p0 O o P Pp p p "'m i 4@ W • • • P22P W W • • gW W WWM+ BNg • • PgNat4i W NW AN1P-1 VB * ! n 29, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P O.P P PIP Q P p P P P 'Z. ! 8 • • • 888888 • • 8888888888 • ' 8[888�8 s 88888 ' H ta 0,M Peter's U eek I-food plain Irnprovemcn tU SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC 1 211,1 Peter's Creek Mo in 8rarrch 1/27/2o26 TABLE 1:EFFECTIVE VS DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE r Effective 1 Duplicate Effective v6.3.1 Difference 1%Annual Chance 1%Annual Chance 1%Annual Chance River Station Floodway Water Floodway Floodwey Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water Water Surface Floodway Width Water Surface Floodway Width Water Surface Floodway Width Surface Elevation Surcharge Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Uce Elevation Elevation (it) (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft) (it) Station Station („) Elevation Sar (ft) (ft) (ft) (fU (ft) 1957.0 974.40 974.40 0.00 395 974.41 974.40 -0.01 4940 5335 1 395 0.01 0.00 000 1477.D - 9,190 97190 Q00 4970 5030 70 D.010.01 0.00 1684.0 9R.80 972.80 0.00 70 I 972.79 97279 Q00 _ 4968 5038 `_t F 1428D - - - - - - - - - - 1379.0 - - - - 96845 968.45 Q00 4970 5025 55 - - - 1284.C - - - - 968 75 968.75 Q 00 4965 5030 6 - - - 1006 G - - - ... 728.0 - - - 959.52 959.53 001 4965 5030 B - - - 538.0 967.40* 967.40* 0.00 85 95801 958.03 Q02 4940 5025 85 -9.39 -9.37 0.00 278.0 967.40* 967.40* 0.93 87 955.30 955.30 _ Q00 4934 5021 87 -12.10 -12.10 0.00 *Values from EIS report reflect backwater from Roanoke River Peter's Creek Flood plain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 2 EFFECTIVE VS.CORRECTED EFFECTIVE Effective Corrected Effective -----�--_ �..-......__-......___.Difference 1%Annuai Corrected 1%Annual 1%Annual Effective I Floodway Water Floodway Floodway Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water River Station Effective Chance Water I face Elevation Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Floodway Width Chance Water Surface Elevation Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) Elevation (R) (ft) Station Station (ft) Surface Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) • (ft) 27750.0 27750.0 1103.90 1104.80 0.90 105 1103.8/ 1104/9 0.92 4915 5020 105 i 0.03 0.01 0.00 r 27361.0 27361.0 1100.20 i 1101.20 100 110 1100.23 1101.22 0.99 4915 5025 110 0.03 0.02 ' 0.00 26864.0 26864.0 1096.00 1097.00 1.00 1/0 109604 109/.02 0.98 4945 5065 120 0.04 0.02 0.00 26582.7 26582.7 • - 109405 i 1094.25 0.20 4985 5090 105 • 26572.0 26572.0 I _-______. I - 26560.0 26560.0 - - - 1093.00 1093.09 0.09 _ 4970 5080_ 110 �26495.0 26495.0 - - 1091.38 1092.31 0.93 4975 50/0 95 264800�_26480.0 ---� -... _.__.. _-_ _.__._ f__._ ____..... -_-_... _ _ _.... -__. • 26465.0 26465.0 - - 1091.71 1092.37 0.66 4975 50/0 95 • 26307.0 263070 109050 _ 1091.00 0.50 90 1090.45 109095 0.50 49/5 5065 90 0.05 0.05 0.00 4. 25876.0 25876.0 108440 1085.40 1.00 80 108439 1085.36 0.97 4955 5035 80 0.01 0.04 0.00 25733.0 25733.0 - 108400 108490 0.90 4920 5030 110 25712.0 25712.0 - - - - ( - - 25691.0 25691.0 - - - - 1083.95 108483 0.88 4920, 5030 110 - 25504.0 25504.0 1081.70 1082.60 0.90 100 1081.67 1082.63 0.96 4925 5025 100 -0.03 0.03 000 25223.0 25223.0 1078.00 1078.70 0.70 110 1077.95 1078.70 0.75 4925 5035 110 -0.05 0.00 0.00 25051.0 25051.0 - - - 1076.07 1077.01 0.94 4915 5055 140 - 25034.0 25034.0 - - • _ - 25017.0 25017.0 - - 1076.23 107710 087 4915 5055 140 24879.0 24879.0 1075.00 1075.90 0.90 155 107497 1075.91 0.94 4865 5020 155 • 0.03 0.01 000 24543.0 24543.0 1072.90 i 1073.90 1.00 190 1072.91 1073.89 0.98 4830 5020 190 0.01 0.01 0.00 24123.0 24123.0 1070.10 1071.00 0.90 - 135 1070.0/ 1070.98 0.91 W 4980 _5115 135 0.03 0.02 • 0.00 23756.0 23756.0 1065.80 106680 1.00 105 1065.84 1066./9 095 4920 5025 105 0.04 0.01 0.00 23198.0 23198.0 1063.40 1064.40 1.00 160 1063.42 1064.40 0.98 4890 5050 160 0.02 0.00 0.00 22904.0 22904.0 1062.50 1063.50 1.00 130 1062.49 1063.45 0.96 4890 5020 130 0.01 •0.05 0.00 22/47.5 22747.5 - _ I_ - 1062.39 1063.39 1.00 4835 t _5030 195 • 22721.0 22721.0 - I - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 r 22694.5 22694.5 - - 1062.14 1062.90 • 0./6 4835 5030 195 i 22566.0 22566.0 1060.00 I 1060.00 0.00 150 1059.99 ( 1059.99 0.00 4890 5040 1b0 001 -0.01 0.00 22224.0 22224.0 1053.80 1054.00 0.20 _ _75- _.__ 1053.79 1054.00 _ 0.21 4965 _ 5040 /5 0.01 0.00 0.00 21/04.0 217040 104660 1046.70 0.10 60 1046.57 1046.67 0.10 4965 --�- 5025 60 0.03 0.03 0.00 21080.0 21080.0 1040.30 1043.60 0.30 60 1040.29 1040.64 0.35 4960 5020 60 -0.01 0.04 0 00 20581.0 20581.0 1036./0 1037.70 1.00 55 1036.91 1037.84 ) 0.93 1 4980 5035 55 0.21 0.14 0.00 20226.0 20226.0 1034.10 1034.90 0.80 80 1033.79 1034.27 0.48 49/0 5050 80 0.31 0.63 0.00 19832.0 i 19821.0 1033.20 i_ 1034.20 1.00 145 1032.60 1032.83 0.23 318 463 145 -0.60 -1.37 0 00 19647.0 i 19644.0 - T - - 1031.'0 1032/6 0 4 3I r, .-$91 215 ., _ ..,,.. - - _ 19622.0 19616.0 Bridge {{' - - • _Bridge ._._ ... .,., .__._...__ ____,.__ ._ .._....i. . 19597.0 I 195130.0 _ d - • • 103 t..ti> 103t.61 0.15 3 31'. I 551 215 - - 19495.0 - - - 101.35 I0n.58 0..t3 s64 I 579 215 • • i 19415.0 - - • - 103133 1131<S4 0.11 400 615 215 - - 19373.0 1, 19339.0 1032.50 103330 0.80 150 103.,32 103 50 0 134 41/ 63? 215 -0.18 -0.80 65.00 18960.0 18872.0 - - • 1031.47 1031S0 0_0 3 476 5/e 162 i - ( - 18561.0- 18665.0 - • 102ft/ 10190/ 011 /19 /54 119 - 1 18759.0 - 1030.48 I 030.53 0 1 • _10 !3; 4;4 119 ! - 0 ��.- �.... • - 16 761 361 100 • i - - - 18450.0 - - - - 102/.89 1018.18 02,1 5/9 6/1 91 - _ `• 18277.0 - - - 10..85 102/.61 0./6 5 I. e90 Ie4 18077.0 1 18075.0 1026.20 1026.90 070 1 170 1026.07 107/.01 0.94 ... /?I 91.3 19/ 013 1 0.11 27.00 1/816.5 1/816:5 1025.56 lip,,.,,, 09n, 4/1,0 4,11411 I/11 • 1/7815 17787.5 1025.4s 1n,,,i2 i l Il., 1/1,0 7030 r/6 1 1025.40 0.90 190 1024.f5 1 40 0.'C, ,D,:i0 1/64/.D 17647.0 1024.50 ',l3iu I'M 0lf, II ICI 0.00 1 Peter's Creek Flood Orlin Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 2 EFFECTIVE VS.CORRECTED EFFECTIVE Effective trot rt.,.and I Ileciont Difference 1%Annul! Effective Corrected 1%Annual 1%Annual Floodway Water Floodway Floodway Chance Water I Floodway W at r l lood�ro.iy Left Right Floodway Water Effective Chance Water Floodway Width Chance Water - Floodway Width River Station Surface EieeatIon Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elev ation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment i Surface Elevation River Station Surface Elevation (ft) (It) (tt) Elevation (ft) (ft) Station Station (ft) Svface("'ration+ (It) (ft) Pt) 1/491.0 17491.0 1024.16 1025.13 0.9/ 4900 5090 190 • 1743/.0 1/43/.0 - - 1024.01 1024.28 0.2/ 4900 5090 190 - - - 17235.0 1/2350 1022.26 1023./6 1.00 48/0 5020 150 - - - 17086.0 17086.0 --.. - 1022.51 1023.33 0.82 4840 5172 332 • - - 17050.0 17050.0 - 1022.4/ 1023.28 0.81 4840 5172 332 - - - 16827.0 16827.0 _1022.30 1023.10 0.80 318 1022.33 1023.09 0.76 4982 5300 318 0.03 -0.01 0.00 16416.0 16416.0 1021.50 1022.50 j 1.00 240 1021.54 1022.48 0.94 4890 5130 240 0.04 -0.02 0.00 15835.0 15835.0 1019.40 1019.90 0.50 268 1019.40 1019.94 0.54 4760 5028 268 0.00 0.04 0.00 15558.0 15558.0 1018.20 1018.60 0.40 233 1018.21 101863 0.42 4795 5028 233 0.01 0.03 -0.10 15288.0 15288.0 1015./0 1016.60 0.90 146 1015.68 101658 0.90 4870 5016 146 -0.02 -0.02 0.00 15035.5 L. 15035.5 - , 1015.20 1016.12 0.92 4905 50/5 170 • - - 14988.0 r 14988.0 --- 14940.5 14940.5 - 1015.16 1015.79 0.63 4905 50/5 1/0 - - - 14868.0 14868.0 - 1014.47 1015.37 1 0.90 4928 5102 1/4 • - - 14838.0 1483E1.0 - - ..._ • 14808.0 14808.0 - - 101427 1015.10 0.83 4928 5102 1/4 • . - 14469.5 14469.5 - - 101408 101474 0.66 4925 5085 160 - - - 14410.0 14410.0 - - _ - .. 14350.5 14350.5 - - - • 1013.89 101431 0.42 4925 5085 160 - ; - • 14040.0 1 14040.0 - - - - 1011.63 1012.23 0.60 4955 5015 60 - ) - - 1402/.0 1 14327.0 - - - - 1012.38 1012.96 0.58 4850 5043 193 • - - 13841.0 13841.0 - - - 1012.06 � 1012.61 0,55 4850 5043 193 - 13344.0 13344.0 1009.00 1009.10 0.10 44 1009.03 1009.13 y 0.10 4964 5008 44 0.03 0.03 -0.04 13016.0 13016.0 - - - - 1008.76 1008.76 0.00 4925 5076 151 • • 12886.0 12886.0 - - - 1007.78 100/.77 -0.01 4925 5076 151 - • - 12593.0 12593.0 1004.70 1004.90 0.20 83 100470 1004.85 0.15 4950 5033 83 0.00 0.05 0.00 12102.0 12102.0 1001.00 1002.00 1.00 60 1001.01 1001.99 0.98 4965 5025 60 0.01 0.01 0.00 11614.0 11614.0 999.70 1000.50 0.80 85 999.70 1000.52 0.82 4962 5047 85 0.00 0.02 0.00 10992.0 10992.0 998.00 998.80 0.80 165 997.99 998.80 0.81 4975 5140 165 0.01 0.00 coo 10550.0 10550.0 996.50 .--- 997.30 0.80 145 _._. 996.46 997.31 0.85 4925_--, 5070�_. 145 ,-..,0.04 0.01 -F- 0.00 10127.5 10127.5 - -� - 996.05 ( 99/.04 0.99 4950 5210 260 - 9982.5 9982.5 - - - - 995.27 996.12 0.85 4950 5210 260 - 9543.0 9543.0 993.20 994.20 1.00 80 993.24 994.14 0.90 4940 5020 80 ' 004 0.06 0.00 9063.0 9063.0 991.30 992.20 0.90 105 991.31 99222 0.91 4985,,.. - 5090 105 0.01 7 0.02 0.00 8613.0 8613.0 989.30 990.10 0.80 65 989.25 990.10 0.85 4965 5030 65 0.05 0.00 0.00 8062.0 8062.0 987.80 988.70 0.90 140 98/.82 988./1 0.89 4890 5030 140 0.02 0.01 { 0.00 7703.0 7703.0 986.30 986.90 0.60 105 986.21 986.8/ 0.66 4920 5025 105 -0.09 -0.03 I 0.00 74540 7454.0 983.80 984.80 1.00 100 98391 984.// 086 4930 5030 100 0.11 j -0.03 0.00 6942.0 6942.0 983.20 984.10 0.90 --. 320 983.17 984.13 096 4/05__. 5025 320 -� -0.03 1.1______0.03 0.00 6651.0 6651.0 982.80 983.70 0.90 325 982.78 983.69 0.91 4/00 5025 325 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 64240 6424.0 982.50 983.50 1.00 320 982.53 983.4/ 0.94 4/10 5030 320 0.03 -0.03 0.00 6085.0 6085.0 981.90 982.80 0.90 260 981.93 982.84 0.91 49/5 5235 260 0.03 y 0.04 0.00 5863.0---4 5863.0 - - - - 981.69 982.66 0.97 4830 5160 330 - - 5803.0 5803.0 - - - • 981.46 981.69 0.23 4830 5160 330 - - 5465.0 5465.0 979.60 979.70 0.10 190 979.58 9/9./3 0.15 4920 5110 190 -0.02 0.03 0.00 _ 5150.0 5150.0 977.10 978.10 1.00 185 977.13 _ 978.13- -, 1.00 48/0_ 5055 185 -__y 0.03 0.03 0.00 4528.0 4528.0 97/.40 9/8.20 0.80 438 9//.38 9/8.19 0.81 4800 5238 438 •0.02 -0.01 0.00 4088.0 • 4088.0 977.20 9//.90 0.70 290 9//.14 9/7.86 0./2 4745 5035 290 -0.06 -0.04 0.00 3629.0 3629.0 976.90 9//.40 0.50 250 976.86 _ 977.39 0.53 _ 4850 5100 250 -0.04 -0.01 0.00 3167.0 3167.0 976.60 9/6.90 0.30 260 976.55 976.91 0.36 4800 5060 260 -0.05 0.01 0.00 2947.0 2947.0 - - 976.44 976.70 0.26 4850 5050 200 - - - Peter's Creek Flood plain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 2:EFFECTIVE VS.CORRECTED EFFECTIVE Effective Corrected Effective Difference 1%Annual Corrected 1X Annual 1%Annual Effective floodway Water Floodway Floodway Chance Water Floodway Water Floodwa► left Right rloodway Water Effective Chance Water Roadway Width Chance Water Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation Stacharge Width Surface Surface El ev aeon! Surcharge Encr oath mem Encroachment Surface Elevation River Station Surface Elevat ion (1t) (it) (It) Elevation (R) (it) Station Station (ft) Surface Elevation (n) (it) (it) (R) (ft) 2918.0 2918.0 2889.0 2889.0 - • - _ _ 9/6 4 2 9/6.64 0 72 4850 5050 200 2426.0 2426.0 975.80 975.90 0.10 170 9/584 9/5.8/ 003 4960 5130 1/0 I 0.04 0.03 000 -. 1957.0 19570 97440 974.40 0.00 395 974,41 '1/4.4(1 0.01 4940 5335 395 0.01 0.00 ( 0.00 16840 1684.0 972.80 912.80 0.00 70 972./9 9/2./9 0.00 4968 5038 /0 i 0.01 0.01 0.00 1477.0 1477.0 - - • 971.90 9/1.90 0 00 49/0 5030 60 • 1428.0 1428.0 f 1379.0 1379.0 - • - - 968.45 16t1.45 000 49/0 5025 SS - 12840 1284.0 - - - 968.75- - 96n./5 0(10 4965 5030 65 • • 1006.0 1006.0 - - - j - 959.53 *-_-_0.01 49(i5 5030 65 - A-^ 728.0 728.0 - - - - 959.52 - _.__. 538.0 538.0 967.40" 967.40' 0.00 85 958.01 958.03 0.02 4940 5025 85 9.39 -9.37 0.00 278.0 278.0 967.40* 967.40* 0.00 87 955.30 , 955.30 0.00 4934 5021 87 3,_ 12.10 -12.10 0.00 "Values front FIS report reflect backwater front Roanoke River Peter's Creek Flood plain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Mien Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 3:DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE VS CORRECTED EFFECTIVE ._.. .. __. _.... ' yFloodway y - y 11 iftctiv l• Uiticrenrc 1%Amami I ...._ DuplicateEfM ve ( rr octet Corrected 1%Annual 1%Annual Effective Floodwa Water 1 FloodwayChance Water Floodwa Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water Effective Chance Water 1 Floodway Width Chance Water I loodway Width River Station Surface Elevation 1 Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Surface llevation River Station Surface Elevation (ft) Surface Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) j (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft) (It) Station station (ft) (ft) (It) 27750.0 27/500 1103.87 1104.79 0.92 105 110381 1104./9 092 4915 5020 105 0.00 0.00 0.00 -. 27361.0 j 2/361 0 1100.23 1101.22 0 99 110 1100.23 1101.22 0.99 4915 5025 110 0 00 0.00 0.00 26864.0 26864.0 1096.04 109/.02 0.98 120 109604 1097.02 098 4945 S06S 120 000 0.00 0.00 26582.7 26582.7 1094.05 1094.25 0.20 105 109405 109425 0.20 4985 5090 105 0.00 0.00 0.00 26572.0 26572.0 - - - -_-_ 26560.0 26560.0 1093.00 1093.09 0.09 110 1093.00 1093.09 0.09 49/0 5080 110 0.00 0.00 0.00 26495.0 264950 1091.38 1092.31 0.93 95 1091.38 1092.31 1 0.93 49/5 50/0 95 0.00 0.00 0.00, 26480.0 26480.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 26465.0 26465.0 1091.71 1092.37 0.66 95 1091.71 1092.37 0.66 4975 50/0 95 0.00 0.00 0.00 26307.0 26307.0 1090.45 1090.95 0.50 90 1090.45 1090.95 0.50 4975 5065 90 0.00 0.00 0.00 25876.0 25876.0 1084.39 1085.36 0.97 80 108439 1085.36 0.97 4955 5035 80 0.00 0.00 0.00 25733.0 25733.0 1084.00 1084.90 0.90 110 108400 108490 0.90 4920 5030 110 0.00 0.00 0.00 25712.0 25712.0 - . . . - - - � 25691.0 25691.0 1083.95 1084.83 0.88 110 1083.95 1084.83 0.88 4920 . 5030 110 0.00 0,00 0.00 25504.0 25504.0 1081.67 1082.63 0.96 100 1081.67 1082.63 0.96 4925 5025 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 25223.0 25223.0 1077.95 1078.70 0.75 110 1077.95 1078.70 0.75 4925 5035 110 0.00 0.00 0.00 25051.0 25051.0 1076.07 1077.01 0.94 140 1076.07 1077.01 0.94 4915 5055 140 0.00 0.00 0.00 25034.0 25034.0 - - - - - - 25017.0 25017.0 1076.23 1077.10 0.87 I.1,, !II, ', 1077.10 0.87 4915 5055 140 0.00 0 00 _ 0.00 24879.0 24879.0 1074.97 1075.91 0.94 I'.'. 10/r1.,/ 1075.91 0.94 4865 5020 155 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 24543.0 24543.0 1072.91 1073.89 0.98 190 10/2.91 1073.89 0.98 4830 5020 190 0.00 0.00 0.00 24123.0 24123.0 _ 1070.07. 1070.98 0.91 135 .1070.0 i 1070.98 0.91 4980m 5115 135 0.00 0.00 0.00 23756.0 23756.0 1065.84 1066.79 0.95 - 105 1065.8,1 1066.79 0.95 4920 5025 105 0.00 0.00 0 00 23198.0 23198.0 1063.42 1064.40 0.98 160 1063.42 106440 0.98 4890 5050 160 0.00 0.00 0.00 22904.0 22904.0 1062.49 1063.45 0.96 130 1062.49 1063.45 0.96 4890 5020 130 0.00 0 00 0.00 22747.5 22741 5 1062.39 1063.39 1 00 i_ 195 ,..,...,_._.106?.39 1063.39 .lT,.,. 1.00 4835 5030 195 0.00 t 0.00 0.00 22721.0 22721.0 - . - 11 i u i 0.00 0.00 0 0 11 22694.5 22694.5 1062.14 1062.90 0.76 195 1062.1.1 1062.90 1 0.76 4835 5030 I'1'. 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 22566.0 22566.0 1059.99 1059.99 0.00 ( 150 1059.90 1059.99 0.00 4890 5040 1'01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1046.E/ 3 0.00 0.01 0.00 21/04 0 21/04.0 1046.57 1046.68 0 11 60 1 nq I u -� 4965 �� Sr1." 0.00 22224 0 22224 0 1053 79 1053.99 0 20 21080.0 21080.0 1040.33 1040.63 0.30 ,,11 1040.2'. 1040.64 4960 1 01 0.04 0.01 0.00 ' 20581.0 20581.0 1036./3 1037.65 0.92 1036.91 1037.114 110: 4980 . 0.18 0.19 0.00 20226.0 20226.0 1034.13 � 1034.90 11 l'1 80 l 33-/0 III:t 1';3 11 1 t 1 11 1 11 0.34 0.63 0.00 ' 19832.0 19821.0 1033.15 1034.15 I ui. _._. - , •055 -1.32 0,00 19647.0 196440 103296 1033.95 0'1'. I!0 1032.51 111^,.'./6 '4 1,1. 5k c 11', -0.44 vs 19622.0 I 19616.0 Bridge - - oudgc• _ �0 19597.0 k 195800 1032.66 1033,57 0.91 liu "s6 11i 1032 .•1,1 1 'S �_- 3i1. i ;,I !I', -0.30 -0.9619495.0 - - - . 1032.3' Ifl ''.1: 11'.t n.4 / 'I`. �® 111162111.1 - ' 19415.0 - . 1032.33 1111.1,1 0...1 ,100 6I., - II', - . 18960.0 18872.0 1031.75 1032,41 0 1.6 11' 1031.4/ 1 i2;I'.n n n I 111, I'I'. n 71 0 t., _.._ n 11 R1 65 00 19373.0 1 19339.0 1032.53 1033.31 0 78 Pill1032.3./ II/1 a I:: 41/ . {' 18759.0 - 103048 III;I',I 00', ,,/I, !'1i 11/ 18665.0 - - 1029./9 le.,80 a In /t,1 8',1 I I'• 18561.0 i 18550.0 1029.31 1030.28 0.97 1 110 1028.91 Ut ,.. .n/ 0.1., I I Iu II:III I_'I I fl s2 ( 18450.0 - �_ - - 1027.89 111 :: n,'0 /•. 1./.' •1.' • I 18277.0 - - -._. 1026.8', lib/..I 1.1.%.. ..'I, rrtu 1r.4 18077.0 I 18075.0 1026.16 I 1026.93 0.77 j 170 1026.0/ IIL'!III II.1.1 1, 1'1, u0'. 1,11,: •!00 1/816.5 1/816.5 1025.56 102652 0.96 2/0 1025'.'' III', '.' u'a, -1r1.0 '.1161 li0 11.110 1)11 1)10 1//8/.5 1/787.5 1025.43 1026.42 0.99 I 2/0 1025.43 1016.41 0.99 I'1�u 5030 2/0 0,0D 000 0.00 1/64/.0 17647.0 1024.55 1025.40 0.85 190 102455 1 1025.40 I 0.85 1 I1111_ , 5070 190 0.00 0.00 0.00 Peter's Creek Flood plain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 3/27/2026 TABLE 1 DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE VS CORRECTED EFFECTIVE Duplicate Effective Corrected Effective Difference 1%Annual ( 1%Armual Corrected 1%Annual 1 Effective Floodway Water Floodway ( Floodway Chance Water Floodw ay Water Floodway Left Right hment t Floodway Water Effective Chance Water Floodway Width Chance Water Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroac Surface Elevation River Station Surface Elevation (ft) Surface Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) (it) (ft) Elevation (8) (it) Station Station (ft) (ft) i (n) 17491.0 17491.0 1024.16 1025.13 0.97 190 1024 16 1025.13 0 9/ 4900 5090 190 ) 0.00 0.00 0.00 17437.0 17437.0 1024.01 1024.28 0.2/ 190 1024.01 1024.28 0.27 ,^-4900 5090 190 0.00 0.00 0.00 17235.0 17235.0 1022.26 1023.26 1.00 150 1022.26 1023.26 1.00 4870 5020 150 000 0.00 000 17086.0 1/086.0 1022.51 1023.33 0.82 332 102251 1023.33 0.82 4840 5172 332 0.00 0.00 0.00 17050.0 17050.0 1022.47 1023.28 0.81 332 10224/ 1023.28 0.81 4840 5172 332 0.00 0.00 0.00 16827.0 16827.0 1022.33 1023.09 0.76 318 1022.33 1023.09 0.76 4982 5300 318 0.00 0.00 0.00 16416.0 16416.0 1021.54 1022.48 0.94 240 1021 54 1022.48 0.94 4890 5130 240 0.00 0.00 0.00 15835.0 151335.0 1019.40 1019.94 0.54 268 1019.40 1019.94 0.54 4760 5028 268 0.00 0.00 0.00 15558.0 15558.0 1018.21 1018.63 0.42 I 233 1018.21 1018.63 0.42 4795 5028 233 0.00 0.00 0.00 15288.0 15288.0 1015.68 1016.58 0.90 146 1015.68 1016.58 0.90 48/0 5016 146 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 15035.5 15035.5 1015.20 1016.12 0.92 170 1015.20 1016.12 0.92 4905 5075 1•/0 0 00 j 0.00 0.00 14968.0 14988.0 - - - - - .. 14940.5 14940.5 1015.16 1015.79 0.63 170 1015.16 1015.79 0.63 4905 5075 170 0.00 0.00 0.00 14868.0 14868.0 1014.47 1015.37 0.90 174 101447 1015.37 0.90 4928 5102 174 0.00 ,^T 0.000 0.00 14838.0 14838.0 - - 11111111111111111 _ 1.111011111111 14808.0 14808.0 1014.27 1015.10 0.83 174 1014.27 1015.10 0.83 4928 5102 174 0.00 0.00 0.00 14469.5 14469.5 1014.08 1014.74 0.66 160 1014.08 1014.74 0.66 4925 5085 160 0.00 0.00 0.00 14410.0 14410.0 - -_ - .. - 14350.5 14350.5 1013.89 1014.31 0.42 160 1013.89 _ 1014.31 �mm0.42 4925 I 5085 160 0.00 0.00 0.00 W 14040.0 14040.0 1011.63 1012.23 0.60 60 1011.63 1012.23 0.60 4955 5015 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 14027.0 14027.0 1012.38 1012.96 0.58 193 1012.38 1012.96 1 0.58 4850 5043 193 0.00 0.00 0.00 13841.0 13841.0 1012.06.^. 1012.61 --_-_.. 055 _.__.,...- 193 1012.06 1012.61 -_-- 055----,-,_-„ 4850 5043 .-,_.., 193 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,._ 13344.0 13344.0 1009.03 1009.13 0.10 44 1009.03 1009.13 0.10 4964 5008 44 0.00 0.00 0.00 13016.0 13016.0 1008.76 1008.76 0.00 151 1008.76 1008.76 0.00 4925 5076 151 0.00 0.00 0.00 12886.0 12886.0 1007.78 1007.77 0.01 151 1007.78 1007.77 i -0.01 4925 5076 151 0.00 0.00 0.00 12593.0 12593.0 1004.70 1004.85 0.15 83 100470 1004.85_- 1 0.15 4950 5033 _.,83 0.00 0.00 0.00 12102.0 12102.0 1001.01 1001.99 0.98 60 1001.01 1001.99 1 0.98 4965 5025 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 11614.0 11614.0 999.70 1000.52 0.82 85 999.70 1000.52 0.82 4962 504/ 85 0.00 0.00 0.00 10992.0 10992.0 997.99 998.80 0.81 165 997.99 998.80 0.81 4975 5140 165 0.00 0.00 0.00 10550.0 10550.0 996.46 997.31 0.85 145 996.46 997.31 0.85 4925 50/0 145 0.00 0.00 0.00 10127.5 10127.5 996.05 997.04 0.99 260 996.05 997.04 0.99 4950 , 5210 260 0.00 0.00 0.00 9982.5 9982.5 995.27 996.12 0.85 260 995.27 996.12 0.85 4950 5210 260 0.00 0.00 0.00 9543.0 9543.0 993.24 994.14 0.90 80 993.24 994.14 0.90 4940 5020 80 0.00 0.00 {y' 0.00 9063.0 9063.0 991.31 992.22 0.91 105 991.31 992.22 0.91 4985 5090 105 0.00 0.00 0.00 8613.0 8613.0 989.25 990.10 0.85 65 989.25 990.10 0.85 4965 5030 65 0.00 0.00 0.00 8062.0 8062.0 987.82 988.71 0.89 140 987.82 988.71 0.89 4890 5030 140 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 7703.0 - 7703.0 986.21 986.87 0.66 105 986.21 986.87 0.66 4920 5025 105 0.00 0.00 4 0.00 74540 7454.0 983.91 984.77 0.86 100 983.91 984.77 0.86 4930 5030 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 6942.0 6942.0 983.17 984.13 0.96 320 983.17 984.13 0.96 4705 5025 320 0.00 0.00 0.00 6651.0 6651.0 982/8 983.69 0.91 325 982.78 983.69 0.91 4700 5025 325 0.00 0.00 0.00 6424.0 6424.D 982.53 983.47 0.94 320 982.53 983.47 0.94 4710 5030 320 0.00 0.00 0.00 6085.0 6085.0 981.93 982.84 0.91 1 260 981.93r. �982.84 0.91 4975 5235 260 0.00 0.00 0.00 5863.0 5863.0 981.69 982.66 0.97 330 981.69 982.66 0.97 4830 5160 330 0.00 0.00 0.00 5803.0 5803.0 981.46 981.69 0.23 tLL 330 981.46 981.69 0.23 4830 5160 330 0.00 0.00 0.00 5465.0 5465.0 979.58 979.73 0.15 190 9/9.58 979.73 0.15 4920 5110 190 0.00 0.00 0.00 5150.0 5150.0 977.13 978.13 1.00 185 9/7.13 978.13 1.00 4870 5055 185 0.00 0.00 0.00 4528.0 4528.0 977.38 978.19 0.81 438 977.38 978.19 0.81 4800 r r r Milli I 0.00 4088.0 4088.0 977.14 977.86 0.72 290 977.14 977.86 0.72 4745 5035 290 r r r r r r 0.00 3629.0 3629.0 976.86 977.39 0.53 250 976.86 977.39 0.53 4850 5100 250 r rr r rr 0.00 3167.0 3167.0 976.55 976.91 0.36 260 976.55 976.91 0.36 4800 5060 260 r r I r v r 0.00 2947.0 2947.0 976.44 976.70 0.26 200 976.44 976.70 0.26 4850 5050 200 0.00 0.00 0.00 Peter's Creek Flood plain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 3:DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE VS CORRECTED EFFECTIVE DuplicateEffeetlee - -Correctedhftective f Difference 1%Annual Effective Corrected 1%Annual 1 ' 1%Annual Floodway Water Floodway Floodwaq Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway Lett Right Floodwaq Water Effective Chance Water i Floodway Width ' Chance Water Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment + 5uface Elevation River Station Surface Elevation (ti) (It) (It) Elevation (ft) (it) Station Station (ft) Surface Elevation (ft) • (ft) (ft) (ft) (It) .1918.0 2918.0 _ 2889 0 2889.0 9/6.42 976.64 0 22 200 9/6.42 9/6 64 _ 0 22 41150 5050 200 0.00 0.00 0.00 2426.0 2426.0 9/5.84 975.87 0.03 _... 1/0 ___ 9/5.84 9/5.8/ yf 003 4960.._._.__--_-- 5130 170 - _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1957.0 1957.0 97441 974.40 -0.01 395 9/4.41 9/4.40 -0.01 4940 5335 395 0.00 0.00 0.00 1684.0 1684.0 972.79 972.79 0.00 70 9/2./9 9/2./9 0.00 4968 5038 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 14/2.0 1477.0 971.90 911.90 0.00 60 9/1.90 9/1.90 0.00 49/0 5030 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 .__ 1428.0 1428.0 - - 13/9.0 13/90 968.45 968.45 000 55 968.45 968.45 000 49/0 5025 _ 55 000 0.00 0.00 1184.0 1284.0 968.75 968.75 0.00 65 968./5 968/5 000 4965 5030 65. 0.00 0.00 0.00 _1006.0 1006.0 - _ • _ _ /28.0 7280 959.52 959.53 0.01 65 959.52 959.53 0.01 4965 5030 65 D. 0.00 0.00 538.0 538.0 958.01* 958.03* 0.02 85 958.01 958.03 0.02 4940 5025 85 9 39 ! 9.3/ 0.00 j ' 278.0 278.0 955.3• 955.3• 0.00 87 955.30 I 955.30 0.00 4934 5021 I 87 -12.10 1 12.10 0.00 'Values from 115 report reflect backwater from Roanoke River WIGGmGGC- w 4G.'.NL414G44144401,WaW.iNN2ll qss - ^R- r > x }C;V.A`_ Q . !^ _ ipRtP. Y R P!,W, ,t,WRY Yi ,8 top -p wri P.- P o3,. o ^'n - w,:0 O O O;O 0 . 0 - - O O O O O O O N O- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O'O O O OO C O o o a z T 8 - _ - ti kit 4 41X X s a di d`�f?la?i 44 W 2t 2t!.21 a n 8 a ._. o s W .'.. _ _ m .1 8W Sl oaa '^ .�'g' 3 P a G _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a N Y R m>r 0 0'� ►Y W RIY 0 P P'+ 0 Y P °1 'o �+.;0 C C OIC O O C O O O N O C O...O G O G O C C O O O O O O O O O o o O:O O �. O!O O n1 R RRR RR. Oogi PPsi$ a8`,88 8,3 sS `8 - - E N P ►w Y,r P.P... Y Y!. IO. w k t g• - _ a s >0 3 8 m 418 9.R, 2 n 5 8 1 I�' 1 8,8 8 5 5 8 6 8 6w c c o a 8 8 P o ;8 5 = A. uj ,m..a a.Q m W c _ -.x _ _ T - i v.O pltit m r p P 0 .Pi. O *I .1 Y18 N 8.y, Y$ I I 4 • • 212 Q o o pIo 0 0 -c c o a o Q o o P o PPP o o c P o o(o p o o P Q•p p O P• , o oIQ P • o P';P o o1P o P 2,2 .3 f R �n :"i8.'.8 iIm- .m.. 8, _ _ > �-..� , _ c 9; _ - -, w W o ol."..8 n 8 a. m m 8 8 IP o ."io S'. uI$ mi.8o v N■ I a= •aI. a I a s a 8 ► 'a '� '� alAasseaaos _ = - = : 8di ' 8i 14 888i889m! G�iDil8 N Di IDi,8 . 9i ..,. - 0 0 m 0 4Imp ' 0L$- c = - _ - c o 0 'R w 0 0 R'.. R 018i0 0 2.- Rt N' N O. ' Oi8 N .YJ OIO O - - ' -- - O O ...O O A NCO O N:N O - , -, i � 3- , 8,RW888u 65 1_ 1 - " - - _ 58 ' a88SIN8Na ' 88818 80Ii4 . 'i.'P Eoo,9 `s 1 I 1 ' 1 i 1 11 I I m a _ ?9888 88I®.g ® ®a g8l8 8P1 10 % • II ? _ _ 8,8.E m R m A a R W a u - a S Y v !!I 8mg. 86iSW A m 3 31, 1, r .W f umWam8m W� � _ - - _ _ ' 8"' a t880 t 46e "O: P ' $ P 7* I 1 i ! l 01.P.Qj0 m m I O' - - - - - - Q PP p .P0.0 O P O l0 O OIP PPP( P.P PIP P PIQ Q P 0IP P PIP O .-.fl. l$ woutila«.�.,81%'41 = _ x - - _ . = > � .n' N'P8a88 mm.m.ai'v aNa1m ovl888Wis omm.., .Ti i m { m•� 1 [ ; 1! Im _ Ao a ttie p - /1a is o 0,8 'o 8 8 8,,8.0 ._ - - - - I. - - _ N o 0 '81 O.P.. m m•n o "I" .n.i8 m.n 1 i 4- l8ti6 E8 "�66 6 6 6 ,Er, - _ - � - 222 I" 6ps62 6 tsE"4 s s 6 • 666, 646 60i ,6 , 666G5 t ; m mowP,oPoP _ oo - � o op0 ... ..00 .P 10 omlmo o10 o ,, I1 8 o a."..m 0 ... o _ s - - v. a. f4 0 0l."i. o 8°8 o o.9.8 o.4 'ol 8 0 8 0 8 mo to.m.. o `m"'o Si c o _ 3 d T 1 I i I i - , j • 4- € 1 1 t s —t— O O O O PIP P P P.P O Po p�_ _ r, 0 0 0l0 0l0 0 Io Q P o$P O o 0 P P O o 0 0 0 PI IQ Q o Qlo A .1 g ' 88888'888]8888.8 PO88888 'j8888188881' 8888'8 ' 88188 ' 8 8 ' 881818 —TE. {O 8 O O O 3 g g O'O O O O - - - O O• Q O O PO 0 0 0 - P P P - - O 0 0 O 0•0 O O 0( O O O,:P O O O O Ol0 PIO 3 m i _ 8888888888888 = ' > I _ r4 _ ;,2+8888H 8,88 ' 888888881 8888 8888 8'8 ' 8888: a1 `I `iQ P P PPPPPPPPI; t - - 0000 PPPP PIP P PRO O i ! 8888818888!8888 - - _, 4.8888888 ' 888888881 88818 8888 88 88'818 - 2 I 0 0 • I Ia l , :C N a33 S ,-gi 5,1z a A x 3. - wR a : mr ay :, «!!`01,34 N aE ...tr., vW sE . � boo bboabbb b oobc _ 0 o{abbo� o12bbool0'0owG IA P Do . , °° 4 2 ,00o,oOOOGOof.no - a ma'm K - _ _ - _ 9F rR A-.." s S g t elm o W mlio Q z as it 8 p:z 1. 2 3' 3 o c a m o a o a o 0 im, v DIr.'► 9'i f�P m ,-;�O O P.0 9' Ac oi�lm 1...S1 z.c o o c c o 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 o o bib b b oyo .n m oI0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0.0 0 0, o u,0 0 0 Ln to 'rd 4 • I , i 9 ?m pI oo00 'o0 ` o w a m '� r.in a m�m W) 9' 8 F,8$ ffi _N r '^► r 3 �. xt 0 0 �� i o m.. a a m m ., m .,R m,•m o 0 om m s R,a .., :1 'g ,, 5',� , 5 B {W 1 1 8 glg; s 8888 ;88 ❑ �n$� z 1m Gw m8 E74$ ti i.n n ° $ ,� a N "s e >o m a o� a. m a m W o ."., w E.-'o„,u°°'.' a W '°W.. Ili o v IW �I �m !W a�V g 9 .s PPP... 0 Oi PPOPP o pi0 0 0 p 0 OHO O o 0 0 0 o 00 0 o O pO o 0 o p o 00 0 0 0 `'O o •o C .�.g 82F881 .8gsW'^ m ..,m. 8N,., .�4a... alc 444..,o ., .I„':28o '"i,ao. W If "s' F. a I j 1 1 i { ' I — I - z. m,a ;a as g Y 8 N!. N 8 812 a S SS' 618{6 A 8 8 8 8 8I8 8 B 8'o 8 8 N' S 8 6 bI,8 mjs 9 E ',G 8 la. 3 l ._. _ 3 w'W(. 8 8I o W " 6 r 8s c s o"4I: "s o,nl n N I 's. R ' s R a 9i. 9 9 s a I Y E R`o to of e { tom o o 0 0 8 n m cco 0 o,n o 0 0 0 0 0 o;ao N,W a al 1( e 3 { , 1 I .. i IW iN -__ 36 1. !. L 8 ' S N :0 8 8 gib ' 8 81 g 6 31 s 8V8 8 8 8j61 D -fit E s s 6, S S IW$ s s a nib. { 7 IA Y C d _Im z t I ,I_, I ( I t 1 ! 1 --- — ¢ '' iI 4 ^ 0 o u+ 10 a ao m,io o.. 0.e .o en .e W ..0 u u E..ic ,,,m Nl.....W.. 'a o ' V 2 r I i E 1 ! PPP' PP o o PPP o o.0 0 0 'o 0 0 oc o 0 00 o m,oeo 0 0 0'0 0 o pp o 0 N'i0 0 0 0 m o o o 8 .9of 88 '88$W m ..1,., .m- 8IN,., ....a m :,n:-;ovm,•N +, m ng8oN:oN o W q { I I �i { I� ,P a I ' a .ae a a al u a a m am ff a.�p. .Is.. .. .. . ... .p�So ..6l,o m m lfn a �s " 3 i 0 54 OI O m 0 8!8 8 8;8 N 8 8,8 0 0 ,8 8 2 0,8 8 4 vmi 0 0 8 N I NIB'88i,to a 88 IN -, ?i' 1 i I 1 1 8 sc . 8 8 6 8 I6.8 Ir. is 6 8 66 t8 E E E E g r 8$.8 8 m / N o o 8 8 818 S N�.'V W r �J o o g.. a,of o om oo ooi oa oa,(o molmoo olocoo}s j 1 I � t I. _ v v M �10 O 8'8 ' 8 O10 8 m ,8 8 8 8;8 8 8 8 N o N 54.8 8 2I4.mi,C.m.,..4 u u. C is. .. s I - - - I, i i 1 I t it s 0 0' O p Io p o 0 0 0 00 o 0 oto 0 0 00 0 0 op p o oIp p p PIP 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 •',n o PP .“A " 3 8881' 888 ` 8888[8 ' 88{8888I8888I88888888i888888888888888 188 .a2 Igo I _= 0 0 Oj, PP (O 0 0 OIO O O10 0 o C;o 0 0 o:..o o p c'.0 o o CIC C G o 0 0 o P P o p C.o G G PP O o. .�m� 888 88 E888818 ' 88i88888888l88888888188881888888881888 ' 8 8 ' 88' _f 11 i 0 o oi p p 10 p o 0I0 0 PP o 0 PIP o 0 PIP 0 0 0;0 0 0 0€0 o p ojo 0 0 0I0 o p plp 0 0 '0 0 PIP Pt.y 8881' 88 :8888,8 ' 8818888'8888!888888888888888888881888 i88 ' 8_:8 �£ 111111 Peter's Creek Floodplain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22763 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 5:EFFECTIVE VS PROPOSED CONDITIONS • Effective Proposed Conditions Difference -- --- -- ( 1%Annual I --1-- -,- - --- ---- Proposed 1%Annual ! ; 1%Annual • Effective Floodway Water , Floodway Floodway Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water Condition Chance Water Floodway Width Chance Water Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation • Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Surface Elevation River Station Surface Elevation (ft) (ft) (It) Elevation (ft) (it) Station Station (10 Surface Elevation (ry) (ft) (ft) (ft) (It) • 2/750.0 2//50.0 1103.90 1104.80 0.90 105 1103.8/ 1104./9 0.92 4915 5020 105 7 0.03 0.01 0.00 , 27361.0 2/361.0 1100.20 1101.20 1.00 110 1100.23 1101.22 0.99 4915 5025 110 i 0.03 0.02 000 26864.0 26864.0 1096.00 I 109/.00 1.00 120 1096.04 109/.02 0.98 4945 5065 120 1 004 0.02 0.00 26582.7 26582.7 - 1094.05 a-_1094.25 0.20 4985 5090 105 26572.0 26572.0 • -_..--- 26560.0 26560.0 - _---4 -- 1093.00 1093.09 0.09 49/0 5080 110 - 26495.0 26495.0 - - - - 1091.38 1092.31 0.93 49/S 50/0 95 - 26480.0 26480.0 - - - - - - j ' 26465.0 26465.0 - - 1091.71 1092.37 0.66 4975 50/0 95 26307.0 26307.0 1090.50 1091.00 0.50 90 4 1090.45 1090.95 0.50 49/5 5065 90 0.05 0.05 0.00 25876.0 25876.0 1084.40 1085.40 1.00 80 1084.39 1085.36 0.97 4955 5035 80 0.01 0.04 0.00 25733.0 25733.0 - , 108400 108490 0.90 4920 5030 110 - - 25712.0 25712.0 - - - - 25691.0 25691.0 - - . 1083.95 1084.83 0.88 4920 S030 110 - - - 25504.0 25504.0 1081.70 1082.60 0.90 100 1081.67 1082.63 0.96 4925 5025 100 -0.03 0.03 0.00 25223.0 25223.0 1078.00 1078.70 0.70 110 1077.95 1078.70 0.75 4925 5035 110 -0.05 0.00 0.00 25051.0 25051.0 - _,_ 1076.07. 1077.01 0.94 4915 5055 140 - - - 25034.0 25034.0 - - . 25017.0 25017.0 - - - 1076.23 1077.10 0.87 4915 ! 5055 140 - 24879.0 24879.0 1075.00 1075.90 0.90 155 107497 1075.91 0.94 4865 5020 155 0.03 0.01 0.00 24543.0 24543.0 1072.90 1073.90 1.00 190 1072.91 1073.89 0.98 w 4830 �_ 5020 190 0.01 -0.01 0.00 24123.0 24123.0 1070.10 1071.00 0.90 135 1070.07 1070.98 0.91 4980 5115 135 4).03 -0.02 0.00 23756.0 23756.0 1065.80 1066.80 1.00 105 1065.84 1066.79 0.95 4920 5025 105 0.04 -0.01 0.00 23198.0 23198.0 1063.40 1064.40 1.00 160 1063.42 1064.40 0.98 4890 5050 160 0.02 0.00 0.00 22904.0 229134.0 1062.50 4 1063.50 1.00 130 1062.49 1063.45 0.96 4890 _Y _5020 130 - -0.01 .0.05 0.00 22747.5 22747.5 - - 1062.39 1063.39 1.00 4835 5030 195 __y • - - 22721.0 22721.0 - - • - • - - - 22694.5 22694.5 - - 1062.14 1062.90 0.76 4835 5030 195 - - - _ 22566.0 22566.0 1060.00 1060.00 0.00 150 1059.99 1059.99 0.00 4890 5040 150 -0.01 •0.01 0.00 22224.0 22/61 0 1 1053.80 1054.00 0.20 75.0 1053.79 1054.00 0.21 4965 5040 75 -0.01 0.00 0.00 21704.0 21/04.F 1046.60 1046.70 0.10 60.0 1046.57 _ 1046.6/ 0.10 4965 5025 60 •0.03 -0.03 ! 0.00 21080.0 21080.0 1040.30 1040.60 0.30 60 1040.29 1040.64 0.35 4960 5020 60 0.01 0.04 0.00 20581.0 20581 0 1036.70 1037.70 1.00 55 1036.91 103/.84 ( 0.93 4980 5035 55 0.21 0.14 0.00 ,•I>>2r,0 2avr,0 1034.10 1034.90 0.80 80 103)/9 1034.2/ 04x 49/0 5050 80 0.31 -0.63 0.00 /-- l'/812 0 19822.0 1033.20 1034.20 1.00 145 10131.159 1032.14 0.55 ' 318 472 - 154 4,61 _ •2.06 9.10 1964/0 19145.0 • - 10:31.32 1032.02 0./0 365 600 235 • - 7 3622.0 19616-0 Rlidge - - - 1959/.0 19580.0 - • 1030.1.4 1031.08 0.94 336 555 219 _ 19495.0 - - - 103013 103103 0.90 364 579 215 - - • • t 19416.0 103009 1 1031.01 0.92 400 615 215 - 19373.0 19340.0 1032.50 1033.30 0.80 150 103005 1030.96 0.91 417 632 215 -2.45 •234 65.00 18960.0 188/2.0 - • 102899 102992 0.93 433 585 152 • - ` 18760.0 - - .1028 36 1029.33_-. 0.9/ 680 810 130 - - • ��.18666.0 1027.88 1028.86 0.98 740 865 US • 18561.0 -__181,50.0 - 1027.16 1028.07 0.91 --� 770 { 880 110 - 18450.0 - 1027.17 1027.73 �_- 056 570 680 110 - • - 18278.0 - 102696 1027.67 0./1 526 690 164 • - - 18077.0 18075.0 1026.20 1026.90 0.70 1/0 t 1026.0/ 1027.00 I 0.93 726 923 197 -0.13 0.10 - 2L .:,,,..'i 1/816.5 17816.5 I f125.51i 1026.52 0.96 4/60 5030 2/0 i• 1/78/.5 17787.5 1025.43 1026.42 099 4/60 5030 210 _ 1/64/.0 17647.0 1024.50 „_ _-1025.40 I 0.90 190 1024.55 1025.40 0.85 4880 50/0 190 0.05 0.00 0.00 Peter's Creek Floodplain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22361 Peter's Creek Main Brunch 1/27/2026 TABLE 5:EFFECTIVE VS PROPOSED CONDITIONS Effective Proposed Conditions Difference r...___-- - 1%Annual Proposed 1%Annual 1%Annual Effective Floodway Water Floodway Floodway Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water Condition Chance Water Floodway Width Chance Water ' Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Surface Elevation River Station Surface('atlas I (ft) (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft) (ft) Station Station (ft) Surface Elevation atlon (ft) (it) • 1/491.0 1/491.0 1024.16 1025.13 0.91 4900 5090 190 1/43/.0 1/43/.0 -- i _- 1024.01 1024.28 0.2/ 4900 5090 190 • -- - 17235.0 1/235.0 - - 1022.26 1023.26 1.00 48/0 5020 150 • 17086.0 17086.0 - - 1022.51 1023.33 0.82 4840 51/2 332 • 17050.0 17050.0 - - 1022.47 1023.28 0.81 4840 51/2 332 1682/.0 1682/.0 1022.30 1023.10 0.80 318 1022.33 1023.09 0./6 4982 5300 318 0.03 0.01 0.00 16416.0 16416.0 1021.50 1022.50 1.00 240 1021.54 1022.48 0.94 4890 5130 240 0.04 -0.02 0.00 • 15835.0 15835.0 1019.40 1019.90 0.50 268 1019.40 1019.94 0.54 4760 5028 268 0.00 0.04 0.00 15558.0 15558.0 1018.20 1018.60 0.40 233 1018.21 1018.63 I 0.42 -,4795 + 5028 233 0.01 0.03 0.10 �. 15288.0 15288.0 1015./0 1016.60 0.90 146 1015.68 1016.58 0.90 4870 5016 146 -0.02 0.02 ' 0.00 15035,5 I 15035.5 • - _• 1015,20 101612 0.92 _ 4905 50/5 1/0 14988-0 14988.0 - - . 14940.5 14940.5 - - - 1015.16 1015.79 0.63 4905 r 50/5 _ 1/0 1 - 14868.0 14868.0 - - . 1014.47 1015.37 0.90 4928 5102 1/4 • - 14838.0 14838.0 - . - . '' . Iy - . 14808.0 14808.0 - 101427 i 1015.10 + 0.83 4928 5102 1/4 • - 14469.5 14469.5 - 101408 101474 0.66 4925 5085 160 - 14410.0 14410.0 - - - -/ 14350.5 14350.5 - 1013.89 101431 0.42 4925 5085 160 14040.0 14040.0 - - 1011.63 f 1012.23 0.60 4955 5015 60 14027.0 14027:0 - } 1012.38 1012.96 0.58 4850 5043 193 - - 13841.0 138410 -+ - 1012.06 1012.61 0.55 4850 9043 193 - 13344.0 13344.0 1009.00 1009 10 0.10 44 1009.03 1009.13 0.10 4964 I 5008 44 0.03 0.03 0.04 13016.0 13016.0 1008.76 1008.76 0.00 4925151 12886.0 12886.0 100/.78 1007.77 -0.01 �I," 5016 151 • 12593.0 12593.0 1004/0 1004.90 0.20 83 1004./0 100485 0.15 T''.ri 5033 83 000 -0.05 0.00 12102.0 12102.0 1001.00 1002.00 1.00 60 1001.01 1001.99 0.98 5025 60 001 0.01 0.00 11614.0 11614.0 999.70 1000.50 0.80 85 999.70 100052 0.82 5047 85 0.00 0.02 0.00 10992.0 10992.0 998.00 998.80 0.80 165 997.99 998.80 0.81 49/5 5140 165 0.01 0.00 0.00 10550.0 I 10550.0 996.50 997.30 0.80 145 996.46 99/.31 0.85 4925 5070 145 0.04 0.01 0.00 10127.5 10127.5 - - 996.05 997.04 0.99 4950 5210 260 _ ___I 9982.5 9982.5 - - 995.27 996.12 0.85 4950 5210 260 - 9543.0 9543.0 993.20 994.20 1.00 80 993.24 994.14 0.90 4940 5020 80__4 0.04 _0.06_ 0.00 9063.0 9063.0 991.30 992.20 0.90 105 991.31 1 992.22 0.91 4985 5090 105 0.01 0.02__� 0.00 8613.0 8613.0 989.30 990.10 0.80 65 989.25 990.10 0.85 4965 5030 65 -0.05 0.00 0.00 8062.0 8062.0 98/.80 988.70 0.90 140 987.82 988.71 0.89 4890 I 5030 140 0.02 Q01 0.00 7703.0 7703.0 986.30 986.90_� 0.60 105. 986.21 986.87 0.66 4920 ) 5025 105 -0.09 -0.03 0.00 7454.0 74540 983.80 984.80 1.00 100 983.91 984.77 0.86 4930 5030 100 0.11 -0.03 0.00 6942.0 6942.0 983.20 984.10 0.90 320 983.17 984.13 0.96 4705 5025 320 -0.03 0.03 0.00 6651.0 6651.0 982.80 983./0 0.90 325 982.78 983.69 0.91 4700 5025 325 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 6424.0 6424.0 982.50 983.50 1.00 1 320 982.53 983.47 0.94 4710 5030 320 0.03 -0.03 0.00 6085.0 6085.0 981.90 982.80 0.90 260 981.93 982.84 0.91 4975 5235 260 0.03 0.04 0,00 5863.0 5863.0 981.69 982.66 0.97 4830 5160 330 - - - 5803.0 5803.0 981.46 981.69 0.23 4830 5160 330 • - - 5465.0 5465.0 979.60 9/9./0 0.10 190 979.58 979.73 0.15 4920 5110 190 -0.02 0.03 0.00 - 5150.0 5150.0 977.10 9/8.10 1.00 185 977.13 978.13 1.00 4870 5055 185 0.03 0.03 0.00 4528.0 4528.0 977.40 9/8.20 0.80 438 9/7.38 978.19 0.81 4800 5238 438 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 4088.0 4088.0 977.20 977.90 0.70 290 9/7.14 977.86 0./2 4745 5035 290 -0.06 -0.04 0.00 3629.0 3629.0 976.90 977.40 0.50 250 9/6.86 977.39 0.53 4850 5100 250 -0.04 -001 0.00 3167.0 3167.0 976.60 976.90 0.30 260 9/6.55 976.91 0.36 4800 5060 260 -0.05 0.01 0.00 2947.0 2947.0 - . - - 976.44 976.70 t 0.26 4850 5050 200 - - - Peter's Creek Floodplain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Tones SPEC•22161 Peter's Creek Main Branch 1/27/2026 TABLE 5:EFFECTIVE VS PROPOSED CON DITI ONS Effective PropascdConditions i Difference Proposed 1%Annual 1%Annual 1%Annual Effective Floodway Water Floodway Floodway Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water Condition Chance Water Floodway Width 3 Chance Water Floodway Width River Station Surface Elevation Surcharge Width Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment + lace Elevation on River Station Surface Elevation (ft)I, Surface Elevation g (ft) (ft) (if) (10 (ft) Elevation (ft) (ft) ' Station Station (ft) (ft) (n) 2918.0 29180 _ r 2869.0 28840 9/6.42 9/6.64 0.22 4850 1 5050 200 _ 2426.0 2426.0 9/5.80--t 9/5.90 0.10 1/0 9/5.84 9/5.8/ 0.03 4960 5130 170 r 0.04 0.03 0.00 1957.0 1957.0 97440 974.40 0.00 395 9/4.41 974.40 -0.01 4940 5335 395 0.01 0.00 0.00 1684.0 16840. 972.80 972.80 0.00 i„_-/0 972.79 972.79 0.00 4968 5038 70 0.01 _ -0.01 0,00 1477.0 1477.0 971.90 971.90 0.00 4970 5030 60 - - 1428.0 1428.0 _ _ - _ - 1379.0 1379.0 - - - 968.45 1 968.45 0.00 4970 5025 55 - - - _ 1284.0 1284.0 - - • __.__ 968.75 968.75 t 0.00 4965 5030 65 • - 1006.0 1006.0 - - _ ---- 728.0 728.0 - - - 959.52 959.53 0.01 4965 5030 65 - 538.0 538.0 967.40v 967.40• 0.00 85 958.01 958.03 0.02 4940 5025 85 9.39 -9.37 0.00 278.0 278.0 967.40* 967.40* 0.00 - 87 955.30 955.30 0.00 4934 5021 87 -12.10 -12.10 0.00 SUMMARY OF RESULTS PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 Peter's Creek Floodplaln Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC'22161 Peter's Creek Trib C 12/9/2025 TABLE 6:EFFECTIVE VS.DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE Effective Duplicate Effective v6.3.1 Difference • 7 1%Annual Chance , 1%Annual Chance 1%Annual Chance Floodway Water Floodway Floodway Water Floodway Left Right Floodway Water River Station Water Surface Floodway Width 1 Water Surface Floodway Width Water Surface Surface Elevation• Floodway Width Surface Elevation Surcharge Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment : Encroachment Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft) (f1) Station Station (ft) Elevation (n) (ft) p0 (ft) (ft) • 6849.0 1087.80 1088.40 0.60 20 1087.82 1088.39 057 4990 5010 20 0.02 I -0.01 0.00 6213.0 107600 1076.40 0.40 20 1076.01 10/6.38 0.37 4930 5010 20 0.01 -0.02 000 58895 - - - - 1070.74 10/074 0.00 4%35 r -..5015 30 - - - 5752.0 5614.5 - - - - 1068.53 10,8.07 0.44 4985 5015 30 - - - 5307.0 1067.93 1068.10 0.20 35 1067.92 t 10,8.16 0.24 4975 5010 35 0.02 D.06 0.00 5117.0 1065.70 101L70 0.00 62 1065.68 1(3,5 65 0.03 4970 5032 62 -0.02 -0.05 ODD 4691.0 106140 10t .00 0.60 40 1061.43 1062.02 0.59 4980 5020 40 0.03 D.D2 0.00 448.0 - - - 1060.49 1061.46 0.97 4`_60 5035 75 - - - 4457.0 - - - - - - - - - - - 4429.0 - - - - 1057.64 1058.04 0.40 49,0 5035 75 - - - 4137.0 1055.30 1056.20 0.90 30 1055.26 1056.22 0.96 4985 5015 30 -D.D4 0.02 0.00 3715.0 105160 1052.30 0.70 20 1051.64 1052.34 0./0 4trin 501020 0.04 0.04 DOD 3292.0 104940 1049.70 0.30 50 1049.40 1049.12 0.32 49/5 5025 50 0.00 0.02 • 0.00 3048.0 - - - - 1048.04 1048.04 0.00 4984 5016 32 - - - 3008.0 - - - 2968.0 - - - - 1044.36 1045.24 0.88 4984 r-.-.-5016 32 - - - 2735.0 1042.40 1043.40 1.00 40 1042.40 1043.39 0.99 49/0 _ 5010 40 0.00 D D1 D.DD 2458.0 104Q70 1041.70 1.00 40 1040.67 1041.66 0.99 49/0 5010 40 -0.03 -0.04 0.00 2088.0 1037.80 1038.50 0.70 50 1037.81 1038.55 0.74 4960 5010 50 0.01 005 0.00 1718.0 103630 1037.00 0.70 35 1035.89 1037.03 �1.14 4975 5010 35 -DM Q03 0.00 1652.5 _ • - - 1035.69 1036.84 1.15 4990 5015 25 - - - 1640.0 t_ - -- - - - 1627.5 - - - 1035.34 4 1036.15~ 0.81 4930 5015 25 - - - 1556.0 10346) 1035.10 0.50 20 1034.56 1035.07 0.51 4990 5010 20 -0.04 -0.03 0.00 14610 - - 1034.24 1035.11 0.87 4565 5015 60 - - - 1435.0 - - - - - - 1409.0 • - - _ 1032.52 I 1033.40 0.88 4955 5015 60 - - - 1254.0 1032.20' 1032.50 0.30 35 II 0I 1 1032.47 0.96 4930 _ 5025 35 -0.69 -0.03 0.00 1054.0 - • - 3. 1030.05 0.35 4973 5013 40 - - - 879.0 I i;•. • -.... 1028.22 0.14 4980 500 _.._. _....25 436.0 - - Iu..1;r, 1024 76 0.00 4978 5013 35 - - - *ValuesfromFISreportreflectI, wit,':I ri,:::Peters Creek Peter's Creek Floodplain Improvements SUMMARY OF RESULTS M.Torres SPEC-22151 Peter's Creek rob C 12/9/2025 TABLE 7:EFFECTIVE VS.CORRECTED EFFECTIVE Effective r A Corrected Etl Retie Difference 1%Annual Corrected 1%Annual Chance 1%Annual Chance Effective Flnud way Water Flood way Chance Water Floodway Water Floodway left Right Floodway Water Eff active Water Surface Flood way Width( Flood way Width f Water Surface Flood way Width River Station Surface Flev atlon Surcharge Surface Surface Elevation Surcharge Encroachment Encroachment Surface Elev atlon River Station Elevation (It) (1,) E3e (It) (It) (10 I Elevation (1t) (It) Station Station (It)on (ft) tt) (i t) 6849.0 6849.0 108/.80 j 1088.40 0.60 20 108/.82 1088.39 0.5/ 4990 5010 20 0.02 0.01 000 • 6213.0 6213.0 10/6.00 10/6.40 0.40 20 fi 10/601 10/6.38 0 3/ 4990 5010 20 0.01 -0.02 0.00 58895 5889.5 -_t.. l 10/0./A 10/0./4 0.00 4985 5015 30 5/S2.0 5/52.G __- 5614.5 56145 106853 1.068.9/ 0.44 4985 5015 .10 5307.0 530/.0 1067.90 1068.10 0.20 35 106/.92 1068.16 0.24 49/5 5010 35 0.02 0.06 000 511/.0 5117.0 1065./0 1065.70 0.00 62 1065.68 1065.65 0.03 4970 5032 62 0,02 0.06 0.00 4691.0 4691.0 1061.40 1062.00 0.60 40 1061.43 1062.02 0.59 4980 5020 40 0.03 0.02 0.00 4485.0 4485.0 - - 1060.49 1061.46 0.96 4960 503 5 /5 4457.0 4457.0 � . • - - - 4429.0 4429.0 - 105/.64 1058.04 0.40 4960 5035 75 - 4137.0 4137.0 1055.30 1056.20 0.90 30 1055.26 1056.22 0.96 4985 5015 30 -0.04 0.02 0.00 3/15.0 3715.0 105160 1052.30 0./0 20 1051.64 1052.34 0.69 4990 5010 20 ' D04 ' 004 0,00 92.3292.0 320 1049 40 1049./0 0.30 50 1049.40 1049.72 0.32 4975 5025 -0 0 SO 1 0.02 0,00 3048.0 30480 1048.04 1046.04 0.00 4984 5016 32 - - 3008.0 3008.0 _. -_ - - - _... _ 2968.0 2968.0 104436 1045.24 0.88 4984 5016 3? - _ 2735.0 2/35.0 1042.40 1043.40 1.00 40 1042.40 1043.39 0.99 49/0 5010 40 0.00 0.01 0.00 __ 2458.0 2458.0 1040./0 1041./0 1.00 40 L040.66 1041.58 0.92 49/0 5010 40 ' 0,04 0.12 0.00 r 2066.0 442066.0 1037.80 1038.SO 0.70 50 ' 1037.81 1038.04 i 0.24 4960 5020 60 0.01 -0.t ::: lO,DD 1/18.0 1/18.0 1036.30 1037.00 0.70 35 1035.89 1036/8 I 0.89 4949 5015 66 -0.41 ' 'r , 1 31.00 1652.5 1652.5 - - 1035.69 1036.4/ 0.78 4960 5020 •- 1640.0 1640.0 - 7 L625 1627.5 - - 1035.34 1035.73 0.38 4965 5020 1556 0 1556.0 1034.60 1035.10 0.50 20 103458 1035.44 0 87 4986 5040 54 -0.02 i 0.34 t 461.G 1461.0 (- 103428 103525 097 4980 5040 60 ,•„ 1435.0 14350 - 1409.0 1409.0 - - - 103259 1032 90 0 31 4991 5015 !f 24 - a ?^ 12540 1228,0 103220 1032.50 0.30 35 1031.27 1031.39 0.12 250 _._ 320 70 1143.0 - - 1030.06 1030.89 0.83 1120 1198 }' 78 1054.0 1030.0 _.. •- _ 1029.28 1029.72 0.44L 1145 1187 _i- _ 42,. _-_ 879.0 - - - - _ _ - • - - 666.0 - - - - 1026.50 1026.76 0 26 1035 1085 50 - - 609.0 - - - - 1025.93 1026.21 0.34 1200 1250 50 - - - 556.0 1025.17 1025.13 0.02 1208 1250 42 436.0 438.0 - 4 - • 1024.09 102428 0 18 1150 1190 40 - - - 279.0 • - i - 1022./5 1022.97._.. 0.22 _.. 920 958 38 - - 118.0 _ - - - _ 1021.40 1021.62 0.23 780 815 35 - - "Values from FIS report reflect backwater from Peter's Creek 51 ' 1 ill 888! . 888188 . 818888 . 8888,88 , 888 8'8 . 8 . .8' it-- 000 OOOIOO O;OOOO Ooo$Z.^„ QAlo . �°,1R s , . s td' 888 . 888`180 �88888: . 88 - 0 0 0 6,6 did 0 61666 0', 66 Q G .- .. •- v m � O 8 t , 1 s E i I i E W, 8881. 88i8!88 , 8?8888i. 8888 - - _ 4 m u 'O 0 O, O OIOi0 O OIO O Q O1 O O Q O -- - - .- -- Q L N 1 1 r 3 igi • if RRRI . RlRbfn • P.18821:4 na<.e .c z. : r - - < _ 7 .. s ws W I l . I E. t fi ( I [ ? I ! 1 i r T -, 0 rm8 00 r0 80l8m8 .. _ _ - _ - Gr_ d O 0 4 0 O d0 0 d O 0 d - - LLr 1 ` f I 1 1 1 a ' I I 1 3 »,1i; aAI18 �* sq� - s - - - W- goo - _ - _ - _ - N i.= dos; '4.0. r.m LL3 ' tt ilifi -. I H . , I 15d ii ,- u T. 2.o 7,1fTbmf aina�a, - = _ 2 4 V �. r 1 I I. RRRI• MAg.94 • '^jRR5SP mLi! _ = 7 _ A. ' j 1 { mg c = _ Ti = - - _ _ - - ffi'• a SX = b " 0 oOO' • 00 dlq!moad- 00000i 80 dol.~i,i 000 00L; 0d •€ 0 I I 1 i 3 5 R m a vi ry e a'1^.1 1Ti,Z'a3 n m 1 64i i,Q a l 0' 41 g I �1 L s I1 1r. C 1 .t c m �' c im^,sli :v: aRaoa �c �slp:s a,sN DrAi oa 1 „ .. a W 'VIE t o o ill • 'girding Oi 00 5 N d gSiti • 1 5 , Nli I 6. Y L' -.olo m. 0555�s. O,I a a' O 031.11 1�1�,� • vi e..I v. I ,I -, O Fi 8 '1�e+rl ed e�l'1 e�i eJC .1 3 1 9 L a. 0 0.1;0 J.OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0I1S1 O N10.o O o oj0 0 O;O o 0 0 0 u € ti G ay. l'A z'AThlig Z-;$:�ws a4; c06r 1•'1"4.3 Dig g$$M:s3$ �pgg S 3 10 :v1 m N<e e m ry 7G k-c.r.r.a,.r.r.r.-1.-1 ri.r dS; tH d�F.'.�� o a W I I e H 0 0 ^Zr' 0 0{A' • ..0 V1 old of0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' O O _ 0 P d d d d d s a5 m Qf,' RI mlm v1l�i.en u+ -y d 5 0 r�.nm �'e m`4 ' Q a i 1 -T- s 888!. 88818.8 . 8'88.88 , 888888 888 8888 . 888888. „ R b o o O7 O O Oi0 O OIO 0 0 0 O O d d^ O O O O 0 0 °?O �? d d X ,Y-, a { G e T �. s 3-g-488 . 88888 8'8888; , 880.88 oOOOO QOQo a 0 0 Oi O O O0 O O0 000 O O 0 0:, P p p 4 4 Q Q 0 o P 9 v C q LL kfr i H I i , 1 f ,, i _L t 1 -. 888' , 888i88 . 8j8888 . 888888 88 -. =gym' 0 0 0, 0 0 070 0 0 o O o of o o 0000 O O o o n o o g q rz i I iF 3 I R,91R ' R A gl.T ,'^.'I.;9i R m� • m 8 8.8'en`'8 , NIi, rv!�R-8 orv1v ! 8 8'Q 8'8 s i y , faA ooaar 3qi 1' Ql t AA o s . . W 1 i 1 5 1 in o .n o o i I Li .iH (;n ,n om o. << ; s W 1 ( e g" f m'w m ry 8- 'm� 1 I Q �o mm S = Q *,wm . 83S 0NIM MS a,. m RSS nrm § 0 d d 'd 0.000 0 00 0:0 d d 0 d d'd d d 6 0.000 000 d d d S , n1.4 m NW " L, _ _ - it Id- mwd "868; 868,88 6'66881 a� a` .3 I 1 v $ Aii I 8 a , ; K m 8 n 2 a 8c< 7 ry ia' o n' w a c _ - n m`m . gg ' gg�i38 rfl 04 fZigr = tFIFdiZ i y �' w"' o 0 0 o 0 . .... o 0 0 0- _ _ - - _ - _ :o o-.0 0 0 Q 3 := k!;RRRI. Fi>Re@� �SSRSSS 'm� - _ _ =. Q , 8oaem 8 i . s 4E1 i ' i 1 I 1 E 1 0 o m; 0 o iR i(' r 04.0 w - _ .-,ig�4 r. .o N n 8M 88Bia9i ;S'i 9.9.9i'. §"i c - - , g' ,-.1,- n'�..'.".. { i c , W S j X W i 1 ',I.,' 8 p10 nm8 Q4888 . 8 8m8 . 88 m - = ry `m-o°-.°ry ry b S' O O 0 G O D = _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 '$ ssE rIA N t- A" V_ _ = _ 'argrgs rpm E $ 0 , _, i i p C s o mfo u.001.00•0I00 10000 _ '00 11g,;, .u. .nv w le iIv m m S 9 M$ j d u b 22 sr rpm'''-N'41 2 O- O O yy��ryp Oyy{{{ O in 1-1 pry 2 p m O :7 _ c c O - . . y,ry a { C y g %b N N t!1 T V. a:O O r T m m r N ,�1 r W S R lA di 1 U Z 9. ep- 1N pIp y YIpY1 tp� N N {Np spy �/ W py to to,{/�VI Oh 0 n S N I. g1. , N' N a,[Y'01 Y1 N y SI' 01 Oh W'O1 O a. 3 :V+w e m a,1.0 8,.N 3 Ili 1 O 1 b! • 1 °.o! o o o;blo in oo'inkm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`o O o o o O o o.La o Ut o O s- ` 1 ;' r a I i I t ti j i m - an o o 3 A a o I I { i - f- o g I $ i�� ag a,$1 a �g 8o z i 1 i # j i 1 j i!S o ! 88 8 888 888'i 8 $ f 8 ; T i I 0 0 r 0 0 . .• o!0 0 PPP 0o ,. . t. !. S 1 I tS ' 1. c�oss . . ' b'`d8 8' 88 $ o E i2 I • i. I I. . ! •!8 blg8$'• • 152i8 as81. . . 80 Z. I II I ! ` ( I 4 Y, Y Yl-Y N'YIY Y 'Y Y Y .Yt4 Y Y Y Y' Y Y+Y Y Y lY Y Y Y1Y Y Y.Y n % k 0 0 0 , ;o 0 0 0 o a o 9,3. ( F.Qpppp�� : 0 0 0;a 17 tItotlanp' � t,pati h1an ! tototo8E o ,to aFS� iu . y000i. to a W uo N V IN 40 N to N VI W� 01 00 0f.01 O to a s 01 N a 1y A to 10Itn V O ' - n E E 40 d..,0 V V iY Wo m VI dl VJ b y O mi A a'Ai01 A Ito W 00 N W .. 1-, ti q. 1 � Y•Y YlYY Y iY-Y Y Y1 E.Y Y, YIY g Y Yi Q Q Q Q i 7- �Qy °F' n N a sn QS,OMf. i :io a to ' IA V.i' .:s.lm N m 6.-,8s b ' LI 5 Cs.ocr,F.'.:iO a m i n to I 1 I. I : I i Sil i 1 R K OIO 0 0 0 0 ,0 O O O OIO 01 O`0 O O 0i0 O 0 00 0 IOp O O o c S -11 2335,3W 8,8I73' v;�i 888 a 8 8 N°e'�.$ `� s $: S',t � = e n g18818's,3 ' I8,8Ig 8I83 ' `$g$ ooWl ZN838 000 Uo8 a _ 3 Opp 1{ypI Y NY_NY ipY lY Y1w„ , in yp1 ( (g! I �g ' n §:§OD N:bli8 ' IW :0 N AiA S • NI.N Fo..Yo... . w', w w W N W . .o+ .o+ .o+ O2 i a 010,0I V1 Ho nj 0. 0 '0 40 0 0 OIO, 01 N,O N N .:O N'.,O N, ,:,O 0 j 3 4 1 ; I — 4 -- ---i I— 111 p I rt 1 I ! I 818 8j ! a;igig • Id!8j8 AI. IV N:. ,8&I 8 8 8 N ' tS 8.88 Zit • I 8 s 8 8 • 8IO of - 1 f1 z s 1 E , i I 1 i j x i I, {p p PPOP ¢P0 I, P¢P Pal E , * „ ! . s .. 1, e: SS sass 1 sss • . , o sz PI I 1 1 I I I ! _ . E( , . !I P ¢6 6 6,, „ plop i, P¢P , , , b e d al : ' i• '1, OY1 . ' j • 1,..at Na ....22 ' N OI Nr I 1 I 1 i =• I, I 85P0 PIPP oPPI, , PO �s ' I' ' • I 2 ' ;S ,' 188881' ' ' 8188 ' ' I' 888 88. `£ 30 CERTIFIED TOPOGRAPHIC WORK MAP Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 I w Legend Wt" N 4 10 Area of Revision s' $� ', Effective 100 yr Floodplain eE... "sNNN�': Effective 500 yr Floodplain ,062131\� : a k — Effective 100 yr Floodway '�' T ."ra'� .� ?' �9p�� R b �crrMl'�_.._. Proposed 100 yr Floodplain ° $ ,�° o `�1 -"— Stubbs :,.,,,'- N Proposed 500 yr Floodplain 06,n O s \` o Proposed 100 yr Floodway N o� — Peters Creek Proposed Cross Sections Sg cP — Trib C Proposed Cross Sections y' Peters Creek is , ON pVE Proposed Stream Centerlines wetland 2� t� ppp1 — Effective Stream Centerlines41i �•� „• Proposed Contours �� Existing Contours 0 „,,, e 0 . , I � illIllrNrr -----is,,,„,..,,,_ ..4 Wetland 1 ', 44 '-** ��\ ., _ HydraWCT-RP °� � i :_ Mappnp De In Povrt l 0 : , ( , O D ..•VAUR4 RD NW Floodplain ,ll ___._\, >`` R9 Benching oa, rz missing,„,,,•••,„011111=1" . s .4', ---"...-01111111.1111 ,441- ,;,i.3. ....... .. stippr :7.5 ,mc , m.,a �—► 'w, sa '4 °w '_ lom Tributary C ro° * , e, 6 •'N ,7 ,�, o ,> '� ��, ,,, 'gym j' \,,,, „Pa +� a ? i Icy, L,, ,,,, OTE ALL ELEVATIONS PROVIDED IN 3 P viNR 'c ii ° ..,a.r..n..u..w.�ai,rcv rw�wv acw,xu....r.vn r..m.wvr�w.+.w- s�.u..�.,renw.�i ..e.m,. uw>aw•s .ae.,.nu..v„�...+. �:•+moo .-i. a� ,\_, TOPOGRAPHIC WORK MAP al 0 150 300 600NIS- PETERS CREEK Feet PROJECT#: SPEC-22161 1"=300' ROANOKE,VIRGINIA MCADAMS MAPPING INFORMATION Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 , , m� Legend o Area of Revision "` ay Proposed 100 yr Floodplain o Proposed 100 yr Floodway m' — Proposed Stream Centerlines +44 `;Y 4w6 °t41, Existing Contours '11, ,"" l 1070 e ,moo; Proposed Contours o �* — Peters Creek Proposed Cross Sections ti �� A� a Peters Creek Ineffective Flow Areas <is_ oS''� . FF 'k, ti FgDo i 8R • .aii - Ci Al.. . �2 !i_iloi, r-7 — ..%Ilir // \ '",, 0 ....,MUR4 RD NW , ;; �.\ :8 ,„..., ' , "ar,„,,,,,, ii: ,g ,............_ .....,„....fig, . _. cr ,.„--- , 41110PP/r,__________„„,,, ,,: ..._---- , ,, Ian lio ✓N, -c.s,.w .cv.c.w., m ♦ / INEFFECTIVE FLOW AREAS - PETERS CREEK I I, 0 150 300 600 )11' PETERS CREEK J Feet PROJECT#: SPEC-22161 1"=300' ROANOKE,VIRGINIA M' Legend o Area of Revision "°`+ rx.„, West V11, Proposed 100 yr Floodplain a m o Proposed 100 yr Floodway — Trib C Proposed Cross Sections o �9q &w P� — Proposed Stream Centerlines Op om f. ,e et; k..& Existing Contours 4 P� — Proposed Contours ; a" �' f?" a 8 Trib C Ineffective Flow Areas w ;` a • ,. F'' I �aR / yh* .. . / r �� r .: r• RD NW c.9 0.4:„.474: \7':-% 1.111te; ,,.. .tW ln P ro ea' INEFFECTIVE FLOW AREAS -TRIB C al 0 150 300 600 PETERS CREEK s Feet PROJECT#: SPEC-22161 1"=300' ROANOKE,VIRGINIA ¢ ,'l 2 EFFECTIVE MAPPING DATA Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Hood Study Report SPEC-22161 TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES - continued FLOODING SOURCE DRAINAGE AREA PEAK DISCHARGES(cfs) AND LOCATION (sq.miles) 10°A anal chance 2%annual chance 1%annual chance 0.2%annual chance MURRAY RUN At confluence with the Roanoke River 3.0 1,137 2,289 3,008 5,728 At State Route 720 (Colonial Avenue) 1.5 748 1,526 1,999 3,882 At State Route 419 0.3 251 528 688 1,400 ORE BRANCH At confluence with the Roanoke River 4.2 1,688 3,354 4,401 8,229 Upstream of unnamed tributary at Wonju Street 3.1 1,343 2,695 3,534 6,680 Downstream of Tanglewood Shopping Center tributary 2.5 1,162 2,346 3,070 5,824 Upstream of Tanglewood Shopping Center tributary 0.6 411 841 1,098 2,183 ORE BRANCH TRIBUTARY At confluence with Ore Branch 1.9 813 1,681 2,201 4,261 Downstream of unnamed tributary near intersection of Southern Lane and Southern Hills Drive 1.3 580 1,226 1,602 3,150 PAINT BANK BRANCH At confluence with Cole Hollow Brook 1.5 660 1,580 2,220 4,800 At Interstate Route 81 1.3 590 1,410 1,990 4,310 PETERS CREEK At confluence with the Roanoke River 9.0 2,297 4,486 5,738 9,020 Downstream of confluence of Peters Creek Tributary C 6.0 1,987 4,144 5,056 8,024 PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY A At confluence with Peters Creek 1.3 798 1,495 1,840 2,980 PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY B At confluence with Peters Creek 1.8 965 1,878 2,335 3,872 23 TABLE 4 -SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES - continued FLOODING SOURCE DRAINAGE AREA PEAK DISCHARGES(cfs) AND LOCATION (sq.miles) 10%annual chance 2%annual chance 1%annul chi►rkc 0-2%annual chance PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C At confluence with Peters Creek 1.0 279 529 654 1,070 ROANOKE RIVER Upstream of Back Creek 512.0 20,400 35,000 43,500 67,500 Upstream of Tinker Creek 400.0 16,800 29,000 35,2001 54,2001 At USGS Gage No. 02055000 (Walnut Street) 395.0 16,800 29,000 35,600 56,600 Upstream of Peters Creek 365.0 16,200 28,200 34,600 55,300 At State Route 760 (Diuguids Lane) 315.0 14,700 26,200 32,100 52,300 At State Route 734 270.0 13,000 23,100 29,200 48,300 SNYDER BRANCH At confluence with Williams Branch 0.6 372 772 1,010 2,029 At High Street 0.1 118 225 275 490 STYPES BRANCH At confluence with the Roanoke River 3.5 1,100 2,650 3,700 7,950 Upstream of Interstate Route 81 and confluence of Little Bear Rock Branch 1.5 600 1,470 2,050 4,650 TINKER CREEK At confluence with the Roanoke River 111.9 11,5002 23,3002 30,8002 53,2002 Upstream of confluence of Glade Creek 78.6 7,8002 15,8002 21,2002 42,0002 Upstream of confluence of Lick Run 67.9 6,7002 13,7002 18,3002 33,1002 At Mason Mill Road 66.2 6,5002 13,2002 17,8002 33,1002 Downstream of Carvin Creek 62.3 6,0002 12,3002 16,5002 31,6002 Upstream of Carvin Creek 33.4 4,013 8,237 10,890 19,488 At Ardmore Drive 30.7 3,787 7,829 10,345 18,600 At U.S. Route 11 (county boundary) 28.6 3,712 7,683 10,147 18,287 'Discharge reduced due to overflow into Lick Run 2Discharges routed due to Carvin Cove Reservoir 24 Interior, 1963, et cetera; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1971). The following tabulation shows the channel and overbank "n" values for the streams studied by detailed methods: Stream Channel "n" Overbank"n" Roanoke County (Unincorporated Areas) 0.040-0.075 0.040-0.110 City of Roanoke 0.016-0.050 0.070-0.200 City of Salem 0.030-0.060 0.050-0.150 Town of Vinton 0.030-0.050 0.100-0.200 October 15, 1993, FIS In the October 15, 1993, FIS, cross-sectional data were obtained from the HEC-2 computer models that were used in the previously printed FISs for the jurisdictions included in this countywide FIS with supplemental sections added where they were needed in order to reflect hydraulic changes in the floodplain (USACE, 1988; FEMA, 1990; FEMA, 1984; FEMA, 1981; FEMA, 1977). These supplemental sections were based on field surveyed structures and channel sections. In the October 15, 1993, FIS, water-surface elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals were computed using the USACE HEC-2 step-backwater computer program (USACE, 1988). The HEC-2 models from the previously printed FISs for the jurisdictions in this countywide FIS were used, where available, with additional data obtained where needed to reflect hydraulic changes in the floodplain (USACE, 1988; FEMA, 1990; FEMA, 1984; FEMA, 1981; FEMA, 1977). Supplemental sections were added using the new strip topographic mapping (Air Surveys Corporation, 1990). Streams that had no significant changes in their hydraulic characteristics and less than 10% change in the 1% annual discharge were only remapped, the profile redrawn, and the Floodway Data Table modified to match profile stations. The models for newly detailed studied streams are based on survey structures and channel sections at selected locations, with supplemental sections taken from the new topographic maps (Air Surveys Corporation, 1990). Flood profiles were drawn showing computed water-surface elevations for floods of the selected recurrence intervals. Starting water-surface elevations for the Roanoke River were based on water-surface elevations for the upper limits of the downstream study. Starting water-surface elevations for all other streams studied in detail were based on the slope/area method. In the October 15, 1993, FIS, channel roughness factors were based on calculated values at recording stream gages in the study area. For all streams studied by detailed methods, the channel "n" values ranged from 0.016 to 0.075, and the overbank "n" values ranged from 0.040 to 0.200. 28 FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION MEAN WITHOUT WITH CROSS DISTANCE' WIDTH SECTION AREA VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE SECTION (FEET) (SQUARE FEET) (FEET PER (NAVD) (NAVD) (NAVD) • SECOND) PETERS CREEK Y 12102 60 542 10.6 1001.0 1001.0 1002.0 1.0 Z 12593 83 709 8.1 1004.7 1004.7 1004.9 0.2 AA 13344 44 538 10.7 1009.0 1009.0 1009.1 0.1 AB 15288 146 838 6.9 1015.7 1015.7 1016.6 0.9 AC 15558 233 1,187 4.8 1018.2 1018.2 1018.6 0.4 AD 15835 268 919 6.2 1019.4 1019.4 1019.9 0.5 AE 16416 240 2,140 2.7 1021.5 1021.5 1022.5 1.0 AF 16827 318 2,976 1.9 1022.3 1022.3 1023.1 0.8 Ar. 17_647 190 1.324 4.3 1024.5 1024.5 1025.4 0.9 AH 18077 170 1,088 5.3 1026.2 1 U26.1 1 Ulb.J u. Al 19373 150 1,326 3.3 1032.5 1032.5 1033.3 0.8 AJ 19832 145 945 4.6 1033.2 1033.2 1034.2 1.0 AK 2012b SU 400 a.v WO4.1 i u.'.i 'u0 6.8 AL 20581 55 443 9.9 1036.7 1036.7 1037.7 1.0 AM 21080 60 434 10.1 1040.3 1040.3 1040.6 0.3 AN 21704 60 377 11.7 1046.6 1046.6 1046.7 0.1 AO 22224 75 515 8.5 1053.8 1053.8 1054.0 0.2 AP 22566 150 592 7.4 1060.0 1060.0 1060.0 0.0 AQ 1 22904 130 1,169 3.8 1062.5 1062.5 1063.5 1.0 AR 23198 160 1 1,216 3.6 1063.4 1063.4 1064.4 1.0 AS 23756 105 727 6.0 1065.8 1065.8 1066.8 1.0 AT 24123 135 978 4.5 1070.1 1070.1 1071.0 0.9 AU 24543 190 1,212 3.6 1072.9 1072.9 1073.9 1.0 AV 24879 155 891 4.9 1075.0 1075.0 1075.9 0.9 AW 25223 110 I 639 6.9 1078.0 I 1078.0 1078.7 1 0.7 1 Feet above confluence with Roanoke River. D FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA rr° ROANOKE COUNTY, VA m AND INCORPORATED AREAS PETERS CREEK f BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY ELEVATION I MEAN -T WITHOUT WITH CROSS DISTANCE' WIDTH SECTION AREA VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE SECTION (FEET) (SQUARE FEET) (FEET PER (NAVD) (NAVD) (NAVD) SECOND) PETERS CREEK T 121 ITAAY(` A 1254 35 172 3.8 1032.2 1031.5' 1032.5 1.0 B 1 155E 20 97 6.8 1034.E 1034.E 1035.1 0.5 C 1718 35 187 3.5 1036.3 1036.3 1037.0 0.7 DQ6 50 1 fi3 4.0 1037.8 1037.8 I 1038.5 1 0.7 E d 8 40 165 I 4.0 104U.1 1 U4U./ 1041.1 1.0 F 2735 40 163 4.0 1042.4 1042.4 1043.4 1.0 G 3292 50 218 3.0 1049.4 1049.4 1049.7 0.3 H 3715 20 86 7.6 1051.6 1051.6 1052.3 0.7 1 4137 30 177 3.7 1055.3 1055.3 1056.2 0.9 JI 4691 40 198 3.3 1061.4 1061.4 1062.0 0.6 K 5117 62 148 4.4 10fi5.7 10fi5.7 1065.7 0.0 L 5307 35 166 2.1 1067.9 1067.9 1068.1 0.2 M 6213 20 47 7.3 1076.0 1076.0 1076.4 0.4 N 6849 20 70 4.9 1087.8 1087.8 1088.4 i 0.6 1 1 I I I I ' Feet above confluence with Peters Creek. 2 Elevation computed without consideration of backwater effects from Peters Creek. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA co ROANOKE COUNTY, VA r rn AND INCORPORATED AREAS PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C • •+to lam _.,�, .+ 0 _,,. t, n 7., �^`'f � - "mil - .4FIR .44` ' -• wE.1 O O i • a'¢ K-.i'*1 mc'+�s. y•s.-f y�'1,1 - , aR �.�. 1.•. I.. a. E a d l:..,..... F '-1 3:• "._ N-i ' q'• w�r >.,.. ` �•f•y)L r~. .e f.E w _ .X. ." t ;,w �. C144i..,. • 1 :. ',,'::::,,,,,i,,,,,,.,.. � >a �'l+>�'�� mas >ti� - �:-�..i � ��' � '��s -.. '"ym,'t tZ ! ZA E s - C. ▪ wM s fs Z ' try . I _ ,� • +.: . �.,,� • • ` , 1. • '�• l �' '.w : • t 'i' I,�. l L• �4A 'R ,u S-' - iw.I,r''Zi + ai1 y-..t.� v , + 46N. � r '.: 41-' i e ; "+ • 2r} .a �r _ 1 41L Jam; ! y .. • S Ye A .s- L.. '��. ♦i �, ,# tom ., ? :Si ,...r.:� < . . h -•k<i+�-ram s. s't p All - 4d"' .: '�,,ee •w{' h.e ._a•. , " .<. A Z.•a: a•Saa,.,a f Al' • t4. „—. ' a r. —4, • 'V i, it `t = 44,rO!«.f " • '♦ �f'�t 0- )' - © =A . ,tee• if%•, 1/•J• 'Q _"'�• �� le. � « ^ � A ,+ice ie• ° s > �/ e s r 0 m.n,sew sress..'w FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE NATIONAL FL000 INSURANCE PROGRAM sEE fLs f XDEx Mw An NRM r.¢umD� ¢ . an Lo lr,suRANCE RATE MAP WM.Rrfleee Boa.M<t) •wwmeuen er< E6 NUM RLOOO RE.E,REw weRm.u.o.an,<.R ••" E`" `•" ,n ew ES 5ee01 ww .w 5 wE p .,,n,, 142 or 277 !WARD ARMS Rep+eMRt.. .asa. "" ,,,.e..,�.w.„•.9.X�-b.... -o ,.ao Esoo In 5W test 6.000 4-1d Meters = *spoons than ono..cent.cirNeso a As re.aermetNend eskee.tweeCO 44' ®71, _C COMMUNITY NUMBER PAIR ROMOKS COUNTS sense sus OiCEP AREAS Of Mn••nn Fbae Ink ew 1.Larx S o ,_..au��.+...e�wn,a...r�.w�ww-+n.,.sm...a.•e••e -0 Ott Of SMBe voice ataz FLOOD NALWO ,yes 0 NO SCREEN N..of NFn,Y A.wa .s.+eeie. •....•«w++rao.w..m.ava.rw..a. L. I 1uXma L.. m OTHER AREAS N..aueenm•w.Meewae...c C O 03 STRUCTURES Lone ONE or RANO o-=Doss mrmven a,o•ewlae•n E.r.wet.urns.VAAASen V — OTHER m edseq iw un INEEI FEATURES eweewim....., MAP NUMBER 51161C0142G EFFECTIVE DATE SoptemMe 29,2007 EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C—Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES STORM DRAINAGE STRICTURES PROPER.I OWNERS NO..oe Sheer Status.'1. WYERIS FOR PPES AND STRUCTURES SNOWN NEIE.ARE BASED ON FIELD FINAL 021 SAIMARYMAWCLE .N13 SANITARY eIWpLE 112125 SANITARY MAN.BE nose ST«M M.NAILE MIN 91ORN M.NHOL£ O ® O T AMASURRTREY s000.0 BE VERIFIED PRIOR rOCWsrmuCirW Submittal Date: f010.9,'fe'PVCFROM.rMM NV•10• 015 1/45'ITS•IRON FRW A.D.) = 52(15-IRONER..2.NB INV.our.IO2e.3B OS.CPP TO 4LWO cONNECTI RWNI•N.Too RECESSED RCP FROMra0r}1 P T BI LLC •' CITY OFROANOKE 3 MVESMEs.PTERr5k TYPE AND INVERT 01-26-2024 W an or PVC FROAeINNI xV 0,=IOII.H'115-IRON TO SNr01 SV OUT•N1s iTa'1RpI FROM..ro5,• 4417 rW1.W WV Wr=TOO RECESS (ra•RCP iO.0251 PERFORMED ION.OLT1.IOw.3r11C IRON TO.0541 .141bawnARVMAxN%E S'lTS MOII TO/fl4ll ONSTa'.TM..WOLE CENTERLINE OF STRUCTURE=1021.11' INST,.2001ITAX MAP MT,4i4L3. TAXPS auto on 401)OJ TAX..IU11Me3k evSPEERV4«axE$Wa AONFOiHED.SP.UC1'1EOY�uaTIW MEASUREMENTS HAVEBEENPERFO M.D O 10M SANITARY MANHOLE RECORD INVERT INFORMATION MANHOLE WV OUT.11001S 0e)15-RCP BOND CONNECD STORM MANHOLE /� 4 ND SURFACE LOCATION PERFORMEOBV COIN.TIORSL INSTRUMENT RIM.1o21O9r11'IWSI 2.101S43 MA </ O O GROUND eTIMPVCFR0.A., INV.IN- L16 IRON FRO Md10I.. ARV.. IT6 s.C.......v21 331 STORM ORATE.AEi .2020 ..,,, IROINA suwvEY BW.0U1 I025. 19•PVC i0M0T11 INv.ono=1015.erns IRON TO.T441110.1 • �'115-M«.ro.WXI •10ra9e' B.... an, 5 RUBLE TO ACCESS.FALLEN TREE ON TOP `10,1 WV IN 10216F OR RCP FROM/11340 OUT/•10162650-RC TO F20y) E34ERCJ:xCYMEDICAI PB3P0116 rAI IHABTJI MID.ER11r+,IMroSM DATUM ESTAMISNFD r1rRdIW REAL SARnARY MWIOLE SANITARY M.NAAE INV OUT.1O21.re'(OPENING INTO VDRCNI FROM RVCFS COUNCIL INCTAMMA 110140 4 TAX CODRECEWs LIADC RTAI CMS OBSERVATIONS WTUNE 1B,2023.DIFFERENTIAL 012. 1e 1..10 ,LVlb STORM IAMINOLE P AST I,aOoffiZJ Ax 1 RE RIVED FN3MNATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ING.CONTINUALLY ar as PVC FROMM., r•1.16.6ARYWMI«E RECESSED...OWN SMg FROST AD) .1J4251WM RATE INLET MMIPG WM O IMOLA. OPERATING REFERENCE STATION ICORS)'L904-.COORDINATE VALUES.P SHOWN ie INV WT r020. ,,,,NC,,,,,, W•101350'R8-IRWFRW.N1e1 EDD TES PVC TO M10111 TOP.1021. nWT•TOT�A-RCP FROMRpr3) TAX MAPK1.011 T AIPM12)W HEREON.ARE BASED ON VIRGIN.STATE ORD..SOUR IRE V'W•� NV.0,=1011311116 WON MINS, CENTENW:OF STRUC 102J.Y WxECES I 1. 111,CP TO IMMO GM'Of 4077.4011F .r31e 9A1400Y.MNpLE I BAAMTARY M4000 .77 E INV OUT=TOG RECESSED((TO.,3e=T 02011 STORM MANHOLE OMIST MOON.. O B FwRVE,-WITS SHDwI1HEREa•I FALL IN,HE FOLLOWING FLOOD HAtARDIWES: • =103J.e5' ROA 11019 RV MANH« ,.NAME TO DETERMINE Prof 511FrtY,E nr OF Ra41InE TAXM4PM1401ra E.ATEp ELMOIGION I.4( SES�O}A0EASi1[v TERMAVED THEM02.M.0 GLIDE OF ANCE FLOOD vim.MID INVWI1600•TO FRW4241n 'z1o1W3ro IRA•MOM FROM.N191 W-lOr2sSlre-IRON FROM 3N uU.0 .A� eLEvar 9AA FLOOD sOETERNxEO IMAM.THIS DFreNNNanW Is �] •1017 er or ro ro.MMl NV Wi.,,,,, 10 RONFRCM.14W1 - MI. CENTERLINE OF STRUCTURE" INV OUT•1015,26 RCP FROM 081.0Pov3 aV9EDION...ALOO ECTW«N ERMINED IMANCEIAIS OFP.Rou0 MV OUT•IOU SF INF IRON TO.N41) n3419IOHMOR.ArEWET !N-RCP TO MSS) A uwlB�uOeINST �/1 ON A FLOOD 1 . INV OUT•101J.5211e'rRON TO EHIM 1 ee!TONS COUVry MAP NUMBER 511e,c01ex MTN•REVISED O.TE OF SEPTEMBER M.200r F ARVMANKKE 0.07 IN10/ 0T112013 STORM. OF RO.MIONE TAXMARM1aM34 AN3 HAS NOT BEEN VERO.160 BYFIELOELEva Dams THE APPROxMUTE BOUNDARY G RR I U'DTI INIe 5AN1ARYMueIOLE RECORD Fr O.ENWwEMIN ILO-RCPFROMFIM31 Mal_ 'N'E T TUESEAREAS ARE SHOWN GRAnxGuv PER 1NIS N4P. .•1012er110.PVC FROM 02.301 ..01300 • -/Ot3a3'I M..WT•102200 OR RCP TO M1331, _ M10N 1.1.0Ie1 LAIRS. 111Yf10roFR«A.r3N) ) - CA51 - 36L15-RCM.1 .0051 *SR SRATIS 3� . .10001'1/P U1C/4 ro4U41M W 99'f1e-In«,FROM IN31 WV IN=,0+5OB'!IB'IROx FRrM.141s1(«M MANHOLE INV.WT 103r. (/s•RCP r0 EN011 LiICRM J.MULTI TAX MAP 1514omM T UNDERCRO.ND UTILITIES VVERE OESRYUTEO IPAINTED1 BY MISS UTILITY ON 0v12-20M Ov�CMW Fli0114wpl WV WT•101506%!IB'RtOHTO R4 p)1C45) OB IPII PO Ber ®tea MAPPING LLC IH.s HELD LOCATED T.DESIGNATED LINES AS 11V Mow TOIW1e1 r D 10041 GRP FE WET PB 3MO11e ORNA PROPERTIES LLC THE aCWRACY OF THE PAINT DESIGNATION SANITARY MAWR. MV W11o1J E TO INV.IN•ULMIV AI•1033 M11s RCP EROMIRtl19) .RfI SeY e. TAXMNA1eMr0 urILlivW«Mar TM = CEssE011e-RCProrM51/ W;r�' Tv OE. 1716 Val INDEED TO DEiEI D PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION aHUALS ARE INV IN.oiiarssrs•MaH FROM.'rm11 ' B SANITARY 3e1 SANITARY CEHTERLINEOOF STRUCTURE•l#1are' �N'/ 2e'ne-RcvFRwwaorl TAX M.�w%2wao REauMEDBvvIRaWa LAW urn 0GF VIRaN�1n14a�r41rL.smrvssxrm MV OUT•T.' 'IT.'MON M.... IN NV.Wi•1OM.11'lIS RCP ID MPEOLRFALL) S WW•r0136e'!e'M«e FRDIIADI N IP PVC FROMI11u1 O JR� REOU.E BYMOSMKIMHWm51PNW iOTBIT,O...MREAGVADW 1 NIB)-1D11.n'TOP OFDROP RAPE VN.WI.l01s IrOvvC IO.IMII .1kD5 STORM 5RUTE MIEN .T056 STORM ORATE MALLET ORAMJ04 HOLDINGS 2 LIG TAN M.PFIM101 ONO ACINITPS. N10 SANITARY M..OLE Mv. l0'IRONER...D.I TOP.10M51' TOP Cm, eF.,,S-ID«,FROM/.,,,INV OUT 115.64'1e•IRCMTO. 191 R34o SNOWY MAHOLE INV.OUT•1033 sr Ns.RCP TO AWOL INV IN•1016.BMW RCP MST/r1000P3B0 0 6.T.R005127TANEN Mr OUT•NrS. '(/SN«I ro.al/51 MANHOLE - 112000 STONMIGR.TE INLET NVO T1015.I� FRWY3O]sl 3B3rG 1rB PROENCEOF.01.SHOWN HEREON AND OCCUPATIOIL CUPATTRI FOUND COURT HOUSE DECO.S. RI M.10211C IS F2422 • • I�N.31.OW PVC FROMM:III M-100.r'IN-RCP EROMF.pn AAMAP IB140109 A%SPG.6 CONSITIUTEAB«MDNrY SUBSET AND Fw9p PREPARED EWITHOUT TIIE�v INA-101109'r NV.OUT a 102212 610•.K10,12431 -/011.30' - 1rTCMP TOAD/ 1B00pr.TRTE DOES NOT BENEFIT OF A TITLE TMENT THEREFORE ALL EASEMENTS MAY NOT SE SHOWN 02412 !Ills IRON FROLA4WSM 3Tn5'Rro FRWAO.1 DIN$0S0rwluwlglE ® ro51e T M5M ale OI6.60'YMaNHOLE MV OUT=1o10.14,16 MON TO AVM! FN.SANITARY MANHOLE iNv..OCT'•1025.20(16 RCP TO MIJ1 R TM_ iAAMAR4B1 1TJ IAA A WTNsswvEv. �4001 OTFc A.0.1 R�•101822 Y THE DIRECTA00RESwn9IME CHARGE OF D l MA230/.0/ 104711 RCP AD.) MANE L.FERWSON Mv.OUT•,Die. 1 s4NTAR wrw«E - ins IRWFRDM.24r5) .10WMORATEWEr v4v.OUT•rbrl4rnsnP TDAoI MPG 108ee (�� 0 UNDER DA1 WAS OBTAINED INED FREN Date: 01-26-24 .,./01025 r 56EDlle•01ON iROM.1U11 - 4e' INV. •r011. WM��i� TRIBAL c 1 PETERS CREEK ROCORP SUPERVISON THE IMAGERY ANOOR w vIN=1 5SM-PVCFRW A.O.) m114-RAW rD.D, 3rns-RCP FRWaew) .573 STORM TAX 1De N1GCmvp., eu Ben.1e901814e`«' Sneer 1o/4 =1.02.(1 I1IRON FROM AELI CENTERLINE O•STRUCTURE=10/2.N' IN.10N.4Y'(,1,RCP RCPT0FROM A.D., TOP1024.63.�MWET T rzaM TAX rPG 31013 MErallara 03033405Mri.A ar..irHArvslGwt'./O,'u /(�..NFDV4nF 00/TO Y wv.our•1021.0605•MmN roa.22) INV.OUT•r0M WV MI.rmarr�l4•PVC FROMA.o.1 0 GU MAPMr4on4 wnMlzes THROUGH THIS Pui osPArLU DATA INCLUDING Drawn B: TJW COO oTZORYMAL40OLE OUT•TOO CE38FD EO•eo,2354211 TYCFRCN 1'E TOPOGRAPHIC SURMEr 00 Checked By: JLN 26 an••loner.O'r ter acv ro.loln CENTERLINE TE"M"+EP EPE I CITY OF 'Qe A PORT/ON OF CITY OF ROANOIKE TAX 5 15"°N' B�+sR0.01E OWNED PARCELS ALONG O 119 G ee33 O 11210 Rev.e Rev.Dale cma< Na� TAX 11A NORTHWOOD DRIVE,PETERS CREEK 3 13577 ROAD B MEADOWBROOK ROAD PO 110 TM I AR.140R1i CITY Of ROAAWNE V/MONWA 9C4lar f'y AT _ ____ W5 Uyl.snE4 0kcvwwn e4 4n-Nkl JR.Tse e,ewe _ vaaae.ea U. :r...n1 due. FF. _e..reR x.w a a. Oni c..,e 34 ,dr..rkldm. 453 .11.67. .4rce. ..ap4M ,e c� IV, Py..,,aa4.d0 Nmn.nsn +4 r.pe.H.+w.M.Ne.w..+. ..e5 +.1 arw.9Maa0.a. 044 R+ Good mpnabwNa 454 Mbden ,es v �,y'z"^e*_ 4,5 I4"8. .M,�„043-- rea.a.,w ia..M'ak0¢.... 44 Nee _ IeMTwwl.C2* Professional 4 w.a.w Sa i 11.707.1.7 4 d4kkGw �,.. Seal w,ena �,.,.�. .r.brw 53.. r5e3 roM.nR.a.nwk eaGtk.w _ v rwa ,ms G.rOwaa.wr.4a.. ,Av.¢¢ _. rHe em..11.r aa.3 rwe�eamkob.e y9. sy ,,. ...on n4 Good =- T.5 0101 .b__. 5.. ¢e rr.Mrw..m.. .m5 732,]b urur e..M.r r rn Lew m+ S.,e4 4.5,4 Gan.44440 - _A A r.4P_ .,n -ua __ 09 Good. ont.,nleR 4.n.r.4 r.m Rx OP tan w 47 cam 42 _ a r. m mm 4r Q.a .9rrcs r..a5+•B.,N A.w 4n.re4 Good �W"2 nr JAL ns cam 35 ,N a , n.. Rana 00 wrK+b st 4.vrH. r1.mos J P0024 , d.9 _ ... 4, Load 1PV _...-. 4n.r.n split 4. .abm.... - 4...w oo r.,ea - �.l�L)�;r 73.9 �.u.b Goon N.MeRR) 3 'W S F.m Torso + +v.. 2 4 /Nas1 i can 45 -Lin ..:+ea 433 wnncn9c 4.7 Goodmare 0940 a R.5 Good 3. rryg -wr '0. Ga. 415 5� bm�. _� _P, re4 O3 Cam )I.-GJf�S_ Good Gvod.ne+ 4. 1...... "• _ _. IIMee.eRM.Imr BB rw. 1 +}. Gala . _ 734 K ^S' A..4 44 Goal 4P a7.1.N r.--. 3.3 i. n 3 NI... _ Goal 417 .� Vb w , s H . Good 4R P....oo... 5.1. a.1.w rM arerracmn un 5ber 4.. .Mem,.e TIN lWbmnaro B&k4IUG rs.5 AureMnsnamne ¢ r..ansd +e5 Abnmueru -__ nx.w 77.4 Good 41. ammlumo . Scd wbn.Vrcmarnn ¢ tma da bmr4 4/4345 N a anade444-___ e.eWr U.1 4M S.,mn9c4mw L.- 1.-. r5.r wM,,,,,arew rM rynmry�u Ma.w...,r r49 Um4weM., 4)9 R.H,op1179_"", Moaner. S, Gm. - _ w O.+ I _ _ ALP .arsmaremFe SNe.�.pe 1y.rv;-In r.w4�u4M � Mxw Gam rre iu+« 343 L¢J.mu.yev.4s 4n a e,,,,,47 elder eJ Gan 4P Au. _0PL. kw. 4w vmb 0s.4rs Lam pu ew 5 y4 r.. Pe nk 75 a ur yy r vb .4 - One. r, 14a rn.0ear,+•e, 441 Nn3IBI. ber Coy PBuo lew .r.0. f ^B coca __rpr ^W wNnr M M.MYNvs Lk �� mbw r•daakr-0s Pgtn�y - 000.1lwr 0,4 NRs CO.) rd won rv5 r -YR , M en0a Lm0 Oro . - Le.m Good,. A r nu. wN Y Na 9M rw, µ A:n slag -So �..r. @4. +a5 45 Tom ee.e�eumb U A,e _ .as. F*.ww Sm.P. 4. +45 NWT may.'^ 30/ . .6YMee W1 AM.m,� w - .A T*4 ¢. 1o.M.a .H. .k.w.Nannon 5e..r.,44 ALA .. xry� renpon•oed. , r l 1y /0 +03 AMbmnkr w..- 4.2 ,+.Wdv 0,280. N A nE S1 1n !1 Moo s5104.0 ,5-_ iwv one. _. .` n v0 P.a.... L'1V= _fie. _vb -.. mm _ rHe wrw. _ 0, ''40 '.055 Ama in r.Pe _. N49s t.a7eaib4 _ey i r s nesu.+ 44 449 �n0 _.. _�- - w.,mes _ 13 mlr.- oro m 1.d4...4 4w Go .m. >eoa-mn .� N I + A.rre ga w...kn 11.7 4.m /Me s .- 4, PaoA4r�Wra l¢eb4r. .-man0 ay r We TB4�wr Coon nm _ R.s44 r.Good - *are N....P.O..aen _ _SI A.n�.ee - .4�N.nes«a+B +. 1 w - mmg,. .I. a.a aelea.. wan. y.5 -.kar4d4..r r>ga r., yv -+rs +3n b. narr.ro. 154 Goad Tar r., Ns RA _ r5R Tne..mwara now rgy ,.rw.-ekna nT _ m4,MM m� arT rs.r - re ,w, v, ,L¢. Good,0akel NH R....R.., wm,9.A0,..1.da... ..a 44 -4 r3M rko Asa ns3rmm Yes r.. rR5 4. 49 ,k.rMe1 y}y_ Gar ...no. S40A Gme ...me Nur. mkd en Nno y n N .. o .Tee NE +SP 1f.n o Mae00 43 Goa r465 /4s.mnc..m .s..n.vur +H ,.e..s 4se S4enaneMn <M *tit V Gt 7133 Ater r.wuna r1 i NUe Icy 5 .Goa ....me urNkwn 4Pn 7154 xa, 55.40 1.•Goo. Sm ,erne Pro rar..ee4 4m .•a. 44,4 lao 9.km4N� ,wok Um... +s1 �1-0o1'4aGx47315 •41nw.Am.. '� h >; bm0, r45 rm4 rA.Aw .4345/,.n Good U ,w. r 540.e. ve4n Gard .M%aebebee ' ,L• Ill A¢3,nm�r GM 39x .w. N..X003. 9 w.e.n.0 fimm �_ 904 r.'4Me4�.snew4 0 N k 4s. .„ ,4n wn Good r.. 4. Sae aa. Re.endolneemPn.4k...ne, ton _ rwea...rGM.w..ws ... L N a ro....w7 r5m s.M - 51.5.:t .,,G M.1e.�o.m _API_ a � p Mbo.+.. 44 WA N.• 004 MIN ..b a,s w d. L.n20Ppo.n} 6407.711.6 G Ewe.. yy Go ...or 44007.e1N7B MIN qua - x 443 Remo.'.4e L.n4kprunv /Uq ko G..ev44 WI nusw.so a alp-.b efi m �_. se......,_..._ _.2y o9_ Irillra s...ex 4.1 PAL 57n _... w ..ngro - Sn y S1 a Gas s4u4. ,a.+�ddbme _SZ, tm.-W.a r.Rma-aww ---..s an a..gc5 4.4 Auk um r upk Gas rml.4avur4uM1we y55 nG. -rP r.IWen AL, .�-.. - Ner�.r yN Go...nen Aur�u�m CeM muLy vg sa I..MiAr77.5 Mae O Gn.4a nor rn AMr 5 9a y5 L.Bide. v3 m ewe era 4.} 4.b A.ers.G.Inm.m SH. w ¢1 4M .mm Tre.dnewnr vo wv.MNan n. 1 ...ro nj INS-rol... -Lnnkn _F Sr.. __ M. 4PT Pon so..mum s4T3 mane 41 Goo 3a cwm S1rtr.W4 0U94 WM.5k44rp4®bM Onus r us90 rr.4. 4 rw 4.,ww4 r4.e Nv453P «M we..Mwk F onow.w u _ _ 014 « raw in.....es .mast Good Gee ki .: w Mkm,0Ury den4� , _ .k _ � .$ l;um. s44rk,e.. 4r non R. 'MrMww.< n.4 411 v4dars«r r 54 P14 Noe dead en.aena RN 4.4ye+e r4.Pvwb• r1.a 4}4 Acerru,04 n4 Amer.....44rxq coo 4w tn.,. s�knn4. +,. nn ,�na nUre 6 7B0 i4anul dude American swan.. u4.0..4g r..m/002, a Nu A4054. m 0492=7k 4.5 Poor.1004 Raey N> nrd. Ry..pe M _.._ 5 Qre.earm Nab. (ne1�4.ea 4. wm +4D No.. 4940404 4O Good ____,}}_ �M0447 a nm0q__... ew +35 _.._ tom r4r to.o.o r w1%. _._ N.D ram.crowed..es 43M nm a 4.r Co. G. Ter m4ge 440 N.o.a-.MNM IN . 9G, lomc ao. N4 T.wPs +Jr G.xe r4+5 M1.. .. V..01 . 0+#Mm9cwve ,o.r Good _r� hJ Wie.1.Mk5M r39 R.enb... an.4rw ays You Go. 45 MgrcMl4rgbo M.o.4 a4 a,35 y.. 4.M dPA4,4..bebaM A4ry s, r3M luabns4R. any ST ...-. 44 W4ws.m W acamroN Acura s PmAan B4.B,w.s 4e5 e495 vino,me. Snerlao en 71.7. Good 740 No..4 r. bG,9,4, *0.954 V.es rnoe0.la, c1.. n+tw ye _ fnaamaaw s M�q.y¢ rY.Meeaa4U M.g9m.l Mc4r - Lwi_1resC r.'e4a417 Ye Mot¢ SAS. Ne 1TMuaor.m ebabrw 45 'wGnusrcawvds Amerce 9ramm 4+ N,q r.la.oacu4445 e .amra An4knr.rve 1•q .+$r4r .4n.,albem. 6WOMk.G.o. as fair k....bna.b 44 Amoroso R Ape Way pear 0.we. Gam-donne Be No.w.0*444.0 Try �1 PH. son 3s. Good ye h tmPo yM ekwen 545 r.r4.d /0470 o,ew.4 e :� Br.Mk. 34. r..b.. ew4r Imo Aa. M. .ww s4.4nem +S.T , -.-- 54s r.aam Oda,.rneamw -11a rwima-a.a se. en, +3. rm/.4440m..en Wr .e.N..mum Tree.heaven M4,4 r..xwlGood en 4B3 _0..nm r>b wee, seen. rm r.KM,re¢.Me ebrrwk See cam 4M Poor'owned,m4 Aree, suer... �,3 r4M R.o 101 r .�. Mara¢ sa M. r,4..... eme-4rp,sm.a4a Nabs ui n�k e..e4 R} r..,4eNs.....e. Gowned rw.woo [New.4nw4A V_o n oun Street Status: o o j FINAL 1 )v I `� { Submittal Date: b W. rme.rr wA6or>ER PARAPET rm.lr ,ff r0 ;3 ��Y4 ® Of-26-2624 •\ ,o„� [ ''II�ra''IIa,r r° �.., f p . i_ ) ,1 W 1 i i4--; 41 Rw,., OPON \\\ a♦/ rap OF...mono. riot r ION PE ary r rr ax„s' \KW OP Luc oei. vWLT Y' _ :TLii: -� _. Amour yqqt`�/ I k \ y_� s do saw ue e t \ r *—,.__ - ;- i -- POST 6R -1 �> uS----C. ).-- % rl rv,an r / 3 \ 0 I �71 r f? �E a e ger0�e 1 g 1,1 4 ='I t '>- ray / 1 \ 1 I �,0",`'�p, p` 40-.2: wf. STORM DETAIL PI µp•. LI. \ —41:--4r; \ a Job* MA2301.01 fie; _\\ ® \ 14 �'� , 1 • Date: Of-2624 r� ,P,,,N,', \ Cc 11, \ 1 / 1 O i I 'I I11 ifi Street: 2624 -•- . . '��.� \ 1 RR ( rrRCR _ Drawn By: TJW 4.___. _ ' ..\., \� r' I � ' -•F r��r� C,.aom :: : ,,.. , — \\\\ \ \ , , 1 I -- \\ I IIK ,,,, ,v :,. , ,,,i;„ ,_ / le... I / 1 i • 'w , \ ..\\, . ., .., „, ,..., , i , i ii \tp)" viox .,, ,.....\\ , „ , ,„:„. .. H, 7 i ,,• \ a I �l x It \. Professional Seal_ `�V o , �* ' v ��v ,, Tilt V.I. A� �� „ F ors„ g r a \ ��\ \\,\_\\\.. 1� , , "yell! tt \ L. ....,9 ,�\ :` \ . �$ - R �I r. -,..,.. --- `�%\\\, \'P\ l ®\f1/ \mEf ,r..�r \ ...SEE STORM ' DETAIL R ErffP11117'=. �,(e�[ ,,,,, \ Ilf, r OA (ABOVEr 6RMEa� \ 7 P r ��s~� \ + \ nr ml� \l . , I `. r Rcv r:Rosy �. ,44 W � N '" /� , va.E�• _ _'\ im \ �` I ��r• 1 1 1 r aim \ �.� m e_ -\ „ / ? \ '\ �x�.. �..\. �1 mow, / / 1'\ ` \ �. \ epT N. 'Q° _ a V al h V • .9 ue \� .d'i .`tq ' ''', \\ �+,\' ‘ I / 'arm Y''' i. I Q 0 0 III as J1 lk Ir v' n.n r^ `N, . . ✓ I k 3 ., r 3 a .. Da i.1,16 9°44 I �4.,, i \.... �v �� _� �'' v ii ',Q I rOFOORRFN/C SURVEY OF \k��\ i7;iID: I� APORT/ON OF CITY OFROANOKE '1, •-' , .� ;WV. �ii1AC- ''mI I v '•'' OWNED PARCELS ALONG �Y ,; , a NORTHH�000 DRIVE,PETERS CREEK \ �� / 31 _ - F.IDi ., A F-ID 'r ROAD B MEADOWBROOK ROAD •,— "� O �`* j w r� ® \i °°'po' I CM'OFROANOKEVIRO/N/A / , ✓ MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3 S / i \ , „., I Sheet Status: FINAL Submittal Date: r 01-26-2024 LEGEND i'a s 1\r. 1 6 - se* • e PwrwVcavrna.,v) aw,ui acTwx.c WALL v m rQT _ x e �i \ • IRON ROD FOUND CCBG CONCRETE CURE AND GUTTER 9►�R� \� "ID!L m u CONCRETEMpuNENT CURB v A '- MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 2 = fNOR o AV)� Y o NAIL FOUND RAILROAD SFvxE town scavc CONCRE IN TE �P.r y \ 111W .m. \ ' r / • O BENCHMAw[SBVODPERB RiW RIG,PTOFWAY O P �\ 4\\ / ... ,er.PP t is, rT�P Ep/ s r. 0 SANITARY WNW. INV INVERT FFF... $ NDUT ,c TERRA 00 ,y� s Q WATER VAULT WON DUCTILE may PIPE \\` ��\ �I} L TER METE OVA) c R.ATED sire POPE WATER NA M STORY INLET GRATE PVC PIPERCP PIPE EAST. ELEVATION F "w.,—— �. r i� ',4'�° • ® rRn 4 \ 9�T 11; O$TCWM pRNNNtWpLE L.PTEO MEAL FS^E r e TeeBW.Ot r10NT10.0U rOTeee G.PPEORCO 9ETr� \�� _.er�r,�E'E �• '�' \I OO TELEPHONE MANHOLE AD.. APPRO.RATE DIRECTX)N T M]/elT.n r10NTW.re r CAPPED Ri00 SET ♦ I r �P"�0�'i'�'///5[•'P, ` \I `I ma k _ OMPED ROD SET �P. I( l'0117 ' SSE PIS D 7977 SEWER EASEMENT 4 30317311110 es>rwr,fd CAPPED R00 SET tl •ILI+ H9� r (— Ws/// II `�1 ,1\`\\ ©ELECTRICALEVAUL WEE CHAIN FENCE EASEMENT a Savew3e r m CCAPPED APPED ROD SET SET ' 1 _..L�, I I j1\1 �`\ O ®1MFF,C SIG.MAST ARM • U 8 869®.fe.E2 11Uu„T 18 r�.11 CAPPED ROO SET ,--\ r.Ra W"., 1 w... I 1`\\� a 8",PArP,c,ANONaE • MIL �.�4 \°•L.\\\ \ `� \ I`of'':r'`7 t OFTUND.FLAre a SIGN ._ `��4 �- ¢y.y�{ • NI wN a fy. OF THE U.S.FLAG T SIGN T WOWS.PONT. NOR.. .S SRPTITONONR \ 'l ?'" "`� Y ,1 i,na uNo • Job a MA2301.01 —__— EPROPERTY DGE OFASPPALT o x+een.s 0.0023 ELEVATION 3.40 PCASHLDFrFLLELLEv� \'@� ,T•CF o,n io "'®� k,_. -•�J.'G � Il re I II l III I'rl \C.a. E Tes!)41T Uw4T. 1OT,T PcxSNroa cyTAealelr. - " �EN�/� F <\\ 1 . I 11If�Ilr DRN: 01-26.24 mNCNETEcwaAND rr,rTER _. r- ssT45w raunu r/ P`` ewLD,Na LINE 102 - v [ S4 �5..� I�D � h 4 \ \ Sheet: 3 of 4 . FENCE LINE 0 Seeeee.07-11044223.71 1024. TRBB --- M�S• `ElEell\j. ''�. \\ f !� 1W►• — — _ H T98817E1 1101430207 rib ee%5 w ` r4 I Pawn By: TJW OF GRAVELJetwrls. r a ,,,'/ 4 Ir J' EDGE OF ER R SSW,6E 10..8.ES 1O2S84 TRee.STR,FFLE �' • g, \\\�\ �' \ Clacked BY JLN w OVERHEAD..LINE L.—L.ERGROUND ELECTMO - UNDSR.01040 GAS R y$�� , Rev.M Rev.Deb n..,.,,',r, FEMI RAIL E... </ - 1\\L.\\ ,--S' ,m°. 1 11111\\•\� •, ; �r1 I'l Ir'I. + ., v wnEROR0UN0 ELECTRICAL LINE `` \1 �lE E.GG44. + 10IO 10 00 TION) A v I kvv A\AVA v\VA , iv a� �� \ J \�,� s\j \ \I\\\\\111 { I } O 'a - N ,.. , � 11 Asr • \\\A \ ..a ',III' 1 _�j /I - ` iI \1\$e / 11\ \\1 sI III t zprEi l I \ C� 11\\\\1 I i1 Professional Seal /o // , / ��'ev1 ,• \ \I\ I �I'' � .1 e4 W,T4O � 1 i AT yr.!!;''',-', r....„.) �`\ � '�/ / 1�. V �i �' �/ A I �1_� ��A\1 I��I I�� Tww I g \ r 1f�� / '! �/ / 1:".) '' 1' IIiiij yr:; — _ J ,:\ / ,____ rtiri.v-yri /7 �LI P . �°}' sore ' /% i� hI IN ,1,11 HI 1 \aB/ V c: \\ \ \ \. ` \� \ , ,\,— 'f m,._,,,_ N cNEx a i'—— / za+E".. "�___, I I I'. a \ Y IWr "EP.T�eeDv c.b �4 �> Qe�\ \\ \N df�PA \ < SVOED _ / yNpEO I,Tr.ii 1I j \IIII\ Z •._ N y`, ji /� �� t4e' / i I �I ' 0 E_::flt 1e 4<. m _!O NNo ns \ \ �� i 1 I�i1 II'11'I ' aI el: v '\"'c--- --..,, ..,.. ......61\,,,,,,,,v..,.:. '6 --�• !,\\ ` \\ '\ 'T�-'y .\i\�/L� I I. �, , 81. rff !��I nl.. _e+�ol�,r p Al \ N ...c....1 a I/ i11} I V• \ E � �� .moo -- - ,$�10 , -P,ww¢r �. q0 .0 ,H, mNCRE,E Or A PORTION�OF CITY OFROANOKE \ :. N�� umw' M� 1 °"'eP �e"a ,uo�ry OWNED PARCELS ALONG ,ENTFOR D P e NORTHWOOD DRIVE,PETERS CREEK \ norm" `EP) .EP WM7 02 284.7.3114. ROAD B MEADOWBROOK ROAD 10,112 DETAIL BRIDGE'S' DONORE EwRnwN 5 C/Tr Of HCAANOXt V/NGiN/A \ SEE SHEET 1(NOT 1054,,a) a�.p '.i�mTf �� y� Sheet Status: MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3 III ' I "'"' ili al,f it. m, + f _ � ^SEE sro FINAL w> — / ,,,,,, �\ II 11 I ��N Illri -'•° e l _ Tar Submittal Date: }y. I ' 1 1('it, ' I ',.,iq..o 1 I -+er f GINS SHEET)^ 01-2tF2024 - I r e.� ''��'4"4- 1 \ k. 4 ' /-'Cr: • V � J r , ) 1b r. iiii � . I W/ A nu) �_ .,me ee I I /-SIMI, e l ,��atl F pl y y�' ��JI' © J2/ h // iz — 1 ' AN all 141 A V `� m.m " III 1 !y f.11�kn' ms, //y �� I a i mar r 6 i I / 7 3N �I �\,\\\\\ mg41 - 'Ø r I f I \ j, II III // / II/: / I Job A MA2301.01 / ,�\ �\\\ \ I f / 1111 II :14( .Z : Sheet. 01-4 of4 ��Eae''1 AV / f I 111 f 1 C r�� Illfl�fl �.'�/ �� Slreef. 40/4 �V V • \ l ---E) I I r , eP �. aownw,o Drawn By TJW m.n \\r, '_ , \ / m.r \ / I.I 'I► I'I/ I' I� • I Checked By. JLN m\. 'reel - - - I II'll /� i ( IA t Rev.y Rev.Date � i1►`�," c �� / ,� I,fG� f; III V ' ' G /1� 1 \m ' � m II t .�,0,, \\\ I I C!I I. if i STORM DETAILn ( \a , - \\ \ I 1 \ I I I I hid I • I 1 �'e @a @ \ `,� \ /1 1 III'd `T I 1 II II 11 I 1 / s. I roar �A PlWessbnal Seal '' I Ise JI l I MOO 4 \��,aro ® �\. \'`w. )--I 1 I it .41 40, 11\q11 , , 1 I GRASS !/(.,.� > VI \\ _ \® I // a I I Ir I n" 1 1yCIJ v� I n0L+ro care ) , �II , I,i I ,I�lll,u m v; ®G AA 1 III' P1 •4'41 �°°- , �, .\ k-y l‘/i III I III • PALAI �'�35Pi....� rr RCP ,a•rtcr `-_ '� � ��A � I I�,1(IItIr tc) • /� `. e, C• aST wro�o Aa. a tim gC A�� /,I 11 { e �— — "e\ } �%/ �y� ., -, © k v Mfg I 1 \�� >Qa a® Rgl r ® I C is a ' AmwKr r/ 1 I srr, e�� ' %r:;r°.°wA. I t1�I(; r „L < yl Z v I KxI ,,,,,,,,,,,,_ ..., g ,v O \ EXPOSED _ ' 4 0. / / W • ^ O u w0 eENFF . \,s STORY ©I 6 `° �i > g� I?�ji g tea. I I 0, k o 9,...7 • �i e 4. e � i Q a"<i .os Nor.TEND PILLAR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF• F LaHL -- h I A PORTION OF CITY OF ROANOKE '®�tf. /f" err ` r. � JO ;I OWNED PARCELS ALONG ___......- 1. 1°` ...„, , NORTHWOOD DR/VE,PETERS CREEK ;; - I U� �nnuun�u��nt7nnuiiunA ROAD&MEADOWBROOKROAD k 1 1 h f � :` w�• �p I — m35 _ L/TY OF ROANOME V/RG%% } 1 o I tr + to I t�,0, _ _ *\.3 '! SCALE:/_-lf. ,+ A• ,II Ids PROPOSED PLANS Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 'PROPOSED n , \ al % ACCESS POINT 1/3 ', . . W n 'o ,..I % 'PROPOSED ACCESS POINT P3 til Q • ' )' ' 14. °°s1. / \ .0,,,) \ ,... ,rj /i 2 \ " MCADAMS \ C,p 4- okiN ,,. jr. . j ,,, 1 ' W g -0 0-,, 0, x ,0 1 \ \ss, c„p skic)°°k\\IC' 09,1\A \ <'‘,,,,r. 1,1 \ , Fi 7 • ,„,. i 111 . N. a.,,,,,y 0 73 1 /I ----11) I ) ,-'9 6 "" / ,:,,,' —,\ i 1 : ilt,tt, ••• / ' ...- ,0 ... . • \‘S` \_ j o tt m \---, ../ ,_0 , 0 I ( 0 *0 I 0/ ,.._"..# .- CUENT > \ \ ,- .4/• VI M ° 31.131WATER DIVISION \ to÷ 6 i O. \ 3303 COOPTL.13 ROAD ME • ,,. ,. I_ l'o V 1 CONTRACTOR \ \ \\ r 11,.... \\ \\ r n \ \ (t.). ... --'7 e) \ ‘ \ e-, ‘--• 111 r.„--- 1r% — PROPOSED ACCESS POINT tt4 / \ r\ Z 0 / 4 (i& . ( , . 4e, ,i LLI 0 Lu o w — '4 '''4•?•'P Q.. '\ \ , -.., r---- . I— IN < \ ..---' \ \ 1 U ( .1 N.\tc,/6'&'''P'ss CP,. \ .-_- 2 0 > • N,.____,-- I 1 \! \-, -c.'''>r 1 i I ( I , . . 0 Lu Ld ,_ \ 7 .----2 il Ce Z I— '4 Lu — 0 0 0 \ • \\ , 0 .1 i .(?s• .,.., K----------__ :=. I •--' al U ! 6 \ \will . '•\ 1 ,..,;:.rrITII,•... ft\ \ -0 N. V . REVISIONS I 1/49 \AN. ''' ^ r•II .0 // ACCESS POINT#2 _, I .5` \V,..„.,..,,,,, , / PARC=EPODINT N2"V:' N\::‘, °a 7.so---.. PLAN INFORMATION OOO q 9 VC: 9:-( ril-CNACIF SPEC21161 C3 , •\_,., I [ ) .., . ?0 VI SHEET GRADING PLAN r i GRADING PLAN PLAN AND PROFILE , 0 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET KEY SHEET KEY o C3.00 1 Mk llINIXAM V MIAWINI,NI II.1 k PSELI KIN l 01,1.1,11. NOTES ,,, o 6 S LpLpopmscapaPpm p•pm.. i \ / _ _ ____.....- . •• N. ./0 MCADAMS ; , 0 ....„,,--, . The lonn R 61zAcIams Comps...Inc ..........'' 0 N/ Mcc 621 liMseofouR9SM.RT Sulte SOO _,.......". 1.4 Om Nalaigh.NC 32602 P9PARvIV ME SOM lIcerme number 0•07000793 0 v.K.M...../..... 1.. _,.---m---.-..N O .o. vdmv.mcadarnma corn .........--- .....-..' , a-- .....M- CLIENT _..__---.o-n----...-. •u-e.-.-----..•-........--....-......--0 vie--..-----.'... ,_,../. o v.- .-.-----...-...-- VIORNIWATER DIVISION -----'...- .......' .../. / •-• rtlARY MCWILLIAMS.UT.CFM ROANOKE.VA 241012 PMONL MO 8S1 S921 ./. TAVIZAVIT,r_1"1 f"----'' . , ..6 ..... \ CONTRACTOR t / _,---.------'------'----- -----..----..". \ NONIFI STA IL ENVIRONMENTAL DARMLLWESTMORELANO 9 288S LOWERY STREET WNSTON-SATEM NC MO/ _. •.......". .....'''. 2 ...... 1,.......__......______.-.-ze-.A-a----. .L ..........\.... ....MR.'-.."---9-.... ., .- ..----. tow ----. ,----‘.- ww•-- ,.----w---' - \ I dE LINED 111.1.I,.01.1.0 75 I 00 ENGINEER EOVIVALENT ,..„,./ • N Ct Fm 1-1 , •. ___--- ...., ,_____ uj _ .1. \ •• NORMAL ROM 4Li* EL LL 10210 , / -'. N 0 ---- - '' ....„ A .....•--.......--... ............-- ....v., I .- ,----- UN 2 0 > 0 • , , ::: , .,..,.....: i0 -----"--w-w•-------'- 1 IOt '°,-;'- --------- --------- - In AZ. Z k••• sr:, , , ...,............._ I S at 0 I *" , ,\, ,, 1, ,1, ',FroTINICSS5r:1,13. TRAPEZOIDAL GRASS CM..L RM.NOM v 99 0 2 Mu SIM 40.,v AT fi 8.... I SEE DETAIL MEET 02,01 LCI20 MOPE v OM 0 0 iI_2,-.--ez_,.._•-•,---. -,--z SEL MEET CR 01 MI 0 1 , . 5 rug or DISTURBANCE(TT) 6.9------ IT moo now MP) LI*', I ACM,IN TIM AREA.SE CM NM 2 PERION•ED PLR Tit CM OF ROANOKE MONT or NAY 9 Ir.;' ° 15 1 ENGVATION AND RESTORATION STANDARDS 1 z ' MEADOWBROOK ROAD I- KERRY A SEA1 STAMARO DEUR LIM-1 I 14d, ,'"V ; DEEM sour CE05 .5 -11 , , I . .. I. ---- - ,-,- REVISIONS 'd _----- i,---- \ cl . / \ V- LL..IW (T) N =To:2r;.--—-," E.77,Z=L. 92.7:09711.79.-:0...T.C1.04 PRO,INV OLIT(E)v 1032.96 MIN FLOMBLE FILL t PLAN INFORMATION prteJtcl. SPE(22161 ve'',. .5 5 g i , \ ', ...- 1 - I PROP 100-M FLOOOPLAN(iTP.) N'9., AM 'ii FILENAME SPEC221.61C2 ! LEL LL2 CHECKED. KAN 12201.202S j \ V C) \,,,• — GRADING PLAN < 'Ai i ...... M 41 , 1..,..,wt. ...--......„..,, C3.O1 • -'....''r..A...'.n.t.A.°").'".......,(,.., 'WI\ IF' Se' `� / `\ \---"....."—�...---- 4"-....- PROP eO-ET SUPPER(Tw.l �,� , • 11 �•� �� • The lolin A McAdams t tympany.Inc 6211.1111sbefougn Street 9t 4 \ I P a C) W, Na ... � 100-m Raa°vuzx(rm.) RalaSuitxc O 4411011 a, 7603 �/ e o CL..T.z° ° NTH �` u4 O NETa a /' ./. ` La "T CLASS'Ai'a5 ro p° OUTLET TO ITE UNED p^ licensewww a�ar ,nn E arm Nei 1-- rA,"sxElz cn°I c oErAN rrtao, 'u\V \ ODENT °v 7`Ruw II 1 /'/" ' ' \ DTI ,. \ x, STREAM sta.3.00 Ai o0�/J 1M1 y/• —ru� _� [rteio-[°x°°a a t^RT , I 1 1 /e x R OAN E,o s601122 i FI,I'r N r 1 I / /'/a/ ok, H., I rai`�oi"Pot aeec""'s �� ; 1 1111 ,,, I '� %1, ii r, H. q `• IIIICUSS CONTRACTOR / gwv HRrc°wrANE .oLE i I . 1 r / r / \ NORTN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL - -- x° /' •�. .� j �iiil�llll r, r r r i .,• H� �•' Q HA A� DARRELL �.� ��.—. ffEOE,.w"(r CLASS Nohl� I II, I 1a,1 ii 4, r i ry 236,25-2,010 r .� _ LIRn. I �'`.1 r r • L� R,x:.a.sw•,Nx°:„°I �.—.—._ _emu_—• " ,� // fi w'�' —1�/ za• '�ma \ r III r ! �' l I 76 n` o. H.�n v.12. Z p ./ 1 —.�I_ / , , , ,r or CAI TAZN. \� f ml, - - 5s I i,rr I' �rl, r sat VIE. ��\ W ~ J o H� _�� •'C r------'�_ h` =-'i'�j II irl ;r,r —�loz, 'AWN Ha = 3 Q it II �• WETLAND RS \ m, III .i �:-, W CC Z V O i _ -- T ,1 w+ITNnc PW III 11, III �I III III 1 1 --/_ '004' +� \`� Q Z LLJ —I i t'w I __ — — -- ---- — — _ oa MIS is DISSPATOR FAD Phi• • N. O. F ---T—T—T 9P 1 � ��Iw. CC 0 1 R c ry a Now°" 91.0F.41 DIG AREA IS TO OE PERFORMED PER Rif ' 38, I ® EX BOULDERS TO BE [rwT ��RELOCATED __— u' ,NN.,1,� Ik i ^f PRaP°sE°ACCESS Danz II—• ° Ste"I PROP PAVEMENT c� ""'° '° STANDARDS { MEADOW BROOK ROAD i "r Knox T s i SEE DETAIL SHEET ce.as "I1 //'' -' \ . ':17 „N �` ` III @, «»:.:N,. yS h-_._._ ' ^—c I�11�/1/{, _ Hr '•\ III Ao REVi51ON5 i I `a�RE m 1 , h\III ti�� ,. o... E u.IT°P DISTURBANCE mP)J p 1 ei'TR¢ro'N°`rosr u[TON \ I I I 1 TO j so,X xs>a I, PROP DROP INLET / \ PLAN INFORMATION TTOP OP lEV SEE OVA,1FLre w INSTALLED AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT SEE to Hx 0XCII NO SPEC 22161 r�isxAti sPcczzuz c3 / o\ @S� ICAO DRAWN.CHECKED MAR [ NOTES `\ I \ scHE z.z° f �. \x\ III 'll SHEET DATE sz.la.zazs (::, ....,.,.,,a....r..,....,... .A,.n„�a.w.�.. GRADING PLAN a `\ IIL .. ..,,, x.L,a, ,� "` ,.RE�IxRRnTRAHIxa•x°nRELn.�aPOR,aN.�• C3.02 •,„ \ ,,,:s, le (I i ,'`i —.—___.... PY......________, • •t, L$ ..... .". Ff , 411111 g --------- ' ,-1101M MCADAMS - ____,*_------ • N 63 I NOrocou..w:Slreet , -1, ,........ PETERS CREEK ROAD ?I `--,.., Ort,e, 4 „." ...7 / N . kl 4t,,,,," .., ,,,11 f 1/( \,,,, •H• Me Rale.,NC 37603 NI' / ---„........, ..-- . 9E9 361 WOO Y , fax PIP.361.3369 r..gtr liedins.number 040,0007,3 . , \ ,, 1 CLIENT OPI OP ROANOKE , S1ORKAWATER DIVISION PROP 100-YR 11000PL AIN(TI,) , CURRY MCWILLIAMS.Eft.VW ' '''' -- \ 18/32 COURTUND 90.40 NE ROANOKE,VA 131012 /. PHONE:540 854 5921 \ . .1 Cr O CONY11.4,011 OSNREIANCE OW.)y NOR IH WA r L.I.P.P.OND141..."1,IA. / 3 f \ OARRELL WESTMORELAND .36-725.2010 . r' i 2689 LOWERY STREET , PROP 50-PL ElUPPER''. (1,) 0 / .. WINSTON-SAUK NC 27101 .' ............_......2......._....._.__.......___...--0...P.-.---...--..... / .....",......_._._..,_,.,..._,,._....__...,....-..-....-- ..---....—••P....."---.9.-49-......-__..... , -..........1\4. / ''.. -.... / 0 Z --'.."."-'?" 1 / < ...,.. .... ...,_ -• I /1,0 L., //y.I'v.,00. ..y ;5,1i ,..,. ,.., - -- ....,..‹- // • „,,,, CL I- 5 , Om NI. / '.,,‘ U.' ''''''',. // U ."." ''.--4-',I.Efl, 34. '---...... / '...., VI Ci 5 UJ Lil , ,.. CC-. 2 "- • ' .„ ow .,T' UNI 0 0 t , , 116E Z ... 4 , . v• lirj 3 < , — et. p. i_CC 0 r‘ I— CC 5P. End 0 / r •\ 0 2 — — ..,_,, 1 __......__:;:____... _-- — ----______ 1 U. 1 , . 1.....-=--•-___.-.0.:-.....„...... .•-----' I ------.. .......... , ,.1 ,, .____,-.Y.. ----cm .....i. ---- ---..„.„... ..<:- .eo. e...—_—.....______ 1 . \ \ , 1 "...PP-.....----..-.. rev a—___,... CP ---.--.-syn n•— I i5N....•N. i 1 \ Mg ---1-"es---....-,-.-sa,.. .....-------...-.11. I J .1'..`S A • ,, , . •IA 1, / ssy 1 .," -,,'", .• .' \‘Nk 'i,- \s, •.`,\ .21 .k.„,, 7 ,".. 4, - •n`i.,,,, ,\,1 , \ \\ ID POW,' P.. 4,1,?• • 1) \ .\ \\\ ,„......7 . ID, __ REVISIONS IEno •-..„___. I - • . \\\ \ .... .• .. E...,, .,,,,•• IF \k, I ,••• • s \ lt \ \ , PLAN INFORMATION ‘s ‘..,.. PROJECT NO SPEC 32161 MENA.. SPEC33IAPC3 ,03.1 I 1D36 ammo St PAB \ \ '•%VOA 1028 DRAWN IPI W. ,._.,,.. ..___,-----"I'O'32'8__- .. -.- k % \ \‘‘\ '4".tk• • ____________----- ---------.... .p. Mt SC.Alk 0 .„.,,,,/ , i , I R•, //,-.......,‘1,,t'4• \' . , „ .riggitg. ,,,-,7 MC OR...Aca To ''''''A ',„ / / *OW Oh,. BE RESTORED POST coy= ). ....,\d1 $ / / -5.0.71- IWO IMO WE 13,01.2035 SHEET R 1 1 / / '..7.0,41., ,TAktitit ' \12..\:._____•'-'•‘‘, 1031 /,/ ',Ott, '.---7'.........-7..' ,..4,4Zetilt4:Pr".'"i':---' - .---72--,•-.__._____'. "...‘ ‘‘ '------' -7;----,c--- :'' :,`• • .-1033 ---'-' GRADING PLAN / / lig,i, ..___._ ----7"--------_________ ---.- -"' - - -1-- s \ \ C3.03 ., "01 ,OE ..."1.0‘,. 74.44,. ,...a.' ,.. .... to-___ .---_,,,, '-'----'‘.---.. ‘.. .. ''.. \ \'' \'' ' ' \ ' / A., At.• , 9---- , ,1141,11,11HANY minwir,.Nur REL."MR STRUCNON i NOTES la , : , ",..,..,.....,......,,,,,...,,,,,..,........ F. \)„,:"•':.:Al‘NI ' —.F..;AI 00•OU•DeN...0.11•1.$1.1-40...o 1... 1 .........../.01111.7.6.0.0. .2....1.21.1......1.2.01...10.5 63.6010.0•01.0.46.•1.1 , ,4.. , 1.111..WI I5 . ==e1175'407=Z„.7='"'" : MCADAMS " sird..._„, • ==';',,===.%:= Tn.,po.ft 2.2.11.Con...V.••. 11. LIMM.111 L._ /_e , • 621 1•11.110..0....• • t. t...[0.51112[1.1•••.“.Slour•pool2 PORN IN TINS Af.IS TO 15--. ' 1414.40PRIAN•1115551111.11440 PF5'4FAPF4 BE PERFORMED PER NE ;IZT EXrC:=Nr"' arox.NUPOINTRA PREN4610 '''''.••1 oa RESTORATION STANDARDS F FoNTRAFT04 NR•FL PP0TAFTA..am rnrs mow AND wommmot "x"•'•'"" . - • license number 0.07030. sling . .......................--. V-F1 NI ta......LL•61......,..a.....,•• I 6—..—p2—p2—, 6,.. .01.••••.14.111•Malla 21.5141.41..111111.6 W./.....0<OM 1.1.1.1.014 ' - I I .... ' 7..•=°17.7=.11=11-=:.:, CLIENT 0......f 1111... ','•TOY.='A.":"'"" •• ••••• - —\ "••••••p--.-----62 .2 1 I ..ar.-..------."-..•--\a.,, •L..MCWILLIAMS.EIT.CFM ...."Ir'.41".4.14FF°..114".4141'4111.1 IF.coux t...O.. 6.OM.070.1211160.111....... I10.00 VA 21011 •2/ en0a0.00110 . ..,........„......,...........mu...............,.. 1•11010 San 6 s 1 SR21 \ SEE NOTE 6 4, \ rn.FLANFT.NTFR.40..54,54(4/1 mom CONTRACTOR ..,,, • I /1•1,04.14. MIT OF • NORTH STATE LIOARONMENTAI. DISTURBANCE(TY,)y l I DAARLIAWESTMOREUND PoNe/101inem DAN 2•39 LOWERY STREET ..-...1 D 1023 1024-- • WINSTON-SALEM.NC 27101•021 1.2.2 -..,,,.. •,,, 'IS .2„........„. ,... P2/ / 1022 1 '....F., , Z 0 1021 P021 '222....._} '-'--'•••.„....., \',,4 ,, 7 ..-• ,.. ----....._....-.--__ IM. < l , •-, " _--- — LIJ 0 La 0 1,001,9. .4" 11J _ ' 1016 ,13 \ Ce N min < -----------1?) U s 0 > ......„. ,./.,,,, ,,,,,, STREAM REALICA.T \ = Z ,-, '-' -5 ....-iF4rk15=..., rigno7.-.,^-)-, LIJ - U ‘-' Z „v ' < D LIJ ...I ----'----'--"--. -1" -0,.... -__.......:-.... .- ..... -7 4.4647 , i ... 1,------ ,,, ... ..... - ,6 i ,_-- 0 Z — 71.— I L T ...,./ .•5.'4'5, ''5, ''...........`.A.,_,'0•,.6...4.5.:5,.,,.-..... ,n__o_,_:,-___,I-6,—„'',1.\ 0 0.—.—.—p.--••—L.—L.—L.,---L.--_p2 p. ,.._.. ._L._I i --,, AVIVTIZA'""'''''' . L,..,,,0* 4 ' • .-",*:',,Or ""I''' i ,..._-..-...., INV OUT EL A 1013.14 1 . .---•-•—5•A• '''''• •—_______ *3. 4'• NfrnicTcaX::rorEZIK 'it,ii.4r ,'' ,0'.'/,' , p.tca 1.-TR FLOCOPLAN(TIP)7 vf, I" HRILVA BEV1 'i \ 1 **"----••-••••• ...,,,,,sa,c.c, • 1•..54551228 : i '6".'-***--•-•-•••••• 5.-P•----------.'PROP' CC 6 (T551) 7 --- --.,_ ........... ,.. / ' ........_ 0 • 1 ) I \ . , / TML!".27)rS,""0.'' PLAN INFORMATION PROIEC1 NO SPEC 22161 1023 1024 t SEE MET C5 o• 4' ,,,,•.1 -0.26 ,.. '11rAillT41111, .4./ • CRIECCED BY AAA I 1020 1026 TEMP ACCESS ROAD aw, / - NY IN EL(113.).101302 •'411`,'•:).:.2r.'" SEE DETAIL SKET CA03 OR.AWN BP NIFB SCALE/ PROP SCOUR POOL STONE MP) . i ITO DATE 12 PP 2025 i 1029 •44,,S13 NOTE a ,-,,F' '-4vos-' , ORCP sac Vs.Enc•SAIEM OMO 5'AromE TOP Ci BANK SHEET SO DETAIL SHEET CB 03 1 I030 I S• \\\ \ 51 / V,I1A,,, 1 1031 I P F. •15 14 55% ? ‘,5,,, .014.,:;'.... / GRADING PLAN i -.3 ......„..... 0 ) --.i4kr, /0 //// / / C3.04 / I 1 / / PROF 50-FT BUFFER 4,-. Iv.wiNApeLpawiN„FAH„iLFA[Fr m i„NF.RL,i,... • . • , 1 4 • -\\.-1\I.,.1, \, N N. N. la ..• \ N. .4". .•l\N . • w . , • .. ,... , 4 \ %. \e Ne \ . ...4 N MCADAMS ; . \ ' i0 6211.1111WocouRn SINN Ir ' NS Suite SOO / 9----.,e______ r' , %1 '• , Nn.e 919 WI.SODO Ns 919 Mt.1269 I . a II •'OA,' ' . license nuenbet;1.07000.3 .e; 7 c...--;----- / .. NINO{ROANOKE SIORNIWASEP DIVISION A . ,1; 111 1'/ ;uRIPI•Acw\uunas.EIT.CNA ' 9 INN COURNANDROAO N. I 7 : 110ANON.VA WOW 61 9 1\; III PHONE.S10.051,921 I 1'! / I\; i I\I CONTRACTOR ( . 1 1 a ,L..). . • NOR,NATE ENVIRONAINOW cARRNL WESTAEORENNIO ,......__, ..i • 336-72,201.0 WIN LOWERY STREET 1 / III WINSTON-SALM.NC 27101 I .• 4. 0 I021 I . . . • . , i / / ., I, , q' „ •----i=-Tht-- ---A, ,0 .... 0 Z 14 I a ,e _____:., Lfs _____ 1, I I 1.. // p I ,,, p 5 N /1 ) .......Ai LLI 0 uj _,0 / 4,0 IOW Ke4 , 9 .--............ • 1015 ',Am.__ C4 o -2 0 ., 0 ILI ui,,P CC Z I- Lu _ 0 I- I< D ,1 II • . .... 1.1.1 W 15o ON r, I- cc / • „ \ .,,,..---i,.....'' .... '''" --------------------------4' =-r--------- ----------------- .-. vi I , , --..,...... 0 Z / •„___.i ._.--:---,... ___ a , 0 0 g ...------------ —Fp J 0 Um I , ,.---- ..,----1:./.:-///7 4...,117'!1;.... 8 - ___.___...... <,.._,,..<................... ......, ! :z,"--,7,,r KLEICAN EX JERSEY BARRIERS tO RESIVICT ........ i'-' OFROVA BR, '.,.. 1 ''' ACCESS AI COMPLETION Of PROJECT m Nee \ ,,,geNAIK;';' .-,,,,,,, X'WIN ,''''t'•-':? R d ''''' '..---, ----------'—'------------------.._. i S;6 = REVISIONS i II .-7.---. ,..-- ...-'- i i sew '11\ '+. . A PLAN INFORMATION i m....---'----- •••'..._........,-"-"'--------.."...\\. ''..--I.--'-,. V. 'NIS. :: i ./...- N. .m. '-'-....., ...a C'S ':,,,c.';‘,1 I 1 PROPEC1 NO SPEC WWI riLENA. SPEC.22161-. .... CPECKEO BV KA.11 tr .e... .....'. SCAN s-s--_...... --we... ...._...!:=7,./ cf. SHE, GRADING PLAN Z' Ca, •;: . ,,,,,„,,,„ ‘. V § C3.05 1:11. N \ lal ,a TINCIOTIT \ so. ',, �.�` !\` ti\ / o ox>..r�...,.t /` .,..T. ��,. MCADAM • S m \ \ `Fa �e` H- »\\ \ � NON.1.1212•10s le F .erL won. Palma,NC 2/603 \ ,\ ` ` �»:'.. `.� ;,NO AuUe,S.OWMD .,.ar...a 19 N \ , Ma Mansenumber ' \ H. \\ • .�,„„,, ..V..........w.\ `\w \ I. ti CIENT \ CITY Of ROPN0113rll \ u\ / �'�p O CONTRACTOR I2 1!0, \*N \ '°¢ ' Nd % V sCr,L i i / NOTE � � d' m ` RY� , ) r= wNsIn 72,2010 2009 a uEH.Nz,ro• ,4, . ` •!4E .3,% SWAM R k,d.EN, z o (�I do N. 17 4itoa + ' Q� I ) I sEaET oioo awaria \ \ ,� . ; Nss�0^! \ A a \ -. • W ,r ��. \ % '' CC H rq _�� \s 1^ STONE \ u G EMEND Sr BEYOND TOP LK 8.2 ii \ !'- .." /101109,1- r.----.7--_----- '<,:..i' . '•:,;,,, ,,,., 1 �.,' e I ,r/� % �� o�aa '.A".�� • WO,»IF a1,ss or askQ Q ] '� �e. NNNti1 �/ 2 : i 01 _ j,9 Do4-4• ' rr u r� /J .•� f O \ \ ~� ;.:0, S \°r �e� °�� An / d '� / \ REVISIONS I .. u�u,� -. u_ d ss,r Ns'd)N°% I 1Oz o I ulu H. f RWT fR ., ,... yF§ i,o u,. ,.: _ _8 u _u�u_�,.I �S� / SIME ALrs'I.rD • ` ,.,d'd u� p A I". SEE DETN,WEFT CS 5. 7 i p`a PLAN INFORMATION 9 '\' r., srunewcE(Trv.)J a - f__.+ - ..,,*y \�`! 'off s, S d r,+ �_ rT wrf m vI°aor�. -n \ �`'o . u czTION`\ �1 '/�."'' wro so Ex(rn.) MOP Do- IN( ) \ '. od'� r 9 P I > . a DRAWN BCNICKEN Y .. ...,,.� M.�'�._�.. f r^•' \ ...,ox.w SHEET v.v.mzs (113 ,y�,l. a'�f GRADING PLAN 1 b.I x.x.0..w,xr.xE,rx,r,..E,,...x„r".,xr,.!It w C3.06 NOTES la ........,..........-.., PETERS CREEK ROAD MC ADAMS 50..0 Rai..NC 27603 *919.1 5000 11.nse number.07000793 W rj www....... > CLIENT cc cin,oF ROAM.. 0 LY1 ,IORMWATER D1V15.N ,..MOMILLAM15,EN,UM CO 1802 COURTIAMO ROAO NE 0 ROANOKE,VA 2.12 0 g PHONE.0.3 5921 12 § / CONTRACTOR * NUNN+STATE(NvIRONIALMT. / .cc ...IA WE51•10.1-.0 0 .'''.--—''''.---------Rh., • • PRO•100-.FLOC...OW) wiNSTON.LENI,NC 27101 .1. ..• ...) 7 ZI' i / - ..„ _1-----------,...-- 7 •. -,..,.. , I- -J rs4 ., _ , ---"'-, r•I ti'' ••• 1. -- • U .... 4 WORK IN.5 AR.15 TO iri PROPOSED KRA.INLET TO BE LIMED N.PYRONAT 75 LU La' II / gfr77,`Cana i OR ENGINFOI EOUIVALEM1 , x _ 4 SIE DETAIL 5NEE1 C9. CC'". Z .s. .. UJ —I fa. o. CtO I— cc \ i ''" ,c.22 • :-!--'---- 4,„ klot,tiNED NM 0.01.1 7b (in''..• I Y., .,....„, -.1.••••—__„._..,...:4 ? " '. ..11 u 1 ' LL rENfrilit PRO,E 1 \ i -......... 1.I.KM.. El••1023 50 • OR NORMAL POOL k 9 '/-- •P'-'''w----.____" /''\\\\ •'•: 1 \ .,,_I .7 ,' s ••,, 7 . V, ,,........, ... '.\-WIT Of OSTURBANCE 0.) • / REVISIONS 4iiii•i;;V:‘‘. 1 .Z • i.----...\ / "V kc• o -.4 PLAN INFORMATION PAO1CCE HO SPEC 22161 \‘) i // D a •S TILENAME 5PEC22161 C3 _ a i OM... KAS 2 (1 ' 111111 DWN.' WS / ,Z,,,,.. ,0., MOAN= RA SCALE 1 'EH,THALIE T.:. 12.2025 • / / / ggi -----zj / // a/ .. DA 4M MA ,. SHEET RADING PLAN 'Ir / / / GB..SCA. . ••• 9 7,' 5NHT KEY / RS / / / C3"CP7 LETTLEAEOLT 7... -------- 1- - -- ------------- _ STREAM REAUGt.ENT \EN.' .1 ir4W PL‘ ,.., RIME GRAZE CONIRIIVOO)l,) , ,__ ,\ Pl. , 2.3. re." '1.•41 LI 1 . / •••• I -------- .1.r ,, - ..-s .., --,-, ..--i—‘-\\,„ — --"" ,... --.,....'., --: ,..1\ __-- ,.„ •‘, ,. ..., ---,, ,... ...„ _ . . . „....._ ,,,,, , ..____ \ LIN IN EL r?PROP N (IC) 012.,1 co m. P kr, '. --..Illie -....„ .0 . -,.......„ RM EL.1010 •,,. '0,, POL0 IN El.1013.17 '.. k..- ,.„ , '',...`,. '--' ,V. -- - / L --"'°-.........._...,. ZN rN.,V2t.,,IX .--, ,-... EXTEND 5.Brit:TOP Of IlfiNI''. i 1‘... .5'5 ' ''''.."-•-•... RI •P ." ..,:: \ '''...............N. ......-Le."''-'' -r ..... PROP TOP Or BANK(Tr.) • , ''''' . A / ,...----------' . . STRE:44 REAUCNNENT 'e z I I 9 _______--_._ SEE DETAIL SHEET C600 WATERTIGHT TIRANE.0. RIP EL.MO TEMP ACCESS ROAD . FRP ACCESS PONT t4 Ze -[2 — / ' :n IINP.11,,741'" SEE MEET C305 ' ' i 1:11./ 9 / '--.....„...„,... SEE DETAIL SHEET 5603 \ . , „ .. / ,.' 01-.0,,-- /• . .. .. PROP CONE SEWER ENCASEMENT EXTEND 5'BEYOND TOP Or BANN SLL SLTNL SHEET C603 1 : ' ... \ I 1 !, \ 1 PETERS CREEK STREAM REALIGNMENT fi 1 1020 1020 \\ 00. .041,e' ! , t.C.:'. 1 : el OP. 1 i I PROP ORbE ib I 412,, ri ." 1i, __ _ .._, ; 1 I \,•,- I .. ' - , . I 1010 . 1 _/ L WOLPER.I.-IMB 04.4)0,) SEE PT.SHEET POI i -RIME ORME CONTROL(RCiC)(TYR) SEE DETA SMELT CP OD 0,0111 45'. V, i GRAN.SCALE-NOMA.1 n k A % TOO 1005 a .GRAPHIC XALE-VERTICAL g SHEET KEY 0 1 -0+20 0+00 ,.....,... ,... PRELIMINARY DRAwiNG NoT RELEASED Pp CONSTRUCTION STREAM LH The APNT,R.McAdams Compao...nc CLIENT 621 Hills.waee, .1.500o6B Mr CITV Of ROANOKE CONTRACTOR REVISIONS .. ... .......''' • PETER'S CREEK PLAN INFORMATION PLAN AND PROFILE K.=A STORNIWATER DIVISION DAARELLWIMMOREUND ....... --...—:- 1111, 1 FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION C5.00 CORRY.1CW...el,El,CM phone SIN..1 5000 .4. 1...S.L.31'', :. CNECKED BY KAI. 1/02 COURTLAND ROAD NE 3.72S-2010 faL.919.361 2269 ,i + CONSTRUCTED WETLAND license number 0407000.3 PORNO..VA 34012 3.9.0.y.BysTREE, DRAWN Bv M. ....'Z MCADAMS PHONE.540.853.5931 WINSTO.SALEM.NC 27101 -.A.,.. sow AS SHOWN ,,,,,„,,,,„...,.,,,,,,,,,,„ '; ;‘. ROANOKE,VA 74017 °ATE 12...202S 125 --'''-------'''''''-'''. ..--'-'..- - '---------- ' I 1 ) \ /* . Vt \ '-• U. a.,1•40Pi%ESE,..; sa12) l.»".,GB^X,r^� •�„ '' I ¢l �l — � ' ter`°� .f ,8. �•..r \' Si n —i / 14 ap % . G+ .0.. PROP G X N. , ,50 M,l vl[,caro(Nh lm) ay' :.xry+'r{ - ,.,• '' +/a + _ ~\ \ * 7 \,G G"°F aN� • . / S'" �— O N. Pr .r -- . use.1. IV 1a050A101;,; __ NV OUT EL 8 1012 MI SEE G1„XWET GlO' 0 f% A> %f• PROP so n eurtix(rro 1 J PROP ioo_m rl000vtux(rw1 \\,\ PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C STREAM REALIGNMENT l''4 e�/ i mooe• ws�, F NO � 1020 �GaJO[ 1020 '1,,,, ,..I 3 4 $t g s 90 I "+ I. , ., 1I1Ae a {!{;{ 1015 1. � 'I e� .,. , �'}Ot o: 4d 1015 I »c �., °„ .a p 8 i 'FE N,w�"WEU�)c0 a,( 'O•pEwlEi(c&oi Mn,) 'lY EL-,1 ENCASEMENTF as-i �-NW 113.PP SS PPO 'A I PROP CONC ENO... ION EL 8 06 JM su(E)�(1 )-' 5 IMO SEE�"« �u.n' SEE OR.SKIT NX-i 1010 i 9 'cc RIM COMM cons)- DETM Ls POO xx11,Alf 14°,111,°»1,,. I'.r I SCOUR Kee sow Is,) `�� 1 1008 SEJ Mil CIG, IOOB rrxa uw vtx,X f Y 614P oXoo 00 PRELIMINARY DRAWING NOT .oX "x..X» STREAM CLIENT EITV CA ROANOKE CONTRACTOR REVISIONS "��Tl�M;y, I PLAN INFORMATION PLAN AND PROFILE 'l .J. NNW 500 c;,:�r ,M .»»NORTH SPATE Ty7S PETER S CREEK n: »u. ,::;'X, """"" "°' »I DARRELL CURRY MCWILURNIS UT, FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION UPC/MIN � rW:'; + CONSTRUCTED WETLAND CS.O1 MCADAMS .,..rn. , ocor w�»'TR» ,R..»J„.J RATE ,,.,01.,aJ; "°" ° .°°°°° ' AXONE.500.1153.'•J' :,;,N�;;N0 ROANOK SCAUE,VA 24017 REVISED MAPPING DATA Peters Creek and Peters Creek Tributary C— Flood Study Report SPEC-22161 FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE ELEVATION MEAN WITHOUT WITH CROSS DISTANCE' WIDTH SECTION AREA 1 VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE SECTION (FEET) (SQUARE FEET) i (FEET PER (NAVD) (NAND) (NAVD) SECOND) PETERS CREEK Y 12102 j 60 542 10.6 1001.0 1001.0 1002.0 1.0 Z 12593 83 709 8.1 1004.7 1004.7 1004.9 0.2 AA 13344 1 44 538 10.7 1009.0 1009.0 1009.1 0.1 AB 15288 146 838 6.9 1015.7 1015.7 1016.6 0.9 AC 15558 233 1,187 4.8 1018.2 1018.2 1018.6 0.4 AD 15835 1 268 919 6.2 1019.4 1019.4 1019.9 0.5 AE 16416 240 2,140 2.7 1021.5 1021.5 1022.5 1.0 AF I 16827 I 318 2,976 1.9 1022.3 1022.3 1023.1 0.8 t7B417 1 1 Qfl . 1 32d d 3 1 1 fl2d 6 _ 1112.1 5 ling A f1 Q , AH 1807718075 170 197 1.088 1,119 5.3 7.1 1026.2 1026.1 1026.2 1026.1 1026.9 1027.0 0.7 0.9 1 i AI 19373 19340 150 215 1,326 1,560 3.3 3.0 1032.5 1030.1 1032.5 1030.1 1033.3 1031.0 0.8 0.9 AJ 19832 19822 145 154 945 695 4.6 8.0 1033.2 1031.6 1033.2 1031.6 1034.2 1032.1 1.0 0.6 AX !- 28248 , 8u 483 9.8 1854.1 1834.1 t 1854.9 8.8 AL 20581 55 443 9.9 1036.7 1036.7 1037.7 1.0 AM 21080 60 434 10.1 1040.3 1040.3 1040.6 0.3 AN 21704 60 377 11.7 1046.6 ! 1046.6 ' 1046.7 0.1 AO 22224 75 515 8.5 1053.8 I 1053.8 1054.0 0.2 AP 22566 150 592 7.4 1060.0 1060.0 1060.0 0.0 AQ I 22904 130 1,169 3.8 1062.5 1062.5 1063.5 1.0 AR 23198 160 1,216 3.6 1063.4 1063.4 1064.4 1.0 I AS 23756 105 727 6.0 1065.8 1065.8 1066.8 1.0 AT 24123 135 978 4.5 1070.1 1070.1 1071.0 0.9 AU 24543 190 1,212 3.6 1072.9 1072.9 1073.9 1.0 AV 24879 155 891 I 4.9 1075.0 1075.0 1075.9 0.9 AW 25223 110 639 6.9 1078.0 I 1078.0 1078.7 1 0.7 'Feet above confluence with Roanoke River. D FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA W ROANOKE COUNTY, VA rn AND INCORPORATED AREAS PETERS CREEK P BASE FLOOD WATER SURFACE FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY ELEVATION MEANI WITHOUT WITH CROSS DISTANCE' WIDTH SECTION AREA VELOCITY REGULATORY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY INCREASE SECTION (FEET) (SQUARE FEET) (FEET PER (NAVD) (NAND) (NAVD) SECOND) __ PETERS CREEK T BINARY A A B 1254 1228 35 70 172 203 3.8 4.0 1032.2 1031.2 1031.521031.2 1032.5 1031.3 1.0 0.1 1556 20 54 97 189 6.8 5.8 1034.6 1034.6 1034.6 1034.6 1035.1 1035.4 0.5 0.8 C 1718 35 65 187 265 3.5 4.6 1036.3 1035.9 1036.3 1035.9 1037.0 1036.8 0.7 0.9 D 2066 50 60 163 170 4.0 7.2 1037.8 1037.8 1037.8 1037.8 1038.5 1038.0 0.7 0.2 = 2.06 40 163 4.0 1048.T 1040.7 1041.7 1.0 F 2735 40 163 4.0 1042.4 1042.4 1043.4 1.0 G 3292 1 50 218 3.0 1049.4 1049.4 1049.7 0.3 1 H 3715 20 86 7.6 1051.6 1051.6 1052.3 0.7 I 4137 30 177 3.7 1055.3 1055.3 1056.2 0.9 J 4691 40 • 198 3.3 1061.4 1061.4 1062.0 0.6 K 5117 62 148 4.4 1065.7 1065.7 1065.7 0.0 L 5307 35 1 fifi 2.1 1067.9 1067.9 1068.1 0.2 M 6213 20 47 7.3 1076.0 1076.0 1076.4 0.4 N 6849 20 70 4.9 1087.8 1087.8 i 1088.4 0.6 I , I I I I I Feet above confluence with Peters Creek. 2 Elevation computed without consideration of backwater effects from Peters Creek. D FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOODWAY DATA 03 ROANOKE COUNTY, VA r R' AND INCORPORATED AREAS PETERS CREEK TRIBUTARY C al National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette er FEMA Legend rU'STW 37"19.47'N SR f's orCeOY11 IC}4 J+`n J_?.WINO AND N it X MAI 3O I f IPM PAVa.L LArt.1/4,l Z. + + V- without Base Flood Eleratgn BFE} :0,A.Y.A9$ i r M."'E i ✓ ti , With BFE Or Depth Tani AE.A0.A .AA Pt ° . ma :�4 Ww, SPECIAL FLOOD $FAG"� HAZARD AREAS Regulator Floodway 0 1 «.M} ► b0 1 0.2••Annual Chance Flood Hazard.Area O ". v v . NI' - 10303 F ET r"K of 14 annual chance flood with average ,, \ a n ,, t areas o than ore square mile • depth less than one footer with drainage ilk le t yyit* ar, • 1036 FE T . Future conditions 1s Annual st lr i I. 0 /ie *�. chance Flood Hazard z: • Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to v 4.1 hf 3�� = OTHER AREAS OF Levee.See Rotes. , .��4`/ _ -4 - 103 . «_ FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Pisa due to Levee.: ,, ei• she la , •f " ® � .i"� r"�*.. ` `" ,j PROPOSED 100-YR a — 1034 FEET Sri FLOODPLAIN t,��•/ i. `\ II - r t , v mc3eev Area of Minimal Flood Hazard .o. A`+;d. * r O •' it '. Effective LOMRs �'d {'� *•� " ; OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard N 4r. <C x • lr—:... t GE1EFi4l Channel Culvert.ar Storm Sewer * 14;15111%. t ' lU =tn, r'r` � l GENERAL i i i i i i i Levee.Dike or Floodwall '` ah�)), kl�� ,,rj� J A 0 p'2 cross Sections with 1w Annual chance ��- �'• e 1- Water SurfaceElevatwn City OflRoanir x f — —— coastal 5101,30 .,,kb z�a� !4 �::::„..: �L ► Base Flood Elevation L re iBFEi O. r f Lmrt of 5tuov l•Z '��O- ' C lunsdicton Boundary ..w*illte : �/ „ PROPOSED 500-YR rr {roastaB aselinTransect Baseline �/� ^r1y � FLOODPLAINOTHER _ Profile Baseline ' W,..�� 10 / ; FEATURES HyorographicFeature • * K. . " Digital Data Availabler Ise CI _. "'. �, r Q No Digital Data Available *' .e" MAP PANELS ® unmapped G �'_ " REVISED STREAM •„ f t The per drsplayep on the map is an approximate CENTERLINE own:selected by the user and does not represen • I. ' an authoritative property location • �� e •.. this map complies with FEMA s standards for the use o' w t ' PROPOSED digital hood maps lit is not void as described below FLOODWAY The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD accurac standardsr rue •. Zarb?X le s ` ji" 1 �® , C The flood hazard in}ofmatian is de+rued duec[Iy tram the '• It e '%y el 042,Et authoritative NFHL web servtoes provided by FEMA This map . was exported on 1:26,2026 al 9 19 PS* and does not it.. R re'leet changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time The NFHL and effective in'ormation may change or " 411 b�� SIL " °' rt become superseded by new data over time NN w 3;, i► s This map image is raid it the one or more of the following map I ' - - ' 1 • ' 1 '..if r� r - elements do not appear basemap imagery.flood zone labels. t- »'R 4 cif .nwc. c 4 legend scale bar map creation date community identifiers • �r 1 t �. ' FIRM panel cumber and FIRM effective date.Map images for F :'t i IIy�I t ` I I,"I I unmapped ana unmodernized areas carrot be used for 0 250 500 1,000 1,50�I ZG;IJ regulator;purposes A�Ca n�an rn.e Ra r.i Cn„•nn.e,e'„„w ter,....�I wr_._-..�°.� IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,VIRGINIA The 16th day of March 2026. No. 43 3 66-031626. A RESOLUTION adopting the City of Roanoke's Strategic Priorities. WHEREAS,in 2025,Mayor and members of Roanoke City Council took time during their spring and fall retreats to reflect on their shared values and goals for the organization and the community it serves. While at the retreats, City Council worked through the organizational goals and built out strategic priorities and desired outcomes. Based on the work conducted by City Council, city administration has synthesized the information provided, defined the strategic goals, created objectives, and engaged with City Directors to develop activities for each strategic goal and/or priority; WHEREAS,in 2025, City Council defined strategic goals, created objectives,and engaged with City Directors to develop activities for each goal; and WHEREAS, the recommended Council priorities aim to strengthen civic engagement, build and maintain quality infrastructure, promote community and economic growth, ensure the well-being and safety of our community, continue to foster educational success and access, and focus on the quality of life for all in order to create a healthy and sustainable community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. City Council approves the City of Roanoke's Strategic Priorities, which are attached to the City Manager's Report dated March 16, 2026. ATTEST: iz • 7/ )GG ei City Clerk. City Manager's Report 111M3.1141&im Submitted by: Angelia Vernon, Assistant to the City Manager Office of the City Manager ROAN O K E March 16, 2026 Title: Adoption of the redefined strategic goals, objectives and priorities for the City of Roanoke. Background: In 2025, Mayor and members of Roanoke City Council took time during their spring and fall retreats to reflect on their shared values and goals for the organization and the community it serves. While at the retreats, City Council worked through the organizational goals and built out strategic priorities and desired outcomes. Based on the work conducted by City Council, city administration has synthesized the information provided, defined the strategic goals, created objectives and engaged with City Directors to develop activities for each strategic goal and/or priority. Considerations: The recommended council priorities are as follows: • Civic Stewardship and Infrastructure • Community and Economic Vitality • Community Safety • Education • Healthy and Sustainable Communities These efforts aim to strengthen civic engagement and deliver exceptional results for our residents, build and maintain quality infrastructure, promote community and economic growth, ensure the well -being and safety of our community, continue to foster educational success and access, and focus on the quality of life for all in order to create a healthy and sustainable community. These initiatives aim to foster a vibrant, sustainable, and inclusive Roanoke by strengthening neighborhoods, diversifying the economy, and investing in quality infrastructure. They ensure organizational excellence while creating a thriving environment where everyone can live, learn, work, play and prosper. Recommended Action: Adopt the City of Roanoke's Strategic Priorities as presented by City Administration. Valmarie Turner, City Manager ROANOKE Strategic Priorities Civic Stewardship and Infrastructure Strengthen civic engagement and deliver exceptional results for our residents by cultivating a high-performing, transparent, and citizen-centered city government that delivers reliable, future- ready core services to our residents, and continues to build and maintain quality infrastructure that supports healthy residential neighborhoods, successful commercial areas, and accessible public facilities and amenities. Activities Include: 1. Use technology enhancements and investments to make data-driven decisions, support transparency in government operations, and deliver accessible and effective city services. 2. Build a customer-centric organization and align organization structure, business processes and practices that result in exceptional customer service and responsiveness. 3. Expand public transit services for marginalized communities to primary destinations in the city and improve shelter infrastructure. 4. Enhance green infrastructure to offer effective, sustainable ways to manage stormwater systems for climate resilience and to support the development and efficiency of clean energy infrastructure: solar, wind, modular systems. 5. Provide a comprehensive maintenance program for ongoing maintenance 6. and operation of public facilities, parks, and greenways that have timely repairs, and are functional, safe, accessible and well-maintained. Community and Economic Vitality Take actions that result in a more diverse, balanced, and resilient economy through business attraction, expansion and retention to enable a business environment that supports growth and community well-being for long-term prosperity for our city and its residents. Activities Include: 1. Diversify economic sectors, with emphasis on manufacturing and emerging industries to drive economic stability and growth. 2. Focus on creating high paying jobs that do not harm public health and provide job ' quality, social impact and are sustainable. 3. Enhance support for small businesses leveraging the Economic Development Authority to provide a support hot-line, micro-lending solutions and highlight available city services for our business community. 4. Develop business sites, brown fields and vacant lands and create incentives for attraction and retention of people. 5. Promote and expand the outdoor recreation economy to foster community revitalization, protect air and water quality, create jobs and support economic diversification, and highlight Roanoke as a community for tourists, clients, business owners and homeowners. Raw ROANOKE Community Safety Strengthen our welcoming community through community collaboration and foster an environment where residents feel safe and are safe in their homes, public spaces, streets, businesses, and neighborhoods. Activities Include: 1. Promote transparency and community relations to build trust and equitable policy models that create a welcoming and safe community for all. 2. Continue to develop strategies to address the complex issues of gun violence and substance abuse aimed at creating a safer community for all. 3. Strengthening the community's ability to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from disasters. 4. Ensure upkeep and safety of facilities that house public safety staff, detention center residents, and social services staff. 5. Continue to foster partnerships with local businesses, organizations, and law enforcement to create a comprehensive safety strategy. Education Cultivate a community that values lifelong learning, strategically invests in programs that foster success beginning in early childhood, expands access to career and technical training, and builds partnerships that align our workforce with regional employers. Activities Include: 1. Expand access to Pre-K and early childhood learning programs to include school readiness to ensure children are proficient readers. 2. Build a lifelong learning ecosystem that supports continuous learning and development to support career transitions and personal group. 3. Develop and invest in learning hubs to provide digital access, research and community learning that offer academic support, enrichment activities, social-emotional learning, exercise, and healthy meals and snacks for student well-being. 4. Expand educational access and workforce pipelines through collaborative efforts with regional partners to include businesses, Workforce Development Board, higher education institutions and medical schools. 5. Find innovative educational strategies to strengthen K-12 education to improve student learning and close equity gaps. Healthy and Sustainable Communities Foster a caring community that focuses on quality of life, housing stability, public health, and behavioral health systems using an equitable, regional, and collaborative approach to preserve, protect and improve our community's natural, cultural and historical resources while increasing housing stability, public health, and behavioral health systems that will foster a safe, healthier and more equitable community for all residents. Activities Include: 1. Provide housing availability and affordability and maintain focus of businesses, civil rights, property rights, tenants, consumers, and environment. 2. Expand transitional housing and offer programmatic solutions that offer long-term housing stability to include housing-first programs. 3. Enhance the availability and accessibility of recovery services to improve the quality of life for residents with mental health and substance use disorders. 4. Strengthen environmentally sustainable practices in city policies and procedures. 5. Preserve, protect and enhance rivers and natural environmentally sensitive assets. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA The 16th day of March 2026. No. 43367-031626. AN ORDINANCE accepting the bid of The First National Exchange, LC, to execute a Parking Agreement with an initial term of twenty (20) years, with such entity having the option to renew such Parking Agreement for up to four (4) additional five (5) year periods and which Parking Agreement will allow such entity to obtain up to twenty (20) Unreserved Parking Permits for use of spaces in the City's Center in the Square Garage, upon certain terms and conditions; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute such a Parking Agreement; authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to take such further actions and execute such further documents as may be necessary to implement, administer, and enforce such Parking Agreement; rejecting any other bids; and dispensing with the second reading by title of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, the City has, by advertisement published once a week for two successive weeks in a paper of general circulation published in the City, publicly invited bids for the execution of a Parking Agreement for the purposes mentioned above; WHEREAS, one (1) bid for the execution of a Parking Agreement for the purposes mentioned above was received pursuant to the advertisement and such bid was opened at the City Council meeting held on March 16, 2026; WHEREAS, on March 11, 2026, The First National Exchange, LC ("Developer"), submitted a bid to the City for the execution of a Parking Agreement for the purposes mentioned above upon substantially the same terms as contained in the proposed Parking Agreement that was on file in the City Clerk's Office; WHEREAS, the matter was referred to the City Manager for evaluation and negotiation with Developer as to the final terms and conditions for such Parking Agreement; WHEREAS, negotiations between the City Manager and Developer have resulted in a Parking Agreement that provides for Developer to obtain up to twenty (20) Unreserved Parking Permits in the City's Center in the Square Garage in order to allow guests of the Hotel, to be constructed by Developer, to use parking spaces in the Center in the Square Garage, upon certain terms and conditions as set forth in the Parking Agreement, for a period of twenty (20) years, starting on the date when the Hotel is issued a permanent Certificate of Occupancy and ending at midnight on the last day of such twenty (20) year term, but with the Developer having the option to renew such Parking Agreement for up to four (4) additional five (5) year periods, with each option being automatically exercised and the Parking Agreement being renewed for each five (5) year term unless terminated by Developer as provided in the Parking Agreement, unless sooner terminated as provided for in such Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law; WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that Council accept the bid of Developer and approve the execution of such Parking Agreement, substantially similar to the copy attached to the City Manager's Report dated March 16, 2026; WHEREAS, after proper and timely notice as required by the Code of Virginia, Council held a Public Hearing on this matter at its regular meeting on March 16, 2026, at which hearing all parties in interest and persons were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed Parking Agreement; WHEREAS, Council has adopted an ordinance dated March 16, 2026, authorizing the City Manager, or designee, on behalf of the City, to execute, deliver, and perform a First Amended and Restated Contract for Sale of Real Estate ("Sale Agreement") with Developer and Developer has agreed to execute, deliver, and perform the Sale Agreement; and WHEREAS, City Council determined that the bid of Developer to execute a Parking Agreement as set forth above, upon certain terms and conditions, was the most responsive and responsible bid received by the City and Council desires to accept such bid. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Roanoke as follows: 1. Council accepts the bid of Developer and hereby makes an award for the Parking Agreement to Developer, subject to certain terms and conditions as further noted in the City Manager's Report dated March 16, 2026, to this Council and upon such other terms and conditions as the City Manager may deem appropriate and agree to. Council further finds that it will be in the best interest of the City to award the Parking Agreement as set forth above and will help in promoting economic development in downtown Roanoke. Any and all other bids made to the City for the above matter are hereby rejected. 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute a Parking Agreement between the City and Developer that provides for Developer to obtain up to twenty (20) Unreserved Parking Permits in the City's Center in the Square Garage for the purposes set forth above and subject to the terms of the Parking Agreement, which Agreement shall be substantially similar to the one attached to the above mentioned City Manager's Report and upon such other terms as the City Manager deems appropriate and agrees to. Such Parking Agreement shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. The bond or security to be provided by the Developer shall be in such form and amount as the City Manager deems appropriate. 3. The Parking Agreement referred to above shall be for an initial term of twenty (20) years, starting on the date when a permanent Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the hotel to be constructed by Developer and ending twenty (20) years thereafter, but with the Developer having the option to renew such Parking Agreement for up to four (4) additional five (5) year periods with each option being automatically exercised and the Parking Agreement renewed for each five (5) year period unless Developer terminates the Parking Agreement as provided therein, unless sooner terminated as provide for in such Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law. 4. The City Manager, or designee, is further authorized to take such further actions and to execute such further documents as may be necessary to implement, administer, and enforce such Parking Agreement, which includes, but is not limited to, any needed modifications to such Parking Agreement. 5. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the City Charter, the second reading of this Ordinance by title is hereby dispensed with. 6. This Ordinance is effective as of the date of its passage. ATTEST:e.4.;,, N City Clerk. . r-: City Manager's Report ..��' Submitted by: Brian Mann ROANOKE Executive Enterprise Administrator 'March 16, 2026 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Subject: - Public Hearing for a Parking Agreement for Unreserved Parking Permits for the Center in the Square Garage located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S.E. Background:. The City of Roanoke is proposing to provide a : Parking Agreement for 20 unreserved parking permits within the Center in the Square Garage, a City-owned parking facility located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S.E.: in connection with development of a hotel. The term for this Agreement would.be for a period of twenty (20) years with the right to extend the terms of the Agreement for up to four (4) additional five (5) year periods. Pursuant to Sections 15.2-2100 and 15.2-2101, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, the City is required to give public notice that the City is proposing to provide a franchise for parking rights subject to certain terms and conditions, establish a bid procedure for.parties interested'in bidding on the franchise, and; conduct a public hearing. A copy of the proposed agreement and related bid - forms were placed with the City Clerk for public information and review on and after March 2, 2026. The required legal advertisements ran in the Cardinal News on March 2, 2026. and March 9, 2026. The deadline for submittal of bids to the City Clerk from interested parties was Friday March 13, 2026, at 12:00 Noon. One written bid was opened and read earlier today at the 2:00 p.m. City Council session pursuant to Section 15.2-2102 Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The First:National Exchange, LC ("Developer"), submitted a bid consistent with all proposed terms 'of the parking agreement advertised with the bid invitation. The matter was referred to the City Manager for review, evaluation, and recommendation. A copy -of the proposed parking agreement, with exhibits (cited hereafter as the "Parking Agreement"), is attached to this report. Considerations The proposed Parking Agreement sets forth additional terms and conditions relevant to development and operation of Developer's hotel, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. The term,of this Parking Agreement shall be fora period of twenty (20) years, : starting-from the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement, and after the date of issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel, which date shall be no later than January 31,.2026, and continuing for a period of twenty(20)years unless this Parking Agreement is sooner terminated . 1 as provided for in this Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law. The Developer shall have the option to renew this Parking Agreement for up to four (4) additional, five (5) year periods, each such option shall be automatically exercised and this Parking.Agreement renewed for such additional five(5)year period unless terminated by Developer by providing at least ninety (90) days (the term "days" in this Agreement shall mean consecutive calendar days unless otherwise stated) written notice to the City prior to the expiration of the then current term (initial term and any subsequent terms, collectively the "Term"). 2. The maximum number of parking permits available to Developer will be 20 and Developer will notify the City by 3:00 p.m. the preceding day of the number of parking permits required for Hotel Guests the next day. The City will subsequently set aside that number of parking spaces in the Garage for the next Hotel Parking Day. Such notice will be provided in writing and delivered via email or by hand to the Park Roanoke Offices. Developer acknowledges and agrees parking permits are to be used only in the Garage and by Hotel guests during the time periods as set forth in the Parking Agreement. Invoices for the prior month's Usage of Parking and Overstay Charges will be billed to Developer on or about the 10th of each month with payment due to the City the first day of the following month. Such payment will be in one check made payable to "Park Roanoke." 3. Developer shall pay to the City during the term of this Parking Agreement the Daily Maximum Rate multiplied by the greater of(i) the number of Parking Permits reserved by the Developer during a calendar month or (ii) the number of Parking Permits used by Hotel Guests during such calendar month ("Usage of Parking"). For the purpose of this formula, each Parking Permit shall be one Hotel Parking Day stay. A Hotel Parking Day shall begin at 3:00 p.m. on the day on which a Hotel Guest checks into the Hotel and ending at 4:00 p.m. on the following day. For example, if a Hotel Guest checks in at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday and checks out at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, when the Daily Maximum Rate is $4.00, then the Developer would pay for three (3) Hotel Parking Days for such Hotel Guest at $4.00 each, resulting in a total of$12.00 for that Hotel Guest's use of Parking Permits. The bid submitted by Developer was fully responsive to the invitation. Developer has provided sufficient evidence of its ability to undertake the obligations contained in the Parking Agreement. After proper and timely notice as required by the Code of Virginia, Council held a public hearing on this matter at its 7:00 p.m. session on March 16, 2026, at which public hearing all parties in interest and persons were given the opportunity to be heard, both for and against the proposed Parking Agreement. The City Manager recommends that the Council find that the bid of The First National Exchange, LC, on this matter is from a responsible bidder and is responsive. The City Manager further recommends that Council accept such bid and approve the execution of the proposed Parking Agreement. 2 Recommended Action: Accept the bid and award the Parking Agreement to The First National Exchange, LC. Approve the Terms of the Parking Agreement between the City of Roanoke and The First National Exchange, LC, as set forth in the proposed Parking Agreement attached to this report. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Parking Agreement between the City and The First National Exchange, LC, similar to the proposed Parking Agreement attached to this report and approved as to form by the City Attorney, and to enforce any and all terms and conditions of such Parking Agreement. Authorize the City Manager to take such further actions and to execute such further documents, approved as to form by the City Attorney, as may be necessary to implement, administer, and enforce the Parking Agreement and to accomplish the above matters and complete the use of the Property described in the Parking Agreement. Valmarie H. Turner, City Manager 3 PARKING AGREEMENT This Parking Agreement ("Agreement" or"Parking Agreement") is dated and is between the City of Roanoke, Virginia, a Virginia municipal corporation, ("City"), and The First National Exchange, LC ("Developer"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the City is the owner and operator of a certain public parking garage named Center in the Square Garage located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S.E., Roanoke, Virginia, which garage provides parking spaces to the public ("Garage"); WHEREAS, the Developer plans to develop, construct, open, and operate a hotel with at least 25 rooms at Promissory Hotel ("Hotel"), 201 South Jefferson Street, S.E., Roanoke, Virginia and which Hotel shall be operated by an entity designated by the Developer ("Hotel Operator"); WHEREAS, the City recognizes that for a favorable development of the Hotel, it is necessary for its patrons to have access to adequate public parking convenient to the Hotel; WHEREAS,readily available and convenient public parking shall be made available to the Hotel's guests, patrons, and visitors on the same basis as it is available to the general public; WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the City provide the Developer with up to 20 unreserved parking permits for the parking for each Hotel Parking Day (as the term "Hotel Parking Day" is defined in this Agreement) (individually,"Parking Permit" and collectively,"Parking Permits")of motor vehicles by the Hotel's guests, patrons, and visitors for the Hotel's nonexclusive use in the Garage for a period of twenty(20) years from the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement,with the right to extend the term of the Parking Agreement for up to four(4) additional five (5) year periods subject to the terms of this Parking Agreement, and such Parking Permits are to be provided pursuant to the parking rates set out in Exhibit A (which rates are subject to modification by City Council from time to time), which is attached hereto and made a part hereof(the"Posted Rates"); WHEREAS, this Parking Agreement is specifically conditioned on the Developer completing the Hotel and having it active and open to the public for business during the entire term of this Agreement; WHEREAS, the parties have complied with the provisions of Virginia Code Sections 15.2-2100 et seq. for this Parking Agreement as authorized by Ordinance No. , adopted by City Council on March 16, 2026, and WHEREAS,the City is agreeable to providing the Developer with the Parking Permits based on the terms and provisions of this Parking Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions set forth herein, the Parties agree that the above Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement and made a part of it and that the Parties further agree as follows: SECTION 1. NO BAILMENT. This is a Parking Agreement and no bailment is created by this Parking Agreement. SECTION 2. GRANT OF PARKING PERMITS. The City hereby grants to Developer Parking Permits, as defined in this Section 2 and also as described in Section 3, for use in the Garage areas described in Section 3(C) hereof. The Parking Permits hereby granted shall become available for use by the Developer, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, on the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement. The Parking Permits are to be used only by the guests,patrons, and visitors of the Hotel(collectively"Hotel Guests"and individually a"Hotel Guest"), but which specifically excludes Hotel workers and employees, in the unreserved parking spaces designated by the City. Such Parking Permits will be in the form of hotel access cards that will allow the user of such card access to the Garage. SECTION 3. PARKING PERMITS. A. The City intends to operate the Garage 24 hours per day throughout each year. The Parking Permits in the Garage shall only be used in the Garage by such Hotel Guests and may be used during the time periods as set forth in Section 5(A). Developer acknowledges and agrees that such Parking Permits shall only be used for the vehicles of the Hotel Guests, in the Garage in the areas as designated by the City in Section 3(C) hereof. The maximum number of Parking Permits available to Developer shall be equal to 20. B. Each of the Parking Permits shall be subject to all applicable rules and regulations applicable to other parking permits issued for the Garage and subject to the same provisions as other users of the Garage, which rules and regulations are attached as Exhibit B, except that each such Hotel Guest will have access to the Garage during the time periods as set forth in Section 5(A). The City agrees that the rules and regulations applicable to such Parking Permits will be reasonable and further agrees to make the Developer aware of the rules and regulations applicable to the users of the Garage. The Developer agrees that the Developer and Hotel staff shall be responsible to provide written notice to the Hotel Guests regarding compliance with such rules and regulations and the liability of Hotel Guests to the City for all damages, costs, and expenses resulting from such Hotel Guest's violations of such rules and regulations. The City and its Parking Management Company, if any, shall not be responsible to any Hotel Guests for any items left in any vehicle or for any damage to the vehicle. Such other rules and regulations that are applicable to other users of the Garage shall be applicable to.Hotel Guests. Such rules and regulations are subject to being amended, modified, and/or changed by the City at the City's discretion, so long as all rules apply uniformly to all users of the Garage. C. The City hereby acknowledges that the Parking Permits provide the Developer a non-exclusive right of access for ingress, egress, and parking in the Garage as set forth in this Agreement for the purpose of parking motor vehicles of Hotel Guests with the right of vehicular and pedestrian access, ingress, egress, on, over, and across the paved entrance and exit ways, ramps, walkways, stairways, and City owned elevators in the Garage. The Parking Permits will allow access to all levels of the Garage with the exception of any reserved parking spaces or any security areas as are designated in the sole discretion of the City from time to time. D. The City and the Developer and/or the Hotel Operator, shall designate their respective representatives who will meet on a regular basis (not less frequently than quarterly during each calendar year during the term of this Agreement) to review the operations of the Garage, distribution and use of Parking Permits, and other matters to assess what changes, alterations or additions should be established to ensure that the interests of the City in the operation of the Garage and the interests of the Developer and the Hotel Operator in the issuance and use of Parking Permits are satisfied. The City and the Developer agree that such representatives may amend, adjust, or supplement any of the provisions of this Section 3 provided such representatives agree to any such amendments, adjustments, or supplements in writing and are executed by all of the representatives. The representatives of the City and the Developer and/or the Hotel Operator shall negotiate in good faith to reach appropriate amendments, alterations, or adjustments as the circumstances may warrant. SECTION 4. TERM. The term of this Parking Agreement shall be for a period of twenty (20) years, starting from the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement, and after the date of issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel, which date shall be no later than January 31, 2025, and continuing for a period of twenty (20) years unless this Parking Agreement is sooner terminated as provided for in this Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law. The Developer shall have the option to renew this Parking Agreement for up to four (4) additional, five (5) year periods, each such option shall be automatically exercised and this Parking Agreement renewed for such additional five (5) year period unless terminated by Developer by providing at least ninety(90) days (the term "days"in this Agreement shall mean consecutive calendar days unless otherwise stated) written notice to the City prior to the expiration of the then current term (initial term and any subsequent terms, collectively the "Term"). SECTION 5. COST OF PARKING PERMITS. A. The City will establish the Posted Rates for the general public to use the Garage, including a Daily Maximum Rate, and a Hourly Rate in the format set forth in Exhibit A. The Posted Rates shall be updated by City Council from time to time in accordance with Section 5 (G) below and shall be inclusive of all taxes,insurance, expenses, etc. B. Developer shall pay to the City during the term of this Parking Agreement the Daily Maximum Rate multiplied by the greater of(i) the number of Parking Permits reserved by the Developer during a calendar month or(ii)the number of Parking Permits used by Hotel Guests during such calendar month ("Usage of Parking"). For the purpose of this formula, each Parking Permit shall be one Hotel Parking Day stay. A Hotel Parking Day shall begin at 3:00 p.m. on the day on which a Hotel Guest checks into the Hotel and ending at 4:00 p.m. on the following day. For example, if a Hotel Guest checks in at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday and checks out at 11:00 a.m. on Friday,when the Daily Maximum Rate is$4.00, then the Developer would pay for three (3) Hotel Parking Days for such Hotel Guest at $4.00 each, resulting in a total of$12.00 for that Hotel Guest's use of Parking Permits. C. Each access card shall allow one vehicle unlimited ingress and egress from 3:00 p.m. on the day of check in (or earlier as allowed pursuant to Section 5 (I)(2) below) until the time of check-out, which shall be no later than 2:00 p.m. After check-out, the access card shall provide for one egress with no additional ingress. Should a vehicle exit the Garage after 4:00 p.m. of the day of check-out, the City shall bill the Developer the Posted Rates for use of the parking space between 4:00 p.m. on the day of check-out and the actual time of egress for that vehicle (the"Overstay Charges"). D. For the use of the Parking Permits, the Hotel Guests may utilize parking in the Garage on a self-park basis only. E. Invoices for the prior month's Usage of Parking and Overstay Charges will be billed to the Developer on or about the 10th of each month. Payment shall be due to the City the first day of the following month and shall be paid by the Developer in one check made payable to "Park Roanoke", 117 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011, or at such other address and/or other payee as City may designate in writing to Developer. In the event Developer shall fail to make such monthly payment by the 5th of each month, a late fee will be assessed for each invoice for which payment is late. The initial late fee will be ten percent(10%) of the monthly invoice amount for which payment is late. The amount of such late fee may be changed by the City Council from time to time, so long as the rate is generally applicable to all of the City's Accounts Payable in similar standing. Furthermore, any past due payments shall also accrue interest at the rate of one percent(1%)per month until the full amount is paid to the City, with any payments being applied first to any interest and late fees due. F. The City may charge the Developer or Hotel Operator the generally applicable fair market rate as the City charges members of the general public for parking spaces in the Garage and in other parking facilities operated by the City in the vicinity of the Hotel should the Developer request such parking permits for uses other than by Hotel Guests. These uses shall be subject to availability of parking at the sole determination of the City. Payment by the Developer to the City for such other spaces shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the City's standard parking rules and regulations, including billing terms and termination for non-payment sections. G. Developer further acknowledges that the Posted Rates are subject to being changed by the action of City Council, and/or the City Manager per City policy, and the rate to be paid by the Developer to the City will be adjusted by any such change in the Posted Rates from time to time and be effective on whatever date such Posted Rates take effect. The City reserves the right in its sole and exclusive discretion to increase the Posted Rates. H. The Developer shall notify the City by 3:00 p.m. (Roanoke time) on each day preceding each Hotel Parking Day of the number of Parking Permits that the Developer will need for Hotel Guests(including Early Check In Guests defined in Section 5 (I)(2)below) for the next Hotel Parking Day and the City shall set aside that number of parking spaces in the Garage for the next Hotel Parking Day. Notice from the Developer shall be in writing and shall be delivered to General Manager Park Roanoke by email at parking@roanokeva.gov or by hand at 117 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24011. After 3:00 p.m.,the City may permit others to use all parking spaces in the Garage not timely reserved by the Developer in accordance with this Section 5(H). Subject to availability, the Developer may request the reservation of additional parking spaces in the Garage after 3:00 p.m. for the next Hotel Parking Day and the City may provide such additional parking spaces at the then current rate as provided for in this Agreement. I. 1. If the City fails to provide the number of parking spaces reserved by Developer in accordance with Section 5(H) above for any Hotel Parking Day, except in the occurrence of an event set forth in Section 10 hereof, the City shall reimburse the Developer for the actual cost of alternative parking for the Hotel Guests for whom parking spaces were not available in the Garage; multiplied by the number of parking spaces which were reserved by Developer in accordance.with Section 5(H)but were unavailable. The Developer shall present the City with an invoice which indicates the actual parking fee paid and the name and location of the parking facility to which the fee was paid. The City shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice, or notify the Developer of a dispute. 2. The City and the Developer acknowledge that,from time to time,Hotel Guests may check into the Hotel before 3:00 p.m. ("Early Check In Guests"). The City shall have no responsibility for any Early Check In Guests who may be unable to park in the Garage unless Developer has notified the City in accordance with Section 5(H) above. The City shall have no responsibility for any requested Parking Permits by the Developer that exceed the lesser of the number of Parking Permits requested for the time in question or the maximum number provided for in this Agreement. J. Developer and the City acknowledge and agree that the operations and functions of the Garage and the Hotel will require cooperation, especially with respect.to Early Check In Guests and Hotel Guests who arrive at the Hotel without prior reservations. Developer and the City agree that the representatives designated pursuant to Section 3(D) hereof will include in their regular meeting these matters and other matters related to the interaction of the operations and functions of the Garage and the Hotel. To the extent that the representatives determine that adjustments should be made in order to accommodate the operations of the Garage and the Hotel, such adjustments shall be set forth in writing and executed by the representatives. SECTION 6. OPERATION,MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TEMPORARY RELOCATION. A. The City will operate the Garage in a manner similar to the operation of other City owned and/or controlled parking facilities. The City will maintain the Garage in good working condition and repair and will make such repairs, perform such preventative maintenance, structural repairs, or other improvements as the City deems reasonably necessary. The City will use commercially reasonable efforts to make other parking spaces available in the event of temporary closure of the Garage for the purposes of maintenance, repair, or replacement, at no additional cost or expense of the alternate Parking Permits to the Developer. Other than in the event of an emergency, the City will confer with Developer prior to any closures of the Garage and will endeavor to accomplish all Garage maintenance, repairs, and replacements in a manner that will result in the least inconvenience for the Hotel and Hotel Guests. The Developer and/or Hotel will not be entitled to any payments or offsets from the City's monthly, hourly, daily, or evening parking revenues against the parking charges otherwise due from the Developer to the City under the terms of this Parking Agreement. Developer and/or Hotel shall have no rights in or to any monies paid by anyone to the City, or revenues received from anyone by the City on account of parking in the Garage. B. If any construction, maintenance, repairs, other work, or other matters take place at the Garage that requires a temporary relocation of any of the spaces available for use by the Developer in connection with the Parking Permits, the City may, on ten (10) days written notice (except in the case of an emergency in which case no notice is required) to Developer, temporarily relocate any of the parking spaces to be used in connection with the Parking Permits to another City owned and/or controlled parking facility until such construction and/or other work has been completed. Such relocation will be to another location in the Garage or to a City parking facility mutually agreeable to the City and Developer, such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld. The City agrees that (i) no such relocation of spaces allocated for Parking Permits shall occur unless and until all other users of parking spaces in the Garage have been relocated and (ii) Parking Permits for parking spaces in the Garage or in alternative locations are available during any period in which a need for relocation arises. SECTION 7. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBORDINATION. A. Assignment Rights of Developer. 1. So long as the Developer is not in default under any provision of this Agreement, the Developer may, with thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, assign Developer's rights under this Agreement without the consent of the City to (i) a purchaser of the Hotel; (ii) a purchaser of all • or a majority of the membership interest in the Developer; or (iii) as additional collateral to a lender who is the beneficiary of a mortgage or deed of trust lien on the Hotel provided,however, any such transferee shall assume and perform all obligations of the Developer under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The City agrees to enter into an agreement with Developer's lender, on mutually agreeable terms, regarding the collateral assignment of this Parking Agreement by the Developer to such lender and the consent to such collateral assignment. 2. Except as provided in Section 8(A)(1) above, Developer may not assign, transfer, or pledge any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City and the City may grant or deny its consent in City's sole discretion. 3. Notwithstanding any permitted assignment, the Developer shall remain responsible for all obligations under this Agreement unless the City specifically grants the Developer a release in writing. B. Sale of Garage by the City. 1. The City may sell all of its right, title, and interest in the Garage at any time without the prior consent or approval of the Developer. In the event of any such sale,the City shall sell the Garage subject to the terms of this Parking Agreement and the purchaser shall acknowledge in writing that(i)the purchaser is acquiring the Garage subject to the terms of this Parking Agreement; and (ii) the cost of Parking Permits charged by the purchaser to the Developer shall be the average of the daily maximum rate charged from time to time by the City at the remaining parking facilities owned by the City located in the downtown area of the City (that area being bounded by I-581 on the east, Elm Avenue on the south, 5th Street on the west, and Wells Avenue on the north). The acknowledgement from the purchaser will provide that this rate shall be adjusted when and as the City adopts changes in its parking rates. The City shall provide a copy of this acknowledgement executed by the purchaser at the time the deed transferring the Garage to the purchaser is recorded. 2. Upon the sale of the Garage, the City shall have no further obligations under this Parking Agreement and the Developer shall have no recourse to the City for any matter arising after the sale of the Garage. SECTION 8. DEFAULT BY DEVELOPER. A. Each of the following shall constitute a default hereunder by the Developer (each of the following events is hereinafter referred to as "Default"): 1. The failure or refusal by Developer to make any payment due to the City hereunder within fifteen (15) days after written notice of nonpayment is given by the City to the Developer. 2. The failure or refusal by the Developer to perform any of its other covenants or obligations hereunder within sixty (60) days after written notice of nonperformance is given by the City to the Developer; provided, however, that if such failure to perform cannot reasonably be cured within sixty (60) days, the Developer shall not be in default if it commences within sixty (60) days steps reasonably calculated to cure the nonperformance and in good faith pursues those • steps diligently and in good faith to completion. 3. The Hotel, for any reason other than those set forth in Section 10 below, is, for any period of more than 30 consecutive days,not actively operating and open to the public for business("Hotel Closing Event"). B. Upon the occurrence of a Default as set forth in Section 9 (A), the City may immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to the Developer. In addition to this right to terminate this Agreement, the City may also in the event of a Default by Developer hereunder exercise any and all other rights and remedies available to the City at law or in equity, including without limitation the recovery of any and all monetary damages that the City has suffered as a result of such Default. SECTION 9. FORCE MAJEURE. A delay in, or failure of, performance by any party, shall not constitute a default, nor shall the Developer or the City be held liable for loss or damage, or be in breach of this Agreement, if and to the extent that such delay, failure, loss, or damage is caused by an occurrence beyond the reasonable control of such party, and its agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants, including results from Acts of God or the public enemy, compliance with any order or request of any governmental authority or person authorized to act therefore, acts of declared or undeclared war, public disorders, rebellion, sabotage, revolution, earthquake, floods, riots, strikes, labor or equipment difficulties, delays in transportation, inability to obtain necessary materials or equipment or permits due to existing or future laws, rules or regulations of governmental authorities or any other causes, whether direct or indirect, and which by the exercise of reasonable diligence said party is unable to prevent. For purposes of this Agreement any one delay caused by any such occurrence shall not be deemed to last longer than six (6) months and the party claiming delay caused by any and all such occurrences shall give the other party written notice of the same within thirty (30) days after the date such claiming party learns of or reasonably should have known of such occurrence. Notwithstanding anything else set forth above, after a total of nine(9)months of delays of any type have been claimed by a party as being subject to force majeure, no further delays or claims of any type shall be claimed by such party as being subject to force majeure and/or being an excusable delay. SECTION 10. DEFAULT BY THE CITY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF THE CITY; CURE; AND REMEDY. A. In the event of any default,nonperformance, or breach of any of the terms or conditions of this Parking Agreement by the City, Developer agrees that the City's liability hereunder shall be limited to the repayment of monies paid by Developer to the City, or a deduction from any payment due from Developer to the City, for any Parking Permits that are not able to be used due to such default, nonperformance, or breach for the period of time of such inability to use such Parking Permits. In addition to the remedies set forth in the prior sentence, if the City is in default, nonperformance, or breach of any of the terms or conditions of the Parking Agreement, Developer may provide the City with written notice of the same and the City shall have sixty(60) days following receipt of such notice from the Developer to cure any such default, nonperformance, or breach, provided if such default, nonperformance,or breach cannot be cured within sixty(60)days from the date of receipt of the notice from the Developer, the City shall be deemed to have cured the default as long as the City undertakes to remedy the same within sixty(60) days following receipt of notice and the City diligently proceeds to remedy such default, nonperformance, and/or breach. B. Under no circumstances under this Agreement shall the Developer have the right of set off against the amounts owed to the City. SECTION 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Developer, any of its permitted assigns or successors, and any of its contractors involved in this Parking Agreement shall maintain the insurance coverages as set forth in Exhibit C and provide the proof of insurance coverage, including workers' compensation coverage if Developer hires any employees. Such insurance coverage shall be obtained at the Developer's sole expense and maintained during the term of the Parking Agreement and shall be effective prior to the beginning of this Parking Agreement. Additional insured endorsements, if required,must be received by the City within thirty(30) days of the execution of this Parking Agreement or as otherwise required by the City's Risk Manager. SECTION 12. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its Parking Management Company, and their respective officers, agents, and employees ("Indemnified Parties") against any and all liability, losses, damages, claims, causes of action, suits of any nature,costs,and expenses,including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from or arising out of actions, activities, or omissions, negligent or otherwise, of the Developer, the operator of the Hotel, and their respective employees, agents, or contractors, but with respect to those employees, agents, or contractors, only if and to the extent that said actions, activities, or omissions occur in the course of their performance of actions that are within the scope of their employment, agency, or contract by or with the Developer or the operator of the Hotel. This Indemnity includes, without limitation,liability, losses, damages, claims, causes of action, suits of any nature, costs, and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from or arising out of any fines or penalties, violations of federal, state, or local laws or regulations, personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage claims or suits. Developer agrees to and shall protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from any and all demands for fees, claims, suits,actions, causes of action, settlement, or judgments based on the actual infringement or violation of any copyright,trademark,patent, invention, article, arrangement, or other apparatus that may be used in the performance of this Parking Agreement. SECTION 13. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, REGULATIONS,AND IMMIGRATION LAW. Developer agrees to and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations,including all applicable licensing requirements. Developer further agrees that Developer does not, and shall not during the performance of this Parking Agreement, knowingly employ an unauthorized alien as defined in the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. SECTION 14. REPORTS AND RECORDS. The City and Developer shall maintain all books, records, and other documents relating to this Parking Agreement for a period of five (5) years after the end of each fiscal year included in this Parking Agreement. The City and Developer and their authorized employees, agents, and/or representatives shall have reasonable access to and the right to examine, copy, and/or audit any of such materials of the other party during the term of the Parking Agreement in connection with this Parking Agreement and the Parking Permits to determine their proper use in accordance with the terms of this Parking Agreement. SECTION 15. NONWAIVER. Each party agrees that any party's waiver or failure to enforce or require performance of any term or condition of this Parking Agreement or any party's waiver of any particular breach of this Parking Agreement by the other party extends to that instance only. Such waiver or failure is not and shall not be a waiver of any of the terms or conditions of this Parking Agreement or a waiver of any other breaches of the Parking Agreement by any party and does not bar the non-defaulting party from requiring the defaulting party to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Parking Agreement and does not bar the non-defaulting party from asserting any and all rights and/or remedies it has or might have against the defaulting party under this Parking Agreement or by law. SECTION 16. CHOICE OF LAW, FORUM SELECTION. This Parking Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, and construed under the substantive laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and any cause of action regarding the rights and duties of the parties must be brought in the Circuit Court or General District Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and further agrees this Parking Agreement is controlled by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, with the exception of Virginia's conflict of law provisions which shall not apply, and that all claims, disputes, and other matters shall be decided only by such court according to the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as aforesaid. The parties further waive and agree not to assert in any such action, suit or proceeding, that such party is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of such courts, that the action, suit or proceeding, is brought in an inconvenient forum or that the venue of the action, suit, or proceeding is improper. SECTION 17. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Parking Agreement,or the application of any provision hereof to a particular entity or circumstance, shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Parking Agreement shall not be affected and all other terms and conditions of this Parking Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. SECTION 18. FAITH BASED ORGANIZATIONS. Pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-4343.1,be advised that the City does not discriminate against faith- based organizations. SECTION 19. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The terms, conditions, provisions, and undertakings of this Parking Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns. SECTION 20. HEADINGS. The captions and headings in this Parking Agreement are for convenience and reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning and interpretation of this Parking Agreement. SECTION 21. COUNTERPART COPIES. This Parking Agreement may be executed in any number of counterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single instrument. SECTION 22. AUTHORITY TO SIGN. The persons who have executed this Parking Agreement represent and warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Parking Agreement on behalf of the party for whom they are signing. SECTION 23. NOTICES. All.notices must be given in writing and shall be validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, with a receipt, addressed as follows (or any other address that the party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): If to the City: City of Roanoke Attn: City Manager 364 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Facsimile: (540) 853-1138 With a copy to: Enterprise Administrator for the City of Roanoke 364 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 If to Developer: The First National Exchange, LC Lucas Thornton 631 Campbell Ave., S.E. Roanoke, VA 24013 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, Notices shall be deemed to be effective one (1) day after sending if sent by overnight courier or three (3) days after sending it by certified mail, return receipt requested. SECTION 24. NONDISCRIMINATION. During the performance of this Parking Agreement, Developer agrees as follows: i. Developer will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,religion, color, sex,national origin, age,disability, or any other basis prohibited by state law relating to discrimination in employment, except where there is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the Developer. Developer agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. ii. Developer in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Developer will state that Developer is an equal opportunity employer. iii. Notices, advertisements, and solicitations placed in accordance with federal law, rule or regulation shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of meeting the requirements of this section. SECTION 25. RIGHTS CUMULATIVE. All rights,powers, and privileges conferred hereunder on the City to enforce this Parking Agreement shall be cumulative, and not restricted to those given by law. SECTION 26. BOND. A. Developer agrees to and shall provide and maintain during the entire term of this Parking Agreement a Bond, or such other security as approved by the City Manager (such as a letter of credit), (collectively-Bond) in the amount of $15,000.00 to secure Developer's performance under this Parking Agreement. Failure to provide and maintain such a bond shall be grounds for termination of this Parking Agreement. The form of the bond shall be subject to approval by City. B. The amount of the bond required herein will be reviewed every five (5) years by the City and may be increased or decreased by the City at the time of each review to reflect the reasonable costs of the performance of this Parking Agreement by Developer at that time. Any increase or decrease in the amount of the bond shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties, such agreement to not be unreasonably withheld. SECTION 27. AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO FUNDING. This Parking Agreement is or may be subject to funding and/or appropriations from federal, state, and/or local governments and/or agencies and/or from the Council of the City of Roanoke. If any such funding is not provided, withdrawn, or otherwise not made available for this Parking Agreement, with the result that the City is unable to perform its obligations hereunder, the City shall give written notice to Developer of such unavailability of funding and Developer shall thereupon have sixty(60)days within which to give the City written notice that Developer will either (i) at the Developer's expense assume performance of those obligations of the City hereunder which the City is unable to perform because of lack of funding, or (ii) terminate this Agreement. Developer further agrees to comply with any applicable requirements of any grants and/or agreements providing for such funding. At such time as the City receives funding and is able to resume performance of its obligations hereunder,the City shall give the Developer written notice of that fact, the Developer shall within sixty (60) days after receiving that notice return operation of the Garage to the City, and the relationship of the City and the Developer shall thereupon resume on the terms set forth in this Agreement. SECTION 28. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC BUSINESSES AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. Developer shall comply with the provisions of Virginia Code Section 2.2-4311.2, as amended, which provides that a contractor organized as a stock or non-stock corporation, limited liability company, business trust, or limited partnership or registered as a registered limited liability partnership shall be authorized to transact business in the Commonwealth as a domestic or foreign business entity if so required by Title 13.1 or Title 50 or as otherwise required by law. Developer shall not allow its existence to lapse or its certificate of authority or registration to transact business in the Commonwealth,if so required under Title 13.1 or Title 50, to be revoked or cancelled at any time during the term of the contract or agreement. The City may void this Parking Agreement if the Developer fails to remain in compliance with the provisions of this section. However, the City agrees that the Developer may cure this matter as set forth in Section 9(A)(2) above. SECTION 29. DRAFTING OF THE PARKING AGREEMENT. The provisions of this Parking Agreement shall not be construed in favor of or against either party, but shall be construed according to their fair meaning as if both parties jointly prepared this Parking Agreement. SECTION 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Parking Agreement, including any attachments, exhibits, and referenced documents, constitutes the complete understanding between the parties with respect to Parking Permits at the Garage. This Parking Agreement may be modified only by written agreement properly executed by the parties. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Parking Agreement by their authorized • representatives as of the date of the Parking Agreement. WITNESS: DEVELOPER By: Lucas Thornton, The First National Exchange,LC Printed Name and Title WITNESS: CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By: Valmarie H. Turner, City Manager Printed Name and Title Approved as to form: Approved as to Execution: City Attorney City Attorney Authorized by Ordinance No. EXHIBIT A PARKING RATES FOR CENTER IN THE SQUARE GARAGE CENTER IN THE SQUARE GARAGE FEES 2022 Center In The Square Garage Fee Schedule Center In The Square Garage New Parking Fees and Charges are to be implemented and noted in the Fee Compendium at such time as deemed appropriate and as directed by the City Manager Monthly reserved $ 110.00/mo. Monthly unreserved $ 90.00/mo. Short term Monday-Sunday: $1.00/0.5 hr. Maximum Daily Rate: $4.00 (after 3.5 hrs.) EXHIBIT,B Parking Rules and Regulations PARK Roanoke P.O.Box 83, Roanoke,VA 24002 • 4 117 Church Ave.,SW,Roanoke,VA 24011 (540)343-0585•(540)342-6447 FAX PARK Email: 'parking@parkroanoke.com RucirrOKE www.PARKRoanoke.com Rev.7.1.2017 MONTHLY PARKING PERMIT APPLICATION&AGREEMENT Start Date: Accountholder's Name: - Social Security Number Drivers License#: - Daytime Telephone: - Home Telephone: - Billing Address: City: State: Zip Code: Email Address: �_. _._ Cellular Telephone: Parker's Name(If different from above name):, Vehicle Make/Model/Color: _ License Plate: Vehicle Make/Model/Color: _._ License Plate: Employer: Employer Telephone: PLEASE READ&INITIAL THE FOLLOWING TERMS.QUALIFICATIONS&CONDITIONS CAREFULLY For the purposes of this application and agreement,the terms accountholder,parker,patron,company,and person are interchangeable and have the same meaning as a person or entity. Further,the terms permit,hangtag,and key card are also interchangeable. Upon acceptance of this application and agreement,a permit for parking is established through the issuance of a hangtag or a key card. Payments are due and must be received by the 5th of every month. Accounts for which PARK Roanoke receives payment after the 5th of the month will be subject to a$10.00 late fee per permit or access key card. Failure to pay by the 15th of the month will cause key cards to be deactivated and a reactivation lee of$15.00 will apply. Checks returned for insufficient funds will be charged a$35.00 per return item fee,in addition to the$10.00 late fee. If your parking permit or space is no longer needed,notification must be submitted to the PARK Roanoke office,in writing,by 5 pm on the last business day of the month prior to the first day of the effective month.If written notice is not received by PARK Roanoke by 5 pm on the last business day of the month,you will be liable for parking charges for the following month. If PARK Roanoke does not receive a written notice to cancel the permit,you will continue to be charged for monthly parking thereafter. A$10.00 key card deposit will be charged the first month for each key card at account set-up. The key card deposit shall be refundable within 30 days of cancellation of the Monthly Parking Permit provided the account is paid in full, the key card is returned and written notice of parking termination is received by the PARK Roanoke office prior to the 15'"of the month prior to termination. If the 15 business day advance written notice is not made,then the account. will be ineligible fora key card deposit refund. Application for each garage or lot is subject to availability and it is at PARK Roanoke's sole determination whether such permits are available for the requested garage or lot. If PARK Roanoke determines that permits are not available for a particular garage or lot location,then no permits will be issued for that garage or lot. Credit is not allowed and charges are not prorated for vacations,illnesses,early cancellations or other contingencies. Monthly permits are non-transferrable to another parker,resident or company. New parke's may be selected from a waiting list. PARK Roanoke reserves the right to terminate any or all monthly permits and key cards immediately for good and just cause and without incurring liability of any type to the undersigned parker. Rates are subject to change at any time by the posting of rates in the garage or on the lot or other means of notification., Any vehicle parked in a PARK Roanoke garage or lot without a current hangtag displayed on the rear view mirror facing outward will be subject to towing,ticketing,or booting at the owner's expense without notice. Garages with key card access where hangtags are not issued are exempt from this requirement. There is a$10.00 non-refundable charge for replacement of any lost,stolen or damaged hangtag or access key card. Only vehicles identified on this application for reserved parking are permitted to park in spaces designated as "reserved parking.` All other vehicles parked in reserved spaces are subject to towing,.ticketing,or booting at the owner's expense. Reserved parking spaces are valid only from 6:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Reserved space parkers must park in their designated reserved parking space from 6:00 a.m-to 6:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday,excluding holidays. All violators are subject to towing,ticketing,or booting at the owner's expense. Unreserved monthly parking spaces are guaranteed to be available only from 6:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday,excluding holidays. Monthly parkers are prohibited from parking in areas designated as'daily parking only." All violators are subject to towing,ticketing,or booting at the owner's expense. Long term storage of vehicles is not permitted in any PARK Roanoke facility without express written permission from PARK Roanoke.Vehicle License Plates and Registration must remain up-to-dale at all times. Virginia requires that all vehicles be registered within 30 days. Abandoned vehicles will be towed at the owner's expense.Vehicle maintenance,oil changes,car washing,etc.are expressly prohibited. Each permit is valid for one vehicle in the designated parking garage or lot,at a time. Sharing of access key cards and/or hangtags is strictly prohibited and will result in the suspension and/or revocation of parking privileges. The undersigned parker understands that all PARK Roanoke and City owned garages and lots are"Non-Smoking." PARK Roanoke,City of Roanoke,and Lancor Parking LLC,and their employees,agents,and representatives are not and shall not be responsible for any theft or damage to individuals,vehicles or property while.in any garage or on any lot. No bailment of any type is hereby created. To reduce the chance of theft or damage,please place your personal items out of sight,lock your doors,and avoid parking in garages and/or lots alone after normal business hours. All parkers park at their own risk at all times and assume the risk of any injuries and damages. The undersigned parker agrees to be responsible for any towing charges for any vehicle covered by or using the parking permit or access key card. Parking privileges are valid for only one space. The undersigned parker further agrees to pay for any ticketing and/or booting charges that may be Issued for any vehicles covered by the parking • permit or access key card.Vehicles may receive citations for storage,double parking,parking in a reserved space, and,parking on a daily level,etc.. Vehicles must park within marked spaces and those taking up more than one space may subject to ticketing. Such ticketing,booting,and/or boot removal charges may be set by the City Manager from time to time. ___ _ _• The PARK Roanoke manager shall enforce this Agreement in the City of Roanoke("City")owned and/or operated parking garages and lots.The City Manager may take such further actions and/or adopt policies and procedures to implement,administer,and enforce this Agreement. The undersigned parker agrees to comply with any such policies and procedures,a copy of which will be provided to the undersigned parker by regular mail or by email. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO THE TERMS,QUALIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE AND TO PAY THE POSTED RATE. I HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS AND TO HAVE THEM ANSWERED BY A PARK ROANOKE REPRESENTATIVE. Accountholder's Signature: Date: Parker's Signature(If different from above): Date: Witnessed or Received by: Date: EXHIBIT C Insurance Requirements The Developer shall comply with the insurance requirements set forth in the Contract,including the items set forth below: The Successful Bidder/Offeror shall carry Public Liability Insurance in the amount specified below, including contractual liability assumed by the Successful Bidder/Offeror, and shall deliver a Certificate of Insurance from carriers licensed to do business in the Commonwealth of Virginia and that is representative of the insurance policies. The Certificate shall show that the policy has been endorsed to add the City of Roanoke as an additional insured for the Commercial General Liability coverage. The certificate must not show in the description of operations section that it is issued specific to any bidjob. or contract.The coverage shall be provided by a carrier(s) rated not less than "A-" with a financial rating of at least VII by A.M. Best or a rating acceptable to the City. In addition, the Successful Bidder/Offeror shall agree to give the City a minimum of 30 days prior notice of any cancellation or material reduction in coverage. The minimum insurance policies and/or coverages that shall be provided by the Contractor, including its subcontractors, include the following: Workers' Compensation Statutory Virginia Limits Employers' Liability Insurance - $100,000 for each Accident by employee $100,000 for each Disease by employee $500,000 policy limit by Disease Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence including contractual liability for specified agreement $2,000,000 General Aggregate(other than Products/Completed Operations) $2,000,000 General Liability-Products/Completed Operations $1,000,000 Personal and Advertising injury $ 500,000 or 1,000,000 Fire Damage Legal Liability Business Automobile Liability—including owned, autos and hired/non-owned auto liability coverage Combined Single Limit- $1,000,000 each accident (add: with applicable endorsement to cover waste cargo, if transporting hazardous materials). Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 Per Occurrence and in the aggregate Additional Requirements In addition to the requirements above, the Successful Bidder/Offeror shall thoroughly review the scope of work that is included and if any of the following are included in the services that will be provided, the following additional insurance will be required, if checked: Professional Liability- $2,000,000 Per Occurrence (or limit in accordance with Statute for Medical PFessionall Required if the Scope includes providing advice or consultation including but not limited to; lawyers, bankers, physicians, programming, design (including construction design), architects & engineers and others who require extensive education and/or licensing to perform their duties. ors and Omissions coverage in an amount of not less than $1,0.00,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage may be written on an occurrence or claims made coverage form. However, if a claims made coverage form is used; coverage must remain in effect for a minimum of 3 years after the Contractor's work is concluded. 011yber Liability- $2,000,000 Per Occurrence equired if the Scope includes the collection and electronic transmittal of Protected Health Information (PHI), or any other demographic data on individuals including but not limited to Name, Address, Social Security Numbers or any other sort of personally identifying information. Abuse and Molestation Coverage - $1,000,000 Per Occurrence Required if the scope of work includes the offering of professional or non-professional services to any child or student where one on one contact or consultation is to be Pluilution Liability- $1,000,000 Per Occurrence Required if the scope of work involves the use(other than in a motor vehicle) or removal of a substance or energy introduced into the environment that potentially has an undesired effect or affects the usefulness of a resource. These include,but are not limited to Asbestos, PCB's, Lead, Mold, and Fuels. Explosion, Collapse &Underground Coverage (XCU) Required of a Contractor in limits equal to the General Liability Limit when the Scope includes any operations involving Blasting, any work underground level including but not limited to wires, conduit, pipes, mains, sewers, tanks,tunnels, or any excavation, drilling, or similar work. ders Risk Coverage 'equired if the scope of work includes the ground up construction of a structure. Limit of insurance shall be 100% of the completed value of the structure. For projects for the renovation of an existing structure, The County shall insure the Builder's Risk with the Contractor being responsible for the first $10,000 of any claim. Tier as Specified Below NOTE 1: The commercial general liability insurance shall include contractual liability. The contract documents include an indemnification provision(s).The City makes no representation or warranty as to how the Bidder/Offeror's insurance coverage responds or does not respond. Insurance coverages that are unresponsive to the indemnification provision(s) do not limit the Bidder/Offeror's responsibilities outlined in the contract documents. NOTE 2: The intent of this insurance specification is to provide the coverage required and the limits expected for each type of coverage. With regard to the Business Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability, the total amount of coverage can be accomplished through any combination of primary and excess/umbrella insurance. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance and non-contributory with respect to any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded the City of Roanoke. This policy shall be endorsed to be primary with respect to the additional insured. NOTE 3: Title 65.2 of the Code of Virginia requires every employer who regularly employs three or more full-time or part-time employees to purchase and maintain workers' compensation insurance. If you do not purchase a workers' compensation policy, a signed statement is required documenting that you are in compliance with Title 65.2 of the Code of Virginia. NOTE 4: Neither the Contractor nor any subcontractor shall commence work under this Contract until the Contractor has obtained and provided proof of the required insurance coverages to the City, and such proof has been approved by the City. The Contractor confirms to the City that all subcontractors have provided Contractor with proof of such insurance, or will do so prior to commencing any work under this Contract NOTE 5: Contractor, including all subcontractors, shall, at its and/or their sole expense, obtain and maintain during the life of this Contract the insurance policies and/or coverages required by this section. The City and its officers, employees, agents, assigns, and volunteers shall be added as an additional insured to the general liability and automobile coverages of any such policies and such insurance coverages shall be primary and noncontributory to any insurance and/or self insurance such additional insureds may have. The Contractor shall immediately notify in writing the City of any changes, modifications, and/or termination of any insurance coverages and/or policies required by this Contract. The Contractor shall provide to the City with the signed Contract an Accord certificate of insurance along with one of the following types of additional insured endorsements: (1) ISO endorsement CG 20 33 which provides that the insured status of such entities is automatic if required by a contract or a written agreement otherwise known as a blanket additional insured endorsement. The coverage shall extend to the City and its officers, employees, agents, assigns, and volunteers. (If additional insured status is automatic under a different coverage form, Contractor must attach a copy of the coverage form to its certificate. Any required insurance policies shall be effective prior to the beginning of any work or other performance by Contractor and any subcontractors under this Contract). OR (2) ISO endorsement CG 20 10 will be issued,prior to the beginning of any work or other performance by Contractor under this Contract, to the City and its officers, employees, agents, assigns, and volunteers naming them as an additional insured under the general liability coverage. (A copy of the binder confirming the issuance must be attached to the certificate. Any required insurance policies shall 19 -, • be effective prior to the beginning of any work or other performance by Contractor and any subcontractors under this Contract). However, if B (1) or (2) cannot be provided, the City's Risk Manager, in such Manager's sole discretion, may approve such other certificate of insurance or insurance document(s) that the Risk Manager deems acceptable. The Certificate Holder should be addressed as follows: City of Roanoke, Attn: City Manager, 215 Church Ave, Roanoke VA 24011. NOTE 6: Such insurance policies and/or coverages shall provide for coverage against any and all claims and demands made by a person or persons or any other entity for property damages or bodily or personal injury(including death) incurred in connection with the services, work, items, and/or other matters to be provided under this Contract with respect to the commercial general liability coverages and the automobile liability coverages. With respect to the workers' compensation coverage, Contractor's and its subcontractors' insurance company shall waive rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, employees, agents, assigns, and volunteers. NOTE 7: Nothing contained in the insurance requirements is to be construed as limiting the liability of the Contractor, and/or its subcontractors, or their insurance carriers. The City does not in any way represent that the coverages or the limits of insurance specified are sufficient or adequate to protect the Contractor's interest or liabilities, but are merely minimums. The obligation of the Contractor, and its subcontractors, to purchase insurance shall not in any way limit the obligations of the Contractor in the event that the City or any of those named above should suffer any injury or loss in excess of the amount actually recoverable through insurance. Furthermore, there is no requirement or obligation for the City to seek any recovery against the Contractor's insurance company before seeking recovery directly from the Contractor. NOTE 8: The Certificate Holder Box shall read as follows: City of Roanoke Risk Management 215 Church Ave Room 209 Roanoke, VA 24011 END 20 BID FORM FOR A PARKING AGREEMENT FOR UNRESERVED PARKING PERMITS FOR THE CITY'S CENTER IN THE SQUARE GARAGE RESPONSIBILITY OF BIDDER: It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to assure that its bid is delivered to the place designated for receipt of bids and prior to the time set for receipt of bids. No bids received after the time designated for receipt of bids will be considered. BID DUE DATE, TIME, AND DELIVERY OF BID: All bids are due on or before Noon, 12:00 p.m., local time, Friday, March 13, 2026, and are to be delivered to the address listed below. Time is of the essence. The completed Bid Form, together with any other documents the bidder wishes to submit, should be enclosed in a sealed envelope and addressed as follows: Council of the City of Roanoke do Office of the City Clerk, Room 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Place in front lower left-hand corner of envelope and on the back of the envelope in bold letters the following title: Bid for Parking Agreement for Unreserved Parking Permits for the City's Center In The Square Garage, Not to Be Opened Until the City Council Meeting at 2:00 p.m. on March 16,2026. Date: ►^ln,t,„ (, 1.01.(4. aa1 NWt%or.1.1. 4.4wt+Mvs.40 Lc. proposes and agrees, if its Bid (Legal Name of Bidder) is accepted, to enter into and be bound by the Parking Agreement for Unreserved Parking Permits for the City's Center In The Square Garage, (Parking Agreement), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Roanoke, 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, VA 24011. Furthermore, the undersigned bidder warrants that it can and will comply with the provisions of such Parking Agreement. Bid: Bidder agrees that monthly payments will be made according to the rates set forth in Section 5 of the above Parking Agreement for each of the Parking Permits provided by such Parking Agreement for the sole use and purpose of providing parking spaces for guests of the _ Hotel to be constructed (Hotel). Payment is due to the City in accordance with the terms of the Parking Agreement. Bidder agrees that the number of Parking Permits that will be available under the Parking Agreement is 20. Bid: Bidder agrees to develop, construct, open, and operate a Hotel in Downtown Roanoke, Virginia by January 31, 2025,with at least 25 rooms. 1 of2 Bid Term: Twenty (20) years, commencing on the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement, and ending 20 years thereafter, provided that the successful bidder will have options to renew the term for up to four (4) additional five (5) year terms, for a total of 40 years if all four options are exercised, unless sooner terminated as provided for in the Parking Agreement or by law. Pursuant to the terms of the Parking Agreement, each option shall be automatically exercised and the Parking Agreement renewed for each additional five (5) year term unless terminated by the successful bidder as provided in the Parking Agreement. Bid: Bidder agrees, if its bid is accepted, to execute, deliver, and perform all terms and conditions of the Parking Agreement, a copy of which Parking Agreement is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, 456 Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,. VA 24011, including, without limitation, providing the City with a bond or other security in the amount of$15,000.00, as required pursuant to Section 15.2-2104, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Bidder agrees, if its bid is accepted, to reimburse the City for the costs of any advertisements for this matter. State bidder's complete legal name, exactly as it is recorded with the Virginia State Corporation Commission(SCC), or the complete legal name of bidder if it is not a corporation. LEGAL NAME OF BIDDER: "Mt KPX14)..)tru. er.xLvk tWI } I.L. BY: - TITLE: is/top. w Nct. µt AA 4 }-tic. (Printed Title) Lk% -I t't,DA.i.I1 .) (Printed Name) STREET ADDRESS: (,3 mrft LL Avt BI7. � ,�h�sccsc vk 2.+°%3 MAILING ADDRESS: (ate,! CkM,0152t.L INf. S.4 . CITY: P,Ja u-L STATE: i f ZIP CODE: 2.-ff l'S TELEPHONE: ( g c, ) S29 -1. 9I FAX: ( ) Bidder's SCC Identification Number: t V,a 2=t`4 la 2of2 CARDINAL NEWS • • •• p.vM ;a—oui w«i�we so��:+roe.�.a:u • • Advertisement for invitation . for Bids and Notice of Public AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Hearing ADVERTISEMENT FOR INVITATION Cardinal-News FOR BIDS - AND . P.O. Box 4455, Roanoke,VA 24015 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - (540) 467-2189 •Before the Council of the City of Roanoke . State-of Florida, County of Orange, Es: for Execution of a Parking Agreement . for unreserved parking permits for the City's Center In the Square Garage - 1, Anjana Bhadoriya, of lawful.age, being duly sworn upon oath depose and saythat I am an agent of Pursuant to the requirements a Sections P P g 15.2-2700,15 2.2101,15.2-2102,et seq., Column Software, PBC, duly appointed and . Code of Virginia(1950).asarnended,the authorized a ent of the Publisher of Cardinal News a city of Roanoke.virginka-(City) hereby g r gives notice that the City is inviting bids . publication that is a "legal.newspaper"as that term is from qualified Bidders to enter Into a Park- ing Agreement with the City under which defined in 8.01-324 of the Code of Virginia, and . Parking Agreement the successful bidder authorized as such by Order of the Circuit Court, that will obtain up to twenty(20)parking per- mite for the use of not more than twenty • . the full text of the attached notice was published in (20) unreserved parking spaces in the said publication and also at City's Center ln The Square Garage locat- ed at 11 Campbell Avenue.S.E.,Roanoke, • • www.publicnoticevirginia.com, which is a searchable Virginia,subject to certain terms and con- statewide repository of such notices, on the followingdAlons o! such Parking Agreement.The • P Y term of the Parking Agreement shall be dates. twenty(20).years,starting on the date of the final,executed version of this Parking Publication Dates: Agreement.and ending twenty(20)years thereafter, provided that the successful - •-Mar 2, 2026 .. ' .. • bidder will have the option to renew such • Mar.9, 2026 Agreement for up to bur(4)additional five (5)year periods.The Parking Agreement Notice ID: yl8D2goFluVe0eg86uw9 � automatiltycs lyrovtees that each the Pa is automatically exercised and Park- . • - ing Agreement renewed for each five(5) Notice Name: Invitation for Bids and Public Hearing .year period unless the successful bidder • terminates the Parking Agreement as*- Notice. vlded in:the Parking Agreement.The term of the Parking Agreement Is also subject Publication Fee: $235.00 to termination as set forth in the Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law. . /)njen%8tisloriya The parking permits issued pursuant to the Parking Agreement shall allow guests of a Hotel to use spaces within the City's Center In The Square Garage except for Agent those spaces within the City's Center In a, t�nrYryj� _ The Square Garage that are designated. • 'pr Poi JESSICA GORDON-THOMPSON . as reserved or otherwise not permitted for VERIFICATION •4O'",:, r NotaryPublk•stateofFtorlda use by the general public. M I I I I I I o 1. Commission#HH3015S6 • The purpose of such Parking Agreement State of Florida •+��Q� • Expires on August 17,2026 is to allow guests of a Hotel to be devel- County of Orange %os oiled.constructed, opened,and operat- ed ed in downtown Roanoke to use parking Signed or attested before me on this: 03/12/2026 . spaces within the City's Center In The Square Garage,subject to the terms and - • conditions as may be more fully set forth `;:he. In the Parking Agreement. II the City elects to award a Parking • Agreement for this matter, City Council - Notary Public - • will be requested to adopt an ordinance - • granting such an award which will provide Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof. in substance for a Parking Agreement as" . • • • Invitation for Bids and Public Hearing Notice I Page 1 of 2 • set forth-above.'A copy of the full text of interest of the City. the proposed Ordinance,and a draft of the proposed Parking Agreement,are on The entity to whom any Parking Agree- file and may be reviewed in the Office of ment may be awarded shall reimburse the the City Clerk,Room 456,Noel C.Taybr City for the costs of any advertisements ' Municipal Building,215 Church Avenue, for this matter. S.W.,Roanoke,Virginia 24011. • • The necessary bid form, a copy of the Any interested entity Is Invited to submit proposed Parking Agreement. and the a written bid,including a completed bid proposed Ordinance may be.obtained • form. for a Parking Agreement for un- from the City Clerk's Office at the above reserved parking permits for the City's address on n and after Monday. March 2, • Center In The Square Garage as set forth 2026. above.Each bidder shall submit at a mini- mum the following information: Pursuant to the regrirements of Sec- • lions 15.2-2100,et eeq.,Code of Virginia 1.The legal name of the entity submitting _ (1950).as amended.notice is hereby giv- the bid,including the Identification Num- en that the Council of the City of Roanoke her issued to it by the Virginia State Cop will hold a pubic.hearing'on the above . poration Commission. • matterat its regular meeting to be held on Monday,March 16,2026,at 7:00 p.m.. 2.The agreement of the bidder to pay the local time,or as soon thereafter as Coun- amounts for the parking permits as set cil is availade,.l_n the Council Chamber, forth in the proposed Parking Agreement: - Room 450.Noel C,Taylor Municipal Build • - tng,215 Church Avenue.S.W.Roanoke. 3.The agreement of the bidder to execute Virginia,24011.For further information on • the Parking Agreement. this matter7 you may contact the Office of . the City clerk a!(540)853-2541. 4.The agreement of the bidder to.provide, the City with a bond or other security, All parties and interested persons may ap- ' acceptable to the City,in the amount of pear on the above date and time and be $15,000.00.as required by Section 15.2- heard on the matter.All persons wishing 2104,Code of Virginia(1850).as amend- to address City Council must sign-up with el, the City Clerk's Office by emaitng deck® • • - • roanokevagov or calling(540)853-2541 5.Such other information as the bidder by 11:00 am.,on March 16,2026. • deems appropriate, '• It you are a person who needs accommo- Bids are to be submitted In a sealed en- datlons for this hearing, please contact velope or container to the City Clerk at the City Clerk's Office at(540)853-2541 .. • the address noted herein on or before before 12:00 noon on Thursday. March Noon. 12:00 p.m., kcal time, Friday, 12,2026. March,13,2026.Time is of the essence. The outside of the bid envelope should be marked as follows:'BID FOR PARK- GIVEN under my hand this 2nd day of ING AGREEMENT FOR UNRESERVED March,2026. . PARKING PERMITS FOR THE CITY'S CENTER IN THE SQUARE GARAGE. NOT TO BE OPENED UNTIL THE CITY Cecelia F.McCoy,City Clerk. COUNCIL MEETING AT 2:00 P.M. ON Monday,March 16,2026."The bid should be addressed to the Council of the City of Roanoke.c/o Office of the City Clerk, • Room 456,Noel C.Taylor Municipal Build- ing,215 Church Avenue,S.W.,Roanoke,• Virginia,24011.All bids received will be held by the City Clerk, unopened, until 2:00 p.m.,local time,on Monday,March 16,2026,at which time they will be deliv- ered to the Council Chamber,Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building,.215 Church Avenue.S.W.,Roanoke,Virginia, 24011,and thereafter be publicly opened " and read aloud in accordance with Sec • - tion 15.2-2102.Code of Virginia(1950). As amended. The City reserves the right to cancel this Invitation for Bids and/or to reject any and • - all bids,to waive any informality or irregu- . larity in the bids received,and to accept • the bid which is deemed to be in the best Invitation for Bids and Public Heating Notice I Page 2-of 2 ADVERTISEMENT FOR INVITATION FOR BIDS AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Before the Council of the City of Roanoke for Execution of a Parking Agreement for unreserved parking permits for the City's Center In the Square Garage Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15.2-2100, 15.2-2101, 15.2-2102, et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, the City of Roanoke, Virginia (City) hereby gives notice that the City is inviting bids from qualified bidders to enter into a Parking Agreement with the City under which Parking Agreement the successful bidder will obtain up to twenty (20)parking permits for the use of not more than twenty(20)unreserved parking spaces in the City's Center In The Square Garage located at 11 Campbell Avenue, S.E., Roanoke, Virginia, subject to certain terms and conditions of such Parking Agreement. The term of the Parking Agreement shall be twenty (20) years, starting on the date of the final, executed version of this Parking Agreement, and ending twenty(20)years thereafter,provided that the successful bidder will have the option to renew such Agreement for up to four(4) additional five(5)year periods. The Parking Agreement specifically provides that each option is automatically exercised and the Parking Agreement renewed for each five(5)year period unless the successful bidder terminates the Parking Agreement as provided in the Parking Agreement. The term of the Parking Agreement is also subject to termination as set forth in the Parking Agreement or in accordance with the law. The parking permits issued pursuant to the Parking Agreement shall allow guests of a Hotel to use spaces within the City's Center In The Square Garage except for those spaces within the City's Center In The Square Garage that are designated as reserved or otherwise not permitted for use by the general public. The purpose of such Parking Agreement is to allow guests of a Hotel to be developed, constructed, opened, and operated in downtown Roanoke to use parking spaces within the City's Center In The Square Garage, subject to the terms and conditions as may be more fully set forth in the Parking Agreement. If the City elects to award a Parking Agreement for this matter, City Council will be requested to adopt an ordinance granting such an award which will provide, in substance for a Parking Agreement as set forth above. A copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance, and a draft of the proposed Parking Agreement, are on file and may be reviewed in the Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.,.Roanoke, Virginia 24011. Any interested entity is invited to submit a written bid, including a completed bid form, for a Parking Agreement for unreserved parking permits for the City's Center In The Square Garage as set forth above. Each bidder shall submit at a minimum the following information: 1. The legal name of the entity submitting the bid, including the Identification Number issued to it by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. 2. The agreement of the bidder to pay the amounts for the parking permits as set forth in the proposed Parking Agreement. 3. The agreement of the bidder to execute the Parking Agreement. 4. The agreement of the bidder to provide the City with a bond or other security, acceptable to the City, in the amount of$15,000.00, as required by Section 15.2- 2104, Code of Virginia(1950), as amended. 5. Such other information as the bidder deems appropriate. Bids are to be submitted in a sealed envelope or container to the City Clerk at the address noted herein on or before Noon, 12:00 p.m.,local.time,Friday,March, 13, 2026.Time is of the essence. The outside of the bid envelope should be marked as follows: "BID FOR PARKING AGREEMENT FOR UNRESERVED PARKING PERMITS FOR THE CITY'S CENTER IN THE SQUARE GARAGE,NOT TO BE OPENED UNTIL THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 2:00 P.M. ON Monday,March 16, 2026." The bid should be addressed to the Council of the City of Roanoke, c/o Office of the City Clerk, Room 456, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W.,Roanoke,Virginia,24011. All bids received will be held by the City Clerk, unopened, until 2:00 p.m., local time, on Monday, March 16, 2026, at which time they will be delivered to the Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, 24011, and thereafter be publicly opened and read aloud in accordance with Section 15.2-2102, Code of Virginia(1950), as amended. The City reserves the right to cancel this Invitation for Bids and/or to reject any and all bids, to waive any informality or irregularity in the bids received, and to accept the bid which is deemed to be in the best interest of the City. The entity to whom any Parking Agreement may be awarded shall reimburse the City for the costs of any advertisements for this matter. The necessary bid form, a copy of the proposed Parking Agreement, and the proposed Ordinance maybe obtained from the City Clerk's Office at the above address on and after Monday,March 2, 2026. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15.2-2100, et seq., Code of Virginia(1950), as amended, notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Roanoke will hold a public hearing on the above matter at its regular meeting to be held on Monday, March 16, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., local time, or as soon thereafter as Council is available, in the Council Chamber, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, 24011. For further information on this matter, you may contact the Office of the City Clerk at(540) 853-2541. All parties and interested persons may appear on the above date and time and be heard on the matter. All persons wishing to address City Council must sign-up with the City Clerk's Office by emailing clerk@roanokeva.gov or calling(540) 853-2541 by 11:00 a.m., on.March 16, 2026. If you are a person who needs accommodations for this hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at(540) 853-2541 before 12:00 noon on Thursday, March 12, 2026. GIVEN under my hand this 2nd day of March, 2026. Cecelia F. McCoy, City Clerk. • Ida:, Wool Rea(Ws) of' (- • 1 :D')pm Sidewalks of Williamson Road 2/6/2026 o31 ►pi Photos taken by Kate Wooley of the Bus Riders of Roanoke Advocacy Group The crosswalk in front of the Health Department/Social Services building " �s p•,x',.°9y'`t,',2 - :. , ..:.' ...'y°i: yr_;ii.. _<..- .!..6.f �, - .;" aim ;.+ '::,, "= rv",�t� i. �" � ;a: �, �,€:."a a��c„y�'��"„ �:r"` ,iS " '` is'. ,%; �.?'# ,'gym..,kye . . €�..n k 2 e. J :rsiiri;', s ,:;;,7 ,,z ,a ;.° .'I'°',„ :,:•°, ::•,—s •e '17^ `= u.a- :' - a "�„' u''t«^�,�.e`:.s °q ;, **A;.,,,,,.' ,r,.V°�Y' � ,J,„"e}y"`.x:_ a te,-. $ „..srxiC ° , a ,,' ;tip: a< "z. s. " , ' ' T `,,;t , , ,. -",N yt&. '*rH`p -' 1 , .t„�' ` � k e, r, e. � • IL.� . ;,, `�� ,'- Vim."`�- . v �� ° �„ � ; " Y- e.x `b4 '.:`a=£. .°-^ k'`-d' � .n W.+,:a "L ", S,i %. �° 'L1 L..M, a 6? -;ea„_'; ;.,<r ' " -R« A:'""~ ;,k, . "4s�n -=`.„ _�3�,a,.& <; • -= q°" yy ;°?ti�?° 1 " �Yw`,' -te: '< . _,,i ,- a'{.. F :-, j'Y. a4,-, .„,0 c,- - .-: ''': �-=, _ ,.,.:� ,;yam,: " ,. x The sidewalk down Williamson Rd, covered in both snow and footprints. { 7 - a p ri i ,j „ = ,b; _l~ » . ° `:- ,-: . •, : -•.-:-,„,,,,,,,..,,,,Aimm,,,,,ituort.,..vi,,,,,...,,44,,,,,,,,,e.:4,02, ,.,-,-), ,,,,,,.• ..4.'• yrN: �. c 4: .i .` -�:' ti.. r'-«i Viai. �- . ;--- '^.._ r-_; / ...'1, - Wk If ^' ,. ~ 'Y " :^ ffi, ' it v 1.? ",L*!, aa- ti., : '`^.`2:. _. _ _ ' t�'4°y fe ' Ev c. " {'S•,e.. "y." n o€ . :�;� .§� 'f* ffi . , ."� , t.t ., ' s , o x' r^ ,� i:,?�s' em� x , G .y` caz ,.- 4 :' 'm 9,v„y«,iz, :+w`�i",a;e° tq€ ,m .,. i „ ,,,,„x� 9 ,� °i z ' 4S ,,zL1 a N, 'S'4 Oro '4 ez 5' -yg: ,;\' tl ,,ole ,�sT F?_ :'°J," y,,0. - .�" , , ? °zt,-, _: ';' %, *:7't;,v 'z:r..;';Y' ry'.'„„• ''.; :: s" a� a 6s ' t: y ,M'x vlx.Y 4 gg. am .,�".5"',u.,,, 'fir:,.;°: �%��,'�'<:., ��;,::°,„�* 4,i�; .� .�,x,��'�-.:a. 'am 3�. pt., t' ,. z•�`•` ,:-„: F,`,,,.-, °,,. .',-,' :v,M -, - Yam'4 ; " ,i 7- i,a.''? < " ; e'.ex.' ,-."- °ue. •.,.&:.. "-S.,t �E3_ Y 'z�„y,"'x� '�Y:?`'i"`i��s.'y`�:�fe"" ?a�',a�N . � 'X'"'q�f, , ,.a<...;.'..��.' , ;�a',..,,,aaka» ,�"`""',:;-F,. ,<1.,, .=-,s.:.i;, :'.....,....._.,._`____z,aa._"...,...,_.............._,,.........,.,._._.......,.._..,.,_........,.... ...`�',kr,x'sYz�:twa ..N.f' • • • • • • • • • The sidewalk leading to the Berglund Center, buried beneath snowdrifts made by snow plows w�. 11,7.14 �`_^'+r..,,_-' .."`,fir'` ��RS .�� Si, j!j n• "om .., x�,�.. _�~'�"• c2:• ? ..-.��•.: `A� :`2 Aa x.,.k� R�6' ,*d�p .�.. „µ,''#`�vi'9r„) `� tlrya a•-per, - i. ££ W z',� _ • �. �: .�,,,• v. "?: .v sue" '' � �; .;roc se 'x�, b'yS,ID a,,:,.:, ;.,. .- ,.` ':e .,.e ,� :. r'":'d;:4n>y":i,..',. i y , ;' ;`-`ice;";"vy, 3 r' ,a: ar:`,<' ,^ ' , 7<` °,:: ':° -• #.;;.,��< ,-:,,` fin; .,• » •..... �y . ,,'a; __,� ,,,; ; . =` fix; ° te ; -is _3''- e � mf'r;,tva < . ``''•-`�- ,�3< i<'.,' Fw: 7 rx ,.'"' ;;L . ::.s, s • • • • • :� ' y,E . „l " - `dy ifd? ,„ct'.:° r '4 "V i� , W '.. . . ,. ,'=F +ah^};:e.{X `'e', Ar. / .A.:‘,.":.,',,, " 'J .rrLiw:a:'�„-7• ? .�<„� r;.t�'.S' �,4",>,."s,t F • ' V. f . 1',zFr°-_ d'`; y'-_,_r•�"ef4 � �,, "•<" • � - ! - �e � �% .,$. *� w"»�.,„,xfi=.,�,M ;, -.i i,;-" �W ,- � ! .v�« k , .. � = % •"�»s' :'� 4, .4 - ; - - .4,� ": " • . ,�4?� ;'' �' �x�. i €.F. .; at ¢ `. ` :'°'" : z -44 . '.-5;4: 11'i � ',,' <-; a: r .r:..� _ s ^:_` ;.�,v fi ' ' `<, . ' = k ' '` T, "; :a t , .;'; fi�, ° 4:2 . . , ,' . ' „2 • ya ry< '.ra,, ; ,r' , „' ;,"'- «:. < ? � '.,"e -` .,+- , sdi,;mmE ,,' . >^e; - `2;;i.,,<, rr.- ',. tfi" ;3`' a : phcx _� - ." • x.f•j y 3' ' A p '£d ° ;' ° - ' L . a ." ."- - ' "'IC .-- . N • • .{K`eq :„,,, ,„ '^ ' ... ; 4n� :i u • •,s4, <q „�%:r „ma ,.. 'fb" �. ;. w'T - 6 :. uq $ i. 4r @. < • ' . e%1i ` 'r -< xyn „n , °�y ;F �, }�aA °m : ,` : 's.�p"6 . �:a. ' "" ,r - * , . :r;z g ° ` , .`,"" g' ''•' 'R"a a x:, m;3C ',f-e °:.14°o ki11" - = :,, : ',-4,-I- -..; K': :> i "`' r;r-'`.Z.' $; t ":may° s, , V .% $< V >: A;x. . x> vd ;: ✓ S r t; .:.g ; em : ,o ." Kr.$A>< ;_ ;a y.° • • • • • • A buried.bus stop on Route 21, in front of the Berglund Center(taken 2/3/2026) • teititt �%ash `E��..2� ;'"v, �^mot F1 :a Z�..« '"..E��,6 i�i°•V��'.--jam�".c,;�,,;: • Agnmpito • ` r m The first cleared sidewalk I encountered when taking photographs. • - e•...,.-;��.�.....:.,: ,.xwc -�_.. ha. s, :....s � � E°fu'd:"E a.�,%...'. �rg+� � '."€.a'.:r.F ,t: rg't , •yamµ" - .^.3vets..: a. • a�:.`Ytra •+ F` :..z��?�`�§°k'r�rex';�n`''*�; �4,ef; -f•` <,-�,' ,,.;� • x:. art:�,a..- N ,, . .'3 r s. .1 ,g.:ti POWERS City of Roanoke, Virginia CITY COUNCIL RECESSED SESSION WIIPV1w1-444 INV March 23 2026 ROA ill O K E 2:00 PM City Council Chamber 215 Church-Avenue, SW AGENDA The City of Roanoke is a safe, caring and economically vibrant community in which to live, learn, work, play and prosper. A vibrant urban center with strong neighborhoods set amongst the spectacular beauty of Virginia's Blue Ridge. NOTICE: City Council meetings will be televised live and replayed on RVTV Channel 3 on Thursdays at 7:00-pm, and Saturdays from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm; and video streamed through YouTube Live at youtube.com/RoanokeVa. Council meetings are offered with closed captioning for the deaf or hard of hearing. 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL. Vice-Mayor S. Terry McGuire arrived late (2:13 p.m.) Statement of Purpose. Mayor Joseph L. Cobb Mayor Cobb advised that the purpose of the meeting was for the presentation of the Recommended Fiscal Year 2026 - 2027 Budget; and the City Manager to receive feedback from the City Council 2. PRESENTATION: 1. Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Recommended Budget. Received and filed. 3. ITEM FOR ACTION: 1. Request of Mayor Joseph L. Cobb to convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the Council's Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as each Council Member's obligations thereunder as permitted, pursuant to Section 2.2=3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. (7-0) 4. RECESSED FOR CLOSED MEETIING. 3:29 P.M. 5. RECONVENED. 4:32 P.M. 1. Certification of Closed Meeting. (7-0) Mayor Cobb announced the FY2027 Budget Community Meetings would be held on Thursday, April 9, at the Williamson Road Public Library, 3837 Williamson Road, N.W., at 6:30 p.m.; and on Thursday, April 16, at the South Roanoke United Methodist Church, 2330 South Jefferson Street, S.E., at 6:30 p.m. 6. ADJOURNED: 4:32 p.m. ., , . IWe . FY2026-2027 ,,, . ,..invwfl PROPOSED ROANOKE BUDGET CITY OF ROANOKE, VA •,, . s_. ioi41,gilli BEE - . - ,------- *USA - 0011-' ' 41011 IL _Since as1 RC0:00Yke . .“)ANOsiK E. City of mr; , . Irleek-nkerC Gr Wise Avenue Tral !e\---NOKt —,--, 14 °- • '' 7 A ,..-:: ... . , ________,... , , ... ..,... . .4 ......„ ..,...,„ - ,.. • . ,,,_. ... . . . .. , ,-..-- •• . ... ,.. ...... . ,,,,...,..........,-, .....r, . 1 ., . ,....,.. .....,.....,„,,,,.,„,,,, ,,, . . , .„. . , . ......_ •,. ,. ,,,,*,,,... ...:„ •. ...... - ,_. ;..,... . . ...- MI - # . ,r, r, , we . - - , •48•::!,,, • _.. ,.. -, . . • • . , . . . .NI t •• • • • 4% l' c t 4 .1.* t 7 ••••••.. ... • r ....._ 1:. .:-..., __- (81 ,••''...' •!....'•••.)Z-' ! • ....a...Qr. - ....., - ....M. .._...,.. . ..._ ....__,.- • agib• , a a'er":. .4.4:1- -,......„ .. I . • r a Agenda _.._ "Illok4 ----,,....._. , , loo. • Overview `-` -- ' • FY2027 Revenue Highlights ; --`,. . `• .., . , ,..........._ t • FY2027 Expenditure Highlights • Capital Improvement Program �-- . (CIP) 1 • Wrap-Up • Budget Timeline _ • Questions ° - r ram ,, f ,.., . _ __ ... Av .i ?F ROANOKE Overview . FY2027 Budget Planning Process ., , ._-__ .... r 71010- ,hit '-.. . . _ . _ . .__ ..., .., ., , . . • Financial Planning began in November r • Updated City Council on Revenues, Expenditures, & Capital • NV Improvement Program from January through March `li§ I .., . fillI ..... y WI II • 1 I I x ,. a a ln» January — Revenue highlights l i g op*AMU I. -a ;::I 3 .µ.aM • February — Capital Improvement Program .i :. I .��, � . • March — Expenditure Challenges and Preliminary ; ice, _�, c Balancing Status = ' hf � . • Briefed council members individually on budget ' y • considerations - i.15 ,,z 4 Budget Development Factors Economic uncertainty Less than moderate revenue growth ,y_ F ) �� Meals tax sunset adds to uncertainty Resources will not be sufficient to address priorities Adjust programmatic expectations 5 • Slowing property tax revenue growth as already seen among Virginia localities and preliminary FY2025 results FY2027to FY2031 • Real estate tax revenue growth is beginning to slow, reflecting moderating Baseline assessed value increases following several years of strong gains • The City's meals tax rate increase is scheduled to sunset in FY2028, which Su rn rn a ry will reduce revenues from that source absent policy action to extend or replace it General Fund 5-Year Baseline Forecast $500 c FY2027-FY2031 Compound $484'9 - $480 Annual Growth Rate $469.4 $460 Revenues 2.9% $455.6 $440.1 $470.9 Expenditures 3.5% $456.4 $440 $427.0 $442.5 $420 $407.7 $429.1 $420.2 $400 $380 $373.8 $379.1 $407.7 $360 $376.3 $379.1 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 Actuals Adopted Adopted Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ©PFM tTotal Revenue --4—Total Expenditures 6 ,, ,,,,, Strategic Vision - -,,,,,k,, , , , • Vision — to build a community defined by pride, S opportunity, and shared success — one that attracts talent, inspires innovation, and prioritizes long-term sustainability • Goal — To become a model city of the future, where creativity drives progress, nature and - innovation coexist, and every neighborhood . = flourishes'', rt • Beginning July 1, 2026, the City will focus on i I ' ,, the newly implemented strategic priorities 4! ,!, W 1:: 1► : - ■ I I I • These priorities serve as the framework that �,`..__„ '• v_ - ' • • •" '� �� ,a .ice s ,� ts} ° 1 11 I a t guides decision-making, resource allocation, �. -1 ,., ,41111. i ' u' "" and service delivery across City operations r w�-c:. -�'�'' _ "� t _ `1 et plc `b� tl �� •I! •mod.- � ',a 4-4 IN ;_ . lti itii EMS 114_ _ ;... / Nna �/ T . *^ kt"44rd t o f *"✓'' Investment Priorities 4s �` s ..,-9,--/-z ., , ,...$.- ,,,,- .i,z. 4 • Civic Stewardship and ` : �kq Infrastructure x. s • Community and Economic Vitality F =r pie . • Community Safety • - . � t • • Healthy and Sustainable = '•• .-.. .. • , ,-,••• It i' Communities • Education '' 8 Details Balanced Budget FY2026-2027 Proposed Budget FY2026 Revenue Base Budget $ 407,733,000 Incremental Revenue 13,751 ,246 • The proposed General Fund budget totals $421.5M, an increase of $13.75M or 3.37% from FY2026, reflecting the Revenues $ 421,484,246 challenges we are anticipating as we move into FY2027 • The proposed expenditure budget represents the choices we have made based on the projected revenues FY2026 Expenditure Base Budget $ 407,733,000 • This proposed budget focuses on funding towards: • Essential services such as Public Safety, Infrastructure, Compensation Package 5,176,848 and Technology Maintenance • The City's commitment to Education through continued funding to RCPS Incremental Expenditures 8,574,398 • The staff who provide the programs and services through compensation Expenditures $ 421,484,246 9 IWIZ ROANOKE FY2026-2027 Revenue Highlights • Total increase to General Property taxes — $9.62M or 5.32% General Property ' Real estate tax assessment for CY2026 — 6.55% • *Downward adjustment in personal property due to a decrease in actual Taxes collections from FY2024 to FY2025 (1.74%) • *Revenue from interest, penalties, and short-term rental tax FY2026 FY2027 Revenue Type Adopted Proposed $ Increase % Increase Budget °„ Budge. Decrease (Decrease) Real Estate Tax $ 136,772,000 $ 146,415,169 $ 9,643,169 7.05% Personal Property* 33,165,000 32,521 ,000 (644,000) -1 .94% Public Service Corp 6,895,000 7,450,620 555,620 8.06% District Taxes 1 ,335,000 1 ,193,750 (141 ,250) -10.58% Other** 2,792,000 3,004,051 212,051 7.59% Total General Property $ 180,959,000 $ 190,584,590 $ 9,625,590 5.32% Taxes 11 • Total decrease to Other Local taxes — ($2.72M) or (2.62)% Other Local • *Downward adjustment in select taxes to reflect current projections Taxes based on a 5-Year trend • **Revenues from bank stock taxes, cigarette stamps sold, water utility tax, admissions tax, current Roanoke gas, etc. FY2026 FY2027 Revenue Type Adopted Proposed Bud..., url• Bu d•et $ Increase % Increase _ (Decrease) (Decrease) Sales Tax $ 30,992,900 $ 30,992,900 $ - -% Prepared Food & Beverage Tax* 26,368,220 23,975,483 (2,392,737) -9.07% Transient Occupancy 5,912,400 6,010,591 98,191 -% Business Licenses 16,917,000 17,093,000 176,000 1 .04% Motor Vehicle Licenses* 3,280,100 3,100,000 (180,100) -5.49% Current Electric Service (AEP)* 5,913,100 5,675,524 (237,576) -4.02% Communications Tax 4,363,200 4,363,200 - -% Other** 10,294,400 10,105,537 (188,863) -1 .83% Total Other Local Taxes $ 104,041;320 $ 101,316,234 $ (2,725,086) -2.62% 12 • Between FY2021 and FY2025, General Property & Other Local Taxes General Property have increased by $62M, reflecting economic growth post-pandemic & Other Local • Compensation — $35.9M • Education — Roanoke City Public Schools Increase — $24.1 M Taxes • In FY2027, the proposed increase for General Property & Other Local Taxes is $6.9M, the lowest in the past 6 years General Property& Other Local Taxes 25.00M 22.83M 21.31 M 20.00M 17.48M 13.36M 15.00M 8.28M 10.00M 6.90M 5.00M O.00M FY21 to FY22 FY22 to FY23 FY23 to FY24 FY24 to FY25 FY25 to FY26 FY26 to FY27 13 FY2026-2027 Real Estate Tax Assessments % CHANGE 12.00% 9.66% 9.99% 10.00°%° G U • Real Estate tax assessed growth has 8.23% averaged 8.85% between CY2022 ri.53% 8.o0%i° % and CY2025 6.55% • In CY2026, the real estate tax U 6.00% assessed value percent change decreased to 6.55% 4.00% • The chart represents the challenges we are facing as revenues begin to 2.00% adjust to current economic conditions 0.00% CY2022 CY2023 CY2024 CY2025 CY2026 14 • Total increase to Intergovernmental Revenue — $6.8M or 7.21 Intergovern mental • *Includes sheriff, commonwealth attorney, treasurer, commissioner of revenue, police 599 funding, etc. Revenue • **Revenues from rental car tax, E911 wireless, public facilities tax, personal property (state), etc. FY2026 FY2027 Revenue Typ°- Adopted Proposed $ Increase % Increase DecreaseDecrease VDOT Reimbursement $ 19,933,000 $ 21 ,440,591 $ 1 ,507,591 7.56% Social Services Revenue 44,077,600 48,089,478 4,011 ,878 9.10% Compensation Board Revenue & 599 Funding* 19,302,700 20,643,059 1 ,340,359 6.94% Other** 11 ,171 ,900 11 ,128,942 (42,958) -0.38% Total Intergovernmental Taxes $ 94,485,200 $ 101,302,070 $ 6,816,870 7.21% 15 • The proposed revenue increase for FY2026-2027 totals $13.75M, a 3.37% increase from FY2026 FY2026-2027 • Social Services — $4.01 M & Street Maintenance — $1.51M • All Other Revenues — $8.23M Proposed Revenue • This budget reflects the challenges we are anticipating as we move into Budget FY2027. • *Revenue from tax sales, purchase card rebate, the city's wellness reimbursement, etc. FY2026 FY2027 Revenue Category Adopted Proposed $ Increase % Increase - •, - Decrease Decrease General Property Taxes $ 180,959,000 $ 190,584,590 $ 9,625,590 5.32% Other Local Taxes 104,041 ,320 101 ,316,234 (2,725,086) -2.62% Permits, Fees, Licenses 2,037,280 2,171 ,835 134,555 6.60% Fines and Forfeitures 725,900 726,625 725 0.10% Revenue - Money/Property 3,302,000 3,176,141 (125,859) -3.81% Intergovernmental 94,485,200 101 ,302,070 6,816,870 7.21 Charges for Services 21 ,123,700 21 ,444,961 321 ,261 1 .52% Other* 1 ,058,600 761 ,790 (296,810) -28.04% Total $ 407,733,000 $ 421,484,246 $ 13,751,246 3.37% 16 /W1, ROANOKE FY2026-2027 E xpenditure Hi ghli ghts • The FY2027 budget represents the City's commitment to Education • RCPS funding represents 26% of the City's total operating budget, FY2027 Funding representing more than a quarter of total spending ($108M for FY2027) t0 RCPS • Between FY2021 and FY2025, funding has increased by $24.1M • The chart represents the incremental funding provided to RCPS RCPS Total Funding Overview 115.00M 108.06M 110.00M 106.90M 105.00M 101.48M 100.00M 95.00 M 92.54M • 90.00M 85.77M 85.00M 82.79M • 80.00M FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025&FY2026 FY2027 18 • At the end of the fiscal year 2024, the RCPS General Fund Unassigned RCPS Fund balance was $22.9M (surplus funding) • City Council approved for RCPS to retain $10.34M of that surplus to Balance balance the current fiscal year budget • Additionally, RCPS's Capital Projects Fund Balance totaled $26.2M Discussion • City Council approved allocating $17.9M to various RCPS capital projects and $2.1 M for Learning Cottages Details Total Co RCPS General Fund Unassigned $ 22,855,561 FY2025-2026 RCPS Budget (10,324, 118) Adjusted Total Available 12,531 ,443 RCPS Capital Project Fund Balance 26,219,913 Allocated for RCPS Capital Projects (17,874,219) Allocated for Learning Cottages (2, 113,508) Adjusted Total Available $ 6,232,186 ir:fi' sac f 1ss.Ali ibis * "` 9 . 6' r, rfro ,r-A-7.• ' 4itir 1 , . , FY2027 Compensation _ _ � . ►� W Package . - 1. t ,- [ R 11 . ., w • Total Compensation Package — $5.2M i • �, ,� 1 �. A 1 Ire ,,,. w lit it • Proposing a 2% base pay increase instead of -' - M = •.i 3% • Moving public safety to their next phase on " h w " } ` the step-pay plan (2.2% on average) 1' : :�-" , ' .. ' ,.." • Funding non-discretionary benefit increases: ;. ` r, i ... , • Retirement contribution rate increase /..4110W`t , - �`- h Y • Medical and Dental increase Ilk- s t: i� • Vacancy savings decrease by $1 M _ t ," • 27th Payroll accrual scheduled for July" r 2028 — occurs every 8 to 10 years ° `' x.. FY2027 Funded Expenditures • Contractual/Fees for Professional Services - funding the ,, following to meet contractual obligations - $2M: I ; ` • Jail Medical & Food Contract . • Fleet Fuel cost .` '- ;,.) _ . � ' ' . • Marathon Health Contract - Employee Health Services A i • Fire-EMS training center lease agreement -=' �" i ` 4 i • Juvenile Detention Center City Share - s+,m 4. -e 410, 15 a 60111 ,ice • Technology Maintenance Contracts, such as body cameras and technology software • Allocating funding for overtime & temporary wages to public safety, as they account for 43% of the FY2025 actual spend - $500K 21 .'w°i. . ' ` f. o' y ' "' ;. + r ir > , _• r MM a ,- a�', • f d • Fs-, t.,A''-4,.,.‘1.,-i e,"'4t... ,.*.„* FY2027 Funded , .- Y, ,., „/,,,t ,',:'V'';*,•,,,,\iOt•f f''f''r.4,.".:),',',, A'•• , ,A ' s! I s,� Expenditures (Cont' d ) ,, 1 i�' • All Other department requests — prioritizing need-based requests _: — $2.1M: ---- • General Services utility cost increase • Police Vet Services to supplement services not covered by ,, III 1 the Regional Center for Animal Care & Protection (RCACP) 1 • Solid Waste tipping fees ., ,fir 0; • Trash Compactor lease ', • Risk Management insurance premiums w- • Economic Development performance agreements — •, pn 10 f' e; Riverdale '- 1 • r ` `,?` ,-.:. • Berglund Center operating subsidy • ,�.. . • Debt service increase -- ° '' 22 -- ROANOKE FY2026-2027 E xpenditures Not Funded 2= ;, - II nn hilt Personnel Requests - . rr-- ROANOKEi FIRE-EMS ON ,` r1" STATION e � f�/�;i�jl11111�1 1 i i rii/f i7j .� 0i 10-27 •I 1 i�r�i�'iiiwl.`i ~�T i i,i l 1i 1 I i�'+ir•. il4 1 _,l m Ii • The recommendation is not to fund $4.0M in -, '' budget requests, which will impact areas s , r , .� -t such as: • Commonwealth's Attorney r ,.- w 2.-. ; . ` A" -- v • • Libraries �' III _ ' • Fire-EMS t . '�."`_' -. • Parks and Recreation • Social Services „ :.,,,,,,„.., ,„ ,,,,, , Managed Hiring � ,,,�, Strategy ... . .. ., „,......,,, ,,.. , .--- ,-,--,,,,,,,, • Beginning FY2027, the City will unfund 29 positions �'” ��° , totaling $2.4M • Departments impacted include: �- - -,-;- ',It ". 7 - F • • Police, Fire-EMS, Sheriff : ! K i , _-.7T-7k- -.----r-ximv.,.., _. i ,,141::::.,i9:::,...:::::,,,,,:!:, : .‘.,,,,,,, • Libraries it' • Parks and Recreation ''- '�''''""�` • General Services and Engineering . ,,,,..__ f • The FY2027 lapse budget will be .)MvM, freezing . �; ` .: w, _- - '° approximately 80 to 95 positions _.° '_` ` ` ¢fit` • After accounting for lapse and the unfunding of 29 n Ail .. positions, the City will manage the remaining vacant positions from various departments 25 v t i Public Safety ,y* • Items Not Funded Under Public Safety , - b , �� Ai"r. , • Police — $830K: overtime and l , %" • . ,. temporary wages and communityp ` " .R engagement programming `,.- , �� " - ^ 1 , • Sheriff's Office — $347K '�,; �' , --1 - _ � Increasingthe City's VRS � � "= ' �� " '�" Y �M : - ,I 1 • fiIL . t, _ ,�' . multiplier to match surrounding �, t ,, 4 .� pr k , - i - a , o slt ` localities -I,��" • Fire-EMS — $250K: overtime and ' " . ' `- <',� �' ., _� ' '. ' q" J w I. temporary wages and Paramedic ; k - �'"` "" V 4 ,�. '�� '` �'� _ 3, �x,•, , Flit- ' classes :..y , : , V • Police — $197K: for pistol optics 26 Ar ; It •"..0OM't; I ' _ pia . h 7r !1 , , :,:: t Infrastructure r--_ ., 1I s"4 y 'I -._> 1;11 11 j::� �coq, INI - 7M1'i r 2 1 1 lrr•:1 ¢` gill 1 I' 1 a1, ' .1 I • Items Not Funded Under Infrastructure t .;=----- • ($1.65M): I, �, • Facilities Program — $833K: Funding for 1 �� " . i ongoing building and facility upgrades , ''•t. I fI - �• Fleet Management Program — $625K: To > 'j is i�cover rising fleet maintenance and fuel c . ---4' r ` '(� ycosts ► . _\,.: ",. j, , klitN.((ti ftg _�.• Special Events Crew — $200K: To support - —' \' 'tp 1origif - "� 414 1_ increased staffing needs for special events 1 '• Automated Container Replacement ir . 111_.,„(111 ' — $20K: additional funding votjf 4 �1 '� program required to replace solid waste cans •, 4 / i' 1�,4,t- 1,• ,4 ._r ! 1 its,f 0 l w ' -11 R--_"--�=ems''''- . � �% 4 � b � � � � y r .. � i ` ANS { 27 , , ... ..., Parks , Recreation , m ri- ` j ,1, .",..-" -. and Cultural . . , ,,,, i ... . ,TY .. • Items Not Funded Under Parks, ��-l.., Recreation, and Cultural ($55K): Irdilliii, NIElmwood Park • Youth Summer Employment — $35K: ,5, &Mill Mountain Greenway previously partnered with Greater ROANOKE **ex..Roanoke Workforce Board for youth PARKS AND RECREATION camps , • Park Management — $20K: ;, * ;,'5, contracting services , . > ' \ N :' 4) id -. 4' ` �o:: �, �a�, $ i , yo F illT .4a R f:' ,, 4 I 0 , ' ' ,,4" , II` ' ;t1:11160,018t, Zt.;."--": ' ' ,w a. *: ti t R"g y'1 e`7•y � r. ~�# �4 :tom' .� --« _ 28 WIZ; ROANOKE Base Budget Reductions Base Budget Reductions Total Base Budget Reductions — ($5.6M) One-Time Funding Contingency — ($1.1 M) " Risk Management Reserve — ($550K) Fire-EMS Positions — ($466K) Greater Roanoke Transit Company (GRTC) Subsidy — ($292K) Facilities Upgrades — ($150K) Libraries Program Activities — ($105K) Youth Development Temporary Wages — ($104K) Environmental Management — ($62K) 30 ROANOKE Capital Improvement Program ( CIP ) I Recommended FY2027 - 2031 CIP Project Costs Project FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 Total School Improvements $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 25,000,000 E-911 Center Additional Unit 796,700 797,640 797,185 797,335 - 3,188,860 Adult Detention Center Maintenance 300,000 294,360 627,815 - - 1,222,175 13th Street/Tinker Bridge Replacement - - 6,821,505 - - 6,821,505 Persinger/Murray Run Bridge Replacement - - 3,904,654 - - 3,904,654 Curb, Gutter&Sidewalk (New) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,000,000 Curb, Gutter& Sidewalk (Maintenance) 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Street Paving &ADA Ramps 5,288,924 5,288,924 5,288,924 5,288,924 5,288,924 26,444,620 Streetscapes Improvements 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Traffic Signal Modernization 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,750,000 Park Maintenance 1,200,000 - - - - 1,200,000 Fleet & Equipment Replacement 8,611,770 4,488,934 5,488,934 1,488,934 1,488,934 21,567,506 Technology Improvements 1,130,000 2,850,000 - - - 3,980,000 Berglund Center 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 7,500,000 Total Project Costs $ 27,577,394 $ 23,969,858 $ 33,179,017 $ 17,825,193 $ 17,027,858 $ 119,579,320 Recommended FY2027 - 2031 CIP Funding Sources Funding Source FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 Total Total Project Costs $ 27,577,394 $ 23,969,858 $ 33,179,017 $ 17,825,193 $ 17,027,858 $ 119,579,320 Grants - - 10,726,159 - - 10,726,159 Cash 5,777,858 5,777,858 5,777, 858 5,777,858 5,777, 858 28,889,290 Debt Issuance Required 21,799,536 18,192,000 16,675,000 12,047,335 11,250,000 79,963,871 Term Out BAN/Line of Credit 57,510,000 10,135,000 - - 25,000,000 92,645,000 Total Debt Issuance Required $ 79,309,536 $ 28,327,000 $ 16,675,000 $ 12,047,335 $ 36,250,000 $ 172,608,871 33 • Fire Station #2 — Revised project estimate — $12M Projects Removed • Fishburn Mansion Renovation — Additional grant funding — $1.5M Pro-ect Amount Planned Fiscal Year s > Public Works Service Center Parking Lot $ 1,500,000 2027 and 2028 > Belmont Branch Library Expansion 7,300,000 2027 > Fire Station #2 Williamson Road 9,450,000 2027 and 2028 > Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Renovation 4,000,000 2029 > MLK Pedestrian Bridge Renovation 1,522,435 2029 > Guardrail Replacement Program 750,000 2029 > Park Projects 5,050,000 2027 and 2029 Fishburn Mansion Renovation 1,500,000 2028 Morningside Park 1,500,000 2028 Greenway ADA Compliance 300,000 2028 > Mill Mountain Star Rehabilitation 5,500,000 2029 > Richardson Wayland Building 7,000,000 2029 > Fallon Park Pool 5,000,000 2030 Grand Total $ 50,372,435 34 Planned Debt Issuance Planned Debt Issuance 100.00 89.23 80.00 • Represents the comparison of the ® recommended 5-year CIP to the 60.00 previously planned 5-year CIP 39.95 before removing projects 36.60 36.25 40.00 17.05 36.25 • A total $50.4 million reduction in 20.00 28.33 planned borrowing during the next 16.68 5 fiscal years 12.05 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 —o—Previously Planned CIP Debt Issuance including BAN Term Out —o—Recommended CIP Debt Issuance including BAN Term Out 35 Projected Incremental Debt Service Projected Incremental Debt Service • Represents the comparison of the 20.00 17.23 19.11 projected annual debt service 13.81 under three scenarios: (1 ) the 15.00 recommended 5-year CIP with 10.37 debt restructuring, (2) the co 0 10.00 7.36 recommended 5-year CIP without 6.16 6.88 7.84 restructuring, and (3) the 4.0 0 �___---- previously planned 5-year CIP 5.00 6,4$. ® 211 without restructuring Ill Ell EM • Indicates a significant reduction in FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 debt service over the 5-year period, driven by a decrease in the Previously Planned CIP -0-Recommended CIP without Existing Debt Restructuring amount of borrowing - Recommended CIP with Existing Debt Restructuring 36 FY2027- 2031 CIP- Enterprise Funds Fund FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 Total Stormwater Utility Fund $ 3,850,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 18,850,000 Berglund Center* 1 ,500,000 1 ,500,000 1 ,500,000 1 ,500,000 1 ,500,000 7,500,000 Parking Fund 450,000 450,000 - - - 900,000 Total CIP Costs $ 5,800,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 27,250,000 Cash 1 ,300,000 1 ,200,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 4,750,000 Debt 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 22,500,000 Total Funding Sources $ 5,800,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 27,250,000 * The City's general fund subsidizes the Berglund Center by paying for its debt service costs. 37 Wrap - Up • The proposed budget of $421.5M budget continues to refine our "Multi-Year, Multi-Prong" strategy FY2027 Proposed • It reflects the City's investments in public safety, health, Budget education, and economic vitality to enhance quality of life • It positions the City to meet current challenges while laying a strong foundation for long-term growth and sustainability m Balanced Budg - FY2026 Revenue Base Budget $ 407,733,000 Incremental Revenue 13,751 ,246 Revenues $ 421 ,484,246 FY2026 Expenditure Base Budget $ 407,733,000 Compensation Package 5,176,848 Incremental Expenditures 8,574,398 Expenditures $ 421 ,484,246 39 IitiN I Wrap-U p t Irrieveet In , ''''' ''* .-' ,.r a � v Economic uncertainty . , t :' � .� 'ski`; 4irs `' 04 0 rn VI- wn Less than moderate revenue _ �- " ,. , .- ' �,.; ter_. � ''�� growth Meals tax sunset adds to uncertainty `" C Rc) �)KE CfS TC)R _- Resources will not be sufficient to address priorities Adjust programmatic -Ns"',.... .'' expectations _.�► - w>L-.'�. `�,. -�_�,`` "`�.�- -' 40 ROANOKE FY2026-2027 Budget Ti meline �n� Budget Timeline Q8 Nov. 2025 9 2 Feb. 2026 2 Mar. 2026 Budget Retreat FY2026-2027 Budget Work FY2026-2027 Budget Work Session Session —.—_..._ ..._. _ •— _ • • •_ FY2026-2027 Budget Work FY2026-2027 Budget Work FY2026-2027 Proposed Session Session Budget O 20 Jan. 2026 6 17 Feb. 2026 23 Mar. 2026 42 Budget Timeline (Cont' d) \._9l/ 9 Apr. 2026 9 23 Apr. 2026 911 May 2026 Community Meeting — Public Hearing on Proposed Budget Adoption — 2:00pm Williamson Library: 6:30pm Budget & Tax Rates — 7:00pm —• •—_._.__.. .•___..w. ..._......_.. • • Community Meeting — South Roanoke United Methodist Church: 6:30pm Budget Study — 9:00am elk, 16 Apr. 2026 6 4 May 2026 43 Questions ? Thank You . CITY OF ROANOKE 6" , OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 215 Church Avenue S.W. Suite 452 a Roanoke,Virginia 24011-1536 u, ' Telephone: (540)853-2444 Fax:(540)853-1145 E-mail: MAYOR@ROANOKEVA.GOV JOSEPH L.COBB Mayor March 23, 2026 The Honorable Vice-Mayor McGuire and Members of the Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Dear Vice-Mayor McGuire and Members of Council: This is to request to convene in a Closed Meeting to discuss the Council's Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as each Council Member's obligations thereunder as permitted, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. Sincerely, Joseph L. Cobb Mayor JLC.:ctw